Introduction

A rational holomorphic line is semiample if some positive Cartier multiple is generated by global sections. Such a multiple defines a holomorphic map to projective space. The abundance question considered here is whether analytic nefness of a klt adjoint on a compact Kähler fourfold, together with one nonzero plurisectiоn, forces this conclusion.

Let XX be an effective rational Weil divisor on a normal complex space XX. We say that D=KX+ΔD = K_X + \Delta is an actual Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier adjoint when an appropriate reflexive adjoint power is an invertible holomorphic sheaf. All multiples and sections of DD then refer to tensor powers of that line. This convention allows KXK_X and Δ\Delta to fail to be separately Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier. The line is analytically nef if, for a fixed Kähler form and every ε>0\varepsilon> 0, a fixed Cartier multiple has a smooth Hermitian metric whose normalized curvature is bounded below by minus ε\varepsilon times that form, using local smooth potentials on XX. Section 2 gives the full sheaf and metric conventions. The Iitaka condition κ(X,D)≥0\kappa(X,D) \ge0 means that a positive Cartier multiple has a nonzero holomorphic section.

Theorem 1.1. Let XX be a normal connected compact Kähler complex space of dimension four. Let Δ\Delta be an effective rational Weil divisor such that (X,Δ)(X,\Delta) is Kawamata log terminal and the actual adjoint D=KX+ΔD = K_X + \Delta is Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier. If DD is analytically nef and κ(X,D)≥0\kappa(X,D) \ge0, then there is an integer m>0m > 0 for which mDmD is Cartier and

H0(X,OX(mD))⊗COX⟶OX(mD)H^0(X,\mathcal{O}_X(mD)) \otimes_{\mathbb{C}} \mathcal{O}_X \longrightarrow\mathcal{O}_X(mD)

is surjective at every point. If κ(X,D)=0\kappa(X,D) = 0, then one may choose mm so that OX(mD)≃OX\mathcal{O}_X(mD) \simeq\mathcal{O}_X.

Nonvanishing is a hypothesis. The conclusion concerns the given holomorphic adjoint line on XX, without projectivity or Q\mathbb{Q}-factoriality of XX and without a numerical-dimension restriction. When the Iitaka dimension is zero, the conclusion is an actual rational-linear trivialization.

The threefold abundance theorems provide both the lower-dimensional input and the methods behind this problem. In the projective terminal case, Miyaoka treated numerical dimension one [40], and Kawamata proved abundance for minimal threefolds [35]. Passing to compact Kähler spaces requires contraction and positivity arguments which cannot be obtained by choosing a global ample divisor. Höring–Peternell developed the minimal-model and Mori-fiber-space theory for compact Kähler threefolds [33], [32]. Campana–Höring–Peternell established canonical abundance for normal ordinary Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial compact Kähler threefolds with terminal singularities [6]; the corrected Chern-class argument is given in their appendix to Guenancia–Păun’s orbifold Bogomolov–Gieseker theorem [30], Appendix, Theorem A.2.

For lc compact Kähler threefold pairs with rational boundary and nef adjoint, Das–Ou proved semiampleness when the numerical dimension is different from two or the Iitaka dimension is positive [13], Theorem 1.1. Their sequel treats numerical dimension two and obtains abundance for lc compact Kähler threefolds [14], Theorem 1.2 and Corollary 1.3. These results generate the adjoint lines on the normal three-dimensional components of a fourfold boundary. They do not by themselves choose sections agreeing on its intersections or extend those sections to the fourfold. Those are the two boundary problems treated here.

For positive Iitaka dimension, Höring–Lazić–Lehn prove semiampleness for nef klt adjoints on ordinary Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial compact Kähler spaces through dimension four [31], Theorem 4.1. A crepant ordinary Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial Kähler model projective over XX places our pair in that scope. The sections of the pulled-back Cartier line are exactly the sections from XX, so generation descends to the original line. It remains to treat Iitaka dimension zero.

From a plurisection to a supported model

Choose s≠0s \ne0 in H0(X,OX(mD))H^0(X,\mathcal{O}_X(mD)), and let

M=1mdiv⁡(s)M = \frac{1}{m}\operatorname{div}(s)

be its normalized effective rational divisor. If M=0M = 0, the section already trivializes OX(mD)\mathcal{O}_X(mD). Suppose that M≠0M \ne0.

The birational reduction requires projective contractions with Kähler targets. We prepare them by two constructions. First, Proposition 3.2 contracts the entire null locus of a nef and big threefold class when that locus is a finite union of curves; its initial target is normal compact analytic. Second, conormal direct-image vanishings and analytic thickenings extend a contraction of a prime floor to the ambient space in Proposition 4.3. These two constructions, combined with the specified relative MMP, rationality, descent, and positivity inputs, give the threefold contraction statement Proposition 3.1. It is used first on the floors of the fourfold program and later on lower strata in the boundary comparison argument.

The surrounding birational results are the pseudoeffective terminal canonical threefold program of Höring–Peternell, the logarithmic threefold program of Das–Hacon, and the crepant dlt models and supported fourfold construction of Das–Hacon–Păun [33, 11, 12]. The proof below states the precise imported inputs alongside the constructions just described.

On a log resolution, we raise to one the coefficients of the strict transforms of Supp⁡M\operatorname{Supp} M and of the exceptional primes. The resulting adjoint has an effective representative supported on its entire reduced floor. The supported program then gives the model of Proposition 5.1: a normal ordinary Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial compact Kähler dlt fourfold (V,B)(V,B) with effective rational boundary and

A=KV+B,P∼QA,S=⌊B⌋,Supp⁡P=Supp⁡S.A = K_V + B,\qquad P \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} A,\qquad S = \lfloor B \rfloor,\qquad\operatorname{Supp} P = \operatorname{Supp} S.

where AA is an analytically nef actual Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier adjoint, PP is an effective nonzero rational Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier divisor, and κ(V,A)=0\kappa(V,A)=0. The equivalence is an isomorphism of actual rational holomorphic lines. Nonvanishing of PP follows from exceptional negativity: if its support disappeared, the pullback of MM would be a nonzero effective nef exceptional divisor.

The model also has the special projective resolution in Lemma 5.6. Its strict boundary and exceptional support have globally smooth distinct SNC components, its exceptional crepant coefficients are below one, and it is generically an isomorphism on the image of every irreducible component of an intersection of distinct strict floor components. The first boundary result, Theorem 6.1, proves that the already existing restriction A∣SA|_S is semiample for this model. It uses this resolution condition and requires no ambient section.

Compatible sections on the whole floor

The normal components and lower strata carry actual adjoint lines. Lower-dimensional abundance, applied after the small models specified below, makes these lines semiample; the threefold input is Das–Ou’s lc abundance theorem [14], Corollary 1.3. We must choose sections whose iterated residue restrictions agree through every intersection, so that they descend to sections on the reduced space SS itself.

The restriction criterion sometimes extends a section without a comparison. When it requires a comparison, a perturbed program on the lower stratum reduces the condition, in a sufficiently divisible common degree, to the two coefficient-one markings on a projective-line fiber of a Mori contraction. They give a birational residue comparison, called a link. On a common projective graph, a link identifies the compatible invertible meromorphic adjoint subsheaves; this equality transports the actual residue sections and their products. The two markings can belong to distinct primes or to one degree-two branch, whose normal finite Stein space carries the exchange involution.

Fujino’s induction by pre-admissible and admissible sections and finite symmetrization is the ancestry of this compatibility construction [19], Sections 2–4. Kollár’s sources and links describe the related algebraic configuration with two disjoint distinguished sections of a projective-line fiber [37], Definition 9, Theorem 10, and Proposition 14; the last proposition records the compatibility of even iterated residues along these links.

For nonprojective surface strata, the links carry an additional geometric constraint. Restrictions of one Kähler form on VV induce positive-square classes on their smooth minimal surface models. A link from a three-dimensional stratum transports these classes modulo the real span of divisor classes. A returning chain begins and ends on the same surface stratum. After a common Cartier degree qq is chosen, the image of all returning chains on the space of qkqk-plurisections is finite for each fixed integer k>0k > 0. The groupoid may have infinitely many arrows: its surface arrows are generated only by these links and their inverses, while point and curve comparisons are treated separately. Finite norm products impose the required invariance, and finite hyperplane avoidance chooses sections nonzero at prescribed points. Their residue agreement through all intersections gives generators on the whole floor.

This common-class constraint is essential. Nonprojective K3 surfaces can have automorphisms acting by a non-root-of-unity scalar on the holomorphic two-form [39], Theorems 3.5 and 4.1]. Swapnajit Das’s recent preprint states abundance for compact Kähler semi-log-canonical threefolds [15], Theorem 1.3]. Its Lemmas 7.2–7.3 and Corollary 7.4 contain a closely related positive-class and ruling mechanism. We give the explicit residue construction here, including the actual meromorphic adjoint equality, the normalized degree-two branch, and the uniform fixed-degree bound for the link action. The cited surface mechanism is prior art; the stated semi-log-canonical theorem is not an input to this proof.

Lifting from the supported boundary

The second boundary result is a dimension-free statement for an arbitrary standard dlt pair. The special resolution used in the fourfold floor-generation application is not part of its data.

Theorem 1.2 (Supported lifting). Let (V,B)(V, B) be a normal irreducible compact Kähler dlt pair of positive dimension, with effective rational boundary and actual Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier adjoint A=KV+BA = K_{V} + B. Suppose that an effective nonzero rational Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier divisor PP satisfies

P∼QA,Supp⁡P=Supp⁡⌊B⌋.P \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} A,\qquad\operatorname{Supp} P = \operatorname{Supp} \lfloor B \rfloor.

If the actual restriction A∣SA|_{S} to the whole reduced subspace S=⌊B⌋S = \lfloor B \rfloor is semiample, then κ(V,A)≥1\kappa(V, A) \ge1.

The support equality places the divisor of the initial section exactly on the boundary where generation is known, and makes the pair klt away from that divisor. The theorem assumes generation on the entire reduced SS, including its intersections; it does not assume nefness of AA.

Choose an effective Cartier multiple G=qPG = qP and an actual identity OV(G)≃OV(qA)\mathcal{O}_{V}(G) \simeq\mathcal{O}_{V}(qA) such that its restriction to SS is generated. A generating system constructs a morphism f:S→T=Pbf : S \to T = \mathbb{P}^{b} and an actual identity

OV(G)∣S≃f∗OT(1).\mathcal{O}_{V}(G)|_{S} \simeq f^{*}\mathcal{O}_{T}(1).

On an ambient neighborhood W⊂VW \subset V of each compact fiber, a root pair and a normalized cyclic cover π:Z→W\pi: Z \to W replace the supported divisor by a reduced Cartier divisor EE. Put I=OZ(−E)I = \mathcal{O}_{Z}(-E), and let g:E→Ug : E \to U be the induced map over a parameter neighborhood U⊂TU \subset T. The finite lifting target is that, for every integer jj and every k≥1k \ge1,

g∗(Ij/Ij+k+1)⟶g∗(Ij/Ij+k)g_{*}(I^{j}/I^{j+k+1}) \longrightarrow g_{*}(I^{j}/I^{j+k})

is an epimorphism of sheaves of complex vector spaces on UU. The quotients are viewed on the underlying space of EE, and the neighborhood used to lift a particular germ may depend on jj and kk. Thus the assertion lifts section germs by one finite order using the boundary map gg.

The obstruction to each order is a graded derivation with values in the first cohomology of a normal layer. A second root and a split residue map embed that cohomology as a direct summand of the residue cohomology of a resolved SNC divisor, retaining classes supported at special parameters. A local differentiation identity turns any nonzero value of the derivation on a base coordinate into a map excluded by the Hodge vanishing on a smooth projective parameter cover. The same identity then kills the remaining derivation. Finally, cyclic invariants give recurring divisorial layers on VV with positive twists from OT(1)\mathcal{O}_T(1). Their sections grow while their higher cohomology and the final loss from H1(V,OV)H^1(V,\mathcal{O}_V) stay bounded. This forces κ(V,A)≥1\kappa(V,A) \ge1.

The direct ancestors of this lifting method are the threefold arguments of Miyaoka and Kawamata. Miyaoka studies an effective pluricanonical divisor on a minimal projective terminal threefold through neighborhood covers and successive thickenings in the numerical-dimension-one case [40], Section 4; he credits Reid with the suggestion to analyze that divisor [40], p. 220. Kawamata’s alternative proof of that case uses neighborhood roots, residues, compatible thickenings, and a mixed Hodge complex [35], Section 4. The proof here establishes the stated compact Kähler dlt lifting theorem.

Apply the two boundary results to the supported model. Generation of A∣SA|_S and Theorem 1.2 force positive Iitaka dimension because P≠0P \ne0, contradicting κ(V,A)=0\kappa(V,A) = 0. Therefore M=0M = 0, and the original section ss trivializes the actual Cartier line OX(mD)\mathcal{O}_X(mD).

Related manuscripts by OpenAI treat log abundance in the projective characteristic-zero setting [43] and supported boundary lifting [42]. The projective supplement also states rational-boundary semi-log-canonical abundance over C\mathbb{C} and a dlt restriction result for a nef adjoint with an effective rational representative whose support contains the floor, in every Cartier degree m≥2m \ge2 [43], Corollaries 11.5–11.6. Those projective statements are separate context; both analytic boundary arguments needed here are proved in this manuscript.

Section 2 fixes the actual-line conventions and a connectedness lemma. Sections 3 and 4 establish the contraction preparations used on fourfold floors and on lower strata. Section 5 constructs the supported model. Sections 6–9 construct compatible sections and prove generation of the existing adjoint restriction on the entire reduced floor. Section 10 constructs root neighborhoods and the split residue map; Section 11 proves the vanishing used for lifting; and Section 12 proves the finite-order surjections and section growth. Section 13 assembles the main theorem.

Actual adjoints and analytic conventions

We collect the conventions that keep the argument on the given holomorphic line bundles. All complex spaces are Hausdorff and countable at infinity. A normal connected complex space is irreducible: its locally irreducible components are open as well as closed. All divisors called effective are Weil divisors with nonnegative coefficients.

Adjoints, residues, and singularities

For a normal complex space XX, let j:Xreg↪Xj:X^{\mathrm{reg}} \hookrightarrow X be the regular locus and set ωX=j∗ωXreg\omega_X = j_*\omega_{X^{\mathrm{reg}}}. For an integral Weil divisor HH, OX(H)\mathcal{O}_X(H) is the rank-one reflexive divisorial sheaf. If Δ\Delta is rational and an integer r>0r > 0 clears its coefficients, the adjoint index condition is the invertibility of

Lr=(ωX[r]⊗OX(rΔ))∗∗.(1)\mathcal{L}_r = \left(\omega_X^{[r]} \otimes\mathcal{O}_X(r\Delta)\right)^{**}. \tag*{(1)}

All later degrees are chosen divisible by such an index. Tensor powers of Lr\mathcal{L}_r, rather than a separately chosen global canonical divisor, define OX(m(KX+Δ))\mathcal{O}_X(m(K_X+\Delta)). Equality in Pic⁡(X)Q\operatorname{Pic}(X)_{\mathbb{Q}} means an isomorphism of holomorphic line bundles after a common positive multiple. The notation P∼QKX+ΔP \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} K_X + \Delta for a rational Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier divisor means precisely OX(mP)≃OX(m(KX+Δ))\mathcal{O}_X(mP) \simeq\mathcal{O}_X(m(K_X + \Delta)) in such a degree.

A local frame of Lr\mathcal{L}_r restricts on the regular locus to a meromorphic rr-pluricanonical form with the allowed boundary poles. Pulling that form back differentially along a proper bimeromorphic model p:W→Xp : W \to X with WW smooth defines a rational crepant subboundary GWG_W by

KW+GW=p∗(KX+Δ).K_W + G_W = p^*(K_X + \Delta).

This equality records both the rational divisor of the meromorphic map and the actual isomorphism of the pulled-back line. It is independent of the local frame: a change of frame is a holomorphic unit, and both pullbacks change by its pullback. At a prime divisor EE on WW,

a(E;X,Δ)=1−coeff⁡E(GW)=1+coeff⁡E(KW−p∗(KX+Δ))a(E; X, \Delta) = 1 - \operatorname{coeff}_E(G_W) = 1 + \operatorname{coeff}_E\left(K_W - p^*(K_X + \Delta)\right)

is the log discrepancy. We use the same definition on higher smooth models. The pair is lc if all these numbers are nonnegative and klt if they are positive. We use the standard Kollár–Mori dlt notion, as imported for analytic pairs in [12], Definition 2.7(4); in particular, a dlt pair is klt away from its coefficient-one floor. Theorem 6.1 uses in addition the globally simple projective resolution supplied by Lemma 5.6 in the fourfold application. Theorem 1.2 uses the standard dlt notion without this additional resolution hypothesis.

On an SNC pair, adjunction to an intersection of distinct coefficient-one components is the iterated meromorphic residue. In a degree divisible by the adjoint index and by two, interchanging two residue operations does not change the resulting pluriform. We always use such even degrees when comparing paths through boundary strata. Equality of the pulled-back invertible subsheaves of meromorphic pluriforms is stronger than an abstract isomorphism of lines: the former fixes the residue transport of sections. This stronger equality is what we mean by a crepant residue comparison. It will be proved for every comparison used below.

Reflexive extension is used in the following precise form. An isomorphism between rank-one reflexive sheaves on a normal space, defined away from an analytic subset of codimension at least two, extends uniquely if it is given there by the same meromorphic identification. In particular, a meromorphic pluriadjoint identity transported through a bimeromorphic map that extracts no prime divisor can be tested in codimension one and then extended. An isomorphism merely in numerical cohomology would not support this operation.

We use ordinary global Q\mathbb{Q}-factoriality: every global Weil divisor has a Cartier multiple, and a reflexive power of the canonical sheaf is invertible. This is the convention of [12], Definition 2.7. It does not assert factoriality of all analytic germs. The input of Theorem 1.1 has no such factoriality assumption.

Kähler positivity and section spaces

A Kähler form on a complex space is given by smooth strictly plurisubharmonic local potentials in local embeddings into complex Euclidean spaces. Smooth metrics and their curvature are interpreted in the same way. For a rational line represented by LrL_r, we use the metric criterion for analytic nefness stated in the introduction. It is independent of the index and of the fixed Kähler form. Restriction to a closed analytic subspace preserves the inequalities and hence nefness. For a holomorphic map from a compact Kähler space, pullback also preserves nefness: after pulling back the metric inequality, bound the pulled-back fixed form by a constant multiple of a fixed Kähler form on the source. This argument will be used for resolutions and for restrictions to possibly singular strata. Curve intersection tests occur only in the relative projective MMP calculations where their use is justified.

For an actual rational line DD, its Iitaka dimension is −∞-\infty if all positive Cartier powers have no sections; otherwise it is the maximum dimension of the meromorphic images of their complete systems. On an irreducible compact space, two linearly independent sections of one line have a nonconstant meromorphic quotient. Consequently, if κ(D)=0\kappa(D)=0, every Cartier degree has at most one independent section. Conversely, unbounded dimensions of the section spaces of positive powers force κ(D)≥1\kappa(D)\ge1: one of those spaces has two independent sections.

We will repeatedly use two elementary consequences of normality. If p:Y→Xp:Y\to X is a proper bimeromorphic morphism between normal spaces, then p∗OY=OXp_*\mathcal O_Y=\mathcal O_X. Hence, for a line LL on XX,

H0(Y,p∗L)=H0(X,L).H^0(Y,p^*L)=H^0(X,L).

If p∗Lp^*L is generated, then LL is generated: at any x∈Xx\in X choose y∈p−1(x)y\in p^{-1}(x) and a pulled-back section nonzero at yy. The corresponding section of LL is nonzero at xx. If a positive multiple of DD has a nowhere-vanishing section, that section is an actual isomorphism OX≃OX(mD)\mathcal O_X\simeq\mathcal O_X(mD).

The second consequence concerns exceptional divisors. If E≥0E\ge0 is pp-exceptional and integral, then

p∗OY(E)=OX.(2)p_*\mathcal O_Y(E)=\mathcal O_X. \tag*{(2)}

Indeed, a section is a meromorphic function on XX that is holomorphic away from the codimension-at-least-two image of EE; normal Hartogs extension makes it holomorphic everywhere. The same statement applies to rational exceptional divisors after clearing their denominators. Combined with projection formula, it identifies the section spaces in the exceptional comparisons below.

A connectedness and rationality lemma

The following sheaf calculation is used both for the conormal layers of a prime floor and for descent of compatible boundary sections. Its klt case also supplies rationality and the Cohen–Macaulay property for the strata used later.

Lemma 2.1. Let (T,BT)(T,B_T) be a normal irreducible effective lc analytic pair with actual Q\mathbb Q-Cartier adjoint, and let p:U→Tp:U\to T be a projective resolution with smooth source whose crepant subboundary GG has SNC support. Put

R=G=1,H=⌈−G<1⌉.R=G^{=1},\qquad H=\left\lceil-G^{<1}\right\rceil.

Then HH is effective and exceptional, has no component in common with RR, and

p∗OR=Op(R),red.(3)p_*\mathcal O_R=\mathcal O_{p(R),\mathrm{red}}. \tag*{(3)}

In particular R→p(R)R\to p(R) has connected fibers. If the pair is klt, then TT has rational singularities and is Cohen–Macaulay.

Proof. The strict boundary coefficients belong to [0,1][0,1], so positive coefficients of HH occur only on exceptional primes. Coefficient by coefficient,

H−R=−[G],(H−R)−(KU+{G})=−p∗(KT+BT).H-R=-[G],\qquad(H-R)-(K_U+\{G\})=-p^*(K_T+B_T).

The fractional boundary {G}=G−[G]\{G\}=G-[G] is effective SNC with coefficients below one. The displayed adjoint difference is relatively nef and big for the bimeromorphic pp: it is relatively trivial, and the generic relative dimension is zero. Analytic relative Kawamata–Viehweg vanishing [12], Theorem 2.41] gives Rip∗OU(H−R)=0R^{i}p_*\mathcal{O}_U(H-R)=0 for i>0i>0. Exceptional Hartogs extension gives p∗OU(H)=OTp_*\mathcal{O}_U(H)=\mathcal{O}_T. The sequence for the Cartier divisor RR therefore yields a surjection

OT⟶p∗OR(H).\mathcal{O}_T\longrightarrow p_*\mathcal{O}_R(H).

It factors through p∗ORp_*\mathcal{O}_R. Multiplication by the canonical section of HH embeds OR\mathcal{O}_R into OR(H)\mathcal{O}_R(H), because RR is reduced SNC and shares no component with HH. The surjection consequently makes that embedding an isomorphism after pushforward and makes OT→p∗OR\mathcal{O}_T\to p_*\mathcal{O}_R surjective. Its kernel is exactly the reduced ideal of the proper image p(R)p(R): a holomorphic function vanishes after restriction to RR precisely when it vanishes on that image. This proves (3); Stein factorization gives connected fibers.

For the last assertion, take a klt resolution, so R=0R=0. The same vanishing and Hartogs calculation identify Rp∗OU(H)≃OTRp_*\mathcal{O}_U(H)\simeq\mathcal{O}_T. The factorization

OT⟶Rp∗OU⟶Rp∗OU(H)≃OT\mathcal{O}_T\longrightarrow Rp_*\mathcal{O}_U\longrightarrow Rp_*\mathcal{O}_U(H)\simeq\mathcal{O}_T

is the identity, as can be checked on degree zero. It splits the first map. Apply proper coherent duality. Canonical higher direct images of the resolution vanish: the canonical torsion-freeness theorem [21], Theorem 2.9 and Proposition 2.11] applies locally on the base, and these higher images vanish generically for a bimeromorphic map. The required local Kählerness follows by restricting to a small Stein base neighborhood and combining a relative ample metric with a pulled-back strictly plurisubharmonic potential. Thus the dual split surjection is the trace

p∗ωU[dim⁡U]⟶ωT,p_*\omega_U[\dim U]\longrightarrow\omega_T,

where ωT\omega_T is the dualizing complex. It follows that this complex is concentrated in degree −dim⁡U-\dim U. On that cohomology sheaf the trace is also injective: its source is torsion-free and the map is generically an isomorphism. Hence it is an isomorphism. Biduality gives Rp∗OU=OTRp_*\mathcal{O}_U=\mathcal{O}_T. This is rational singularity, and the concentration of the dualizing complex is the Cohen–Macaulay property.

Threefold contractions for the boundary argument

The boundary argument uses the following specialization of Das–Hacon–Păun’s threefold contraction theorem [12], Theorem 5.5]. It supplies contractions both on the floors of the supported fourfold program and on lower strata in the restriction argument. Throughout these preparations, a real (1,1)(1,1)-class on a singular space is a Bott–Chern class defined by smooth local potentials.

Proposition 3.1 (Threefold contraction of an adjoint plus a Kähler class). Let (Z,Γ)(Z,\Gamma) be a normal connected compact Kähler klt threefold with effective rational boundary and actual Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier adjoint A=KZ+ΓA=K_Z+\Gamma. Suppose

α=c1(A)+[ω]  is nef,ω  is Ka¨hler.(4)\alpha=c_1(A)+[\omega]\ \text{ is nef},\qquad\omega\ \text{ is Kähler}. \tag*{(4)}

Then there is a projective surjection f:Z→Yf:Z\to Y with f∗OZ=OYf_*\mathcal{O}_Z=\mathcal{O}_Y, where YY is normal compact Kähler with rational singularities, and a Kähler class [ωY][\omega_Y] satisfying α=f∗[ωY]\alpha=f^*[\omega_Y]. The actual rational line −A-A is ff-ample. A compact curve is contracted exactly when its α\alpha-degree is zero.

The proposition assumes no bigness of α\alpha, pseudo-effectivity of AA, or factoriality of ZZ. Its proof is given in Subsection 4.4, after the required constructions. The separate exposure input [12], Corollary 5.3 supplies a class of the form (4) exposing any negative extremal ray in the cited threefold cone theorem. In that case the proposition contracts exactly the curves in that ray.

The preparation has three parts. First we contract the entire finite curve null locus of a nef and big class, obtaining a normal compact analytic target. Next, conormal direct-image vanishings and analytic thickenings extend a contraction of a prime floor to its ambient space. Finally, these two constructions combine with the named projective MMP, descent, positivity, and nonbig inputs to prove the proposition and its floor restriction. The Kähler target in the proposition is part of this combined argument, beyond the finite-null construction alone.

Contraction of the full finite null locus

We first prove the finite-null contraction assertion of [11] used in the nef and big cases. For an irreducible positive-dimensional analytic subspace VV, its top intersection with such a class is computed on a resolution of VV. Write

Null⁡(α)=⋃V⊂X irreducibledim⁡V>0, αdim⁡V⋅V=0V\operatorname{Null}(\alpha)=\bigcup_{\substack{V\subset X\ \text{irreducible}\\ \dim V>0,\ \alpha^{\dim V}\cdot V=0}}V

Proposition 3.2 (A finite null locus). Let XX be a normal connected ordinary Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial compact Kähler threefold with klt singularities. Let α\alpha be a nef and big real (1,1)(1,1)-class. Suppose that C=Null⁡(α)C=\operatorname{Null}(\alpha) is a finite union of curves. There is a proper bimeromorphic morphism ϕ:X→X′\phi:X\to X' to a normal compact analytic space such that ϕ\phi is an isomorphism on X∖CX\setminus C, and the underlying sets of its nontrivial fibers are exactly the connected components of CC.

Proof. The assertion is the identity map if CC is empty. Otherwise give CC its reduced structure and write C1,…,CsC_1,\ldots,C_s for its irreducible components.

We will construct a positive line on a resolution and use it to give the conormal of the full analytic inverse image a positive presentation. Grauert’s contraction criterion will then apply to that conormal.

An exceptional divisor and one actual positive line

Choose a projective resolution π:X^→X\pi:\widehat{X}\to X with smooth source which is an isomorphism over XregX_{\mathrm{reg}} and has pure divisorial exceptional locus [12]. Compactness makes the resolution a finite composition of blowups. Its source is compact Kähler: metrics of a relatively ample line can be patched using a partition of unity from the base, preserving positivity on the vertical tangent spaces, and a sufficiently large pulled-back Kähler form makes the curvature positive in every direction. Compactness supplies one constant for this last step.

Put β=π∗α\beta=\pi^*\alpha. Pullback of the metric nef approximations shows that β\beta is nef. We check the positive top intersection needed on the smooth source. By bigness choose a Kähler current TX∈αT_X\in\alpha with TX≥ωXT_X\geq\omega_X, where ωX\omega_X is a Kähler form on XX. Pulling back its local plurishubharmonic potentials gives

T=π∗TX∈β,T≥η:=π∗ωX.T=\pi^*T_X\in\beta,\qquad T\geq\eta:=\pi^*\omega_X.

The pulled potentials are not identically minus infinity, since X^\widehat{X} dominates XX. The form η\eta is smooth and semipositive. Fix a Kähler form κX^\kappa_{\widehat{X}}, and for δ>0\delta>0 choose a positive form bδ∈β+δ[κX^]b_\delta\in\beta+\delta[\kappa_{\widehat{X}}]. Wedge the positive current T−ηT-\eta, successively, with bδ2b_\delta^2, η∧bδ\eta\wedge b_\delta, and η2\eta^2. Integration and δ↓0\delta\downarrow0 give

β3≥β2[η]≥β[η]2≥[η]3>0.\beta^3\geq\beta^2[\eta]\geq\beta[\eta]^2\geq[\eta]^3>0.

The last inequality holds because η\eta is positive on a nonempty open set. All these products are on the smooth compact X^\widehat{X}; only a current wedged with smooth semipositive forms was used.

For an irreducible dd-dimensional positive-dimensional subspace V⊂X^V \subset\widehat{X}, projection of its fundamental cycle gives

βd⋅V={0,dim⁡π(V)<d,deg⁡(V/π(V))αd⋅π(V),dim⁡π(V)=d.(5)\beta^{d} \cdot V = \begin{cases} 0, & \dim\pi(V) < d,\\ \deg(V/\pi(V)) \alpha^{d} \cdot\pi(V), & \dim\pi(V) = d. \end{cases} \tag*{(5)}

The second case maps a null subspace into CC. In the first case its image is contained in the image of the exceptional locus, hence in Sing⁡X\operatorname{Sing} X. Normality of the threefold makes that singular locus at most one-dimensional. Thus every null subspace of β\beta maps into the set C∪Sing⁡XC \cup\operatorname{Sing} X of dimension at most one.

The smooth nef positive-volume criterion [12] makes β\beta big by (3.2). Collins–Tosatti [8] identifies its non-Kähler locus on X^\widehat{X} with Null⁡(β)\operatorname{Null}(\beta). Choose the Kähler current S∈βS \in\beta supplied by [3]. In that convention its analytic singularities are defined by one coherent ideal a\mathfrak{a} on X^\widehat{X} and one coefficient c>0c > 0, with E+(S)=V(a)=Null⁡(β)E_{+}(S) = V(\mathfrak{a}) = \operatorname{Null}(\beta) as sets. Principalize this global ideal by a finite sequence g:Y→X^g : Y \to\widehat{X} of blowups with smooth centers, using [12]. The source YY is smooth and compact Kähler. If aOY=OY(−Da)\mathfrak{a}\mathcal{O}_{Y} = \mathcal{O}_{Y}(-D_{\mathfrak{a}}), the logarithmic presentation and Poincaré–Lelong, in the cited normalization, give

g∗S=θ+[G],G=cDa≥0,g^{*}S = \theta+ [G], \qquad G = cD_{\mathfrak{a}} \ge0,

where GG is a finite real divisor supported over the singular set and θ\theta is a global smooth closed form. If S≥ϵκX^S \ge\epsilon\kappa_{\widehat{X}}, the equality off GG and continuity show that θ≥ϵg∗κX^\theta\ge\epsilon g^{*}\kappa_{\widehat{X}} everywhere.

Discarding blowups along Cartier centers, which are isomorphisms, choose for this finite composition an effective gg-exceptional integral divisor FF with OY(−F)\mathcal{O}_{Y}(-F) gg-ample. Such a divisor is obtained from the exceptional tautological divisors, giving earlier pullbacks sufficiently large positive weights. A smooth representative vv of c1(F)c_{1}(F) can be chosen so that g∗κX^−δvg^{*}\kappa_{\widehat{X}} - \delta v is Kähler for some δ>0\delta> 0: the curvature of −F-F is positive on the vertical kernels, and compactness bounds the horizontal and mixed terms. If gg is an isomorphism, take F=0F = 0. Consequently θ−ϵδv\theta- \epsilon\delta v is Kähler. With p=πgp = \pi g, we obtain

p∗α=κ0+[E],κ0=[θ−ϵδv] Ka¨hler,E=G+ϵδF≥0.(6)p^{*}\alpha= \kappa_{0} + [E], \qquad\kappa_{0} = [\theta- \epsilon\delta v]\ \text{Kähler}, \qquad E = G + \epsilon\delta F \ge0. \tag*{(6)}

Every prime of GG maps into C∪Sing⁡XC \cup\operatorname{Sing} X, and every prime of FF maps to a set of codimension at least two in X^\widehat{X}. Hence every prime of EE is pp-exceptional. The morphism pp is projective: projective morphisms compose over the compact base XX by [12].

Openness of the Kähler cone on the smooth YY permits a nonnegative rational divisor E′E' with the same exceptional prime support and coefficients sufficiently close to those of EE so that

κ′=p∗α−[E′]\kappa' = p^{*}\alpha- [E']

is Kähler.

Choose r>0r > 0 clearing its denominators, and put

H=rE′≥0,L=OY(−H).(7)H = rE' \ge0, \qquad L = \mathcal{O}_{Y}(-H). \tag*{(7)}

Thus HH is an integral exceptional Cartier divisor and LL is an actual holomorphic invertible sheaf.

We verify relative ampleness on every full fiber of pp. Let aa be a smooth representative of α\alpha with local potentials on XX, let ΘL\Theta_{L} be the curvature of a smooth metric on LL, and choose a Kähler representative for κ′\kappa'. Equality of Bott–Chern classes on YY gives a global smooth function φ\varphi with

rκ′=rp∗a+ΘL+ddcφ.r\kappa' = rp^{*}a + \Theta_{L} + dd^{c}\varphi.

Adjust the metric of LL by φ\varphi. On a base chart a=ddcρa=dd^{c}\rho, adding rρ∘pr\rho\circ p to its local weights makes their curvature rκ′r\kappa'. On a fiber, that added function is constant. The restricted weights therefore have strictly plurisubharmonic ambient extensions. The same weights define positivity on the full possibly nonreduced fiber: nilpotents do not change their values or the absolute values of transition units. The compact analytic positivity criterion and the proper fiberwise criterion [22] now show that LL is pp-ample.

Numerical ampleness on the projective inverse image

The compact reduced curve CC is projective, even if it is reducible or disconnected. Indeed, choose one point on each irreducible component which is smooth on all of CC and is outside the other components. Their sum is an effective Cartier divisor. Its canonical section is nonzero and has a zero on each positive-dimensional irreducible subspace of CC. The positivity lemma in Section 3.4 of [26], followed by Section 3.2, Satz 2, makes its line positive and ample. Fix a very ample line AA on CC.

Put

D=(p−1C)red,fD:D→C,LD=L∣D.D=(p^{-1}C)_{\mathrm{red}},\qquad f_D:D\to C,\qquad L_D=L|_D.

The reduced base change of pp is projective over CC. Since CC is compact and projective and the final base is a point, the compact-base projective composition assertion makes DD projective [12]. Chow and GAGA allow DD and its holomorphic invertible sheaves to be treated as a projective scheme over C\mathbb{C} [50]. The space DD can be reducible, nonnormal, and of mixed dimension. The restriction LDL_D is the restriction of the actual line LL; a component of DD can lie inside HH.

Choose an ample line ADA_D on DD with a smooth curvature form ΘAD\Theta_{A_D}. For one integer q>0q>0 sufficiently large,

qrκ′∣D−ΘADqr\kappa'|_D-\Theta_{A_D}

is positive. To see this on the singular space, extend the local weights of ADA_D to finitely many relatively compact ambient charts covering DD, and bound their Hessians by the ambient Kähler form. This is the local-potential positivity convention. If Γ⊂D\Gamma\subset D is an integral curve, its image is a point or one of the CiC_i; projection on the normalizations gives (p∗α)⋅Γ=0(p^*\alpha)\cdot\Gamma=0. Therefore

deg⁡Γ(LDq⊗AD−1)=qrκ′⋅Γ−ΘAD⋅Γ>0.(8)\deg_{\Gamma}\left(L_D^q\otimes A_D^{-1}\right)=qr\kappa'\cdot\Gamma-\Theta_{A_D}\cdot\Gamma>0. \tag*{(8)}

The class of LDq⊗AD−1L_D^q\otimes A_D^{-1} is consequently in the dual of the closed cone of curves of the projective scheme DD. The numerical space is finite-dimensional. Kleiman’s line-bundle criterion [20] says that the ample ADA_D is positive on every nonzero class of the closed curve cone. Its minimum on a compact unit slice is positive, so its class is in the interior of the dual cone. The sum of an element of the dual cone and an element of its interior is again in the interior. Thus LDqL_D^q, and hence LDL_D, is ample. The ample subtraction in (8) supplies the uniform margin; strict positivity on individual curves alone would not give this conclusion.

The ample line LDL_D is the positivity needed for the contraction. The remaining ideal calculations transfer it to a positive presentation of the conormal of the full analytic inverse image, including its nonreduced structure.

The full scheme inverse image

Let c=IC\mathfrak c=\mathcal I_C, and define

J=cOY=im⁡(p∗c→OY),Z=V(J)=Y×XC,f:Z→C.(9)J=\mathfrak c\mathcal O_Y=\operatorname{im}(p^*\mathfrak c\to\mathcal O_Y),\qquad Z=V(J)=Y\times_X C,\qquad f:Z\to C. \tag*{(9)}

The space ZZ has its full analytic subspace structure, including possible multiplicities and embedded components, and Zred=DZ_{\mathrm{red}} = D. Put Km=p∗LmK_m = p_*L^m for m≥1m \ge1. It is a coherent ideal of OX\mathcal{O}_X: effectivity of HH gives Lm⊂OYL^m \subset\mathcal{O}_Y, and p∗OY=OXp_*\mathcal{O}_Y = \mathcal{O}_X by normality and proper bimeromorphy.

We use relative Serre vanishing in the following exact form. For a proper holomorphic map, a relatively ample invertible sheaf, a fixed coherent twist, and a compact part of the base, its positive higher direct images vanish there for every sufficiently large tensor power. This is [2], Definitions 2.1–2.2 and Proposition 2.5; it permits nonreduced complex spaces and assumes they are separated and countable at infinity. Those conditions hold for the present spaces and the relatively compact opens used next.

On a base open UU choose generators g1,…,gtg_1,\ldots,g_t of c\mathfrak{c}. Let QUQ_U be the coherent kernel in

0⟶QU⟶Op−1U⊕t→(p∗g1,…,p∗gt)J∣p−1U⟶0.0 \longrightarrow Q_U \longrightarrow\mathcal{O}_{p^{-1}U}^{\oplus t} \xrightarrow{(p^*g_1,\ldots,p^*g_t)} \mathcal{J}|_{p^{-1}U} \longrightarrow0.

Choose finitely many such opens with compact subsets whose interiors cover CC. Relative Serre vanishing for QU⊗LmQ_U \otimes L^m on these compact subsets and for J⊗Lm\mathcal{J} \otimes L^m over CC gives one integer MM for which the needed R1p∗R^1p_*'s vanish for every m≥Mm \ge M. Tensor the displayed presentation by LmL^m and push forward. Inside KmK_m, the image of Km⊕tK_m^{\oplus t} is exactly multiplication by the gig_i. Hence, at every stalk over CC,

p∗(J⊗Lm)=cKm(m≥M).(10)p_*(\mathcal{J} \otimes L^m) = \mathfrak{c}K_m \qquad(m \ge M). \tag*{(10)}

This is an image computation; it uses no projection formula for the possibly nonflat ideal c\mathfrak{c}.

Push forward the exact sequence

0⟶J⊗Lm⟶Lm⟶Lm∣Z⟶0.0 \longrightarrow\mathcal{J} \otimes L^m \longrightarrow L^m \longrightarrow L^m|_Z \longrightarrow0.

The other R1R^1 vanishing and (10) give the canonical isomorphism of coherent OC\mathcal{O}_C-modules

Pm:=Km/cKm=Km⊗OXOC→∼f∗(Lm∣Z),m≥M.(11)P_m := K_m/\mathfrak{c}K_m = K_m \otimes_{\mathcal{O}_X} \mathcal{O}_C \xrightarrow{\sim} f_*(L^m|_Z), \qquad m \ge M. \tag*{(11)}

In particular the full inverse ZZ, rather than only its reduction, occurs in this equality. No flatness or Cartier assumption on J\mathcal{J} has been used.

A positive presentation of the conormal

Let n=ker⁡(OZ→OD)\mathfrak{n} = \ker(\mathcal{O}_Z \to\mathcal{O}_D). This coherent nilradical satisfies ne=0\mathfrak{n}^e = 0 for one ee, by local Noetherianity and compactness of ZZ. For

Tm=Lm∣Z⊗f∗A−2,T_m = L^m|_Z \otimes f^*A^{-2},

the filtration njTm\mathfrak{n}^jT_m has quotients

(nj/nj+1)⊗LDm⊗fD∗A−2,0≤j<e.(\mathfrak{n}^j/\mathfrak{n}^{j+1}) \otimes L_D^m \otimes f_D^*A^{-2}, \qquad0 \le j < e.

Their coefficient sheaves are fixed and coherent on the projective DD. Serre vanishing for the ample LDL_D kills their H1H^1 for every sufficiently large mm. Induction on this finite filtration then gives

H1(Z,Tm)=0(m≫0).H^1(Z,T_m) = 0 \qquad(m \gg0).

Only H1H^1 of the subobject and quotient is needed at each step, so the embedded nilpotent layers are included.

Write Fm=f∗(Lm∣Z)F_m = f_*(L^m|_Z). Projection formula with the invertible A−2A^{-2} and the low-degree Leray sequence give

H1(C,Fm⊗A−2)=H1(C,f∗Tm)⟶H1(Z,Tm)=0.(12)H^1(C,F_m \otimes A^{-2}) = H^1(C,f_*T_m) \longrightarrow H^1(Z,T_m) = 0. \tag*{(12)}

This does not assert vanishing of R1f∗TmR^{1}f_{*}T_{m}. Embed i:C↪Pni:C\hookrightarrow\mathbb{P}^{n} by AA. By GAGA the coherent sheaf FmF_{m} is algebraic. The sheaf i∗(Fm⊗A−1)i_{*}(F_{m}\otimes A^{-1}) is 0-regular: its degree-one condition is (12), and all higher conditions vanish since its support has dimension at most one. Castelnuovo–Mumford regularity [54], Tag 08A8, Lemma 33.35.12 gives a surjection

A⊕nm⟶Fm=Pm⟶0(13)A^{\oplus n_m}\longrightarrow F_m=P_m\longrightarrow0 \tag*{(13)}

Coherent torsion is allowed in this argument.

Fix one such mm. We first check that C⊂V(Km)C\subset V(K_m). For each ClC_l, the projective DD contains an integral curve Γ\Gamma dominating ClC_l: take a component dominating ClC_l and cut by sufficiently general ample hyperplanes, taking the component itself when it is a curve. From (p∗α)⋅Γ=0(p^{*}\alpha)\cdot\Gamma=0 and κ′⋅Γ>0\kappa'\cdot\Gamma>0 we obtain E′⋅Γ<0E'\cdot\Gamma<0. If Γ\Gamma were not contained in the support of the effective Cartier divisor HH, its canonical section on the normalization of Γ\Gamma would give nonnegative degree, a contradiction. Thus an irreducible component of HH contains Γ\Gamma. Its image contains ClC_l and has dimension at most one by exceptionality, so that image equals ClC_l. At every point of ClC_l a unit germ on XX pulls back to a unit and cannot vanish along that component. Hence KmK_m is a proper ideal at every point of CC.

Outside p(H)p(H), the ideal KmK_m equals OX\mathcal{O}_X. The image of each exceptional prime has codimension at least two in the normal threefold. It follows that V(Km)redV(K_m)_{\mathrm{red}} is a finite union of curves and points. Since it contains every ClC_l, each ClC_l is one of its irreducible curve components. Let BB be the union of its irreducible components other than the selected curves ClC_l, and put b=IB\mathfrak b=I_B. Define

I=(Km:b∞).I=(K_m:\mathfrak b^\infty).

This is a coherent ideal with one global finite saturation exponent. Indeed, for each integer j≥0j\geq0, the ideal (Km:bj)(K_m:\mathfrak b^j) is the kernel of the coherent morphism OX→Hom(bj,OX/Km)\mathcal{O}_X\to\mathcal{H}om(\mathfrak b^j,\mathcal{O}_X/K_m). The ascending chain stabilizes at each stalk by Noetherianity. Equality of two successive coherent ideals then holds on a neighborhood, and the colon recursion gives all later equalities there. Compactness supplies one exponent for all of XX.

