alphaFeedback

WorksPhysics and Astronomy

Conformal Description of Near-Horizon Vacuum States

AI contributions
Not recorded for this paper
View details

Abstract

Motivated by recent work suggesting observably large spacetime fluctuations in the causal development of an empty region of flat space, we conjecture that these metric fluctuations can be quantitatively described in terms of a conformal field theory of near-horizon vacuum states. One consequence of this conjecture is that fluctuations in the modular Hamiltonian ΔKΔK of a causal diamond are equal to the entanglement entropy: ⟨ΔK2⟩=⟨K⟩=A(Σd−2)4Gd\langle ΔK^2 \rangle = \langle K \rangle = \frac{A(Σ_{d-2})}{4 G_d}, where A(Σd−2)A(Σ_{d-2}) is the area of the entangling surface in dd dimensions. Our conjecture applies to flat space, the cosmological horizon of dS, and AdS Ryu-Takayanagi diamonds, but not to large finite area diamonds in the bulk of AdS. We focus on three pieces of quantitative evidence, from a Randall-Sundrum II braneworld, from the conformal description of black hole horizons, and from the fluid-gravity correspondence. Our hypothesis also suggests that a broader range of formal results can be brought to bear on observables in flat and dS spaces.

Introduction

Because a detector in any experiment follows a time-like trajectory for a finite proper time, an experimental measurement defines a causal diamond of finite proper time. The covariant entropy bound (CEB) asserts that the maximal entropy of any quantum state of the diamond in dd dimensions is less than A(Σd−2)/4GdA(\Sigma_{d-2})/4G_d, where A(Σd−2)A(\Sigma_{d-2}) is the area of the bifurcation surface of the diamond. Remarkably this bound takes an identical form to the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy, and has been shown to be saturated in several situations where there is no black hole. For example

  • In any quantum field theory, tracing out the complement of the region bounded by Σd−2\Sigma_{d-2} produces a density matrix which is thermal with respect to an operator called the modular Hamiltonian. In CFTs with an Einstein-Hilbert (EH) dual1 the thermal and entanglement entropy are A(Σd−2)/4GdA(\Sigma_{d-2})/4G_d [1, 2], where A(Σd−2)A(\Sigma_{d-2}) is the area of a Rindler diamond in AdS space.

  • In gravity, diamonds in maximally symmetric spacetimes obey a first law of the form dHζ=−T dSdH_\zeta=-T\,dS, where 2πT=κ2\pi T=\kappa is the surface gravity of the horizon, S=A(Σd−2)/4GdS=A(\Sigma_{d-2})/4G_d is the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy, and HζH_\zeta is the total Hamiltonian generating flow along a conformal Killing vector (CKV) ζ\zeta that preserves the diamond [3]. The authors of [3] argue that the modular Hamiltonian for causal diamonds in such spaces is the quantum generator of the CKV that

preserves the diamond, evaluated at a point on the diamond’s bifurcation surface. Below, we will embed this generator in a Virasoro algebra.

  • The entanglement entropy of causal diamonds may in some cases be computed with Euclidean methods. One obtains a finite result Sent=A(Σd−2)/4GdS_{\mathrm{ent}} = A(\Sigma_{d-2})/4G_d [4–8].

  • In general quantum field theories, states with finite numbers of local operators acting on the vacuum state exhibit UV divergent entanglement entropy proportional to the area A(Σd−2)A(\Sigma_{d-2}) of the entangling surface [9]. This is interpreted as a renormalization of Newton’s constant [4] if one assumes the Covariant Entropy Bound is saturated for general diamonds. Note that this point is conceptually distinct from the use of field theory in the AdS/CFT correspondence. Here, the field theory in question is a bulk effective field theory.

These results lead one to consider the idea that the logarithm of the dimension of the Hilbert space of a causal diamond is A(Σd−2)4Gd\frac{A(\Sigma_{d-2})}{4G_d}, with A(Σd−2)A(\Sigma_{d-2}) the area of the bifurcation surface defined by light sheets [10–12]. Let us outline the steps leading to these conclusions in more detail. The density matrix ρ\rho of any quantum field theory, restricted to such a diamond, is given by (see e.g. [2])

ρ=e−KTr⁡(e−K),(1)\rho= \frac{e^{-K}}{\operatorname{Tr}(e^{-K})}, \tag*{(1)}

which defines the modular Hamiltonian KK of the diamond. For a CFT, the general form of the modular Hamiltonian (for any state obtained by acting on the vacuum with a finite number of local operators, space-like separated from the diamond) is known in terms of the stress tensor TabT_{ab} and the CKV ζb\zeta^b,

K=Hζ=∫dVd−1aTabζb,K = H_\zeta= \int dV^a_{d-1} T_{ab}\zeta^b,

where Vd−1V_{d-1}, shown as shaded disks in Fig. I, is a volume element (at fixed time) in the CFT. Such a density matrix allows one to compute the thermodynamic quantities ⟨K⟩\langle K\rangle and its fluctuations ⟨ΔK2⟩\langle\Delta K^2\rangle via the free energy

Fn=−1nlog⁡tr⁡(e−nK),(2)F_n = -\frac{1}{n}\log\operatorname{tr}\left(e^{-nK}\right), \tag*{(2)}

such that

⟨K⟩=ddn(nFn)∣n=1(3)\langle K\rangle= \left.\frac{d}{dn}(nF_n)\right|_{n=1} \tag*{(3)}
⟨ΔK2⟩=−d2dn2(nFn)∣n=1.(4)\langle\Delta K^2\rangle= -\left.\frac{d^2}{dn^2}(nF_n)\right|_{n=1}. \tag*{(4)}

Here we have used the “replica index” nn is a stand-in for the inverse temperature of the system β\beta. For continuous nn the formula for FnF_n embeds the modular Hamiltonian in a one parameter set of thermal density matrices. For integer values of nn there is a path integral over branched covers of the original manifold, which allows one to perform calculations semi-classically. The replica trick thus allows one to relate the thermodynamic entropy to geometric variations of the diamond, as considered by many authors, including [6, 7, 13]. In particular, by identifying the Euclidean gravitational effective action by the relation nFn=In−nI1nF_n = I_n - nI_1, one finds the geometric entropy of Ref. [6] is

Sgeom=⟨K⟩=∂n(In−nI1)∣n=1,(5)S_{\mathrm{geom}} = \langle K \rangle= \left.\partial_n\left(I_n - nI_1\right)\right|_{n=1}, \tag*{(5)}

in which case the geometric and entanglement entropies are equivalent. The geometric entropy has been shown, for the case of an extremal entangling surface, to be (e.g. [7, 13, 14])

Sgeom=A(Σd−2)4Gd.(6)S_{\mathrm{geom}} = \frac{A(\Sigma_{d-2})}{4G_d}. \tag*{(6)}

Note this quantity should be thought of as a renormalized entropy. If one imposes a UV cutoff, the infinity is regularized to Λd−2A(Σd−2)\Lambda^{d-2} A(\Sigma_{d-2}). It was proposed in [4] that this infinity could be absorbed in a universal way into the definition of Newton’s constant GdG_d, in any theory of quantum gravity well-approximated by the Einstein-Hilbert action. This formula originated in the work of Carlip and Teitelboim [5] and of Susskind [4], and was also anticipated in earlier work of Srednicki [9]. The same relation holds in AdS/CFT for the entanglement entropy of a causal diamond anchored to the boundary [15]

⟨K⟩=Sent=A(Σd−2)4G,(7)\langle K \rangle= S_{\mathrm{ent}} = \frac{A(\Sigma_{d-2})}{4G}, \tag*{(7)}

where A(Σd−2)A(\Sigma_{d-2}) is now the area of the bifurcate horizon in the bulk (known as the Ryu-Takayanagi (RT) surface).

Since the number of degrees of freedom at large scales is smaller than what would be naively expected from Quantum Field Theory, this naturally suggests that there may be correlations between the degrees-of-freedom. It has been suggested that such correlations could be observable in modern interferometers, mostly based on heuristic holographic arguments and matrix theory [16–18]. The first realistic theoretical proposal for calculating fluctuations of observables in finite causal diamonds (such as interferometers measure), utilizing modern holographic techniques, was made in Refs. [19, 20], and an effective field theory description was formulated in Ref. [21]. It is easy to understand the relevance of a finite size causal diamond to an interferometer experiment – a single pass of the interferometer defines a causal diamond in space-time, with the geodesic of the beam splitter following the center of the diamond from tip-to-tip and the far mirror intersecting the diamond at the outside corner. This is shown in Fig. I (see also the figure in Ref. [19]).

