Introduction

A central aim of abundance theory is to recover a holomorphic map from the positivity of an adjoint class. For an ordinary log canonical line, the expected conclusion is semiampleness of that line itself. Adding an arbitrary nef line introduces a different phenomenon: its flat part need not be torsion. The natural conclusion is then numerical semiampleness, namely the existence of a semiample line with the same real Chern class.

We prove this statement for smooth compact Kähler manifolds with a klt boundary. A rational line bundle is an element of Pic⁡(X)⊗ZQ\operatorname{Pic}(X) \otimes_{\mathbb{Z}} \mathbb{Q}. It is nef when its first Chern class belongs to the closure of the Kähler cone, and pseudo-effective when that class contains a closed positive (1,1)(1,1)-current. It is semiample when a positive integral multiple is a holomorphic line bundle generated everywhere by global sections.

Theorem 1.1. Let XX be a smooth connected compact Kähler manifold, let B≥0B \ge0 be a rational simple normal crossing divisor whose coefficients are strictly less than one, and let M∈Pic⁡(X)⊗ZQM \in\operatorname{Pic}(X)\otimes_{\mathbb{Z}}\mathbb{Q}. Assume that KX+BK_X+B is pseudo-effective, MM is nef, and D=KX+B+MD=K_X+B+M is nef. Then there is a semiample rational line bundle LL on XX such that

c1(L)=c1(D)in HBC1,1(X,R).c_1(L)=c_1(D)\quad\text{in }H_{\mathrm{BC}}^{1,1}(X,\mathbb{R}).

The numerical formulation is essential even on an elliptic curve: a nontorsion degree-zero line MM is nef but has no section in any positive power, whereas its Chern class is represented by the trivial line. Theorem 1.1 allows exactly this change of flat part. It keeps the nef line MM on the original manifold; it is not a statement about an arbitrary nef b-divisor on a higher model.

Context and the inputs to the proof

Lazić and Peternell formulated generalized abundance for projective klt pairs as precisely this numerical semiampleness problem [27], Generalised Abundance Conjecture. Their work relates it to ordinary abundance and to positivity on varieties with numerically trivial canonical class, using nef reduction and the positive part of the divisorial Zariski decomposition [27, 28]. They proved the surface case and the threefold case in which the ordinary adjoint has positive numerical dimension [27]. The present proof uses the projective positive-part theorem of [33] as an input. Our task is to pass from that projective statement to the analytic setting, where the nef summand need not be represented by a divisor and a manifold may have no nonconstant meromorphic functions.

The compact Kähler minimal model program has developed alongside these abundance questions. Höring and Peternell constructed minimal models for compact Kähler threefolds [25]. The threefold abundance results and their corrections [7, 8], and the log abundance theorem of Das and Ou [12, 13], establish important cases of the ordinary problem. Hacon and Xie’s analytic cone theorem [23] supplies the rational curve length bound. The restricted Kähler model constructions and ordinary scaling in [32] supply the detected projective steps used here. For ordinary adjoints in arbitrary dimension, we use that paper’s divisorial decomposition theorem, with its logarithmic Iitaka hypothesis supplied by [34].

These are substantial inputs. Section 2 states their precise forms, retaining the distinction between actual rational line identities and equalities of real classes. The proof below supplies the further arguments needed for the nef summand. It uses Boucksom’s analytic divisorial decomposition [4], the compactness theory of cycle spaces [2, 30, 19], and the geometry of compact Kähler spaces of algebraic dimension zero [9, 31, 35]. The adjoint construction on a projective base follows the discriminant and moduli-line strategy of Ambro [1], using the period results of [34] to accommodate a real polarization.

The stronger statement and the proof

For a pseudo-effective real (1,1)(1,1)-class α\alpha, denote by N(α)N(\alpha) its divisorial negative part: the effective real divisor whose coefficient along each prime is the least generic multiplicity forced in positive representatives, with arbitrarily small Kähler perturbations. A nef class has zero negative part. We prove a stronger statement in which the adjoint sum need not be nef.

The algebraic dimension a(T)a(T) is the transcendence degree of the field of meromorphic functions on TT. Its algebraic reduction, after modification, is a morphism h:T→Wh:T \to W to a smooth projective variety of dimension a(T)a(T) whose meromorphic functions account for all those on TT.

Theorem 1.2. Let TT be a smooth connected compact Kähler manifold, B≥0B \ge0 a rational simple normal crossing divisor with coefficients less than one, and MM a nef rational line bundle. Suppose J=KT+BJ = K_T + B is pseudo-effective. There are a smooth compact Kähler modification μ:U→T\mu: U \to T, a semiample rational line PP on UU, and an effective rational divisor RR on UU, such that

μ∗(J+M)≡P+R,R=N(c1(μ∗(J+M))).\mu^*(J+M) \equiv P+R,\qquad R=N\bigl(c_1(\mu^*(J+M))\bigr).

Here ≡\equiv denotes equality of real Chern classes. Moreover, if a(T)=0a(T)=0, then c1(M)=0c_1(M)=0.

We prove both assertions of Theorem 1.2 simultaneously by induction on dimension. Projective manifolds are covered by [33]. For a(T)=0a(T)=0, the ordinary decomposition and the decomposition theorem for Kähler klt pairs of Calabi–Yau type [31] reduce the problem to tori and simple spaces carrying a generically symplectic form. The simple case requires a meromorphic nonvanishing statement for KT+MK_T+M. Section 5 develops the required extension of the two-diagonal argument in [32]. The new geometric input excludes a family of correspondences sweeping T×TT \times T: such a family would produce a nonzero holomorphic one-form on a fixed finite cover.

When 0<a(T)<dim⁡T0 < a(T) < \dim T, the first objective is to descend MM numerically to WW. Induction decomposes the adjoint on a very general fiber, but the associated flat twist on that fiber is not known to extend. Section 6 resolves this difficulty using countably many global maps constructed from relative cycles. Each map permits one fixed global choice of flat twist. Coherent base change then turns positive fiberwise Iitaka dimension into a meromorphic function contradicting the algebraic reduction. It follows that MM has zero class on a very general fiber, and the current-theoretic descent proved in Section 3 gives a nef rational line on WW.

It remains to put the ordinary adjoint on a projective base. After adding a large multiple of an ample line from WW, an ordinary negative program can be run entirely over WW. Its semiample fibration yields

f:Y→Z,KY+Δ∼Qf∗Hf:Y \to Z,\qquad K_Y+\Delta\sim_{\mathbb{Q}} f^*H

where ZZ is projective and (Y,Δ)(Y,\Delta) is effective and klt. Section 4 proves that HH itself is an ordinary klt adjoint on ZZ. The key infinitesimal observation identifies the rank of the extreme Hodge-line period map with the full period rank. The rational period quotient then supplies the positivity needed to choose an effective klt boundary on ZZ.

The projective theorem now applies to the descended adjoint and nef summand. Section 7 identifies its pulled-back exceptional divisor with the entire analytic negative part using the mixed Hodge–Riemann relations. This finishes the induction. For a nef original sum, the negative part vanishes; invariance of Pic⁡0\operatorname{Pic}^0 under smooth modifications descends the semiample representative and proves Theorem 1.1.

The descent of rational nef classes, the countable construction of global twists, and the adjoint formula for a Kähler total space are stated separately because each can be used beyond this induction.

Rational lines and divisorial decompositions

The proof keeps two kinds of information separate: a real (1,1)(1,1)-class and the rational holomorphic line bundle representing it. We first set out this distinction and the precise ordinary and projective results used below.

Conventions and changes of model

We work over C\mathbb{C}. A rational line bundle on a complex space XX means an element of Pic⁡(X)⊗ZQ\operatorname{Pic}(X)\otimes_{\mathbb{Z}}\mathbb{Q}; we use additive notation. The relation L∼QL′L \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} L' is equality in this group, so that sufficiently divisible integral multiples are isomorphic holomorphic line bundles. On a smooth compact Kähler manifold, L≡L′L \equiv L' means c1(L)=c1(L′)c_1(L)=c_1(L') in real Bott–Chern cohomology. We also write {E}=c1(OX(E))\{E\}=c_1(\mathcal{O}_X(E)) for a real divisor EE. The ∂∂ˉ\partial\bar{\partial}-lemma identifies real Bott–Chern (1,1)(1,1)-classes with real de Rham classes of type (1,1)(1,1).

A class is pseudo-effective if it contains a closed positive current; it is nef if it lies in the closure of the Kähler cone. A rational line is semiample if a positive integral multiple is generated by its global sections. On a smooth projective variety these notions, for divisor classes, agree with the corresponding algebraic ones, and equality of real divisor classes agrees with numerical equivalence. We use the analytic definitions on every nonprojective model.

All manifolds and normal spaces are connected unless otherwise stated. A modification is a proper bimeromorphic morphism. Resolutions, flattenings, and main components of fiber products are always followed, when necessary, by normalization and a smooth compact Kähler modification. Spaces in Fujiki class C\mathcal{C} are used only through such models. Projective targets admit projective modifications. The resolution procedures can be chosen projective and functorial; finite covers of compact Kähler spaces are Kähler.

We use the usual discrepancy definition of a klt pair, with an effective rational boundary unless a signed boundary is expressly mentioned. A signed pair with all discrepancies greater than −1-1 is called sub-klt. On a smooth model, a simple normal crossing boundary is klt precisely when all its coefficients are less than one.

For a normal klt pair (X,B)(X,B) and a log resolution μ:X~→X\mu:\widetilde{X}\to X, write

KX~+B~=μ∗(KX+B).K_{\widetilde{X}}+\widetilde{B}=\mu^{*}(K_X+B).

Replacing B~\widetilde{B} by its coefficientwise positive part produces an effective simple normal crossing klt boundary B+B^{+}, and

KX~+B+=μ∗(KX+B)+E,E≥0 exceptional over X.(1)K_{\widetilde{X}}+B^{+}=\mu^{*}(K_X+B)+E,\qquad E\geq0\text{ exceptional over }X. \tag*{(1)}

The exceptional support assertion uses effectiveness of BB: the nonexceptional coefficients of B~\widetilde{B} are already nonnegative. The pullback of a nef rational line remains nef. Thus this convention preserves the hypotheses of the induction.

Lemma 2.1 (Lines of zero class). Let μ:Y→X\mu:Y\to X be a modification between smooth compact Kähler manifolds.

  1. A rational line whose real Chern class is zero belongs to Pic⁡0(X)⊗ZQ\operatorname{Pic}^{0}(X)\otimes_{\mathbb{Z}}\mathbb{Q}.

  1. Pullback identifies Pic⁡0(X)\operatorname{Pic}^{0}(X) with Pic⁡0(Y)\operatorname{Pic}^{0}(Y).

  1. If a rational line LL on XX has semiample pullback, then LL is semiample.

Proof. After clearing denominators, a line of zero real class has torsion integral Chern class. Another positive power has zero integral class, so belongs to Pic⁡0\operatorname{Pic}^{0} by the exponential sequence. The second assertion is the standard bimeromorphic invariance of Pic⁡0\operatorname{Pic}^{0}: a smooth modification preserves H1(O)H^{1}(\mathcal{O}) and the integral lattice defining this torus. It also follows by factoring smooth bimeromorphic maps into blowups and blowdowns with smooth centers. Finally μ∗OY=OX\mu_{*}\mathcal{O}_{Y}=\mathcal{O}_{X} by normality. The projection formula identifies the sections of every integral multiple of LL with those of its pullback. A base point downstairs would therefore be a base point at every point above it.

The analytic negative part

For a pseudo-effective real class α\alpha on a smooth compact Kähler manifold, fix a Kähler form ω\omega. If EE is a prime divisor, its minimal multiplicity is

νE(α)=lim⁡ε→0inf⁡{νE(T):T∈α, T≥−εω}.\nu_{E}(\alpha)=\lim_{\varepsilon\to0}\inf\{\nu_{E}(T):T\in\alpha,\ T\geq-\varepsilon\omega\}.

Here νE(T)\nu_{E}(T) is the generic Lelong number. The definition is independent of ω\omega, and currents with analytic singularities suffice. Boucksom’s divisorial decomposition is

N(α)=∑EνE(α)E,Z(α)=α−{N(α)}.N(\alpha)=\sum_{E}\nu_{E}(\alpha)E,\qquad Z(\alpha)=\alpha-\{N(\alpha)\}.

Its negative part is an effective real divisor, and its positive part is modified nef: all its minimal divisorial multiplicities vanish. For a rational line LL, write N(L)=N(c1(L))N(L)=N(c_{1}(L)). The foundational analytic results are due to Boucksom [4] (Sections 2–3 and 5). The following forms, including their use on smooth resolutions of normal Kähler spaces, are recorded and proved in [32], Section 2.

Lemma 2.2 (Negative-part calculus). Let α\alpha be pseudo-effective on a smooth compact Kähler manifold.

  1. Every positive current in α\alpha contains [N(α)][N(\alpha)]. If 0≤F≤N(α)0 \leq F \leq N(\alpha), then

N(α−{F})=N(α)−F.N(\alpha-\{F\})=N(\alpha)-F.
  1. If β\beta is nef, then N(α+β)≤N(α)N(\alpha+\beta) \leq N(\alpha). In particular N(β)=0N(\beta)=0.

  1. A modified nef class restricts pseudo-effectively to a resolution of every prime divisor.

  1. If μ:Y→X\mu:Y \to X is a smooth modification and α=β+{R}\alpha=\beta+\{R\}, with β\beta nef and R=N(α)R=N(\alpha), then

N(μ∗α)=μ∗R.N(\mu^{*}\alpha)=\mu^{*}R.
  1. Suppose μ:Y→X\mu:Y \to X is a modification from a smooth compact Kähler manifold to a normal compact Kähler space, AA is a rational line on XX, and E≥0E \geq0 is μ\mu-exceptional. If μ∗A+E\mu^{*}A+E is pseudo-effective, then μ∗A\mu^{*}A is pseudo-effective and

N(μ∗A+E)=N(μ∗A)+E.N(\mu^{*}A+E)=N(\mu^{*}A)+E.

These are [32], Lemmas 2.2–2.4. The exceptional translation in part (5) also holds for a real class with smooth local potentials on the normal target. Part (3) concerns prime divisors; we do not use unrestricted pseudo-effective restriction to arbitrary subvarieties. Section 7 gives the related intersection argument needed when a map has positive-dimensional fibers.

Two consequences will be used repeatedly. An effective divisor representing a multiple mLmL contains mN(L)mN(L), because its divisorial current is positive. Also, the decomposition sought in Theorem 1.2 is unchanged by taking a higher smooth model: part (4) pulls it up, and part (5) removes the error (1).

The ordinary Kähler input

The first substantial input is ordinary log abundance, in its divisorial form. We state the full line-bundle information needed in the proof.

Theorem 2.3 (Ordinary divisorial decomposition). Let XX be a smooth compact Kähler manifold, and let BB be a rational simple normal crossing divisor with coefficients in [0,1][0,1]. If J=KX+BJ=K_X+B is pseudo-effective, there is a smooth compact Kähler modification μ:U→X\mu:U \to X and an identity

μ∗J∼QP+R,P semiample,R=N(μ∗J)≥0,\mu^{*}J \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} P+R,\qquad P\ \text{semiample},\qquad R=N(\mu^{*}J)\geq0,

where PP is a rational line and RR is a rational divisor.

This is [32], Theorem 2.13, whose logarithmic Iitaka hypothesis is supplied by [34], Corollary 6.2. More precisely, the required inequality is

κ(X,KX+DX)≥κ(F,KF+DX∣F)+κ(Y,KY+DY)\kappa(X,K_X+D_X)\geq\kappa(F,K_F+D_X|_F)+\kappa(Y,K_Y+D_Y)

for a surjective morphism f:X→Yf:X \to Y with connected fibers between smooth connected projective varieties, a very general smooth fiber FF, reduced simple normal crossing boundaries DX,DYD_X,D_Y, and Supp⁡(f∗DY)⊆Supp⁡(DX)\operatorname{Supp}(f^{*}D_Y)\subseteq\operatorname{Supp}(D_X). Thus the boundary condition in the input is retained. We use Theorem 2.3 in every dimension. It implies ordinary nonvanishing: a sufficiently divisible multiple of JJ has a nonzero section. If a(X)=0a(X)=0, its semiample part is rationally trivial, and hence μ∗J∼QR\mu^*J\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}R.

We also use the following program consequence of ordinary decomposition. The version stated here is confined to its smooth starting models.

Proposition 2.4 (Contraction of a known negative part). Let (X,B)(X,B) be a smooth compact Kähler klt pair with rational simple normal crossing boundary. Suppose

KX+B∼QP+R,P semiample,R=N(KX+B)≥0K_X+B\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}P+R,\qquad P\ \text{semiample},\qquad R=N(K_X+B)\geq0

with P,RP,R rational. A finite ordinary (KX+B)(K_X+B)-negative program reaches a normal compact Kähler klt model on which the log canonical line is semiample. Its steps contract or flip detected analytic extremal rays, are PP-trivial, and preserve a fixed generated Cartier multiple of PP as an actual line. The final adjoint is rationally linearly equivalent to the descended semiample line. The steps extract no divisors; on a common resolution the initial adjoint equals the pullback of the final adjoint plus an effective divisor exceptional over the final model.

This is the ordinary klt case of [32], Proposition 3.8, using the ordinary scaling construction of [32], Lemma 3.6 and its detected analytic rays. Smoothness supplies global strong Q\mathbb{Q}-factoriality, the displayed identity and Lemma 2.2(4) supply its resolution hypothesis, and Theorem 2.3 supplies the lower-dimensional ordinary hypotheses in that proposition. The ray estimate used to keep this program over a prescribed projective base will be verified at the point of use.

The projective input

The second substantial input is numerical semiampleness of the positive part for projective klt pairs. It is important to apply it to a nef line on the original model; the trace of its b-divisor on a later minimal model need not remain nef.

Proposition 2.5 (Projective positive parts). Let (S,Δ)(S,\Delta) be a normal projective klt pair with rational boundary, and let MM be a nef rational Cartier divisor. Suppose KS+ΔK_S+\Delta is pseudo-effective. There is a smooth projective modification u:S′→Su:S'\to S, a birational morphism v:S′→Smv:S'\to S_m to a normal projective variety, a nef rational Cartier divisor HmH_m on SmS_m, and an effective rational vv-exceptional divisor EE, such that

u∗(KS+Δ+M)∼Qv∗Hm+E.(2)u^*(K_S+\Delta+M)\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}v^*H_m+E. \tag*{(2)}

On a sufficiently high such model, v∗Hmv^*H_m is numerically equivalent to a semiample rational divisor and

N(u∗(KS+Δ+M))=E.N\bigl(u^*(K_S+\Delta+M)\bigr)=E.

Proof. The positive-part assertion of [33], Proposition 8.1 gives a smooth model on which the rational positive part of the original adjoint is numerically semiample. Separately, take a small projective Q\mathbb{Q}-factorialization and run a terminating generalized klt program as in [33], Theorem 2.3. Its fixed nef data are the pullback of MM. The generalized discrepancies initially agree with the ordinary ones because MM descends, and the generalized adjoint is pseudo-effective. The resulting model has nef adjoint HmH_m. The comparison on a common resolution is (2), with effective exceptional error.

Choose this resolution also to dominate the model furnished by the positive-part theorem. Lemma 2.2(5) and nefness of v∗Hmv^*H_m identify EE as the negative part. Pulling up the first model’s decomposition by Lemma 2.2(4) identifies its numerically semiample positive class with v∗Hmv^*H_m. Algebraic and analytic negative parts agree on these smooth projective models.

The generalized program used in this proof is the fixed-nef-data minimal-model theorem cited in [33]; it is not an application of the numerical semiampleness assertion being proved here. The two inputs above will be used as stated theorems. The remaining sections prove the additional Kähler arguments, including the descent and period constructions that permit their application.

Descent of nef and flat lines

A nef class that vanishes on the fibers of a fibration should come from its base. Singular fibers make this assertion more delicate than cohomological descent on a smooth family: the discrepancy can contain vertical divisors. We first remove those divisors, and then distinguish numerical descent from descent of an actual rational line. Throughout this section a fibration is a surjective holomorphic map with connected fibers.

Proposition 3.1 (Numerical descent of a nef line). Let f:X→Yf : X \to Y be a fibration of smooth connected compact Kähler manifolds, and let M∈Pic⁡(X)⊗QM \in\operatorname{Pic}(X) \otimes\mathbb{Q} be analytically nef. Suppose that c1(M∣Xy)=0c_1(M|_{X_y}) = 0 on a general smooth fiber. There are smooth compact Kähler modifications p:X′→Xp : X' \to X and q:Y′→Yq : Y' \to Y, a fibration g:X′→Y′g : X' \to Y' satisfying fp=qgfp = qg, and a rational line NN on Y′Y' such that

p∗M=g∗N.(3)p^*M = g^*N. \tag*{(3)}

If YY is projective, Y′Y' can be chosen projective and NN is nef.

Proof. We descend a positive current over the smooth fibers, remove the vertical divisor discrepancy over the remaining fibers, and finally recover the rationality of the descended class. If YY is a point, the hypothesis says that c1(M)=0c_1(M) = 0. If the relative dimension is zero, ff is bimeromorphic; take a common smooth model as both X′X' and Y′Y'. We may therefore assume k=dim⁡Y>0k = \dim Y > 0 and d=dim⁡X−dim⁡Y>0d = \dim X - \dim Y > 0.

Flatten ff after a smooth modification q:Y′→Yq : Y' \to Y [24]. Let ZZ be the normalization of the main component of X×YY′X \times_Y Y', and resolve it by a projective modification r:X′→Zr : X' \to Z. Write g0:Z→Y′g_0 : Z \to Y' and g=g0rg = g_0r. The map g0g_0 is equidimensional; it and gg have connected fibers by Stein factorization and normality of Y′Y'. All these spaces admit the asserted Kähler models. Write p0:Z→Xp_0 : Z \to X for the map to the original source, so that p=p0rp = p_0r is a modification. If YY is projective, the base modifications may be chosen projective. Figure 1 separates the equidimensional map from the resolution above it.

Diagram of the flattened main component and its resolution

Figure 1. The flattened main component ZZ is equidimensional over Y′Y'. A prime divisor on the resolution X′X' whose image in Y′Y' has codimension at least two must therefore be exceptional for rr.

Put α=c1(p∗M)\alpha= c_1(p^*M), choose a Kähler form ω\omega on X′X', and choose a closed positive current $T representing α\alpha. The volume

c=∫Xy′ωdc = \int_{X'_y} \omega^d

is positive and constant on the smooth-fibration locus. Define the closed positive (1,1)(1,1)-current

S=c−1g∗(T∧ωd)S = c^{-1}g_*(T \wedge\omega^d)

on Y′Y'. We claim that T=g∗ST = g^*S over that locus. Indeed g∗(T∧ωd−1)g_*(T \wedge\omega^{d-1}) is a closed positive current of degree zero, hence a nonnegative constant. Its cohomology class is the fiber intersection of α\alpha with ωd−1\omega^{d-1}, which vanishes. Thus this current is zero. In local product coordinates this says that the vertical block of the positive matrix of measures defining TT vanishes. Positivity also forces its mixed block to vanish. Closedness then makes the horizontal coefficients independent of the fiber coordinates. Connectedness of the fibers makes these local currents descend, and Equation (3.2) identifies their common descent as SS.

The current SS has local plurisubharmonic potentials, so its pullback by the dominant map gg is defined on all of X′X'. The closed order-zero current T−g∗ST-g^*S is supported on the inverse image of the complement of the smooth-fibration locus in Y′Y'. The support theorem for currents [15], Chapter III, Corollaries 2.11 and 2.14 therefore gives

T−g∗S=[D],D=∑ExEE,T-g^*S=[D], \qquad D=\sum_E x_E E,

where DD is a signed real divisor supported on vertical primes. We next show that its components dominating base divisors come in whole pullbacks.

Fix a prime divisor Q⊂Y′Q \subset Y' occurring among their images, and let E1,…,EsE_1,\ldots,E_s be the primes of X′X' dominating QQ. Let ai>0a_i>0 be their multiplicities in g∗Qg^*Q, and let xix_i be their coefficients in DD. For a Kähler form η\eta on Y′Y', set

Cij=∫X′{Ei}{Ej}(g∗η)k−1ωd−1.C_{ij}=\int_{X'}\{E_i\}\{E_j\}(g^*\eta)^{k-1}\omega^{d-1}.

