alphaFeedback

WorksMathematics

Asymptotically Optimal Weighted Edge Colorings via Local Bin Packing

AI contributions
Not recorded for this paper
View details
Ancillary data
1 code link
View

Abstract

We study weighted edge coloring, where each edge of a graph GG has a weight in (0,1](0,1], and colors are assigned so that the incident weight of each color at every vertex is at most one. The objective is to minimize the number of colors, denoted by χw′(G)χ'_w(G). This generalizes classical edge coloring (all weights are one) and bin packing (GG is a star). Two natural lower bounds are the maximum weighted degree Δw(G)Δ_w(G) and the maximum local bin-packing number bp(G)\mathrm{bp}(G): the maximum, over vertices, of the minimum number of unit bins needed to pack the incident weights. We have ⌈Δw(G)⌉≤bp(G)≤χw′(G)\lceilΔ_w(G)\rceil\le\mathrm{bp}(G)\leχ'_w(G). How closely these local lower bounds approximate the global optimum is a longstanding open problem. Our main result establishes an asymptotic weighted analogue of Vizing's theorem: every simple graph admits a coloring using at most (1+o(1))bp(G)(1+o(1))\mathrm{bp}(G) colors. Thus local bin packings can be made globally consistent with asymptotically vanishing relative loss, even in nonbipartite graphs. Our local-to-global rounding framework coordinates feasible local packing distributions into a partial coloring, leaving only o(bp(G))o(\mathrm{bp}(G)) uncolored weight at every vertex. For bipartite multigraphs, we prove χw′(G)≤(2+o(1))Δw(G)χ'_w(G)\le(2+o(1))Δ_w(G), establishing the Chung–Ross conjecture [SICOMP'91] asymptotically. For loopless multigraphs, we obtain the exact bound χw′(G)≤3⌈Δw(G)⌉χ'_w(G)\le3\lceilΔ_w(G)\rceil. Both leading coefficients are optimal, giving weighted analogues of the classical Kőnig–Shannon bounds. Further upper and lower bounds show that the classical factor-3/23/2 separation does not persist with the local bin-packing benchmark. We also disprove the exact weighted-degree conjecture of Feige and Singh [ESA'08]. Our upper bounds have polynomial-time algorithms, and their existence statements are formalized in Lean 4.

Introduction

Edge coloring is a classical and fundamental topic in graph theory and algorithms. We study the weighted edge coloring problem, where we are given an edge-weighted graph G:=(V,E)G := (V, E), possibly with parallel edges but without loops, and a weight function w:E→(0,1]w : E \to(0, 1]. A coloring is a proper weighted coloring if, at every vertex, the sum of the weights of incident edges of each color is at most one. The objective is to minimize the number of colors, denoted by χw′(G)\chi'_{w}(G).

This problem is a generalization of classical edge coloring in unweighted graphs (when all edge weights are one) and bin packing (when the graph is a star). Apart from its structural importance, the problem also finds many applications in switching networks, scheduling, frequency assignment, and graph decomposition. A principal application is multirate routing in three-stage Clos networks [6, 28, 7]. Here, vertices represent input and output switches, edges represent unsplittable connection requests, and colors represent middle-stage switches. Minimizing the number of colors reduces the interconnection resources needed to support simultaneous requests in communication and parallel-computing systems. We refer to Correa and Goemans [5] for a detailed account of this connection.

In (unweighted) edge coloring, a color class forms a matching. Three classical theorems describe much of the landscape. Kőnig’s theorem gives χ′(G)=Δ(G)\chi'(G) = \Delta(G) for bipartite multigraphs [25]; Vizing’s theorem gives χ′(G)≤Δ(G)+1\chi'(G) \le\Delta(G) + 1 for simple graphs [36]; and Shannon’s theorem gives χ′(G)≤⌊3Δ(G)/2⌋\chi'(G) \le\lfloor3\Delta(G)/2 \rfloor for arbitrary multigraphs [34]. Here Δ(G)\Delta(G) is the maximum vertex degree.

