Introduction

Let (X,B)(X,B) be a normal projective log canonical pair over an algebraically closed field kk of characteristic zero, and put D=KX+BD=K_X+B. When κ(X,D)≥0\kappa(X,D)\ge0, the sections of multiples of DD determine the Iitaka fibration. The effective problem asks whether one degree, depending only on the dimension and the allowed boundary coefficients, already determines that fibration. A uniform degree must control both the birational geometry of its base and the information lost in passing between different pluricanonical degrees.

We formulate the conclusion directly as an equality of subfields of the function field. For an integer ℓ>0\ell>0, write

Vℓ(D)=H0(X,OX(⌊ℓD⌋)).V_\ell(D)=H^0(X,\mathcal{O}_X(\lfloor\ell D\rfloor)).

When Vℓ(D)≠0V_\ell(D)\ne0, the ratios of its nonzero sections generate a field Fℓ(D)⊂k(X)F_\ell(D)\subset k(X). Define

K(D)=k(st:s,t∈Vℓ(D)∖{0}, ℓ>0, Vℓ(D)≠0).K(D)=k\left(\frac{s}{t}:s,t\in V_\ell(D)\setminus\{0\},\ \ell>0,\ V_\ell(D)\ne0\right).

Thus Fℓ(D)F_\ell(D) is the function field of the image of the complete degree-ℓ\ell system, viewed inside k(X)k(X), and K(D)K(D) collects these fields over all degrees. The reflexive sheaf OX(⌊ℓD⌋)\mathcal{O}_X(\lfloor\ell D\rfloor) makes this definition meaningful even when ℓD\ell D is not Cartier.

Theorem 1.1 (Uniform log Iitaka degree). For every integer d≥5d\ge5 and every finite set Φ⊂[0,1]∩Q\Phi\subset[0,1]\cap\mathbb{Q}, there is an integer m=m(d,Φ)>0m=m(d,\Phi)>0 with the following property. Let kk be any algebraically closed field of characteristic zero, and let (X,B)(X,B) be a normal integral projective lc dd-fold pair over kk. Assume that B≥0B\ge0, every nonzero coefficient of BB belongs to Φ\Phi, D=KX+BD=K_X+B is rational Cartier, and κ(X,D)≥0\kappa(X,D)\ge0. Then

Vm(D)≠0,Fm(D)=K(D)inside k(X).V_m(D)\ne0,\qquad F_m(D)=K(D)\quad\text{inside }k(X).

The bound is existential. The proof uses the good-model theorem of [33], the normal log canonical index theorem of [35], and the arithmetic Stein-degree theorem of [32]. Their precise statements are recalled in Section 2. The contribution developed here is the passage from these inputs to uniform denominators for log fibrations with horizontal boundary, followed by the exact comparison of rounded section fields. We state the higher-dimensional range d≥5d\ge5 to complement the lower-dimensional results discussed below; the intermediate arguments are formulated in all fibre dimensions.

History and the denominator problem

Iitaka’s work established the asymptotic fibration associated with pluricanonical systems [18]. Uniform effectivity asks for a degree independent of the particular variety. In the general-type case this became uniform birationality of pluricanonical maps, proved in arbitrary dimension by Hacon–McKernan, Takayama, and Tsuji [13, 26, 30]. Hacon–McKernan–Xu extended effective birationality to big log canonical adjoints with coefficients in a DCC set [15]; Theorem 1.3]. That theorem includes round-down systems, the convention used here.

When the Kodaira dimension is smaller than the dimension, the induced log adjoint on the generic fibre has Kodaira dimension zero. The canonical bundle formula transfers the adjoint to the base, where the variation of the fibres contributes a moduli divisor. Fujino–Mori developed this approach to effective Iitaka fibrations [11]; Viehweg–Zhang obtained effective results with a surface base and controlled fibre invariants [31]. Birkar–Zhang’s general effectivity theorem depends on the dimension, the least nonvanishing pluricanonical degree of the general fibre, and the middle Betti number of a smooth model of its canonical cover [4], Theorem 1.2. Their effective birationality theorem for polarized pairs [4], Theorem 1.3 is also the final birational input in the present proof.

The logarithmic problem introduces horizontal boundary on the generic fibre. Earlier results include the low-dimensional klt results of Todorov and Todorov–Xu [27, 28], and the boundedness and birationality results of Hacon–Xu for klt pairs whose boundary is big over the generic point of the Iitaka base [16]. Chen–Han–Liu formulate the effective log Iitaka problem for lc pairs with DCC coefficients and relate it to good minimal models and complements [5], Conjecture 1.2 and Theorem 1.4. They obtain the dimension-at-most-three case in [5], Corollary 1.5. Our coefficient set is finite, and the higher-dimensional argument here uses the three companion theorems stated above.

A bounded index of the generic fibre does not by itself give the needed Cartier denominator for the moduli divisor. After a curve base change one can obtain semistable reduction, but its ramification degree is generally uncontrolled. The relevant question is whether the action of inertia on a suitably normalized logarithmic volume form has bounded order. Only this character needs to be bounded; the covering degree and the order of the entire automorphism need not be.

Fujino–Mori already control finite characters through the cohomology of the fibre [11], Theorem 3.1 and Sections 3.6–3.8. The companion [U] develops the character method for boundary-free factors using the singular Beauville–Bogomolov decomposition. The curve and effective-system arguments of [U4] treat log Calabi–Yau fibrations in total dimension at most four, using the index of the whole reduced slc fibre. We adapt these methods to horizontal boundary in arbitrary fibre dimension. The geometric structure theorem of Matsumura–Wang [24], Theorem 1.3 supplies a rationally connected factor carrying the boundary, together with abelian and nonabelian Beauville–Bogomolov factors. The additional work is to retain the factor decomposition under semilinear actions and to control the logarithmic character of the rationally connected factor.

The main intermediate result and the proof

The reusable intermediate statement is a bound for weights over curves. Let CC be a smooth projective complex curve, put K=C(C)K = \mathbb{C}(C), let zz be a uniformizer at c∈Cc \in C, and let (V,Δ)(V, \Delta) be a geometrically integral normal projective lc ss-fold pair over KK, with Δ≥0\Delta\ge0. For a positive integer aa, a degree-aa rational log trivialization is a nonzero rational aa-canonical form ϕ\phi satisfying div⁡(ϕ)+aΔ=0\operatorname{div}(\phi) + a\Delta= 0. Its weight at cc is the infimum

wz(ϕ)=inf⁡Eord⁡E(ϕ∧(dz/z)⊗a)+aaord⁡Ez,w_z(\phi) = \inf_E \frac{\operatorname{ord}_E\left(\phi\wedge(dz/z)^{\otimes a}\right) + a}{a\operatorname{ord}_E z},

where EE ranges over divisorial valuations of the total function field centred over cc. These are ordinary canonical orders; the additive aa records the logarithmic pole along the base. Theorem 4.2 proves that an integer depending only on ss and aa clears this weight. Once a degree-aa trivialization is given, no further coefficient parameter is needed.

There are two parts to the weight argument. If a dlt model has a horizontal coefficient-one component, taking a rational plurisubidue reduces the fibre dimension. Its Stein factorization may change the curve field. The arithmetic bound of [SD] controls that change, so residue gives an induction with bounded denominators.

In the klt case, the product theorem of [24] applies, but the product cover need not carry the inertia action. We pass to a Galois comparison cover and prove that a bounded power acts separately on suitable finite covers of the factors. The proof uses the algebra of endomorphisms of the tangent sheaf of the comparison cover that preserve its subsheaf of vector fields tangent to the boundary. The required vanishing of global vector fields tangent to the boundary on the rationally connected factor follows from a finite invariant log-volume measure.

After equivariant semistable reduction, each factor form can be normalized to have weight zero. Their product has weight zero as well. If the original form differs from this product by a base function vv on a curve cover, and c′c' is a point over cc of ramification index ee, then

e wZ(ϕ)=ord⁡c′(v)a.e\,w_Z(\phi)=\frac{\operatorname{ord}_{c'}(v)}{a}.

The inertia identity forces ee to divide a bounded multiple of ord⁡c′(v)\operatorname{ord}_{c'}(v) once the factor characters have bounded order. This cancels the uncontrolled ramification and bounds the original weight denominator.

For abelian factors the character acts on a bounded-rank integral cohomology group. For the other factors we instead use a dlt special fibre on a good model. Du Bois base change determines its structure-sheaf cohomology, and coherent Lefschetz gives a fixed point of a bounded power of the action. A bounded further power preserves a normal component. The residue there is a log trivialization in the original degree, so its different has coefficients in a fixed finite set. The normal lc index theorem of [U], applied to the cyclic quotient of this component, bounds the character. This step works on one normal component and is the reason an index theorem for a reducible special fibre is unnecessary.

To finish the proof over C\mathbb{C}, let f ⁣:Y→Zf\colon Y\to Z be the semiample contraction of a good model (Y,BY)(Y,B_Y) of (X,B)(X,B). The normal index theorem gives a bounded positive integer p0p_0 and a rational function ψ∈C(Y)∗\psi\in\mathbb{C}(Y)^* such that the canonical bundle formula has the exact presentation

KY+BY+1p0div⁡(ψ)=f∗(KZ+BZ+MZ).K_Y+B_Y+\frac{1}{p_0}\operatorname{div}(\psi)=f^*(K_Z+B_Z+M_Z).

Here BZB_Z is the discriminant defined by log canonical thresholds, and the equality specifies the moduli representative MZM_Z. Fixing the degree p0p_0 is essential: arbitrary rational principal shifts can introduce new denominators. Slicing the base by a curve identifies a coefficient of this moduli divisor with the curve weight, up to an integer. This proves Theorem 7.2: a uniform multiple of the moduli trace on a suitable smooth birational model of ZZ is nef Cartier.

Birkar–Zhang’s theorem then gives a birational system on the base. The remaining step is to identify complete rounded section spaces upstairs with those downstairs. This yields equality with K(D)K(D) inside the original function field, including ratios initially appearing in other degrees, and permits descent from C\mathbb{C} to any algebraically closed characteristic-zero field.

Section 3 records the relative minimal-model construction. Section 4 proves the residue reduction for weights. Sections 5 and 6 establish the klt weight bound. Section 7 converts that bound into moduli denominators, and Section 8 proves Theorem 1.1.

Conventions and companion theorems

We assume familiarity with discrepancies, singularities of pairs, and the minimal model program, as in [22, 20]. We recall the conventions and precise theorem inputs needed for the argument. The argument is carried out over C\mathbb{C} until the final descent to an arbitrary algebraically closed field of characteristic zero. Varieties are integral and projective unless a different setting is specified. A contraction is a projective surjective morphism f ⁣:X→Zf\colon X\to Z of normal varieties satisfying f∗OX=OZf_*\mathcal{O}_X=\mathcal{O}_Z. In characteristic zero its generic fibre is geometrically integral. All boundaries in our argument are rational.

For a normal variety, a rational section of a divisorial sheaf is identified with a rational function. Thus, for a rational Weil divisor DD,

H0(X,OX(⌊D⌋))={a∈k(X):div⁡(a)+D≥0}∪{0}.(1)H^0(X,\mathcal{O}_X(\lfloor D\rfloor))=\{a\in k(X):\operatorname{div}(a)+D\ge0\}\cup\{0\}. \tag*{(1)}

The equality uses the integrality of the orders of aa. It does not require ⌊D⌋\lfloor D\rfloor to be Cartier. We use compatible canonical divisors on birational models, obtained from one rational top differential. A rational mm-canonical form means an element of the mmth tensor power of the top differential line of a function field; its divisor is computed on normal models at codimension-one regular points.

We use log discrepancies. If π:Y→X\pi:Y\to X is a birational model and KY+BY=π∗(KX+B)K_Y+B_Y=\pi^*(K_X+B), then the log discrepancy of a prime divisor EE on YY is 1−coeff⁡EBY1-\operatorname{coeff}_E B_Y. In particular, log canonicity means that all these numbers are nonnegative. Crepant boundaries on higher models may have negative coefficients. Effectiveness will always be specified when it is needed. We use dlt adjunction in its usual form: a component SS of the coefficient-one part of a dlt boundary is normal, and

(KY+BY)∣S=KS+Diff⁡S(BY−S)(K_Y+B_Y)|_S=K_S+\operatorname{Diff}_S(B_Y-S)

with an effective lc different when BYB_Y is an effective boundary [22, 20].

The three companion inputs

The following statements are the substantive inputs from companion manuscripts. We recall their full scope because the coefficient and ground-field conditions matter at different places in the proof.

Theorem 2.1 (Normal log canonical indices [U, Theorem 1.2]). For every integer n≥0n\ge0 and every DCCDCC set Ψ⊂[0,1]∩Q\Psi\subset[0,1]\cap\mathbb{Q}, there is an integer a(n,Ψ)>0a(n,\Psi)>0 such that every normal integral projective lc pair (V,Δ)(V,\Delta) over C\mathbb{C} with dim⁡V=n\dim V=n, Δ≥0\Delta\ge0, coefficients in Ψ\Psi, and KV+Δ∼Q0K_V+\Delta\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}0 satisfies

a(n,Ψ)(KV+Δ)∼0.a(n,\Psi)(K_V+\Delta)\sim0.

Here the displayed multiple is an integral principal divisor.

A DCC set is a set with no infinite strictly decreasing sequence. We will apply Theorem 2.1 both to a finite coefficient set and to the DCC set produced by finite cyclic quotients. Its principal-divisor conclusion supplies an actual rational pluriform in a bounded degree.

Theorem 2.2 (Good models [LA, Theorem 11.1]). Every projective lc pair (V,Δ)(V,\Delta) over C\mathbb{C} with effective real boundary and pseudo-effective real Cartier adjoint KV+ΔK_V+\Delta has a good log minimal model.

We use only the rational-boundary case, including semiampleness of a nef adjoint. This theorem supplies existence; the terminating programs used below also use the MMP with scaling [29]. Section 3 explains precisely how to apply these results over a projective curve.

Theorem 2.3 (Arithmetic Stein degrees [SD, Main Theorem]). For every integer n≥1n\ge1 and every real number t>0t>0, there is an integer N(n,t)N(n,t) with the following property. Let FF be a field of characteristic zero, and let (V,Δ)(V,\Delta) be a normal integral projective lc rational pair over FF with

dim⁡V=n,H0(V,OV)=F,Δ≥0,KV+Δ∼Q0.\dim V=n,\qquad H^0(V,\mathcal{O}_V)=F,\qquad\Delta\ge0,\qquad K_V+\Delta\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}0.

