alphaFeedback

WorksMathematics

Rational points on the non-split Cartan modular curve of level 121121

AI contributions
  • Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5
  • OpenAI GPT 6.1 Sol
  • OpenAI GPT 6 Astra
View details
Ancillary data
10 code links
View

Abstract

We show that the modular curve Xns+(121)X_{\mathrm{ns}}^+(121), attached to the normalizer of a non-split Cartan subgroup of GL2(Z/121Z)\mathrm{GL}_2(\mathbb{Z}/121\mathbb{Z}), has exactly 77 rational points, all of them CM points. Together with the work of Rouse, Sutherland and Zureick-Brown, this completes the classification of the possible 1111-adic images of Galois of elliptic curves over Q\mathbb{Q} without complex multiplication. We do not use a model of Xns+(121)X_{\mathrm{ns}}^+(121), which has genus 511511. Instead we use the map Xns+(121)→Xns+(11)X_{\mathrm{ns}}^+(121)\rightarrow X_{\mathrm{ns}}^+(11), whose target is an elliptic curve of rank 11, a descent with the cusps of Xns+(11)X_{\mathrm{ns}}^+(11) and a Mordell-Weil sieve to reduce the problem to 77 hyperelliptic curves of genus 55 over a number field of degree 1515. We deal with these curves by a version of Stoll's Selmer group Chabauty method for the isogeny 1−ζ111-\zeta_{11} of their Jacobians.

Introduction

Let EE be an elliptic curve over Q\mathbb{Q} without complex multiplication (CM) and let ℓ\ell be a prime. Serre [14] proved that the image of the ℓ\ell-adic Galois representation ρE,ℓ∞:GQ→GL⁡2(Zℓ)\rho_{E,\ell^\infty}: G_{\mathbb{Q}} \to\operatorname{GL}_{2}(\mathbb{Z}_{\ell}) is open, and that the mod ℓ\ell representation ρ‾E,ℓ\overline{\rho}_{E,\ell} is surjective for all but finitely many ℓ\ell. He asked whether the primes ℓ\ell for which ρ‾E,ℓ\overline{\rho}_{E,\ell} is not surjective can be bounded independently of EE, and it is expected that over Q\mathbb{Q} the bound 37 suffices (see [18]). For ℓ>37\ell> 37, by the work of Mazur [8], Serre [14] and Bilu, Parent and Rebolledo [3], if ρ‾E,ℓ\overline{\rho}_{E,\ell} is not surjective, then its image is contained in the normalizer of a non-split Cartan subgroup of GL⁡2(Fℓ)\operatorname{GL}_{2}(\mathbb{F}_{\ell}), so this question becomes the question whether the modular curves Xns+(ℓ)X_{\mathrm{ns}}^{+}(\ell) have non-CM rational points.

Rouse, Sutherland and Zureick-Brown [10] determined, for every prime ℓ\ell, the possible ℓ\ell-adic images of non-CM elliptic curves over Q\mathbb{Q}, apart from the images contained in the normalizer of a non-split Cartan subgroup of level ℓ≥19\ell\ge19 and apart from the images corresponding to rational points on finitely many explicit modular curves, whose rational points they could not determine: the curves Xns+(N)X_{\mathrm{ns}}^{+}(N) for N=27,25,49,121N=27,25,49,121, and two curves of level 49 and genus 9 (see Theorem 1.6 of [10]). Balakrishnan, Betts, Hast, Jha and Müller [2] have since determined the rational points on Xns+(27)X_{\mathrm{ns}}^{+}(27), Furio and Lombardo [6] the rational points on Xns+(49)X_{\mathrm{ns}}^{+}(49), and Arango-Piñeros and Zureick-Brown [1] showed that the two curves of level 49 and genus 9 have no non-CM rational points. The curve Xns+(121)X_{\mathrm{ns}}^{+}(121) has genus 511, and Rouse, Sutherland and Zureick-Brown did not compute a model of it. Using the map φ:Xns+(121)→Xns+(11)\varphi:X_{\mathrm{ns}}^{+}(121) \to X_{\mathrm{ns}}^{+}(11) to an elliptic curve of rank 1, they showed with a Mordell-Weil sieve that a non-CM rational point on Xns+(121)X_{\mathrm{ns}}^{+}(121) would map to a multiple