For i≠ji\ne j, these numbers are nonnegative. The inverse image g−1(Q)g^{-1}(Q) is an effective Cartier divisor, hence has pure codimension one. After a generic choice of the point in QQ, its fiber components all have pure dimension dd. Distinct primes Ei,EjE_i,E_j have pure codimension-two intersection; if they meet over a general point of QQ, that intersection dominates QQ and has fibers of dimension d−1d-1. It therefore contributes positively to CijC_{ij}. These dimension statements follow by generic flatness over QQ, excluding the smaller base images. The graph having an edge when Cij>0C_{ij}>0 is consequently connected. Indeed, over a general point of QQ the irreducible components of the connected fiber have a connected intersection graph. Grouping those components according to the global prime EiE_i containing them gives the graph above as a quotient, which is still connected. Moreover Ca=0Ca=0, where a=(ai)a=(a_i). To see this, pair EiE_i with g∗Qg^*Q and (g∗η)k−1ωd−1(g^*\eta)^{k-1}\omega^{d-1}. Its image lies in QQ, so the kk classes from the base give zero. Components of g∗Qg^*Q whose images have codimension at least two give zero separately in this pairing.

Let β\beta be the Bott–Chern class of SS. Equation (3.3) gives {D}=α−g∗β\{D\}=\alpha-g^*\beta. Pairing this identity with each Ei(g∗η)k−1ωd−1E_i(g^*\eta)^{k-1}\omega^{d-1} shows that

Cx≥0.Cx \ge0.

Here the α\alpha term is nonnegative by nefness, and the base term vanishes by dimension. Components of DD above other base divisors, or above sets of codimension at least two, also contribute zero.

Since aa has strictly positive entries and aTCx=0a^{\mathsf{T}}Cx=0, we obtain Cx=0Cx=0. The kernel is precisely Ra\mathbb{R}a: indeed

xTCx=−∑i<jCijaiaj(xiai−xjaj)2.x^{\mathsf{T}}Cx=-\sum_{i<j}C_{ij}a_i a_j\left(\frac{x_i}{a_i}-\frac{x_j}{a_j}\right)^2.

and the graph is connected. Consequently xi=tQaix_i=t_Qa_i for one real number tQt_Q.

Subtract g∗(∑QtQQ)g^*(\sum_Q t_Q Q) from DD, and denote the resulting divisor by D0D_0. Its image in Y′Y' has codimension at least two. Equidimensionality of g0g_0 implies that every such prime on X′X' is rr-exceptional. Also

{D0}=α−g∗β′,β′=β+∑QtQ{Q}.\{D_0\}=\alpha-g^*\beta',\qquad\beta'=\beta+\sum_Q t_Q\{Q\}.

Both classes on the right come from classes with local potentials on ZZ: α\alpha comes from the original source XX, and β′\beta' comes from Y′Y'. Thus D0D_0 has degree zero on every curve contracted by rr. Relative negativity for a projective morphism of normal analytic spaces [20], applied to the exceptional divisors D0D_0 and −D0-D_0, gives D0=0D_0=0. We have proved

α=g∗β′.\alpha=g^*\beta'.

It remains to justify that the descended class is a rational line class; the use of ω\omega above does not supply rationality by itself. Pullback

g∗:H2(Y′,Q)⟶H2(X′,Q)g^*:H^2(Y',\mathbb{Q})\longrightarrow H^2(X',\mathbb{Q})

is injective. Over R\mathbb{R} a left inverse is obtained by pushing against ωd\omega^d and dividing by cc, so injectivity follows there and hence over Q\mathbb{Q}. An injective rational linear map has a rational preimage for every rational vector in its real image. Since α\alpha is rational, (3.5) therefore makes β′\beta' rational. It has type (1,1)(1,1), and the Lefschetz (1,1)(1,1) theorem gives a rational line NN with c1(N)=β′c_1(N)=\beta'.

Finally suppose that Y′Y' is projective. For any irreducible curve C⊂Y′C\subset Y', resolve a component of g−1(C)g^{-1}(C) that dominates CC, and factor its map through the normalization of CC. The pullback of α\alpha is nef. Pairing it with a Kähler power on that resolution gives a positive constant times deg⁡(N∣C)\deg(N|_C). This degree is nonnegative. The projective numerical criterion for nefness now shows that NN is nef. ▫

The preceding proposition descends the Chern class. For later use we also need an actual rational-line identity. The price is a single flat twist on the original source.

Corollary 3.2 (Choosing a descended representative). In the notation and under the hypotheses of Proposition 3.1, there is a rational line M∗M^* on XX with M∗≡MM^*\equiv M such that

p∗M∗∼Qg∗N.p^*M^*\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}g^*N.

Proof. The rational line g∗N−p∗Mg^*N-p^*M has zero real Chern class. After clearing denominators and torsion, it belongs to Pic⁡0(X′)\operatorname{Pic}^0(X'). Lemma 2.1(2) identifies Pic⁡0(X)\operatorname{Pic}^0(X) with Pic⁡0(X′)\operatorname{Pic}^0(X'). Thus g∗N−p∗M∼Qp∗Fg^*N-p^*M\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}p^*F for some F∈Pic⁡0(X)⊗QF\in\operatorname{Pic}^0(X)\otimes\mathbb{Q}. Take M∗=M+FM^*=M+F. ▫

The next lemma explains which fiberwise trivial flat twists already come from the base. Passing to rational lines allows us to remove finite meridian holonomy and torsion Chern classes.

Lemma 3.3 (Descent of a flat line). Let f:X→Yf:X\to Y be a fibration of smooth connected compact Kähler manifolds, and let F∈Pic⁡0(X)⊗QF\in\operatorname{Pic}^{0}(X)\otimes\mathbb{Q}. If FF is trivial as a rational line on a general smooth fiber, then

F∼Qf∗GF\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}f^{*}G

for some G∈Pic⁡0(Y)⊗QG\in\operatorname{Pic}^{0}(Y)\otimes\mathbb{Q}.

Proof. Take a positive multiple so that FF is a genuine unitary flat line and its restriction to one smooth fiber XyX_y is holomorphically trivial. On a compact connected Kähler manifold, a holomorphically trivial unitary flat line has trivial holonomy. Thus the character of FF is trivial on π1(Xy)\pi_1(X_y).

Choose a dense Zariski open Y∘Y^\circ over which ff is smooth, and write X∘=f−1(Y∘)X^\circ=f^{-1}(Y^\circ). The homotopy sequence of the smooth proper fibration gives

π1(Xy)⟶π1(X∘)⟶π1(Y∘)⟶1.\pi_1(X_y)\longrightarrow\pi_1(X^\circ)\longrightarrow\pi_1(Y^\circ)\longrightarrow1.

The character of F∣X∘F|_{X^\circ} therefore comes from a unitary character χ\chi of π1(Y∘)\pi_1(Y^\circ).

Let QQ be a divisorial component of Y∖Y∘Y\setminus Y^\circ. Choose a prime dominating QQ and a transverse disk at a general point of that prime, away from the other components of the inverse image of Y∖Y∘Y\setminus Y^\circ. Its image winds aQa_Q times around a small meridian of QQ, where aQ>0a_Q>0 is the multiplicity of that prime in f∗Qf^*Q. The disk lies in XX, so the character of FF is trivial on its boundary. Hence χ\chi has finite order dividing aQa_Q on the base meridian. There are finitely many such QQ. A common power of χ\chi kills all their meridians and therefore factors through π1(Y)\pi_1(Y); subsets of complex codimension at least two add no obstruction. The resulting unitary flat line on YY has zero real Chern class, and another power removes any torsion in its integral Chern class. It then belongs to Pic⁡0(Y)\operatorname{Pic}^{0}(Y).

The resulting characters agree after pullback on X∘X^\circ. Since π1(X∘)→π1(X)\pi_1(X^\circ)\to\pi_1(X) is surjective, they agree on XX as well. Dividing by the powers taken in the argument proves the asserted identity in Pic⁡(X)⊗Q\operatorname{Pic}(X)\otimes\mathbb{Q}. □

An ordinary adjoint on the projective base

The induction will produce a morphism to a projective variety for which an ordinary adjoint is pulled back from the base. To apply the projective numerical-semiampleness theorem, we must realize the line downstairs as an ordinary klt adjoint. The following proposition provides this realization. The total space need not be projective.

Proposition 4.1 (An adjoint on the base). Let (Y,D)(Y,D) be an effective klt pair with rational boundary on a normal compact Kähler space. Let f:Y→Zf:Y\to Z be a surjective morphism with connected fibers to a normal projective variety, and suppose that dim⁡Y>dim⁡Z\dim Y>\dim Z. If HH is a rational Cartier line bundle on ZZ and

KY+D∼Qf∗H,(4)K_Y+D\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}f^{*}H, \tag*{(4)}

then there is an effective rational divisor DZD_Z such that (Z,DZ)(Z,D_Z) is klt and

H∼QKZ+DZ.H\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}K_Z+D_Z.

Ambro proves the corresponding statement for projective total spaces [1], Theorem 0.2. We follow the same separation into a discriminant and a Hodge-theoretic moduli line. The two points requiring attention here are the real, possibly irrational polarization of a Kähler family and the construction of its cyclic cover without a meromorphic frame of KYK_Y. The period results recalled next address the first point; we give the cover and the required infinitesimal calculation explicitly.

The period input and the discriminant

For a pure variation of Hodge structures on a smooth open set, the line period map of a rank-one highest Hodge piece is the map to the projective space of the flat vector space that records this line in a local flat trivialization. Its generic differential rank is independent of the trivialization. The full period map records the entire Hodge filtration. For quasi-unipotent boundary monodromy, the parabolic extension of the line is the rational line bundle obtained by making the monodromy unipotent on local finite covers, extending the highest Hodge piece, and descending with its rational boundary weights.

We use the following precise consequence of the period results in [34], Lemmas 4.1 and 4.3 and Proposition 4.5.

Lemma 4.2 (Period quotient input). Let SS be a smooth projective variety and let S∘⊂SS^\circ\subset S have simple normal crossing complement. Let V\mathbb{V} be a real-polarizable pure variation on S∘S^\circ with an integral lattice and quasi-unipotent local monodromy. Suppose that a complex direct summand of VC\mathbb{V}_{\mathbb{C}}, as a variation of Hodge structures, has a rank-one highest Hodge piece, with parabolic extension LL. Then LL is nef, and its numerical dimension is the generic rank of its line period map.

After modification τ:S′→S\tau:S' \to S, there are a smooth projective variety QQ, a surjective morphism p:S′→Qp:S' \to Q with connected fibers, and a nef rational line bundle PP on QQ such that

τ∗L∼Qp∗P.(5)\tau^*L \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} p^*P. \tag*{(5)}

Moreover, dim⁡Q\dim Q is at most the generic rank of the full period map of V\mathbb{V}. If QQ is a point, τ∗L\tau^*L is rationally trivial.

Here the identity is in Pic⁡(S′)⊗Q\operatorname{Pic}(S') \otimes\mathbb{Q}, including the boundary. For clarity, the dimension assertion follows because the descended, generically immersive period map on QQ belongs to an adjoint variation obtained by tensor constructions from V\mathbb{V}. The rational adjoint reduction in [34], Lemma 4.3 retains entire rational simple factors, so its monodromy is discrete even when the original real polarization is irrational. It also kills only finite scalar monodromy after taking a power. Thus (4.2) does not discard an arbitrary flat twist. We shall need exactly this actual line identity.

Choose a projective resolution b:S→Zb:S \to Z, and normalize the main component of Y×ZSY \times_Z S. Choose its log resolution functorially with respect to local isomorphisms preserving the marked boundary; over the open where bb is an isomorphism this is a functorial log resolution of (Y,D)(Y,D). Denote the resulting smooth compact Kähler space by XX, with maps π:X→Y\pi:X \to Y and g:X→Sg:X \to S. Such a resolution is available in the complex analytic category; see [3], Theorem 1.1 and the preceding analytic remark. The functorial choice will matter when we lift local flows. Additional resolutions used to compute thresholds and fiber integrals are auxiliary and do not replace the family whose cohomology we use. Define the crepant rational divisor DXD_X by

KX+DX=π∗(KY+D).K_X + D_X = \pi^*(K_Y + D).

Its exceptional coefficients may be negative; all its coefficients are strictly less than one. For a prime divisor Q0Q_0 on SS, let

tQ0=sup⁡{c∈R:(X,DX+cg∗Q0) is log canonical over the general point of Q0}.t_{Q_0} = \sup\{c \in\mathbb{R} : (X,D_X + cg^*Q_0) \text{ is log canonical over the general point of } Q_0\}.

The definition is unchanged on a higher crepant resolution. It gives a positive rational number, computed by a log resolution as

tQ0=min⁡i1−uiai.(6)t_{Q_0} = \min_i \frac{1-u_i}{a_i}. \tag*{(6)}

where g∗Q0=∑iaiEig^{*}Q_{0}=\sum_i a_iE_i over its general point and uiu_i is the coefficient of EiE_i in the crepant boundary there. Define

ΔS=∑Q0(1−tQ0)Q0,LS=b∗H−KS−ΔS.(7)\Delta_S=\sum_{Q_0}(1-t_{Q_0})Q_0,\qquad L_S=b^{*}H-K_S-\Delta_S. \tag*{(7)}

Only finitely many terms of ΔS\Delta_S are nonzero: off a suitable proper analytic subset the resolved pair is relatively simple normal crossing, the map is smooth, and the threshold of a base prime is one. We may choose SS with a simple normal crossing divisor containing this exceptional set and the support of ΔS\Delta_S.

The coefficients of ΔS\Delta_S are strictly less than one. To prove Proposition 4.1, we will show that LSL_S has an effective rational representative whose addition to ΔS\Delta_S is sub-klt. The relevant positivity comes from the following root construction.

The root cover and its highest Hodge line

Lemma 4.3 (The root eigenline). In the setting of Proposition 4.1, there is a dense Zariski open S∘⊂SS^\circ\subset S and a smooth proper family h:V∘→S∘h:V^\circ\to S^\circ obtained from a cyclic cover and resolution, such that Rlh∗RR^lh_*\mathbb{R}, where l=dim⁡Y−dim⁡Zl=\dim Y-\dim Z, is real-polarizable and has an integral lattice. One character summand of its complexification has a rank-one highest Hodge piece. On S∘S^\circ, this line agrees, as a rational line bundle, with b∗H−KSb^*H-K_S.

Proof. Choose an integer m>0m>0 clearing all divisors and rational line identities. A meromorphic section of the line mb∗Hmb^*H exists because SS is projective. Its pullback, under the identity

m(KX+DX)≃g∗(mb∗H),m(K_X+D_X)\simeq g^*(mb^*H),

and division by the canonical meromorphic section of mDXmD_X give a meromorphic section σ\sigma of KX⊗mK_X^{\otimes m}. On the open where σ\sigma has neither zeros nor poles, take its mmth roots in the fibers of KXK_X. In local canonical frames this is the equation zm=σz^m=\sigma; on overlaps the roots transform by the transition functions of KXK_X. The local covers therefore glue without a meromorphic trivialization of KXK_X, and without choosing a root of HH.

The Grauert–Remmert extension theorem for finite analytic covers [22], Exposé XII, Proposition 5.3 and Theorem 5.4] extends it normally across the divisor of σ\sigma, giving a finite cyclic cover of XX, possibly disconnected. It is compact Kähler. Take a resolution functorial for the cyclic action and for local isomorphisms of the pair, as in [1], Section 1.1 and Lemma 1.1]. Thus both resolutions are functorial. A local flow preserving the original pair lifts through them once its lift to the root cover has been chosen; we will construct that lift explicitly below. The resulting compact manifold VV is Kähler. After deleting from SS the zeros and poles of the chosen base section and the degeneration locus, the map h:V∘→S∘h:V^\circ\to S^\circ is smooth and proper. We take S∘S^\circ inside the isomorphism locus of bb. Shrinking it further, the original fibers of Y→ZY\to Z are normal effective klt pairs and the chosen resolutions restrict to resolutions of those pairs.

Average a global Kähler class on VV under the cyclic group. Its restriction is a flat real section of R2h∗RR^2h_*\mathbb{R} and polarizes the primitive pieces. Their Lefschetz decomposition supplies a flat real polarization of the full degree-ll cohomology. We retain the full cohomology local system, with lattice Rlh∗ZR^lh_*\mathbb{Z} modulo torsion; an irrational primitive summand is not required to carry its own lattice. The finite group action preserves this variation and its polarization.

Locally over the base, the tautological root, divided by a local base volume form, gives a relative meromorphic top form τ\tau on the cover. It belongs to a fixed character of the cyclic group. The klt condition makes its squared volume locally integrable, including after resolution, so extends holomorphically: a meromorphic top form with a divisorial pole cannot be locally square integrable. To see the orders directly, consider a boundary prime on the original normal fiber with coefficient u=p/e∈(0,1)u=p/e\in(0,1) in lowest terms. At a general point the cover has local coordinate x=yex=y^e, and the pulled-back root form has order

e−1−eu=e−1−p∈{0,…,e−2}.e-1-eu=e-1-p\in\{0,\ldots,e-2\}.

Away from the boundary its order at a nonexceptional prime is zero. The corresponding calculation on a crepant resolution uses coefficients less than one and proves integrability at exceptional divisors as well.

Suppose that τ′\tau' is another holomorphic top form of the same character on a fiber. The ratio τ′/τ\tau'/\tau is an invariant meromorphic function and descends to the original normal connected fiber. A pole along a boundary prime downstairs would pull back with order at least ee, whereas (4.5) permits only e−2e-2 zeros of τ\tau. No such pole is possible. Away from the boundary, τ\tau has no divisorial zeros downstairs. Normality extends the ratio across codimension two, and compactness makes it constant. This also handles a disconnected cover, since the full root group acts transitively on its components over a connected fiber. The highest Hodge piece of the chosen character is therefore one-dimensional.

Finally, changing a local frame of mb∗Hmb^*H changes the root by an mmth root of the corresponding base factor; changing the base volume form contributes the inverse canonical transition. Taking the mmth tensor power removes the finite root ambiguities. These are precisely the transitions of m(b∗H−KS)m(b^*H-K_S), proving the asserted identity on S∘S^\circ.

Lemma 4.4 (Extension across the discriminant). The parabolic extension of the eigenline in Lemma 4.3 is LSL_S of (7). This identification persists on higher smooth base models with simple normal crossing complement.

Proof. Fix a general point of a prime Q0=(t=0)Q_0=(t=0) on SS. We normalize the root form by a nonvanishing local frame of b∗H−KSb^*H-K_S. More explicitly, if the meromorphic section of mb∗Hmb^*H chosen in Lemma 4.3 is aa times a nonvanishing local frame, divide its root by a1/ma^{1/m} and by the local base volume form. This is an ordinary frame after a finite power substitution; the finite ambiguity is precisely part of the parabolic convention. Thus zeros or poles of the chosen meromorphic base section do not enter the following exponent. Tangential base coordinates may be treated as parameters. On a log resolution,

t=∏i=1kxiait=\prod_{i=1}^{k}x_i^{a_i}

up to a nowhere-zero factor, and the squared absolute root form has vertical density factors ∣xi∣−2ui|x_i|^{-2u_i}. Horizontal boundary factors are integrable because their coefficients are less than one. The squared Hodge norm of the relative form is its fiber integral. Writing si=−log⁡∣xi∣s_i=-\log|x_i|, the integral is computed on slices

∑iaisi=−log⁡∣t∣\sum_i a_i s_i=-\log|t|

with exponential weight exp⁡(−2∑i(1−ui)si)\exp(-2\sum_i(1-u_i)s_i). Conversion to the ordinary base area element contributes ∣t∣−2|t|^{-2}. The minimum in (6) thus gives constants C,N>0C,N>0 such that, on a sufficiently small punctured disk,

C−1∣t∣2(tQ0−1)(−log⁡∣t∣)−N≤∥τ∥2≤C∣t∣2(tQ0−1)(−log⁡∣t∣)N.(8)C^{-1}|t|^{2(t_{Q_0}-1)}(-\log|t|)^{-N}\le\|\tau\|^2\le C|t|^{2(t_{Q_0}-1)}(-\log|t|)^N. \tag*{(8)}

Indeed, the slice has at most polynomial volume in −log⁡∣t∣-\log|t|, which proves the upper estimate after factoring out the least exponential decay. For the lower estimate take a chart along a component attaining the minimum, away from all other vertical components, and integrate over a fixed compact set in the remaining directions. Compactness allows finitely many charts; the integrable horizontal factors do not alter the power of ∣t∣|t|.

After a local power substitution making monodromy unipotent, extending Hodge frames and their duals have norms bounded by powers of −log⁡∣t∣-\log|t|. These are the nilpotent-orbit estimates of Schmid and Cattani–Kaplan–Schmid [36, 10], in the form used in [34], Section 4.1. Consequently the comparison between a frame of b∗H−KSb^*H-K_S and an extending Hodge frame has rational order tQ0−1t^{Q_0-1}. Multiplication by t1−tQ0t^{1-t^{Q_0}}, on a cover where this power is integral, removes exactly that order. Both the corrected comparison and its inverse have at most logarithmic growth. A holomorphic function on a punctured disk with such growth has no pole; applying this to the inverse excludes a zero. The same argument with tangential parameters extends the identification across each divisor, and normal extension treats codimension two. Thus the extending line is

b∗H−KS+∑Q0(tQ0−1)Q0=LS.b^*H-K_S+\sum_{Q_0}(t_{Q_0}-1)Q_0=L_S.

For the last assertion, first make the boundary monodromies unipotent. In canonical extending frames a local monomial pullback ti=unit⁡⋅∏jsjaijt_i=\operatorname{unit}\cdot\prod_j s_j^{a_{ij}} replaces the commuting nilpotent residues NiN_i by ∑iaijNi\sum_i a_{ij}N_i, which are again nilpotent. Both the canonical flat extension and its extending Hodge filtration therefore pull back without an additional divisor. Descending with rational weights incorporates the finite-monodromy parts and gives the same conclusion for the parabolic line, including exceptional base divisors; see [34], Section 4. [square]

We have now identified the moduli line with an extreme Hodge line, so Lemma 4.2 makes it nef and gives an actual line descent. To obtain a big line on the quotient, we must compare the variation seen by this one line with that seen by the whole family. Effectivity of the original boundary is decisive in this comparison.

The line detects the full period rank

Lemma 4.5 (Equality of period ranks). For the family of Lemma 4.3, the line period map of its root eigenline and the full period map of Rlh∗RR^lh_*\mathbb{R} have the same generic differential rank.

Proof. Work in an open patch on which the ranks are constant, and let ξ\xi be a holomorphic base vector field in the kernel of the line period map. Choose a local frame τ\tau of the eigenline, viewed as a relative top form on V∘V^\circ. The infinitesimal period formula says that contraction with τ\tau sends the Kodaira–Spencer class of ξ\xi to zero in the fiber cohomology H1(Ωl−1)H^1(\Omega^{l-1}).

Here is the corresponding lifting construction. Pull back the tangent sequence to the line generated by ξ\xi and push it out along

TV∘/S∘⟶TV∘/S∘⊗KV∘/S∘≃ΩV∘/S∘l−1,v⟼ιvτ.T_{V^\circ/S^\circ}\longrightarrow T_{V^\circ/S^\circ}\otimes K_{V^\circ/S^\circ}\simeq\Omega^{l-1}_{V^\circ/S^\circ},\qquad v\longmapsto\iota_v\tau.

Write UU for a sufficiently small Stein base patch and put F=ΩVU/Ul−1\mathcal{F}=\Omega^{l-1}_{V_U/U}. The pushed-out extension is

0⟶F⟶E⟶OVU⟶0,0\longrightarrow\mathcal{F}\longrightarrow\mathcal{E}\longrightarrow\mathcal{O}_{V_U}\longrightarrow0,

with class in H1(VU,F)H^1(V_U,\mathcal{F}). Shrink within the generic locus so that R1h∗FR^1h_*\mathcal{F} is locally free and coherent base change holds. The contraction formula makes the image of this class in H0(U,R1h∗F)H^0(U,R^1h_*\mathcal{F}) zero. The Leray exact sequence and the vanishing H1(U,h∗F)=0H^{1}(U,h_{*}\mathcal{F})=0 show that H1(VU,F)→H0(U,R1h∗F)H^{1}(V_{U},\mathcal{F}) \to H^{0}(U,R^{1}h_{*}\mathcal{F}) is injective. The extension class is therefore zero, and a holomorphic splitting exists on the entire VUV_{U}. Where τ\tau is nonzero, divide the vertical part of the splitting by τ\tau. This gives a meromorphic vector field ξ~\widetilde{\xi} on the resolved cover projecting to ξ\xi, with poles bounded by the zero divisor of τ\tau. Average it under the root group. Its projection remains ξ\xi, and the averaged field is invariant.