Depiction of a causal diamond with the arms of the interferometer shown on the bifurcate horizon

Figure 1. Depiction of a causal diamond, with the arms of the interferometer shown on the bifurcate horizon. The worldlines of the beamsplitter and mirror (not shown for clarity of representation) flow vertically. The entangling surface is denoted as Σd−2\Sigma_{d-2}, where the far mirrors of the interferometer measure the quantum uncertainty in the position of this surface. The vertical arrows show lines of flow of the conformal Killing vector ζ\zeta.

The results of [20] were particularly interesting, because they revealed an unanticipated universality in the ratio between the fluctuations of entanglement entropy2 and the entanglement entropy itself. For any system with an entanglement spectrum3 whose Laplace transform is dominated by a Gaussian peak4, we expect a relation

⟨ΔK⟩2=α⟨K⟩.(8)\langle\Delta K\rangle^2 = \alpha\langle K\rangle. \tag*{(8)}

The authors of [20] found that, for RT diamonds, the bulk dual of a causal diamond on the boundary in a conformal field theory with an Einstein-Hilbert (EH) dual,

α=1.(9)\alpha= 1. \tag*{(9)}

This is independent of all details of the CFT, including its dimension. Although any O(1)O(1) value of α\alpha is interesting, the observation of a universal value would be both phenomenologically and theoretically striking. It provides a precise target for experimental investigation, and also gives important information about the general principles underlying a theory of quantum gravity.

In the literature, the fluctuations of the modular Hamiltonian have been called the capacity of entanglement [22, 23]. We will use this term, and the phrase modular fluctuations interchangeably.

The result of [20] was obtained by using black hole entropy formulae for topological black holes, obtained by small (replica) deformations of AdS/Rindler space. It is notable that the result is confirmed by an independent calculation. Perlmutter [24], using the observations of [25] [2] that Renyi entropies of spherical diamonds in CFTs could be computed as thermal entropies of the same CFT in hyperbolic space, showed that for a general CFT α\alpha was proportional to the coefficient in the stress tensor two-point function. When applied to CFTs with an Einstein-Hilbert dual, this formula gives α=1\alpha= 1 [26].

Because no experiment exists in the bulk of AdS, we need to be able to calculate modular fluctuations in causal diamonds small compared to the radius defined by the cosmological constant (c.c.). We will carry out a few simple calculations, and make a few observations, to make the case for a universal value of α=1\alpha= 1 in small (i.e. Minkowski) and RT diamonds. We will argue that we expect the same result to hold for the cosmological horizon in dS.

  1. First, we calculate ⟨ΔK2⟩\langle\Delta K^2\rangle on a flat Randall-Sundrum brane [27]. The Randall-Sundrum model relates gravity weakly coupled to a CFT with an EH dual, to the physics on an infinite flat brane in AdS space. This simple model for QG in flat space gives α=1\alpha= 1.

  1. Second, we make a conjecture stemming from seminal work of Carlip and Solodukhin [28, 29, 30, 31, 32] relating the entropy of black holes to the representation theory of a near-horizon Virasoro algebra. We will generalize this conjecture to small empty diamonds and the cosmological horizon of dS space. It states that the modular Hamiltonian of a diamond has an entanglement spectrum identical to that of the asymptotic L0L_0 generator in a 1+11+1 dimensional CFT where the Cardy formula is correct. In fact, the result α=1\alpha= 1 depends only on the scaling of the log density of states with L0L_0 eigenvalue,

ln⁡ρ(L0)=BL0,(10)\ln\rho(L_0) = B\sqrt{L_0}, \tag*{(10)}

with BB a large constant. Below we will call the eigenvalues of the L0L_0 generator EIEI, where EE is the energy of the CFT, quantized on an interval of length II. The full Cardy formula is necessary to get the exact result for the entanglement entropy [31, 32].

  1. Lastly, the fluid gravity correspondence: a large number of works over the years [33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39] (and references therein) have shown that near-horizon Einstein equations, subjected to a few global boundary conditions, reduce to the Navier-Stokes (NS) equation, with universal coefficients. In particular [40] showed that the ratio of shear viscosity to entropy density for small diamonds, is universal and agreed with that found in [41, 42] for large black holes in AdS. The fluctuation

dissipation theorem (FDT) then tells us that fluctuations should be universal. The fluctuations relevant to the incompressible NS equation are those of the 0i0i components of the Brown-York stress tensor, evaluated on the “stretched horizon,” a time-like “hyperboloid” that approaches the bifurcation surface of the horizon at a minimal distance of one Planck unit. These entropy fluctuations are not the main focus of the present paper, but their universality gives credence to the idea that entropy fluctuations are also universal.

One way of understanding our results is as a conformal description of near-horizon states. The near-horizon limit will be taken for the causal diamond described by a metric with “blackening factor” f(r)f(r),

ds2=−f(r)dt2+dr2f(r)+r2dΣd−22.(11)ds^2=-f(r)dt^2+\frac{dr^2}{f(r)}+r^2d\Sigma_{d-2}^2. \tag*{(11)}

This metric covers a causal diamond with different blackening factors depending on the background. For example, in empty Minkowski, f(r)=1−r/Rf(r)=1-r/R [19], where RR is the radius of the bifurcation surface of the diamond boundary, and for boundary anchored diamonds in AdS, f(r)=r2/L2−1f(r)=r^2/L^2-1, where LL is the AdS curvature.

In the near-horizon limit, we can incorporate metric fluctuations by linearizing the blackening factor about the entangling surface at some position rnr_n:

ds2=−4πTn(r−rn)dt2+dr24πTn(r−rn)+rn2dΣd−22.(12)ds^2=-4\pi T_n(r-r_n)dt^2+\frac{dr^2}{4\pi T_n(r-r_n)}+r_n^2d\Sigma_{d-2}^2. \tag*{(12)}

where the temperature is Tn=f′(rn)/4πT_n=f'(r_n)/4\pi. In the language of [14], rnr_n is the position of a cosmic d−2d-2 brane, which sources the fluctuation of the geometry. This mirrors the argument of [19] which identifies the fluctuations as due to a gravitating mass distribution near the horizon of the classical geometry. For the case of boundary anchored diamonds in AdS, the dependence of rnr_n on TnT_n can be computed by insisting that when T1=nTnT_1=nT_n the global geometry be asymptotic to an nn-fold cover of the boundary, branched over the sphere to which the RT surface asymptotes. Throughout this paper we will refer to the undeformed geometries having n=1n=1 to have a horizon radius rn=1≡r0r_{n=1}\equiv r_0 and with corresponding horizon temperature T0=β0−1T_0=\beta_0^{-1}.

In the near-horizon limit, we will see, following the analysis of Solodukhin and as discussed in point 2 of the enumerated list above, that the dd-dimensional Einstein-Hilbert action can be reduced to a classical 2-d conformal field theory on the light cone directions. A plausible assumption about how the algebra of that CFT is realized in the quantum theory will allow us to obtain α=1\alpha=1. We will argue that such a calculation will accurately reproduce the global near-horizon behavior when the proper time for an inertial diamond observer is of the order of, or larger than, the radius rnr_n of the entangling surface. We will see that this criterion is met for RT and small diamonds in AdS and the cosmological horizon of dS, but not for large diamonds in AdS.

More importantly, this assumption also offers concrete paths forward for modeling the near-horizon behavior of quantum gravity even in ordinary flat space, utilizing the beautiful and powerful techniques of 2-d CFTs. We reserve further work along these directions for the future. The outline of this paper follows the numbered list above. In the next section we show how ⟨ΔK2⟩=⟨K⟩=A(B)4Gd\langle\Delta K^2\rangle= \langle K\rangle= \frac{A(B)}{4G_d} in a spherical ball B\mathcal{B} on a flat RS-II brane having Newton’s constant GdG_d. In Sec. III, we consider that this same result is derived from positing that the near-horizon dynamics of a causal diamond is described by a 2-d CFT with density of states given by the Cardy formula. We also relate our conjecture of universal entropy fluctuations to [40], which showed that the famous result [43] that the viscosity to entropy density ratio for large black holes in AdS is ηs=14π\frac{\eta}{s}=\frac{1}{4\pi}, valid for any weakly curved null surface in a model satisfying the Einstein equations. In Sec. IV we discuss why the results of Secs. II-III are not expected to apply to large diamonds in the bulk of AdS. Finally, in Sec. V, we show how entropy fluctuations give rise to fluctuations in the time-of-arrival in a light beam that traces out the causal development of B\mathcal{B}, by following a series of nested causal diamonds. Though utilizing distinct methods, these results on length fluctuations exactly agree with Ref. [20].