In the weighted setting, two natural local lower bounds are Δw(G):=max⁡v∈V∑e∋vwe\Delta_w(G) := \max_{v \in V} \sum_{e \ni v} w_e, and bp⁡(G):=max⁡v∈Vbp⁡v(G)\operatorname{bp}(G) := \max_{v \in V} \operatorname{bp}_v(G), where bp⁡v(G)\operatorname{bp}_v(G) is the minimum number of unit-capacity bins needed to pack the weights of the edges incident with vv. Every proper weighted coloring induces a feasible bin packing at each vertex, so ⌈Δw(G)⌉≤bp⁡(G)≤χw′(G)\lceil\Delta_w(G) \rceil\le\operatorname{bp}(G) \le\chi'_{w}(G). We call the ratio χw′(G)/bp⁡(G)\chi'_{w}(G)/\operatorname{bp}(G), when bp⁡(G)>0\operatorname{bp}(G) > 0, the global-to-local packing gap: it measures the additional cost of reconciling locally feasible packings into a single coloring. Even on a star, the distinction between volume and local packability matters. A star with kk edges of weight 1/2+ε1/2 + \varepsilon has χw′(G)=bp⁡(G)=k\chi'_{w}(G) = \operatorname{bp}(G) = k and Δw(G)=k(1/2+ε)\Delta_w(G) = k(1/2 + \varepsilon). In particular, χw′(G)>2Δw(G)−1\chi'_{w}(G) > 2\Delta_w(G) - 1 whenever 0<ε<1/(2k)0 < \varepsilon< 1/(2k).

In 1991, Chung and Ross [7] conjectured that every bipartite multigraph admits a proper weighted coloring using 2bp⁡(G)−12\operatorname{bp}(G) - 1 colors.1 Feige and Singh [15] also proposed a related conjecture that a proper weighted coloring exists using at most 2N−12N - 1 colors, where NN is the smallest integer strictly greater than Δw(G)\Delta_w(G), namely N=⌈Δw(G)⌉+1N = \lceil\Delta_w(G) \rceil+ 1. These conjectures ask how efficiently locally feasible packings can be reconciled into a globally consistent coloring. The conjectures have motivated a sequence of works in approximation algorithms.

Du, Gao, Hwang, and Kim [8] obtained the bound χw′(G)≤4116bp⁡(G)+O(1)\chi'_{w}(G) \le\frac{41}{16}\operatorname{bp}(G) + O(1) for bipartite multigraphs. Correa and Goemans [5] improved this to 2.5480bp⁡(G)+o(bp⁡(G))2.5480\operatorname{bp}(G) + o(\operatorname{bp}(G)) and separately established 2.557Δw(G)+o(Δw(G))2.557\Delta_w(G) + o(\Delta_w(G)). Feige and Singh [15] subsequently gave a combinatorial algorithm using ⌈94Δw(G)⌉\lceil\frac{9}{4}\Delta_w(G) \rceil colors. Khan and Singh [24] gave a guarantee of ⌈2.2223bp⁡(G)⌉\lceil2.2223\operatorname{bp}(G) \rceil colors. Ngo and Vu [30] constructed bipartite instances exhibiting a 5/45/4 gap between χw′(G)\chi'_{w}(G) and bp⁡(G)\operatorname{bp}(G).

For arbitrary multigraphs, Feige and Singh [15] extended their algorithm to use at most ⌈94Δw(G)⌉+μ(G)\lceil\frac{9}{4}\Delta_w(G) \rceil+ \mu(G) colors, where μ(G)\mu(G) is the maximum edge multiplicity. Odd cycles and multiplicities create genuine obstructions. The triangle example recorded by Feige and Singh [15 Section 1.2] has tt parallel edges on each side, all of weight 1/2+ε1/2 + \varepsilon. It has χw′(G)=3t\chi'_{w}(G) = 3t, bp⁡(G)=2t\operatorname{bp}(G) = 2t, and Δw(G)=t(1+2ε)\Delta_w(G) = t(1 + 2\varepsilon): its global-to-local packing gap is 3/23/2, while its ratio to weighted degree approaches three. Improved bounds are also known for certain special graph classes; see Huc [21] and Sannyasi [32].

Despite this progress, even for simple bipartite graphs, it remained unknown whether the local bin-packing bound approximates the global optimum asymptotically, or whether the factor two in terms of maximum weighted degree is sufficient asymptotically. More broadly, weighted analogues of Vizing’s and Shannon’s theorems remained elusive.

