Introduction

The congruences between classical modular forms of different weights assemble their Hecke eigenvalues into a single pp-adic algebra. Its spectrum is larger than an individual family of eigenforms: many such families can pass through the same classical point. The dimension of this spectrum measures how much variation is present when no slope or residual irreducibility condition is imposed.

Fix an odd positive integer NN. For i≥1i \ge1, let Mi(N)M_i(N) be the complex vector space of modular forms of weight ii and level Γ1(N)\Gamma_1(N), including Eisenstein series. For every prime ℓ∤N\ell\nmid N, write TℓT_\ell for the usual Hecke operator and let SℓS_\ell act on Mi(N)M_i(N) as ℓi−2⟨ℓ⟩\ell^{i-2}\langle\ell\rangle, where ⟨ℓ⟩\langle\ell\rangle is the diamond operator. Let

T≤k(2)(N)⊆End⁡C(⨁i=1kMi(N))T_{\leq k}^{(2)}(N) \subseteq\operatorname{End}_{\mathbb{C}}\left(\bigoplus_{i=1}^{k} M_i(N)\right)

be the Z\mathbb{Z}-algebra generated by TℓT_\ell and ℓSℓ\ell S_\ell for ℓ∤2N\ell\nmid2N. Set

Ak=Z2⊗ZT≤k(2)(N),A=T2(N)=lim←⁡kAk,(1)A_k = \mathbb{Z}_2 \otimes_{\mathbb{Z}} T_{\leq k}^{(2)}(N), \qquad A = T_2(N) = \varprojlim_k A_k, \tag*{(1)}

with transition maps given by restriction. The topology on AA is the inverse-limit topology, with the 22-adic topology on each AkA_k. All dimensions below are Krull dimensions.

Theorem 1.1. For every odd positive integer NN, every irreducible component of Spec⁡T2(N)\operatorname{Spec} T_2(N) has dimension exactly 4.

This is the p=2p = 2 case of Emerton’s Conjecture 2.9 [8]. The algebra in (1) retains all weights, all Eisenstein systems, and all residual systems of eigenvalues. In particular, the theorem does not require a residual Galois representation to be irreducible, nonscalar, or distinguished at 2.

History and the main input

Hida’s ordinary families [10] and the eigencurve of Coleman and Mazur [5] give fundamental constructions of pp-adic families of modular eigenforms. Gouvêa and Mazur’s infinite fern [9] explains how families intersect and produce higher-dimensional Zariski closures. Emerton’s account [8] formulates the dimension question for the full prime-to-NpNp Hecke algebra, without restricting to one residual deformation problem. His Corollary 2.28 gives the lower bound needed here: every irreducible component has dimension at least 4.

The complementary upper bound is a deformation-theoretic question. Mazur’s deformation theory [14] relates infinitesimal deformations of a Galois representation to its adjoint cohomology. For automorphic representations, the finite local conditions of Bloch and Kato [2] isolate a Selmer group within this cohomology. Under suitable hypotheses, Kisin [13] proved geometric adjoint Selmer vanishing and applied it to local deformation and eigencurve geometry. Allen [1] established adjoint Selmer vanishing under residual hypotheses and related local genericity to unobstructed deformations. Newton and Thorne [16] subsequently proved the vanishing theorem used here without the residual restrictions that would obstruct its application to all components at 2.

We use their Theorem 5.4 for classical cuspidal forms over Q\mathbb{Q}. The theorem includes p=2p = 2 and also includes a CM form provided its CM field is not contained in the cyclotomic 2-power extension. Odd level guarantees this last condition. The result concerns the full adjoint representation, of dimension four, which is the one required when the determinant is allowed to vary.

Method and organization

The proof works at characteristic-zero points, even on components whose residual systems are reducible or scalar. There are three steps. First, the integral algebra is a finite product of complete Noetherian local rings, and its classical points are Zariski dense. At 2 we justify Noetherianity using Chenevier’s determinant laws [4], avoiding division by 2 in the integral pseudorepresentation. Second, the Eisenstein locus has dimension at most 2. Together with Emerton’s lower bound, this supplies a classical cuspidal point of weight at least 3 on every component. Third, the tangent space at such a point has dimension at most 3: the Newton–Thorne theorem annihilates the global finite Selmer group, and the only nonzero local quotient has dimension 3 at 2. A dimension formula then adds the one-dimensional arithmetic quotient.

Two passages in this argument are useful beyond the immediate application. Section 3 constructs the Eisenstein interpolation maps directly from the inverse-limit Hecke algebra by a compact graph argument. Section 4 gives a characteristic-zero tangent bound for a compact Noetherian algebra carrying a two-dimensional determinant. In particular, it proves the continuity of the derivations that occur in its algebraic tangent space. Neither passage assumes residual irreducibility.

We supply these arguments in detail. The deep external inputs are the classical attachment and local compatibility of Galois representations, Emerton’s lower bound, Chenevier’s determinant theorems, and Newton–Thorne’s Selmer vanishing. Their relevant forms and hypotheses are stated where they are used.

The integral algebra and its Galois determinant

Our first goal is to put the inverse limit eq:1 in the category of Noetherian rings while retaining all of its classical systems. Write SS for the set of finite primes dividing 2N2N, and let G=GQ,SG=G_{\mathbb{Q},S} be the Galois group of the maximal extension of Q\mathbb{Q} unramified at finite primes outside SS. Ramification at infinity is allowed. All Galois cohomology will be continuous cohomology.