We check this field at codimension-one points of the original normal total space. At a boundary prime use the ramification coordinate x=yex=y^{e} from (4.5). A tangential coefficient of an invariant vector field has Laurent exponents congruent to zero modulo ee. Its permitted pole order is at most e−2e-2, so every exponent is nonnegative. The coefficient of ∂/∂y\partial/\partial y has exponents congruent to one modulo ee. Its first possible negative exponent is 1−e1-e, which is again excluded. The normal coefficient is therefore divisible by yy. Thus the descended vector field is holomorphic and tangent to the boundary. At a prime outside the boundary the root form has no zero, and the conclusion is immediate.

The resolution is an isomorphism at the codimension-one points just used. Remaining exceptional divisors map into codimension at least two in the original normal space. Holomorphic derivations extend across that subset, so the descended field is holomorphic everywhere on the family over our base patch and still projects to ξ\xi. Its local flow preserves the boundary components, their coefficients, and the singular locus. By the functorial choice made above, the flow first lifts to XX and preserves its crepant boundary DXD_{X}.

This flow then lifts holomorphically to the root cover. Indeed, on the good base patch the defining pluriform has divisor exactly the negative multiple of the boundary. Pullback by a pair-preserving flow gives a pluriform with the same divisor. Their ratio is a holomorphic unit on the normal space; its mmth root can be chosen starting at one in the flow parameter. The root normalized at flow time zero is unique as a germ. Thus the local cover lifts agree on overlaps of the unbranched open and glue by normality. Functorial resolution then lifts the flow to V∘V^{\circ}. Consequently the Kodaira–Spencer class of the resolved family vanishes on ξ\xi, and so does its full period differential. The reverse kernel inclusion holds because the line is part of the full Hodge filtration. The two kernels, and therefore the generic ranks, are equal.

The argument is the analytic counterpart of Ambro’s infinitesimal comparison [1, 36]. Notice exactly where it uses D≥0D \geq0: the strict pole bound in (4.5) is imposed at primes of the original pair. Negative crepant exceptional coefficients are allowed because their images have codimension at least two.

Replacing the moduli line by a klt boundary

Proof of Proposition 4.1. Apply Lemma 4.2 to the variation of Lemma 4.3. Its monodromy is quasi-unipotent by the monodromy theorem for this proper Kähler family [36]. Lemma 4.4 identifies its parabolic line with LSL_{S}. Passing to the indicated higher smooth projective model, and keeping the notation SS, we have

LS≃q∗PL_{S}\simeq q^{*}P

for a nef rational line PP on a smooth projective quotient QQ. Let rr be the generic rank of the line period map. Numerical dimension of a nef line is unchanged by a surjective pullback, so

r=ν(LS)=ν(P)≤dim⁡Q≤rank⁡(dΦ)=r,r=\nu(L_{S})=\nu(P)\leq\dim Q\leq\operatorname{rank}(d\Phi)=r,

where Φ\Phi is the full period map and the last equality is Lemma 4.5. Thus PP is big if dim⁡Q>0\dim Q>0. If QQ is a point, LSL_{S} is rationally trivial.

Suppose first that dim⁡Q>0\dim Q > 0. By Kodaira’s lemma write P∼QA+EP \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} A + E, with AA ample rational and E≥0E \ge0 rational. For every small positive rational ε\varepsilon,

P∼QAε+εE,Aε=(1−ε)P+εAample.(9)P \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} A_{\varepsilon} + \varepsilon E,\qquad A_{\varepsilon} = (1-\varepsilon)P + \varepsilon A\quad\text{ample}. \tag*{(9)}

The pair (S,ΔS)(S,\Delta_S) is sub-klt. On a fixed log resolution of ΔS+p∗E\Delta_S + p^*E, choose ε\varepsilon sufficiently small that (S,ΔS+εp∗E)(S,\Delta_S + \varepsilon p^*E) remains sub-klt. Choose a sufficiently large divisible integer NN and a general member G∈∣NAε∣G \in|NA_{\varepsilon}|. The system ∣Np∗Aε∣|Np^*A_{\varepsilon}| is basepoint-free; on that resolution its general member meets the fixed boundary transversely. Taking NN large makes its coefficient 1/N1/N less than one. Bertini therefore gives an effective rational divisor

ES=εp∗E+1Np∗G∼QLSE_S = \varepsilon p^*E + \frac{1}{N}p^*G \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} L_S

with (S,ΔS+ES)(S,\Delta_S + E_S) sub-klt. In the point case take ES=0E_S = 0. In either case,

KS+ΔS+ES∼Qb∗H.(10)K_S + \Delta_S + E_S \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} b^*H. \tag*{(10)}

Set DZ=b∗(ΔS+ES)D_Z = b_*(\Delta_S + E_S). This divisor is effective. Indeed, for each prime of the original normal base, some component of its pullback on YY dominates it. That component has multiplicity a≥1a \ge1 and boundary coefficient u≥0u \ge0, so its threshold is at most (1−u)/a≤1(1-u)/a \le1. Thus the coefficient of the discriminant at every nonexceptional base prime is nonnegative, and ESE_S is effective.

Choose compatible canonical divisors and a rational Cartier divisor representing HH. The line identity (10) gives an integer m>0m > 0 and a rational function φ\varphi in the common function field of SS and ZZ such that

KS+ΔS+ES−b∗H=1mdiv⁡S(φ).K_S + \Delta_S + E_S - b^*H = \frac{1}{m}\operatorname{div}_S(\varphi).

Pushing down gives

KZ+DZ−H=1mdiv⁡Z(φ).K_Z + D_Z - H = \frac{1}{m}\operatorname{div}_Z(\varphi).

In particular, KZ+DZK_Z + D_Z is rational Cartier and rationally linearly equivalent to HH. Pulling the latter divisor equality back and comparing with the former proves the crepant identity

KS+ΔS+ES=b∗(KZ+DZ).K_S + \Delta_S + E_S = b^*(K_Z + D_Z).

Since the pair upstairs is sub-klt, the effective pair (Z,DZ)(Z,D_Z) is klt. This proves the proposition.

Nef classes in algebraic dimension zero

A semiample line bundle on a space of algebraic dimension zero is rationally trivial. The induction therefore requires a stronger conclusion in this case: the additional nef class must itself vanish. The ordinary adjoint decomposition reduces this assertion to a question about nef line bundles on simple manifolds. We first carry out that geometric reduction. The remaining argument adapts the meromorphic nonvanishing construction of [32] to a line bundle that need not be canonical.

Proposition 5.1. Let n≥1n \ge1. Assume that the algebraic-dimension-zero assertion of Theorem 1.2 holds in every dimension less than nn. Let TT be a smooth connected compact Kähler nn-fold with a(T)=0a(T) = 0, and let BB be an effective rational simple normal crossing boundary with coefficients less than one. If KT+BK_T + B is pseudo-effective, then every nef rational holomorphic line bundle MM on TT satisfies c1(M)=0c_1(M) = 0.

For intersections in this Section, a line bundle and its first Chern class are distinguished when necessary by braces: {H}=c1(H)\{H\}=c_1(H). An inequality between real (1,1)(1,1)-classes is in pseudo-effective order. A compact manifold is simple if no positive-dimensional proper compact analytic subvariety passes through a very general point. Here, as usual, “very general” permits deletion of a countable union of proper analytic subsets.

Reduction to a simple symplectic manifold

The following elementary intersection test lets us use finite covers without requiring the nef line bundle to descend through them.

Lemma 5.2. Let VV be a smooth compact Kähler nn-fold, where n≥1n \ge1, and let γ\gamma be a nef class, and let CC be a nef and big class. If γ⋅Cn−1=0\gamma\cdot C^{n-1}=0, then γ=0\gamma=0. In particular, if VV admits a generically finite surjective morphism to a complex torus of algebraic dimension zero, every nef rational line class on VV is zero.

Proof. Choose a Kähler class ω\omega and ε>0\varepsilon>0 such that C−εωC-\varepsilon\omega is pseudo-effective. When n≥2n \ge2, the identity

Cn−1−(εω)n−1=(C−εω)∑j=0n−2Cn−2−j(εω)jC^{n-1}-(\varepsilon\omega)^{n-1}=(C-\varepsilon\omega)\sum_{j=0}^{n-2}C^{n-2-j}(\varepsilon\omega)^j

and nonnegativity of intersections of a pseudo-effective class with nef classes give

0=γ⋅Cn−1≥εn−1γ⋅ωn−1≥0.0=\gamma\cdot C^{n-1}\ge\varepsilon^{n-1}\gamma\cdot\omega^{n-1}\ge0.

The same conclusion is immediate when n=1n=1. A positive current in γ\gamma thus has zero mass, so it vanishes.

For the last assertion, write f:V→Af:V\to A for the morphism. The pushforward of the nef rational line class is a rational pseudo-effective (1,1)(1,1)-class on AA. Averaging a positive current under translations represents it by a constant semipositive form. The kernel of a rational such form is the tangent space of a subtorus; the induced positive integral form, after clearing denominators, polarizes the quotient. Since a(A)=0a(A)=0, this quotient is a point, and hence f∗γ=0f_*\gamma=0. For a Kähler class η\eta on AA, the class C=f∗ηC=f^*\eta is nef and big and

γ⋅Cn−1=(f∗γ)⋅ηn−1=0.\gamma\cdot C^{n-1}=(f_*\gamma)\cdot\eta^{n-1}=0.

Apply the first assertion.

Lemma 5.3. Under the induction hypothesis of Proposition 5.1, it suffices to prove the following assertion: every nef rational line class on a smooth simple compact Kähler manifold of algebraic dimension zero carrying a generically nondegenerate holomorphic two-form is zero.

Proof. Apply the ordinary good divisorial decomposition to KT+BK_T+B. On a smooth modification its semiample part is rationally trivial, because a(T)=0a(T)=0. After the klt modification convention of Section 2, the resulting ordinary adjoint still equals its rational negative divisor as an actual rational line bundle. The contraction of a known negative part [32], with nef part zero, produces an ordinary compact Kähler klt pair (T0,B0)(T_0,B_0) such that KT0+B0∼Q0K_{T_0}+B_0\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}0.

The decomposition theorem of Matsumura–Wang–Wu–Zhang [31] applies to this pair: its nef b-part is zero. A finite quasi-étale cover of T0T_0 is a product of a rationally connected factor, strict Calabi–Yau factors, irreducible holomorphic symplectic factors, and a torus. Algebraic dimension is unchanged by proper generically finite maps and by modifications. No positive-dimensional rationally connected factor can occur, since a Kähler resolution of such a factor is projective by algebraic connectedness [6]. A strict Calabi–Yau factor of dimension at least three has no holomorphic two-forms. Extension of forms for klt spaces [26] gives the same vanishing on a resolution, which is projective by Kodaira’s criterion. Such factors are also excluded. Dimension-two factors of Calabi–Yau type are counted among the symplectic factors. A resolution of an irreducible symplectic factor has h2,0=1h^{2,0}=1, generated by a generically nondegenerate form.

Resolve the cover and the maps to TT and to smooth models of all its factors. We obtain a smooth compact Kähler manifold VV, with the pulled-back nef line class γ\gamma, mapping generically finitely to TT and to a product X1×⋯×XrX_1 \times\cdots\times X_r. If r≥2r \ge2, let CC be the pullback of a sum of Kähler classes from the factors. For the projection omitting XiX_i, every component of a smooth general fiber maps generically finitely to XiX_i. This fiber has algebraic dimension zero and a nonzero top form, obtained by pulling back either a torus volume form or a power of a symplectic form. Its canonical class is therefore pseudo-effective. Its dimension is less than nn, so the induction hypothesis, with zero boundary, makes the restriction of γ\gamma zero.

Expand Cn−1C^{n-1}. A nonzero term has top powers from all factors except one, where precisely one power is missing. Integration over the fibers just considered shows that its pairing with γ\gamma is zero. Thus γ⋅Cn−1=0\gamma\cdot C^{n-1}=0, and Lemma 5.2 gives γ=0\gamma=0. Vanishing descends to TT by push–pull for a generically finite map. A single torus factor is covered by the last assertion of that lemma.

It remains to consider one symplectic factor. On a smooth model XX we have a(X)=0a(X)=0 and H0(X,ΩX2)=CσH^0(X,\Omega_X^2)=\mathbb{C}\sigma, with σ\sigma generically nondegenerate. There is no dominant meromorphic fibration from XX to an intermediate-dimensional compact base. Indeed, on smooth Kähler models such a base has algebraic dimension zero, hence is nonprojective and has a nonzero holomorphic two-form by Kodaira’s criterion. Its pullback would be a nonzero degenerate holomorphic two-form on XX, which is impossible.

The minimal-fibration theorem of Campana, in the form [9], now says that XX is isotypically semi-simple. This means that XX and a power SrS^r of a simple manifold have a common generically finite cover; we may take smooth Kähler models. If r≥2r \ge2, repeat the preceding product intersection argument. The smaller-dimensional fibers are simple: simplicity is preserved by generically finite maps between spaces of algebraic dimension zero. Indeed, a covering family of proper subvarieties upstairs or downstairs gives such a family on the other space by images or inverse images at points where the map is finite; the countability of compact cycle components gives the very general formulation. They are not uniruled, and hence their canonical bundles are pseudo-effective by [35]. The induction hypothesis again applies. If r=1r=1, the common smooth cover is simple and carries the pullback of σ\sigma, a generically nondegenerate holomorphic two-form. This is precisely the assertion stated in the lemma. □\square

Finite correspondences and cotangent slopes

We next isolate the two geometric properties needed for the nonvanishing argument. The first controls subvarieties of a product; the second controls line subsheaves of cotangent tensors.

Lemma 5.4. Let XX be a smooth simple compact Kähler manifold of algebraic dimension zero, carrying a generically nondegenerate holomorphic two-form. Suppose that every smooth connected compact Kähler manifold mapping generically finitely onto XX has irregularity zero. Through a very general point of X2X^2, the only positive-dimensional proper irreducible compact analytic subvarieties are the two factor slices.

Proof. Fix a generically nondegenerate holomorphic two-form σ\sigma on XX. A moving correspondence would produce a holomorphic one-form on a fixed finite cover of XX. To see this, we identify its first projection with a fixed finite cover over a parameter ball, and then contract the pulled-back two-form in a direction varying the second projection.

For a subvariety through a pair whose coordinates are very general, simplicity makes each projection image either a point or all of XX. If both projections dominate, their fibers through general points are either zero-dimensional or the full other factor. A proper such subvariety must therefore be a generically finite correspondence.

Suppose these correspondences sweep X2X^2. The compact cycle spaces of a compact Kähler manifold have countably many compact irreducible components [30]. One component must have incidence image equal to X2X^2. Resolve that component and the relevant incidence component, obtaining a compact Kähler parameter space SS, a smooth incidence space YY, and maps

h:Y→S,F1,F2:Y→X.h:Y\to S,\qquad F_1,F_2:Y\to X.

For a general parameter, the fiber is smooth and irreducible, and each FiF_i restricts to a generically finite map. The map (F1,h):Y→X×S(F_1,h):Y\to X\times S is generically finite. Its normal finite Stein factor is a finite cover of the smooth product.

By purity, the branch locus of this cover is divisorial. Every branch component dominating SS has a proper image in XX: otherwise its divisorial fibers over SS would sweep XX, contradicting simplicity. Compactness of SS makes these images closed analytic subsets. Remove the images in SS of the remaining branch components and take a small ball BB about a general parameter. There is a fixed proper analytic subset A⊂XA\subset X such that the cover is étale over (X∖A)×B(X\setminus A)\times B. Since BB is simply connected, this étale cover is pulled back from a fixed cover of X∖AX\setminus A. Normalize XX in that cover. Uniqueness of normal finite extension then identifies the cover over X×BX\times B with the product of this fixed normal cover and BB; see [22], Exposé XII, Proposition 5.3 and Theorem 5.4.

Let X~\widetilde{X} be a smooth Kähler resolution of the fixed cover. The second projection gives a meromorphic map G:X~×B⇢XG:\widetilde{X}\times B\dashrightarrow X. The pullback G∗σG^*\sigma is a holomorphic two-form: resolve the meromorphic map and descend holomorphic forms across a modification of a smooth space. Dominance of (F1,F2)(F_1,F_2) implies that, at suitable general points, the derivatives of GG in the parameter directions span TXT_X, while the derivative along X~\widetilde{X} is an isomorphism. Choose a constant tangent vector on BB for which this parameter derivative is nonzero at such a point. Contracting G∗σG^*\sigma with that vector and restricting to X~×{t}\widetilde{X}\times\{t\} yields a nonzero global holomorphic one-form on X~\widetilde{X}. This contradicts the hypothesis on irregularity.

Each component parametrizing generically finite correspondences thus has proper incidence image. Their countable union misses a very general pair, proving the assertion. □

Lemma 5.5. Let XX be a smooth simple compact Kähler manifold of dimension n≥2n\geq2, algebraic dimension zero and irregularity zero, and suppose KXK_X is pseudo-effective. Let L\mathcal{L} be a holomorphic line bundle such that L=c1(L)≥c1(KX)L=c_1(\mathcal{L})\geq c_1(K_X) in pseudo-effective order. For every nonzero map H→ΩXk\mathcal{H}\to\Omega_X^{k}, where H\mathcal{H} is a line bundle and k≥0k\geq0,

c1(H)≤kL.(11)c_1(\mathcal{H})\leq kL. \tag*{(11)}

For every very general x∈Xx\in X, write a:Y=Bl⁡xX→Xa:Y=\operatorname{Bl}_x X\to X. Every nonzero line map HY→(a∗ΩX)⊗k\mathcal{H}_Y\to(a^*\Omega_X)^{\otimes k} satisfies

c1(HY)≤ka∗L.(12)c_1(\mathcal{H}_Y)\leq ka^*L. \tag*{(12)}

The exceptional set of points can be chosen simultaneously for all HY\mathcal{H}_Y and kk.

Proof. We give the slope argument from [32], indicating why it does not require any hypothesis about canonical sections. Let γ\gamma belong to the full dual of the pseudo-effective cone. Ou’s convention calls precisely these classes movable, and Harder–Narasimhan filtrations exist for them [35]. If the minimum γ\gamma-slope of ΩX\Omega_X were negative, the first Harder–Narasimhan subsheaf T⊂TX\mathcal{T} \subset T_X would have positive slope and be semistable. Tensor slope inequalities make its bracket into TX/TT_X/\mathcal{T} zero, so it is a foliation. Its dual has negative maximum slope and is non-pseudo-effective. By [35], its leaves have compact closures given by a meromorphic fibration. The rank of T\mathcal{T} is strictly less than dim⁡X\dim X, since c1(TX)⋅γ≤0c_1(T_X) \cdot\gamma\le0. A general leaf closure contradicts simplicity.

All Harder–Narasimhan quotient slopes of ΩX\Omega_X are consequently nonnegative, and its maximum slope is at most c1(KX)⋅γc_1(K_X) \cdot\gamma. Tensor slopes give

c1(H)⋅γ≤kc1(KX)⋅γ≤kL⋅γ.c_1(\mathcal{H}) \cdot\gamma\le kc_1(K_X) \cdot\gamma\le kL \cdot\gamma.

Separation by the dual cone proves (5.1).

Irregularity zero embeds Pic⁡(X)\operatorname{Pic}(X) in the countable group H2(X,Z)H^2(X,\mathbb{Z}). For any vector bundle on XX, linearly independent global sections are generically pointwise independent: the coefficients expressing one section in a maximal pointwise independent subfamily are meromorphic functions, hence constants because a(X)=0a(X) = 0. Evaluation is therefore injective outside a proper analytic subset. Apply this simultaneously to H−1⊗ΩX⊗k\mathcal{H}^{-1} \otimes\Omega_X^{\otimes k} for all lines H\mathcal{H} and all kk.

For a point outside the resulting countable exceptional union, write HY=a∗H⊗OY(mF)\mathcal{H}_Y = a^*\mathcal{H} \otimes\mathcal{O}_Y(mF), where FF is the exceptional divisor. A nonzero map as in the statement extends away from FF to a section on XX by Hartogs. If m>0m > 0, that section vanishes at xx, because a∗OY(−mF)=Ixma_*\mathcal{O}_Y(-mF) = \mathcal{I}_x^m, contrary to injectivity of evaluation. Thus m≤0m \le0, and (5.1) proves (5.2). □

Meromorphic nonvanishing from cotangent slope bounds

The next proposition extracts the line-bundle content of the construction in [32]. Its hypotheses deliberately separate cotangent slopes from the identity of the chosen line bundle. This is what permits the application to the sum of the canonical bundle and a nef line bundle.

Proposition 5.6. Let XX be a smooth simple compact Kähler manifold of dimension n≥2n \ge2, with a(X)=0a(X) = 0 and irregularity zero. Assume that the only positive-dimensional proper compact irreducible analytic subvarieties through a very general point of X2X^2 are its factor slices. Let L\mathcal{L} be a holomorphic line bundle with pseudo-effective class LL. Assume the following line-subbundle bounds:

  1. For every line bundle H\mathcal{H}, every integer k≥0k \ge0, and every nonzero map H→ΩX⊗k\mathcal{H} \to\Omega_X^{\otimes k}, one has c1(H)≤kLc_1(\mathcal{H}) \le kL.

  1. Outside a countable union of proper analytic subsets of XX, every point xx has this property: if a:Y=Bl⁡xX→Xa : Y = \operatorname{Bl}_x X \to X, then for every line bundle HY\mathcal{H}_Y, every k≥0k \ge0, and every nonzero map HY→(a∗ΩX)⊗k\mathcal{H}_Y \to(a^*\Omega_X)^{\otimes k}, one has c1(HY)≤ka∗Lc_1(\mathcal{H}_Y) \le ka^*L.

Then some positive power of L\mathcal{L} has a nonzero meromorphic section.

We prove the proposition by comparing point poles with vanishing along a diagonal. Assume, throughout the proof, that no positive power of L\mathcal{L} has a nonzero meromorphic section. A normalized big class on XX has bounded pole order at a very general point. On the rank-two projective bundle over X2X^2 formed from the two pullbacks of L\mathcal{L}, a class of growing volume produces a large family of symmetric cotangent tensors. The diagonal in X2X^2 forces a large common vanishing order in their determinant. The slope inequalities then turn that vanishing into an impossible point pole on XX.

The proof below follows the volume and two-diagonal construction of [32]. We retain its analytic estimates and give their proofs along with the determinant calculations, so that the chosen line bundle enters only through the hypotheses stated above.

Point pole thresholds

We will use several standard facts about volumes of real (1,1)(1,1)-classes. Our normalization is vol⁡(α)=∫αe\operatorname{vol}(\alpha)=\int\alpha^e for a nef class on an ee-fold. Volume is continuous, homogeneous, monotone in pseudo-effective order, invariant under modification, and its ee-th root is concave on the big cone. Analytic Fujita approximation computes it by Kähler parts on smooth projective modifications. Here a smooth projective modification means a projective modification whose source is smooth; the sources used here are compact Kähler manifolds obtained by resolving coherent analytic ideals. For a smooth irreducible divisor DD and a big class α\alpha, write vol⁡∣D(α)\operatorname{vol}_{\mid D}(\alpha) for the numerical restricted volume. It is zero when DD is contained in the non-Kähler locus [39]; otherwise it is the supremum of the masses on DD of restrictions of Kähler currents with analytic singularities that are not generically singular on $D {cite:p}ref-11`. The divisorial derivative and its continuity on the big cone are

dduvol⁡(α−u{D})=−evol⁡∣D(α−u{D});(13)\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}u}\operatorname{vol}(\alpha-u\{D\})=-e\operatorname{vol}_{\mid D}(\alpha-u\{D\}); \tag*{(13)}

see [39]. We apply this formula only on smooth manifolds while the varying class is big.