RS-II Flat Brane in AdS/CFT

We begin by considering a braneworld set-up as shown in Fig. II. For continuity, our notation largely follows that of Ref. [20]. Our goal is to compute the modular energy ⟨K⟩\langle K\rangle and its fluctuations ⟨ΔK2⟩\langle\Delta K^2\rangle in the volume enclosed by the spherical entangling surface B\mathcal{B} on the brane, utilizing a bulk holographic calculation. We begin with a d=D+1d=D+1 dimensional bulk AdS space with AdS curvature LL and metric in Poincare coordinates

ds2=L2dz2+dxi2−dx02z2(13)ds^2=L^2\frac{dz^2+dx_i^2-dx_0^2}{z^2} \tag*{(13)}

with i=1,…,D−1i=1,\ldots,D-1. We take the flat DD-dimensional brane located at some position zcz_c in the bulk, as also shown in the figure. In such a set-up, gravity is induced on the brane, with a dimensionally reduced Newton constant (e.g. [44])

GD=D−22LGd.(14)G_D=\frac{D-2}{2L}G_d. \tag*{(14)}

The measuring apparatus is confined to the brane (labeled by B\mathcal{B}), with light beams from a beam splitter (shown at the bottom of the brane causal diamond) reflecting off a mirror at the bifurcate horizon on the brane, and recombining again at the top of the causal diamond. The causal diamond on the brane anchors the Ryu-Takayanagi (RT) surface Σd−2\Sigma_{d-2} in the bulk. This spatial slice of Vd−1V_{d-1} (shown as shaded) is given by z2+xi2≤R2z^2+x_i^2\le R^2, and the full interior of the bulk diamond is given by

Depiction of the RS-II braneworld scenario

Figure 2. Depiction of the RS-II braneworld scenario. The boundary is located at z=0z=0 and the RS-II brane at z=zcz=z_c. We compute the modular fluctuations ⟨ΔK2⟩\langle\Delta K^2\rangle in the volume enclosed by B\mathcal{B} at the bifurcate horizon on the brane causal diamond, utilizing the holographic map from the bulk RT surface, shown in darker red and labeled Σd−2\Sigma_{d-2}.

R2−z2−xi2+x02≥2R∣x0∣.(15)R^2-z^2-x_i^2+x_0^2\ge2R\lvert x_0\rvert. \tag*{(15)}

The modular fluctuations ⟨ΔK2⟩\langle\Delta K^2\rangle can also be calculated in the bulk [20], with the result α=1\alpha=1, as noted in the introduction. In the bulk of AdS, Ref. [20] showed that these modular fluctuations gravitate and induce metric fluctuations.

Because gravity is induced on the brane, with strength given by Eq. (14), an instrument on a brane at zcz_c will also experience modular energy fluctuations. To relate the bulk and brane modular fluctuations, we must geometrically relate the transverse area of the surface on the brane A(B)A(\mathcal{B}) to the RT bulk surface Σd−2\Sigma_{d-2} which is anchored to it.

To do this, it is useful to put the metric on the interior of the bulk causal diamond into AdS-Rindler form, Eq. (11). Here the transverse plane (having the entangling surface) can be written as

dΣd−22=dρ2+sinh⁡2ρ dΩd−22.(16)d\Sigma_{d-2}^2=d\rho^2+\sinh^2\rho\,d\Omega_{d-2}^2. \tag*{(16)}

The bulk light cone directions rr, tt are related to the Poincare coordinates via

R2−z2−xi2+x022Rz=(r2L2−1)1/2cosh⁡tL,x0z=(r2L2−1)1/2sinh⁡tL,(17)\frac{R^2-z^2-x_i^2+x_0^2}{2Rz}=\left(\frac{r^2}{L^2}-1\right)^{1/2}\cosh\frac{t}{L},\qquad\frac{x_0}{z}=\left(\frac{r^2}{L^2}-1\right)^{1/2}\sinh\frac{t}{L}, \tag*{(17)}

while the transverse direction is

∣xi∣=Rtanh⁡ρ.(18)\lvert x_i\rvert=R\tanh\rho. \tag*{(18)}

The blackening function is of the standard (topological) black hole form

f(r)=(r2L2−1)+4πM(d−2)rd−3Ld−2A(Σd−2)4Gd(19)f(r)=\left(\frac{r^2}{L^2}-1\right)+\frac{4\pi M}{(d-2)r^{d-3}}\frac{L^{d-2}}{A(\Sigma_{d-2})}\frac{4G_d}{} \tag*{(19)}

where the black hole mass is replaced with the modular fluctuations M=ΔK2πLM=\frac{\Delta K}{2\pi L}, following Ref. [20].

These modular fluctuations hence cause geometric fluctuations. We seek to understand the relation between the modular fluctuations computed in the bulk and those induced on the brane.

To do this, we relate the area appearing in Eq. (7) to the area of the entangling surface on the brane A(B)A(\mathcal{B}). Now the area of the RT surface is

A(Σd−2)=LD−1ΩD−2∫0ρcdρ sinh⁡D−2ρ.(20)A(\Sigma_{d-2})=L^{D-1}\Omega_{D-2}\int_{0}^{\rho_c}d\rho\,\sinh^{D-2}\rho. \tag*{(20)}

The location of the entangling surface is found by noting that the transformations between Poincare and topological BH coordinates imply that the bulk diamond satisfies

((R−x0)2−z2−xi22Rz)((R+x0)2−z2−xi22Rz)=r2L2−1.(21)\left(\frac{(R-x_0)^2-z^2-x_i^2}{2Rz}\right)\left(\frac{(R+x_0)^2-z^2-x_i^2}{2Rz}\right)=\frac{r^2}{L^2}-1. \tag*{(21)}

We can thus see that Σd−2\Sigma_{d-2} is located at x0=0x_0=0 and z2+xi2=R2z^2+x_i^2=R^2. We also find that fixing zcz_c is equivalent to fixing the brane location in the bulk according to the relation

zc=R1−tanh⁡2ρc=Rcosh⁡ρc,(22)z_c=R\sqrt{1-\tanh^2\rho_c}=\frac{R}{\cosh\rho_c}, \tag*{(22)}

such that zc≪Rz_c\ll R is equivalent to ρc≫1\rho_c\gg1.

Since the bulk RT diamond is anchored to the boundary diamond, a light beam traveling from tip-to-tip on the boundary diamond will arrive at the same time as a light beam traveling from tip-to-tip on the bulk RT diamond. This time is given by

T=Lzc(R−zc)=L(cosh⁡ρc−1)≈eρc2L.(23)T=\frac{L}{z_c}(R-z_c)=L(\cosh\rho_c-1)\approx\frac{e^{\rho_c}}{2}L. \tag*{(23)}

Then, combining Eq. (20) with Eq. (14), we have

A(Σd−2)4Gd≃LD−2ΩD−24GD(eρc2)D−2,(24)\frac{A(\Sigma_{d-2})}{4G_d}\simeq\frac{L^{D-2}\Omega_{D-2}}{4G_D}\left(\frac{e^{\rho_c}}{2}\right)^{D-2}, \tag*{(24)}

where we are taking the ρc≫1\rho_c\gg1 limit. We now identify

A(B)=LD−2ΩD−2(eρc2)D−2,(25)A(\mathcal{B})=L^{D-2}\Omega_{D-2}\left(\frac{e^{\rho_c}}{2}\right)^{D-2}, \tag*{(25)}

as the area of D−2D-2 dimensional surface B\mathcal{B}. Therefore, utilizing the α=1\alpha=1 result for bulk RT diamonds of Ref. [20], we have

⟨ΔK2⟩=A(Σd−2)4Gd=A(B)4GD.(26)\langle\Delta K^2\rangle=\frac{A(\Sigma_{d-2})}{4G_d}=\frac{A(\mathcal{B})}{4G_D}. \tag*{(26)}

This suggests that modular Hamiltonian fluctuations in Minkowski space are the same as in AdS, i.e. α=1\alpha= 1.

Note that very similar reasoning, applied now to ⟨K⟩\langle K\rangle rather than ⟨ΔK2⟩\langle\Delta K^2\rangle, gives

⟨K⟩=A(Σd−2)4Gd=A(B)4GD.(27)\langle K\rangle= \frac{A(\Sigma_{d-2})}{4G_d} = \frac{A(\mathcal{B})}{4G_D}. \tag*{(27)}

The vacuum entanglement entropy of a causal diamond on an RS-II brane was also calculated by independent methods in Ref. [44], and the same result was obtained, supporting the results obtained here.

At first sight ⟨ΔK2⟩=⟨K⟩\langle\Delta K^2\rangle= \langle K\rangle for Minkowski diamonds may seem surprising, so we explore next why this result could have been expected from the dynamics of conformal field theories in the near-horizon limit.

