WorksMathematics
Kwapień's property (K) in Lipschitz-free spaces
Abstract
We prove that a Lipschitz-free space \F(M) fails Kwapień's property (K) whenever its underlying metric space contains a bi-Lipschitz copy of , where is closed with positive measure and contains a Cantor metric space. Consequently, this holds for every subset of , , whose closure has positive measure, and for a compact planar set of Assouad dimension one. These Lipschitz-free spaces embed into no strongly weakly compactly generated space and no -space; in the separable case their duals are not isomorphic to . Combining our result with a decomposition of Aliaga and Medina, we show that \F(\R^n\times\Z^m) is strongly weakly compactly generated if and only if it has (K), and this occurs precisely when . In particular, \F(\R^2) does not embed isomorphically into \F(\R\times\Z), answering a question of Aliaga. The planar examples nevertheless have the Dunford–Pettis property and Pełczyński's property and are weakly sequentially complete.
Introduction
Kwapień’s property (K), in the formulation of Kalton and Pełczyński [15 Section 2], concerns convex blocks of weak*-null sequences in a dual Banach space. A Banach space has property (K) if every such sequence admits a convex block subsequence converging to zero uniformly on each weakly compact subset of . Equivalently, the blocks converge to zero in the Mackey topology . Avilés and Rodríguez [7 Corollary 2.3] show that every subspace of a strongly weakly compactly generated (SWCG) space has (K). Finite-measure -spaces are strongly weakly compactly generated [22], so their subspaces have (K). Kwapień’s argument in Kalton and Pełczyński [15 Section 2] already shows that finite-measure -spaces have (K).
The Lipschitz-free space of is isometric to [10 Corollary 3.3] and therefore has (K). We show that already a Cantor family of suitable subsets of an interval forces failure of (K). The proof constructs a uniformly null, uniformly Lipschitz sequence whose every convex block subsequence is detected on one fixed fibre. The fibre depends on the whole block sequence. No linear extension operator on the ambient metric space is required.
All Banach spaces are real, , and denotes a Banach space isomorphism. A Cantor metric space is a metric space homeomorphic to . On , where and is a metric space, we use the metric
Equivalent standard product metrics give the same conclusions. We equip with the Euclidean metric inherited from . Any other norm on gives an isomorphic Lipschitz-free space, since the identity map is bi-Lipschitz.
2020 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 46B20, 46E15; Secondary 46A20, 28A80.
Key words and phrases. Lipschitz-free space, Kwapień’s property (K), Mackey topology, strongly weakly compactly generated space, Cantor set, Assouad dimension.
RVO: 67985840.
Theorem A. Suppose that a metric space contains a bi-Lipschitz copy of , where is closed and has positive Lebesgue measure, and contains a Cantor metric space. Then fails property (K) and is isomorphic to no subspace of a strongly weakly compactly generated space or of any -space. If is separable, then .
In particular, the theorem applies to for every uncountable compact metric space , to every cube with , and to every normed space of dimension at least two. Indeed, every uncountable compact metric space contains a Cantor subspace.
An application to the isomorphic classification of Lipschitz-free spaces follows from Aliaga and Medina’s decomposition [5 Proposition 3.14]: for , the space is isomorphic to the direct sum of and . Their proof uses the maximum norm; the preceding norm equivalence gives the Euclidean formulation used here. Throughout, and denote singletons.
Theorem B. Let be integers. The following conditions are equivalent:
is strongly weakly compactly generated;
has property (K);
.
Moreover, if and , then does not embed isomorphically into .
In particular, . This answers [1 Question 5], also recorded in [5 Section 3.5] and [17 Problem 2]. Mason’s recent Dunford–Pettis theorem [17 Theorem 1 and Corollary 2] shows that both spaces have the Dunford–Pettis property, so that property cannot distinguish them. Property (K) does, and the SWCG conclusion yields the stronger nonembeddability result. In the original topological formulation of SWCG, Theorem B also says that the closed unit ball of is metrisable in its Mackey topology precisely when .
An Eggleston-type product lemma gives a further geometric consequence.
Theorem C. Every subset whose closure has positive Lebesgue measure, where , satisfies all the conclusions of Theorem A.
