alphaFeedback

WorksMathematics

Unconditional implications of the Quasi-Riemann Hypothesis

AI contributions
  • OpenAI ChatGPT GPT-6 Astra
View details

Abstract

This record identifies published conclusions formerly obtained under RH or GRH whose proofs require only a fixed zero-free half-plane for Dirichlet LL-functions, with further applications of finite-order Hecke LL-functions over Q(−3)\mathbb Q(\sqrt{-3}). The input is the 7/87/8 theorem stated in the recent OpenAI manuscript claiming to prove the quasi-Riemann Hypothesis. We give the uniform analytic deductions explicitly and distinguish them from previously established algebraic and combinatorial results used in the proofs. An accompanying audit records the source verification and rejected candidates. No theorem about all number-field or automorphic LL-functions is inferred from the Dirichlet statement; the pure cubic and cubic-nonresidue applications separately identify the precise fixed-field Hecke input.

Principal conclusions. The following guide distinguishes complete published conclusions from published orders of magnitude whose sharp GRH constants are not recovered. The proofs specify every imported algebraic and computational input.

SourceConclusion recovered here
Montgomery–VaughanCharacter sums ≪qlog⁡log⁡(3q)\ll\sqrt{q}\log\log(3q); Theorem 2.1.
Granville–SoundararajanUniform cancellation when log⁡x/log⁡log⁡q→∞\log x/\log\log q \to\infty; Theorem 3.1.
Klurman–Mangerel–TeräväinenAll four published uniform short-progression conclusions for bounded multiplicative functions, including the hybrid short-interval theorem, with the stated typicality conditions; and L3(q)≪δq2+δL_3(q) \ll_\delta q^{2+\delta} for every modulus; Theorem 4.1 and Corollary 4.2.
WalshThe complete linear Fourier-cancellation conclusion for Möbius and Liouville in intervals with log⁡H/log⁡log⁡X→∞\log H/\log\log X \to\infty; Theorem 5.1.
Green–TaoThe full published power-saving improvement for Möbius correlations with polynomial nilsequences, Om,d(QCm,d(1+∥F∥Lip)N−cm,d)O_{m,d}(Q^{C_{m,d}}(1+\lVert F\rVert_{\mathrm{Lip}})N^{-c_{m,d}}), with cm,d>0c_{m,d}>0 and effective constants; Theorem 6.1.
MangerelQuadratic Gauss-sum rigidity from approximate prime dilations up to NcN^c, for every fixed c>0c>0, with the full published sparse-prime allowance; Theorem 7.1.
Sofos; MontgomeryInfinitely many primes with both the first prime nonresidue and the next gap ≫log⁡plog⁡log⁡p\gg\log p\log\log p; the published Paley clique lower order follows from the same argument; Theorem 8.1 and Corollary 8.2.
Mourtada–MurtyBoth quadratic Euler–Kronecker extreme-value bounds, with leading terms log⁡log⁡x+log⁡log⁡log⁡x\log\log x+\log\log\log x and ≫x\gg\sqrt{x} prime conductors below xx for each sign; Theorem 9.1.
Badzyan; Ford–Luca–MoreeThe full all-conductor bound ∣γQ(ζm)∣≪log⁡mlog⁡log⁡(3m)\lvert\gamma_{\mathbb{Q}(\zeta_m)}\rvert\ll\log m\log\log(3m) and the published GRH error for the second coefficient in counting nn with q∤φ(n)q\nmid\varphi(n); Theorem 10.1 and Corollary 10.3.
HoughExact maximum bias for products of two primes, (log⁡log⁡log⁡x)/log⁡log⁡x(\log\log\log x)/\log\log x; Theorem 11.1.
LittlewoodTwo-sided L(1,χ)L(1,\chi) bounds and the orders of magnitude for ζ\zeta, 1/ζ1/\zeta, and ζ′/ζ\zeta'/\zeta on the line 11.
Darbar–David–Lalín–LumleyBoth extreme-value distribution formulas for cubic L(1,χ)L(1,\chi), throughout the full published GRH ranges with endpoint constant −37-37; Theorem 13.1.
Granville–SoundararajanBoth quadratic L(1,χd)L(1,\chi_d) tail asymptotics with error O(A−1+t−1)O(A^{-1}+t^{-1}), throughout the full published larger range with endpoint constant −20-20; Theorem 14.1.
Hoffstein–LockhartEffective bounds L(1,Ad⁡f)−1L(1,\operatorname{Ad} f)^{-1}, ∣ρf(1)∣2≪log⁡(1+λN)\lvert\rho_f(1)\rvert^2\ll\log(1+\lambda_N) for every Maass newform, including the dihedral case; Theorem 15.1.
Boyd–KisilevskyEffective growth of the imaginary quadratic class-group exponent; Theorem 16.2.