On X∖BX\setminus B we have I=KmI=K_m. On X∖CX\setminus C, the analytic Nullstellensatz puts a local power of b\mathfrak b inside KmK_m, so I=OXI=\mathcal{O}_X. Closure of the dense parts Cl∖BC_l\setminus B now gives

V(I)red=C,I=c.V(I)_{\mathrm{red}}=C,\qquad\sqrt{I}=\mathfrak c.

The set B∩CB\cap C is finite. The induced map

Pm=Km/cKm⟶Q:=I/cIP_m=K_m/\mathfrak cK_m\longrightarrow Q:=I/\mathfrak cI

is therefore an isomorphism away from finitely many points of CC. After tensoring by A−2A^{-2}, its kernel and cokernel are still point-supported. Splitting through its image, the two long exact sequences, (12), and the vanishing of positive cohomology of point-supported sheaves give

H1(C,Q⊗A−2)=0.H^1(C,Q\otimes A^{-2})=0.

Here a coherent sheaf on the projective curve has no H2H^2. The same regularity argument as above gives

A⊕NQ⟶Q⟶0(14)A^{\oplus N_Q}\longrightarrow Q\longrightarrow0 \tag*{(14)}

Since I⊂cI\subset\mathfrak c, right exactness of restriction gives the actual conormal identity

Q=I/cI=(I/I2)⊗OXOC.(15)Q=I/\mathfrak cI=(I/I^2)\otimes_{\mathcal{O}_X}\mathcal{O}_C. \tag*{(15)}

Its support is all of CC. At each point there, II is a nonzero proper finitely generated ideal and c\mathfrak c lies in the maximal ideal, so Nakayama gives I/cI≠0I/\mathfrak cI\ne0. Nonzeroness of the ideal also follows from its one-dimensional zero set in the normal threefold.

The coherent conormal contraction criterion

For a coherent ideal, Grauert’s associated normal linear space is defined by its local linear relations. Restricting a finite presentation of II to CC presents the module in (15). Thus the reduced associated space in Sections 3.6–3.7 of [26] is

NI=(Specan⁡CSym⁡Q)red.N_I = \left(\operatorname{Specan}_C \operatorname{Sym} Q\right)_{\mathrm{red}}.

This definition does not require QQ to be locally free. The surjection (14) embeds NIN_I as a closed reduced linear subspace of Tot⁡((A−1)⊕NQ)\operatorname{Tot}((A^{-1})^{\oplus N_Q}).

Put VA=H0(C,A)∗V_A = H^0(C,A)^*. The very ample embedding C↪P(VA)C \hookrightarrow\mathbb{P}(V_A), where P(VA)\mathbb{P}(V_A) parametrizes lines, identifies A−1A^{-1} with the restricted tautological line. Consequently Tot⁡((A−1)⊕NQ)\operatorname{Tot}((A^{-1})^{\oplus N_Q}) is closed in C×VANQC \times V_A^{N_Q}. Its projection to VANQV_A^{N_Q} is proper because CC is compact, and it is an analytic embedding off the zero section: on the open set where its jj-th vector is nonzero, projectivization to that vector’s line, followed by the inverse of the embedding of CC on its image, recovers the base point holomorphically. The squared Euclidean norm of this projection is strictly plurisubharmonic off the zero section. Its positive sublevels are relatively compact neighborhoods of that section with strongly pseudoconvex boundaries; scalar multiplication gives a nonzero radial derivative at every positive level. Restricting them to NIN_I proves exactly the weak negativity of this reduced linear space, including when CC is singular or disconnected and QQ has torsion.

Grauert’s Section 3.7, Satz 8, applies to any coherent ideal with the given compact zero set and with weakly negative associated normal linear space [26]. It does not require the ideal to be radical or locally principal. The ambient XX is reduced and normal, and its compact zero set CC is a union of curves with no isolated points. The criterion therefore makes CC exceptional. Section 2, Definition 3 and Satz 5, of that source give a global proper surjective holomorphic map ϕ:X→X′\phi: X \to X' with ϕ(C)\phi(C) discrete, ϕ−1(ϕ(C))=C\phi^{-1}(\phi(C)) = C as underlying sets, and

X∖C≃X′∖ϕ(C).X \setminus C \simeq X' \setminus\phi(C).

The Remmert reduction used there has connected fibers. Hence each connected component of CC has one image point and two components cannot have the same image. Its normality statement for a normal source (p. 337) makes the Remmert-reduced target neighborhood normal; gluing it to the unchanged normal complement makes X′X' normal. Compactness of XX makes X′X' compact, and the complement isomorphism makes ϕ\phi bimeromorphic. This proves the proposition. □

The proposition supplies the normal compact analytic contraction and its fiber sets. The later assertions that a target is Kähler and that a class descends to a Kähler class are separate inputs.

Lemma 3.3 (Finiteness when there is no null surface). Let XX be a normal connected compact Kähler threefold, and let α\alpha be nef and big. If no irreducible surface has zero top intersection with α\alpha, then Null⁡(α)\operatorname{Null}(\alpha) is a finite union of curves, possibly empty.

Proof. Use a projective resolution π:X^→X\pi: \widehat{X} \to X with smooth compact Kähler source as above. The class β=π∗α\beta= \pi^*\alpha is nef with positive cube by (3.2). Collins–Tosatti makes Null⁡(β)\operatorname{Null}(\beta) a proper analytic set.

Each irreducible component ZZ of this analytic set is itself null. It has positive dimension, since each of its points lies on a positive-dimensional null subspace. Suppose instead that βdim⁡Z⋅Z>0\beta^{\dim Z} \cdot Z > 0. Resolve ZZ projectively. The restricted pulled class on the smooth compact Kähler resolution is nef with positive top intersection, so Collins–Tosatti gives it a proper null set. Choose a point of ZZ outside the image of that set, the target nonisomorphism locus of the resolution, the singular locus of ZZ, and the other components of Null⁡(β)\operatorname{Null}(\beta). Such a point exists because these are proper analytic subsets of ZZ. By the definition of Null⁡(β)\operatorname{Null}(\beta), a null irreducible subspace passes through it. That subspace lies in ZZ, since the point is on no other component. Its strict transform is null for the restricted class, contradicting the choice of the point.

There are finitely many components of the compact analytic null set. By (5), each of its surface components is exceptional, since a nonexceptional one would map to a null surface on XX. Thus their images, as well as those of its curve components, have dimension at most one. For any downstairs null curve C0C_0, choose an irreducible component VV of π−1C0\pi^{-1}C_0 dominating C0C_0. Proper surjectivity supplies such a component. If dim⁡V=1\dim V = 1, cycle projection gives β⋅V=deg⁡(V/C0) α⋅C0=0\beta\cdot V = \deg(V/C_0)\,\alpha\cdot C_0 = 0; if dim⁡V>1\dim V > 1, it gives zero by dimension drop. Thus VV lies in an upstairs null component whose image contains C0C_0. Every downstairs null curve is therefore contained in the finite union of images. An irreducible curve in a finite union of curves and points is one of the curve components. There are therefore only finitely many downstairs null curves, as asserted.

Conormal layers and the contraction interfaces

We next prove the ordinary conormal statement used to extend a contraction of one prime floor to an ambient contraction. It concerns divisorial ideals and their actual reflexive powers. We then construct analytic base thickenings from the resulting direct images and apply the analytic blowdown criterion to obtain the ambient contraction.

Proposition 4.1 (Conormal layers of a prime floor). Let (X,S+B)(X, S + B) be an ordinary plt pair, where XX is a normal connected compact Kähler space, SS is an irreducible effective Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier prime, B≥0B \ge0 is a rational Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier divisor not containing SS, and KX+S+BK_X + S + B is an actual Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier adjoint. Suppose dim⁡S≤3\dim S \le3. Write the actual residue adjunctions as

(KX+S)∣S=KS+Θ,(KX+S+B)∣S=KS+BS.(K_X + S)|_S = K_S + \Theta,\qquad(K_X + S + B)|_S = K_S + B_S.

Let ϕ:S→W\phi: S \to W be a projective surjection to a normal compact analytic space with ϕ∗OS=OW\phi_*\mathcal{O}_S = \mathcal{O}_W. Suppose that the actual rational lines −(KS+BS)-(K_S + B_S) and −S∣S-S|_S are ϕ\phi-ample. For k≥0k \ge0, put

Ik=OX(−kS),Ek=Ik/Ik+1.\mathcal{I}_k = \mathcal{O}_X(-kS),\qquad\mathcal{E}_k = \mathcal{I}_k/\mathcal{I}_{k+1}.

Then SS is normal, (S,BS)(S, B_S) is klt, and each Ek\mathcal{E}_k is a rank-one reflexive sheaf on SS. For any positive global Cartier index qq of SS, there is a finite effective rational Weil divisor Ξk\Xi_k on SS, with qΞkq\Xi_k integral, such that

Ek[q]≃(OX(−kqS)∣S)⊗OS(−qΞk),0≤Ξk≤Θ≤BS.(16)\mathcal{E}_k^{[q]} \simeq\left(\mathcal{O}_X(-kqS)|_S\right) \otimes\mathcal{O}_S(-q\Xi_k),\qquad0 \le\Xi_k \le\Theta\le B_S. \tag*{(16)}

Here Ek[q]=(Ek⊗q)∗∗\mathcal{E}_k^{[q]} = (\mathcal{E}_k^{\otimes q})^{**} is formed on SS, and OS(−qΞk)\mathcal{O}_S(-q\Xi_k) is a divisorial reflexive sheaf, which need not be invertible. Moreover

Riϕ∗Ek=0(i>0, k≥1).(17)R^i\phi_*\mathcal{E}_k = 0\qquad(i>0,\ k\ge1). \tag*{(17)}

Proof. Choose an integer N>0N > 0 clearing the actual adjoint index and the Cartier indices of S+BS+B. On the common codimension-one locally free open, and hence everywhere by reflexive extension,

ωX[N]≃OX(N(KX+S+B))⊗OX(−N(S+B)).\omega_X^{[N]} \simeq\mathcal{O}_X\bigl(N(K_X+S+B)\bigr)\otimes\mathcal{O}_X\bigl(-N(S+B)\bigr).

Thus this reflexive canonical power is an actual line. In particular KX+SK_X+S is an actual rational adjoint; no global canonical Weil generator is being chosen. Subtracting the effective Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier boundary from discrepancies shows that (X,S)(X,S) is plt and XX is klt. Ordinary plt adjunction [9] gives normal SS and klt (S,BS)(S,B_S). With compatible residue embeddings, restriction of the canonical section of a Cartier multiple of BB gives

BS=Θ+B∣S,B∣S≥0.B_S = \Theta+ B|_S,\qquad B|_S \ge0.

The coefficient computation below also proves Θ≥0\Theta\ge0. The notation S∣SS|_S always denotes the restriction of the actual rational normal line.

The analytic quotient in codimension two

Fix a prime PP on SS. Near a general point choose a holomorphic equation vv for a Cartier multiple mSmS, and normalize the full finite root cover

tm=v.t^m=v.

The root algebra is reduced before normalization. It is free with basis 1,t,…,tm−11,t,\ldots,t^{m-1} over the normal local domain. Its generic Kummer algebra is reduced in characteristic zero because v≠0v \ne0, and freeness makes the map to that generic algebra injective. A nilpotent element must therefore be zero. Finite analytic normalization [34] gives a finite normal cover τ:Y→U\tau:Y\to U with its complete μm\mu_m-action. It can be disconnected, and we retain all components. The invariant subalgebra of its normalization is OU\mathcal{O}_U: in the total meromorphic algebra the invariants are the meromorphic field of UU, and normality of UU identifies its integral elements. Thus the quotient is the original normal space.

This cover is étale at every codimension-one point. Off SS, the equation is a root of a unit. At a general smooth point of SS, write v=uxmv=ux^m for a unit uu; after choosing a holomorphic root of uu, normalization is a disjoint union of the branches t=ζu1/mxt=\zeta u^{1/m}x. The lifted floor

SY=div⁡(t)S_Y=\operatorname{div}(t)

is reduced and Cartier. Its prime coefficients are one, and on a normal space the principal divisorial ideal with these coefficients is the radical ideal of their union.

The finite discrepancy formula is valid here in the analytic category. Normalize a base change of a model carrying a tested divisorial valuation. The Hurwitz formula for the corresponding discrete valuation rings and the actual identity KY+SY=τ∗(KX+S)K_Y+S_Y=\tau^*(K_X+S) give

a(F;Y,SY)=e(F/E)a(E;X,S).a(F;Y,S_Y)=e(F/E)a(E;X,S).

Extensions of the valuation of SS are exactly the height-one valuations of the lifted floor. All exceptional log discrepancies remain positive, so the lifted pair is plt. Applying the same formula without the floor shows that the components of YY are klt.

The lifted floor is normal. One can use the ordinary plt adjunction just cited, or the following independent connectedness argument. On a projective SNC resolution of the lifted pair, its coefficient-one locus is the union of the strict floor components, with no exceptional component. Two such components cannot meet: blowing up their intersection would give an exceptional log discrepancy zero. They are therefore disjoint and smooth. Lemma [2] gives the equality of their direct-image structure sheaf with that of the reduced floor. Factoring the map through the finite normalization of the floor, and applying normal bimeromorphic Hartogs extension on that normalization, identifies this direct image with the normalization sheaf. The equality forces the normalization to be an isomorphism. This use of the connectedness lemma is independent of any contraction existence assertion.

Choose a component P′P' above PP and a general point on it. The normal SYS_Y is smooth there, since P′P' has codimension one in it, and P′P' is smooth after a further generic choice. The ambient YY is smooth there as well. Indeed, in its local ring R′R' the nonzerodivisor tt has regular quotient R′/(t)R'/(t). Lifting its minimal generators and adjoining tt bounds the embedding dimension of R′R' by dim⁡R′\dim R', so R′R' is regular.

Remove the finitely many proper fixed loci on P′P'. At a remaining point its stabilizer G⊂μmG \subset\mu_m fixes P′P' pointwise. Holomorphic linearization can preserve the smooth flag P′⊂SY⊂YP' \subset S_Y \subset Y: average lifts of an eigenbasis of the cotangent space inside the respective invariant ideals, and use their independent differentials as local coordinates. The coordinates tangent to P′P' are fixed. The stabilizer has no ineffective element: its action sends tt to ζt\zeta t, and the nonzerodivisor tt forces ζ=1\zeta=1 for an element acting trivially on the local germ. A nonidentity stabilizer element cannot fix a transverse hyperplane, because τ\tau is étale in codimension one. Both transverse characters are consequently faithful. If r=∣G∣r=|G|, rescaling the generator gives the analytic germ

(X,S,P)≃((C2,{x=0},0)/μr(1,a))×Cdim⁡X−2,gcd⁡(a,r)=1.(18)(X,S,P) \simeq\left(\left(\mathbb{C}^{2},\{x=0\},0\right)/\mu_r(1,a)\right)\times\mathbb{C}^{\dim X-2}, \qquad\gcd(a,r)=1. \tag*{(18)}

The smooth case is r=1r=1. The local Cartier index of SS is rr: xrx^r descends, whereas invariance of a unit times xdx^d, evaluated at the fixed point, forces r∣dr\mid d.

On the quotient floor let z=yrz=y^r. Residue of the rr-th log-canonical power changes (dy)⊗r(dy)^{\otimes r} into a nonzero constant times z−(r−1)(dz)⊗rz^{-(r-1)}(dz)^{\otimes r}; the tangential factors are unchanged. The actual meromorphic residue embedding therefore gives

coeff⁡PΘ=r−1r.(19)\operatorname{coeff}_{P}\Theta=\frac{r-1}{r}. \tag*{(19)}

This derivation is on the analytic cover and does not infer a higher-dimensional analytic quotient theorem from an algebraic slice.

Depth and the canonical multiplication

The sheaves Ik\mathcal{I}_k are maximal Cohen–Macaulay on XX. Here is the index-cover argument at every point of XX. On a small open about an arbitrary point, repeat the full normalized root construction using a local equation for a Cartier multiple mSmS. Codimension-one étaleness and the discrepancy calculation above do not require the generic choice on PP. The klt components of this full cover YY are Cohen–Macaulay by the last assertion of Lemma 2.1; its proof uses relative vanishing, canonical torsion-freeness, and coherent duality. The total meromorphic Kummer algebra has basis 1,t,…,tm−11,t,\ldots,t^{m-1}, even when it splits. Its character-jj holomorphic summand on this open is

OX(jS)tj(0≤j<m).\mathcal{O}_X(jS)t^j \qquad(0\leq j<m).

Indeed regularity in each height-one discrete valuation ring requires the coefficient to have order at least −j-j along SS and at least zero elsewhere. Normality supplies the equality of these sheaves. Up to tensoring by the actual Cartier line of a multiple of mSmS, these are all the Ik\mathcal{I}_k. Averaging over μm\mu_m splits them as modules.

For the depth assertion, let R=OX,xR=\mathcal{O}_{X,x} have dimension dd and choose a system of parameters. Every normalization component dominates the base open: the generic Kummer algebra is a separable product of fields, and the full normalization retains all of those components. Thus each local ring of YY above xx has dimension dd, and finiteness makes the extended parameter ideal primary for its maximal ideal. Cohen–Macaulayness upstairs makes the same parameter sequence regular. Testing at all upstairs maximal ideals makes it regular on the finite semilocal RR-module (τ∗OY)x(\tau_* \mathcal{O}_Y)_x. It remains regular on each split summand, and hence on Ik\mathcal{I}_k. No flatness of the finite cover is used.

Divisor orders give IjIℓ⊂Ij+ℓ\mathcal{I}_j\mathcal{I}_\ell\subset\mathcal{I}_{j+\ell}; also I1\mathcal{I}_1 is the reduced ideal of SS. Thus Ek\mathcal{E}_k is a coherent sheaf on SS. The depth lemma in

0⟶Ik+1⟶Ik⟶Ek⟶00 \longrightarrow\mathcal{I}_{k+1} \longrightarrow\mathcal{I}_k \longrightarrow\mathcal{E}_k \longrightarrow0

gives depth at least dim⁡X−1\dim X - 1 along SS. The quotient has generic rank one on the irreducible SS, so its support is all of SS and has local dimension dim⁡X−1\dim X - 1. Depth cannot exceed this dimension, and equality follows. Thus it is Cohen–Macaulay on SS, has no embedded associated component, and is torsion-free and S2S_2. Normality of SS makes it rank-one reflexive.

In (18), exactness of finite-group invariants identifies

Ek=(xkC{y,u})μr.\mathcal{E}_k = \left(x^k \mathbb{C}\{y,\mathbf{u}\}\right)^{\mu_r}.

where u\mathbf{u} denotes the fixed tangential coordinates. Let jk,Pj_{k,P} be the unique integer with

0≤jk,P<r,k+ajk,P≡0(modr).0 \leq j_{k,P} < r, \qquad k + a j_{k,P} \equiv0 \pmod{r}.

Each invariant series factors as xkyjk,Ph(yr,u)x^k y^{j_{k,P}}h(y^r,\mathbf{u}). Hence this is a free rank-one module at the general point of PP, and its rr-th multiplication into the degree krkr layer is

(xkyjk,P)r=(xr)kzjk,P.\left(x^k y^{j_{k,P}}\right)^r = (x^r)^k z^{j_{k,P}}.

Relative to the local frame (xr)k(x^r)^k of the actual line OX(−krS)∣S\mathcal{O}_X(-krS)|_S, its vanishing order is jk,Pj_{k,P}. By (19),

ξk,P:=jk,Prsatisfies0≤ξk,P≤coeff⁡PΘ.(20)\xi_{k,P} := \frac{j_{k,P}}{r} \qquad\text{satisfies} \qquad0 \leq\xi_{k,P} \leq\operatorname{coeff}_P \Theta. \tag*{(20)}

Now choose the global Cartier index qq in the statement. Multiplication of the divisorial filtration defines a canonical global map

μk:Ek⊗q⟶Ekq=OX(−kqS)∣S=:Ak.(21)\mu_k : \mathcal{E}_k^{\otimes q} \longrightarrow\mathcal{E}_{kq} = \mathcal{O}_X(-kqS)|_S =: \mathcal{A}_k. \tag*{(21)}

Replacing one factor by Ik+1\mathcal{I}_{k+1} raises its product into Ikq+1\mathcal{I}_{kq+1}, so the map is well defined. The equality on the right follows from Ikq+1=I1⊗OX(−kqS)\mathcal{I}_{kq+1} = \mathcal{I}_1 \otimes\mathcal{O}_X(-kqS). The image Jk\mathcal{J}_k is a coherent rank-one subsheaf of the actual line Ak\mathcal{A}_k. Its reflexive hull is that line tensored with the divisorial ideal of an effective integral Weil divisor. At every codimension-one point the source of μk\mu_k is free and the map is injective. Thus its reflexive hull is canonically the same Jk∗∗\mathcal{J}_k^{**}.

The local index rr divides qq, so the order of μk\mu_k at PP is qjk,P/rqj_{k,P}/r. Define Ξk=∑Pξk,PP\Xi_k = \sum_P \xi_{k,P}P. It is finite, either from the coherent image on the compact SS or from the bound by Θ≤BS\Theta\leq B_S. Taking the reflexive image in (21) gives exactly (16). The canonical map into the specified target line supplies the global identity and excludes an undetermined line-bundle factor.

Vanishing on a small floor model

We use the projective relative MMP in dimension at most three to obtain a small ordinary Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial model p:S′→Sp : S' \to S. For precision, take a projective log resolution of (S,BS)(S,B_S), principalizing the coherent ideal of its finite boundary support; no individual Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier assumption on BSB_S is required. Give each exceptional prime an effective rational coefficient below one and strictly above its crepant coefficient. For the resulting effective SNC klt boundary CS′C_{S}^{\prime},

KS′+CS′=ρ∗(KS+BS)+F,F≥0K_{S}^{\prime}+C_{S}^{\prime}=\rho^{*}(K_{S}+B_{S})+F,\qquad F\geq0

with FF exceptional and positive on every exceptional prime. This is the actual meromorphic adjoint identity. The adjoint is relatively pseudo-effective. The morphism is a projective surjection between normal compact analytic spaces, the source is smooth and ordinary Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial, and its dimension is at most three. Thus [11] applies. On its relative minimal model the transform of FF is exceptional and relatively nef, so negativity [55] makes it zero. No step extracts a prime, hence the resulting p:S′→Sp:S^{\prime}\to S is small and projective. The source is ordinary globally Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial and compact Kähler, and codimension-one comparison gives the actual crepant identity

KS′+BS′=p∗(KS+BS)(22)K_{S^{\prime}}+B_{S^{\prime}}=p^{*}(K_{S}+B_{S}) \tag*{(22)}

with the strict boundary and a klt pair. This uses the relative projective MMP as an external input; it is separate from the global contraction construction considered here.

The finite strict transform Ξk′\Xi_{k}^{\prime} is Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier by ordinary global Q\mathbb{Q}-factoriality, as is Bk′B_{k}^{\prime}. Put Bk′=BS′′−Ξk′B_{k}^{\prime}=B_{S^{\prime}}^{\prime}-\Xi_{k}^{\prime}. It is effective by (16). Pullback of the effective Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier Ξk′\Xi_{k}^{\prime} lowers the crepant coefficients of the klt pair, so (S′,Bk′)(S^{\prime},B_{k}^{\prime}) is klt.

Work over a connected relatively compact Stein open U⊂WU\subset W whose closure lies in a chosen larger open. Properness and connected fibers make SUS_{U} connected, and normality then makes it irreducible. Relative generation for a large twist by a ϕ\phi-ample line [12], followed by Cartan generation on the Stein base, gives a meromorphic section of Ek∣SU\mathcal{E}_{k}|_{S_{U}}: take the quotient of a nonzero section of the twist and a nonzero section of the twisting line. The same argument applies to the actual line Ak\mathcal{A}_{k}. Write

Ek∣SU=OSU(Gk),Ak∣SU=OSU(Hk)\mathcal{E}_{k}|_{S_{U}}=\mathcal{O}_{S_{U}}(G_{k}),\qquad\mathcal{A}_{k}|_{S_{U}}=\mathcal{O}_{S_{U}}(H_{k})

for the resulting integral Weil divisor GkG_{k} and Cartier divisor HkH_{k}. Applying the actual identity (16) to these meromorphic sections gives a genuine principal relation

qGk∼Hk−qΞk.qG_{k}\sim H_{k}-q\Xi_{k}.

Let Gk′G_{k}^{\prime} be the strict transform on S′S^{\prime}. A small map has no local exceptional prime either. Strict transform therefore takes HkH_{k} to its Cartier pullback and a principal divisor to that of the pulled-back meromorphic function. It follows that

qGk′∼p∗Hk−qΞk′.(23)qG_{k}^{\prime}\sim p^{*}H_{k}-q\Xi_{k}^{\prime}. \tag*{(23)}

After clearing the global indices of Ξk′\Xi_{k}^{\prime}, the right side is Cartier. Hence the locally chosen integral Gk′G_{k}^{\prime} is Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier. This local assertion follows from the displayed identity; ordinary global Q\mathbb{Q}-factoriality supplied the index of the globally defined Ξk′\Xi_{k}^{\prime}. The actual adjoint in (22), together with the globally Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier boundary BS′B_{S^{\prime}}, also makes a reflexive canonical power on S′S^{\prime} an actual line. The same local generation argument supplies a meromorphic canonical generator for a local Weil representative if needed for the vanishing statement.

Equations (22) and (23) give

Gk′−(KS′+Bk′)∼Qp∗H,H=−(KS+BS)−kS∣S.(24)G_{k}^{\prime}-(K_{S^{\prime}}+B_{k}^{\prime})\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}p^{*}H,\qquad H=-(K_{S}+B_{S})-kS|_{S}. \tag*{(24)}

The right side pulls back the defined full adjoint and normal rational lines, and the locally chosen Gk′G'_k is Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier by (23). The line HH is ϕ\phi-ample. Projective analytic morphisms compose over a neighborhood of a compact subset of the final base [12]. Here WW is compact, so ϕp\phi p is projective over the whole base; equivalently one may use the compact closures in the local argument. Both pp and ϕp\phi p are proper surjections.

The difference in (24) is nef and big for both maps in the convention of [12]. Nefness follows by projecting vertical curves: a curve for ϕp\phi p maps to a ϕ\phi-vertical curve or a point, and the degree for pp is zero. For the relative Iitaka condition, clear the index and write H=OS(hH)\mathcal{H}=\mathcal{O}_S(hH) for a ϕ\phi-ample line. Normality and proper bimeromorphicity give p∗OS′=OSp_*\mathcal{O}_{S'}=\mathcal{O}_S, so projection formula gives

(ϕp)∗p∗Hm=ϕ∗Hm,p∗p∗Hm=Hm.(\phi p)_*p^*\mathcal{H}^m=\phi_*\mathcal{H}^m,\qquad p_*p^*\mathcal{H}^m=\mathcal{H}^m.

For large mm, the first relative complete system is pp followed by the relative embedding from Hm\mathcal{H}^m. Its image has relative dimension dim⁡S′−dim⁡W\dim S'-\dim W. The second has image the base SS, of relative dimension zero, equal to dim⁡S′−dim⁡S\dim S'-\dim S. These are exactly the two maximal relative Iitaka dimensions. For pp, relative bigness is this zero-relative-dimension condition; the pulled line has degree zero on its exceptional curves.

Analytic Kawamata–Viehweg vanishing [12] now applies to the effective rational klt boundary BkB_k, the integral Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier divisor Gk′G'_k, and each of the two proper surjections. It yields, locally over UU,

Rip∗OS′(Gk′)=0,Ri(ϕp)∗OS′(Gk′)=0(i>0).R^i p_*\mathcal{O}_{S'}(G'_k)=0,\qquad R^i(\phi p)_*\mathcal{O}_{S'}(G'_k)=0\quad(i>0).

The bijection of prime valuations for the small map, together with normal divisorial extension, identifies

p∗OS′(Gk′)=OS(Gk)=Ek.p_*\mathcal{O}_{S'}(G'_k)=\mathcal{O}_S(G_k)=\mathcal{E}_k.

This is an equality of meromorphic sections satisfying the same codimension-one order conditions. Leray gives (17) on UU, hence everywhere. This proves the proposition.

For k≥1k\ge1, put Sk=V(Jk)S_k=V(\mathcal{J}_k). The inclusions J1k⊂Jk⊂J1\mathcal{J}_1^k\subset\mathcal{J}_k\subset\mathcal{J}_1 show that Jk=J1\sqrt{\mathcal{J}_k}=\mathcal{J}_1, so these thickenings have the common underlying floor. Their conormal sequence is

0⟶Ek⟶OSk+1⟶OSk⟶0.0\longrightarrow\mathcal{E}_k\longrightarrow\mathcal{O}_{S_{k+1}}\longrightarrow\mathcal{O}_{S_k}\longrightarrow0.

Use the underlying continuous map ∣ϕ∣:∣S∣→∣W∣|\phi|:|S|\to|W| to put Bk=∣ϕ∣∗OSk\mathcal{B}_k=|\phi|_*\mathcal{O}_{S_k}. Then B1=OW\mathcal{B}_1=\mathcal{O}_W, and (17) gives epimorphisms of sheaves of rings on ∣W∣|W|

Bk+1↠Bk(k≥1).(25)\mathcal{B}_{k+1}\twoheadrightarrow\mathcal{B}_k\qquad(k\ge1). \tag*{(25)}

This is the immediate cohomological assertion used in [9]. Exactness is stalkwise, and no splitting of the augmentation Bk→OW\mathcal{B}_k\to\mathcal{O}_W is assumed. The next construction realizes these ringed spaces analytically and constructs the corresponding maps from SkS_k.

Analytic realization of the floor thickenings

Retain the divisorial ideals Jk\mathcal{J}_k, the thickenings SkS_k, the map ϕ:S→W\phi:S\to W from Proposition (16), and the sheaves Bk\mathcal{B}_k in (25). We construct their analytic structure from the already analytic source thickenings.

Lemma 4.2 (Analytic base thickenings). For every k≥1k \ge1, put

Wk=(∣W∣,Bk).W_k = (|W|,\mathcal{B}_k).

Then WkW_k is a complex space with canonical reduction WW, and the canonical sheaf evaluation defines a proper surjective holomorphic map ϕk:Sk→Wk\phi_k : S_k \to W_k with

(ϕk)∗OSk=OWk.(\phi_k)_*\mathcal{O}_{S_k} = \mathcal{O}_{W_k}.

Its reduction is ϕ\phi. The quotients Bk+1↠Bk\mathcal{B}_{k+1} \twoheadrightarrow\mathcal{B}_k define closed analytic embeddings Wk↪Wk+1W_k \hookrightarrow W_{k+1}. They commute with the embeddings Sk↪Sk+1S_k \hookrightarrow S_{k+1} and the maps ϕk\phi_k.

Proof. Canonical rings and their successive kernels. All direct images defining Bk\mathcal{B}_k first use the continuous map ∣ϕ∣:∣S∣→∣W∣|\phi| : |S| \to|W|. The equality B1=OW\mathcal{B}_1 = \mathcal{O}_W is the canonical equality for the holomorphic map ϕ\phi. Apply derived direct image for abelian sheaves to the conormal sequence. Its derived image on an OS\mathcal{O}_S-module is the underlying sheaf of the analytic higher direct image. To see this formally, an injective OS\mathcal{O}_S-module is flasque: for open sets V⊂UV \subset U, the extension-by-zero modules satisfy jV!OV↪jU!OUj_{V!}\mathcal{O}_V \hookrightarrow j_{U!}\mathcal{O}_U. Adjunction identifies Hom⁡OS(jU!OU,J)\operatorname{Hom}_{\mathcal{O}_S}(j_{U!}\mathcal{O}_U,J) with Γ(U,J)\Gamma(U,J), so injectivity of JJ makes the restriction of sections surjective. Flasque abelian sheaves are acyclic for continuous direct image. An injective module resolution therefore computes both the analytic module higher images and their underlying abelian-sheaf higher images. Thus (17) gives exact sequences

0⟶Fk:=ϕ∗Ek⟶Bk+1⟶Bk⟶0(k≥1).(26)0 \longrightarrow\mathcal{F}_k := \phi_*\mathcal{E}_k \longrightarrow\mathcal{B}_{k+1} \longrightarrow\mathcal{B}_k \longrightarrow0 \qquad(k \ge1). \tag*{(26)}

The displayed quotients are ring maps; exactness here concerns their underlying abelian sheaves. Proper direct-image coherence for the already holomorphic ϕ\phi [29] makes Fk\mathcal{F}_k a coherent OW\mathcal{O}_W-module.

In OSk+1\mathcal{O}_{S_{k+1}}, the ideal Ek\mathcal{E}_k is square-zero and is annihilated by I1\mathcal{I}_1: use Ik2⊂I2k⊂Ik+1\mathcal{I}_k^2 \subset\mathcal{I}_{2k} \subset\mathcal{I}_{k+1} and I1Ik⊂Ik+1\mathcal{I}_1\mathcal{I}_k \subset\mathcal{I}_{k+1}. Consequently the action of Bk+1\mathcal{B}_{k+1} on the ideal Fk\mathcal{F}_k factors through B1=OW\mathcal{B}_1 = \mathcal{O}_W. This is the OW\mathcal{O}_W-module structure on the square-zero ideal used in the following construction.

The composites of (26) are epimorphisms Bk→OW\mathcal{B}_k \to\mathcal{O}_W. Their kernels are

Nk=∣ϕ∣∗(I1/Ik),Nkk=0,\mathcal{N}_k = |\phi|_*(\mathcal{I}_1/\mathcal{I}_k), \qquad\mathcal{N}_k^k = 0,

by left exactness and I1k⊂Ik\mathcal{I}_1^k \subset\mathcal{I}_k. Since WW is reduced, Nk\mathcal{N}_k is exactly the nilradical. Each stalk of Bk\mathcal{B}_k is local: an element lifting a unit in OW,w\mathcal{O}_{W,w} has an inverse by a finite geometric series in the nilpotent kernel, whereas an element mapping to the maximal ideal is not a unit. Its residue field is C\mathbb{C}. Thus WkW_k is already a locally ringed space, and it remains to construct local analytic presentations for it.

A local analytic presentation from source functions.

Fix kk and w∈Ww \in W. Choose a local closed analytic embedding of a neighborhood of ww into an open polydisc. Lift the finitely many germs of its coordinate restrictions through Bk→OW\mathcal{B}_k \to\mathcal{O}_W, represent the lifts on a common neighborhood, and shrink the polydisc. This gives a closed embedding

i:U↪D⊂Cdi : U \hookrightarrow D \subset\mathbb{C}^d

and sections b1,…,bd∈Bk(U)b_1,\ldots,b_d \in\mathcal{B}_k(U) reducing to the coordinate restrictions. Put Z=Sk,UZ = S_{k,U}, the open subspace of SkS_k underlying set ϕ−1(U)\phi^{-1}(U). By definition, Bk(U)=H0(Z,OZ)\mathcal{B}_k(U) = H^0(Z,\mathcal{O}_Z).

For a possibly nonreduced complex space, a tuple of holomorphic functions defines a holomorphic map to affine space, functorially on structure sheaves [28]. Apply this theorem to the bjb_j. Their point values lie in DD, so the map factors as

g:Z⟶D.g : Z \longrightarrow D.

The same tuple theorem identifies its actual analytic restriction to the reduction with iϕi\phi, because the reduced coordinate functions are those of iϕi\phi. In particular ∣g∣=i∣ϕ∣|g|=i|\phi|. The restriction ϕ−1(U)→U\phi^{-1}(U)\to U is proper and ii is closed, so gg is proper; nilpotents do not change properness of the underlying continuous map.

The holomorphic map gg makes A=g∗OZ\mathcal{A}=g_*\mathcal{O}_Z a genuine OD\mathcal{O}_D-algebra. Its underlying module is coherent by the proper direct-image theorem [29], Theorem 1.1]. Directly from the underlying maps, as sheaves of C\mathbb{C}-algebras,

A=i∗(Bk∣U).\mathcal{A}=i_*(\mathcal{B}_k|_U).

Reduction gives an epimorphism A→i∗OU\mathcal{A}\to i_*\mathcal{O}_U. It is OD\mathcal{O}_D-linear because the actual analytic restriction g∣S=iϕg|_S=i\phi identifies the reduced action of every ambient holomorphic function with its restriction to UU. The target is the coherent quotient of OD\mathcal{O}_D by the ideal of UU. Hence its kernel N\mathcal{N} is a coherent OD\mathcal{O}_D-module. It is also a nilpotent ideal. Shrink DD once more and choose sections n1,…,nrn_1,\ldots,n_r generating N\mathcal{N} as a module. They are actual sections of OZ\mathcal{O}_Z whose reductions vanish. Since OD→i∗OU\mathcal{O}_D\to i_*\mathcal{O}_U is an epimorphism, subtraction of an ambient lift of a reduction gives the stalkwise module equality

A=OD⋅1+∑ν=1rOD⋅nν.(27)\mathcal{A}=\mathcal{O}_D\cdot1+\sum_{\nu=1}^{r}\mathcal{O}_D\cdot n_\nu. \tag*{(27)}

No splitting of the reduction map is used here.

Apply the tuple theorem again to the bjb_j and nνn_\nu. It gives

H=(g,n1,…,nr):Z⟶P=D×Cr.H=(g,n_1,\ldots,n_r):Z\longrightarrow P=D\times\mathbb{C}^r.

If j:U↪Pj:U\hookrightarrow P is u↦(i(u),0)u\mapsto(i(u),0), then ∣H∣=j∣ϕ∣|H|=j|\phi|, since the nνn_\nu are nilpotent. Thus HH is proper. The sheaf A′=H∗OZ\mathcal{A}'=H_*\mathcal{O}_Z is a coherent OP\mathcal{O}_P-module and the unit is an algebra map

θ:OP⟶A′.\theta:\mathcal{O}_P\longrightarrow\mathcal{A}'.

As sheaves of rings A′=j∗(Bk∣U)\mathcal{A}'=j_*(\mathcal{B}_k|_U), so its stalk at j(u)j(u) is Bk,u=Ai(u)\mathcal{B}_{k,u}=\mathcal{A}_{i(u)}, and its stalk outside j(U)j(U) is zero. The stalk identification uses the cofinality of restrictions of ambient neighborhoods among neighborhoods in the closed subspace UU.

The map θ\theta is surjective on every stalk. At j(u)j(u), any element of the target has, by (27), the form a0+∑aνnνa_0+\sum a_\nu n_\nu with aν∈OD,i(u)a_\nu\in\mathcal{O}_{D,i(u)}. The projection of HH to DD is gg, and the extra coordinate tνt_\nu pulls back to nνn_\nu. The element is therefore the image of the convergent germ

a0(z)+∑ν=1raν(z)tν∈OP,j(u).a_0(z)+\sum_{\nu=1}^{r}a_\nu(z)t_\nu\in\mathcal{O}_{P,j(u)}.

At all other stalks the target is zero. The kernel Q=ker⁡θ\mathcal{Q}=\ker\theta is a coherent analytic ideal [27], pp. 9-07–9-08]. It defines a closed complex subspace Y=V(Q)⊂PY=V(\mathcal{Q})\subset P by [27], Definition 2.2 and adjacent construction, p. 9-10]. Its support is exactly j(U)j(U), since the target stalk there surjects onto the nonzero ring OU,u\mathcal{O}_{U,u}. Under the homeomorphism with UU, its structure sheaf is Bk∣U\mathcal{B}_k|_U, and its reduction is UU.

Every germ of Q\mathcal{Q} pulls back to zero by the definition of θ\theta. The closed-subspace factorization criterion [27], pp. 9-04–9-05] therefore factors HH holomorphically through YY. Its sheaf map, under the identified structure sheaf, is the canonical evaluation

∣ϕ∣−1(Bk∣U)⟶OZ.|\phi|^{-1}(\mathcal{B}_k|_U)\longrightarrow\mathcal{O}_Z.

Indeed every germ of Bk∣U\mathcal{B}_k|_U lifts through the surjective θ\theta to an ambient germ, whose pullback is precisely its value as a section on the inverse image. This proves the assertion for every germ, not only the chosen coordinates.

Gluing and closed transition maps.

The ringed space (∣W∣,Bk)(|W|,\mathcal{B}_k) was fixed before any of the local choices. The presentations just constructed make each of its restrictions an analytic space by the local definition and adjacent construction in [27] Definitions 2.1–2.2 and adjacent prose. On overlaps the identifications are the identity on the same sheaf of C\mathbb{C}-algebras, and hence are analytic isomorphisms satisfying the cocycle condition [27]. This proves that WkW_k is a complex space. It retains the Hausdorff topology of WW, and its reduction is canonically WW. Write εk:∣φ∣−1Bk→OSk\varepsilon_k : |\varphi|^{-1}\mathcal{B}_k \to\mathcal{O}_{S_k} for the global sheaf evaluation. It is locally the holomorphic factorization above, so it defines φk\varphi_k. Its reduction is φ\varphi, and its underlying map is ∣φ∣|\varphi|; thus it is proper and surjective. The direct-image equality is the definition of its target structure sheaf, with the canonical unit as the identification.

For the closed transition, use the construction with HH at level k+1k+1 and restrict its coordinate functions to the closed subspace Sk,US_{k,U}. They give another proper holomorphic map to the same PP, with underlying map j∣φ∣j|\varphi|. Its unit is the composite

OP↠j∗(Bk+1∣U)↠j∗(Bk∣U).\mathcal{O}_P \twoheadrightarrow j_*(\mathcal{B}_{k+1}|_U) \twoheadrightarrow j_*(\mathcal{B}_k|_U).

The second quotient stays surjective under the closed embedding jj, as seen on its stalks. The last sheaf with this ambient action is coherent by proper direct image. The two units therefore have nested coherent ideal kernels, so their analytic subspaces give the required closed inclusion. These local inclusions glue because their ring maps are the fixed quotients. Naturality of the evaluation maps gives

εk∘∣φ∣−1(Bk+1→Bk)=(OSk+1→OSk)∘εk+1,\varepsilon_k \circ|\varphi|^{-1}(\mathcal{B}_{k+1} \to\mathcal{B}_k) = (\mathcal{O}_{S_{k+1}} \to\mathcal{O}_{S_k}) \circ\varepsilon_{k+1},

which proves commutativity with the source inclusions. No retraction Wk→WW_k \to W, Cartesian square, or realization of the infinite tower as one formal completion is asserted or needed. □\square

Extension of a prime-floor contraction

Proposition 4.3 (Extension from a prime floor). Under the hypotheses of Proposition 4.14.1, there are a normal compact analytic space ZZ, a closed embedding W↪ZW \hookrightarrow Z, and a proper bimeromorphic morphism F:X→ZF : X \to Z such that F∣SF|_S is the given map φ\varphi followed by that embedding and

X∖S≃Z∖W,F−1(∣W∣)=∣S∣,∣F−1(w)∣=∣φ−1(w)∣(w∈W).(28)X \setminus S \simeq Z \setminus W,\qquad F^{-1}(|W|)=|S|,\qquad|F^{-1}(w)|=|\varphi^{-1}(w)|\quad(w\in W). \tag*{(28)}

The natural map OZ→F∗OX\mathcal{O}_Z \to F_*\mathcal{O}_X is an isomorphism, and the fibers are connected. For a sufficiently divisible global index ℓ\ell of SS, the actual line OX(−ℓS)\mathcal{O}_X(-\ell S) is FF-ample; in particular FF is projective. More generally an actual rational line on XX whose restriction to SS is φ\varphi-ample is FF-ample. The target is in Fujiki’s class C\mathcal{C}.

Proof. Choose a positive global index ℓ\ell such that ℓS\ell S is Cartier and OS(−ℓS)\mathcal{O}_S(-\ell S) is φ\varphi-ample. Put

A=Sℓ=ℓS,A′=Wℓ,f=φℓ:A⟶A′.A=S_\ell=\ell S,\qquad A'=W_\ell,\qquad f=\varphi_\ell:A\longrightarrow A'.

Here AA is the full effective Cartier divisor, including its nilpotents; its local equation on normal XX is a nonzerodivisor. Lemma 4.24.2 makes ff a proper surjective holomorphic map of complex spaces and gives the natural equality f∗OA=OA′f_*\mathcal{O}_A=\mathcal{O}_{A'}. Cartier multiplication gives IℓIj=Ij+ℓ\mathcal{I}_{\ell}\mathcal{I}_{j}=\mathcal{I}_{j+\ell}. Hence, for every integer n>0n>0, on the full space AA one has

OA(−nA)=Inℓ⊗OA=Inℓ/I(n+1)ℓ.(29)\mathcal{O}_{A}(-nA)=\mathcal{I}_{n\ell}\otimes\mathcal{O}_{A}=\mathcal{I}_{n\ell}/\mathcal{I}_{(n+1)\ell}. \tag*{(29)}

Its finite filtration by Ij/I(n+1)ℓ\mathcal{I}_{j}/\mathcal{I}_{(n+1)\ell}, for nℓ≤j≤(n+1)ℓn\ell\leq j\leq(n+1)\ell, has successive quotients Ej\mathcal{E}_{j} for nℓ≤j<(n+1)ℓn\ell\leq j<(n+1)\ell. All indices are at least one. These filtration terms are OA\mathcal{O}_{A}-modules, because IℓIj⊂I(n+1)ℓ\mathcal{I}_{\ell}\mathcal{I}_{j}\subset\mathcal{I}_{(n+1)\ell}.

