Introduction

The canonical Arthur filtration organizes unramified automorphic functions by nilpotent orbits in the Langlands dual Lie algebra. Its definition uses singular support in a category of ℓ\ell-adic sheaves, whereas the underlying space of finitely supported functions has a natural rational form. The rationality question asks whether these two structures are compatible.

Arthur’s conjectures organize departures from temperedness by an additional algebraic SL2\mathrm{SL}_2 factor in an automorphic parameter [6]. In geometric Langlands, Arinkin–Gaitsgory introduced nilpotent singular support to encode this Arthur direction [2]. The restricted local-system stack and nilpotent automorphic category of Arinkin–Gaitsgory–Kazhdan–Raskin–Rozenblyum–Varshavsky provide the corresponding setting over a finite field [3]. Gaitsgory–Lafforgue–Raskin formulate this question, jointly with Kazhdan, as the assertion that their canonical filtration is defined over Q\mathbb{Q} [GLR, Section 2.7, Conjecture 2.7.3]. The construction and its relation to Arthur’s and Ramanujan’s conjectures are discussed in [GLR, Ras]. Restricted geometric Langlands theory supplies the spectral description of the support categories, and the trace-of-Frobenius theorem identifies the ambient trace with automorphic functions [3, 5, 13]. These results make rationality a precise question about the images of supported categorical traces.

We prove the rationality assertion for split connected semisimple groups under the explicit characteristic assumptions below. Thus the result positively resolves Conjecture 2.7.3 of [GLR] in this setting. It applies to the entire space of finitely supported functions, including its noncuspidal part.

Hypotheses and the filtration

Let XX be a smooth projective geometrically connected curve over Fq\mathbb{F}_q, and let G/FqG/\mathbb{F}_q be split, connected and semisimple. Put k0=F‾qk_0 = \overline{\mathbb{F}}_q, H=Gk0H = G_{k_0} and h=Lie⁡(H)\mathfrak{h} = \operatorname{Lie}(H).

Assumption 1.1. The following four conditions hold.

(i) The Lie algebra h\mathfrak{h} has an HH-invariant nondegenerate symmetric bilinear form whose restriction to the center of Lie⁡(M)\operatorname{Lie}(M) is nondegenerate for every Levi subgroup MM of HH.

(ii) For each Levi subgroup MM of HH, including HH itself, and each maximal torus TM⊂MT_M \subset M, restriction induces an isomorphism

k0[m]M→∼k0[tM]WM,m=Lie⁡(M),tM=Lie⁡(TM),WM=NM(TM)/TM.k_0[\mathfrak{m}]^M \xrightarrow{\sim} k_0[\mathfrak{t}_M]^{W_M}, \qquad\mathfrak{m} = \operatorname{Lie}(M), \quad\mathfrak{t}_M = \operatorname{Lie}(T_M), \quad W_M = N_M(T_M)/T_M.

(iii) The scheme-theoretic centralizer in HH of every semisimple element of h\mathfrak{h} is a Levi subgroup.

(iv) For every extension K/k0K/k_0 and every nilpotent n∈h⊗k0Kn \in\mathfrak{h} \otimes_{k_0} K, there is a parabolic subgroup P⊂HKP \subset H_K, defined over KK, such that n∈Lie⁡(Ru(P))n \in\operatorname{Lie}(R_u(P)).

Here a Levi subgroup is a Levi factor of a parabolic subgroup. Semisimple means geometrically conjugate into the Lie algebra of a maximal torus; nilpotent means that the geometric adjoint orbit closure contains zero.

Fix a prime ℓ≠char⁡(Fq)\ell\ne\operatorname{char}(\mathbb{F}_q) and set E=Q‾ℓE = \overline{\mathbb{Q}}_\ell. Write SS for the set of isomorphism classes of GG-bundles on XX over Fq\mathbb{F}_q. For a characteristic-zero field LL, let

AL=L(S)\mathcal{A}_L = L^{(S)}

be the space of finitely supported functions on SS. Its distinguished basis consists of the point functions. In particular AE=E⊗QAQ\mathcal{A}_E = E \otimes_{\mathbb{Q}} \mathcal{A}_{\mathbb{Q}}.

Fix the pinned split Q\mathbb{Q}-form of the Langlands dual group and write G^/E\widehat{G}/E for its scalar extension, with Lie algebra g^\widehat{\mathfrak{g}} and nilpotent cone N\mathcal{N}. All later coefficient identifications use this same pinned form. On X‾=X×Fqk0\overline{X} = X \times_{\mathbb{F}_q} k_0 put

C=Shv⁡Nilp⁡(Bun⁡G(X‾),E),Φ=(Frob⁡Bun⁡)∗.\mathcal{C} = \operatorname{Shv}_{\operatorname{Nilp}}(\operatorname{Bun}_G(\overline{X}), E), \qquad\Phi= (\operatorname{Frob}_{\operatorname{Bun}})_*.

The subscript denotes singular support in the global nilpotent cone, the zero fiber of the Hitchin map. We use geometric Frobenius and its pushforward on the automorphic category.

For a closed Ad⁡(G^)\operatorname{Ad}(\widehat{G})-invariant subset Y⊂NY \subset\mathcal{N}, let CY⊂C\mathcal{C}_Y \subset\mathcal{C} be the derived-Satake support category. More explicitly, the restricted geometric Langlands equivalence identifies

C≃IndCoh⁡N^(Z),Z=′LocSys⁡G^restr⁡(X‾),(1)\mathcal{C} \simeq\operatorname{IndCoh}_{\widehat{\mathcal{N}}}(Z), \qquad Z = {}'\operatorname{LocSys}_{\widehat{G}}^{\operatorname{restr}}(\overline{X}), \tag*{(1)}

and CY\mathcal{C}_Y corresponds to IndCoh⁡Y(Z)\operatorname{IndCoh}_Y(Z). The prime denotes the union of connected components occurring in that equivalence; it is retained throughout. A singular point is a pair (σ,A)(\sigma, A) with AA a horizontal section of the adjoint local system, after identifying g^∗\widehat{\mathfrak{g}}^* with g^\widehat{\mathfrak{g}} by an invariant form. The support condition requires AA to take values in YY. Thus YY is a condition on singular directions, not on the support of a function on SS.

For a dualizable differential graded category D\mathcal{D} and an endofunctor TT, write Tr⁡(T,D)\operatorname{Tr}(T,\mathcal{D}) for its categorical trace, a complex of vector spaces. It is Hochschild homology with coefficients in the graph bimodule of TT. The trace/functions isomorphism gives Tr⁡(Φ,C)≃AE\operatorname{Tr}(\Phi,\mathcal{C}) \simeq\mathcal{A}_E, with the latter in degree zero. Define

FYAE=im⁡[H0Tr⁡(Φ,CY)⟶AE].(2)\mathcal{F}_Y\mathcal{A}_E = \operatorname{im}\left[H^0\operatorname{Tr}(\Phi,\mathcal{C}_Y) \longrightarrow\mathcal{A}_E\right]. \tag*{(2)}

This image definition does not assume concentration of the supported trace. The required concentration and injectivity statements will be proved in Section 5.

Theorem 1.2. Under Assumption 1.1, for every prime ℓ≠char⁡(Fq)\ell\ne\operatorname{char}(\mathbb{F}_q) and every closed invariant Y⊂NY \subset\mathcal{N}, the natural map

E⊗Q(AQ∩FYAE)→∼FYAE(3)E \otimes_{\mathbb{Q}} \left(\mathcal{A}_{\mathbb{Q}} \cap\mathcal{F}_Y\mathcal{A}_E\right) \xrightarrow{\sim} \mathcal{F}_Y\mathcal{A}_E \tag*{(3)}

is an isomorphism. The intersection is taken inside AE\mathcal{A}_E.

No Hecke-finiteness or cuspidality condition is imposed. The theorem does not require X(Fq)X(\mathbb{F}_q) to be nonempty. These rational filtration subspaces are also independent of ℓ\ell, with the closed invariant supports matched through the pinned split dual group, as shown in Section 7. On the unramified cuspidal subspace, Corollary 7.5 further identifies this filtration with the sums of the rational cuspidal Arthur summands of [27] whose orbit labels lie in YY.

A bilinear detection criterion

The proof gives a characterization after every abstract field isomorphism ι:E→∼C\iota:E \xrightarrow{\sim} \mathbb{C}. Such isomorphisms are used without prescribing their restriction to the algebraic numbers. Transport all coefficient-linear categories and spaces by ι\iota.

Fix a closed point vv of XX of degree dd, and put r=qdr=q^d. For a nilpotent orbit o⊂gCo \subset\mathfrak{g}_{\mathbb{C}}, choose an SL2\mathrm{SL}_2-homomorphism associated with a triple for e∈oe \in o, and write λe\lambda_e for its diagonal cocharacter, so ee has weight two. Define

Bo={[λe(r)s]:s∈ZG^C(SL2,e)cpt}⊂G^C//G^C,BY=⋃o⊂YCBo.(4)B_o=\{[\lambda_e(\sqrt{r})s]:s\in Z_{\widehat{G}_{\mathbb{C}}}(\mathrm{SL}_2,e)_{\mathrm{cpt}}\}\subset\widehat{G}_{\mathbb{C}}//\widehat{G}_{\mathbb{C}},\qquad B_Y=\bigcup_{o\subset Y_{\mathbb{C}}}B_o. \tag*{(4)}

Here r\sqrt{r} is positive, [ ][\ ] denotes semisimple conjugacy value, and the compact form includes the components of the triple centralizer. The sets BoB_o, as in [14], do not depend on these choices, are compact and pairwise disjoint. Their elementary properties are proved in Lemma 7.1.

For a finite-dimensional algebraic representation DD of G^C\widehat{G}_{\mathbb{C}}, let TDT_D be the spherical Hecke operator at vv, with the positive square-root Satake normalization. For f,g∈ACf,g\in\mathcal{A}_{\mathbb{C}}, put

[f,g]=∑b∈Sf(b)g(b)∣Aut⁡(b)∣.(5)[f,g]=\sum_{b\in S}\frac{f(b)g(b)}{|\operatorname{Aut}(b)|}. \tag*{(5)}

This is a bilinear pairing. The automorphism groups over the finite field are finite, and the sum is finite.

The key result, Theorem 6.1, says that for each f,gf,g there is a unique finite complex Borel measure νf,g\nu_{f,g} on B=⋃oBoB=\bigcup_o B_o such that

[TDf,g]=∫BχD dνf,gfor every D,[T_Df,g]=\int_B\chi_D\,d\nu_{f,g}\quad\text{for every }D,

and that

f∈ι∗(FYAE)⟺supp⁡(νf,g)⊆BYfor every g∈AC.(6)f\in\iota_*(\mathcal{F}_Y\mathcal{A}_E)\Longleftrightarrow\operatorname{supp}(\nu_{f,g})\subseteq B_Y\quad\text{for every }g\in\mathcal{A}_{\mathbb{C}}. \tag*{(6)}

A finite complex measure means one of finite total variation. No positivity of these measures is asserted or needed.

The right side of (1.7) uses the same complex function space, point-counting Hecke operations, rational stack weights and compact sets for every ι\iota. It therefore gives invariance of the filtration under all coefficient automorphisms over Q\mathbb{Q}. Finite-coordinate linear algebra then proves (1.3).

The local arguments

The supported trace concentration and injection statements in [14] are conditional on Conjecture 2.1.5 there, as stipulated in its Section 2.1.9. Section 5 proves the concentration and injection needed here from the component and orbit calculations, and constructs actual compact Weil representatives of the supported trace classes.

The central task is to detect every nonzero top support class by a finitely supported function test despite possible cancellation from its boundary. Our contribution is the bilinear criterion (1.6)–(1.7) on the full space of finitely supported functions, together with the local calculations and compact representatives that establish it. First, on a retained fixed component of the local-system stack, a pure Weil lift supplies separated Frobenius weights. Finite covariant tests recover the component from a closed-orbit slice while preserving completion along its invariant base. Nonresonance then gives a quadratic moment-map model compatible with evaluation bundles and singular support.

A deformation-theoretic antecedent is the quadratic-germ theorem of Goldman–Millson for compact Kähler manifolds and compact-image representations [16]. Pridham obtains Frobenius-compatible classical deformation hulls and cup-product quadratic equations from purity for smooth proper varieties [26]. Our finite-jet nonresonance argument retains the derived equivariant model, its formal invariant base, evaluation bundles and singular-support map.

Second, a graded Koszul description reduces each nilpotent-orbit quotient to equivariant Clifford modules together with strictly contracting Hom directions. Clifford algebras and graded matrix factorizations also enter the spectral Whittaker construction of Ben-Zvi, Raskin and Venkatesh described in [27], Section 4.5, which develops an idea of V. Lafforgue; the even-nilpotent construction appears in [8], Section 18.5. Here a twisted-bar contraction proves trace concentration. Proper orbit-closure extensions and finite Koszul lifts produce actual compact Weil classes, so the result describes the image in (1.2), not only an abstract associated graded. The passage from equivariant localization to a cofiber sequence of traces follows the formalism of Hoyois–Scherotzke–Sibilla [17], Theorem 3.4 and Proposition 5.4.

Third, nonstandard automorphic duality turns these classes into the bilinear tests (1.5). Localization with supports gives decaying normal-direction contributions and hence finite complex measures. On a top orbit the common density is invertible; finite character approximations remove it and leave a nondegenerate coefficient pairing. A strict drop in ambient adjoint rank separates every proper boundary contribution. These two facts prevent cancellation from hiding a nonzero top class.

The supported local-cohomology and orbit-distribution strategy is inspired by Kazhdan–Okounkov’s treatment of the unramified Eisenstein spectrum [18], Sections 2.6.1–2.6.4 and 3.3–3.4. The all-function bilinear detector, compact Weil lifts, and noncancellation and rational-descent arguments are developed here; that reference does not establish the rationality theorem above.

Main line of the proof

Figure 1. Main line of the proof. The compact-set properties used by the measure criterion are proved independently in Section 7.

Section 2 records the established geometric inputs and their precise scope. Sections 3–5 prove the local model and trace calculations. Section 6 establishes the measure criterion, and Section 7 completes the rational descent.

Geometric inputs and Frobenius conventions

We use the constructible ℓ\ell-adic geometric Langlands framework. The results recalled here apply under Assumption 1.1: its first three conditions are those of [3], §14.4.1, and its fourth is the additional condition of [3], §D.1.1. All categories are Q‾ℓ\overline{\mathbb{Q}}_\ell-linear. A compact object means an object whose Hom functor commutes with filtered colimits; compactness is stronger than constructibility on an algebraic stack.

Restricted Langlands and functions

Theorem 2.1 (Restricted geometric Langlands). There is a Frobenius-invariant union ZZ of connected components of LocSys⁡G^restr(X‾)\operatorname{LocSys}^{\mathrm{restr}}_{\widehat{G}}(\overline{X}) and an equivalence

LGrestr:C→∼IndCoh⁡N^(Z).\mathsf{L}^{\mathrm{restr}}_{G}:\mathcal{C}\xrightarrow{\sim}\operatorname{IndCoh}_{\widehat{\mathcal{N}}}(Z).

It identifies CY\mathcal{C}_{Y} with IndCoh⁡Y(Z)\operatorname{IndCoh}_{Y}(Z) for every closed G^\widehat{G}-invariant Y⊂N^Y\subset\widehat{\mathcal{N}} and intertwines Hecke functors with tensoring by the corresponding evaluation bundles. If f:Z→Zf:Z\to Z sends a local system to its pullback along geometric Frobenius of X‾\overline{X}, the functor corresponding to Φ=(Frob⁡Bun⁡)∗\Phi=(\operatorname{Frob}_{\operatorname{Bun}})_{*} is f!f^{!}. The embedding C↪Shv⁡(Bun⁡G(X‾),Q‾ℓ)\mathcal{C}\hookrightarrow\operatorname{Shv}(\operatorname{Bun}_{G}(\overline{X}),\overline{\mathbb{Q}}_{\ell}) preserves compact objects.

The equivalence and the last assertion are [15]; Frobenius invariance of the retained union is [15]. The Hecke action is compatible with the spectral linear structure [15], and the support compatibility is [27]. The stated Frobenius convention is exactly [14]. Thus ZZ is the prime union of the introduction throughout this paper. In particular, this theorem does not require identifying that union with the entire restricted stack. Under Assumption 1.1, the companion full-support theorem [24] identifies Z=LocSys⁡G^restr(X‾)Z=\operatorname{LocSys}^{\mathrm{restr}}_{\widehat{G}}(\overline{X}) as spectral prestacks over the fixed coefficient field E=Q‾ℓE=\overline{\mathbb{Q}}_{\ell}.

At a geometric point xx, a representation DD of G^\widehat{G} supplies the vector bundle σ↦Dσ,x\sigma\mapsto D_{\sigma,x} on ZZ. At a closed point of degree dd, the geometric points form a Frobenius cycle of length dd. The corresponding Hecke construction uses all dd evaluation bundles, with cyclic transport. This observation will keep the degree of a closed point visible in our trace calculation.

Remark 2.2 (Theta normalization). The theta normalization of the equivalence can be made over Fq\mathbb{F}_{q}. Indeed, XX admits a line bundle ϑ\vartheta defined over Fq\mathbb{F}_{q} with ϑ⊗2≃ωX\vartheta^{\otimes2}\simeq\omega_{X}. For odd characteristic this follows from [7]: there is a Frobenius-invariant square-root class, and the Brauer group of the finite field vanishes, so this class descends. In characteristic two, choose a rational function a∈Fq(X)a\in\mathbb{F}_{q}(X) with da≠0da\ne0. The orders of dada are even, as a Laurent expansion over each perfect residue field shows. Hence OX(12div⁡(da))\mathcal{O}_{X}\left(\frac{1}{2}\operatorname{div}(da)\right) is such a square root [21]. No rational point of XX is needed.

Theorem 2.3 (Trace and ordinary local terms). There is a canonical isomorphism of complexes

LT⁡:Tr⁡(Φ,C)→∼AQ‾ℓ,\operatorname{LT}:\operatorname{Tr}(\Phi,\mathcal{C})\xrightarrow{\sim}\mathcal{A}_{\overline{\mathbb{Q}}_{\ell}},

with the right-hand side in degree zero. For a compact object MM and a morphism b:M→ΦMb:M\to\Phi M, it sends the categorical class [M,b][M,b] to the ordinary alternating trace function of the adjoint morphism (Frob⁡Bun⁡)∗M→M(\operatorname{Frob}_{\operatorname{Bun}})^{*}M\to M. The function has finite support. This comparison is compatible with Hecke operations and with the sheaf-function operations of pullback, star tensor product, and compactly supported pushforward.

The trace isomorphism is [5]. Its identification with local terms is [5]; the compact-embedding hypothesis used there is provided by Theorem 2.1. The compatibilities and the stack convention for summation are recalled in [14]. This is a statement about all of AQ‾ℓ\mathcal{A}_{\overline{\mathbb{Q}}_{\ell}}. It does not restrict to cuspidal or Hecke-finite functions. The stronger assertion that actual invertible Weil structures span the supported traces will be proved below.

Duality and finite evaluations

Theorem 2.4 (Nonstandard duality). The pairing

C⊗C⟶Vect⁡Q‾ℓ,(M,N)⟼RΓc(Bun⁡G(X‾),M⊗∗N)(7)\mathcal{C} \otimes\mathcal{C} \longrightarrow\operatorname{Vect}_{\overline{\mathbb{Q}}_\ell}, \qquad(M,N) \longmapsto R\Gamma_c\left(\operatorname{Bun}_G(\overline{X}),M\otimes^*N\right) \tag*{(7)}

defines a self-duality of C\mathcal{C}. It is invariant under simultaneous Frobenius. If M,NM,N are compact, its value is a perfect complex, also after any finite Hecke representation is inserted in either variable.

The duality is [4], Theorem 3.2.2. Here is the finiteness deduction, which is useful when applying it. By Theorem 2.1, the two objects are compact in ambient sheaves, hence constructible [4]. Star tensoring an ambient compact with a constructible object preserves compactness [4]. For p:Bun⁡G→pt⁡p:\operatorname{Bun}_G \to\operatorname{pt}, the functor p!p_! is left adjoint to the continuous functor p!p^! [4], so it preserves compactness. Its value is therefore compact in Vect⁡Q‾ℓ\operatorname{Vect}_{\overline{\mathbb{Q}}_\ell}, hence perfect. The Hecke functor for a finite-dimensional representation has a continuous adjoint supplied by its dual representation, and likewise preserves compactness. Frobenius invariance of (2.1) follows by change of variables and the compatibility of Frobenius with star tensor product.

