Introduction

Shafarevich asked whether the universal cover of a complete algebraic variety is holomorphically convex [25]. We follow the formulation reproduced by Lasell and Ramachandran [21], pp. 135–137, who locate the question on p. 407 of Shafarevich’s book. We use its usual smooth-projective formulation, called the Shafarevich conjecture on holomorphic convexity: the universal cover of every smooth connected projective complex variety is holomorphically convex. For a complex manifold VV and a nonempty compact set K⊂VK \subset V, its holomorphic hull is

K^V={v∈V:∣g(v)∣≤sup⁡K∣g∣ for every g∈O(V)}.\widehat{K}_V = \{v \in V : |g(v)| \le\sup_{K} |g| \text{ for every } g \in\mathcal{O}(V)\}.

Holomorphic convexity means that every such hull is compact. We disprove the conjecture in complex dimension two.

Theorem 1.1. There is a smooth connected projective complex surface XX containing a connected nodal curve Z0Z_0 with smooth rational irreducible components such that

im⁡(π1(Z0)⟶π1(X)) is infinite.\operatorname{im}(\pi_1(Z_0) \longrightarrow\pi_1(X)) \text{ is infinite.}

In the simply connected universal cover of XX, a connected component above Z0Z_0 is a closed, connected, noncompact, locally finite union of compact rational curves. The holomorphic hull of any one of its points is noncompact. In particular, this universal cover is not holomorphically convex.

Earlier approaches and the obstruction

The conjecture connects projective geometry with the analytic geometry of covering spaces. Gurjar and Shastri proved it for smooth projective elliptic surfaces [17], [Theorem 2(ii)], and Katzarkov proved it for smooth projective varieties with virtually nilpotent fundamental group [18]. Eyssidieux proved holomorphic convexity for the cover defined by the intersection of the kernels of all reductive complex representations of a fixed rank [11]. Eyssidieux, Katzarkov, Pantev and Ramachandran then established the universal-cover conclusion for smooth projective varieties whose fundamental groups admit faithful finite-dimensional complex representations [13]. Campana, Claudon and Eyssidieux extended this linear Shafarevich theorem to compact Kähler manifolds [5].

Recent results extend this theory beyond smooth projective varieties. Deng and Yamanoi, with an appendix joint with Katzarkov, proved the fixed-rank reductive-cover conclusion for normal projective varieties [7], [Theorem C(i)]. Bakker, Brunebarbe and Tsimerman proved that, for a connected normal algebraic space whose fundamental group has a finite-dimensional complex representation with finite kernel, the universal cover is a dense analytic-Zariski open subset of a holomorphically convex complex space [1], [Theorem 1.1]. This last conclusion concerns a partial compactification of the universal cover.

The geometric reduction approach seeks to contract subvarieties for which the fundamental group of the normalization has finite image in the ambient fundamental group. Kollár’s rational Shafarevich maps and Campana’s meromorphic Γ\Gamma-reduction address this problem through sufficiently general points [20], §1 [3], [Theorem 3.5 and Definition 3.8]. Such generic reductions do not by themselves provide a proper holomorphic map from the entire universal cover to a Stein space.

The obstruction used in the present construction is classical. Lasell and Ramachandran [21], pp. 136–137 and Katzarkov and Ramachandran [19], pp. 527–528 explain why a connected curve can obstruct holomorphic convexity when its normalized components have finite fundamental-group image but the curve itself has infinite image. A connected lift then has compact irreducible components but is itself noncompact. Such a curve is called an infinite Nori string [6], arXiv version, Definition 3]. Every holomorphic function is constant on each compact component, and connectedness makes these constants agree. A closed infinite Nori string therefore cannot lie in a holomorphically convex space. For our rational components the individual fundamental groups are trivial; the decisive issue is the image of the loops in the incidence graph of their whole nodal union.

Bogomolov and Katzarkov proposed constructions from degenerating curves and quotients of their fundamental groups in which this obstruction would occur if the resulting geometric quotient remained infinite after all required relations [2], author manuscript, §4.1, Lemma 4.2 and Conjecture 4.1]. That infinitude assertion remained conditional. Eyssidieux and Funar subsequently proved holomorphic convexity for the associated uniform-ramification construction from semistable families of curves of genus at least two, outside explicit finite exceptional ranges [12], Theorems 1.2 and 6.18].

The construction here follows the same broad passage from a family of curves to a group quotient and then to a projective surface. Its input is a marked genus-zero family, with both horizontal marked sections and vertical boundary components. A meridian is the boundary of a small disk transverse to a divisor. We kill the meridians of one distinguished fiber and impose high powers of the remaining boundary meridians only after compactification. The argument must establish both infinitude of this particular quotient and its survival in the final surface. The weighted presentation proves the first assertion; finite detection of entire local boundary-group images, followed by transfer to the compact rational fiber, proves the second. These are the steps developed below.

Consequences and comparisons

By the linear Shafarevich theorem, the fundamental group of the surface in eq:1.1 has no faithful finite-dimensional complex representation. Two further comparisons concern restrictions on the surface and on its universal cover.

A smooth compact Kähler manifold MM is special in Campana’s sense if no holomorphic line bundle LL admits a nonzero map L→ΩMpL \to\Omega_{M}^{p} with κ(M,L)=p\kappa(M,L)=p for any 1≤p≤dim⁡M1 \le p \le\dim M; here κ\kappa denotes Iitaka dimension [4], Theorem 2.27]. The abelianity theorem for special compact Kähler manifolds gives a virtually abelian fundamental group, and hence a faithful finite-dimensional complex representation. The compact Kähler linear theorem therefore makes their ordinary universal covers holomorphically convex [23], Corollary 1.4]. Consequently the surface in eq:1.1 is not special.

A subset of a complex projective variety is semialgebraic if it is given in affine charts by finite Boolean combinations of real polynomial equalities and inequalities. The ordinary universal cover of our surface is not biholomorphic to a semialgebraic open subset of a projective variety, with openness in the complex topology: such a presentation would imply holomorphic convexity by [24], Corollary 8.1], contrary to eq:1.1.

The construction in outline

We begin with a family of spheres with 48 moving punctures. The family comes from multiplication by 4 on the elliptic curve with an automorphism of order three. Near one parameter value, the punctures collide in 24 pairs. A double base change and one blowup at each collision produce an unmarked main sphere with 24 attached spheres, each carrying two marked points. Finite covers of these components, branched only at those points, are again rational. The main task is to retain an infinite fundamental-group image after filling in this fiber and all other missing fibers. Three features make this possible.

First, we study the moving points on the elliptic curve before taking its sign quotient. Three explicit double covers show that monodromy changes each generator only in higher degree. Deep elements of the free parameter group therefore impose relations of arbitrarily high degree. A surjective map of the actual based fiber groups transfers these equalities to the sphere family.

Second, the multiplication cover has deck group (Z/4)2(\mathbb{Z}/4)^2. Successive differences under its two translations give a free basis with useful degrees. A calculation with the linear terms of the sign involution selects 24 relations that impose all sign identifications on this 48-generator group. These relations leave a strict margin in a weighted Golod–Shafarevich inequality. That margin accommodates the deep monodromy relations and large powers of the remaining boundary loops. The weighted infinitude method builds on Golod and Shafarevich [15], Golod [14], Vinberg [27], Ershov [9], and Ershov and Jaikin-Zapirain [10]. The group construction takes place in inverse limits of finite 2-groups, described in Section 2.

Third, we choose the finite parameter cover and compactify the marked family. Only then do we impose high powers of the remaining boundary meridians so that their images are finite. We then choose a finite quotient that is injective on each entire local boundary-group image. In the associated cover, this lets the infinite quotient survive normalization and resolution, including every exceptional divisor. The resulting smooth projective surface retains a rational special fiber. A neighborhood deformation retraction and properness transfer the infinite image of a nearby fiber to a connected component of that rational fiber.

The two reusable mechanisms are the economical involution presentation in Proposition 4.2 and the finite-local-group argument in Lemma 6.1. The former retains enough generators relative to relations for the weighted infinitude criterion; the latter extends a homomorphism from the fundamental group of a divisor complement across a smooth projective compactification of a finite cover.

We give the weighted algebra in Section 2, construct and compare the actual fiber groups in Section 3, and analyze the involution in Section 4. Section 5 constructs the infinite quotient and the compactified marked family. Section 6 completes the surface and its rational curve.

Why the rational curve is enough

The following elementary form of the compact-curve obstruction makes the last step explicit. It is the rational-curve case of the mechanism described in Lasell and Ramachandran [21], pp. 136–137, Katzarkov and Ramachandran [19], pp. 527–528, and Bogomolov and Katzarkov [2], author manuscript, §4.1.

Lemma 1.2. Let XX be a connected complex manifold and let Z⊂XZ \subset X be a compact connected nodal curve whose irreducible components are smooth rational curves. If the image of π1(Z)→π1(X)\pi_1(Z) \to\pi_1(X) is infinite, then every connected component WW of the inverse image of ZZ in the simply connected universal cover X~\widetilde{X} is closed and noncompact. It is a locally finite union of compact rational curves, and every holomorphic function on X~\widetilde{X} is constant on WW. Consequently {w}‾X~\overline{\{w\}}_{\widetilde{X}} is noncompact for every w∈Ww \in W.

Proof. The restricted map W→ZW \to Z is the connected covering corresponding to

ker⁡(π1(Z)⟶π1(X)).\operatorname{ker}\bigl(\pi_1(Z) \longrightarrow\pi_1(X)\bigr).

Thus it has infinitely many sheets. A fiber is a closed discrete infinite subset, so WW cannot be compact. It is closed in X~\widetilde{X}, since it is a connected component of the closed inverse image of ZZ. Each rational component of ZZ is simply connected. Its inverse image therefore consists of compact rational curves mapping isomorphically onto it. Choose an evenly covered neighborhood in XX of each point of ZZ, small enough that it meets ZZ in one smooth branch or in the two branches of a node. Each lifted neighborhood meets at most one or two lifted components. These neighborhoods show that the collection is locally finite in the ambient manifold X~\widetilde{X}; points outside the closed inverse image have a neighborhood meeting none of it. The connected space WW is locally path connected; a path in it has compact image and meets only finitely many of these curves. The maximum principle makes a holomorphic function constant on each compact curve, and the constants agree at their intersections. They therefore agree throughout WW.

For w∈Ww \in W, this proves W⊂{w~}X~W \subset\{\widetilde{w}\}_{\widetilde{X}}. A compact hull cannot contain the closed noncompact set WW.

Weighted free pro-2 groups

We will construct an infinite quotient by comparing the weighted number of generators with the weighted number of relations. This section records the precise version of the Golod–Shafarevich argument that we use, including convergence for infinitely many relators.

Magnus degrees and automorphisms

A pro-2 group is an inverse limit of finite groups of order a power of two. The free pro-2 group on a finite set is the pro-2 completion of the discrete free group on that set. Let FdF_d be free pro-2 on g1,…,gdg_1,\ldots,g_d, and assign positive integer weights w1,…,wdw_1,\ldots,w_d. Its Magnus expansion sends

gi⟼1+UiinA=F2⟨⟨U1,…,Ud⟩⟩,deg⁡Ui=wi.g_i \longmapsto1+U_i \quad\text{in}\quad A=\mathbb{F}_2\langle\langle U_1,\ldots,U_d\rangle\rangle,\qquad\deg U_i=w_i.