Ellenberg–VenkateshThe exact GRH exponents for torsion in every quadratic and every cubic ideal class group, with effective constants and no exceptional fields, and the specified further families in every fixed degree; Theorem 17.1 and Corollary 17.3.
LamzouriThe full sharper odd-class-number average 154H2/log⁡H+O(H2(log⁡log⁡H)3/(log⁡H)2)\frac{15}{4}H^2/\log H+O(H^2(\log\log H)^3/(\log H)^2); Theorem 18.1.
LouboutinEffective exponent growth in the specified family of simplest cyclic cubic fields; Theorem 24.2.
DailedaThe class-number bound hF≪DFL(DF)/log⁡DFh_F\ll\sqrt{D_F}L(D_F)/\log D_F for all pure cubic fields; Theorem 25.2.
PollackThe exact limiting mean of the least completely split prime in cyclic fields of every fixed odd prime degree; Theorem 26.1.
Elsenhans–Klüners–Nicolae; Euler–KaniComplete 1046-field classification for exponent dividing 8, and the exact 65 idoneal integers; Theorems 19.3 and 19.5.
Chang–Kwon; MiyadaComplete lists of 489 imaginary abelian fields, and 301 multiquadratic fields, with one class per genus.
Ahn–KwonExactly 650 imaginary multiquadratic fields with class-group exponent dividing 2, with independently verified finite computations; Theorem 21.1.
Mollin; LouboutinExactly 107 real quadratic fields of extended Richaud–Degert type with ordinary class number two, and exactly 43 with class number one, using the same fresh complete finite computation; Theorem 22.1 and Corollary 22.4.
LouboutinThe complete 19-value exceptional-case classification for ω(d+x2)≤2\omega(d+x^2)\le2, and hence the full 42-value list for odd dd; Theorem 23.1.
Bourdon–PollackCM torsion in odd degree has upper order (dlog⁡log⁡d)2/3(d\log\log d)^{2/3}; Theorem 27.1.
Clark–Genao–Pollack–SaiaThe exact typical degrees dCM(X0(N))=(log⁡N)(log⁡2)/2+o(1)d_{\mathrm{CM}}(X_0(N))=(\log N)^{(\log2)/2+o(1)} and dCM(X1(N))=N(log⁡N)(log⁡2)/2+o(1)d_{\mathrm{CM}}(X_1(N))=N(\log N)^{(\log2)/2+o(1)}; the least nonsquare which is a square modulo NN has typical size (log⁡N)log⁡2+o(1)(\log N)^{\log2+o(1)}; Theorem 28.1 and Corollary 28.2.
BanwaitAn unconditional algorithm bounding every prime-degree isogeny over each eligible quadratic field; Theorem 29.1.
Rasmussen–TamagawaThe full uniform finiteness theorem for all dimensions and all fixed odd degrees; Theorem 30.1.
Schütt; Elkies–SchüttFinitely many rational CM newforms per weight up to the specified twists; every rational weight-3 newform has a singular K3 realization over Q\mathbb{Q}.
KaniThe exact 21 exceptional types of non-CM elliptic products which are not genus-2 Jacobians; Theorem 32.2.
Pasten; WeiThe all-Heegner-point height error of order log⁡log⁡dK\log\log d_K and the root-discriminant height bound for adjacent CM types; Theorems 33.1 and 34.1.
Binyamini–KowalskiFully effective André–Oort bounds and enumeration for arbitrary subvarieties of Y(1)nY(1)^n; Theorem 35.2; effective polynomial bounds in Theorem 35.3.
Edixhoven–RichardThe André–Oort statement for reductions of full CM orbits modulo any prime; Theorem 36.1.
HabeggerWeakly bounded height on every nonspecial modular-plane curve with unequal projection degrees; Theorem 37.1.
Balestrieri–Johnson–NewtonEffective computation of the Brauer–Manin set for every singular K3 surface and every geometric Kummer surface of a product of CM elliptic curves; Theorem 38.1.
KhayutinJoint equidistribution of CM packets and Galois orbits in the published two-fixed-split-prime setting, including bounded order conductors; Theorem 39.1.
Duke–Schulze-Pillot; DukeEffective primitive-spinor representation thresholds, and effective n>CD337n>CD^{337} squarefree representation; Theorems 41.1 and 41.2.
Kane; Elkies–Ono–YangEffective CM lifting to every supersingular class, with multiplicity bounds and the polynomial congruence; Theorem 42.1.
CampagnaEffective enumeration of singular SℓS_\ell-units for Sℓ={p:p≡1(mod3)}∪{ℓ}S_\ell=\{p:p\equiv1\pmod3\}\cup\{\ell\}, ℓ≥5\ell\ge5; Theorem 40.1.
Achter–Howe; Arul et al.The published GRH orders for split abelian surfaces and for pairs of D4D_4-curves with isogenous Jacobians.

Table 1.