For compact Weil objects the numerical trace of (2.1) is consequently

[u,g]=∑b∈Su(b)g(b)∣Aut⁡(b)∣.(8)[u,g]=\sum_{b\in\mathcal{S}}\frac{u(b)g(b)}{\lvert\operatorname{Aut}(b)\rvert}. \tag*{(8)}

This is the Grothendieck trace formula with groupoid counting measure; see [GLR, §§1.1.9 and 1.2.3]. The pairing is bilinear over Q‾ℓ\overline{\mathbb{Q}}_\ell, without complex conjugation. The compact objects of the categorical dual are the opposites of the compact objects of C\mathcal{C}, and their evaluation is enriched Hom [4], §§0.5.3 and 5.1.2. Thus the second input may be transported to a compact Hom-test object. Its Weil arrow is reversed on passing to the opposite category. For arrows a:ΦM→Ma:\Phi M\to M and b:N→ΦNb:N\to\Phi N, the induced endomorphism of Hom⁡(M,N)\operatorname{Hom}(M,N) is

h⟼Φ−1(b∘h∘a).h\longmapsto\Phi^{-1}(b\circ h\circ a).

This convention fixes the direction of every Frobenius action below. The later spanning theorem will justify testing against every function in (2.2).

The geometry of a spectral component

Theorem 2.5 (Components and deformation theory). Every connected component ZσZ_\sigma of the restricted local-system stack has a unique semisimple isomorphism class σ\sigma. Its automorphism group J=Aut⁡(σ)J=\operatorname{Aut}(\sigma) is reductive, possibly disconnected. There is a formal affine coarse space SσS_\sigma with reduced space a point, and Zσ→SσZ_\sigma\to S_\sigma is relatively algebraic. After choosing a frame at a geometric point, the component is formal affine. For an affine infinitesimal stage Sn→SσS_n\to S_\sigma, its base change is affine; almost finite type stages and bounded Postnikov truncations may be used. These affine stages have coherent cohomology in each bounded range. The tangent complex at a local system τ\tau is

TτLocSys⁡G^restr(X‾)≃RΓ(X‾,gτ)[1].(9)T_\tau\operatorname{LocSys}^{\mathrm{restr}}_{\widehat{G}}(\overline{X})\simeq R\Gamma(\overline{X},\mathfrak{g}_\tau)[1]. \tag*{(9)}

In particular the stack is quasi-smooth.

The component and finiteness statements assemble [3], Theorems 1.4.5 and 1.6.3, Remarks 1.4.6–1.4.7, Corollary 3.7.4, and Theorem 5.4.2. The affine fiber assertion is Corollary 5.4.6 there; the assertion for general affine infinitesimal stages is made explicitly in [3], §7.9.10]. The deformation formula is [3], Proposition 2.2.2 and §§2.4, 25.4.3. Formal quasi-smoothness is established in [3], §§21.2.1–21.2.3; the deformation complex has the required amplitude because the curve has cohomological dimension two. Semisimplicity of σ\sigma makes its geometric monodromy reductive, and its centralizer JJ is reductive in characteristic zero.

For dd frames, write K=G^dK = \widehat{G}^{d}. Adding the remaining frames is an affine torsor, so the same finite-stage assertions hold. The unique closed KK-orbit is K/JK/J: closed orbits correspond to semisimple local systems, and the stabilizer of a framed representative is JJ. Every nonempty invariant closed subset of a finite stage meets this orbit. These statements supply the finite-stage setting for the reconstruction in the next section; they do not yet identify the component with a quadratic moment-map model.

Theorem 2.6 (Pure Weil lift). Fix an abstract field isomorphism ι:Q‾ℓ→∼C\iota: \overline{\mathbb{Q}}_{\ell} \xrightarrow{\sim} \mathbb{C}. If ZσZ_{\sigma} is Frobenius invariant, its semisimple point σ\sigma admits a Weil structure that is ι\iota-pure of weight zero. In particular, writing g^σ\widehat{\mathfrak{g}}_{\sigma} for its adjoint local system, every Frobenius eigenvalue on Hi(X‾,g^σ)H^{i}(\overline{X}, \widehat{\mathfrak{g}}_{\sigma}) has ι\iota-absolute value qi/2q^{i/2}, for 0≤i≤20 \leq i \leq2.

The pure-lift application to a Frobenius-fixed semisimple point is stated in [14], Appendix A.5.4–A.5.5, using [3], Corollary 3.7.4 and Proposition 25.4.6. The literal statement of that proposition treats irreducible Weil parameters; the cited appendix records the semisimple consequence used here. Purity of H1H^{1} is the smooth proper curve application of Weil II [10], Corollary 3.3.6 and §3.3.10, also stated explicitly in [14], Appendix A.5.5. For H0H^{0} it follows by viewing horizontal sections in a pure fiber, and for H2H^{2} by curve duality. No semisimplicity of the cohomological Frobenius operators is asserted or required.

Put j=Lie⁡(J)\mathfrak{j} = \operatorname{Lie}(J) and V=H1(X‾,g^σ)V = H^{1}(\overline{X}, \widehat{\mathfrak{g}}_{\sigma}). An invariant form on g^\widehat{\mathfrak{g}} and curve duality give

H0(X‾,g^σ)=j,H2(X‾,g^σ)≃j∗(−1),H^{0}(\overline{X}, \widehat{\mathfrak{g}}_{\sigma}) = \mathfrak{j}, \qquad H^{2}(\overline{X}, \widehat{\mathfrak{g}}_{\sigma}) \simeq\mathfrak{j}^{*}(-1),

and a JJ-invariant symplectic form V⊗V→Q‾ℓ(−1)V \otimes V \to\overline{\mathbb{Q}}_{\ell}(-1). Its moment map is the cup–bracket obstruction. After forgetting the Tate factor it is the usual quadratic map μ:V→j∗\mu: V \to\mathfrak{j}^{*}. We will use purity to linearize Frobenius on the full formal component, including this obstruction and the evaluation bundles.

A quadratic model with its Frobenius action

We now replace each Frobenius-fixed retained component by a derived quadratic moment-map model, retaining its evaluation bundles and the map defining nilpotent singular support. The main issue is to extend coordinates constructed at its closed semisimple orbit over the formal invariant base.

Fix an abstract field isomorphism Q‾ℓ≃C\overline{\mathbb{Q}}_{\ell} \simeq\mathbb{C}. All absolute values in this section refer to this isomorphism. An invertible linear operator has absolute weight ww if all its eigenvalues have modulus qw/2q^{w/2}. This terminology does not assert that the operator is semisimple. It is distinct from both cohomological degree and the weights of an sl2\mathfrak{sl}_{2}-triple.

The spectral stack remains the prime union ZZ from Section 2. Its components form a categorical coproduct. In the twisted bar construction, an arrow string closes only in a component preserved by Φ\Phi. Consequently

Tr⁡(Φ,IndCoh⁡(Z))≃⨁Zσ preserved by ΦTr⁡(Φ,IndCoh⁡(Zσ)).(10)\operatorname{Tr}(\Phi,\operatorname{IndCoh}(Z)) \simeq\bigoplus_{\substack{Z_{\sigma}\ \text{preserved by }\Phi}} \operatorname{Tr}(\Phi,\operatorname{IndCoh}(Z_{\sigma})). \tag*{(10)}

The sum is a direct sum, including when there are infinitely many components. There are no arrows between distinct components; this also proves their orthogonality for the Hom pairings used below.

Choose such a component and its unique closed semisimple parameter σ\sigma. Choose a pure Weil lift as in Theorem 2.6, and put

J=Aut⁡(σ),j=Lie⁡(J),V=H1(XF‾q,gσ).J = \operatorname{Aut}(\sigma), \qquad\mathfrak{j} = \operatorname{Lie}(J), \qquad V = H^1(X_{\overline{\mathbb{F}}_q}, \mathfrak{g}_\sigma).

The group JJ is reductive; it need not be connected. Curve duality and an invariant form identify H2(gσ)H^2(\mathfrak{g}_\sigma) with j∗(−1)\mathfrak{j}^*(-1) and give a JJ-invariant symplectic form ω\omega on VV, after forgetting its Tate factor. The moment map is

μ:V⟶j∗,⟨μ(x),z⟩=12ω(zx,x).(11)\mu: V \longrightarrow\mathfrak{j}^*, \qquad\langle\mu(x),z\rangle= \frac{1}{2}\omega(zx,x). \tag*{(11)}

Its zero fiber will always mean its derived zero fiber. In particular no regular-sequence assumption on the components of μ\mu is being made.

What is recovered from completion at the closed orbit

We first explain why constructing a model near σ\sigma suffices here. The invariant base must be retained in this argument. Choose a closed point vv of degree dd and frames at its dd geometric points. Write K=GdK = G^d. The framed component supplied by Theorem 2.5 is an ind-affine derived scheme over a formal invariant base with reduced scheme a point. Its unique closed KK-orbit is K/JK/J. It has affine almost-finite-type stages over nilpotent thickenings of that invariant point. At each such stage the classical coordinate ring is noetherian, its invariant ring is Artinian, and its cohomology sheaves in any bounded Postnikov range are coherent. Adding the other frames to a one-frame presentation is an affine operation. These are precisely the finite-stage properties we use.

Lemma 3.1 (Finite covariants and completion). Let KK be a reductive complex algebraic group, possibly disconnected, and let AA be a finitely generated KK-algebra. Suppose AKA^K is Artinian and Spec⁡A\operatorname{Spec} A has a unique closed KK-orbit OO, with ideal II. For an equivariant finite AA-module MM and a finite-dimensional KK-representation DD, the inverse system

Hom⁡K(D,M/InM)\operatorname{Hom}_K(D,M/I^nM)

is eventually constant with value Hom⁡K(D,M)\operatorname{Hom}_K(D,M). In particular the rational, locally KK-finite part of the II-adic completion recovers MM, and recovers AA together with its multiplication when M=AM=A.

Proof. Choose a finite-dimensional KK-stable generating space U⊂MU \subset M. The surjection A⊗U→MA \otimes U \to M induces a surjection on Hom⁡K(D,−)\operatorname{Hom}_K(D,-), by reductivity. Finite generation of the covariants of AA over AKA^K [9] therefore makes MD=Hom⁡K(D,M)M_D = \operatorname{Hom}_K(D,M) finite over AKA^K, hence finite-dimensional. This applies to disconnected KK: its identity component is reductive and its component group is finite. Let N=⋂n≥1InMN = \bigcap_{n\geq1} I^nM. It is a finite equivariant submodule because AA is noetherian. At every point of OO its localization vanishes by Krull intersection [29]. If NN were nonzero, its nonempty invariant closed support would contain a closed orbit, hence would meet OO. Therefore N=0N=0.

The descending subspaces Hom⁡K(D,InM)\operatorname{Hom}_K(D,I^nM) of MDM_D have zero intersection and thus are eventually zero. Reductivity in characteristic zero makes Hom⁡K(D,−)\operatorname{Hom}_K(D,-) exact, so

Hom⁡K(D,M/InM)=MD/Hom⁡K(D,InM).\operatorname{Hom}_K(D,M/I^nM)=M_D/\operatorname{Hom}_K(D,I^nM).

This proves the assertion. Every rational representation is the union of its finite-dimensional subrepresentations; applying the assertion to all DD therefore recovers MM. Applied also to finite tensor products of representation spaces, it recovers multiplication and every equivariant finite-presentation map. □\square

For example, let Gm\mathbb{G}_m act with weights 11, −1-1 on the coordinate functions x,yx,y, and put

AN=C[x,y]/((xy)N),ANGm=C[t]/(tN),t=xy,N≥1.A_N = \mathbb{C}[x,y]/((xy)^N), \qquad A_N^{\mathbb{G}_m} = \mathbb{C}[t]/(t^N), \qquad t=xy,\quad N \ge1.

The origin is the unique closed orbit. Each weight space of ANA_N is finite-dimensional, so the locally Gm\mathbb{G}_m-finite part of its (x,y)(x,y)-adic completion recovers ANA_N. The ordinary inverse limit also contains arbitrary formal series such as ∑m≥0xm\sum_{m\geq0}x^m, which are not locally finite. Thus rational recovery retains the nonzero points on both axes, not only the closed orbit. As NN varies, these stages give the formal neighborhood of xy=0xy=0, including the formal invariant parameter tt. The next lemma carries out this recovery for derived algebras and their maps.

Lemma 3.2 (Restoring the invariant base). For the framed component above, an equivariant isomorphism of its completion along K/JK/J with another such completed model extends uniquely over the formal invariant bases to an isomorphism of their invariant-fiber completions. The same assertion holds for equivariant maps and their full mapping spaces, and for finite equivariant presentation data. Here the extension is unique up to a contractible space of choices.

Proof. We give the derived argument, since recovering coordinate rings alone would not recover homotopies. The proof has three stages: finite covariants recover each affine stage and its mapping spaces; trivial covariants recover the invariant base; derived Koszul thickenings then give compatible extensions over that base. Write RK\mathcal{R}_K for the derived category of rational KK-representations. All limits in this paragraph are taken in RK\mathcal{R}_K, not in the category of vector spaces with an arbitrary, possibly nonrational, KK-action.

Recovery at a fixed invariant-base stage. Let AA be its connective coordinate algebra, viewed as a commutative algebra in RK\mathcal{R}_K. The precise hypotheses are that H0(A)H^0(A) is finitely generated, H0(A)KH^0(A)^K is Artinian, Spec⁡H0(A)\operatorname{Spec} H^0(A) has a unique closed orbit OO, and every mathitHi(A)mathit{H}^i(A) is finite over H0(A)H^0(A). Choose a finite-dimensional KK-stable generating space for the ideal of OO in H0(A)H^0(A), lift its generators to degree-zero cycles, and extend them to a finite-dimensional stable generating space for H0(A)H^0(A). Reductivity allows these lifts to be equivariant. This gives a map from a polynomial KK-algebra PP to AA, surjective on H0H^0. Let IPI_P be the ideal generated by the chosen orbit equations and put

An=A⊗PLP/IPn.A_n = A \mathbin{\otimes_P^{\mathbb{L}}} P/I_P^n.

These derived orbit jets compute completion along OO; the module-level comparison is [29]. The resulting formal neighborhood is independent of the generating presentation [3], Theorem A.1.3(c) and §A.1.5].

Here is the cohomological calculation at these jets. Every Hi(A)H^i(A) is a finite PP-module. Noetherian Artin–Rees makes the positive-Tor systems {Tor⁡jP(Hi(A),P/IPn)}n\{\operatorname{Tor}^{P}_j(H^i(A),P/I_P^n)\}_n, j>0j>0, pro-zero. Since PP has finite global dimension, the hyper-Tor calculation has finite width in every cohomological degree, even if AA is unbounded below. Consequently

{Hi(An)}n≃{Hi(A)/IPnHi(A)}n\{H^i(A_n)\}_n \simeq\{H^i(A)/I_P^nH^i(A)\}_n

as pro-modules. This is the coherent derived-completion calculation of [29], Tags 00MA, 0A06, and 0BKH, applied here over the ordinary noetherian polynomial ring PP. For every finite-dimensional KK-representation DD, Lemma 3.1 and exactness of covariants therefore give a natural pro-isomorphism

{HiRHom⁡K(D,An)}n≃HiRHom⁡K(D,A),(12)\{H^i\operatorname{RHom}_K(D,A_n)\}_n \simeq H^i\operatorname{RHom}_K(D,A), \tag*{(12)}

with a constant system on the right. In particular these systems have zero lim⁡1\lim^1.1 The functors RHom⁡K(D,−)\operatorname{RHom}_K(D,-) commute with limits and jointly detect equivalences in RK\mathcal{R}_K. Applying the Milnor exact sequence to (12) proves

A≃holim⁡nAnin CAlg⁡(RK).(13)A \simeq\mathop{\operatorname{holim}}\limits_n A_n \quad\text{in } \operatorname{CAlg}(\mathcal{R}_K). \tag*{(13)}

Indeed the forgetful functor from commutative algebras creates limits and detects equivalences. Thus this is a natural equivalence of algebras, not merely an identification of their cohomology. It gives, for every rational equivariant coordinate algebra BB, an equivalence of full mapping spaces

Map⁡CAlg(RK)(B,A)≃holim⁡nMap⁡CAlg(RK)(B,An),(14)\operatorname{Map}_{\mathrm{CAlg}(\mathcal{R}_K)}(B,A) \simeq\underset{n}{\operatorname{holim}}\operatorname{Map}_{\mathrm{CAlg}(\mathcal{R}_K)}(B,A_n), \tag*{(14)}

compatible with composition. No index nn uniform in ii or DD has been asserted or used. The rational limit is essential: as in the preceding example, the ordinary vector-space limit would retain arbitrary formal series. The same calculation applies to an AA-module with coherent cohomology. Finite equivariant module presentations and their maps are recovered by testing their generating representation spaces; their relations and coherent homotopies are recovered by the corresponding derived mapping spaces.

Recovery of the invariant base. The formal coarse base is constructed from the system of trivial covariants of the framed affine stages [3] §§5.3.5–5.3.6. We do not identify an arbitrarily chosen base stage with the spectrum of its pullback’s invariant algebra. The trivial case of (3.3) instead recovers this entire system. On classical invariant functions the topologies are cofinal: if m\mathfrak{m} is the invariant ideal of definition, then m⊂I\mathfrak{m} \subset I, and, after passage to a fixed nilpotent invariant-base stage, Lemma 3.1 makes the trivial covariants of high powers of II vanish. Applying this in every bounded range gives the corresponding comparison for the derived invariant systems. An equivariant map of orbit completions therefore gives the formal base map as well.

Factorization and extension. The noetherian formal-affine presentation of that base uses finitely many invariant generators t1,…,trt_1,\ldots,t_r of an ideal of definition. The noetherian and coherent presentation is supplied by [3], Theorem A.1.3(b),(c) and Remark A.1.4. Its infinitesimal stages may be taken to be the derived Koszul thickenings

RN=R//(t1N,…,trN):=R⊗C[u1,…,ur]C,uj⟼tjN.(15)R_N = R//(t_1^N,\ldots,t_r^N) := R \mathop{\otimes}_{\mathbb{C}[u_1,\ldots,u_r]} \mathbb{C}, \qquad u_j \longmapsto t_j^N. \tag*{(15)}

These are precisely the formal-affine stages used in [3], §7.1 and §§7.9.8–7.9.10. The relevant framed base changes are affine and almost of finite type.

Restrict a map of orbit completions to the completed orbit of one source stage AA. Compose it with the target’s map to its formal base and then with the structural map to Spec⁡R\operatorname{Spec} R. Equation (3.5), applied to the base algebra RR with trivial KK-action, recovers a map R→AR \to A and its homotopies. The images of the tjt_j vanish at the reduced invariant point, so they are nilpotent in the Artinian algebra H0(A)KH^0(A)^K. Choose a common power NN and invariant nullhomotopies of these tjNt_j^N. Such nullhomotopies exist because vanishing in H0H^0 means being a boundary; they may be chosen invariant by reductivity. The universal property of (3.6) now factors this base map through a derived Koszul stage. Pulling back the target framed component along that stage factors the completed-space map through an affine target stage. Nilpotence alone would not justify factorization through an ordinary quotient. If BNB_N is the coordinate algebra of the resulting affine target stage, the completed-stage map is a compatible point of the right-hand side of (3.5), with B=BNB = B_N. It therefore extends to a map on the source stage AA, with all its homotopies and composition data.

For clarity, the choices of powers and nullhomotopies do not add extra maps. The Koszul stages are cofinal tests for a formal neighborhood. One can check this directly on mapping spaces: above a fixed map with nilpotent tjt_j, the choices of nullhomotopy are torsors for the corresponding additive loop spaces, and increasing NN to MM acts on their differences by multiplication by tjM−Nt_j^{M-N}. Nilpotence kills every such homotopy group after passing far enough in this filtered system. Its nonempty space of choices is therefore contractible. This verifies cofinality for maps and homotopies, without interchanging a filtered colimit with a Postnikov limit. Equation (3.5) makes the extended maps on different source stages compatible. Applying it also to inverse maps and to their compositions completes the proof. ∡՗

Thus completion along the closed orbit is used to construct coordinates. It is not substituted for completion along the invariant null fiber. For example, nonclosed points of that null fiber are retained by Lemma 3.2.

Simultaneous linearization

Here is the elementary nonresonance calculation that removes the higher relations in the local deformation problem. The classical Frobenius-compatible quadratic hull in the smooth proper, pure weight-zero setting is established in [26]; its proof also uses Jordan decomposition on finite jets. We retain the derived presentation and equivariant data, then apply Lemma 3.2 to restore the formal invariant base.

Lemma 3.3 (Nonresonance with Jordan blocks). Let a minimal complete free graded-commutative algebra have generators V∗V^* in cohomological degree 0 and R∗R^* in degree −1-1. Suppose a continuous graded automorphism has linear parts of absolute weights −1-1 and −2-2 on these two generator spaces. It is conjugate, by a formal graded coordinate change tangent to the identity, to its linear part. If it commutes with a minimal differential, that differential, in the resulting coordinates, sends R∗R^* to quadratic polynomials in V∗V^*. These assertions hold equivariantly for a reductive group normalized by the automorphism.