Here is a useful precise form of the approximation in the restricted volume formula. Resolve the log-ideal singularities of a current restricted to DD. Its pullback is an effective real divisor plus a positive residual current with locally bounded potentials. The latter dominates a positive multiple of the pulled-back Kähler form. A current with locally bounded potentials has zero Lelong numbers, so Demailly regularization makes its class, after subtracting that multiple, nef [14]. On a projective modification there is an effective exceptional divisor whose negative is relatively ample. Subtracting a sufficiently small multiple of this divisor from the residual class therefore makes that class Kähler; add the same multiple to the divisor part. Round all divisor coefficients slightly upwards to rational numbers. Openness of the Kähler cone preserves the Kähler property. These changes can be arbitrarily small in top intersections, which compute the original mass by the bounded-potential product formula. Thus we may approximate a restricted mass by

n∗(α∣D)=β+{D′},β Ka¨hler,D′≥0 a rational divisor.(14)n^*(\alpha|_D)=\beta+\{D'\},\qquad\beta\ \text{Kähler},\quad D'\geq0\ \text{a rational divisor}. \tag*{(14)}

Moreover, D′D' has at least the log-ideal orders of the original restriction on every further resolution. We will use this last property to turn poles into vanishing conditions. Only D′D' is made rational; the class β\beta and the horizontal part of α\alpha remain real.

Lemma 5.7 (A point pole bound). Let WW be a smooth compact Kähler manifold of dimension e≥2e\geq2, α\alpha a big real (1,1)(1,1)-class, and z∈Wz\in W. Suppose a smooth projective modification μ:W′→W\mu:W'\to W, which is an isomorphism near zz, admits a decomposition

μ∗α=K+{D},K Ka¨hler,D≥0,\mu^*\alpha=K+\{D\},\qquad K\ \text{Kähler},\quad D\geq0,

where DD misses the point z′z' over zz. If the ordinary analytic Seshadri constant ϵ(K,z′)\epsilon(K,z') is at least η>0\eta>0, then, on the blowup b:W^=Bl⁡z′W′→W′b:\widehat{W}=\operatorname{Bl}_{z'}W'\to W' with exceptional divisor GG,

sup⁡{u≥0:b∗α−u{G}≥0}≤η2+2e−1vol⁡(α)η−(e−1).(15)\sup\{u\geq0:b^*\alpha-u\{G\}\geq0\}\leq\frac{\eta}{2}+2^{e-1}\operatorname{vol}(\alpha)\eta^{-(e-1)}. \tag*{(15)}

Proof. Set u0=η/2u_0=\eta/2. Blowing up z′z', the class K−u0{G′}K-u_0\{G'\} is Kähler. The Fujita decomposition is unchanged near G′G', so it supplies a Kähler current for αu0=b∗α−u0{G}\alpha_{u_0}=b^*\alpha-u_0\{G\} that is smooth near GG. Its restriction there has class u0c1(OPe−1(1))u_0c_1(\mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^{e-1}}(1)). The restricted volume is consequently u0e−1u_0^{e-1}: the current gives this lower bound, and the volume of the restricted class gives the opposite bound.

Let τ\tau denote the left side of (15). The classes αu=b∗α−u{G}\alpha_u=b^*\alpha-u\{G\} are big for 0≤u<τ0\leq u<\tau, since α0\alpha_0 is big and the pseudo-effective cone is convex. The concave function f(u)=vol⁡(αu)1/ef(u)=\operatorname{vol}(\alpha_u)^{1/e} satisfies, by (13),

f′(u0)=−u0e−1f(u0)e−1.f'(u_0)=-\frac{u_0^{e-1}}{f(u_0)^{e-1}}.

Its tangent line at u0u_0 must remain positive up to τ\tau. Therefore

τ≤u0+f(u0)eu0e−1≤u0+vol⁡(α)u0e−1,\tau\leq u_0+\frac{f(u_0)^e}{u_0^{e-1}}\leq u_0+\frac{\operatorname{vol}(\alpha)}{u_0^{e-1}},

which is Equation (15).

Fix a Kähler class ω\omega on XX. The class LL is not big: a big holomorphic line bundle would make XX Moishezon, contrary to a(X)=0a(X)=0. For t>0t>0 define

P=r(L+tω),r=vol⁡(L+tω)−1/n.P=r(L+t\omega),\qquad r=\operatorname{vol}(L+t\omega)^{-1/n}.

Then PP is a big real class, vol⁡(P)=1\operatorname{vol}(P)=1, L≤P/rL\leq P/r, and r→∞r\to\infty as t↓0t\downarrow0. Choose a smooth Fujita model μ:YP→X\mu:Y_P\to X with Kähler part P′P' satisfying

μ∗P=P′+{DP},v:=∫YP(P′)n>12.(16)\mu^*P=P'+\{D_P\},\qquad v:=\int_{Y_P}(P')^n>\frac{1}{2}. \tag*{(16)}

At a very general point yy of this model there is no positive-dimensional proper subvariety: its image would be one through a very general point of XX, and yy avoids the exceptional locus. The ordinary Seshadri formula for a Kähler class,

ϵ(K,y)=inf⁡W∋ydim⁡W>0(∫WKdim⁡Wmult⁡yW)1/dim⁡W,\epsilon(K,y)=\inf_{\substack{W\ni y\\ \dim W>0}}\left(\frac{\int_W K^{\dim W}}{\operatorname{mult}_y W}\right)^{1/\dim W},

therefore gives ϵ(P′,y)=v1/n≥2−1/n\epsilon(P',y)=v^{1/n}\geq2^{-1/n}. This is the ordinary nef/Kähler formula [37]; see also [11] and the Kähler cone criterion of [16]. We use this ordinary formula in both applications below. Lemma 5.7, with vol⁡(P)=1\operatorname{vol}(P)=1, now yields a constant CnC_n depending only on nn such that, for a very general xx,

τ(P,x):=sup⁡{u≥0:a∗P−u{F}≥0}≤Cn,a:Bl⁡xX→X.(17)\tau(P,x):=\sup\{u\geq0:a^*P-u\{F\}\geq0\}\leq C_n,\qquad a:\operatorname{Bl}_xX\to X. \tag*{(17)}

Here and below positive constants denoted cnc_n, CnC_n may be decreased or increased from one occurrence to the next. They are independent of all parameters and choices of currents and modifications.

A projective bundle with controlled volume

We now produce a class whose volume grows, while its point pole threshold grows much more slowly. On X2X^2, let Li\mathcal{L}_i and LiL_i denote the pullbacks of L\mathcal{L} and LL from the ii-th factor. Use the quotient convention and put

π:Z=PX2(L1⊕L2)⟶X2,ξ=c1(OZ(1)),d=dim⁡Z=2n+1.\pi:Z=\mathbb{P}_{X^2}(\mathcal{L}_1\oplus\mathcal{L}_2)\longrightarrow X^2,\qquad\xi=c_1(\mathcal{O}_Z(1)),\qquad d=\dim Z=2n+1.

Thus π∗OZ(m)=Sym⁡m(L1⊕L2)\pi_*\mathcal{O}_Z(m)=\operatorname{Sym}^m(\mathcal{L}_1\oplus\mathcal{L}_2) for m≥0m\geq0. The zero divisor AiA_i of π∗Li→OZ(1)\pi^*\mathcal{L}_i\to\mathcal{O}_Z(1) has class ξ−Li\xi-L_i; it is the section on which ξ\xi restricts to L3−iL_{3-i}. In particular ξ={Ai}+Li≥0\xi=\{A_i\}+L_i\geq0.

Lemma 5.8. For the projective bundle ZZ just defined, the only positive-dimensional compact irreducible analytic subvarieties through a very general point are a fiber of π\pi, the full inverse images of the two factor slices, and ZZ itself.

Proof. The image of such a subvariety in X2X^2 is a point, a factor slice, or all of X2X^2, by the hypothesis of Proposition 5.6. Generic relative dimension one gives the full inverse image. Otherwise, except for a point, the subvariety is a multisection of the restricted projective line bundle. On the slice or product SS, its divisor line is O(k)⊗π∗H\mathcal{O}(k) \otimes\pi^*\mathcal{H}, with k>0k > 0. Its homogeneous equation has coefficients in

H0(S,H⊗L1⊗i⊗L2⊗(k−i)),0≤i≤k.H^0\left(S,\mathcal{H}\otimes\mathcal{L}_1^{\otimes i}\otimes\mathcal{L}_2^{\otimes(k-i)}\right), \qquad0 \le i \le k.

A single nonzero monomial cuts out only axes and vertical divisors. A non-axis multisection therefore has two nonzero coefficients. Their quotient is a meromorphic section of a nonzero power of L1⊗L2−1\mathcal{L}_1\otimes\mathcal{L}_2^{-1}. Restricting to a general factor slice gives a meromorphic section of a nonzero power of L\mathcal{L}; inversion makes the power positive if necessary. This contradicts the standing contrary hypothesis. The axes avoid a very general point of ZZ, proving the lemma.

Let qq tend to infinity through positive integers. For each sufficiently large qq, choose t=t(q)t=t(q) in Equation (5.6) so that r=r(q)≥q2r=r(q)\ge q^2, and use the resulting normalized class P=P(q)P=P(q). Define the real class and the scale

M=P1+P2+qξ,Aq=q1/d.M=P_1+P_2+q\xi,\qquad A_q=q^{1/d}.

The quantitative goal can now be stated. On the blowup a:Bl⁡xX→Xa:\operatorname{Bl}_x X\to X of a very general point, with exceptional divisor FF, we will produce a positive rational scale ss satisfying cnAq≤s≤CnAqc_nA_q\le s\le C_nA_q and

2a∗P+(s+2q)a∗L−cns{F}≥0.2a^*P+(s+2q)a^*L-c_ns\{F\}\ge0.

Since L≤P/rL\le P/r, this would imply

cns2+(s+2q)/r≤τ(P,x)≤Cn.\frac{c_ns}{2+(s+2q)/r}\le\tau(P,x)\le C_n.

The denominator stays bounded because r≥q2r\ge q^2, while the numerator tends to infinity. To obtain the class inequality, the first diagonal will produce a subsheaf occupying a fixed positive fraction of a symmetric cotangent power. An incidence construction will then force its determinant to vanish to order proportional to ss. We begin with the volume that supplies this rank fraction.

Lemma 5.9. For these choices, MM is big and

cnq≤vol⁡(M)≤Cnq,τ(M,z):=sup⁡{u≥0:bz∗M−u{Fz}≥0}≤CnAqc_nq\le\operatorname{vol}(M)\le C_nq,\qquad\tau(M,z):=\sup\{u\ge0:b_z^*M-u\{F_z\}\ge0\}\le C_nA_q

at a very general point z∈Zz\in Z, where bz:Bl⁡zZ→Zb_z:\operatorname{Bl}_z Z\to Z has exceptional divisor FzF_z.

Proof. Pull ZZ to the Fujita model YP2Y_P^2 from Equation (16), and put H=P1′+P2′H=P_1'+P_2' on this pulled-back bundle. There is a further smooth projective modification ν:Z^→PYP2(μ∗L1⊕μ∗L2)\nu:\widehat{Z}\to\mathbb{P}_{Y_P^2}(\mu^*\mathcal{L}_1\oplus\mu^*\mathcal{L}_2) and a Fujita decomposition of the pullback of MM whose Kähler part is exactly

K=12ν∗H+Θ,(18)K=\frac{1}{2}\nu^*H+\Theta, \tag*{(18)}

where Θ\Theta is Kähler and has degree qq on a general vertical line. The modification and the divisor part miss that line.

Here is the construction. It suffices to decompose H/2+qξH/2+q\xi as Θ\Theta plus an effective divisor, clean on a whole general vertical line. Since O(1)\mathcal{O}(1) is relatively ample, a small positive class of the form δ(ξ+cH)\delta(\xi+cH) is Kähler for some c>0c>0. Choose δ>0\delta>0 so small that δ<q\delta<q and the remaining horizontal part of H/2H/2 is Kähler. Represent the remaining ξ\xi first as {A1}+L1\{A_1\}+L_1 and then as {A2}+L2\{A_2\}+L_2. Regularize the pseudo-effective classes LiL_i with analytic singularities, paying their arbitrarily small negative errors from that horizontal Kähler part. This gives two Kähler currents in H/2+qξH/2+q\xi, each smooth off its own axis and a proper horizontal analytic set. The maximum of their potentials is locally bounded along an entire general vertical line, since the two axes are disjoint. Analytic regularization preserving a smaller Kähler lower bound [4] gives a Kähler current with analytic singularities missing that line. Resolve its singularities and make the small Kähler adjustment described before Lemma 5.7. The divisor still misses a general vertical line, so the residual class Θ\Theta has degree exactly qq there. Adding the other half of HH and the pullbacks of the divisor parts DPD_P gives Equation (18). Its two summands are nef, with Θ\Theta Kähler, so every mixed intersection used in the following bounds is nonnegative.

At a very general point of Z^\widehat{Z}, Lemma 5.8 lists the possible positive-dimensional subvarieties: the vertical line, the strict transforms of the two full bundles over slices, and Z^\widehat{Z}. They have multiplicity one there. By Equation (18) and nonnegativity of mixed intersections of nef classes, their top intersections are respectively bounded below by

K⋅(vertical line)=q,K\cdot(\text{vertical line})=q,
∫sliceKn+1≥n+12nqv,\int_{\text{slice}}K^{n+1}\geq\frac{n+1}{2^n}qv,
∫Z^Kd≥d22n(2nn)qv2.(19)\int_{\widehat{Z}}K^d\geq\frac{d}{2^{2n}}\binom{2n}{n}qv^2. \tag*{(19)}

For example, the middle line is the term containing one factor Θ\Theta and nn factors from the varying P′P'; pushforward of Θ\Theta along a general vertical line is qq. The last line is the term with one Θ\Theta and 2n2n horizontal factors. These intersections give vol⁡(M)≥cnq\operatorname{vol}(M)\geq c_nq. The ordinary Seshadri formula and q≥1q\geq1 give ϵ(K,z′)≥cnq1/d=cnAq\epsilon(K,z')\geq c_nq^{1/d}=c_nA_q at a very general z′z': each possible dimension is at most dd, and every numerator in that formula is at least cnqc_nq.

For the upper bound, subtract the axis A1A_1. For 0≤u≤q0\leq u\leq q put

Mu=M−u{A1}=P1+P2+uL1+(q−u)ξ.M_u=M-u\{A_1\}=P_1+P_2+uL_1+(q-u)\xi.

The endpoint MqM_q is pulled back from X2X^2 and has zero volume on the dd-fold ZZ. It is pseudo-effective, and M0M_0 is big by the preceding construction, so MuM_u is big for u<qu<q. The restriction of MuM_u to A1≃X2A_1\simeq X^2 is

(P+uL)1+(P+(q−u)L)2.(P+uL)_1+(P+(q-u)L)_2.

The restricted volume along A1A_1 is at most the volume of this restriction. For big classes αi\alpha_i on manifolds of dimensions eie_i,

vol⁡(pr⁡1∗α1+pr⁡2∗α2)=(e1+e2e1)vol⁡(α1)vol⁡(α2).\operatorname{vol}(\operatorname{pr}_1^*\alpha_1+\operatorname{pr}_2^*\alpha_2)=\binom{e_1+e_2}{e_1}\operatorname{vol}(\alpha_1)\operatorname{vol}(\alpha_2).

One can see this directly from the non-pluripolar product formula [5]: the envelope with minimal singularities of a sum on a product is the sum of the two envelopes, by testing the defining inequality on successive slices. Its top product has only the indicated binomial term. Since L≤P/rL\leq P/r and r≥q2r \ge q^{2}, monotonicity and Equation (5.13) bound the restriction volume by

(2nn)(1+u/r)n(1+(q−u)/r)n≤Cn.\binom{2n}{n}(1+u/r)^{n}(1+(q-u)/r)^{n} \le C_{n}.

Integrating Equation (13) from 00 to qq gives vol⁡(M)≤Cnq\operatorname{vol}(M) \le C_{n}q. Finally apply Lemma 5.7 with e=de=d, η=cnAq\eta=c_{n}A_{q}, and vol⁡(M)≤Cnq\operatorname{vol}(M) \le C_{n}q. Both terms on the right of Equation (15) are at most CnAqC_{n}A_{q}, since Aqd=qA_{q}^{d}=q. This proves Equation (5.10).

The first diagonal

We now use the volume of MM to obtain a high-rank subsheaf of a symmetric cotangent power on ZZ. Distinguish the two copies of ZZ by bracketed indices and blow up their diagonal:

b:B=Bl⁡ΔZ(Z×Z)⟶Z×Z,E=b−1(ΔZ).b:B=\operatorname{Bl}_{\Delta_Z}(Z \times Z) \longrightarrow Z \times Z,\qquad E=b^{-1}(\Delta_Z).

Thus E=PZ(ΩZ)E=\mathbb{P}_{Z}(\Omega_{Z}); its points are normal lines in TZT_{Z}. The dimensions are dim⁡B=2d\dim B=2d and dim⁡E=2d−1\dim E=2d-1, and E→ZE\to Z has relative dimension d−1d-1. Put ζ=c1(OE(1))\zeta=c_{1}(\mathcal{O}_{E}(1)), so that {E}∣E=−ζ\{E\}|_{E}=-\zeta. For s≥0s\ge0 define

Cs=b∗(M[1]+M[2])−s{E},smax⁡=sup⁡{s≥0:Cs≥0}.C_{s}=b^{*}(M_{[1]}+M_{[2]})-s\{E\},\qquad s_{\max}=\sup\{s\ge0:C_{s}\ge0\}.

The class C0C_{0} is big, so smax⁡>0s_{\max}>0 and CsC_{s} is big for 0≤s<smax⁡0\le s<s_{\max}. Restricting a Kähler current with analytic singularities to the fiber of the first projection at a very general z∈Zz\in Z gives the class bz∗M−s{Fz}b_{z}^{*}M-s\{F_{z}\}. The current can be restricted for a general such zz, and Lemma 5.9 therefore gives

smax⁡≤CnAq.(20)s_{\max}\le C_{n}A_{q}. \tag*{(20)}

Write vE(s)=vol⁡∣E(Cs)v_{E}(s)=\operatorname{vol}|_{E}(C_{s}) for 0<s<smax⁡0<s<s_{\max}. The restriction class is

Cs∣E=2M+sζ.(21)C_{s}|_{E}=2M+s\zeta. \tag*{(21)}

The intermediate target is a rational ss comparable to AqA_{q} and a current in CsC_{s} whose restriction to EE has a Kähler part

h∗(2M+sζ)=β+{D′},h:U⟶E,h^{*}(2M+s\zeta)=\beta+\{D'\},\qquad h:U\longrightarrow E,

on a smooth projective modification, with D′≥0D'\ge0 rational, for which the general fiber volume over ZZ satisfies

w:=∫Uzβd−1≥cnsd−1.w:=\int_{U_{z}}\beta^{d-1}\ge c_{n}s^{d-1}.

For such a part, let f:U→Zf:U\to Z be the natural map and put Λ=sh∗OE(1)−OU(D′)\Lambda=sh^{*}\mathcal{O}_{E}(1)-\mathcal{O}_{U}(D'). The direct images Fj=f∗OU(jΛ)\mathcal{F}_{j}=f_{*}\mathcal{O}_{U}(j\Lambda), for sufficiently divisible jj, are subsheaves of Sym⁡jsΩZ\operatorname{Sym}^{j s}\Omega_{Z}, since D′≥0D'\ge0. The direct-image formula below will show that their rank fraction tends to w/sd−1w/s^{d-1}. We now prove the bounds needed to obtain this positive fraction from the total restricted mass.

A direct-image estimate

We need to bound a Kähler volume upstairs by a class on the base whose size can be controlled through determinants. The base need not be projective, and the horizontal class is allowed to be real.

The analytic issue is to replace a positive pushforward class by a nef class on a modified base. Flattening removes the possible concentration of mass caused by fibers of excessive dimension.

Lemma 5.10. Let f:U→Z0f: U \to Z_0 be a surjective projective morphism of smooth connected compact Kähler manifolds, with dim⁡Z0=b0≥1\dim Z_0 = b_0 \ge1 and dim⁡U=b0+e\dim U = b_0 + e, where e≥1e \ge1. Let β\beta be a Kähler class, w=∫Uzβew = \int_{U_z} \beta^e its general fiber volume, and

B0=f∗βe+1(e+1)w.B_0 = \frac{f_*\beta^{e+1}}{(e+1)w}.

There are smooth projective modifications p:Z0′→Z0p: Z'_0 \to Z_0 and q:U′→Uq: U' \to U, and a morphism f′:U′→Z0′f': U' \to Z'_0 with pf′=fqpf' = fq, such that

B0′:=f∗′(q∗β)e+1(e+1)w=p∗B0−{D0}B'_0 := \frac{f'_*(q^*\beta)^{e+1}}{(e+1)w} = p^*B_0 - \{D_0\}

is nef and D0D_0 is an effective pp-exceptional real divisor.

Proof. Take a smooth projective flattening modification p:Z0′→Z0p: Z'_0 \to Z_0, the equidimensional main transform U‾\overline{U} of U×Z0Z0′U \times_{Z_0} Z'_0, and a resolution U′→U‾U' \to\overline{U}. Write f′:U′→Z0′f': U' \to Z'_0 and q:U′→Uq: U' \to U for the maps and β′=q∗β\beta' = q^*\beta. The class

B0′=f∗′(β′)e+1(e+1)wB'_0 = \frac{f'_*(\beta')^{e+1}}{(e+1)w}

is nef. It is enough to show that the positive pushforward current representing this class has zero Lelong numbers. This current can be computed by integration on the cycle U‾\overline{U} of the smooth form pulled back from UU. At a base point, cover the compact fiber by finitely many coordinate neighborhoods, each embedded in a product of base coordinates and ambient coordinates. In the mass over a base ball of radius δ\delta, after wedging with a base Euclidean form to power b0−1b_0 - 1, the integrand is bounded by a finite sum of projection volume forms using b0−1b_0 - 1 base coordinates and e+1e + 1 generic linear combinations of all coordinates of the ambient product, including the remaining base direction. These projections can be chosen finite on the neighborhoods: fixing the b0−1b_0 - 1 base coordinates leaves local dimension at most e+1e + 1, by equidimensionality, and generic ambient coordinates finish a finite projection. Choose finite proper local representatives of these projections and then shrink to compact subneighborhoods. Their degrees are bounded by the fixed finite projection degrees; singularities and cycle multiplicities are included in this bound. The finite projections form an open dense set of linear choices. We can therefore choose a finite collection whose exterior-coordinate forms span, and hence control, the finitely many coordinate-minor terms of the integrand. Change of variables therefore bounds each integral by O(δ2(b0−1))O(\delta^{2(b_0-1)}) times the measure of the remaining coordinate range. On each compact subneighborhood these ranges, taken over closed base balls, are nested compact sets whose intersection is the image of the central fiber. That image has measure zero in the e+1e+1 coordinates, because the fiber has dimension ee. Continuity of finite measure from above shows that the range measures tend to zero. Thus the mass is

o(δ2(b0−1)).o(\delta^{2(b_0-1)}).

This also covers b0=1b_0 = 1, when it asserts absence of an atom. The pushforward current has zero Lelong numbers at every point, and Demailly regularization [14], Theorem 1.1 proves that its class B0′B'_0 is nef.

Pushforward under pp gives p∗B0′=B0p_*B'_0 = B_0. For a modification between smooth compact Kähler manifolds, the kernel of pushforward on real Bott–Chern (1,1)(1,1)-classes is generated by the classes of its exceptional prime divisors. Since p∗p∗B0=B0p_*p^*B_0 = B_0, it follows that B0′−p∗B0B'_0 - p^*B_0 is an exceptional real divisor class. It is pp-nef because B0′B'_0 is nef. Apply relative negativity to this exceptional real divisor. Locally over the base, the usual proof for a projective modification cuts by general hyperplanes to a surface and uses the negative definite intersection matrix of exceptional curves; it forces every coefficient of a relatively nef exceptional divisor to be nonpositive. Thus

B0′=p∗B0−{D0},D0≥0 p-exceptional.B^{\prime}_{0} = p^{*}B_{0} - \{D_{0}\}, \qquad D_{0} \ge0\ p\text{-exceptional}.