Jeřábek; Adleman–Manders–MillerThe stated total-search complexity memberships for factoring, and deterministic extraction of fixed-degree roots in prime fields.
MillerDeterministic polynomial-time equivalence of factoring, φ\varphi, λ\lambda, and λ′\lambda', with one supplied value; the period-oracle equivalence and graph-recognition conclusions; Theorem 46.1.
Gao; RónyaiPolynomial-time balance decomposition and proper factoring of squarefree completely split polynomials of even degree; Theorem 48.1.
Rónyai; Ivanyos et al.Deterministic proper factoring when three divides the degree of a completely split polynomial; Theorem 49.1.
Pollack–SchornThe exact expected bit complexity for three-square representations without a supplied factorization; Theorem 50.1.
Balaji–Nosan–Shirmohammadi–WorrellSquare-root circuit identity testing in coRP; Theorem 51.1.
Balaji–Perifel–Shirmohammadi–WorrellGeneral cyclotomic identity testing in BPP and the deterministic restricted diagonal theorem; Theorems 52.1 and 52.2.
Castel; KutasA randomized polynomial-time isotropic-vector algorithm in dimension at least five without a factorization oracle; Theorem 53.1.
WesolowskiPolynomial-time prime sampling for every primitive positive definite integral quadratic form of rank at least two, with the published interval and input-size dependence; Theorem 54.1.
Herlédan Le Merdy–WesolowskiThe full worst-case to average-case reduction to supersingular maximal orders for every prime p>3p > 3, including the formerly conditional p≡1(mod8)p \equiv1 \pmod{8} case; Theorem 55.1.

Table 2.

The analytic input and uniform consequences

Throughout, log⁡\log is the natural logarithm, Λ\Lambda is the von Mangoldt function, and sums indexed by n≤xn \le x run over positive integers unless an interval or a different index set is explicitly specified. Put

ϑ=78,δ=1−ϑ=18,ℓ(x)=log⁡log⁡(eex)(x≥1).\vartheta= \frac{7}{8}, \qquad\delta= 1-\vartheta= \frac{1}{8}, \qquad\ell(x) = \log\log(e^{e}x) \quad(x \ge1).

The harmless modification in ℓ\ell makes bounds meaningful also for small arguments. All constants below are absolute and effective unless a dependence is specified.

Theorem 1.1 (Imported zero-free theorem). For every Dirichlet character χ\chi modulo a positive integer qq, its Dirichlet LL-function has no zero in ℜs>7/8\Re s > 7/8. The pole at s=1s = 1 for a principal character is excepted.

This is the Dirichlet part of [58 Theorem 1.1]. We use it as a cited unconditional theorem. We do not claim to have supplied a new proof of it. The companion [59] gives the weaker boundary 11/1211/12; that boundary would suffice for all qualitative conclusions in this record, with larger fixed logarithmic exponents in the intermediate estimates.

For a primitive nonprincipal character, the functional equation relates L(s,χ)L(s,\chi) to L(1−s,χ‾)L(1-s,\overline{\chi}). Since Theorem 1.1 also applies to χ‾\overline{\chi}, every nontrivial zero ρ=β+iγ\rho= \beta+ i\gamma satisfies

δ≤β≤ϑ.(1)\delta\le\beta\le\vartheta. \tag*{(1)}

The same assertion holds for the nontrivial zeros of ζ\zeta. Uniformity in qq below is derived from this zero location and the ordinary explicit formula. It is not inferred from uniformity of the fixed-character estimates in the proof of [58].

Lemma 1.2 (Uniform prime sum). For a primitive nonprincipal character χ\chi modulo q≥3q \ge3 and x≥2x \ge2,

ψ(x,χ):=∑n≤xΛ(n)χ(n)≪x7/8log⁡2(qx).\psi(x,\chi) := \sum_{n \le x} \Lambda(n)\chi(n) \ll\frac{x^{7/8}}{\log^2(qx)}.

Also ψ(x)=x+O(x7/8log⁡2(2x))\psi(x) = x + O\left(\frac{x^{7/8}}{\log^2(2x)}\right).

Proof. We use the classical uniform truncated explicit formula and zero count [60 Chapters 16 and 19]; these analytic identities and bounds are unconditional. At a half-integer xx, choose a permissible height T≍xT \asymp x. For a primitive nonprincipal character the formula is

ψ(x,χ)=−∑∣γ∣≤Txρρ+O(log⁡2(qx)),\psi(x,\chi) = -\sum_{|\gamma| \le T} \frac{x^\rho}{\rho} + O(\log^2(qx)),

where, after (1), the terms from trivial zeros and the logarithmic derivative at zero are included in the error. To justify this last uniformity explicitly, subtract the completed logarithmic derivatives at 1 and 2. The zero contribution has terms ((1−ρ)(2−ρ))−1((1-\rho)(2-\rho))^{-1}, whose absolute sum is Oδ(log⁡(3q))O_\delta(\log(3q)). The absolutely convergent Dirichlet series bounds L′/L(2,χ)L'/L(2,\chi), and the gamma factors and functional equation then bound the finite Laurent coefficient at zero by Oδ(log⁡(3q))O_\delta(\log(3q)).