Proof. Filter coordinate changes by total generator order. At order n≥2n \ge2 the error in a degree-zero generator belongs to Hom⁡(V∗,Sym⁡nV∗)\operatorname{Hom}(V^*,\operatorname{Sym}^n V^*). All eigenvalues of the conjugacy operator “linear target action times inverse linear source action” on this space have modulus q−(n−1)/2q^{-(n-1)/2}, hence differ from 1. An error in a degree-minus-one generator contains exactly one degree-minus-one factor and n−1n-1 degree-zero factors. The corresponding operator on

Hom⁡(R∗,R∗⊗Sym⁡n−1V∗)\operatorname{Hom}(R^*,R^* \otimes\operatorname{Sym}^{n-1} V^*)

has the same modulus q−(n−1)/2q^{-(n-1)/2}. In either case its difference from the identity is invertible. This assertion follows from its eigenvalues and holds on generalized eigenspaces; it requires no diagonalization. Solve the conjugacy equation at this order and continue. The corrections converge in the generator-adic topology.

In the equivariant case the errors and corrections lie in the equivariant subspaces of these finite-dimensional jet spaces. The conjugacy operator preserves these subspaces and its inverse does also, so the same construction is equivariant. Transport the differential along the coordinate changes. The differential of a degree-zero generator is zero by degree. That of a degree-minus-one generator has no constant or linear term by minimality. Since the differential commutes with the now linear automorphism, an order-nn term can occur only if its weight −n-n agrees with −2-2. Thus only n=2n=2 remains.

Theorem 3.4 (The framed quadratic model). The retained component ZσZ_\sigma, with its Frobenius action, evaluation bundles at the chosen cyclic tuple, and singular-support map, admits the model

Zσ≃[(μ−1(0))unst/J].(16)Z_\sigma\simeq\left[(\mu^{-1}(0))^{\mathrm{unst}}/J\right]. \tag*{(16)}

Here unst is the inverse image of the origin under V→V//JV \to V//J, and completion is along this invariant null fiber. In this model:

  1. the singularity scheme has points (x,z)(x,z) satisfying μ(x)=0\mu(x)=0 and zx=0zx=0, with z∈jz \in\mathfrak{j};

  1. the support condition defined by YY is the condition that the image of zz under j↪g^\mathfrak{j} \hookrightarrow\widehat{\mathfrak{g}} belongs to YY;

(iii) every evaluation representation of K=G^dK = \widehat{G}^{d} is the bundle associated to its restriction along J↪KJ \hookrightarrow K; Frobenius has constant cyclic transport on these bundles;

(iv) after removing the scalars q1/2q^{1/2} on deformation points and q−1q^{-1} on singular points, Frobenius is a linear automorphism of the moment-map data, normalizing JJ and the framed representation labels. Its eigenvalues on these normalized linear data have modulus one.

The meaning of Frobenius on Hom complexes in (iv) is fixed explicitly in Lemma 3.5 below.

Proof. We first work in the completion of the framed component along K/JK/J. The smooth affine orbit admits an equivariant formal retraction: lift the identity retraction through successive nilpotent neighborhoods, using smoothness, and average the lifting torsors using reductivity. The fiber is a formal slice with stabilizer JJ; the completed framed space is its induction from JJ to KK. Equivalently, this follows by splitting the orbit tangent directions and comparing tangent complexes at every lifting step.

The transverse tangent and obstruction spaces are respectively V=H1(g^σ)V = H^{1}(\widehat{\mathfrak{g}}_{\sigma}) and H2(g^σ)H^{2}(\widehat{\mathfrak{g}}_{\sigma}). Quasi-smoothness therefore gives a minimal presentation by complete free coordinates dual to these spaces in degrees 0 and −1-1. One obtains this presentation from a free resolution by removing the contractible linear pairs; the splittings can be chosen JJ-equivariantly.

We recall the second-order obstruction calculation to fix its coefficient and sign, working over EE before the chosen coefficient transport. Use the simplicial descent model for local systems underlying (9), computed by hypercover cochains with the ℓ\ell-adic limit retained. Its adjoint cochains compute RΓ(X‾,g^σ)R\Gamma(\overline{X},\widehat{\mathfrak{g}}_{\sigma}), and its cup bracket combines the cup product with the Lie bracket of the adjoint coefficients. For a formal parameter tt, write a perturbation of the descent data modulo t3t^{3} as gijexp⁡(txij+t2yij)g_{ij}\exp(tx_{ij}+t^{2}y_{ij}), with the cochains twisted by the original transition data gijg_{ij}. Expanding the cocycle equation by the Baker–Campbell–Hausdorff formula gives

dx=0,dy=−12[x,x].dx = 0,\qquad dy = -\frac{1}{2}[x,x].

Thus the quadratic obstruction is the class of 12[x,x]\frac{1}{2}[x,x] in H2(X‾,g^σ)H^{2}(\overline{X},\widehat{\mathfrak{g}}_{\sigma}). This calculation uses a cochain model computing the deformation problem, rather than an assumed finite trivializing cover. Invariance of the coefficient pairing and graded commutativity give, with the duality and sign convention of (11),

⟨12[x,x],z⟩=12ω(zx,x)=⟨μ(x),z⟩.\left\langle\frac{1}{2}[x,x],z\right\rangle= \frac{1}{2}\omega(zx,x)=\langle\mu(x),z\rangle.

This identifies the quadratic obstruction with μ(x)\mu(x).

We next arrange that both the retraction and these coordinates respect the chosen Frobenius transporter. Purity gives absolute point weights 0, 1, 2 on the orbit tangent, transverse tangent, and obstruction spaces. A positive-transverse-order error in the retraction has positive source weight and orbit target weight zero. Its Frobenius conjugacy operator therefore has no eigenvalue 1. At every finite jet order it can be removed uniquely by solving the same linear equation used in Lemma 3.3. The errors are equivariant sections of the tangent bundle of the smooth orbit; they are determined by their JJ-equivariant values at its base point. The stabilizer transport and the cyclic permutation of frames have weight zero. This constructs a Frobenius-compatible retraction and an invariant slice.

Represent its single cyclic automorphism on the minimal free presentation. Such a representative can be chosen equivariantly by free lifting and reductivity. Its invertible linear part makes it an automorphism of the complete graded algebra. There is no additional relation to impose on the generator of an infinite cyclic action. On formal coordinate functions use inverse transport; its generator weights are −1,−2-1,-2. Lemma 3.3 makes this automorphism linear and forces the transported differential to be quadratic. A coordinate change tangent to the identity preserves that quadratic part, so the differential is precisely μ\mu. This proves the moment-map presentation on the orbit completion. Lemma 3.2 extends it over the invariant base, giving (3.7).

For its singularities one computes directly that

⟨dμx(v),z⟩=ω(zx,v).\langle\mathrm{d}\mu_x(v),z\rangle=\omega(zx,v).

Nondegeneracy of ω\omega identifies ker⁡(dμx∗)\ker(\mathrm{d}\mu_x^*) with {z:zx=0}\{z:zx=0\}, proving (i). The singular evaluation map is fiberwise linear in zz. At x=0x=0 curve duality identifies it with the centralizer inclusion j↪g^j\hookrightarrow\widehat{\mathfrak{g}}, with its duality Tate factor. The target singular points have absolute weight −2-2. A correction of positive degree nn in xx, linear in zz, would have weight n−2n-2, and cannot intertwine this Frobenius action. Comparison on each finite jet, again valid for Jordan blocks, excludes every such term. This proves (ii). Changing the invariant form only rescales the simple factors of g^\widehat{\mathfrak{g}}, which preserves every nilpotent orbit.

Finally, a KK-frame is exactly the datum trivializing all the evaluation bundles in question. Write S\mathcal{S} for the formal slice. The equivariant retraction identifies the framed completion with K×JSK\times^J\mathcal{S}, with its map to K/JK/J given by [k,s]↦kJ[k,s]\mapsto kJ. For a representation DD of KK, quotienting the trivial framed bundle by KK therefore gives the bundle on [S/J][\mathcal{S}/J] associated to D∣JD|_J. The retraction is Frobenius-compatible, so the transport on its K/JK/J coordinate is the closed-orbit transport, independent of ss. The same is therefore true of the cyclic transport on every evaluation bundle. Purity on the chosen Weil parameter gives modulus-one eigenvalues on every normalized frame representation. A cyclic action can be tested on its ddth power. Together with purity on H1H^1 and H2H^2, this proves (iii) and (iv).

Which action contracts Hom complexes

The next convention is essential: the category still has the endomorphism Φ\Phi specified in the problem.

Lemma 3.5 (Inverse transport on arrows). Choose structures αM:ΦM⟶∼M\alpha_M:\Phi M\overset{\sim}{\longrightarrow}M on compact objects. On an arrow h:M→Nh:M\to N put

T(h)=αNΦ(h)αM−1,(17)T(h)=\alpha_N\Phi(h)\alpha_M^{-1}, \tag*{(17)}
S(h)=Φ−1(αN−1hαM)=T−1(h).(18)S(h)=\Phi^{-1}(\alpha_N^{-1}h\alpha_M)=T^{-1}(h). \tag*{(18)}

The action in the bilinear Hom pairing is SS. On the quadratic model it gives absolute weight −1-1 to deformation functions and absolute weight +2+2 to degree-two obstruction operators. Thus its associated point weights on (x,z)(x,z) are (1,−2)(1,-2), and W(x,z)=⟨z,μ(x)⟩W(x,z)=\langle z,\mu(x)\rangle has weight zero.

The graph identification in (5.4) turns the original Φ\Phi-graph bimodule into the graph of the transported arrow action. In those coordinates the induced simultaneous bar actions TT and SS are inverse. If the paracyclic homotopy is bH+Hb=1−TbH+Hb=1-T, then

b(−T−1H)+(−T−1H)b=1−S.(19)b(-T^{-1}H)+(-T^{-1}H)b=1-S. \tag*{(19)}

In particular using contracting SS-weights does not replace Tr⁡(Φ,−)\operatorname{Tr}(\Phi,-) by Tr⁡(Φ−1,−)\operatorname{Tr}(\Phi^{-1},-).

Proof. The Frobenius compatibility in Section 2 identifies Φ\Phi with f′f', where ff is pullback of parameters by geometric Frobenius of the curve. Since ff is an automorphism, this is its usual pullback functor. A covariant trace structure is b:N→ΦNb:N\to\Phi N, whereas a structure on the opposite input is a:ΦM→Ma:\Phi M\to M. Their pairing takes an arrow to

h⟼Φ−1(bha).h\longmapsto\Phi^{-1}(bha).

With b=αN−1b=\alpha_N^{-1} and a=αMa=\alpha_M this is (18). It is the inverse of (17), directly by composition.

For the signs, consider a coordinate and a relation generator with f#x=a1xf^\#x=a_1x and f#ϵ=a2ϵf^\#\epsilon=a_2\epsilon, where ∣x∣=0|x|=0, ∣ϵ∣=−1|\epsilon|=-1. Inverse transport on the endomorphisms of the free module sends multiplication by xx to multiplication by a1−1xa_1^{-1}x. In a Koszul resolution the degree-two operator dual to ϵ\epsilon transforms by a2a_2 under the same transport. Thus purity, ∣a1∣=q1/2|a_1|=q^{1/2} and ∣a2∣=q|a_2|=q, gives the stated signs. The calculation is linear-algebraic and applies to generalized eigenspaces. The polynomial operator dual to ϵ\epsilon is a linear function on the singular variable zz; point weights are the contragredient weights, giving −2-2 on zz.

There is a distinction between ordinary arrows and raw graph coefficients. In the left-graph convention for classes M→ΦMM\to\Phi M, a raw coefficient is m∈Hom⁡(M,ΦN)m\in\operatorname{Hom}(M,\Phi N). It is identified with an ordinary arrow by m↦αNmm\mapsto\alpha_Nm. The simultaneous operator on this raw coefficient is

m⟼Φ(αN)Φ(m)αM−1.m\longmapsto\Phi(\alpha_N)\Phi(m)\alpha_M^{-1}.

not the ordinary-arrow formula (17). Under the stated graph identification it becomes the transported ordinary-arrow action. The full multiobject identification, including permuted labels and the last twisted bar face, is proved in Lemma 5.2; see (32)–(5.5). Thus the paracyclic homotopy is transported through an actual isomorphism of graph bimodules. In these coordinates TT commutes with bb, and multiplying bH+Hb=1−TbH+Hb=1-T by −T−1-T^{-1} proves (19). For permuted labels a common positive power is used only to read their weights. The graph throughout is canonically identified with the original Φ\Phi-graph; neither a power of Φ\Phi nor Φ−1\Phi^{-1} is substituted for it.

Compact normalization, including the frame labels

For the measure calculation, modulus-one eigenvalues before twisting are not enough: they must remain of modulus one after every compact stabilizer twist. We establish a simultaneous normalization of the deformation and frame data. Choose a faithful representation RR of G^\widehat{G} and include in the linear data the direct sum of its fibers at all dd framed points. The ddth power of the cyclic transporter acts on these summands by the pure weight-zero closed-point Weil transports. Hence the cyclic transporter itself has modulus-one eigenvalues. Together with VV and jj, these data give a faithful finite-dimensional realization of the normalized algebraic data group, a subgroup of a product of linear groups and K⋊⟨cyclic permutation⟩K\rtimes\langle\text{cyclic permutation}\rangle.

Lemma 3.6 (Simultaneous compact normalization). Let J.eJ.e be a nilpotent orbit preserved by the normalized transporter in Theorem 3.4. After changing that transporter by an element of JJ, choose a triple (e,h,f)(e,h,f) in this orbit and write the normalized transporter as

u=tv0.u=tv_0.

There are simultaneous compact forms of the group and frame data such that:

  1. tt belongs to a compact group, preserves the compact form JcptJ_{\mathrm{cpt}}, and centralizes the triple;

  1. v0v_0 is unipotent, centralizes JJ, and commutes with tt;

  1. for Le=ZG^(SL2,e)L_e=Z_{\widehat{G}}(\mathrm{SL}_{2,e}), Le,cpt=Le∩JcptL_{e,\mathrm{cpt}}=L_e\cap J_{\mathrm{cpt}} is a maximal compact including its components, and every ktv0k tv_0, k∈Le,cptk\in L_{e,\mathrm{cpt}}, has modulus-one eigenvalues on all the normalized linear data.

These assertions also hold on their tensor, symmetric, exterior, subquotient, and triple-weight constructions. After the orbit-fixing translation by λe(q)\lambda_e(\sqrt{q}), the semisimple value of the frame transport around the dd-cycle belongs to

{ [λe(qd/2)s]:s∈ZG^(SL2,e)cpt }=BG^,e.(20)\{\,[\lambda_e(q^{d/2})s]:s\in Z_{\widehat{G}}(\mathrm{SL}_{2,e})_{\mathrm{cpt}}\,\} =B_{\widehat{G},e}. \tag*{(20)}

This holds for every k∈Le,cptk \in L_{e,\mathrm{cpt}}.

Proof. Write u1=s1v1u_1 = s_1v_1 for the Jordan decomposition of the original normalized transporter in its algebraic normalizer. Both factors preserve the data and normalize JJ. The semisimple part has compact closure of its powers in the faithful realization just chosen.

We first remove the inner action of the unipotent part; this step requires some care when JJ is disconnected. For a complex reductive group,

Aut⁡(J)∘=im⁡(J∘⟶Aut⁡(J)).(21)\operatorname{Aut}(J)^\circ= \operatorname{im}\left(J^\circ\longrightarrow\operatorname{Aut}(J)\right). \tag*{(21)}

Indeed an infinitesimal automorphism is inner on the semisimple part of J∘J^\circ and trivial on its central torus, whose character lattice has discrete automorphism group. After subtracting this inner action, its values on the other components give a cocycle of the finite group π0(J)\pi_0(J) with values in Lie⁡Z(J∘)\operatorname{Lie} Z(J^\circ). Averaging makes that cocycle a coboundary, which is an inner infinitesimal action by the central torus. This proves surjectivity of the differential of the inner-automorphism map and hence (3.12). The kernel of J∘→Aut⁡(J)J^\circ\to\operatorname{Aut}(J) is Z(J)∩J∘Z(J) \cap J^\circ, a diagonalizable central group. Therefore the automorphism induced by v1v_1 has a unique unipotent lift a∈J∘a \in J^\circ: take the unipotent part of any lift; uniqueness follows because two such lifts differ by a central semisimple element. Since s1s_1 commutes with v1v_1, uniqueness gives s1as1−1=as_1as_1^{-1} = a. The element v0=a−1v1v_0 = a^{-1}v_1 is unipotent, centralizes JJ, and commutes with s1s_1: here v1av1−1=av_1av_1^{-1} = a because the action of v1v_1 on JJ is conjugation by aa, so the two unipotent factors defining v0v_0 commute. Changing the transporter by a−1∈Ja^{-1} \in J thus leaves s1v0s_1v_0. Since v1v_1 acts on j\mathfrak{j} by an inner automorphism, it preserves every JJ-orbit; the assumed stable orbit is therefore also preserved by s1s_1.

Let A1A_1 be the Zariski closure of the group generated by s1s_1. It is diagonalizable, normalizes JJ, and M=JA1M = JA_1 is reductive: its unipotent radical maps trivially to M/JM/J and would be a connected normal unipotent subgroup of J∘J^\circ. The maximal-compact theorem for complex reductive groups, including disconnected groups [2], gives a maximal compact McptM_{\mathrm{cpt}} containing the compact closure of ⟨s1⟩\langle s_1\rangle. Its intersection with JJ is a maximal compact JcptJ_{\mathrm{cpt}}: conjugate a maximal compact of JJ into McptM_{\mathrm{cpt}} and use normality of JJ and maximality inside the compact intersection. The element s1s_1 preserves this intersection. Averaging one Hermitian form makes this whole compact group unitary on the faithful simultaneous realization.

Choose the triple in J.eJ.e so that its SU⁡(2)\operatorname{SU}(2) lies in JcptJ_{\mathrm{cpt}}. The two homomorphisms SL⁡2→J\operatorname{SL}_2 \to J given by this triple and its s1s_1-translate are JJ-conjugate, because their nilpotents lie in the same orbit. Their restrictions to SU⁡(2)\operatorname{SU}(2) land in JcptJ_{\mathrm{cpt}}, so they are already conjugate by an element k0∈Jcptk_0 \in J_{\mathrm{cpt}}. For completeness, if a complex conjugator is b=kpb = kp in the polar decomposition relative to JcptJ_{\mathrm{cpt}} [2], unitarity of the two homomorphisms implies that b∗bb^*b commutes with the first one. Its positive square root pp therefore commutes with it, and kk is the required compact conjugator. This works in every component. Set t=k0s1t = k_0s_1, choosing the conjugator’s direction so that tt centralizes the triple. Since v0v_0 centralizes JJ, it commutes with k0k_0, with tt, and with every compact twist from LeL_e. The product ktkt belongs to McptM_{\mathrm{cpt}} and is unitary for the same Hermitian form. Multiplication by the commuting unipotent v0v_0 changes neither its eigenvalues nor its semisimple character. The centralizer of SU⁡(2)\operatorname{SU}(2) is stable under the compact conjugation, so its compact intersection is a compact real form of the full complex triple centralizer [2], including every component. This proves (i)–(iii). The same proof applies to all the indicated functorial linear constructions.

It remains to check the cyclic frame value, rather than merely the action on VV. Embed the compact frame image of McptM_{\mathrm{cpt}} in a maximal compact of K×⟨cyclic permutation⟩K \times\langle\text{cyclic permutation}\rangle. Its intersection with KK is a product of compact forms of the dd factors. For k∈Le,cptk \in L_{e,\mathrm{cpt}}, the iith factor of (kt)d(kt)^d is the product transport around the cycle starting at the iith frame. It is compact and centralizes the triple in that factor. Since v0v_0 commutes with ktkt, the corresponding factor of (ktv0)d(ktv_0)^d has that compact element as its semisimple part. The translation by λe(q)\lambda_e(\sqrt{q}) commutes with both ktkt and v0v_0, and v0v_0 commutes with ktkt. Thus, writing w=ktw=kt,

(λe(q)wv0)d=λe(qd/2)wdv0d.\left(\lambda_e(\sqrt{q})wv_0\right)^d=\lambda_e(q^{d/2})w^dv_0^d.

No commutation between kk and tt is needed. This proves (3.11). Compact forms of the triple centralizer are conjugate inside that centralizer, so the set of ambient conjugacy values is independent of the compact form chosen in this proof.

Translation of a transporter by JJ does not change an equivariant calculation: it changes the chosen identification of the same Frobenius functor. After the additional translation by λe(q)\lambda_e(\sqrt{q}) the point ee is fixed, since singular points originally scale by q−1q^{-1} and ee has triple weight 2. The resulting weights and the distinction between the original and lifted gradings are recorded in Section 4.