Here AA is the algebra of formal noncommutative power series, with the filtration A≥nA_{\ge n} by weighted degree at least nn. For g≠1g\ne1, let ν(g)\nu(g) be the least degree in g−1g-1, and put ν(1)=∞\nu(1)=\infty. For clarity, this expansion is faithful and gives the pro-2 topology. Each truncated algebra is finite, and its group 1+A>0/A≥n1+A_{>0}/A_{\ge n} is a finite 2-group. Conversely the augmentation ideal of F2[P]\mathbb{F}_2[P] is nilpotent for every finite 2-group PP. To see this, induct on ∣P∣|P|, choosing a central involution zz when P≠1P\ne1. The kernel of F2[P]→F2[P/⟨z⟩]\mathbb{F}_2[P]\to\mathbb{F}_2[P/\langle z\rangle] is generated by z−1z-1 and has square zero. Nilpotence follows by induction. Thus every finite 2-quotient of the free group factors through some Magnus truncation. This proves faithfulness on the pro-2 completion and cofinality of the truncations. Positive finite weights give the same topology as ordinary degree.

Multiplication of series gives

ν(gh)≥min⁡{ν(g),ν(h)},ν([g,h])≥ν(g)+ν(h),ν(g2e)≥2eν(g).(1)\nu(gh)\ge\min\{\nu(g),\nu(h)\},\qquad\nu([g,h])\ge\nu(g)+\nu(h),\qquad\nu(g^{2^e})\ge2^e\nu(g). \tag*{(1)}

We use either commutator convention, since only its degree matters. The last inequality follows from g2e−1=(g−1)2eg^{2^e}-1=(g-1)^{2^e} in characteristic two.

Lemma 2.1 (Substitution). Suppose an automorphism α\alpha of FdF_d satisfies

ν(α(gi)gi−1)≥wi+a(1≤i≤d)\nu\bigl(\alpha(g_i)g_i^{-1}\bigr)\ge w_i+a\qquad(1\le i\le d)

for an integer a≥1a\ge1. Then its continuous action on AA satisfies

(α−id⁡)(A≥n)⊂A≥n+a.(\alpha-\operatorname{id})(A_{\ge n})\subset A_{\ge n+a}.

More generally, substitution of degree-raising operators for Magnus variables is well defined whenever the operator assigned to a variable of weight ww raises degree by at least ww.

Proof. The hypothesis says that α(Ui)−Ui\alpha(U_i)-U_i has degree at least wi+aw_i+a. Expand the difference between a monomial and its substituted image. Every summand replaces at least one factor by an error of at least aa additional degrees. The estimate follows for polynomials and then for series by completeness. For operator substitution, a word of weighted degree nn raises degree by at least nn; hence only finitely many words contribute in each finite truncation. Multiplication and composition respect these substitutions.

We also use the following basis criterion. The Frattini quotient of a finitely generated pro-22 group GG is

G/G2[G,G].G/G^2[G,G].

an F2\mathbb{F}_2-vector space. Elements whose images span this space topologically generate GG: otherwise their closed generated subgroup has proper image in a finite 22-quotient, and is contained in a maximal subgroup of index two there, contradicting the span. Consequently, dd elements of FdF_d whose Frattini images form a basis are again a free pro-22 basis. Indeed, they define a surjective endomorphism of FdF_d, and every finitely generated profinite group is Hopfian. For the latter assertion, a surjective endomorphism permutes, by inverse image, the finite set of open normal subgroups of any fixed index. Its kernel therefore lies in every open normal subgroup and is trivial.

The infinitude inequality

The infinitude method originates in the work of Golod and Shafarevich [15]; Vinberg [27] developed its filtered form. For the weighted completed-algebra inequality and its pro-pp consequence, see Ershov [9], Theorem 2.1 and Corollary 2.2. The more general language of positive weighted deficiency is developed by Ershov and Jaikin-Zapirain [10], arXiv version, Corollary 4.4. We include the filtered proof needed here to specify exactly the completion and the infinite-relator convention.

Lemma 2.2 (Weighted infinitude criterion). Let FdF_d have the weighted basis above, and let (rλ)(r_\lambda) be a finite or countable family of relators with positive integer bounds vλv_\lambda satisfying

ν(rλ)≥vλ≥1.\nu(r_\lambda) \ge v_\lambda\ge1.

Assume only finitely many vλv_\lambda lie below any fixed bound. If, for some 0<t<10<t<1, the relator series converges and

1−∑i=1dtwi+∑λtvλ<0,(2)1-\sum_{i=1}^{d}t^{w_i}+\sum_{\lambda}t^{v_\lambda}<0, \tag*{(2)}

then the quotient of FdF_d by the closed normal subgroup generated by all rλr_\lambda is infinite.

Proof. Let I⊂AI\subset A be the closed two-sided ideal generated by fλ=rλ−1f_\lambda=r_\lambda-1, and let R=A/IR=A/I with its quotient filtration. Put

C(n)=dim⁡F2R/R≥n(n≥1),C(n)=0(n≤0).C(n)=\dim_{\mathbb{F}_2}R/R_{\ge n}\quad(n\ge1),\qquad C(n)=0\quad(n\le0).

First-letter decomposition gives a surjective map

⨁iR/R≥n−wi⟶R>0/R≥n,(bi)i⟼∑iUibi.\bigoplus_i R/R_{\ge n-w_i}\longrightarrow R_{>0}/R_{\ge n},\qquad(b_i)_i\longmapsto\sum_i U_i b_i.

Its kernel has dimension at most ∑λC(n−vλ)\sum_\lambda C(n-v_\lambda). Here is the filtered justification. Write fλ=∑iUifiλf_\lambda=\sum_i U_i f_{i\lambda}. A vector in the kernel can be lifted to series whose first-letter sum lies in I+A≥nI+A_{\ge n}. Subtracting the first-letter decomposition of the degree-at-least-nn term does not change the truncated vector, so the sum may be taken in II. For a product afλhaf_\lambda h, the positive-degree part of aa contributes first-letter coefficients that vanish in RR; its constant part contributes

(fλ‾)ih‾.(\overline{f_\lambda})_i\overline{h}.

This vector has shifted degree at least vλv_\lambda. Only h‾\overline{h} modulo R≥n−vλR_{\ge n-v_\lambda} matters. These vectors therefore span a space of dimension at most ∑λC(n−vλ)\sum_\lambda C(n-v_\lambda). Closure adds nothing to a span in a finite-dimensional truncation. Since dim⁡R>0/R≥n=C(n)−1\dim R_{>0}/R_{\ge n}=C(n)-1, we obtain

C(n)−∑iC(n−wi)+∑λC(n−vλ)≥1.(3)C(n)-\sum_i C(n-w_i)+\sum_\lambda C(n-v_\lambda)\ge1. \tag*{(3)}

Suppose the stated pro-2 quotient were finite, of order mm. Its image spans every truncated algebra R/R≥nR/R_{\ge n}: the variables are the images of gi−1g_i-1, and their products are linear combinations of group elements. The group map to each truncated unit group kills the relators, hence factors through that quotient. Thus C(n)≤mC(n)\le m for all nn. Multiply (3) by tn−1t^{n-1} and sum over n≥1n\ge1. Boundedness of C(n)C(n) and convergence of the relator series justify the sums. This gives

(1−∑itwi+∑λtvλ)∑n≥1C(n)tn−1≥11−t.\left(1-\sum_i t^{w_i}+\sum_\lambda t^{v_\lambda}\right)\sum_{n\ge1}C(n)t^{n-1}\ge\frac{1}{1-t}.

contradicting (2).

The use of lower bounds vλv_\lambda makes the criterion convenient: increasing an actual relator degree can only improve the inequality. In the construction below, the inexpensive relations impose a geometric involution. The remaining relations will be pushed arbitrarily far into the filtration.

A family of paired punctures

We construct a family of spheres with 48 marked points. Near one missing parameter value these points form 24 disjoint pairs. The purpose of this section is to relate the actual based monodromy of the family to an action on a free group whose weighted Magnus degree it raises. We also identify the quotient obtained by killing the loops around the pairs.

The family and its torus cover

Put

E=C/(Z+Zω),ω3=1,ω≠1,ι(z)=−z.E=\mathbb{C}/(\mathbb{Z}+\mathbb{Z}\omega),\qquad\omega^3=1,\qquad\omega\ne1,\qquad\iota(z)=-z.

Let q:E→E/⟨ι⟩=P1q:E\to E/\langle\iota\rangle=\mathbb{P}^1 be the quotient map. Multiplication by ω\omega and by 44 induce maps ω‾\overline{\omega} and ff on P1\mathbb{P}^1, respectively. Thus

q∘[4]=f∘q,q∘[ω]=ω‾∘q.q\circ[4]=f\circ q,\qquad q\circ[\omega]=\overline{\omega}\circ q.

Our parameter curve is

B=P1∖(q(E[2])∪q(ker⁡(1−ω))).(4)B=\mathbb{P}^1\setminus\left(q(E[2])\cup q(\ker(1-\omega))\right). \tag*{(4)}

For s∈Bs\in B, let AsA_s be the following subset of the fiber sphere:

As={z∈P1:f(z)=ω‾ js for some j∈{0,1,2}}.(5)A_s=\{z\in\mathbb{P}^1:f(z)=\overline{\omega}^{\,j}s\text{ for some }j\in\{0,1,2\}\}. \tag*{(5)}

Lemma 3.1. The complement defining BB consists of five points. The sets AsA_s form 48 disjoint points varying as an étale multisection: locally on BB they are the graphs of 48 distinct holomorphic functions. The point q(0)q(0) belongs to no AsA_s. If e0∈E[2]∖{0}e_0 \in E[2] \setminus\{0\} and s∗=q(e0)s_* = q(e_0), then as s→s∗s \to s_* the markings collide in 24 pairs, each at a simple ramification point of ff.

Proof. The group ker⁡(1−ω)\ker(1-\omega) has order three. Its two nonzero points are exchanged by ι\iota, and its intersection with E[2]E[2] is {0}\{0\}. This gives the five excluded values. A fixed point of ωˉ\bar{\omega} lifts to a point satisfying ωz=±z\omega z = \pm z; since 1+ω1+\omega is a unit in Z[ω]\mathbb{Z}[\omega], all such values are excluded by (4). The three targets in (5) are therefore distinct. They avoid q(E[2])q(E[2]), which contains the critical values of the degree-16 map ff. Also f(q(0))=q(0)f(q(0)) = q(0), so q(0)q(0) gives a section of the complement.

The three points ej=ωje0e_j = \omega^j e_0 are the distinct nonzero elements of E[2]E[2]. A point p∈Ep \in E with [4]p=ej[4]p = e_j is not two-torsion. Consequently qq is unramified at pp, [4][4] is étale there, and qq is simply ramified at eje_j. Thus ff has simple ramification at q(p)q(p). The sixteen points above each eje_j are paired freely by ι\iota, giving eight collisions for each jj and 24 in total.

Choose henceforth e0∈E[2]∖{0}e_0 \in E[2] \setminus\{0\} and put s∗=q(e0)s_* = q(e_0). Fix s0∈Bs_0 \in B sufficiently close to s∗s_*, and choose x0∈q−1(s0)x_0 \in q^{-1}(s_0) close to e0e_0. The six points ±ωjx0\pm\omega^j x_0 lie, two at a time, in disjoint ι\iota-invariant disks DjD_j about eje_j, none containing zero. Write

T=E∖{±ωjx0:0≤j≤2},F=π1(T,0),Γ=π1(B,s0).T = E \setminus\{\pm\omega^j x_0 : 0 \leq j \leq2\}, \qquad F = \pi_1(T,0), \qquad\Gamma= \pi_1(B,s_0).