The usual zero count is

Nχ(U):=#{ρ:∣ℑρ∣≤U}≪(U+1)log⁡(q(U+2)),N_\chi(U) := \#\{\rho: |\Im\rho| \le U\} \ll(U+1)\log(q(U+2)),

with multiplicities. The zeros with ∣γ∣≤1|\gamma| \le1 contribute Oδ(log⁡(3q))O_\delta(\log(3q)) to ∑1/∣ρ∣\sum1/|\rho|; partial summation for the remaining zeros gives

References

  1. [1]P. Castel, Solving quadratic equations in dimension 5 or more without factoring, The Open Book Series 1 (2013), 213–233. DOI:10.2140/obs.2013.1.213. Publisher full text.DOI
  2. [2]P. Kutas, Splitting quaternion algebras over quadratic number fields, Journal of Symbolic Computation 94 (2019), 173–182. DOI:10.1016/j.jsc.2018.08.002. Accepted author manuscript.DOI
  3. [3]L. M. Adleman, D. R. Estes and K. S. McCurley, Solving bivariate quadratic congruences in random polynomial time, Mathematics of Computation 48 (1987), no. 177, 17–28. DOI:10.1090/S0025-5718-1987-0866095-8.DOI
  4. [4]D. Simon, Solving quadratic equations using reduced unimodular quadratic forms, Mathematics of Computation 74 (2005), no. 251, 1531–1543. DOI:10.1090/S0025-5718-05-01729-1.DOI
  5. [5]D. Simon, Quadratic equations in dimensions 4, 5 and more, preprint, 4 July 2006. Author’s full text.
  6. [6]W. Bosma and P. Stevenhagen, On the computation of quadratic 2-class groups, Journal de Théorie des Nombres de Bordeaux 8 (1996), no. 2, 283–313; erratum, 9 (1997), no. 1, 249 (reference numbering). Full text; erratum.
  7. [7]A. Granville and K. Soundararajan, The distribution of values of L(1, χ_d), Geom. Funct. Anal. 13 (2003), 992–1028. doi:10.1007/s00039-003-0438-3; author’s version.DOI
  8. [8]A. Granville and K. Soundararajan, Errata to: The distribution of values of L(1, χ_d), Geom. Funct. Anal. 14 (2004), 245–246. doi:10.1007/s00039-004-0456-9; published errata.
  9. [9]P. Darbar and G. Maiti, Large values of quadratic Dirichlet L-functions, Math. Ann. 392 (2025), 4573–4605. doi:10.1007/s00208-025-03187-6; author’s version.DOI
  10. [10]P. Darbar, C. David, M. Lalín, and A. Lumley, Asymmetric distribution of extreme values of cubic L-functions at s = 1, J. London Math. Soc. 110 (2024), no. 4, e12996, 61 pp. doi:10.1112/jlms.12996; published version.
  11. [11]Y. Lamzouri, On the average of the number of imaginary quadratic fields with a given class number, Ramanujan J. 44 (2017), 411–416. doi:10.1007/s11139-017-9910-9; author’s version.DOI
  12. [12]Y. Lamzouri, The number of imaginary quadratic fields with prime discriminant and class number up to H, Q. J. Math. 68 (2017), 1379–1393. doi:10.1093/qmath/hax026; author’s version.DOI
  13. [13]G. L. Miller, Riemann’s hypothesis and tests for primality, J. Comput. System Sci. 13 (1976), 300–317. doi:10.1016/S0022-0000(76)80043-8; author-hosted published scan.DOI
  14. [14]M. Agrawal, N. Kayal, and N. Saxena, PRIMES is in P, Ann. of Math. (2) 160 (2004), 781–793. doi:10.4007/annals.2004.160.781.DOI
  15. [15]F. Morain, G. Renault, and B. Smith, Deterministic factoring with oracles, Appl. Algebra Engrg. Comm. Comput. 34 (2023), 663–690. doi:10.1007/s00200-021-00521-8.
  16. [16]A. Dąbrowski, J. Pomykala, and I. E. Shparlinski, On oracle factoring of integers, J. Complexity 76 (2023), article 101741. doi:10.1016/j.jco.2023.101741.DOI
  17. [17]N. Gupta, A. Sikarov, and I. Volkovich, A computational perspective on Carmichael numbers, ECCC Report TR26-212 (2026), preprint. primary preprint.
  18. [18]J. Hoffstein and P. Lockhart, Coefficients of Maass forms and the Siegel zero, Ann. of Math. (2) 140 (1994), 161–176. doi:10.2307/2118543.DOI
  19. [19]D. Goldfeld, J. Hoffstein, and D. Lieman, Appendix: An effective zero-free region, Ann. of Math. (2) 140 (1994), 177–181. doi:10.2307/2118544.DOI
  20. [20]O. Klurman, A. P. Mangerel, and J. Teräväinen, Multiplicative functions in short arithmetic progressions, Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 127 (2023), 366–446. doi:10.1112/plms.12546; published open-access copy.DOI
  21. [21]A. Herlédan Le Merdy and B. Wesolowski, Unconditional foundations for supersingular isogeny-based cryptography, Theory of Cryptography–TCC 2025, LNCS 16270 (2026), 266–297; first online 3 December 2025. doi:10.1007/978-3-032-12296-4_9; author’s mirror revision, version 2, 2 February 2026.
