An isomorphism of the free group factors
Abstract
We solve the free group factor isomorphism problem affirmatively by proving that and are isomorphic as tracial von Neumann algebras. The classical free group factor alternative then implies that all interpolated free group factors, including , are isomorphic and have fundamental group .
Introduction
For a discrete group , its group von Neumann algebra is
with canonical trace . Write for the free group on generators and for the free group on countably infinitely many generators. The free group factors arose in Murray and von Neumann’s foundational work [9]. Their nonhyperfiniteness distinguished them from the hyperfinite factor, but did not distinguish their ranks; see the historical account in [10]. The question whether and are isomorphic for distinct became a central problem in the classification of finite factors. Dykema’s introduction [3] records the early history and credits Kadison with raising the rank-isomorphism question.
Free probability supplied a way to study these factors through their generating distributions. Voiculescu developed the reduced-free-product framework [14] and its semicircular and circular models [15]. His compression results showed that the fundamental group of contains every positive rational, and Rădulescu extended this to every positive real number [10]. Dykema and Rădulescu independently constructed the interpolated factors for real and established their amplification calculus [3, 11]. These results relate changes of rank to normalized corners. They also give a dichotomy: the interpolated free group factors are either all isomorphic or pairwise nonisomorphic. The version including the infinite parameter is due to Rădulescu [11]; see also the precise restatement in [5].
The amplification calculus thus links rank to corner size, while the dichotomy reduces the classification to two alternatives. To choose the isomorphic alternative, it suffices to construct an isomorphism between two distinct finite ranks. Our constructive result is the following rank comparison.
Theorem 1.1 (Isomorphism of consecutive ranks). For every integer there is a unital trace-preserving normal -isomorphism
The construction gives a freely generating Haar -tuple inside . Applying it at ranks three and four, and then using the established amplification formula, gives the headline conclusion.
Theorem 1.2. There exists a unital normal trace-preserving -isomorphism
This gives an affirmative solution to the free group factor isomorphism problem. Together with the classical dichotomy, this proves that all interpolated free group factors, including the infinite-rank factor, are isomorphic. Their fundamental groups are therefore . We state and prove these consequences in Corollary 6.1; the constructive rank comparison itself does not use interpolation.
Free entropy offered another approach to distinguishing ranks. A free semicircular -tuple generates [15] and has free entropy dimension [17]. Voiculescu asked whether of a finite self-adjoint tuple depends only on the tracial von Neumann algebra it generates [17]. Such invariance would distinguish the finite ranks. Our isomorphisms give the opposite conclusion: Corollary 7.1 gives a negative answer and proves the same failure for , , and . Each of the four dimensions attains every integer value on finite self-adjoint generating tuples of . The proof transports semicircular tuples for the microstates dimensions , and group-algebra tuples for the nonmicrostates dimensions , ; the two tuple families need not coincide.
Fix . We begin with a freely generating Haar tuple in and set using bounded Borel functional calculus. For , let denote the corresponding word in . Conjugates drive a polynomial differential equation in . A formal trace identity and analyticity of the actual solutions’ moments prove moment preservation. The resulting maps descend through the relations among the generators, preserve the operator norm, and extend to normal trace-preserving automorphisms.
The coefficients are finitely supported real vectors , extended to group words by the cocycle rule
After trace preservation has been established, a free-sum estimate gives two bounds for the time-one automorphism in Proposition 3.1, with :
Thus small generator coefficients keep the tuple nearly fixed, while a cocycle value near makes a selected word approximate .
The coefficient problem is solved in Lemma 4.1. For each , we choose a word with selected nonidentity prefixes forming a free family. With for , its cocycle value is , where . An explicit Catalan moment count shows that the spectral measures of converge to a measure with no atom at zero. A truncated inverse of then gives a small vector whose image under is close to . A real-symmetry argument and a final truncation give finitely supported real coefficients, as required by the polynomial flow.
A free-group basis change now yields an automorphism moving each arbitrarily little in operator norm while making a word in the moved ’s approximate the old variable ; this is Proposition 5.1. We iterate this step, choosing each future error budget only after the current approximating word has been fixed. The first coordinates converge in norm, so their joint Haar distribution persists. The complementary coordinate may vary at every stage. Generation is proved separately: the word algebra of the limiting tuple is dense in the ambient tracial space, and the trace-preserving conditional expectation then identifies its von Neumann closure with the entire factor.