The group Γ\Gamma is free of rank four. In the core E∖⋃jint⁡DjE \setminus\bigcup_j \operatorname{int} D_j, choose handle generators x,yx,y representing the lattice basis 1,ω1,\omega. Choose based meridians aj,aˉja_j,\bar{a}_j about the two punctures in DjD_j, with core access paths, so that its boundary loop is cj=ajaˉjc_j = a_j\bar{a}_j. The choices and ordering can be made so that the surface relation is [x,y]c0c1c2=1[x,y]c_0c_1c_2 = 1. Hence FF is free on

x,y,a0,a1,a2,c0,c1.(6)x,y,a_0,a_1,a_2,c_0,c_1. \tag*{(6)}

Give the first five generators weight one and the last two weight two. Let νF\nu_F be the resulting Magnus valuation on the pro-2 completion F^\widehat{F}. The surface relation gives νF(c2)≥2\nu_F(c_2) \geq2.

The multiplication map [4][4] restricts to an unramified cover of TT. Its deck group and based covering subgroup are

H=(Z/4)2,K=ker⁡(F⟶H),H = (\mathbb{Z}/4)^2, \qquad K = \ker(F \longrightarrow H),

where the map records the two handle coordinates modulo four. Thus KK is free of rank 1+16(7−1)=971 + 16(7 - 1) = 97. Its source is

T(4)=[4]−1(T),K=π1(T(4),0),T^{(4)} = [4]^{-1}(T), \qquad K = \pi_1(T^{(4)},0),

the torus with the 96 preimages of the six punctures removed. Quotienting T(4)T^{(4)} by ι\iota gives

S=P1∖As0,Π=π1(S,q(0)).S = \mathbb{P}^1 \setminus A_{s_0}, \qquad\Pi= \pi_1(S,q(0)).

We identify KK with the based fundamental group of the source torus through [4][4] and denote by p:K→Πp : K \to\Pi the map induced by qq. The group Π\Pi is free of rank 47.

The two fiber groups serve different purposes. The torus group FF has a small basis on which monodromy can be controlled; the sphere group Π\Pi is the fundamental group of the geometric fiber used in the surface. The covering subgroup KK will connect these two descriptions. Keeping this connection based, rather than only up to an inner automorphism, is essential when we impose monodromy relations.

Actual based monodromy

Following x0x_0 over a loop m∈Γm \in\Gamma ends at (−1)ϵ(m)x0(-1)^{\epsilon(m)}x_0; this defines a character ϵ:Γ→Z/2\epsilon:\Gamma\to\mathbb{Z}/2. Follow also the six points ±ωjx0\pm\omega^j x_0. Their motion extends to an isotopy HuH_u of the torus which fixes zero and commutes with ι\iota. Indeed, subdivide the path into motions in disjoint small disks, prescribe a vector field in one disk of each sign pair, extend it equivariantly to the other, and use bump functions supported away from zero. Every HuH_u fixes all four points of E[2]E[2] pointwise: commutation with ι\iota preserves this discrete fixed-point set, and an isotopy starting at the identity cannot permute it. Define the corrected endpoint and its based action by

ιϵ(m)H1,φm∈Aut⁡(F).(7)\iota^{\epsilon(m)}H_1,\qquad\varphi_m\in\operatorname{Aut}(F). \tag*{(7)}

The correction fixes each of the six punctures individually; this is what pure means here.

Proposition 3.2. The actions φm\varphi_m form a homomorphism Γ→Aut⁡(F)\Gamma\to\operatorname{Aut}(F), are pure, and commute with ι∗\iota_*. They preserve KK. If βm∈Aut⁡(Π)\beta_m \in\operatorname{Aut}(\Pi) is the actual based monodromy of the punctured sphere family, then

p∘φm∣K=βm∘p.(8)p\circ\varphi_m|_K=\beta_m\circ p. \tag*{(8)}

Moreover, p:K→Πp:K\to\Pi is surjective.

Proof. Two extensions of the same point motion differ by an isotopy fixing the initial punctures and zero. Their endpoint actions therefore agree. The disk construction also extends homotopies of parameter paths. With loop composition chosen to agree with composition of the endpoint actions, uncorrected monodromy is a homomorphism. All its maps commute with ι\iota, and ϵ\epsilon is a character, so the corrected actions also compose.

The uncorrected endpoint acts trivially on the homology of the closed torus; the correction acts there by a sign. It therefore preserves the handle-coordinate kernel KK and lifts uniquely through [4] fixing zero. The lift commutes with ι\iota by uniqueness: both compositions lift the same map and fix zero. Requiring this fixed basepoint also excludes any nontrivial deck translation. Write H~u\widetilde{H}_u for the lift of HuH_u through [4] starting at the identity; it fixes zero and gives the actual motion of the 96 punctures upstairs. The zero-fixed lift of the corrected endpoint is ιϵ(m)H~1\iota^{\epsilon(m)}\widetilde{H}_1, because [4] commutes with sign. After quotienting by sign, this endpoint is the endpoint induced by H~u\widetilde{H}_u, hence gives the actual based sphere monodromy. This proves (8).

For surjectivity, represent a loop in SS based at q(0)q(0) by a path which avoids the four branch values of qq except at its endpoints. Its open interval lifts through the ordinary two-sheeted cover away from those values. Both lifted endpoints tend to zero, the unique point above q(0)q(0). Thus the lift is a based loop in the source punctured torus, as required. □\square

Three invariant double covers

We next prove that φm−id⁡\varphi_m-\operatorname{id} raises the weighted degree on F^\widehat{F}. The only delicate first step is its action in degree one. Three double covers of the moving torus complement make this action explicit.

Lemma 3.3. Every φm\varphi_m, and also ι∗\iota_*, acts as the identity on the weighted degree-one quotient V=F^/{g:vF(g)≥2}V=\widehat{F}/\{g:v_F(g)\ge2\}.

Proof. The vector space VV over F2\mathbb{F}_2 has the five basis classes x,y,a0,a1,a2x,y,a_0,a_1,a_2. Two characters of FF are obtained from the handle coordinates modulo two. Uncorrected monodromy preserves them, and ι\iota preserves them modulo two.

Choose an affine coordinate on the quotient sphere with q(0)=∞q(0)=\infty, using the same letter qq for its pullback to EE. It is an even meromorphic function with a double pole at zero. Normalize its leading coefficient to one in an additive local coordinate vv at zero, so that v(ιz)=−v(z)v(\iota z)=-v(z) and q(z)=v(z)−2+O(1)q(z)=v(z)^{-2}+O(1). For j=0,1,2j=0,1,2, consider over the moving torus complement the cover

Yj2=q(z)−ω‾sj.(9)Y_j^2=q(z)-\overline{\omega}^j_s. \tag*{(9)}

Here ss and ω‾sj\overline{\omega}^j_s are expressed in the chosen affine coordinate. The right side has simple zeros precisely at the two removed jj-punctures. The cover is unramified elsewhere, including at zero: with η=vYj\eta=vY_j, its local equation is

η2=v2(q(z)−ω‾sj)=1+O(v2).\eta^2=v^2(q(z)-\overline{\omega}^j_s)=1+O(v^2).

Thus the points η=1\eta=1 and η=−1\eta=-1 over zero give two global lifts of the fixed basepoint section throughout BB.

Let χj:F→F2\chi_j:F\to\mathbb{F}_2 be the character of this double cover on the fiber over s0s_0. A cover of the entire family with a lifted basepoint section gives an extension of χj\chi_j to the fundamental group of its total space. Conjugating a fiber loop by the section loop does not change its value in F2\mathbb{F}_2. Hence uncorrected based monodromy preserves χj\chi_j. Sign has the lift

(z,Yj)⟼(−z,−Yj).(z,Y_j)\longmapsto(-z,-Y_j).

This lift fixes each selected sheet over zero, because both vv and YjY_j change sign and η=vYj\eta=vY_j does not. It follows that ι∗\iota_* also preserves χj\chi_j, and therefore so does the corrected action φm\varphi_m.

The character χj\chi_j takes value one on aja_j and a‾j\overline{a}_j and zero on the other puncture meridians. In particular it vanishes on all cic_i and factors through VV. The three characters χj\chi_j, together with the two handle characters, form a basis of V∗V^*: evaluation on the five displayed generators has an invertible block triangular matrix. Their common kernel is therefore {g:νF(g)≥2}\{g:\nu_F(g)\ge2\}. Since all five characters are preserved, this kernel is preserved and the two induced actions on VV are trivial. □

Proposition 3.4. For every m∈Γm\in\Gamma, the induced operator φm−id\varphi_m-\mathrm{id} on the weighted completed Magnus algebra of F^\widehat{F} raises degree by at least one.

Proof. By Lemma 3.3, the changes of the five weight-one generators in (6) have valuation at least two. It remains to check the two weight-two boundaries. Fix one pair, writing a=aja=a_j and a−=a‾ja^-= \overline{a}_j. Pureness gives φm(a)=waw−1\varphi_m(a)=waw^{-1} for some w∈Fw\in F. Choose d∈Fd\in F with ι∗(a)=da−d−1\iota_*(a)=da^-d^{-1}. Commutation with ι∗\iota_* yields

φm(a−)=w′a−(w′)−1,w′=φm(d)ι∗(w)d.\varphi_m(a^-)=w'a^-(w')^{-1},\qquad w'=\varphi_m(d)\iota_*(w)d.

By Lemma 3.3, w′w−1w'w^{-1} has valuation at least two. Replacing w′w' by ww in the conjugation of a−a^- therefore changes it by an element of valuation at least three. On the other hand, conjugating cj=aa−c_j=aa^- by ww changes it by valuation at least 1+νF(cj)≥31+\nu_F(c_j)\ge3. It follows that

νF(φm(cj)cj−1)≥3.\nu_F\bigl(\varphi_m(c_j)c_j^{-1}\bigr)\ge3.

The degree-raising substitution rule of Lemma 2.1 now applies to the entire weighted free basis. □

Pinching the pairs and passing to the sphere

We have obtained a degree-raising action on the seven-generator torus group. We now collapse the lifted core to obtain a free group on the individual puncture pairs. This construction will identify both the quotient map from KK and its compatibility with the actual sphere group Π\Pi.

Write

Tcore=E∖⋃jint⁡Dj,Tcore(4)=[4]−1(Tcore).T_{\mathrm{core}}=E\setminus\bigcup_j\operatorname{int}D_j,\qquad T_{\mathrm{core}}^{(4)}=[4]^{-1}(T_{\mathrm{core}}).

The lifted core Tcore(4)T_{\mathrm{core}}^{(4)} is connected, because the handle loops in TcoreT_{\mathrm{core}} map onto HH. Its complementary disks are indexed by (h,j)∈H×{0,1,2}(h,j)\in H\times\{0,1,2\}. For each jj, choose the index-zero disk to be the one reached by lifting the chosen access path of aja_j from zero; use deck translations to label the others. All four fixed points of sign lie in Tcore(4)T_{\mathrm{core}}^{(4)}, since multiplication by four sends them to zero, outside every DjD_j.

Collapsing Tcore(4)T_{\mathrm{core}}^{(4)} kills its fundamental group, including every disk boundary. By van Kampen, the resulting quotient of KK is free on one positive meridian for each of the 48 disks: in each two-puncture disk, killing the boundary makes the negative meridian the inverse of the positive one. Let LL be the pro-2 completion of this free group, with generators ah,ja_{h,j}. Paths in the lifted core disappear under collapse, so these generators do not depend on the remaining choices of core access paths. Deck translations induce the coordinate shifts T1,T2T_1,T_2 on LL.