If SS is a prime component of Δ\Delta of coefficient at least tt, the algebraic closure of FF in F(S)F(S) has degree at most N(n,t)N(n,t) over FF.

For a proper normal component this algebraic closure is its field of global functions. In our application FF is a complex curve field and t=1t=1; the theorem controls the finite curve in the Stein factorization of a horizontal coefficient-one component.

Trivializations and constants

Two elementary facts will be useful repeatedly. First, a rational function with zero divisor on a normal integral proper variety is an invertible global function. Second, the degree of a geometric trivialization does not increase on descending the constants.

Lemma 2.4 (Descent in the same degree). Let VV be a geometrically integral normal projective variety over a characteristic-zero field FF. Let DD be an integral Weil divisor. If DF‾D_{\overline{F}} is principal, then DD is principal. In particular, an integral principal multiple of a rational log canonical divisor on VF‾V_{\overline{F}} descends in the same degree to VV.

Proof. The divisorial sheaf OV(D)\mathcal{O}_V(D) becomes the trivial line bundle after extension to F‾\overline{F}. Divisorial sheaves commute with this extension, as can be seen on a regular big open and by reflexive extension. Faithfully flat descent makes OV(D)\mathcal{O}_V(D) invertible. Proper base change shows that its space of sections is one-dimensional over FF. The evaluation map from this space tensored with OV\mathcal{O}_V is an isomorphism after scalar extension, hence already an isomorphism. A nonzero section therefore trivializes the line bundle and principalizes DD.

The geometric instances of Theorem 2.1 over a complex function field are legitimate: the algebraic closure of any finitely generated extension of C\mathbb{C} is abstractly isomorphic to C\mathbb{C}. Transporting the variety and its divisor through such an isomorphism preserves the stated algebraic hypotheses. The final section gives a separate descent argument for the ground field in the main theorem.

Minimal models over a curve

We will use good minimal models for several degenerations of log Calabi–Yau pairs. Theorem 2.2 gives absolute good models. The following consequence supplies the relative form needed here, even when the original adjoint is not pseudo-effective on the total space.

Lemma 3.1. Let f:X→Cf:X\to C be a contraction from a projective variety over CC to a smooth projective curve, and let (X,Δ)(X,\Delta) be a Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial dlt pair with effective rational boundary. Suppose that, for some sufficiently divisible integer r>0r>0,

H0(Xη,OXη(r(KXη+Δη)))≠0,η=Spec⁡C(C).H^0\left(X_{\eta},\mathcal{O}_{X_{\eta}}\left(r(K_{X_{\eta}}+\Delta_{\eta})\right)\right)\ne0,\qquad\eta=\operatorname{Spec}\mathbb{C}(C).

There is a (KX+Δ)(K_X+\Delta)-MMP over CC that terminates with a Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial dlt pair (X′,Δ′)(X',\Delta') for which KX′+Δ′K_{X'}+\Delta' is semiample over CC. If (X,Δ)(X,\Delta) is klt, its output is klt.

Proof. A generic section extends after a sufficiently positive twist from CC. Choose an ample rational divisor AA on CC such that

KX+Δ+f∗A is pseudo-effective,deg⁡A>2dim⁡X.K_X+\Delta+f^*A\ \text{is pseudo-effective},\qquad\deg A>2\dim X.

We may represent AA by many general points with small positive coefficients. Then (X,Δ+f∗A)(X,\Delta+f^*A) is dlt, and is klt if (X,Δ)(X,\Delta) is klt. Choose an effective ample rational scaling divisor GG, represented by general members with small coefficients, such that (X,Δ+f∗A+G)(X,\Delta+f^*A+G) is lc and KX+Δ+f∗A+GK_X+\Delta+f^*A+G is nef. The good-model theorem just recalled and [29], Theorem A give a terminating MMP for KX+Δ+f∗AK_X + \Delta+ f^*A with scaling of GG. The resulting log adjoint is nef and hence semiample by the nef case of [LA, Theorem 11.1].

Every step of this program is over CC. Indeed, suppose inductively that the current variety XiX_i has a morphism fi:Xi→Cf_i : X_i \to C, and let RR be the negative extremal ray chosen at that step. Since fi∗Af_i^*A is nef, RR is also negative for KXi+ΔiK_{X_i} + \Delta_i. The lc length bound [9] supplies a rational curve Γ\Gamma spanning RR with

0<−(KXi+Δi)⋅Γ≤2dim⁡X.0 < -(K_{X_i} + \Delta_i) \cdot\Gamma\le2 \dim X.

If Γ\Gamma dominated CC, then fi∗A⋅Γ≥deg⁡Af_i^*A \cdot\Gamma\ge\deg A, giving

(KXi+Δi+fi∗A)⋅Γ≥−2dim⁡X+deg⁡A>0,(K_{X_i} + \Delta_i + f_i^*A) \cdot\Gamma\ge-2 \dim X + \deg A > 0,

a contradiction. Thus the ray is vertical. The morphism to CC descends through its contraction, and any flip is also over CC. On a vertical ray the two adjoints have the same intersection numbers, so these are also steps of a (KX+Δ)(K_X + \Delta)-MMP over CC.

The transform of the added divisor remains fi∗Af_i^*A. Dlt preservation for the augmented pairs, followed by decreasing the boundary, keeps (Xi,Δi)(X_i, \Delta_i) dlt throughout; the usual discrepancy comparison preserves klt in the klt case. Finally, subtracting a divisor pulled back from CC does not change relative semiampleness. Hence the semiampleness of KX′+Δ′+f′∗AK_{X'} + \Delta' + f'^*A proves the assertion.

Weights of logarithmic pluriforms

The denominator needed in the canonical bundle formula will be detected by a rational pluriform over a curve. Its weight compares the corrected canonical order with the multiplicity of the base parameter. The main assertion of this section bounds the denominator using only the relative dimension and the degree of the pluriform. Coefficient-one horizontal boundary will permit induction by residue; the remaining klt case is proved in Proposition 6.7.

Let CC be a smooth projective complex curve, let c∈Cc \in C, and put K=C(C)K = \mathbb{C}(C). A rational uniformizer at cc is an element z∈Kz \in K with ord⁡cz=1\operatorname{ord}_c z = 1. Suppose that F/KF/K is a finitely generated regular field extension of transcendence degree ss. A rational relative mm-canonical form is a nonzero element of (⋀sΩF/K)⊗m(\bigwedge^s \Omega_{F/K})^{\otimes m}. We use the canonical-line identification given by a fixed wedge order to write its associated absolute form as

Ω=ϕ∧(dz/z)⊗m.\Omega= \phi\wedge(dz/z)^{\otimes m}.

Orders of this absolute pluriform are ordinary canonical orders on models of FF over $C.

Definition 4.1. For a rational relative mm-canonical form ϕ\phi, set

wz(ϕ)=inf⁡Eord⁡E(ϕ∧(dz/z)⊗m)+mmord⁡Ez.(2)w_z(\phi) = \inf_E \frac{\operatorname{ord}_E\bigl(\phi\wedge(dz/z)^{\otimes m}\bigr) + m}{m\operatorname{ord}_E z}. \tag*{(2)}

Here EE runs through the normalized divisorial valuations of F/CF/C whose restriction to KK is a positive multiple of ord⁡c\operatorname{ord}_c.

The definition depends only on the field and form. In the log canonical setting below the infimum is finite and is attained on a log resolution.

Theorem 4.2 (Uniform weight denominator). For integers s≥0s \ge0 and $m \ge 1 there is an integer q(s,m)>0q(s,m) > 0 with the following property. Let CC be a smooth projective complex curve, c∈Cc \in C, and zz a rational uniformizer at cc. Let VV be a normal geometrically integral projective ss-fold over K=C(C)K = \mathbb{C}(C), and let (V,B)(V, B) be a geometrically log canonical pair with effective rational boundary. If a rational relative mm-canonical form ϕ\phi satisfies

div⁡V(ϕ)+mB=0,(3)\operatorname{div}_{V}(\phi) + mB = 0, \tag*{(3)}

then

q(s,m)wz(ϕ)∈Z.q(s,m)w_z(\phi) \in\mathbb{Z}.

The integer q(s,m)q(s,m) is independent of the boundary coefficients and of the curve, variety, and form.

Although the boundary is not prescribed in the theorem, (3) already makes mBmB integral. What remains unbounded on an arbitrary model is the multiplicity of a vertical divisor. The preparation below makes its contribution visible in a dlt fibre.

Changes of fields and forms

We first record the valuation rules used throughout the proof. They extend the boundary-free rules of [U, Lemma 4.2]; the boundary does not enter their proof.

Lemma 4.3. Weights of rational relative pluriforms have the following properties.

(i) They do not depend on the rational uniformizer at the fixed point. For a∈K∗a \in K^* and t≥1t \ge1,

wz(aϕ)=wz(ϕ)+ord⁡Cam,wz(ϕ⊗t)=wz(ϕ).w_z(a\phi) = w_z(\phi) + \frac{\operatorname{ord}_C a}{m}, \qquad w_z(\phi^{\otimes t}) = w_z(\phi).

(ii) If F′/FF'/F is finite and KK is algebraically closed in F′F', then the pullback of ϕ\phi has the same weight over CC.

(iii) Let K′/KK'/K be finite Galois, let C′→CC' \to C be the associated map of smooth projective curves, and let c′∈C′c' \in C' lie above cc with ramification index ll. For a rational uniformizer uu at c′c' and the pullback ϕ′\phi' to FK′/K′FK'/K', one has

wu(ϕ′)=lwz(ϕ).w_u(\phi') = l w_z(\phi).

Proof. If z′z' is another uniformizer, (dz′/z′)/(dz/z)(dz'/z')/(dz/z) is a base unit at cc. This proves independence of zz. For every valuation in (2), ord⁡Ea=(ord⁡Ca)ord⁡Ez\operatorname{ord}_E a = (\operatorname{ord}_C a)\operatorname{ord}_E z; this gives the first formula, and the tensor-power formula follows by multiplying numerator and denominator.

For a divisorial valuation E′E' above EE in a finite extension of characteristic-zero fields, with ramification index aa, the canonical ramification formula gives

ord⁡E′(Ω)+m=a(ord⁡E(Ω)+m).(4)\operatorname{ord}_{E'}(\Omega) + m = a\bigl(\operatorname{ord}_E(\Omega) + m\bigr). \tag*{(4)}

Divisorial valuations restrict and prolong to divisorial valuations. When the constant field is unchanged, ord⁡E′z=aord⁡Ez\operatorname{ord}_{E'} z = a\operatorname{ord}_E z, so the individual quotients, and hence their infima, agree.

For a curve extension, the pullback of dz/zdz/z is a unit times du/udu/u at c′c', and

ord⁡E′u=alord⁡Ez.\operatorname{ord}_{E'} u = \frac{a}{l}\operatorname{ord}_E z.

Equation (4) therefore multiplies each quotient by ll. Regularity of F/KF/K makes FF and K′K' linearly disjoint over KK. The Galois action on their compositum is thus available to move a prolongation to the chosen branch c′c'. Every valuation downstairs has such a prolongation, proving (4.3).

A model on which the weight is exact

We adapt the curve preparation in [U4, Section 4] to obtain an exact divisor equality on a dlt model in any relative dimension. The elementary discrepancy calculation behind the preparation will also be used on semistable models. Write A(E;W,Δ)A(E;W,\Delta) for the log discrepancy, so a component of coefficient one has discrepancy zero.

Lemma 4.4. Let f:W→Cf:W\to C be a projective model of F/KF/K with WW smooth. Put FW=f∗cF_W=f^*c and TW=(FW)redT_W=(F_W)_{\mathrm{red}}. Let HWH_W be an effective horizontal rational boundary whose coefficients are at most one, and suppose that TW+HWT_W+H_W has simple normal crossings near TWT_W. For Ω=ϕ∧(dz/z)⊗m\Omega=\phi\wedge(\mathrm{d}z/z)^{\otimes m}, assume that the horizontal part of div⁡W(Ω)/m+HW\operatorname{div}_W(\Omega)/m+H_W is effective. Then

wz(ϕ)=min⁡D⊂TWord⁡D(Ω)+mmord⁡Dz,(5)w_z(\phi)=\min_{D\subset T_W}\frac{\operatorname{ord}_D(\Omega)+m}{m\operatorname{ord}_D z}, \tag*{(5)}

where DD ranges over the prime components of TWT_W.

Proof. Denote the minimum on the right by ww. After shrinking the curve around cc, the rational divisor

EW=1mdiv⁡W(Ω)+TW+HW−wFW(6)E_W=\frac{1}{m}\operatorname{div}_W(\Omega)+T_W+H_W-wF_W \tag*{(6)}

is effective. For every divisorial valuation over cc, pullback of this equality gives

ord⁡E(Ω)m+1=word⁡Ez+A(E;W,TW+HW)+ord⁡EEW.(7)\frac{\operatorname{ord}_E(\Omega)}{m}+1=w\operatorname{ord}_E z+A(E;W,T_W+H_W)+\operatorname{ord}_E E_W. \tag*{(7)}

The last two terms are nonnegative. Thus every quotient in (4.1) is at least ww. A component realizing the displayed minimum gives equality.

Proposition 4.5. For the data of Theorem 4.2, with s>0s>0, there is a projective contraction f:N→Cf:N\to C and an effective horizontal rational boundary HH such that:

(i) NN is Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial, its generic fibre is geometrically integral and birational to VV, and (N,T+H)(N,T+H) is dlt, where T=(f∗c)redT=(f^*c)_{\mathrm{red}};

(ii) KN+T+H∼Q,C0K_N+T+H\sim_{\mathbb{Q},C}0;

(iii) for the same field-theoretic form Ω\Omega and w=wz(ϕ)w=w_z(\phi), there is an equality of rational divisors near TT,

1mdiv⁡N(Ω)+T+H=wf∗c.(8)\frac{1}{m}\operatorname{div}_N(\Omega)+T+H=wf^*c. \tag*{(8)}

In particular, on the generic fibre, div⁡(ϕ)+mHη=0\operatorname{div}(\phi)+mH_\eta=0. If HH has no coefficient-one component, then (Nη,Hη)(N_\eta,H_\eta) is geometrically klt and KNηK_{N_\eta} is Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier.