Naor and Schechtman [20] proved that the -distortion of planar earthmover metrics on square grids tends to infinity, with a lower bound of order for grids of side length . Their theorem implies that and do not embed into . This also implies : otherwise would embed into and hence, by the measure-domination argument in Lemma 2.4, into a finite-measure -space. Theorem A gives a direct qualitative proof of these consequences. Its additional scope includes arbitrary positive-measure sets, products with null Cantor sets , and the example below, where square grids of uniformly bounded distortion are unavailable.
Theorem D. There is a compact planar set with satisfying all the conclusions of Theorem A. For each fixed distortion bound, contains bi-Lipschitz copies of square grids of only bounded size, even when arbitrary rescaling is allowed. The space has the Dunford–Pettis property and property () and is weakly sequentially complete.
The Euclidean examples above combine failure of (K) with the Dunford–Pettis property, property () and weak sequential completeness [16, 6, 17]. By contrast, complete purely 1-unrectifiable metric spaces have Schur Lipschitz-free spaces [4 Theorem C] and hence have (K); neither these Schur spaces nor our weakly sequentially complete examples contain .
Preliminaries
For a pointed metric space , let be the Banach space of real Lipschitz functions vanishing at , with norm . Its canonical predual is the Lipschitz-free space
Changing the base point gives canonically isometric spaces. McShane’s extension theorem [23 Theorem 1.33] identifies isometrically with a closed subspace of whenever contains the base point. Moreover, is canonically isometric to , where is the metric completion. A uniformly bounded sequence in is weak-null if it converges pointwise to zero, by density of the evaluation functionals.
For a Banach space , write for its closed unit ball. The Mackey topology on is the locally convex topology of uniform convergence on weakly compact subsets of . It is generated by the seminorms
One may equivalently restrict to absolutely convex weakly compact sets, since the closed absolutely convex hull of a weakly compact set is weakly compact. Thus in means that for every such . The weak topology requires only pointwise convergence on .
A convex block subsequence of has the form
where the are finite and non-empty. The following standard consequence of Eberlein–Šmulian connects the Mackey formulation of (K) with the pairing formulation in [15]. We recall the proof for completeness; see also the quantitative version in [9 Lemma 3.1].
Lemma 2.1. A weak-null sequence in converges to zero in if and only if for every weakly null sequence in .
Proof. One implication follows by applying uniform convergence to the weakly compact set . Conversely, failure of uniform convergence on a weakly compact set gives , indices and points with . By Eberlein–Šmulian, pass to a subsequence such that weakly. Set and at all other indices. Then is weakly null, whereas weak convergence gives eventually.
The proof of Theorem A uses only the forward implication. The converse reconciles the two formulations of property (K).
Definition 2.2. A Banach space is strongly weakly compactly generated (SWCG) if the relative Mackey topology on is metrisable.
This is the original definition of Schlüchtermann and Wheeler. By [22 Theorem 2.1], it is equivalent to the existence of a weakly compact absolutely convex set such that
Here , and is said to strongly generate . We use this characterisation below. Equivalently, there is a sequence of weakly compact absolutely convex subsets of such that, for every weakly compact and every , some satisfies . This expresses the weakly compact density condition: a countable family approximates every weakly compact set to arbitrary norm accuracy. The three equivalent formulations are also recorded in [13 Theorem 10]; for the density-condition viewpoint, see [12 Section 6.7, pp. 177–183].
The result below for separable Schur spaces is due to Schlüchtermann and Wheeler [22]; see also Mercourakis and Stamati [18 Example 1.3(ii)]. We include its short proof and the elementary permanence properties needed for Theorem B.
Lemma 2.3. Every separable Schur space is SWCG. Finite direct sums of SWCG spaces are SWCG, and the property is invariant under isomorphisms.
Proof. Let be a non-zero separable Schur space and let be dense in its unit sphere. The closed absolutely convex hull of is norm compact and has dense linear span. Since is absolutely convex, is norm dense in . Every weakly compact set is norm compact, by the Schur property and Eberlein–Šmulian. A finite -net in , followed by approximation of its points in , gives for some . The zero space is immediate. For a finite direct sum with the maximum norm, take the product of weakly compact absolutely convex generating sets and apply the inclusions in (2) to the coordinate projections of . Finally, an isomorphism transports a generating set and changes only the required approximation tolerance. □
SWCG itself does not pass to closed subspaces: Mercourakis and Stamati [18 Corollary 3.10] construct a non-SWCG closed subspace of . Thus the nonembedding conclusion in Theorem A uses the stronger fact that every subspace of an SWCG space has (K), due to Avilés and Rodríguez [7 Corollary 2.3]. Together with the finite-measure case of [22], this also gives the following observation for arbitrary measures and dual isomorphisms.