We also denote the corresponding elements of the factor HH in L⋊HL\rtimes H by T1,T2T_1,T_2. Define

Φ:F⟶L⋊H,\Phi:F\longrightarrow L\rtimes H,
x⟼T1,y⟼T2,aj⟼a0,j,c0,c1⟼1.(10)x\longmapsto T_1,\qquad y\longmapsto T_2,\qquad a_j\longmapsto a_{0,j},\qquad c_0,c_1\longmapsto1. \tag*{(10)}

The shifts commute and have order four, so c2c_2 also maps to one. On the core group, Φ\Phi is exactly the HH-valued covering character. It therefore kills π1(Tcore(4),0)⊂K\pi_1(T_{\mathrm{core}}^{(4)},0)\subset K. A positive meridian in disk (h,j)(h,j) can be based using the lift of uaju−1u a_j u^{-1}, where uu is a core loop with handle coordinate hh; its image under Φ\Phi is exactly ah,ja_{h,j}. Thus Φ∣K:K→L\Phi|_K:K\to L is the core-collapse map just constructed, followed by pro-2 completion. Its image contains the discrete free group on the ah,ja_{h,j} and is dense in LL.

Sign preserves the lifted core and pairs its complementary disks freely: their centers map to nonzero two-torsion, whereas [4][4] kills the source two-torsion. Let bj∈Hb_j\in H be the index of the negative of the chosen index-zero center. Sign takes a positive puncture in disk (h,j)(h,j) to the negative puncture in disk (bj−h,j)(b_j-h,j). Since both core access paths and disk boundaries have been killed, its induced action is exactly

σ(ah,j)=abj−h,j−1.(11)\sigma(a_{h,j})=a_{b_j-h,j}^{-1}. \tag*{(11)}

If the index-zero center is represented by v/4v/4, with v mod (Z+Zω)=ejv\bmod(\mathbb{Z}+\mathbb{Z}\omega)=e_j, then bjb_j is represented, up to the deck-coordinate convention, by −2v-2v modulo 4(Z+Zω)4(\mathbb{Z}+\mathbb{Z}\omega). Since eje_j is nonzero two-torsion,

bj mod 2H≠0.(12)b_j\bmod2H\ne0. \tag*{(12)}

Lemma 3.5. Let Πpair\Pi_{\mathrm{pair}} be the quotient of Π\Pi obtained by killing the boundary loops of its 24 two-puncture disks. It is free of rank 24, and its pro-2 completion is naturally

Π^pair≃L/⟨⟨σ(g)g−1:g∈L⟩⟩‾.(13)\widehat{\Pi}_{\mathrm{pair}}\simeq L/\overline{\langle\langle\sigma(g)g^{-1}:g\in L\rangle\rangle}. \tag*{(13)}

More precisely, let λ:L↠R\lambda:L\twoheadrightarrow R be a continuous quotient of pro-2 groups satisfying λσ=λ\lambda\sigma=\lambda. There is a homomorphism θ:Π→R\theta:\Pi\to R with dense image and

θρ=λΦ∣K.(14)\theta\rho=\lambda\Phi|_K. \tag*{(14)}

For m∈Γm \in\Gamma, the condition

λΦ(φm(k))=λΦ(k)(k∈K)(15)\lambda\Phi(\varphi_m(k)) = \lambda\Phi(k) \qquad(k \in K) \tag*{(15)}

implies θβm=θ\theta\beta_m = \theta on the entire unpinched group Π\Pi.

Proof. Each sign-paired pair of torus disks projects to one two-puncture disk on the sphere, and either disk maps homeomorphically to it. The image q(Tcore(4))q(T_{\mathrm{core}}^{(4)}) is the sphere exterior, a sphere with 24 holes. Killing its boundary loops kills its fundamental group, so the quotient defining Πpair\Pi_{\mathrm{pair}} is the quotient induced by collapsing this exterior. Van Kampen identifies it with the free group on one meridian per projected disk.

The map qq commutes with the two core collapses, with the basepoints in their respective cores. Upstairs there is one cyclic generator per disk, and sign identifies them in pairs by ah,j=abj−h,j−1a_{h,j} = a^{-1}_{b_j-h,j}. This accounts for the entire quotient: every fixed point of sign is already in the collapsed core, and either disk in each remaining pair maps homeomorphically to the corresponding sphere disk. Passing to pro-2 completions proves (13). The based collapse diagram then gives the dense map θ\theta and the exact identity (14).

Finally, Proposition 3.2 and (15) give

θβmp=θpφm∣K=λΦφm∣K=λΦ∣K=θp.\theta\beta_m p = \theta p\varphi_m|_K = \lambda\Phi\varphi_m|_K = \lambda\Phi|_K = \theta p.

The map pp is surjective, so θβm=θ\theta\beta_m = \theta. This argument does not require the monodromy to preserve the kernel of the pair-pinching map.

The maps just constructed are summarized in Figure 1.

Diagram showing the maps between K, L, R, and Π

Figure 1. The actual sphere group Π\Pi maps to every pro-2 quotient RR of LL on which sign acts trivially. The triangle records θp=λΦ∣K\theta p = \lambda\Phi|_K. The map pp is surjective and Φ∣K\Phi|_K has dense image. Monodromy is compared on KK and Π\Pi before it is passed to RR.

We conclude with two properties of the finite geometric monodromy which will control a parameter cover. Let γ∗∈Γ\gamma_\ast\in\Gamma be the positively oriented local circuit around s∗s_\ast based at the nearby point s0s_0.

Lemma 3.6. The joint action of Γ\Gamma on the 48 markings and on the sign of x0x_0 factors through a finite 2-group. The element γ∗\gamma_\ast has nontrivial sign, whereas γ∗2\gamma_\ast^2 fixes every marking and acts trivially on Πpair\Pi_{\mathrm{pair}}.

Proof. Choose a positive representative in the source torus for each marking. Within the jjth block these representatives are indexed by HH. Along a parameter loop, their endpoints are obtained by a translation in HH and the common sign (−1)ϵ(m)(-1)^{\epsilon(m)}. The three blocks are preserved individually. Thus the joint action is contained in H3⋊Z/2H^3 \rtimes\mathbb{Z}/2, with sign acting by inversion; this is a finite 2-group.

The quotient qq is simply ramified at e0e_0, so γ∗\gamma_\ast exchanges the two lifts of the parameter. By the local simple ramification in Lemma 3.1, each marking pair has equation w2=tw^2 = t near its collision. Its motion under γ∗\gamma_\ast is a half twist and under γ∗2\gamma_\ast^2 a full twist. These motions are supported in the disjoint pair disks and fix the exterior. A full twist acts on a disk group by conjugation by its boundary; after that boundary is killed, it fixes the remaining cyclic generator. Hence the induced action on Πpair\Pi_{\mathrm{pair}} is trivial.

The groups and their geometric roles are collected below. All ranks are free-group ranks, with pro-2 completion understood only in the row for LL.

GroupGeometric descriptionRank
Γ\GammaFive-punctured parameter sphere4
FFSix-punctured torus7
KKIts degree-16 multiplication cover97
Π\PiSphere with 48 punctures47
LLLifted torus after killing the core and pair boundaries48
Πpair\Pi_{\mathrm{pair}}Sphere after killing the 24 pair boundaries24

Table 1.

The next section keeps the presentation through LL in order to retain the degree estimates coming from FF.

A weighted presentation for the pinched fiber

We now equip the free pro-2 group LL with a filtration adapted to the covering shifts. In this filtration the involution relations from the preceding section can be imposed with a sufficiently small contribution to the weighted relation sum. We also show that the degree bounds on FF survive the map Φ:F→L⋊H\Phi:F\to L\rtimes H. Although the pinched sphere group is already free of rank 24, an arbitrary basis of that quotient would not retain these degree bounds. Keeping 48 generators and imposing 24 carefully chosen relations preserves the filtration needed to control all later monodromy relations.

A basis adapted to the two translations

Recall that LL is free on ah,ja_{h,j}, where h∈H=(Z/4)2h\in H=(\mathbb{Z}/4)^2 and j∈{0,1,2}j\in\{0,1,2\}. The commuting shifts T1,T2T_1,T_2 translate the two coordinates of hh. The involution is

σ(ah,j)=abj−1h,j,bj mod 2≠0.\sigma(a_{h,j})=a_{b_j^{-1}h,j},\qquad b_j\bmod2\ne0.

Thus σTrσ=Tr−1\sigma T_r\sigma=T_r^{-1} for r=1,2r=1,2. For an automorphism TT, write δT(g)=T(g)g−1\delta_T(g)=T(g)g^{-1}, and define

uiℓ,j=δT1iδT2ℓ(a0,j),0≤i,ℓ<4.(16)u_{i\ell,j}=\delta_{T_1}^{i}\delta_{T_2}^{\ell}(a_{0,j}),\qquad0\le i,\ell<4. \tag*{(16)}

Lemma 4.1. The elements in (16) form a free pro-2 basis of LL. Give uiℓ,ju_{i\ell,j} weight i+ℓ+1i+\ell+1, and denote the resulting Magnus valuation by νL\nu_L. Each of T1−idT_1-\mathrm{id}, T2−idT_2-\mathrm{id}, and σ−id\sigma-\mathrm{id} raises the degree of the completed Magnus algebra by at least one.

Proof. In the Frattini quotient, the span of the generators in one block is the permutation module

R=F2[H]=F2[ξ,η]/(ξ4,η4),T1=1+ξ,T2=1+η.R=\mathbb{F}_2[H]=\mathbb{F}_2[\xi,\eta]/(\xi^4,\eta^4),\qquad T_1=1+\xi,\quad T_2=1+\eta.

The images of uiℓ,ju_{i\ell,j} are its monomial basis ξiηℓ\xi^i\eta^\ell. The Frattini basis criterion therefore gives the first assertion. We henceforth use the stated weights.

The proof has three steps: control the last difference of a cyclic shift, propagate the two translation bounds, and then treat sign. We first establish the endpoint estimate needed for a cyclic shift. Suppose T4=idT^4=\mathrm{id}, put wi=δTi(w0)w_i=\delta_T^i(w_0), and assume

νL(wi)≥d+i(0≤i≤3),d≥1.(17)\nu_L(w_i)\ge d+i\qquad(0\le i\le3),\qquad d\ge1. \tag*{(17)}

Then

νL(w4)≥d+4.(18)\nu_L(w_4)\ge d+4. \tag*{(18)}

This assertion does not assume that TT preserves the filtration. To prove it, take formal free generators z0,z1,z2,z3z_0,z_1,z_2,z_3 of weights d,d+1,d+2,d+3d,d+1,d+2,d+3, and define the triangular automorphism

T′(zi)=zi+1zi(0≤i<3),T′(z3)=z3.T'(z_i)=z_{i+1}z_i \quad(0\le i<3), \qquad T'(z_3)=z_3.

By Lemma 2.1, T′−id⁡T'-\operatorname{id} raises algebra degree by one. In characteristic two,

(T′)4−id⁡=(T′−id⁡)4,(T')^4-\operatorname{id}=(T'-\operatorname{id})^4,

so T4(z0)z0−1T^4(z_0)z_0^{-1} has valuation at least d+4d+4. Evaluation at zi=wiz_i=w_i preserves this bound by (17). The positive word T4(z0)T^4(z_0) contains z3z_3 exactly once, as its first letter. In passing from the evaluated formal fourth iterate to the actual fourth iterate, the only changed substitution is

T(w3)=w4w3in place ofT′(z3)=z3.T(w_3)=w_4w_3 \quad\text{in place of} \quad T'(z_3)=z_3.

Consequently T4(w0)=w4T4(z0)∣zi=wiT^4(w_0)=w_4T^4(z_0)|_{z_i=w_i}. Since T4(w0)=w0T^4(w_0)=w_0, the bound for the evaluated formal iterate proves (18).