The category on a nilpotent orbit

Fix an isomorphism Q‾ℓ≃C\overline{\mathbb{Q}}_\ell\simeq\mathbb{C} and a Frobenius-fixed retained component. Use the quadratic model of Theorem 3.4, with J=Aut⁡(σ)J=\operatorname{Aut}(\sigma), j=Lie⁡(J)\mathfrak{j}=\operatorname{Lie}(J) and V=H1(X,gσ)V=H^1(X,\mathfrak{g}_\sigma). All representations in this section are algebraic; rational representations of an algebraic group may be unions of finite-dimensional representations. The group JJ is reductive but need not be connected. We first omit the completion along the invariant null fiber. Section 5 restores that condition, on both traces and their actual compact representatives.

On each nilpotent orbit we construct compact generators, extend them with Weil structures to its closure, and compute their morphisms. With pure coefficient normalizations, the generators and their weight-zero morphism cohomology form a semisimple category, and the remaining weights for the inverse action SS are strictly negative. Section 5 uses these facts to contract the nonconstant part of each orbit trace.

The curved model and supported localization

Put R=C[V]R=\mathbb{C}[V]. The derived zero fiber of the moment map is represented by the Koszul differential graded algebra

A=(R⊗Λ(j[1]),dμ),∣ηa∣=−1,dμηa=μa.(22)A=(R\otimes\Lambda(\mathfrak{j}[1]),d_\mu),\qquad|\eta_a|=-1,\qquad d_\mu\eta_a=\mu_a. \tag*{(22)}

Here a basis of j\mathfrak{j} indexes the components μa\mu_a of μ:V→j∗\mu:V\to\mathfrak{j}^*. In particular, no regularity of this section is asserted or needed. Its graded Koszul dual is the curved algebra

B=C[V×j],∣x∗∣=0,∣z∗∣=2,W(x,z)=⟨z,μ(x)⟩.(23)B=\mathbb{C}[V\times\mathfrak{j}],\qquad|x^*|=0,\qquad|z^*|=2,\qquad W(x,z)=\langle z,\mu(x)\rangle. \tag*{(23)}

A curved module has a differential δ\delta of degree one satisfying δ2=W\delta^2=W. A simultaneous reversal of the curvature sign gives the same calculations after the corresponding convention change.

Lemma 4.1 (Koszul model and support). The compact ind-coherent category on the uncompleted derived quotient [μ−1(0)/J][\mu^{-1}(0)/J] is the category of finite coherent graded JJ-equivariant factorizations of (4.2). Coherent singular support in a closed cone Ω⊂j\Omega\subset\mathfrak{j} corresponds to local vanishing of the factorization off V×Ω.ThecompletioninTheorem3.4additionallyimposesordinarysupportontheinverseimageof$0∈Spec⁡RJV\times\Omega. The completion in Theorem 3.4 additionally imposes ordinary support on the inverse image of \$0\in\operatorname{Spec}R^J.

Proof. The uncompleted derived quotient is a QCA stack: it is quasi-compact, with affine stabilizers, and its classical inertia is of finite presentation, as for every finite-type quotient here. Its compact ind-coherent objects are therefore its coherent objects by [11], Theorem 3.3.5. We recall the Koszul construction to specify the derived and grading conventions. A coherent AA-module is perfect as an RR-complex because RR is regular. Choose a bounded finite projective RR-resolution and transfer the actions of the degree-minus-one generators to it, allowing higher homotopies. The Koszul twisting cochain, on the symmetric divided-power coalgebra of the dual generators, turns those homotopies into a differential on its extension to BB. Its square is ∑azaμa\sum_a z_a\mu_a. The linear coefficients encode nullhomotopies of μa\mu_a, and the higher coefficients encode all compatibility homotopies for the exterior-generator actions. Conversely, the coefficients of such a curved differential, specialized at z=0z=0, recover that homotopy-coherent AA-action.

The usual free Koszul resolution proves that these constructions are inverse on derived modules and morphisms: after filtering by exterior length, it is the ordinary exterior/symmetric Koszul equivalence, and the equation differential contributes precisely the curvature term. There is no completed polynomial ring here. Between bounded finite projective models only finitely many zz-monomials can occur in any fixed total degree. Derived morphisms on the curved side are sections of differential Hom; its two curvature terms cancel.

One may equivalently define coherent curved modules modulo totalizations of finite exact sequences. On the smooth ambient space, finite locally free replacements compute this category. They are obtained by curved free covers, with the partner part of the differential correcting the square to WW; the underlying coherent resolutions terminate by regularity. Reductivity permits equivariant choices for J∘J^\circ, followed by equivariance for the finite component group. This is also the equivariant derived-zero-locus Koszul equivalence of [30], Theorem 2.3.3, with its differential graded formulation in [25], Theorem 2.1.

The variables zaz_a are the degree-two complete-intersection operators on the AA-side. Their localization is the localization defining coherent singular support. Under the equivalence, the category with that singular support is exactly the kernel of restriction to the complementary open, with the corresponding quotient description; this is [30], Proposition 2.3.9. Support here is support of the object in the curved category: a locally free underlying module can represent an object vanishing on an open set.

The remaining completion imposes a different, ordinary support condition. For a DG scheme almost of finite type, [[13], Proposition 7.4.5] identifies ind-coherent sheaves on its formal prestack completion with the kernel of restriction to the complementary open; its compact objects are the coherent objects with that ordinary support by [[12], Proposition 4.1.7(b)]. Smooth descent, [[12], Corollary 10.4.5], identifies the presentable supported categories on the quotient by JJ. Compactness on the quotient also uses the QCA theorem just invoked and the continuous support right adjoint of [[12], Corollary 4.1.5]. If ii denotes the supported inclusion and Γ\Gamma its continuous right adjoint, then Hom⁡(iM,−)=Hom⁡(M,Γ(−))\operatorname{Hom}(iM,-)=\operatorname{Hom}(M,\Gamma(-)) shows that ii preserves compactness. Conversely, since ii preserves colimits, an ambient compact whose restriction to the complementary open vanishes is compact in the supported category. Its compact objects are therefore precisely the supported coherent objects. This identifies compacts after presentable descent, without commuting compact objects with a descent limit. Applied to the invariant null fiber in our derived affine model, it proves the last condition in the lemma. The completion is the formal prestack, not the spectrum of a completed coordinate ring. This ordinary support condition leaves the singular-direction operators unchanged and can be intersected with the prescribed zz-support. □

Write BΩ\mathcal{B}_{\Omega} for the resulting compact category with zz-support in Ω\Omega, and BΩ,0\mathcal{B}_{\Omega,0} when the invariant null-fiber condition is also imposed. We use the same notation with Ind⁡\operatorname{Ind} when a presentable category is required for a trace. All compact quotients below are idempotent completed.

Lemma 4.2 (Supported localization). Let Ω′⊂Ω\Omega' \subset\Omega be closed invariant cones. Restriction to the complementary open gives the compactly generated localization with compact quotient BΩ/BΩ′\mathcal{B}_{\Omega}/\mathcal{B}_{\Omega'}. If OO is an orbit closed in that open, its supported compact category is generated by coherent curved pushforwards from V×OV \times O. Morphisms are computed in the open before taking derived equivariant sections. The statements also hold with invariant null-fiber support.

Proof. Choose finite homogeneous equivariant generators of the relevant ideal sheaves on a finite affine cover. Koszul complexes on their powers, and their duals, give the ordinary local-cohomology projector and complementary localization. Tensoring a curved module by these ordinary complexes is defined because their differentials have square zero. A compact object’s identity factors through a finite stage of the projector if the object is supported on its center. Thus it is a summand of a finite supported stage.

Let i:Z0↪Ui: Z_0 \hookrightarrow U be the smooth closed locus in the smooth ambient open, with ideal sheaf II, and let KnK_n be the finite ordinary perfect projector stage just chosen. Its locally free terms need not be supported on Z0Z_0. Its bounded ordinary cohomology sheaves are coherent, supported on Z0Z_0, and annihilated by powers of II. Since UU is smooth, those coherent sheaves are perfect. Ordinary truncation triangles therefore express KnK_n in their thick span. Each such sheaf has a finite II-adic filtration whose successive quotients have the form i∗Fi_*F, for coherent sheaves FF on Z0Z_0. The truncations, ideal filtrations, and their maps retain equivariance and grading.

Ordinary perfect complexes act exactly by tensor product on coherent curved modules. The extra ordinary differential has square zero, so this action takes the preceding finite triangles to curved triangles without changing the potential. For a locally free curved representative MM, the projection formula gives

(i∗F)⊗M≃i∗(F⊗Li∗M).(i_*F) \otimes M \simeq i_*(F \otimes L i^*M).

The right side is a coherent curved pushforward with the restricted potential. Consequently Kn⊗MK_n \otimes M lies in the thick span of such pushforwards. The factorization of the identity through this stage makes MM a summand, proving generation. The ordinary truncations have been applied only to KnK_n, before its exact action on the curved factor.

The same local-cohomology construction computes restriction and the quotient on morphisms; the support/quotient compatibility is also the one in [30], Proposition 2.3.9. On the ambient open, finite covers and finite Čech descent compute the ordinary perfect-complex statements. On a homogeneous orbit, equivariant descent takes the finite Lie-cochain complex for its unipotent stabilizer, followed by exact invariants for the reductive quotient. These bounded operations commute with the finite triangles and direct-sum folding of the grading. The argument also applies on homogeneous vector bundles. Ordinary support in the invariant base is preserved at every step.

Gradings and Clifford generators

The intersection of j\mathfrak{j} with N^\widehat{\mathcal{N}} is its nilpotent cone; for a reductive subgroup, the semisimple and nilpotent parts of an element agree with those in the ambient faithful representation. There are finitely many nilpotent JJ-orbits. Fix one, O=J.e\mathcal{O}=J.e, and choose an sl2\mathfrak{sl}_2-triple (e,h,f)(e,h,f) in j\mathfrak{j}. Set

λ=λe,Ce=Je=Le⋉Ue,Le=ZJ(SL⁡2,e),Ne=j/[j,e].(24)\lambda=\lambda_e,\qquad C_e=J^e=L_e\ltimes U_e,\qquad L_e=Z_J(\operatorname{SL}_{2,e}),\qquad N_e=\mathfrak{j}/[\mathfrak{j},e]. \tag*{(24)}

The zero orbit is included, with trivial triple and Ue=1U_e=1. Subscripts ii denote hh-weights, independently of cohomological degree or Frobenius weight. The Lie algebra of UeU_e has strictly positive hh-weights. The quotient NeN_e consists of lowest-weight vectors and has hh-weights at most zero.

Suppose first that the orbit is Frobenius-stable. By Lemma 3.6, the weight-zero normalized transporter can be chosen to fix the triple, preserve a compatible compact form, and remain of absolute weight zero after compact LeL_e-twists. Multiplication by λ(q)\lambda(\sqrt{q}) corrects the scalar motion of ee and gives an action fixing ee. Write SeS_e for this translated inverse action on the Hom calculation. For an orbit or a finite list of labels stable only under a power, the same convention is made for that power. Absolute weights are measured in units q1/2q^{1/2} (or qm/2q^{m/2} for the mmth power).

There is a separate translation of the grading. The original grading acts on zz-points by t−2t^{-2}; lifting it by λ(t)\lambda(t) makes ee fixed. We call the resulting degree on a fiber at ee the lifted degree. The data needed below are

factorlifted degree before an Ext shiftabsolute SeS_e-weight
(Vi)∗(V_i)^*, as an xx-function−i-i−1−i-1-i
(Ne)i(N_e)_i, as a normal tangenti−2i-2−2+i-2+i
Lie⁡(Ue)∗\operatorname{Lie}(U_e)^*−i-i−i-i

Table 4.4.

Translating by a group element changes none of the final equivariant invariants. In particular these are the actual weights there, rather than weights for a newly chosen categorical Frobenius.

The original super sign must be retained during this change of grading. It differs from the lifted-degree sign by the action of λ(−1)\lambda(-1). Consequently the lifted total-degree sign computes true alternating traces after taking invariants. In particular, a polynomial coordinate of odd lifted degree remains a commuting coordinate; it is not replaced by an exterior generator.

Put Qe(x)=W(x,e)Q_e(x)=W(x,e). With the symplectic pairing on VV, this is, up to the fixed moment-map sign, 12⟨ex,x⟩\frac{1}{2}\langle e x,x\rangle. Its restriction to V−1V_{-1} is nondegenerate: e:V−1→V1e:V_{-1}\to V_1 is an isomorphism and the symplectic pairing identifies V1V_1 with V−1∗V_{-1}^*. Let

De=Cl⁡(V−1,Qe)D_e=\operatorname{Cl}(V_{-1},Q_e)

be the ordinary Clifford algebra, with c(v)2=Qe(v)c(v)^2=Q_e(v), and let EeE_e be the category of finite-dimensional DeD_e-modules with compatible algebraic LeL_e-action.

The related spectral Whittaker construction uses Clifford modules for a quadratic cohomology complex [27]; its orbit trace comparison is Theorem J in Section 4.6.2 there. Here we keep explicit generators and their Hom weights, as well as compact Weil extensions, for the later bilinear tests.

For P∈EeP\in E_e, give its coefficient space lifted degree zero. Its original coefficient parity is the involution

γP=ρP(λ(−1)),γPc(v)γP−1=−c(v)(v∈V−1).\gamma_P=\rho_P(\lambda(-1)),\qquad\gamma_P c(v)\gamma_P^{-1}=-c(v)\quad(v\in V_{-1}).

Define MPM_P over ee as the curved pushforward from V≥−1⊂VV_{\geq-1}\subset V of

(OV≥−1⊗P;δ=c(x−1)).(25)\left(\mathcal{O}_{V_{\geq-1}}\otimes P;\quad\delta=c(x_{-1})\right). \tag*{(25)}

The unipotent radical acts on PP through its trivial quotient, and acts trivially on the projection of V≥−1V_{\geq-1} to V−1V_{-1}. Only quadratic terms with both inputs of weight minus one contribute to QeQ_e on this subspace. Thus (4.6) has square QeQ_e, is CeC_e-equivariant, and has lifted differential degree one. The lifted grading and CeC_e-equivariance descend to the required original graded object over J.e\mathcal{J}.e. Denote its curved pushforward into a surrounding open by the same symbol MPM_P.

Proposition 4.3 (Orbit generation). The objects MPM_P, for simple P∈EeP\in E_e, generate the compact category supported on J.e\mathcal{J}.e in an open where it is closed. Here “generate” allows finite cones, shifts and summands. The category EeE_e is semisimple.

Proof. For a locally free factorization, differentiation of δ2=Qe\delta^2=Q_e gives

δ(∂vδ)+(∂vδ)δ=∂vQe.\delta(\partial_v\delta)+(\partial_v\delta)\delta=\partial_vQ_e.

Thus the derivatives of QeQ_e annihilate the identity up to homotopy. Their common zero locus is ker⁡(e:V→V)\ker(e:V\to V), which consists of highest-weight vectors and lies in V≥0V_{\geq0}. Lemma 4.2 therefore reduces generation to curved pushforwards from V≥0V_{\geq0}, where the potential is zero.

On this affine space, finite graded free modules with finite stabilizer-representation labels and their degree shifts generate the zero-potential category. To justify this with the nonreductive stabilizer, note first that all finite rational CeC_e-modules have a finite filtration with UeU_e-trivial subquotients: take unipotent invariants and iterate, retaining LeL_e-stability. Rational UeU_e-cohomology has cohomological dimension dim⁡Ue\dim U_e and is computed by its finite Lie-cochain complex. The usual equivariant free tests therefore detect underlying graded cohomology: tensor by all finite representation labels, pass to their union in the regular representation, and then take invariants. These operations preserve colimits. The tests are compact and hence generate.

There is no additional curved object at zero potential invisible to this test. After a finite projective replacement, an acyclic folded differential module over the regular polynomial ring is absolutely acyclic: resolve its cycles and boundaries by finite projective resolutions and fold the resulting bounded exact complexes. Equivariant descent adds only the bounded Lie-cochain complex above. Equivalently, the lifted coordinate degrees on V≥0V_{\geq0} are nonpositive; filtering finite free representatives by generator degree reduces to finite complexes over the degree-zero polynomial ring.

Stabilizing the zero section of the nondegenerate quadratic space V−1V_{-1} replaces a generator on V≥0V_{\geq0} by (4.6) with the regular Clifford module. In coordinates this is the Koszul differential for x−1=0x_{-1}=0, together with its Clifford partner; their square is Qe(x−1)Q_e(x_{-1}). The normal coordinates have lifted degree one, so the Koszul shifts put the coefficient module in lifted degree zero. Tensoring by LeL_e-representations and allowing shifts gives all the preceding generators.

Finally DeD_e is a finite-dimensional semisimple complex algebra, including when dim⁡V−1\dim V_{-1} is odd. A DeD_e-linear splitting of any short exact sequence in EeE_e can be averaged over a compact form of the reductive group LeL_e. Conjugation preserves DeD_e-linearity, so the averaged splitting is also LeL_e-equivariant. This proves semisimplicity, including the finite component group, and reduces the generating list to its simple objects.

Actual extensions with Weil structures

Proposition 4.4 (Compact orbit-closure lifts). Every MPM_P is the restriction of a compact object with zz-support in J‾e\overline{J}_e. If PP has a compatible locally finite cyclic structure, the extension can be given that structure. For a simple label fixed by Frobenius, a structure may be chosen whose triple-translated coefficient eigenvalues have modulus one. The same assertions hold for a power of Frobenius, for a finite cyclic list of labels, and after tensoring PP by any finite-dimensional LeL_e-representation with compatible cyclic structure, placed in lifted degree zero. Inverse structures are available for opposite category classes.

Proof. Let Pe=J≥0P_e=J_{\geq0} be the subgroup of elements for which lim⁡t→0λ(t)gλ(t)−1\lim_{t\to0}\lambda(t)g\lambda(t)^{-1} exists, and put J0=ZJ(λ)J_0=Z_J(\lambda). The Jacobson–Morozov incidence map is

π:J×J≥2Pe⟶J‾e,[g,z]⟼Ad⁡(g)z.(26)\pi:J\times^{P_e}_{J_{\geq2}}\longrightarrow\overline{J}_e,\qquad[g,z]\longmapsto\operatorname{Ad}(g)z. \tag*{(26)}

Its connected version is the resolution in [22] Section 2.3; the following argument records the properties, including disconnected groups, that we use. The sl2\mathfrak{sl}_2 decomposition gives [j≥0,e]=j≥2[j_{\geq0},e]=j_{\geq2}. Hence Pe∘.eP_e^\circ.e is open dense in j≥2\mathfrak{j}_{\geq2}. Every component of PeP_e preserves this unique open Pe∘P_e^\circ-orbit, so Pe.e=Pe∘.eP_e.e=P_e^\circ.e. The centralizer decomposition in (4.3) gives Je⊂PeJ^e\subset P_e. Consequently the open part of the source of (4.7) is J×Pe(Pe.e)=J/JeJ\times^{P_e}(P_e.e)=J/J^e, mapped isomorphically to J.eJ.e. The entire source is equidimensional of dimension dim⁡(J/Je)\dim(J/J^e). Its complementary closed subset has smaller dimension and has JJ-invariant image, so that image cannot meet J.eJ.e. Thus this is the whole inverse image of the orbit. Finally J/PeJ/P_e is a finite disjoint union of flag varieties; the incidence space is closed in (J/Pe)×j(J/P_e)\times\mathfrak{j}. The map is therefore proper and its image is J.eJ.e.

The degree-two component of this construction uses the open orbit J0.e⊂j2J_0.e\subset\mathfrak{j}_2, whose stabilizer is LeL_e. Over that open orbit the module PP gives an equivariant coherent module for the family of Clifford algebras of

Qz∣V−1,z∈j2.Q_z|_{V_{-1}}, \qquad z\in\mathfrak{j}_2.

This Clifford algebra is finite as a module over Oj2\mathcal{O}_{\mathfrak{j}_2}, also where the quadratic form degenerates. Extend the module coherently over j2\mathfrak{j}_2 as follows. Its quasi-coherent direct image from the open orbit is a rational J0J_0-module. Choose finitely many module generators over that open, enlarge them to a finite-dimensional equivariant space, and take their span under the finite Clifford algebra and the polynomial ring. This is a coherent equivariant submodule whose restriction is the original family. More explicitly, let tt act on this coefficient family through the central element λ(t−1)∈J0\lambda(t^{-1})\in J_0. It sends z↦t−2zz\mapsto t^{-2}z and cz(w)↦ct−2z(tw)c_z(w)\mapsto c_{t^{-2}z}(tw). With the original xx-points fixed, cz(x−1)c_z(x_{-1}) consequently has degree one. At t=−1t=-1 its coefficient parity is precisely λ(−1)\lambda(-1). Thus equivariant extension also preserves the required original grading.