Lemma 2.4. Every separable closed subspace of any -space is isomorphic to a subspace of a finite-measure -space, and hence has (K). If a separable Banach space satisfies , then has (K).
Proof. For a dense sequence in a separable subspace of , put and . Every element of that subspace vanishes off , and , defined as zero when , is an isometry into , where is finite.
For the second part, identify , up to isomorphism, with a separable subspace of . For a dense sequence in , the finite positive measure dominates every . Absolute continuity is preserved under variation-norm limits, so Radon–Nikodým derivatives embed isometrically into . The subspace theorem for (K) completes the proof. □
The derivative map identifies isometrically with ; Pełczyński’s theorem [21] gives . We shall also use that Schur spaces have (K): their weakly compact sets are norm compact, and bounded weak-null sequences converge uniformly on norm-compact sets. Recall also that the Dunford–Pettis property is equivalent to whenever both and are weakly null. In contrast, the dual sequences in the definition of (K) are only assumed to be weak-null.
The product construction
Passing to a compact subset and rescaling, it suffices to consider compact with , and . When normalising , rescale the metric on by the same factor; this rescaling leaves the distortion of the embedding unchanged. Let
The Rademacher functions are orthonormal in . By Bessel’s inequality, applied to , we have for every , and their common Lipschitz bound 1 implies
Lemma 3.1. There is a weakly null sequence in the unit sphere of such that for all .
Proof. We first describe the affine extension used in [10 Theorem 3.2]. Since is compact and contains 0 and 1, each component of is an open interval with . For , define on and
This defines a linear operator . On , the slope of is , whose modulus is at most . If do not lie in the closure of one gap, let and be the first and last points of . Applying the preceding estimate on and , and the Lipschitz bound for on , gives
Since restriction to recovers , is an isometry. Its adjoint sends an evaluation at to the same evaluation on , and for it satisfies
where the evaluations on the right belong to . Thus maps the linear span of the evaluations on into and, by continuity, restricts to a contraction . The identity for and gives .
For , write for its almost-everywhere derivative. Such a function is absolutely continuous, , and . The interval representation in [10 Corollary 3.3] can therefore be described directly by
Indeed, whenever . Interval step functions are dense in , so the estimate shows that for every . Taking gives the reverse inequality, hence is an isometry. Its range is closed and contains every evaluation , so it is onto.
Put . Since , we have . For every ,
by Bessel’s inequality, since . Thus is weakly null. The function is constant on every gap of , so . Consequently
As , this also gives .
Let be a Cantor metric space. Fix a homeomorphism from the subsets of , identified with , onto . For a finite binary word , define the compact cylinder
For , put
The sequence decreases to zero. By (3), choose strictly increasing indices with . For a fixed and a subset , call the elements of the selected indices. Define on
These functions vanish on , satisfy , and are 1-Lipschitz in the first coordinate. To check the second coordinate, suppose that first differ at . If and a selected index lies in , the first selected indices agree and the values in (4) coincide. Otherwise all selected indices are at least ; this also holds when , since they are then at least . The difference is therefore at most . Going through now gives the explicit estimate
Proof of Theorem A. Reduce to the compact normalised case above and to a Cantor subspace. Let be a bi-Lipschitz embedding, and choose the base point . Write for the metric on , put , and define on . By (5), these functions have a common Lipschitz bound . McShane’s extension theorem [23 Theorem 1.33] gives the extensions
Here is the distance between and multiplied by the constant . The triangle inequality gives ; interchanging and proves the Lipschitz bound . For , the Lipschitz bound on gives for every , and taking shows that .
To retain the uniform bound , define
This replaces values above by and values below by . The scalar map is 1-Lipschitz and fixes every point of . Since on , it follows that still extends , vanishes at , and satisfies and . In particular, is weak*-null in .
For each fixed , the bounded linear map
has by the universal linearisation property of Lipschitz-free spaces [23 Theorem 3.6], and sends to a weakly null sequence. Let be any convex block subsequence of , with notation as in (1). Put and . For every , the least selected index at least is . Consequently
Lemma 2.1 proves that fails (K). Notice that the same fibre is used for the whole block sequence.
