betaFeedback

WorksMathematics

Second homology of some quandles

Abstract

We derive formulas from Eisemann's formula for the second quandle homology of quandles. We prove that for a finite injective quandle QQ, the second quandle homology H2(Q)H_2(Q) can be computed in a representation group of QQ, which is a finite quotient of the enveloping group of QQ, by giving a formula for that. We use this to compute H2(Q)H_2(Q) for QQ the subquandle of kk-cycles of SnS_n and QQ the quandle corresponding to the conjugacy class of a diagonalizable element of SL(n,q)SL(n,q), with some exceptions. For GG a finite group with trivial Bogomolov multiplier, as many classical groups, simple groups and (with exceptions) quasi-simple groups, we derive a formula for H2(Conj(G))H_2(Conj(G)) that can be computed in GG alone. The formula relies on conjugacy classes of GG, centralizers in GG of representative of such classes and the derived group of GG. If GG is moreover perfect this formula can be related to the first Hochschild homology of the group ring Z[G]\mathbb{Z}[G]. As an application, we compute H2(Q)H_2(Q) for QQ the conjugacy quandle of GL(2,q)GL(2,q) for q≠2,3q\neq 2,3.

Introduction and main results

A quandle QQ is a set equipped with a binary operation Q×Q→QQ \times Q \to Q satisfying some axioms. They originally appeared in knot theory [1]. To a quandle one can associate an enveloping group G(Q)G(Q) which is infinite for QQ non-empty. For quandles one has quandle homology and rack homology. Here, we consider quandle homology, more specifically the second quandle homology group. Study of second quandle homology is present in the literature. We cite [6], [7],[8] and [9] where the authors consider quandles of transpositions in SnS_n, Alexander quandles, generalized alexander quandles, the conjugacy quandle of the symmetric group and other examples. More generally, Eisermann ([5]), gives a formula to compute the second quandle homology from the enveloping group. In this text we derive formulas from this formula.

A representation group R(Q)R(Q) for QQ is a type of finite quotients of G(Q)G(Q) ([10]). We derive from Eisermann’s formula that for QQ a connected injective quandle, the second quandle homology is given by:

H2(Q)=([R(Q),R(Q)]∩CR(Q)(q))ab,H_2(Q) = ([R(Q), R(Q)] \cap C_{R(Q)}(q))^{ab},

where qq is an element in R(Q)R(Q) coming from QQ and CR(Q)(q)C_{R(Q)}(q) is the centralizer of qq in R(Q)R(Q). This formula is derived in section 1, where we also give some basic definitions (quandles, enveloping groups, representation groups etc.) and derive some facts used in sections 2, 3 and 4.

The set of kk-cycles of SnS_n forms a quandle with the operation x▹y=xyx−1x \triangleright y = xyx^{-1}. It is a subquandle of the conjugacy quandle of SnS_n. Such quandles are connected except when n=kn = k, k+1k + 1 for kk odd. We determine representation groups for these injective quandles when they are connected (with the exception of n=6,7n = 6, 7 for kk odd) and compute their second quandle homology using the above formula. The enveloping group for kk odd is determined. This is done in § 3, where we treat the cases kk even and kk odd separately.

In § 4, we show that for a finite injective quandle QQ, the second quandle homology is given by:

H2(Q)=ZnQ(nQ−1)⊕(⨁i[R(Q),R(Q)]∩CR(Q)(xi)[CR(Q)(xi),CR(Q)(xi)])H_2(Q)=\mathbb{Z}^{n_Q(n_Q-1)}\oplus\left(\bigoplus_i\frac{[R(Q),R(Q)]\cap C_{R(Q)}(x_i)}{[C_{R(Q)}(x_i),C_{R(Q)}(x_i)]}\right)

where nQn_Q is the number of orbits of QQ and xix_i represent in R(Q)R(Q) the orbits of QQ. We use this formula to compute the second quandle homology for the non connected quandles of kk-cycles still with the exception of n=6,7n=6,7. We also determine the enveloping groups of these quandles. We note that the last formula for connected differ in form from the one given before. We give a direct proof that both formulas agree.

In § 5, we consider GG a Schur cover of a centerless group. A conjugacy class of GG is a quandle with respect to the binary operation g▹h=ghg−1g\triangleright h=ghg^{-1}. We show that if the conjugacy class of x∈Gx\in G (xx not in the center) generates GG, then the conjugacy class form a connected injective quandle, GG is a representation group for this quandle and the first formula given here for quandle homology apply. As an application, we determine the second homology of the quandle defined by the conjugacy class of x∈SL(n,q)x\in SL(n,q) for xx diagonalizable, with some exceptions on n,qn,q.