For each fixed ℓ,j\ell,j, apply this estimate to wi=uiℓ,jw_i=u_{i\ell,j}, T=T1T=T_1, and d=ℓ+1d=\ell+1. For i<3i<3, the required difference is exactly δT1(uiℓ,j)=ui+1,ℓ,j\delta_{T_1}(u_{i\ell,j})=u_{i+1,\ell,j}; (18) supplies the case i=3i=3. Thus T1−id⁡T_1-\operatorname{id} raises degree by one on every basis element, and therefore on the algebra.

The same argument gives the T2T_2 bounds on the initial sequence u0ℓ,ju_{0\ell,j}. They propagate along the T1T_1-sequences as follows. If T2(z)=vzT_2(z)=vz, commutativity of the shifts gives

T2(δT1z)=T1(v)(δT1z)v−1.(19)T_2(\delta_{T_1}z)=T_1(v)(\delta_{T_1}z)v^{-1}. \tag*{(19)}

Suppose zz has assigned weight dd, the element vv has valuation at least d+1d+1, and δT1z\delta_{T_1}z has valuation at least d+1d+1. The already proved T1T_1 bound gives νL(T1(v)v−1)≥d+2\nu_L(T_1(v)v^{-1})\ge d+2. Conjugating δT1z\delta_{T_1}z by vv changes it only in degree at least 2d+2≥d+22d+2\ge d+2. (19) therefore gives the next T2T_2 bound. Induction proves that T2−id⁡T_2-\operatorname{id} raises degree by one on the full basis.

It remains to treat σ\sigma. Powers of either shift preserve the filtration and differ from the identity by an operator raising degree by one. Since σ(a0,j)=T1(bj)1T2(bj)2(a0,j)−1\sigma(a_{0,j})=T_1^{(b_j)_1}T_2^{(b_j)_2}(a_{0,j})^{-1}, and inversion has the same linear term in characteristic two, we have

νL(σ(a0,j)a0,j−1)≥2.\nu_L\bigl(\sigma(a_{0,j})a_{0,j}^{-1}\bigr)\ge2.

We propagate this estimate along the two difference sequences. For either shift TT, its inverse preserves the filtration, and

T−1−T=T−1(id⁡−T2),T2−id⁡=(T−id⁡)2.T^{-1}-T=T^{-1}(\operatorname{id}-T^2), \qquad T^2-\operatorname{id}=(T-\operatorname{id})^2.

Hence, if νL(z)≥d\nu_L(z)\ge d, the elements δT−1z\delta_{T^{-1}}z and δTz\delta_Tz agree modulo degree d+2d+2. If σ(z)=vz\sigma(z)=vz, the identity σT=T−1σ\sigma T=T^{-1}\sigma gives

σ(δTz)=T−1(v)(δT−1z)v−1.(20)\sigma(\delta_Tz)=T^{-1}(v)(\delta_{T^{-1}}z)v^{-1}. \tag*{(20)}

When νL(v)≥d+1\nu_L(v)\ge d+1, the inverse-shift bound and the commutator estimate show that the right side differs from δT−1z\delta_{T^{-1}}z only in degree at least d+2d+2. The preceding comparison then replaces δT−1z\delta_{T^{-1}}z by δTz\delta_Tz. Starting with a0,ja_{0,j}, first apply this argument along δT2\delta_{T_2} and then along δT1\delta_{T_1}. It proves that σ\sigma changes each basis element of weight ww only in degree at least w+1w+1. A final application of Lemma 2.1 proves the assertion with the completed algebra. ▫

Twenty-four relations impose the involution

There are 24 pairs of generators exchanged, up to inversion, by sign. Choosing one relation per pair in the original basis would impose the involution, but would lose the higher degrees gained from the shifts. We must choose 24 relations whose degrees are measured in the new basis. The Frattini quotient will identify those relations, and its generation criterion will show that they impose the full group action.

Proposition 4.2. Let LL be the free pro-22 group on ah,ja_{h,j}, with h∈(Z/4)2h \in(\mathbb{Z}/4)^2 and 0≤j≤20 \le j \le2, and let σ(ah,j)=abj−h,j−1\sigma(a_{h,j}) = a_{b_j-h,j}^{-1}, where bj mod 2≠0b_j \bmod2 \ne0. Equip LL with the basis and weights of Lemma 4.1. There are 24 elements g∈Lg \in L, with assigned positive weights wgw_g, such that

νL(g)≥wg,νL(rg)≥wg+1,rg=σ(g)g−1,\nu_L(g) \ge w_g,\qquad\nu_L(r_g) \ge w_g+1,\qquad r_g=\sigma(g)g^{-1},

and the closed normal subgroup generated by the rgr_g imposes σ=id⁡\sigma=\operatorname{id} on all of LL. The basis polynomial and the polynomial of the chosen weights are

P(t)=∑i,ℓ,jti+ℓ+1=3t(1+t+t2+t3)2,G(t)=∑gtwg=3t(1+t)(1+t2)2.(21)\begin{aligned} P(t) &= \sum_{i,\ell,j} t^{i+\ell+1}=3t(1+t+t^2+t^3)^2,\\ G(t) &= \sum_g t^{w_g}=3t(1+t)(1+t^2)^2. \tag*{(21)} \end{aligned}

In particular, P=(1+t)GP=(1+t)G, and these involution relations have degree cost at most tG(t)tG(t).

Proof. The full Magnus degree bounds are already proved. We now use the Frattini quotient to choose enough relations to impose the whole involution; generation is detected in this linear quotient. Consider one block of the Frattini quotient, identified with R=F2[ξ,η]/(ξ4,η4)R=\mathbb{F}_2[\xi,\eta]/(\xi^4,\eta^4) as above. Give a homogeneous polynomial of degree nn weight n+1n+1. Write b=(b1,b2)b=(b_1,b_2) for the shift of this block. The action of σ\sigma on RR is

f(ξ,η)⟼(1+ξ)b1(1+η)b2f((1+ξ)−1−1,(1+η)−1−1).(22)f(\xi,\eta)\longmapsto(1+\xi)^{b_1}(1+\eta)^{b_2}f\left((1+\xi)^{-1}-1,(1+\eta)^{-1}-1\right). \tag*{(22)}

Here inversion of a group generator disappears in the mod-2 Frattini quotient. Since (1+ξ)−1−1=ξ+ξ2+⋯(1+\xi)^{-1}-1=\xi+\xi^2+\cdots, expansion of (22) shows that the part of σ−id⁡\sigma-\operatorname{id} raising weight by exactly one is

d=(bˉ1ξ+bˉ2η)+ξ2∂∂ξ+η2∂∂η,(bˉ1,bˉ2)=b mod 2.(23)d=(\bar b_1\xi+\bar b_2\eta)+\xi^2\frac{\partial}{\partial\xi}+\eta^2\frac{\partial}{\partial\eta},\qquad(\bar b_1,\bar b_2)=b\bmod2. \tag*{(23)}

The first term means multiplication.

Set u=bˉ1ξ+bˉ2ηu=\bar b_1\xi+\bar b_2\eta, which is nonzero, and choose a linear coordinate vv independent of uu over F2\mathbb{F}_2. The fourth-power relations become u4=v4=0u^4=v^4=0. Moreover, the vector field ξ2∂ξ+η2∂η\xi^2\partial_\xi+\eta^2\partial_\eta sends any linear form over F2\mathbb{F}_2 to its square. In these coordinates,

R=F2[u,v]/(u4,v4),d=u+u2∂∂u+v2∂∂v.(24)R=\mathbb{F}_2[u,v]/(u^4,v^4),\qquad d=u+u^2\frac{\partial}{\partial u}+v^2\frac{\partial}{\partial v}. \tag*{(24)}

The uu-part sends 11 to uu, u2u^2 to u3u^3, and odd powers to zero. Its square is zero, as is the square of the vv-part. The two parts commute, so d2=0d^2=0.

Take the homogeneous subspace

C=span⁡F2{uavb:a∈{0,2}, 0≤b<4}.(25)C=\operatorname{span}_{\mathbb{F}_2}\{u^a v^b:a\in\{0,2\},\ 0\le b<4\}. \tag*{(25)}

On CC, the odd-uu component of dd is multiplication by uu, an isomorphism from CC to the span of the odd-uu monomials. Thus d∣Cd|_C is injective and

R=C⊕dC,ker⁡d=im⁡d=dC.(26)R=C\oplus dC,\qquad\ker d=\operatorname{im}d=dC. \tag*{(26)}

Indeed the direct-sum assertion follows by projecting to the odd-uu monomials; both summands have dimension eight. It then follows from d2=0d^2=0 that the image and kernel, each of dimension eight, coincide.

For each of the eight monomials in (25), expand it in the original homogeneous monomials ξiηℓ\xi^i\eta^\ell. Choose gg to be a product of the corresponding uiℓ,ju_{i\ell,j}, each appearing with its coefficient in F2\mathbb{F}_2, in any fixed order. Its assigned weight wgw_g is the polynomial degree plus one. Then νL(g)≥wg\nu_L(g) \ge w_g, and [4] gives νL(rg)≥wg+1\nu_L(r_g) \ge w_g+1. In the graded Frattini quotient the leading vectors of g,rgg,r_g are respectively the chosen basis of CC and its image under dd. By (26) these form a homogeneous basis. The actual Frattini vectors therefore form a basis as well: any linear dependence would give one between their lowest nonzero weight components. Doing this in all three blocks shows that the 48 elements g,rgg,r_g, equivalently g,σ(g)g,\sigma(g), generate LL.

Let NN be the closed normal subgroup generated by these 24 elements rgr_g. It is invariant under σ\sigma, because

σ(rg)=gσ(g)−1=rg−1.\sigma(r_g)=g\sigma(g)^{-1}=r_g^{-1}.

The quotient L/NL/N is generated by the images of the gg, since there σ(g)=g\sigma(g)=g; its induced involution fixes those generators and hence is the identity. Thus NN is exactly the closed normal subgroup imposing σ=id⁡\sigma=\operatorname{id}.

Finally, in each block the chosen monomials have weight polynomial

t(1+t2)(1+t+t2+t3)=t(1+t)(1+t2)2.t(1+t^2)(1+t+t^2+t^3)=t(1+t)(1+t^2)^2.

Adding the three blocks gives (21). Since each rgr_g has degree at least wg+1w_g+1, its contribution to the relation bound is at most twg+1t^{w_g+1} for 0<t<10<t<1.

Transferring the degree bounds

The involution relations leave the positive polynomial G=P−tGG=P-tG in the generator-minus-relation count. To control the remaining monodromy relations, we need to compare the two filtrations.

Write K^\widehat{K} for the closure of KK in F^\widehat{F}. The normal subgroup K◃FK\triangleleft F has the induced pro-2 topology: if N◃KN\triangleleft K has 2-power index, its FF-core N0N_0 is the intersection of finitely many conjugates of NN. The group K/N0K/N_0 embeds in a product of finite 2-groups, and F/N0F/N_0 is an extension of F/KF/K by K/N0K/N_0, hence is also a finite 2-group. This proves the required cofinality and identifies the pro-2 completion of KK with its closure in F^\widehat{F}.

Lemma 4.3. Let Φ:F^→L⋊H\Phi:\widehat{F}\to L\rtimes H be the continuous extension of the homomorphism from the preceding section:

x⟼T1,y⟼T2,aj⟼a0,j,c0,c1⟼1.x\longmapsto T_1,\qquad y\longmapsto T_2,\qquad a_j\longmapsto a_{0,j},\qquad c_0,c_1\longmapsto1.