2020 Mathematics Subject Classification. 11G05, 11G18, 14G05, 11F80.

Key words and phrases. modular curves, non-split Cartan subgroups, Galois representations, Selmer groups, Chabauty method.

F.N. was supported by the Croatian Science Foundation under the project no. IP-2022-10-5008, by the project “Implementation of cutting-edge research and its application as part of the Scientific Center of Excellence for Quantum and Complex Systems, and Representations of Lie Algebras”, PK.1.1.10.0004, co-financed by the European Union through the European Regional Development Fund – Competitiveness and Cohesion Programme 2021–2027, and by the European Union – NextGenerationEU through the National Recovery and Resilience Plan 2021–2026, via an institutional grant of the University of Zagreb Faculty of Science, IK IA 1.1.3, Impact4Math. kPkP of a generator PP with ∣k∣≥lcm⁡(1,2,…,233)\lvert k\rvert\ge\operatorname{lcm}(1,2,\ldots,233), and hence its jj-invariant would have height roughly 107.92⋅1020210^{7.92\cdot10^{202}} (see [10 Section 9.2]).

In this paper we determine the rational points on Xns+(121)X^{+}_{\mathrm{ns}}(121). Our main result is the following theorem.

Theorem 1.1. The modular curve Xns+(121)X^{+}_{\mathrm{ns}}(121) has exactly 7 rational points. All of them are CM points, one for each of the discriminants

D∈{−3,−4,−12,−16,−27,−67,−163}.D \in\{-3,-4,-12,-16,-27,-67,-163\}.

Note that these are all the discriminants of imaginary quadratic orders of class number 1 in which 11 is inert, so the rational points on Xns+(121)X^{+}_{\mathrm{ns}}(121) are the ones that the theory of complex multiplication predicts. We obtain the following corollary.

Corollary 1.2. Let E/QE/\mathbb{Q} be an elliptic curve without CM. Then ρE,121(GQ)\rho_{E,121}(G_{\mathbb{Q}}) is not contained in a conjugate of the normalizer of a non-split Cartan subgroup of GL⁡2(Z/121Z)\operatorname{GL}_{2}(\mathbb{Z}/121\mathbb{Z}). Hence ρE,11∞(GQ)\rho_{E,11^{\infty}}(G_{\mathbb{Q}}) is one of the groups described in [10 Theorem 1.6 (i) and (ii)].

Proof. If ρE,121(GQ)\rho_{E,121}(G_{\mathbb{Q}}) were contained in such a group, then j(E)j(E) would be the jj-invariant of a non-CM rational point on Xns+(121)X^{+}_{\mathrm{ns}}(121), contradicting Theorem 1.1. The second statement now follows from [10 Theorem 1.6], as for ℓ=11\ell=11 we have just excluded case (iii) of that theorem, and case (iv) occurs only for ℓ=7\ell=7. □

Thus the 11-adic images of Galois of non-CM elliptic curves over Q\mathbb{Q} are now completely determined. Of the curves listed in [10 Theorem 1.6], this leaves only Xns+(25)X^{+}_{\mathrm{ns}}(25). While writing this paper, we became aware that Eray Karabıyık has determined the rational points on Xns+(25)X^{+}_{\mathrm{ns}}(25) (private communication).