The analytic and algebraic ingredients have established predecessors. Voiculescu’s cyclomorphy theorem exponentiates trace-preserving polynomial vector fields on algebraically free self-adjoint generators [16], Theorem 3.8]. Our flow uses Haar unitaries and a fixed bounded logarithm, so the descent through their relations is proved directly from moments. Guionnet and Shlyakhtenko’s free monotone transport constructs isomorphisms by analytic changes of variables for suitable perturbations of semicircular systems [6]; the present argument uses small automorphisms and an iteration that changes the size of a generating tuple. The cocycle product rule is the coefficient form of Fox’s free differential calculus [4], §1, equation (1.2)′]. The support-independent norm estimate for free sums uses the creation, annihilation, and diagonal decomposition underlying reduced-free-product Khintchine inequalities [12], §2]. We give the estimates and moment arguments needed here in full.
A recent preprint of Shlyakhtenko announces identifications of specified Fuchsian group factors with interpolated free group factors [13]. Its main construction finds a free complement to a commutator inside , using finite automorphisms and a limiting generation argument. In both constructions the limiting distribution and the generation of the ambient algebra require separate attention. Here the small-cocycle estimate enables absorption of an additional free generator, and the adaptive error budgets preserve the approximations needed for generation. No result from that preprint is used below.
Section 2 supplies the free-probability and representation facts used in the construction. Sections 3 and 4 construct the automorphisms and their coefficients, and Section 5 carries out the limiting argument. Section 6 proves Theorem 1.2 and its classical consequences. Section 7 proves the generator dependence of free entropy dimensions.
Tracial preliminaries and a free-sum estimate
Throughout, is a von Neumann algebra with faithful normal tracial state. We write
The Hilbert space completion of in is , with inner product , linear in the first variable. Left multiplication gives its faithful normal representation of . A -isomorphism is a bijective complex-linear map preserving multiplication and adjoints. A linear map between von Neumann algebras is normal if it is ultraweakly continuous. We use standard finite von Neumann algebra facts, including bounded Borel functional calculus, Kaplansky density, and the trace-preserving conditional expectation onto a von Neumann subalgebra. The expectation extends to the orthogonal projection of onto the subalgebra’s space. Section 6 recalls the amplification convention separately.
A family of unital subalgebras is free if, for every integer and every choice of elements satisfying the conditions below,
Freeness of unital -algebras passes to their generated von Neumann algebras. Indeed, bounded strong approximation gives bounded approximation in a finite tracial algebra; telescoping a product shows continuity of its trace under such approximations. Centering the approximants proves the assertion. Freeness also persists when disjoint collections of the free components are grouped: their algebraic spans consist of scalars and reduced products of centered elements, and the same definition applies to the resulting reduced products.
Haar tuples and normal isomorphisms
Definition 2.1. A freely generating Haar -tuple in is a tuple of unitaries such that and
Here is the evaluation of the reduced group word in , with inverse letters evaluated as adjoints.
Lemma 2.2 (Identification by a generating Haar tuple). For a freely generating Haar -tuple in , the assignment extends to a unital normal trace-preserving -isomorphism .
Proof. The vectors , indexed by , are orthonormal because . They span . To see this, let be orthogonal to their span. Choose converging to in . The normal functionals converge in norm to , since . The space of normal linear functionals is norm closed in , so is normal. It vanishes on the ultraweakly dense word algebra and therefore on all of . Thus .
Consequently the map with is unitary. It intertwines with left multiplication by . Conjugation by identifies their double commutants. The double commutant on the right is the faithful normal left representation of , so this spatial identification gives the claimed isomorphism. It preserves the trace because . □
In particular, two freely generating Haar tuples of the same size in are related by a normal trace-preserving automorphism. The component algebras of a Haar tuple are free: expanding centered Laurent polynomials reduces the assertion to the nonidentity group-word trace, and bounded approximation gives freeness of the von Neumann closures.
For completeness, is a factor for . Its canonical trace is , which is faithful and normal. Every nonidentity reduced word has infinitely many distinct conjugates: choose a letter whose powers cause no cancellation at either end of . At most two of the letters are excluded, and the reduced lengths then tend to infinity. Fourier coefficients of a central element are constant on conjugacy classes and form an vector, so every coefficient off the identity vanishes. Faithfulness of the tracial representation implies that the center consists of scalars. The infinitely many orthonormal group unitaries show that the factor is infinite-dimensional.