In § 6, we show that if a finite group GG has trivial Bogomolov multiplier, then the second quandle homology of the conjugacy quandle Conj(G)Conj(G) of GG is given by:

H2(Conj(G))≃Zc(G)(c(G)−1)⊕(⨁C∈Cl(G)[G,G]∩CG(gC)[CG(gC),CG(gC)])H_2(Conj(G))\simeq\mathbb{Z}^{c(G)(c(G)-1)}\oplus\left(\bigoplus_{C\in Cl(G)}\frac{[G,G]\cap C_G(g_C)}{[C_G(g_C),C_G(g_C)]}\right)

where Cl(G)Cl(G) is the set of conjugacy classes of GG, gCg_C is a representative of the class CC and CG(gC)C_G(g_C) is the centralizer of gCg_C in GG. When GG is moreover perfect the sum over Cl(G)Cl(G) correspond to the first Hochschild homology group of the group ring Z[G]\mathbb{Z}[G]. We apply the above formula to compute H2(Conj(GL(2,q)))H_2(Conj(GL(2,q))) for q≠2,3q\ne2,3.

AI tools :

The author used Claude Sonnet 5.5 during the research process and for proof reading. The author checked the information obtained using Claude.

Quandles, second quandle homology and representation groups

We recall some facts about quandles, second quandle homology and representation groups. We also prove that for an injective connected quandle, the second quandle homology can be computed in a representation group by giving a formula for that. A criterion on wether a Schur cover of the inner automorphism group of a quandle is a representation group for the quandle is given.

Quandles

1.1. Quandles. A quandle is a set QQ equipped with a binary operation ▹\triangleright such that:

  • x▹x=xx\triangleright x=x for x∈Qx\in Q.

  • For all x,y∈Qx,y\in Q there exist a unique z∈Qz\in Q, such that x▹z=yx\triangleright z=y.

  • x▹(y▹z)=(x▹y)▹(x▹z)x\triangleright(y\triangleright z)=(x\triangleright y)\triangleright(x\triangleright z), for x,y,z∈Qx,y,z\in Q.

A subquandle of QQ is a subset stable under ▹\triangleright. One can construct a quandle from a group GG using the binary operation defined by x▹y=xyx−1x \triangleright y = xyx^{-1} for x,y∈Gx,y \in G. The defined quandle is called the conjugacy quandle and is usually denoted by Conj(G)Conj(G). A conjugacy class of GG is a subquandle of Conj(G)Conj(G). A map f:Q→Q′f:Q \to Q' is a quandle morphism if f(x▹y)=f(x)▹f(y)f(x \triangleright y)=f(x)\triangleright f(y). It is called isomorphism if ff is a bijection.

Inner automorphisms

For QQ a quandle and x∈Qx \in Q denote by LxL_x the bijection given by Lx(y)=x▹yL_x(y)=x \triangleright y for y∈Qy \in Q. LxL_x is called the left translation by xx. The inner automorphism group Inn(Q)Inn(Q) of QQ is the subgroup of bijections of QQ generated by the bijection LxL_x for x∈Qx \in Q. The orbits of QQ are the orbits of the action of Inn(Q)Inn(Q). The morphism x↦Lxx \mapsto L_x is a quandle morphism. A quandle is called faithful if the last map is injective. A quandle is called connected if QQ consist of one orbit under the natural action of Inn(Q)Inn(Q). For Q=Conj(G)Q=Conj(G) the group Inn(Q)Inn(Q) correspond to Inn(G)Inn(G) and the orbits are the conjugacy classes of GG.

Proposition 1.1. Let GG be a group and QQ be a conjugacy class of GG. If QQ generates GG as a group, then Inn(Q)≃Inn(G)Inn(Q)\simeq Inn(G) and QQ is connected. The isomorphism is given by Lx↦cxL_x \mapsto c_x where cxc_x is the conjugacy by x∈Gx \in G.

Proof. QQ is stable by Inn(G)Inn(G) and hence we have a morphism ϕ\phi from Inn(G)Inn(G) to the bijections of QQ. Since QQ generates GG, any element of GG is a product of elements of QQ. It follows that any element of Inn(G)Inn(G) restricted to QQ is a product of left translations of QQ. Hence, ϕ\phi is in fact a morphism Inn(G)→Inn(Q)Inn(G) \to Inn(Q). ϕ\phi is clearly onto. Now, let cgc_g be the conjugacy by g∈Gg \in G. Since QQ generates GG, cgc_g restricts trivially to QQ if and only if gg is central in GG. This proves that ϕ\phi is injective. We have proved that ϕ:Inn(G)→Inn(Q)\phi:Inn(G) \to Inn(Q) is an isomorphism. QQ is a single orbit under Inn(G)Inn(G). This proves that QQ is connected. □

Enveloping group

The enveloping group G(Q)G(Q) of a quandle QQ is the group:

G(Q)=⟨ex,x∈Q∣exeyex−1=ex▹y, for x,y∈Q⟩G(Q)=\langle e_x,x\in Q\mid e_xe_ye_x^{-1}=e_{x\triangleright y},\ \text{for }x,y\in Q\rangle

The enveloping group is also known as: the associated group, adjoint group or structure group. The group G(Q)G(Q) is infinite.