We now describe our methods. We never use a model of Xns+(121)X^{+}_{\mathrm{ns}}(121). The only information about Xns+(121)X^{+}_{\mathrm{ns}}(121) that we use is the moduli interpretation of the map φ:Xns+(121)→Xns+(11)\varphi: X^{+}_{\mathrm{ns}}(121) \to X^{+}_{\mathrm{ns}}(11) of degree 121, at the cusps and at the CM points. The curve Xns+(11)X^{+}_{\mathrm{ns}}(11) is the elliptic curve

E:y2+y=x3−x2−7x+10E: y^{2}+y=x^{3}-x^{2}-7x+10

of rank 1, with E(Q)=ZGE(\mathbb{Q})=\mathbb{Z}G, where G=(4,5)G=(4,5). Its 5 cusps are defined over K=Q(ζ11)+K=\mathbb{Q}(\zeta_{11})^{+}, the maximal real subfield of Q(ζ11)\mathbb{Q}(\zeta_{11}), and they are points of order 11 on EE. The proof has three steps.

The first step is a descent with the cusps. If ξ∈Xns+(121)(Q)\xi\in X^{+}_{\mathrm{ns}}(121)(\mathbb{Q}), then for every prime qq of KK not above 11 and every cusp cc of Xns+(11)X^{+}_{\mathrm{ns}}(11), the point φ(ξ)∈E(Q)\varphi(\xi) \in E(\mathbb{Q}) is congruent to cc modulo qiq^{i} only if it is congruent to cc modulo q11⌈i/11⌉q^{11\lceil i/11\rceil}, i.e. the intersection number of φ(ξ)\varphi(\xi) and cc at qq is divisible by 11 (Lemmas 4.2 and 4.3). This is the analogue for Xns+(121)X^{+}_{\mathrm{ns}}(121) of the condition, used by Schoof and Tzanakis [13] to determine the points on Xns+(11)X^{+}_{\mathrm{ns}}(11) with integral jj-invariant, that φ(ξ)\varphi(\xi) does not meet the cusps at all. It follows that certain functions on EE whose divisors are supported on the cusps and the origin take values in the finite group K(S,11)K(S,11), where SS consists of the prime of KK above 11. A Mordell-Weil sieve with 6 primes then shows that φ(ξ)=nG\varphi(\xi)=nG with n≡n0(mod4356)n \equiv n_{0} \pmod{4356} for some n0∈{−2,…,4}n_{0} \in\{-2,\ldots,4\}, and determines the values of these functions modulo 11-th powers (Proposition 4.7). The 7 values of n0n_{0} correspond to the 7 CM points, and since 121 divides 4356, it follows that n−n0n-n_{0} is divisible by 121.

The second step reduces the problem to curves of genus 5 (§ 5). The values from the first step show that x(nG−3s)=α+δn0w11x(nG-3s)=\alpha+\delta_{n_{0}}w^{11} with w∈Kw \in K, where s∈E(K)s \in E(K) is a cusp and α,δn0∈K\alpha,\delta_{n_{0}} \in K are explicit. Combined with a 2-descent on EE over a cubic extension LL of KK, this gives a point on one of 7 hyperelliptic curves ηy2=x11+b2\eta y^{2}=x^{11}+b^{2} of genus 5 over LL, which is a number field of degree 15. The CM point gives the point with w=1w=1.

The third step deals with these curves. Over F=L(ζ11)F=L(\zeta_{11}) their Jacobians JJ have the automorphism σ\sigma induced by X↦ζ11XX \mapsto\zeta_{11}X, and λ=1−σ\lambda=1-\sigma is an isogeny of degree 11. We use the idea of Stoll’s Selmer group Chabauty [16 Theorem 2.1 and Remark 2.2] for the isogeny λ\lambda. Since 121 divides n−n0n-n_0, the point [P−P0]∈J(F)[P-P_0] \in J(F), where PP is the point coming from ξ\xi and P0P_0 the point coming from the CM point, is deep in the kernel of reduction at a prime vv above 11. As long as a point is deep enough, its image under the local λ\lambda-Kummer map is 0, and since the localization at vv of the λ\lambda-Selmer group turns out to be injective, the point is divisible by λ\lambda in J(F)J(F). Repeating this, we arrive at a point of the kernel of reduction whose leading term we know. Its image under the local Kummer map is not in the image of the Selmer group, which is a contradiction (Propositions 8.3 and 9.2).