Finite stages and classical systems

We use the classical rationality, integrality, and simultaneous semisimplicity of the prime-to-level Hecke action; a convenient statement including weight one and Eisenstein forms is [8 Proposition 1.12 and Remark 1.13]. For cusp forms, old copies have the same good-prime eigenvalues as their associated newforms. On the Eisenstein subspace the eigenvalues are sums and products of Dirichlet character values and powers of primes.

Consequently, for every nonzero finite stage there is an embedding

Ak↪∏j=1mkOEk,j,(2)A_k \hookrightarrow\prod_{j=1}^{m_k} \mathcal{O}_{E_{k,j}}, \tag*{(2)}

where each Ek,j/Q2E_{k,j}/\mathbb{Q}_2 is finite and the coordinate maps are classical eigenvalue systems, with all necessary 22-adic embeddings included. Indeed, before tensoring with Z2\mathbb{Z}_2 the algebra embeds into a finite product of rings of integers of number fields. It is therefore finite and torsion-free over Z\mathbb{Z}; flatness of Z2\mathbb{Z}_2 preserves the embedding. Thus AkA_k is finite free over Z2\mathbb{Z}_2, and its image in (2) is closed. Zero initial stages, if present, can be discarded.

A classical point of Spec⁡A\operatorname{Spec} A means the kernel of a classical eigenvalue map A→OEA\to\mathcal{O}_E obtained from some finite stage. The following consequences will be used repeatedly.

Lemma 2.1. The ring AA is compact, Hausdorff, and reduced. Its classical points are Zariski dense, and the operators TℓT_\ell, ℓSℓ\ell S_\ell, ℓ∤2N\ell\nmid2N, topologically generate it over Z2\mathbb{Z}_2.

Proof. The restriction maps between finite-stage algebras are surjective: the generators at the smaller stage are restrictions of the same generators at the larger stage. Compactness and Hausdorffness follow from (1). Reducedness follows from the injections (2). Those injections also show that the intersection of all classical kernels in AA is zero, which is equivalent to the asserted density. Finally, the Z2\mathbb{Z}_2-algebra of polynomials in the indicated generators surjects onto each AkA_k, and is therefore dense in the inverse limit.

For every classical system, the theorems of Deligne and Deligne–Serre [6, 7] give a continuous two-dimensional representation of GG over a finite extension of Q2\mathbb{Q}_2; in the Eisenstein case one uses a direct sum of characters. Choose the Frobenius convention so that its characteristic polynomial at ℓ∤2N\ell\nmid2N is

Z2−TℓZ+ℓSℓZ^2-T_\ell Z+\ell S_\ell

after specialization. A stable lattice ensures integral traces and determinants at every element of GG.

An integral determinant law

A two-dimensional determinant over a commutative ring RR is a unital multiplicative homogeneous polynomial law of degree two R[G]→RR[G]\to R, compatible with extension of scalars; see [4 Section 1].

For a determinant DD, its trace and determinant on a group element gg are defined by D(Z−g)=Z2−t(g)Z+d(g)D(Z-g)=Z^2-t(g)Z+d(g). This notion works over rings in which 2 is not invertible.

Lemma 2.2. There is a continuous two-dimensional determinant over AA whose trace and determinant satisfy

t(Frob⁡ℓ)=Tℓ,d(Frob⁡ℓ)=ℓSℓ(ℓ∤2N).t(\operatorname{Frob}_{\ell})=T_{\ell},\qquad d(\operatorname{Frob}_{\ell})=\ell S_{\ell}\qquad(\ell\nmid2N).

Proof. At a fixed finite stage, take the tuple of traces and determinants of its classical Galois representations. The tuple belongs to the image of (2) on Frobenius conjugacy classes, by (2.2). The union of these classes is dense in GG by Chebotarev. The tuples are continuous class functions, and the image of (2) is closed. Hence the tuples belong to AkA_k at every g∈Gg\in G. Uniqueness on the dense union of Frobenius classes makes these functions compatible as kk varies. They give continuous functions t,dt,d with values in AA.

For completeness, the determinant law itself can be constructed without recovering it by division by 2. On a finite formal sum ∑gxgg\sum_g x_g g, prescribe the quadratic polynomial

∑gd(g)xg2+∑g<h(t(g)t(h)−t(gh))xgxh(3)\sum_g d(g)x_g^2+\sum_{g<h}\bigl(t(g)t(h)-t(gh)\bigr)x_gx_h \tag*{(3)}

where any ordering of the finite support may be used. In every classical representation this is the determinant of ∑gxgr(g)\sum_g x_g r(g); the formula is symmetric since t(gh)=t(hg)t(gh)=t(hg). All polynomial identities expressing normalization and multiplicativity hold coefficientwise in every classical specialization. Their coefficients therefore vanish in AA by Lemma 2.1. Formula (3) defines the required polynomial law over arbitrary AA-algebras, with trace tt and determinant dd. □

Noetherianity at two

Proposition 2.3. The ring AA is a finite product of complete Noetherian local rings with finite residue fields. Its given topology on each factor is the maximal-ideal-adic topology.