Near-Horizon Dynamics

We first consider a general coordinate system that covers a causal diamond characterized by a geodesic proper time TpropT_{\mathrm{prop}}. There is a different near-horizon behavior for large finite diamonds than for boundary-anchored and small diamonds in AdS, or the cosmological horizon of dS space. The essential difference is simple, and determined by whether the inequality

Tpropd−2≳A(Σd−2)(28)T_{\mathrm{prop}}^{d-2} \gtrsim A(\Sigma_{d-2}) \tag*{(28)}

is satisfied. If it is, our claim is that there is sufficient time for the near-horizon dynamics to equilibrate the state of the system, and α=1\alpha= 1.

  1. For diamonds smaller than the curvature radius LL, area scales like Tpropd−2T_{\mathrm{prop}}^{d-2} and this scaling relation is valid for the proper time along any trajectory of finite acceleration.

  1. For the cosmological horizon of dS the proper time along any timelike trajectory connecting the tips of the causal patch can be arbitrarily long, while the area is bounded by Ld−2L^{d-2}. Thus, localized probes of the horizon measure the equilibrium behavior of the entire diamond.

  1. For boundary-anchored diamonds in AdS, the same is true, though in this case the system has infinite entropy.

In all three of these cases, Eq. (28) is satisfied. By contrast, for finite area diamonds in AdS, the proper time along any trajectory is bounded by Lπ2\frac{L\pi}{2}, while the area can be arbitrarily large. Although the local near-horizon dynamics is identical to that of the other kinds of diamonds, no diamond observer can follow the system long enough to probe the equilibrium state. The calculations of this section are valid locally on all horizons with the near-horizon Rindler factorization exhibited below.

The authors of [45, 46] have argued that the behavior of the quasi-normal modes on Minkowski diamonds indicates that the quantum systems responsible for the equilibration are in fact fast scramblers. The same arguments apply to the cosmological horizon of dS space, and indeed to the local behavior on any diamond horizon. Fast scrambling systems have a characteristic time scale t0t_0 and become completely equilibrated in a time t0ln⁡St_0\ln S where SS is the total number of q-bits in the system. For small black holes t0t_0 is the Schwarzschild radius, while for the dS horizon it is the Hubble time. For AdS-Rindler t0t_0 is the AdS radius LL. In all three of the cases enumerated above, t0ln⁡St_0\ln S is of the same order or smaller than the proper time along trajectories in the diamond and one can explore the equilibration of perturbations over the entire horizon within the proper time available to a detector on such a trajectory. For AdS-Rindler we must cut off the zz coordinate on the hyperboloid, similarly to the RS-II model, to render the entropy finite in order to make this statement unambiguous.

In the case of large AdS diamonds/black holes, however, the local quasi-normal modes dissipate after having spread to only a distance ∼L\sim L on the horizon, which is much smaller than their Schwarzschild radius. Furthermore, as we will recall below, the quasi-normal spectrum of large AdS diamonds includes sound modes with wavelengths >L> L, which indicate ballistic propagation of energy and entropy densities, rather than fast scrambling. By contrast, the quasi-normal spectrum of all other horizons, including AdS-Rindler space does not have sound modes. We believe that this is an indication that our local calculation of the modular fluctuations is valid for any causal diamond with a Rindler horizon, but that the thermal equilibrium ensemble dual to a large radius AdS causal diamond can have a different value of α\alpha because its entropy is dominated by modes that propagate ballistically on the large horizon. This is of course the message of the AdS/CFT correspondence. The equilibrium dynamics is that of a local field theory on the sphere.

Our claim, following the work of Carlip [31] and Solodukhin [32], is that locally on the bifurcation surface of a diamond with a Rindler near-horizon expansion, the quantum dynamics is governed by a Virasoro algebra in a representation satisfying Cardy’s theorem. The argument begins with a rigorous classical theorem that the algebra of near-horizon symmetries consists of conformal transformations of the flat two dimensional Rindler space,5 which acts on the horizons of all of these diamonds in space-time. It is important to note that the L0L_0 generator of this algebra is precisely the CKV of the background geometry which switches from time-like to space-like on the diamond boundary. The quantum generator associated with the action of this CKV on the bifurcation surface of the diamond was proposed [2, 3] to be the modular Hamiltonian of the diamond. It has been shown [31, 32] that, using the symplectic structure derived from the EH Lagrangian, the Poisson brackets of these generators have a central charge and there is a classical value for the L0L_0 generator, coming from the boundary terms. If one assumes that the quantum model of horizons is a representation of the Virasoro algebra satisfying the constraints giving rise to the Cardy formula for the asymptotic density of L0L_0 eigenvalues, then that formula reproduces the Bekenstein-Hawking area law for black holes.6

We will summarize and generalize these arguments using the formalism of Solodukhin [32], who dimensionally reduced the Einstein-Hilbert action on a class of metrics of the form

ds2=gabdyadyb+ρ2(y)dΣd−22=ρ2(y)[ρ−2gabdyadyb+dΣd−22].(29)ds^2 = g_{ab}dy^a dy^b + \rho^2(y)d\Sigma^2_{d-2} = \rho^2(y)[\rho^{-2}g_{ab}dy^a dy^b + d\Sigma^2_{d-2}]. \tag*{(29)}

Solodukhin assumed that dΣd−22d\Sigma^2_{d-2} was the round metric on a sphere. We will argue that in fact dΣd−22d\Sigma^2_{d-2} can be any fixed d−2d-2 dimensional Riemannian manifold, and gabg_{ab} a two dimensional Lorentzian metric, which we will soon restrict to be Rindler space. Evaluated on such a configuration, the EH action reduces to a metric for dilaton gravity, with the dilaton a function of ρ\rho. Such metrics, in the near-horizon limit, can be expanded, following Solodukhin, in the form of Eq. (12). For our purposes, the transverse metric dΣd−22d\Sigma^2_{d-2} can be any Riemannian manifold, for which this reduction produces a valid solution of the dd dimensional Einstein equations. To see the reduction, note that the metric g~\tilde{g} in square brackets is a product manifold so that

Rd(g~μν)=R2(ρ−2gab)+Rd−2.(30)R_d(\tilde{g}_{\mu\nu}) = R_2(\rho^{-2}g_{ab}) + R_{d-2}. \tag*{(30)}

Our metric is conformal to this one so that [47]

R(gμν)=ρ−2Rd(g~μν)+2ρ−1(d−1)g~ab∇~a∇~b(ρ−1)−d(d−1)g~ab∂aρ−1∂bρ−1.(31)R(g_{\mu\nu}) = \rho^{-2}R_d(\tilde{g}_{\mu\nu}) + 2\rho^{-1}(d-1)\tilde{g}^{ab}\tilde{\nabla}_a\tilde{\nabla}_b(\rho^{-1}) - d(d-1)\tilde{g}^{ab}\partial_a\rho^{-1}\partial_b\rho^{-1}. \tag*{(31)}

Here we have used the fact that the conformal factor depends only on the two dimensional coordinates, to simplify the general relation between scalar curvatures of conformally related metrics.

Combining the last two equations, we see that the geometry of the d−2d-2 dimensional bifurcation surface enters into the two dimensional Lagrangian only via overall factors of the area of the surface and its integrated scalar curvature. Furthermore, the d−2d-2 dimensional curvature term multiplies something that is a pure potential for the dilaton, with no derivatives of the two dimensional fields.

As we will see below, Solodukhin argues that such potential terms become irrelevant near the horizon, where the theory thus becomes conformal.

The upshot of these remarks is that we can translate Solodukhin’s analysis of spherically symmetric black hole horizons to the bifurcate horizon of a causal diamond in a Lorentzian space-time solving the Einstein equations. Moreover, the argument that the curvature of the bifurcation surface is negligible near the horizon implies that the calculation is ultra-local on the horizon. This is quite analogous to the replica calculation of ⟨K⟩\langle K\rangle and ⟨ΔK2⟩\langle\Delta K^2\rangle.

We now recapitulate Solodukhin’s analysis of the spherically symmetric case, where he has carried out the algebra of the general discussion of the previous paragraphs. Solodukhin writes the dimensionally reduced action as7

I=−Σd−216πGd∫d2y−g2[ρd−2R2(gab)+(d−3)(d−2)ρd−4(∇ρ)2+(d−3)(d−2)ρd−4].(32)I=-\frac{\Sigma_{d-2}}{16\pi G_d}\int d^2y\sqrt{-g_2}\left[\rho^{d-2}R_2(g_{ab})+(d-3)(d-2)\rho^{d-4}(\nabla\rho)^2+(d-3)(d-2)\rho^{d-4}\right]. \tag*{(32)}

Note that a dd dimensional cosmological constant would similarly add a potential term that is a power of ρ\rho. The field ρ\rho is the radius of the Σd−2\Sigma_{d-2} entangling surface. When we solve its equation of motion it will have the value ρ0\rho_0 at the horizon.