  22. [22]K. Eisenträger, S. Hallgren, K. Lauter, T. Morrison, and C. Petit, Supersingular isogeny graphs and endomorphism rings: reductions and solutions, EUROCRYPT 2018, LNCS 10822, 329–368. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-78372-7_11.DOI
  23. [23]B. Wesolowski, The supersingular isogeny path and endomorphism ring problems are equivalent, 2021 IEEE 62nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), 1100–1111. doi:10.1109/FOCS52979.2021.00109; full version.DOI
  24. [24]F. Balestrieri, A. Johnson, and R. Newton, Explicit uniform bounds for Brauer groups of singular K3 surfaces, Ann. Inst. Fourier 73 (2023), 567–607. doi:10.5802/aif.3526.DOI
  25. [25]É. Gaudron and G. Rémond, Nouveaux théorèmes d’isogénie, Mém. Soc. Math. France (N.S.) 176 (2023), 1–123. doi:10.24033/msmf.484.
  26. [26]A. Kresch and Y. Tschinkel, Effectivity of Brauer–Manin obstructions on surfaces, Adv. Math. 226 (2011), 4131–4144. doi:10.1016/j.aim.2010.11.012.DOI
  27. [27]B. Poonen, D. Testa, and R. van Luijk, Computing Néron–Severi groups and cycle class groups, Compos. Math. 151 (2015), 713–734. doi:10.1112/S0010437X14007878.DOI
  28. [28]J. Thorner and A. Zaman, A unified and improved Chebotarev density theorem, Algebra Number Theory 13 (2019), 1039–1068. doi:10.2140/ant.2019.13.1039.DOI
  29. [29]G. Ivanyos, M. Karpinski, L. Rónyai, and N. Saxena, Trading GRH for algebra: algorithms for factoring polynomials and related structures, Math. Comp. 81 (2012), 493–531. doi:10.1090/S0025-5718-2011-02505-6; published author copy.DOI
  30. [30]I. Khayutin, Joint equidistribution of CM points, Ann. of Math. (2) 189 (2019), 145–276. doi:10.4007/annals.2019.189.1.4.DOI
  31. [31]P. Habegger, Weakly bounded height on modular curves, Acta Math. Vietnam. 35 (2010), no. 1, 43–69. Published paper.DOI
  32. [32]B. Edixhoven and R. Richard, A mod p variant of the André–Oort conjecture, Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo (2) 69 (2020), 151–157. doi:10.1007/s12215-018-00392-y.
  33. [33]N. Balaji, S. Perifel, M. Shirmohammadi, and J. Worrell, Cyclotomic identity testing and applications, Proceedings of the 2021 International Symposium on Symbolic and Algebraic Computation (ISSAC ’21) (2021), 35–42. doi:10.1145/3452143.3465530.DOI
  34. [34]N. Balaji, K. Nosan, M. Shirmohammadi, and J. Worrell, Identity testing for radical expressions, Proceedings of the 37th ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS ’22) (2022), article 8, 1–11. doi:10.1145/3531130.3533331.DOI
  35. [35]C. Rasmussen and A. Tamagawa, Arithmetic of abelian varieties with constrained torsion, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 369 (2017), no. 4, 2395–2424. doi:10.1090/tran/6790.
  36. [36]P. Pollack and P. Schorn, Dirichlet’s proof of the three-square theorem: An algorithmic perspective, Math. Comp. 88 (2019), no. 316, 1007–1019. doi:10.1090/mcom/3349.DOI
  37. [37]P. Hough, A lower bound for biases amongst products of two primes, Res. Number Theory 3 (2017), article 19. doi:10.1007/s40993-017-0083-9.DOI
  38. [38]R. C. Daileda, Non-abelian number fields with very large class numbers, Acta Arith. 125 (2006), 215–255. doi:10.4064/aa125-3-2.DOI
  39. [39]B. S. Banwait, Explicit isogenies of prime degree over quadratic fields, Int. Math. Res. Not. 2023, no. 14, 11829–11876. doi:10.1093/imrn/rnad134.
  40. [40]B. S. Banwait and M. Derickx, Explicit isogenies of prime degree over number fields, Algebra Number Theory 19 (2025), no. 6, 1147–1197. doi:10.2140/ant.2025.19.1147.DOI
  41. [41]S. Gao, On the deterministic complexity of factoring polynomials, J. Symbolic Comput. 31 (2001), 19–36. doi:10.1006/jsco.1999.1001.DOI
  42. [42]L. Rónyai, Factoring polynomials over finite fields, J. Algorithms 9 (1988), 391–400. doi:10.1016/0196-6774(88)90029-6.DOI
  43. [43]P. Pollack, The smallest inert prime in a cyclic number field of prime degree, Math. Res. Lett. 20 (2013), 163–179. doi:10.4310/MRL.2013.v20.n1.a13; Author’s copy.DOI