Proof. Choose a smooth projective model W→CW\to C whose generic fibre is a log resolution of VV. Resolve also the closures of the horizontal boundary and exceptional divisors, together with the fibre over cc. Let BWηcB^c_{W_\eta} be the crepant subboundary on the generic resolution, and take HWH_W to be the closure of its positive part. Its coefficients are at most one, and the horizontal divisor

1mdiv⁡W(Ω)+HW\frac{1}{m}\operatorname{div}_W(\Omega)+H_W

is effective and exceptional over VV on the generic fibre. The markings can be chosen so that (W,TW+HW)(W,T_W+H_W) is log smooth. Lemma 4.4 computes ww and gives the effective error EWE_W in (4.6) near $c. On the generic fibre, KW+TW+HWK_W+T_W+H_W is rationally linearly equivalent to an effective exceptional divisor over the normal projective variety VV. Its Kodaira dimension is zero: a rational function whose poles are supported on that exceptional divisor descends to a regular function on VV, hence is constant. In particular it has a section in a sufficiently divisible degree. Lemma 3.1 therefore gives a terminating MMP over CC for KW+TW+HWK_W+T_W+H_W. Write its output as (N,T+H)(N,T+H). No divisors are extracted, so the transform of TWT_W is precisely (f∗c)red(f^*c)_{\mathrm{red}}. The generic function field is unchanged and is regular over KK; Stein factorization consequently makes f:N→Cf:N\to C a contraction.

Discrepancy comparison preserves the divisible generic-fibre section spaces through these steps. Thus the generic adjoint on NN still has Kodaira dimension zero. Its relative semiample contraction has zero-dimensional image on the generic fibre. The image is therefore a normal curve finite over CC. Connectedness of the fibres makes its function field equal to KK, so this curve is CC. This proves KN+T+H∼Q,C0K_N+T+H\sim_{\mathbb{Q},C}0.

Pushforward of (6) now gives, near the marked fibre,

1mdiv⁡N(Ω)+T+H=wf∗c+EN,EN≥0.(9)\frac{1}{m}\operatorname{div}_N(\Omega)+T+H=w f^*c+E_N,\qquad E_N\geq0. \tag*{(9)}

The restriction of ENE_N to the generic fibre is effective and Q\mathbb{Q}-linearly trivial, hence zero. Thus ENE_N is vertical, and it is Q\mathbb{Q}-linearly trivial over CC. Such a divisor is locally a rational multiple of a fibre. Indeed, a relative principal trivialization has vertical divisor, so its defining rational function has neither zeros nor poles on the normal projective generic fibre. It belongs to K∗K^*, because that fibre has no new global functions. Consequently EN=af∗cE_N=af^*c near cc for some rational number aa.

Applying the discrepancy calculation (7) to (9) shows that all valuation quotients are at least w+aw+a: the pair (N,T+H)(N,T+H) is lc. Each component of TT has coefficient one, so its quotient is exactly w+aw+a. The valuation definition still gives ww, since the function field and form have not changed. Hence a=0a=0, proving (8).

The generic restriction of that equality gives the claimed trivialization. A dlt pair with no coefficient-one boundary is klt; generic restriction, checked on a resolution, preserves this statement after algebraic closure in characteristic zero. Finally, Q\mathbb{Q}-factoriality of NN makes KNηK_{N_\eta} Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier.

Residue and the reduction to klt fibres

Suppose the prepared model has a coefficient-one horizontal component. Residue lowers the relative dimension, but that component may acquire new constants. The arithmetic Stein-degree theorem controls precisely this finite extension.

Lemma 4.6. Let f:(N,T+H)→Cf:(N,T+H)\to C be as in Proposition 4.5, with relative dimension s≥1s\geq1, and suppose that SS is a coefficient-one component of HH. Factor S→CS\to C as

S→hCS→νC,S\xrightarrow{h} C_S\xrightarrow{\nu} C,

where hh is a contraction and ν\nu is finite. Then CSC_S is a smooth projective curve and

deg⁡ν≤Ds\deg\nu\leq D_s

for an integer DsD_s depending only on ss. For every c′∈CSc'\in C_S above cc, with ramification index ee, there are data satisfying Theorem 4.2 in relative dimension s−1s-1 and degree mm over C(CS)\mathbb{C}(C_S), with a rational form ϕS\phi_S whose weight is

wu(ϕS)=ewz(ϕ)w_u(\phi_S)=e w_z(\phi)

for a rational uniformizer uu at c′c'. Proof. Dlt adjunction [22] makes SS normal and gives an effective rational different Θ\Theta such that (S,Θ)(S,\Theta) is lc. Its Stein curve is normal and hence smooth. The generic pair (Nη,Hη)(N_\eta,H_\eta) is normal, projective and lc, has H0(ONη)=KH^0(\mathcal{O}_{N_\eta})=K, and has KNη+Hη∼Q0K_{N_\eta}+H_\eta\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}0. Its prime boundary component SηS_\eta has coefficient one. Theorem 2.3, applied with coefficient lower bound 1, bounds the relative algebraic closure of KK in K(Sη)K(S_\eta). This field is exactly C(CS)\mathbb{C}(C_S), so it gives the asserted DsD_s.

At the generic point of SS, the absolute form Ω\Omega has a logarithmic pole of order mm. Choose a local equation xx of SS and a rational ss-form β\beta, regular at the generic point of SS, whose restriction generates its canonical line. Write

Ω=a(dxx∧β)⊗m,a a unit along S.\Omega=a\left(\frac{dx}{x}\wedge\beta\right)^{\otimes m},\qquad a\text{ a unit along }S.

Its degree-mm Poincaré residue is the rational mm-canonical form

ΩS=(a∣S)(β∣S)⊗m.\Omega_S=(a|_S)(\beta|_S)^{\otimes m}.

This construction is independent of the local equation and commutes with tensor powers. Adjunction and (4.8) give the equality of actual divisors

1mdiv⁡S(ΩS)+Θ=w(f∣S)c∗(10)\frac{1}{m}\operatorname{div}_S(\Omega_S)+\Theta=w(f|_S)c^* \tag*{(10)}

near the marked fibre. To verify the identity in this exact degree, take a tensor power for which the ambient adjunction is Cartier and apply the pluricanonical adjunction isomorphism. The resulting divisor identity is that same positive multiple of (4.11), and can be divided by it. This uses the rational degree-mm residue already defined at the generic point; it does not require a uniform Cartier index along SS.

The generic fibre of hh is normal, projective and geometrically integral. Its pair induced by Θ\Theta is geometrically lc, as one sees by generic restriction of a resolution in characteristic zero. Dividing ΩS\Omega_S by (du/u)⊗m(du/u)^{\otimes m} in the canonical-line identification gives a rational relative form ϕS\phi_S. The generic restriction of (4.11) is exactly

div⁡(ϕS)+mΘηS=0,ηS=Spec⁡C(CS).\operatorname{div}(\phi_S)+m\Theta_{\eta_S}=0,\qquad\eta_S=\operatorname{Spec}\mathbb{C}(C_S).

It remains to compute the weight at c′c'.

Near h−1(c′)h^{-1}(c'), the right side of (4.11) is ewh∗c′ewh^*c'. For every valuation over c′c' the corrected order is consequently

ord⁡E(ΩS)m+1=eword⁡Eu+A(E;S,Θ).\frac{\operatorname{ord}_E(\Omega_S)}{m}+1=ew\operatorname{ord}_E u+A(E;S,\Theta).

Log canonicity gives wu(ϕS)≥eww_u(\phi_S)\ge ew. The fibre of hh has a prime divisor, and any such divisor is a component of the intersection of SS with TT. At its generic point the two coefficient-one branches of the dlt pair are simple normal crossings; adjunction gives coefficient one in Θ\Theta. The quotient for that divisor is ewew, which proves (4.10).

Proof of Theorem 4.2. When s=0s=0, geometric integrality gives V=Spec⁡KV=\operatorname{Spec}K, and ϕ∈K∗\phi\in K^*. The definition gives wz(ϕ)=ord⁡c(ϕ)/mw_z(\phi)=\operatorname{ord}_c(\phi)/m, so q(0,m)=mq(0,m)=m works.

Proceed by induction on ss. Use Proposition 4.5. If its horizontal boundary has a coefficient-one component, Lemma 4.6 and the induction hypothesis give

q(s−1,m)ewz(ϕ)∈Zfor some 1≤e≤Ds.q(s-1,m)ew_z(\phi)\in\mathbb{Z}\qquad\text{for some }1\le e\le D_s.

Thus q(s−1,m)lcm⁡(1,…,Ds)q(s-1,m)\operatorname{lcm}(1,\ldots,D_s) clears the weight in this case. Otherwise the prepared generic pair is geometrically klt with Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier canonical divisor. Proposition 6.7, proved independently of this induction below, gives a clearing integer depending only on s,ms,m. Taking a common multiple of these two integers completes the induction.

Product covers and semilinear factor actions

We now prepare the klt case of the curve weight bound. A finite cover decomposes a klt log Calabi–Yau pair into factors with controlled holomorphic forms. The cover need not be Galois, however, and its Galois closure need not be a product. The purpose of this section is to retain the factor directions on that closure and to show that a bounded power of each finite transformation acts regularly on suitable finite covers of the individual factors. This is the comparison construction of [U, Lemma 3.5], extended to a rationally connected factor carrying the boundary.

The factors and their automorphisms

A finite surjective morphism between normal varieties is quasi-étale if it is étale in codimension one. Over an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero, purity implies that such a morphism is étale over the smooth locus of its target. For a normal variety FF, we write ΩF[j]\Omega_F^{[j]} for the reflexive extension of jj-forms from its smooth locus.

Proposition 5.1 (Product decomposition). Let (V,B)(V,B) be a projective klt pair over C\mathbb{C} with B≥0B \ge0, KVK_V rational Cartier, and KV+B∼Q0K_V+B \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} 0. There is a finite quasi-étale cover π:P→V\pi:P \to V and a decomposition

(P,π∗B)≃(F,H)×A×∏jYj×∏kZk(P,\pi^*B) \simeq(F,H) \times A \times\prod_j Y_j \times\prod_k Z_k

where (F,H)(F,H) is a rationally connected klt log Calabi–Yau pair, AA is an abelian variety, and the YjY_j and ZkZ_k are respectively irreducible Calabi–Yau and irreducible holomorphic symplectic varieties in the singular Beauville–Bogomolov decomposition. All factors are Q\mathbb{Q}-Gorenstein. Point factors are omitted, and the boundary is pulled back entirely from FF.

Proof. The product decomposition, including its assertion about the boundary, is [24]. Its boundary-free factors have the stated properties by the singular Beauville–Bogomolov theorem [17]. Since KVK_V is rational Cartier, quasi-étaleness makes KPK_P rational Cartier. Restricting the canonical sheaf in product charts, with the complementary points smooth, gives the same property on every factor. Restriction of KP+π∗B∼Q0K_P+\pi^*B \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} 0 gives KF+H∼Q0K_F+H \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} 0.

We use two properties of the nonabelian boundary-free factors. They and all their connected normal finite quasi-étale covers have canonical singularities and Cartier trivial canonical divisor. On each such cover the reflexive form algebra is generated by a top form in the Calabi–Yau case and by the pulled-back symplectic form in the symplectic case [17]. In particular there are no reflexive one-forms or vector fields: contraction with a volume form, or with the symplectic form, proves the latter assertion. Connected normal finite quasi-étale covers of an abelian variety are étale by purity and are again abelian varieties after an origin is chosen.

For the rationally connected factor, vector fields must be required to preserve the boundary. If DD is a reduced Weil divisor on a normal variety, TF(−log⁡D)\mathcal{T}_F(-\log D) denotes the subsheaf of derivations preserving the reduced ideal of every component of DD. This condition can be checked at height-one primes and then extended reflexively.

Lemma 5.2 (Automorphisms of a rationally connected pair). Let (F,H)(F,H) be a rationally connected projective klt pair over C\mathbb{C} with H≥0H \ge0 and KF+H∼Q0K_F+H \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} 0. Then

Hj(F,OF)=0(j>0),H0(F,ΩF[1])=0,H0(F,TF(−log⁡Supp⁡H))=0.H^j(F,\mathcal{O}_F)=0 \quad(j>0), \qquad H^0(F,\Omega_F^{[1]})=0, \qquad H^0(F,\mathcal{T}_F(-\log\operatorname{Supp} H))=0.

For every ample line bundle LL, the group of automorphisms of (F,H)(F,H) preserving LL is finite.

Proof. A smooth projective resolution of FF is rationally connected; one may lift rational curves through general smooth points, or use the rational connectedness results for klt varieties in [14]. Its positive-degree structure-sheaf cohomology vanishes. Klt singularities are rational, so the same is true on FF. The extension theorem for klt differential forms [12] then gives the asserted vanishing of reflexive one-forms.

Choose a>0a > 0 and a rational aa-canonical form θ\theta with

div⁡(θ)+aH=0.\operatorname{div}(\theta) + aH = 0.

On the smooth locus, the density ∣θ∣2/a\lvert\theta\rvert^{2/a} defines a positive measure. Pull it to a log resolution. Every divisorial order of the pulled-back form is strictly greater than −a-a, because the pair is klt. In SNC coordinates this is exactly the local integrability condition for the density. Thus it defines a finite nonzero measure μ\mu on FF, with no mass on proper algebraic subsets.

An automorphism preserving HH multiplies θ\theta by a nonzero constant. Its pullback therefore multiplies μ\mu by a positive constant; comparison of total masses makes that constant one. Consequently every automorphism of the pair preserves μ\mu.

There can be no nontrivial additive or multiplicative algebraic one-parameter subgroup of such automorphisms. Indeed, iterate the element 1∈Ga1 \in G_{\mathrm{a}} or 2∈Gm2 \in G_{\mathrm{m}} on a nonfixed point. The orbit map extends across infinity by projectivity, so these iterates converge to a subgroup-fixed point. The nonfixed locus has full μ\mu-measure. Such convergence contradicts Poincaré recurrence for the resulting invertible transformation of the finite measure space (F,μ)(F,\mu).

The group preserving LL and HH is a linear algebraic group: a sufficiently high power of LL realizes it as a closed subgroup of a projective linear group. Every positive-dimensional linear algebraic group over C\mathbb{C} contains a copy of GaG_{\mathrm{a}} or GmG_{\mathrm{m}}, so this group is finite. Moreover, the identity component of the automorphism group preserving HH preserves LL. Indeed its variation of LL lies in Pic⁡0(F)\operatorname{Pic}^{0}(F), which is zero because H1(F,OF)=0H^{1}(F,\mathcal{O}_{F}) = 0. Its Lie algebra therefore vanishes. In characteristic zero this Lie algebra is precisely the space of vector fields tangent to Supp⁡H\operatorname{Supp} H: a connected group preserving the support fixes its components and their coefficients. This proves the last vanishing.