Inflate this extension along j≥2→j2\mathfrak{j}_{\geq2}\to\mathfrak{j}_2 and tensor it with OV≥−1\mathcal{O}_{V_{\geq-1}}. The differential c(x−1)c(x_{-1}) has square W(x,z)W(x,z) on this locus: a term pairing zkz_k with xi,xjx_i,x_j requires k+i+j=0k+i+j=0, with k≥2k\geq2 and i,j≥−1i,j\geq-1, and hence k=2k=2, i=j=−1i=j=-1. The construction is PeP_e-equivariant because its unipotent radical acts trivially on the two indicated associated graded quotients. Induction to JJ and proper pushforward from

J×Pe(V≥−1×j≥2)⟶V×jJ\times^{P_e}(V_{\geq-1}\times\mathfrak{j}_{\geq2})\longrightarrow V\times\mathfrak{j}

give the required coherent factorization. This map is proper by the same closed-incidence argument. Over J.eJ.e its restriction is exactly MPM_P, so this is an actual lift, with the asserted support.

For completeness, the equivariance in this extension can include a chosen cyclic operator, rather than merely its action on isomorphism classes. Take the Zariski closure of the group generated by the algebraic equivariance data, the grading, and that operator; if necessary take a common algebraic cover acting on the coefficient module. Rational direct image is the union of finite-dimensional representations of this group. Thus the finite generating space in the preceding paragraph can be chosen stable under the operator, and the entire extension and proper pushforward retain its structure.

Here is also why the pure coefficient choices exist. Use the finite-type normalizer of the linear and framed data in Lemma 3.6; the action is an algebraic action of this finite-type group, not of an abstract automorphism group of a torus. For a fixed simple equivariant Clifford module, pairs consisting of a data automorphism and an implementing linear map form an algebraic group over the stabilizer of its isomorphism class. Its kernel is the scalars, by Schur’s Lemma. Given a lift (u,A)(u,A), take its semisimple Jordan part and the diagonalizable algebraic group it generates. Characterwise polar decomposition in this group separates its positive-real and unit-modulus parts. The positive-real part projects to the identity: the eigenvalues of uu on the faithful normalized data realization have modulus one. The scalar-kernel assertion therefore forces this positive-real part to be (1,cI)(1,cI) for some c>0c>0. All eigenvalues of AA have the same modulus cc, and c−1Ac^{-1}A is the required pure implementing map. The Jordan unipotent part supplies the compatible commuting unipotent lift.

The label orbits are finite as well. Encode compatible Clifford and LeL_e actions as representations of the reductive group De×⋊LeD_e^\times\rtimes L_e. A simple compatible module is irreducible for this group, because the units linearly span DeD_e. A connected algebraic family of automorphisms preserves each irreducible class: on a fixed maximal compact group, its multiplicities against irreducible characters are continuous integer-valued functions of the family, hence constant. The compact group is Zariski dense, so this identifies the algebraic representations. Only the finite component group of the data normalizer can therefore permute labels. The preceding choices apply to a power, or around a finite orbit; a label fixed by Frobenius needs no power. Undoing the triple translation gives the original locally finite Weil structure. Tensor products and inversion of the implementing maps preserve the extension construction, proving the remaining assertions.

Morphisms, parity, and contracting weights

Proposition 4.5 (The orbit Hom calculation). For P,P′∈EeP, P' \in E_e, the Hom complex between the orbit generators has a finite equivariant calculation with Euler terms

[C[ker⁡(e:V→V)]⊗Hom⁡De(P,P′)⊗Λ∙(Ne[−1])⊗Λ∙(Lie⁡(Ue)[−1])]Le.(27)\left[\mathbb{C}[\ker(e: V \to V)] \otimes\operatorname{Hom}_{D_e}(P,P') \otimes\Lambda^\bullet(N_e[-1]) \otimes\Lambda^\bullet(\operatorname{Lie}(U_e)[-1])\right]^{L_e}. \tag*{(27)}

Here the coefficient factor has lifted degree zero; the shifts in the normal and Lie factors add one to the degrees in (4.4). The formula is an equality of alternating equivariant characters, and a finite-filtration calculation bounding weights, rather than an assertion that the Hom complex splits as the displayed tensor product.

For pure coefficient normalizations, all nonconstant terms have strictly negative absolute SeS_e-weight. The weight-zero cohomology is

H∙Hom⁡(MP,MP′)wt=0=Hom⁡De,Le(P,P′)[0],(28)H^\bullet\operatorname{Hom}(M_P,M_{P'})^{\mathrm{wt}=0}=\operatorname{Hom}_{D_e,L_e}(P,P')[0], \tag*{(28)}

with ordinary composition. Before the finite invariant calculation, weight pieces are finite-dimensional and their dimensions grow at most polynomially over bounded-length weight intervals. In particular, the character sums in (4.8) are absolutely convergent on every normalized compact LeL_e-coset, uniformly on that coset.

Proof. Take an LeL_e-stable lowest-weight slice transverse to J.eJ.e in the zz-space. Its tangent is NeN_e; moving this slice by JJ is smooth near ee, so it computes the equivariant transverse fiber of Hom. Then take UeU_e-cochains and finally exact LeL_e-invariants.

The second input is pushed forward from the equations n=0n=0 in the slice and x<−1=0x_{<-1}=0. A finite locally free stabilization of the first input is obtained by tensoring its Clifford differential with the Koszul factorizations of these equations and their potential partners. Indeed the difference between the full potential and Qe(x−1)Q_e(x_{-1}) is a sum of an equation times its partner. The terms in nn have quadratic partners in xx; the terms xix_i for i<−1i<-1 have partners of grade −i−2≥0-i-2\geq0. This explicit correction makes the square of the differential equal to the full potential. Hom into the second pushforward sets the normal equations to zero. The zz-normal Koszul generators remain as exterior normal tangent factors Λ(Ne[−1])\Lambda(N_e[-1]).

Filter finitely by those exterior generators. The remaining xx-Koszul differential pairs every grade i<−1i<-1 with its grade −i−2-i-2 partner. On an irreducible sl2\mathfrak{sl}_2 summand these pairings are nondegenerate except for its highest-weight vector. Thus their cohomology is precisely C[ker⁡e]\mathbb{C}[\ker e]. The terms involving nn may give further differentials in this finite filtration, but do not change its Euler terms. It remains to calculate the nondegenerate quadratic part. On C[V−1]⊗Hom⁡(P,P′)\mathbb{C}[V_{-1}]\otimes\operatorname{Hom}(P,P') its differential is the sum of the coordinate functions times the Clifford supercommutators. Choose an orthonormal Clifford basis, and on a homogeneous coefficient map aa put

Li(a)=ci′a,Ri(a)=(−1)∣a∣aci,Ti=Li−Ri,Ki=14(Li+Ri).L_i(a)=c'_i a,\qquad R_i(a)=(-1)^{|a|}ac_i,\qquad T_i=L_i-R_i,\qquad K_i=\frac{1}{4}(L_i+R_i).

Clifford anticommutation gives

{Ti,Tj}={Ki,Kj}=0,{Ti,Kj}=δij.\{T_i,T_j\}=\{K_i,K_j\}=0,\qquad\{T_i,K_j\}=\delta_{ij}.

Thus the KiK_i are contracting partners for the exterior operators TiT_i. The differential ∑ixiTi\sum_i x_iT_i is the polynomial Koszul calculation: its cohomology is the constant common kernel of the TiT_i, namely the Clifford super-intertwiners, in lifted degree zero. All positive polynomial degrees are acyclic. This calculation works in even and odd Clifford dimensions alike.

We explain its parity before taking invariants. A homogeneous map a:P→P′a:P\to P' of original parity pp is a super-intertwiner precisely when

ac(v)=(−1)pc′(v)a.ac(v)=(-1)^p c'(v)a.

The map a↦aγPpa\mapsto a\gamma_P^p identifies that vector space with ordinary Clifford intertwiners. It respects the LeL_e-action and the triple-preserving cyclic action, because λ(−1)\lambda(-1) is central in LeL_e and is fixed by that action. Only a representation-space identification is claimed before taking invariants. An LeL_e-invariant map commutes with γP,γP′\gamma_P,\gamma_{P'}, so an invariant super-intertwiner has even parity. After invariants the identification therefore has its ordinary composition and is exactly Hom⁡De,Le(P,P′)\operatorname{Hom}_{D_e,L_e}(P,P'). This proves that no odd Clifford morphism is being silently retained in degree zero.

Finally rational UeU_e-cohomology is computed by its finite Chevalley–Eilenberg complex, adding the terms Λ(Lie⁡(Ue)∗[−1])\Lambda(\operatorname{Lie}(U_e)^*[-1]), with their Lie differential and action on the other terms. This proves (4.8) as an alternating character identity with a finite cohomological filtration.

The weight assertions now follow factor by factor. Functions on ker⁡e\ker e have weights −1−i≤−1-1-i\leq-1 because its hh-weights satisfy i≥0i\geq0. The normal factors have weights −2+i≤−2-2+i\leq-2 because their hh-weights satisfy i≤0i\leq0. Nontrivial Lie-cochain factors have weights −i<0-i<0. The pure constant coefficient Hom⁡\operatorname{Hom} has weight zero. Thus nothing of any other degree has weight zero, and no differential can enter or leave its invariant subspace. This proves (4.9).

There are finitely many polynomial generators, all with strictly negative weights, and finitely many exterior and coefficient factors. Their monomial counts in bounded-length weight intervals have polynomial growth. Multiplication by the geometric decay of the absolute eigenvalues makes their traces summable. The same estimates hold uniformly with any compact LeL_e-twist by Lemma 3.6. Unipotent parts may be retained: trace depends on eigenvalues with multiplicity, not on an assertion that those operators are unitary.

Frobenius traces and compact Weil classes

This section proves the concentration and spanning assertions needed for the image definition of FYF_Y. They will also permit every function in the second variable of the automorphic pairing to be represented by a finite combination of compact spectral tests. The argument has three parts: remove invariant-base support on the trace, contract the nonconstant part of an orbit trace, and use finite supported localization to assemble the result.

The invariant-base projector and actual supported lifts

Lemma 5.1 (Invariant support on traces). For every Frobenius-stable conical zz-support bound Ω\Omega, inclusion induces an isomorphism

Tr⁡(Φ,Ind⁡BΩ,0)→∼Tr⁡(Φ,Ind⁡BΩ).(29)\operatorname{Tr}(\Phi,\operatorname{Ind}\mathcal{B}_{\Omega,0})\xrightarrow{\sim}\operatorname{Tr}(\Phi,\operatorname{Ind}\mathcal{B}_{\Omega}). \tag*{(29)}

A compact Weil object on the right has a compact Weil lift on the left whose trace class maps to a nonzero scalar multiple of its class. Both statements hold for the compact opposite categories. Moreover, for Hom pairings of two such lifts, the finite Koszul construction multiplies each orbit contribution by a constant nonzero factor, independent of the compact stabilizer variable.

Proof. The ideal I⊂RJI\subset R^J of the invariant origin is generated by a finite Frobenius-stable homogeneous space UU of positive-degree invariant polynomials. To obtain UU, choose homogeneous algebra generators and take their Frobenius spans inside the finitely many finite-dimensional polynomial-degree spaces involved. The inverse Hom action has strictly negative weights on UU by Lemma 3.5; its forward inverse has strictly positive weights. In either convention the appropriate transport operator FUF_U has no eigenvalue one. Thus 1−FU1-F_U is invertible, even when FUF_U has Jordan blocks.

For a central scalar aa, its two actions on a twisted Hochschild complex, one transported by Frobenius, are chain homotopic. This is the elementary homotopy moving aa once around the bar. Applying it simultaneously to a basis of UU and multiplying by (1−FU)(1-F_U) shows that every generator of II acts trivially on trace cohomology. Equivalently, regard the complex as a module over the polynomial algebra Sym⁡U\operatorname{Sym}U mapping to RJR^J; its cohomology is supported at the origin. In particular it is II-torsion, a statement about the ordinary complex rather than about its completion.

Let ii be inclusion of the support category and let ΓI\Gamma_I be its continuous colocalization. On the ambient category, iΓIi\Gamma_I is tensor product with the scalar local-cohomology complex RΓI(R)R\Gamma_I(R). The inclusion preserves compact objects. Cyclicity of categorical trace, followed by continuity in its coefficient bimodule, therefore identifies the map in (29) with

RΓITr⁡(Φ,Ind⁡BΩ)⟶Tr⁡(Φ,Ind⁡BΩ).R\Gamma_I\operatorname{Tr}(\Phi,\operatorname{Ind}\mathcal{B}_{\Omega})\longrightarrow\operatorname{Tr}(\Phi,\operatorname{Ind}\mathcal{B}_{\Omega}).

One can compute this equality directly with the finite Koszul complexes on powers of the chosen equations and their filtered union. It is an isomorphism because the target cohomology is II-torsion. This proves the trace assertion without replacing Hochschild chains by a completed bar complex.

To lift an actual class, let MM be a compact Weil object and let K(U)K(U) be the finite equivariant Koszul complex on the map U⊗R→RU\otimes R\to R. Then M⊗K(U)M\otimes K(U) is compact, has ordinary support over I=0I=0, retains its zz-support, and has the induced Weil structure. The finite exterior filtration and additivity of trace give

[M⊗K(U)]=(∑j(−1)jTr⁡(FU∣ΛjU))[M]=det⁡(1−FU∣U)[M].(30)[M\otimes K(U)]=\left(\sum_j(-1)^j\operatorname{Tr}(F_U\mid\Lambda^jU)\right)[M]=\det(1-F_U\mid U)[M]. \tag*{(30)}

The determinant is nonzero. The notation FUF_U in this formula means the coefficient transport on the chosen exterior terms; passing to inverse Weil structures replaces it by its inverse, which still has no eigenvalue one. Dividing the class by this nonzero complex scalar gives any desired lift in the trace vector space, with the representative itself still an actual compact Weil object.

The same finite filtration proves the pairing statement. In a Hom from one Koszul lift to another, its associated terms have coefficient factor Hom⁡(ΛaU,ΛbU)\operatorname{Hom}(\Lambda^aU,\Lambda^bU), with the dual transport on the contravariant coefficient and the original transport on the covariant one. Its alternating character is the product of the corresponding two nonzero determinants. Since the equations are JJ-invariant, these are constant functions of every compact LeL_e-variable. Taking sections with support in an orbit commutes with this finite filtration. Thus the same factor multiplies each orbit contribution, not merely the sum of all contributions. This also proves the assertions for opposite categories and their inverse structures.

An algebraic contraction of the twisted bar complex

We first identify the original Φ\Phi-graph with the transported model, then use the contracting inverse action SS on that same graph. On a finite stable list of models let π\pi be the permutation induced by Frobenius and choose αi:ΦMi⟶∼Mπi\alpha_i:\Phi M_i \overset{\sim}{\longrightarrow} M_{\pi i}. These identifications give a functor Ψ\Psi on the chosen models. For arrows a:Mi→Mja:M_i\to M_j and b:Mπi→Mπjb:M_{\pi i}\to M_{\pi j}, its forward transport and inverse are

T(a)=Ψ(a)=αjΦ(a)αi−1,T(a)=\Psi(a)=\alpha_j\Phi(a)\alpha_i^{-1},
S(b)=T−1(b)=Φ−1(αj−1bαi).(31)S(b)=T^{-1}(b)=\Phi^{-1}\left(\alpha_j^{-1}b\alpha_i\right). \tag*{(31)}

The action SS is the contracting Hom action of Lemma 3.5.

To match trace classes M→ΦMM\to\Phi M, use the left-twisted graph GΦ(i,j)=Hom⁡(Mi,ΦMj)G_\Phi(i,j)=\operatorname{Hom}(M_i,\Phi M_j), whose left action is composition through Φ\Phi. The maps

θij:GΦ(i,j)⟶GΨ(i,j),m⟼αjm,GΨ(i,j)=Hom⁡(Mi,Mπj)(32)\theta_{ij}:G_\Phi(i,j)\longrightarrow G_\Psi(i,j),\qquad m\longmapsto\alpha_jm,\qquad G_\Psi(i,j)=\operatorname{Hom}(M_i,M_{\pi j}) \tag*{(32)}

identify the graph bimodules: for composable arrows, θ(Φ(a)mb)=Ψ(a)θ(m)b\theta(\Phi(a)mb)=\Psi(a)\theta(m)b, with the appropriate source and target indices. Transport the entire twisted bar construction through this identification. In the GΨG_\Psi coordinates simultaneous forward transport is Ψ\Psi on every factor. On the original graph coefficient it is instead

TG(m)=Φ(αj)Φ(m)αi−1∈GΦ(πi,πj),θπi,πj(TG(m))=Ψ(θij(m)).T_G(m)=\Phi(\alpha_j)\Phi(m)\alpha_i^{-1}\in G_\Phi(\pi i,\pi j),\qquad\theta_{\pi i,\pi j}(T_G(m))=\Psi(\theta_{ij}(m)).

For example, for one algebra with automorphism ϕ\phi and ψ=Ad⁡αϕ\psi=\operatorname{Ad}_\alpha\phi, these formulas are θ(m)=αm\theta(m)=\alpha m and TG(m)=ϕ(α)ϕ(m)α−1T_G(m)=\phi(\alpha)\phi(m)\alpha^{-1}. Thus the original Φ\Phi-trace is retained, with its graph coefficient canonically identified. Ordinary-arrow transport cannot be applied to the raw graph factor without this identification.

Lemma 5.2 (Locally finite contraction). Let a small generating differential graded category with an autoequivalence be modeled in complexes of locally finite cyclic representations. Suppose, after finite cyclic permutations of its labels and pure choices of their structures, its morphism cohomology has nonpositive absolute SS-weights; composition adds weights. Suppose its weight-zero morphism cohomology is concentrated in degree zero and its additive idempotent completion is semisimple, with endomorphism algebra C\mathbb{C} for every simple object. Then its twisted trace is the twisted trace of that split semisimple category. It is concentrated in degree zero, with one basis line for each fixed simple label. Nontrivially permuted simple labels contribute zero.

Proof. Take the sum of the nonpositive-weight subcomplexes in every morphism complex. This is a differential graded subcategory: identities have weight zero, the differential preserves weights, and composition adds them. It is quasi-equivalent to the original category because the excluded weight pieces have zero cohomology. Locally finite semisimple-weight decomposition is exact, so this assertion also holds for unbounded morphism complexes.

Use the direct-sum realization of its twisted cyclic bar complex. Every chain belongs to a finite sum of finite-dimensional cyclic subrepresentations. On a finite permutation-stable list of labels, take a common power fixing the labels; divided absolute weights for that power define the same nonpositive grading on the bar terms. Only the weights are read using this power: the functor and graph whose trace is computed remain Φ\Phi and GΦG_{\Phi}. In the identified left-graph convention, cyclic rotation has the one-algebra formula tn(a0∣⋯∣an)=(Ψ(an)∣a0∣⋯∣an−1)t_n(a_0 \mid\cdots\mid a_n) = (\Psi(a_n) \mid a_0 \mid\cdots\mid a_{n-1}), with the usual Koszul signs for graded factors. Its (n+1)(n+1)-fold iterate applies Ψ\Psi to every factor. The usual paracyclic homotopy therefore gives

dH+Hd=1−T.dH + Hd = 1 - T.

Here dd is the total Hochschild and internal differential, and the operator TT is simultaneous forward transport in the identified GΨG_{\Psi} coordinates, or equivalently the ordinary-arrow transport and (5.5) on the original graph. The identity can be obtained by inserting the unit and summing the cyclic rotations: consecutive faces cancel in pairs, and the two remaining faces are the identity and a full rotation. Transporting this identity through (5.4) gives the asserted identity on the original Φ\Phi-twisted bar. In degree zero the one-algebra convention makes it explicit: with d(m∣a)=ma−ϕ(a)md(m \mid a) = ma - \phi(a)m, the term H0(m)=α−1∣αmH_0(m) = \alpha^{-1} \mid\alpha m satisfies dH0(m)=m−TG(m)dH_0(m) = m - T_G(m).

Since TT commutes with dd, the operator

Hinv=−T−1HsatisfiesdHinv+Hinvd=1−S.H_{\mathrm{inv}} = -T^{-1}H \qquad\text{satisfies} \qquad dH_{\mathrm{inv}} + H_{\mathrm{inv}}d = 1 - S.

On every strictly negative-weight block, 1−S1-S is invertible. This inverse is algebraic: on each finite-dimensional cyclic subrepresentation it is a polynomial in SS, by its minimal polynomial, and the resulting inverses agree on inclusions. There is no infinite geometric series of chains. The homotopy (1−S)−1Hinv(1-S)^{-1}H_{\mathrm{inv}} contracts that block. The homotopy preserves total weight, and the same conclusion holds when a power is used to read the weights, since every eigenvalue of SS then has modulus strictly less than one.