The subspace theorem from [7] excludes an embedding into an SWCG space. To exclude an embedding into an arbitrary -space, restrict it to the separable subspace . Applying the construction with ambient space shows that fails (K), contradicting Lemma 2.4. Finally, if is separable then so is , and the same lemma gives .
The construction also gives a quantitative estimate. Following [9 Section 3], for a bounded sequence put
The quantity is the supremum, over weak*-null sequences in , of the infimum of over their convex block subsequences. If is as in the proof above and , then
Indeed, for any , choose the indices so that . The functions in (4) are then -Lipschitz in the second coordinate and have Lipschitz norm at most . Run the extension construction with and truncate the extensions to . For every convex block sequence of these extensions, the weakly null sequence
satisfies
Letting gives (6). Since , we obtain whenever the product embeds isometrically.
This proof also explains the significance of positive horizontal measure. If a non-empty compact set has Lebesgue measure zero, then in and is identically zero. Moreover, has the Schur property: if is infinite, it is linearly isometric to by [10 Corollary 3.4], whereas for finite it is finite-dimensional. Thus contains no normalised weakly null sequence. This explains why the fibre argument requires to have positive measure; it does not show that this condition is necessary for to fail (K).
Proof of Theorem B. Each is countable and uniformly discrete, so is a separable Schur space by [14 Proposition 4.4]; it is therefore SWCG by Lemma 2.3. This settles the case , including the zero space if . For and , [5 Proposition 3.14] gives
where the second isomorphism uses [10 Corollary 3.3]. The first summand is isomorphic to and hence is SWCG; Lemma 2.3 applies again. The case is the same observation. Every SWCG space has (K) by [7]. If , then the underlying space contains an isometric copy of , so Theorem A gives failure of (K). Finally, embeds into no SWCG space when , which proves the final part of the theorem.
Positive-measure Euclidean sets
We include the following Eggleston-type argument for completeness; see [19] for related product theorems and their history.
Lemma 4.1. If , , is Lebesgue measurable and has positive measure, then contains , where is compact with positive measure and is a Cantor set.
Proof. By inner regularity, replace by a compact subset of positive measure. For , set and . The map is measurable: its distances to a countable dense family in are measurable by Fubini. Fubini and Lusin give a compact parameter set of positive measure on which is continuous and every has positive measure. Replace by the support of Lebesgue measure restricted to . The resulting compact set has no isolated points and retains both properties.
Choose and let . By continuity and the absence of isolated points, choose inductively and relatively open neighbourhoods for finite binary words , with , nested closures, disjoint sibling closures, diameters tending uniformly to zero, and
Here and below closures are taken in . Then
are compact, and the nested construction makes a Cantor set. Every point lost from the root fibre is lost at some edge of a finite branch, whence
For , the points along its branch converge to . Closedness of then gives . □
Proof of Theorem C. Apply Lemma 4.1 to , with , and then Theorem A. Since canonically, all the conclusions follow. □
Aliaga [1 Theorem 3.7 and Corollary 3.8] proves whenever is non-porous, in particular whenever it has positive measure. That dual isomorphism alone does not identify the weak* topologies determined by the canonical preduals. Theorem C establishes failure of (K) directly for those preduals. Aliaga’s subsequent theorem [2 Theorem 1] gives a complemented copy of in whenever is non-porous. It does not yield failure of (K), since is Schur. Indeed, the positive-measure hypothesis in Theorem C cannot be replaced by non-porosity: is non-porous in the all-scales sense of [1 Definition 2.1], but its Lipschitz-free space is SWCG. That definition requires a fixed such that every ambient ball , at every scale , contains a ball of radius disjoint from the set. Every point of is within of , so every ball of radius greater than meets . Taking rules out the required hole. This is compatible with the porosity of at small scales.
Candido, Cúth and Doucha [8 Theorem 1.16] proved for every . The non-isomorphism of the canonical preduals was already known: is Schur, whereas contains a copy of coming from a line. For , the present argument also distinguishes these preduals by property (K).
An example of Assouad dimension one
For a metric space , its Assouad dimension is the infimum of the exponents for which there is such that
where may be infinite and is the least number of balls of radius needed to cover the indicated set.
Proof of Theorem D. Starting with , at stage retain the two endpoint subintervals of relative length in each remaining interval. Let be the resulting Cantor set. The intervals at level have length , with .