Lemma 5.3 (A choice stable under further covers). The cover in Proposition 5.1 can be chosen so that every connected normal finite quasi-étale cover of FF is rationally connected. On every such cover, with the pulled-back boundary, the conclusions of Lemma 5.2 hold.

Proof. Among all covers in Proposition 5.1, choose one with dim⁡F\dim F minimal, taking this dimension to be zero when the factor is absent. Let F′→FF' \to F be a connected normal finite quasi-étale cover. The pulled-back pair is klt and log Calabi–Yau, and KF′K_{F'} is rational Cartier. Apply Proposition 5.1 to it. If F′F' were not rationally connected, the resulting product would have a positive-dimensional boundary-free part: otherwise rational connectedness would descend from its rationally connected factor along a finite surjection. Replacing FF by this product would therefore give a product cover of VV with a smaller rationally connected factor, a contradiction. Lemma 5.2 now applies to (F′,H′)(F',H').

Separating finite actions on a comparison cover

We refer to the positive-dimensional factors just described as blocks, collecting the whole abelian part into one block. The rationally connected block is always chosen as in Lemma 5.3. For a block over a nonclosed field, the corresponding properties under connected normal finite quasi-étale covers, including the form and vector-field vanishings above, are imposed after algebraic closure. In the application the field is a finite extension of a complex curve function field. Its algebraic closure is abstractly isomorphic to C\mathbb{C}, so the preceding complex projective results apply, and their finite algebraic data descend to a finite extension.

A semilinear automorphism of a variety over a field kk is an automorphism together with an automorphism of kk over which it lies; equivalently, it is a kk-isomorphism to the corresponding field conjugate. Differentials below are relative to kk.

Proposition 5.4 (Semilinear comparison with the blocks). Let kk be a characteristic-zero field, and let P=∏i∈IPiP = \prod_{i\in I} P_i be a product of geometrically integral projective blocks as above. Let HPH_P be the pullback of the boundary on its rationally connected block, or zero if that block is absent. Suppose

ρ:R⟶P\rho: R \longrightarrow P

is a finite quasi-étale morphism from a geometrically integral normal variety, and a finite group GG acts semilinearly on (R,HR)(R,H_R), where HR=ρ∗HPH_R = \rho^*H_P. Put s=dim⁡R>0s = \dim R > 0. There are normal geometrically integral varieties RiR_i, finite quasi-étale maps Ri⟶PiR_i \longrightarrow P_i, and a finite quasi-étale map R⟶∏iRiR \longrightarrow\prod_i R_i such that every gsg^s, for g∈Gg \in G, induces regular semilinear automorphisms of the pairs (Ri,Hi)(R_i,H_i). Here HiH_i is the pulled-back boundary on the rationally connected block and is zero on the other blocks. The projections from RR are equivariant for these automorphisms. Each geometric RiR_i has the same block properties as PiP_i.

Proof. We first show that a bounded power preserves the factor directions on RR. We then recover their constant fields and show that the resulting birational actions on the finite factor covers are regular.

The factor directions. On a smooth big open where ρ\rho is étale, the product tangent directions pull back to a splitting. Reflexive extension gives

TR=⨁i∈IEi.\mathcal{T}_R = \bigoplus_{i\in I} \mathcal{E}_i.

Consider the finite-dimensional kk-algebra

A={u∈End⁡R(TR):u(TR(−log⁡Supp⁡HR))⊆TR(−log⁡Supp⁡HR)}.\mathcal{A} = \{u \in\operatorname{End}_R(\mathcal{T}_R) : u(\mathcal{T}_R(-\log\operatorname{Supp} H_R)) \subseteq\mathcal{T}_R(-\log\operatorname{Supp} H_R)\}.

Every projection onto Ei\mathcal{E}_i belongs to A\mathcal{A}. We claim that every member of A\mathcal{A} has zero entries between distinct summands.

This may be checked after extending kk to an algebraic closure. Fix general smooth points in all but one factor, say PiP_i, and take the corresponding slice of RR. After shrinking the space of complementary points, its connected components are normal and finite quasi-étale over PiP_i. To see this, the generic slice is normal by localization and geometrically normal in characteristic zero. The projection to the complementary factors is projective, so generic flatness and openness of geometric normality give normality of the entire fibres after shrinking that base. Every component has dimension dim⁡Pi\dim P_i: the fibre-dimension inequality gives the lower bound, and finiteness over PiP_i gives the upper bound. Its finite image is therefore all of PiP_i. The closed subset omitted from the étale product charts has codimension at least two on a general slice: its components not dominating the complementary factors can be avoided, and the others have fibre dimension at most dim⁡Pi−2\dim P_i - 2. On its smooth big open, Ei\mathcal{E}_i is the tangent sheaf of the slice, and every complementary summand is trivial.

If either of two distinct summands is nonabelian and boundary-free, slice in that direction. A homomorphism in either direction gives reflexive one-forms or vector fields on a finite quasi-étale cover of that block, and hence vanishes. The only remaining possibility is an abelian and a rationally connected summand. Slice in the rationally connected direction. An entry from this summand to the abelian one gives reflexive one-forms. An entry in the reverse direction gives vector fields tangent to the pulled-back boundary, because the endomorphism preserves the log tangent subsheaf. Both vanish by Lemmas 5.2 and 5.3. These slices cover a dense open of RR, which proves the claim.

The block projections are therefore central idempotents of A\mathcal{A}. Its primitive central idempotents give nonzero direct summands of TR\mathcal{T}_R, each of positive generic rank, so there are at most ss of them. Conjugation by GG acts on A\mathcal{A}, since GG preserves the pair; it is a ring automorphism even for a semilinear action. It permutes these primitive central idempotents. Thus gs!g^{s!} fixes every one of them and consequently every block projection. This argument takes place over kk itself and requires no extension of GG to an algebraic closure.

The finite factor covers. Let k(Ri)k(R_i) be the relative algebraic closure of k(Pi)k(P_i) in k(R)k(R), and let

R⟶Ri⟶PiR \longrightarrow R_i \longrightarrow P_i

be the Stein factorization of the projection. At the generic point of RR, the complementary directions span Der⁡k(Pi)k(R)\operatorname{Der}_{k(P_i)} k(R). In characteristic zero their common constants are exactly k(Ri)k(R_i). Preservation of the directions therefore gives semilinear birational transformations of RiR_i under every gs!g^{s!}.

The fields k(Ri)k(R_i) are regular over kk, since they lie in the regular extension k(R)/kk(R)/k; hence RiR_i is geometrically integral. The extension obtained by adjoining the complementary product factors to k(Pi)k(P_i) is regular and linearly disjoint from k(Ri)/k(Pi)k(R_i)/k(P_i). Consequently the normal product Ri×∏j≠iPjR_i \times\prod_{j\ne i} P_j is an intermediate finite cover of PP. Ramification over a prime of PiP_i would persist on this product and on a prolongation to RR, contradicting quasi-étaleness of R→PR \to P. This proves that Ri→PiR_i \to P_i is quasi-étale.

The product map R→∏iRiR \to\prod_i R_i is proper with finite fibres, because its composite to PP is finite. It is therefore finite. Its image has the dimension of the integral target, so it is surjective, and the same ramification argument makes it quasi-étale. In particular every fibre of R→RiR \to R_i has dimension s−dim⁡Ris-\dim R_i.

Regularity of the factor actions. Fix a transformation preserving the factor directions. The two morphisms from RR to RiR_i—the projection and its composition with the transformation—map RR onto the closed graph Γi\Gamma_i of the induced birational factor transformation. Their target is replaced by its field conjugate in the semilinear case. Every fibre of R→ΓiR \to\Gamma_i has dimension at least s−dim⁡Ris-\dim R_i. A positive-dimensional fibre of either graph projection would therefore give a fibre of R→RiR \to R_i of larger dimension. Both graph projections are thus finite and birational; normality of their targets makes them isomorphisms. This proves regularity.

Finally, equality of divisors on ∏iRi\prod_i R_i can be checked after pullback along the finite surjection from RR. Since its entire boundary is pulled back from the rationally connected factor, invariance of HRH_R implies invariance of that factor’s boundary. Hence the factor actions preserve their boundaries. The asserted geometric properties of the RiR_i follow from their being quasi-étale covers of the chosen blocks. □

After the bounded power, the action on ∏iRi\prod_i R_i is the product of its regular factor actions. The factor degrees and the orders of these automorphisms may be unbounded.

Block forms over a curve field

We now collect the exact data needed for degeneration, including the degrees of the log pluriforms on the factors.

Corollary 5.5 (Comparison cover and block forms). Let K=C(C)K=\mathbb{C}(C) for a smooth projective curve CC. Let (V,B)(V,B) be a geometrically integral normal projective ss-fold pair over KK, with s>0s > 0, geometrically klt, B≥0B \ge0, and KVK_V rational Cartier. Suppose that, for an integer m>0m > 0, a rational mm-canonical form ϕ\phi satisfies div⁡(ϕ)+mB=0\operatorname{div}(\phi) + mB = 0.

There is a finite Galois extension K1/KK_1/K, a geometrically integral normal projective variety R/K1R/K_1, and finite quasi-étale maps

R⟶∏i∈IRi⟶∏i∈IPi⟶VK1R \longrightarrow\prod_{i\in I} R_i \longrightarrow\prod_{i\in I} P_i \longrightarrow V_{K_1}

with the following properties. The field K1(R)K_1(R) is finite Galois over K(V)K(V); its Galois group acts semilinearly on RR, maps onto Gal⁡(K1/K)\operatorname{Gal}(K_1/K), and preserves the pulled-back pair. For each element gg of this group, g!g^! induces regular semilinear actions on the pairs (Ri,Hi)(R_i,H_i). There is at most one rationally connected block, chosen with the cover-stability of Lemma 5.3, and all other blocks are boundary-free of the types in Proposition 5.1.

Put pi=mp_i = m on the rationally connected block and pi=1p_i = 1 on the other blocks. There are rational pip_i-canonical forms ηi\eta_i over K1K_1 satisfying

div⁡(ηi)+piHi=0.(11)\operatorname{div}(\eta_i) + p_iH_i = 0. \tag*{(11)}

On RR, after pulling back all forms, one has

ϕ=a⋀i∈Iηi⊗m/pifor some a∈K1∗.\phi= a \bigwedge_{i\in I} \eta_i^{\otimes m/p_i} \qquad\text{for some } a \in K_1^*.

The wedge uses any fixed ordering of the blocks and the natural identification of their relative canonical lines.

Proof. Apply Proposition 5.1 and Lemma 5.3 to the geometric generic pair, and define the resulting product cover over a finite extension of KK. Take a Galois closure LL of its total function field over the original field K(V)K(V), and let K1K_1 be the relative algebraic closure of KK in LL. The extension K(V)/KK(V)/K is regular. It follows that K1/KK_1/K is finite Galois and that restriction maps Gal⁡(L/K(V))\operatorname{Gal}(L/K(V)) onto Gal⁡(K1/K)\operatorname{Gal}(K_1/K). Let RR be the normalization of VK1V_{K_1} in LL. Since K1K_1 is algebraically closed in LL, RR is geometrically integral.

Over an algebraic closure of KK, the conjugate product covers are all étale over the smooth locus of the original variety. Their compositum, and hence the Galois closure, has the same property. Thus RR is finite quasi-étale over the product and over VK1V_{K_1}. Its Galois transformations preserve the crepant pullback of BB. Proposition 5.4 now constructs the RiR_i and supplies the factor actions.

The boundary-free blocks and their covers have Cartier trivial canonical divisor over the algebraic closure, so they possess degree-one volume forms there. Still over the algebraic closure, on the rationally connected factor, restrict the pulled-back degree-mm trivialization from VV to the product factor, choosing the complementary points smooth. This gives a degree-mm log trivialization; pull it back to its Stein block RiR_i.

Here piHip_iH_i is integral: on the rationally connected block this follows from the integrality of mBmB, quasi-étale pullback, and restriction to the product factor; on the other blocks Hi=0H_i = 0. Thus piKRi+piHip_iK_{R_i} + p_iH_i is an integral Weil divisor whose divisorial sheaf becomes trivial after algebraic closure. Lemma 2.4 descends this trivialization in degree pip_i, giving (5.1). The product in (5.2) and the pullback of ϕ\phi have the same divisor on the normal projective variety RR. Their ratio has neither zeros nor poles and is a global unit. Since RR is geometrically integral, that unit belongs to K1∗K_1^*.

For later use, put L=K1(R)L = K_1(R) and let K2⊃K1K_2 \supset K_1 be a finite extension Galois over KK, and choose a branch over a fixed point CC in the corresponding tower of curves. The inertia groups are cyclic and the upper one surjects onto the lower one. Choose generators of these inertia groups, viewed as elements τ2∈Gal⁡(K2/K)\tau_2 \in\operatorname{Gal}(K_2/K) and τ1∈Gal⁡(K1/K)\tau_1 \in\operatorname{Gal}(K_1/K) with τ2∣K1=τ1\tau_2|_{K_1} = \tau_1, and choose a lift g∈Gal⁡(L/K(V))g \in\operatorname{Gal}(L/K(V)) of τ1\tau_1. Since L/K1L/K_1 is regular, it is linearly disjoint from K2/K1K_2/K_1. The compatible pair (g,τ2)(g,\tau_2) therefore defines a finite-order automorphism g2g_2 of LK2LK_2. The base change RK2R_{K_2} is geometrically integral, and g2sg_2^s acts regularly on every base-changed block by the action of gsg^s together with τ2s\tau_2^s on its constants. This supplies the compatible inertia lift and block actions after the further base changes used for semistable reduction.

Degeneration characters and the klt weight bound

For a klt generic pair, Section 5 supplies a finite comparison cover and separates the action of a bounded power of inertia into actions on its factors. We now pass to semistable models of these factors. The degree of the necessary curve cover is unrestricted. The point of this section is to bound the characters on normalized logarithmic forms; those bounds will cancel the unrestricted ramification in the weight calculation.

Equivariant semistable models

We first record the form of semistable reduction that we use. A marked horizontal divisor in this statement may include both a boundary and exceptional divisors of a generic log resolution.

Lemma 6.1 (Marked semistable reduction). Let C1C_1 be a smooth projective complex curve with a marked point c1c_1, and let a finite cyclic group act on C1C_1, fixing c1c_1. Consider finitely many geometrically integral normal projective varieties over C(C1)\mathbb{C}(C_1), each with a compatible semilinear action of this group and an invariant finite set of horizontal divisor markings. After a finite extension of curve fields and replacement by compatible finite-order lifts of the actions, there are equivariant smooth projective models for which the marked fibre is reduced simple normal crossings and its union with the horizontal markings is simple normal crossings. The generic fibres may be log resolutions. If a given generic fibre is already smooth and has no markings requiring resolution, it can be left unchanged.