Conjugates of a bounded logarithm
Fix a freely generating Haar tuple , let , and write for the word in the first variables indexed by . Put
where the argument takes values in . The bounded Borel functional calculus for normal operators defines this logarithm in ; see [7], Theorem 7.1. Since the spectral distribution of is uniform on the circle,
Lemma 2.3 (Freeness of the conjugate components). The algebras , , form a free family. In particular, each is free from the von Neumann algebra generated by all with $b\ne g. Proof. Consider a product of centered elements , with and . Cyclicity of the trace rewrites its trace as
All interior group elements are nonidentity and hence centered. If the last group element is the identity, omit it; otherwise it too is centered. Freeness of and makes the displayed trace zero. For a single factor this is simply . The assertion about the other components follows by grouping free subalgebras.
For a monomial in , and , define its label as the product in of its group symbols, read in order with each occurrence of ignored.
Lemma 2.4 (Group labels and traces). A monomial with nonidentity label has trace zero. A monomial with identity label can be expressed as a product of variables (or as the constant 1).
Proof. For the first assertion, combine consecutive group symbols and consecutive powers of . Remove identity group factors. Split each polynomial in into its scalar trace and a centered part. A term with all alternating factors centered has trace zero by freeness of the group algebra and . Removing a scalar factor permits a reduction to fewer alternating factors, without changing the total group label. Induction on the number of factors ends with either a centered alternating product or a single group element whose label remains nonidentity. Both have trace zero.
For the second assertion, successively use to move every group factor to the right. The final group factor is exactly the label, and is therefore 1.
A bound independent of support size
For a finitely supported real function on , set
The coefficient norm below is distinguished from the tracial norm of operators. The next estimate uses the creation, annihilation, and diagonal decomposition underlying free-product Khintchine inequalities; see Ricard and Xu [12], Section 2, Lemmas 2.1–2.3 and Corollary 2.4. We include the scalar self-adjoint argument to give an explicit constant independent of the number of summands.
Lemma 2.5 (Norm of a free sum). *For every such ,
Proof. We prove the more general bound
for a finite free family of subalgebras and centered self-adjoint in the respective components. Work in the tracial space of their generated algebra. Freeness identifies this space with the orthogonal sum of the scalar vector and the reduced centered tensor spaces, whose successive component indices are different. To check the identification, take inner products of reduced centered words. If the two letters at the joining point belong to different components, freeness gives zero. If they belong to the same component, split their product into its trace and its centered part; the latter again has zero contribution, while the scalar term shortens both words. Iteration gives orthogonality for different index sequences and the tensor-product inner product for matching sequences. The reduced word span is dense by the argument used in Lemma 2.2.
Let project onto the reduced tensors beginning with component , and let denote left multiplication. On , multiplication prefixes , so
The ranges of the are orthogonal. For every vector this gives
The blocks in the opposite direction are , because is self-adjoint. The block is zero. The remaining diagonal blocks act on mutually orthogonal subspaces; their sum has norm at most . Summing these three parts proves (3), since the left representation is faithful.
Apply this bound to . Both and are at most , and . This proves (2).
Trace-preserving polynomial flows
Voiculescu’s exponentiation theorem turns trace-preserving polynomial vector fields on algebraically free self-adjoint generators into one-parameter automorphism groups [16]. We prove the version needed here directly for Haar unitaries and a fixed bounded logarithm. The proof treats the unitary relations explicitly and derives preservation of all evaluated relations from moment invariance.
Retain the notation of Section 2. Thus is a freely generating Haar tuple in the finite tracial von Neumann algebra , , and
Write for the finitely supported real functions on , and let be the unit vector at the identity. All coefficient vectors used in this section are finitely supported. The left regular action on them is .
Choose real coefficient vectors . There is a unique cocycle satisfying
Indeed, set and define the value on a word by summing the shifted values of its letters. The two terms associated with an adjacent inverse pair cancel, so the definition respects reduction. The cocycle identity and uniqueness follow.
The next proposition turns small norms of the into small operator-norm displacements of the generators. For a word , a small also makes the time-one image of close to .