We verify that . Fix and choose so that for . For , choose with and . Then . Distinct level- intervals are separated by gaps of length at least ; for there is just one such interval. Thus a ball of radius meets at most one, and . If , this is at most 4. Otherwise,
The same global estimate treats , so . Product covers give , and the contained interval gives the reverse inequality. Set and apply Theorem A.
Since is a compact subset of the plane, [16] gives and weak sequential completeness, while [17 Corollary 2] gives the Dunford–Pettis property.
Finally, suppose that satisfies
for some and fixed . Its image points are -separated and lie in a ball of radius . The Assouad estimate with exponent and gives
If the displayed outer radius exceeds , use instead. The constant depends only on , so is bounded for each fixed . □
The dimension in Theorem D is minimal even among complete metric spaces. If , every bounded ball in has zero -measure, and a countable covering by such balls gives . Thus is purely 1-unrectifiable, and [4 Theorem C] gives the Schur property and (K).
For context, Kochanek and Pernecká [16] establish and weak sequential completeness for Lipschitz-free spaces over compact subsets of superreflexive spaces. Aliaga, Pernecká and Quero [6 Theorem C] prove over Hilbert spaces; as this property passes to closed subspaces, it holds for all our Euclidean examples. More generally, Jung, Petitjean, Procházka and Quilis [11 Proposition 6.1(ii)] obtain for metric spaces of finite Nagata dimension, including doubling spaces. Mason’s theorem [17 Corollary 2] gives the Dunford–Pettis property for every subset of a finite-dimensional Euclidean space. The example above therefore has all three properties despite failing (K).
Further questions
Let be the middle-third Cantor set. Both and the product in Theorem D are porous in the plane. Indeed, all retention ratios are at most . For a point of either Cantor set and , the first level interval of length at most has a parent with a middle gap longer than , at distance at most from the point. This gives a complementary planar ball of radius inside the ball of radius centred at the corresponding product point. Larger scales follow from boundedness. For an arbitrary ambient ball , either misses the product or it contains a product point to which this construction applies with radius . Thus one may take porosity constant .
Porosity, rather than measure zero alone, places these products outside Aliaga’s non-porosity theorem. We know that , but the argument does not decide whether . A negative answer would disprove the line-or-plane dichotomy in [1 Question 3]; a positive answer would supply a porous example for [1 Question 4]. The recent theorem of Aliaga, Cúth and Vico [3 Theorem 1.1] makes every Lipschitz-free space the strongly unique isometric predual of its Lipschitz space. This does not require arbitrary Banach space isomorphisms of Lipschitz spaces to preserve their canonical weak* topologies, and therefore does not settle the question above. The example versus already shows that such an inference would fail.
Question 6.1. If is compact and fails (K), must contain a bi-Lipschitz copy of as in Theorem A?
Compactness is a substantive restriction here: a countable dense subset of the square has the same Lipschitz-free space as the square, but cannot contain such an uncountable product.
Question 6.2. Can the construction give explicit lower bounds for the -distortion of finite-dimensional subspaces of in terms of the separation scales of ?
The estimate (6) quantifies failure of (K), but does not by itself give finite-dimensional -distortion bounds. In particular, it does not recover the grid estimates of [20].
Use of artificial intelligence
This project originated in 2019. ChatGPT (OpenAI) was subsequently used to assess whether our preliminary results could address more recent problems, notably Aliaga’s question concerning the isomorphism of and [1 Question 5], also recorded in [17 Problem 2], and his questions about the isomorphism types of Lipschitz spaces over planar sets and the rôle of porosity [1 Questions 3 and 4]. It also assisted with literature searches and the revision of the exposition. We retain responsibility for the mathematical content and references. (T. Kania) MATHEMATICAL INSTITUTE, CZECH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, ŽITNÁ 25, 115 67 PRAHA 1, CZECH REPUBLIC AND INSTITUTE OF MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTER SCIENCE, JAGIELLONIAN UNIVERSITY, ŁOJASIEWICZA 6, 30-348 KRAKÓW, POLAND
Email address: [email protected], [email protected]
(J. Kąkol) DEPARTMENT OF FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS, FACULTY OF MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTER SCIENCE, ADAM MICKIEWICZ UNIVERSITY, UNIWERSYTETU POZNAŃSKIEGO 4, 61-614 POZNAŃ, POLAND
Email address: [email protected]
References
- [1]R. J. Aliaga, Lipschitz spaces over non-porous sets, J. Funct. Anal. 290 (2026), no. 11, Paper No. 111439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfa.2026.111439.