  44. [44]J.-H. Ahn and S.-H. Kwon, The class groups of the imaginary Abelian number fields with Galois group (Z/2Z)^n, Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. 70 (2004), 267–277. doi:10.1017/S0004972700034481.DOI
  45. [45]G. Binyamini, Point counting for foliations over number fields, Forum Math. Pi 10 (2022), e6, 1–39. doi:10.1017/fmp.2021.20.DOI
  46. [46]P. Habegger, Weakly bounded height on modular curves, Acta Math. Vietnam. 35 (2010), 43–69. Published paper.DOI
  47. [47]F. Campagna, Effective bounds on differences of singular moduli that are S-units, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 174 (2023), 415–450. doi:10.1017/S0305004122000378; Author preprint.DOI
  48. [48]F. Campagna, On singular moduli that are S-units, Manuscripta Math. 166 (2021), 73–90. doi:10.1007/s00229-020-01230-1.DOI
  49. [49]A. Granville and K. Soundararajan, Large character sums, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 14 (2001), 365–397. doi:10.1090/S0894-0347-00-00357-X; Author’s copy.DOI
  50. [50]A. Granville, A. J. Harper, and K. Soundararajan, A new proof of Halász’s theorem, and its consequences, Compos. Math. 155 (2019), 126–163. doi:10.1112/S0010437X18007522; Author preprint.DOI
  51. [51]G. Binyamini, with an appendix by E. Kowalski, Some effective estimates for André–Oort in Y(1)^n, J. reine angew. Math. 767 (2020), 17–35. doi:10.1515/crelle-2019-0028; Author preprint.DOI
  52. [52]B. Kane, Representations of integers by ternary quadratic forms, Int. J. Number Theory 6 (2010), 127–158. doi:10.1142/S1793042110002831.DOI
  53. [53]W. Duke and R. Schulze-Pillot, Representation of integers by positive ternary quadratic forms and equidistribution of lattice points on ellipsoids, Invent. Math. 99 (1990), 49–57. doi:10.1007/BF01234411; Author’s copy.DOI
  54. [54]W. Duke, On ternary quadratic forms, J. Number Theory 110 (2005), 37–43. doi:10.1016/j.jnt.2004.06.013; Author’s copy.DOI
  55. [55]R. Schulze-Pillot, Darstellungsmaße von Spinorgeschlechtern ternärer quadratischer Formen, J. Reine Angew. Math. 352 (1984), 114–132. Original published paper.
  56. [56]B. Kane, CM liftings of supersingular elliptic curves, J. Théor. Nombres Bordeaux 21 (2009), 635–663. doi:10.5802/jtnb.692.DOI
  57. [57]N. D. Elkies, K. Ono, and T. Yang, Reduction of CM elliptic curves and modular function congruences, Int. Math. Res. Not. 2005 (2005), no. 44, 2695–2707. Author preprint.DOI
  58. [58]OpenAI, The Quasi-Riemann Hypothesis: A Zero-Free Half-Plane ℜs > 7/8, 30 September 2026, Theorem 1.1. Official manuscript and source.hub.valency.io/works/W_sj8ks5ag
  59. [59]OpenAI, The Quasi-Riemann Hypothesis, 5 October 2026, companion proof of the 11/12 boundary. Official manuscript and source.hub.valency.io/works/W_sj8ks5ag
  60. [60]H. Davenport, Multiplicative Number Theory, 3rd ed., revised by H. L. Montgomery, Springer, 2000.
  61. [61]J. E. Littlewood, On the class-number of the corpus P(√−k), Proc. London Math. Soc. (2) 27 (1928), 358–372.DOI
  62. [62]J. B. Friedlander and H. Iwaniec, A note on Dirichlet L-functions, Exposition. Math. 36 (2018), 343–350. doi:10.1016/j.exmath.2018.06.003; author preprint.DOI
  63. [63]E. Jérábek, Integer factoring and modular square roots, J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 82 (2016), 380–394. doi:10.1016/j.jcss.2015.08.001.DOI
  64. [64]L. Adleman, K. Manders, and G. Miller, On taking roots in finite fields, 18th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (1977), 175–178. Original paper.DOI
  65. [65]J. D. Achter and E. W. Howe, Split abelian surfaces over finite fields and reductions of genus-2 curves, Algebra Number Theory 11 (2017), 39–76. doi:10.2140/ant.2017.11.39.DOI
  66. [66]V. Arul, J. Booher, S. R. Groen, E. W. Howe, W. Li, V. Matei, R. Pries, and C. Springer, Doubly isogenous genus-2 curves with D₄-action, Math. Comp. 93 (2024), 347–381. doi:10.1090/mcom/3891.DOI
  67. [67]R. Schoof, Nonsingular plane cubic curves over finite fields, J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 46 (1987), 183–211.DOI