Let a:S↪Aa:S\hookrightarrow A and i:W↪A′i:W\hookrightarrow A' be the closed reduction embeddings. The compatibility in Lemma [4] gives fa=iϕfa=i\phi. Pushforward by a closed embedding is exact, so the composition identity for derived direct images of abelian sheaves gives

Rqf∗(a∗Ej)=i∗Rqϕ∗Ej=0(q>0).R^{q}f_{*}(a_{*}\mathcal{E}_{j})=i_{*}R^{q}\phi_{*}\mathcal{E}_{j}=0\quad(q>0).

The long exact sequences of the finite filtration in (29) therefore give

Rqf∗OA(−nA)=0(q>0, n>0).(30)R^{q}f_{*}\mathcal{O}_{A}(-nA)=0\quad(q>0,\ n>0). \tag*{(30)}

This uses no vanishing for E0\mathcal{E}_{0} and keeps the full Cartier thickening throughout.

The actual line OA(−A)\mathcal{O}_{A}(-A) restricts to OS(−ℓS)\mathcal{O}_{S}(-\ell S). The underlying map of ff is ϕ\phi, so the reductions of their fibers, as closed subspaces of XX, coincide: a reduced closed analytic subspace is determined by its support. Thus OA(−A)\mathcal{O}_{A}(-A) is ample on the reduction of every ff-fiber. For a line on a compact nonreduced complex space, ampleness on the reduction implies ampleness on the whole space. Indeed the positive metric from [22] has local strictly plurisubharmonic weights in common ambient embeddings, by its Lemma 2.4. The same weights define a metric on the original line, since the pointwise absolute values of transition units are unchanged by nilpotents. The converse positive-metric criterion gives ampleness on the full space. The proper fiberwise criterion [22] now makes OA(−A)\mathcal{O}_{A}(-A) ff-ample.

We apply the analytic blowdown criterion stated in [9], attributed there to [18]. For a reduced complex space, an effective Cartier divisor AA with its full possibly nonreduced structure, and a proper surjective holomorphic map f:A→A′f:A\to A', this criterion assumes ff-ampleness of OA(−A)\mathcal{O}_{A}(-A) and

R1f∗OA(−nA)=0for every n>0.R^{1}f_{*}\mathcal{O}_{A}(-nA)=0\qquad\text{for every }n>0.

It supplies a blowing down: a complex target ZZ containing A′A' as an embedded subspace, a proper surjective holomorphic map F:X→ZF:X\to Z whose restriction to AA is ff, and an analytic isomorphism of the complements. In its universal form it also supplies the natural equality of sheaves of rings

F∗SX,A,f=OZ.(31)F_{*}\mathcal{S}_{X,A,f}=\mathcal{O}_{Z}. \tag*{(31)}

Here SX,A,f\mathcal{S}_{X,A,f} consists along AA of the germs in OX\mathcal{O}_{X} whose restrictions lie locally in im⁡(f−1OA′→OA)\operatorname{im}(f^{-1}\mathcal{O}_{A'}\to\mathcal{O}_{A}), and is OX\mathcal{O}_{X} away from AA. This is a subsheaf of rings; no module coherence of this particular sheaf is used. The hypotheses of the stated criterion follow from (30) and the preceding ampleness argument. No flatness or reducedness of AA or A′A' is required.

The embedded A′A' is closed because it is compact. Its reduction embeds the original WW as a closed subspace of ZZ. The compatible reductions give F∣S=ϕF|_{S}=\phi followed by this embedding. Removing a subspace depends only on its support, so the complement isomorphism is X∖S≃Z∖WX\setminus S\simeq Z\setminus W. It follows that F−1(∣W∣)=∣S∣F^{-1}(|W|)=|S|, and the prescribed restriction to AA gives the fiber-set equalities in (28). Outside WW the fibers are single reduced points. These assertions concern underlying fiber sets over WW; they require no Cartesian square of the closed thickenings. The fibers are connected because the floor fibers are connected. The target is compact as the image of compact XX.

We next prove normality; it is not an extra conclusion assumed from the blowdown criterion. For every open V⊂ZV \subset Z, a section s∈OX(F−1V)s \in\mathcal{O}_X(F^{-1}V) restricts to a section on the open space

A∩F−1V=f−1(V∩A′).A \cap F^{-1}V = f^{-1}(V \cap A').

The equality f∗OA=OA′f_*\mathcal{O}_A = \mathcal{O}_{A'} makes this restriction the pullback of a unique section on V∩A′V \cap A'. Thus every germ of ss along AA satisfies the defining condition of SX,A,f\mathcal{S}_{X,A,f}. The reverse inclusion follows from SX,A,f⊂OX\mathcal{S}_{X,A,f} \subset\mathcal{O}_X. Consequently

F∗SX,A,f=F∗OX,F∗OX=OZF_*\mathcal{S}_{X,A,f} = F_*\mathcal{O}_X,\qquad F_*\mathcal{O}_X = \mathcal{O}_Z

as sheaves of rings, the second equality by (31). This reasoning uses equality of the displayed open subspaces, not of any closed fiber products.

The equality first makes ZZ reduced. The complement is dense: the inverse image of a nonempty open of ZZ is a nonempty open of XX, and therefore meets X∖SX \setminus S. The complement isomorphism thus makes FF bimeromorphic. Let ν:Zν→Z\nu: Z^\nu\to Z be the finite analytic normalization. The finite normalization exists by [34], Part B, Section 4, Corollaries 2–3. The dominant bimeromorphic map from normal XX lifts to ZνZ^\nu. Pullback along this lift gives inclusions, injective on the dense common complement,

OZ⊂ν∗OZν⊂F∗OX=OZ.\mathcal{O}_Z \subset\nu_*\mathcal{O}_{Z^\nu} \subset F_*\mathcal{O}_X = \mathcal{O}_Z.

The normalization is consequently an isomorphism and ZZ is normal. The natural direct-image equality also gives connected fibers by analytic Stein factorization.

Finally consider the actual global line OX(−ℓS)\mathcal{O}_X(-\ell S). Its restriction is ample on every reduced FF-fiber: this is clear off WW, and over WW the reduction is the same embedded reduced space as that of the corresponding ϕ\phi-fiber. The nonreduced upgrade and the proper fiberwise criterion used above therefore make this one line FF-ample. The same proof works for any actual ambient rational line with ϕ\phi-ample restriction after clearing its global index. In particular it works for the negative full adjoint in Proposition 4.1. Thus FF is projective. A projective resolution with smooth source of the compact Kähler XX is again compact Kähler, and its composite with FF is bimeromorphic. Hence ZZ lies in Fujiki’s class CC.

The proposition supplies the ambient step for floor data satisfying its stated hypotheses, including the two actual ample-line conditions. In the threefold argument below it extends divisor-to-curve contractions. In Section 5 it extends a selected floor contraction of the supported fourfold program. When that floor contraction cuts out the selected ray, the exact fiber description keeps the same contracted curves, and the actual relatively ample lines make the ambient step projective. Its target Kähler class is then established in the supported-program argument.

Descent of a dominating current

Lemma 4.4 (Descent of a dominating current). *Let p:Y→Zp:Y \to Z be a proper bimeromorphic morphism between normal compact complex spaces, with YY Kähler. Let η\eta be a smooth real closed (1,1)(1,1)-form with local smooth potentials on ZZ. Suppose that a positive current TT with local potentials represents the local-potential Bott–Chern class p∗[η]p^*[\eta], and that T≥κT \ge\kappa for a Kähler form κ\kappa on YY. For every smooth positive Hermitian form gg on ZZ, understood in local ambient embeddings, there are a constant c>0c>0 and a global quasi-plurisubharmonic function uZu_Z such that

η+i∂∂ˉuZ≥cg.(32)\eta+ i\partial\bar\partial u_Z \ge cg. \tag*{(32)}

This is a current in [η][\eta] with local potentials, and it has the bigness property preceding [12].

Proof. We make the potential in the class equality explicit. Use the normal-space potential description of Boucksom–Guedj [4], specifically Lemma 4.6.1 and the paragraph following Definition 4.6.2. The soft-sheaf descriptions of Bott–Chern cohomology by smooth functions and distributions first give a global real distribution uYu_Y for which

T=p∗η+i∂∂ˉuY.T = p^*\eta+ i\partial\bar\partial u_Y.

Locally write T=i∂∂ˉvT = i\partial\bar\partial v with vv plurisubharmonic and p∗η=i∂∂ˉhp^*\eta= i\partial\bar\partial h with hh smooth. Then uY+h−vu_Y+h-v is pluriharmonic as a distribution. By the cited lemma it is a smooth real part of a holomorphic germ. Thus uYu_Y is locally represented by a quasi-plurisubharmonic function. These representatives agree as distributions on overlaps and hence, after taking their upper-semicontinuous representatives, agree pointwise. They give one global quasi-plurisubharmonic uYu_Y, which is locally integrable and locally bounded above.

In local ambient embeddings, p∗gp^*g is represented by a smooth semipositive form and κ\kappa by a smooth positive definite form. A finite relatively compact cover of YY therefore gives a constant C>0C>0 with p∗g≤Cκp^*g\le C\kappa. Consequently

p∗η+i∂∂ˉuY≥C−1p∗g.p^*\eta+i\partial\bar\partial u_Y\ge C^{-1}p^*g.

The map pp is a modification between normal spaces, and uYu_Y has the local upper bound needed in the current descent argument. [12] gives a global quasi-plurisubharmonic uZu_Z with (32) for c=C−1c=C^{-1}. It is an L1L^1 potential, and the formula keeps the descended current in the chosen Bott–Chern class. The local potentials of η\eta give local potentials for that current. No Kähler form on ZZ has been used.

Threefold contractions used in the boundary argument

We prove Proposition 3.1 by applying the cited threefold MMP with two analytic constructions supplied here: Proposition 3.2 contracts the finite null loci, and Proposition 4.3 extends the prime-floor contractions. The projective relative MMP, the nonbig argument through a surface contraction, and the terminal canonical threefold program remain external inputs. We verify the hypotheses at each use of the two constructions, then supply the required target positivity; neither construction alone asserts that its target is Kähler. We first record the cone observation used in the big and floor cases.

For a normal compact space ZZ in Fujiki’s class C\mathcal{C}, put N1(Z)=HBC1,1(Z)N^1(Z)=H^{1,1}_{BC}(Z) in the local-potential convention. Let N1(Z)N_1(Z) be the vector space of real closed currents of bidimension (1,1)(1,1), modulo T1≡T2T_1\equiv T_2 when T1(η)=T2(η)T_1(\eta)=T_2(\eta) for every real closed (1,1)(1,1)-form η\eta with local potentials; the pairing is evaluation. Following [33], let NA⁡(Z)=NA⁡‾(Z)⊂N1(Z)\operatorname{NA}(Z)=\overline{\operatorname{NA}}(Z)\subset N_1(Z) denote the closed cone generated by the numerical classes of positive closed currents. Thus both notations used below refer to this same closed cone.

Lemma 4.5 (Positivity on the current cone). Let ZZ be a normal compact Kähler analytic variety with rational singularities, and let κ\kappa be a Kähler class. In the finite-dimensional local-potential numerical spaces put

C=NA⁡‾(Z),Σ={z∈C:κ⋅z=1}.C=\overline{\operatorname{NA}}(Z),\qquad\Sigma=\{z\in C:\kappa\cdot z=1\}.

Then Σ\Sigma is compact. If a real local-potential (1,1)(1,1)-class ℓ\ell is strictly positive on Σ\Sigma, then ℓ\ell is Kähler.

Proof. By [12], Lemma 2.3 and Proposition 2.4, the natural pairing is perfect, Nef⁡(Z)=C∗\operatorname{Nef}(Z) = C^{*}, and the Kähler cone is open with closure the nef cone. In particular κ\kappa lies in the interior of C∗C^{*}. A sequence in Σ\Sigma with unbounded norm would, after division by its norm and passage to a subsequence, give a nonzero class z∈Cz \in C with κ⋅z=0\kappa\cdot z = 0, contradicting that interior property. The slice is closed and hence compact.

If it is nonempty, let μ=min⁡Σℓ>0\mu= \min_{\Sigma} \ell> 0. Homogeneity gives ℓ−μ2κ∈C∗=Nef⁡(Z)\ell- \frac{\mu}{2}\kappa\in C^{*} = \operatorname{Nef}(Z). A smooth local-potential nef approximation for this last class, bounded below by −μκ/4-\mu\kappa/4, becomes a positive representative after adding μκ/2\mu\kappa/2. Thus ℓ\ell is Kähler. If Σ\Sigma is empty, then C={0}C = \{0\} by the interior property; the same conclusion follows because every class is nef and a positive small multiple of κ\kappa can be subtracted first. All cones here are the local-potential cones in the cited perfect pairing. □

The spaces used below have rational singularities: this is Lemma 2.31 of [11] for dlt pairs and its Remark 2.14 for klt varieties.

Proof of Proposition 3.1. The proof of [12], Theorem 5.5 first uses a projective relative small Q\mathbb{Q}-factorialization and then [11], Theorem 1.7. The latter proof passes to a small strongly Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial model and treats a nef nonbig class by its Theorem 5.5 and a nef big class by its Theorem 6.4. Here strong Q\mathbb{Q}-factoriality means that every global coherent reflexive rank-one sheaf has an invertible reflexive power. It implies ordinary global Q\mathbb{Q}-factoriality; it does not assert the analogous property for all analytic open subsets. The small models use the projective relative MMP of [11], Proposition 2.26 and Lemma 2.27, whose maps are already projective. Compactness of the final bases is retained when projective maps are composed, as required by [12], Remark 2.11.

The imported programs and target descent. The nef nonbig branch follows the chain Theorem 5.5, Corollary 5.4, and Theorem 5.2 of [11]. It uses Step 4 in the proof of [32], Theorem 1.4, p. 242, which contracts a negative-definite collection of curves on a smooth compact Kähler surface and descends through a graph. We use that nonbig argument as an external input. The pseudoeffective cone lineage also uses the terminal canonical threefold program: Assumption 10.1 of [13] invokes its nonvanishing Theorem 9.1, whose proof at p. 50 invokes [32], Theorem 1.1 for a terminal KK-MMP and Mori fiber space. We retain that terminal program as an external input. Together with the projective relative MMP just specified, these are the birational inputs used below.

For an already constructed negative-ray contraction with ordinary Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial compact Kähler dlt source and relatively ample negative adjoint, [6], Proposition 3.1 gives rationality of the target and descent of the supporting class. We use the proof of its Corollary 3.1 for target positivity. The corollary assumes non-uniruledness to obtain a nef support; our ray already has an exposed nef support. Its remaining argument descends that class, proves positivity on the target current cone, and lifts target curves through the projective morphism. These steps apply to the data just stated. The proposition and corollary numbers here are those of the journal edition. We now verify the finite-null and prime-floor constructions to which this argument will be applied.

Nef and big classes with a finite null locus. Three geometric situations use Proposition 3.2: a small negative ray, the entire null locus at a stopping model, and a small ray with pseudo-effective adjoint. The big threefold program uses strongly Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial klt sources. The last situation can also occur for ordinary dlt data, whose underlying space is ordinary Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial and klt, as checked below. In every case the relevant locus is the full top-intersection null locus of the proposition.

For a small negative ray, the small branch of [11], proof of Theorem 4.16, p. 40 has, after its boundary perturbation, a strongly Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial klt source and a nef big supporting class a=(K+Γ′)+κa = (K + \Gamma') + \kappa with κ\kappa Kähler. At this input [11] says that an aa-null surface is covered by aa-null curves. All those curves lie in the exposed ray. Such a covering of a surface contradicts the smallness of that ray. Lemma 3.3 therefore makes Null⁡(a)\operatorname{Null}(a) a finite union of curves, and Proposition 3.2 constructs its contraction. This argument permits a non-pseudo-effective underlying adjoint.

For the entire null locus at the final model XnX_n of the program in [11], the pair is strongly Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial klt, its class ana_n is nef and big, and every ana_n-null curve has nonnegative degree for the running adjoint AnA_n. These are the stopping data from that program. Its null-surface argument, using Lemma 4.5 of the same source, would cover a null surface by ana_n-null curves on which the remainder an−c1(An)a_n-c_1(A_n) has positive degree. Their AnA_n-degrees would then be negative, contrary to the stopping data. There is therefore no null surface. Lemma 3.3 again gives finitely many null curves. Apply Proposition 3.2 to their entire union. This use has no single-ray hypothesis and needs only the proper bimeromorphic map to a normal compact analytic target supplied by that proposition.

For a small ray with pseudo-effective adjoint, the branch in the proof of Theorem 6.4 at p. 50 invokes the small case of Theorem 2.23(1) of the same source; this case can also occur in its Theorem 3.1, Claim 3.2. Let AA be the negative adjoint and bb an exposed nef support for the ray. It may be scaled so that b−c1(A)b-c_1(A) is Kähler. To check this usual support step, normalize the closed cone of positive bidimension-(1,1)(1,1) classes by a Kähler class. Its normalized slice is compact. The continuous function −c1(A)-c_1(A) is strictly positive on its intersection with the exposed ray, hence on a neighborhood of that intersection. On the compact complement, the support has a positive minimum. A large multiple of the support minus c1(A)c_1(A) is consequently strictly positive on the full slice. Lemma 4.5 makes this difference Kähler. Since AA is pseudo-effective, the scaled bb is big. The same Lemma 4.5 and the smallness of the ray exclude null surfaces, so Lemma 3.3 and Proposition 3.2 apply. At the outer Theorem 6.4 use the pair is klt. If this step is made for the ordinary dlt data in Claim 3.2, the underlying space is still klt, which is the singularity condition of Proposition 3.2; a small decrease of the boundary preserves negativity when a klt adjoint is needed in a subsequent result.

In each of the two single-ray situations just described, the constructed map contracts exactly that ray. A positive-dimensional reduced fiber is a finite connected union of compact curves, hence is projective. For the corresponding negative adjoint AA, a positive global Cartier multiple of the actual line −A-A has positive degree on every irreducible component of that fiber, and is therefore ample on the fiber. It is ample also on every zero-dimensional fiber. Ampleness passes from a reduction to its nilpotent thickening by the positive-metric criterion [22], Lemma 2.4 and Corollary 1.12. The proper fiberwise criterion [22], Definition 3.1 and Remark 3.2 now makes this one actual line relatively ample, so the contraction is projective. Normality and proper bimeromorphy give connected fibers. The source is ordinary Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial klt, or dlt in the indicated variant, and the exposed nef support is unchanged. Thus [6], Proposition 3.1 and proof of Corollary 3.1, applied as specified above, gives the Kähler target and the descended supporting class. Thus Proposition 3.2 supplies the normal compact analytic contraction, and this postprocessing supplies projectivity and positivity in the single-ray cases. The entire-null cleanup uses the different argument that follows.

In that cleanup, write μ ⁣:Xn→Z\mu\colon X_n \to Z for the entire-null contraction just constructed. The graph argument in [11], proof of Theorem 6.4, pp. 51–52 descends its composite with the program to a morphism ψ ⁣:X0→Z\psi\colon X_0 \to Z, where X0X_0 is the original strongly Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial klt source of that theorem. All steps of the program are trivial for the transported supporting class. Before applying its Lemma 2.44 to ψ\psi, restore the original boundary Γorig\Gamma^{\mathrm{orig}} and the original nef big difference ωorig\omega^{\mathrm{orig}} on X0X_0, before the internal boundary replacement. The original supporting class is numerically trivial on its contracted curves, and hence

−(K+Γorig)≡ψωorig.(33)-(K+\Gamma^{\mathrm{orig}}) \equiv_{\psi} \omega^{\mathrm{orig}}. \tag*{(33)}

The left side is ψ\psi-nef and is ψ\psi-big for the bimeromorphic map. The rationality result of Lemma 2.44 thus applies to this original Q\mathbb{Q}-Gorenstein klt pair and makes the target ZZ rational. This step uses the original nef big difference; the transported remainder an−c1(An)a_n-c_1(A_n) on the stopping model is not substituted into (33).

For the entire-null contraction μ\mu, the source XnX_n is a normal compact Kähler klt threefold, so it has rational singularities. The target is normal and compact, and is in Fujiki’s class CC: a projective resolution of XnX_n with smooth source is compact Kähler, and its composite with μ\mu is bimeromorphic. The exceptional image EZ=μ(Null⁡(an))E_Z=\mu(\operatorname{Null}(a_n)) is finite. Every curve contracted by μ\mu is ana_n-null. Apply [11] to this map between normal compact rational spaces in class CC. It gives a smooth real closed (1,1)(1,1)-form ηZ\eta_Z with local smooth potentials such that

an=μ∗[ηZ] in the local-potential Bott–Chern group.a_n=\mu^*[\eta_Z]\text{ in the local-potential Bott--Chern group.}

The normalized graph constructed ψ\psi earlier; this application of Lemma 2.11 uses μ\mu.

We check the three analytic positivity hypotheses on ZZ. Fix a smooth positive Hermitian form gZg_Z in local ambient embeddings. The bimeromorphic nef descent theorem [33] applies to the normal compact threefold ZZ in class CC and the normal compact threefold XnX_n. It makes [ηZ][\eta_Z] analytically nef from (4.20); it does not assume that ZZ is Kähler. If its defining approximation uses a different positive reference form, compact comparison with gZg_Z and rescaling the approximation parameter give, for every δ>0\delta>0, a smooth function fδf_\delta with

ηZ+i∂∂‾fδ≥−δgZ.(34)\eta_Z+\mathrm{i}\partial\overline{\partial}f_\delta\geq-\delta g_Z. \tag*{(34)}

Changing a smooth representative of the same local-potential class only changes fδf_\delta by a global smooth potential.

The big class ana_n on the compact Kähler source contains a positive closed current TnT_n with local potentials and Tn≥κnT_n\geq\kappa_n for a Kähler form κn\kappa_n. In view of (4.20), Lemma 4.4 applied to μ\mu gives a global quasi-plurisubharmonic, hence L1L^1, function uZu_Z and a constant c>0c>0 satisfying

ηZ+i∂∂‾uZ≥cgZ.(35)\eta_Z+\mathrm{i}\partial\overline{\partial}u_Z\geq c g_Z. \tag*{(35)}

This establishes the required current bigness on the not yet Kähler target in the selected class [ηZ][\eta_Z].

Finally let V⊂ZV\subset Z be an irreducible reduced analytic subspace of dimension d>0d>0. Its strict transform V′V' is the closure of the inverse image of V∖EZV\setminus E_Z. It has dimension dd, maps bimeromorphically to VV, and is not contained in Null⁡(an)\operatorname{Null}(a_n). Nef approximations on XnX_n, their restriction to the integration cycle of V′V', and Stokes’ theorem give and⋅V′≥0a_n^d\cdot V'\geq0. Equality would put V′V' into the null locus by its definition, so the inequality is strict. The proper cycle identity μ∗[V′]=[V]\mu_*[V']=[V] and projection formula therefore give

∫VregηZd=and⋅V′>0.(36)\int_{V_{\mathrm{reg}}}\eta_Z^d=a_n^d\cdot V'>0. \tag*{(36)}

This includes V=ZV=Z; it requires neither VV nor V′V' to be normal. Additivity over the top-dimensional irreducible components gives the same positivity for every positive-dimensional compact reduced analytic subspace.

Equations (34), (35), and (36) are the three hypotheses of [12]. Apply that theorem directly to ηZ\eta_Z. It gives a smooth potential making ηZ\eta_Z positive definite, so [ηZ][\eta_Z] is Kähler and ZZ is compact Kähler. This verifies the positivity conclusion at the cleanup contraction.

Divisorial contractions. In the point case, let PP be the selected prime surface and ν:Pν→P\nu: P^\nu\to P its normalization. The nef-dimension-zero condition for the supporting class is taken on PνP^\nu; the whole normalized fiber has zero restricted class by [32], Theorem 3.19(a) and its proof, p. 234. Use [9], Corollary 4.4, whose proof invokes its Lemma 4.3, at the stated data: a Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial compact Kähler source, a nef big exposed support, ray curves covering PP, and zero restriction on PνP^\nu. The corollary constructs the proper analytic point contraction and its proof supplies an actual ample line OP(−mP)\mathcal{O}_P(-mP) for some m>0m>0. Thus PP is projective, and ampleness persists on the full possibly nonreduced fiber by the positive-metric criterion used above. The full-fiber criterion makes −mP-mP relatively ample.

Every curve of PP lifts finitely to its normalization. The zero restricted support therefore gives zero degree on every such curve, so its ambient class lies in the exposed ray. The negative adjoint restricted to PP is consequently numerically a fixed positive multiple of the negative normal line. Both have actual rational Cartier multiples. Numerical invariance of ampleness on the projective PP and then the full-fiber criterion make the negative adjoint relatively ample. The same [6], Proposition 3.1 and proof of Corollary 3.1 then supplies rationality, class descent, and target positivity for this negative-ray contraction. The point-contraction corollary was used to construct the underlying proper analytic map.

For a divisor-to-curve step, Proposition 4.3 supplies the ordinary extension used both in [11], Theorem 3.1, Claim 3.2 and in its replay in Theorem 4.16 of that source. We verify the two ample-line hypotheses for this use. Write (M,ΔM)(M,\Delta_M) for the strongly Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial compact Kähler dlt threefold there, A=KM+ΔMA=K_M+\Delta_M, PP for the selected prime floor, and RR for its exposed ray. The selected ray satisfies

A⋅R<0,P⋅R<0.A\cdot R<0,\qquad P\cdot R<0.

Adjunction makes PP a normal compact Kähler dlt surface and makes A∣PA|_P its actual full adjoint. For its inclusion i:P→Mi:P\to M, put

F={z∈NA‾(P):i∗z∈R}.F=\{z\in\overline{\mathrm{NA}}(P):i_*z\in R\}.

Fix a Kähler class κ\kappa on MM and a nonzero r∈Rr\in R. For z∈Fz\in F with κ∣P⋅z=1\kappa|_P\cdot z=1, positivity of κ∣P\kappa|_P gives i∗z=r/(κ⋅r)i_*z=r/(\kappa\cdot r). Thus on the full compact normalized vertical face

−(A∣P)⋅z=−A⋅rκ⋅r>0,−(P∣P)⋅z=−P⋅rκ⋅r>0.-(A|_P)\cdot z=\frac{-A\cdot r}{\kappa\cdot r}>0,\qquad-(P|_P)\cdot z=\frac{-P\cdot r}{\kappa\cdot r}>0.

This uses the cone of positive current classes and includes its limits.

Let ζ\zeta be the nef support exposing RR. Its restriction has null cone FF. The compact-slice argument just used makes ζ∣P−c1(A∣P)\zeta|_P-c_1(A|_P) Kähler for sufficiently large λ\lambda: near FF the negative adjoint has the uniform positive bound in (4.24), and away from FF the support has a positive minimum. Lemma 4.5 on the rational compact Kähler surface turns this bound into a Kähler class. The ordinary dlt case of the surface theorem [10], Theorem 2.32 therefore gives a projective surjection γ:P→WP\gamma:P\to W_P with connected fibers onto a normal compact Kähler space, contracting exactly FF, with the support pulled back from a Kähler class on WPW_P. This use is of the surface theorem.

Applying the same compact-slice estimate after adding a sufficiently large pullback of that target Kähler class makes each of −A∣P-A|_P and −P∣P-P|_P relatively Kähler over WPW_P. They have actual global rational Cartier multiples by the factoriality of MM. The proper fiberwise positivity criterion makes both lines γ\gamma-ample, including when a fiber is the whole surface. Put H=∣ΔM∣−PH=|\Delta_M|-P. For small rational ε>0\varepsilon>0, the pair (M,ΔM−εH)(M,\Delta_M-\varepsilon H) is plt with sole floor PP. Indeed on a dlt resolution the pullback of the effective globally Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier divisor HH is effective. Subtracting it preserves the strict inequality for every exceptional crepant coefficient and lowers all the other strict floor coefficients below one. The negative degree of A−εHA-\varepsilon H on RR persists for small ε\varepsilon, so the first relative ample line persists by (4.24); the second is unchanged. These are precisely the hypotheses of Proposition 4.3.

That proposition constructs the extension, whose fiber sets show that the ambient map contracts exactly the original ray and is an isomorphism off PP. The negative original adjoint is relatively ample by the same full-fiber criterion. Return at once to ΔM\Delta_M and AA for the running program. For this projective negative-ray contraction, [6] applies with the already exposed support, exactly as specified at the start of the proof. It gives rationality, class descent, and Kähler target positivity. Strong factoriality is preserved by [11], and an ordinary projective flip, when needed, is supplied by its Theorem 2.24. Thus the original support and boundary are the ones transported to the next step.

Return to the original threefold. The finite-null and divisorial constructions now supply the indicated steps of the cited big-case program, with their required positivity. Together with the external inputs stated at the start, they give the asserted contraction for the data in (4) by the proof of [11]. The proof of [12] descends the contraction from the small model. A pulled-back Kähler class has degree zero on a constant curve and positive degree on a nonconstant curve, as seen on its normalization. This proves the asserted curve criterion and completes Proposition 3.1.

For the separate exposure input, the proof of Theorem 5.2 and Corollary 5.3 of [12] uses the same Theorem 1.7 for the supporting contractions, followed by the projective relative cone theorem and convex separation. Its contraction inputs are therefore the ones just established.

The actual floor split

We verify the use of that specialization for the dlt floor in the fourfold supported program. Let (X,S+B)(X,S+B) be one of its compact ordinary Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial Kähler dlt pairs, with reduced floor SS, coefficients of BB below one, and actual adjoint A=KX+S+BA=K_X+S+B. Fix a prime TT of SS, and write H=S−TH=S-T, A0=A−H=KX+T+BA_0=A-H=K_X+T+B.

H=S−T,A0=A−H=KX+T+B.H=S-T,\qquad A_0=A-H=K_X+T+B.

The finite global divisor HH is Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier by ordinary global factoriality, and A0A_0 is an actual rational line. On a dlt resolution, subtracting the effective pullback of HH lowers the exceptional crepant coefficients and removes the strict transforms of the other floor components. Only the strict transform of TT has coefficient one. Hence (X,T+B)(X,T+B) is plt. Ordinary plt adjunction [9] gives a normal TT, an effective rational boundary B0B_0 with (T,B0)(T,B_0) klt, and the actual restriction A0∣T=KT+B0A_0|_T=K_T+B_0.

Choose one positive integer mm clearing the indices of A,A0,HA,A_0,H. The canonical section of OX(mH)\mathcal{O}_X(mH) restricts nontrivially to TT because TT is not a component of HH. Set

B′=1mdiv⁡(smH∣T)≥0.B'=\frac{1}{m}\operatorname{div}(s_{mH}|_T)\geq0.

It is an effective rational Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier divisor. Use compatible local meromorphic residue embeddings for the two adjunctions. Their ratio in codimension one on TT is multiplication by smH∣Ts_{mH}|_T. Reflexive extension on normal TT then gives the divisor split and actual line identities

BT=B0+B′,B_T = B_0 + B',
OT(m(KT+B0))≃OX(mA0)∣T,\mathcal{O}_T(m(K_T+B_0)) \simeq\mathcal{O}_X(mA_0)|_T,
OT(mB′)≃OX(mH)∣T.(37)\mathcal{O}_T(mB') \simeq\mathcal{O}_X(mH)|_T. \tag*{(37)}

where A∣T=KT+BTA|_T = K_T + B_T is the full dlt adjunction. This proves the split without assuming TT to be Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial.

Suppose, as in the supported program, that αT=c1(A∣T)+[ωT]\alpha_T = c_1(A|_T) + [\omega_T] is nef and ωT\omega_T is Kähler. These properties hold by restricting the ambient smooth metric nef approximations and local strictly plurisubharmonic potentials. For a sufficiently small rational ε>0\varepsilon> 0, put

Bε=B0+(1−ε)B′,ωε=ωT+εθB′,B_\varepsilon= B_0 + (1-\varepsilon)B', \qquad \omega_\varepsilon= \omega_T + \varepsilon\theta_{B'},

where θB′\theta_{B'} is the normalized curvature of a smooth metric on a Cartier multiple of B′B'. The full adjunction is lc and the lower adjunction is klt. Affineness of discrepancies in this convex combination makes (T,Bε)(T,B_\varepsilon) klt. On finitely many compact local embedding charts, the Hessian of θB′\theta_{B'} is bounded and that of ωT\omega_T is uniformly positive. For the chosen small ε\varepsilon, ωε\omega_\varepsilon is therefore Kähler and

αT=c1(KT+Bε)+[ωε].\alpha_T = c_1(K_T+B_\varepsilon) + [\omega_\varepsilon].

If dim⁡T=3\dim T = 3, Proposition 3.1 applies and gives a projective connected-fiber contraction T→WT \to W to a normal compact Kähler target with αT\alpha_T pulled back from a Kähler class. This is the use of [12], Corollary 5.6 in its Theorem 7.2. The restricted class αT\alpha_T is not assumed big, and its null face may have several rays. The contraction follows from the assembled argument in the preceding subsection, using Proposition 4.3 and the specified external results.

Reduction to a supported nef boundary

The positive-Iitaka-dimensional case is an application of a known Kähler abundance theorem. The purpose of this section is to prepare the remaining case for the two boundary arguments: from a nonzero divisor of a section in Iitaka dimension zero, we construct a nef dlt fourfold whose adjoint has a nonzero effective representative supported on exactly its reduced floor. We also construct the particular log resolution used to index and compare all strata of that floor.

Proposition 5.1 (Supported nef model). Under the hypotheses of Theorem 1.1, suppose κ(X,D)=0\kappa(X,D) = 0 and the normalized rational divisor MM of a nonzero plurisection of DD is nonzero. Then there are a normal ordinary Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial compact Kähler dlt fourfold (V,B)(V,B), with effective rational boundary, and a nonzero effective rational Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier divisor PP such that

A=KV+B is analytically nef,A∼QP,Supp⁡P=Supp⁡⌊B⌋,κ(V,A)=0.A = K_V + B \text{ is analytically nef}, \qquad A \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} P, \qquad\operatorname{Supp} P = \operatorname{Supp} \lfloor B \rfloor, \qquad\kappa(V,A) = 0.

The pair has the projective resolution described in Lemma 5.6.

The resolution has globally smooth distinct SNC strict boundary and exceptional components, all exceptional crepant coefficients are below one, and it is generically an isomorphism on the image of every intersection component of distinct strict floor primes. These properties let the floor argument index its strata by actual boundary intersections. The proposition will follow from the construction below; the final step uses the original nef adjoint to show that PP cannot disappear.

We use the following analytic negativity theorem at several points. If h:W→Zh : W \to Z is a proper bimeromorphic morphism of normal irreducible analytic spaces and EE is a rational Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier divisor with −E-E relatively nef, then

E≥0⟺h∗E≥0.E \geq0 \quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad h_*E \geq0.

This is [55], after clearing an index. In particular, an exceptional relatively nef divisor is nonpositive. When hh is projective, nonnegative degrees on its contracted curves give the relative nefness used in this theorem; see [55]. This relative curve test will not be used as a definition of nefness on a nonprojective compact Kähler space.

Positive Iitaka dimension

Proposition 5.2. Under the hypotheses of Theorem 1.11.1, if κ(X,D)≥1\kappa(X,D) \geq1, then DD is semiample on XX.

Proof. Das–Hacon–Păun’s dlt modification theorem [12] applies to a compact Kähler lc fourfold with effective rational boundary and Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier adjoint. It gives a projective bimeromorphic morphism

g:(X′,Δ′)⟶(X,Δ)g : (X', \Delta') \longrightarrow(X, \Delta)

with X′X' compact Kähler and ordinary Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial, the pair (X′,Δ′)(X', \Delta') dlt, and the adjoint crepant. The input is klt, so equality of discrepancies makes the output klt as well. The crepant equality is an equality of actual rational lines: pull a local pluriadjoint frame to a common resolution with smooth source as in (2.2), compare the crepant coefficients, and extend the identical meromorphic map across codimension two on the normal X′X'. Thus for a common index

OX′(m(KX′+Δ′))≃g∗OX(mD).\mathcal{O}_{X'}\bigl(m(K_{X'}+\Delta')\bigr) \simeq g^*\mathcal{O}_X(mD).

There is no possible undetected flat-line difference in this comparison. The pulled-back line is analytically nef by the metric criterion. Also, normality and projection formula identify all its sections with those of OX(mD)\mathcal{O}_X(mD). The meromorphic maps agree on the common dense open, so their Iitaka dimensions agree. Theorem 4.1 of Höring–Lazić–Lehn [31] states that a nef adjoint of a compact ordinary Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial Kähler klt pair of positive Iitaka dimension is semiample, unconditionally in dimension at most four. Its analytic positivity and canonical-sheaf conventions are the ones in use here. Apply it to (X′,Δ′)(X', \Delta'), then enlarge the generated degree to a multiple of the original index. All sections are pullbacks. A section nonzero at a chosen point above x∈Xx \in X descends to a section nonzero at xx; Nakayama’s lemma gives the evaluation surjectivity on XX.

A log-smooth supported representative

We next begin with a divisor of a section. No nefness is needed for the preparation in this subsection. The later proof that the support survives the minimal model program will use the nefness of the original adjoint.

Lemma 5.3. Let (X,Δ)(X,\Delta) be a normal connected compact Kähler klt pair with effective rational boundary and actual Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier adjoint DD. Assume κ(X,D)=0\kappa(X,D)=0, and let M≥0M \geq0 be a rational Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier divisor with M∼QDM \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} D. There are a projective modification p:Y→Xp : Y \to X with YY smooth compact Kähler, an effective rational SNC boundary BYB_Y, and an effective rational divisor PYP_Y such that

KY+BY∼QPY,Supp⁡PY=Supp⁡⌊BY⌋,κ(Y,KY+BY)=0.K_Y+B_Y \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} P_Y,\qquad\operatorname{Supp} P_Y=\operatorname{Supp}\lfloor B_Y\rfloor,\qquad\kappa(Y,K_Y+B_Y)=0.

The SNC support has globally smooth distinct components, and BYB_Y has coefficient one on every pp-exceptional prime and on every strict transform of a prime in MM.

Proof. Principalize the reduced coherent ideal of Supp⁡(Δ+M)\operatorname{Supp}(\Delta+M), using [12], Theorem 2.13 and Remark 2.14. This use of an ideal is important: the original boundary need not be Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier. The resulting modification has smooth source, is projective, and has locally normal crossing strict and exceptional support. Mark each of its finitely many global prime components separately as an ordered Cartier boundary and apply the ordered-boundary resolution of [53], Theorems 1.1.3 and 1.1.13. Its final indexed components and their intersections are smooth, and its complete support consists of strict transforms and new exceptional components [53], Lemmas 2.1.10 and 2.2.9(iv). Denote the composite by p:Y→Xp:Y\to X. It is projective over the compact base. A relative ample metric plus a sufficiently large pullback of a Kähler form makes YY compact Kähler.

Let GYG_Y be the crepant subboundary for DD, defined by the actual meromorphic pluriadjoint pullback. Then p∗GY=Δp_*G_Y=\Delta, and klt gives coeff⁡E(GY)<1\operatorname{coeff}_E(G_Y)<1 at every prime. Define BYB_Y only after the preceding resolution: assign coefficient one to the actual pp-exceptional primes and the strict transforms of primes in MM, and retain the coefficients of Δ\Delta on the other strict boundary primes. An exceptional label in the resolution bookkeeping that is not an actual exceptional divisor does not change this rule. This is an effective rational SNC boundary, hence dlt.

Set

PY=p∗M+(BY−GY).P_Y=p^*M+(B_Y-G_Y).

Pullback of the holomorphic equation of a Cartier multiple of MM makes p∗Mp^*M effective. On a strict prime of MM, the second summand has coefficient 1−coeff⁡(Δ)>01-\operatorname{coeff}(\Delta)>0; on an exceptional prime it has coefficient 1−coeff⁡(GY)>01-\operatorname{coeff}(G_Y)>0; on any other strict boundary prime it is zero. Thus PYP_Y is effective and its reduced support is exactly the floor of BYB_Y. The actual identity p∗D∼Qp∗Mp^*D\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}p^*M, together with (2.2), gives KY+BY∼QPYK_Y+B_Y\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}P_Y.

Choose an integer t>0t>0 at least the ratios of the coefficients of PYP_Y to those of p∗Mp^*M on every nonexceptional prime of MM. The positive part of PY−tp∗MP_Y-tp^*M is then an effective rational exceptional divisor EE, and

PY≤tp∗M+E.P_Y\le tp^*M+E.

For every sufficiently divisible nn, exceptional Hartogs extension and projection formula give

H0(Y,OY(n(tp∗M+E)))=H0(X,OX(ntM)).H^0\bigl(Y,\mathcal{O}_Y(n(tp^*M+E))\bigr)=H^0\bigl(X,\mathcal{O}_X(ntM)\bigr).

The space on the right has dimension one: it is nonzero and κ(X,D)=0\kappa(X,D)=0. The displayed divisor inequality bounds h0(Y,OY(nPY))h^0(Y,\mathcal{O}_Y(nP_Y)) by one, while effectivity makes it nonzero. This controls every sufficiently divisible degree. If two independent sections existed in another Cartier degree, their powers s0vs_0^v and s0v−1s1s_0^{v-1}s_1 would remain independent in a degree divisible by the fixed common index, a contradiction. Therefore κ(Y,PY)=0\kappa(Y,P_Y)=0.

Projective steps with Kähler targets

Apply the preceding lemma in dimension four. We follow the supported construction of Das–Hacon–Păun [12], Theorem 7.2] from the compact ordinary Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial Kähler dlt pair (Y,BY)(Y,B_Y). We isolate its three-dimensional floor-contraction input through Subsection 4.5 and use Proposition 4.3 for the ambient contraction. The construction below gives projective steps with Kähler targets and supplies the graphs needed for the discrepancy comparison.

Write (Xi,Bi)(X_i,B_i) for a nonnef running pair and Ai=KXi+BiA_i=K_{X_i}+B_i. At the start of this step, induction from PYP_Y gives an effective rational divisor PiP_i with

Pi∼QAi,Supp⁡Pi=Supp⁡⌊Bi⌋.(38)P_i \sim_{\mathbb Q} A_i,\qquad\operatorname{Supp} P_i=\operatorname{Supp}\lfloor B_i\rfloor. \tag*{(38)}

The equivalence is an isomorphism of actual rational holomorphic lines. It holds initially by the supported-model construction, and the one-step transform identity proved below supplies it at the next step only after the current step has been completed. Thus the representative used now is already available before constructing the current target.

The floor-contraction input in the proof of Theorem 7.2, using its Corollary 5.6, is the following assertion. There are a global irreducible floor prime TT, a Kähler form ωi\omega_i on XiX_i, a projective contraction φ:T→W\varphi:T\to W to a normal compact Kähler space with φ∗OT=OW\varphi_*\mathcal O_T=\mathcal O_W, and a Kähler form ωW\omega_W. The class αi=c1(Ai)+[ωi]\alpha_i=c_1(A_i)+[\omega_i] is nef and big but not Kähler, and

c1(Ai∣T)+[ωi∣T]=φ∗[ωW].c_1(A_i|_T)+[\omega_i|_T]=\varphi^*[\omega_W].

Here the equality is in the local-potential Bott–Chern group. The contracted compact curves are exactly those whose classes on TT lie in

FT=(c1(Ai∣T)+[ωi∣T])⊥∩NA⁡(T).F_T=\left(c_1(A_i|_T)+[\omega_i|_T]\right)^\perp\cap\operatorname{NA}(T).

This face is generated by finitely many curve classes whose images in XiX_i lie in one AiA_i-negative ray Ri⊂αi⊥R_i\subset\alpha_i^\perp, with T⋅Ri<0T\cdot R_i<0. For the global form of this selection, apply Lemma 7.1 in the setup of Theorem 7.2 together with Claim 7.3 and its proof. We choose one representative per proportionality ray among the countably many compact curve classes to meet the lemma’s nonproportionality hypothesis. A Kähler degree is positive on each curve, so proportional effective representatives differ by a positive scalar. Lemma 7.1 permits at most one representative on which the selected class vanishes, and Claim 7.3 and its proof supply it. Consequently the selection gives the global implication

αi⋅C=0⟹[C]∈Rifor every compact irreducible curve C⊂Xi.\alpha_i\cdot C=0\quad\Longrightarrow\quad[C]\in R_i\quad\text{for every compact irreducible curve }C\subset X_i.