If f∈F^f\in\widehat{F} has νF(f)≥n\nu_F(f)\ge n, its LL-component under Φ\Phi has νL≥n\nu_L\ge n. In particular, this holds for the homomorphism Φ∣K^:K^→L\Phi|_{\widehat{K}}:\widehat{K}\to L.

Proof. Let ALA_L be the completed Magnus algebra of LL. Represent L⋊HL\rtimes H on ALA_L by letting l∈Ll\in L act by left multiplication and letting HH act by its shifts. By [4], the operators representing x−1x-1 and y−1y-1 raise degree by one. So does the operator representing aj−1a_j-1, which is left multiplication by a0,j−1a_{0,j}-1. The operators representing c0−1,c1−1c_0-1,c_1-1 are zero, and in particular satisfy their required weight-two bounds.

Substitute these operators into the weighted Magnus algebra of F^\widehat{F}. This substitution converges: a monomial of weight at least nn becomes an operator raising degree by at least Consequently the operator representing f−1f-1 raises degree by at least nn. If Φ(f)=(l,h)\Phi(f)=(l,h), its action on 1∈AL1\in A_L is ll, since every shift fixes 11. Evaluating the operator for f−1f-1 on 11 therefore gives l−1l-1, proving νL(l)≥n\nu_L(l)\ge n. On K^\widehat{K} the HH-component is trivial, which proves the last assertion.

An infinite quotient compatible with the family

We now impose the geometric relations. The order of the choices matters. We first make the parameter monodromy sufficiently deep, then compactify the resulting finite cover of the marked family, and only then choose powers for its finitely many remaining boundary meridians.

All deep monodromies from a controlled set of relations

Write Γ^\widehat{\Gamma} for the free pro-22 completion of the rank-four parameter group Γ\Gamma. Give its four free generators ordinary Magnus degree one, and let

DN={m∈Γ^:νΓ(m)≥N},ΓN=Γ∩DN.D_N=\{m\in\widehat{\Gamma}:\nu_{\Gamma}(m)\ge N\},\qquad\Gamma_N=\Gamma\cap D_N.

Each DND_N is open and normal, and these subgroups form a neighborhood basis of the identity. The leading degree-NN Magnus part embeds

DN/DN+1↪F2{words of length N on four letters}.D_N/D_{N+1}\hookrightarrow\mathbb{F}_2\{\text{words of length }N\text{ on four letters}\}.

In particular, its dimension is at most 4N4^N. Choose a set MN⊂ΓN\mathcal{M}_N\subset\Gamma_N representing a basis of this quotient. Discrete representatives exist by density and openness. For any integer J≥1J\ge1, the union of the MN\mathcal{M}_N, N≥JN\ge J, topologically generates DJD_J: successive removal of the leading part approximates every element modulo each DND_N.

By Proposition 3.4, the automorphisms associated with the four generators of Γ\Gamma differ from the identity by operators raising degree on the Magnus algebra of F^\widehat{F}. Substitute these four operators into the base Magnus expansion, as in Lemma 2.1. It follows that the action extends continuously to Γ^\widehat{\Gamma} and that

(φm−id⁡)(AF,≥d)⊂AF,≥d+N(m∈DN).(27)(\varphi_m-\operatorname{id})(A_{F,\ge d})\subset A_{F,\ge d+N}\qquad(m\in D_N). \tag*{(27)}

Indeed, on each finite truncation these actions lie in a finite unipotent 22-group, so completion introduces no extra continuity assumption. The action preserves K^\widehat{K}, since the actual action on the closed torus is ±id⁡\pm\operatorname{id} and preserves reduction modulo four.

Recall that KK is free of rank 9797. Fix a free basis k1,…,k97k_1,\ldots,k_{97}. By the completion identification in Section 4.3, this is a topological generating set of K^\widehat{K}.

We count monodromies by their depth in the filtration. This lets us control the relation cost without estimating the free rank of the finite-index subgroup ΓJ\Gamma_J. The bound 4N4^N will be offset by the higher degree N+1N+1 of the resulting fiber relations.

For every N≥JN\ge J, m∈MNm\in\mathcal{M}_N and 1≤i≤971\le i\le97, impose on LL the relator

Φ(φm(ki)ki−1).(28)\Phi\left(\varphi_m(k_i)k_i^{-1}\right). \tag*{(28)}

Its argument belongs to K^\widehat{K} and has FF-degree at least N+1N+1 by (27). Its LL-degree is at least N+1N+1 by Lemma 4.3. Thus these relators have total cost at most

97∑N≥J4NtN+1=97t(4t)J1−4t,0<t<14.(29)97\sum_{N\ge J}4^N t^{N+1}=97t\frac{(4t)^J}{1-4t},\qquad0<t<\frac14. \tag*{(29)}

Let Q0Q_0 be the quotient of LL by the closed normal subgroup generated by these relators and the 24 involution relators of Proposition 4.2. The following observation is what turns the counted relations into all the required equalities.

Lemma 5.1. The homomorphism fK:K^→Q0f_K:\widehat{K}\to Q_0 induced by Φ\Phi satisfies

fKφm=fK(m∈DJ).f_K\varphi_m=f_K \qquad(m\in D_J).

Consequently the induced homomorphism Π→Q0\Pi\to Q_0 from the punctured sphere is invariant under its actual based monodromy for every m∈ΓJm\in\Gamma_J.

Proof. For each imposed mm, equality on the basis kik_i gives equality of the two continuous homomorphisms on all of K^\widehat{K}. The set

E0={m∈Γ^:fKφm=fK on K^}E_0=\{m\in\widehat{\Gamma}:f_K\varphi_m=f_K\text{ on }\widehat{K}\}

is a closed subgroup. For multiplication, apply one equality to φn(k)\varphi_n(k) and then the other to kk; for inverses apply the equality to φm−1(k)\varphi_m^{-1}(k). Closedness follows from continuity. It contains all MN\mathcal{M}_N with N≥JN\geq J, and hence contains DJD_J.

The last assertion uses the actual surjection K→ΠK\to\Pi and its exact compatibility with the two based actions, proved in Proposition 3.2 and Lemma 3.5. Surjectivity onto the unpinched sphere group is essential here; no invariance of the pinching kernel was assumed in defining the relators.

A finite parameter cover with ramification index two

The monodromy series in (29) requires 4t<14t<1. The involution leaves the weighted expression 1−G(t)1-G(t), where G(t)=3t(1+t)(1+t2)2G(t)=3t(1+t)(1+t^2)^2, so we also need G(t)>1G(t)>1. Both conditions hold for tt sufficiently close to 1/41/4 from below. We choose the following rational value and check its exact margin in Proposition 5.3:

t=49200<14.(30)t=\frac{49}{200}<\frac{1}{4}. \tag*{(30)}

We reserve 1/1001/100 of the relation bound for deep monodromy and another 1/1001/100 for the final boundary powers; the strict inequality below will justify both allowances. Choose JJ large enough that (29) is less than 1/1001/100. Enlarge JJ, if necessary, until ΓJ\Gamma_J kills the finite permutation and sign action of Lemma 3.6. This is possible because that action has finite 22-group image.

Set

M=⟨γ∗2⟩ΓJ⊂Γ.M=\langle\gamma_*^2\rangle\Gamma_J\subset\Gamma.

Normality of ΓJ\Gamma_J makes this a finite-index subgroup. The action of γ∗2\gamma_*^2 on the pinched sphere group is trivial, by Lemma 3.6. Together with Lemma 5.1, this proves invariance of Π→Q0\Pi\to Q_0 under all of MM. Moreover MM fixes every marking and lies in the parameter sign kernel. It contains γ∗2\gamma_*^2 but not γ∗\gamma_*.

Let B′→BB'\to B be the connected finite cover corresponding to MM, and let C′C' be its smooth projective completion. These are algebraic: Riemann existence applies to finite covers of a complex variety without a properness hypothesis [16], and normalization compactifies the curve cover. The selected point c∗∈C′∖B′c_*\in C'\setminus B' has ramification index exactly two over s∗s_*, since ⟨γ∗⟩∩M=⟨γ∗2⟩\langle\gamma_*\rangle\cap M=\langle\gamma_*^2\rangle.

The 48 markings split into disjoint algebraic sections over B′B'. Denote their complement by

U⊂P1×B′.U\subset\mathbb{P}^{1}\times B'.

Finite-point isotopy gives a locally trivial punctured-sphere bundle. The open base curve is aspherical, and the fixed section at q(0)q(0) splits its fundamental-group sequence. Therefore

π1(U)=Π⋊M.\pi_1(U)=\Pi\rtimes M.

The monodromy invariance just proved extends Π→Q0\Pi\to Q_0 to a homomorphism

ρ0:π1(U)⟶Q0(31)\rho_0:\pi_1(U)\longrightarrow Q_0 \tag*{(31)}

that kills the section subgroup MM. Its restriction to every punctured fiber has dense image, because the pinched sphere group maps densely onto the pro-2 quotient Q0Q_0.

Separating the sections and filling the distinguished fiber

Extend the marked sections across C′∖B′C' \setminus B' in P1×C′\mathbb{P}^1 \times C'. Blow up their collision points until their strict transforms are disjoint, obtaining a smooth projective surface

Y⟶C′Y \longrightarrow C'

with UU unchanged. This terminates: at any common point of two sections, a blowup decreases their intersection multiplicity by one, so the sum of all pairwise intersection multiplicities strictly decreases.

All fibers over C′∖B′C' \setminus B' stay reduced with simple normal crossings. Here is the local induction, which also ensures that the full boundary is a simple normal crossing divisor. At a smooth point of a reduced vertical component, take the projection coordinate uu and write a section as w=g(u)w = g(u). Blowing up the origin gives the chart w=uvw = uv, where the transformed section is v=g(u)/uv = g(u)/u and is still transverse to the new multiplicity-one component u=0u = 0. In the other chart the projection has the form u=wbu = wb; its differential vanishes at the vertical node w=b=0w = b = 0. A section cannot pass through that node, because its composite with the projection is the identity. Thus every further collision center is a smooth point of a reduced vertical component. When the sections are disjoint, each meets a single vertical component transversely and avoids all vertical nodes. The boundary

D=Y∖UD = Y \setminus U

is consequently a simple normal crossing divisor: locally it is defined by u=0u = 0 or uv=0uv = 0 in smooth coordinates. It contains the 48 horizontal marked sections and every component of the fibers over C′∖B′C' \setminus B'.

Over c∗c_* the local marking equation is w2=s−s∗w^2 = s - s_*. After the base change of index two it becomes w2=u2w^2 = u^2, up to analytic coordinate changes. One blowup separates the two branches w=±uw = \pm u. Hence the distinguished fiber D∗D_* consists of one main sphere and 24 tails. Every tail carries two marked sections and meets the main sphere once; the main sphere carries none.

The distinguished fiber $D_*$ with one main sphere and 24 rational tails

Figure 2. The distinguished fiber D∗D_* on YY, after the base change of index two and one blowup at each collision. Each of the 24 rational tails has two markings (solid dots) and one node on the main component (open circles). The middle 20 tails are omitted. The cover constructed in Section 6 is unramified at the nodes and can branch only at the markings. Its inverse image may have a different incidence graph.

Lemma 5.2. Every meridian around a component of D∗D_* has trivial image under ρ0\rho_0.

Proof. A main-component meridian is represented by the circuit along the fixed exterior section, so it is killed by (31).

For a tail use the blowup chart w=uvw=uv. A meridian at a sufficiently large fixed slope v=cv=c is represented downstairs by

u=εeiθ,w=cεeiθ,0≤θ≤2π.u=\varepsilon e^{i\theta},\qquad w=c\varepsilon e^{i\theta},\qquad0\leq\theta\leq2\pi.