Proof. Take equivariant projective models by closing graphs of the finitely many translates, and resolve equivariantly, including the reduced marked fibre and the horizontal markings. Near the marked fibre the map to the curve is toroidal: in local coordinates a uniformizer is a monomial in the vertical coordinates, up to a unit. The horizontal markings are among the remaining coordinates. Root extraction on the base, normalization, and the projective subdivision theorem of [19], Chapter IV, Section 3 give the reduced SNC fibre. The horizontal coordinates remain transverse throughout this construction.

Here equivariance can be retained in the subdivision step. First barycentrically subdivide the finite vertical cone complex so that stabilizers fix each ray of any stabilized cone. They then act trivially on that cone’s lattice. After removing face self-identifications by further such subdivision, choose compatible projective subdivisions on orbit representatives and pull them back. The lattices used on the combinatorial quotient are the original cone lattices, not the invariant lattices of a geometric quotient. The regular height-one subdivision theorem after sufficiently divisible ramification applies to this finite complex. It applies with identical subdivisions to the copies of strata that split after normalization.

This is the equivariant marked construction used in [U], Section 4; the marked resolution and finite-group extension are also described in [23], Paragraphs 16 and 21. Taking a common further extension handles the finite list of models. One may take a Galois closure and further roots of an original local parameter, so that the extension remains Galois over any specified original curve field. Compatible automorphisms extend to the compositum; they have finite order. Equivariant resolution away from the marked fibre gives projective models over the complete curve.

Apply this lemma to the factors from Corollary 5.5. Let C′→CC' \to C be the resulting Galois curve cover, let c′c' lie over cc, and write

K′=C(C′),l=e(c′/c),b=s!.K' = \mathbb{C}(C'), \qquad l = e(c'/c), \qquad b = s!.

The compatible lift constructed after Corollary 5.5 gives a finite-order automorphism gg of the comparison cover whose base action generates inertia. Its power σ=gb\sigma= g^b acts separately on the factors.

Choose a rational uniformizer uu at c′c'. Its leading transformation under gg is

g∗u∼ζu,g^*u \sim\zeta u,

where ζ\zeta is a primitive llth root of unity. Only the leading coefficient is used; it is unnecessary to require g∗u=ζug^*u = \zeta u as an equality of rational functions.

For a factor (Ri,Hi)(R_i,H_i), let pi=mp_i=m on the rationally connected factor and pi=1p_i=1 on the other factors. We have a rational pip_i-canonical form ηi\eta_i satisfying

div⁡(ηi)+piHi=0\operatorname{div}(\eta_i) + p_iH_i = 0

on its generic normal model. On the semistable resolution choose the horizontal boundary H^i\widehat{H}_i to equal the strict transform of HiH_i plus the positive parts of the horizontal crepant exceptional coefficients. These coefficients are less than one. On the abelian and nonabelian Beauville–Bogomolov factors we have H^i=0\widehat{H}_i = 0, because their singularities are canonical.

Lemma 6.2 (Normalization and products). Multiplying each ηi\eta_i by an integral power of uu, one can arrange wu(ηi)=0w_u(\eta_i) = 0. For these normalized forms, the exterior product in common degree mm has weight zero. On the comparison cover there is a base function a∈K′∗a \in K'^* such that

ϕ=a⋀iηi⊗m/pi,lwz(ϕ)=ord⁡c′am.(12)\phi= a \bigwedge_i \eta_i^{\otimes m/p_i}, \qquad l w_z(\phi) = \frac{\operatorname{ord}_{c'} a}{m}. \tag*{(12)}

Here the exterior product denotes the tensor power of the relative canonical product identification, with a fixed order of factors.

Proof. On a semistable model every component of the marked fibre has multiplicity one. The computation of weights on a log-smooth model in Lemma 4.4 shows that piwu(ηi)p_iw_u(\eta_i) is an integer. Multiplication by unu^n changes the weight by n/pin/p_i, so normalization is possible. The logarithmic divisor

div⁡(ηi∧(du/u)⊗pi)+pi(Ti+H^i)\operatorname{div}\left(\eta_i \wedge(du/u)^{\otimes p_i}\right) + p_i(T_i + \widehat{H}_i)

is then effective near the marked fibre, and its coefficient on at least one component of TiT_i is zero.

We check the product assertion before passing to the comparison cover. On the fibre product of the semistable models, the local vertical equations have the form

∏jxij=ufor each factor i.\prod_j x_{ij} = u \qquad\text{for each factor } i.

Horizontal coordinates are independent. Include their SNC markings in the toroidal boundary. Relative logarithmic top forms multiply over the logarithmic curve with exactly one base differential du/udu/u in the absolute form. The product therefore acquires no additional power of uu. In logarithmic coordinates the resulting form has at most full logarithmic poles. This remains true on toroidal resolutions, since their logarithmic canonical generators pull back to logarithmic generators. Thus its weight is nonnegative.

For equality, choose on each factor a fibre component of zero logarithmic order and a general point away from all other markings. The morphism to the curve is smooth there. The product of these open subsets supplies a fibre component of zero logarithmic order, so the weight is zero. Finite pullback to the comparison cover preserves this weight by Lemma 4.3.

On its normal proper generic fibre, the pulled-back product and ϕ\phi have the same divisor: both trivialize the same degree-mm log canonical divisor. Their ratio has zero divisor and hence lies in the constant field K′K'. The scalar rule and the ramification rule for weights now give (12).

Since σ\sigma preserves each factor pair, write

σ∗ηi=diηi,di∈K′∗.\sigma^*\eta_i=d_i\eta_i,\qquad d_i\in K'^{*}.

Both sides have weight zero, hence ord⁡c′di=0\operatorname{ord}_{c'}d_i=0. Put λi=di(c′)\lambda_i=d_i(c'). Finite order of σ\sigma and the fact that it fixes c′c' imply that each λi\lambda_i is a root of unity. The form ϕ\phi descends to the original field and is fixed by gg. Taking leading coefficients of its transformation in (12) yields

ζord⁡c′a∏iλim/pi=1.(13)\zeta^{\operatorname{ord}_{c'}a}\prod_i\lambda_i^{m/p_i}=1. \tag*{(13)}

There is no permutation sign in this formula: σ\sigma preserves each ordered factor.

We have reduced the weight problem to one concrete question: can the orders of the λi\lambda_i be bounded using only ss and mm? The following subsections treat abelian factors and the remaining factors separately.

Abelian factors

Lemma 6.3 (The abelian character). For an abelian factor of dimension hh, the order of its normalized character λi\lambda_i is bounded in terms of hh alone.

Proof. Here pi=1p_i=1. On the semistable model the normalized form is a regular relative logarithmic top form. It is not divisible by uu as such a section, since its logarithmic order is zero on some fibre component. Consequently it frames the extended top Hodge line. This identification is the semistable comparison between logarithmic de Rham cohomology and Deligne’s canonical extension, with nilpotent residue [7, 25]. The action on the central fibre of this line is λi\lambda_i.

The integral local system in degree hh, modulo torsion, has rank (2hh)\binom{2h}{h}. Indeed its smooth fibres are abelian varieties; our models were unchanged on the smooth generic fibre. In a small disc choose an analytic coordinate linearizing the finite base action. On the universal cover of the punctured disc the action, combined with parallel transport, is an integral matrix AA commuting with the unipotent monodromy TT. Since the geometric action has finite order, a power of AA is a power of TT.

Passing from flat frames to canonical-extension frames changes AA by a commuting factor of the form exp⁡(clog⁡T)\exp(c\log T), which is unipotent. The eigenvalues are therefore unchanged. Since the Hodge line is invariant, λi\lambda_i is an eigenvalue of the integral matrix AA. If its order is nn, its cyclotomic polynomial divides the characteristic polynomial of AA, and

φ(n)≤(2hh).\varphi(n)\leq\binom{2h}{h}.

Only finitely many positive integers satisfy this inequality. Their least common multiple bounds and annihilates the character orders in the stated dimension.

An equivariant model with a log generator

For the remaining factors the ordinary Betti numbers are not bounded by the argument. Instead we use the much smaller structure-sheaf cohomology and a normal component of a special fibre. This requires a model on which the normalized logarithmic form generates everywhere near that fibre. An exact log trivialization in degree pip_i then has a residue in the same degree on a normal fibre component. The coefficients of its different must consequently lie in {0,1/pi,…,1}\{0,1/p_i,\ldots,1\}, allowing the normal index theorem to bound the residue character.

Lemma 6.4 (Equivariant good model). Let (Ri,Hi)(R_i,H_i) be a rationally connected or nonabelian Beauville–Bogomolov factor of dimension h>0h>0 above, with pi∈{1,m}p_i\in\{1,m\} and normalized form ηi\eta_i. There is a projective equivariant model Y→C′Y\to C' such that, near c′c',

(i) YY is klt and its fibre T=Yc′T=Y_{c'} is reduced Cartier;

(ii) with JJ the transformed horizontal boundary, (Y,T+J)(Y,T+J) is dlt and KY+JK_Y+J is semiample over C′C';

(iii) for Ωi=ηi∧(du/u)⊗pi\Omega_i=\eta_i\wedge(du/u)^{\otimes p_i},

div⁡Y(Ωi)+pi(T+J)=0.(14)\operatorname{div}_Y(\Omega_i)+p_i(T+J)=0. \tag*{(14)}

The geometric generic fibre is birational to RiR_i.

Proof. Start with the equivariant smooth semistable model QQ from Lemma 6.1. The pair (Q,H^i)(Q,\widehat{H}_i) is klt; adding the reduced fibre Qc′Q_{c'} gives a dlt pair. Since this fibre is a base pullback, a (KQ+H^i)(K_Q+\widehat{H}_i)-negative program over the curve is also negative for the adjoint with this fibre added.

We construct the program equivariantly. Let GG be the finite cyclic group generated by σ\sigma and take the quotient π:Q→Q‾=Q/G\pi:Q\to\overline{Q}=Q/G. Define the branch-corrected boundary H‾\overline{H} by

KQ+H^i=π∗(KQ‾+H‾).K_Q+\widehat{H}_i=\pi^*(K_{\overline{Q}}+\overline{H}).

Its coefficients are 1−(1−δ)/e1-(1-\delta)/e, where δ<1\delta<1 is an upstairs coefficient and ee a ramification index. They lie in [0,1)[0,1), and finite-map discrepancy comparison makes (Q‾,H‾)(\overline{Q},\overline{H}) klt. A finite quotient of a smooth variety is Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial.

On the generic fibre upstairs the adjoint has a nonzero section in a sufficiently divisible degree: the log-resolution error is effective and exceptional over the log Calabi–Yau factor. Multiplying the finitely many translates of this section gives an invariant section in a divisible degree downstairs. The horizontal section inequalities descend by the finite-map formula. Thus Lemma 3.1 applies to the quotient pair over C′/GC'/G and gives a terminating program with relatively semiample output.

Lift each step by normalization in the upstairs function field, using Stein factorization for contractions. These are the usual finite-group equivariant MMP diagrams; see also [23], Complement 3 and Paragraph 21]. They remain over C′C', since functions integral over the downstairs curve extend on the normalizations. Finite pullback preserves relative negativity and relative ampleness. The canonical pullback equality continues in codimension one because no step extracts divisors. In particular the lifted pairs remain klt. The invariant divisor JJ is rational Cartier: it descends rationally to the Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial quotient, and its finite pullback is JJ. The displayed canonical pullback equality makes KY+JK_Y+J rational Cartier as well, and their difference makes KYK_Y rational Cartier.

For completeness, ordinary Q\mathbb{Q}-factoriality upstairs is unnecessary for dlt preservation here. The lifted negative contraction or flip has the same discrepancy comparison as an ordinary MMP step. Adding the marked fibre changes the adjoint by a pullback and leaves this comparison unchanged. Discrepancies strictly improve for centres in the affected locus; hence every lc centre on the output meets the unchanged locus of an input lc centre. It therefore meets its SNC locus. This is the generic-SNC characterization of dlt, and gives dlt on each output; compare [6], Section 3, before Lemma 16.

Since no divisors are extracted, every surviving marked fibre component still has multiplicity one. The fibre is Cartier, and the klt total space is Cohen–Macaulay. It has no embedded fibre components, so the fibre is reduced. Relative semi ampleness pulls back from the quotient output.

It remains to prove the exact equality (14). The generic adjoint has Kodaira dimension zero, and the steps preserve its divisible section spaces. The relative semiample contraction therefore has zero-dimensional generic image. Connected fibres identify its Stein image with C′C', so KY+J∼Q,C′0K_Y+J\sim_{\mathbb{Q},C'}0. The logarithmic divisor on the left of (14) is effective near c′c' by normalization, and stays effective by pushforward along the program. Its horizontal part is effective and rationally trivial on the proper generic fibre, hence zero. Its remaining vertical part is relatively rationally principal. A function with vertical divisor is constant on the normal proper generic fibre, and so comes from K′K'. Thus this divisor is a rational multiple of TT near c′c'.

If the multiple were positive, the dlt discrepancy calculation would make every weight quotient positive, contradicting wu(ηi)=0w_u(\eta_i)=0. It is therefore zero, proving (14).

Fixed points and normal component characters

Lemma 6.5 (A character on a normal log Calabi–Yau pair). Fix h≥0h\ge0 and p≥1p\ge1. Let (A,Δ)(A,\Delta) be a normal integral projective lc pair over C\mathbb{C}, and let ω\omega be a nonzero rational pp-canonical form with

Δ≥0,div⁡(ω)+pΔ=0.\Delta\ge0,\qquad\operatorname{div}(\omega)+p\Delta=0.

If a finite-order automorphism γ\gamma preserves the pair and γ∗ω=λω\gamma^*\omega=\lambda\omega, the order of λ\lambda divides an integer depending only on h=dim⁡Ah=\dim A and pp.

Proof. The divisor of ω\omega is integral, so the coefficients of Δ\Delta belong to {0,1/p,…,1}\{0,1/p,\ldots,1\}. On the normal quotient A/⟨γ⟩A/\langle\gamma\rangle the crepant branch boundary has coefficients in*

Ψp={1−1−δe:δ∈{0,1/p,…,1}, e∈Z>0}.\Psi_p=\left\{1-\frac{1-\delta}{e}:\delta\in\{0,1/p,\ldots,1\},\ e\in\mathbb{Z}_{>0}\right\}.