In particular

∫Z0′(B0′)b0=vol⁡(B0′)≤vol⁡(p∗B0)=vol⁡(B0).\int_{Z'_0}(B'_0)^{b_0} = \operatorname{vol}(B'_0) \le\operatorname{vol}(p^*B_0) = \operatorname{vol}(B_0).

The next result combines this nef replacement with the determinant formula. It is the quantitative direct-image estimate used in the construction of symmetric cotangent tensors.

Lemma 5.11. Let f:U→Z0f: U \to Z_0 be a surjective projective morphism of smooth connected compact Kähler manifolds, with dim⁡Z0=b0≥1\dim Z_0 = b_0 \ge1 and dim⁡U=b0+e\dim U = b_0 + e, e≥1e \ge1. Suppose

β=f∗G+c1(Λ)\beta= f^*G + c_1(\Lambda)

is a Kähler class, where G∈HBC1,1(Z0,R)G \in H^{1,1}_{\mathrm{BC}}(Z_0,\mathbb{R}) and Λ∈Pic⁡(U)⊗Q\Lambda\in\operatorname{Pic}(U) \otimes\mathbb{Q}. Put

w=∫Uzβe>0w = \int_{U_z}\beta^e > 0

on a general fiber. For sufficiently large divisible integers jj, let Fj=f∗OU(jΛ)\mathcal{F}_j = f_*\mathcal{O}_U(j\Lambda) and Rj=rk⁡FjR_j = \operatorname{rk}\mathcal{F}_j. Here jΛj\Lambda is an actual line bundle and c1(Fj)c_1(\mathcal{F}_j) means c1(det⁡Fj)c_1(\det\mathcal{F}_j). Then

Rj=we!je+O(je−1),(22)R_j = \frac{w}{e!}j^e + O(j^{e-1}), \tag*{(22)}
B0:=G+lim⁡jc1(Fj)jRj=f∗βe+1(e+1)w≥0,(23)B_0 := G + \lim_j \frac{c_1(\mathcal{F}_j)}{jR_j} = \frac{f_*\beta^{e+1}}{(e+1)w} \ge0, \tag*{(23)}
∫Uβb0+e≤(e+1)b0wvol⁡(B0).(24)\int_U \beta^{b_0+e} \le(e+1)^{b_0}w\operatorname{vol}(B_0). \tag*{(24)}

The limit in (23) is a limit of real Bott–Chern classes.

Proof. The restriction of c1(Λ)c_1(\Lambda) to each fiber is represented by the restriction of the Kähler form β\beta. The fiberwise criterion for relative ampleness makes Λ\Lambda relatively ample after clearing denominators. Relative Serre vanishing then kills the higher direct images for all sufficiently large divisible jj. Analytic Grothendieck–Riemann–Roch [29], in degrees zero and two, gives

Rj=f∗c1(Λ)ee!je+O(je−1),c1(Fj)=f∗c1(Λ)e+1(e+1)!je+1+O(je).R_j = \frac{f_*c_1(\Lambda)^e}{e!}j^e + O(j^{e-1}), \qquad c_1(\mathcal{F}_j) = \frac{f_*c_1(\Lambda)^{e+1}}{(e+1)!}j^{e+1} + O(j^e).

The degree-zero pushforward is ww. Expanding β=f∗G+c1(Λ)\beta= f^*G + c_1(\Lambda) shows that

f∗βe+1=f∗c1(Λ)e+1+(e+1)wG.f_*\beta^{e+1} = f_*c_1(\Lambda)^{e+1} + (e+1)wG.

because terms with at least two horizontal factors have negative fiber degree after pushforward. This proves the equality in (23); the cohomological GRR equality is an equality in Bott–Chern cohomology by the ∂∂ˉ\partial\bar{\partial}-lemma on compact Kähler manifolds. Pushforward of the positive form βe+1\beta^{e+1} is a positive closed (1,1)(1,1)-current, so B0B_0 is pseudo-effective.

Apply Lemma 5.10 to choose p:Z0′→Z0p: Z'_0 \to Z_0, q:U′→Uq: U' \to U, and f′:U′→Z0′f': U' \to Z'_0, and put β′=q∗β\beta' = q^*\beta. The resulting class B0′B'_0 is nef and satisfies (5.16). Choose a Kähler class ω′\omega' on Z0′Z'_0 and put C=B0′+ϵω′C = B'_0 + \epsilon\omega'. For 0≤k≤b00 \le k \le b_0, set

Ik=∫U′(β′)e+k(f′∗C)b0−k.I_k = \int_{U'}(\beta')^{e+k}(f'^*C)^{b_0-k}.

These are mixed intersections of nef classes. The first two satisfy

I0=w∫Z0′Cb0,I1=(e+1)w∫Z0′B0′Cb0−1≤(e+1)w∫Z0′Cb0.I_0 = w\int_{Z'_0}C^{b_0}, \qquad I_1 = (e+1)w\int_{Z'_0}B'_0C^{b_0-1} \le(e+1)w\int_{Z'_0}C^{b_0}.

The mixed nef inequalities make the sequence IkI_k log-concave. Every IkI_k is positive: on the dense open where qq is a local biholomorphism and f′f' is a submersion, β′\beta' is positive definite and f′∗Cf'^*C has rank b0b_0, so the defining top form is strictly positive. The successive ratios are therefore at most I1/I0≤e+1I_1/I_0 \le e+1. Thus

∫U′βb0+e=Ib0≤(e+1)b0w∫Z0′Cb0.\int_{U'}\beta^{b_0+e} = I_{b_0} \le(e+1)^{b_0}w\int_{Z'_0}C^{b_0}.

Letting ϵ↓0\epsilon\downarrow0 and using (5.16) proves (24).

We will also use the determinant formula without its volume bound.

Corollary 5.12. Let YY be a smooth compact Kähler manifold and E\mathcal{E} a holomorphic vector bundle of rank at least two. Write πE:PY(E)→Y\pi_{\mathcal{E}}: \mathbb{P}_Y(\mathcal{E}) \to Y and ζE=c1(OP(E)(1))\zeta_{\mathcal{E}} = c_1(\mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}(\mathcal{E})}(1)). Suppose that a real class DD on YY satisfies

c1(H)≤kDwhenever 0≠(H⟶E⊗k)c_1(\mathcal{H}) \le kD \qquad\text{whenever } 0 \ne(\mathcal{H} \longrightarrow\mathcal{E}^{\otimes k})

for a line bundle H\mathcal{H} and integer k≥0k \ge0. For a real class AA on YY and a real number b≥0b \ge0,

πE∗A+bζE≥0⟹A+bD≥0.(25)\pi_{\mathcal{E}}^*A + b\zeta_{\mathcal{E}} \ge0 \quad\Longrightarrow\quad A+bD \ge0. \tag*{(25)}

Proof. If YY is a point, both AA and DD vanish and the assertion is immediate. Suppose dim⁡Y≥1\dim Y \ge1. Choose a real class H0H_0 on YY so that ζE+πE∗H0\zeta_{\mathcal{E}}+\pi_{\mathcal{E}}^*H_0 is Kähler; relative ampleness of O(1)\mathcal{O}(1) permits such a choice. Take numbers δ↓0\delta\downarrow0 with b+δ>0b+\delta>0 rational. Adding δ(ζE+πE∗H0)\delta(\zeta_{\mathcal{E}}+\pi_{\mathcal{E}}^*H_0) to the pseudo-effective class in (25) makes it big. A Fujita decomposition on a smooth projective modification h:U→PY(E)h: U \to\mathbb{P}_Y(\mathcal{E}), with the divisor coefficients rounded upwards as in (14), has the form

β=f∗(A+δH0)+c1(Λ),Λ=(b+δ)h∗O(1)−OU(D′) in Pic⁡(U)⊗Q,\beta= f^*(A+\delta H_0)+c_1(\Lambda), \qquad\Lambda= (b+\delta)h^*\mathcal{O}(1)-\mathcal{O}_U(D') \text{ in } \operatorname{Pic}(U)\otimes\mathbb{Q},

where f=πEhf=\pi_{\mathcal{E}}h, β\beta is Kähler, and D′≥0D' \ge0 is rational. For divisible jj,

f∗OU(jΛ)⊆Sym⁡j(b+δ)E.f_*\mathcal{O}_U(j\Lambda) \subseteq\operatorname{Sym}^{j(b+\delta)}\mathcal{E}.

Its determinant of rank RjR_j consequently maps into E⊗j(b+δ)Rj\mathcal{E}^{\otimes j(b+\delta)R_j}. The assumed line inequality gives

c1(Fj)jRj≤(b+δ)D.\frac{c_1(\mathcal{F}_j)}{jR_j} \leq(b+\delta)D.

Lemma 5.11 makes A+δH0+lim⁡c1(Fj)/(jRj)A+\delta H_0+\lim c_1(\mathcal{F}_j)/(jR_j) pseudo-effective. Adding the preceding pseudo-effective difference shows that A+δH0+(b+δ)DA+\delta H_0+(b+\delta)D is pseudo-effective. Let δ↓0\delta\downarrow0. This proves the corollary. In this argument only b+δb+\delta and the coefficients of D′D' are rational; AA, H0H_0, and DD remain real classes.

For the forthcoming application over the dd-fold ZZ, with fibers of dimension d−1d-1, Lemma 5.11 has a useful concrete consequence. Once we prove B0≤CnMB_0\leq C_nM, the bound vol⁡(M)≤Cnq\operatorname{vol}(M)\leq C_nq gives

∫Uβ2d−1≤Cnwq.\int_U \beta^{2d-1}\leq C_nwq.

Thus an upper bound for the normalized determinant class will convert a lower bound for total mass into a lower bound for the fiber volume ww. The next calculation supplies the required determinant control.

Cotangent lines on the projective bundle

We return to Z=PX2(L1⊕L2)Z=\mathbb{P}_{X^2}(\mathcal{L}_1\oplus\mathcal{L}_2). The following calculation is where the chosen line bundle enters the first determinant estimate. A line mapping into a cotangent tensor has nonpositive degree on a general projective-line fiber; the calculation also controls its horizontal class.

Lemma 5.13. Let H\mathcal{H} be a holomorphic line bundle on ZZ, and suppose there is a nonzero map H→ΩZ⊗k\mathcal{H}\to\Omega_Z^{\otimes k}, with k≥0k\geq0. Then

H=π∗(Q1⊠Q2)⊗OZ(ℓ)\mathcal{H}=\pi^*(\mathcal{Q}_1\boxtimes\mathcal{Q}_2)\otimes\mathcal{O}_Z(\ell)

for lines Qi\mathcal{Q}_i on XX and an integer ℓ\ell, and

ℓ≤0,c1(Q1)1+c1(Q2)2≤(k−ℓ)(L1+L2).\ell\leq0,\qquad c_1(\mathcal{Q}_1)_1+c_1(\mathcal{Q}_2)_2\leq(k-\ell)(L_1+L_2).

Proof. Irregularity zero and Künneth give Pic⁡(X2)=pr⁡1∗Pic⁡(X)⊕pr⁡2∗Pic⁡(X)\operatorname{Pic}(X^2)=\operatorname{pr}_1^*\operatorname{Pic}(X)\oplus\operatorname{pr}_2^*\operatorname{Pic}(X), and the projective-bundle formula for Pic⁡(Z)\operatorname{Pic}(Z) gives the asserted expression. Filter the target using

0⟶π∗ΩX2⟶ΩZ⟶OZ(−2)⊗π∗(L1⊗L2)⟶0.0\longrightarrow\pi^*\Omega_{X^2}\longrightarrow\Omega_Z\longrightarrow\mathcal{O}_Z(-2)\otimes\pi^*(\mathcal{L}_1\otimes\mathcal{L}_2)\longrightarrow0.

Choose a nonzero associated graded component. Suppose it has ii relative factors and k1,k2k_1,k_2 cotangent factors from the two copies of XX, so k1+k2=k−ik_1+k_2=k-i. Its relative degree is −2i-2i. Pushing to X2X^2 forces m=−2i−ℓ≥0m=-2i-\ell\geq0; hence ℓ≤−2i≤0\ell\leq-2i\leq0. A nonzero monomial in Sym⁡m(L1⊕L2)\operatorname{Sym}^m(\mathcal{L}_1\oplus\mathcal{L}_2), with first exponent m1m_1, gives on the two general slices

c1(Q1)≤(i+m1+k1)L,c1(Q2)≤(i+m−m1+k2)L.c_1(\mathcal{Q}_1)\leq(i+m_1+k_1)L,\qquad c_1(\mathcal{Q}_2)\leq(i+m-m_1+k_2)L.

These are exactly the assumed cotangent-line bounds on XX, applied after moving the indicated powers of L\mathcal{L} to the source. Each coefficient on the right is at most k−ℓk-\ell. Since L≥0L\geq0, pullback and addition prove the claimed bound.

Extracting a positive rank fraction

Lemma 5.14. There are constants cn,Cn>0c_n,C_n>0 such that, for every sufficiently large qq, one can choose a rational number

cnAq≤s≤CnAqc_nA_q\leq s\leq C_nA_q

and a Kähler current TT in Cs\mathcal{C}_s with analytic singularities, not generically singular on EE, with the following property. On a smooth projective modification h:U→Eh:U\to E, its restricted mass has a rational-divisor approximation

h∗(2M+sζ)=β+{D′},β Ka¨hler,D′≥0 rational,(26)h^*(2M+s\zeta)=\beta+\{D'\},\qquad\beta\ \text{Kähler},\quad D'\geq0\ \text{rational}, \tag*{(26)}

which retains all log-ideal orders of T∣ET|_E. If f:U→Zf:U\to Z is the natural map and

w=∫Uzβd−1w=\int_{U_z}\beta^{d-1}

on a general fiber, then

w≥cnsd−1.(27)w\geq c_ns^{d-1}. \tag*{(27)}

Proof. First let ss be any rational number in (0,smax⁡)(0,s_{\max}) with vE(s)>0v_E(s)>0, and use the approximation in (14) for any current used to compute this restricted volume. In Lemma 5.11, the data for (21) are

b0=d,e=d−1,G=2M,Λ=sh∗OE(1)−OU(D′) in Pic⁡(U)⊗Q.b_0=d,\qquad e=d-1,\qquad G=2M,\qquad\Lambda=sh^*\mathcal{O}_E(1)-\mathcal{O}_U(D')\ \text{in }\operatorname{Pic}(U)\otimes\mathbb{Q}.

For large divisible jj, the associated sheaves satisfy

Fj=f∗OU(jΛ)⊆Sym⁡jsΩZ,Rj=rk⁡Fj,0<w≤sd−1.(28)\mathcal{F}_j=f_*\mathcal{O}_U(j\Lambda)\subseteq\operatorname{Sym}^{js}\Omega_Z,\qquad R_j=\operatorname{rk}\mathcal{F}_j,\qquad0<w\leq s^{d-1}. \tag*{(28)}

The inclusion follows by pushing OU(−jD′)⊆OU\mathcal{O}_U(-jD')\subseteq\mathcal{O}_U through hh. For the last inequality restrict the decomposition to a general Pd−1\mathbb{P}^{d-1}-fiber: monotonicity of volume bounds the Kähler volume there by vol⁡(sζ)=sd−1\operatorname{vol}(s\zeta)=s^{d-1}.

We claim that the class B0B_0 of (23) satisfies

0≤B0≤CnM.(29)0\leq B_0\leq C_nM. \tag*{(29)}

By Lemma 5.13, write

det⁡Fj=π∗(Qj,1⊠Qj,2)⊗OZ(ℓj),Qj=c1(Qj,1)1+c1(Qj,2)2.\det\mathcal{F}_j=\pi^*(\mathcal{Q}_{j,1}\boxtimes\mathcal{Q}_{j,2})\otimes\mathcal{O}_Z(\ell_j),\qquad Q_j=c_1(\mathcal{Q}_{j,1})_1+c_1(\mathcal{Q}_{j,2})_2.

The determinant of the inclusion in (28) gives a nonzero map into ΩZ⊗jsRj\Omega_Z^{\otimes jsR_j}. It is defined off codimension two and extends across that set. The lemma consequently gives

ℓj≤0,Qj≤(jsRj−ℓj)(L1+L2).(30)\ell_j\leq0,\qquad Q_j\leq(jsR_j-\ell_j)(L_1+L_2). \tag*{(30)}

Lemma 5.11 supplies a limit of the entire determinant class divided by jRjjR_j. The projective-bundle decomposition of Bott–Chern cohomology gives separate limits QQ and ℓ\ell of the two displayed components. Since

B0=2(P1+P2)+(2q+ℓ)ξ+Q≥0,B_0=2(P_1+P_2)+(2q+\ell)\xi+Q\geq0,

testing on a general vertical line gives 2q+ℓ≥02q+\ell\geq0. Equation (30) gives ℓ≤0\ell\leq0 and Q≤(s−ℓ)(L1+L2)Q\leq(s-\ell)(L_1+L_2). Use ξ≥0\xi\geq0, −ℓ≤2q-\ell\leq2q, L≤P/rL\leq P/r, r≥q2r\geq q^2, and s≤CnAq≤Cnqs\leq C_nA_q\leq C_nq. They give

B0≤2(P1+P2)+2qξ+(s+2q)(L1+L2)≤CnM,B_0\leq2(P_1+P_2)+2q\xi+(s+2q)(L_1+L_2)\leq C_nM,

which proves (29).

Volume monotonicity, Lemma 5.9, and (24) now imply

∫Uβ2d−1≤Cnwq,vE(s)≤Cnqsd−1.(31)\int_U \beta^{2d-1} \le C_n wq,\qquad v_E(s) \le C_n q s^{d-1}. \tag*{(31)}

For the second inequality, approximate the mass of each current arbitrarily closely by β\beta and use w≤sd−1w \le s^{d-1}, then take the supremum over currents. This proves it for rational ss; continuity of divisorial restricted volume extends it to every s∈(0,smax⁡)s \in(0,s_{\max}).

At smax⁡s_{\max} the class is on the boundary of the pseudo-effective cone, so its volume is zero. The product formula in (5.13), modification invariance, and the derivative formula in (13) yield

2d∫0smax⁡vE(s) ds=vol⁡(C0)=(2dd)vol⁡(M)2≥cnq2.(32)2d\int_0^{s_{\max}} v_E(s)\,\mathrm{d}s = \operatorname{vol}(C_0) = \binom{2d}{d}\operatorname{vol}(M)^2 \ge c_nq^2. \tag*{(32)}

Choose a fixed small θn>0\theta_n > 0. The contribution of 0<s<θnAq0 < s < \theta_n A_q, by (31), is at most Cnθndq2C_n\theta_n^d q^2. Fix θn\theta_n small enough that this is less than half the last lower bound. The remaining interval has length at most CnAqC_nA_q, by (20). Continuity therefore permits a rational s∈[θnAq,smax⁡)s \in[\theta_nA_q,s_{\max}) such that

vE(s)≥cnq2/Aq=cnqAqd−1≥cnqsd−1.v_E(s) \ge c_nq^2/A_q = c_nqA_q^{d-1} \ge c_nqs^{d-1}.

Choose a current with restricted mass at least three quarters of vE(s)v_E(s), and then an approximation as in (26) with ∫Uβ2d−1≥vE(s)/2\int_U\beta^{2d-1} \ge v_E(s)/2. The first inequality of (31) gives w≥cnsd−1w \ge c_ns^{d-1}, as claimed.

For the selected ss, TT, hh, β\beta, D′D' and ww, retain the natural map f:U→Zf: U \to Z and put

Λ=sh∗OE(1)−OU(D′),Fj=f∗OU(jΛ),Rj=rk⁡Fj,\Lambda= sh^*O_E(1) - O_U(D'),\qquad F_j = f_*O_U(j\Lambda),\qquad R_j = \operatorname{rk} F_j,

where jj is sufficiently large and divisible. Here Λ\Lambda is a rational line, and (28) gives Fj⊆Sym⁡jsΩZF_j \subseteq\operatorname{Sym}^{js}\Omega_Z. With qq and these selected data fixed, (22) and (27) give

rk⁡Sym⁡jsΩZ=(js+d−1d−1),lim⁡jRjrk⁡Sym⁡jsΩZ=wsd−1≥cn.(33)\operatorname{rk}\operatorname{Sym}^{js}\Omega_Z = \binom{js+d-1}{d-1},\qquad\lim_j \frac{R_j}{\operatorname{rk}\operatorname{Sym}^{js}\Omega_Z} = \frac{w}{s^{d-1}} \ge c_n. \tag*{(33)}

The limit is through divisible integers. Thus the first diagonal has produced a subsheaf occupying a fixed positive proportion of the symmetric power for all sufficiently large divisible jj. The remaining proof carries this rank bound to a modification of ZZ and converts it into a large common order of vanishing for the determinant map on that model.

A pole along the incidence

We next locate a large pole of the selected current TT along a smooth incidence submanifold of BB. This will impose vanishing conditions on the symmetric-power subsheaf in (28).

Let U0=π−1(ΔX)⊂ZU_0 = \pi^{-1}(\Delta_X) \subset Z, where ΔX\Delta_X is the diagonal in X2X^2. Since L1∣ΔX=L2∣ΔX=L\mathcal{L}_1|_{\Delta_X} = \mathcal{L}_2|_{\Delta_X} = \mathcal{L}, there is a canonical identification

U0=X×P1.U_0 = X \times\mathbb{P}^1.

For λ∈P1\lambda\in\mathbb{P}^{1} write Dλ=X×{λ}⊂ZD_{\lambda}=X\times\{\lambda\}\subset Z. Inside Z×ZZ\times Z consider

V0={((x,x,λ),(y,y,λ)):x,y∈X,λ∈P1}≃X2×P1.V_{0}=\{((x,x,\lambda),(y,y,\lambda)):x,y\in X,\lambda\in\mathbb{P}^{1}\}\simeq X^{2}\times\mathbb{P}^{1}.

It meets ΔZ\Delta_{Z} in ΔX×P1\Delta_{X}\times\mathbb{P}^{1}. The strict transform V⊂BV\subset B is Bl⁡ΔX×P1V0\operatorname{Bl}_{\Delta_{X}\times\mathbb{P}^{1}}V_{0}; it is smooth, of dimension d=2n+1d=2n+1. Its first projection is a smooth family over U0U_{0}. Over z=(x,x,λ)z=(x,x,\lambda) its fiber is

Y=Bl⁡xDλ≃Bl⁡xX,Y=\operatorname{Bl}_{x}D_{\lambda}\simeq\operatorname{Bl}_{x}X,

and its intersection with EE in that fiber is the projective space of lines in TzDλT_{z}D_{\lambda}, inside the projective space of lines in TzZT_{z}Z. These assertions follow either from the blowup of the section y=xy=x in this family or from the coordinates used below.

Let ρV ⁣:Bl⁡VB→B\rho_{V}\colon\operatorname{Bl}_{V}B\to B have exceptional divisor GVG_{V}. Denote by bV≥0b_{V}\ge0 the generic divisorial pole of ρV∗T\rho_{V}^{*}T along GVG_{V}. Equivalently, it is the generic log-ideal order of TT along VV, with the coefficient of the logarithm included.

Lemma 5.15. The pole just defined satisfies

bV≥s−Cn.(34)b_{V}\ge s-C_{n}. \tag*{(34)}

Proof. Remove bV[GV]b_{V}[G_{V}] from ρV∗T\rho_{V}^{*}T. Its residual positive current can be restricted to GVG_{V}: for analytic singularities removal of the generic divisorial pole leaves a potential that is not identically −∞-\infty on that divisor. Choose z=(x,x,λ)∈U0z=(x,x,\lambda)\in U_{0} general enough for all restrictions and for (12) and Lemma 5.7. On the bundle

GV∣Y=PY(NV/B∗∣Y),Y=Bl⁡xX,G_{V}|_{Y}=\mathbb{P}_{Y}(N_{V/B}^{*}|_{Y}),\qquad Y=\operatorname{Bl}_{x}X,

this restriction is a positive current in the class

a∗(2P+qL)−s{F}+bVζV,(35)a^{*}(2P+qL)-s\{F\}+b_{V}\zeta_{V}, \tag*{(35)}

where ζV=c1(OP(NV/B∗∣Y)(1))\zeta_{V}=c_{1}\bigl(\mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}(N_{V/B}^{*}|_{Y})}(1)\bigr). Indeed M∣Dλ=2P+qLM|_{D_{\lambda}}=2P+qL, the first projection to ZZ is constant on YY, and E∣Y=FE|_{Y}=F. Also GV∣GV=−ζVG_{V}|_{G_{V}}=-\zeta_{V}, explaining the positive sign of the last term.