Only weight zero remains. As every arrow has nonpositive weight, a weight-zero bar term has only weight-zero arrows. Hence this is exactly the bar complex of the weight-zero category. Its morphism cohomology is in degree zero; the canonical differential graded truncation gives a zigzag of quasi-equivalences to its degree-zero cohomology category, compatibly with the cyclic action and composition. A split semisimple category has the same trace as its full subcategory of simple objects. By the scalar-endomorphism hypothesis, its only nonzero morphisms are scalar endomorphisms. The twisted bar therefore gives CC in degree zero for a fixed simple and zero for a permuted block.

Finally, any chain uses only finitely many labels. Enlarge them to a finite permutation-stable list and apply the preceding argument. Filtered union gives the assertion for all labels. All realizations are direct sums; neither an infinite product nor convergence of an infinite Hochschild spectral sequence has been used.

Proposition 5.3 (Trace of an orbit). The trace on the supported category of a Frobenius-stable nilpotent orbit is concentrated in degree zero. A basis is given by the classes of MPM_P for Frobenius-fixed simple P∈EeP \in E_e, with chosen pure normalized structures. Every basis class lifts to an actual compact Weil object supported on the orbit closure, and also to one with invariant null-fiber support up to a nonzero scalar. The same conclusions hold for the compact opposite category with simultaneous Frobenius.

Proof. By Proposition 4.3, the full subcategory on the simple labels generates the supported category; Morita invariance permits computing its trace on this generating subcategory. We first check the local finiteness required by Lemma 5.2, since numerical weight bounds on cohomology alone would not suffice.

All models used in Section 4 are algebraic equivariant models with finite-dimensional starting representation data. Keep the grading internal until direct-sum totalization. For a finite cyclic list of labels, take a common finite-type algebraic cover HH of the equivariance and cyclic chain-map data, acting on the chosen objects and the invariant quasi-compact separated ambient open UU. Polynomial functions, finite Koszul resolutions, equivariant restriction, and proper pushforward are defined in rational representations of this group.

One can compute derived sections without choosing a transporter-stable affine cover. Equivariant derived pushforward along [U/H]→BH[U/H] \to BH produces complexes of rational HH-representations. Flat base change along pt→BH\mathrm{pt} \to BH recovers ordinary derived sections on UU, and the lax monoidal pushforward supplies their composition maps [13]. Here differential Hom is an ordinary square-zero complex because the two curvature terms cancel. Functorial bar–cobar rectification uses direct sums of finite tensor words, so it stays in rational representations, preserves the cyclic action, and gives a compatible differential graded model with strict composition [19]. Restriction to the algebraic closure of the cyclic operator makes the action on this model locally finite. Stabilizer invariants are computed by the finite Lie-cochain complex followed by exact reductive invariants. These bounded constructions commute with the direct-sum folding of the grading. Thus the locally finite cyclic actions are defined on morphism complexes with their composition, and decomposition by the characters of the semisimple part gives the weight subcomplexes used in the contraction lemma.

Proposition 4.4 provides finite cyclic orbits of the labels and consistently pure implementing maps, including when a power is required to fix a label. On taking invariants, the triple translation is by a group element and does not change the actual arrow action SS. Proposition 4.5 therefore says that this model has no positive-weight cohomology and that its zero-weight category is exactly the semisimple category Ee\mathcal{E}_e. Its simple objects have scalar endomorphisms: each is a finite-dimensional complex module, so Schur’s Lemma applies over the algebraically closed field C\mathbb{C}. Lemma 5.2 proves concentration and the stated basis. The incidence construction of Proposition 4.4 supplies its actual compact orbit-closure representatives; Lemma 5.1 supplies the completed representatives.

For the opposite category use the same object models, with reversed arrows and inverse object structures. Its simultaneous forward action on a reversed arrow is the forward action on the underlying original arrow; its inverse is consequently the same contracting SS on that underlying complex. The weight calculation and paracyclic identity are unchanged. In particular, this argument uses the autoequivalence Φop\Phi^{\mathrm{op}} of the opposite category, not the inverse autoequivalence of the original category. It proves the same spanning assertion with actual inverse Weil structures. □

Finite support filtrations and the full function space

Theorem 5.4 (Concentration, injection, and Weil spanning). On a fixed retained spectral component, the trace of every closed invariant nilpotent support category is concentrated in degree zero. If Ω′⊂Ω\Omega' \subset\Omega are such support bounds, then

H0Tr⁡(Φ,Ind⁡BΩ′,0)⟶H0Tr⁡(Φ,Ind⁡BΩ,0)(33)H^0\operatorname{Tr}(\Phi,\operatorname{Ind}\mathcal{B}_{\Omega',0}) \longrightarrow H^0\operatorname{Tr}(\Phi,\operatorname{Ind}\mathcal{B}_{\Omega,0}) \tag*{(33)}

is injective. A finite filtration by invariant unions of orbits has the orbit traces as its actual successive quotients. Every trace class is a finite linear combination of classes of compact objects with Weil structures; those objects can be chosen with support in the prescribed bound. All assertions hold on the compact opposite side.

After assembling retained components, these statements apply to Cy\mathrm{Cy} and C\mathcal{C}. In particular, the image defining FAQ‾e\mathcal{F}_{\mathcal{A}_{\overline{\mathbb{Q}}_e}} is the injective image of the supported trace, and every function in AQ‾e\mathcal{A}_{\overline{\mathbb{Q}}_e} and every vector in FAQ‾e\mathcal{F}_{\mathcal{A}_{\overline{\mathbb{Q}}_e}} is a finite linear combination of the corresponding actual compact Weil trace functions. The analogous statement supplies all tests through the nonstandard self-duality of Theorem 2.4.

Proof. Choose a finite filtration of the nilpotent support by closed invariant unions of JJ-orbits, grouping Frobenius permutations into stable strata. It exists because there are finitely many nilpotent orbits and Frobenius preserves their closure order. At each step, Lemma 4.2 gives a compactly generated localization. Twisted Hochschild homology is localizing, so it gives a cofiber sequence of traces; this is the trace-localization formalism of [17], Theorem 3.4 and Proposition 5.4, applied to the actual Frobenius-compatible localization just constructed. Disjoint orbits closed in the corresponding open have orthogonal supported categories. If Frobenius permutes such summands without a fixed summand, their twisted trace is zero: in the bar model, nonzero chains would have to begin and end in the same summand, while the graph coefficient ends in its Frobenius translate. Every fixed orbit has the degree-zero trace of Proposition 5.3.

Induction up this finite filtration proves concentration in degree zero. Each cofiber sequence is therefore a short exact sequence on H0H^0. More generally, apply the same argument to the finite orbit filtration of the complement of Ω′\Omega' in Ω\Omega. Its trace is also concentrated in degree zero, so the localization sequence starts

0⟶H0Tr⁡(Φ,BΩ′,0)⟶H0Tr⁡(Φ,BΩ,0)⟶H0Tr⁡(Φ,BΩ,0/BΩ′,0)⟶0,0 \longrightarrow H^0\operatorname{Tr}(\Phi,\mathcal{B}_{\Omega',0}) \longrightarrow H^0\operatorname{Tr}(\Phi,\mathcal{B}_{\Omega,0}) \longrightarrow H^0\operatorname{Tr}(\Phi,\mathcal{B}_{\Omega,0}/\mathcal{B}_{\Omega',0}) \longrightarrow0,

where taking ind-completions in the trace notation is understood. This proves (33) and identifies the successive quotients with the computed orbit traces. It does not infer injectivity from concentration of the full category alone.

At an induction step, each quotient basis class lifts by the compact incidence construction and the finite invariant Koszul construction. Subtract a finite linear combination of these lifts from a given class; the remainder lies in the preceding supported trace. The induction terminates after finitely many strata. Thus every class is spanned by actual compact Weil classes with the required closed support. This argument also proves spanning on the opposite side; its localization sequences and orbit lifts have already been checked in Proposition 5.3.

For the retained union of components, compact objects involve only finitely many components and there are no morphisms between distinct components. The same bar argument shows

Tr⁡(Φ,C)=⨁Za⊂Z retainedΦZa=ZaTr⁡(Φ,C∣Za)(34)\operatorname{Tr}(\Phi,\mathcal{C}) = \bigoplus_{\substack{Z_a \subset Z\ \mathrm{retained}\\ \Phi Z_a=Z_a}} \operatorname{Tr}(\Phi,\mathcal{C}|_{Z_a}) \tag*{(34)}

and likewise for supported categories and their compact opposites. A component permuted nontrivially contributes zero even if a power fixes it. The direct sum in (34) is essential: no vector acquires infinitely many component contributions.

The Frobenius-compatible restricted equivalence of Theorem 2.1 transports these results to the categories in the problem, retaining exactly the prescribed prime union. The trace/functions isomorphism and ordinary compact local-term compatibility of Theorem 2.3 take each compact Weil class to its actual finitely supported trace function. This identifies the supported trace injection with the image used to define FYAQℓ‾\mathcal{F}_Y\mathcal{A}_{\overline{\mathbb{Q}_\ell}}. Finally the simultaneous-Frobenius nonstandard duality identifies the trace on the compact opposite category with the full space of tests. The opposite spanning statement therefore supplies every such test by a finite linear combination of the constructed classes. All calculations were performed after an arbitrary coefficient isomorphism with C\mathbb{C}; concentration, injections, and finite spanning transport back along that isomorphism. ▫

Hecke matrix coefficients and support detection

Fix an abstract coefficient isomorphism Q‾ℓ≃C\overline{\mathbb{Q}}_\ell\simeq\mathbb{C} and a closed point v∈Xv \in X of degree dd. Put r=qdr=q^d. We use the compact sets BoB_o and the bilinear pairing [−,−][-,-] of (1.4) and (1.5). Write

B=⋃o⊂N^Bo,BY=⋃o⊂YBo.B=\bigcup_{o\subset\widehat{\mathcal{N}}}B_o,\qquad B_Y=\bigcup_{o\subset Y}B_o.

There are finitely many ambient nilpotent orbits. Lemma 7.1, whose proof is independent of this section, says that the BoB_o are disjoint compact sets and that representation characters are uniformly dense in C(B)C(B). We will use this elementary fact for uniqueness and for separating different orbit contributions.

Theorem 6.1 (Bilinear support detector). For every f,g∈ACf,g\in\mathcal{A}_{\mathrm C} there is a unique finite complex Borel measure νf,g\nu_{f,g} on BB such that, for every finite-dimensional representation DD of G^\widehat{G},

[TDf,g]=∫BχD dνf,g.[T_Df,g]=\int_B\chi_D\,d\nu_{f,g}.

For every closed invariant subset Y⊂N^Y\subset\widehat{\mathcal{N}},

f∈FYAC⟺supp⁡(νf,g)⊂BYfor every g∈AC.(35)f\in\mathcal{F}_Y\mathcal{A}_{\mathrm C}\quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad\operatorname{supp}(\nu_{f,g})\subset B_Y\quad\text{for every }g\in\mathcal{A}_{\mathrm C}. \tag*{(35)}

The theorem concerns ordinary finitely supported functions. In its proof, infinite sums occur only in auxiliary character calculations on compact groups. Every automorphic input and test remains a finite linear combination of compact Weil classes.

The bilinear Hom formula

We first identify exactly which scalar trace is being calculated. Use the nonstandard self-duality and compactness of Theorem 2.4 [4] [Theorem 3.2.2 and Appendix A.1]. On the automorphic side its evaluation is

(F,G)⟼Γc(Bun⁡G,F∗⊗G).(\mathcal{F},\mathcal{G})\longmapsto\Gamma_{\mathrm c}(\operatorname{Bun}_G,\mathcal{F}^{\ast}\otimes\mathcal{G}).

On compact objects the categorical dual is the opposite category. Simultaneous invariance under Φ\Phi identifies its action there with Φop\Phi^{\mathrm{op}}. Thus, on the spectral side, take a covariant class b:N⟶ΦNb:\mathcal{N}\longrightarrow\Phi\mathcal{N} and an opposite-input class a:ΦM⟶Ma:\Phi\mathcal{M}\longrightarrow\mathcal{M}. Evaluation acts on an arrow h:M⟶Nh:\mathcal{M}\longrightarrow\mathcal{N} by

SM,N(h)=Φ−1(b∘h∘a).(36)S_{\mathcal{M},\mathcal{N}}(h)=\Phi^{-1}(b\circ h\circ a). \tag*{(36)}

The action with a Hecke insertion includes its specified cyclic Weil transport. Formula (36) is the inverse transported action SS of Section 3; it uses the original Φ\Phi-trace.

Lemma 6.2. Let NN and MM be compact spectral objects with the structures just specified, and let fNf_N and gMg_M be their automorphic trace functions, where MM is transported through the categorical duality. Then

[TDfN,gM]=str⁡(SM,N,D;RHom⁡(M,ED,v⊗N)).(37)[T_Df_N,g_M]=\operatorname{str}\left(S_{M,N,D};\operatorname{RHom}(M,\mathcal{E}_{D,v}\otimes N)\right). \tag*{(37)}

Here ED,v\mathcal{E}_{D,v} denotes the evaluation insertion at the cyclic tuple above vv. The scalar evaluation complex is perfect. Finite linear combinations of these classes give all inputs and all tests in AC\mathcal{A}_{\mathrm C}. Inputs in FYAC\mathcal{F}_Y\mathcal{A}_{\mathrm C} may be represented by such NN with the prescribed YY-support.

Proof. The compact embedding into ambient sheaves, preservation of compactness by the star tensor product in two compact variables, and preservation by the finite Hecke insertion imply that the displayed compact-cohomology evaluation is perfect. Compact pushforward to a point preserves compactness; its target is the category of complexes of vector spaces, whose compact objects are precisely the perfect complexes. These are the compactness assertions recorded with the duality input in Section 2. They are needed in addition to abstract self-duality.

The ordinary local-term comparison of Theorem 2.3 and the sheaf–function dictionary identify the Frobenius trace of this evaluation with

∑b∈Bun⁡G(Fq)/≅(TDfN)(b)gM(b)∣Aut⁡(b)∣.\sum_{b\in\operatorname{Bun}_{G}(\mathbb{F}_{q})/\cong} \frac{(T_{D}f_{N})(b)g_{M}(b)}{|\operatorname{Aut}(b)|}.

For each fixed Hecke label the correspondences are bounded, and the compact inputs have quasi-compact !-support. Thus the compact local-term theorem applies to precisely this evaluation. Transport through the duality gives (6.3), proving (6.4). Finally, Theorem 5.4 gives actual compact Weil-class spanning on both the covariant and opposite sides, and on every closed-support trace image. Combined with the trace–functions isomorphism, it proves the last assertions.

The duality need not preserve individual spectral components or their support labels. We choose MM on the Hom side and then obtain its function test by duality. Distinct components are orthogonal because their spectral Hom complexes vanish.

Supported traces on an orbit

Fix a retained Frobenius-stable component and the model of Theorem 3.4. In the curved description, write W(x,z)=⟨z,μ(x)⟩W(x,z)=\langle z,\mu(x)\rangle. For two compact lifts let H=Hom⁡(M,N)\mathcal{H}=\operatorname{Hom}(M,N) be their differential Hom, computed with locally free representatives. Its differential squares to zero. Its derived JJ-invariant sections, with the evaluation insertion, compute the right side of (6.4). The support of H\mathcal{H} lies in the intersection of the two factorization supports: where either object vanishes in the local factorization category, the differential Hom is acyclic.

We filter these sections by local cohomology with supports in the nilpotent zz-orbits. Ordinary restriction to an orbit would give the wrong answer on boundary strata. The following calculation fixes both the normal-direction sign and the convergence issue.

For the motivating use of local cohomology, normal symmetric powers and distributional convergence, see [18] [KO, Sections 2.6.1–2.6.4, equations (107)–(111)]. The following calculation supplies the supported convergence needed for the present bilinear detector.

Lemma 6.3 (Supported convergence). Let O=J.eO=J.e be a stable nilpotent orbit, closed in an invariant open subset of j\mathfrak{j}. The contribution with support on OO to the Hom calculation has an absolutely convergent alternating character on the compact transporter coset of LeL_e. Convergence is uniform on that coset, also after any fixed finite-dimensional evaluation insertion. These characters are additive through the finite orbit filtration and compute the ordinary supertrace of the final perfect evaluation complex.

Proof. Let i:O↪U⊂ji:O\hookrightarrow U\subset\mathfrak{j} be the closed immersion and c=codim⁡U(O)c=\operatorname{codim}_{U}(O). It is a regular immersion, with normal bundle whose fiber at ee is Ne=j/[j,e]N_e=\mathfrak{j}/[\mathfrak{j},e]. If II is its ideal, local cohomology is the filtered colimit

RΓO(H)=colim⁡n RHom(OU/In+1,H).(38)R\Gamma_{O}(\mathcal{H})=\underset{n}{\operatorname{colim}}\ R\mathcal{H}om\left(\mathcal{O}_{U}/I^{n+1},\mathcal{H}\right). \tag*{(38)}

The successive derived cofibers of this filtration are

i!(Li∗H⊗Sym⁡nN⊗det⁡N[−c]),n≥0.(39)i_!(Li^*\mathcal{H} \otimes\operatorname{Sym}^n N \otimes\det N[-c]), \qquad n \geq0. \tag*{(39)}

Indeed, In/In+1=Sym⁡nN∗I^n/I^{n+1} = \operatorname{Sym}^n N^*, while regular-immersion duality gives i!H=Li∗H⊗det⁡N[−c]i^!\mathcal{H} = Li^*\mathcal{H} \otimes\det N[-c]. One may verify the same formula directly by the regular Koszul resolution. Each such resolution is bounded before folding the grading, so it also applies to the locally free differential Hom used here. In particular the determinant in (6.5) is the normal determinant.

For example, a degree-two coordinate zz with S(z)=qzS(z)=qz gives

H(z)1C[z]=⨁m≥1Cz−m,S(z−m)=q−mz−m.(40)H^1_{(z)}\mathbb{C}[z] = \bigoplus_{m\geq1} \mathbb{C}z^{-m}, \qquad S(z^{-m}) = q^{-m}z^{-m}. \tag*{(40)}

The total degree of z−mz^{-m} after including local-cohomology degree is 1−2m1-2m. This checks the normal sign and the shift simultaneously.

Take the fiber at ee and then derived Ce=Le⋉UeC_e=L_e\ltimes U_e invariants. The cohomology of the restricted differential Hom is a coherent graded module over C[V]\mathbb{C}[V]. Its support is contained in ker⁡e\ker e. To see the last assertion directly, differentiate the factorization differential: if dN2=Wd_N^2=W, then

dN(∂dN)+(∂dN)dN=∂W.d_N(\partial d_N)+(\partial d_N)d_N=\partial W.

Left composition with ∂dN\partial d_N is a homotopy for multiplication by ∂W\partial W on differential Hom. At z=ez=e the derivatives in the VV-directions give the linear equations ex=0ex=0. This also proves the assertion using any finite locally free replacement.

Coherence implies that some power of the ideal of ker⁡e\ker e annihilates this cohomology. Consequently only finitely many polynomial orders transverse to ker⁡e\ker e in the xx-space occur. The orders nn in (6.5), in contrast, remain unbounded. After the triple translation, the weights from Proposition 4.5 give

spaceabsolute SS-weightbound
(ker⁡e∩Vi)∗(\ker e\cap V_i)^*−1−i-1-i (i≥0i\geq0)≤−1\leq-1
(Ne)i(N_e)_i−2+i-2+i (i≤0i\leq0)≤−2\leq-2
Lie⁡(Ue)i∗\operatorname{Lie}(U_e)_i^*−i-i (i>0i>0)<0<0

Table 1.

Absolute weight ww means eigenvalue modulus qw/2q^{w/2}. Thus the unrestricted xx-variables and the normal symmetric powers both contract. The finitely many transverse xx-orders, the normal determinant, and the finite complex of UeU_e-cochains affect only a finite coefficient factor.

Here is a precise summability bound. Choose a finite-dimensional invariant generating space for the restricted cohomology, including its finite transverse thickening. The locally finite models constructed in the proof of Proposition 5.3 permit this choice for the algebraic group generated by the normalized transporter and equivariance. There are constants C,a,bC,a,b and 0<ρx,ρz<10<\rho_x,\rho_z<1 such that the sum of eigenvalue moduli, counted with multiplicities, in the terms of xx-degree mm and normal order nn is at most

C(m+1)a(n+1)bρxmρzn.C(m+1)^a(n+1)^b\rho_x^m\rho_z^n.

For example one can take ρx=q−1/2\rho_x=q^{-1/2} and ρz=q−1\rho_z=q^{-1} after absorbing the finite coefficient spaces into CC. Polynomial dimension growth follows from the finite number of polynomial variables. Subquotients can only decrease the multiplicity bound on each generalized weight.