Now let us suppose that there is a solution of the dd dimensional equations, which has a causal diamond whose bifurcation surface has fixed area Σd−2\Sigma_{d-2}, in Planck units. Near the bifurcation surface, generically, the two-dimensional metric will be two dimensional Rindler space as in Eq. (12). Following Solodukhin, define

ρd−2=ρ0d−22πSd−3d−2qϕ.(33)\rho^{d-2}=\rho_0^{d-2}\sqrt{\frac{2\pi}{S}\frac{d-3}{d-2}}q\phi. \tag*{(33)}

where S=Σd−2ρ0d−2/4GdS=\Sigma_{d-2}\rho_0^{d-2}/4G_d and qq is an arbitrary parameter. We immediately see that the dilaton ϕ\phi is related to the area.

One then redefines the background metric by a ϕ\phi dependent Weyl transformation

gab=(ϕ0ϕ)d−3d−2e2ϕΦ0gˉab,(34)g_{ab}=\left(\frac{\phi_0}{\phi}\right)^{\frac{d-3}{d-2}}e^{\frac{2\phi}{\Phi_0}}\bar{g}_{ab}, \tag*{(34)}

where Φ0=2Sπd−3d−2=2q(d−3)/(d−2)ϕ0\Phi_0=\sqrt{\frac{2S}{\pi}\frac{d-3}{d-2}}=2q(d-3)/(d-2)\phi_0, with ϕ0\phi_0 is the value of ϕ\phi near the horizon according to the definition in Eq. (33). The action takes the form

I=−∫d2y−gˉ2[(∇ϕ)22+qϕ(d−3)S(d−2)8πR2(gˉab)+U(ϕ)].(35)I=-\int d^2y\sqrt{-\bar{g}_2}\left[\frac{(\nabla\phi)^2}{2}+q\phi\sqrt{\frac{(d-3)S}{(d-2)8\pi}}R_2(\bar{g}_{ab})+U(\phi)\right]. \tag*{(35)}

Notice that nothing in this derivation requires that the metric is a black hole. The calculation is valid, locally on the transverse space, for any metric that is approximately the product of two-dimensional Rindler space and a transverse manifold, as in Eq. (11). The action above, with U=0U = 0, is called the (free) Liouville action.

Differentiating the free Liouville action with respect to the metric and then setting it equal to the Rindler metric we find that the stress tensor of the ϕ\phi field is [32]

Tab=14[∂aϕ∂bϕ−gˉab(∇ϕ)2]−q(d−3)S(d−2)8π[∂a∂bϕ−gˉab∇2ϕ].(36)T_{ab} = \frac{1}{4}\left[\partial_a\phi\partial_b\phi-\bar{g}_{ab}(\nabla\phi)^2\right]-q\sqrt{\frac{(d-3)S}{(d-2)8\pi}}\left[\partial_a\partial_b\phi-\bar{g}_{ab}\nabla^2\phi\right]. \tag*{(36)}

The trace vanishes when the flat space equation of motion ∇2ϕ=0\nabla^2\phi= 0 is satisfied, verifying that this is a classical conformal field theory. Importantly, this criterion is met in the near-horizon limit. This is most easily seen by defining

z=−14πT0ln⁡(r−r0)+z0,(37)z=-\frac{1}{4\pi T_0}\ln\left(r-r_0\right)+z_0, \tag*{(37)}

where rr is the spatial Rindler coordinate in Eq. (12), and z0z_0 is a constant defined so that the horizon maps to z=I/2z=I/2, with II taken to infinity at the end of the calculation. In this coordinate system, the blackening factor becomes f(z)=f0e2z/β0f(z)=f_0e^{2z/\beta_0}. Then the trace of Eq. (36) gives an equation of motion for ϕ\phi [32]:

−∂t2ϕ+∂z2ϕ=14qΦ0f(z)R2.(38)-\partial_t^2\phi+\partial_z^2\phi=\frac{1}{4}q\Phi_0f(z)R_2. \tag*{(38)}

The right-hand-side vanishes exponentially as r→r0r\to r_0, and in this limit the theory becomes conformal. The non-vanishing trace can be viewed as the (classical) conformal anomaly of the flat space space Liouville theory in the background two dimensional metric, and it vanishes near the horizon because the metric becomes flat.

More importantly, the classical limit of the representation theory for the conformal spectrum of the free Liouville theory shows that all of the terms in U(ϕ)U(\phi) are relevant perturbations of the free Liouville Lagrangian. The near-horizon limit is the analog of a UV fixed point. We can zoom in on the horizon by rescaling the coordinate r−r0r-r_0, which rescales the Rindler metric by a Weyl transformation. The field ϕ\phi, which plays the role of an invariant entropy, has weight zero under this transformation. Powers of r−r0r-r_0 higher than linear, as well as potential terms for ϕ\phi, scale away like relevant operators at an ultraviolet fixed point. We emphasize that this is a purely classical argument, but we believe the analogy with the renormalization group makes it more transparent. Details of the conformal representation theory for the Liouville theory, with particular emphasis on the classical limit, can be found in [48] and references therein.

We conclude that at the level of classical geometric symmetries, the generator L0L_0, which, according to Refs. [2, 3] becomes the modular Hamiltonian of a diamond in the quantum theory, is embedded in a Virasoro algebra. Our conjecture, following Refs. [31, 32] is that the full Virasoro algebra is realized in the quantum theory, and that its representation satisfies the criteria for Cardy’s theorem.8

Utilizing the z−tz-t coordinate system, which make the conformal symmetry manifest, the Poisson brackets of the dilaton

{ϕ(z),∂tϕ(z′)}PB=δ(z−z′),(39)\{\phi(z), \partial_t\phi(z')\}_{PB} = \delta(z-z'), \tag*{(39)}

allow one to write down the Poisson algebra of the charges T++=T00+T0zT_{++}=T_{00}+T_{0z} by identifying

Ln=I2π∫−I/2I/2dze2πinz/IT++.(40)L_n = \frac{I}{2\pi}\int_{-I/2}^{I/2} dz e^{2\pi i n z/I} T_{++}. \tag*{(40)}

Here II is the length of the finite interval on which the Liouville theory is defined. The LnL_n are, as a result, found to have a Virasoro algebra with central charge

c=6q2d−3d−2S.(41)c = 6q^2\frac{d-3}{d-2}S. \tag*{(41)}

Note that the free scalar stress tensor has vanishing classical central charge, but the canonical Poisson bracket relations have induced a large central charge proportional to the square of the coefficient of the term linear in ϕ\phi. This classical central charge is much larger than the quantum correction to the central charge Δc=1\Delta c=1 of the free scalar, and the quantized ϕ\phi field is not the correct description of the fluctuating degrees of freedom.

To be able to use Cardy’s formula and count the number of states SCFT=2πcL06S_{\mathrm{CFT}}=2\pi\sqrt{\frac{cL_0}{6}}, one must have not only the central charge but also the value of L0L_0. Applying Cardy’s formula will allow us to determine ⟨K⟩\langle K\rangle and ⟨ΔK2⟩\langle\Delta K^2\rangle. Since L0=I2P2/8πL_0=I^2P^2/8\pi, with P=∂zϕP=\partial_z\phi, we need the field configuration. The classical solutions of the Liouville model are right moving waves (the left moving waves don’t contribute to T++T_{++}) and a zero mode solution which is a linear function of zz. The equilibrium configuration of the diamond is described by the zero mode. Solodukhin posits that the correct zero mode is

ϕ=2ϕ0z−β0I−2β0.(42)\phi= 2\phi_0\frac{z-\beta_0}{I-2\beta_0}. \tag*{(42)}

This obviously has the right value at the horizon, while the behavior at z=0z=0 is gotten by imposing that the boundary term in the EH action vanish there.9 L0L_0 for the classical solution is then

L0=ϕ022π,(43)L_0 = \frac{\phi_0^2}{2\pi}, \tag*{(43)}

for which Cardy’s formula is

SCFT=2πcL06=S.(44)S_{\mathrm{CFT}} = 2\pi\sqrt{\frac{cL_0}{6}} = S. \tag*{(44)}

Carlip derived the same result, including the case of rotating black holes, by purely dd dimensional methods.