The conormal bundle in (35) has exact sequences

0⟶OY⊕n⟶NV/B∗∣Y⟶a∗NDλ/Z∗⊗OY(F)⟶0,(36)0\longrightarrow\mathcal{O}_{Y}^{\oplus n}\longrightarrow N_{V/B}^{*}|_{Y}\longrightarrow a^{*}N_{D_{\lambda}/Z}^{*}\otimes\mathcal{O}_{Y}(F)\longrightarrow0, \tag*{(36)}
0⟶ΩX⟶NDλ/Z∗⟶OX⟶0.(37)0\longrightarrow\Omega_{X}\longrightarrow N_{D_{\lambda}/Z}^{*}\longrightarrow\mathcal{O}_{X}\longrightarrow0. \tag*{(37)}

The first constant term is the conormal of U0U_{0} in the first copy of ZZ, evaluated at zz. For the last term in (36), the conormal of the strict transform of DλD_{\lambda} in Bl⁡zZ\operatorname{Bl}_{z}Z is a∗NDλ/Z∗⊗OY(F)a^{*}N_{D_{\lambda}/Z}^{*}\otimes\mathcal{O}_{Y}(F): in a blowup chart, a normal coordinate is divided by an exceptional coordinate, giving precisely the twist by FF for conormals. (37) is the conormal sequence for Dλ⊂U0⊂ZD_{\lambda}\subset U_{0}\subset Z; the diagonal in X2X^{2} has conormal ΩX\Omega_{X}, and the λ\lambda-normal direction is constant on XX.

Filter a kk-fold tensor of NV/B∗∣YN_{V/B}^{*}|_{Y} by these sequences. A graded term has the form

OY(hF)⊗(a∗ΩX)⊗k′⊗(a constant vector space),0≤k′≤h≤k.\mathcal{O}_{Y}(hF)\otimes(a^{*}\Omega_{X})^{\otimes k'}\otimes(\text{a constant vector space}),\qquad0\le k'\le h\le k.

For any nonzero line map into that tensor, take a nonzero graded component. (12) gives

c1(HY)≤h{F}+k′a∗L≤k({F}+a∗L),c_{1}(\mathcal{H}_{Y})\le h\{F\}+k'a^{*}L\le k(\{F\}+a^{*}L),

since both {F}\{F\} and a∗La^*L are pseudo-effective. Apply Corollary 5.12 to (35), with D={F}+a∗LD=\{F\}+a^*L. We obtain

a∗(2P+(q+bV)L)−(s−bV){F}≥0.(38)a^*\left(2P+(q+b_V)L\right)-(s-b_V)\{F\}\geq0. \tag*{(38)}

If bV≥sb_V\geq s, the conclusion is immediate. Otherwise bV<s≤CnAq≤Cnqb_V<s\leq C_nA_q\leq C_nq, and L≤P/rL\leq P/r gives

(2+q+bVr)a∗P−(s−bV){F}≥0.\left(2+\frac{q+b_V}{r}\right)a^*P-(s-b_V)\{F\}\geq0.

Use the point bound in (17). Since r≥q2r\geq q^2, its consequence

s−bV≤Cn(2+q+bVr)s-b_V\leq C_n\left(2+\frac{q+b_V}{r}\right)

is bounded by a dimensional constant. This proves (34).

From incidence order to determinant vanishing

Blow up U0U_0 in the base of EE:

p+:Z+=Bl⁡U0Z⟶Z,J+=p+−1(U0).p_+:Z^+=\operatorname{Bl}_{U_0}Z\longrightarrow Z,\qquad J_+=p_+^{-1}(U_0).

This is the bundle ZZ pulled to Bl⁡ΔX(X2)\operatorname{Bl}_{\Delta_X}(X^2), since U0=π−1(ΔX)U_0=\pi^{-1}(\Delta_X). In particular Z+Z^+ is smooth. Put

E+=E×ZZ+=PZ+(p+∗ΩZ).E^+=E\times_Z Z^+=\mathbb{P}_{Z^+}(p_+^*\Omega_Z).

Extend the incidence ideal from BB to EE, and then to E+E^+:

J=(IV⋅OE)⋅OE+.\mathcal{J}=(I_V\cdot\mathcal{O}_E)\cdot\mathcal{O}_{E^+}.

The products denote extension of ideals under the indicated maps. Figure 2 locates V∩EV\cap E and this extension of the incidence ideal to E+E^+.

Two geometric constructions used in the determinant estimate

Figure 2. Two geometric constructions used in the determinant estimate. On the left, the strict transform V⊂BV\subset B meets EzE_z in the directions tangent to DλD_\lambda. Under the quotient convention, the displayed projectivized cotangent spaces parametrize tangent lines. On the right, E+E^+ is the Cartesian base change over Z+=Bl⁡U0ZZ^+=\operatorname{Bl}_{U_0}Z, whose exceptional divisor is J+J_+. The restricted incidence ideal extends to J\mathcal{J} on E+E^+. The ensuing local calculation identifies the normal parameter of J+J_+ among its generators.

The next lemma turns the pole bound in (34) into a common vanishing order for the coefficients of each determinant map.

Lemma 5.16. On a smooth projective modification h+:U+→E+h_{+}: U^{+} \to E^{+} one can choose an approximation

h+∗(2p∗M+sζ)=β++{D+},β+ Ka¨hler,D+≥0 rational,(39)h_{+}^{*}(2p^{*}M+s\zeta)=\beta^{+}+\{D^{+}\},\qquad\beta^{+}\ \text{Kähler},\qquad D^{+}\geq0\ \text{rational}, \tag*{(39)}

retaining the log-ideal orders of T∣ET|_{E}, such that the general fiber volume w+w^{+} of β+\beta^{+} over Z+Z^{+} satisfies w+≥w/2w^{+}\geq w/2. Let f+:U+→Z+f_{+}:U^{+}\to Z^{+} be the natural map and put

Λ+=sh+∗OE+(1)−OU+(D+),Fj+=(f+)∗OU+(jΛ+),Rj+=rk⁡Fj+.\Lambda^{+}=sh_{+}^{*}\mathcal{O}_{E^{+}}(1)-\mathcal{O}_{U^{+}}(D^{+}),\qquad\mathcal{F}_{j}^{+}=(f_{+})_{*}\mathcal{O}_{U^{+}}(j\Lambda^{+}),\qquad R_{j}^{+}=\operatorname{rk}\mathcal{F}_{j}^{+}.

For every sufficiently large divisible jj, write

ιj:Fj+↪p+∗Sym⁡jsΩZ,φj:det⁡Fj+⟶⋀Rj+(p+∗Sym⁡jsΩZ)\iota_{j}:\mathcal{F}_{j}^{+}\hookrightarrow p_{+}^{*}\operatorname{Sym}^{j s}\Omega_{Z},\qquad\varphi_{j}:\det\mathcal{F}_{j}^{+}\longrightarrow\bigwedge^{R_{j}^{+}}(p_{+}^{*}\operatorname{Sym}^{j s}\Omega_{Z})

for the inclusion and its nonzero determinant map. Here det⁡Fj+=(⋀Rj+Fj+)∗∗\det\mathcal{F}_{j}^{+}=(\bigwedge^{R_{j}^{+}}\mathcal{F}_{j}^{+})^{**}, and the determinant map extends across the complement of the locally free locus, which has codimension at least two. Localize a coordinate local ring of Z+Z^{+} at the height-one prime of J+\mathcal{J}_{+}, obtaining a discrete valuation ring RR with uniformizer uu. In local frames over RR, define

hj=min⁡{ord⁡u(c):c is a nonzero coefficient of φj}.h_{j}=\min\{\operatorname{ord}_{u}(c):c\text{ is a nonzero coefficient of }\varphi_{j}\}.

Equivalently, hjh_{j} is the minimum order of the maximal minors of ιj\iota_{j}; it is independent of the frames. If σJ+\sigma_{\mathcal{J}_{+}} is the canonical section of OZ+(J+)\mathcal{O}_{Z^{+}}(\mathcal{J}_{+}), then φj\varphi_{j} factors as

det⁡Fj+→ σJ+hj det⁡Fj+(hjJ+)→ φ~j ⋀Rj+(p+∗Sym⁡jsΩZ),\det\mathcal{F}_{j}^{+}\xrightarrow{\ \sigma_{\mathcal{J}_{+}}^{h_{j}}\ }\det\mathcal{F}_{j}^{+}(h_{j}\mathcal{J}_{+})\xrightarrow{\ \widetilde{\varphi}_{j}\ }\bigwedge^{R_{j}^{+}}(p_{+}^{*}\operatorname{Sym}^{j s}\Omega_{Z}),

where φ~j\widetilde{\varphi}_{j} is holomorphic. The common order satisfies

hj≥cnjRj+s,(40)h_{j}\geq c_{n}jR_{j}^{+}s, \tag*{(40)}

provided qq is sufficiently large.

Proof. Blow up J\mathcal{J} and take a common smooth projective resolution with U→EU\to E from (26). Pull back β\beta and D′D'. Subtracting a sufficiently small rational multiple of an effective exceptional divisor whose negative is relatively ample makes the pulled-back Kähler class Kähler on this resolution; add that multiple to the effective part. Further upward rational rounding may be arbitrarily small. This gives Equation (39) with all original orders retained. Its general fiber intersection is as close to ww as desired, so arrange w+≥w/2w^{+}\geq w/2. Lemma 5.11 and the effective divisor give

Fj+⊂p+∗Sym⁡jsΩZ,Rj+=w+(d−1)!jd−1+O(jd−2).(41)\mathcal{F}_{j}^{+}\subset p_{+}^{*}\operatorname{Sym}^{j s}\Omega_{Z},\qquad R_{j}^{+}=\frac{w^{+}}{(d-1)!}j^{d-1}+O(j^{d-2}). \tag*{(41)}

We spell out the local order imposed on the polynomials in this inclusion. Near z=(x,x,λ)z=(x,x,\lambda), use coordinates (x,a,λ)(x,a,\lambda) on the first ZZ, where xx and aa each have nn components and U0=(a=0)U_{0}=(a=0). Write the second coordinates as (x+h,a+k,λ+μ)(x+h,a+k,\lambda+\mu), with h,kh,k each having nn components. Then

V0=(a=k=μ=0),ΔZ=(h=k=μ=0).V_{0}=(a=k=\mu=0),\qquad\Delta_{Z}=(h=k=\mu=0).

In a blowup chart meeting the lines tangent to DλD_{\lambda}, take

h1=v,hi=vαi (2≤i≤n),ki=vyi (1≤i≤n),μ=vyn+1.h_{1}=v,\qquad h_{i}=v\alpha_{i}\ (2\leq i\leq n),\qquad k_{i}=vy_{i}\ (1\leq i\leq n),\qquad\mu=vy_{n+1}.

Here E=(v=0)E=(v=0), while the strict transform is V=(a1=⋯=an=y1=⋯=yn+1=0)V=(a_1=\cdots=a_n=y_1=\cdots=y_{n+1}=0). In particular,

IV∣E=(a1,…,an,y1,…,yn+1).(42)\mathcal{I}_V|_E=(a_1,\ldots,a_n,y_1,\ldots,y_{n+1}). \tag*{(42)}

On a chart of the blowup of U0U_0, write a1=ua_1=u and ai=uτia_i=u\tau_i for i≥2i\geq2. Along the general point of J+=(u=0)J_+=(u=0), the ideal J\mathcal{J} is exactly

(u,y1,…,yn+1).(43)(u,y_1,\ldots,y_{n+1}). \tag*{(43)}

Here uu measures vanishing along J+J_+, while the yiy_i measure transverse fiber directions. Thus a term of transverse degree ℓ\ell can contribute at most ℓ\ell to the incidence order; the remaining order must come from its coefficient in uu. We now make this statement precise.

Suppose locally that the singularities of TT are clog⁡∣a∣+O(1)c\log|a|+O(1), with the logarithmic normalization for which a divisorial coefficient is cc times the ideal order. If k=ord⁡V(a)k=\operatorname{ord}_V(a), then bV=ckb_V=ck. The normal Taylor coefficients of degree less than kk vanish on a dense open set of VV, hence on VV locally. Thus a⊆IVk\mathfrak{a}\subseteq\mathcal{I}_V^k also near a general point of V∩EV\cap E. Restricting to EE and pulling to E+E^+ gives the corresponding order in (43). At its general center the displayed generators are regular coordinates. If HJH_J is the exceptional divisor of their blowup, its valuation is the ordinary ideal-adic order:

ord⁡HJ(g)=max⁡{k:g∈(u,y1,…,yn+1)k}.\operatorname{ord}_{H_J}(g)=\max\{k:g\in(u,y_1,\ldots,y_{n+1})^k\}.

The common resolution dominates this blowup. Pullback preserves the effective difference between D′D' and the resolved log divisor, and the later adjustments only increase the effective part. Thus D+D^+ has coefficient at least bVb_V at this valuation. Every polynomial image of a section of Fj+\mathcal{F}_j^+ has integral valuation at least ⌈jbV⌉\lceil jb_V\rceil. Locally bounded remainders have zero order at this valuation.

There are nn homogeneous coordinates along TzDλT_zD_\lambda and n+1n+1 transverse homogeneous coordinates in TzZT_zZ. Denote these two groups by H1,…,HnH_1,\ldots,H_n and Y1,…,Yn+1Y_1,\ldots,Y_{n+1}. For m=jsm=js, a local polynomial in Sym⁡m(p∗+ΩZ)\operatorname{Sym}^m(p_*^+\Omega_Z) has the form

∑∣α∣+∣γ∣=mcα,γ(u)HαYγ.\sum_{|\alpha|+|\gamma|=m}c_{\alpha,\gamma}(u)H^\alpha Y^\gamma.

Work over the discrete valuation ring RR used to define hjh_j, choosing the chart parameter uu as uniformizer, and let κ\kappa be its residue field. The coefficients cα,γc_{\alpha,\gamma} lie in RR. Equation (43) implies, monomial by monomial,

ord⁡u(cα,γ)≥max⁡{0,⌈jbV⌉−∣γ∣}.(44)\operatorname{ord}_u(c_{\alpha,\gamma})\geq\max\{0,\lceil jb_V\rceil-|\gamma|\}. \tag*{(44)}

Indeed, on the chart H1≠0H_1\ne0, group the dehomogenized polynomial as

∑γPγ(H2/H1,…,Hn/H1)(Y/H1)γ,Pγ∈R[H2/H1,…,Hn/H1].\sum_\gamma P_\gamma(H_2/H_1,\ldots,H_n/H_1)(Y/H_1)^\gamma,\qquad P_\gamma\in R[H_2/H_1,\ldots,H_n/H_1].

Put bj=⌈jbV⌉b_j=\lceil jb_V\rceil. At the general center of (u,Y/H1)(u,Y/H_1), order at least bjb_j forces PγP_\gamma to be divisible by ubj−∣γ∣u^{b_j-|\gamma|} whenever ∣γ∣<bj|\gamma|<b_j. Otherwise its first nonzero reduction would be a nonzero polynomial over κ\kappa, which stays nonzero in κ(H2/H1,…,Hn/H1)\kappa(H_2/H_1,\ldots,H_n/H_1); in the associated graded ring it would give a nonzero term of total (u,Y/H1)(u,Y/H_1)-degree less than bjb_j. The transverse monomials there are independent. Comparing the internal polynomial coefficients over the base residue field κ\kappa now gives Equation (44).

We compare the number of monomials with the rank estimate in Equation (41). The ambient rank and the number of monomials of transverse degree ℓ\ell are

Nm=(m+2n2n),Nm,ℓ=(ℓ+nn)(m−ℓ+n−1n−1).N_m=\binom{m+2n}{2n},\qquad N_{m,\ell}=\binom{\ell+n}{n}\binom{m-\ell+n-1}{n-1}.

For fixed δ∈(0,1)\delta\in(0,1), let Hm(δ)H_m(\delta) count the monomials with ℓ>(1−δ)m\ell> (1-\delta)m. Summing instead over their internal degree gives

Hm(δ)≤(m+nn)(⌈δm⌉+nn),lim sup⁡m→∞Hm(δ)Nm≤(2nn)δn.H_m(\delta) \le\binom{m+n}{n}\binom{\lceil\delta m\rceil+n}{n}, \qquad\limsup_{m\to\infty}\frac{H_m(\delta)}{N_m}\le\binom{2n}{n}\delta^n.

On the other hand, w+≥w/2w^+ \ge w/2 and Equation (41) show that the approximation on E+E^+ retains at least half the rank fraction in Equation (33):

lim⁡j→∞Rj+Njs=w+sd−1≥w2sd−1≥cn>0.\lim_{j\to\infty}\frac{R_j^+}{N_{js}}=\frac{w^+}{s^{d-1}}\ge\frac{w}{2s^{d-1}}\ge c_n>0.

Fix δ>0\delta>0, depending only on nn, so small that, for each fixed qq and its selected data, fewer than Rj+/2R_j^+/2 monomials have transverse degree greater than (1−δ)js(1-\delta)js for all sufficiently large divisible jj. For each remaining monomial, Equation (44) and Lemma 5.15 give

ord⁡u(cα,γ)≥j(s−Cn)−(1−δ)js=j(δs−Cn)≥δjs2.\operatorname{ord}_u(c_{\alpha,\gamma})\ge j(s-C_n)-(1-\delta)js=j(\delta s-C_n)\ge\frac{\delta js}{2}.

The last inequality holds once qq is large, since s≥cnAq→∞s\ge c_nA_q\to\infty.

Over the same discrete valuation ring RR, the torsion-free sheaf Fj+\mathcal{F}_j^+ becomes a free module of rank Rj+R_j^+. Write its inclusion into the symmetric power as a matrix with the monomials as rows. Every maximal minor uses at least Rj+/2R_j^+/2 of the rows whose coefficients have order at least δjs/2\delta js/2. All maximal minors therefore have order at least δjRj+s/4\delta jR_j^+s/4. By the definition of hjh_j, this proves Equation (40). Dividing the determinant map by σJ+hj\sigma_{J_+}^{h_j} gives a holomorphic map at every point of codimension one: the coefficients have the required order along J+J_+, and its local equation is a unit away from J+J_+. Hartogs’ theorem extends the divided map across the remaining set of codimension at least two, giving the stated factorization through det⁡Fj+(hjJ+)\det\mathcal{F}_j^+(h_jJ_+).

Cancellation on the point blowup

Completion of the proof of Proposition 5.6. Fix qq sufficiently large for the preceding lemmas, with its chosen PP, ss, TT and modifications. Choose a very general point xx in the first factor of X2X^2. The slice of Z+Z^+ above xx is

S=PY(OY⊕a∗L),a:Y=Bl⁡xX⟶X,S=\mathbb{P}_Y(\mathcal{O}_Y\oplus a^*\mathcal{L}),\qquad a:Y=\operatorname{Bl}_xX\longrightarrow X,

and J+∣SJ_+|_S is the pullback of FF. We choose xx so that Equation (12), Equation (17), the restrictions of the currents below, and all determinant maps for divisible jj can be tested on this slice. These exclude at most countably many proper analytic sets and the measure-zero exceptional sets for current restrictions.

Write the restricted determinant line as

(det⁡Fj+)∣S=πS∗Qj+⊗OS(ℓj+),Qj+=c1(Qj+).(\det\mathcal{F}_j^+)|_S=\pi_S^*Q_j^+\otimes\mathcal{O}_S(\ell_j^+),\qquad Q_j^+=c_1(Q_j^+).

Factoring the common zero of order hjh_j from the determinant map gives a nonzero map whose source on SS is

πS∗(Qj+⊗OY(hjF))⊗OS(ℓj+).\pi_S^*(Q_j^+\otimes\mathcal{O}_Y(h_jF))\otimes\mathcal{O}_S(\ell_j^+).

The plus sign of hjFh_jF follows because division of the map by the local equation of J+hjJ_+^{h_j} enlarges its source from det⁡Fj+\det\mathcal{F}_j^+ to det⁡Fj+⊗O(hjJ+)\det\mathcal{F}_j^+\otimes\mathcal{O}(h_jJ_+). Its target embeds into the jsRj+jsR_j^+-fold tensor of the restriction of p+∗ΩZp^*_{+}\Omega_Z. In particular we use the cotangent bundle of the original ZZ, with its restricted filtration

0⟶πY∗(OY⊕n⊕a∗ΩX)⟶(p+∗ΩZ)∣S⟶OS(−2)⊗πS∗a∗L⟶0.0 \longrightarrow\pi_Y^*(\mathcal{O}_Y^{\oplus n}\oplus a^*\Omega_X) \longrightarrow(p^*_+\Omega_Z)|_S \longrightarrow\mathcal{O}_S(-2)\otimes\pi^*_S a^*\mathcal{L} \longrightarrow0.

The same homogeneous-monomial calculation as in (30), now applying (12) to the second factor of X2X^2, gives

ℓj+≤0,Qj++hj{F}≤(jsRj+−ℓj+)a∗L.(45)\ell_j^+ \le0,\qquad Q_j^+ + h_j\{F\} \le(jsR_j^+ - \ell_j^+)a^*L. \tag*{(45)}

More explicitly, if the chosen graded term has ii relative factors, the pushed polynomial has degree −2i−ℓj+≥0-2i-\ell_j^+\ge0. Its exponent in a∗La^*\mathcal{L}, together with the ii relative factors and the cotangent order from the second factor of X2X^2, is at most jsRj+−ℓj+jsR_j^+-\ell_j^+. The cotangent factors from the first factor of X2X^2 are constant. This proves the displayed inequality using the tensors of a∗ΩXa^*\Omega_X, without introducing ΩY\Omega_Y or ΩZ+\Omega_{Z^+}.

Apply Lemma 5.11 to the decomposition in (39). (23) shows that the limits of the restricted determinant components divided by jRj+jR_j^+ exist; denote them by Q+Q^+ and ℓ+\ell^+. Divide (45) by jRj+jR_j^+, use (40), and pass to the closed pseudo-effective cone. We obtain

ℓ+≤0,Q++cns{F}≤(s−ℓ+)a∗L.(46)\ell^+ \le0,\qquad Q^+ + c_n s\{F\} \le(s-\ell^+)a^*L. \tag*{(46)}

The pseudo-effective class in (23), restricted to the very general slice SS, is

πS∗(Q++2a∗P)+(ℓ++2q)ξ≥0.(47)\pi_S^*(Q^+ + 2a^*P) + (\ell^+ + 2q)\xi\ge0. \tag*{(47)}

Testing on a general vertical line gives ℓ++2q≥0\ell^+ + 2q \ge0. Let A⊂SA\subset S be the axis of PY(OY⊕a∗L)\mathbb{P}_Y(\mathcal{O}_Y\oplus a^*\mathcal{L}) with divisor class {A}=ξ\{A\}=\xi. On A≃YA\simeq Y, its normal class is {A}∣A=ξ∣A=a∗L≥0\{A\}|_A=\xi|_A=a^*L\ge0. Add an arbitrarily small Kähler class to the class in (47), and choose a Kähler current with analytic singularities in the resulting big class. Remove its generic divisorial pole along AA and restrict the residual current to AA. Adding back the removed nonnegative multiple of a∗La^*L preserves pseudo-effectivity. Passing to the limit gives

Q++2a∗P+(ℓ++2q)a∗L≥0.(48)Q^+ + 2a^*P + (\ell^+ + 2q)a^*L \ge0. \tag*{(48)}

The slope bound in (46) supplies the pseudo-effective class (s−ℓ+)a∗L−Q+−cns{F}(s-\ell^+)a^*L-Q^+-c_ns\{F\}. Adding it to (48) cancels the entire normalized determinant class restricted to the axis, Q++ℓ+a∗LQ^++\ell^+a^*L, leaving

2a∗P+(s+2q)a∗L−cns{F}≥0.2a^*P + (s+2q)a^*L-c_ns\{F\}\ge0.