This is a rational DCC subset of [0,1][0,1]. An invariant tensor power of ω\omega descends and shows that the quotient log canonical divisor is rational Cartier and rationally linearly trivial. Finite-map discrepancy comparison makes the quotient pair lc.

Apply Theorem 2.1 in dimension hh with coefficient set Ψp\Psi_p. Choose its principalizing degree aa divisible also by pp. The pullback of a degree-aa trivialization downstairs is invariant and has the same divisor as ω⊗a/p\omega^{\otimes a/p}. Their ratio is constant on the normal proper variety AA. Consequently λa/p=1\lambda^{a/p}=1. This gives the asserted uniform integer.

Lemma 6.6 (Characters of the other factors). For the normalized rationally connected, Calabi–Yau, and symplectic factors, the orders of the λi\lambda_i are bounded in terms of ss and mm.

Proof. Use the model of Lemma 6.4 and write h=dim⁡Rih=\dim R_i. It is flat over the smooth curve, since its integral total space is torsion-free over the local discrete valuation rings. The central fibre TT is a union of lc centres of the dlt pair (Y,T+J)(Y,T+J) and is therefore Du Bois. Cohomology and base change for a proper flat family with Du Bois special fibre imply local constancy of hj(O)h^j(\mathcal{O}) near that fibre [21]. After shrinking, the other fibres are klt, as can be checked on a resolution. Rational singularities and birational invariance identify their structure-sheaf cohomology with that of a resolution of the generic factor.

For the rationally connected factor this gives

Hj(T,OT)=0(j>0),h0=1.H^j(T,\mathcal{O}_T)=0 \quad(j>0), \qquad h^0=1.

For a Calabi–Yau factor the only nonzero groups are in degrees 00 and hh, each of dimension one. For a symplectic factor there is one dimension in every even degree and none in odd degree. These identifications follow from extension of reflexive forms, the defining form algebras of the factors, and Hodge symmetry on resolutions [12, 17].

We use the following consequence of coherent Lefschetz: a finite-order automorphism of a projective scheme with nonzero alternating trace on H∙(O)H^\bullet(\mathcal{O}) has a fixed point. It applies to this possibly singular fibre. One can either use [3], or embed the fibre equivariantly in a smooth projective space and apply [8] to its pushed-forward structure sheaf. If the fibre has no fixed point, the sheaf restricts to zero along each ambient fixed component, and its Lefschetz contribution vanishes.

In the rationally connected case the alternating trace of σ\sigma is 11, so σ\sigma has a fixed point. In the symplectic case write μ1,…,μN\mu_1,\ldots,\mu_N for the eigenvalues on its nonzero cohomology groups, where N=h/2+1N=h/2+1. They are nonzero. Their first NN power sums cannot all vanish: Newton’s identities would then give ∏jμj=0\prod_j\mu_j=0. Thus σa\sigma^a has a fixed point for some 1≤a≤N1\leq a\leq N.

In the Calabi–Yau case pi=1p_i=1 and J=0J=0. (14) makes KYK_Y Cartier near TT. The klt Cohen–Macaulay total space, and hence its Cartier fibre, is Gorenstein there. Adjunction trivializes ωT\omega_T by the residue of Ωi\Omega_i. The induced scalar on this generator is λi\lambda_i: the action on du/u\mathrm{d}u/u has residue one. Serre duality therefore gives alternating trace

1+(−1)hλi−1.1+(-1)^h\lambda_i^{-1}.

If λi\lambda_i has order at most two it is already bounded. Otherwise the trace is nonzero, and σ\sigma has a fixed point.

In every remaining case a power σa\sigma^a, with a≤h+1a\leq h+1, fixes a point of TT. At most h+1h+1 components of the coefficient-one part of a dlt boundary on an (h+1)(h+1)-fold meet at one point. Indeed their common intersection is a union of lc centres, and at the generic point of such a centre the pair is SNC. A further power of exponent at most (h+1)!(h+1)! therefore preserves a prime component AA through that fixed point.

By dlt adjunction AA is normal and carries an effective lc different ΔA\Delta_A. The rational pip_i-pluriresidue ωA\omega_A of Ωi\Omega_i satisfies

div⁡(ωA)+piΔA=0.\operatorname{div}(\omega_A)+p_i\Delta_A=0.

This is an equality of divisors: at the generic smooth point it is the ordinary residue, and at every prime it follows by taking a Cartier tensor power in adjunction and dividing the resulting identity. No change of the residue’s degree is required. Naturality of residue shows that the character of the chosen power on ωA\omega_A is the corresponding power of λi\lambda_i.

Apply Lemma 6.5 with pi=1p_i=1 or mm and dim⁡A=h≤s\dim A=h\leq s. The power used to stabilize AA was bounded in terms of ss, so the order of λi\lambda_i is bounded in terms of ss and mm. Taking least common multiples supplies a single annihilating integer for all factors. □

Completion of the klt case

Proposition 6.7 (The klt weight bound). For every s≥1s \ge1 and m≥1m \ge1 there is a positive integer qklt(s,m)q_{\mathrm{klt}}(s,m) with the following property. Let K=C(C)K = \mathbb{C}(C) for a smooth projective complex curve, let zz be a uniformizer at c∈Cc \in C, and let (V,B)(V,B) be a geometrically integral normal projective geometrically klt ss-fold pair over KK. Assume that KVK_V is rational Cartier, B≥0B \ge0, and that a rational mm-canonical form ϕ\phi satisfies div⁡(ϕ)+mB=0\operatorname{div}(\phi) + mB = 0. Then

qklt(s,m)wz(ϕ)∈Z.q_{\mathrm{klt}}(s,m)w_z(\phi) \in\mathbb{Z}.

Proof. Use the product and comparison constructions of Section 5, and then the normalized models above. Lemmas 6.3 and 6.6 give a common integer Q=Q(s,m)>0Q = Q(s,m) > 0 with λiQ=1\lambda_i^Q = 1 for every ii. Equation (13) implies

l∣bQord⁡c′a.l \mid bQ\operatorname{ord}_{c'} a.

Together with (12), this gives

mbQwz(ϕ)=bQord⁡c′al∈Z.mbQw_z(\phi) = \frac{bQ\operatorname{ord}_{c'} a}{l} \in\mathbb{Z}.

Thus qklt(s,m)=ms!Q(s,m)q_{\mathrm{klt}}(s,m) = ms!Q(s,m) works. The reduced generic presentation in Section 4 is rationally Gorenstein, so this is exactly the klt assertion needed there. The residue induction therefore proves Theorem 4.2.

Denominators in the canonical bundle formula

The curve weight theorem controls a coefficient of the moduli divisor after restriction to a transverse curve. To use that control for a linear system, we must keep track of the actual divisors in the canonical bundle formula, including their principal parts. We first choose a presentation with a uniform pluricanonical degree, and then show that its moduli divisor has a uniform denominator. Throughout this section the ground field is C\mathbb{C}.

Proposition 7.1 (An exact presentation). Fix an integer d≥1d \ge1 and a finite set Φ⊂[0,1]∩Q\Phi\subset[0,1]\cap\mathbb{Q}. There is an integer p0=p0(d,Φ)>0p_0 = p_0(d,\Phi) > 0, clearing the denominators of Φ\Phi, with the following property. Let f:X→Zf : X \to Z be a contraction of normal projective varieties with dim⁡X≤d\dim X \le d, and let (X,B)(X,B) be lc with B≥0B \ge0 and nonzero coefficients in Φ\Phi. Suppose that KX+BK_X + B is Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier and

KX+B∼Qf∗LK_X+B \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} f^*L

for a Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier divisor LL on ZZ. Then there are ψ∈C(X)∗\psi\in\mathbb{C}(X)^* and a Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier divisor DZ∼QLD_Z \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} L such that

KX+B+1p0div⁡(ψ)=f∗DZ.(15)K_X+B+\frac{1}{p_0}\operatorname{div}(\psi)=f^*D_Z. \tag*{(15)}

Proof. Put K=C(Z)K = \mathbb{C}(Z) and let F=X×ZSpec⁡KF = X \times_Z \operatorname{Spec} K be the generic fibre. Since ff is a contraction and the characteristic is zero, FF is geometrically integral. It is normal, its induced pair (F,BF)(F,B_F) is geometrically lc, and KF+BF∼Q0K_F+B_F \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} 0. These assertions may be checked on a log resolution: after shrinking the base, the resolution and its marked strata have the required generic smoothness, and the discrepancy formula restricts to the fibres. We choose the canonical divisor on FF by dividing a rational top form on XX by a rational top form on ZZ.

Theorem 2.1, applied to the geometric generic fibre, gives a principal multiple in a degree depending only on its dimension and Φ\Phi. Taking a common multiple over dimensions at most dd, and also clearing Φ\Phi, gives p0p_0. The theorem applies over the algebraic closure of KK by characteristic-zero comparison: all data descend to an algebraically closed field admitting an embedding into C\mathbb{C}.

By Lemma 2.4, this trivialization descends to KK in the same degree. Consequently we may choose ψ∈C(X)∗\psi\in\mathbb{C}(X)^* such that

V:=p0(KX+B)+div⁡(ψ)V := p_0(K_X+B)+\operatorname{div}(\psi)

has no component dominating ZZ.

It remains to show that this particular vertical divisor is a pullback. Choose n>0n>0 and h∈C(X)∗h \in\mathbb{C}(X)^* with n(KX+B−f∗L)=div⁡(h)n(K_X+B-f^*L)=\operatorname{div}(h). Then

n(V−p0f∗L)=div⁡(hp0ψn).n(V-p_0f^*L)=\operatorname{div}(h^{p_0}\psi^n).

The divisor on the right is vertical. Its defining function has zero divisor on the normal projective generic fibre and hence belongs to K∗K^*, because H0(F,OF)=KH^0(F,\mathcal{O}_F)=K. Write hp0ψn=f∗ah^{p_0}\psi^n=f^*a for a∈K∗a \in K^*. We obtain

V=f∗(p0L+1ndiv⁡(a)).V=f^*\left(p_0L+\frac{1}{n}\operatorname{div}(a)\right).

Thus DZ=L+(np0)−1div⁡(a)D_Z=L+(np_0)^{-1}\operatorname{div}(a) has all the asserted properties.

We recall the part of the canonical bundle formula needed below. Fix a presentation (15). For a prime divisor PP on ZZ, let tPt_P be the log canonical threshold of f∗Pf^*P over the generic point of PP; here PP is Cartier after restricting to a neighborhood of that point. Set

BZ=∑P(1−tP)P,MZ=DZ−KZ−BZ.B_Z=\sum_P(1-t_P)P,\qquad M_Z=D_Z-K_Z-B_Z.

On a higher model τ:W→Z\tau:W\to Z, use the crepant induced sub-pair to define the thresholds and put

DW=τ∗DZ=KW+BW+MW.(16)D_W=\tau^*D_Z=K_W+B_W+M_W. \tag*{(16)}

with compatible canonical divisors. A sub-pair here permits negative boundary coefficients. The traces MWM_W form the moduli b-divisor MM. We say that it is determined on WW if its trace on every higher model is the pullback of MWM_W.

The lc-trivial fibration theorem gives a projective model on which MM is determined and its trace is nef and Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier [10], extending the klt-trivial theory of Ambro [1, 2]. The lc formulation uses the discrepancy b-divisor A∗A^* with the discrepancy −1-1 terms omitted. Its rank-one hypothesis holds here: on a resolution, ⌈A∗⌉\lceil A^*\rceil has only effective exceptional terms over the generic fibre, since BB is an effective boundary. Its pushforward on that normal fibre is the structure sheaf, and the contraction condition gives rank one. In particular, horizontal components of coefficient one are allowed. A further resolution gives a smooth projective determination. We use the representative (7.2); changing DZD_Z by a rational principal divisor changes MM by the corresponding principal b-divisor and preserves these qualitative properties.

The original discriminant BZB_Z is effective and its coefficients lie in a rational DCC set depending only on dd and Φ\Phi. To see this, lc gives tP≥0t_P\geq0. A component of f∗Pf^*P with multiplicity a≥1a\geq1 and boundary coefficient b≥0b\geq0 gives tP≤(1−b)/a≤1t_P\leq(1-b)/a\leq1. Near the generic point of PP, the testing divisor f∗Pf^*P has positive integral coefficients. A log resolution, followed by removing proper closed subsets of PP, realizes its generic threshold as an ordinary threshold on an open subset of XX. The ACC theorem for log canonical thresholds [15], Theorem 1.1, with testing coefficient set Z≥0\mathbb{Z}_{\geq0}, therefore puts the numbers 1−tP1-t_P in the claimed DCC set. On higher models, BWB_W need not be effective, but its coefficients remain at most one, since the induced sub-pair is crepant and sub-lc.

Theorem 7.2 (A uniform denominator for the moduli divisor). Fix d≥1d \ge1 and a finite set Φ⊂[0,1]∩Q\Phi\subset[0,1] \cap\mathbb{Q}, and let p0=p0(d,Φ)p_0=p_0(d,\Phi) be as in Proposition 7.1. There is a positive integer p=p(d,Φ)p=p(d,\Phi) divisible by p0p_0 with the following property. Let f:X→Zf:X\to Z be a contraction of normal projective complex varieties with dim⁡X≤d\dim X \le d and dim⁡Z>0\dim Z>0, and let (X,B)(X,B) be lc with B≥0B\ge0, coefficients in Φ\Phi, and KX+BK_X+B Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier. For any exact presentation

KX+B+1p0div⁡(ψ)=f∗DZK_X+B+\frac{1}{p_0}\operatorname{div}(\psi)=f^*D_Z

with ψ∈C(X)∗\psi\in\mathbb{C}(X)^* and DZD_Z Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier, let MM be its moduli bb-divisor. On every smooth projective determination WW of MM, the divisor pMWpM_W is nef Cartier.

The normalization by p0p_0 fixes the scale at which principal changes are allowed. The next lemma computes one coefficient of this actual moduli divisor by a curve weight. It does not require the crepant boundary on a resolution to be effective.