It is a mistake to think that the quantized Liouville theory is the 1+11+1 dimensional CFT to which the Cardy formula is being applied. In that model the lowest value of L0L_0 is not the conformally invariant state, and Cardy’s formula for the spectral density is not valid. The density of states of the quantized Liouville theory is much too small to account for the entropy of the horizon. Moreover, the Liouville model is integrable, while the entanglement spectra of horizons are expected to be chaotic. Instead, one should think of the results of Carlip and Solodukhin as a classical calculation of black hole entropy, analogous to that following from saddle point approximations to functional integrals over Euclidean metrics. We expect, however, that a stochastic scalar field theory of ϕ\phi, with entropy given by Cardy’s formula, and fluctuations satisfying α=1\alpha= 1, could give an adequate effective description of the full theory. We leave the precise formulation of such an effective description for future work.

It is useful to recall the calculation of Brown and Henneaux [49] which motivated the results of Carlip and Solodukhin. Strominger [50] argued that the Brown-Henneaux calculation should be viewed as an avatar of the AdS/CFT correspondence. The entropy of black holes in AdS3AdS_3 had been, in many cases, shown to be calculable in terms of 1+11+1 CFT. Earlier work of Brown and Henneaux showed that the asymptotic symmetry group of classical AdS3AdS_3 gravity contained a Virasoro algebra (in this case two sided) with a classical central charge. Indeed, the boundary modes of AdS3AdS_3 gravity obey the equations of motion of the Liouville theory. The classical central charge derived from AdS3AdS_3 gravity coincides with the actual central charge of the CFT describing AdS space according to the AdS/CFT correspondence. So the results of Carlip and Solodukhin should be viewed as a conjecture, analogous to the AdS/CFT conjecture, about the near-horizon quantum dynamics of black holes. The conjecture is that the modular Hamiltonian of a small black hole is the L0L_0 generator of a Virasoro algebra in a representation satisfying Cardy’s theorem. We have extended that conjecture to the spectrum of the modular Hamiltonian of any causal diamond with Rindler behavior near its horizon.

While we think this conjecture is extremely plausible, and have argued that Solodukhin’s method generalizes to the near-horizon dynamics of any causal diamond with geometry R2×Σd−2R_2 \times\Sigma_{d-2}, for the purposes of calculating α\alpha, we only need a more modest conjecture. The classical calculations of [31, 32] tell us that that the L0L_0 generator which preserves the diamond is embedded in a Virasoro algebra with a large central charge. Since the modular Hamiltonian KK was also identified in Refs. [2, 3] as the generator of boosts that preserves the diamond, this suggests that L0L_0 should be identified with KK.

We denote the spectrum of eigenvalues of L0L_0 (or equivalently KK) as EE, in which case the density of states, assuming that Cardy’s theorem Eq. (44) is valid for the entropy of the quantum theory, is given by eBEe^{B\sqrt{E}}. We will assume a large constant BB such that we can carry out a saddle point approximation (this corresponds to large entropy). We then identify

βFβ=−(ln⁡∫E1E2dE eBE−βE)(45)\beta F_\beta=-\left(\ln\int_{E_1}^{E_2}dE\,e^{B\sqrt{E}-\beta E}\right) \tag*{(45)}

in Eq. (2), from which one can calculate the modular fluctuations thermodynamically:

⟨ΔK2⟩=β2∂β2(ln⁡∫E1E2dE eBE−βE)∣β=1.(46)\langle\Delta K^2\rangle=\left.\beta^2\partial_\beta^2\left(\ln\int_{E_1}^{E_2}dE\,e^{B\sqrt{E}-\beta E}\right)\right|_{\beta=1}. \tag*{(46)}

For large BB, the integral is dominated by a stationary point on the contour of integration

BE∗=2β.(47)\frac{B}{\sqrt{E_*}}=2\beta. \tag*{(47)}

Taking just the saddle point contribution we have

⟨ΔK2⟩=β2∂β2(B24β)∣β=1=B22β.(48)\langle\Delta K^2\rangle=\left.\beta^2\partial_\beta^2\left(\frac{B^2}{4\beta}\right)\right|_{\beta=1}=\frac{B^2}{2\beta}. \tag*{(48)}

At the same time, the entropy is the microcanonical entropy at the saddle point,

⟨K⟩=BE∗=B22β,(49)\langle K\rangle=B\sqrt{E_*}=\frac{B^2}{2\beta}, \tag*{(49)}

so that α=1\alpha=1. For a 1+11+1 dimensional CFT of course, the results α=1\alpha=1 follows from the fact that the entropy is linear in the temperature as a consequence of scale invariance and extensivity. This calculation shows that the result α=1\alpha=1 is more general than 1+11+1 dimensional CFTs. In particular, it shows that SYK models [51, 52] (by which we mean Hamiltonians with fixed couplings belonging to one of the SYK ensembles) also have α=1\alpha=1 since they all have a density of states ρ(E)∼sinh⁡(BE)\rho(E)\sim\sinh(B\sqrt{E}).10

We recall that for RT diamonds in AdS/CFT with an Einstein-Hilbert dual, the result α=1\alpha=1 was already obtained by multiple independent calculations [53] [20, 22, 23]. If one accepts the RS II conjecture relating gravitational physics on a stabilized brane in AdS space to CFT dynamics, then our calculation in the RS II model extends this result to causal diamonds in Minkowski space. Our generalization of the conjecture of [31, 32] to arbitrary Rindler horizons implies that we should have α=1\alpha=1 for local fluctuations on any such horizon, including the cosmological horizon of dS space. Below we will explain why this conjecture does not contradict the result α=d−2\alpha= d - 2, for large diamonds in AdS space, which follows from the thermal equilibrium fluctuations of large black holes.

Readers uncomfortable with the idea of attributing entropy to empty causal diamonds, should remember the fact that effective field theory implies the existence of a state independent11 entanglement entropy of any such diamond, whose leading term is proportional to A(Σd−2)Λd−2A(\Sigma_{d-2})\Lambda^{d-2}, with Λ\Lambda a UV cutoff. The map in Ref. [2] of this UV divergence into a volume divergence on hyperbolic space shows that for an EFT flowing from a UV fixed point, the coefficient of this term is finite and calculable. It depends on the UV fixed point, but in effective field theory the whole effect is a renormalization of GdG_d, if we accept the Covariant Entropy Bound, which attributes a classical gravitational entropy to the diamond boundary. Thus we expect the universal entropy A(Σd−2)/4GdA(\Sigma_{d-2})/4G_d, for any small diamond in any finite model of quantum gravity12.

Our conjecture thus unifies effective field theory methods for calculating gravitational entropy [4–8] with the arguments of [31, 32], and with the explicit calculations of [20] for RT diamonds. Like effective field theory replica methods, it is ultra-local on the d−2d - 2 dimensional bifurcation surface. Physically, one might think of all of these techniques as giving one the snapshot of horizon dynamics seen by a measuring device with Planck scale acceleration localized at a particular point on the bifurcation surface of the diamond boundary. Ultra-locality on the bifurcation surface will be the key to understanding the discrepancy between the universal result α=1\alpha= 1 and thermal entropy fluctuations for large AdS black holes.

To conclude this section we note that our conjecture is also suggested by the results of [40]. These authors showed that the viscosity to entropy density ratio for the hydrodynamic equations arising from Einstein’s equations on any weakly curved diamond boundary, is universal, and equal to 14π\frac{1}{4\pi}. The Fluctuation-Dissipation theorem relates that ratio to the fluctuations of a hypothetical quantum operator, dual to the TτiT^{\tau i} components of the Brown-York stress tensor on a time-like near-horizon surface, in any model of quantum gravity in which Einstein’s equations are approximately valid. Our conjecture is the analogous statement for entropy fluctuations. The hydrodynamics of entropy is compressible fluid dynamics, because of the thermodynamic relation for entropy density

σ=(p+ρ)/T.(50)\sigma= (p + \rho)/T. \tag*{(50)}

We conjecture that the hydrodynamic equations equivalent to Einstein’s equation are incompressible because of the fast scrambling [45, 46] of information on certain null surfaces. The dynamics that equilibrates entropy operates on a time scale t0ln⁡St_0\ln S shorter than the diffusive time scale, t0t_0 times a power of SS, which determines the flow of transverse momentum. As a consequence, the entropy density in the Einstein/Navier-Stokes equations is constant. This insight will be important in § 1.3, where we seek to understand why the equilibrium fluctuations of large AdS black holes do not satisfy our universal rule.

In order to relate the capacity of entanglement to a transport coefficient, and demonstrate the analog of the Fluctuation-Dissipation Theorem for entropy fluctuations, one would have to work out the analog of the Navier-Stokes equations that describes the fast scrambling of entropy on a small enough area of any stretched horizon. This is the subject of future work.