The method works because the curves Y2=X11+b2Y^2=X^{11}+b^2 have cuspidal reduction Y2=(X+bˉ2)11Y^2=(X+\bar b^2)^{11} at the primes above 11. As a consequence, the formal groups of their Jacobians at these primes are isomorphic to G^a5\widehat{\mathbb{G}}_a^5 via the formal logarithm (Lemma 6.1), and λ\lambda acts diagonally in the logarithmic coordinates, so the repeated divisions by λ\lambda can be followed explicitly. Note that our approach needs neither generators of the Mordell–Weil groups of the Jacobians (which have rank 5 over LL for 3 of the 7 curves, see Remark 5.3) nor a bound on the height of the points. We do not assume the Generalized Riemann Hypothesis (GRH). It is used only to find generators of groups of SS-units, which are then shown to be correct unconditionally.

We fix our notation in Section 2 and prove Theorem 1.1 in Section 10. The computations are described in Section 11.

All the code used in the paper can be found at

https://github.com/F-Najman/Xns-121-

Data availability and reproducibility

The repository contains the code, the logs and the certificates of all the computations in this paper, and a script that reruns all of them (in about 4 minutes). This paper refers to the revision c12c8c3 of the repository, and the links in the paper point to this revision. The README file there lists, statement by statement, which script establishes each claim and which log it produced. In the digital form of this article, the words reporting a computation, such as “we compute”, are hyperlinks to the script that carries it out.

AI disclosure and comments

The mathematical content of this paper was produced by AI models. Anthropic’s Claude Opus 5.5, OpenAI’s GPT-6.1 Sol and GPT-6 Astra produced almost all of the mathematics of the first versions of the proofs and carried out the computations. Claude Opus 5.5 also reviewed these proofs, reran all the computations, independently reimplemented the sieve, the Selmer group computations for the even classes, the determination of the rational points above the CM points and the computation of the genus, checked the references, wrote the manuscript and organized the code repository. We have not yet fully checked the proofs.

Notation and conventions

Throughout the paper ζ11\zeta_{11} denotes a primitive 11-th root of unity, and π=1−ζ11\pi=1-\zeta_{11}. For a number field kk, a finite set SS of primes of kk and a prime pp we write

k(S,p)={a∈k×/k×p:vq(a)≡0(modp) for all primes q∉S}.k(S,p)=\{a\in k^\times/k^{\times p}:v_{\mathfrak q}(a)\equiv0\pmod p\text{ for all primes }\mathfrak q\notin S\}.

This is a finite dimensional Fp\mathbb{F}_p-vector space, which we write additively. If kk contains a primitive pp-th root of unity and Cl⁡(k)[p]=0\operatorname{Cl}(k)[p]=0, then dim⁡Fpk(S,p)=r1+r2+#S\dim_{\mathbb{F}_p}k(S,p)=r_1+r_2+\#S, where (r1,r2)(r_1,r_2) is the signature of kk. For a finite extension ll of Qp\mathbb{Q}_p we denote by vv or vlv_l the valuation of ll normalized by v(l×)=Zv(l^\times)=\mathbb{Z}, and by Ol\mathcal{O}_l its ring of integers.