For a positive global Cartier multiple mTmT, the line OT(−mT)\mathcal O_T(-mT) is φ\varphi-ample. The use of Corollary 5.6 here is the actual-line specialization proved in Subsection 4.5, with the inputs stated in Subsection 4.4. In particular, the restriction to TT need not be big and TT need not be Q\mathbb Q-factorial. The numerical selection of TT, the ray, and the negative normal line is the one in the supported construction. Its threefold contraction is supplied by the bridge, using Proposition 4.3 and the external results stated there.

Write Bi=T+CB_i=T+C, where C≥0C\geq0 has no component TT. Ordinary Q\mathbb Q-factoriality makes CC a global rational Q\mathbb Q-Cartier divisor. For a positive rational ε<1\varepsilon<1, put

Bi(ε)=T+(1−ε)C,Ai(ε)=Ai−εC=KXi+Bi(ε).B_i(\varepsilon)=T+(1-\varepsilon)C,\qquad A_i(\varepsilon)=A_i-\varepsilon C=K_{X_i}+B_i(\varepsilon).

The second identity is an identity of actual rational adjoint lines. The perturbed pair is plt. Indeed, choose a log resolution f:U→Xif:U\to X_i with smooth source that witnesses the standard dlt criterion for (Xi,Bi)(X_i,B_i). Its strict boundary and exceptional primes have simple normal crossings, and all exceptional crepant coefficients are below one. If GG is its crepant boundary, the new boundary on this resolution is G−εf∗CG-\varepsilon f^*C. The divisor f∗Cf^*C is effective: pull back a local holomorphic equation for an effective Cartier multiple of CC. It follows that all exceptional coefficients remain below one. The strict transform of TT is the only coefficient-one prime, and all other strict coefficients are below one. The plt criterion on this resolution now applies. This is the ordinary Kollár–Mori convention used in Section 2 of [9]. If C=0C = 0, the same argument applies to the unchanged pair (Xi,T)(X_i,T).

Choose a smooth Hermitian metric on an actual Cartier multiple of CC, and let θC\theta_C be its normalized curvature form. On a finite relatively compact local embedding cover of the compact XiX_i, choose smooth ambient extensions of the local potentials and metric weights. After shrinking the charts, the Levi forms for ωi\omega_i have a uniform positive lower bound on their compact closures, while those for θC\theta_C are bounded. Thus ωi+εθC\omega_i+\varepsilon\theta_C is Kähler for one sufficiently small positive rational ε\varepsilon, chosen for this running step. No positivity of C∣TC|_T is asserted. Equation (5.3) gives

−c1(Ai(ε)∣T)+φ∗[ωW]=[ωi∣T+εθC∣T].-c_1(A_i(\varepsilon)|_T)+\varphi^*[\omega_W]=[\omega_i|_T+\varepsilon\theta_C|_T].

The right side is Kähler. Locally on WW, a potential for ωW\omega_W can be pulled back, so this equality says precisely that −Ai(ε)∣T-A_i(\varepsilon)|_T is relatively Kähler over WW. After clearing its index, the same local metric weights restrict to positive weights on every full φ\varphi-fiber. The proper fiberwise criterion [22] therefore makes this actual rational line φ\varphi-ample. The other required positivity, that of −T∣T-T|_T, is unchanged. With the boundary (1−ε)C(1-\varepsilon)C, these are the hypotheses of Proposition 4.1; its conormal direct-image vanishings hold for the present floor contraction.

Proposition 4.3 now constructs a proper bimeromorphic morphism c:Xi→Zic:X_i\to Z_i to a normal compact analytic space. It restricts to φ\varphi on TT, embeds WW as the reduced image of TT, has exactly the φ\varphi-fiber sets over WW, and is an isomorphism away from TT. Its fibers are connected. A sufficiently divisible global line OXi(−ℓT)O_{X_i}(-\ell T) is cc-ample, and the actual rational line −Ai(ε)-A_i(\varepsilon) is cc-ample as well. The target is in Fujiki’s class C. The proposition proves these assertions through the analytic thickenings and the full-fiber criterion. For this constructed contraction, we use the rationality assertion of [9]. The target Kähler class is proved below.

Every curve contracted by cc is a φ\varphi-contracted curve in TT, and therefore has class in RiR_i. Conversely a curve in RiR_i lies in TT, since T⋅Ri<0T\cdot R_i<0 whereas the effective Cartier section of a multiple of TT has nonnegative degree on the normalization of any curve not contained in TT. The floor assertion then contracts it. The constructed morphism thus contracts precisely the compact curves whose classes lie in the original negative ray. The boundary transported in the supported program remains BiB_i; the plt boundary is used only to construct cc.

Claim 5.4 (Kähler positivity on the current target). Retain the current pair (Xi,Bi)(X_i,B_i), its effective rational divisor PiP_i with the actual line identity in (5.2), the nef and big class αi=c1(Ai)+[ωi]\alpha_i=c_1(A_i)+[\omega_i] with ωi\omega_i Kähler, and the selected ray and floor in (5.3)–(5.4). Let c:Xi→Zic:X_i\to Z_i be the projective contraction with connected fibers just constructed. It is an isomorphism away from TT, has the embedded floor image WW and the exact φ\varphi-fiber sets, and contracts precisely the curves in RiR_i. Its target is a normal compact analytic space in class C with rational singularities. For every other floor prime, retain the projective contraction with connected fibers supplied by Subsection 4.5, whose target is normal compact Kähler and whose pulled-back Kähler class is the restricted αi\alpha_i. Then there is a Kähler form ωZi\omega_{Z_i} on ZiZ_i such that

αi=c∗[ωZi]in HBC1,1(Xi),\alpha_i=c^*[\omega_{Z_i}]\quad\text{in }H^{1,1}_{BC}(X_i),

where the group is defined by local smooth potentials.

Proof. Bott–Chern descent first supplies a target class whose pullback is αi\alpha_i. We prove that this class is nef, contains a current dominating a positive Hermitian form, and has positive top intersection on every positive-dimensional compact reduced subspace. These are the three conditions in [12], Theorem 2.29 that make the target class Kähler.

The descended class and its floor restriction. In this paragraph and the next three, write X=XiX = X_i, Z=ZiZ = Z_i, and α=αi\alpha= \alpha_i. We use ddc=i2π∂∂ˉd d^c = \frac{i}{2\pi}\partial\bar{\partial}, the normalization for which ddcφd d^c\varphi is the normalized Chern curvature of a metric locally written as e−φe^{-\varphi}. A fixed positive rescaling of potentials gives the i∂∂ˉi\partial\bar{\partial} convention in the cited analytic inequalities.

Both ends of cc are normal compact spaces in class C\mathcal{C} with rational singularities, and α\alpha is zero on every contracted curve. The Bott–Chern descent [11], Lemma 2.11 therefore gives a class β\beta on ZZ and a smooth real closed representative β0\beta_0, with local smooth potentials, such that

c∗β=αin HBC1,1(X).c^*\beta= \alpha\quad\text{in } H^{1,1}_{BC}(X).

Here and below the group is the local-potential Bott–Chern group. Its smooth representative description, including adjustment by a global smooth ddcd d^c-potential, is [33], Definition 3.1 and Remark 3.2.

Let iW:W↪Zi_W: W \hookrightarrow Z be the embedded floor image and put δ=iW∗β\delta= i_W^*\beta. The actual identity c∣T=iW∘φc|_T = i_W \circ\varphi, (5.3), and (5.7) give

φ∗δ=α∣T=φ∗[ωW]in HBC1,1(T).\varphi^*\delta= \alpha|_T = \varphi^*[\omega_W] \quad\text{in } H^{1,1}_{BC}(T).

Thus the pullback of δ−[ωW]\delta- [\omega_W] is zero and hence nef. Apply [12], Lemma 2.38 only to φ:T→W\varphi: T \to W: it is proper and surjective, and both spaces are normal compact Kähler. The lemma makes δ−[ωW]\delta- [\omega_W] nef. For a smooth representative ee of that difference, choose a nef approximation e+ddcu≥−ωW/2e+d d^c u \ge-\omega_W/2. Then ωW+e+ddcu\omega_W + e + d d^c u is a Kähler representative of δ\delta. In particular its restriction gives a positive current in the class β∣V\beta|_V and a positive top integral for every positive-dimensional irreducible V⊂WV \subset W. Only the nefness of δ−[ωW]\delta- [\omega_W] enters this deduction.

Nefness on the target. For every positive-dimensional irreducible reduced compact subspace V⊂ZV \subset Z, we first produce a current

TV=β0∣V+ddcqV≥0(39)T_V = \beta_0|_V + d d^c q_V \ge0 \tag*{(39)}

with a global real distribution qVq_V on VV. Currents and their positivity on the pure-dimensional reduced VV are defined by duality with smooth test forms from local ambient embeddings; see [16], Section 1, Definitions 1.1–1.2, pp. 14–15. We will use exactly this positive-current meaning of pseudoeffectivity on a possibly nonnormal subspace. The preceding Kähler representative of δ\delta gives (5.9) for V⊂WV \subset W, with a smooth potential.

Suppose V⊄WV \not\subset W, and let V′⊂XV' \subset X be the closure of the inverse image of V∖WV \setminus W. The isomorphism X∖T≃Z∖WX \setminus T \simeq Z \setminus W makes V′V' irreducible and its map to VV proper and bimeromorphic. Choose a projective resolution r:U→V′r: U \to V' with smooth source. The restricted Kähler form makes V′V' a compact Kähler space. A relatively positive metric for the projective resolution, plus a sufficiently large pullback of this form, makes UU a compact Kähler manifold. This metric construction applies to the possibly nonnormal V′V'.

Let ν:Vν→V\nu: V^\nu\to V be normalization. The dominant map from the normal UU factors through ν\nu, giving a proper bimeromorphic map p:U→Vνp: U \to V^\nu, hence a modification between normal compact spaces. For the other map j:U→Xj: U \to X, functoriality of the actual maps and (5.7) gives

p∗ν∗(β∣V)=j∗α.p^*\nu^*(\beta|_V) = j^*\alpha.

The class on the right is nef. Indeed, pull back the smooth nef approximations from XX; on compact UU, the pullback of their reference form is bounded above by a fixed multiple of a Kähler form η\eta on UU, so rescaling the error gives the nef inequalities.

Set γ=p∗ν∗(β0∣V)\gamma=p^{*}\nu^{*}(\beta_0|_V). Choose smooth approximations γ+ddcfn≥−n−1η\gamma+dd^c f_n\geq-n^{-1}\eta. The closed positive currents γ+ddcfn+n−1η\gamma+dd^c f_n+n^{-1}\eta have bounded η\eta-mass by Stokes’ theorem. Weak compactness gives a positive closed limit in [γ][\gamma]. The ∂∂ˉ\partial\bar\partial-lemma on the compact Kähler manifold UU, and the global potential description of a positive current, give a global quasi-plurisubharmonic qUq_U with

γ+ddcqU≥0.\gamma+dd^c q_U\geq0.

These are also the closed-cone statement following Definition 1.6 and the potential description in (3.1) and its following paragraph in [17], pp. 1253 and 1260. Apply [12], Corollary 2.32 and its proof, p. 18 to pp, with target form ν∗(β0∣V)\nu^{*}(\beta_0|_V) and constant zero in its current inequality. The locally integrable, locally bounded above qUq_U supplies the required potential. We obtain a global quasi-plurisubharmonic qνq_\nu satisfying

Tν=ν∗(β0∣V)+ddcqν≥0.(40)T_\nu=\nu^{*}(\beta_0|_V)+dd^c q_\nu\geq0. \tag*{(40)}

This applies the normal-modification descent to the displayed local-potential inequality on the still general normal compact target.

It remains to push through the finite normalization. Locally write β0∣V=ddch\beta_0|_V=dd^c h with hh smooth. The function ν∗h+qν\nu^{*}h+q_\nu is locally integrable and locally bounded above, and its Hessian is Tν≥0T_\nu\geq0. On normal VνV^\nu, its upper regularization is plurisubharmonic. The finite trace is weakly plurisubharmonic and its Hessian is the positive current ν∗Tν\nu_*T_\nu by [16], Corollary 1.11 and Proposition 1.13(a), p. 22. Since ν\nu has generic degree one, change of variables off the proper analytic exceptional sets gives ν∗ν∗(β0∣V)=β0∣V\nu_*\nu^{*}(\beta_0|_V)=\beta_0|_V as currents; those sets have measure zero for the smooth top-degree integrands. Proper push of distributions commutes with ddcdd^c. Hence

TV=ν∗Tν=β0∣V+ddc(ν∗qν)≥0.T_V=\nu_*T_\nu=\beta_0|_V+dd^c(\nu_*q_\nu)\geq0.

The traced distributions are locally integrable and glue because qνq_\nu is global. On a locally reducible VV, these local potentials may be only weakly plurisubharmonic; the argument below uses their associated positive currents.

We now apply the sufficient direction of the restriction criterion [12], Theorem 2.36 and Remark 2.37, spelling out its singular-current input. Proposition 3.3(iv), p. 1262, and the following paragraph, pp. 1262–1263, of [17] applies to a compact complex space and a smooth class containing a closed positive current. It gives nefness if the restrictions to the irreducible components of every positive Lelong level set are nef. Induct on the dimension of each irreducible V⊂ZV\subset Z; points are automatic. For a positive-dimensional VV, use (39). The Siu analyticity assertion accompanying that proposition makes each positive Lelong level set analytic, and it is proper. Indeed, if a fixed positive level filled VV, pack disjoint radius-rr balls in a coordinate ball of VregV_{\mathrm{reg}}. The Lelong mass lower bound on each ball would force the locally finite mass of the (1,1)(1,1)-current to grow at least as a positive multiple of r−2r^{-2} when rr tends to zero. This is impossible. The level set components therefore have smaller dimension, and their restricted classes are nef by induction. The proposition makes β∣V\beta|_V nef. Taking V=ZV=Z proves analytic nefness of β\beta. This uses the positive-current formulation above also on nonnormal subspaces, where the local potentials may be only weakly plurisubharmonic.

Bigness from the supported section. Use the effective actual representative already present in (38). Choose m>0m>0 clearing the indices and an isomorphism of holomorphic lines

L=OX(mAi)≃OX(mPi).L=\mathcal{O}_{X}(mA_i)\simeq\mathcal{O}_{X}(mP_i).

The canonical section of the right side gives a nonzero holomorphic section ss of LL with divisor mPimP_i. Choose a smooth metric hh on LL. In a local frame write h=e−ϕh=e^{-\phi}, s=fs=f, and put

ϑ=1mddcϕ,ℓ=1mlog⁡∣s∣h2.\vartheta=\frac{1}{m}dd^{c}\phi,\qquad\ell=\frac{1}{m}\log|s|_{h}^{2}.

The first formula defines the normalized global curvature form. The second is a global quasi-plurisubharmonic function, locally m−1(log⁡∣f∣2−ϕ)m^{-1}(\log|f|^{2}-\phi). The holomorphic ff extends in a local ambient embedding and is not identically zero on any nonempty open subset of that chart in XX. Local integrability is Proposition 1.8 of [16], and the unnumbered prose after its proof gives the current positivity

ϑ+ddcℓ=1mddclog⁡∣f∣2≥0.\vartheta+dd^{c}\ell=\frac{1}{m}dd^{c}\log|f|^{2}\geq0.

The smooth form ϑ+ωi\vartheta+\omega_i represents α=c∗β\alpha=c^{*}\beta, so the smooth local-potential representative description supplies a global smooth vv with ϑ+ωi=c∗β0+ddcv\vartheta+\omega_i=c^{*}\beta_0+dd^{c}v. Thus

c∗β0+ddc(v+ℓ)≥ωi.(41)c^{*}\beta_0+dd^{c}(v+\ell)\geq\omega_i. \tag*{(41)}

This is a global quasi-plurisubharmonic potential obtained from the supported section at this running step.

Fix any smooth positive Hermitian form gZg_Z on ZZ in local ambient embeddings. Local holomorphic coordinate lifts of cc make c∗gZc^{*}g_Z semipositive in those embeddings. A finite relatively compact cover of XX and comparison with the positive definite ambient representatives of ωi\omega_i give one C>0C>0 with c∗gZ≤Cωic^{*}g_Z\leq C\omega_i. Corollary 2.32 of [12] applies to the normal modification cc and (41). It gives a global quasi-plurisubharmonic, hence L1L^{1}, function vZv_Z with

β0+ddcvZ≥C−1gZ.(42)\beta_0+dd^{c}v_Z\geq C^{-1}g_Z. \tag*{(42)}

This is the required dominating current in the selected target class.

Top intersections and the other floor. Let V⊂ZV\subset Z be irreducible of dimension k>0k>0. The case V⊂WV\subset W was proved using the Kähler class δ\delta. Otherwise use its strict transform V′V' above. The proper integration cycle identity c∗[V′]=[V]c_{*}[V']=[V], projection formula, and (5.7) give

∫Vregβ0k=∫Vreg′αk.(43)\int_{V_{\mathrm{reg}}}\beta_0^{k}=\int_{V'_{\mathrm{reg}}}\alpha^{k}. \tag*{(43)}

The right side denotes the integral of any smooth representative of α\alpha; Stokes’ theorem makes it independent of that choice. Neither subspace needs to be normal.

If V′⊄Supp⁡PiV'\not\subset\operatorname{Supp}P_i, take the projective resolution r:U→V′r:U\to V' with smooth Kähler source used above. The pullback of ss is nonzero and defines the effective rational divisor E=m−1div⁡(r∗s)E=m^{-1}\operatorname{div}(r^{*}s) on UU. Put a=r∗(α∣V′)a=r^{*}(\alpha|_{V'}) and w=r∗[ωi∣V′]w=r^{*}[\omega_i|_{V'}]. The class aa is nef, ww has a semipositive smooth representative, and the actual section gives a−w=c1(E)a-w=c_1(E). Therefore

∫Uak−∫Uwk=∑j=0k−1c1(E)⋅ak−1−jwj≥0.(44)\int_U a^k-\int_U w^k=\sum_{j=0}^{k-1}c_1(E)\mathbin{\cdot}a^{k-1-j}w^j\geq0. \tag*{(44)}

For each summand, choose a smooth representative of a+ε[η]a+\varepsilon[\eta] which is semipositive, where η\eta is a fixed Kähler form on UU. Restrict it and the semipositive representative of ww to every effective divisor component, integrate, and let ε\varepsilon tend to zero. This proves its nonnegativity, including the degree statement when k=1k=1. Projection formula gives ∫Uwk=∫Vreg′ωik>0\int_U w^k=\int_{V'_{\mathrm{reg}}}\omega_i^k>0. Equations (43)–(44) give the desired strict positivity.

It remains that V′V' lies in a component T′T' of Supp⁡Pi\operatorname{Supp} P_i. It meets X∖TX\setminus T, so T′≠TT'\ne T. The actual floor specialization in Subsection 4.5 gives

g:T′→W‾,α∣T′=g∗κ,(45)g:T'\to\overline{W},\qquad\alpha|_{T'}=g^*\kappa, \tag*{(45)}

where gg is projective with connected fibers, its source and target are normal compact Kähler, and κ\kappa is a Kähler class. The equality is in the local-potential Bott–Chern group. Every irreducible curve in a gg-fiber has α\alpha-degree zero, so (5.4) puts its class in RiR_i, and cc contracts it.

It follows that h=c∣T′h=c|_{T'} is pointwise constant on every full gg-fiber. To see this also for nonreduced fibers, their reductions are connected projective varieties, possibly reducible. If the image of such a reduction were not a point, one irreducible component QQ would have nonconstant image; otherwise its image would be a connected finite set. At a smooth point of QQ where a local coordinate of hh has nonzero differential, general hyperplanes through that point cut an irreducible projective curve component whose tangent is not in the differential’s kernel. That curve has nonconstant image, a contradiction. If dim⁡Q=1\dim Q=1, take QQ itself.

There is consequently a holomorphic factorization

h=b∘g,b:W‾→Z.(46)h=b\circ g,\qquad b:\overline{W}\to Z. \tag*{(46)}

For clarity, the specialization gives g∗OT′=OW‾g_*\mathcal{O}_{T'}=\mathcal{O}_{\overline{W}}; this also follows from analytic Stein factorization, connected fibers, and the normality of the two spaces. Proper surjectivity makes gg a closed quotient map, so the pointwise constancy first defines a continuous bb. For an open O⊂ZO\subset Z embedded in a polydisc, restrict to the open b−1(O)b^{-1}(O). The coordinate functions of hh on its full inverse image descend through g∗OT′=OW‾g_*\mathcal{O}_{T'}=\mathcal{O}_{\overline{W}} to a holomorphic tuple. It lies pointwise in the embedded OO; its defining ideal therefore vanishes on the reduced open b−1(O)b^{-1}(O). The resulting local holomorphic maps glue to (46). This factorization uses pointwise constancy on the underlying full fibers.

Put H=g(V′)H=g(V'), a closed irreducible analytic subspace of W‾\overline{W}. Since c∣V′c|_{V'} is bimeromorphic onto VV, (46) yields

k=dim⁡c(V′)=dim⁡b(H)≤dim⁡H≤dim⁡V′=k.k=\dim c(V')=\dim b(H)\leq\dim H\leq\dim V'=k.

Thus g∣V′g|_{V'} is generically finite onto HH, of some integer degree d>0d>0. The projection formula using (45) now gives

∫Vreg′β0k=∫Vreg′(g∗κ)k=d∫Hregκk>0.(47)\int_{V'_{\mathrm{reg}}}\beta_0^k=\int_{V'_{\mathrm{reg}}}(g^*\kappa)^k=d\int_{H_{\mathrm{reg}}}\kappa^k>0. \tag*{(47)}

The last integral is a positive Kähler volume. The one-way factorization h=b∘gh=b\circ g and this degree calculation give the needed implication in [12], proof of Theorem 7.2, p. 48.

These cases cover every irreducible positive-dimensional VV. Additivity over top-dimensional irreducible components gives strict positivity for every positive-dimensional compact reduced subspace. We have proved analytic nefness of β\beta, the dominating current (42), and all positive top intersections. The normal compact ZZ and the smooth real closed β0\beta_0 therefore satisfy the three hypotheses of [12], Theorem 2.29]. That theorem gives a positive smooth representative of β\beta. Its local smooth potentials make this a Kähler form ωZi\omega_{Z_i}. Equation (5.7) gives (5.6), and ZiZ_i is compact Kähler. ∞ӘА

For a small step, the construction of its flipped morphism also has to respect the hypotheses of the relative canonical-model theorem. Use the current representative in (38), and write Pi=∑pjSjP_i=\sum p_jS_j with every pj>0p_j>0 and SjS_j the floor primes. At a nontrivial step this list is nonempty, since otherwise Ai∼Q0A_i\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}0 is nef. Independently choose a rational 0<ε<10<\varepsilon<1 small enough that

Biε=Bi−εPiB_i^\varepsilon=B_i-\varepsilon P_i

is effective. Its floor coefficients are below one. On a dlt resolution, subtracting the pullback of the effective Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier divisor εPi\varepsilon P_i can only lower the exceptional crepant coefficients, which were already below one. Hence (Xi,Biε)(X_i,B_i^\varepsilon) is klt. Its actual adjoint satisfies

KXi+Biε=Ai−εPi∼Q(1−ε)Ai.(48)K_{X_i}+B_i^\varepsilon=A_i-\varepsilon P_i\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}(1-\varepsilon)A_i. \tag*{(48)}

The projective contraction is bimeromorphic, so this adjoint is relatively big. Corollary 3.7 of [12] therefore applies at its stated klt scope. The actual isomorphism in (48) identifies common Cartier Veroneses of its relative algebra and of the relative AiA_i-algebra. On the compact base the latter is thus finitely generated. A further Veronese is generated in degree one, and its coherent degree-one piece embeds its relative Projan in the associated relative projective space. The tautological line is globally relatively ample. The ordinary small flip supplied by Theorem 7.2 is this relative canonical model; in a common degree the tautological line agrees with the flipped adjoint line on the common codimension-one open and hence everywhere by reflexive extension. The flipped morphism is projective and the flipped adjoint is positive on its contracted curves. Thus Corollary 3.7 is applied to the klt perturbation, whose common Veronese is identified with that of the original adjoint.

The transform identities follow by induction from PYP_Y, one completed step at a time. Divisorial contractions remove their contracted primes and flips change no prime valuation. On the open containing all codimension-one points of the destination, the fixed meromorphic pluriadjoint section identifies its line with the strict transform Pi+1P_{i+1}. After clearing the new indices, reflexive extension gives

Pi+1∼QAi+1,Supp⁡Pi+1=Supp⁡⌊Bi+1⌋.P_{i+1}\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}A_{i+1},\qquad\operatorname{Supp}P_{i+1}=\operatorname{Supp}\lfloor B_{i+1}\rfloor.

This establishes the identity needed for the perturbation at the next step. It uses ordinary Q\mathbb{Q}-factoriality only for the finitely many global prime transforms.

We have now constructed a projective step, proved that its target is Kähler, and supplied the effective actual representative needed to repeat the construction. The factorial/dlt preservation and the special-termination argument in [12], proof of Theorem 7.2, apply to the unchanged original boundary. That construction, with Proposition 4.3 at its ambient extension steps and the target positivity proved above, therefore gives a finite supported sequence to an analytically nef adjoint.

For a flip, take the main component of Xi×ZiXi+1X_i\times_{Z_i}X_{i+1} as its graph; its projections are projective. For a divisorial contraction the source is its graph. The main component of the iterated fiber product of these finitely many graphs, followed by normalization, is a normal common graph Γ\Gamma. Normalization is finite and projective, and projective morphisms compose over a compact base [12], Remark 2.11]. Thus Γ\Gamma is projective over every running model. Projective resolutions of it supply all common resolutions with smooth source used below. Their sources are compact Kähler by the relative metric construction.

On a common projective resolution of one step with smooth source WiW_i, let r:Wi→Xir:W_i\to X_i and s:Wi→Xi+1s:W_i\to X_{i+1} be the maps, and put

Ei=r∗Pi−s∗Pi+1.E_i=r^*P_i-s^*P_{i+1}.

It is ss-exceptional by the codimension-one comparison. For an ss-contracted curve, its image under rr is a point or a curve in the negative source contraction fiber, so EiE_i has nonpositive degree. Negativity gives Ei≥0E_i \ge0. In any common Cartier degree,

H0(Xi,OXi(mPi))=H0(Wi,OWi(mr∗Pi))=H0(Wi,OWi(ms∗Pi+1+mEi))=H0(Xi+1,OXi+1(mPi+1)).\begin{aligned} H^0(X_i,\mathcal{O}_{X_i}(mP_i)) &= H^0(W_i,\mathcal{O}_{W_i}(mr^*P_i)) \\ &= H^0(W_i,\mathcal{O}_{W_i}(ms^*P_{i+1}+mE_i)) \\ &= H^0(X_{i+1},\mathcal{O}_{X_{i+1}}(mP_{i+1})). \end{aligned}

The last equality is exceptional Hartogs extension for ss. The identifications agree with the fixed section on the common open and therefore respect multiplication. A common Veronese section ring is unchanged through the finite chain. The power argument in Lemma 5.3 handles other degrees, so the final pair (V,B)(V,B), with A=KV+BA=K_V+B and PP the final transform, satisfies

A∼QP≥0,Supp⁡P=Supp⁡⌊B⌋,κ(V,A)=0.(49)A\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}P\ge0,\qquad\operatorname{Supp}P=\operatorname{Supp}\lfloor B\rfloor,\qquad\kappa(V,A)=0. \tag*{(49)}

Discrepancy increase and a resolution of the floor

We now show that the final pair has a resolution which is generically unchanged along every floor intersection. The point is that a negative step strictly increases discrepancies over all its nontrivial fibers, including those on the positive side of a flip.

Lemma 5.5 (Support on a projective fiber). Let h:W→Zh:W\to Z be a projective morphism between normal analytic spaces with connected fibers, let FF be a scheme fiber, and let E≥0E\ge0 be a rational Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier divisor on WW. Suppose that E⋅C≤0E\cdot C\le0 for every irreducible curve CC in FF. Then either Supp⁡E∩F=∅\operatorname{Supp}E\cap F=\varnothing or F⊆Supp⁡EF\subseteq\operatorname{Supp}E.

Proof. Clear the index and pass to the reduction of FF. If an irreducible component FαF_\alpha is not contained in Supp⁡E\operatorname{Supp}E but meets it, the restricted canonical section cuts a nonempty effective Cartier divisor on the integral projective FαF_\alpha. This component has positive dimension: a point that is an irreducible component cannot meet another component, and a connected zero-dimensional fiber is a point. Cutting by sufficiently general hyperplanes of a very ample line on FαF_\alpha gives a curve on which EE has strictly positive degree, a contradiction. If some components are contained in the support and others are not, connectedness gives a noncontained component meeting a contained one and the same contradiction. These alternatives prove the claim, with no reducedness assumption on the original fiber. □\square

Apply the lemma to a common resolution over the contraction base of one step and to EiE_i in (5.20). The maps to the contraction base have connected fibers: they are proper bimeromorphic over a normal space. On a base-fiber curve CC, a divisorial step has Ei⋅C=(r∗Ai)⋅C≤0E_i\cdot C=(r^*A_i)\cdot C\le0. For a flip,

Ei⋅C=(r∗Ai)⋅C−(s∗Ai+1)⋅C≤0,E_i\cdot C=(r^*A_i)\cdot C-(s^*A_{i+1})\cdot C\le0,

because the source adjoint is negative on its contracted curves and the flipped adjoint is positive on its contracted curves. Above any point where either side has a nontrivial fiber, a curve in the common fiber can be chosen to dominate a curve of that side: take a component over the curve and cut by relative ample hyperplanes. The corresponding term in the preceding degree is then strictly negative. Thus EiE_i meets the common fiber, and Lemma 5.5 puts the entire fiber in Supp⁡Ei\operatorname{Supp}E_i.

Use the fixed meromorphic pluriadjoint section to calculate discrepancies on the resolution. Its divisor as a section of the old pulled-back line is r∗Pir^*P_i, and as a section of the new line is s∗Pi+1s^*P_{i+1}.

The two meromorphic pluriforms agree. Their difference is consequently the difference of the two crepant boundary divisors, so for every prime FF

coeff⁡F(Ei)=a(F;Xi+1,Bi+1)−a(F;Xi,Bi).(50)\operatorname{coeff}_{F}(E_i)=a(F;X_{i+1},B_{i+1})-a(F;X_i,B_i). \tag*{(50)}

The same formula applies on higher projective resolutions after pullback.

For each contraction base ZiZ_i, let Ci⊂ZiC_i\subset Z_i consist of the points whose fiber on the source or, for a flip, on the destination has positive dimension. This is a closed analytic subset of the base by properness and the fiber-dimension theorem. A proper bimeromorphic morphism to a normal space is an isomorphism near any zero-dimensional fiber, since it is finite there. Write v:Γ→Vv:\Gamma\to V and qi:Γ→Ziq_i:\Gamma\to Z_i for the projections from the normal common graph to the final model and the contraction bases. Set

DΓ=⋃iqi−1(Ci),BV=v(DΓ),UV=V∖BV.D_\Gamma=\bigcup_iq_i^{-1}(C_i),\qquad B_V=v(D_\Gamma),\qquad U_V=V\setminus B_V.

The sets DΓD_\Gamma and BVB_V are closed analytic, the latter by properness. We claim that

v−1(BV)=DΓ.v^{-1}(B_V)=D_\Gamma.

Indeed, at a point γ∉DΓ\gamma\notin D_\Gamma, both sides of every step are isomorphisms near the corresponding point of ZiZ_i. Restricting to these neighborhoods makes their iterated graph a common normal open, so normalization does not change it and vv is an isomorphism near γ\gamma. Thus {γ}\{\gamma\} is open in its vv-fiber, and it is closed because the spaces are Hausdorff. The fibers of vv are connected: a proper bimeromorphic morphism between normal spaces has v∗OΓ=OVv_*\mathcal{O}_\Gamma=\mathcal{O}_V, and its Stein factorization has connected fibers. That fiber is therefore {γ}\{\gamma\}, so it cannot meet DΓD_\Gamma. This proves (5.24).

The corresponding open UY⊂YU_Y\subset Y is isomorphic to UVU_V through every step, because every successive lift there is unique. No step extracts a divisor, so the generic point of any prime on VV follows a surviving prime through the chain and avoids the contraction centers. Therefore

codim⁡V(V∖UV)≥2.(51)\operatorname{codim}_V(V\setminus U_V)\ge2. \tag*{(51)}

Every final log-canonical center tested by a prime on a projective resolution meets UVU_V. To see this, suppose the final discrepancy of that prime is zero. Initial log canonicity, Ei≥0E_i\ge0, and (50) force all intermediate discrepancies and all coefficients in the EiE_i to be zero. If its center lay over some CiC_i, the fiber-support conclusion would place that center in Supp⁡Ei\operatorname{Supp}E_i. A local equation of a positive Cartier multiple of EiE_i would then have positive order in the valuation, a contradiction. If its center on VV were contained in BVB_V, its center on the proper graph Γ\Gamma would be contained in v−1(BV)=DΓv^{-1}(B_V)=D_\Gamma. Irreducibility would then put that entire center in one qi−1(Ci)q_i^{-1}(C_i). On a higher projective resolution carrying the prime, the center would lie over CiC_i, giving the contradiction just proved. Thus it meets UVU_V, as claimed. We only need this statement for primes on the projective resolutions constructed here and for the blowups of their floor strata.

Lemma 5.6 (A globally simple dlt resolution). The final pair (V,B)(V,B) has a projective log resolution π:V^→V\pi:\widehat{V}\to V with the following properties:

  1. the strict boundary and exceptional support have globally smooth distinct SNC components;

  1. every π\pi-exceptional crepant coefficient is strictly below one;

  1. if Z^\widehat{Z} is an irreducible component of the nonempty intersection of distinct strict transforms of floor primes, then π\pi is generically an isomorphism on π(Z^)\pi(\widehat{Z}).

Moreover π\pi is an isomorphism over UVU_V.

Proof. Write b:Γ→Yb:\Gamma\to Y for the normal common graph. Choose a relatively very ample and generated line L\mathcal{L} for bb; compactness permits one global power. Its evaluation embeds Γ\Gamma in PY(E)\mathbb{P}_Y(\mathcal{E}), where E=b∗L\mathcal{E}=b_*\mathcal{L}. This coherent sheaf is torsion-free of rank one: a section killed by a nonzero function vanishes on the dense isomorphism locus and hence everywhere. Since YY is smooth, E∗∗\mathcal{E}^{**} is a line, and

J=E⊗(E∗∗)−1⊂OY\mathcal{J}=\mathcal{E}\otimes(\mathcal{E}^{**})^{-1}\subset\mathcal{O}_Y

is a coherent ideal equal to OY\mathcal{O}_Y on UYU_Y.

Apply the ideal principalization functor of [53] to J\mathcal{J}. For smooth input it is supported on the cosupport of the ideal, so it avoids UYU_Y; its total transform is invertible on a smooth space Y1Y_1. The resulting invertible quotient of the pulled-back E\mathcal{E} defines a map Y1→PY(E)Y_1\to\mathbb{P}_Y(\mathcal{E}). It lands in the closed subspace Γ\Gamma on a dense open, and hence everywhere because Y1Y_1 is reduced. The map Y1→ΓY_1\to\Gamma is projective: its graph is a closed immersion into the base change of the projective map Y1→YY_1\to Y. Its composite to VV is projective and is an isomorphism over UVU_V.

This principalization is not required to have transverse intermediate centers. Instead, after it is complete, mark as separate ordered Cartier boundary components all strict initial boundary primes, all primes in the principalized support, and all divisorial exceptional primes. On UYU_Y this is the original globally simple SNC list. Apply the ordered-boundary functor of [53]. Its centers lie over the original labeled bad locus and therefore avoid UYU_Y. The final indexed components and intersections are smooth, and the total support consists of the strict support and new exceptional support. The already invertible ideal remains invertible, so the map to Γ\Gamma persists.

Finally apply the same two stages to the pullback of the reduced coherent ideal of V∖UVV\setminus U_V. In the second stage mark, each distinct prime once, every component of the prior resolved support, every component of the newly principalized support, and every divisorial exceptional prime. Its total transform has divisorial support equal to the entire inverse image of V∖UVV\setminus U_V; every such divisor maps to a subset of codimension at least two by (5.25). Outside this support the resulting map π:V^→V\pi:\widehat{V}\to V is an isomorphism. Conversely a point on this support cannot be a local isomorphism point, because the divisor germ through it would map to a hypersurface contained in V∖UVV\setminus U_V. Thus this is exactly the nonisomorphism locus. The complete support is globally simple SNC and includes every strict boundary component of VV.

Each π\pi-exceptional prime has center in V∖UVV\setminus U_V. The preceding discrepancy argument shows that its log discrepancy is positive, proving property (2). Let Z^\widehat{Z} be an irreducible intersection of kk distinct transformed floor components. At its general point exactly those components occur, by SNC. If k=1k=1, its prime valuation has log discrepancy zero. If k≥2k\geq2, the blowup of the smooth stratum has log discrepancy codim⁡(Z^)−k=k−k=0\operatorname{codim}(\widehat{Z})-k=k-k=0. This is a prime on a projective resolution, so its image meets UVU_V. Since π\pi is an isomorphism there, it is generically an isomorphism on that image. This proves property (3).

The support survives

Proof of Proposition 5.1. All statements except P≠0P\ne0 have been established. Suppose that P=0P=0. Every component of PYP_Y, and hence every component of p∗Mp^*M, has disappeared. On a common projective resolution with smooth source r:W→Yr:W\to Y, s:W→Vs:W\to V, set Q=r∗p∗MQ=r^*p^*M. It is effective and nonzero: the pullback of a nonzero effective Cartier multiple has a nonzero strict transform. It is ss-exceptional. Indeed, a prime of WW mapping onto a prime of VV corresponds, by no extraction, to a surviving prime of YY; its coefficient in QQ is zero under the supposition that every component of p∗Mp^{*}M disappeared.

The actual rational line of QQ is (pr)∗D(pr)_{*}D. It is analytically nef on the compact Kähler WW, by pullback of the metric inequalities for the original DD. In particular it is relatively nef for the projective ss. Exceptional negativity gives Q≤0Q \le0, contradicting its effectivity and nonvanishing. Thus P≠0P \ne0.

The construction uses the original section but supplies no new ambient section. Its floor line is already defined by restricting a Cartier multiple of AA to the reduced subspace S=⌊B⌋S = \lfloor B\rfloor. The next sections will generate that line on all of SS, after which supported lifting contradicts the last equality in Proposition [5].

Adjunction on the entire dlt floor

We now prove the boundary-generation statement applied to the model supplied by Proposition [5]. The adjoint line already exists on the reduced floor as a restriction from the ambient space. Our task is to construct enough sections of that line which agree through all of its intersections. This section sets up the strata and the actual residue identities; the next three sections construct the compatible sections.

Theorem 6.1 (Generation on the whole dlt floor). Let (V,B)(V, B) be a normal ordinary Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial compact Kähler dlt fourfold with effective rational boundary and analytically nef actual adjoint A=KV+BA = K_V+B. Suppose that it has a projective log resolution π:V~→V\pi: \widetilde{V} \to V for which the strict boundary and exceptional support have globally smooth distinct SNC components, every exceptional crepant coefficient is below one, and π\pi is generically an isomorphism on the image of every irreducible component of an intersection of distinct strict transforms of coefficient-one boundary primes. Then the actual restriction A∣SA|_S to the entire reduced floor S=⌊B⌋S = \lfloor B\rfloor is semiample.

If SS is empty the conclusion is vacuous. Otherwise its components are three-dimensional. We may work on each connected component of VV and take a common multiple over the finitely many components, so in the proof we assume VV connected and hence irreducible. The theorem needs no section of the ambient adjoint. Its resolution hypothesis is precisely the output of Lemma [5], so it does not add a hypothesis to Theorem [1].

Local adjunction calculations

Lemma [2] supplies the connectedness and rationality properties used for successive strata. We next compare an adjunction coefficient on a normal surface slice.

Lemma 6.2 (A normal surface slice for an adjunction coefficient). Let ZZ be a normal Cohen–Macaulay irreducible analytic space of dimension n≥2n \ge2, let DD be a normal prime divisor, and let B=D+B′B = D + B' be an effective rational boundary with actual Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier adjoint. Fix a divisible degree mm, a local frame of OZ(m(KZ+B))\mathcal{O}_Z(m(K_Z+B)), and its meromorphic mm-residue on DD. For a prime Γ⊂D\Gamma\subset D, a general point of Γ\Gamma admits a local slice by n−2n-2 holomorphic parameters with the following properties. The slice TT is a normal surface germ, the cut C=D∩TC = D \cap T is a smooth curve germ transverse to Γ\Gamma, and the restricted line is the actual mm-adjoint line of the effective sliced boundary on TT. After division by the base parameter volume, the order along Γ\Gamma of the residue on DD equals the order at C∩ΓC \cap\Gamma of the surface residue on CC. For n=2n = 2, the slice is the surface germ itself.

Proof. Work in a relatively compact local embedding in CN\mathbb{C}^{N}, and refine the regular loci of ZZ, its singular locus, DD, Γ\Gamma, the boundary primes, and their intersections into a locally finite collection of smooth strata. After a neighborhood shrink only finitely many relevant strata meet the chosen compact closure. Choose a linear map ℓ:CN→Cn−2\ell:\mathbb{C}^{N}\to\mathbb{C}^{n-2} whose differential is an isomorphism on the tangent space of Γ\Gamma at a general smooth point where DD is smooth. Such points exist because DD is normal. For the restriction of ℓ\ell to each smooth stratum of dimension at least n−2n-2, Sard’s theorem makes its critical values a measure-zero subset of the parameter space; strata of smaller dimension have measure-zero image [48]. The image of Γ\Gamma contains a neighborhood of the chosen value. We may therefore choose a nearby value regular for all these restrictions and still meeting Γ\Gamma at a general point. The corresponding level is transverse to every stratum it meets.

At regular points of ZZ the level is a smooth surface. The singular locus of a normal nn-fold has dimension at most n−2n-2; its strata therefore meet this level only discretely. Every irreducible component of the level has dimension at least two by the principal ideal theorem. It cannot be contained in that discrete singular intersection, and hence has dimension exactly two by its smooth dense part. The n−2n-2 level equations have height n−2n-2 at every point. In the Cohen–Macaulay local rings of ZZ they are a regular sequence. The quotient is consequently Cohen–Macaulay of dimension two. It is generically reduced and regular in codimension one, since its possible singular points are discrete; Serre’s criterion makes it normal. Transversality on DD gives a smooth curve at the cut point, and the fact that dℓd\ell is an isomorphism on TΓT\Gamma makes this curve transverse to Γ\Gamma.

Each boundary prime cuts an effective curve with its original rational coefficient, counted with its positive intersection multiplicity. At a generic codimension-one point of the normal surface, the ambient space and the slice are smooth and transverse to these primes. Dividing the ambient canonical form by the parameter volume identifies the restriction of the frame with the pluriadjoint frame of this sliced effective boundary. Both are rank-one reflexive sheaves on the normal surface, so the identification extends from codimension one and is an actual line identity.

To compare the orders, on the smooth DD near a general point of Γ\Gamma complete the parameters to coordinates (z1,…,zn−2,u)(z_1,\ldots,z_{n-2},u) with Γ=(u=0)\Gamma=(u=0). Write the meromorphic residue as

uch(z,u)(du∧dz1∧⋯∧dzn−2)⊗m,u^c h(z,u)(du\wedge dz_1\wedge\cdots\wedge dz_{n-2})^{\otimes m},

where hh is a unit at a general point of Γ\Gamma. Choose the regular level above also outside the proper zero set of its leading coefficient. Division by the base volume and restriction to that level then has order exactly cc on the cut curve. On the ambient smooth locus the two operations commute: in coordinates with D=(x=0)D=(x=0), both take the residue of h(x,u,z)(dx/x∧du∧dz)⊗mh(x,u,z)(dx/x\wedge du\wedge dz)^{\otimes m} to h(0,u,z)(du)⊗mh(0,u,z)(du)^{\otimes m} on the level, up to the ordering sign. The preceding reflexive identification makes the surface term the residue of the same actual frame. The restricted original residue is already a meromorphic form on the smooth curve CC, so equality on its dense smooth-ambient part extends across the cut point. This proves the order assertion. In even degree the ordering sign is one. □\square

The indexed strata and their actual adjoints

Fix the resolution in Theorem 6.1, and let S^i\widehat{S}_i, for ii in a finite set II, be the strict transforms of the components of SS. For a nonempty subset J⊂IJ\subset I, each irreducible component Z^\widehat{Z} of ⋂i∈JS^i\bigcap_{i\in J}\widehat{S}_i is smooth of dimension 4−∣J∣4-|J|. Call its reduced image Z=π(Z^)Z=\pi(\widehat{Z}) a stratum and write πZ:Z^→Z\pi_Z:\widehat{Z}\to Z. We also include VV, with the empty index set and resolution V^\widehat{V}. The special resolution makes each πZ\pi_Z bimeromorphic and generically an isomorphism. The image determines its index set and its resolving component: on the generic isomorphism locus, two different choices would force an SNC intersection to have two different codimensions or local branches. There are finitely many strata, since the intersections are compact analytic spaces. Imposing one additional index j∉Jj \notin J cuts Z^\widehat{Z} in a smooth, possibly disconnected divisor. Its components give the incidences from ZZ to the next strata.