Large Diamonds/Black Holes in AdS Space

We now turn to the exception that violates the rule, large diamonds or black holes in AdS space. For large black holes, the rules of the AdS/CFT correspondence say that they are dual to the thermal ensemble of a boundary CFT on a sphere. The entropy and temperature computed by black hole thermodynamics are those of the density matrix Eq. (1), and as a consequence we can calculate the modular fluctuations via the thermodynamic formulae Eqs. (3), (4), by taking a temperature derivative ⟨ΔK2⟩=TdSdT\langle\Delta K^2\rangle= T\frac{dS}{dT}. Since S∝rSd−2S \propto r_S^{d-2}, it follows that we must find the temperature dependence of rSr_S. For large mass, the Schwarzschild radius is given by

rSd−1=CdML2,(51)r_S^{d-1}=C_dML^2, \tag*{(51)}

with CdC_d determined from Eq. (19). The black hole temperature, given by T=f′(rS)4πT=\frac{f'(r_S)}{4\pi}, is related to LL as

T∝(3−d)CdMrS(T)d−2+2rS(T)L2=(5−d)rS(T)L2.(52)T\propto(3-d)C_d\frac{M}{r_S(T)^{d-2}}+2\frac{r_S(T)}{L^2}=(5-d)\frac{r_S(T)}{L^2}. \tag*{(52)}

The entropy is thus S∝Td−2S\propto T^{d-2}, and hence,

α=d−2.(53)\alpha=d-2. \tag*{(53)}

As we discussed already in § 1.2, we can understand the failure of the 1+11+1 dimensional CFT description of the horizon variables by noting that for large AdS black holes, the range of validity of the near-horizon approximation is small in comparison to the time required to span the horizon, since rS≫Lπ/2r_S\gg L\pi/2, with the latter bounding the proper time of a generic time-like trajectory.

There is a feature of the dynamics that gives a clue to what is going on. The spectrum of quasi-normal modes of a large AdS black hole includes sound modes, which indicate ballistic propagation of energy, momentum and information over the horizon [37, 38]. Note that there are no sound modes in the quasi-normal spectra of small diamonds, the dS horizon, or the boundary of an RT diamond. This is of course expected from the AdS/CFT correspondence: dynamics on the d−2d-2 sphere is described by a local field theory. Thus the temperature scaling of the entropy follows from scale invariance and extensivity of the entropy of a CFT on a boundary sphere Sd−2S^{d-2} of radius RR. So, α=d−2\alpha=d-2 follows both from black hole thermodynamics, and from the same kind of scaling argument that we used for 1+11+1 dimensional CFT, applied to d−1d-1 dimensional CFT.

A further piece of evidence is the fact that the sound modes on a large AdS black hole have a shortest wavelength, of order the AdS curvature radius LL. To see this, note that scale invariance of the boundary CFT, and the fact that the UV cutoff on sound modes is independent of the boundary volume, implies that the cutoff wavelength on the boundary is λc∼T−1∼L2rS\lambda_c\sim T^{-1}\sim\frac{L^2}{r_S}. The large black holes in AdS have a blackening factor

f(r)=r2L2−1−rSd−1rd−3L2.(54)f(r)=\frac{r^2}{L^2}-1-\frac{r_S^{d-1}}{r^{d-3}L^2}. \tag*{(54)}

The metric Eq. (11) with this blackening factor has a scaling symmetry [56], which tells us that ratios of length scales on the black hole horizon are the same as those on the boundary. So the cutoff length scale lcl_c on the horizon at radius rSr_S satisfies

lc∼λcrSL∼L≪rS.(55)l_c\sim\lambda_c\frac{r_S}{L}\sim L\ll r_S. \tag*{(55)}

On the other hand the spectrum of quasi-normal modes of shorter wavelength behave exactly like those on the horizon of a flat space black hole, because the geometries are identical on scales less than LL. The authors of [45, 46] have argued that this behavior indicates fast scrambling of the information in a localized probe of some point on the horizon over a region of radius LL, in a time ∼Lln⁡(L/lp)\sim L\ln(L/l_p).

The picture that one gets by combining these arguments is of a lattice of fast scrambling systems with ∼(L/lp)d−2\sim(L/l_p)^{d-2} q-bits, and asymptotic densities of states like those of a 1+11+1 dimensional CFT, coupled together in a manner local on the sphere. The black hole entropy formula tells us that the modular fluctuations of large AdS diamonds are dominated by those of the d−1d-1 dimensional “sound modes”. This is to be expected. The inequality rS≫Lr_S\gg L tells us that the entropy of the full system scales like (L/lp)d−2(rS/L)d−2(L/l_p)^{d-2}(r_S/L)^{d-2}, which is much larger than the entropy of “individual lattice points”.

This picture is very natural in the context of tensor network regularizations of CFTs, which tile a spatial slice of AdS with a sequence of lattices. The large coefficient of Td−2T^{d-2} in the thermal entropy of CFTs with an EH dual implies that each of the nodes of the tensor network must be a Hilbert space of large dimension. In this context, our conjecture states that the dynamics internal to each node are described by a model with the spectral density of a 1+11+1 dimensional CFT. Sound modes arise because of the couplings between different nodes. The black hole entropy formula tells us that the entropy of the sound modes dominates the localized entropy at fixed temperature. The authors of [40] showed that the incompressible hydrodynamics of large black holes is identical to that of Minkowski diamonds in the near-horizon limit. A localized perturbation of the large black hole, rapidly spreads its information over a node of the tensor network, on a time scale much shorter than the hydrodynamic scale, so the local entropy density appears constant. It is only on length scales greater than the AdS radius that sound propagation becomes important.

To summarize, the quadratic thermal fluctuations of large black holes, which we claim are the same as the modular fluctuations of large empty diamonds in AdS space, are dominated by the behavior of the system on length scales much larger than the AdS radius. They are proportional to the entropy, but with α=d−2\alpha=d-2 rather than 1. On length scales below the AdS radius large AdS black hole horizons behave like other horizons studied in this paper. It is important to realize that this reasoning does not apply to the boundary anchored RT diamonds studied in [20]. There, the proper time along time-like trajectories in the diamond are much larger than the AdS curvature radius; this allows ample time for information to propagate through the entire diamond. Furthermore, there are no sound modes appearing at length scales above the AdS radius.

Nested Causal Diamonds and the Random Walk

The results we have presented so far are mathematical formulae/conjectures applying to general causal diamonds. In order to apply them to an actual interferometer experiment we must take into account the fact that the light beam in the apparatus passes through many causal diamonds. More precisely, as depicted in Fig. V, we can cover the maximal causal diamond of the experiment by a nested sequence of diamonds (somewhat akin to Matryoshka dolls) corresponding to proper time intervals. We must identify the interval δx0\delta x_0 over which subsequent nested causal diamonds of size x0x_0 become statistically uncorrelated. For simplicity we restrict ourselves to a spherically symmetric diamond in Minkowski space (relevant for an experiment), though the result can be generalized to RT and dS diamonds. We calculate the entropy associated to a diamond at each subsequent step

Sent=Ωd−2(x0+δx0)d−24lpd−2≃A0+Ωd−2(d−2)x0d−24lpd−2δx0x0,(56)S_{\rm ent} = \frac{\Omega_{d-2}(x_0+\delta x_0)^{d-2}}{4l_p^{d-2}} \simeq A_0+\frac{\Omega_{d-2}(d-2)x_0^{d-2}}{4l_p^{d-2}}\frac{\delta x_0}{x_0}, \tag*{(56)}
An interferometer of arm length $R$ tracing nested causal diamonds

Figure 3. An interferometer of arm length RR traces out a series of nested causal diamonds, with each subsequent diamond separated by the scrambling length δx0\delta x_0. In the left panel, the nested causal diamonds are shown in position space, with each concentric sphere representing subsequent nested diamonds, while the right panel depicts the nested diamonds in the xi−x0x_i-x_0 plane.

where the dd-dimensional Planck length is defined here by lpd−2=Gdl_p^{d-2}=G_d, and A0A_0 is the entangling surface area when δx0=0\delta x_0=0.