Lemma 7.3 (A transverse curve and its weight). Let f:X→Zf:X\to Z be a contraction of normal projective complex varieties, let (X,B)(X,B) be lc with B≥0B\ge0, and suppose that

KX+B+1mdiv⁡(ψ)=f∗DZK_X+B+\frac{1}{m}\operatorname{div}(\psi)=f^*D_Z

for an integer m>0m>0, a function ψ∈C(X)∗\psi\in\mathbb{C}(X)^*, and a Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier divisor DZD_Z. Let τ:W→Z\tau:W\to Z be a smooth projective birational model, and let PP be a prime divisor of WW. Write α=coeff⁡P(τ∗DZ)\alpha=\operatorname{coeff}_P(\tau^*D_Z), and let tPt_P be the threshold for the crepant induced sub-pair over the generic point of PP. Put s=dim⁡X−dim⁡Zs=\dim X-\dim Z. Then there are a smooth projective curve CC, a point c∈Cc\in C, a rational uniformizer zz at cc, and a regular function-field extension of C(C)\mathbb{C}(C) admitting a geometrically integral projective normal effective ss-fold pair (V,BV)(V,B_V) that is geometrically lc, and a rational relative mm-canonical form ϕ\phi such that

div⁡(ϕ)+mBV=0,wz(ϕ)=α−1+tP.(17)\operatorname{div}(\phi)+mB_V=0,\qquad w_z(\phi)=\alpha-1+t_P. \tag*{(17)}

Proof. Choose a smooth projective common resolution UU mapping to XX and to WW, and denote the latter morphism by gg. With a compatible rational top form θ\theta on UU, write

div⁡(θ)+BUc+1mdiv⁡(ψ)=g∗DW,DW=τ∗DZ.(18)\operatorname{div}(\theta)+B_U^c+\frac{1}{m}\operatorname{div}(\psi)=g^*D_W,\qquad D_W=\tau^*D_Z. \tag*{(18)}

Here BUcB_U^c is the crepant sub-boundary. Resolve so that its support, the exceptional divisors over XX, and the support of g∗Pg^*P are SNC. We may include the finitely many canonical and principal supports occurring in (18) among the markings.

Write r=dim⁡Zr=\dim Z. If r>1r>1, take a sufficiently general smooth complete-intersection curve

C=L1∩⋯∩Lr−1⊂WC=L_1\cap\cdots\cap L_{r-1}\subset W

of very ample members, and choose a transverse point c∈C∩Pc\in C\cap P over a general point of PP. If r=1r=1, take C=WC=W and c=Pc=P. Here are the avoidance and smoothness conditions used in this choice. The fibre-dimension jumping locus of gg has codimension at least two: a jump over a divisor would give a proper inverse image of dimension dim⁡U\dim U. There are also finitely many smooth marked intersections on UU. We avoid their images when those images have codimension at least two. For each intersection whose image is a divisor, generic smoothness gives a dense smooth open of that divisor over which its map is smooth; we avoid the complement. All these excluded closed sets have codimension at least two in WW, so a general complete intersection curve misses them. Choose cc also away from the other divisor supports. For global smoothness of the cut, apply Bertini successively to the basepoint-free systems g∗∣Lj∣g^*|L_j| on UU and simultaneously on its smooth marked intersections. This gives a smooth variety U~=g−1(C)\widetilde{U}=g^{-1}(C) with restricted SNC markings. This argument uses the smoothness of UU, not smoothness or flatness of gg along PP.

The morphism gg has connected fibres, as follows from Stein factorization and the fact that C(W)\mathbb{C}(W) is relatively algebraically closed in C(U)\mathbb{C}(U). Its restriction h:U~→Ch:\widetilde{U}\to C has the same fibres over points of CC. Thus U~\widetilde{U} is connected and, being smooth, is integral; hh is a contraction. In particular its function field is regular over C(C)\mathbb{C}(C).

We record why the threshold is retained in this cut. On the SNC model, the threshold over the generic point of PP is

min⁡i1−biai,\min_i \frac{1-b_i}{a_i},

where the marked prime divisors dominating PP have crepant boundary coefficients bib_i and multiplicities aia_i in g∗Pg^*P. Transversality gives the same coefficients and multiplicities in the fibre over cc. Components with image a proper closed subset of PP are avoided by the choice of cc. The SNC criterion for sub-lc pairs then shows that this minimum is also the threshold on the cut.

Exact adjunction fixes the coefficient of the base divisor as well. For each jj choose Lj′∼LjL'_j\sim L_j avoiding cc, and choose a rational function on WW with divisor Lj′−LjL'_j-L_j. Multiply θ\theta by the pullbacks of these functions and take iterated residues along the cuts. The resulting rational top form θ~\widetilde{\theta} on U~\widetilde{U} has the canonical divisor prescribed by adjunction, namely the restriction of div⁡(θ)+∑jg∗Lj′\operatorname{div}(\theta)+\sum_j g^*L'_j. Restricting (18) therefore gives

div⁡(θ~)+B~c+1mdiv⁡(ψ~)=h∗DC′,DC′=(DW+∑jLj′)∣C.(19)\operatorname{div}(\widetilde{\theta})+\widetilde{B}^{c}+\frac{1}{m}\operatorname{div}(\widetilde{\psi})=h^*D'_C,\qquad D'_C=\left(D_W+\sum_j L'_j\right)\bigg|_C. \tag*{(19)}

All restrictions are defined by generality. Since Lj′L'_j avoid cc and CC meets PP transversely, coeff⁡CDC′=α\operatorname{coeff}_C D'_C=\alpha. When r=1r=1, the sums and the residue operations are empty.

To obtain the effective generic presentation, return to the original model XX. Its normal generic fibre over ZZ is geometrically normal over its perfect characteristic-zero ground field, and is geometrically integral since ff is a contraction. Generic flatness and openness of geometric normality and integrality therefore give a dense open subset of WW where W→ZW\to Z is an isomorphism and the original fibres have these properties. Shrink this open set further using generic smoothness of the resolution strata, so that the restricted resolution computes the fibre discrepancies also after algebraic closure. Exceptional centres that do not dominate the base disappear there; centres that dominate it retain codimension at least two in the fibres by the dimension formula. These are conditions at the generic point of CC, which is chosen in this open set even when the marked point cc is outside it. Hence the generic fibre VV is a normal projective geometrically lc pair with the effective boundary BVB_V induced by BB, and B~c\widetilde{B}^{c} compares crepantly with it.

Choose a rational uniformizer zz at cc and define the relative form

ϕ=(θ~/dz)⊗mψ~.\phi=(\widetilde{\theta}/dz)^{\otimes m}\widetilde{\psi}.

Restriction of (19) to the generic fibre gives div⁡(ϕ)+mBV=0\operatorname{div}(\phi)+mB_V=0. The absolute form used to compute its weight is

Ω=ϕ∧(dz/z)⊗m=z−mθ~⊗mψ~.\Omega=\phi\wedge(dz/z)^{\otimes m}=z^{-m}\widetilde{\theta}^{\otimes m}\widetilde{\psi}.

For a divisor EE over the cut lying above cc, put aE=ord⁡E(z)>0a_E=\operatorname{ord}_E(z)>0 and let bEb_E be its crepant boundary coefficient. Equation (19) gives

1mord⁡E(Ω)+1=(α−1)aE+(1−bE).\frac{1}{m}\operatorname{ord}_E(\Omega)+1=(\alpha-1)a_E+(1-b_E).

Taking the infimum after division by aEa_E proves (17), since the infimum of (1−bE)/aE(1-b_E)/a_E is exactly the preserved threshold tPt_P. □\square

Proof of Theorem 7.2. Let PP be any prime divisor of the smooth determination WW, and put α=coeff⁡PDW\alpha= \operatorname{coeff}_P D_W. From (16),

coeff⁡PMW=α+tP−1−coeff⁡PKW.\operatorname{coeff}_P M_W = \alpha+ t_P - 1 - \operatorname{coeff}_P K_W.

Lemma 7.3 realizes α−1+tP\alpha- 1 + t_P as the weight of an exact degree-p0p_0 form with an effective lc generic presentation of dimension s=dim⁡X−dim⁡Zs = \dim X - \dim Z. Theorem 4.2 consequently gives

q(s,p0)coeff⁡PMW∈Z,q(s,p_0)\operatorname{coeff}_P M_W \in\mathbb{Z},

because KWK_W is integral. Take pp to be a common multiple of p0p_0 and q(s,p0)q(s,p_0) for 0≤s≤d−10 \leq s \leq d-1. This choice works for every PP without any bound on the complexity of WW. Thus pMWpM_W is an integral Weil divisor on the smooth variety WW, hence Cartier. It is nef by the lc-trivial fibration theorem. □\square

Effective systems and the field of section ratios

The moduli denominator now allows effective birationality on the base of a log Calabi–Yau fibration. We first make two section comparisons explicit. They will retain the actual subfield of the function field through both the fibration and the passage to a good minimal model.

Lemma 8.1 (Rounded section comparisons). All varieties in this statement are normal and projective over a field of characteristic zero.

(i) Let f:X→Zf : X \to Z be a contraction and let DD and DZD_Z be Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier divisors such that

D+1adiv⁡(ψ)=f∗DZD + \frac{1}{a}\operatorname{div}(\psi) = f^*D_Z

for an integer a>0a > 0 and ψ∈k(X)∗\psi\in k(X)^*. For every positive ℓ\ell divisible by aa, the spaces of divisorial sections, regarded as rational functions, satisfy

H0(X,OX(⌊ℓD⌋))=ψℓ/af∗H0(Z,OZ(⌊ℓDZ⌋)).(20)H^0(X,\mathcal{O}_X(\lfloor\ell D\rfloor)) = \psi^{\ell/a} f^*H^0(Z,\mathcal{O}_Z(\lfloor\ell D_Z\rfloor)). \tag*{(20)}

(ii) Let X⇢X′X \dashrightarrow X' be birational, let DD and D′D' be Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier divisors, and suppose that on a common resolution p:T→Xp : T \to X, q:T→X′q : T \to X' one has

p∗D=q∗D′+E,p^*D = q^*D' + E,

where E≥0E \geq0 is qq-exceptional. Under the identification of the function fields, for every integer ℓ>0\ell> 0 one has

H0(X,OX(⌊ℓD⌋))=H0(X′,OX′(⌊ℓD′⌋)).(21)H^0(X,\mathcal{O}_X(\lfloor\ell D\rfloor)) = H^0(X',\mathcal{O}_{X'}(\lfloor\ell D'\rfloor)). \tag*{(21)}

Proof. For a rational function uu, the inequality div⁡(u)+⌊ℓD⌋≥0\operatorname{div}(u) + \lfloor\ell D\rfloor\geq0 is equivalent to div⁡(u)+ℓD≥0\operatorname{div}(u) + \ell D \geq0, since function orders are integral. Also, effectivity of a Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier divisor is preserved by surjective pullback. It is detected by such a pullback: over the generic point of each prime divisor downstairs, a local defining parameter pulls back with positive order along some divisor upstairs. For (i), divide a section upstairs by ψℓ/a\psi^{\ell/a}. The result vv satisfies

div⁡(v)+ℓf∗DZ≥0.\operatorname{div}(v)+\ell f^{*}D_Z \ge0.

It has no pole on the normal projective generic fibre, so is a base function. For v∈k(Z)v \in k(Z) the displayed divisor equals f∗(div⁡(v)+ℓDZ)f^{*}(\operatorname{div}(v)+\ell D_Z). The effectivity comparison just noted proves both inclusions in (20).

For (ii), pull an effective divisor div⁡(u)+ℓD\operatorname{div}(u)+\ell D to TT and push it to X′X'. Since q∗E=0q_*E=0, this gives div⁡(u)+ℓD′≥0\operatorname{div}(u)+\ell D' \ge0. Conversely, pull the latter inequality to TT, add ℓE\ell E, and push to XX. This yields the original inequality. The argument uses Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier pullbacks, so it does not require ℓD\ell D or ℓD′\ell D' to be Cartier.

Proposition 8.2 (Effective degree on the base). Fix d≥1d \ge1 and a finite set Φ⊂[0,1]∩Q\Phi\subset[0,1] \cap\mathbb{Q}. There is an integer N=N(d,Φ)>0N=N(d,\Phi)>0 with the following property. Let f:X→Zf:X \to Z be a contraction of normal projective complex varieties with dim⁡X≤d\dim X \le d and dim⁡Z>0\dim Z>0, and let (X,B)(X,B) be lc with B≥0B \ge0, coefficients in Φ\Phi, and D=KX+BD=K_X+B Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier. Suppose that D∼Qf∗LD \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} f^{*}L for a big Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier divisor LL on ZZ. Then ∣⌊ND⌋∣|\lfloor ND\rfloor| is nonempty, and its section ratios generate exactly f∗C(Z)f^{*}\mathbb{C}(Z) inside C(X)\mathbb{C}(X). This is also the field K(D)K(D) generated by section ratios in all positive degrees.

Proof. Use Proposition 7.1 to obtain (15), and choose a smooth projective determination τ:W→Z\tau:W \to Z of its moduli b-divisor. After a further resolution we may suppose that the strict transform of BZB_Z and the exceptional divisor of τ\tau have SNC support. Theorem 7.2 gives a uniform pp for which pMWpM_W is nef Cartier. Let

A=τ∗−1BZ+Exc⁡(τ)red.A=\tau_*^{-1}B_Z+\operatorname{Exc}(\tau)_{\mathrm{red}}.

Then (W,A)(W,A) is log smooth and lc. Its coefficients lie in the fixed DCC set for the discriminant, enlarged by 1. Moreover,

KW+A+MW=τ∗DZ+E,E=A−BW≥0,(22)K_W+A+M_W=\tau^{*}D_Z+E,\qquad E=A-B_W\ge0, \tag*{(22)}

where EE is exceptional: at nonexceptional primes AA and BWB_W agree, and at exceptional primes AA has coefficient one whereas BWB_W has coefficient at most one.

The divisor in (22) is big. The effective birationality theorem for polarized pairs [4] (Theorem 1.3) now applies to (W,A)(W,A) and MWM_W: the pair is projective lc, its boundary coefficients belong to a fixed DCC set, pMWpM_W is nef Cartier, and the adjoint sum is big. Consequently

∣⌊n(KW+A+MW)⌋∣|\lfloor n(K_W+A+M_W)\rfloor|

is birational for every nn divisible by an integer depending only on dim⁡W\dim W, the DCC set, and pp. The notation in that theorem uses round down, as in the displayed system.

Pushing the rational section inequalities to ZZ shows that this birational system is a subsystem of ∣⌊nDZ⌋∣|\lfloor nD_Z\rfloor| under the identification C(W)=C(Z)\mathbb{C}(W)=\mathbb{C}(Z). Thus the latter system is nonempty and its ratios generate C(Z)\mathbb{C}(Z). Choose a common such n=Nn=N over 1≤dim⁡Z≤d1 \le\dim Z \le d, also divisible by p0p_0. Equation (20) then proves the asserted nonemptiness and ratio-field equality upstairs.