By Lemma 3.6 these estimates are uniform when a compact element of LeL_e is included in the transporter. The semisimple normalized parts preserve a compact form; the residual unipotent commutes with it. Hence compact twists do not change the contracting moduli of the linear data.

Finite coefficient representations supply only a uniform constant. This reasoning concerns traces and eigenvalue multiplicities; it does not require a unipotent operator to be unitary.

For completeness, the bound also justifies passage from the graded pieces to their colimit. For every ϵ>0\epsilon> 0, only finitely many pairs (m,n)(m,n) can have eigenvalues of modulus at least ϵ\epsilon, since the coefficient weights lie in a fixed finite set. In the category of locally finite representations, taking a sum of generalized eigenspaces in such a range is exact. On that range the filtered calculation therefore stabilizes after finitely many normal orders, and the ordinary long exact sequences give trace additivity. Filtered colimits of vector spaces are exact, so this identifies the same part of the cohomology of the colimit. Finally (6.7) is summable in (m,n)(m,n), allowing ϵ\epsilon to decrease to zero.

The argument applies also to the finite orbit filtration. It uses direct-sum folding of the graded complexes; bounded Koszul and group-cochain calculations commute with this folding.

If Frobenius permutes a finite set of strata without fixing any, use a power StS^t to make the preceding estimates on each summand. The same geometric bound is summable after raising each eigenvalue modulus to any positive power, in particular 1/t1/t. It therefore gives summability also for SS, whose one-step action has zero trace on the resulting permuted sum. On fixed strata the preceding calculation applies directly. The full scalar evaluation is perfect by Lemma 6.2, so its convergent alternating character is its ordinary finite supertrace.

Constructing the measures

Let Le,cL_{e,c} be the maximal compact subgroup of LeL_e chosen in Lemma 3.6, including all components. Denote by τe\tau_e the triple-adjusted SS-action, using that normalized transporter and retaining the absolute-weight scalars in the displayed table above. On coefficient modules in lifted degree zero it is the normalized transporter itself. Expressions on the corresponding compact coset are written as functions of k∈Le,ck \in L_{e,c}, with operator kτek\tau_e on the space in question. Haar measure dkdk is probability measure on the entire compact group. This notation allows τe\tau_e to act nontrivially on LeL_e.

Projection to reductive invariants is integration over Le,cL_{e,c}:

str⁡(τe;HLe)=∫Le,cstr⁡(kτe;H) dk.\operatorname{str}(\tau_e; H^{L_e}) = \int_{L_{e,c}} \operatorname{str}(k\tau_e; H)\,dk.

For a finite-dimensional representation this is the Reynolds projection, which commutes with τe\tau_e because it normalizes the compact group. Lemma 6.3 proves the formula for all the convergent characters here by uniform absolute convergence. It also applies when LeL_e is disconnected: averaging over its finitely many components is part of the same Reynolds projection.

The Hecke insertion contributes a finite-dimensional cyclic trace. For linear maps around dd copies of DD one has

tr⁡(cyc⁡(A1⊗⋯⊗Ad);D⊗d)=tr⁡(Ad⋯A1;D).(41)\operatorname{tr}\bigl(\operatorname{cyc}(A_1 \otimes\cdots\otimes A_d); D^{\otimes d}\bigr) = \operatorname{tr}(A_d \cdots A_1; D). \tag*{(41)}

Expanding in a basis proves the identity: the cyclic identification of indices leaves precisely the matrix entries of the indicated product. The framed evaluation description in Theorem 3.4 applies this identity to the geometric points above vv. The triple translations contribute λe(qd/2)\lambda_e(q^{d/2}), and the residual semisimple product is compact and centralizes the triple. Unipotent factors may be discarded in this trace. We obtain a continuous map

βe:Le,c⟶BG^e.(42)\beta_e : L_{e,c} \longrightarrow B_{\widehat{G}_e}. \tag*{(42)}

Any lifted-degree sign on the insertion contributes λe(−1)\lambda_e(-1) to the compact part. This is already included in BG^eB_{\widehat{G}_e}. Contravariant character conventions give the inverse parameter, which lies in the same compact set by Lemma 7.1.

Remove the insertion and write aM,N,e(k)a_{M,N,e}(k) for the alternating character density of the supported contribution. The lifted-degree sign may be used inside (6.8): after taking invariants it is the true cohomological sign, as established in Proposition 4.5. The density is continuous and absolutely integrable by Lemma 6.3. The contribution of OO is therefore the finite complex measure

(βe)∗(aM,N,e(k) dk).(\beta_e)_*(a_{M,N,e}(k)\,dk).

Its total variation is bounded by ∫∣aM,N,e∣ dk\int\lvert a_{M,N,e}\rvert\,dk. Formula (41) shows that its χD\chi_D-moment is exactly the orbit contribution with the Hecke insertion.

Proposition 6.4. Suppose M,NM,N belong to one retained component and have closed zz-support bounds ZM,ZN⊂jZ_M,Z_N\subset\mathfrak{j}. Their measure satisfies

supp⁡(νfN,gM)⊂⋃e∈ZM∩ZNBGe.(43)\operatorname{supp}(\nu_{f_N,g_M})\subset\bigcup_{e\in Z_M\cap Z_N}B_{G_e}. \tag*{(43)}

Proof. Sum (6.11) over the finitely many stable nilpotent orbits in the common support. Lemma 6.3 gives additivity, and Lemma 6.2 identifies all its moments. Orbits outside the common support give zero differential Hom; permuted orbits give zero trace. The support bound follows from (42). Uniqueness follows from the density of characters in C(B)C(B) in Lemma 7.1.

By Theorem 5.4, every pair of functions is a finite linear combination of the pairs just considered. Each vector uses only finitely many retained fixed components, because the categorical trace is the direct sum on such components. Cross-component Homs vanish. Adding the finite measures above therefore proves existence in Theorem 6.1 for every f,gf,g, and character density proves uniqueness independent of the chosen expansion. The construction is bilinear. Proposition 6.4 already proves the forward implication in (35).

Nondegeneracy of the top-orbit contribution

The decisive test concerns total mass. Canceling a common nonvanishing density will isolate a simple coefficient, so injectivity of the parameter map βe\beta_e is unnecessary.

We must also show that a nonzero quotient class cannot be hidden by cancellation of its measure. Fix a stable orbit O=J.eO=J.e. Let P,QP,Q be finite-dimensional equivariant DeD_e-modules, with compatible cyclic structures, and take the compact orbit-closure lifts of Proposition 4.4. We put the test coefficient QQ first and the input coefficient PP second in a Hom.

On an open subset where OO is closed and the proper boundary of its closure has been removed, both lifts are already supported on OO. Consequently local cohomology with that support is the actual Hom complex. There is no additional series of inverse normal powers to put into its Euler character. Proposition 4.5 gives

aQ,P,e(k)=pe(k)tr⁡(kτe;Hom⁡De(Q,P)),k∈Le,c.(44)a_{Q,P,e}(k)=p_e(k)\operatorname{tr}\bigl(k\tau_e;\operatorname{Hom}_{D_e}(Q,P)\bigr),\qquad k\in L_{e,c}. \tag*{(44)}

The action on the Hom uses the inverse structure on the test as in (36). The factor pep_e is the graded Euler character of

C[ker⁡e]⊗Λ∙(Ne[−1])⊗Λ∙(Lie⁡(Ue∙)[−1]).(45)\mathbb{C}[\ker e]\otimes\Lambda^\bullet(N_e[-1])\otimes\Lambda^\bullet(\operatorname{Lie}(U_e^\bullet)[-1]). \tag*{(45)}

The identification of constant Clifford super-intertwiners with ordinary intertwiners, and its compatibility with lifted parity and tensor twists, are part of Proposition 4.5.

The invariant-base Koszul complexes used to obtain actual compact lifts do not alter (44) except by constant nonzero factors. Indeed, expand their finite exterior terms by additivity in each input. Their equation spaces are JJ-invariant, so these factors are independent of kk; their Frobenius eigenvalues and inverse eigenvalues are never one. The exterior traces are therefore nonzero, as in Lemma 5.1. We rescale the trace classes by these constants. This permits computation first on the uncompleted orbit model while retaining actual compact tests throughout.

Lemma 6.5 (Cancellation of the universal density). The function pep_e is continuous and nowhere zero on Le,cL_{e,c}. Its reciprocal is a uniform limit of finite complex linear combinations of twisted characters of finite-dimensional LeL_e-representations with compatible transporter structures. Such a twisted character can be inserted in (6.13) by tensoring the test coefficient with the dual representation, in lifted degree zero.

Proof. Decompose each of the finite-dimensional spaces in (6.14) by lifted degree. The symmetric algebra contributes inverse determinants, and each exterior algebra contributes determinants. Thus pep_e is a finite product of terms

det⁡(1−εkA;W)η,ε∈{1,−1},η∈{1,−1}.(46)\det(1-\varepsilon kA;W)^{\eta},\qquad\varepsilon\in\{1,-1\},\qquad\eta\in\{1,-1\}. \tag*{(46)}

where WW is a finite-dimensional LeL_e-representation with transporter AA, and all eigenvalues of kAkA have modulus strictly less than one, uniformly in kk. The sign ε\varepsilon incorporates the specified lifted-degree shift. The strict inequality follows from the weight bounds: all factors outside the constant coefficient Hom have negative absolute weight. Each determinant in (6.15) is therefore nonzero, proving the first assertion.

The identities

det⁡(1−A;W)=∑j=0dim⁡W(−1)jtr⁡(A;ΛjW),det⁡(1−A;W)−1=∑n≥0tr⁡(A;Sym⁡nW)\det(1-A;W)=\sum_{j=0}^{\dim W}(-1)^j\operatorname{tr}(A;\Lambda^jW),\qquad \det(1-A;W)^{-1}=\sum_{n\geq0}\operatorname{tr}(A;\operatorname{Sym}^nW)

apply also with the sign ε\varepsilon. The second series converges uniformly here: its nnth term is bounded by dim⁡(Sym⁡nW)ρn\dim(\operatorname{Sym}^nW)\rho^n for a fixed ρ<1\rho<1. Finite products of these identities express 1/pe1/p_e as the required uniform limit. Every finite term is the twisted character of a finite tensor product of symmetric and exterior powers of the allowed representation data; scalar factors may be put into its coefficient or cyclic structure.

Finally,

Hom⁡De(Q⊗R∗,P)≃R⊗Hom⁡De(Q,P)\operatorname{Hom}_{D_e}(Q\otimes R^*,P)\simeq R\otimes\operatorname{Hom}_{D_e}(Q,P)

with the induced cyclic actions. Under the parity identification already used for (6.13), its character multiplies that density by the twisted character of RR. The extension construction in Proposition 4.4 applies to Q⊗R∗Q\otimes R^* as well. Each finite approximant is consequently realized by a finite linear combination of permitted compact test classes.

Lemma 6.6 (Top quotient detection). Every nonzero finite linear combination of fixed-simple classes in the OO-quotient is detected by a compact test supported on O‾\overline{O}: its top-orbit measure has nonzero total mass on B‾G,e\overline{B}_{G,e}.

Proof. Write the quotient class as u=∑PcP[P]u=\sum_P c_P[P], with finitely many nonzero coefficients. Suppose its top mass were zero against every permitted test lift. Fix a test coefficient QQ. By tensoring QQ with the duals of the representations in Lemma 6.5, the assumption gives

∫Le,cpe(k)h(k)∑PcPtr⁡(kτe;Hom⁡De(Q,P)) dk=0\int_{L_{e,c}}p_e(k)h(k)\sum_P c_P\operatorname{tr}(k\tau_e;\operatorname{Hom}_{D_e}(Q,P))\,dk=0

for every finite character combination hh used there. Letting these hh converge uniformly to 1/pe1/p_e gives

0=∑PcPtr⁡(τe;Hom⁡De,Le(Q,P)).(47)0 = \sum_{P} c_P \operatorname{tr}\left(\tau_e;\operatorname{Hom}_{D_e,L_e}(Q,P)\right). \tag*{(47)}

This is legitimate integration against a fixed continuous function, not a limit of automorphic functions.

The equivariant Clifford coefficient category is semisimple. Choose QQ to be any fixed simple appearing in uu, with the matching structure. For P≄QP \not\simeq Q its Hom is zero; for P≃QP \simeq Q it is the scalar endomorphism line and the action is the identity. Thus (6.16) says cQ=0c_Q = 0. Repeating this contradicts u≠0u \ne0. Some actual finite test must therefore have nonzero top mass. The argument requires no injectivity of βe:Le,c→BG.e^\beta_e : L_{e,c} \to B_{\widehat{G.e}}: the total mass alone suffices.

Excluding boundary cancellation

Lemma 6.7. If e′∈J.e‾∖J.ee' \in\overline{J.e} \setminus J.e, then dim⁡(G.e′^)<dim⁡(G.e^)\dim(\widehat{G.e'}) < \dim(\widehat{G.e}). In particular the two ambient nilpotent orbits, and their compact sets, are distinct.

Proof. Since JJ is reductive in characteristic zero, choose a JJ-stable complement WW in g^=j⊕W\widehat{\mathfrak g} = \mathfrak j \oplus W. The adjoint rank on j\mathfrak j is the dimension of the JJ-orbit and strictly drops on a proper boundary orbit. The rank on WW cannot increase under specialization, because the condition that a matrix have rank at most a given integer is closed. Hence

rk⁡(ad⁡(e′)|g^)<rk⁡(ad⁡(e)|g^).\operatorname{rk}\left(\operatorname{ad}(e')\middle|_{\widehat{\mathfrak g}}\right) < \operatorname{rk}\left(\operatorname{ad}(e)\middle|_{\widehat{\mathfrak g}}\right).

These ranks are the ambient orbit dimensions. The same argument works for a disconnected JJ, whose orbits are finite unions of orbits of its identity component. Disjointness of the compact sets follows from Lemma 7.1.

We finish the converse in Theorem 6.1. Suppose f∉FYACf \notin\mathcal{F}_{Y}\mathcal{A}_{C}. By Theorem 5.4, choose a retained fixed component on which its trace class does not lie in the supported trace for Y∩jY \cap\mathfrak j. Starting with this closed subset, filter the nilpotent cone in j\mathfrak j by closed invariant subsets, adding one Frobenius orbit of JJ-orbits at a time, compatibly with closure. Write T0⊂T1⊂⋯⊂TmT_0 \subset T_1 \subset\cdots\subset T_m for the resulting supported trace subspaces, with T0T_0 the trace for Y∩jY \cap\mathfrak j. Let ii be the least index for which the component class lies in TiT_i. Then i>0i > 0, and its image u∈Ti/Ti−1u \in T_i/T_{i-1} is nonzero. A nontrivially permuted stratum has zero trace, so this step adds a single Frobenius-stable orbit O=J.eO = J.e outside Y∩jY \cap\mathfrak j.

Express uu as a finite combination of the fixed-simple classes in the OO-quotient, and choose their compact orbit-closure lifts as in the proof of Theorem 5.4. Subtract their sum from the component class. The remainder belongs to Ti−1T_{i-1} and, by the same theorem, is represented by a finite combination of compact Weil classes with that earlier support. Apply Lemma 6.6 to uu and these lifts to obtain a compact test supported on O‾\overline{O} with nonzero top mass. The earlier support bound defining Ti−1T_{i-1} meets O‾\overline{O} only in O‾∖O\overline{O} \setminus O. Proposition 6.4 and Lemma 6.7 therefore show that the remainder, and the proper-boundary contributions of the chosen lifts, have zero mass on BG.e^B_{\widehat{G.e}}. This also excludes contributions from incomparable JJ-orbits in the same ambient nilpotent orbit. Other components give zero Hom. Therefore

νf,g(BG.e^)≠0\nu_{f,g}\left(B_{\widehat{G.e}}\right) \ne0

for the resulting genuine finitely supported function test gg. Since e∉Ye \notin Y, the invariant set YY does not contain its ambient orbit, and BG.e^B_{\widehat{G.e}} is disjoint from BYB_Y. The asserted support condition fails. This proves the converse and completes the proof of Theorem 6.1.

No step used a rational point of XX, a cuspidality condition, or Hecke-finiteness. Empty and full YY are included, and the closed point vv may have any positive degree.

Compact spectral sets and rational descent

We first verify the elementary properties of the sets in (1.4). These properties supply the uniqueness used in Theorem 6.1; their proof is independent of that theorem.

Lemma 7.1. There are finitely many sets BoB_o. Each is compact and independent of the triple and compact form used to define it, and distinct orbits give disjoint sets. The algebra of representation characters restricted to B=⋃oBoB=\bigcup_o B_o contains the constants, separates points and is closed under complex conjugation. It is uniformly dense in C(B,C)C(B,\mathbb{C}). Each BoB_o is preserved by inversion and by multiplication by a finite-order central element of G^C\widehat{G}_{\mathbb{C}}.

Proof. Nilpotent orbits in a complex semisimple Lie algebra are finite in number. Triples for a fixed orbit are conjugate, and maximal compact forms of a complex reductive group, including its components, are conjugate. Consequently their images in the affine conjugacy quotient give the same BoB_o. The image of a compact group under the displayed continuous map is compact. The finite union BB, as a compact subspace of a complex affine variety, is metrizable.

Choose a maximal torus T⊂G^CT\subset\widehat{G}_{\mathbb{C}}. Polar decomposition in T(C)T(\mathbb{C}) gives

T(C)=T(R>0)×Tcpt,T(\mathbb{C})=T(\mathbb{R}_{>0})\times T_{\mathrm{cpt}},

where the positive factor is intrinsically described by the absolute values of all characters. This decomposition is Weyl-equivariant. The centralizer of the torus λe(Gm)\lambda_e(\mathbb{G}_m) in G^C\widehat{G}_{\mathbb{C}} is a connected reductive Levi subgroup. It contains ss, and a maximal torus of this Levi containing the semisimple element ss also contains its central torus λe(Gm)\lambda_e(\mathbb{G}_m). Thus λe\lambda_e and ss can be placed in a common maximal torus. The positive part of λe(r)s\lambda_e(\sqrt{r})s is exactly λe(r)\lambda_e(\sqrt{r}). Its Weyl orbit determines the dominant cocharacter λe\lambda_e: evaluation of cocharacters at r>1\sqrt{r}>1 is injective.

For completeness, that cocharacter determines the nilpotent orbit without forgetting any distinction in type D. Fix λ\lambda and write g^i\widehat{\mathfrak{g}}_i for its weight spaces. Whenever a triple has diagonal cocharacter λ\lambda, the sl2\mathfrak{sl}_2 decomposition gives

[g^0,e]=g^2.[\widehat{\mathfrak{g}}_0,e]=\widehat{\mathfrak{g}}_2.

Indeed, the raising map from weight zero to weight two is surjective on each irreducible sl2\mathfrak{sl}_2 summand. Thus the centralizer of λ\lambda has an open orbit through ee in the irreducible vector space g^2\widehat{\mathfrak{g}}_2. Two such open orbits must coincide. It follows that two parameters with the same positive part have the same ambient nilpotent orbit. This proves disjointness; it is also the description underlying [GLR, Lemma 3.1.3].

Representation characters separate semisimple conjugacy values in a connected complex reductive group: restriction to TT identifies their complex span with C[T]W\mathbb{C}[T]^W [20]. Hence their restrictions separate the points of BB. To check complex conjugation, write a=λe(r)a=\lambda_e(\sqrt{r}). For a representation DD, D(a)D(a) is diagonalizable with positive real eigenvalues and commutes with D(s)D(s); on each of its eigenspaces D(s)D(s) is unitary after choosing an invariant Hermitian form for the compact centralizer. Therefore

χD(as)‾=χD(as−1).\overline{\chi_D(as)}=\chi_D(as^{-1}).

A Weyl element in the triple’s SL2\mathrm{SL}_2 conjugates aa to a−1a^{-1} and commutes with ss. Thus

χD(as−1)=χD(a−1s−1)=χD∨(as).(48)\chi_D(as^{-1})=\chi_D(a^{-1}s^{-1})=\chi_{D^\vee}(as). \tag*{(48)}

The same representation D∨D^\vee works simultaneously on every BoB_o. The character algebra is consequently self-adjoint, and the complex Stone–Weierstrass Theorem proves its density on the finite compact union.

The triple Weyl element also shows that (as)−1(as)^{-1} is conjugate to as−1as^{-1}, proving invariance under inversion. A finite-order central element lies in the chosen compact triple centralizer: adjoining it gives a compact group, and maximality leaves that group unchanged. Multiplication by it therefore preserves BoB_o.

Corollary 7.2. A finite complex Borel measure on BB is determined by its integrals against all representation characters.

Proof. Integration against a finite complex measure is a continuous functional on C(B,C)C(B,\mathbb{C}) for the uniform norm. Lemma 7.1 makes the character algebra dense. Equality on the characters therefore gives equality of the continuous functionals and hence of the measures.