  68. [68]A. Granville and K. Soundararajan, Large character sums: pretentious characters and the Pólya–Vinogradov theorem, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 20 (2007), 357–384. doi:10.1090/S0894-0347-06-00536-4.DOI
  69. [69]H. L. Montgomery and R. C. Vaughan, Exponential sums with multiplicative coefficients, Invent. Math. 43 (1977), 69–82. doi:10.1007/BF01390204.DOI
  70. [70]D. W. Boyd and H. Kisilevsky, On the exponent of the ideal class groups of complex quadratic fields, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 31 (1972), 433–436. doi:10.1090/S0002-9939-1972-0289454-4.DOI
  71. [71]A.-S. Elsenhans, J. Klüners, and F. Nicolae, Imaginary quadratic number fields with class groups of small exponent, Acta Arith. 193 (2020), 217–233. doi:10.4064/aa180220-20-3; author preprint.DOI
  72. [72]A.-S. Elsenhans, J. Klüners, and F. Nicolae, Imaginary quadratic fields with small exponent, author-maintained tables, accessed 9 October 2026. Complete tables.
  73. [73]E. Kani, Idoneal numbers and some generalizations, Ann. Sci. Math. Québec 35 (2011), 197–227. Published paper.
  74. [74]A. Bourdon and P. Pollack, Torsion subgroups of CM elliptic curves over odd degree number fields, Int. Math. Res. Not. 2017 (2017), no. 16, 4923–4961. doi:10.1093/imrn/rnw163; author preprint.DOI
  75. [75]P. T. Joshi, The size of L(1, χ) for real nonprincipal residue characters χ with prime modulus, J. Number Theory 2 (1970), 58–73.DOI
  76. [76]M. Schütt, CM newforms with rational coefficients, Ramanujan J. 19 (2009), 187–205. doi:10.1007/s11139-008-9147-8; author preprint.DOI
  77. [77]H. Pasten, Shimura curves and the abc conjecture, J. Number Theory 254 (2024), 214–335. doi:10.1016/j.jnt.2023.07.002; author manuscript.DOI
  78. [78]N. D. Elkies and M. Schütt, Modular forms and K3 surfaces, Adv. Math. 240 (2013), 106–131. doi:10.1016/j.aim.2013.03.008; author preprint.DOI
  79. [79]E. Kani, The moduli spaces of Jacobians isomorphic to a product of two elliptic curves, Collect. Math. 67 (2016), 21–54. doi:10.1007/s13348-015-0148-9.DOI
  80. [80]X. Wei, Smallness of Faltings heights of CM abelian varieties, J. Number Theory 242 (2023), 73–101. doi:10.1016/j.jnt.2022.07.007.DOI
  81. [81]X. Wei, Smallness of Faltings heights of CM abelian varieties, arXiv:2111.00617v1 (2021). Preprint with the numbering used in the proof.arxiv.org/abs/2111.00617
  82. [82]H. M. Stark, Some effective cases of the Brauer–Siegel theorem, Invent. Math. 23 (1974), 135–152. doi:10.1007/BF01405166.DOI
  83. [83]K.-Y. Chang and S.-H. Kwon, The imaginary abelian number fields with class numbers equal to their genus class numbers, J. Théor. Nombres Bordeaux 12 (2000), 349–365. doi:10.5802/jtnb.283.DOI
  84. [84]I. Miyada, On imaginary abelian number fields of type (2, 2, . . . , 2) with one class in each genus, Manuscripta Math. 88 (1995), 535–540. doi:10.1007/BF02567840.DOI
  85. [85]S. Louboutin, The exponent three class group problem for some real cyclic cubic number fields, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 130 (2002), 353–361. doi:10.1090/S0002-9939-01-06168-8.DOI
  86. [86]F. Lemmermeyer and A. Pethő, Simplest cubic fields, Manuscripta Math. 88 (1995), 53–58. doi:10.1007/BF02567804; author preprint.DOI
  87. [87]S. Louboutin and M. F. Newman, On the diophantine equation xy + yz + zx = d, Acta Math. Inform. Univ. Ostraviensis 6 (1998), 155–158. Published paper.
  88. [88]J. S. Ellenberg and A. Venkatesh, Reflection principles and bounds for class group torsion, Int. Math. Res. Not. 2007 (2007), article rnm002, 18 pp. doi:10.1093/imrn/rnm002.DOI
  89. [89]D. R. Heath-Brown, ℓ-Torsion in class groups via Dirichlet L-functions, Int. J. Number Theory (2026). doi:10.1142/S1793042126500168; Author version.
  90. [90]S. Chan and P. Koymans, A new pointwise bound for 3-torsion of class groups, arXiv:2505.00611 (2025). Prior-art comparison only. Author preprint.arxiv.org/abs/2505.00611
  91. [91]R. J. Lemke Oliver and A. Zaman, Improving the trivial bound for ℓ-torsion in class groups, arXiv:2502.03464 (2025). Prior-art comparison only. Author preprint.arxiv.org/abs/2502.03464