Let ε=2\varepsilon=2, which is not a square modulo 11. The non-split Cartan subgroup Cns(121)C_{\mathrm{ns}}(121) of GL2(Z/121Z)\mathrm{GL}_2(\mathbb{Z}/121\mathbb{Z}) is the group of invertible matrices of the form

(aεbba),a,b∈Z/121Z,\begin{pmatrix} a & \varepsilon b \\ b & a \end{pmatrix},\qquad a,b\in\mathbb{Z}/121\mathbb{Z},

References

  1. [1]S. Arango-Piñeros and D. Zureick-Brown, 7-adic Galois representations of elliptic curves over the rationals via Kummer descent, 2026. preprint, https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.06521.
  2. [2]J. S. Balakrishnan, L. A. Betts, D. R. Hast, A. Jha, and J. S. Müller, Rational points on the non-split Cartan modular curve of level 27 and quadratic Chabauty over number fields, (2025). preprint, https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.07833.
  3. [3]Y. Bilu, P. Parent, and M. Rebolledo, Rational points on X₀⁺(pʳ), Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble), 63 (2013), pp. 957–984.
  4. [4]S. Bosch, W. Lütkebohmert, and M. Raynaud, Néron models, vol. 21 of Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete (3), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1990.
  5. [5]W. Bosma, J. Cannon, and C. Playoust, The Magma algebra system. I. The user language, J. Symbolic Comput., 24 (1997), pp. 235–265.DOI
  6. [6]L. Furio and D. Lombardo, On 7-adic Galois representations for elliptic curves over ℚ, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3), 133 (2026), p. Paper No. e70193.
  7. [7]G. Ligozat, Courbes modulaires de niveau 11, in Modular functions of one variable, V (Proc. Second Internat. Conf., Univ. Bonn, Bonn, 1976), vol. 601 of Lecture Notes in Math., Springer, Berlin, 1977, pp. 149–237.DOI
  8. [8]B. Mazur, Rational isogenies of prime degree, Invent. Math., 44 (1978), pp. 129–162. With an appendix by D. Goldfeld.DOI
  9. [9]A. M. Odlyzko, Discriminant bounds, 1976. Unpublished tables, November 29, 1976. Table 4: https://www-users.cse.umn.edu/~odlyzko/unpublished/discr.bound.table4, description: https://www-users.cse.umn.edu/~odlyzko/unpublished/discr.bound.tables.txt.
  10. [10]J. Rouse, A. V. Sutherland, and D. Zureick-Brown, ℓ-adic images of Galois for elliptic curves over ℚ (and an appendix with John Voight), Forum Math. Sigma, 10 (2022), pp. Paper No. e62, 63 pp.DOI
  11. [11]E. F. Schaefer, Class groups and Selmer groups, J. Number Theory, 56 (1996), pp. 79–114.arxiv.org/abs/1507.08324
  12. [12]—, Computing a Selmer group of a Jacobian using functions on the curve, Math. Ann., 310 (1998), pp. 447–471.
  13. [13]R. Schoof and N. Tzanakis, Integral points of a modular curve of level 11, Acta Arith., 152 (2012), pp. 39–49.arxiv.org/abs/1107.2776
  14. [14]J.-P. Serre, Propriétés galoisiennes des points d’ordre fini des courbes elliptiques, Invent. Math., 15 (1972), pp. 259–331.
  15. [15]J. H. Silverman, The arithmetic of elliptic curves, vol. 106 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer, Dordrecht, second ed., 2009.
  16. [16]M. Stoll, Chabauty without the Mordell–Weil group, in Algorithmic and experimental methods in algebra, geometry, and number theory, Springer, Cham, 2017, pp. 623–663.DOI
  17. [17]The LMFDB Collaboration, The L-functions and modular forms database, 2026. https://www.lmfdb.org.
  18. [18]D. Zywina, On the possible images of the mod ℓ representations associated to elliptic curves over ℚ, 2015. preprint, https://arxiv.org/abs/1508.07660.

Paper details

vlnc:W_7sy5agud
v1 · latestHistory (1)

published · Fresh — published within the last 30 days

Usage

views · 0

downloads · 0

A view counts once per browser per day, a download each time the PDF is requested.

CC BY 4.0

Original source

  • Mathematics

Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5, OpenAI GPT 6.1 Sol, OpenAI GPT 6 Astra · View statement →

Looking for related papers…
Contents