Our contributions

We establish weighted analogues of Vizing’s, Kőnig’s, and Shannon’s theorems, resolve the Chung–Ross conjecture asymptotically, and disprove the exact weighted-degree conjecture of Feige and Singh. Our main results are summarized below.

Theorem 1.1. The following bounds hold uniformly over the indicated graph classes.

Graph classUpper bound for χw(G)\chi_w(G)Full proof
Simple graphs(1+o(1)) bp⁡(G)(1 + o(1))\,\operatorname{bp}(G)Section C
Bipartite multigraphs(2+o(1))Δw(G)(2 + o(1))\Delta_w(G)Section D
Loopless multigraphs3⌈Δw(G)⌉3\lceil\Delta_w(G)\rceilSection B
Bipartite multigraphs(1.62+o(1)) bp⁡(G)(1.62 + o(1))\,\operatorname{bp}(G)Section E
Loopless multigraphs(1.999+o(1)) bp⁡(G)(1.999 + o(1))\,\operatorname{bp}(G)Section F

Table 2.

The coefficient one for simple graphs and the total-weight coefficients two and three are optimal.2

In the following, we explain the results in more detail.

Simple graphs: an asymptotic weighted analogue of Vizing’s theorem. Our main result shows that χw(G)≤bp⁡(G)+o(bp⁡(G))\chi_w(G) \le\operatorname{bp}(G) + o(\operatorname{bp}(G)) for every simple graph, whether or not it is bipartite. This (asymptotically) extends the coefficient-one phenomenon of Vizing’s theorem to weighted graphs.

The local packing problems here are considerably richer than in the unweighted setting. When every edge has weight one, a local bin can contain only one edge. With arbitrary weights, an optimal local packing may rely on intricate combinations of different item sizes. Moreover, these packings cannot be chosen independently: an edge belongs to the packing problems at both of its endpoints and must receive the same color at both. Surprisingly, our result shows that these local packings can nevertheless be made globally consistent with an asymptotically vanishing relative loss.

The main technical contribution is a local-to-global rounding framework. Our rounding theorem coordinates the local choices while retaining almost all incident weight at every vertex. To coordinate local packing distributions, we use partial resampling [20, 29] and hypergraph matching [10]. The proof has four main steps. First, each local bin is represented by a short description consisting of a bounded number of slots for large edges and reserved space for small edges. Second, fractional assignments link compatible slots at the two endpoints of each edge. Third, we choose one description for each vertex and color, controlling the resulting local capacities. Finally, hypergraph matching selects whole large edges, and a separate rounding procedure assigns the small edges. A small fresh palette colors the remaining edges. A key feature is that the loss at every vertex is o(bp⁡(G))o(\operatorname{bp}(G)), independently of the number of vertices. See § 3 for details.

Tight weighted degree bounds and the Chung–Ross conjecture. For bipartite multigraphs we obtain an asymptotically tight guarantee: χw′(G)≤(2+o(1))Δw(G)\chi_w'(G) \le(2 + o(1))\Delta_w(G). In particular, since Δw(G)≤bp⁡(G)\Delta_w(G) \le\operatorname{bp}(G), this establishes the Chung–Ross conjecture asymptotically.

The proof groups parallel edges into feasible bundles, leaving a simple graph of light remainders. Kőnig’s theorem properly colors the heavier bundles with approximately 2Δw(G)2\Delta_w(G) colors. The challenge is that a remaining edge can use only a color missing at both endpoints, and the two sets of missing colors may initially have little overlap. Kempe-style exchanges along two-color paths coordinate these missing sets in a weighted average sense, after which the simple-graph local-to-global rounding theorem completes the coloring. Thus the bipartite bound is also a substantial application of our main rounding framework. See § 4 for details.

For arbitrary loopless multigraphs we obtain the tight bound χw′(G)≤3⌈Δw(G)⌉\chi_w'(G) \le3\lceil\Delta_w(G)\rceil. This proof is considerably simpler and independent of the rounding machinery. We present a self-contained argument for this guarantee as a gentle starting point in § 2.

Improved bounds from the contents of bins. Exploiting local bin packing, we obtain further improvements on upper bounds on χw′(G)\chi_w'(G): (1.62+o(1))bp⁡(G)(1.62 + o(1))\operatorname{bp}(G) for bipartite multigraphs, and (1.999+o(1))bp⁡(G)(1.999 + o(1))\operatorname{bp}(G) for arbitrary loopless multigraphs.

