alphaFeedback

WorksMathematics

The operator Hilbert space OH\mathrm{OH} embeds completely isometrically into a noncommutative L1\mathrm{L}^1-space

AI contributions
Not recorded for this paper
View details

Abstract

We prove that Pisier's operator Hilbert space OH\mathrm{OH} embeds completely isometrically into the predual of a QWEP\mathrm{QWEP} von Neumann algebra, answering a longstanding question introduced by Pisier and later by Haagerup and Musat. The embedding is obtained as an ultraproduct of free probabilistic models hk=Λ12ckΛ12h_k = \Lambda^{\frac{1}{2}}c_k\Lambda^{\frac{1}{2}} realized in the free group factor VN(F∞)\mathrm{VN}(\mathbb{F}_\infty), with the trace and circular family scaled according to the mass of the truncated measure t−53dtt^{-\frac{5}{3}} \mathrm{d} t.

Introduction

The operator Hilbert space OHOH introduced by Pisier in the memoir [21] is the unique operator space structure on the complex Hilbert space ℓ2\ell^2 which is completely isometric to its conjugate dual via the canonical identification. The question of embedding OHOH into the predual of a von Neumann algebra has a rich history. Junge [10] constructed the first completely isomorphic embedding of OHOH into the predual of a QWEP von Neumann algebra, by means of free probability. Pisier explicitly recorded the completely isometric embedding problem as open in [23 Remark following Corollary 7.16, p. 145]. He reiterated the question in the introduction of [Pis04b], whose appendix gives a simpler proof of the completely isomorphic embedding, based on complex interpolation and Shlyakhtenko’s generalized circular systems. Pisier [24] proved that OHOH does not even embed completely isomorphically into the predual of a semifinite von Neumann algebra. Junge [11] showed that OHOH embeds completely isomorphically into the predual of the hyperfinite factors of type IIIλ_\lambda, 0<λ≤10 < \lambda\le1, and Haagerup and Musat [6 Corollary 3.8 p. 620] obtained an embedding into the predual of the hyperfinite factor of type III1_1 whose cb-isomorphism constant is at most 2\sqrt{2}. The constants in the general Khintchine inequalities underlying their construction are optimal [6 Theorem 3.10 p. 621]. Related questions appear in [28 remark p. 208 after Corollary 3.1] and in the introduction of [12]. The aim of this paper is to answer this question.

Theorem 1.1 There exist a QWEP von Neumann algebra M\mathcal{M} and a completely isometric map J:OH→L1(M)J:\mathrm{OH}\to L^1(\mathcal{M}).

By duality, Theorem 1.1 is equivalent to the fact that the operator space OH is a complete quotient of a QWEP C∗^*-algebra, see Corollary 6.3. This is in sharp contrast with the operator spaces R + C and Rn+CnR_n + C_n for n≥2n \ge2, which do not embed completely isometrically into noncommutative L1L^1-spaces according to [1], although they embed completely isomorphically [6]. By Pisier’s theorem [24], the von Neumann algebra M\mathcal{M} of Theorem 1.1 cannot be semifinite. Our construction takes M=(A∗∗)op\mathcal{M} = (A^{**})^{\mathrm{op}}, where A=∏UVN(F∞)A = \prod_{\mathcal{U}} \mathrm{VN}(\mathbb{F}_{\infty}) is the C∗^*-algebraic (norm) ultrapower of the free group factor, see Theorem 6.2 and Remark 4.3. Corollary 6.4 also gives a complete isometry into the predual of a σ\sigma-finite factor of type III.

The QWEP property gives finite-dimensional matrix approximations: for any integer n≥1n \ge1 and any δ>0\delta> 0, the operator space OHn\mathrm{OH}_n embeds into some space S1NS^N_1 with cb-distortion less than 1+δ1+\delta, by [3 Corollary 7.2], see Corollary 6.3. Combining the complete isometry with Junge’s [10 Lemmas 4.4 and 4.5] gives an exact realization of completely 1-summing norms as tensor norms in a predual. Ozawa’s compactness theorem [18] then yields convergence of the truncated models in cb-distortion for each fixed dimension, and Proposition 6.8 identifies the joint limit of their two-factor tensor norms with ∥T∥π1∘\lVert T\rVert_{\pi^\circ_1}. For the identity on OHn\mathrm{OH}_n, the order n(1+log⁡n)\sqrt{n(1+\log n)} and the numerical comparison constants are inherited from [10]. Section 7 derives the tensor distortion formula.