Proof. Jochnowitz’s finiteness theorem [11], in the form [8 Proposition 2.8], says that the reductions of the classical systems at fixed prime-to-2 level form a finite set. Every maximal ideal of AkA_k is detected by such a reduction: the product in (2) is finite integral over AkA_k, so one can apply lying over. Each AkA_k is a finite product of complete local rings with finite residue fields. A surjective transition map Ak+1→AkA_{k+1}\to A_k injects the set of maximal ideals of AkA_k into that of Ak+1A_{k+1}. These increasing sets have bounded cardinality, so stabilize on a tail. The corresponding local-factor maps are surjective, and identify their residue fields. We obtain

A=∏α=1sA(α).A=\prod_{\alpha=1}^{s}A^{(\alpha)}.

where each A(α)A^{(\alpha)} is a profinite local ring with finite residue field kαk_\alpha. The canonical Witt coefficient maps W(kα)W(k_\alpha) into the finite-stage local rings are the unique unramified lifts of the residue-field identifications. Their uniqueness makes them compatible, and gives A(α)A^{(\alpha)} its W(kα)W(k_\alpha)-algebra structure. Project the determinant of Lemma 2.2 to this factor, and let D‾α\overline{D}_\alpha be its reduction. Chenevier’s determinant deformation theorem [4 Propositions 3.3 and 3.7] provides a complete Noetherian local universal ring RD‾αR_{\overline{D}_\alpha} with finite residue field, representing continuous deformations of D‾α\overline{D}_\alpha. Here the relevant finiteness hypothesis is Mazur’s condition: every open subgroup H⊆GH\subseteq G has only finitely many continuous homomorphisms to Z/2Z\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}. For GQ,SG_{\mathbb{Q},S} this follows from number-field finiteness for quadratic extensions with ramification restricted to a fixed finite set; see also [4 Example 3.6].

Apply the universal property to finite quotients and pass to the inverse limit. This gives a continuous map

RD‾α⟶A(α).R_{\overline{D}_{\alpha}} \longrightarrow A^{(\alpha)}.

Its image contains the projections of every TℓT_{\ell} and ℓSℓ\ell S_{\ell}. The image is compact and therefore closed, so Lemma 2.1 makes the map surjective. Its kernel is closed; the quotient is a complete Noetherian local ring. The continuous bijection from this compact quotient to the Hausdorff ring A(α)A^{(\alpha)} is a homeomorphism. This proves the topology assertion as well.

The determinant argument supplies the p=2p = 2 justification for the pseudodeformation step in [8 Theorem 2.7], whose original references included an odd-prime restriction. No division by 2 has been used in Proposition 2.3.

We now record the geometric input from the infinite fern.

Theorem 2.4 (Emerton). For the algebra AA in (1.1), every irreducible component of Spec⁡A\operatorname{Spec} A has dimension at least 4.

This is [8 Corollary 2.28], with the definitions in Sections 2.1 and 2.5 of that paper and with p=2p = 2. It concerns the Hecke algebra of all modular forms used here, rather than a universal deformation ring for an irreducible residual representation.

Finding cuspidal points on every component

The lower bound in Theorem 2.4 lets us exclude small classical loci. We show that Eisenstein systems cannot fill a component, even when all weights are allowed.

Proposition 3.1. The closure of the classical points of bounded weight has dimension at most 1. The closure of all Eisenstein points has dimension at most 2.

Proof. Systems of weights at most kk factor through AkA_k, which is finite over Z2\mathbb{Z}_2. Their closure therefore lies in the one-dimensional closed subset defined by ker⁡(A→Ak)\ker(A \to A_k). In particular, we may discard weights one and two when considering the Eisenstein locus.

In weight i≥3i \ge3, an Eisenstein system has eigenvalues

Tℓ⟼ψ(ℓ)+ϕ(ℓ)ℓi−1,ℓSℓ⟼ψ(ℓ)ϕ(ℓ)ℓi−1,(4)T_{\ell} \longmapsto\psi(\ell) + \phi(\ell)\ell^{i-1}, \qquad\ell S_{\ell} \longmapsto\psi(\ell)\phi(\ell)\ell^{i-1}, \tag*{(4)}

where ψ,ϕ\psi,\phi are Dirichlet characters of conductors dividing NN. The standard Eisenstein description gives these formulas; oldforms do not change the good-prime system. There are finitely many possible pairs, including their 2-adic embeddings. Partition the systems by pair and by the parity of ii. A family with finitely many weights has already been dealt with, so fix an infinite family, indexed by a set II of weights, and a finite extension E/Q2E/\mathbb{Q}_2 containing the character values. Put O=OE\mathcal{O} = \mathcal{O}_E.

Every odd prime has a unique expression

ℓ=sℓ5bℓ,sℓ∈{1,−1}, bℓ∈Z2.\ell= s_{\ell}5^{b_{\ell}}, \qquad s_{\ell} \in\{1,-1\},\ b_{\ell} \in\mathbb{Z}_2.