The bipartite bound builds on our rounding framework. We first use harmonic rounding, ubiquitous in bin packing [26], to achieve a guarantee of the classical harmonic constant h∞≈1.691h_\infty\approx1.691. The further improvement to 1.62 uses three selections of edges from compatible weight ranges: a heavy edge and a small edge, or two small edges, can share one color. Coloring these selections separately reduces the harmonic charge of the remainder.

For general multigraphs, packet coloring must additionally respect odd-set constraints. Degree bounds from the previous results already handle sufficiently large odd sets, so the difficult cases reduce to dense triangles and five-vertex sets. We show that the relevant obstructions can be selected disjointly and contracted. After coloring the remaining edges, we restore their internal edges without conflicting with external colors. For multigraphs, we also employ fractional edge-coloring methods [11, 35]. Finally, this gives a coefficient strictly below two even without bipartiteness; the details are explained in § 6.

Lower bounds and exact conjectures. We give a simple bipartite counterexample (see § 5.1) to the exact weighted-degree conjecture of Feige and Singh [15]: it has Δw(G)=39/20<2\Delta_w(G) = 39/20 < 2 but χw′(G)=4\chi_w'(G) = 4, whereas the conjecture predicts three colors.

Parallel edges make the simple-graph theorem genuinely special. We construct bipartite multigraphs GNG_N with bp⁡(GN)=3N\operatorname{bp}(G_N) = 3N, χw′(GN)=4N\chi_w'(G_N) = 4N, although the underlying simple graph is a tree of maximum degree three (see § 5.2). This improves the earlier 5/45/4 lower bound of [30] to 4/34/3. Our bounds also show that the ratio of the optimal uniform asymptotic coefficients for general and bipartite multigraphs, relative to bp⁡(G)\operatorname{bp}(G), is strictly less than 3/23/2: 1.9994/3<32\frac{1.999}{4/3} < \frac{3}{2}.

Algorithms and verification. All five upper bounds in Theorem 1.1 have polynomial-time algorithms. Their descriptions and running-time analyses appear in the appendices. Companion Lean 4 formalizations cover the five existence statements in the table, not the running-time analyses.

Related results.

Our algorithms draw on classical bin-packing ideas, including linear grouping [FdIVL81], configuration-LP and rounding [22, 19]. They also use techniques from online bin packing related to Harmonic grouping [26, 31, 33]. For recent developments on online bin packing, see [BBD⁺18, BBD⁺21, HKS24, ADKS25, DJKS26]. The online variant of weighted edge coloring, where edges must be colored irrevocably upon arrival, has also been studied [5, 12].

A Weighted Analogue of Shannon's Theorem

We begin with an elementary argument showing that every loopless weighted multigraph admits a coloring with χw′(G)≤3⌈Δw(G)⌉\chi'_w(G) \le3\lceil\Delta_w(G)\rceil. Unlike our subsequent results, this argument requires no probabilistic rounding. Here, the idea is to properly color a carefully selected subgraph and then insert all remaining edges into the same palette. It is similar in spirit to the previous approaches of Feige and Singh [15]. See Section B for omitted details in this section.

Select and color a bounded-degree skeleton. Put n=⌈Δw(G)⌉n = \lceil\Delta_w(G)\rceil and inspect the edges in nonincreasing order of weight. Starting with F=∅F = \varnothing, keep an edge if adding it leaves the degree of FF at most 2n2n at both endpoints. Thus Δ(F)≤2n\Delta(F) \le2n, and Shannon’s theorem properly colors FF with at most 3n3n colors. Pad the palette with unused colors to obtain exactly 3n3n colors. A constructive proof of the required form of Shannon’s theorem appears in Lemma B.1.

Consider a rejected edge e=uve = uv of weight aa. When ee was inspected, one endpoint, say uu, already had 2n2n selected edges. Each was inspected before ee and therefore has weight at least aa. We call these edges the witnesses of ee. The witnesses serve two purposes. First, a<1/2a < 1/2: otherwise the 2n2n witnesses together with ee would have weight at least (2n+1)/2>n(2n + 1)/2 > n at uu, contradicting Δw(G)≤n\Delta_w(G) \le n. Second, because the coloring of FF is proper, the witnesses receive 2n2n distinct colors. We never recolor FF, so each of these colors continues to carry load at least aa at uu, regardless of which other edges are inserted. The following elementary lemma explains why the witnesses suffice.