To perform adjunction inductively, allow each unused floor coefficient either to remain one or to become 1/21/2. More precisely, for a stratum indexed by JJ, choose ei=1e_i=1 for i∈Ji\in J and ei∈{1,1/2}e_i\in\{1,1/2\} for i∉Ji\notin J, and put

Be=B−∑i∈I(1−ei)Si.B^e = B-\sum_{i\in I}(1-e_i)S_i.

Ordinary global Q\mathbb{Q}-factoriality makes this an actual rational-line operation. If G^\widehat{G} is the crepant boundary of BB, the new one is

G^e=G^−π∗∑i∈I(1−ei)Si.\widehat{G}^e=\widehat{G}-\pi^*\sum_{i\in I}(1-e_i)S_i.

The subtracted pullback is effective. Exceptional coefficients remain below one, and the coefficient-one primes are exactly the retained strict floor primes. Its support stays inside the resolved SNC support.

SNC adjunction along the indices in JJ defines a subboundary B^Z^e\widehat{B}^e_{\widehat{Z}} on Z^\widehat{Z} and an actual residue identity

(KV^+G^e)∣Z^=KZ^+B^Z^e.(52)(K_{\widehat{V}}+\widehat{G}^e)|_{\widehat{Z}}=K_{\widehat{Z}}+\widehat{B}^e_{\widehat{Z}}. \tag*{(52)}

Every coefficient is at most one. Its coefficient-one divisors are precisely the one-index intersections for unused indices with ei=1e_i=1. The equality means equality of the meromorphic maps from the same restricted plur iadjoint line in a sufficiently divisible even degree.

Proposition 6.3 (Adjunction and full-floor descent). Every stratum ZZ is normal and compact Kähler. For every allowed choice ee there is an effective rational boundary BZeB^e_Z such that

πZ∗(KZ+BZe)=KZ^+B^Z^e,(53)\pi_Z^*(K_Z+B^e_Z)=K_{\widehat{Z}}+\widehat{B}^e_{\widehat{Z}}, \tag*{(53)}
OZ(m(KZ+BZe))≃OV(m(KV+Be))∣Z(54)\mathcal{O}_Z\bigl(m(K_Z+B^e_Z)\bigr)\simeq\mathcal{O}_V\bigl(m(K_V+B^e)\bigr)|_Z \tag*{(54)}

for all sufficiently divisible even mm. Both identities are the actual meromorphic residue identifications. For the full weights write BZ=BZ1B_Z=B^1_Z and CZ=⌊BZ⌋C_Z=\lfloor B_Z\rfloor. The pair (Z,BZ)(Z,B_Z) is dlt; its floor components are exactly the next incident strata. In a common degree, sections on those components that agree by residue on every subordinate stratum descend uniquely to a section on the entire reduced CZC_Z. The same assertion holds for the floor S⊂VS\subset V.

Proof. We induct on the number of indices. The assertions for the empty index set are the given normality, effective boundary, and crepant identity on VV. Assume them for a stratum ZZ and all allowed weights there. Lower all unused floor weights. The resulting crepant SNC boundary on Z^\widehat{Z} has every coefficient below one. The effective pair (Z,BZe)(Z,B^e_Z) is therefore klt. Lemma 2.1 shows that ZZ has rational singularities and is Cohen–Macaulay.

To add an index jj, retain only that unused weight at one and lower the others. The coefficient-one locus on Z^\widehat{Z} is R=Z^∩S^jR=\widehat{Z}\cap\widehat{S}_j, a disjoint union of smooth components. Apply Lemma 2.1 to πZ\pi_Z. Its connected fibers prevent the images of two such components from meeting. On each image DD, the equality πZ∗OR=OπZ(R),red\pi_{Z*}\mathcal{O}_R=\mathcal{O}_{\pi_Z(R),\mathrm{red}} identifies the proper bimeromorphic pushforward of the structure sheaf of its smooth resolving component D^\widehat{D} with OD\mathcal{O}_D. Factoring through the finite normalization shows that DD is normal. It is a compact analytic subspace of VV, so it inherits a Kähler form by restricting local strictly plurisubharmonic potentials.

For arbitrary allowed weights retaining jj, define BDe=πD,∗B^DeB_D^e=\pi_{D,*}\widehat{B}_D^e. At this point it is a rational divisor whose effectivity remains to be shown. In a divisible even degree, a local frame of the ambient adjoint line pulls back and takes SNC residue to a meromorphic pluriform on D^\widehat{D}. The proper bimeromorphic map D^→D\widehat{D}\to D is an isomorphism at the generic points of divisors of the normal DD. There the same map identifies the divisorial adjoint for BDeB_D^e with the restriction of the existing invertible line. Normal reflexive extension gives (6.3) on all of DD. Pulling the line back to D^\widehat{D} recovers the original meromorphic map, since the maps agree on a dense open. This proves (6.2), including its meromorphic interpretation.

We verify that BDeB_D^e is effective. It is enough to test the coefficient at a general point of each prime in DD, a codimension-two locus in ZZ. Apply Lemma 6.2, using the Cohen–Macaulay property already proved for ZZ. It reduces exactly that coefficient, with the actual residue order preserved, to the smooth cut curve in a normal surface germ with effective boundary. On a minimal resolution of this surface germ, write its crepant boundary as the effective strict transform plus an exceptional divisor EE. For every exceptional curve CC,

E⋅C=−(KT~+Bstr)⋅C≤0.E\cdot C=-(K_{\widetilde{T}}+B^{\mathrm{str}})\cdot C\leq0.

Indeed Bstr⋅C≥0B^{\mathrm{str}}\cdot C\geq0, while surface adjunction gives KT~⋅C=2pa(C)−2−C2≥0K_{\widetilde{T}}\cdot C=2p_a(C)-2-C^2\geq0: exceptional self-intersections are negative and a smooth rational exceptional (−1)(-1)-curve is excluded by minimality. The negative-definite exceptional intersection matrix, with nonnegative off-diagonal entries, then implies E≥0E\geq0. Explicitly, if E=P−NE=P-N has disjoint nonnegative parts and N≠0N\neq0, then E⋅N=P⋅N−N2>0E\cdot N=P\cdot N-N^2>0, contradicting E⋅C≤0E\cdot C\leq0 on each component of $N. The strict transform of the smooth cut curve is finite birational over it and hence isomorphic. Adjunction to that smooth curve in a smooth surface with effective remaining boundary has a nonnegative coefficient. This is the coefficient originally tested. There is no coefficient to test when the new stratum is a point. Effectivity follows and completes this part of the induction.

For clarity, the full-weight pair on each stratum is dlt and has exactly the claimed floor. The SNC subboundary has coefficients at most one, so it is lc, and crepancy makes the pair on ZZ lc. On the smooth Z^\widehat{Z}, let a divisorial valuation have center of codimension cc, and choose local coordinates x1,…,xc,…x_1,\ldots,x_c,\ldots at a general point of that center, with the SNC boundary components among the coordinate divisors. Give an unmarked coordinate weight zero and write the boundary weights as bi≤1b_i\leq1. The reduced coordinate arrangement is lc, so

a(v;Z^,B^Z^)≥∑i=1c(1−bi)v(xi).a(v;\widehat{Z},\widehat{B}_{\widehat{Z}})\geq\sum_{i=1}^{c}(1-b_i)v(x_i).

All v(xi)v(x_i) here are positive. A zero discrepancy therefore forces every bi=1b_i=1; its center is an intersection of coefficient-one components. Each such intersection has image meeting the isomorphism locus of the original special resolution. In particular each coefficient-one divisor is nonexceptional for πZ\pi_Z; the others have coefficients below one. Let FZ⊂ZF_Z\subset Z be the complement of the largest open over which πZ\pi_Z is an isomorphism. It has codimension at least two on the normal target ZZ, and contains no entire image of a zero-discrepancy center. Its inverse image on Z^\widehat{Z} may already be divisorial. If necessary, principalize the pulled reduced ideal J(FZ)OZ^\mathcal{J}(F_Z)\mathcal{O}_{\widehat{Z}}, and then apply the ordered-boundary resolution as in Lemma 5.6, marking each distinct prime in the prior SNC support, the newly principalized support, and every divisorial exceptional prime. All new exceptional centers lie over FZF_Z. The displayed inequality makes their discrepancies positive. This is a dlt resolution in the standard sense. It also proves that the coefficient-one primes on ZZ are exactly the images of the one-index intersections.

It remains to check the asserted descent of sections. With full weights, let R=B^Z=1R = \widehat{B}_Z^{=1}. The preceding floor identification gives (πZ(R))red=CZ(\pi_Z(R))_{\mathrm{red}} = C_Z; write πR:R→CZ\pi_R : R \to C_Z for the induced restriction of πZ\pi_Z. Sections on the incident strata pull back to sections on its smooth components. Residue compatibility means equality on the entire scheme-theoretic pairwise intersections, which are reduced smooth SNC strata. The local equalizer for an SNC union therefore glues them to a section on RR; it is the elementary equalizer for the coordinate ideals of its components. Even-degree iterated residues make all paths to deeper intersections identical. By Lemma 2.1 and projection formula,

(πR)∗πR∗(L∣CZ)=(L∣CZ)(\pi_R)_*\pi_R^*(L|_{C_Z}) = (L|_{C_Z})

for any ambient Cartier line LL under consideration. The section descends uniquely to all of CZC_Z. This reasoning applies also to Z=VZ = V and CZ=SC_Z = S. In particular it retains the conductor coefficient at a general double crossing on each normalized component; it does not posit an additional conductor boundary on the nonnormal union itself.

The proposition supplies a finite collection of normal compact Kähler dlt strata, all carrying restrictions of the same actual ambient line. It also specifies exactly what compatibility is needed to descend to a whole floor. The next section proves that, after imposing a small list of birational residue comparisons on the lower strata, these compatible boundary sections extend to their parent stratum.

Proposition 6.3 gives normal dlt pairs on the strata and a single actual adjoint line along every incidence. We now show that a section on the floor of a stratum extends after it satisfies at most one birational residue comparison. The comparison comes from two markings of a projective-line fiber on a Mori model. In the next section we will control the actions generated by these comparisons.

Semiample lines on the normal strata

We use a small model both to place lower-dimensional abundance inside its explicit sheaf conventions and to run the later perturbed program. Let ZZ be a positive-dimensional stratum of dimension at most three. Lower its remaining floor coefficients as in the preceding section, obtaining an effective klt boundary BZB_Z with actual adjoint. There is a projective small ordinary Q\mathbb{Q}-factorialization qZ:Z0→Zq_Z : Z_0 \to Z of this pair. Here is a construction that also checks the actual line used on it.

On a projective log resolution r:W→Zr : W \to Z, keep the effective strict boundary and assign to each exceptional prime a rational weight just below one but strictly above its crepant coefficient. This produces an effective SNC klt boundary CWC_W with

KW+CW=r∗(KZ+BZ∗)+F,K_W + C_W = r^*(K_Z + B_Z^*) + F,

where FF is effective, exceptional, and positive on every divisorial exceptional component. The equality is the meromorphic actual-line identity. The adjoint is relatively pseudo-effective. Apply the relative MMP for a projective morphism of compact analytic spaces in dimension at most three [11], Proposition 2.26. Its source is the ordinary Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial smooth WW, its pair is effective SNC klt, and its morphism is a projective surjection of normal compact analytic spaces. On the relative ordinary Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial minimal model over ZZ, the transform of FF is exceptional and relatively nef, since the pulled-back adjoint is relatively trivial. Negativity makes that transform zero. No step extracts a divisor, so the resulting morphism qZ:Z0→Zq_Z : Z_0 \to Z is small. It is projective, hence Z0Z_0 is compact Kähler. Codimension-one comparison and reflexive extension identify its perturbed adjoint with the actual pullback from ZZ.

The same smallness gives the crepant actual pullback for the full boundary. Moreover qZq_Z is an isomorphism over a smooth germ of ZZ. To see this, take a relatively very ample line over a small Stein neighborhood of the germ. It has a meromorphic section there: after large relative ample twists, relative Serre generation and Cartan generation supply sections whose quotient is such a section. Its divisor pushes to a Cartier divisor on the smooth factorial target. Smallness leaves no exceptional prime, so the original divisor and line are its pullback. A pulled-back line cannot be relatively ample on a positive-dimensional fiber. Any nonisomorphism fiber here would have positive dimension: otherwise properness and the fiber-dimension theorem make the morphism finite near that fiber, and a finite bimeromorphic morphism to the normal target is an isomorphism. Thus the small model is unchanged over this smooth germ. The lc centers of the full pair meet the smooth crossing locus established in Proposition (54); the small model is generically unchanged there. The full transformed pair (Z0,B0)(Z_0, B_0) is therefore dlt, and its floor C0C_0 is the strict transform of CZC_Z.

For a three-dimensional stratum, apply Das–Ou’s lc threefold abundance theorem [14] to this full pair. Its adjoint is the analytically nef actual pullback of the ambient restriction: the metric lower bound restricts to ZZ and then pulls back. The detailed conventions in [14] use the reflexive canonical sheaf, the invertible reflexive pluriadjoint, actual restriction isomorphisms, and smooth-potential nefness. Thus this application does not choose a global canonical Weil divisor. Generation descends to ZZ by normality and projection formula. Lower strata inherit generation by restriction from a three-dimensional stratum containing them.

Choose a common sufficiently divisible even integer qq for the finite list of strata and set

L=OV(q(KV+B)),LZ=L∣Z=OZ(q(KZ+BZ)).L = \mathcal{O}_V(q(K_V + B)), \qquad L_Z = L|_Z = \mathcal{O}_Z(q(K_Z + B_Z)).

Enlarge qq so all LZL_Z in dimension at most three are generated. Their complete systems followed by Stein factorization give

fZ:Z⟶YZ,LZ≃fZ∗NZ(55)f_Z : Z \longrightarrow Y_Z, \qquad L_Z \simeq f_Z^*N_Z \tag*{(55)}

where fZf_Z has connected fibers, YZY_Z is normal projective, and NZN_Z is ample. Indeed the image in projective space is projective by Chow, and the finite analytic Stein space is projective by algebraizing its finite coherent algebra with GAGA. Its line is the pullback of the tautological ample line. In particular, for every k≥0k \ge0, all sections of LZkL_Z^k come from NZkN_Z^k.

A torsion-free obstruction to restriction

The following lemma is what lets general-fiber matching control all parameters, including those where the floor has a singular or nonreduced scheme fiber. Its hypothesis that the pair is klt off the floor is essential to the canonical character calculation.

Lemma 7.1. Let (T,G)(T,G) be a normal irreducible compact Kähler lc pair with effective rational boundary, and put C=[G]C = [G] with its reduced structure. Assume that the pair is klt on T∖CT \setminus C. Let f:T→Pf : T \to P be a surjective holomorphic map with connected fibers to a normal irreducible compact complex space. Suppose an actual positive adjoint multiple is pulled back from a line on PP. Then

R1f∗OT(−C) is torsion-free on P.R^1 f_* \mathcal{O}_T(-C) \text{ is torsion-free on } P.

Here OT(−C)\mathcal{O}_T(-C) is the ideal of the reduced floor.

Proof. The equality with the ideal holds because on the normal TT both sheaves consist of holomorphic functions vanishing at every height-one prime in CC. Work on a small connected base open trivializing the line whose pullback is m(KT+G)m(K_T+G). Its nonvanishing pulled-back frame is a local meromorphic mm-pluricanonical form θ\theta.

Adjoin the full set of mmth roots of this form. This construction is local even without a canonical Cartier frame. At a normal local domain AA, choose a meromorphic canonical generator η\eta and write θ/ηm=a/b\theta/\eta^m=a/b. The monic algebra

A[w]/(wm−abm−1)⊂Frac⁡(A)[t]/(tm−a/b),w=bt,A[w]/(w^m-ab^{m-1})\subset\operatorname{Frac}(A)[t]/(t^m-a/b),\qquad w=bt,

is finite and reduced; its analytic normalization is finite [34], Part B, Section 4, Corollaries 2–3. Changes of meromorphic canonical generator multiply the root coefficient by an mmth power, and identify the total algebras and their integral closures. They therefore glue to the normalized cover. Keep every component and the full μm\mu_m-action. The tautological form τ=tη\tau=t\eta is a meromorphic top form on a projective resolution with smooth source; take this resolution functorially and equivariantly, after shrinking near the compact fibers. Write l:H→Tl:H\to T for the composite.

At a general prime of TT with boundary coefficient bb, the order of τ\tau upstairs is

e(1−b)−1(56)e(1-b)-1 \tag*{(56)}

where ee is the ramification index. This follows from the pole order −eb-eb of the root coefficient and the differential ramification order e−1e-1. It is −1-1 when b=1b=1 and is an integer between zero and e−1e-1 when 0≤b<10\le b<1. A meromorphic form in the τ\tau-character has the form hτh\tau, where hh is an invariant meromorphic function and hence descends to TT; this uses the entire root algebra, whose invariants are the normal base. Regularity in codimension one forces hh to be holomorphic and to vanish on CC.

Conversely, suppose h∈OT(−C)h\in\mathcal{O}_T(-C). On a log resolution of the pair, every crepant coefficient is at most one. A coefficient-one exceptional prime has center in CC, because the pair is klt away from CC; the pullback of hh has positive order there. Thus in SNC coordinates the density ∣h∣2∣θ∣2/m|h|^2|\theta|^{2/m} has every exponent strictly above the integrability threshold. It is locally integrable. Change of variables makes l∗hτl^*h\tau locally square integrable on the smooth resolution, and a square-integrable meromorphic top form is holomorphic. This proves the exact character equality

(l∗ωH)τ=OT(−C)τ.(57)(l_*\omega_H)_\tau=\mathcal{O}_T(-C)_\tau. \tag*{(57)}

Each component of the full normalized cover dominates the normal base, and each resolved component does so as well. The inverse image in TT of the connected base open is connected, because ff is proper with connected fibers; normality makes it irreducible. Finite maps followed by projective resolutions have Kähler sources near the whole inverse image of a sufficiently small base neighborhood: patch relative ample metrics and add a large pulled-back Kähler form. Canonical torsion-freeness [21], Theorem 2.9 and Proposition 2.11 applies componentwise. For the generically finite map to TT, its higher canonical images vanish generically and hence vanish. For the map to PP, its first canonical image is torsion-free. Leray and the character projector in (57) make R1f∗OT(−C)R^1f_*\mathcal{O}_T(-C) a direct summand of that torsion-free sheaf. This proves the assertion locally, and hence on PP. □

Here is its restriction consequence. Suppose LT=f∗NL_T=f^*N in the lemma, where PP is projective and NN ample. The ideal sequence gives

Q:=coker⁡(OP→f∗OC)⟶R1f∗OT(−C).(58)\mathcal{Q}:=\operatorname{coker}(\mathcal{O}_P\to f_*\mathcal{O}_C)\longrightarrow R^1f_*\mathcal{O}_T(-C). \tag*{(58)}

If CC is vertical, meaning that it does not dominate PP, then Q\mathcal{Q} is supported on a proper analytic subset and is zero by torsion-freeness. Serre vanishing for the kernel of OP→f∗OC\mathcal{O}_P \to f_*\mathcal{O}_C, after tensoring by NkN^k, shows that every section of Lk∣CL^k|_C extends to TT for all sufficiently large kk. The bound is uniform over the sections.

If CC dominates PP, the left arrow into f∗OCf_*\mathcal{O}_C is injective, and f∗OCf_*\mathcal{O}_C is torsion-free by (7.4). The finite Stein space of the reduced C→PC \to P is reduced and every irreducible component dominates PP: a vertical minimal prime of a finite reduced algebra over a domain would supply a nonzero torsion element. Off a proper analytic subset this finite map is étale. A section of Lk∣CL^k|_C whose values agree throughout the reduced floor fiber over every point of some dense open of PP has zero image in Q⊗Nk\mathcal{Q} \otimes N^k on that open, and hence everywhere by torsion-freeness. Its local lifts from NkN^k are unique and glue. Thus it extends. This argument neither asserts that special scheme fibers are reduced nor uses cohomology base change at a special point.

A Mori contraction over the semiample target

The torsion-free argument has settled extension when the floor is vertical over the semiample target. For a horizontal floor, it remains to make a section take the same value on the connected components of a general floor fiber. We first construct a Mori model on which those components can be counted.

Fix a stratum ZZ of dimension one, two, or three and its small model qZ:(Z0,B0)→(Z,BZ)q_Z:(Z_0,B_0)\to(Z,B_Z). Put C0=⌊B0⌋C_0=\lfloor B_0\rfloor and f0:Z0→Y=YZf_0:Z_0\to Y=Y_Z. The full adjoint is the actual pullback of the semiample line on YY.

Lemma 7.2 (A Mori model for a horizontal floor). Assume that C0C_0 dominates YY. There is a finite sequence of projective divisorial contractions and flips from Z0Z_0 to an ordinary Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial compact Kähler model TT, followed by a projective Mori contraction

u:T⟶W,g:W⟶Y,u:T\longrightarrow W,\qquad g:W\longrightarrow Y,

where WW is normal compact Kähler and both maps have connected fibers. Write GG for the transform of B0B_0 and C+=⌊G⌋C^+=\lfloor G\rfloor. The pair (T,G)(T,G) is effective lc and klt off C+C^+; the divisor C+C^+ is relatively ample for uu and still dominates YY. All steps factor over YY and extract no divisor. On a common projective resolution of the sequence, the full adjoints are equal as meromorphic pullbacks of the same actual line from YY.

Proof. Choose a small rational ε>0\varepsilon>0 for which B0−εC0B_0-\varepsilon C_0 is effective klt. This uses dlt and the fact that all its lc centers are contained in the floor. Let HH be an integral very ample divisor on YY and choose a rational effective H′∼QdHH'\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}dH with d>2dim⁡Zd>2\dim Z such that

B0−εC0+f0∗H′B_0-\varepsilon C_0+f_0^*H'

is still klt. A sum of sufficiently many general members of ∣H∣|H| with small rational weights does this by Bertini on a log resolution. If YY is a point take H′=0H'=0.

The adjoint of this perturbed pair is not pseudo-effective. On a smooth general fiber of a resolution of f0f_0, its class is the negative of the nonzero effective divisor εC0\varepsilon C_0 restricted to that fiber: the full adjoint and H′H' are pulled back from YY, and the floor is horizontal. Its integral against a Kähler power is strictly negative. If the ambient class were pseudo-effective, the potential of a positive current representing its pullback would restrict to a positive current on almost every such smooth fiber, contradicting this integral. The smooth horizontal-fiber conditions hold on a nonempty open, so the almost-everywhere restriction is sufficient. This same integral also produces a negative class in the cone used by the Kähler cone theorem. If the smooth fiber has dimension v>0v > 0, push its positive closed bidimension-(1,1)(1,1) current ωFv−1\omega_F^{v-1} through the fiber inclusion and the resolution to Z0Z_0. It represents a class in NA‾(Z0)\overline{NA}(Z_0), and its pairing with the perturbed adjoint is exactly that strictly negative integral. The cone decomposition therefore supplies a negative extremal ray.

Run the klt Kähler program for this perturbed adjoint. In dimension three, the negative extremal-ray and contraction theorems [12] are used through Subsection 4.4, which incorporates Proposition 4.3 and the specified external results. They give connected projective contractions to normal compact Kähler targets. The supporting class differs from the klt adjoint by a Kähler class, which is the projectivity condition in that theorem. The supporting class need not be big, and the perturbed adjoint here is not pseudo-effective. Flips and termination of flip sequences are provided by [11]. In dimensions at most two the non-pseudo-effective pair is projective and the ordinary projective program applies. For a surface, otherwise a non-Moishezon Kähler resolution has a nonzero holomorphic two-form: if H2,0=0H^{2,0}=0, rational approximation of a Kähler class would make it projective. That form descends reflexively and, with the effective boundary, gives a section of a positive adjoint multiple, contradicting non-pseudo-effectivity. A Moishezon Kähler klt surface is projective by Namikawa’s criterion [41]. Curves are projective.

We specify the ordinary Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial and finiteness details used by this program. For a projective negative extremal contraction, a global rational line of degree zero on all contracted curves descends in a multiple by [12]. Here we apply its projective relative theorem to the effective klt pair, with the compact set equal to the entire compact target. For this projective surjection, property Q of [12] requires a normal source and compact source and target, as here. All fiber curves span the one relative ray, so the theorem’s contraction is the given contraction. Indeed its map is constant on each connected projective fiber of the given contraction, and rigidity factors it through that contraction. Its structure map back to the relative base supplies the reverse factorization; surjectivity makes the two factorizations inverse. This use of Theorem 2.44 does not assert a factoriality hypothesis for that theorem. At a divisorial step, adjust the transform of a destination Weil divisor by a Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier exceptional prime of nonzero degree on the ray, and descend the resulting degree-zero line. Comparison in codimension one makes the destination divisor Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier. At a flip, adjust on the negative side by the negative adjoint, descend, and pull to the positive side; the positive adjoint is Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier and the same comparison applies. Boundary components and the adjoint then also give the canonical reflexive power. This preserves ordinary Q\mathbb{Q}-factoriality.

The rank of global rational divisor classes modulo curve numerical equivalence is finite. Each running model is a connected compact complex analytic space. Its reduced underlying real analytic space has bounded Zariski tangent dimension by a finite analytic chart cover. Acquistapace–Broglia–Tognoli [1] embed it closely in Euclidean space, and Łojasiewicz [38] gives a compatible locally finite triangulation; the subcomplex corresponding to the compact model is finite. Hence its rational H2H^2 is finite-dimensional. The first Chern class sends global rational Cartier divisors to that group. Every divisor in its kernel has degree zero on each compact curve, by restriction to the curve’s normalization. The rational divisor space modulo curve numerical equivalence is consequently a quotient of the Chern-class image, and has finite rank. The rank drops at a divisorial contraction, by the nonzero exceptional ray degree, and does not increase at a flip. For the latter assertion a numerically trivial line on the negative side descends as above; the descended line is curve-numerically trivial because every curve downstairs is covered by a curve upstairs, using projectivity over that curve. Its pullback is trivial on curves on the positive side, and every divisor there is a transform by smallness. There can therefore be only finitely many divisorial steps. Together with termination of flip sequences this gives a finite program to a nef model or a Mori contraction. All steps extract no divisors.

Every step factors over YY. Inductively write the running perturbed adjoint as

Aiε=KXi+Bi−εCi+fi∗H′.A_i^{\varepsilon}=K_{X_i}+B_i-\varepsilon C_i+f_i^*H'.

For a negative contraction apply the relative cone and length theorem [12], Theorem 2.45 to KXi+Bi−εCiK_{X_i}+B_i-\varepsilon C_i over its entire compact contraction target. The source is ordinary Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial and the pair is klt. Property Q holds as above; because the compact set is the whole target, Theorem 2.45’s factoriality over that set is precisely the global factoriality of the source, including its canonical reflexive power. A negative generator Γ\Gamma has

−(KXi+Bi−εCi)⋅Γ≤2dim⁡Z.-(K_{X_i}+B_i-\varepsilon C_i)\cdot\Gamma\leq2\dim Z.

If fi(Γ)f_i(\Gamma) were a curve, then fi∗H′⋅Γ≥df_i^*H'\cdot\Gamma\geq d, contradicting the negativity of AiεA_i^{\varepsilon}. On the nonnegative part of that relative cone, both KXi+Bi−εCiK_{X_i}+B_i-\varepsilon C_i and the nef fi∗H′f_i^*H' are nonnegative, while their sum is nonpositive on the contracted cone; its H′H'-degree is zero there as well. All contracted curves are vertical over YY. A holomorphic map from a connected projective fiber that is nonconstant would map a curve nontrivially, so fif_i is constant on each fiber. Rigidity and normality of the target give the factorization, and the positive side of a flip factors through the same base.

We check the boundary properties needed to repeat the step. No prime is extracted, so the transformed full boundary is effective and its floor is exactly the transform Ci+1C_{i+1} of CiC_i. The running MMP preserves the klt pair Bi−εCi+fi∗H′B_i-\varepsilon C_i+f_i^*H'. Removing the effective divisor fi+1∗H′f_{i+1}^*H' shows that Bi+1−εCi+1B_{i+1}-\varepsilon C_{i+1} is klt. In particular the full pair is klt away from its floor.

The full adjoints remain actually crepant pullbacks from YY. Indeed the chosen meromorphic pluriadjoint identity extends to the new model in codimension one, since no prime is extracted, and then reflexively. On a common graph both meromorphic maps start from the same line pulled back from YY and agree on the dense isomorphism open. They agree everywhere as meromorphic maps. Equality of discrepancies therefore preserves log canonicity of the full pair. If r,sr,s are the graph projections, negativity for the perturbed step gives

0≤r∗Aiε−s∗Ai+1ε=ε(s∗Ci+1−r∗Ci).0\leq r^*A_i^{\varepsilon}-s^*A_{i+1}^{\varepsilon} =\varepsilon(s^*C_{i+1}-r^*C_i).

A horizontal component of CiC_i cannot disappear into an entirely vertical Ci+1C_{i+1}, since the coefficient of the right side along its strict valuation would then be negative. Thus the floor remains horizontal. On every subsequent model the full adjoint and H′H' still come from YY. Repeating the resolved smooth-fiber integral and pushing its Kähler-power current as above gives a negative class in its NA cone and hence a negative extremal ray. In particular a nef endpoint is impossible.

We have obtained a Mori contraction

u:T⟶W,g:W⟶Y,u:T\longrightarrow W,\qquad g:W\longrightarrow Y,

with TT normal compact Kähler, uu projective of fiber type, and both maps having connected fibers. For gg, this follows also from (gu)∗OT=OY(gu)_*\mathcal{O}_T=\mathcal{O}_Y and u∗OT=OWu_*\mathcal{O}_T=\mathcal{O}_W. The full boundary GG is effective lc, its adjoint is an actual pullback from YY, and it is klt away from C+=[G]C^+=[G]: subtracting εC+\varepsilon C^+ is klt. The running perturbed adjoint satisfies

Aε≡u−εC+,−Aε≡u+εC+.A^{\varepsilon}\equiv_u-\varepsilon C^+,\qquad-A^{\varepsilon}\equiv_u+\varepsilon C^+.

The left side of the second equivalence is relatively ample for the Mori contraction. Thus C+C^{+} is relatively ample for uu. The graphs of the divisorial steps and flips are projective over both sides. A main component of their iterated fiber product, followed by normalization and projective resolution, gives the common projective resolution in the statement. Its smooth source is compact Kähler.

The restriction criterion

We now use the Mori model only to compare the values of a boundary section on general fibers. The torsion-free obstruction then extends that comparison over every parameter.

Proposition 7.3 (Restriction criterion). For every stratum ZZ of dimension one, two, or three, there is either no comparison or one proper bimeromorphic comparison between two normal components of CZC_Z, allowing a component to be compared with itself, with the following properties.

  1. On a resolution of its graph with smooth source, the two pulled-back actual boundary adjoint lines are equal as invertible subsheaves of meromorphic pluricanonical forms.

  1. For all sufficiently large divisible kk, uniformly over sections, a section of Lk∣CZL^{k}|_{C_Z} extends to ZZ if its two pullbacks agree under this comparison. With no comparison there is no matching condition.

  1. When present, the comparison pairs two coefficient-one markings on general projective-line fibers of a projective Mori contraction on a bimeromorphic compact Kähler model of ZZ.

Proof. If CZC_Z is vertical over YZY_Z, the consequence of (58) gives extension in a uniform large-degree tail without a comparison. Suppose therefore that it is horizontal, and use the small model qZq_Z and the Mori model u:T→Wu:T\to W, g:W→Yg:W\to Y of Lemma 7.2. Extending the pulled-back section on C0C_0 suffices: a section on Z0Z_0 descends to ZZ, and equality of its restriction after pullback implies equality on the reduced CZC_Z, since every component is covered birationally.

The floor on general Mori fibers

We now compare the connected components of a general floor fiber with the markings of one Mori fiber. On a common projective log resolution of the program, the full crepant boundary is the same on both sides. Its coefficient-one union maps to both C0C_0 and C+C^{+} with connected fibers by Lemma 2.1. After restriction over any y∈Yy\in Y, proper closed maps with connected fibers preserve connected components. Thus the connected components of the underlying spaces of C0,yC_{0,y} and Cy+C^{+}_y correspond. This is a topological statement, not a reducedness claim for their scheme fibers.

The finite Stein space of C+→WC^{+}\to W has every component dominating WW. Indeed relative ampleness makes C+→WC^{+}\to W surjective, and Lemma 7.1 and (58) give the torsion-free property used in the preceding discussion. For general yy, every irreducible component of the finite Stein fiber has dimension dim⁡W−dim⁡Y\dim W-\dim Y, by the dimension theorem. The fiber WyW_y is irreducible of that dimension: a resolution of WW has connected fibers over YY, and a general one is smooth and connected, hence irreducible, and surjects onto WyW_y. Each component of the finite Stein fiber therefore dominates WyW_y. It follows that every connected component of Cy+C^{+}_y meets u−1(w)u^{-1}(w) for a common general w∈Wyw\in W_y.

The underlying space of a general fiber FF of uu is irreducible by the same resolution argument. If dim⁡F≥2\dim F\geq2, a Cartier multiple of C+C^{+} restricts to a nonzero effective ample Cartier divisor on FredF_{\mathrm{red}}. Its support is connected. To recall the reason, if an ample effective divisor split into two disjoint nonzero parts, general hyperplane sections would reduce to an irreducible projective surface F2F_2. Write the two induced nonzero effective Cartier parts on it as D1,D2D_1,D_2, and let v:F~→F2v:\widetilde{F}\to F_2 be a projective resolution with smooth source. Their pullbacks are effective and orthogonal. Although v∗(D1+D2)v^*(D_1+D_2) is only nef and big, the projection formula gives

v∗(D1+D2)⋅v∗Di=(D1+D2)⋅v∗[v∗Di]>0(i=1,2).v^*(D_1+D_2)\cdot v_*D_i=(D_1+D_2)\cdot v_*[v^*D_i]>0 \qquad(i=1,2).

the pushforward is a nonzero effective curve cycle and D1+D2D_1+D_2 is ample on the integral surface. Orthogonality then gives (v∗Di)2>0(v^*D_i)^2>0 for both ii. The surface Hodge index theorem forbids two such orthogonal positive classes. This argument does not require normality of FredF_{\mathrm{red}}.

If dim⁡F=1\dim F=1, choose FF also in the generic-smoothness open. Generality avoids the singular locus of TT, the singularities and intersections of the boundary, and the ramification of its horizontal primes. The fiber is a smooth connected curve, and the full pullback identity gives

0=deg⁡(KF+G∣F)=2g(F)−2+deg⁡(G∣F).0=\deg(K_F+G|_F)=2g(F)-2+\deg(G|_F).

There is at least one coefficient-one point. Hence F≃P1F\simeq\mathbb{P}^1, and its floor has one or two points. In the two-point case these points exhaust the horizontal boundary on FF. In all connected cases, every connected component of Cy+C_y^+ meets the same connected subset C+∩FC^+\cap F, so Cy+C_y^+, and therefore C0,yC_{0,y}, is connected. Then no comparison is needed. In the two-point case each connected component of C0,yC_{0,y} is represented by at least one of these two markings, after their transfer through the common graph.

The two-marking comparison

Normalize each surviving horizontal prime D⊂C+D\subset C^+ and take the Stein factorization

Dν⟶ED⟶W.D^\nu\longrightarrow E_D\longrightarrow W.

The first map is projective bimeromorphic and EDE_D is normal; the second is finite. If there are two horizontal primes, each finite map has degree one and is an isomorphism over the normal WW. The main component of the fiber product of their normalizations over WW gives a proper bimeromorphic comparison. If there is one horizontal prime, ED→WE_D\to W has degree two. On a dense open it is étale and has an exchange. The reduced horizontal non-diagonal component of ED×WEDE_D\times_W E_D has finite generically one-to-one projections to the normal EDE_D; both are isomorphisms. It defines the exchange involution globally, including across the branch. The main component of Dν×ED,exchangeDνD^\nu\times_{E_D,\mathrm{exchange}}D^\nu lifts it to a proper bimeromorphic graph. It is the Stein space of the normalized prime that is used here, not the possibly nonnormal Stein space of the entire floor.

Compose this graph with the common graphs of the program and with the small model. It gives the asserted comparison between normal primes of CZC_Z, possibly a self-comparison. Each surviving prime is generically finite over WW; the image in WW of the proper subset where its transfer is not an isomorphism is proper. Thus both markings on a general Mori fiber lie in the common transfer isomorphism loci.

These graph projections are projective. The maps Dν→EDD^\nu\to E_D are projective and the maps ED→WE_D\to W are finite; their fiber products and closed main components are therefore projective over the branches. The small-model and MMP graphs have the same property. Iterated main components and finite normalization preserve it, so the comparison admits a projective resolution with smooth compact Kähler source.

We verify the actual meromorphic identity required by property (1). The two residues of a logarithmic fiber form give the same comparison as the even Poincaré-residue diagrams of [37], Section 3, Definition 13 and Proposition 14; we include the calculation for the normalized two-branch construction above. On a smooth ruled open of WW, order the two markings after an étale local cover when necessary, choose a base volume form ξ\xi, and a fiber coordinate with markings at zero and infinity. The full qq-pluriadjoint frame coming from YY has the form

a(w)(dz/z)⊗q⊗ξ⊗q.a(w)(dz/z)^{\otimes q}\otimes\xi^{\otimes q}.

There is no other horizontal divisor on the general fiber. Its two residues are a(w)ξ⊗qa(w)\xi^{\otimes q} and (−1)qa(w)ξ⊗q(-1)^q a(w)\xi^{\otimes q}; they agree because qq is even. The calculation is invariant under exchanging the two local markings. Full crepancy transfers it to the original primes. On a resolution of their comparison graph, both actual adjoint lines are the same pullback of NZN_Z from YY. Their meromorphic embeddings agree on this dense ruled open, hence agree everywhere. Thus the invertible subsheaves of meromorphic pluriforms are equal even at exceptional primes. An abstract Q\mathbb{Q}-linear equivalence without this residue calculation would not suffice.

A section satisfying this comparison has equal values at the two representatives over a general ww. On every connected component of a compact reduced floor fiber it is constant in the trivialized pulled-back line: holomorphic functions on a compact connected reduced complex space are constant. The representatives meet every component, so its values agree on C0,yC_{0,y} for every yy in a dense base open. The horizontal consequence of (58) extends it to Z0Z_0, and then it descends to ZZ. The only asymptotic bound on kk came from Serre vanishing in the vertical case. Finitely many strata admit a common sufficiently divisible tail. This proves all three properties.

For the remainder of the boundary proof, call each comparison supplied by Proposition 7.3 a link. This word refers to its proper bimeromorphic graph together with the proved equality of meromorphic adjoint subsheaves. It does not mean only an abstract linear equivalence. We will use all curve comparisons, but on surfaces only the groupoid generated by links of three-dimensional strata. That restriction is what allows the common ambient Kähler class to control their scalar action.

Finite residue actions from one Kähler class

The restriction criterion asks for equality under links on lower strata. To build enough sections with all these equalities, we need finiteness of the induced actions on each fixed section space. On projective strata this is the usual log pluricanonical representation theorem. On nonprojective surfaces it holds here because the links all come from the boundary of one compact Kähler fourfold and therefore compare restrictions of one ambient Kähler class.

Fix the common even degree qq and lines LZL_Z from (55). For d=0,1,2d=0,1,2, form a groupoid Gd\mathcal{G}_d whose objects are the finitely many dd-dimensional strata. In dimension zero use all identifications of points, with the canonical zero-form generator 11. In dimension one use all crepant residue comparisons between the indicated curve pairs. In dimension two use only the groupoid generated by the links of three-dimensional strata from Proposition 7.3, together with their inverses. Here a comparison includes equality of the pulled-back invertible meromorphic adjoint subsheaves, as specified there.

Such a comparison induces an isomorphism

H0(Z1,LZ1k)⟶H0(Z2,LZ2k)H^0(Z_1,L_{Z_1}^k)\longrightarrow H^0(Z_2,L_{Z_2}^k)

for every k>0k>0. Pull a section to a resolution of the graph, use the equality of invertible meromorphic subsheaves, and descend to the other normal stratum by projection formula. This transport is compatible with composition, products of sections, and residue restriction along boundary divisors whose centers are birational on both strata. Lemma 9.1 proves the compatibility also when a floor curve is contracted, before that case enters the construction. The same argument shows that evaluation after a graph pullback is evaluation in the identified actual line fibers, a fact needed for generation later.

Proposition 8.1 (Finite isotropy images). For every d∈{0,1,2}d \in\{0,1,2\}, every dd-stratum ZZ, and every fixed integer k>0k > 0, the image of the self-comparisons in GdG_d on H0(Z,LZk)H^0(Z,L_Z^k) is a finite group.

The restriction on G2G_2 is essential. A nonprojective K3 surface with trivial canonical line can have an automorphism acting by a non-root-of-unity scalar on its holomorphic two-form [39]. Thus the proposition would be false for arbitrary bimeromorphic self-comparisons of nonprojective surfaces.

Points, curves, and projective surfaces

On a point the zero-form generator is 1 and every comparison acts as the identity. A normal compact curve is smooth, and a bimeromorphic map is an isomorphism preserving the boundary coefficients. For genus at least two the automorphism group is finite. For genus one, the stabilizer of a nonempty finite boundary support is finite; with empty boundary translations act trivially on holomorphic forms and the linear automorphism group is finite. For genus zero, nefness of the adjoint and coefficients at most one require at least two marked points. If there are exactly two, both coefficients are one and the log line is trivial with generator (dt/t)⊗qk(dt/t)^{\otimes qk}. Scaling fixes it, and exchange has sign one in the even degree. With at least three marked points the stabilizer is finite. This proves Proposition 8.1 in dimensions zero and one.

Suppose a surface stratum ZZ is Moishezon. Its klt perturbation in Proposition 6.3 gives rational singularities. Namikawa’s projectivity criterion [41] makes the compact Kähler ZZ projective. Its effective full boundary is dlt and its adjoint is semiample. The analytic comparison graphs are algebraic by Chow, and their meromorphic equality is the usual crepant B-birational equality for compatible canonical identifications. Fujino–Gongyo’s log pluricanonical representation theorem [24] gives finite image in every fixed Cartier degree. It applies exactly in this projective case.

The class attached to a nonprojective surface

Let ZZ now be a non-Moishezon surface stratum, and let PP be the minimal smooth surface of a compact Kähler resolution of ZZ. Point blowdowns preserve Kählenness, for example by the even-b1b_1 criterion [5]. Algebraic dimension is bimeromorphically invariant, so PP is nonprojective and has algebraic dimension zero or one. It has a nonzero holomorphic two-form: otherwise H2(P,R)=H1,1(P,R)H^2(P,\mathbb{R}) = H^{1,1}(P,\mathbb{R}), and rational approximation of a Kähler class followed by Kodaira embedding would make PP projective. Thus κ(P)≥0\kappa(P) \ge0. The minimal model is neither rational nor ruled; its bimeromorphic maps are automorphisms, and bimeromorphic maps between such minimal surfaces are isomorphisms [44]. Under a common resolution, H0(Z,LZk)H^0(Z,L_Z^k) embeds as a finite-dimensional space of meromorphic qkqk-pluricanonical forms on PP, compatibly with all transports.

Fix once and for all a Kähler form ωV\omega_V on the ambient fourfold. For a common resolution h:R→Ph:R \to P, ρ:R→Z\rho:R \to Z, define

cZ=h∗ρ∗([ωV∣Z])∈H1,1(P,R).(59)c_Z = h_*\rho^*([\omega_V|_Z]) \in H^{1,1}(P,\mathbb{R}). \tag*{(59)}

The brackets denote the de Rham class of the pulled-back local-potential form on the smooth resolution. All cohomology in the comparison below is taken on smooth manifolds. This is independent of further resolutions, since v∗v∗=1v_*v^*=1 for a modification vv. Put β=[ρ∗(ωV∣Z)]\beta=[\rho^*(\omega_V|_Z)]. Its smooth representative is semipositive and is strictly positive on a nonempty open: the original stratum is generically immersed in the smooth isomorphism locus of the special resolution. Hence β2>0\beta^2>0. The blowup orthogonal decomposition has β=h∗cZ+e\beta=h^*c_Z+e, with ee in the negative-definite exceptional subspace. Consequently

cZ2=β2−e2>0.c_Z^2=\beta^2-e^2>0.