Approach of the paper Our proof consists of two exact computations. Let m,n≥1m,n \ge1 be integers. For any nn-tuple x=(x1,…,xn)x=(x_1,\ldots,x_n) of matrices of Mm\mathrm{M}_m, consider the completely positive maps Φx,Φx∗:Mm→Mm\Phi_x,\Phi_x^*:\mathrm{M}_m\to\mathrm{M}_m defined by

Φx(b)=def∑k=1nxkbxk∗andΦx∗(b)=def∑k=1nxk∗bxk,b∈Mm.(1)\Phi_x(b) \mathrel{\mathop{=}^{\mathrm{def}}} \sum_{k=1}^{n} x_k b x_k^* \quad\text{and}\quad\Phi_x^*(b) \mathrel{\mathop{=}^{\mathrm{def}}} \sum_{k=1}^{n} x_k^* b x_k,\quad b\in\mathrm{M}_m. \tag*{(1)}

We first show in Theorem 3.2 that if the matrices Φx(1)\Phi_x(1) and Φx∗(1)\Phi_x^*(1) are invertible then the system of matrix equations

P=Φx(Q−13),Q=Φx∗(P−13),(2)P=\Phi_x\left(Q^{-\frac{1}{3}}\right),\qquad Q=\Phi_x^*\left(P^{-\frac{1}{3}}\right), \tag*{(2)}

admits a unique solution (P,Q)(P,Q) in positive definite matrices and that the norm of ∑kxk⊗ek\sum_k x_k\otimes e_k in S1m(OHn)S^m_1(\mathrm{OH}_n) is equal to Tr⁡(Q23)=Tr⁡(P23)\operatorname{Tr}(Q^{\frac{2}{3}})=\operatorname{Tr}(P^{\frac{2}{3}}). This turns Pisier’s factorization formula [22] into a characterization by a uniquely determined pair of positive matrices. The associated map (P,Q)↦(Φx(Q−13),Φx∗(P−13))(P,Q)\mapsto\left(\Phi_x(Q^{-\frac{1}{3}}),\Phi_x^*(P^{-\frac{1}{3}})\right) is a 13\frac{1}{3}-contraction for the product Thompson metric, so its iterates converge uniformly for pairs from any positive definite initial pair. The norm identity follows by constructing an optimal factorization and a norming functional, using a Perron-Frobenius argument. Thus the characterization also gives an iterative procedure for evaluating these norms, independently of the free probabilistic construction.

Next, we use a σ\sigma-system in the sense of Definition 4.1. Write ∣σ∣=defσ((0,∞))|\sigma| \mathrel{\mathop{=}^{\mathrm{def}}} \sigma((0,\infty)). By Lemma 4.2, this system can be realized in a finite von Neumann algebra A\mathcal{A} with τ=∣σ∣φ\tau=|\sigma|\varphi, where $\varphi is a normal faithful tracial state, and ck:=∣σ∣12ck0c_k \mathrel{\mathop:}=|\sigma|^{\frac{1}{2}}c_k^{0}, where (ck0)(c_k^{0}) is a standard scalar-valued free circular family which is free from Λ\Lambda with respect to φ\varphi. For D:=W∗(Λ)D \mathrel{\mathop:}= W^{*}(\Lambda) and any d∈Dd \in D, the covariance is

ED(ckdcl∗)=ED(ck∗dcl)=δklτ(d)1.\mathbb{E}_{D}(c_kdc_l^{*})=\mathbb{E}_{D}(c_k^{*}dc_l)=\delta_{kl}\tau(d)1.