Proposition 1.2.

  1. The map φQ:Q→G(Q)\varphi_Q:Q \to G(Q) mapping x∈Qx \in Q to the corresponding generator is a quandle morphism for the conjugacy quandle structure on G(Q)G(Q).

  1. For f:Q→Conj(G)f:Q \to Conj(G) a quandle morphism there is a unique group morphism f~:G(Q)→G\widetilde{f}:G(Q) \to G such that f=f~∘φQf=\widetilde{f}\circ\varphi_Q.

A quandle QQ is called injective if φQ:Q→G(Q)\varphi_Q:Q \to G(Q) is injective.

Proposition 1.3. Let QQ be a subquandle of Conj(G)Conj(G) for some group GG. The quandle QQ is injective. In particular, the quandle defined by a conjugacy class of GG is injective.

Proof. This follows from the universal property of φQ\varphi_Q applied to the inclusion Q→Conj(G)Q \to Conj(G). □

Proposition 1.4. The abelianisation G(Q)abG(Q)^{ab} of G(Q)G(Q) is isomorphic to the free abelian group on the set of orbits of QQ. The abelianisation map can be identified to the morphism mapping exe_x to the orbit of xx.

As we have mentioned Q→Inn(Q)Q \to Inn(Q), x↦Lxx \mapsto L_x is a quandle morphism. Hence, we have a unique group morphism θQ:G(Q)→Inn(Q)\theta_Q:G(Q) \to Inn(Q) given by ex↦Lxe_x \mapsto L_x for x∈Qx \in Q.

References

  1. [1][DJ82] D. Joyce, A classifying invariant of knots, the knot quandle. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 23 (1982), 37–65.DOI
  2. [2][DB85] Burghelea, D., The cyclic homology of the group rings. Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici 60, 354–365, 1985.
  3. [3][Ka87] Karpilovsky, Gregory, The Schur Multiplier.Clarendon Press, 1987.
  4. [4][Ku10] Kunyavskiĭ Boris, The Bogomolov Multiplier of Finite Simple Groups. Cohomological and Geometric Approaches to Rationality Problems: New Perspectives, Birkhäuser Boston, 2010, pp. 209-217.
  5. [5][ME14] Michael Eisermann, Quandle coverings and their Galois correspondence. Fundamenta Mathematicae 225 (2014), 103-167.arxiv.org/abs/math/0612459
  6. [6][IV17] García Iglesias, A., Vendramin, L. An explicit description of the second cohomology group of a quandle. Math. Z. 286, 1041–1063, 2017.
  7. [7][BIMNP20] Rhea Palak Bakshi, Dionne Ibarra, Sujoy Mukherjee, Takefumi Nosaka, Józef H. Przytycki, Schur multipliers and second quandle homology. Journal of Algebra, Volume 552, Pages 52-67,2020.DOI
  8. [8][KI25] Katsumi Ishikawa,Computing the associated groups of quandles with tools from group homology theory. Fundamenta Mathematicae 268, 181-195, 2025.arxiv.org/abs/2402.15417
  9. [9][VL26] Lebed, Victoria, Conjugation groups and structure groups of quandles Journal of Group Theory, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 1045-1073, 2026.arxiv.org/abs/2407.02955
  10. [10][MM26a] Mohamad Maassarani, On irreducible representation of quandles, arxiv, 2026.arxiv.org/abs/2604.12550
  11. [11][MM26b] Mohamad Maassarani, On irreducible representations of conjugacy quandles, arxiv, 2026.arxiv.org/abs/2604.22078
  12. [12][JD26] Jacques Darné, Nilpotent quandles, Advances in Mathematics, Volume 495, 2026.

Paper details

vlnc:W_8pph7ux8
Version
v1 · latest
Published
Fresh — added to the Hub within the last 30 days
Added
License
CC BY 4.0
Usage

views · 0

downloads · 0

A view counts once per browser per day, a download each time the PDF is requested.

  • Mathematics

Not recorded for this paper

View statement
Looking for related papers…
Contents