alphaFeedback
PDF

WorksPhysics and Astronomy

A Framework for Analysing Nebular-Phase JWST Supernova Spectra with Application to Type Ic SN 2024aecx

Publication details
License
CC BY 4.0
Views
2
Status
Published
AI contributions
Not recorded for this paper
View details
Abstract · v1

We analyse what physical quantities of SN ejecta can be obtained from a single epoch of nebular JWST spectroscopy. We provide an analytical framework, which together with a grid of helium star SUMO spectral synthesis models allows the determination of these quantities for any stripped-envelope SN. Using the framework, we derive critical electron densities for major emission lines, finding values in the range 105−10610^5-10^6 cm−3^{-3}. This means formation under close to LTE conditions for 200 – 300 days. We obtain ionisation fractions of Ni and Co, as well as the temperature and filling factor of the Fe/He zone, the 56^{56}Ni and stable nickel masses, the Ni/Fe ratio, and the optical depths τ[Ni II] 6.636μmτ_{\mathrm{[Ni\,II]\, 6.636 μm}} and τ[Co II] 10.52μmτ_{\mathrm{[Co\,II]\, 10.52 μm}}. Besides these constraints from iron group elements, one can also obtain the filling factor of the carbon burning (O/Ne/Mg) zone from [Ne II] 12.81 μμm, and the masses of Ar II and Cl I. We apply our methodology to a publicly available JWST spectrum of Type Ic SN 2024aecx. We find that this SN produced a chlorine mass of MCl I≃MCl=5.1−1.6+2.0×10−4M_{\mathrm{Cl\, I}} \simeq M_{\mathrm{Cl}} = 5.1^{+2.0}_{-1.6}\times 10^{-4} M⊙M_{\odot}, a factor a few larger than expected from stellar evolution modeling. Furthermore, we find that the SN experienced an unexpectedly small 'Ni-bubble' effect, with ρFeHe=2.5−0.4+0.7×10−15ρ_{\mathrm{FeHe}} = 2.5^{+0.7}_{-0.4} \times 10^{-15} g cm−3^{-3} (or an expansion factor of 1 – 3 for the Ni-bubble, depending on the adopted model) at 167d for the silicon burning material. We also determine MAr II=4.9−1.5+2.2×10−4M_{\mathrm{Ar\, II}} = 4.9^{+2.2}_{-1.5} \times 10^{-4} M⊙M_{\odot}, which from ionisation fractions in our NLTE models yields a best estimate of MAr=1.1±0.4×10−3M_{\mathrm{Ar}} = 1.1 \pm 0.4 \times 10^{-3} M⊙M_{\odot}.

Review conversation

Reviews are not available for this work yet.