We posit statistical independence when δSent∼S0\delta S_{\mathrm{ent}}\sim\sqrt{S_0}, where S0S_0 in the entanglement entropy when δx0=0\delta x_0=0. This implies a scrambling length

δx0≃x0d−24lpd−2Ωd−2x0d−2.(57)\delta x_0 \simeq\frac{x_0}{d-2}\sqrt{\frac{4l_p^{d-2}}{\Omega_{d-2}x_0^{d-2}}}. \tag*{(57)}

As the light beam in the interferometer travels to the mirror at a distance RR from the beam splitter, it traverses a sequence of statistically uncorrelated causal diamonds, the number of which is N=Rδx0\mathcal{N}=\frac{R}{\delta x_0}. The uncertainty in the length traversed, caused by fluctuations of the near-horizon degrees of freedom—the pixellons of Ref. [21]—in each of these diamonds is of order δx0\delta x_0, so the total length traversed should be thought of as a one dimensional random walk. We thus have

δR2≃δx02N=R2d−21S0.(58)\delta R^2\simeq\delta x_0^2\mathcal{N}=\frac{R^2}{d-2}\frac{1}{\sqrt{S_0}}. \tag*{(58)}

This result is in agreement with the length fluctuations obtained in [20], computed via a topological black hold foliation of a boundary-anchored diamond in AdS. These length fluctuations can be thought of as the quantum width of the horizon of the causal diamond. In d=4d=4, this implies δR2∼lpR\delta R^2\sim l_pR, an observably large fluctuation as proposed in Ref. [19]. In higher dimensions, the effect is suppressed by higher powers of lpl_p and would be unobservable.

Note that an important aspect of our picture is that the transverse directions do not experience these length fluctuations, leaving the shape of the light cone intact. This is important phenomenologically, because it implies that the images of stars do not become blurred over cosmological distances, a consequence of the entangling surface being minimal. It is also a consequence, as we discussed above, of there being quasi-normal modes on Minkowski diamonds that are fast scramblers. We expect, as described in [19], that transverse fluctuations are given by an approximately Gaussian distribution with covariance K(Ω,Ω′)K(\Omega,\Omega') that is rotationally invariant; such a distribution is described in terms of spherical harmonics in Ref. [19]. The calculations in this paper describe fluctuations only along the light cone.

Conclusions

We have conjectured that the near-horizon dynamics of causal diamonds in flat space, boundary-anchored AdS and dS, are described in terms of a conformal field theory. We focused on three pieces of evidence. All three pieces of evidence imply ⟨ΔK2⟩=⟨K⟩=A(Σd−2)4Gd\langle\Delta K^2\rangle=\langle K\rangle=\frac{A(\Sigma_{d-2})}{4G_d}, with the first two being explicit calculations and the third a heuristic argument. First, we calculated ⟨ΔK2⟩=A(Σd−2)4Gd\langle\Delta K^2\rangle=\frac{A(\Sigma_{d-2})}{4G_d} for a causal diamond on a flat RS-II brane in the bulk of AdS. Second, we calculated the same from the density of states derived from the dimensional reduction of the Einstein-Hilbert action in flat space, following seminal work of Carlip and Solodukhin. Third, we argued that the fluid-gravity correspondence combined with the fluctuation-dissipation theorem, as well as the nature of fast-scrambling horizons (in particular, the absence of sound modes for dS, Minkowski and boundary-anchored diamonds), supports α=1\alpha=1.

We also showed that such an entropic (or holographic) picture of gravity implies that metric fluctuations in the causal development of a spherical ball B\mathcal{B} will accumulate, with each nested causal diamond (analogous to a Matryoshka doll, each with radius δR∼R/S\delta R\sim R/\sqrt{S} larger than the previous) uncorrelated with the previous causal diamond. In d=4d=4 dimensions, such trajectory-integrated fluctuations are observable in a future experiment, utilizing the advances in spacetime measurements achieved with gravitational wave observatories.

Taken together, these ideas imply that formal developments, often in the context of AdS or conformal field theories, need not be far removed from the realm of observation. Possible concrete theoretical tools that could be utilized in the context of trajectory-integrated fluctuations are SYK models13, tensor networks and OTOCs that describe fast-scrambling systems. We look forward to further development along these lines, including observational tests.

Acknowledgments

This paper is dedicated to the memory of M. Virasoro, whose algebra proved pivotal. We thank Patrick Draper for collaboration at the early stages of this work, Y. Chen, S. Gukov, V. Lee, D. Li for discussion, and S. Shenker, E. Verlinde, and especially C. Keeler and J. Parra-Martinez for comments on the manuscript. TB thanks M. Rangamani, R. Myers and S. Carlip for email discussions of their work. The work of TB is partially supported by the Department of Energy under grant DOE SC0010008. The work of KZ is supported by the Heising-Simons Foundation “Observational Signatures of Quantum Gravity” collaboration grant 2021-2817, by the DoE under contract DE-SC0011632, and by a Simons Investigator award.

References

  1. [25]L.-Y. Hung, R. C. Myers, M. Smolkin, and A. Yale, JHEP 12, 047 (2011), arXiv:1110.1084 [hep-th].DOI
  2. [26]E. Perlmutter, (2019).
  3. [27]L. Randall and R. Sundrum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4690 (1999), arXiv:hep-th/9906064.DOI
  4. [28]S. Carlip, Phys. Rev. D 51, 632 (1995), arXiv:gr-qc/9409052.DOI
  5. [29]S. Carlip, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2828 (1999), arXiv:hep-th/9812013.DOI
  6. [30]S. Carlip, Class. Quant. Grav. 15, 3609 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9806026.DOI
  7. [31]S. Carlip, AIP Conf. Proc. 1483, 54 (2012), arXiv:1207.1488 [gr-qc].DOI
  8. [32]S. N. Solodukhin, Phys. Lett. B 454, 213 (1999), arXiv:hep-th/9812056.DOI
  9. [33]T. Damour, Phys. Rev. D 18, 3598 (1978).
  10. [34]T. Damour, Quelques proprietes mecaniques, electromagnet iques, thermodynamiques et quantiques des trous noir, Ph.D. thesis, Paris U., VI-VII (1979).
  11. [35]I. Bredberg and A. Strominger, JHEP 05, 043 (2012), arXiv:1106.3084 [hep-th].DOI
  12. [36]I. Bredberg, C. Keeler, V. Lysov, and A. Strominger, JHEP 07, 146 (2012), arXiv:1101.2451 [hep-th].DOI
  13. [37]M. Crossley, P. Glorioso, H. Liu, and Y. Wang, JHEP 02, 124 (2016), arXiv:1504.07611 [hep-th].DOI
  14. [38]M. Rangamani, Class. Quant. Grav. 26, 224003 (2009), arXiv:0905.4352 [hep-th].DOI
  15. [39]G. Compere, P. McFadden, K. Skenderis, and M. Taylor, JHEP 07, 050 (2011), arXiv:1103.3022 [hep-th].DOI
  16. [40]I. Bredberg, C. Keeler, V. Lysov, and A. Strominger, JHEP 03, 141 (2011), arXiv:1006.1902 [hep-th].DOI
  17. [41]G. Policastro, D. T. Son, and A. O. Starinets, JHEP 09, 043 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0205052.DOI
  18. [42]G. Policastro, D. T. Son, and A. O. Starinets, JHEP 12, 054 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0210220.DOI
  19. [43]P. Kovtun, D. T. Son, and A. O. Starinets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 111601 (2005), arXiv:hep-th/0405231.DOI
  20. [44]R. C. Myers, R. Pourhasan, and M. Smolkin, JHEP 06, 013 (2013), arXiv:1304.2030 [hep-th].DOI
  21. [45]P. Hayden and J. Preskill, JHEP 09, 120 (2007), arXiv:0708.4025 [hep-th].DOI
  22. [46]Y. Sekino and L. Susskind, JHEP 10, 065 (2008), arXiv:0808.2096 [hep-th].DOI
  23. [47]S. M. Carroll, Spacetime and Geometry (Cambridge University Press, 2019).DOI
  24. [48]N. Seiberg, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 102, 319 (1990).
  25. [49]J. D. Brown and M. Henneaux, Commun. Math. Phys. 104, 207 (1986).
  26. [50]A. Strominger, JHEP 02, 009 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9712251.DOI
  27. [51]S. Sachdev and J. Ye, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3339 (1993), arXiv:cond-mat/9212030.DOI
  28. [52]A. Kitaev, KITP strings seminar and Entanglement 2015 program (Feb 12, April 7 and May 27 2015).
  29. [53]E. Perlmutter, JHEP 03, 117 (2014), arXiv:1308.1083 [hep-th].DOI
  30. [54]J. Polchinski, (1999), arXiv:hep-th/9901076.DOI
  31. [55]L. Susskind, AIP Conf. Proc. 493, 98 (1999), arXiv:hep-th/9901079.DOI
  32. [56]G. T. Horowitz and V. E. Hubeny, Phys. Rev. D 62, 024027 (2000), arXiv:hep-th/9909056.DOI

Paper details

vlnc:W_5cchkprx
v1 · latestHistory (1)

published · Fresh — added to the Hub within the last 30 days

added ·

Usage

views · 0

downloads · 0

A view counts once per browser per day, a download each time the PDF is requested.

CC BY 4.0

Original source

  • Physics and Astronomy

Not recorded for this paper · View statement →

Looking for related papers…
Contents