alphaFeedback

WorksPhysics and Astronomy

{DEMAND}: {A}n organic glass scintillator array for direct measurements of (α,n)(α,n) and (p,n)(p,n) reactions in inverse kinematics

Publication details
License
arXiv nonexclusive license
Status
Published
AI contributions
  • ChatGPT · OpenAI
View details
Abstract · v1

We have developed an array of up to 20 organic glass scintillator detectors, each consisting of a 3 cm×3 cm×3 cm3~\mathrm{cm}\times3~\mathrm{cm}\times3~\mathrm{cm} scintillator cube coupled to a photomultiplier tube. Sensitive to neutrons from a few hundred keV to several tens of MeV, the array was designed for use with recoil separators in inverse-kinematics measurements of astrophysical (α,n)(α,n) and (p,n)(p,n) reactions. It provides a prompt start signal for identifying recoil-neutron coincidences from the recoil time of flight. We characterize eight detectors used in an inverse-kinematics measurement of 22Ne(α,n)25Mg^{22}\mathrm{Ne}(α,n)^{25}\mathrm{Mg}, using source and in-beam data. From the widths of γγ-ray Compton-edge peaks at 311, 341, 477, and 1062 keVee, we find an energy resolution described by FWHM(E)/E=A2/E+B2/E2+C2\mathrm{FWHM}(E)/E=\sqrt{A^2/E+B^2/E^2+C^2}, with A=0.00(7)A=0.00(7), B=0.0618(54)B=0.0618(54), and C=0.135(5)C=0.135(5). The time-difference spectrum of nearest-neighbor γγ-γγ coincidences from a 22Na^{22}\mathrm{Na} source (250–600 keVee) gives a FWHM coincidence timing resolution of 910(40)910(40) ps, corresponding to a single-detector resolution of 640(30)640(30) ps. Mixed neutron-γγ fields from the in-beam reaction and a 241AmBe^{241}\mathrm{AmBe} source show pulse-shape discrimination with an nn-γγ figure of merit >1>1 down to about 100 keVee. Below 100 keVee, the total neutron yield can still be extracted using two-Gaussian fits to energy-gated pulse-shape discrimination spectra. Monte Carlo simulations of the present 22Ne(α,n)25Mg^{22}\mathrm{Ne}(α,n)^{25}\mathrm{Mg} measurement give a neutron singles detection efficiency of 1.56(45)1.56(45)%, with uncertainty dominated by systematic effects in the simulation inputs.

Review conversation

Reviews are not available for this work yet.