Since L≤P/rL\le P/r, the point bound in (17) implies

cns2+(s+2q)/r≤Cn.(49)\frac{c_ns}{2+(s+2q)/r}\le C_n. \tag*{(49)}

The denominator is bounded independently of qq, because s≤Cnq1/ds\le C_nq^{1/d} and r≥q2r\ge q^2. The numerator tends to infinity, because s≥cnq1/ds\ge c_nq^{1/d}. Equation (49) is impossible for arbitrarily large qq.

For each qq, the choice of t(q)t(q), the rational ss, the current TT, and the modifications precedes the limit in jj. The monomial cutoff δ\delta depends only on nn, while the required lower bound for divisible jj may depend on the fixed data. We choose the very general points after those data are fixed. Thus every simultaneous general-point test above involves at most countably many conditions, and no bound depends on the point. The contradiction disproves the contrary hypothesis and proves Proposition 5.6. □\square

Vanishing on the simple model

We now apply Proposition 5.6 to the sum of the canonical bundle and the nef line bundle whose class we wish to eliminate. The remaining use of the ordinary adjoint decomposition is particularly short: it turns meromorphic nonvanishing into both signs of pseudo-effectivity.

Proposition 5.17. Let XX be a smooth simple compact Kähler manifold of algebraic dimension zero carrying a generically nondegenerate holomorphic two-form. Every nef rational holomorphic line bundle on XX has zero first Chern class.

Proof. The assertion is immediate for a point. A positive-dimensional space of algebraic dimension zero cannot be a curve, so assume dim⁡X≥2\dim X \ge2. If q(X)>0q(X) > 0, its Albanese map is generically finite onto its image, by simplicity. Ueno’s structure theorem for subvarieties of complex tori makes this image a translate of a torus: its quotient by the connected stabilizer is of general type, and positive dimension of that quotient would contradict algebraic dimension zero [38]. Lemma 5.2 proves the conclusion.

The same argument applies after any smooth generically finite Kähler cover of XX having positive irregularity. Such a cover is still simple and has algebraic dimension zero; vanishing upstairs descends by push–pull. We may therefore suppose that every such cover has irregularity zero. Lemma 5.4 then describes the subvarieties through a very general point of X2X^2.

Clear denominators and let N0N_0 be the resulting nef holomorphic line bundle. A top wedge of the generically nondegenerate two-form is a nonzero holomorphic section of KXK_X. In particular KXK_X is effective. Set

L=KX+N0,L=c1(L).\mathcal{L} = K_X + N_0,\qquad L = c_1(\mathcal{L}).

The class LL is pseudo-effective and dominates c1(KX)c_1(K_X). Lemma 5.5 supplies both slope inequalities. Every hypothesis of Proposition 5.6 is now satisfied. Some positive power of KX+N0K_X + N_0 therefore has a nonzero meromorphic section. Dividing by the corresponding power of a canonical section shows that N0N_0, as a rational line bundle, is represented by a signed divisor.

Resolve its positive and negative parts. On the resulting smooth Kähler model write

N0∼QE−G,E,G≥0,N_0 \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} E-G,\qquad E,G \ge0,

with rational coefficients and simple normal crossing union of their supports; we suppress the pullback notation for N0N_0. The canonical bundle K′K' of this model remains effective. Choose a small rational u>0u > 0 so that both uEuE and uGuG are klt boundaries. The ordinary decomposition, Theorem 2.3, applies to K′+uEK' + uE and K′+uGK' + uG. On a common higher model, denote their pulled back classes by αE\alpha_E and αG\alpha_G. Algebraic dimension zero makes each semiample part rationally trivial, so that the pulled back rational lines equal their negative divisors. Since αE−αG=u{N0}\alpha_E - \alpha_G = u\{N_0\} is nef, Lemma 2.2 (2) gives

N(αE)≤N(αG),u{N0}={N(αE)−N(αG)}.N(\alpha_E) \le N(\alpha_G),\qquad u\{N_0\} = \{N(\alpha_E)-N(\alpha_G)\}.

Thus −{N0}-\{N_0\} is pseudo-effective, whereas {N0}\{N_0\} is nef. Pairing both classes with a Kähler power gives zero mass, and hence {N0}=0\{N_0\}=0. Pullback injectivity yields the same conclusion on XX. □

Proof of Proposition 5.1. Lemma 5.3 reduces the assertion to Proposition 5.17, which proves it. In particular, once the induction has reached dimension nn, the ordinary decomposition of KT+BK_T+B also proves the decomposition assertion of Theorem 1.2 in algebraic dimension zero: adding the nef line changes no Chern class. Its semiample positive part is rationally trivial, and its negative part is unchanged. □

The nef summand on the algebraic-reduction fibers

Let TT be a smooth compact Kähler manifold of dimension nn, and suppose that 0<a(T)<n0 < a(T) < n. After resolving its algebraic reduction, we have a fibration h:T→Wh : T \to W with WW smooth projective. The objective of this section is to show that a nef rational line bundle MM occurring in the adjoint decomposition theorem has numerically trivial restriction to a general fiber of hh. Proposition (3) will then descend its class to WW, after modifications.

The inductive decomposition on an individual fiber supplies a semiample positive part only up to a flat twist. To obtain sections on the total space, we must choose the twists from a countable collection of global line bundles. Relative divisor cycles provide the required countable collection of maps. We first isolate the two ingredients of this construction.

Sections and coherent base change

Lemma 6.1. Let h:X→Wh : X \to W be a holomorphic algebraic reduction of a smooth connected compact complex manifold, with connected fibers and smooth projective base. Let (Li)i∈I(L_i)_{i \in I} be a countable collection of rational holomorphic line bundles on XX. Outside a countable union of nowhere dense subsets of WW, a smooth fiber FF of hh satisfies

κ(F,Li∣F)≤0for every i∈I.\kappa(F,L_i|_F) \le0 \qquad\text{for every } i \in I.

Any prescribed countable collection of further conditions holding on dense open subsets of WW can be imposed on the same fiber.

Proof. Choose a positive integer qiq_i such that qiLiq_iL_i is an actual line bundle. For every positive multiple mm of qiq_i, the proper direct-image theorem gives a coherent analytic sheaf

Ei,m=h∗OX(mLi)\mathcal{E}_{i,m}=h_*\mathcal{O}_X(mL_i)

on WW. Work over the smooth-fibration locus, where the line bundle is flat over the base. On a dense open set where the dimension of fiberwise sections is locally constant, coherent base change gives the isomorphism

Ei,m⊗C(w)≃H0(Xw,OXw(mLi∣Xw))(50)\mathcal{E}_{i,m}\otimes\mathbb{C}(w)\simeq H^0(X_w,\mathcal{O}_{X_w}(mL_i|_{X_w})) \tag*{(50)}

by [21], Section 7, Satz 5]. It suffices here to delete proper analytic subsets within dense open sets of WW. Fix an ample line bundle HH on WW. By GAGA and Serre’s theorem, Ei,m⊗Hki,m\mathcal{E}_{i,m}\otimes H^{k_{i,m}} is generated by global sections for some integer ki,mk_{i,m}. The projection formula and (50) therefore show that all sections of mLi∣XwmL_i|_{X_w} lift, after choosing a nonzero frame of Hki,mH^{k_{i,m}} at ww, to global sections of

OX(mLi)⊗h∗Hki,m.\mathcal{O}_X(mL_i)\otimes h^*H^{k_{i,m}}.

There are only countably many pairs (i,m)(i,m). Choose ww in the smooth locus of hh, outside all the base-change exceptions and the further generic exceptions in the statement. If κ(Xw,Li∣Xw)>0\kappa(X_w,L_i|_{X_w})>0, some divisible mm has two sections whose ratio is nonconstant on the connected fiber XwX_w. Lifting these sections as above gives a meromorphic function on XX whose restriction to XwX_w is that ratio. Every meromorphic function on XX factors through its algebraic reduction. Such a function, when defined on a nonempty open subset of the smooth fiber XwX_w, is constant there: a local holomorphic section of hh through a point where the quotient is holomorphic shows that the base function extends holomorphically at ww. This contradicts the chosen nonconstant ratio.

The countable simultaneous choice is legitimate by Baire’s theorem. If a generic assertion is initially established on a dense open set, a proper analytic exceptional subset of that open is still nowhere dense in WW. Thus such generic assertions can also be included in the choice. □

Divisor incidence and a countable collection of fibrations

We use the cycle-space results of Barlet, Lieberman, and Fujiki [2, 30, 18, 19]. In the form needed here, the spaces of effective cycles of a compact Kähler manifold have countably many irreducible components; each component is compact and belongs to Fujiki’s class CC; see [19]. The locus of cycles contained in a fiber of a proper map is an analytic relative cycle space [18]. We also use the meromorphic fiber map obtained by analytic flattening: after modifying the base, the flat strict transform has an analytic family of fiber cycles and hence a holomorphic map to the cycle space [2]. All parameter spaces and images in class CC will be replaced by smooth compact Kähler models when needed.

The following observation explains why the numerical class of a divisor can detect a semiample fibration without fixing its flat twist.

Lemma 6.2. Let FF be a smooth connected compact Kähler manifold, let AA be a rational line bundle on FF, and suppose that a modification ρ:F^→F\rho:\widehat{F}\to F from a smooth compact Kähler manifold satisfies

ρ∗A=P+R,P semiample,R=N(c1(ρ∗A)) a rational divisor.(51)\rho^* A = P + R,\qquad P\ \text{semiample},\qquad R=N\bigl(c_1(\rho^*A)\bigr)\ \text{a rational divisor}. \tag*{(51)}

Let g:F^→Qg:\widehat{F}\to Q be the fibration defined by PP, so that QQ is normal projective and P∼Qg∗HQP\sim_{\mathbb Q}g^*H_Q for an ample rational line bundle HQH_Q. There is a dense open subset U⊂FU\subset F, independent of the divisors below, with the following properties for every sufficiently divisible positive integer mm.

  1. There exists an analytic family of effective divisors on FF with class mc1(A)mc_1(A) that distinguishes the general fibers of the meromorphic fibration g∘ρ−1g\circ\rho^{-1}.

  1. For every effective divisor DD with class mc1(A)mc_1(A), membership in Supp⁡D\operatorname{Supp}D is constant along the intersection of UU with a general smooth fiber of that meromorphic fibration.

Proof. The difference between the two sides of (51) is flat as a rational line bundle. By Lemma 2.1, there is a flat rational line bundle η\eta on FF such that

ρ∗(A+η)∼QP+R.\rho^*(A+\eta)\sim_{\mathbb Q}P+R.

Choose mm clearing the denominators and such that mHQmH_Q is very ample. The divisors

g∗DQ+mR,DQ∈∣mHQ∣,g^*D_Q+mR,\qquad D_Q\in|mH_Q|,

descend to an analytic family of divisors on FF with class mc1(A)mc_1(A). Indeed ρ∗OF^=OF\rho_*\mathcal{O}_{\widehat{F}}=\mathcal{O}_F, so the projection formula identifies sections of m(A+η)m(A+\eta) with sections of its pullback. On the isomorphism locus of ρ\rho, away from Supp⁡R\operatorname{Supp}R, they distinguish general gg-fibers, since hyperplanes distinguish points of QQ.

For an arbitrary effective divisor DD of this class, Lemma 2.2(1) gives

ρ∗D≥mR.\rho^*D\ge mR.

The residual divisor D′=ρ∗D−mRD'=\rho^*D-mR is effective and has class mc1(P)mc_1(P). Let GG be a smooth compact connected fiber of gg. If D′D' does not contain GG, its restriction is an effective divisor of class zero on GG, hence is empty; in positive dimension this follows by integrating against a Kähler form to the appropriate power. Consequently Supp⁡D′\operatorname{Supp}D' either contains GG or misses it. For a point fiber the same alternative is immediate. Taking the image of the isomorphism locus of ρ\rho, and deleting Supp⁡R\operatorname{Supp}R and the nonsmooth locus of gg, gives the stated open set UU. This choice uses only ρ\rho, RR, and gg, and works for all the divisors simultaneously. ∎

Lemma 6.3. Let h:X→Wh : X \to W be a fibration of smooth connected compact Kähler manifolds with dim⁡W<dim⁡X\dim W < \dim X, and let AA be a rational line bundle on XX. There is a countable collection of diagrams

Xi→fiZipi↓↓kiX→hW(52)\begin{CD} X_i @>{f_i}>> Z_i \\ @V{p_i}VV @VV{k_i}V \\ X @>{h}>> W \tag*{(52)} \end{CD}

where pip_i is a modification, fif_i is a fibration, and Xi,ZiX_i,Z_i are smooth compact Kähler manifolds, with the following property.

For a very general smooth fiber F=XwF = X_w, suppose that a smooth compact Kähler modification ρ:F^→F\rho: \widehat{F} \to F has a decomposition (51) for A∣FA|_F, and that the fibration g:F^→Qg : \widehat{F} \to Q defined by PP has positive-dimensional base. For some ii, the restriction of fif_i over ww is bimeromorphically equivalent to gg. In particular, on a common resolution, their general fibers coincide. The collection and the exceptional subsets of WW can be fixed before FF, ρ\rho, PP, and RR are chosen.

Proof. We associate a map to each component of the relative divisor space by recording all its divisors through a point. On a fiber with the stated decomposition, Lemma 6.2 makes these incidence supports constant along the semiample fibration. Integral multiplicities will then give constancy of the cycle maps themselves, while the distinguishing linear system will give the converse.

Put d=dim⁡X−dim⁡Wd = \dim X - \dim W, and let W∘W^\circ be the smooth-fibration locus of hh. Consider the relative cycle spaces whose points are pairs (w,D)(w,D), where DD is an effective (d−1)(d - 1)-cycle in XwX_w. They are closed subspaces of the product of WW with the corresponding compact cycle components of XX. Thus they have countably many compact irreducible components in class C\mathcal{C}.

For each positive integer mm clearing the denominator of AA, retain the components meeting W∘W^\circ on which the divisor class is mc1(A∣Xw)mc_1(A|_{X_w}). This is a condition on an entire component over W∘W^\circ: in a smooth family the cohomology class of an analytic family of cycles is locally constant, and c1(A)c_1(A) supplies a global section of the same cohomology local system. After resolving a component, its open part over W∘W^\circ is connected, so equality at one point implies equality throughout that part. Components not dominating WW have proper analytic images; exclude all these images from the eventual choice of ww.

Fix a retained dominating component and a smooth compact Kähler resolution SS of it. Denote its divisor at s∈Ss \in S by DsD_s and form the incidence

IS={(x,s)∈X×S:x∈Supp⁡Ds}.I_S = \{(x,s) \in X \times S : x \in\operatorname{Supp} D_s\}.

We take the incidence of the analytic cycle family, including its limits from the open part over W∘W^\circ. Over that open part it is a family of pure (d−1)(d - 1)-dimensional cycles. Hence every irreducible component there dominates SS and has dimension dim⁡S+d−1\dim S + d - 1. Let I1,…,ItI_1,\ldots,I_t be the incidence components that dominate XX. The other components have proper analytic images in XX; outside those images they contribute nothing to incidence.

For each Ij→XI_j \to X, analytic flattening gives a meromorphic map recording its generic fiber as an effective cycle in SS. All these cycles have dimension

e=dim⁡S+d−1−dim⁡X.e = \dim S + d - 1 - \dim X.

Taking the tuple of these maps, together with hh, gives a meromorphic map ΦS\Phi_S from XX into WW times a finite product of compact cycle components of SS. On a dense open subset of XX, the union of the supports of the recorded cycles is precisely

{s∈S:x∈Supp⁡Ds}.\{s \in S : x \in\operatorname{Supp} D_s\}.

In obtaining this open set we discard the images of the nondominating incidence components and the exceptional sets of the fiber maps. The target components and the image of ΦS\Phi_S belong to class C\mathcal{C}. Resolving the graph, taking Stein factorization, and replacing the base by a smooth compact Kähler model therefore gives a diagram (52). The coordinate hh ensures that its base maps to WW. If there is no dominating incidence component, we retain only the coordinate hh; such a component will not be needed to detect a positive-dimensional QQ.

This construction gives countably many diagrams. Fix their models, their incidence-recording open sets, and their Stein factorizations. We may simultaneously require that their fibers over the eventual ww be smooth, that πi\pi_i restrict to a modification over ww, and that each of the dense open sets used meet the corresponding fiber densely. For any one diagram these are generic conditions, by properness, generic smoothness, and the fiber-dimension theorem. In particular, let Ui⊂ZiU_i \subset Z_i be the locus over which fif_i is smooth. We require that ki−1(w)k_i^{-1}(w) meet UiU_i densely. To justify this condition, a component of Zi∖UiZ_i \setminus U_i that does not dominate WW has proper image, whereas a component dominating WW has general fiber of dimension strictly less than dim⁡Zi−dim⁡W\dim Z_i - \dim W. Since the general kik_i-fiber is smooth of that pure dimension, it cannot have a component contained in Zi∖UiZ_i \setminus U_i. The same conditions may be imposed after any preselected countable collection of further modifications of these diagrams.

We now choose such a very general ww and a decomposition on F=XwF = X_w as in the statement. By Lemma 6.2, a projective linear system of divisors of class mc1(A∣F)m c_1(A|_F) distinguishes the general gg-fibers for some mm. Its image in the relative cycle space is irreducible and lies in one irreducible component. That component dominates WW, since all images of nondominating components were excluded. It is therefore one of the components used above. Passing to its parameter resolution SS preserves the distinguishing property: every divisor still has a preimage in SS.

The map ΦS∣F\Phi_S|_F distinguishes general gg-fibers. Indeed two different general points of QQ are separated by a divisor in the chosen linear system, so their incidence supports (6.4) differ. Conversely, fix a general smooth connected gg-fiber GG. On the common open set of Lemma 6.2 and the incidence recording, membership in every divisor DsD_s is constant along GG. Thus the support in (6.4) is fixed as the point moves in that open part of GG.

This support assertion also gives constancy of the recorded cycles. Their fixed union of supports is pure ee-dimensional and has finitely many irreducible components. Since all recorded cycles have dimension ee, there are only countably many possible tuples of effective cycles supported there: their multiplicities are nonnegative integers. A holomorphic map from a connected complex manifold with countable image is constant. Removing a proper analytic subset from the smooth connected GG leaves a connected open set, so ΦS\Phi_S is constant on a general gg-fiber. Point fibers require no separate argument.

Constancy on the general connected fibers gives a meromorphic factorization through QQ. One can see this by taking the image of the graph in QQ times the target: its projection to QQ has one-point general fibers and is bimeromorphic. The distinguishing property makes the induced map from QQ generically one-to-one onto its image. Hence ΦS∣F\Phi_S|_F defines the same meromorphic fibration as gg.

Finally, the restriction of fif_i over ww still has connected fibers: its fibers are exactly the corresponding fibers of fif_i. Its base over ww is connected, being the image of the connected source fiber. The finite map in Stein factorization cannot split a connected general gg-fiber: a map from that fiber into a finite set is constant. The preselected resolutions restrict to modifications over ww. Thus the same comparison holds for fif_i, proving the assertion.

Vanishing of the nef class on the fibers

We can now choose the flat twists on the total space. The order of choice is essential: the following proof fixes a countable collection of global representatives before it chooses the smooth fiber.

Proposition 6.4. Assume Theorem 1.2 in dimensions less than nn. Let TT be a smooth connected compact Kähler nn-fold with 0<a(T)<n0 < a(T) < n, and let h:T→Wh:T \to W be a holomorphic algebraic reduction with smooth projective base and connected fibers. Let BB be an effective rational SNC divisor with coefficients less than one, assume that J=KT+BJ = K_T + B is pseudo-effective, and let MM be a nef rational line bundle. Then

c1(M∣F)=0c_1(M|_F) = 0

for a general smooth fiber FF of hh.

Proof. Set A=J+MA = J + M. By Theorem 2.3, fix an effective rational divisor EE with J∼QEJ \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} E. Apply Lemma 6.3 to hh and AA, and fix its countable collection (pi,fi,ki)(p_i, f_i, k_i). Let I0I_0 be the subset of indices for which c1(pi∗M)c_1(p_i^*M) vanishes on the general smooth fiber of fif_i. For every i∈I0i \in I_0, apply Corollary 3.2 to pi∗Mp_i^*M on XiX_i. It gives a representative on XiX_i differing from pi∗Mp_i^*M by a flat rational line. By Lemma 2.1(2), that flat difference comes from TT. We therefore obtain a rational line bundle Mi∗M_i^* on TT, with

Mi∗≡M,M_i^* \equiv M,

whose pullback is an actual rational pullback from the intermediate base, after further modifications of the diagram. Fix one such representative and one such diagram for every i∈I0i \in I_0. In particular, Mi∗M_i^* restricts rationally trivially to a general fiber of that modified fibration. This is a countable collection of choices on TT.

Choose w∈Ww \in W simultaneously satisfying the detection lemma and its generic conditions for all the further diagrams just fixed. Require also the conclusion of Lemma 6.1 for the countable collection

(J+Mi∗)i∈I0.(J + M_i^*)_{i \in I_0}.

We take F=TwF = T_w smooth, with B∣FB|_F an SNC klt boundary. We also require that the defining section of EE restrict nontrivially to FF; then

JF:=KF+B∣F∼QEF:=E∣F≥0.J_F := K_F + B|_F \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} E_F := E|_F \geq0.

All the choices preceding ww depend only on data on the total space.

Suppose, towards a contradiction, that M∣F≢0M|_F \not\equiv0. The lower-dimensional decomposition theorem gives a modification ρ:F^→F\rho:\widehat{F} \to F and

ρ∗(JF+M∣F)≡PF+RF,RF=N(c1(ρ∗(JF+M∣F))),(53)\rho^*(J_F + M|_F) \equiv P_F + R_F, \qquad R_F = N(c_1(\rho^*(J_F + M|_F))), \tag*{(53)}

where PFP_F is semiample and RFR_F is a rational effective divisor. Lemma 2.2, applied to the nef summand ρ∗(M∣F)\rho^*(M|_F), gives

RF≤N(c1(ρ∗JF))≤ρ∗EF,PF≡(ρ∗EF−RF)+ρ∗(M∣F).(54)R_F \leq N(c_1(\rho^*J_F)) \leq\rho^*E_F, \qquad P_F \equiv(\rho^*E_F - R_F) + \rho^*(M|_F). \tag*{(54)}

Let g:F^→Qg:\widehat{F} \to Q be the fibration defined by PFP_F. If QQ were a point, the last equality would make a nef class and an effective divisor sum to zero. Pairing with a Kähler power would give ρ∗(M∣F)≡0\rho^*(M|_F) \equiv0, contrary to the assumption. Hence dim⁡Q>0\dim Q > 0.

On a general smooth gg-fiber GG, the class of PFP_F is zero. Restricting the last equality in (54) and using the same positivity argument shows that

c1(ρ∗(M∣F)∣G)=0,G∩Supp⁡(ρ∗EF−RF)=∅.c_1\left(\rho^*(M|_F)|_G\right)=0,\qquad G\cap\operatorname{Supp}\left(\rho^*E_F-R_F\right)=\varnothing.

If GG is a point, the first assertion is automatic and the second holds for a general point. In positive dimension, choose a general fiber not contained in the effective divisor, restrict it, and integrate the effective and nef classes against a Kähler power. Both nonnegative masses must vanish.

Lemma 6.3 gives an index ii such that the restriction of fif_i over ww and gg have the same general fibers up to modifications. By (6.7) and injectivity of pullback on cohomology, pi∗Mp_i^*M has class zero on a smooth fif_i-fiber above ww. Such a fiber can be chosen in the smooth-fibration locus of fif_i, by the generic conditions already imposed. Over the connected smooth locus in ZiZ_i, the restrictions of this Chern class form a locally constant section of R2(fi)∗RR^2(f_i)_*\mathbb{R}. Vanishing at one fiber therefore implies vanishing at every fiber in this locus. Thus i∈I0i\in I_0; its representative Mi∗M_i^* was already chosen before ww.