On the fixed parity class, sℓi−1s_{\ell}^{i-1} is constant. In (3.1), replace ℓi−1\ell^{i-1} by sℓi−1(1+X)bℓ∈O[[X]]s_{\ell}^{i-1}(1+X)^{b_{\ell}} \in\mathcal{O}[[X]]. The resulting series specialize correctly at

X=xi:=5i−1−1∈4Z2,i∈I.(5)X = x_i := 5^{i-1} - 1 \in4\mathbb{Z}_2,\qquad i \in I. \tag*{(5)}

We next verify that this prescription extends from generators to the inverse-limit algebra. Give O[[X]]\mathcal{O}[[X]] its maximal-ideal-adic topology. Let CC be the closure in A×O[[X]]A \times\mathcal{O}[[X]] of the Z2\mathbb{Z}_2-algebra generated by the paired Hecke generators and their prescribed series. The projection C→AC \to A is surjective: its image is closed by compactness and contains a dense subalgebra. For every (a,F)∈C(a,F) \in C and i∈Ii \in I, continuity gives

λi(a)=F(xi).(6)\lambda_i(a) = F(x_i). \tag*{(6)}

where λi\lambda_i is the corresponding classical system. If (0,F)∈C(0,F) \in C, then FF vanishes at all the distinct xix_i. The series F(4Y)F(4Y) is a restricted power series, since its coefficients tend to zero. Strassmann’s theorem therefore implies F(4Y)=0F(4Y) = 0, and hence F=0F = 0. Thus C→AC \to A is also injective. It is a homeomorphism, and the second projection defines a continuous map

Φ:A⟶O[[X]].(7)\Phi: A \longrightarrow\mathcal{O}[[X]]. \tag*{(7)}

Let B=Φ(A)B = \Phi(A), a compact, hence closed, subring of O[[X]]\mathcal{O}[[X]]. Choose a prime ℓ∤2N\ell\nmid2N with

ℓ≡1(modN),ℓ≡5(mod8).\ell\equiv 1 \pmod{N}, \qquad\ell\equiv 5 \pmod{8}.

Such primes exist by the Chinese remainder theorem and Dirichlet’s theorem. For this prime ψ(ℓ)=ϕ(ℓ)=1\psi(\ell) = \phi(\ell) = 1, sℓ=1s_\ell= 1, and bℓ∈Z2×b_\ell\in\mathbb{Z}_2^\times. It follows from the image of ℓSℓ\ell S_\ell that u=(1+X)bℓ∈Bu = (1 + X)^{b_\ell} \in B. The series

ubℓ−1=∑n≥0(bℓ−1n)(u−1)n=1+Xu^{b_\ell^{-1}} = \sum_{n \ge0} \binom{b_\ell^{-1}}{n}(u - 1)^n = 1 + X

converges in O[[X]]\mathcal{O}[[X]], and its partial sums belong to BB. Closedness gives X∈BX \in B and then Z2[[X]]⊆B\mathbb{Z}_2[[X]] \subseteq B. A finite Z2\mathbb{Z}_2-basis of O\mathcal{O} consequently generates O[[X]]\mathcal{O}[[X]] as a BB-module. This is a finite integral extension, so dim⁡B=dim⁡O[[X]]=2\dim B = \dim\mathcal{O}[[X]] = 2. All the points in this family factor through B=A/ker⁡ΦB = A/\ker\Phi by (6); their closure has dimension at most 2. Taking the finite union over the families, and adding weights one and two, proves the claim.

Corollary 3.2. For every minimal prime PP of AA, there is a classical cuspidal map λ:A→OE\lambda: A \to\mathcal{O}_E of weight at least 3 such that P⊆x:=ker⁡λP \subseteq\mathfrak{x} := \ker\lambda and x\mathfrak{x} belongs to no other irreducible component of Spec⁡A\operatorname{Spec} A.

Proof. Let ZZ be the closure of the Eisenstein points and of the points of weights one and two. By Proposition 3.1, dim⁡Z≤2\dim Z \le2, whereas dim⁡V(P)≥4\dim V(P) \ge4 by Theorem 2.4. Since AA is Noetherian, it has finitely many minimal primes. Removing ZZ and every component other than V(P)V(P) leaves an open subset of Spec⁡A\operatorname{Spec} A containing the point PP. This open subset is nonempty and lies in V(P)V(P). Lemma 2.1 supplies a classical point in it, which has the asserted properties.

Fix a point furnished by Corollary 3.2. Its system comes from a cuspidal newform ff of weight k≥3k \ge3 and level dividing NN. Enlarging EE if necessary, let

r:G⟶GL⁡2(E)(8)r : G \longrightarrow\operatorname{GL}_2(E) \tag*{(8)}

be its absolutely irreducible Galois representation. Absolute irreducibility here is a characteristic-zero theorem for cuspidal newforms [17 Theorem 2.3]; nothing is asserted about its reduction. The specializations λ(t),λ(d)\lambda(t), \lambda(d) are the trace and determinant of rr.

A tangent bound in characteristic zero

We prove the tangent estimate in a form that separates it from the particular Hecke algebra. For a representation rr, the notation ad⁡r\operatorname{ad} r means End⁡E(E2)\operatorname{End}_{E}(E^{2}) with the conjugation action, not its trace-zero subspace.

Proposition 4.1. Let RR be a compact Hausdorff Noetherian topological Zp\mathbb{Z}_{p}-algebra, with continuous structure map Zp→R\mathbb{Z}_{p} \to R. Suppose a profinite group HH has a continuous two-dimensional determinant over RR, with trace tt and determinant dd, and that their values topologically generate RR over Zp\mathbb{Z}_{p}. Let λ:R→OE\lambda: R \to\mathcal{O}_{E} be a continuous Zp\mathbb{Z}_{p}-algebra map, where E/QpE/\mathbb{Q}_{p} is finite, and suppose its specialized determinant is that of an absolutely irreducible continuous representation r:H→GL⁡2(E)r : H \to\operatorname{GL}_{2}(E). For x=ker⁡λ\mathfrak{x} = \ker\lambda,

dim⁡Rx≤edim⁡Rx≤dim⁡EH1(H,ad⁡r).(9)\dim R_{\mathfrak{x}} \leq\operatorname{edim} R_{\mathfrak{x}} \leq\dim_{E} H^{1}(H,\operatorname{ad} r). \tag*{(9)}

Proof. The first inequality is the usual dimension bound for a Noetherian local ring. We prove the second by relating derivations to first-order Galois deformations.