We put

hk:=Λ12ckΛ12.(3)h_k \mathrel{\mathop:}= \Lambda^{\frac{1}{2}}c_k\Lambda^{\frac{1}{2}}. \tag*{(3)}

Weighting on both sides leads to coupled covariance equations involving Φx\Phi_x and its adjoint Φx∗\Phi_x^{*}, which can be matched with the two equations in (2). With a one-sided weighting Λ12ck\Lambda^{\frac{1}{2}}c_k, the maps Φx\Phi_x and Φx∗\Phi_x^{*} enter the covariance equations with different weights, and the symmetry of (2) is lost. For coefficients xx with Φx(1)\Phi_x(1) and Φx∗(1)\Phi_x^{*}(1) invertible, using the operator-valued Cauchy transform of the hermitization of Z=∑kxk⊗hkZ=\sum_k x_k\otimes h_k, we show in Proposition 4.4 that the norm of ZZ in L1(Mm⊗A‾)L^1(M_m\otimes\overline{A}) is given by

∥Z∥L1(Mm⊗‾A)=1π∫0∞s−12Tr⁡(QsFσ(Qs)) ds.\|Z\|_{L^1(M_m\overline{\otimes}A)}=\frac{1}{\pi}\int_0^\infty s^{-\frac{1}{2}}\operatorname{Tr}\bigl(Q_sF_\sigma(Q_s)\bigr)\,ds.