- [2]R. J. Aliaga, Lipschitz-free spaces over non-porous subsets of ℝⁿ, preprint (2026), arXiv:2607.29655. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.29655.
- [3]R. J. Aliaga, M. Ćuth and F. Vico, Lipschitz-free spaces are strongly unique preduals, preprint (2026), arXiv:2609.24392. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.24392.
- [4]R. J. Aliaga, C. Gartland, C. Petitjean and A. Procházka, Purely 1-unrectifiable metric spaces and locally flat Lipschitz functions, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 375 (2022), no. 5, 3529–3567. https://doi.org/10.1090/tran/8591.
- [5]R. J. Aliaga and R. Medina, Lipschitz extension and Lipschitz-free spaces over nets in normed spaces, preprint (2026), arXiv:2601.03131. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.03131.
- [6]R. J. Aliaga, E. Pernecká and A. Quero, Pełczyński’s property (V*) in Lipschitz-free spaces, Results Math. 80 (2025), Paper No. 197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00025-025-02510-6.
- [7]A. Avilés and J. Rodríguez, Convex combinations of weak*-convergent sequences and the Mackey topology, Mediterr. J. Math. 13 (2016), no. 6, 4995–5007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00009-016-0788-3.
- [8]L. Candido, M. Ćuth and M. Doucha, Isomorphisms between spaces of Lipschitz functions, J. Funct. Anal. 277 (2019), no. 8, 2697–2727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfa.2019.02.003.
- [9]D. Chen, T. Kania and Y. Yuan, Quantifying properties (K) and (μs), Math. Nachr. 296 (2023), no. 3, 996–1012. https://doi.org/10.1002/mana.202100198.
- [10]A. Godard, Tree metrics and their Lipschitz-free spaces, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 138 (2010), no. 12, 4311–4320. https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-2010-10421-5.
- [11]M. Jung, C. Petitjean, A. Procházka and A. Quilis, Affine approximation in finite Nagata dimension and applications to Lipschitz-free spaces, preprint (2026), arXiv:2606.11723. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.11723.
- [12]J. Kakol, W. Kubiś, M. López-Pellicer and D. Sobota, Descriptive Topology in Selected Topics of Functional Analysis: Updated and Expanded, 2nd ed., Developments in Mathematics 24, Springer, Cham, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-76062-4.
- [13]J. Kakol and M. López-Pellicer, On realmcompact topological vector spaces, Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fís. Nat. Ser. A Mat. RACSAM 105 (2011), 39–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-011-0003-0.
- [14]N. J. Kalton, Spaces of Lipschitz and Hölder functions and their applications, Collect. Math. 55 (2004), no. 2, 171–217. https://kaltonmemorial.missouri.edu/assets/docs/collect2004.pdf.
- [15]N. J. Kalton and A. Pełczyński, Kernels of surjections from L1-spaces with an application to Sidon sets, Math. Ann. 309 (1997), no. 1, 135–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002080050107.
- [16]T. Kochanek and E. Pernecká, Lipschitz-free spaces over compact subsets of superreflexive spaces are weakly sequentially complete, Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 50 (2018), no. 4, 680–696. https://doi.org/10.1112/blms.12179.
- [17]F. Mason, The Dunford–Pettis property for Lipschitz-free spaces over Rn, preprint (2026), arXiv:2609.28842. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.28842.
- [18]S. Mercourakis and E. Stamati, A new class of weakly K-analytic Banach spaces, Comment. Math. Univ. Carolin. 47 (2006), no. 2, 291–312. https://dml.cz/handle/10338.dmlcz/119593.
- [19]M. Michalski, R. Ralowski and S. Żeberski, Around the Eggleston theorem, Arch. Math. Logic 65 (2026), 193–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-025-00998-x.
- [20]A. Naor and G. Schechtman, Planar earthmover is not in L1, SIAM J. Comput. 37 (2007), no. 3, 804–826. https://doi.org/10.1137/05064206X.
- [21]A. Pełczyński, On the isomorphism of the spaces m and M, Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. Sér. Sci. Math. Astr. Phys. 6 (1958), 695–696.
- [22]G. Schluchtermann and R. F. Wheeler, On strongly WCG Banach spaces, Math. Z. 199 (1988), no. 3, 387–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01159786.
- [23]N. Weaver, Lipschitz Algebras, 2nd ed., World Scientific, Hackensack, NJ, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1142/9911.