The algebraic tangent space consists of continuous derivations. The image R/xR/\mathfrak{x} is a Zp\mathbb{Z}_{p}-submodule of OE\mathcal{O}_{E}, so is finite over Zp\mathbb{Z}_{p}. Its fraction field E0=Frac⁡(R/x)E_{0} = \operatorname{Frac}(R/\mathfrak{x}) is the residue field of RxR_{\mathfrak{x}} and is finite over Qp\mathbb{Q}_{p}. Since p∉xp \notin\mathfrak{x}, RxR_{\mathfrak{x}} is a Qp\mathbb{Q}_{p}-algebra. Put m=xRx\mathfrak{m} = \mathfrak{x}R_{\mathfrak{x}}. Separability of E0/QpE_{0}/\mathbb{Q}_{p} gives a coefficient field in Rx/m2R_{\mathfrak{x}}/\mathfrak{m}^{2}, and every Qp\mathbb{Q}_{p}-derivation kills this field. It follows that

Der⁡Qp(Rx,E)≃Hom⁡E0(m/m2,E),(10)\operatorname{Der}_{\mathbb{Q}_{p}}(R_{\mathfrak{x}},E) \simeq\operatorname{Hom}_{E_{0}}(\mathfrak{m}/\mathfrak{m}^{2},E), \tag*{(10)}

so the left side has EE-dimension edim⁡Rx\operatorname{edim} R_{\mathfrak{x}}. The coefficient field can also be obtained by lifting a primitive element of the finite separable extension across the square-zero ideal; its minimal polynomial has invertible derivative.

Let DD be such a derivation, restricted to RR. It is Zp\mathbb{Z}_{p}-linear and vanishes on x2\mathfrak{x}^{2}. Noetherianity makes x/x2\mathfrak{x}/\mathfrak{x}^{2} finite over R/xR/\mathfrak{x}, and the exact sequence

0⟶x/x2⟶R/x2⟶R/x⟶00 \longrightarrow\mathfrak{x}/\mathfrak{x}^{2} \longrightarrow R/\mathfrak{x}^{2} \longrightarrow R/\mathfrak{x} \longrightarrow0

shows that R/x2R/\mathfrak{x}^{2} is finite over Zp\mathbb{Z}_{p}. Every finitely generated ideal of RR is closed: it is the image of a continuous map Rm→RR^{m} \to R, hence compact. The quotient topology on R/x2R/\mathfrak{x}^{2} is its usual finite-module topology, since a continuous surjection from a finite free Zp\mathbb{Z}_{p}-module to it is a quotient map between compact Hausdorff spaces. Any Zp\mathbb{Z}_{p}-linear map from a finite Zp\mathbb{Z}_{p}-module to EE is continuous. In particular, D:R→ED : R \to E is continuous.

First-order determinants lift to continuous representations. Write E[ε]E[\varepsilon] for the dual-number EE-algebra, with ε2=0\varepsilon^{2} = 0. The map λ+εD:R→E[ε]\lambda+ \varepsilon D : R \to E[\varepsilon] specializes the determinant to a continuous determinant lifting that of rr. Passing to the canonical Cayley–Hamilton quotient of E[ε][H]E[\varepsilon][H] (the quotient imposing the characteristic-polynomial identities of this determinant), the absolutely irreducible lifting theorem for determinants [4 Theorem 2.22(i) and Corollary 2.23] gives a representation

rD:H⟶GL⁡2(E[ε])r_{D} : H \longrightarrow\operatorname{GL}_{2}(E[\varepsilon])

with this determinant, whose reduction can be identified with rr. Its applicability is over the Henselian local ring E[ε]E[\varepsilon]: the residual representation at this point is the split absolutely irreducible representation rr over the characteristic-zero field EE.

Here continuity of rDr_{D} follows from continuity of its trace. Choose g1,…,g4∈Hg_{1},\ldots,g_{4} \in H such that the matrices r(gj)r(g_{j}) form an EE-basis of M2(E)M_{2}(E); absolute irreducibility guarantees such a choice. The lifts rD(gj)r_D(g_j) form a basis over E[ε]E[\varepsilon]. The trace pairing on this matrix algebra is nondegenerate, so the coordinates of rD(g)r_D(g) in that basis are obtained by inverting a fixed Gram matrix and using the four functions

g⟼tr⁡(rD(g)rD(gj))=λ(t(ggj))+εD(t(ggj)).g \longmapsto\operatorname{tr}(r_D(g)r_D(g_j))=\lambda(t(gg_j))+\varepsilon D(t(gg_j)).

These functions are continuous. Hence rDr_D is continuous.