We claim that

κ(F,JF+Mi∣F∗)>0.(55)\kappa(F,J_F+M^*_{i|F})>0. \tag*{(55)}

On a common resolution of the maps on FF, the line Mi∣F∗M^*_{i|F} is rationally trivial on a general gg-fiber because it is a pullback from the intermediate base of fif_i. This triviality descends between smooth models of the fiber: for a modification, pullback on line bundles is injective by normality and the projection formula. The difference

Λ=ρ∗(JF+Mi∣F∗)−PF−RF\Lambda=\rho^*(J_F+M^*_{i|F})-P_F-R_F

is a flat rational line bundle by (53). Its restriction to a general GG is rationally trivial. Indeed, PF∣GP_F|_G is trivial, Mi∣G∗M^*_{i|G} is trivial, and (6.7) makes OF^(ρ∗EF−RF)∣G\mathcal{O}_{\widehat F}(\rho^*E_F-R_F)|_G trivial, while JF∼QEFJ_F\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}E_F.

Resolve QQ and the induced map, and continue to denote the resulting fibration between smooth models by gg. By Lemma 3.3, Λ∼Qg∗λ\Lambda\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}g^*\lambda for a flat rational line bundle λ\lambda on the smooth projective base. The line PFP_F is the pullback of the ample rational line on the original QQ; on its resolution the corresponding base line HQ′H'_Q is nef and big. Twisting by λ\lambda preserves bigness. On these models we have an actual rational identity

ρ∗(JF+Mi∣F∗)∼Qg∗(HQ′+λ)+RF.\rho^*(J_F+M^*_{i|F})\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}g^*(H'_Q+\lambda)+R_F.

Multiplication by the canonical section of a divisible multiple of RFR_F embeds the section spaces of the big base line into the section spaces on F^\widehat F. Since dim⁡Q>0\dim Q>0, this proves (55).

This contradicts the instance of Lemma 6.1 imposed on J+Mi∗J+M_i^* when ww was chosen. Hence M∣F≡0M|_F\equiv0 for the chosen fiber. Finally, restrictions of c1(M)c_1(M) form a locally constant section of R2h∗RR^2h_*\mathbb{R} on the connected smooth locus of hh. Their vanishing therefore holds on every fiber in that locus, and in particular on a general smooth fiber. □

Corollary 6.5. Under the assumptions of Proposition 6.4, there are modifications p:T′→Tp:T'\to T and b:W′→Wb:W'\to W, with T′T' smooth compact Kähler and W′W' smooth projective, a fibration h′:T′→W′h':T'\to W' lifting hh, and a nef rational line bundle NN on W′W' such that

p∗M≡(h′)∗N.p^*M\equiv(h')^*N.

Proof. Proposition 6.4 supplies the fiberwise vanishing required in Proposition 3.1. Apply that proposition to hh and MM. The modified base remains projective, so the descended rational class is nef. □

Completion of the induction

We now combine the preceding constructions. The main geometric step is to make the ordinary adjoint semiample after adding a sufficiently positive line from the algebraic base, while preserving the map to that base. The adjoint formula of Proposition 4.1 then puts the problem on a projective variety. We first isolate the negative-part calculation needed to pull the projective answer back.

Divisors above subsets of codimension at least two

Lemma 7.1. Let r:V→Sr: V \to S be a surjective morphism from a smooth compact Kähler manifold to a normal projective variety. Let HH be a nef rational Cartier divisor on SS. If E≥0E \ge0 is a real divisor on VV whose every component has image of codimension at least two in SS, then

N(r∗H+E)=E.N(r^*H + E) = E.

Proof. Put n=dim⁡Vn = \dim V, β=c1(r∗H)\beta= c_1(r^*H), and α=β+{E}\alpha= \beta+ \{E\}. Nefness gives N(α)≤EN(\alpha) \le E. Suppose

U=E−N(α)>0.U = E - N(\alpha) > 0.

Then β+{U}=Z(α)\beta+ \{U\} = Z(\alpha) is modified nef. Write U=∑iuiUiU = \sum_i u_i U_i, with ui>0u_i > 0, and choose

s=max⁡idim⁡r(Ui)≤dim⁡S−2.s = \max_i \dim r(U_i) \le\dim S - 2.

In particular 0≤s≤n−20 \le s \le n - 2. Let η\eta be the pullback of an ample class on SS, and let ω\omega be a Kähler class on VV. Consider the symmetric bilinear form

Q(γ,δ)=∫Vγδηsωn−s−2Q(\gamma,\delta) = \int_V \gamma\delta\eta^s\omega^{n-s-2}

on H1,1(V,R)H^{1,1}(V,\mathbb{R}).

Since the image of each UiU_i has dimension at most ss, any pairing on UiU_i with s+1s+1 classes from SS vanishes. Therefore

Q({U},η)=0,Q({U},β)=0.Q(\{U\},\eta) = 0,\qquad Q(\{U\},\beta) = 0.

By Lemma 2.2(3), Z(α)Z(\alpha) restricts pseudo-effectively to a resolution of UiU_i. Pairing there with the nef classes ηsωn−s−2\eta^s\omega^{n-s-2} and summing over ii gives

0≤Q({U},Z(α))=Q({U},{U}).0 \le Q(\{U\},Z(\alpha)) = Q(\{U\},\{U\}).

On the other hand,

Q(η,η)=∫Vηs+2ωn−s−2>0,Q(\eta,\eta) = \int_V \eta^{s+2}\omega^{n-s-2} > 0,

because s+2≤dim⁡Ss+2 \le\dim S. The mixed Hodge–Riemann relations [17], applied with η+εω\eta+\varepsilon\omega and then passed to the limit, show that QQ has at most one positive eigenvalue. Thus its restriction to η⊥\eta^\perp is negative semidefinite. Equations (7.1) force Q({U},{U})=0Q(\{U\},\{U\})=0. A zero-square vector for a negative semidefinite form belongs to its radical; decomposing every class into a multiple of η\eta and an element of η⊥\eta^\perp shows that {U}\{U\} belongs to the radical of the whole form QQ.

This contradicts

Q({U},ω)=∑iui∫Uiηsωn−s−1>0.Q(\{U\},\omega) = \sum_i u_i\int_{U_i}\eta^s\omega^{n-s-1} > 0.

Indeed every term is nonnegative, and a component with image dimension ss gives a strictly positive integral on its smooth generic locus. Consequently U=0U=0.

This proof is the codimension-two part of the lifting argument in [32], Section 5. Its formulation above also applies to maps with positive-dimensional fibers; birational exceptional translation alone would not suffice at that point of our proof.

Keeping the ordinary program over the algebraic base

Proposition 7.2. Let TT be a smooth compact Kähler manifold of dimension nn, let (T,B)(T,B) be a rational simple normal crossing klt pair with J=KT+BJ=K_T+B pseudo-effective, and let h:T→Wh:T\to W be a surjective morphism to a smooth projective variety. There are a smooth compact Kähler modification T1→TT_1\to T, an effective klt adjoint J1J_1 on T1T_1 as in (2.1), and a finite ordinary J1J_1-negative program over WW, ending at a normal compact Kähler klt pair (Y,Δ)(Y,\Delta), such that for some positive integer bb and an ample Cartier divisor AWA_W on WW,

KY+Δ+bhY∗AWK_Y+\Delta+b h_Y^*A_W

is semiample. Here hY:Y→Wh_Y:Y\to W is the descended morphism.

Proof. Choose AWA_W very ample and an integer b>2nb>2n, and set C=h∗AWC=h^*A_W. A general member of a sufficiently high multiple of the free system ∣C∣|C|, divided by that multiple and multiplied by bb, gives an effective rational representative of bCbC. Bertini’s theorem, with the multiple chosen large enough, makes its sum with BB an effective simple normal crossing klt boundary. Theorem 2.3 therefore gives a decomposition of J+bCJ+bC.

Pass to a higher smooth model T1T_1 and apply the convention (2.1) to the original pair (T,B)(T,B). Write J1=KT1+B1J_1=K_{T_1}+B_1 and C1=h1∗AWC_1=h_1^*A_W. The exceptional error and Lemma 2.2 retain an actual identity

J1+bC1∼QP1+R1,P1 semiample,R1=N(J1+bC1)≥0,(56)J_1+bC_1\sim_{\mathbb Q}P_1+R_1,\qquad P_1\text{ semiample},\qquad R_1=N(J_1+bC_1)\geq0, \tag*{(56)}

with rational terms. On this fixed model choose a fresh general fractional representative of bC1bC_1, so that its sum with B1B_1 is again simple normal crossing and klt. Apply Proposition 2.4 to this augmented ordinary adjoint and its known negative part in (7.2). Its finite ordinary scaling contracts or flips detected analytic extremal rays negative for the augmented adjoint. It preserves the actual semiample positive line P1P_1, with a fixed generated Cartier multiple, and contracts the negative part R1R_1.

The positive line P1P_1 and the fixed algebraic-base line C1=h1∗AWC_1=h_1^*A_W have distinct roles; they need not be equal or proportional. Preservation of C1C_1 and of the specific morphism to WW follows from a separate ray estimate. We check inductively that each step is over WW. Suppose the current model TiT_i still has a morphism hi:Ti→Wh_i:T_i\to W and the unaugmented pair is klt. Put

Ji=KTi+Bi,Ci=hi∗AW.J_i=K_{T_i}+B_i,\qquad C_i=h_i^*A_W.

An extremal ray negative for Ji+bCiJ_i+bC_i is JiJ_i-negative because CiC_i is nef. The Kähler klt cone theorem [23], with zero nef bb-part, supplies a rational curve Γ\Gamma generating this ray and satisfying

0<−Ji⋅Γ≤2n.0<-J_i\cdot\Gamma\leq2n.

If Ci⋅Γ>0C_i\cdot\Gamma>0, Cartier integrality gives

(Ji+bCi)⋅Γ≥−2n+b>0,(J_i+bC_i)\cdot\Gamma\geq-2n+b>0,

a contradiction. Hence CiC_i is numerically trivial on the contracted ray. The contracted fibers are projective, and all their curves have class in the contracted ray. If their image under hih_i had positive dimension, a curve on a fiber would have positive degree against hi∗AWh_i^*A_W; thus hih_i is constant on each contracted fiber. Connected-fiber descent to the normal contraction base factors hih_i through it. For a flip, composing the morphism from the flipped space with this base map gives the next hih_i. The added line is consequently the same Cartier pullback Ci+1=hi+1∗AWC_{i+1}=h_{i+1}^{*}A_W on the next model. Each step is also JiJ_i-negative, and the unaugmented ordinary klt pair persists. This proves the induction through the finite program. On a common resolution the two pullbacks of the line from WW agree. Subtracting bb times this pullback from the augmented comparison therefore gives an effective exceptional comparison for the unaugmented adjoints as well. Writing PYP_Y for the descended positive line, the final actual rational-line identity is

KY+Δ+bhY∗AW∼QPY.K_Y+\Delta+bh_Y^{*}A_W\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}P_Y.

The line PYP_Y is semiample by Proposition 2.4, which proves the required semiampleness of the augmented adjoint.

The degree argument is the familiar way of preserving a nef Cartier line in an adjoint program; compare [32] (Lemma 3.6) and [33] (Section 8.2). Here preservation of the line also preserves the specific morphism to WW.

The strengthened decomposition

Proof of Theorem 1.2. We induct simultaneously on n=dim⁡Tn=\dim T for both assertions of the theorem. Dimension zero is immediate. Suppose both assertions hold in every dimension less than nn. The projective case of the decomposition is Proposition 2.5. If a(T)=0a(T)=0, Proposition 5.1 gives M≡0M\equiv0; ordinary decomposition then proves the required statement for J+MJ+M. It remains to treat

0<a(T)<n.0<a(T)<n.

Resolve the algebraic reduction. This changes the ordinary adjoint by (1), so we may work on the resulting smooth Kähler model and remove its exceptional error at the end. We obtain a morphism h:T→Wh:T\to W with connected fibers and smooth projective WW, where dim⁡W=a(T)\dim W=a(T). By Proposition 6.4 and Corollary 6.5, after further modifications if needed, there is a nef rational line NWN_W on WW such that

M≡h∗NW.(57)M\equiv h^{*}N_W. \tag*{(57)}

Apply Proposition 7.2. On its final model YY, write JY=KY+ΔJ_Y=K_Y+\Delta. The map defined by a generated multiple of JY+bhY∗AWJ_Y+bh_Y^{*}A_W, together with hYh_Y, has image in a product of projective varieties. Its Stein factorization is

f:Y⟶Z,j:Z⟶W,f:Y\longrightarrow Z,\qquad j:Z\longrightarrow W,

where ZZ is normal projective, ff has connected fibers, and hY=j∘fh_Y=j\circ f. The semiample augmented line comes from ZZ; subtracting bj∗AWbj^{*}A_W gives a rational Cartier divisor HH with

JY∼Qf∗H.(58)J_Y\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}f^{*}H. \tag*{(58)}

Surjectivity to WW and the definition of algebraic dimension give

a(T)=dim⁡W≤dim⁡Z≤a(Y)=a(T).a(T)=\dim W\leq\dim Z\leq a(Y)=a(T).

In particular ff has positive relative dimension.

A divisible multiple of J1J_1 has a nonzero section by Theorem 2.3. The effective exceptional comparisons in the ordinary negative program preserve these section spaces. Equation (58) and f∗OY=OZf_*\mathcal{O}_Y=\mathcal{O}_Z therefore give a nonzero section of a multiple of HH; in particular HH is pseudo-effective. Proposition 4.1 gives

H∼QKZ+ΔZH\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}K_Z+\Delta_Z

for an effective rational boundary ΔZ\Delta_Z with (Z,ΔZ)(Z,\Delta_Z) klt. The divisor

H+j∗NWH + j^*N_W

now satisfies exactly the hypotheses of Proposition 2.5. Accordingly, take a smooth projective modification u:Z′→Zu : Z' \to Z and a birational morphism v:Z′→Zmv : Z' \to Z_m such that

u∗(H+j∗NW)∼Qv∗Hm+E,(59)u^*(H + j^*N_W) \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} v^*H_m + E, \tag*{(59)}

where HmH_m is nef rational Cartier, E≥0E \ge0 is rational and vv-exceptional, and v∗Hmv^*H_m is numerically equivalent to a semiample rational line PZ′P_{Z'}.

Take a smooth compact Kähler common resolution VV of the program and of the main transform over Z′Z'. Denote its morphisms by

q:V→T1,p:V→Y,g:V→Z′,r=v∘g.q : V \to T_1,\qquad p : V \to Y,\qquad g : V \to Z',\qquad r = v \circ g.

Thus f∘p=u∘gf \circ p = u \circ g. Pulling back (7.5) gives

p∗(JY+hY∗NW)∼Qr∗Hm+g∗E.p^*(J_Y + h_Y^*N_W) \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} r^*H_m + g^*E.

Every component of g∗Eg^*E maps into a subset of codimension at least two in ZmZ_m. Lemma 7.1 therefore identifies

N(p∗(JY+hY∗NW))=g∗E.N\bigl(p^*(J_Y + h_Y^*N_W)\bigr) = g^*E.

Its positive class is represented by the semiample rational line g∗PZ′g^*P_{Z'}.

Finally, the ordinary program comparison gives

q∗J1∼Qp∗JY+F,F≥0 exceptional over Y.q^*J_1 \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} p^*J_Y + F,\qquad F \ge0\text{ exceptional over }Y.

The line from WW is unchanged throughout the program. Combining this equality with (57) yields

q∗(J1+M1)≡g∗PZ′+g∗E+F,q^*(J_1 + M_1) \equiv g^*P_{Z'} + g^*E + F,

where M1M_1 is the pullback of MM. By exceptional translation,

N(q∗(J1+M1))=g∗E+F.N\bigl(q^*(J_1 + M_1)\bigr) = g^*E + F.

This is the required decomposition on the model T1T_1. Removing the effective resolution errors by Lemma 2.2(5) proves it for the original TT. The zero-algebraic-dimension assertion and the decomposition have now both been established in dimension nn, completing the simultaneous induction.

Descent of the semiample representative

Proof of Theorem 1.1. Apply Theorem 1.2 to D=KX+B+MD = K_X + B + M. It gives a smooth compact Kähler modification μ:U→X\mu: U \to X and

μ∗D≡P+R,P semiample,R=N(μ∗D).\mu^*D \equiv P + R,\qquad P\text{ semiample},\qquad R = N(\mu^*D).

Since DD is nef, μ∗D\mu^*D is nef and R=0R = 0. Thus P−μ∗DP - \mu^*D has zero real Chern class. By Lemma 2.1, it is the pullback of a rational line F∈Pic⁡0(X)⊗ZQF \in\operatorname{Pic}^0(X) \otimes_{\mathbb{Z}} \mathbb{Q}. Set L=D+FL = D + F. Then c1(L)=c1(D)c_1(L) = c_1(D) and μ∗L∼QP\mu^*L \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} P. The last assertion of Lemma 2.1 descends semiampleness to LL.

References

  1. [1]Florin Ambro. The moduli $b$-divisor of an lc-trivial fibration. _Compositio Mathematica_, 141(2):385–403, 2005.
  2. [2]Daniel Barlet. Espace analytique réduit des cycles analytiques complexes compacts d’un espace analytique complexe de dimension finie. In François Norguet, editor, _Fonctions de plusieurs variables complexes, II_, volume 482 of _Lecture Notes in Mathematics_, pages 1–158. Springer, Berlin, 1975.DOI
  3. [3]Edward Bierstone and Pierre D. Milman. Functoriality in resolution of singularities. _Publications of the Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences_, 44(2):609–639, 2008.arxiv.org/abs/math/0702375
  4. [4]Sébastien Boucksom. Divisorial Zariski decompositions on compact complex manifolds. _Annales scientifiques de l’École Normale Supérieure_, 37(1):45–76, 2004.DOI
  5. [5]Sébastien Boucksom, Philippe Eyssidieux, Vincent Guedj, and Ahmed Zeriahi. Monge–Ampère equations in big cohomology classes. _Acta Mathematica_, 205:199–262, 2010.arxiv.org/abs/0812.3674
  6. [6]Frédéric Campana. Coréduction algébrique d’un espace analytique faiblement Kählerien compact. _Inventiones Mathematicae_, 63(2):187–223, 1981.
  7. [7]Frédéric Campana, Andreas Höring, and Thomas Peternell. Abundance for Kähler threefolds. _Annales scientifiques de l’École Normale Supérieure_, 49(4):971–1025, 2016.
  8. [8]Frédéric Campana, Andreas Höring, and Thomas Peternell. Erratum and addendum to the paper: Abundance for Kähler threefolds, 2023. arXiv:2304.10161v1.arxiv.org/abs/2304.10161
  9. [9]Frédéric Campana, Keiji Oguiso, and Thomas Peternell. Non-algebraic hyperkähler manifolds. _Journal of Differential Geometry_, 85(3):397–424, 2010.
  10. [10]Eduardo Cattani, Aroldo Kaplan, and Wilfried Schmid. Degeneration of Hodge structures. _Annals of Mathematics_, 123(3):457–535, 1986.DOI
  11. [11]Tristan C. Collins and Valentino Tosatti. Restricted volumes on Kähler manifolds. _Annales de la Faculté des sciences de Toulouse: Mathématiques_, 31(3):907–947, 2022.DOI
  12. [12]Omprokash Das and Wenhao Ou. On the log abundance for compact Kähler threefolds. _Manuscripta Mathematica_, 173(1–2):341–404, 2024.DOI
  13. [13]Omprokash Das and Wenhao Ou. On the log abundance for compact Kähler threefolds II. _Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society_, 132(3):e70141, 2026. Numbered citations refer to arXiv:2306.00671v4.arxiv.org/abs/2306.00671
  14. [14]Jean-Pierre Demailly. Regularization of closed positive currents and intersection theory. _Journal of Algebraic Geometry_, 1:361–409, 1992.
  15. [15]Jean-Pierre Demailly. Complex analytic and differential geometry, 2012. Version of June 21, 2012.
  16. [16]Jean-Pierre Demailly and Mihai Păun. Numerical characterization of the Kähler cone of a compact Kähler manifold. _Annals of Mathematics_, 159(3):1247–1274, 2004.
  17. [17]Tien-Cuong Dinh and Viet-Anh Nguyen. The mixed Hodge–Riemann bilinear relations for compact Kähler manifolds. Geometric and Functional Analysis, 16(4):838–849, 2006.
  18. [18]Akira Fujiki. Closeness of the Douady spaces of compact Kähler spaces. Publications of the Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences, 14(1):1–52, 1978.DOI
  19. [19]Akira Fujiki. On the Douady space of a compact complex space in the category C. Nagoya Mathematical Journal, 85:189–211, 1982.
  20. [20]Osamu Fujino. Minimal model program for projective morphisms between complex analytic spaces, 2022. arXiv:2201.11315v1.arxiv.org/abs/2201.11315
  21. [21]Hans Grauert. Ein Theorem der analytischen Garbentheorie und die Modulräume komplexer Strukturen. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci., 5:5–64, 1960. Correction: ibid. 16 (1963), 35–36, doi:10.1007/BF02684291.
  22. [22]Alexander Grothendieck et al. Revêtements étales et groupe fondamental (SGA 1), volume 3 of Documents Mathématiques. Société Mathématique de France, Paris, 2003. Updated edition of Lecture Notes in Mathematics 224 (1971); arXiv:math/0206203v2.
  23. [23]Christopher Hacon and Lingyao Xie. On the Kähler MMP and the transcendental base-point-free theorem, 2026. arXiv:2607.24986v1.arxiv.org/abs/2607.24986
  24. [24]Heisuke Hironaka. Flattening theorem in complex-analytic geometry. American Journal of Mathematics, 97(2):503–547, 1975.DOI
  25. [25]Andreas Höring and Thomas Peternell. Minimal models for Kähler threefolds. Inventiones mathematicae, 203(1):217–264, 2016.
  26. [26]Stefan Kebekus and Christian Schnell. Extending holomorphic forms from the regular locus of a complex space to a resolution of singularities. Journal of the American Mathematical Society, 34(2):315–368, 2021. Numbered citations refer to arXiv:1811.03644v4.
  27. [27]Vladimir Lazić and Thomas Peternell. On generalised abundance, I. Publications of the Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences, 56(2):353–389, 2020.DOI
  28. [28]Vladimir Lazić and Thomas Peternell. On generalised abundance, II. Peking Mathematical Journal, 3(1):1–46, 2020.DOI
  29. [29]Roni N. Levy. The Riemann–Roch theorem for complex spaces. Acta Mathematica, 158:149–188, 1987.DOI
  30. [30]David I. Lieberman. Compactness of the Chow scheme: applications to automorphisms and deformations of Kähler manifolds. In François Norguet, editor, Fonctions de plusieurs variables complexes III, volume 670 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics, pages 140–186. Springer, 1978.DOI
  31. [31]Shin-ichi Matsumura, Juanyong Wang, Xiaojun Wu, and Qimin Zhang. Beauville–Bogomolov–Yau decomposition for Kähler generalized pairs, 2026. arXiv:2506.23218v2, September 9, 2026.arxiv.org/abs/2506.23218
  32. [32]OpenAI. Log abundance for compact Kähler spaces under logarithmic Iitaka subadditivity. OpenAI Math Release preprint OAI:Log-abundance-for-compact-Kahler-spaces-under-logarithmic-Iitaka-subadditivity-October-4-2026, 2026.
  33. [33]OpenAI. Numerical Semiampleness of Nef Adjoint Divisors. OpenAI Math Release preprint OAI:Numerical-Semiampleness-of-Nef-Adjoint-Divisors-October-3-2026, 2026.
  34. [34]OpenAI. Orbifold and logarithmic Iitaka subadditivity. OpenAI Math Release preprint OAI:Orbifold-and-logarithmic-Iitaka-subadditivity-September-26-2026, 2026.
  35. [35]Wenhao Ou. A characterization of uniruled compact Kähler manifolds, 2025. arXiv:2501.18088v1.arxiv.org/abs/2501.18088
  36. [36]Wilfried Schmid. Variation of Hodge structure: the singularities of the period mapping. Inventiones Mathematicae, 22:211–319, 1973.DOI
  37. [37]Valentino Tosatti. The Calabi–Yau theorem and Kähler currents. Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, 20(2):381–404, 2016.DOI
  38. [38]Kenji Ueno. Classification Theory of Algebraic Varieties and Compact Complex Spaces, volume 439 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Springer, Berlin, 1975.
  39. [39]Duc-Viet Vu. Derivative of volumes of big cohomology classes, 2023. arXiv:2307.15909v1.arxiv.org/abs/2307.15909

Paper details

Contents