It remains to compare with all degrees. If s,s0s,s_0 are nonzero sections in degree ℓ\ell, their ratio can be represented in every multiple degree bℓb\ell as

ss0=ss0b−1s0b.\frac{s}{s_0}=\frac{s s_0^{b-1}}{s_0^b}.

These products are sections in degree bℓb\ell because b⌊ℓD⌋≤⌊bℓD⌋b\lfloor\ell D\rfloor\le\lfloor b\ell D\rfloor. Choose bb so that p0∣bℓp_0\mid b\ell and apply (20). Every such ratio belongs to f∗C(Z)f^{*}\mathbb{C}(Z), proving K(D)=f∗C(Z)K(D)=f^{*}\mathbb{C}(Z).

The proof of the main theorem first treats the ground field C\mathbb{C}. For the final change of ground field we use the following elementary observation, which keeps track of equality of subfields rather than only the associated rational maps.

Lemma 8.3 (Descent of the field of ratios). Let k⊂k′k \subset k' be an extension of algebraically closed fields, let XX be a normal integral projective variety over kk, and let DD be a Q\mathbb{Q}-divisor on XX. Write X′=Xk′X'=X_{k'} and D′=Dk′D'=D_{k'}. For each ℓ>0\ell>0 having nonzero sections, let Fℓ⊂k(X)F_\ell\subset k(X) be the field generated over kk by ratios of sections of OX(⌊ℓD⌋)\mathcal{O}_X(\lfloor\ell D\rfloor), and define Fℓ′F'_\ell similarly on X′X'. Then

Fℓ′=k′Fℓ,K(D′)=k′K(D),F'_\ell=k'F_\ell,\qquad K(D')=k'K(D),

where the composita are taken in k′(X′)k'(X'). In particular, for a fixed m>0m>0, nonemptiness of ∣⌊mD⌋∣\lvert\lfloor mD\rfloor\rvert and the equality Fm=K(D)F_m=K(D) hold if and only if they hold after extension to k′k'.

Proof. The rounded divisorial sheaves commute with these field extensions. One may check this on the smooth big open set where the prime divisors are Cartier, and then use reflexive extension across its complement. Base change for global sections gives

H0(X′,OX′(⌊ℓD′⌋))=k′⊗kH0(X,OX(⌊ℓD⌋)).(23)H^0(X',\mathcal{O}_{X'}(\lfloor\ell D'\rfloor))=k'\otimes_k H^0(X,\mathcal{O}_X(\lfloor\ell D\rfloor)). \tag*{(23)}

Choose a nonzero section s0s_0 over kk. Dividing any section over k′k' by s0s_0 expresses it as a finite k′k'-linear combination of ratios over kk. This proves Fℓ′=k′FℓF'_\ell=k'F_\ell; taking all degrees proves the analogous assertion for K(D)K(D).

For descent of the equality, we use the following intersection fact. If FF is an intermediate field k⊂F⊂k(X)k\subset F\subset k(X), then

k(X)∩k′F=Fk(X)\cap k'F=F

inside k′(X′)k'(X'). Indeed XX is geometrically integral, so k(X)⊗kk′k(X)\otimes_k k' injects into k′(X′)k'(X'). If u∈k(X)∩k′Fu\in k(X)\cap k'F, write

u=∑i=1aciai∑i=1acibi,ai,bi∈F,ci∈k′,u=\frac{\sum_{i=1}^{a}c_i a_i}{\sum_{i=1}^{a}c_i b_i},\qquad a_i,b_i\in F,\quad c_i\in k',

where the cic_i are linearly independent over kk and the denominator is nonzero. Such an expression is obtained by collecting a finite list of constants into a kk-basis. After clearing the denominator, injectivity of the tensor product map and linear independence give ubi=aiub_i=a_i for every ii. Some bib_i is nonzero, so u∈Fu\in F. Applying (8.6) to F=FmF=F_m proves descent of Fm′=K(D′)F'_m=K(D'). The forward implication follows from the compositum identities, and nonemptiness follows in either direction from (8.5).

Proof of Theorem 1.1. First let the ground field be C\mathbb{C}, and put D=KX+BD=K_X+B. The hypothesis κ(X,D)≥0\kappa(X,D)\ge0 implies that DD is pseudo-effective. Take a crepant Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial dlt modification μ:(Y,Δ)→(X,B)\mu:(Y,\Delta)\to(X,B). Its adjoint is μ∗D\mu^*D, and its boundary coefficients belong to Φ∪{1}\Phi\cup\{1\}. Theorem 2.2 and termination with ample scaling [29] give a terminating (KY+Δ)(K_Y+\Delta)-MMP to a Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial dlt pair (X′,B′)(X',B'). The nef case of the good-model theorem makes its adjoint semiample. The MMP extracts no divisors, so the coefficients of B′B' still belong to Φ∪{1}\Phi\cup\{1\}. With compatible canonical divisors, crepancy of μ\mu and the discrepancy comparison for this MMP give, on a common resolution,

p∗(KX+B)=q∗(KX′+B′)+E,E≥0q-exceptional;p^*(K_X+B)=q^*(K_{X'}+B')+E,\qquad E\ge0\quad q\text{-exceptional};

see the minimal-model discrepancy comparison and negativity lemma in [22]. Lemma 8.1(ii) identifies all rounded section spaces as subspaces of the common function field. It therefore suffices to prove the result on (X′,B′)(X',B'). The adjoint D′=KX′+B′D' = K_{X'} + B' is semiample. Its semiample contraction f:X′→Zf : X' \to Z satisfies D′∼Qf∗LD' \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} f^*L with LL an ample Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier divisor on the normal projective base. If dim⁡Z>0\dim Z > 0, Proposition 8.2, with coefficient set Φ∪{1}\Phi\cup\{1\}, gives a uniform nonempty degree whose ratios generate the entire field K(D′)K(D'). If ZZ is a point, then D′∼Q0D' \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} 0, and Theorem 2.1 gives a uniform principal multiple. Its system is nonempty and all ratios in that degree are constants. For any other degree, pass to a common multiple by (8.4); ratios in the latter degree are again constants. Hence K(D′)=CK(D') = \mathbb{C} in this case. A common multiple of the two uniform degrees works in both cases, again by (8.4). Denote it by m(d,Φ)m(d, \Phi). The rounded comparison transfers the conclusion to XX.

Now let kk be any algebraically closed field of characteristic zero. Descend XX, its prime boundary components and coefficients, the canonical and Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier data, and a log resolution to a finitely generated subfield of kk. Let k0⊂kk_0 \subset k be the algebraic closure of that field inside kk. Enlarging the finitely generated field if necessary, the descended variety X0X_0 is geometrically integral and normal, its pair (X0,B0)(X_0, B_0) is lc, and its adjoint D0D_0 is Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier. These conditions can be checked after the faithfully flat extension to kk, using the chosen resolution for the discrepancy inequalities. The field k0k_0 embeds into C\mathbb{C}.

Equation (23) shows that nonzero sections in some positive degree, and hence nonnegative Kodaira dimension, descend from kk to k0k_0 and persist after extension to C\mathbb{C}. The complex case gives the conclusion in the same integer m(d,Φ)m(d, \Phi) for (X0,B0)C(X_0, B_0)_{\mathbb{C}}. Lemma 8.3 first descends the nonemptiness and exact equality of ratio fields to k0k_0, and then extends them to kk. This proves the theorem over the stated ground field. ∎

References

  1. [1]F. Ambro, Shokurov’s boundary property, J. Differential Geom. 67 (2004), no. 2, 229–255. doi:10.4310/jdg/1102536201.DOI
  2. [2]F. Ambro, The moduli b-divisor of an lc-trivial fibration, Compos. Math. 141 (2005), no. 2, 385–403. doi:10.1112/S0010437X04001071.DOI
  3. [3]P. Baum, W. Fulton, and G. Quart, Lefschetz–Riemann–Roch for singular varieties, Acta Math. 143 (1979), 193–211. doi:10.1007/BF02392092.DOI
  4. [4]C. Birkar and D.-Q. Zhang, Effectivity of Iitaka fibrations and pluricanonical systems of polarized pairs, Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 123 (2016), 283–331. doi:10.1007/s10240-016-0080-x.DOI
  5. [5]G. Chen, J. Han, and J. Liu, On effective log Iitaka fibrations and existence of complements, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2024 (2024), no. 10, 8329–8349. doi:10.1093/imrn/rnad253.DOI
  6. [6]T. de Ferney, J. Kollár, and C. Xu, The dual complex of singularities, in Higher Dimensional Algebraic Geometry—in Honour of Professor Yujiro Kawamata’s Sixtieth Birthday, Adv. Stud. Pure Math., vol. 74, Math. Soc. Japan, Tokyo, 2017, pp. 103–129. doi:10.2969/aspm/07410103.
  7. [7]P. Deligne, Équations différentielles à points singuliers réguliers, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 163, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1970. doi:10.1007/BFb0061194.DOI
  8. [8]P. Donovan, The Lefschetz–Riemann–Roch formula, Bull. Soc. Math. France 97 (1969), 257–273. doi:10.24033/bsmf.1680.DOI
  9. [9]O. Fujino, Fundamental theorems for the log minimal model program, Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. 47 (2011), no. 3, 727–789. doi:10.2977/PRIMS/50.DOI
  10. [10]O. Fujino and Y. Gongyo, On the moduli b-divisors of lc-trivial fibrations, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 64 (2014), no. 4, 1721–1735. doi:10.5802/aif.2894.DOI
  11. [11]O. Fujino and S. Mori, A canonical bundle formula, J. Differential Geom. 56 (2000), no. 1, 167–188. doi:10.4310/jdg/1090347529.DOI
  12. [12]D. Greb, S. Kebekus, S. J. Kovács, and Th. Peternell, Differential forms on log canonical spaces, Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 114 (2011), 87–169. doi:10.1007/s10240-011-0036-0.DOI
  13. [13]C. D. Hacon and J. McKernan, Boundedness of pluricanonical maps of varieties of general type, Invent. Math. 166 (2006), no. 1, 1–25. doi:10.1007/s00222-006-0504-1.DOI
  14. [14]C. D. Hacon and J. McKernan, On Shokurov’s rational connectedness conjecture, Duke Math. J. 138 (2007), no. 1, 119–136. doi:10.1215/S0012-7094-07-13813-4.DOI
  15. [15]C. D. Hacon, J. McKernan, and C. Xu, ACC for log canonical thresholds, Ann. of Math. (2) 180 (2014), no. 2, 523–571. doi:10.4007/annals.2014.180.2.3.DOI
  16. [16]C. D. Hacon and C. Xu, Boundedness of log Calabi–Yau pairs of Fano type, Math. Res. Lett. 22 (2015), no. 6, 1699–1716. doi:10.4310/MRL.2015.v22.n6.a8.DOI
  17. [17]A. Höring and Th. Peternell, Algebraic integrability of foliations with numerically trivial canonical bundle, Invent. Math. 216 (2019), no. 2, 395–419. doi:10.1007/s00222-018-00853-2.DOI
  18. [18]S. Iitaka, On D-dimensions of algebraic varieties, J. Math. Soc. Japan 23 (1971), no. 2, 356–373. doi:10.2969/jmsj/02320356.DOI
  19. [19]G. Kempf, F. F. Knudsen, D. Mumford, and B. Saint-Donat, Toroidal Embeddings I, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 339, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1973. doi:10.1007/BFb0070318.DOI
  20. [20]J. Kollár, with the collaboration of S. Kovács, Singularities of the Minimal Model Program, Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, vol. 200, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139547895.DOI
  21. [21]J. Kollár, with the collaboration of K. Altmann and S. J. Kovács, Families of Varieties of General Type, Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, vol. 231, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2023. doi:10.1017/9781009346115.DOI
  22. [22]J. Kollár and S. Mori, with the collaboration of C. H. Clemens and A. Corti, Birational Geometry of Algebraic Varieties, Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, vol. 134, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511662560.DOI
  23. [23]J. Kollár, J. Nicaise, and C. Xu, Semi-stable extensions over 1-dimensional bases, Acta Math. Sin. (Engl. Ser.) 34 (2018), no. 1, 103–113. doi:10.1007/s10114-017-7048-8.DOI
  24. [24]S.-i. Matsumura and J. Wang, Structure theorem for projective klt pairs with nef anti-canonical divisor, J. Eur. Math. Soc., published online 30 September 2025. doi:10.4171/JEMS/1702; arXiv:2105.14308.DOI
  25. [25]J. Steenbrink, Limits of Hodge structures, Invent. Math. 31 (1976), no. 3, 229–257. doi:10.1007/BF01403146.DOI
  26. [26]S. Takayama, Pluricanonical systems on algebraic varieties of general type, Invent. Math. 165 (2006), no. 3, 551–587. doi:10.1007/s00222-006-0503-2.DOI
  27. [27]G. T. Todorov, Effective log Itaka fibrations for surfaces and threefolds, Manuscripta Math. 133 (2010), nos. 1–2, 183–195. doi:10.1007/s00229-010-0370-4.DOI
  28. [28]G. Todorov and C. Xu, Effectiveness of the log Itaka fibration for 3-folds and 4-folds, Algebra Number Theory 3 (2009), no. 6, 697–710. doi:10.2140/ant.2009.3.697.DOI
  29. [29]N. Tsakanikas and L. Xie, Remarks on the existence of minimal models of log canonical generalized pairs, Math. Z. 307 (2024), article 20, 39 pp. doi:10.1007/s00209-024-03489-6.DOI
  30. [30]H. Tsuji, Pluricanonical systems of projective varieties of general type. II, Osaka J. Math. 44 (2007), no. 3, 723–764. doi:10.18910/6697.DOI
  31. [31]E. Viehweg and D.-Q. Zhang, Effective Itaka fibrations, J. Algebraic Geom. 18 (2009), no. 4, 711–730. doi:10.1090/S1056-3911-09-00515-3.
  32. [32]OpenAI, Arithmetic Stein-degree bounds for log Calabi–Yau pairs, OpenAI Math Release preprint OAI:Arithmetic-Stein-degree-bounds-for-log-Calabi-Yau-pairs-September-25-2026, 2026.
  33. [33]OpenAI, Log abundance in characteristic zero, OpenAI Math Release preprint OAI:Log-abundance-in-characteristic-zero-September-24-2026, 2026.
  34. [35]OpenAI, Uniform Pluricanonical Itaka Fibrations, OpenAI Math Release preprint OAI:Uniform-Pluricanonical-Itaka-Fibrations-October-3-2026, 2026.

Paper details

Contents