Traces detect tangent vectors. Write rD(g)=(1+εc(g))r(g)r_D(g)=(1+\varepsilon c(g))r(g). The homomorphism identity is exactly the cocycle identity for a continuous c∈Z1(H,ad⁡r)c \in Z^1(H,\operatorname{ad} r). Comparing traces gives

D(t(g))=tr⁡(c(g)r(g)).D(t(g))=\operatorname{tr}(c(g)r(g)).

Coboundaries have zero image under the linear map

H1(H,ad⁡r)⟶Maps⁡(H,E),[c]⟼(g⟼tr⁡(c(g)r(g))).(11)H^1(H,\operatorname{ad} r)\longrightarrow\operatorname{Maps}(H,E),\qquad[c]\longmapsto\left(g\longmapsto\operatorname{tr}(c(g)r(g))\right). \tag*{(11)}

where Maps⁡(H,E)\operatorname{Maps}(H,E) is the EE-vector space of all functions H→EH \to E. Thus the image of the linear map D⟼D∘tD \longmapsto D \circ t lies in the image of (11).

This map on derivations is injective. Indeed the degree-two trace identity gives

2d(g)=t(g)2−t(g2).2d(g)=t(g)^2-t(g^2).

If D(t(g))=0D(t(g))=0 for every gg, applying DD and working in the characteristic-zero field EE gives D(d(g))=0D(d(g))=0 for every gg. The derivation then vanishes on the algebra of generators, and on its closure by continuity. Its restriction to RR determines it on RxR_{\mathfrak{x}} by the quotient rule. The injection and (10) now prove (9). □

Apply Proposition 4.1 to R=AR=A, p=2p=2, H=GH=G, and the classical point chosen above. Propositions and lemmas in Section 2 verify its hypotheses. With V=ad⁡rV=\operatorname{ad} r, we obtain

dim⁡Ax≤edim⁡Ax≤dim⁡EH1(G,V).(12)\dim A_{\mathfrak{x}} \le\operatorname{edim} A_{\mathfrak{x}} \le\dim_E H^1(G,V). \tag*{(12)}

The use of characteristic zero in the last proof does not impose any condition on the residual system of the component.

The adjoint cohomology bound

We now show that the right side of (12) is at most 3. For a finite place vv, write Hj(Qv,V)H^j(\mathbb{Q}_v,V) for the cohomology of its absolute Galois group. The Bloch–Kato finite subspace is

Hf1(Qv,V)={ker⁡(H1(Qv,V)→H1(Iv,V)),v≠2,ker⁡(H1(Q2,V)→H1(Q2,V⊗Q2Bcris)),v=2,H^1_f(\mathbb{Q}_v,V)= \begin{cases} \ker\left(H^1(\mathbb{Q}_v,V)\to H^1(I_v,V)\right), & v\ne2,\\ \ker\left(H^1(\mathbb{Q}_2,V)\to H^1(\mathbb{Q}_2,V\otimes_{\mathbb{Q}_2}B_{\mathrm{cris}})\right), & v=2, \end{cases}

where IvI_v is inertia and BcrisB_{\mathrm{cris}} is Fontaine’s crystalline period ring. The global group Hf1(Q,V)H^1_f(\mathbb{Q},V) consists of classes satisfying these conditions at every finite place. Conditions at infinity impose nothing here: the positive-degree cohomology of the real Galois group with EE-coefficients vanishes, since 2 is invertible in EE.

Global Selmer vanishing

The input from [16 Theorem 5.4], specialized to GL2/Q\mathrm{GL}_2/\mathbb{Q}, is the following: if a regular algebraic cuspidal automorphic representation is non-CM, or is CM by a quadratic field not contained in Q(ζ2∞)\mathbb{Q}(\zeta_{2^\infty}), then the finite Selmer group of its full 2-adic adjoint representation vanishes. There is no hypothesis of residual irreducibility or an odd-prime restriction in this statement.

Lemma 5.1. For the representation (3.5), Hf1(Q,ad⁡r)=0H^1_f(\mathbb{Q},\operatorname{ad} r)=0.

Proof. The form ff has weight at least 3, so its associated cuspidal automorphic representation is regular algebraic, in the usual cohomological normalization. Twists introduced by normalization do not change its adjoint representation.

Only the CM case requires a check. If ff has CM by KK, its automorphic representation has the quadratic self-twist χK/Q\chi_{K/\mathbb{Q}}. Since the level of ff divides the odd integer NN, its local representation at 2 is unramified. The local Langlands parameter of an unramified representation has trivial inertia; tensoring it with a ramified character cannot leave it unchanged. Thus χK/Q\chi_{K/\mathbb{Q}} is unramified at 2. The three quadratic subfields of Q(ζ2∞)\mathbb{Q}(\zeta_{2^\infty}) are Q(−1)\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{-1}), Q(2)\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2}), and Q(−2)\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{-2}), all ramified at 2. Therefore KK is not contained in that cyclotomic extension. Newton–Thorne’s theorem applies in both cases and gives the result. We may enlarge the finite coefficient field to apply the theorem; vanishing descends to EE under finite extension of scalars. □

The local quotients

Global Selmer vanishing will make restriction to the sum of the local quotients injective. To compute these quotients, we first use local Tate duality to eliminate the H2H^2 terms from the local Euler characteristic formulas.

Lemma 5.2. For every finite place vv, H0(Qv,V∗(1))=0H^0(\mathbb{Q}_v,V^*(1))=0, where V=ad⁡rV=\operatorname{ad} r.