  92. [92]M. N. Walsh, Stability under scaling in the local phases of multiplicative functions, Invent. Math. 241 (2025), 325–362. doi:10.1007/s00222-025-01343-y; author-linked full version.DOI
  93. [93]K. Matomäki, M. Radziwiłł, and T. Tao, Fourier uniformity of bounded multiplicative functions in short intervals on average, Invent. Math. 220 (2020), 1–58. doi:10.1007/s00222-019-00926-w.
  94. [94]R. A. Mollin, Class number two for real quadratic fields of Richaud–Degert type, Serdica Math. J. 35 (2009), 287–300. Published paper.
  95. [95]T. Tatuzawa, On a theorem of Siegel, Japanese J. Math. 21 (1951), 163–178. doi:10.4099/jjm1924.21.0_163.DOI
  96. [96]S. R. Louboutin, Ideal class groups of some quadratic number fields and factorization of values of some quadratic polynomials, Czechoslovak Math. J. 76 (2026), 677–697. Publisher record; author version.
  97. [97]A. P. Mangerel, On a rigidity property for quadratic Gauss sums, Mathematika 72 (2026), no. 1, e70061, 30 pp. doi:10.1112/mtk.70061.DOI
  98. [98]A. Granville and K. Soundararajan, The spectrum of multiplicative functions, Ann. of Math. (2) 153 (2001), 407–470. doi:10.2307/2661346.DOI
  99. [99]E. Sofos, Statistics of small prime quadratic non-residues, Rend. Semin. Mat. Univ. Politec. Torino 80 (2022), no. 1, 73–85. Published paper.arxiv.org/abs/2212.14816
  100. [100]R. Mrazović, A random model for the Paley graph, Q. J. Math. 68 (2017), 193–206. doi:10.1093/qmath/haw037.DOI
  101. [101]H. L. Montgomery, Topics in Multiplicative Number Theory, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 227, Springer, 1971.
  102. [102]S. Louboutin, Prime producing quadratic polynomials and class-numbers of real quadratic fields, Canad. J. Math. 42 (1990), no. 2, 315–341. doi:10.4153/CJM-1990-018-3.DOI
  103. [103]A. Biró and K. Lapkova, The class number one problem for the real quadratic fields Q(√(an)^2 + 4a), Acta Arith. 172 (2016), no. 2, 117–131. doi:10.4064/aa7957-12-2015.DOI
  104. [104]J. Lee, The complete determination of wide Richaud–Degert types which are not 5 modulo 8 with class number one, Acta Arith. 140 (2009), no. 1, 1–29. doi:10.4064/aa140-1-1.DOI
  105. [105]M. Mourtada and V. Kumar Murty, Omega theorems for L′/L(1, χ_D), Int. J. Number Theory 9 (2013), no. 3, 561–581. doi:10.1142/S1793042112501485.DOI
  106. [106]M. Mourtada, The distribution of values of logarithmic derivatives of real L-functions, Ph.D. thesis, University of Toronto, 2013, Chapter 4, especially Theorem 17. Author’s full thesis.
  107. [107]A. I. Badzyan, The Euler–Kronecker constant, Math. Notes 87 (2010), 31–42; Russian original, Mat. Zametki 87 (2010), 35–47. English publication; Russian original.DOI
  108. [108]K. Ford, F. Luca, and P. Moree, Values of the Euler φ-function not divisible by a given odd prime, and the distribution of Euler–Kronecker constants for cyclotomic fields, Math. Comp. 83 (2014), 1447–1476. doi:10.1090/S0025-5718-2013-02749-4; Revised author version, with the numbering used here.
  109. [109]P. L. Clark, T. Genao, P. Pollack, and F. Saia, The least degree of a CM point on a modular curve, J. London Math. Soc. (2) 105 (2022), 825–883. doi:10.1112/jlms.12518; Author errata, 4 May 2026.DOI
  110. [110]B. Green and T. Tao, The Möbius function is strongly orthogonal to nilsequences, Ann. of Math. (2) 175 (2012), 541–566. doi:10.4007/annals.2012.175.2.3.DOI
  111. [111]B. Green and T. Tao, The quantitative behaviour of polynomial orbits on nilmanifolds, Ann. of Math. (2) 175 (2012), 465–540. doi:10.4007/annals.2012.175.2.2; correction, Ann. of Math. (2) 179 (2014), 1175–1183, doi:10.4007/annals.2014.179.3.8.DOI

Paper details

vlnc:W_3drjq8uk
v1 · latestHistory (1)

published · Fresh — added to the Hub within the last 30 days

added ·

Usage

views · 1

downloads · 0

A view counts once per browser per day, a download each time the PDF is requested.

CC BY 4.0

Original source

  • Mathematics

OpenAI ChatGPT GPT-6 Astra · View statement →

Looking for related papers…
Contents