Lemma 8.2 (The same ambient class across a link). Let a link of a three-dimensional stratum compare non-Moishezon surface strata Z1,Z2Z_1,Z_2, allowing Z1=Z2Z_1=Z_2. Let PiP_i be their smooth minimal models and τ:P1≃P2\tau:P_1\simeq P_2 the induced isomorphism. For the classes in (59),

cZ1−τ∗cZ2∈NS⁡(P1)R.(60)c_{Z_1}-\tau^*c_{Z_2}\in\operatorname{NS}(P_1)_{\mathbb{R}}. \tag*{(60)}

Here NS⁡(P)R\operatorname{NS}(P)_{\mathbb{R}} is the real span of the first Chern classes of holomorphic line bundles in H1,1(P,R)H^{1,1}(P,\mathbb{R}).

Proof. Let i:Z↪Vi:Z\hookrightarrow V be the parent stratum, and choose a common projective resolution with smooth compact Kähler source UU, with maps a:U→Za:U\to Z and b:U→Tb:U\to T to its original and Mori models. Use the single class

α=[(i∘a)∗ωV]∈H1,1(U,R).\alpha=[(i\circ a)^*\omega_V]\in H^{1,1}(U,\mathbb{R}).

Resolve the marked-branch comparison graph and its maps to UU and the minimal surfaces. We obtain a smooth compact Kähler surface DD with maps ri:D→Ur_i:D\to U, bimeromorphic maps di:D→Pid_i:D\to P_i, and bimeromorphic maps to the original ZiZ_i, such that ariar_i is the inclusion of that original branch after its resolution and d2=τd1d_2=\tau d_1. These identities hold on the common marked open and hence everywhere. This construction includes a self-link: its two maps to the same original prime may differ by the normalized exchange. Resolution independence and projection formula give

cZ1−τ∗cZ2=d1,∗(r1∗−r2∗)α.c_{Z_1}-\tau^*c_{Z_2}=d_{1,*}(r_1^*-r_2^*)\alpha.

The exceptional image of the modification b:U→Tb:U\to T has codimension at least two in the normal threefold, and hence dimension at most one. The Mori base in this two-marking case has dimension two. After removing its image, the discriminant, and the singular base locus, UU is therefore a smooth proper P1\mathbb{P}^1-fibration over a dense open of the base. For such a fibration π:U∘→W∘\pi:U^\circ\to W^\circ, the differential sequence and H0(P1,Ω1)=0H^0(\mathbb{P}^1,\Omega^1)=0 give

π∗ΩU∘2=ΩW∘2.\pi_*\Omega^2_{U^\circ}=\Omega^2_{W^\circ}.

Indeed the quotient of ΩU∘2\Omega^2_{U^\circ} by π∗ΩW∘2\pi^*\Omega^2_{W^\circ} is π∗ΩW∘1⊗ΩU∘/W∘1\pi^*\Omega^1_{W^\circ}\otimes\Omega^1_{U^\circ/W^\circ}, whose direct image is zero, while π∗OU∘=OW∘\pi_*\mathcal{O}_{U^\circ}=\mathcal{O}_{W^\circ}. Thus the two restrictions of a holomorphic two-form on UU agree on the dense paired-branch open of DD, even for the double branch after an étale local ordering. They agree on all of DD.

Holomorphic pullback and proper pushforward on compact Kähler manifolds preserve Hodge type. The map

d1,∗(r1∗−r2∗):H2(U,Q)⟶H2(P1,Q)d_{1,*}(r_1^*-r_2^*):H^2(U,\mathbb{Q})\longrightarrow H^2(P_1,\mathbb{Q})

is therefore a rational Hodge morphism; pushforward here is between equal-dimensional surfaces. The preceding equality kills its (2,0)(2,0) part and, by conjugation, its (0,2)(0,2) part. Its rational image is of type (1,1)(1,1), hence belongs to NS⁡(P1)Q\operatorname{NS}(P_1)_{\mathbb{Q}} by Lefschetz (1,1)(1,1). Extend scalars to R\mathbb{R} in (8.4) to obtain (60). ∎

Swapnajit Das’s positive-class and ruled-branch arguments [15] are close predecessors of this mechanism for two disjoint degree-one branches. The proof above uses the same ambient class on both restrictions and includes the single normalized degree-two branch. It requires no rational polarization.

A uniform scalar bound

We spell out why the class congruence gives finite image for a whole group, not just a finite-order scalar for each individually chosen comparison.

Lemma 8.3. Let PP be a smooth connected nonprojective compact Kähler surface with a nowhere-vanishing holomorphic two-form η\eta. Put N=NS⁡(P)RN = \operatorname{NS}(P)_{\mathbb{R}}. Let G⊂Aut⁡(P)G \subset\operatorname{Aut}(P) be a subgroup. Assume either that NN is degenerate, or that there exists c∈H1,1(P,R)c \in H^{1,1}(P,\mathbb{R}) with c2>0c^2 > 0 and σ∗c−c∈N\sigma^*c-c \in N for every σ∈G\sigma\in G. Then the image of GG on Cη⊗m\mathbb{C}\eta^{\otimes m} is finite for every m>0m > 0. More precisely, every volume scalar has order in the finite set of integers nn with φ(n)≤b2(P)\varphi(n) \le b_2(P).

Proof. The intersection form on H1,1(P,R)H^{1,1}(P,\mathbb{R}) has Lorentz signature (1,h1,1−1)(1,h^{1,1}-1). Its restriction to NN is nonpositive. To see this, a rational positive-square class in NN, after scaling and choosing its sign, is c1(L)c_1(L) with positive Kähler degree. Riemann–Roch and Serre duality give h0(P,Lv)≫v2h^0(P,L^v) \gg v^2: the Euler characteristic has positive quadratic leading term and H0(P,KP⊗L−v)=0H^0(P,K_P \otimes L^{-v}) = 0 for large vv by its negative Kähler degree. This would make PP Moishezon and hence projective. Rational approximation in NN rules out a positive real class as well.

If NN is negative definite, orthogonally project cc to N⊥N^\perp. The projection c⊥c_\perp has positive square and is fixed by every σ∗\sigma^*: the congruence kills its projected difference, and each automorphism preserves NN and the intersection form. The perpendicular of c⊥c_\perp is negative definite, so all eigenvalues on H1,1(P,R)H^{1,1}(P,\mathbb{R}) have modulus one.

If NN is degenerate, its radical is a rational isotropic line ℓ\ell; nonpositivity in a Lorentz space permits no larger radical. An integral automorphism preserves a primitive integral generator of ℓ\ell up to sign. The invariant flag

ℓ⊂ℓ⊥⊂H1,1(P,R)\ell\subset\ell^\perp\subset H^{1,1}(P,\mathbb{R})

has eigenvalues ±1\pm1 on the first and last quotients, which pair dually, and a negative-definite middle quotient ℓ⊥/ℓ\ell^\perp/\ell. All (1,1)(1,1) eigenvalues again have modulus one. This argument permits unipotent action and makes no finiteness assertion for all cohomology.

Write σ∗η=δση\sigma^*\eta= \delta_\sigma\eta. Integration of η∧ηˉ\eta\wedge\bar{\eta} gives ∣δσ∣=1|\delta_\sigma| = 1, and the conjugate eigenvalue has the same modulus. Since a nowhere-vanishing canonical form spans H2,0(P)H^{2,0}(P), all eigenvalues on H2(P,C)H^2(P,\mathbb{C}) now have modulus one. The action on H2(P,Z)/torsionH^2(P,\mathbb{Z})/\text{torsion} is integral. Kronecker’s theorem makes each eigenvalue a root of unity; if its order is nn, its cyclotomic polynomial has degree φ(n)≤b2(P)\varphi(n) \le b_2(P). There are only finitely many such nn. The scalars of every element of GG therefore lie in one finite set of roots of unity, which proves finite image on Cη⊗m\mathbb{C}\eta^{\otimes m}.

If PP has algebraic dimension zero, its minimality and [36], Theorem 4 imply that its canonical line is trivial, so it has a nowhere-vanishing volume η\eta. Every meromorphic pluriform is a constant multiple of a power of η\eta, since the quotient is a meromorphic function and a(P)=0a(P)=0. In particular the section space under consideration has dimension at most one. Composing (60) along a returning sequence of links gives σ∗cZ−cZ∈NS⁡(P)R\sigma^*c_Z-c_Z \in\operatorname{NS}(P)_{\mathbb{R}}; each intervening isomorphism preserves Néron–Severi. Lemma 8.3 applies, with the fixed cohomology rank of this PP. It gives a finite scalar image for all returning compositions at once.

Algebraic dimension one

Suppose a(P)=1a(P)=1. Its holomorphic algebraic reduction is an elliptic fibration v:P→Jv:P\to J with connected fibers over a smooth compact curve, and every curve on PP is vertical [36]. Every automorphism preserves this reduction, which is determined by the meromorphic function field. Let GG be the group of returning link automorphisms and let HH be the corresponding finite-dimensional invariant space of meromorphic qkqk-pluriforms on PP.

On a smooth base open avoiding the finitely many polar fibers of a basis of HH, division by a base differential makes these forms holomorphic powers of the elliptic differential on each fiber. An automorphism over the base multiplies that differential by a root of unity of order 11, 22, 33, 44, or 66; its multiplier is holomorphic with values in a finite set, hence locally constant. It acts on all of HH by the corresponding common scalar. Thus the kernel of G→Aut⁡(J)G\to\operatorname{Aut}(J) has finite image on HH. If the image on JJ is finite, its finitely many cosets make the full image finite as well.

It remains to consider an infinite base image. A curve of genus at least two has finite automorphism group. If J=P1J=\mathbb{P}^{1}, the finite set of nonsmooth fibers, including multiple fibers, is invariant, so it would have at most two points. This contradicts the theorem that a nonalgebraic compact Kähler elliptic surface over P1\mathbb{P}^{1} has at least three singular fibers [7]. This theorem is a short form of the elliptic canonical-degree exclusion needed here and does not assume a section of the fibration.

If JJ has genus one, the infinite base group contains infinitely many translations. Its invariant finite special-fiber set must be empty. Choose a nonzero holomorphic two-form η\eta on PP, whose existence was proved above, and write its effective integral zero divisor as DPD_{P}. Every component is vertical. Each fiber is now smooth and connected, hence an irreducible reduced elliptic curve; a vertical prime is that entire fiber, and smoothness gives it multiplicity one in the pullback of its base point. Thus DP=v∗DJD_{P}=v^{*}D_{J} for an effective integral divisor DJD_{J} on JJ, and the actual section gives

ωP≃OP(DP)≃v∗OJ(DJ).\omega_{P}\simeq\mathcal{O}_{P}(D_{P})\simeq v^{*}\mathcal{O}_{J}(D_{J}).

Pullback v∗:Pic⁡(J)→Pic⁡(P)v^{*}:\operatorname{Pic}(J)\to\operatorname{Pic}(P) is injective. Indeed, if v∗M≃OPv^{*}M\simeq\mathcal{O}_{P}, connected fibers and projection formula give

M≃M⊗v∗OP≃v∗v∗M≃v∗OP≃OJ.M\simeq M\otimes v_{*}\mathcal{O}_{P}\simeq v_{*}v^{*}M\simeq v_{*}\mathcal{O}_{P}\simeq\mathcal{O}_{J}.

For an automorphism σ∈G\sigma\in G covering h∈Aut⁡(J)h\in\operatorname{Aut}(J), the identities vσ=hvv\sigma=hv and σ∗ωP≃ωP\sigma^{*}\omega_{P}\simeq\omega_{P} therefore imply h∗OJ(DJ)≃OJ(DJ)h^{*}\mathcal{O}_{J}(D_{J})\simeq\mathcal{O}_{J}(D_{J}).

Put d=deg⁡DJd=\deg D_{J} and write J=C/ΛJ=\mathbb{C}/\Lambda. If translation txt_{x} stabilizes OJ(DJ)\mathcal{O}_{J}(D_{J}), then tx∗DJ−DJt_{x}^{*}D_{J}-D_{J} is principal. Its point sum in JJ is −dx-dx, whereas a principal divisor has point sum zero. To recall the latter fact, lift its meromorphic function to an elliptic function FF, and choose a fundamental parallelogram P\mathcal{P} with boundary avoiding its zeros and poles. For a lattice basis ω1,ω2\omega_{1},\omega_{2}, the residue theorem and pairing opposite edges give

∑z∈Pord⁡z(F)=12πi∫∂PzF′(z)F(z) dz=ω1n2−ω2n1∈Λ,\sum_{z\in\mathcal{P}}\operatorname{ord}_{z}(F)=\frac{1}{2\pi i}\int_{\partial\mathcal{P}}z\frac{F'(z)}{F(z)}\,dz=\omega_{1}n_{2}-\omega_{2}n_{1}\in\Lambda,

where ni=(2πi)−1∫z0z0+ωiF′(z)/F(z) dz∈Zn_{i}=(2\pi i)^{-1}\int_{z_{0}}^{z_{0}+\omega_{i}}F'(z)/F(z)\,dz\in\mathbb{Z}, since the endpoint values of FF agree. It follows that dx=0dx=0 in JJ. If d>0d>0, all stabilizing translations lie in the finite group J[d]=(1dΛ)/ΛJ[d]=(\frac{1}{d}\Lambda)/\Lambda. The infinitely many translations above therefore force d=0d=0. Effectivity gives DJ=0D_{J}=0, so η\eta is nowhere vanishing.

The ratio of any holomorphic two-form to η\eta is holomorphic on the compact connected PP, hence constant. Thus η\eta spans H0(P,ωP)H^{0}(P,\omega_{P}), and every σ∈G\sigma\in G satisfies σ∗η=cση\sigma^{*}\eta=c_{\sigma}\eta for a nonzero constant cσc_{\sigma}. Every element of HH is η⊗qk\eta^{\otimes qk} times a meromorphic function from JJ. The corresponding function space is therefore preserved by the base action. The union of the pole sets of a basis is finite and intrinsic to this vector space, hence invariant under the base group. Infinitely many translations preserve no nonempty finite subset. Thus these functions have no poles and are constant.

The fiber class belongs to NS⁡(P)R\operatorname{NS}(P)_{\mathbb{R}}, has square zero, and is nonzero by its positive Kähler area. Nonpositivity of NS⁡(P)R\operatorname{NS}(P)_{\mathbb{R}} makes it a radical vector. The degenerate case of Lemma 8.3 gives the same finite scalar image on HH. This completes the algebraic-dimension-one case and the proof of Proposition 8.1.

For later use, finiteness of isotropy also controls all transports in a fixed degree between two objects of the same orbit. Choose one comparison from an orbit representative to each member. Every other transport to that member is a self-transport of the representative, whose image is finite, followed by this chosen transport. Thus only finitely many linear transport actions occur in that degree, even if the groupoid has infinitely many bimeromorphic arrows.

Compatible sections on the whole floor

We finish Theorem 6.1 by constructing sections on all strata at one common degree. The construction follows the pre-admissible and admissible section induction of Fujino [19], using the restriction criterion and finite images proved in the preceding sections. The point to retain is that compatibility holds on every intersection before the sections descend to the existing line on the reduced floor.

We proceed from lower strata to higher ones. At each stage the restriction criterion lets us choose all extensions of an already compatible lower collection. Those extensions need not be invariant under comparisons. Finite products of their transports will impose invariance while raising every prescribed lower section to the same power. To make this possible, we first show that transport preserves the prescribed lower restrictions, including when a surface comparison contracts a floor curve.

For a positive degree kk and d∈{0,1,2,3}d \in\{0,1,2,3\}, a system of tuples through dimension dd is a vector subspace

Vd(k)⊂⨁dim⁡Z≤dH0(Z,LZk)\mathcal{V}_{d}(k) \subset\bigoplus_{\dim Z \le d} H^{0}(Z,L_{Z}^{k})

whose tuples satisfy the residue restriction equality along every incidence among these strata. We call the system invariant if, for each e∈{0,…,min⁡(d,2)}e \in\{0,\ldots,\min(d,2)\}, each tuple is compatible with every arrow of Ge\mathcal{G}_{e}: the arrow carries its component at the source to its component at the target. It generates if for every such stratum ZZ and every z∈Zz \in Z, some tuple has its ZZ-component nonzero at zz. These are linear conditions except for generation. The vector space is finite-dimensional because there are finitely many strata and each is compact.

If a system generates, the span of the componentwise powers of its tuples generates in degree kvkv. Restriction and transport commute with products, so compatibility and invariance persist. We may therefore enlarge a successful degree to any sufficiently divisible later degree. Empty collections of strata impose no condition.

Lemma 9.1 (Transport preserves lower restrictions). Fix k>0k>0 and d∈{1,2}d \in\{1,2\}. Let a tuple through dimension dd be compatible along all incidences, and suppose that its part through dimension d−1d-1 is invariant. For any arrow of Gd\mathcal{G}_{d}, transport of the tuple’s source component has the assigned lower restriction on every floor stratum of its target. Proof. For curves, the comparison is an isomorphism preserving the marked points and their residue generators. Invariance makes the lower point values equal, so the assertion follows.

For surfaces, take a target floor curve and view its valuation on the source of the comparison. If its center is a floor curve there, adjunction of the equality of meromorphic adjoint subsheaves on the graph gives a crepant residue comparison of the two curve pairs. This is an arrow of G1\mathcal{G}_1, and the assigned curve tuple is invariant.

If the center is a point, it is a zero-dimensional lc center of the source dlt surface, by crepancy. It is one of the point strata and is an actual smooth crossing of two coefficient-one curves: the resolution used in Proposition 6.3 is an isomorphism at such a point. In coordinates (x,z)(x,z) for the crossing, a divisorial lc place above it arises by successive blowups of crossings of two coefficient-one branches. To verify this, factor a surface resolution into point blowups. In an SNC surface boundary the new crepant coefficient at the blowup of a crossing is the sum of the two coefficients minus one; at a point on just one branch it is that coefficient minus one. Starting with coefficients at most one, a new coefficient one can arise only at a crossing of two coefficient-one branches. This remains true at every subsequent step.

The corresponding exceptional curve is a P1\mathbb{P}^{1} whose different has exactly the two adjacent coefficient-one points. Residue of (dx/x∧dz/z)⊗qk(dx/x \wedge dz/z)^{\otimes qk} along it is (dt/t)⊗qk(dt/t)^{\otimes qk}, up to a sign removed in the even degree: at each crossing blowup the logarithmic change-of-coordinate determinant is ±1\pm1. Further point blowups do not change this meromorphic residue on its strict transform. The normal target floor curve is bimeromorphic, hence isomorphic, to this P1\mathbb{P}^{1}, and its actual log line is trivial with that generator. Its section is determined by the common residue at the two point strata. Pulling a local surface section through the crossing restricts on the exceptional curve to its value at the point times that generator. Compatibility of the original tuple identifies this value with its assigned point component, and invariance makes it the assigned value at both target point strata. Thus the entire target curve receives exactly the prescribed lower section.

The two alternatives apply to every composite surface comparison, so the assertion holds for the whole groupoid, not only for a generating link.

Proposition 9.2. There is a degree k>0k > 0 and a compatible generating system of tuples through dimension three which is invariant in dimensions zero, one, and two.

Proof. For point strata take the same scalar in the canonical zero-form generator 11 on every point. The even iterated residue convention identifies these generators along all paths. This gives an invariant generating system in dimension zero.

Suppose a system has been constructed through dimension d−1d-1, for 1≤d≤31 \le d \le3. Replace it by powers and their span in a sufficiently large common degree, still denoted kk. For a dd-stratum ZZ, the components of any lower tuple glue to a section on its entire floor CZC_Z by Proposition 6.3. They satisfy its link comparison: for d=1d=1 the link is a point comparison, for d=2d=2 a curve comparison, and for d=3d=3 one of the generating surface links. Lower invariance supplies each equality. Proposition 7.3 therefore extends every such boundary section to ZZ, once the degree is sufficiently large. There are only finitely many strata, so the degree can be chosen uniformly.

Let Pd(k)\mathcal{P}_d(k) be the vector space of all tuples through dimension dd whose lower part belongs to the chosen lower system and whose dd-components restrict to those glued floor sections. It maps surjectively to the lower system, since the finitely many extensions can be chosen independently. This is a linear space of lifts; no choice of a nonlinear extension operator is involved.

The pre-system Pd(k)\mathcal{P}_d(k) generates. For z∈Zz \in Z with y=fZ(z)∈fZ(CZ)y=f_Z(z) \in f_Z(C_Z), choose a floor point above yy and a lower tuple nonzero there. Any extension to ZZ is the pullback of a section of NZkN_Z^k, by (7.1). Its value at yy is nonzero, and hence it is nonzero at zz. If y∉fZ(CZ)y \notin f_Z(C_Z), the sheaf IfZ(CZ)⊗NZk\mathcal{I}_{f_Z}(C_Z) \otimes N_Z^k is generated for large kk by Serre’s theorem. A section nonzero at yy pulls back to a section vanishing on CZC_Z; with zero lower tuple and all other new components zero, it belongs to Pd(k)\mathcal{P}_d(k). This also covers an empty floor. Lower points remain generated because the projection to the lower system is surjective.

For d=3d=3 this pre-system is the required final system. For d=1,2d=1,2 we impose invariance by norm products. Lemma 9.1 applies to every pre-tuple: all transported top components have the same assigned lower restrictions. A product of hh such factors will therefore have the original lower tuple raised componentwise to hh.

For each orbit of dd-strata choose a representative ZZ, and let GZG_Z be the finite isotropy image on H0(Z,LZk)H^0(Z,L_Z^k) from Proposition 8.1. Given a pre-tuple with component sZs_Z, form its norm

PZ(sZ)=∏g∈GZg(sZ)∈H0(Z,LZk∣GZ∣).P_Z(s_Z)=\prod_{g\in G_Z}g(s_Z)\in H^0(Z,L_Z^{k|G_Z|}).

Choose a common integer hh divisible by every ∣GZ∣|G_Z|, and use PZ(sZ)h/∣GZ∣P_Z(s_Z)^{h/|G_Z|}. Transport this section to every member of its orbit. This is well defined: a change of the chosen transport by an isotropy arrow permutes the factors in degree kk, and transport commutes with multiplication. No finiteness statement about the possibly larger representation in degree khkh is needed. Each factor has the assigned lower restriction proved above, so the resulting lower tuple is the original lower tuple raised componentwise to hh. Thus all these sections are compatible across different orbits and all deeper intersections, and they are invariant in dimension dd.

They still generate. Fix a point zz of an orbit member. For each of the finitely many transported factors, choose a point over zz on a resolution of its comparison graph. Equality of the pulled-back invertible adjoint subsheaves identifies the line fibers. Nonvanishing of that factor at zz is therefore the nonvanishing of the representative pre-section at a definite point of ZZ. Each such condition is a nonzero linear evaluation functional on the generating vector space Pd(k)\mathcal{P}_d(k). A finite union of the proper kernels of these functionals cannot cover a complex vector space. One pre-tuple satisfies all of them, and its norm is nonzero at zz. At a lower point choose a pre-tuple whose assigned lower value is nonzero; its hhth power remains nonzero. Finally take the linear span of all the constructed norm tuples. Compatibility and invariance are linear conditions, so this span is an invariant generating system in degree khkh.

This completes the induction through dimensions one and two; the pre-system at dimension three then has all the required properties.

Proof of Theorem 6.1. Apply Proposition 9.2. Its three-dimensional components agree on every subordinate stratum, so Proposition 6.3 descends each tuple uniquely to a section of Lk∣SL^k|_S. For any x∈Sx\in S, choose a component through xx. The generating system has a tuple whose value there is nonzero. It is the pullback of the descended value in the actual line fiber at xx, so that descended value is nonzero. Nakayama’s lemma makes the evaluation map onto Lk∣SL^k|_S surjective at xx. The finite-dimensional span of these global sections therefore generates at every point, proving semiampleness on the whole reduced floor.

For the supported model in Proposition 5.1, choose a common multiple of the actual adjoint index, the coefficients and actual equivalence of PP, and the generated boundary degree just obtained. It gives a line L=OV(qA)L=\mathcal{O}_V(qA), a section with divisor qPqP, and a generated restriction on SS. Its boundary sections define a holomorphic map S→PbS\to\mathbb{P}^b with the actual pullback identity for L∣SL|_S. The gluing argument has not extended these sections to VV; that is the distinct lifting task to which we now turn.

Root neighborhoods and a split residue map

We begin the proof of Theorem 1.2. A generated multiple of the actual adjoint restriction constructs a morphism from the reduced boundary to projective space. Near its compact fibers we will replace the supported divisor by a reduced Cartier covering divisor and study sections on its finite neighborhoods. The use of neighborhood covers and successive finite thickenings has its threefold antecedents in [40], Sections 1–2 and 4 and [35], Section 4. Here no extension of the boundary map off the reduced boundary is assumed.

Fix the data of Theorem 1.2, and put S=⌊B⌋S = \lfloor B\rfloor, so Supp⁡P=Supp⁡S\operatorname{Supp} P = \operatorname{Supp} S. Choose a sufficiently divisible even integer q>0q > 0 which clears the actual adjoint and equivalence indices, the boundary and PP coefficients, and a generated degree of A∣SA|_S. There are then an actual line and section

L=OV(qA),s∈H0(V,L),G=div⁡L(s)=qP=∑idiSi,(61)L = \mathcal{O}_V(qA), \qquad s \in H^0(V,L), \qquad G = \operatorname{div}_L(s) = qP = \sum_i d_iS_i, \tag*{(61)}

where every did_i is a positive integer, and a morphism

f:S⟶T=Pb,L∣S≃f∗OT(1).(62)f : S \longrightarrow T = \mathbb{P}^b, \qquad L|_S \simeq f^*\mathcal{O}_T(1). \tag*{(62)}

The morphism is constructed from a generating system on SS; it is used only on that reduced subspace and is not required to be surjective. Choose r>0r > 0 divisible by qq and every did_i, and put a=r/qa = r/q. In particular aa is a positive integer and di≤rd_i \le r.

Root pairs near a compact analytic subspace

Lemma 10.1 (A root with a prescribed boundary comparison). Let AA be a compact analytic subspace of a Hausdorff complex analytic space XX, and let LL be a holomorphic line on a neighborhood of AA. Suppose a line QQ on AA and an isomorphism β:Q⊗r≃L∣A\beta: Q^{\otimes r} \simeq L|_A are given, with r>0r > 0. There are a neighborhood UU of AA, a line PP on UU, and isomorphisms

α:P⊗r≃L∣U,γ:P∣A≃Q,α∣A=β∘γ⊗r.\alpha: P^{\otimes r} \simeq L|_U, \qquad\gamma: P|_A \simeq Q, \qquad\alpha|_A = \beta\circ\gamma^{\otimes r}.

If two root pairs are already defined near AA, every prescribed power-compatible isomorphism between their restrictions to AA extends to an isomorphism on a neighborhood, uniquely as a germ about AA. The root pair itself is not asserted unique.

Proof. The analytic Kummer sequence

1⟶μr⟶OX×→( )rOX×⟶11 \longrightarrow\mu_r \longrightarrow\mathcal{O}_X^\times\xrightarrow{(\ )^r} \mathcal{O}_X^\times\longrightarrow1

is exact also for singular or nonreduced analytic spaces. A unit germ has a local holomorphic root; the kernel is the locally constant sheaf of rrth roots of unity, since ur−1u^r - 1 has distinct roots, including in a local ring with nilpotents. Line bundles are classified by H1(O×)H^1(\mathcal{O}^\times), and abelian torsors by H1H^1 of the corresponding sheaf [54], Tags 09NU and 02FQ.

For an abelian sheaf FF and a compact subset whose distinct points have disjoint neighborhoods, SGA 4 continuity [51], Exposé Vbis, Lemma 4.1.3 gives

lim⁡U⊃AHi(U,F)=Hi(A,F∣A)for every i.(63)\lim_{U \supset A} H^i(U,F) = H^i(A,F|_A) \quad\text{for every } i. \tag*{(63)}

The separation hypothesis holds in the Hausdorff analytic space. Although the intrinsic structure sheaf of AA need not be the inverse image of OX\mathcal{O}_X, the inverse image of μr\mu_r is exactly μr\mu_r on $A. Naturality of Kummer therefore makes the obstruction to a root of LL restrict to zero in H2(A,μr)H^2(A,\mu_r), because QQ is such a root there. Continuity in degree two kills that obstruction on a smaller neighborhood, giving a root pair (P,α)(P,\alpha).

The difference between (P∣A,α∣A)(P|_A,\alpha|_A) and (Q,β)(Q,\beta) is a μr\mu_r-torsor. By continuity in degree one it extends to a torsor on a smaller neighborhood. The associated line with its trivialized rrth power twists PP to give the prescribed pair on AA. Finally, the sheaf of compatible isomorphisms of two root pairs is itself a locally trivial finite μr\mu_r-torsor. A prescribed section on AA trivializes its restriction there. Continuity in degree one therefore trivializes this torsor on a smaller neighborhood; choose a section there. The ratio of its boundary restriction to the prescribed section is a section of μr\mu_r on AA. Continuity in degree zero extends that ratio uniquely as a germ, and correcting the chosen section gives the prescribed extension. The same degree-zero injectivity gives uniqueness as a germ. These sections are holomorphic, being locally solutions of zr=uz^r=u for a holomorphic unit.

Apply the lemma near a parameter t∈Tt\in T to A=(f−1(t))redA=(f^{-1}(t))_{\mathrm{red}}, using a local frame ℓ\ell of OT(1)\mathcal{O}_T(1) and the trivial root whose rrth power is f∗ℓf^*\ell. We obtain a root pair P1r≃LP_1^r\simeq L on a neighborhood of that compact fiber. The prescribed compatible frame on the fiber extends as a germ inside SS, by the last part of the lemma. If it is defined on NS⊂SN_S\subset S containing the fiber, properness of ff gives a smaller base neighborhood U∋tU\ni t with SU=f−1(U)⊂NSS_U=f^{-1}(U)\subset N_S: remove the closed set f(S∖NS)f(S\setminus N_S). Shrink once more so this whole SUS_U lies in the ambient root neighborhood W0W_0, and replace W0W_0 by W=W0∖(S∖SU)W=W_0\setminus(S\setminus S_U). Thus

W∩S=SU,P1r≃L∣W,p1 a frame of P1∣SU,p1r=f∗ℓ.W\cap S=S_U,\qquad P_1^r\simeq L|_W,\qquad p_1\text{ a frame of }P_1|_{S_U},\qquad p_1^r=f^*\ell.

Comparisons between two choices, with prescribed power-compatible boundary frames, extend uniquely as ambient germs near a compact fiber. Only this torsion comparison is extended; no arbitrary boundary trivialization is extended off SS.

The first normalized cover and the lifting target

On a chart (10.4), take the full normalized cyclic cover π:Z→W\pi:Z\to W defined by

yr=π∗sin π∗P1r,y^r=\pi^*s\quad\text{in }\pi^*P_1^r,

retaining all components and the μr\mu_r-action. Finite analytic normalization is available by [34], Part B, Section 4, Corollaries 2–3. At a general point of SiS_i, a root of a local unit reduces the equation to yr=xdiy^r=x^{d_i}. Because di∣rd_i\mid r, each normalized branch is

x=tr/di,y=ζt.x=t^{r/d_i},\qquad y=\zeta t.

The ramification index is r/dir/d_i and yy has order one. Outside SS the equation roots a unit and is étale. A finite map preserves the dimension of a prime analytic subset, so no further divisor above a codimension-two set is missed. The zero divisor

E=(y=0)E=(y=0)

is Cartier: yy is a nonzerodivisor on each normal component. A Cartier divisor on a normal space is S1S_1, and the calculation makes it generically reduced; hence it is reduced. Its canonical line identity is

OZ(E)≃π∗P1(64)\mathcal{O}_Z(E)\simeq\pi^*P_1 \tag*{(64)}

sending the canonical section of OZ(E)\mathcal{O}_Z(E) to yy.

Put

I=OZ(−E),g=f∘π∣E:E→U,Aj=Ij/Ij+1=OE(−jE)(j∈Z).(65)I=\mathcal{O}_Z(-E),\qquad g=f\circ\left.\pi\right|_E:E\to U,\qquad\mathcal{A}_j=I^j/I^{j+1}=\mathcal{O}_E(-jE)\quad(j\in\mathbb{Z}). \tag*{(65)}

The map E→SUE\to S_U is finite and gg is proper. Each Aj\mathcal{A}_j is invertible on the possibly singular reduced EE. In the Laurent graded algebra of these layers, u=y/p1u=y/p_1 denotes the degree-one frame. This is intrinsic on the associated graded: locally divide the equation of EE by the boundary value of a frame of P1P_1. It does not assert that p1p_1 is an ambient frame.

For j∈Zj\in\mathbb{Z} and k≥1k\ge1, put

Tj,k=Ij/Ij+k.(66)\mathcal{T}_{j,k}=I^j/I^{j+k}. \tag*{(66)}

We view this as a sheaf of complex vector spaces on the underlying topological space of EE. A sheaf on ZZ supported on the closed subset EE is canonically such a sheaf. Thus g∗g_* and its derived functors are defined for Tj,k\mathcal{T}_{j,k}, although there is no holomorphic map from its thickening to UU. For a coherent layer Aj\mathcal{A}_j, this is the usual coherent analytic direct image. The finite-neighborhood assertion we will prove is the following.

Proposition 10.2 (All finite lifting orders). For every local root chart (10.4), every integer jj, and every k≥1k\ge1, the map

g∗Tj,k+1⟶g∗Tj,k(67)g_*\mathcal{T}_{j,k+1}\longrightarrow g_*\mathcal{T}_{j,k} \tag*{(67)}

is an epimorphism of sheaves of complex vector spaces on UU. The neighborhoods used to lift a particular germ may depend on jj and kk.

The proof is in Section 12. To see what geometry it requires, consider the exact sequence

0⟶Aj+k⟶Tj,k+1⟶Tj,k⟶0.(68)0\longrightarrow\mathcal{A}_{j+k}\longrightarrow\mathcal{T}_{j,k+1}\longrightarrow\mathcal{T}_{j,k}\longrightarrow0. \tag*{(68)}

Its connecting map takes a section of g∗Tj,kg_*\mathcal{T}_{j,k} to an obstruction in R1g∗Aj+kR^1g_*\mathcal{A}_{j+k}. In order kk, choosing j=−a−kj=-a-k puts that obstruction in the fixed sheaf R1g∗A−aR^1g_*\mathcal{A}_{-a}. We next construct a split insertion of this sheaf into the first cohomology of an SNC dualizing sheaf. The Hodge argument will apply there, and the induction will return from these negative degrees to all integer degrees.

A canonical root and its resolved support

Take a second full normalized cover, this time adjoining a qqth root of π∗s\pi^*s as a meromorphic qq-pluricanonical form. The local construction in Lemma 7.1 also proves its existence on the normal analytic ZZ: if its coefficient in a meromorphic canonical generator is a0/b0a_0/b_0, normalize the finite reduced monic algebra

A[w]/(wq−a0b0q−1)⊂Frac⁡(A)[t]/(tq−a0/b0).A[w]/(w^q-a_0b_0^{q-1})\subset\operatorname{Frac}(A)[t]/(t^q-a_0/b_0).

The total meromorphic algebra is separable and its components all dominate. A change of generator identifies the total meromorphic algebras by multiplying the root by a meromorphic unit. The displayed finite monic orders need not coincide under this identification, but their integral closures do: each is the integral closure of the base ring in that same total algebra. These closures therefore glue. The forms tηt\eta glue to the tautological meromorphic top form τ\tau. For the total meromorphic field KK of a normal base component, the full μq\mu_q-action has invariant algebra KK and root-character space KtKt; the corresponding meromorphic form space is KτK\tau. The invariant subalgebra of the normalized holomorphic algebra is the base ring AA, by normality. These statements are read componentwise on a disconnected base. The earlier μr\mu_r-action lifts functorially, preserving the pulled-back pluriform, and commutes with μq\mu_q. Choosing one component instead would in general destroy these assertions.

Resolve this second cover and principalize the pulled ideal of EE, equivariantly for these finite actions. We use the analytic smooth-functorial resolution and principalization of [53], Theorems 1.1.11 and 1.1.13, together with its nonembedded analytic construction [52], Sections 5.2.2 and 5.3.2. We retain the final indexed complete boundary in the construction of FprincF_{\mathrm{princ}}: after the blowup of the ideal, boundary desingularization makes the final strictly monomial support a union of components of this SNC boundary. Its closed indexed intersections are regular by [53], Lemma 2.1.10. Splitting the disjoint connected components of each boundary component near the compact fiber gives globally smooth component labels; their intersections remain smooth, and the finite group may permute the labels. On a neighborhood of a compact parameter fiber only finitely many stages of the locally finite blowup hypersequence occur; a finite-group invariant shrink preserves equivariance. Write the composite as ρ:Z^→Z\rho:\widehat{Z}\to Z, with Z^\widehat{Z} smooth, and put

DE=ρ∗E,H=(DE)red,ρH:H→E,h=gρH.(69)D_E=\rho^*E,\qquad H=(D_E)_{\mathrm{red}},\qquad\rho_H:H\to E,\qquad h=g\rho_H. \tag*{(69)}

Here DED_E is the scheme inverse Cartier divisor and HH is its globally simple SNC reduction. The tautological form satisfies τ⊗q=(πρ)∗s\tau^{\otimes q}=(\pi\rho)^*s with differential pullback understood.

These constructions commute with restrictions to opens and ordinary products by a complex manifold. For normalization, the product of the normal normalization with a manifold is finite, normal, and bimeromorphic to the reduced product, hence is its normalization by uniqueness; normality of these analytic products is part of [34], Part C, Theorem 4(b)]. The resolution is functorial for smooth morphisms, including products. We make no assertion about normalization or resolution under a ramified base change.

We will also need the Kähler property near the resolved support. A finite analytic map is projective locally: generators of its finite algebra embed it in a relative projective space, and the affine coordinate 1 makes the trivial line relatively ample. The finite maps and the finitely many blowups above are therefore projective near the preimage of a compact set. Patch local positive metrics of a relatively ample line by partitions pulled from the base. Their curvature remains positive on vertical tangent directions. A sufficiently large multiple of the pulled-back Kähler form of WW makes it positive in all directions near the compact preimage; compactness bounds the mixed terms uniformly. This gives a closed Kähler form on an ambient neighborhood N\mathcal{N} of the compact resolved fiber under consideration. Properness of h:H→Uh:H\to U lets us shrink UU so that all of HH above the smaller UU lies in N\mathcal{N}: remove the closed image of H∖NH\setminus\mathcal{N}. We make this shrink in each root chart. Every closed intersection of components of HH is then smooth and proper over UU, and inherits one global relative Kähler form there. A connected component can split after a further restriction of the base, so we make the indexing choice only after these neighborhood restrictions.

Finite indexing near a parameter fiber

The filtered direct-image construction will use the closed intersections of globally indexed smooth components. The following lemma makes that indexing finite after a base restriction, even when some strata map only to special parameter loci.

Lemma 10.3 (Components near a compact fiber). Let h:H→Th:H\to T be a proper holomorphic map to a complex manifold, and fix t0∈Tt_0\in T. Suppose that near h−1(t0)h^{-1}(t_0) the reduced support HH has a locally finite family of closed smooth labels DλD_\lambda which locally are its distinct SNC branches, and that every closed intersection of these labels is smooth. After restricting to a suitable open neighborhood UU of t0t_0, the support has finitely many globally smooth indexed irreducible components. Every closed intersection of the new components has finitely many connected components, all smooth and proper over UU. A global relative Kähler form already given on the old strata restricts to such a form on the new ones. The open UU can be chosen inside any previously prescribed neighborhood of t0t_0.

Proof. Local finiteness and compactness give an open neighborhood N1N_1 of the central fiber which meets only finitely many labels. Remove from the base the closed image of H∖N1H \setminus N_1; properness then puts the entire restricted support in N1N_1. There are now finitely many closed indexed intersections to consider. The connected components of each form a locally finite family in HH: the intersection is closed and smooth, so near one of its points a small smooth neighborhood meets only its own component, and near a point outside it a neighborhood avoids it. Compactness, followed by the same properness argument, gives a second neighborhood N2N_2 meeting only finitely many such components and a base restriction on which the whole support lies in N2N_2.

Let C1,…,CNC_1,\ldots,C_N be the whole connected components of the pre-restriction closed intersections which meet N2N_2. We retain the whole components, not just their intersections with N2N_2. Each CaC_a is closed in a closed stratum and is a connected complex manifold. Thus fa=h∣Caf_a=h|_{C_a} is proper over the preceding base and CaC_a is irreducible. Their restrictions cover every closed intersection after the current restriction, including the singleton intersections.

Put Sa=fa(Ca)S_a=f_a(C_a) with its reduced structure. Remmert’s proper mapping theorem makes SaS_a closed analytic [25], and it is irreducible because CaC_a is. Inside any prescribed open coordinate neighborhood V∋t0V\ni t_0 contained in the preceding restrictions, take the locally finite irreducible decompositions of all Sa∩VS_a\cap V. Let BB be the union of those components which do not contain t0t_0. A union of a subfamily of the locally finite irreducible components of an analytic set is closed analytic. Since the list of aa’s is finite, BB is closed analytic in VV and misses t0t_0. Set U=V∖BU=V\setminus B.

This removal does not split any retained irreducible component AA of an Sa∩VS_a\cap V. Its regular locus is connected, and its intersection with BB is a proper analytic subset: otherwise closedness and density would imply A⊂BA\subset B, contrary to t0∈A∖Bt_0\in A\setminus B. The complement of a proper analytic subset in a connected complex manifold is connected. One may see this by perturbing a path, in a finite chain of coordinate balls, off a subset of positive complex codimension. Hence Reg⁡(A)∖B\operatorname{Reg}(A)\setminus B is connected and A∩UA\cap U is irreducible. Only finitely many components of Sa∩VS_a\cap V contain t0t_0, by local finiteness. Their restrictions give a finite cover of Sa∩US_a\cap U by irreducible closed analytic subsets, all containing t0t_0. Therefore every irreducible component of Sa∩US_a\cap U contains t0t_0; if SaS_a misses t0t_0, its restriction is empty.

Let WW be a connected component of fa−1(U)f_a^{-1}(U). It is open in the connected smooth CaC_a, is closed in fa−1(U)f_a^{-1}(U), and is smooth and irreducible. Its map to UU is proper. Put ra=dim⁡Sar_a=\dim S_a. The maximal-rank locus of faf_a is dense in CaC_a: the generic rank theorem gives maximal rank rar_a, and the lower-rank locus is a proper analytic subset defined by the maximal minors. The nonempty open WW meets the maximal-rank locus. Its proper image is consequently an irreducible closed analytic subset of Sa∩US_a\cap U of dimension rar_a. Every component of Sa∩US_a\cap U has this dimension because SaS_a is irreducible and hence pure-dimensional. The image is therefore an irreducible component, since a proper analytic subset of such a component has smaller dimension. It therefore contains t0t_0, and WW meets fa−1(t0)f_a^{-1}(t_0).

The compact analytic fiber has finitely many connected components: on its reduction, irreducible components are locally finite and compactness makes their number finite. Each W∩fa−1(t0)W\cap f_a^{-1}(t_0) is a nonempty open-and-closed subset of this fiber. Different WW’s give disjoint such subsets, so

#π0(fa−1(U))≤#π0((fa−1(t0))red)<∞.(70)\#\pi_0\left(f_a^{-1}(U)\right)\leq\#\pi_0\left(\left(f_a^{-1}(t_0)\right)_{\mathrm{red}}\right)<\infty. \tag*{(70)}

This includes zero-dimensional and other vertical images and permits nonreduced scheme fibers.

Reindex the singleton strata by these finitely many components WW. An intersection of the new labels is an open-and-closed part of the restriction of the corresponding old closed intersection, hence is a union of some of its finitely many connected components. It remains smooth and proper, and the relative form restricts. Distinct new pieces from one old label are disjoint, so the local SNC branches and their ordering are unchanged. This proves the assertion.

Apply Lemma 10.3 after the preceding Kähler neighborhood and properness restrictions, to all regular labels and their closed intersections. The resulting local support has the finite global component indexing used in Section 11. The final open need not be Stein or a polydisc: the roots and covers have already been constructed, and their remaining local uses only restrict the existing coordinate charts.