Proof. The trace pairing identifies V∗V^* with VV. The asserted group is therefore Hom⁡GQv(r,r(1))\operatorname{Hom}_{G_{\mathbb{Q}_v}}(r,r(1)).

At v=2v=2, the representation rr is de Rham, hence Hodge–Tate, with two weights whose difference is k−1≥2k-1\geq2. These are the classical comparison and filtration statements for modular Galois representations; see [12 Section 11.3, especially (11.3.3)–(11.3.4)]. One may pass to an auxiliary fine level when applying that cohomological description; the representation attached to ff is unchanged. A Tate twist shifts both weights by one, so the weight sets of rr and r(1)r(1) are disjoint. Subrepresentations and quotients of Hodge–Tate representations are Hodge–Tate, with their weights among those of the original representation. A nonzero image of a map r→r(1)r\to r(1) would have weights in both sets, which is impossible.

Let v≠2v\neq2. Local–global compatibility for cuspidal newforms [3 Theorem A] identifies the Frobenius-semisimplified Weil–Deligne parameter of r∣GQvr|_{G_{\mathbb{Q}_v}} with that of the local automorphic representation, up to the conventional normalizing twist. The local automorphic representation is generic. The genericity criterion [1 Lemma 1.1.3] says that its Frobenius-semisimple Weil–Deligne parameter WW has Hom⁡WD(W,W(1))=0\operatorname{Hom}_{\mathrm{WD}}(W,W(1))=0. Here the Tate twist is normalized consistently with geometric Frobenius; normalizing character twists do not affect the criterion.

A nonzero Galois morphism r→r(1)r\to r(1) would give a nonzero morphism of Weil–Deligne representations. It would remain a morphism after Frobenius semisimplification: an intertwiner of Frobenius also intertwines its semisimple part, and the inertia and monodromy conditions are unchanged. This contradicts the genericity criterion. □

Proposition 5.3. For the representation rr of a cuspidal newform of weight at least 3 and odd level dividing NN,

dim⁡EH1(GQ,S,ad⁡r)≤3.\dim_E H^1(G_{\mathbb{Q},S},\operatorname{ad} r) \le3.

Proof. Write hjh^j for the EE-dimension of a cohomology group. Local Tate duality and the local Euler characteristic formulas are used in their characteristic-zero form; see [15 Chapter 7]. Duality and Lemma 5.2 give h2(Qv,V)=0h^2(\mathbb{Q}_v,V)=0 at every finite place. For v≠2v\ne2, the local Euler characteristic formula yields h1(Qv,V)=h0(Qv,V)h^1(\mathbb{Q}_v,V)=h^0(\mathbb{Q}_v,V). The unramified cohomology is

Hf1(Qv,V)=VIv/(Frob⁡v−1)VIv.H^1_f(\mathbb{Q}_v,V)=V^{I_v}/(\operatorname{Frob}_v-1)V^{I_v}.

The cokernel and kernel of an endomorphism of a finite-dimensional vector space have the same dimension. Consequently this group has dimension h0(Qv,V)h^0(\mathbb{Q}_v,V), and

H1(Qv,V)/Hf1(Qv,V)=0(v≠2).(13)H^1(\mathbb{Q}_v,V)/H^1_f(\mathbb{Q}_v,V)=0 \qquad(v\ne2). \tag*{(13)}

At 2, the Euler characteristic formula instead gives

h1(Q2,V)=h0(Q2,V)+dim⁡EV=h0(Q2,V)+4.h^1(\mathbb{Q}_2,V)=h^0(\mathbb{Q}_2,V)+\dim_E V=h^0(\mathbb{Q}_2,V)+4.

Write DdR(V)=(V⊗Q2BdR)GQ2D_{\mathrm{dR}}(V)=(V\otimes_{\mathbb{Q}_2}B_{\mathrm{dR}})^{G_{\mathbb{Q}_2}} for the filtered de Rham module, where BdRB_{\mathrm{dR}} is Fontaine’s de Rham period field. The Bloch–Kato dimension formula [2 Corollary 3.8.4] gives

hf1(Q2,V)=h0(Q2,V)+dim⁡E(DdR(V)/Fil⁡0DdR(V))=h0(Q2,V)+1.\begin{aligned} h^1_f(\mathbb{Q}_2,V)&=h^0(\mathbb{Q}_2,V)+\dim_E\left(D_{\mathrm{dR}}(V)/\operatorname{Fil}^0D_{\mathrm{dR}}(V)\right)\\ &=h^0(\mathbb{Q}_2,V)+1. \end{aligned}

Indeed the filtration degrees of the adjoint consist of two zeros and two nonzero opposite integers, so exactly one degree contributes to the indicated quotient. We have proved

dim⁡EH1(Q2,V)/Hf1(Q2,V)=3.(14)\dim_E H^1(\mathbb{Q}_2,V)/H^1_f(\mathbb{Q}_2,V)=3. \tag*{(14)}

Finally consider restriction followed by passage to these local quotients:

H1(GQ,S,V)⟶⨁v∈SH1(Qv,V)/Hf1(Qv,V).(15)H^1(G_{\mathbb{Q},S},V)\longrightarrow\bigoplus_{v\in S} H^1(\mathbb{Q}_v,V)/H^1_f(\mathbb{Q}_v,V). \tag*{(15)}

Inflation identifies the source with a subspace of H1(GQ,V)H^1(G_{\mathbb{Q}},V). Its classes are already unramified outside SS, so the kernel of (15) lies in Hf1(Q,V)H^1_f(\mathbb{Q},V), which vanishes by Lemma 5.1. Thus (15) is injective. Equations (13) and (14) give a target of dimension 3.