Lemma 2.1. Let n≥1n \ge1 be an integer and 0<a<1/20 < a < 1/2. Suppose the loads xc,yc≥0x_c, y_c \ge0 of 3n3n colors at two vertices satisfy ∑cxc≤n\sum_c x_c \le n, and ∑cyc≤n\sum_c y_c \le n. If at least 2n2n colors satisfy xc≥ax_c \ge a, then some color cc satisfies xc+a≤1x_c + a \le1 and yc+a≤1y_c + a \le1.

Proof sketch. Suppose, to the contrary, that no color has room at both endpoints. Then every color has load greater than 1−a1-a at one endpoint. Let S={c:yc>1−a}S = \{c : y_c > 1-a\}, and s=∣S∣s = |S|. Since ∑cyc≤n\sum_c y_c \le n, we have s<n/(1−a)s < n/(1-a); for every c∉Sc \notin S, we must have xc>1−ax_c > 1-a.

References

  1. [4]Kristóf Bérczi, Siyue Liu, Victor Reis, and Jakub Tarnawski. Weighted equitability and matroid-constrained discrepancy, 2026. Submitted 14 August 2026. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.13983v1, arXiv:2608.13983v1.
  2. [5]J. R. Correa and M. X. Goemans. Improved bounds on nonblocking 3-stage Clos networks. SIAM Journal on Computing, 37(3):870–894, 2007. doi:10.1137/060656413.DOI
  3. [6]Charles Clos. A study of non-blocking switching networks. Bell System Technical Journal, 32(2):406–424, 1953. doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1953.tb01433.x.DOI
  4. [7]S.-P. Chung and K. W. Ross. On nonblocking multirate interconnection networks. SIAM Journal on Computing, 20(4):726–736, 1991. doi:10.1137/0220046.DOI
  5. [8]D. Z. Du, B. Gao, F. K. Hwang, and J. H. Kim. On multirate rearrangeable Clos networks. SIAM Journal on Computing, 28(2):463–470, 1998. doi:10.1137/S0097539795284716.DOI
  6. [10]Michelle Delcourt and Luke Postle. Finding an almost perfect matching in a hypergraph avoiding forbidden submatchings, 2024. arXiv:2204.08981v3.arxiv.org/abs/2204.08981
  7. [11]Jack Edmonds. Maximum matching and a polyhedron with 0,1-vertices. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards, Section B, 69B:125–130, 1965. doi:10.6028/jres.069b.013.DOI
  8. [12]Leah Epstein. More on online weighted edge coloring. Discrete Optimization, 50:100803, 2023. doi:10.1016/j.disopt.2023.100803.DOI
  9. [13]Leah Epstein. Tighter bounds for the harmonic bin packing algorithm. European Journal of Operational Research, 316(1):72–84, 2024. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2024.01.051.DOI
  10. [14]W. Fernandez de la Vega and George S. Lueker. Bin packing can be solved within 1+ ε in linear time. Combinatorica, 1(4):349–355, 1981. doi:10.1007/BF02579456.DOI
  11. [15]Uriel Feige and Mohit Singh. Edge coloring and decompositions of weighted graphs. In Algorithms—ESA 2008, volume 5193 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 405–416. Springer, 2008. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-87744-8_34.DOI
  12. [16]Rajiv Gandhi, Samir Khuller, Srinivasan Parthasarathy, and Aravind Srinivasan. Dependent rounding and its applications to approximation algorithms. Journal of the ACM, 53(3):324–360, 2006. URL: https://www.cs.umd.edu/~srin/PDF/2005/depround-dec05.pdf, doi:10.1145/1147954.1147956.DOI
  13. [17]Martin Grötschel, László Lovász, and Alexander Schrijver. Geometric Algorithms and Combinatorial Optimization, volume 2 of Algorithms and Combinatorics. Springer-Verlag, 1988. URL: https://www.zib.de/userpage/groetschel/pubnew/paper/groetschellovaszschrijver1988.pdf, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-97881-4.DOI
  14. [19]Rebecca Hoberg and Thomas Rothvoss. A logarithmic additive integrality gap for bin packing. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA 2017), pages 2616–2625. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2017. doi:10.1137/1.9781611974782.172.DOI