A residue insertion that retains all cohomology

Proposition 10.4 (Split residue insertion). For the data (10.6)–(10.10), multiplication by τ\tau gives a morphism

ρ∗OZ(aE)⟶ωZ^(H),\rho^*\mathcal{O}_Z(aE) \longrightarrow\omega_{\widehat{Z}}(H),

and residue gives ρH∗A−a→ωH\rho_H^*\mathcal{A}_{-a} \to\omega_H. The resulting map in the derived category of EE has a retraction in the τ\tau-character. Consequently, for every jj, and in particular for j=1j=1, it gives a split injection

τ∗:Rjg∗A−a↪Rjh∗ωH.(71)\tau_*: R^j g_*\mathcal{A}_{-a} \xhookrightarrow{} R^j h_*\omega_H. \tag*{(71)}

The construction is natural under the power-compatible root comparisons of Lemma 10.1. Under an ordinary product with a complex manifold B0B_0, it is the pullback construction for canonical sheaves relative to B0B_0. For absolute canonical sheaves the insertion and its retraction are tensored with ωB0\omega_{B_0}; in particular the product insertion has source A−a⊠ωB0\mathcal{A}_{-a}\boxtimes\omega_{B_0} and target R(ρH×id⁡)∗ωH×B0R(\rho_H\times\operatorname{id})_*\omega_{H\times B_0}.

Proof. Let vv be a local meromorphic frame of OZ(aE)\mathcal{O}_Z(aE). By (10.5) and aq=raq=r, the qq-pluriform vqπ∗sv^q\pi^*s is, up to a holomorphic unit, the pullback of a local frame ℓV\ell_V of LL. On a log resolution of (V,B,G)(V,B,G), write bFb_F for a crepant boundary coefficient and mF=ord⁡F(s/ℓV)m_F=\operatorname{ord}_F(s/\ell_V). Then mF≥0m_F\geq0, bF≤1b_F\leq1, and bF=1b_F=1 implies mF>0m_F>0: the dlt pair is klt off SS, and the section vanishes exactly on SS. Thus the local density

∣ℓV∣2/q∣s/ℓV∣2ϵ\frac{|\ell_V|^{2/q}}{|s/\ell_V|^{2\epsilon}}

has exponent −bF+ϵmF>−1-b_F+\epsilon m_F>-1 at each prime for every ϵ>0\epsilon>0, and is locally integrable. Change of variables under the proper generically finite map πρ\pi\rho preserves this integrability. For α=(ρ∗v)τ\alpha=(\rho^*v)\tau, let kFk_F be its integral order at a prime upstairs and nFn_F the order of the pulled section ratio. Integrability says kF+ϵnF>−1k_F+\epsilon n_F>-1 for all ϵ>0\epsilon>0. The order nFn_F is positive exactly on HH. Hence kF≥−1k_F\geq-1 on HH and kF≥0k_F\geq0 elsewhere. This proves the logarithmic map. Cartier adjunction on the reduced divisor gives its residue map on HH, with ρH∗A−a=ρ∗OZ(aE)∣H\rho_H^*\mathcal{A}_{-a}=\rho^*\mathcal{O}_Z(aE)|_H.

Let χ\chi be the τ\tau-character of the second cover. At a general point of EE over SiS_i, differential pullback gives

ord⁡E(π∗s)=rdi(di−q)+q(rdi−1)=r−q=q(a−1).\operatorname{ord}_E(\pi^*s)=\frac{r}{d_i}(d_i-q)+q\left(\frac{r}{d_i}-1\right)=r-q=q(a-1).

The second root is unramified there and ord⁡Eτ=a−1\operatorname{ord}_E\tau=a-1. At any other codimension-one prime the first cover is étale and the original boundary coefficient is β∈[0,1)\beta\in[0,1). For e=q/gcd⁡(q,qβ)e=q/\gcd(q,q\beta), the second-cover order is e(1−β)−1∈{0,…,e−1}e(1-\beta)-1\in\{0,\ldots,e-1\}, by (7.2). A meromorphic form in character χ\chi is fτf\tau for an invariant meromorphic ff descended to ZZ. The orders force ord⁡Ef≥−(a−1)\operatorname{ord}_E f\geq-(a-1) and nonnegative orders at all other primes. Normality extends it as a section of the indicated invertible line. Conversely, the logarithmic map multiplied by the equation of EE has no pole because DE≥HD_E \ge H. We obtain the exact sheaf identities

(ρ∗ωZ^)χ=OZ((a−1)E)τ,(72)(\rho_*\omega_{\widehat{Z}})_\chi=\mathcal{O}_Z((a-1)E)_\tau, \tag*{(72)}
(ρ∗ωZ^(DE))χ=OZ(aE)τ.(73)(\rho_*\omega_{\widehat{Z}}(D_E))_\chi=\mathcal{O}_Z(aE)_\tau. \tag*{(73)}

The second is projection formula for the invertible line OZ(E)\mathcal{O}_Z(E).

Canonical torsion-freeness [21] applies locally near EE to each dominating resolved component. More precisely, around a compact fiber choose the Kähler neighborhood just constructed. Properness of ρ\rho supplies a smaller normal target neighborhood whose entire inverse image lies in it, by removing the closed image of its complement. After a base shrink this neighborhood contains all of EE in the root chart. The restricted morphism is proper with Kähler smooth source, so the cited theorem applies there. These neighborhoods cover EE. On each, the higher direct images for the generically finite resolution vanish because they vanish generically. Finite pushforward is exact. Thus on their union Z∘⊂ZZ^\circ\subset Z, an open neighborhood of EE,

(Riρ∗ωZ^)∣Z∘=0(i>0).(R^i\rho_*\omega_{\widehat{Z}})|_{Z^\circ}=0 \quad(i>0).

Projection formula gives the same restricted vanishing for ωZ^(DE)\omega_{\widehat{Z}}(D_E).

Put AE=A−a=OE(aE)A_E=A_{-a}=\mathcal{O}_E(aE). Cartier adjunction for the possibly nonreduced divisor DED_E is the exact sequence

0⟶ωZ^⟶ωZ^(DE)⟶ωDE⟶0.0\longrightarrow\omega_{\widehat{Z}}\longrightarrow\omega_{\widehat{Z}}(D_E)\longrightarrow\omega_{D_E}\longrightarrow0.

Since DED_E is the scheme inverse image of EE, it has a morphism ρD:DE→E\rho_D:D_E\to E. The preceding vanishings and character identities identify

(R(ρD)∗ωDE)χ≃AEτ[0]in D(OE).(74)(R(\rho_D)_*\omega_{D_E})_\chi\simeq A_E\tau[0]\quad\text{in }D(\mathcal{O}_E). \tag*{(74)}

One can see this first after exact closed pushforward from EE to Z∘Z^\circ, where it is the quotient of (10.14) by (10.13). Closed pushforward detects its cohomology sheaves, and the canonical truncation of a complex concentrated in degree zero gives (10.15) on EE. No derived full-faithfulness assertion is needed.

Because AEA_E is invertible, its pullback followed by the residue map defines AE[0]→R(ρH)∗ωHA_E[0]\to R(\rho_H)_*\omega_H. The inclusion ωH↪ωDE\omega_H\hookrightarrow\omega_{D_E}, followed by the character projection and (10.15), gives a map back to AEτ[0]A_E\tau[0]. On degree zero their composition sends ff to fτf\tau in the quotient of the two character lines. Under the chosen identification it is the identity. An endomorphism of the sheaf AE[0]A_E[0] in degree zero is determined by its sheaf map, so this is a derived retraction. Applying Rg∗Rg_* proves the split injections (10.12). All maps were defined by the tautological form, the actual divisor ideal, and residue, so they respect root comparisons. Under an ordinary product the tautological form is relative to the new factor; wedging with a local frame of its canonical line gives the absolute map and the stated ωB0\omega_{B_0} factor.

The derived retraction is stronger than an injection only on functions or at general fibers. It is this strength that allows the later argument to retain obstruction classes supported on special parameters.

One compact graph on a parameter cover

We next prepare the geometric setting for a global symbol test. For any chosen parameter t∗t_*, the construction gives a projective parameter cover unbranched over t∗t_* and one compact SNC graph over the entire cover. Global vanishing can then be tested back at t∗t_\ast without discarding a class supported there. The cover may change with t∗t_\ast. We form and resolve the covers before imposing the graph equations; this avoids assuming that normalization commutes with ramified base change.

Proposition 10.5 (Compact transverse graph). Assume b>0b > 0, and fix any t∗∈T=Pbt_\ast\in T = \mathbb{P}^{b}. There is a coordinate-power map ψ:T′=Pb→T\psi: T' = \mathbb{P}^{b} \to T of degree rr in each coordinate, with R=OT′(1)R = \mathcal{O}_{T'}(1) and an actual identity Rr≃ψ∗OT(1)R^{r} \simeq\psi^{*}\mathcal{O}_{T}(1), which is unbranched over t∗t_\ast, and the following data. On a neighborhood of the compact graph Ξ=S×TT′⊂V×T′\Xi= S \times_{T} T' \subset V \times T' there are the two full root covers and a projective resolution with smooth ambient source W\mathcal{W}. The graph cut H′H' inside the reduced inverse section divisor is compact and reduced SNC of pure dimension dim⁡V−1\dim V - 1, with finitely many globally smooth components. The projection p′:W→T′p' : \mathcal{W} \to T' is a submersion near H′H', and every nonempty closed component intersection is smooth and proper over T′T', carrying the restriction of one Kähler form on a neighborhood of H′H'.

Locally near every compact graph slice over w∈T′w \in T', the resolved ambient data, including their projection and full tautological divisor ideal, are isomorphic to an open restriction of the ordinary product Z^×U′\widehat{Z} \times U' for a local root chart. There the cut is Hb=H×UU′H^{b} = H \times_{U} U', and its actual dualizing line is

ωHb≃pr⁡H∗ωH⊗pr⁡U′∗(ωU′⊗ψ∗ωU−1).(75)\omega_{H^{b}} \simeq\operatorname{pr}_{H}^{*}\omega_{H} \otimes\operatorname{pr}_{U'}^{*}\left(\omega_{U'} \otimes\psi^{*}\omega_{U}^{-1}\right). \tag*{(75)}

Proof. Choose finitely many pairs of parameter opens Ui′⋐UiU_i' \Subset U_i, with the Ui′U_i' covering f(S)f(S), such that a local root chart and its proper map hi:Hi→Uih_i : H_i \to U_i are defined on UiU_i. Each hi−1(Ui′)h_i^{-1}(U_i') is compact. Local finiteness therefore leaves only finitely many smooth component intersections meeting these compact sets. For each such stratum CC and each subset of variable hyperplanes in TT, consider the incidence

{(z,H1,…,Hv):h(z)∈H1∩⋯∩Hv}.\{(z,H_1,\ldots,H_v):h(z)\in H_1\cap\cdots\cap H_v\}.

It is smooth, since varying each hyperplane independently supplies its normal direction. Sard’s theorem for the projection to the hyperplane parameter space gives transversality for a general tuple; a countable atlas handles any noncompact stratum. Choose a tuple satisfying all the finitely many conditions and also the open conditions that it forms a coordinate basis and that none of its hyperplanes contains t∗t_\ast. Use those coordinates for

ψ([w0:⋯:wb])=[w0r:⋯:wbr].\psi([w_0:\cdots:w_b])=[w_0^r:\cdots:w_b^r].

Its derivative at a point has image the tangent space to the intersection of exactly the coordinate hyperplanes corresponding to vanishing coordinates, or is invertible when none vanish. The chosen transversality therefore gives, at h(z)=ψ(w)h(z)=\psi(w),

dh(TzC)+dψ(TwT′)=Th(z)T(76)dh(T_zC)+d\psi(T_wT')=T_{h(z)}T \tag*{(76)}

for every smooth SNC stratum. The map is unbranched over t∗t_\ast.

In local coordinates tit_i on UU, extend the coordinate functions of hh holomorphically off HH to functions GiG_i on local opens of Z^\widehat{Z}. In Z^×U′\widehat{Z}\times U', the equations ψi(w)−Gi=0\psi_i(w)-G_i=0 have surjective differential on each HH-stratum by (76). They cut a smooth submanifold of codimension bb transverse to the SNC divisor. The cut Hb=H×UU′H^{b}=H\times_U U' is therefore reduced SNC of pure dimension dim⁡V−1\dim V-1, and has codimension b+1b+1 in the product ambient. Complete-intersection adjunction gives (75). In coordinates its last factor has the wedge frame dw/dtdw/dt; this means a frame of ωU′⊗ψ∗ωU−1\omega_{U'}\otimes\psi^*\omega_U^{-1}, not an inverse Jacobian.

The graph Ξ\Xi is a compact closed analytic subspace. Its actual line identity is

pr⁡V∗L∣Ξ≃pr⁡T′∗R∣Ξ.\operatorname{pr}_{V}^{*}L|_{\Xi} \simeq\operatorname{pr}_{T'}^{*}R|_{\Xi}.

Lemma 10.1 gives a root P∗P_{*} of pr⁡V∗L\operatorname{pr}_{V}^{*}L on a neighborhood of Ξ\Xi, identified with pr⁡T′∗R\operatorname{pr}_{T'}^{*}R along Ξ\Xi. Form the same two full normalized covers there. For the second cover use coefficients of ss in meromorphic canonical generators from the first factor VV. This defines its relative tautological form without requiring a Cartier relative canonical line on the singular cover; changing to a generator after differential pullback changes the coefficient by a qqth power and identifies the total root algebra and its normalization. Resolve and principalize the full tautological ideal functorially on this neighborhood, before cutting by the graph.

Near w0w_{0}, choose a frame pˉ\bar{p} of RR whose rrth power is ψ∗ℓ\psi^{*}\ell for a downstairs frame ℓ\ell; a local root of a unit gives such a choice. Along the compact graph slice, compare the pullback of P1P_{1} with P∗P_{*} by sending the boundary frame p1p_{1} to pˉ\bar{p}. Lemma 10.1 extends this to an ambient root isomorphism as a germ. On the graph, its ratio with the prescribed comparison is a μr\mu_{r}-section equal to one on the compact slice, hence equal to one on an open graph neighborhood of that slice. Properness of Ξ→T′\Xi\to T' permits a base shrink on which the ambient comparison is defined and agrees with the prescribed one along the entire graph: remove the closed image of the complement of that neighborhood. This argument also applies to a nonreduced graph. The comparison identifies the first cover with the local ordinary product cover, and product normality identifies the second cover as well. Apply the same fixed smooth-functorial principalization to the same full ideal and ordered boundary data on both sides; functoriality identifies the results. These are isomorphisms of resolved ambient germs over the product base preserving the whole divisor ideal, not only isomorphisms of their supports.

Let H′H' be the graph cut inside the reduced inverse section divisor on this global resolution. Locally it is exactly H♭H^{\flat} above, so it is reduced SNC with the asserted pure dimension. It is compact, being over the compact Ξ\Xi by proper maps. The ambient projection is a submersion near it by the local product comparison. The transverse cuts of the globally smooth inverse-divisor components are smooth; split them into their disjoint connected components. Compactness and local finiteness leave only finitely many. Their closed intersections are smooth and compact, hence proper over T′T'. Finally, the relative metric construction above, applied over the Kähler product neighborhood of Ξ\Xi, gives one Kähler form near H′H'. Its restrictions supply all the required relative Kähler forms.

The local and global graph supports in this proposition are locally a reduced SNC divisor in a smooth complete intersection, with submersive ambient projection. The next section develops the filtered direct-image statement for precisely that geometry.

Filtered direct images on simple normal-crossing supports

The residue insertion has placed the finite lifting obstruction in R1h∗ωHR^{1}h_{*}\omega_{H}. We need two facts about this absolute dualizing direct image: it embeds as the lowest step of a filtered right D\mathcal{D}-module, and on a projective base the kernel of first-symbol multiplication admits no map from an ample line. In Section 12, differentiation of representatives of the finite obstruction will produce just such a symbol relation. We prove the two facts here at the geometric scope of the graph supports.

Let p:A→Tp:A \to T be a holomorphic map of complex manifolds, where AA has pure dimension nn. Let i:H→Ai:H \to A be a reduced closed analytic subspace of pure dimension dd, and put c=n−d>0c=n-d>0. Assume the following.

  1. The map pp is a submersion near HH, and h=p∣H:H→Th = p|_H : H \to T is proper.

  1. Locally in AA, the space HH is a reduced SNC divisor in a smooth submanifold of dimension d+1d + 1. It has finitely many globally smooth indexed irreducible components H1,…,HsH_1,\ldots,H_s, and every closed intersection HI=⋂i∈IHiH_I = \bigcap_{i\in I} H_i is smooth, possibly empty or disconnected.

  1. Every connected component of every nonempty HIH_I is proper over TT and has a global closed real (1,1)(1,1)-form which, locally on TT, becomes Kähler after adding the pullback of a Kähler form from TT.

The last condition is the relative-form convention for a proper Kähler map. A Kähler form on a neighborhood of HH, as constructed in the preceding section, implies it. We may replace AA by the submersion neighborhood of HH. All direct images below are proper on their support; the ambient map pp itself need not be proper.

We use right D\mathcal{D}-modules with the increasing order filtration. Set

K=H[H]c(ωA),F0K=im⁡(Ext⁡Ac(OH,ωA)⟶K),FpK=(F0K)FpDA(p≥0),(77)K = \mathcal{H}^{c}_{[H]}(\omega_A), \qquad F_0K = \operatorname{im}\bigl(\operatorname{Ext}^{c}_A(\mathcal{O}_H,\omega_A) \longrightarrow K\bigr), \qquad F_pK = (F_0K)F_p\mathcal{D}_A \quad(p \geq0), \tag*{(77)}

and FpK=0F_pK = 0 for p<0p < 0. The brackets mean algebraic local cohomology with finite pole orders. We will show that the first map is injective and its image is the absolute dualizing sheaf ωH\omega_H.

For filtered right D\mathcal{D}-modules, p+p_+ denotes the direct image; in this submersion setting it is computed by the relative right de Rham (Spencer) complex followed by Rp∗Rp_*.

Proposition 11.1 (The filtered SNC direct image). For the preceding data, (K,F)(K,F) is a good filtered regular holonomic right module. Put Mj=Hjp+KM^j = \mathcal{H}^j p_+K for any integer jj, and give it the filtration induced by the filtered direct image. Every level cohomology map

HjFpp+(K,F)⟶Mj\mathcal{H}^j F_p p_+(K,F) \longrightarrow M^j

is injective, with image FpMjF_pM^j. The module (Mj,F)(M^j,F) has a finite filtration by DT\mathcal{D}_T-submodules, strict at every FpF_p, whose quotients are polarizable real pure Hodge modules. More precisely, the quotient with support-filtration index ℓ\ell has weight ℓ+j\ell+j. There are canonical identities, with the first realized by that injection,

F0Mj=Rjh∗ωH↪Mj,FpMj=0(p<0).(78)F_0M^j = \mathrm{R}^j h_*\omega_H \xhookrightarrow{} M^j, \qquad F_pM^j = 0 \quad(p < 0). \tag*{(78)}

Here Rj=0R^j = 0 for j<0j < 0, and ωH\omega_H is the absolute dualizing sheaf.

For the later use with j=1j = 1, define the first-symbol map for the right action by

σ:F0M1⊗TT⟶gr⁡1FM1,m⊗ξ⟼[mξ].\sigma: F_0M^1 \otimes T_T \longrightarrow\operatorname{gr}^{F}_1 M^1, \qquad m \otimes\xi\longmapsto[m\xi].

When TT is smooth projective, Corollary 11.3 will prove Hom⁡OT(N,ker⁡σ)=0\operatorname{Hom}_{\mathcal{O}_T}(N,\ker\sigma) = 0 for every ample line NN on TT.

Finite poles and the two filtrations

At a point of HH, choose analytic coordinates

(z1,…,zc−1,x1,…,xt,y),IH=(z1,…,zc−1,f),f=x1⋯xt.(z_1,\ldots,z_{c-1},x_1,\ldots,x_t,y), \qquad\mathcal{I}_H = (z_1,\ldots,z_{c-1},f), \qquad f = x_1\cdots x_t.

The zz-list is empty when c=1c=1. Write RR for the local analytic ring and η\eta for its coordinate volume form. These equations are a regular sequence. Their localization Čech complex, equivalently the direct limit of their Koszul complexes, has cohomology only in degree cc. In that degree it is

R[z1−1,…,zc−1−1,f−1]η∑j=1c−1R[z1−1,…,zj−1,…,zc−1−1,f−1]η+R[z1−1,…,zc−1−1]η(79)\frac{R[z_1^{-1},\ldots,z_{c-1}^{-1},f^{-1}]\eta}{\sum_{j=1}^{c-1}R[z_1^{-1},\ldots,z_j^{-1},\ldots,z_{c-1}^{-1},f^{-1}]\eta+R[z_1^{-1},\ldots,z_{c-1}^{-1}]\eta} \tag*{(79)}

The same assertion holds for a subunion of the branches, with the product of its selected xix_i’s. An intersection of kk branches instead has c+k−1c+k-1 regular equations.

Successive finite Taylor divisions give a unique additive polar normal form in (79): a finite sum of terms

au,v,J(xJc,y)∏j=1c−1zj−uj∏i∈Jxi−viη,uj,vi≥1,∅≠J⊂{1,…,t}.a_{\mathbf{u},\mathbf{v},J}(x_{J^c},y)\prod_{j=1}^{c-1}z_j^{-u_j}\prod_{i\in J}x_i^{-v_i}\eta,\qquad u_j,v_i\geq1,\quad\varnothing\ne J\subset\{1,\ldots,t\}.

The coefficient is a holomorphic germ in exactly the displayed variables. Each fraction has bounded negative orders, so only finitely many Taylor coefficients in its denominator variables enter this description. It is an additive normal form, not an assertion that the polar types form an RR-linear direct sum.

The Koszul generator of Ext⁡Ac(OH,ωA)\operatorname{Ext}^{c}_{A}(\mathcal{O}_{H},\omega_{A}) maps to the class

aηz1⋯zc−1f.\frac{a\eta}{z_1\cdots z_{c-1}f}.

If it is zero in (79), the expansion of a∣z=0/fa|_{z=0}/f has no negative xix_i-power. Every Taylor monomial of a∣z=0a|_{z=0} is then divisible by every xix_i, hence by ff. Thus a∈(z1,…,zc−1,f)a\in(z_1,\ldots,z_{c-1},f), proving injectivity. Complete-intersection adjunction, including its determinant of the conormal, identifies its image intrinsically with ωH\omega_H.

For a polar term define the excess order

e(u,v,J)=∑j=1c−1(uj−1)+∑i∈J(vi−1).e(\mathbf{u},\mathbf{v},J)=\sum_{j=1}^{c-1}(u_j-1)+\sum_{i\in J}(v_i-1).

The simple fractions (11.5) are exactly the terms of excess zero. On a right canonical module a coordinate derivative acts by minus differentiation of the coefficient of η\eta. A derivative in a denominator variable raises its pole order by one with a nonzero scalar. Conversely, in (11.4) the coefficient is independent of those variables, so these derivatives produce each desired term from an excess-zero term without a tangential error. It follows that

FpK={finite sums of terms (11.4) of excess at most p},FpK=0 (p<0).(80)F_pK=\{\text{finite sums of terms \text{(11.4)} of excess at most }p\},\qquad F_pK=0\ (p<0). \tag*{(80)}

This proves the generated formula in (77) locally, and proves that it is a good filtration. The generated definition makes it independent of the coordinates.

For a closed immersion of smooth manifolds j:Y↪Aj:Y\hookrightarrow A, the right transfer convention is

Fpj+(N,F)=∑νFp−∣ν∣N ∂⊥ν.F_pj_+(N,F)=\sum_{\nu}F_{p-|\nu|}N\,\partial_{\perp}^{\nu}.

There is no codimension shift. For example, the codimension shift for left transfer cancels the two dimension shifts in changing sides. These right conventions are recorded in [23], Section 1.1, equations (1.1.2)–(1.1.4).

We define an increasing support filtration on KK by summing the images of the local-cohomology modules of subunions of at most kk of the indexed components:

W−d+k−1K=∑∣I∣≤kim⁡(H⋃i∈IHic(ωA)⟶K)(1≤k≤s).(81)W_{-d+k-1}K=\sum_{|I|\leq k}\operatorname{im}\left(\mathcal{H}^{c}_{\bigcup_{i\in I}H_i}(\omega_A)\longrightarrow K\right)\qquad(1\leq k\leq s). \tag*{(81)}

Set the lower steps to zero and the upper steps to KK. In the polar normal form the summand for II consists of the types J⊂IJ\subset I. The support maps are locally injective, and hence

W−d+k−1K={terms with ∣J∣≤k}.W_{-d+k-1}K=\{\text{terms with }|J|\leq k\}.

The intersection FpK∩W−d+k−1KF_pK\cap W_{-d+k-1}K imposes this bound and the excess bound simultaneously. Keeping exactly the polar type J=IJ=I, ∣I∣=k|I|=k, leaves c+k−1c+k-1 normal denominators. By (11.7) the resulting filtered quotient is

gr⁡−d+k−1W(K,F)≃⨁∣I∣=k(iI)+(ωHI,F(0)),Fp(0)ωHI={0,p<0,ωHI,p≥0.(82)\operatorname{gr}^{W}_{-d+k-1}(K,F)\simeq\bigoplus_{|I|=k}(i_I)_+(\omega_{H_I},F^{(0)}),\qquad F^{(0)}_p\omega_{H_I}= \begin{cases} 0,&p<0,\\ \omega_{H_I},&p\geq0. \end{cases} \tag*{(82)}

Here iI:HI↪Ai_I:H_I\hookrightarrow A, empty intersections contribute zero, and dI=dim⁡HI=d−k+1d_I=\dim H_I=d-k+1. Distinct sets II give distinct polar types even at a point incident to further components. This proves the exact induced FF in (82), not just the unfiltered quotient.

The identifications glue intrinsically. For an ordered II of size kk, the iterated connecting maps for Mayer–Vietoris triangles of supports give

H⋃i∈IHic(ωA)∑J⊊Iim⁡H⋃j∈JHjc(ωA)⟶H[HI]c+k−1(ωA).(83)\frac{\mathcal{H}^{c}_{\bigcup_{i\in I}H_i}(\omega_A)} {\sum_{J\subsetneq I}\operatorname{im}\mathcal{H}^{c}_{\bigcup_{j\in J}H_j}(\omega_A)} \longrightarrow\mathcal{H}^{c+k-1}_{[H_I]}(\omega_A). \tag*{(83)}

Locally this map selects the term with every i∈Ii\in I in the polar type, up to the sign of the order, and is therefore an isomorphism. The one fixed ordering of the global smooth components fixes those signs on overlaps. Disconnected intersections are treated componentwise. This identifies (83) with (82) globally. The smooth-support modules on the right are regular holonomic; their finite extension KK is regular holonomic as well.

The real structure and strict direct image

The filtration WW has a real realization. With the absolute right de Rham complex ending in degree zero, DR⁡AωA≃CA[n]\operatorname{DR}_{A}\omega_A\simeq\mathbb{C}_{A}[n]. The ordinary unshifted finite-pole de Rham complex along one coordinate has the degree-zero constant and the degree-one logarithmic class of a punctured disk. Tensoring these local comparisons and then taking the localization Čech complexes gives, naturally for all inclusions of subunions,

DR⁡AK≃RΓHCA[n+c]≃i∗DH(CH[d]).(84)\operatorname{DR}_{A}K\simeq R\Gamma_{H}\mathbb{C}_{A}[n+c]\simeq i_*\mathbb{D}_{H}(\mathbb{C}_{H}[d]). \tag*{(84)}

Here RΓHR\Gamma_H is the sheaf-valued support functor on AA. The shift in the second identity is fixed by the complex orientation: n+c=2n−dn+c=2n-d. The same support complexes with R\mathbb{R} supply a real perverse sheaf, since complexification is exact and faithful and its complexification is the de Rham realization of the regular holonomic module. Taking real perverse images of the subunion maps defines a real filtration whose complexification is (81).

The real version of (83) is an isomorphism because its complexification is. Apply the support comparison anew to its graded target H[HI]c+k−1(ωA)\mathcal{H}^{c+k-1}_{[H_I]}(\omega_A), now with support dimension dId_I. Its real realization is

(iI)∗DHI(RHI[dI])≃(iI)∗RHI[dI],(i_I)_*D_{H_I}(\mathbb{R}_{H_I}[d_I]) \simeq(i_I)_*\mathbb{R}_{H_I}[d_I],

using smoothness and the complex orientation of HIH_I. This is the shifted rank-one constant real local system of the graded target. The residue normalization may multiply its complex realization by a nonzero constant on a connected component; it introduces neither a varying factor nor monodromy. Such a real rank-one form is polarizable for its single Hodge type. With the filtration in (82), the right module on HIH_I is the dual constant

RHIH[dI](dI).\mathbb{R}_{H_I}^{H}[d_I](d_I).

The untwisted constant has weight dId_I and first right step F−dIF_{-d_I}; the twist by dId_I moves that step to zero and changes the weight by −2dI-2d_I. Thus its weight is −dI=−d+k−1-d_I=-d+k-1. These dual-constant conventions agree with [23], equations (1.2.1)–(1.2.6) and Theorem 2.3.

There is also a useful support check. If a holomorphic germ gg vanishes on reduced HH, then

gFpK⊂Fp−1K.gF_pK \subset F_{p-1}K.

Indeed g∈(z1,…,zc−1,f)g \in(z_1,\ldots,z_{c-1},f). Multiplication by zjz_j lowers the excess or kills the polar class; multiplication by ff does the same, since a surviving class has some remaining xix_i-pole. This is the filtered support condition for treating the object on HH through its local embeddings [46], Section 1.17. In particular properness on HH, rather than properness of AA, is the relevant properness here.

We now prove Proposition 11.1. Apply the proper Kähler direct-image theorem [47] after restricting to each connected component of TT, and then separately to the constant real Hodge module on each connected smooth component of HIH_I over it, using the stipulated global relative form. These componentwise sums are locally finite on TT: near any parameter, apply Lemma 10.3 to the proper support and its smooth closed intersections. Thus the componentwise direct images and their polarizations give those for the full HIH_I; in the cover and graph applications the final indexing is already finite. The theorem supplies strict filtered direct image, Lefschetz decomposition, and real primitive polarizations. The latter give a polarization on each full cohomology module. After twisting by dId_I and using filtered closed-embedding transitivity, the degree-vv direct image of a summand of gr⁡ℓWK\operatorname{gr}^{W}_{\ell}K is polarizable real pure of weight

dI+v−2dI=−dI+v=ℓ+v.d_I+v-2d_I=-d_I+v=\ell+v.

We use the convention fixed by the constant input in Section 1.1 and the direct image in Section 2.2 of that source. The opposite sign for the untwisted dimension in its displayed theorem statement is a typographical error, also ruled out by applying it to the identity map. This application is only to constant modules on smooth sources.

Write C=p+(K,F)C=p_+(K,F) for the filtered direct-image complex. Since pp is a submersion near its support, before applying Rp∗Rp_* its right relative de Rham complex has at level FpF_p and degree −v-v the term

Fp−vK⊗ωA∧vTA/T.(85)F_{p-v}K\otimes\omega_A\wedge^v T_{A/T}. \tag*{(85)}

The tangent wedges are locally free. The simultaneous pole and branch bounds show that the quotient of this level complex by WW is exactly the same level of the relative complex for gr⁡WK\operatorname{gr}^{W}K.

Use the increasing WW spectral sequence, written as

E1−ℓ,v+ℓ=Hvp+gr⁡ℓWK⟹Hvp+K.(86)E_1^{-\ell,v+\ell} = \mathcal{H}^v p_+ \operatorname{gr}^W_\ell K \Longrightarrow\mathcal{H}^v p_+ K. \tag*{(86)}

Each term on the first page is a strict filtered direct image and a polarizable real pure module of weight ℓ+v\ell+v, by (11.13). Strictness says that the corresponding level-FpF_p first page injects into it with image FpF_p. The real support realization (84), its proper direct image on the support, and the de Rham comparison make the unfiltered differentials real. Comparison with the level spectral sequences makes them filtration preserving.

The differential drd_r sends (ℓ,v)(\ell,v) to (ℓ−r,v+1)(\ell-r,v+1). For r=1r=1 these weights are equal. The differential is therefore a morphism of real pure Hodge modules, hence is strict for FF, and its kernels and cokernels remain polarizable pure modules [46], Propositions 1.10 and 1.14. Consequently the level second page injects into the unfiltered second page with image FpF_p, and the latter consists of pure pieces of the indicated weights.

For r≥2r \ge2 the target weight ℓ+v−r+1\ell+v-r+1 is smaller than the source weight ℓ+v\ell+v. Here is why a real filtered differential between those pieces is zero. Decompose both into their locally finite strict-support summands. A perverse map between distinct strict supports has image supported properly in at least one of them, and hence is zero. On a common smooth dense support of dimension ee, the map is a real map of local systems preserving their Hodge filtrations; this follows also directly from (11.7), which recovers the intrinsic filtered module as the sections annihilated by the normal ideal. The two variation weights are the module weights minus ee. A real map preserving F∙F^\bullet preserves F‾∙\overline{F}^\bullet as well. The image of a vector of source type (a,b)(a,b) lies in Fa∩F‾bF^a \cap\overline{F}^b of the target. Since a+ba+b is the larger source weight, that intersection in the pure target is zero. Thus the generic map is zero, and strict support makes the map zero everywhere.

Inductively, injection of a level page implies its differential is zero when the unfiltered differential is zero. Hence both sequences degenerate at the second page and the level infinity page injects with image FpF_p. The filtration WW is finite. If the abutment map Hj(FpC)→Hj(C)\mathcal{H}^j(F_pC) \to\mathcal{H}^j(C) had a nonzero kernel element, choose the least ℓ\ell containing it. Its nonzero leading class in gr⁡ℓW\operatorname{gr}^W_\ell would contradict the injection on the infinity page. This proves the asserted injection of every level.

The same leading-class argument proves strictness of the induced WW: if an element of Hj(FpC)\mathcal{H}^j(F_pC) maps into WℓMjW_\ell M^j, it already lies in WℓHj(FpC)W_\ell\mathcal{H}^j(F_pC). The resulting finite filtration of (Mj,F)(M^j,F) is therefore strict for every level and has exactly the pure second-page quotients, of weights ℓ+j\ell+j. It follows as well that MjM^j is regular holonomic and its filtration is good: these properties are preserved under this finite filtered extension. Taking gr⁡F\operatorname{gr}^F, and then gr⁡FDRT\operatorname{gr}^F \mathrm{DR}_T, preserves its short exact sequences. If indexed by their pure weights, the output weight filtration is the shifted filtration W[j]W[j].

For p<0p<0, every term in (85) vanishes. For p=0p=0, its only term is F0K=i∗ωHF_0K=i_{\ast}\omega_H in degree zero. The just-proved level injection consequently gives exactly (78). This completes the proof of Proposition 11.1. A relative dualizing sheaf would appear only after tensoring by ωT−1\omega_T^{-1}; the line in (78) is absolute.

The first residue cohomology R1h∗ωHR^1h_{\ast}\omega_H is therefore embedded as F0M1F_0M^1. For lifting, it remains to prove the symbol-kernel vanishing when TT is smooth projective.

Projective vanishing for the pure quotients

The projective vanishing we will use is stated for the filtered components of the real or complex theory of Sabbah–Schnell. The Kähler direct-image theorem above supplied real polarizations; a rational polarization was not part of its output. We therefore need vanishing in the real theory and must identify the actual filtration, not merely the underlying regular holonomic module. The following comparison does this for each strict-support pure summand.

Lemma 11.2 (Pure-component comparison and vanishing). Let TT be smooth projective, and let (Q,F)(Q,F) be the right filtered module of one strict-support summand of a polarizable real pure quotient in Proposition 11.1. Write ZZ for its support and ww for its weight. It is isomorphic, as a right filtered module, to the prime holomorphic component of a pure object in pHM⁡Z(T,R,w)\operatorname{pHM}_{Z}(T,\mathbb{R},w) of Sabbah–Schnell, attached to the same generic polarized real variation. In particular, for every ample line NN on TT, every integer pp, and every v<0v<0,

Hv(T,N−1⊗gr⁡pFDR⁡TQ)=0.(87)\mathbb{H}^{v}\left(T,N^{-1}\otimes\operatorname{gr}^{F}_{p}\operatorname{DR}_{T}Q\right)=0. \tag*{(87)}

Proof. We use Saito’s analytic category of pure real Hodge modules [46], which permits discrete real indices for the VV-filtration. The pure properties supplied above are in that category. If the constant-source theorem is read with the stronger rationally indexed pure conditions, those imply the broad real specializability conditions, and induction on support dimension gives the pure clauses of Definition 1.8 as well. On a smooth dense analytic Zariski open Z∘Z^\circ of ZZ, the piece QQ gives a polarized real variation H\mathcal{H} of weight w−dim⁡Zw-\dim Z, by Lemmas 1.9 and 1.13 of that source. Theorem 16.2.1 and Corollary 16.3.6 of [45] give a pure object B∈pHM⁡Z(T,R,w)B\in\operatorname{pHM}_{Z}(T,\mathbb{R},w) extending this same variation with its real polarization. Use its prime holomorphic filtered component.

Both underlying complex regular holonomic modules are the intermediate extension IC⁡Z(HC)\operatorname{IC}_{Z}(\mathcal{H}_{\mathbb{C}}). For the Saito filtered module use strict support and regularity in Remark 1.11 of [46]; for the Sabbah–Schnell component use [45]. Regular Riemann–Hilbert and uniqueness of intermediate extension [45] give the unique unfiltered identity extending the chosen identity on Z∘Z^\circ. It remains to prove that this identity preserves FF at the boundary.

On a smooth support UU of dimension ee, write H\mathcal{H} for the flat holomorphic bundle of the variation, with decreasing Hodge filtration. Its right filtration is

Fp(ωU⊗H)=ωU⊗F−p−eH.(88)F_{p}\left(\omega_{U}\otimes\mathcal{H}\right)=\omega_{U}\otimes F^{-p-e}\mathcal{H}. \tag*{(88)}

Indeed the left filtration is FpL=F−pF^{L}_{p}=F^{-p}, and the side change is FpR=ωU⊗Fp+eLF^{R}_{p}=\omega_{U}\otimes F^{L}_{p+e}. The same formula is recorded in [45]. The right closed transfer (11.7) introduces no further shift. Thus the two right filtrations agree away from the boundary of Z∘Z^\circ.

Work locally on TT. Choose a holomorphic gg whose zero set contains that boundary but no local component of ZZ, and split into the finitely many local strict-support factors if necessary. Such a gg exists by prime avoidance: the boundary has smaller dimension than each local support branch. If the boundary is empty there is nothing to prove. Use the graph embedding in T×CT\times\mathbb{C}, and let QgQ_g denote the transferred module. Put b=dim⁡Tb=\dim T. Saito’s left convention uses increasing FLF^{L} and decreasing VαLV^{L}_{\alpha} with ∂t−α\partial_t-\alpha nilpotent on its α\alpha-grade. On the graph ambient the conversion is

FpR=ωT×C⊗Fp+b+1L,VαL⟷V−α−1R.(89)F^{R}_{p}=\omega_{T\times\mathbb{C}}\otimes F^{L}_{p+b+1},\qquad V^{L}_{\alpha}\longleftrightarrow V^{R}_{-\alpha-1}. \tag*{(89)}

The second rule follows because transposition sends t∂tt\partial_t to −t∂t−1-t\partial_t-1. In particular V≥−1LV^{L}_{\geq-1} becomes V<0RV^{R}_{<0}. The sign change of a normal ∂t\partial_t does not change a generated sum.

We verify the filtered surjectivity needed in Saito’s reconstruction. Put Ψ=ψg,1Q\Psi=\psi_{g,1}Q and Φ=ϕg,1Q\Phi=\phi_{g,1}Q. Strict support gives a surjective can⁡:Ψ→Φ\operatorname{can}:\Psi\to\Phi and an injective Var⁡\operatorname{Var}, by [46]. Forgetting FF, this is the nilpotent middle-extension monodromy quiver of holonomic modules. Its monodromy filtrations centered at zero obey

can⁡(MkΨ)=Mk−1Φ(90)\operatorname{can}(M_k\Psi)=M_{k-1}\Phi \tag*{(90)}

by [45], Lemma 3.3.13. The centers of the weight filtrations in Saito’s pure definition are w−1w-1 for Ψ\Psi and ww for Φ\Phi. Thus (90) says can⁡(WiΨ)=WiΦ\operatorname{can}(W_i\Psi)=W_i\Phi. Condition (1.8.2) of Definition 1.8 and the direct-factor Lemma 1.15 of [46] put both gr⁡iWΨ\operatorname{gr}^{W}_{i}\Psi and gr⁡iWΦ\operatorname{gr}^{W}_{i}\Phi in Saito’s pure real category of weight ii. The induced surjection on each grade is a filtered pure morphism, hence is FF-strict by its Proposition 1.10.

At a stalk, take y∈FpΦy\in F_p\Phi and choose ii with y∈WiΦy\in W_i\Phi. Strictness on the iith grade lifts its class by an element of FpΨ∩WiΨF_p\Psi\cap W_i\Psi. Subtract its image and repeat on the next lower weight. The finite monodromy filtration terminates this procedure. It proves

can⁡(FpΨ)=FpΦfor all p.\operatorname{can}(F_p\Psi)=F_p\Phi\quad\text{for all }p.

The finite lifting argument obtains filtered surjectivity from pure strictness on each weight grade. Saito’s filtered middle-extension formula [46], equation (1.7.2)] now applies: the local pure factor satisfies its specializability conditions, the zero set of gg does not contain its support, and can⁡\operatorname{can} is filtered surjective. After (89), that formula is

FpQgOR=∑v≥0(V<0RQgOR∩(ȷop)∗Fp−v(QgOR∣t≠0))∂tv,(91)F_pQ_g^{OR}=\sum_{v\geq0}\left(V_{<0}^{R}Q_g^{OR}\cap(\jmath_{\mathrm{op}})_*F_{p-v}\left(Q_g^{OR}\vert_{t\ne0}\right)\right)\partial_t^v, \tag*{(91)}

where ȷop:T×C∗↪T×C\jmath_{\mathrm{op}}:T\times\mathbb{C}^*\hookrightarrow T\times\mathbb{C} and the intersection is inside (ȷop)∗ȷop−1QgR(\jmath_{\mathrm{op}})_*\jmath_{\mathrm{op}}^{-1}Q_g^{R}. The strict-support module and its VV-pieces embed there by restriction.

For the Sabbah–Schnell component, strict real specializability, pure support, and strictness of can⁡\operatorname{can} follow respectively from Definition 14.2.2, Theorem 14.2.19, and Corollary 14.2.23 of [45]. Its unfiltered intermediate-extension property makes can⁡\operatorname{can} surjective, so it is a filtered middle extension. Definition 10.6.1, Remark 10.6.2, and Proposition 10.6.5 of the same source give precisely (91) for its right component: for α<0\alpha<0, the filtered VαV_\alpha is the intersection with the filtration off the divisor, and the full module is generated from V<0V_{<0} by normal derivatives.

The unfiltered intermediate-extension identity preserves the canonical VV-filtration and, by (88), preserves FF off the divisor. The two right sides of (91) are therefore identical. This proves equality of FF on the graph. Formula (11.7) recovers the module before graph transfer, and its filtration, as the sections annihilated by the normal ideal. Hence the identity is filtered on TT. The local identities glue by uniqueness of the unfiltered identity. The comparison uses the actual generic variation and its filtration; the two theories’ internal twist symbols need not have the same weight convention.

A pure object of Sabbah–Schnell is an object of WHM⁡(T)\operatorname{WHM}(T) with its one-step weight filtration, by Section 14.2.14 of [45]. Its Theorem 16.3.10, on the smooth projective TT, gives negative-ample graded de Rham vanishing for either filtered component. Sections 8.4.1–8.4.9 of that source identify the perverse right de Rham convention with the Spencer complex ending in the module in degree zero, with its filtration grading preserved. The theorem therefore gives (87) for every homogeneous degree pp in our convention. This proves the lemma. □

Corollary 11.3 (No ample line in the first symbol kernel). In Proposition 11.1, assume in addition that TT is smooth projective, and fix jj. Put M=MJM=M^J, and let

σ:F0M⊗TT⟶gr⁡−1FM,m⊗ξ⟼[mξ]\sigma:F_0M\otimes\mathcal{T}_T\longrightarrow\operatorname{gr}^{F}_{-1}M,\qquad m\otimes\xi\longmapsto[m\xi]

be principal-symbol multiplication for the right action. For every ample line NN on TT,

Hom⁡OT(N,ker⁡σ)=0.(92)\operatorname{Hom}_{\mathcal{O}_T}(N,\ker\sigma)=0. \tag*{(92)}

This assertion includes a coherent torsion subsheaf of the kernel.

Proof. On compact TT the locally finite strict-support decomposition of each pure quotient of Proposition 11.1 is finite. Apply Lemma 11.2 to each factor. The finite filtration of MM is FF-strict, so its short exact sequences remain exact after gr⁡FDR⁡T\operatorname{gr}^{F}\operatorname{DR}_T. Their hypercohomology long exact sequences give (11.16) for MM itself. This deduction uses the comparison for the pure quotients and the strict filtration of MM.