Choose ∣c∣|c| larger than the two branch slopes and then choose ε\varepsilon small. Trivialize the pair motion by an isotopy supported inside the circle containing the two marks but not this meridian. In this trivialization the loop is the base circuit followed by one full pair-boundary loop, up to conjugacy and the choice of multiplication convention. The base circuit is killed by the section splitting; the pair boundary is killed by the pinching map. Both factors therefore have trivial image.

The remaining boundary relations

There are finitely many components of DD outside D∗D_*. Choose based meridians μ1,…,μb\mu_1,\ldots,\mu_b for them, and choose lifts μ~i∈L\widetilde{\mu}_i\in L of ρ0(μi)∈Q0\rho_0(\mu_i)\in Q_0. These lifts exist since L→Q0L\to Q_0 is surjective. Choose an integer ee so large that

bt2e<1100(32)bt^{2^e}<\frac{1}{100} \tag*{(32)}

and impose the additional relators μ~i2e\widetilde{\mu}_i^{2^e}. This is the high-power method underlying Golod’s construction [14], applied here to the finitely many boundary elements. Each added relator has degree at least 2e2^e by (1). Denote the resulting pro-2 quotient by QQ.

Proposition 5.3. The group QQ is infinite. The homomorphism

ρ:π1(U)⟶Q\rho:\pi_1(U)\longrightarrow Q

induced by ρ0\rho_0 has dense image on every punctured fiber. Each component meridian of DD has finite image, and every component meridian of D∗D_* has trivial image.

Proof. Only infinitude remains to prove. The generators of LL have polynomial P(t)P(t) and the involution relators have cost at most tG(t)tG(t), where [4] gives

P(t)=(1+t)G(t),G(t)=3t(1+t)(1+t2)2.P(t)=(1+t)G(t),\qquad G(t)=3t(1+t)(1+t^2)^2.

At the rational value (30), t2>3/50t^2>3/50, so

G(t)>3⋅49⋅249⋅5322002⋅502=102817827100000000>257250.G(t)>\frac{3\cdot49\cdot249\cdot53^2}{200^2\cdot50^2} =\frac{102817827}{100000000}>\frac{257}{250}.

The complete weighted expression in Lemma 2.2 is therefore less than

1−P(t)+tG(t)+1100+1100=1−G(t)+150<−1125<0.1-P(t)+tG(t)+\frac{1}{100}+\frac{1}{100} =1-G(t)+\frac{1}{50}<-\frac{1}{125}<0.

The infinite monodromy-relator family is finite in each bounded degree and has convergent cost by (29). The remaining families are finite. All hypotheses of Lemma 2.2 hold, proving that QQ is infinite. Passage to the quotient preserves all earlier equalities and the density of each fiber image.

Notice that ee is chosen after the finite cover and compactification. Thus their possibly large number of boundary components introduces no circular parameter choice. The surface construction now uses only the finite local images and the infinite fiber image recorded in Proposition 5.3.

The projective surface and its rational fiber

We now turn the quotient of Proposition 5.3 into a fundamental-group image on a smooth projective surface. The construction must retain the distinguished fiber: its rational components will lift compactly, while the fundamental group of their union will have infinite image.

Recall the inputs. The complement U=Y∖DU = Y \setminus D lies in a smooth connected projective surface YY, the boundary DD has simple normal crossings, and

ρ:π1(U)⟶Q\rho: \pi_1(U) \longrightarrow Q

has dense image in an infinite pro-2 group. Its restriction to a punctured smooth fiber also has dense image. Every component meridian of DD has finite image, and the meridians of the distinguished fiber D∗D_\ast have trivial image. This fiber consists of an unmarked main sphere and 24 tails, each meeting the main sphere once and carrying two horizontal markings.

A finite cover that kills all compactification meridians

At a crossing, two commuting meridians may have relations that neither cyclic subgroup detects separately. We therefore choose a finite quotient that detects the entire local group at every boundary point.

Lemma 6.1 (Finite local detection and descent). Let YY be a smooth connected projective complex surface, let DD be a simple-normal-crossings divisor, and put U=Y∖DU = Y \setminus D. Suppose ρ:π1(U)⟶Q\rho: \pi_1(U) \longrightarrow Q has dense image in a profinite group and sends every component meridian of DD to an element of finite order. There is a finite quotient Q↠PfQ \twoheadrightarrow P_f with the following properties.

  1. The quotient is injective on the image under ρ\rho of every sufficiently small local boundary-complement group.

  1. The connected finite cover π:U′⟶U\pi: U' \longrightarrow U defined by ker⁡(π1(U)⟶Pf)\ker(\pi_1(U) \longrightarrow P_f) extends to a projective morphism p:X⟶Yp : X \longrightarrow Y, where XX is smooth and connected and DX=X∖U′D_X = X \setminus U' is a simple-normal-crossings divisor.

  1. Writing i:U′↪Xi : U' \hookrightarrow X for inclusion, there is a homomorphism ρX:π1(X)⟶Q\rho_X : \pi_1(X) \longrightarrow Q such that

ρX∘i∗=ρ∘π∗(33)\rho_X \circ i_\ast= \rho\circ\pi_\ast \tag*{(33)}

Moreover, the resolution used to construct XX can be chosen to preserve every open subset of the normalization on which the surface is smooth and its reduced boundary has simple normal crossings.

Proof. We first find a finite quotient detecting all local boundary images, then compactify and resolve the corresponding cover, and finally check that the original quotient map kills every new boundary meridian.

Choose a small coordinate polydisk VV about a point of DD. Its boundary complement is

V∖D≃(Δ∗)r×Δ2−r,r∈{1,2}.V \setminus D \simeq(\Delta^\ast)^r \times\Delta^{2-r}, \qquad r \in\{1,2\}.

After choosing an access path in UU, let AV⊂QA_V \subset Q be the image of its fundamental group. This group is generated by rr commuting finite-order elements, so it is finite. Only finitely many such images occur up to conjugacy: there is one meridian type on the smooth part of each boundary component and one local group at each crossing. The smooth part of an irreducible component, with its finitely many crossings removed, is connected; moving the access path along it conjugates the local group.

For every nonidentity element in representatives of these finite groups, choose an open normal subgroup of QQ that does not contain it. Their finite intersection NN is open and normal. It satisfies

N∩gAVg−1={1}(g∈Q)(34)N \cap gA_Vg^{-1} = \{1\} \qquad(g \in Q) \tag*{(34)}

for every local group. Set Pf=Q/NP_f = Q/N. Density makes the map π1(U)→Pf\pi_1(U) \to P_f surjective, so its kernel defines a connected finite Galois cover π:U′→U\pi: U' \to U.

The cover has the complex structure obtained by lifting local charts. It is algebraic and finite étale by the Riemann existence theorem for complex varieties [16], Exposé XII, Théorème 5.1. This theorem applies to the nonproper surface UU. Normalize Y‾\overline{Y} in the function field of U′U' and denote the resulting morphism by n:Y‾→Yn : \overline{Y} \to Y. It is finite: complex varieties are Nagata, so finiteness of relative normalization applies to the finite-type morphism U′→YU' \to Y [26]. Its restriction over UU is U′U', because the latter is already normal. Finite morphisms are projective, so Y‾\overline{Y} is projective [26].

Resolve Y‾\overline{Y} by projective blowups, leaving its smooth locus unchanged; strong resolution in characteristic zero has this prescribed-open property [8]. Next resolve the reduced boundary on the resulting smooth surface. For curves on a smooth surface this can be done by point blowups: resolve the singular component germs, decrease tangency intersection multiplicities, and separate crossings of three or more branches [26]. Choose these centers only where the boundary is not already simple normal crossings. Thus this additional operation preserves every open subset on which the pair was already smooth with simple normal crossings. We obtain

X→rY‾→nY,p=n∘r,X \xrightarrow{r} \overline{Y} \xrightarrow{n} Y,\qquad p=n\circ r,

with XX smooth and projective and with DXD_X a simple-normal-crossings divisor. The dense open set U′U' is unchanged, so XX is connected.

We prove the factorization, including the meridians of resolution exceptional curves. The inclusion ii is surjective on fundamental groups: a loop can be perturbed off a real-codimension-two divisor. Its kernel is normally generated by the component meridians of DXD_X. Indeed, perturb a null-homotopy disk relative to its boundary so that it avoids the finitely many crossings of DXD_X and meets its smooth part transversely. Deleting small disks around the finitely many intersection points expresses its boundary loop as a product of conjugates of meridians and their inverses.

Let EE be any component of DXD_X, choose a smooth point x∈Ex \in E away from the other components, and take a small transverse disk TT through xx with T∖{x}⊂U′T \setminus\{x\} \subset U'. Choose a boundary polydisk VV about p(x)p(x) downstairs. By shrinking TT, we may assume p(T)⊂Vp(T) \subset V. Consequently the projection of a small meridian in T∖{x}T \setminus\{x\} lies in V∖DV \setminus D. After including its access path, its QQ-image belongs to a conjugate of AVA_V. This argument applies also when EE is exceptional and is contracted to a boundary point.

The projected meridian has trivial image in PfP_f, since its lift is a closed loop in U′U'. Its QQ-image therefore lies in both NN and a conjugate of AVA_V, and is trivial by (34). All generators of ker⁡i∗\ker i_* are thus killed by ρ∘π∗\rho\circ\pi_*. This proves (33). □

Apply Lemma 6.1 to the map supplied by Proposition 5.3. Retain its notation Pf,N,U′,Y‾,X,ρ,ρXP_f,N,U',\overline{Y},X,\rho,\rho_X. We next verify that the normalization is already smooth along the distinguished fiber, so that the resolution can preserve it.

The distinguished fiber remains a union of spheres

Lemma 6.2. Let h:X→C′h : X \to C' be the composite of pp and Y→C′Y \to C'. The resolution can be chosen so that the reduced fiber

Z=h−1(c∗)redZ = h^{-1}(c_*)_{\mathrm{red}}

has only smooth rational irreducible components and ordinary transverse crossings.

Proof. Every vertical meridian along D∗D_* is trivial in QQ, and hence in PfP_f, by [5]. We describe the normalization locally at every kind of point of D∗D_*. The restriction of the Galois cover to a boundary-complement polydisk is classified by its local meridian homomorphism to PfP_f; its connected components correspond to cosets of the local image.

At a smooth unmarked point of D∗D_*, the sole meridian is trivial. Every connected local cover therefore extends as a copy of the polydisk. At a node between the main component and a tail, both vertical meridians are trivial, and the same assertion holds.

At a horizontal–vertical intersection choose coordinates (u,v)(u,v) with the vertical curve u=0u=0 and the horizontal marking v=0v=0. The uu-meridian is trivial. If the image of the vv-meridian has order ee, the kernel of the local map Z2→Pf\mathbb{Z}^2 \to P_f is Z×eZ\mathbb{Z} \times e\mathbb{Z}. Each connected local cover thus has the finite normal extension

(u,w)⟼(u,v)=(u,we).(35)(u,w) \longmapsto(u,v)=(u,w^e). \tag*{(35)}

This extension is smooth, and its reduced boundary is uw=0uw=0. Analytification preserves finiteness and normality [16]. Thus the local extensions just described agree with Y‾\overline{Y} by uniqueness of finite normal extension [16]. The entire preimage of D∗D_* lies in the smooth simple-normal-crossings locus of the normalized pair. The resolution in Lemma 6.1 can be the identity on this open neighborhood.