Dimension of the components

Proof of Theorem 1.1. Let PP be an arbitrary minimal prime of AA. By Corollary 3.2, choose a classical cuspidal point x=ker⁡λ\mathfrak{x}=\ker\lambda of weight at least 3 with P⊆xP\subseteq\mathfrak{x}. Equation (4.4) and Proposition 5.3 give

dim⁡Ax≤3.\dim A_{\mathfrak{x}}\le3.

The quotient A/PA/P is a complete Noetherian local domain by Proposition 2.3, and is therefore catenary. The classical quotient A/xA/\mathfrak{x} is finite over Z2\mathbb{Z}_2 and contains Z2\mathbb{Z}_2, so has dimension one. The dimension formula for a catenary local domain yields

dim⁡A/P=ht⁡(x/P)+dim⁡A/x≤dim⁡Ax+1≤4.\dim A/P=\operatorname{ht}(\mathfrak{x}/P)+\dim A/\mathfrak{x}\le\dim A_{\mathfrak{x}}+1\le4.

Theorem 2.4 gives the opposite inequality. Since PP was arbitrary, all irreducible components have dimension 4.

References

  1. [1]Patrick B. Allen, Deformations of polarized automorphic Galois representations and adjoint Selmer groups, Duke Mathematical Journal 165 (2016), no. 13, 2407–2460.DOI
  2. [2]Spencer Bloch and Kazuya Kato, L-functions and Tamagawa numbers of motives, The Grothendieck Festschrift. Vol. I, Progress in Mathematics, vol. 86, Birkhäuser, Boston, 1990, pp. 333–400.
  3. [3]Henri Carayol, Sur les représentations l-adiques associées aux formes modulaires de Hilbert, Annales Scientifiques de l’École Normale Supérieure 19 (1986), no. 3, 409–468.DOI
  4. [4]Gaëtan Chenevier, The p-adic analytic space of pseudocharacters of a profinite group and pseudorepresentations over arbitrary rings, Automorphic Forms and Galois Representations. Vol. 1 (Fred Diamond, Payman L. Kassaei, and Minhyong Kim, eds.), London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol. 414, Cambridge University Press, 2014, pp. 221–285.
  5. [5]Robert F. Coleman and Barry Mazur, The eigencurve, Galois Representations in Arithmetic Algebraic Geometry (Durham, 1996) (A. J. Scholl and R. L. Taylor, eds.), London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol. 254, Cambridge University Press, 1998, pp. 1–113.DOI
  6. [6]Pierre Deligne, Formes modulaires et représentations ℓ-adiques, Séminaire Bourbaki, volume 1968/69, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 179, Springer, 1971, Exposé 355, pp. 139–172.
  7. [7]Pierre Deligne and Jean-Pierre Serre, Formes modulaires de poids 1, Annales Scientifiques de l’École Normale Supérieure 7 (1974), no. 4, 507–530.DOI
  8. [8]Matthew Emerton, p-adic families of modular forms [after Hida, Coleman, and Mazur], Séminaire Bourbaki, volume 2009/2010, exposés 1012–1026, Astérisque, no. 339, Société Mathématique de France, 2011, Exposé 1013, pp. 31–61.
  9. [9]Fernando Q. Gouvêa and Barry Mazur, On the density of modular representations, Computational Perspectives on Number Theory (Chicago, IL, 1995) (Duncan A. Buell and Jeremy T. Teitelbaum, eds.), AMS/IP Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 7, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1998, pp. 127–142.DOI
  10. [10]Haruzo Hida, Galois representations into GL₂(𝐙ₚ[[𝑋]]) attached to ordinary cusp forms, Inventiones Mathematicae 85 (1986), no. 3, 545–613.DOI
  11. [11]Naomi Jochnowitz, Congruences between systems of eigenvalues of modular forms, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 270 (1982), no. 1, 269–285.
  12. [12]Kazuya Kato, p-adic Hodge theory and values of zeta functions of modular forms, Cohomologies p-adiques et applications arithmétiques (III), Astérisque, no. 295, Société Mathématique de France, 2004, pp. 117–290.
  13. [13]Mark Kisin, Geometric deformations of modular Galois representations, Inventiones Mathematicae 157 (2004), no. 2, 275–328.DOI
  14. [14]Barry Mazur, Deforming Galois representations, Galois Groups over 𝐐 (Berkeley, CA, 1987), Mathematical Sciences Research Institute Publications, vol. 16, Springer, New York, 1989, pp. 385–437.DOI
  15. [15]Jürgen Neukirch, Alexander Schmidt, and Kay Wingberg, Cohomology of number fields, second ed., Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, vol. 323, Springer, Berlin, 2008.DOI
  16. [16]James Newton and Jack A. Thorne, Adjoint Selmer groups of automorphic Galois representations of unitary type, Journal of the European Mathematical Society 25 (2023), no. 5, 1919–1967.arxiv.org/abs/1912.11265
  17. [17]Kenneth A. Ribet, Galois representations attached to eigenforms with Nebentypus, Modular Functions of One Variable V, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 601, Springer, Berlin, 1977, pp. 17–52.DOI

Paper details

Contents