By (11.2), the p=1p=1 right graded de Rham complex has exactly two terms:

gr⁡1FDR⁡TM=[F0M⊗TT→ σ gr⁡1FM]in degrees −1,0.(93)\operatorname{gr}^{F}_{1}\operatorname{DR}_{T}M=\left[F_{0}M\otimes T_{T}\xrightarrow{\ \sigma\ }\operatorname{gr}^{F}_{1}M\right]\quad\text{in degrees }-1,0. \tag*{(93)}

Since NN is invertible, its tensor is exact, and negative hypercohomology gives

0=H−1(T,N−1⊗gr⁡1FDR⁡TM)=H0(T,N−1⊗ker⁡σ)=Hom⁡OT(N,ker⁡σ).0=\mathbb{H}^{-1}\left(T,N^{-1}\otimes\operatorname{gr}^{F}_{1}\operatorname{DR}_{T}M\right)=H^{0}\left(T,N^{-1}\otimes\ker\sigma\right)=\operatorname{Hom}_{\mathcal{O}_{T}}(N,\ker\sigma).

The two-term calculation uses no local freeness of ker⁡σ\ker\sigma, so it applies to torsion as well.

Lifting through every boundary neighborhood

We retain the data L,s,G,q,r,aL,s,G,q,r,a, the local root charts, and the maps g:E→Ug:E\to U, h:H→Uh:H\to U of Section 10. In particular EE is reduced Cartier, I=OZ(−E)I=\mathcal{O}_{Z}(-E) is invertible, and Aj=Ij/Ij+1A_j=I^j/I^{j+1} has the Laurent graded frame uju^j for every integer jj. The frame uses the prescribed boundary root comparison; it is a frame on the associated graded, not an extension of that boundary frame to ZZ.

The finite quotients Tj,k=Ij/Ij+kT_{j,k}=I^j/I^{j+k} have the lifting target in Proposition 10.2. The intervening constructions supplied the split residue insertion and the projective symbol-kernel vanishing. We now use them to kill the connecting maps of (10.9) at every finite order. The quotients remain sheaves on the underlying space of EE; no map from an infinitesimal thickening to the parameter space is required.

The obstruction is a graded derivation

We prove the proposition by induction on kk, simultaneously in all integer degrees and all root charts. The following description uses only the orders strictly smaller than the current one.

Lemma 12.1. Fix k≥1k\ge1, and assume (10.8) for every smaller order, every integer degree, and every root chart. The connecting maps for the current order factor uniquely as maps of complex vector space sheaves

δk:g∗Aj⟶R1g∗Aj+k(j∈Z).(94)\delta_k:g_*A_j\longrightarrow R^1g_*A_{j+k}\quad(j\in\mathbb{Z}). \tag*{(94)}

They form a degree-kk derivation from the Laurent graded algebra ⨁jg∗Aj\bigoplus_j g_*A_j to its graded cohomology module ⨁jR1g∗Aj\bigoplus_j R^1g_*A_j. If t1,…,tbt_1,\ldots,t_b are local coordinates on UU and FF is holomorphic in those coordinates, then

δk(F(t))=∑i=1bFti(t) δk(ti).(95)\delta_k(F(t))=\sum_{i=1}^{b}F_{t_i}(t)\,\delta_k(t_i). \tag*{(95)}

These maps and formulas commute with restriction and with the ambient power-compatible root comparisons. Vanishing of δk\delta_k in all degrees proves the current order of (10.8).

Proof. Use (68) together with

0⟶Tj+1,k−1⟶Tj,k⟶Aj⟶0(k>1).(96)0 \longrightarrow\mathcal{T}_{j+1,k-1} \longrightarrow\mathcal{T}_{j,k} \longrightarrow A_j \longrightarrow0 \qquad(k > 1). \tag*{(96)}

All are valid for negative jj because II is invertible. Write ∂j,k:g∗Tj,k⟶R1g∗Aj+k\partial_{j,k}: g_*\mathcal{T}_{j,k} \longrightarrow R^1g_*A_{j+k} for the connecting map of the first sequence. The shorter orders make g∗Tj,k⟶g∗Ajg_*\mathcal{T}_{j,k} \longrightarrow g_*A_j surjective. For k>1k > 1, its kernel is the image of g∗Tj+1,k−1g_*\mathcal{T}_{j+1,k-1}, by left exactness in the second sequence. The shorter order k−1k-1 in degree j+1j+1 lifts that image through g∗Tj+1,kg_*\mathcal{T}_{j+1,k}, which maps into g∗Tj,k+1g_*\mathcal{T}_{j,k+1}. The connecting map vanishes on the kernel. For k=1k = 1, the leading map is the identity and its kernel is zero. This proves the unique factorization (94). If it is zero, exactness of the first sequence gives the desired epimorphism.

Here is the derivation calculation on germs. A leading section in degree jj lifts to a section of Tj,k\mathcal{T}_{j,k} after a base shrink. Choose local representatives xα∈Ijx_\alpha\in I^j on an ambient open cover near EE. Their differences belong to Ij+kI^{j+k}, and their classes modulo Ij+k+1I^{j+k+1} represent δk(x)\delta_k(x). For a second section zz of degree ll, take simultaneous representatives. On an overlap,

xβzβ−xαzα=xα(zβ−zα)+zα(xβ−xα)+(xβ−xα)(zβ−zα).x_\beta z_\beta- x_\alpha z_\alpha= x_\alpha(z_\beta-z_\alpha) + z_\alpha(x_\beta-x_\alpha) + (x_\beta-x_\alpha)(z_\beta-z_\alpha).

The last term lies in Ij+l+2k⊂Ij+l+k+1I^{j+l+2k} \subset I^{j+l+k+1}. The first two terms reduce to multiplication by the leading coefficients. Their Čech classes therefore give

δk(xz)=xδk(z)+zδk(x).\delta_k(xz) = x\delta_k(z) + z\delta_k(x).

This uses the ordinary multiplication action of layer sections on their first cohomology, and gives the asserted graded derivation.

For the chain rule, choose simultaneous shorter representatives Gi,α∈OZG_{i,\alpha} \in\mathcal{O}_Z of the degree-zero sections tit_i. Their differences lie in IkI^k. Shrink the local opens so that F(G1,α,…,Gb,α)F(G_{1,\alpha},\ldots,G_{b,\alpha}) is defined. Its holomorphic Taylor difference, modulo the square of the differences, is ∑iFti(Gα)(Gi,β−Gi,α)\sum_i F_{t_i}(G_\alpha)(G_{i,\beta}-G_{i,\alpha}). The square lies in I2k⊂Ik+1I^{2k} \subset I^{k+1}, and the coefficient restricts to Fti(t)F_{t_i}(t) on EE. This gives (95) before any restriction to a generic parameter. It is valid when the target contains torsion. The connecting map and all representative calculations are natural for restrictions and the prescribed ambient root isomorphisms.

The local differential-operator identity

Fix the current order kk, and put m=a+k>0m = a+k > 0. For a local leading section x∈g∗A−mx \in g_*A_{-m}, define, in coordinates t=(t1,…,tb)t=(t_1,\ldots,t_b) on UU,

c(x)=τ∗δk(x),ei(x)=τ∗(xδk(ti))in R1h∗ωH.c(x)=\tau_*\delta_k(x), \qquad e_i(x)=\tau_*\bigl(x\delta_k(t_i)\bigr) \quad\text{in } R^1h_*\omega_H.

Both arguments of τ∗\tau_* have layer degree −a-a, since −m+k=−a-m+k=-a. The map is the residue insertion of Proposition 10.4; it is injective on every parameter germ.

Consider a holomorphic ψ:U′⟶U\psi: U' \longrightarrow U between manifolds of the same dimension bb, in coordinates w=(w1,…,wb)w=(w_1,\ldots,w_b), satisfying the transversality (76) for every smooth component intersection of HH. The identity map is one such map. As in Proposition 10.5, after a shrink about a compact fiber the support

Hb=H×UU′⊂Z^×U′H^b = H \times_U U' \subset\widehat{Z} \times U'

is reduced SNC, locally a divisor in a smooth complete intersection, of codimension b+1b+1 in the product. Its ambient projection pbp^b is a submersion and its closed strata are proper with global relative Kähler forms. After the restrictions needed for the root comparisons and the Kähler neighborhood, apply Lemma 10.3 anew to the smooth closed strata of the graph cut over U′U', and use its final open neighborhood. Properness survives this base change, and the lemma gives finitely many globally smooth irreducible component labels and finitely many smooth proper connected pieces of each closed intersection. The existing coordinates and relative forms restrict to that open. Set

K♭=H[H♭]b+1(ωZ^×U′),M♭=Hp+1K♭.K^{\flat}=\mathcal{H}^{b+1}_{[H^{\flat}]}(\omega_{\widehat{Z}\times U'}),\qquad M^{\flat}=\mathcal{H}^{1}_{p+}K^{\flat}.

Proposition 11.1 applies with no additional codimension shift and gives F0M♭=R1h∗♭ωH♭↪M♭F_0M^{\flat}=R^1h^\flat_*\omega_{H^\flat}\hookrightarrow M^\flat.

The adjunction identity (10.16) supplies the factor ωU′⊗ψ∗ωU−1\omega_{U'}\otimes\psi^*\omega_U^{-1}. We denote its wedge frame by dw/dtdw/dt; this notation is a ratio of canonical frames, not an inverse Jacobian. Pull the Čech classes representing c(x),ei(x)c(x),e_i(x) to H♭H^\flat and tensor with this frame. Write their images in F0M♭F_0M^\flat as c~,e~i\widetilde c,\widetilde e_i. These are the natural pullbacks of these classes; no base-change isomorphism is asserted for a ramified ψ\psi.

Lemma 12.2 (The adjugate identity). Let J=(∂ψi/∂wj)J=(\partial\psi_i/\partial w_j) and J#=adj⁡(J)J^\#=\operatorname{adj}(J). Under the preceding assumptions, the following identity holds in the right module M♭M^\flat:

c~det⁡J+∑i,j(e~i∂wj)Jji#=0.\widetilde c\det J+\sum_{i,j}(\widetilde e_i\partial_{w_j})J^\#_{ji}=0.

In particular,

σ(∑i,jJji#e~i⊗∂wj)=0in gr⁡1FM♭.(97)\sigma\left(\sum_{i,j}J^\#_{ji}\widetilde e_i\otimes\partial_{w_j}\right)=0\quad\text{in }\operatorname{gr}^{F}_{1}M^\flat. \tag*{(97)}

For ψ=id⁡\psi=\operatorname{id}, after the natural graph identification, the exact identity is

c(x)+∑iei(x)∂ti=0in M♭.c(x)+\sum_i e_i(x)\partial_{t_i}=0\quad\text{in }M^\flat.

When b=0b=0, the same construction without graph equations gives c(x)=0c(x)=0 in its degree-one direct-image module.

Proof. All statements are on germs, so choose a common parameter shrink and simultaneous shorter lifts of the finitely many sections x,tix,t_i. Choose local ambient representatives near EE, indexed by α\alpha, with

xα∈I−a−k,xβ−xα∈I−a,Gi,α∈OZ,Gi,β−Gi,α∈Ik.(98)x_\alpha\in I^{-a-k},\qquad x_\beta-x_\alpha\in I^{-a},\qquad G_{i,\alpha}\in\mathcal{O}_Z,\qquad G_{i,\beta}-G_{i,\alpha}\in I^k. \tag*{(98)}

They exist by the smaller orders in Lemma 12.1; for k=1k=1 the shorter truncation is already the layer. Pull them to Z^\widehat Z, suppressing pullback symbols, and put

ηα=xατ,Qi,α=ψi(w)−Gi,α,Pα=∏iQi,α.\eta_\alpha=x_\alpha\tau,\qquad Q_{i,\alpha}=\psi_i(w)-G_{i,\alpha},\qquad P_\alpha=\prod_i Q_{i,\alpha}.

On HH the Gi,αG_{i,\alpha} restrict to the coordinate functions of hh. The QiQ_i’s and a reduced equation of HH are therefore the regular graph-support equations. The logarithmic insertion and DE=ρ∗E≥HD_E=\rho^*E\geq H give the precise pole bounds

ηα∈ωZ^(H+kDE),ηβ−ηα,ηα(Gi,β−Gi,α)∈ωZ^(H),ηα(Gi,β−Gi,α)(Gl,β−Gl,α),(ηβ−ηα)(Gi,β−Gi,α)∈ωZ^(H−kDE)⊂ωZ^.\begin{aligned} \eta_\alpha&\in\omega_{\widehat Z}(H+kD_E),\\ \eta_\beta-\eta_\alpha,\quad\eta_\alpha(G_{i,\beta}-G_{i,\alpha})&\in\omega_{\widehat Z}(H),\\ \eta_\alpha(G_{i,\beta}-G_{i,\alpha})(G_{l,\beta}-G_{l,\alpha}),\quad (\eta_\beta-\eta_\alpha)(G_{i,\beta}-G_{i,\alpha})&\in\omega_{\widehat Z}(H-kD_E)\subset\omega_{\widehat Z}. \end{aligned}

The last inclusion uses k≥1k \ge1. Thus the quadratic and cross difference terms have no pole on the first-factor support HH.

In algebraic local cohomology consider the local sections

Sα=[ηα∧dwPα]S_\alpha=\left[\frac{\eta_\alpha\wedge dw}{P_\alpha}\right]

of K♭K^{\flat}.

The HH-pole is already in ηα\eta_\alpha. These are finite-pole generalized fractions with a fixed ordering of the graph equations. To expand their differences, first quotient the localization along HH by forms regular there, and then localize for the QiQ_i’s. Each polar class is killed by a power of a reduced equation of HH, and every Gi,β−Gi,αG_{i,\beta}-G_{i,\alpha} is a multiple of that equation. The change from Qi,αQ_{i,\alpha} to Qi,β=Qi,α−(Gi,β−Gi,α)Q_{i,\beta}=Q_{i,\alpha}-(G_{i,\beta}-G_{i,\alpha}) therefore has a finite geometric expansion on each polar class. By (12.9) only its linear terms survive. This proves the exact generalized-fraction equality on an overlap

Sβ−Sα=[(ηβ−ηα)∧dwPα]+∑i[ηα(Gi,β−Gi,α)∧dwQi,αPα].S_\beta-S_\alpha= \left[\frac{(\eta_\beta-\eta_\alpha)\wedge dw}{P_\alpha}\right] +\sum_i\left[\frac{\eta_\alpha(G_{i,\beta}-G_{i,\alpha})\wedge dw}{Q_{i,\alpha}P_\alpha}\right].

There is no infinite series or division by a Jacobian in this identity.

Let CC be the first Čech cochain in (12.10). Let EiE_i have the numerator of its iith summand but only the denominator PαP_\alpha, and let Ei(l)E_i^{(l)} denote that cochain with the additional denominator Ql,αQ_{l,\alpha}. The simple fractions C,EiC,E_i are cocycles: their reductions are respectively the cocycles for δk(x)\delta_k(x) and xδk(ti)x\delta_k(t_i); on a triple overlap the possible change of the representative of xx is a cross term with no HH-pole by (12.9). The description of the residue insertion on representatives and complete-intersection adjunction identify their classes with c~,e~i\tilde c,\tilde e_i in F0M♭F_0M^\flat. More explicitly, the residue of a log form η\eta on HH, pulled with dw/dtdw/dt, is represented by [η∧dw/Pα][\eta\wedge dw/P_\alpha]; the determinant of the graph conormal gives exactly that frame. Thus this identification holds also at ramification. The cochains Ei(l)E_i^{(l)} need not individually be cocycles.

The numerator of EiE_i is independent of ww. The right canonical action is minus differentiation of the coefficient of the volume form, so at the cochain level

Ei∂wj=∑lJljEi(l).E_i\partial_{w_j}=\sum_l J_{lj}E_i^{(l)}.

Write dˇ\check d for the Čech differential. Equation (12.10) is dˇS=C+∑iEi(i)\check dS=C+\sum_iE_i^{(i)}. Multiply it by det⁡J\det J and use JJ#=(det⁡J)id⁡JJ^\#=(\det J)\operatorname{id} together with (12.11). The result, still at the cochain level, is

dˇ(Sdet⁡J)=Cdet⁡J+∑i,j(Ei∂wj)Jji#.\check d(S\det J)=C\det J+\sum_{i,j}(E_i\partial_{w_j})J^\#_{ji}.

The placement of Jji#J^\#_{ji} after the right derivative is part of this exact formula.

These cochains lie in the end term of the relative right de Rham complex for the product projection, with first-factor coordinates held fixed. That term has no outgoing relative differential, so a Čech coboundary there is a total coboundary in direct image. The action in (12.11) induces the base right action there. Passing (12.12) to MbM^b gives (12.5). This uses the natural map from these Čech classes to direct image, and does not require that all direct-image classes be computed by this cover.

The term c~det⁡J\tilde c\det J is in F0F_0. Moving a holomorphic function past a right vector field changes an operator by order zero. Taking gr⁡1F\operatorname{gr}_1^F of (12.5) gives (97). With unchanged coordinates J=id⁡J=\operatorname{id}, the exact formula itself gives (12.7). If b=0b=0, there are no QiQ_i; the undivided difference of the ηα\eta_\alpha in the support module of HH is the cochain for c(x)c(x) and is a total coboundary. This proves the last assertion as well. ∮ედვით

One global symbol kills the current obstruction

Proof of Proposition 10.2. Assume the shorter orders and use Lemma 12.1. First suppose b>0b>0, and fix an arbitrary point t∗∈T=Pbt_* \in T=\mathbb{P}^b. Proposition 10.5 gives the coordinate-power map ψ:T′=Pb→T\psi:T'=\mathbb{P}^b\to T, the line R=OT′(1)R=\mathcal{O}_{T'}(1) with Rr≃ψ∗OT(1)R^r\simeq\psi^*\mathcal{O}_T(1), and a single compact SNC graph support H′⊂WH'\subset\mathcal{W} with submersive projection p′:W→T′p':\mathcal{W}\to T'. It is unbranched over t∗t_*. Put

K′=H[H′]b+1(ωW),M′=Hp′+1K′.K'=\mathcal{H}^{b+1}_{[H']}(\omega_{\mathcal{W}}),\qquad M'=\mathcal{H}^1_{p'+}K'.

The global graph proposition verifies every hypothesis of Proposition 11.1: the support has pure dimension dim⁡V−1\dim V-1, globally smooth finitely many components, and proper smooth closed intersections with one ambient Kähler form. Thus F0M′=R1h∗′ωH′↪M′F_0M'=R^1h'_*\omega_{H'}\hookrightarrow M', in the absolute canonical convention, and Corollary 11.3 applies.

Take the local leading section x=u−mx=u^{-m}. On a local graph chart choose a frame pˉ\bar p of RR with pˉr=ψ∗ℓ\bar p^r=\psi^*\ell for a downstairs frame ℓ\ell. The local formula

pˉm⟼∑j,iJji#e~ei(u−m)⊗∂wj(99)\bar p^m\longmapsto\sum_{j,i}J^{\#\tilde e}_{ji}e_i(u^{-m})\otimes\partial_{w_j} \tag*{(99)}

defines a global morphism

Rm⟶F0M′⊗TT′.(100)R^m\longrightarrow F_0M'\otimes TT'. \tag*{(100)}

We verify the transition, including on the branch locus.

Let t′=t′(t)t'=t'(t) and w′=w′(w)w'=w'(w) be changes of coordinates, and put At=∂t′/∂tA_t=\partial t'/\partial t, Bw=∂w′/∂wB_w=\partial w'/\partial w. These matrices are invertible. If pˉ′=λpˉ\bar p'=\lambda\bar p, then λr=ψ∗μ\lambda^r=\psi^*\mu for the downstairs unit μ\mu changing the frame of OT(1)\mathcal{O}_T(1). Locally even at a branch point, λ\lambda descends as a holomorphic unit: take an rrth root of μ\mu on a small downstairs neighborhood, and observe that the remaining ratio has rrth power one and hence is locally constant. Denote the resulting downstairs unit also by λ\lambda.

Compare the local root pairs by sending their new boundary frame to λp1\lambda p_1. Lemma 10.1 extends this power-compatible comparison to the ambient germs. Its pullback agrees with the transition of the global root near the graph, by the uniqueness and properness argument in Proposition 10.5. It therefore identifies both full covers, their tautological forms, and the fixed functorial principalizations. Under this identification u′−m=λmu−mu'^{-m}=\lambda^m u^{-m}. In the definition of ei(x)e_i(x), the factor xx multiplies outside the derivation. Hence no derivative of λ\lambda occurs. Naturality and the chain rule (12.2) transform the downstairs column of eie_i's by λmAt\lambda^mA_t.

The absolute graph factor changes by dw′/dt′=(det⁡Bw/det⁡At) dw/dtdw'/dt'=(\det B_w/\det A_t)\,dw/dt. Consequently, for the pulled columns and Jacobians,

e~′=det⁡Bwdet⁡AtλmAte~,J′=AtJBw−1,(101)\widetilde e'=\frac{\det B_w}{\det A_t}\lambda^m A_t\widetilde e,\qquad J'=A_tJB_w^{-1}, \tag*{(101)}
(J′)#=det⁡Atdet⁡BwBwJ#At−1,(J′)#e~′=λmBwJ#e~.(102)(J')^\#=\frac{\det A_t}{\det B_w}B_wJ^\#A_t^{-1},\qquad(J')^\#\widetilde e'=\lambda^mB_wJ^\#\widetilde e. \tag*{(102)}

The adjugate identity holds for every JJ: it follows for invertible JJ from the inverse formula and then for all JJ as a polynomial identity. Only the coordinate changes At,BwA_t,B_w are inverted. Since the vector basis changes by Bw−1B_w^{-1}, the last equality is exactly the transition for the image of the frame pˉm\bar p^m in (12.13). This proves (12.14) on all of T′T'. At ramification the classes are the natural Čech pullbacks under the resolved ambient germ comparisons; a flat base-change isomorphism for R1h∗′ωHR^1h'_*\omega_H is not used.

By Lemma 12.2, the image of (12.14) lies in ker⁡σ\ker\sigma. The line Rm=OPb(a+k)R^m=\mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^b}(a+k) is ample because a+k>0a+k>0. Corollary 11.3 makes the global map zero. At a point above t∗t_*, the map ψ\psi is locally biholomorphic and J#J^{\#} is invertible. The ambient product comparison then identifies the graph family and its Čech classes with the downstairs family. Thus the zero map implies ei(u−m)=0e_i(u^{-m})=0 as a downstairs germ near t∗t_\ast, including a class supported at that parameter. The point t∗t_\ast was arbitrary, and the root comparisons allow any chart at it. It follows that these classes vanish locally everywhere.

The injection τ∗\tau_\ast and the invertible layer frame u−mu^{-m} now imply δk(ti)=0\delta_k(t_i)=0 on every chart: multiplication by that frame is an isomorphism from the layer AkA_k to A−aA_{-a}, including on first direct images. For any local xx of degree −m-m, all ei(x)e_i(x) vanish. The exact unchanged coordinate identity (12.7) gives c(x)=0c(x)=0 in MbM^b. The injection (78) brings this back to R1h∗ωHR^1h_\ast\omega_H, and the residue injection gives δk(x)=0\delta_k(x)=0. When b=0b=0, Lemma 12.2 gives c(x)=0c(x)=0 directly, and the same two injections give this conclusion; there are no parameter coordinates to treat.

In particular δk(u−m)=0\delta_k(u^{-m})=0. The derivation rule for the invertible Laurent frame gives

0=δk(u−m)=−mu−m−1δk(u).0=\delta_k(u^{-m})=-m u^{-m-1}\delta_k(u).

so δk(u)=0\delta_k(u)=0. For any local F∈g∗OEF\in g_\ast\mathcal{O}_E, the section Fu−mFu^{-m} also has degree −m-m, and

0=δk(Fu−m)=u−mδk(F).0=\delta_k(Fu^{-m})=u^{-m}\delta_k(F).

Thus δk(F)=0\delta_k(F)=0. Every local graded section is FujFu^j, so δk\delta_k is zero in every integer degree. Lemma 12.1 closes the current order. Induction from k=1k=1 proves Proposition 10.2.

Invariant layers and the growth of sections

Finite lifting is now available in every degree. To obtain ambient sections, we pass to cyclic invariants and count the resulting finite quotients downstairs. Translation by the Cartier divisor GG will make the same finitely many coherent layers recur with increasing positive twists on TT. Those twists supply the section growth and bound the higher-cohomology loss.

Completion of Theorem 1.2. Define global divisorial subsheaves of meromorphic functions on the normal space VV by

Jj=OV(−⌈jGr⌉)(j∈Z).(103)J_j=\mathcal{O}_V\left(-\left\lceil\frac{jG}{r}\right\rceil\right)\quad(j\in\mathbb{Z}). \tag*{(103)}

They agree in each root chart with (π∗Ij)μr(\pi_\ast I^j)^{\mu_r}. Indeed, at a prime over SiS_i, an invariant meromorphic function of downstairs order viv_i has order (r/di)vi(r/d_i)v_i. Membership in IjI^j is equivalent to

vi≥⌈jdir⌉.v_i\ge\left\lceil\frac{j d_i}{r}\right\rceil.

At all other primes it is regular. The full invariant meromorphic algebra is the downstairs algebra, and normality extends the codimension-one test. Finite coherent pushforward and averaging by μr\mu_r are exact. This also proves coherence of the divisorial sheaves in (103) and of their quotients locally, and their valuation descriptions glue globally.

Since 0<di≤r0<d_i\le r, the sheaf J1=OV(−S)J_1=\mathcal{O}_V(-S) is the ideal of the reduced divisor SS. The same coefficient inequality gives J1Jj⊂Jj+1J_1J_j\subset J_{j+1} for every jj. Hence

Bj=Jj/Jj+1\mathcal{B}_j=J_j/J_{j+1}

is a coherent OS\mathcal{O}_S-module, and B0=OS\mathcal{B}_0=\mathcal{O}_S. Taking invariants of Proposition 10.2 preserves its epimorphisms: lift an invariant local section upstairs and average the lift. For l<nl<n, define the sheaf of complex vector spaces

Fl,n=f∗(Jl/Jn)  on T,Fj=f∗Bj.\mathcal{F}_{l,n}=f_\ast(J_l/J_n)\ \text{ on } T,\qquad F_j=f_\ast\mathcal{B}_j.

Set also Fn,n=0\mathcal{F}_{n,n}=0. The quotients Jl/JnJ_l/J_n are considered on the underlying space of SS, just as before. The invariant lifting surjections give exact sequences of complex vector space sheaves

0⟶Fj+1,n⟶Fj,n⟶Fj⟶0(j<n).(104)0 \longrightarrow\mathcal{F}_{j+1,n} \longrightarrow\mathcal{F}_{j,n} \longrightarrow F_j \longrightarrow0 \quad(j<n). \tag*{(104)}

In particular Fl,n\mathcal{F}_{l,n} has a finite filtration with the full quotients FjF_j, l≤j<nl\leq j<n. Each FjF_j is a coherent OT\mathcal{O}_T-module by properness of ff; coherence as an OT\mathcal{O}_T-module is not asserted for Fl,n\mathcal{F}_{l,n}.

Cartier translation by GG in (103), together with the actual line identity OV(G)=L\mathcal{O}_V(G)=L defined by ss, gives

Jj−r=Jj⊗OV(G),Bj−r=Bj⊗L∣S.J_{j-r}=J_j\otimes\mathcal{O}_V(G), \qquad B_{j-r}=B_j\otimes L|_S.

Projection formula and (62) consequently give

Fj−r=Fj⊗OT(1),F0=f∗OS≠0.(105)F_{j-r}=F_j\otimes\mathcal{O}_T(1), \qquad F_0=f_*\mathcal{O}_S\ne0. \tag*{(105)}

This is an identity of the actual holomorphic lines and sheaves.

For N>0N>0, each −Nr≤j<0-Nr\leq j<0 is uniquely j=l−trj=l-tr with 0≤l<r0\leq l<r and 1≤t≤N1\leq t\leq N. By (105), Fj=Fl(t)F_j=F_l(t). Analytic GAGA and Serre’s coherent finiteness and vanishing theorems [50], [49] imply, for every i>0i>0,

∑j=−Nr−1hi(T,Fj)≤Ci:=∑l=0r−1∑t≥1hi(T,Fl(t))<∞.(106)\sum_{j=-Nr}^{-1}h^i(T,F_j)\leq C_i:=\sum_{l=0}^{r-1}\sum_{t\geq1}h^i(T,F_l(t))<\infty. \tag*{(106)}

These constants are independent of NN, and they are zero for i>dim⁡Ti>\dim T. The long exact sequences of the finite filtration (104) give the same bounds for hi(T,F−Nr,0)h^i(T,\mathcal{F}_{-Nr,0}), as well as finiteness and vanishing above that fixed dimension. Serre vanishing is being applied only to the coherent quotients Fl(t)F_l(t).

There is at least one section of F0(t)F_0(t) for every t≥1t\geq1. Choose a point of the nonempty SS and a section of OT(t)\mathcal{O}_T(t) nonzero at its image; its pullback is nonzero there. Thus ∑j=−Nr−1h0(T,Fj)≥N\sum_{j=-Nr}^{-1}h^0(T,F_j)\geq N. Additivity of the finite Euler characteristics in (104), and the uniform higher bounds for both the quotients and F\mathcal{F}, give a constant CC independent of NN with

h0(T,F−Nr,0)≥N−C.(107)h^0(T,\mathcal{F}_{-Nr,0})\geq N-C. \tag*{(107)}

For example one can take C=2∑i=1dim⁡TCiC=2\sum_{i=1}^{\dim T}C_i.

Finally, J−Nr=OV(NG)J_{-Nr}=\mathcal{O}_V(NG) and J0=OVJ_0=\mathcal{O}_V. Degree-zero direct image on the underlying support gives

H0(T,F−Nr,0)=H0(V,OV(NG)/OV).H^0(T,\mathcal{F}_{-Nr,0})=H^0(V,\mathcal{O}_V(NG)/\mathcal{O}_V).

The exact sequence on VV loses at most the fixed finite dimension h1(V,OV)h^1(V,\mathcal{O}_V) when lifting these quotient sections to H0(V,OV(NG))H^0(V,\mathcal{O}_V(NG)); finiteness follows from proper coherent direct image to a point. Equation (107) therefore makes these section spaces unbounded. For some NN the line OV(NG)\mathcal{O}_V(NG) has two independent sections. Their quotient is a nonconstant meromorphic function on the irreducible normal VV, so its Iitaka dimension is at least one. Since OV(G)=L=OV(qA)\mathcal{O}_V(G)=L=\mathcal{O}_V(qA) is the actual adjoint identity, this proves κ(V,A)≥1\kappa(V,A)\geq1, as claimed.

Proof of abundance after nonvanishing

Proof of Theorem 1.1. If κ(X,D)≥1\kappa(X,D)\geq1, Proposition (38) gives semi-ampleness on the original XX, by descent of the generated actual Cartier multiple. It remains to treat κ(X,D)=0\kappa(X,D)=0. Choose a positive integer m0m_0 for which the actual line L=OX(m0D)\mathcal{L} = \mathcal{O}_X(m_0D) is invertible and has a nonzero section s0s_0. A connected normal space is irreducible, so this section is locally a nonzerodivisor. Let

M=1m0div⁡L(s0).M = \frac{1}{m_0}\operatorname{div}_{\mathcal{L}}(s_0).

It is the normalized effective rational Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier divisor of the plurisection, and the chosen line and section give the actual equivalence M∼QDM \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} D.

Suppose M≠0M \ne0. Proposition 5.1 produces a normal ordinary Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial compact Kähler dlt fourfold (V,B)(V,B) with effective rational boundary, analytically nef actual adjoint A=KV+BA = K_V + B, and a nonzero effective rational Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier divisor PP such that

A∼QP,Supp⁡P=Supp⁡⌊B⌋,κ(V,A)=0.A \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} P,\qquad\operatorname{Supp} P = \operatorname{Supp} \lfloor B \rfloor,\qquad\kappa(V,A) = 0.

The space VV is irreducible, being bimeromorphic to XX, and has the special projective resolution in Lemma 5.6. Theorem 6.1 therefore makes the actual restricted adjoint semiample on the entire reduced floor S=⌊B⌋S = \lfloor B \rfloor. This floor is nonempty because P≠0P \ne0. Every hypothesis of Theorem 1.2 is now satisfied, so it gives κ(V,A)≥1\kappa(V,A) \ge1, a contradiction.

Thus M=0M = 0. The section s0s_0 is nowhere zero. Indeed, if a local representative were a nonunit at a point of the normal space, a minimal prime over its nonzero principal ideal would have height one, and would give a component of its zero divisor. Consequently s0s_0 supplies an isomorphism of holomorphic lines

OX→∼OX(m0D).\mathcal{O}_X \xrightarrow{\sim} \mathcal{O}_X(m_0D).

This proves the asserted actual Q\mathbb{Q}-linear triviality in Iitaka dimension zero, and in particular semiampleness there. Together with the positive-Iitaka-dimensional case it proves the theorem. □\square

References

[1] F. Acquistapace, F. Broglia, and A. Tognoli. An embedding theorem for real analytic spaces. Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Classe di Scienze, 6(3):415–426, 1979. Series 4.

[2] Vincenzo Ancona. Faisceaux amples sur les espaces analytiques. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 274(1):89–100, 1982. Definitions 2.1–2.2, p. 91; Proposition 2.5, p. 92.

[3] Sébastien Boucksom. Divisorial Zariski decompositions on compact complex manifolds. Annales scientifiques de l’École Normale Supérieure, Ser. 4, 37(1):45–76, 2004.

[4] Sébastien Boucksom and Vincent Guedj. Regularizing properties of the Kähler–Ricci flow. In Sébastien Boucksom, Philippe Eyssidieux, and Vincent Guedj, editors, An Introduction to the Kähler–Ricci Flow, volume 2086 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics, pages 189–237. Springer, Cham, 2013.

[5] Nicholas P. Buchdahl. On compact Kähler surfaces. Annales de l’Institut Fourier, 49(1):287–302, 1999.

[6] Frédéric Campana, Andreas Höring, and Thomas Peternell. Abundance for Kähler threefolds. Annales scientifiques de l’École Normale Supérieure, Ser. 4, 49(4):971–1025, 2016.

References

  1. [1]F. Acquistapace, F. Broglia, and A. Tognoli. An embedding theorem for real analytic spaces. Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Classe di Scienze, 6(3):415–426, 1979. Series 4.
  2. [2]Vincenzo Ancona. Faisceaux amples sur les espaces analytiques. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 274(1):89–100, 1982. Definitions 2.1–2.2, p. 91; Proposition 2.5, p. 92.
  3. [3]Sébastien Boucksom. Divisorial Zariski decompositions on compact complex manifolds. Annales scientifiques de l’École Normale Supérieure, Ser. 4, 37(1):45–76, 2004.DOI
  4. [4]Sébastien Boucksom and Vincent Guedj. Regularizing properties of the Kähler–Ricci flow. In Sébastien Boucksom, Philippe Eyssidieux, and Vincent Guedj, editors, An Introduction to the Kähler–Ricci Flow, volume 2086 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics, pages 189–237. Springer, Cham, 2013.
  5. [5]Nicholas P. Buchdahl. On compact Kähler surfaces. Annales de l’Institut Fourier, 49(1):287–302, 1999.DOI
  6. [6]Frédéric Campana, Andreas Höring, and Thomas Peternell. Abundance for Kähler threefolds. Annales scientifiques de l’École Normale Supérieure, Ser. 4, 49(4):971–1025, 2016.
  7. [7]Benoît Claudon, Andreas Höring, and Hsueh-Yung Lin. The fundamental group of compact Kähler threefolds. Geometry & Topology, 23(7):3233–3271, 2019.
  8. [8]Tristan C. Collins and Valentino Tosatti. Kähler currents and null loci. Inventiones Mathematicae, 202(3):1167–1198, 2015. Cited arXiv:1304.5216v5, February 20, 2015; Theorem 1.1, p. 2.
  9. [9]Omprokash Das and Christopher Hacon. On the minimal model program for Kähler 3-folds, 2024. arXiv:2306.11708v2, June 26, 2024.arxiv.org/abs/2306.11708
  10. [10]Omprokash Das, Christopher Hacon, and José Ignacio Yáñez. MMP for generalized pairs on Kähler 3-folds, 2026. arXiv:2305.00524v3, June 29, 2026.arxiv.org/abs/2305.00524
  11. [11]Omprokash Das and Christopher D. Hacon. The log minimal model program for Kähler 3-folds, 2024. arXiv:2009.05924v4, April 9, 2024.
  12. [12]Omprokash Das, Christopher D. Hacon, and Mihai Păun. On the 4-dimensional minimal model program for Kähler varieties, 2024. arXiv:2205.12205v3, April 9, 2024.DOI
  13. [13]Omprokash Das and Wenhao Ou. On the log abundance for compact Kähler 3-folds, 2023. arXiv:2201.01202v3, February 21, 2023.arxiv.org/abs/2201.01202
  14. [14]Omprokash Das and Wenhao Ou. On the log abundance for compact Kähler threefolds II, 2025. arXiv:2306.00671v4, June 12, 2025.arxiv.org/abs/2306.00671
  15. [15]Swapnajit Das. Abundance for semi log canonical compact Kähler threefolds, 2026. arXiv:2604.28085v2, September 13, 2026.arxiv.org/abs/2604.28085
  16. [16]Jean-Pierre Demailly. Mesures de Monge-Ampère et caractérisation géométrique des variétés algébriques affines. Mémoires de la Société Mathématique de France, 2e série, 19:1–124, 1985.
  17. [17]Jean-Pierre Demailly and Mihai Păun. Numerical characterization of the Kähler cone of a compact Kähler manifold. Annals of Mathematics, 159(3):1247–1274, 2004.
  18. [18]Akira Fujiki. On the blowing down of analytic spaces. Publications of the Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences, 10(2):473–507, 1975.
  19. [19]Osamu Fujino. Abundance theorem for semi log canonical threefolds. Duke Mathematical Journal, 102(3):513–532, 2000.DOI
  20. [20]Osamu Fujino. Fundamental theorems for the log minimal model program, 2009. Author version 4.02, September 24, 2009; Section 4.8 and Theorem 4.10, pp. 11–12.arxiv.org/abs/0909.4445
  21. [21]Osamu Fujino. Vanishing theorems for projective morphisms between complex analytic spaces, 2023. arXiv:2205.14801v7, October 14, 2023.arxiv.org/abs/2205.14801
  22. [22]Osamu Fujino. On vanishing theorems for non-compact analytic spaces, 2026. Author version 0.25, April 29, 2026.
  23. [23]Osamu Fujino, Taro Fujisawa, and Morihiko Saito. Some remarks on the semipositivity theorems. Publications of the Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences, 50(1):85–112, 2014. Preprint locators refer to arXiv:1302.6180v2, June 24, 2013.arxiv.org/abs/1302.6180
  24. [24]Osamu Fujino and Yoshinori Gongyo. Log pluricanonical representations and the abundance conjecture. Compositio Mathematica, 150(4):593–620, 2014. Cited author manuscript.DOI
  25. [25]Hans Grauert. Ein Theorem der analytischen Garbentheorie und die Modulräume komplexer Strukturen. Publications Mathématiques de l’IHÉS, 5:5–64, 1960. Section 7, no. 1, Satz 1, p. 60 (PDF p. 59).
  26. [26]Hans Grauert. Über Modifikationen und exceptionelle analytische Mengen. Mathematische Annalen, 146:331–368, 1962. Section 3, no. 7, Satz 8, p. 353; Section 2, no. 4, Definition 3 and Satz 5, pp. 339–340.
  27. [27]Alexander Grothendieck. Techniques de construction en géométrie analytique. II. Généralités sur les espaces annelés et les espaces analytiques. Séminaire Henri Cartan, 13(1):1–14, 1960-1961. Exposé no. 9.
  28. [28]Alexander Grothendieck. Techniques de construction en géométrie analytique. III. Produits fibrés d’espaces analytiques. Séminaire Henri Cartan, 13(1):1–11, 1960-1961. Exposé no. 10.
  29. [29]Alexander Grothendieck. Techniques de construction en géométrie analytique. VIII. Rapport sur les théorèmes de finitude de Grauert et Remmert. Séminaire Henri Cartan, 13(2):1–10, 1960-1961. Exposé no. 15.
  30. [30]Henri Guenancia and Mihai Păun. Bogomolov–Gieseker inequality for log terminal Kähler threefolds. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 78(11):2206–2244, 2025. With an appendix by Frédéric Campana, Andreas Höring, and Thomas Peternell. Appendix locators refer to arXiv:2405.10003v4, March 2, 2025.arxiv.org/abs/2405.10003
  31. [31]Andreas Höring, Vladimir Lazić, and Christian Lehn. Nonvanishing results for Kähler varieties, 2025. arXiv:2508.14634v2, October 21, 2025.
  32. [32]Andreas Höring and Thomas Peternell. Mori fibre spaces for Kähler threefolds. Journal of Mathematical Sciences, the University of Tokyo, 22(1):219–246, 2015.
  33. [33]Andreas Höring and Thomas Peternell. Minimal models for Kähler threefolds. Inventiones Mathematicae, 203:217–264, 2016. Locators refer to the author manuscript dated January 16, 2015.
  34. [34]Christian Houzel. Géométrie analytique locale, IV. Séminaire Henri Cartan, 13(2):1–15, 1960–1961. Exposé 21.
  35. [35]Yujiro Kawamata. Abundance theorem for minimal threefolds. Inventiones Mathematicae, 108:229–246, 1992.DOI
  36. [36]Kunihiko Kodaira. On compact analytic surfaces. In Analytic Functions, number 24 in Princeton Mathematical Series, pages 121–135. Princeton University Press, 1960. Theorems 2 and 4, original pp. 121–122, reproduced in Collected Works, vol. III (1975).
  37. [37]János Kollár. Sources of log canonical centers, 2012. arXiv:1107.2863v3, November 14, 2012.arxiv.org/abs/1107.2863
  38. [38]S. Łojasiewicz. Triangulation of semi-analytic sets. Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Classe di Scienze, 18(4):449–474, 1964. Series 3.
  39. [39]Curtis T. McMullen. Dynamics on K3 surfaces: Salem numbers and Siegel disks. Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik, 545:201–233, 2002. Cited author manuscript dated January 19, 2001.
  40. [40]Yoichi Miyaoka. Abundance conjecture for 3-folds: case ν = 1. Compositio Mathematica, 68(2):203–220, 1988.
  41. [41]Yoshinori Namikawa. Projectivity criterion of Moishezon spaces and density of projective symplectic varieties, 2001. arXiv:math/0101019v6, November 12, 2001.DOI
  42. [42]OpenAI. Lifting sections from the reduced support of an adjoint. OpenAI Math Release preprint OAI:Lifting-sections-from-the-reduced-support-of-an-adjoint-September-27-2026, 2026.
  43. [43]OpenAI. Log abundance in characteristic zero. OpenAI Math Release preprint OAI:Log-abundance-in-characteristic-zero-September-24-2026, 2026. Corollaries 11.5–11.6.
  44. [44]Yuri Prokhorov and Constantin Shramov. Automorphism groups of compact complex surfaces, 2019. arXiv:1708.03566v5, July 3, 2019.arxiv.org/abs/1708.03566
  45. [45]Claude Sabbah and Christian Schnell. Pure complex Hodge modules, 2026. MHM Project, version 2.
  46. [46]Morihiko Saito. Decomposition theorem for proper Kähler morphisms. Tohoku Mathematical Journal, Second Series, 42(2):127–148, 1990.
  47. [47]Morihiko Saito. Some remarks on decomposition theorem for proper Kähler morphisms, 2022. arXiv:2204.09026v5, May 26, 2022.arxiv.org/abs/2204.09026
  48. [48]Arthur Sard. The measure of the critical values of differentiable maps. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 48:883–890, 1942.DOI
  49. [49]Jean-Pierre Serre. Faisceaux algébriques cohérents. Annals of Mathematics, 61(2):197–278, 1955.
  50. [50]Jean-Pierre Serre. Géométrie algébrique et géométrie analytique. Annales de l’Institut Fourier, 6:1–42, 1956.
  51. [51]SGA 4. Théorie des topos et cohomologie étale des schémas, tome 2. Exposé Vbis by B. Saint-Donat. Cited retypeset version 71766d9 (2024-07-30), Lemma 4.1.3, PDF p. 95.
  52. [52]Michael Temkin. Functorial desingularization of quasi-excellent schemes in characteristic zero: the non-embedded case, 2011. arXiv:0904.1592v2, December 11, 2011.DOI
  53. [53]Michael Temkin. Functorial desingularization over ℚ: boundaries and the embedded case, 2017. arXiv:0912.2570v3, February 21, 2017.
  54. [54]The Stacks Project Authors. The Stacks Project. Tags 09NU, 02FQ, and 08A8.
  55. [55]Juanyong Wang. On the Iitaka conjecture Cₙ,ₘ for Kähler fibre spaces. Annales de la Faculté des Sciences de Toulouse. Mathématiques, 30(4):813–897, 2021.DOI

Paper details

Contents