Independence of the coefficient isomorphism

All algebraically closed characteristic-zero coefficient fields below are considered as abstract fields. Both EE and C\mathbb{C} have transcendence degree 2ℵ02^{\aleph_0} over Q\mathbb{Q}, so there are field isomorphisms E≃CE \simeq\mathbb{C}. No continuity or compatibility with a selected embedding of the algebraic numbers is used.

Proposition 7.3. For a fixed closed invariant support YY, the subspace ι∗(FYAE)⊂AC\iota_*(\mathcal{F}_Y\mathcal{A}_E) \subset\mathcal{A}_{\mathbb{C}} is independent of the abstract isomorphism ι:E→∼C\iota:E \xrightarrow{\sim} \mathbb{C}, after matching nilpotent orbits by the split root datum. Consequently FYAE\mathcal{F}_Y\mathcal{A}_E is invariant under every automorphism of EE fixing Q\mathbb{Q}.

Proof. The point functions identify every transported ambient space with the same C(S)\mathbb{C}^{(S)}. The pinned split form identifies representation characters by highest weight across coefficient fields. The pairing (1.5) has rational coefficients. Spherical Hecke correspondences count the same finite-field modifications under each transport. Their normalization may be chosen on the complex side using the fixed positive q\sqrt{q}, so their operators TDT_D are the same for each ι\iota.

If a transported choice of q\sqrt{q} differs from this one, set

z=(2ρG)(−1)∈Z(G^)[2].z=(2\rho_G)(-1)\in Z(\widehat{G})[2].

where 2ρG2\rho_G is the sum of the positive roots of GG, viewed as a cocharacter of its dual group. The Satake parity convention at the degree-dd point introduces zdz^d: a highest weight μ\mu acquires the sign (−1)d⟨2ρG,μ⟩(-1)^{d\langle2\rho_G,\mu\rangle}, which is exactly its central character at zdz^d. This convention is also encoded by the modified dual group in [28]. On characters the change is therefore translation by zdz^d, and on moment measures it is the corresponding pushforward. By Lemma 7.1, this translation preserves each BoB_o. The contragredient convention similarly preserves each BoB_o by inversion. Thus these conventions do not change the support test.

Nilpotent orbits of the split group are identified across these fields using the fixed pinned Q\mathbb{Q}-form and their triple cocharacters, or equivalently their weighted Dynkin diagrams. No outer automorphism is introduced in this identification. In particular the orbit labels in YY and the compact set BYB_Y are fixed independently of ι\iota. Theorem 6.1 and Corollary 7.2 now characterize the transported subspace by the same moment equations and the same support condition for every test g∈ACg\in\mathcal{A}_{\mathbb{C}}. The subspaces are equal.

Fix one ι\iota and let τ∈Aut⁡(E/Q)\tau\in\operatorname{Aut}(E/\mathbb{Q}). Comparing ι\iota with ι∘τ\iota\circ\tau gives ι∗(FYAE)=ι∗τ∗(FYAE)\iota_*(\mathcal{F}_Y\mathcal{A}_E)=\iota_*\tau_*(\mathcal{F}_Y\mathcal{A}_E). Applying ι−1\iota^{-1} proves invariance.

Descent on finite coordinate sets

Lemma 7.4. Let EE be an algebraically closed extension of Q\mathbb{Q}, and let VQV_{\mathbb{Q}} have a specified basis, possibly infinite. If W⊂E⊗QVQW \subset E \otimes_{\mathbb{Q}} V_{\mathbb{Q}} is invariant under every τ∈Aut⁡(E/Q)\tau\in\operatorname{Aut}(E/\mathbb{Q}), then

E⊗Q(W∩VQ)⟶WE \otimes_{\mathbb{Q}} (W \cap V_{\mathbb{Q}}) \longrightarrow W

is an isomorphism.

Proof. The fixed field of Aut⁡(E/Q)\operatorname{Aut}(E/\mathbb{Q}) is Q\mathbb{Q}. Indeed, an algebraic element outside Q\mathbb{Q} has a different conjugate, and the corresponding embedding of its number field extends to an automorphism of EE. A transcendental element can be included in a transcendence basis; the substitution t↦t+1t \mapsto t+1 on that basis element extends from the rational function field to its algebraic closure EE. Thus it too is moved by an automorphism over Q\mathbb{Q}.

Let II be a finite subset of the specified basis, choose an order on II, and put

WI=W∩EI.W_I = W \cap E^I.

This is an invariant finite-dimensional subspace. Its unique reduced row-echelon basis matrix is unchanged by every automorphism over Q\mathbb{Q}: field automorphisms preserve the row space, the pivot positions and the normalization conditions. Every matrix entry therefore belongs to the fixed field Q\mathbb{Q}. Its nonzero rows give a rational basis, and hence

WI=E⊗Q(WI∩QI).W_I = E \otimes_{\mathbb{Q}} (W_I \cap\mathbb{Q}^I).

Every vector of E⊗QVQE \otimes_{\mathbb{Q}} V_{\mathbb{Q}} has finite support in the specified basis. Taking the directed union over II gives the claimed surjectivity. Injectivity follows by tensoring the inclusion W∩VQ↪VQW \cap V_{\mathbb{Q}} \hookrightarrow V_{\mathbb{Q}} with the flat Q\mathbb{Q}-module EE.

Proof of Theorem 1.2. Proposition 7.3 makes W=FYAEW = \mathcal{F}_{Y}\mathcal{A}_{E} invariant under all coefficient automorphisms over Q\mathbb{Q}. Apply Lemma 7.4 to VQ=AQV_{\mathbb{Q}} = \mathcal{A}_{\mathbb{Q}} with its point-function basis. This is exactly the map (1.3).

The argument applies to every closed invariant YY, including the empty set and the full nilpotent cone. The trace calculation uses all retained fixed components and actual finite linear combinations of Weil trace classes. The detector allows every finitely supported test function. Consequently the result holds for the entire specified space, without any additional finiteness or cuspidality assumption.

The argument also compares coefficient primes on the full function space under the same four conditions of Assumption 1.1. Put p=char⁡(Fq)p = \operatorname{char}(\mathbb{F}_{q}) and Eℓ=QℓE_{\ell} = \mathbb{Q}_{\ell} for ℓ≠p\ell\ne p. Let Yℓ⊂NEℓY_{\ell} \subset\mathcal{N}_{E_{\ell}} be closed invariant supports with the same nilpotent-orbit labels under the pinned split dual group. Then, as subspaces of AQ\mathcal{A}_{\mathbb{Q}},

AQ∩FYℓAEℓ=AQ∩FYℓ′AEℓ′,(ℓ,ℓ′≠p).\mathcal{A}_{\mathbb{Q}} \cap\mathcal{F}_{Y_{\ell}}\mathcal{A}_{E_{\ell}} = \mathcal{A}_{\mathbb{Q}} \cap\mathcal{F}_{Y_{\ell'}}\mathcal{A}_{E_{\ell'}}, \qquad(\ell,\ell' \ne p).

Indeed, choose the same closed point vv and abstract isomorphisms Eℓ≃CE_{\ell} \simeq\mathbb{C}. With the positive square-root Satake normalization, the moment equations for every f,g∈ACf,g \in\mathcal{A}_{\mathbb{C}} and the compact support sets in Theorem 6.1 are the same for every prime, as in the proof of Proposition 7.3. Uniqueness of the measures gives the same transported filtration in AC\mathcal{A}_{\mathbb{C}}. Intersecting with AQ\mathcal{A}_{\mathbb{Q}}, which every coefficient isomorphism fixes, proves the equality. As the matched closed orbit subset varies, these common rational subspaces form a filtration of AQ\mathcal{A}_{\mathbb{Q}} whose EℓE_{\ell} scalar extension is the original Arthur filtration, by Theorem 1.2. This compares rational function subspaces; it does not identify spectral support categories or individual eigenobjects.

Unramified cuspidal comparison

Corollary 7.5 (Cuspidal comparison across coefficient primes). *Keep the curve X/FqX/\mathbb{F}_q, the split connected semisimple group G/FqG/\mathbb{F}_q, and all four conditions of Assumption 1.1. Put p=char⁡(Fq)p=\operatorname{char}(\mathbb{F}_q) and Eℓ=QℓE_\ell=\mathbb{Q}_\ell for ℓ≠p\ell\ne p. At unramified level D=0D=0, let C0,Q⊂AQC_{0,\mathbb{Q}}\subset A_{\mathbb{Q}} be the cuspidal function space and C0,QC_{0,\mathbb{Q}} its rational orbit summands from [RA, Theorem 1.1], and set C0,ℓ=Eℓ⊗QC0,QC_{0,\ell}=E_\ell\otimes_{\mathbb{Q}}C_{0,\mathbb{Q}}. For each ℓ≠p\ell\ne p, let Yℓ⊂NEℓY_\ell\subset\mathcal{N}_{E_\ell} be closed and invariant, with the same nilpotent-orbit subset YY under the fixed pinned split rational dual group. Write Y=(Yℓ)ℓ≠pY=(Y_\ell)_{\ell\ne p} and define

FY,ℓQ:=AQ∩FYℓAEℓ,VY,Q:=⨁O∈YC0,O,Q.F^\mathbb{Q}_{Y,\ell}:=A_{\mathbb{Q}}\cap F_{Y_\ell}A_{E_\ell},\qquad V_{Y,\mathbb{Q}}:=\bigoplus_{\mathcal{O}\in Y}C_{0,\mathcal{O},\mathbb{Q}}.

Then

C0,Q∩FY,ℓQ=VY,Q,C_{0,\mathbb{Q}}\cap F^\mathbb{Q}_{Y,\ell}=V_{Y,\mathbb{Q}},
C0,ℓ∩FYℓAEℓ=Eℓ⊗QVY,Q.(49)C_{0,\ell}\cap F_{Y_\ell}A_{E_\ell}=E_\ell\otimes_{\mathbb{Q}}V_{Y,\mathbb{Q}}. \tag*{(49)}

The intersections are taken in the corresponding finitely supported function spaces. The equalities include the zero cusp space and empty or full YℓY_\ell.

This is precisely the unramified cuspidal common-scope form of [GLR, Conjectures 3.4.9 and 3.4.11]. The additional identification with the companion’s orbit summands concerns the D=0D=0 cuspidal subspace.

Proof. For split GG, the companion’s unramified double quotient is the set SS of bundle classes [RA, Section 6.1], giving the stated point-function embeddings. Fix ℓ\ell, an abstract isomorphism ι:Eℓ→∼C\iota:E_\ell\xrightarrow{\sim}\mathbb{C}, and a closed point vv with r=qdeg⁡vr=q^{\deg v}. The finite reduced global Hecke image on the cusp space gives finitely many joint eigenspaces [RA, Lemma 6.1]. Restrict to the spherical algebra at vv and group all joint characters with the same one-place Satake class. The ordinary Hecke compatibility of Theorem 2.3 and the companion’s volume-one normalization give

C0,C:=C⊗QC0,Q=⨁t∈ΣvCt,TV∣Ct=χV(t),C_{0,\mathbb{C}}:=\mathbb{C}\otimes_{\mathbb{Q}}C_{0,\mathbb{Q}}=\bigoplus_{t\in\Sigma_v}C_t,\qquad T_V|_{C_t}=\chi_V(t),

where the tt are distinct classes in the positive r\sqrt{r} convention and VV is any finite-dimensional representation of G^C\widehat{G}_{\mathbb{C}}. The possible square-root correction is a finite central translate [RA, Remark 6.3], and a contragredient convention gives inversion; both preserve every BOB_{\mathcal{O}} by Lemma 7.1.

The companion’s orbit descent assigns each joint character one orbit label, independent of the good place and complex embedding, and the complex scalar extension of each rational orbit summand is the sum of the joint eigenspaces with that label [RA, Lemma 6.2 and Propositions 6.5–6.6]. Every occurring embedded class of label O\mathcal{O} lies in BOB_{\mathcal{O}} by the all-embeddings compactness defining Rr,OR_{r,\mathcal{O}}. Since the BOB_{\mathcal{O}} are disjoint, all joint eigenspaces grouped into one CtC_t have the same label. Thus Σv⊂B\Sigma_v\subset B and

C⊗QC0,O,Q=⨁t∈Σv∩BOCt.\mathbb{C}\otimes_{\mathbb{Q}}C_{0,\mathcal{O},\mathbb{Q}}=\bigoplus_{t\in\Sigma_v\cap B_{\mathcal{O}}}C_t.

For the common support put BY=⋃O∈YBOB_Y=\bigcup_{\mathcal{O}\in Y}B_{\mathcal{O}}. Write f=∑tft∈C0,Cf=\sum_t f_t\in C_{0,\mathbb{C}}. For every g∈ACg\in A_{\mathbb{C}}, the finite atomic measure μf,g:=∑t[ft,g]δt\mu_{f,g}:=\sum_t[f_t,g]\delta_t on BB satisfies

[TVf,g]=∑tχV(t)[ft,g]=∫BχV dμf,g.[T_Vf,g]=\sum_t\chi_V(t)[f_t,g]=\int_B\chi_V\,d\mu_{f,g}.

Corollary 7.2 identifies μf,g\mu_{f,g} with the detector measure νf,g\nu_{f,g}. If ft≠0f_t \ne0, choose b∈Sb \in S with ft(b)≠0f_t(b) \ne0 and take the point function g=δbg = \delta_b. Then

μf,δb({t})=[ft,δb]=ft(b)∣Aut⁡(b)∣≠0.\mu_{f,\delta_b}(\{t\}) = [f_t,\delta_b] = \frac{f_t(b)}{|\operatorname{Aut}(b)|} \ne0.

The atoms are distinct, so no other local component cancels this mass. The test need not be cuspidal. Consequently all detector measures are supported in BYB_Y exactly when ft=0f_t = 0 for every t∉BYt \notin B_Y. Theorem 6.1 and the preceding orbit decomposition give

C0,C∩ι∗(FYℓAEℓ)=C⊗QVY,Q.C_{0,\mathbb{C}} \cap\iota_*(F_{Y_\ell}A_{E_\ell}) = C \otimes_{\mathbb{Q}} V_{Y,\mathbb{Q}}.

Pulling back by ι\iota, which fixes Q\mathbb{Q}, proves the second equality in (7.1). Intersect it with C0,QC_{0,\mathbb{Q}} and use C0,Q∩(Eℓ⊗QVY,Q)=VY,QC_{0,\mathbb{Q}} \cap(E_\ell\otimes_{\mathbb{Q}} V_{Y,\mathbb{Q}}) = V_{Y,\mathbb{Q}} to obtain the first. □\square

References

  1. [2][AG] Dima Arinkin and Dennis Gaitsgory, Singular support of coherent sheaves and the geometric Langlands conjecture, Selecta Mathematica, New Series 21 (2015), no. 1, 1–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00029-014-0167-5. Introduction locators refer to arXiv:1201.6343v4. https://arxiv.org/abs/1201.6343v4.
  2. [3][AGKRRV1] Dima Arinkin, Dennis Gaitsgory, David Kazhdan, Sam Raskin, Nick Rozenblyum, and Yakov Varshavsky, The stack of local systems with restricted variation and geometric Langlands theory with nilpotent singular support, arXiv:2010.01906v2, 6 April 2022. https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.01906v2.
  3. [4][AGKRRV2] Dima Arinkin, Dennis Gaitsgory, David Kazhdan, Sam Raskin, Nick Rozenblyum, and Yakov Varshavsky, Duality for automorphic sheaves with nilpotent singular support, arXiv:2012.07665v2, 17 May 2022. https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.07665v2.
  4. [5][AGKRRV3] Dima Arinkin, Dennis Gaitsgory, David Kazhdan, Sam Raskin, Nick Rozenblyum, and Yakov Varshavsky, Automorphic functions as the trace of Frobenius, arXiv:2102.07906v2, 3 June 2022. https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.07906v2.
  5. [6][Art] James Arthur, Unipotent automorphic representations: conjectures, Astérisque 171–172 (1989), 13–71. https://www.numdam.org/item/AST_1989__171-172__13_0/.
  6. [7][Ati] Michael F. Atiyah, Riemann surfaces and spin structures, Annales scientifiques de l’École Normale Supérieure (4) 4 (1971), no. 1, 47–62. https://doi.org/10.24033/asens.1205.
  7. [8][BZSV] David Ben-Zvi, Yiannis Sakellaridis, and Akshay Venkatesh, Relative Langlands duality, arXiv:2409.04677v1, 7 September 2024. https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.04677v1.
  8. [9][Bri] Michel Brion, Invariant Hilbert schemes, arXiv:1102.0198v2, 21 April 2011. https://arxiv.org/abs/1102.0198v2.
  9. [10]Pierre Deligne, La conjecture de Weil: II, Publications Mathématiques de l’IHÉS 52 (1980), 137–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02684780.
  10. [11]Vladimir Drinfeld and Dennis Gaitsgory, On some finiteness questions for algebraic stacks, Geometric and Functional Analysis 23 (2013), 149–294; arXiv:1108.5351v3, 26 October 2012. https://arxiv.org/abs/1108.5351v3.
  11. [12]Dennis Gaitsgory, Ind-coherent sheaves, arXiv:1105.4857v7, 22 September 2012. https://arxiv.org/abs/1105.4857v7.
  12. [13]Dennis Gaitsgory and Nick Rozenblyum, DG indschemes, arXiv:1108.1738v8, 19 March 2023. https://arxiv.org/abs/1108.1738v8.
  13. [14]Dennis Gaitsgory, Vincent Lafforgue, and Sam Raskin, Tempered vs generic automorphic functions and the canonical filtration on automorphic functions, arXiv:2603.26925v2, 2026. https://arxiv.org/html/2603.26925v2.
  14. [15]Dennis Gaitsgory and Sam Raskin, Geometric Langlands in positive characteristic from characteristic zero, arXiv:2508.02237v1, 4 August 2025. https://arxiv.org/html/2508.02237v1.
  15. [16]William M. Goldman and John J. Millson, The deformation theory of representations of fundamental groups of compact Kähler manifolds, Publications Mathématiques de l’IHÉS 67 (1988), 43–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02699127.
  16. [17]Marc Hoyois, Sarah Scherotzke, and Nicolò Sibilla, Higher traces, noncommutative motives, and the categorified Chern character, arXiv:1511.03589v3. https://arxiv.org/abs/1511.03589v3.
  17. [18]David Kazhdan and Andrei Okounkov, On the unramified Eisenstein spectrum, arXiv:2203.03486v3. https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.03486v3. Section and equation locators refer to this version.
  18. [19]Bernhard Keller, A-infinity algebras, modules and functor categories, arXiv:math/0510508v3, 12 February 2006. https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0510508v3.
  19. [20]J. S. Milne, Algebraic Groups: The Theory of Group Schemes of Finite Type over a Field, Cambridge University Press, 2017. https://www.jmilne.org/math/Books/iAG2017.pdf.
  20. [21]David Mumford, Theta characteristics of an algebraic curve, Annales scientifiques de l’École Normale Supérieure (4) 4 (1971), no. 2, 181–192. https://doi.org/10.24033/asens.1209.
  21. [22]Yoshinori Namikawa, Birational geometry for nilpotent orbits, arXiv:1002.2821v2, 10 March 2010; Handbook of Moduli, vol. III, Advanced Lectures in Mathematics 26 (2013), 1–38. https://arxiv.org/abs/1002.2821v2.
  22. [24][RGL] OpenAI, The Restricted Geometric Langlands Equivalence in Positive Characteristic, OpenAI Math Release preprint OAI:The-Restricted-Geometric-Langlands-Equivalence-in-Positive-Characteristic-September-24-2026, 2026.
  23. [25][PT] Tudor Pădurariu and Yukinobu Toda, The categorical DT/PT correspondence and quasi-BPS categories for local surfaces, Moduli 3 (2026), e1, 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1112/mod.2025.10017.
  24. [26][Pri] J. P. Pridham, The deformation theory of representations of the fundamental group of a smooth variety, arXiv:math/0401344v2, revised 3 July 2019. https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0401344v2.
  25. [27][Ras] Sam Raskin, Conjectures of Arthur and Ramanujan for unramified automorphic forms: announcement, ICM 2026 contribution, 12 October 2025, updated 10 March 2026. https://www.samraskin.net/icm.pdf.DOI
  26. [28][RS] Timo Richarz and Jakob Scholbach, The motivic Satake equivalence, Mathematische Annalen 380 (2021), 1595–1653, published 15 May 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00208-021-02176-9.
  27. [29][Sta] The Stacks Project Authors, The Stacks Project, 2026, Tags 00MA, 00IP, 0A06, and 0BKH, accessed 18 September 2026.
  28. [30][Tod] Yukinobu Toda, Categorical Donaldson–Thomas theory for local surfaces, arXiv:1907.09076v4, 10 June 2021. https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.09076v4.

Paper details

Contents