Consider now an irreducible component above the main sphere. Its map to that sphere is unramified, including at the attaching nodes, and there are no horizontal markings on the main component. It is therefore a connected unramified cover of P1\mathbb{P}^1, hence a sphere mapping with degree one. A component above a tail can branch only at its two horizontal markings, and is unramified at the attaching node. Removing those two points downstairs and all their preimages upstairs gives a connected finite cover of C∗\mathbb{C}^*. Its covering subgroup is dZ⊂Zd\mathbb{Z} \subset\mathbb{Z}. Thus it is the covering z↦zdz \mapsto z^d of C∗\mathbb{C}^*, whose smooth compactification is P1\mathbb{P}^1.

There are no additional components from resolution over D∗D_*. The local models show that the components just identified are smooth and meet only in ordinary transverse crossings. This proves the assertion about ZZ.

Infinite image on the compact fiber

Although D∗D_* is a tree of spheres, a degree-dd component above one of its tails meets dd distinct degree-one lifts of the main sphere: the attaching node has dd distinct preimages. The incidence graph upstairs therefore need not be a tree. For a connected nodal union of simply connected components, van Kampen identifies its fundamental group with that of its dual graph, which has one vertex for each component and one edge for each node. We now prove that some connected component of ZZ has infinite fundamental-group image in XX.

Lemma 6.3. Let Z=h−1(c∗)redZ=h^{-1}(c_*)_{\mathrm{red}} be the rational nodal fiber of Lemma 6.2. Some connected component Z0Z_0 of ZZ satisfies

∣im⁡(π1(Z0)⟶π1(X))∣=∞.\left|\operatorname{im}\left(\pi_1(Z_0) \longrightarrow\pi_1(X)\right)\right|=\infty.

Proof. Let Fs⊂UF_s \subset U be a punctured smooth fiber, with s∈B′s \in B' and choose access paths when comparing its group with π1(U)\pi_1(U). Its image under ρ\rho is dense in QQ by Proposition 5.3. In particular its image in PfP_f is all of PfP_f, so its inverse image Fs′⊂U′F'_s \subset U' is connected. Under the covering inclusion, its group is the preimage of NN in π1(Fs)\pi_1(F_s). Thus the image of π1(Fs′)\pi_1(F'_s) in QQ is

ρ(π1(Fs))∩N.\rho\left(\pi_1(F_s)\right) \cap N.

It is dense in NN, because NN is open and the fiber image is dense in QQ. The group NN is infinite: a finite open subgroup would make its finite-index overgroup QQ finite. Consequently the image of π1(Fs′)\pi_1(F'_s) in QQ is infinite. By (33), its image in π1(X)\pi_1(X) is infinite as well.

We transfer this conclusion to ZZ using an explicit deformation-retract neighborhood. Regard XX as a compact real analytic manifold and ZZ as a closed semianalytic subset. This pair admits a compatible finite triangulation [22]. Write it as a finite simplicial pair (K,A)(K,A), and barycentrically subdivide so that AA is a full subcomplex: any simplex whose vertices belong to AA belongs to AA. For a point of ∣K∣|K|, let sAs_A be the sum of its barycentric coordinates at vertices of AA. On the open neighborhood

V={sA>0}V = \{s_A > 0\}

retain those coordinates, divide them by sAs_A, and set all other coordinates to zero. Fullness ensures that the result belongs to ∣A∣|A|. The straight-line homotopy inside each simplex gives a strong deformation retraction V→ZV \to Z. In particular the inclusion of VV into XX is homotopic to a map through ZZ.

Properness of hh supplies the needed containment of nearby fibers. The set h(X∖V)h(X \setminus V) is closed in C′C' and does not contain c∗c_*. Hence every whole fiber over a sufficiently small neighborhood of c∗c_* lies in VV. Choose s∈B′s \in B' in this neighborhood. Its connected punctured lifted fiber Fs′F'_s lies in one connected component of VV; the deformation retraction takes that component into a connected component Z0Z_0 of ZZ. Therefore its inclusion-induced homomorphism to π1(X)\pi_1(X) factors, up to a change-of-basepoint conjugation, through π1(Z0)\pi_1(Z_0). Since the former has infinite image, so does the latter. □\square

Proof of Theorem 1.1. The construction above gives a smooth connected projective surface XX. By Lemmas 6.2 and 6.3, it contains a connected nodal curve Z0Z_0 with smooth rational irreducible components and infinite image in π1(X)\pi_1(X).

Lemma 1.2 now applies to (X,Z0)(X,Z_0). In the simply connected universal cover X~\widetilde{X}, every connected component WW above Z0Z_0 is a closed noncompact locally finite union of compact rational curves. For every w∈Ww \in W, the holomorphic hull of {w}\{w\} contains WW and is noncompact. This proves all the assertions of Theorem 1.1. □\square

References

  1. [1]Benjamin Bakker, Yohan Brunebarbe, and Jacob Tsimerman. The linear Shafarevich conjecture for quasiprojective varieties and algebraicity of Shafarevich morphisms. Author-hosted preprint, 2026. URL https://benjamin-bakker.github.io/Shafarevich.pdf. Revision dated September 9, 2026, 134 pp.; initial version arXiv:2408.16441 (2024).arxiv.org/abs/2408.16441
  2. [2]Fedor Bogomolov and Ludmil Katzarkov. Complex projective surfaces and infinite groups. Geometric and Functional Analysis, 8(2):243–272, 1998. doi: 10.1007/s000390050055. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/alg-geom/9703002v2.
  3. [3]Frédéric Campana. Remarques sur le revêtement universel des variétés kählériennes compactes. Bulletin de la Société Mathématique de France, 122(2):255–284, 1994. doi: 10.24033/bsmf.2232. URL https://www.numdam.org/item/10.24033/bsmf.2232.pdf.DOI
  4. [4]Frédéric Campana. Orbifolds, special varieties and classification theory. Annales de l’Institut Fourier, 54(3):499–630, 2004. doi: 10.5802/aif.2027. URL https://www.numdam.org/item/10.5802/aif.2027.pdf.DOI
  5. [5]Frédéric Campana, Benoît Claudon, and Philippe Eyssidieux. Représentations linéaires des groupes kählériens : factorisations et conjecture de Shafarevich linéaire. Compositio Mathematica, 151(2):351–376, 2015. doi: 10.1112/S0010437X14007751. URL https://doi.org/10.1112/S0010437X14007751.
  6. [6]Mihnea Colțoiu and Cezar Joița. The disk property of coverings of 1-convex surfaces. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 140(2):575–580, 2012. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1104.1077v1.
  7. [7]Ya Deng and Katsutoshi Yamanoi. Reductive Shafarevich conjecture, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.03070v2. Version 2, May 29, 2024; with an appendix joint with Ludmil Katzarkov.
  8. [8]Santiago Encinas and Herwig Hauser. Strong resolution of singularities in characteristic zero. Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici, 77(4):821–845, 2002. doi: 10.1007/PL00012443. URL https://ems.press/journals/cmh/articles/377.DOI
  9. [9]Mikhail Ershov. Kazhdan quotients of Golod–Shafarevich groups. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society (3), 102(4):599–636, 2011. doi: 10.1112/plms/pdq022. URL https://m-ershov.github.io/Research/gosha_Kazhdan_lms_revised.pdf.DOI
  10. [10]Mikhail Ershov and Andrei Jaikin-Zapirain. Groups of positive weighted deficiency and their applications. Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik, 677:71–134, 2013. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1007.1489v3.
  11. [11]Philippe Eyssidieux. Sur la convexité holomorphe des revêtements linéaires réductifs d’une variété projective algébrique complexe. Inventiones mathematicae, 156(3):503–564, 2004. doi: 10.1007/s00222-003-0345-0. URL https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00222-003-0345-0.
  12. [12]Philippe Eyssidieux and Louis Funar. Orbifold Kähler groups related to mapping class groups. Author-hosted preprint, 2025. URL https://www-fourier.univ-grenoble-alpes.fr/~funar/mcgokahgpv25.pdf. Revision dated September 30, 2025; initial version arXiv:2112.06726 (2021).
  13. [13]Philippe Eyssidieux, Ludmil Katzarkov, Tony Pantev, and Mohan Ramachandran. Linear Shafarevich conjecture. Annals of Mathematics, 176(3):1545–1581, 2012. doi: 10.4007/annals.2012.176.3.4. URL https://annals.math.princeton.edu/2012/176-3/p04.DOI
  14. [14]E. S. Golod. On nil-algebras and finitely approximable p-groups. Izvestiya Akademii Nauk SSSR. Seriya Matematicheskaya, 28(2):273–276, 1964. URL https://www.mathnet.ru/eng/im2956. In Russian.DOI
  15. [15]E. S. Golod and I. R. Shafarevich. On the class field tower. Izvestiya Akademii Nauk SSSR. Seriya Matematicheskaya, 28(2):261–272, 1964. URL https://www.mathnet.ru/eng/im2955. In Russian.
  16. [16]Alexander Grothendieck et al. Revêtements étales et groupe fondamental (SGA 1), volume 3 of Documents Mathématiques. Société Mathématique de France, 2003. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0206203v2. Revised edition of Lecture Notes in Mathematics 224 (1971).
  17. [17]R. V. Gurjar and A. R. Shastri. Covering spaces of an elliptic surface. Compositio Mathematica, 54(1):95–104, 1985. URL https://www.numdam.org/item/CM_1985__54_1_95_0/.
  18. [18]Ludmil Katzarkov. Nilpotent groups and universal coverings of smooth projective varieties. Journal of Differential Geometry, 45(2):336–348, 1997. doi: 10.4310/jdg/1214459801. URL https://doi.org/10.4310/jdg/1214459801.
  19. [19]Ludmil Katzarkov and Mohan Ramachandran. On the universal coverings of algebraic surfaces. Annales scientifiques de l’École Normale Supérieure, 31(4):525–535, 1998. doi: 10.1016/S0012-9593(98)80105-5. URL https://www.numdam.org/item/ASENS_1998_4_31_4_525_0/.DOI
  20. [20]János Kollár. Shafarevich maps and plurigenera of algebraic varieties. Inventiones mathematicae, 113(1):177–215, 1993. doi: 10.1007/BF01244307. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01244307.
  21. [21]Brendon Lasell and Mohan Ramachandran. Observations on harmonic maps and singular varieties. Annales scientifiques de l’École Normale Supérieure, 29(2):135–148, 1996. doi: 10.24033/asens.1737. URL https://www.numdam.org/item/ASENS_1996_4_29_2_135_0/.DOI
  22. [22]Stanislaw Łojasiewicz. Triangulation of semi-analytic sets. Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Classe di Scienze (3), 18(4):449–474, 1964. URL https://numdam.org/item/ASNSP_1964_3_18_4_449_0/.
  23. [23]OpenAI. The abelianity conjecture for special compact Kähler manifolds. OpenAI Math Release preprint OAI:The-abelianity-conjecture-for-special-compact-Kahler-manifolds-September-23-2026, 2026.
  24. [24]OpenAI. Semialgebraic universal covers of normal projective varieties. OpenAI Math Release preprint OAI:Semialgebraic-universal-covers-of-normal-projective-varieties-September-24-2026, 2026.
  25. [25]Igor R. Shafarevich. Basic Algebraic Geometry. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1974. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-96200-4. URL https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-642-96200-4.DOI
  26. [26]The Stacks Project Authors. The Stacks Project, 2026. URL https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/. Accessed 1 October 2026.
  27. [27]Ė. B. Vinberg. On the theorem concerning the infinite-dimensionality of an associative algebra. Izvestiya Akademii Nauk SSSR. Seriya Matematicheskaya, 29(1):209–214, 1965. URL https://www.mathnet.ru/eng/im2905. In Russian.

Paper details

Contents