  15. [20]David G. Harris and Aravind Srinivasan. The Moser–Tardos framework with partial resampling. Journal of the ACM, 66(5), 2019. Article 36. arXiv:1406.5943v5.
  16. [21]Florian Huc. Weighted-edge-coloring of k-degenerate graphs and bin-packing. Journal of Interconnection Networks, 12(1–2):109–124, 2011. doi:10.1142/S0219265911002861.DOI
  17. [22]Narendra Karmarkar and Richard M. Karp. An efficient approximation scheme for the one-dimensional bin-packing problem. In 23rd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS 1982), pages 312–320. IEEE Computer Society, 1982. doi:10.1109/SFCS.1982.61.DOI
  18. [23]Tamás Király, Lap Chi Lau, and Mohit Singh. Degree bounded matroids and submodular flows. In Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization (IPCO 2008), volume 5035 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 259–272. Springer, 2008. URL: https://cs.uwaterloo.ca/~lapchi/papers/submodular-conf.pdf, doi:10.1007/978-3-540-68891-4_18.DOI
  19. [24]Arindam Khan and Mohit Singh. On weighted bipartite edge coloring. In 35th IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2015), volume 45 of Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), pages 136–150. Schloss Dagstuhl, 2015. doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2015.136.DOI
  20. [25]Dénes Kőnig. Über Graphen und ihre Anwendung auf Determinantentheorie und Mengenlehre. Mathematische Annalen, 77:453–465, 1916. doi:10.1007/BF01456961.DOI
  21. [26]C. C. Lee and D. T. Lee. A simple on-line bin-packing algorithm. Journal of the ACM, 32(3):562–572, 1985. doi:10.1145/3828.3833.DOI
  22. [27]Jayadev Misra and David Gries. A constructive proof of Vizing’s theorem. Information Processing Letters, 41(3):131–133, 1992. doi:10.1016/0020-0190(92)90041-S.DOI
  23. [28]Riccardo Melen and Jonathan S. Turner. Nonblocking multirate networks. SIAM Journal on Computing, 18(2):301–313, 1989. doi:10.1137/0218021.DOI
  24. [29]Robin A. Moser and Gábor Tardos. A constructive proof of the general Lovász Local Lemma. Journal of the ACM, 57(2), 2010. Article 11. doi:10.1145/1667053.1667060.DOI
  25. [30]Hung Q. Ngo and Van H. Vu. Multirate rearrangeable Clos networks and a generalized edge-coloring problem on bipartite graphs. SIAM Journal on Computing, 32(4):1040–1049, 2003. doi:10.1137/S0097539702408235.DOI
  26. [31]Prakash Ramanan, Donna J. Brown, C. C. Lee, and D. T. Lee. On-line bin packing in linear time. Journal of Algorithms, 10(3):305–326, 1989. doi:10.1016/0196-6774(89)90031-X.DOI
  27. [32]Debarsho Sannyasi. Improved approximation algorithms for weighted edge coloring of graphs, 2020. arXiv:2012.15056.arxiv.org/abs/2012.15056
  28. [33]Steven S. Seiden. On the online bin packing problem. Journal of the ACM, 49(5):640–671, 2002. doi:10.1145/585265.585269.DOI
  29. [34]Claude E. Shannon. A theorem on coloring the lines of a network. Journal of Mathematics and Physics, 28:148–151, 1949. doi:10.1002/sapm1949281148.DOI
  30. [35]Peter Sanders and David Steurer. An asymptotic approximation scheme for multigraph edge coloring. ACM Transactions on Algorithms, 4(2), 2008. Article 21. doi:10.1145/1361192.1361198.DOI
  31. [36]V. G. Vizing. On an estimate of the chromatic class of a p-graph. Diskret. Analiz, 3:25–30, 1964. In Russian.

Paper details

vlnc:W_5nrunufu
v1 · latestHistory (1)

published · Fresh — added to the Hub within the last 30 days

added ·

Usage

views · 8

downloads · 0

A view counts once per browser per day, a download each time the PDF is requested.

CC BY 4.0

Original source

  • Mathematics

Not recorded for this paper · View statement →

Looking for related papers…
Contents