References

  1. [1]C. Arhancet. Column rigidity in noncommutative L¹-spaces and completely isometric embeddings of Hilbertian operator spaces. Preprint, 2026.
  2. [2]D. Blecher and C. Le Merdy. Operator algebras and their modules-an operator space approach. London Mathematical Society Monographs. New Series, 30. Oxford Science Publications. The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004.
  3. [3]E. G. Effros, M. Junge and Z.-J. Ruan. Integral mappings and the principle of local reflexivity for noncommutative L¹-spaces. Ann. of Math. (2) 151 (2000), no. 1, 59–92.
  4. [4]E. G. Effros and Z.-J. Ruan. Operator spaces. London Mathematical Society Monographs. New Series, 23. The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York, 2000.
  5. [5]T. Fack and H. Kosaki. Generalized s-numbers of τ-measurable operators. Pacific J. Math. 123 (1986), no. 2, 269–300.
  6. [6]U. Haagerup and M. Musat. On the best constants in noncommutative Khintchine-type inequalities. J. Funct. Anal. 250 (2007), no. 2, 588–624.
  7. [7]J. W. Helton, R. Rashidi Far and R. Speicher. Operator-valued semicircular elements: solving a quadratic matrix equation with positivity constraints. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2007, no. 22, Art. ID rnm086.arxiv.org/abs/math/0703510
  8. [8]F. Hiai and D. Petz. The semicircle law, free random variables and entropy. Math. Surveys Monogr., 77, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2000.
  9. [10]M. Junge. Embedding of the operator space OH and the logarithmic ‘little Grothendieck inequality’. Invent. Math. 161 (2005), no. 2, 225–286.
  10. [11]M. Junge. Operator spaces and Araki-Woods factors: a quantum probabilistic approach. Int. Math. Res. Pap. IMRP 2006, Art. ID 76978, 87 pp.DOI
  11. [12]M. Junge and J. Parcet. Mixed-norm inequalities and operator space Lₚ embedding theory. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 203 (2010), no. 953.
  12. [13]M. Junge and Q. Xu. Representation of certain homogeneous Hilbertian operator spaces and applications. Invent. Math. 179 (2010), no. 1, 75–118.DOI
  13. [14]A. S. Kechris. Classical descriptive set theory. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 156. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1995.DOI
  14. [15]J. A. Mingo and R. Speicher. Free probability and random matrices. Fields Institute Monographs, 35. Springer, New York; Fields Institute for Research in Mathematical Sciences, Toronto, ON, 2017.
  15. [16]A. Nica, D. Shlyakhtenko and R. Speicher. Operator-valued distributions. I. Characterizations of freeness. Int. Math. Res. Not. 2002, no. 29, 1509–1538.DOI
  16. [17]A. Nica, D. Shlyakhtenko and R. Speicher. R-cyclic families of matrices in free probability. J. Funct. Anal. 188 (2002), no. 1, 227–271.
  17. [18]N. Ozawa. On the set of finite-dimensional subspaces of preduals of von Neumann algebras. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math. 331 (2000), no. 4, 309–312.DOI
  18. [19]N. Ozawa. About the QWEP conjecture. Internat. J. Math. 15 (2004), no. 5, 501–530.
  19. [20]V. Paulsen. Completely bounded maps and operator algebras. Cambridge Univ. Press (2002).DOI
  20. [21]G. Pisier. The operator Hilbert space OH, complex interpolation and tensor norms. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 122 (1996), no. 585. 1, 5, 21
  21. [22]G. Pisier. Non-commutative vector valued Lₚ-spaces and completely p-summing maps. Astérisque No. 247 (1998). 2, 4, 19, 22
  22. [23]G. Pisier. Introduction to operator space theory. London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, 294. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003. 1, 3, 4, 6, 26DOI
  23. [24]G. Pisier. The operator Hilbert space OH and type III von Neumann algebras. Bull. London Math. Soc. 36 (2004), no. 4, 455–459. 1, 2, 18, 21, 22DOI
  24. [26]G. Pisier. Grothendieck’s theorem, past and present. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 49 (2012), no. 2, 237–323. 25arxiv.org/abs/1101.4195
  25. [27]G. Pisier. Grothendieck’s theorem, past and present: UNCUT. Expanded version, August 21, 2013. https://webusers.imj-prg.fr/~gilles.pisier/grothendieck.UNCUT.pdf. 25
  26. [28]G. Pisier and D. Shlyakhtenko. Grothendieck’s theorem for operator spaces. Invent. Math. 150 (2002), no. 1, 185–217. 2
  27. [29]G. Pisier and Q. Xu. Non-commutative Lᵖ-spaces. Handbook of the geometry of Banach spaces, Vol. 2, 1459–1517, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2003. 4, 5
  28. [30]D. Shlyakhtenko. Random Gaussian band matrices and freeness with amalgamation. Internat. Math. Res. Notices 1996, no. 20, 1013–1025. 8
  29. [31]R. Speicher. Combinatorial theory of the free product with amalgamation and operator-valued free probability theory. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 132 (1998), no. 627. 7DOI
  30. [32]M. Terp. Lᵖ spaces associated with von Neumann algebras. Notes, Math. Institute, Copenhagen Univ., 1981. 4
  31. [33]A. C. Thompson. On certain contraction mappings in a partially ordered vector space. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 14 (1963), 438–443. 6DOI
  32. [34]Y. Ueda. Factoriality, type classification and fullness for free product von Neumann algebras. Adv. Math. 228 (2011), no. 5, 2647–2671. 21DOI
  33. [35]D. V. Voiculescu, K. J. Dykema and A. Nica. Free random variables. CRM Monograph Series, 1. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1992. 11
  34. [36]D. Voiculescu. Operations on certain non-commutative operator-valued random variables. Recent advances in operator algebras (Orléans, 1992). Astérisque No. 232 (1995), 243–275. 7
  35. [37]Q. Xu. Operator-space Grothendieck inequalities for noncommutative Lₚ-spaces. Duke Math. J. 131 (2006), no. 3, 525–574. 4DOI
  36. [38]K. L. Yew. Completely p-summing maps on the operator Hilbert space OH. J. Funct. Anal. 255 (2008), no. 5, 1362–1402. 22DOI

Paper details

vlnc:W_5dz3gppx
v1 · latestHistory (1)

published · Fresh — added to the Hub within the last 30 days

added ·

Usage

views · 0

downloads · 0

A view counts once per browser per day, a download each time the PDF is requested.

CC BY-SA 4.0

Original source

  • Mathematics

Not recorded for this paper · View statement →

Looking for related papers…
Contents