Proposition 3.1 (Polynomial flow and displacement bounds). There is a one-parameter group of unital trace-preserving normal -automorphisms of that fixes and whose restriction to
is point-norm continuous. Writing and evaluating group words at this tuple, the paths satisfy
The derivatives here are in operator norm. With as in (2), for every ,
In particular, at the target in (7) is .
We first establish a trace identity on a formal polynomial algebra. This will prove invariance along the actual flow without assuming freeness of the evolving tuple.
The formal derivation and its trace identity
Let be the complex unital -algebra generated by unitaries and a self-adjoint symbol , subject only to these unitary and self-adjoint relations. Put
Here is the group word in the formal unitaries. Evaluation at defines a -homomorphism ; we make no assumption about its kernel.
Define a complex-linear derivation by the rules
These rules define a -derivation on . The reality of makes self-adjoint, so the rules respect adjoints. They also respect the defining unitary relations: for example,
and the calculation for is the same. The identity and the cocycle rule give
For instance, multiplying the formulas for and gives the formula for with coefficient ; inverse letters are covered by the unitary relations.
Lemma 3.2 (Universal initial trace identity). For every and every integer ,
Proof. First take . Give a monomial its group label by ignoring each occurrence of and multiplying the remaining group symbols in order. Each term of has label . The replacement rules (8) consequently preserve a monomial’s label term by term. If that label is nonidentity, Lemma 2.4 makes every evaluated derivative term have trace zero.
An identity-label monomial is a polynomial in the . To see this algebraically, repeatedly use to move group factors to the right; the final group factor is the identity. Because these are identities in and is a derivation on that algebra, differentiating this rewriting gives the same result as differentiating the original monomial. It is therefore enough to consider , with finite and a noncommutative polynomial.
For a fixed , remove the commuting own-variable term from the commutator in (9). Its evaluated direction is
The element is a bounded self-adjoint in , and is free from by Lemma 2.3.
We use the following direct consequence of freeness. If a unital subalgebra is free from a unital subalgebra and is unitary, then is free from . Indeed, conjugating an alternating product of centered elements from these two algebras by gives an alternating product of centered elements from and : a fixed centered becomes , which is still centered in . Its trace is zero. Conjugation preserves the marginal law of each element of . Since freeness determines mixed moments from the marginal laws, it follows that replacing by preserves its joint law with any fixed collection of elements of .
Apply this observation with for real . The scalar function obtained by replacing every occurrence of in by and leaving all other variables fixed has constant trace. Its derivative at zero is the trace of the sum over those occurrences with the direction inserted. Sum these zero derivatives over . The product rule and (9) identify the sum exactly with , proving the case . Linearity handles arbitrary finite sums of monomials.
The result just proved is the identity on all of . Since maps finite polynomials to finite polynomials, applying it to proves (10). In this application every derivative of every coefficient polynomial is included. The auxiliary conjugations above are used only to compute a first variation at the initial tuple; they need neither lift to motions of the nor be jointly integrated.
Global solutions and actual moment invariance
We now solve the polynomial equation globally in and use analyticity to turn the initial trace identity into moment invariance. For a tuple , let denote the reduced group word evaluated in a -algebra using adjoints for inverse letters. This notation defines a polynomial even for nonunitary tuples, so the right side of (5) defines the finite polynomial vector field
Lemma 3.3 (Global solvability in a generated subalgebra). Let be any closed unital -subalgebra of containing , and let be unitaries in . The equation with has a unique global solution in that is smooth in norm, and all its coordinates remain unitary.
Proof. Regard , with its maximum norm, as a real Banach space. Adjunction is bounded and real-linear, so is a finite smooth polynomial map. Its norm and its Lipschitz constant are bounded on every fixed bounded ball. Picard iteration on a sufficiently short interval gives a unique local solution; repeated differentiation makes it smooth.
Each is self-adjoint, even before unitarity is known. Along a local solution,
Thus . Such an isometry is unitary in : the projection has trace , and faithfulness makes it zero. This equality also holds in , so throughout the local solution.
On this unitary trajectory,
If a maximal interval had a finite endpoint, this bounded derivative would make the tuple norm-Cauchy as time approached that endpoint. Its limit lies in the closed algebra and is again a unitary tuple. Local existence at the limit continues the solution, a contradiction. The same argument applies at either endpoint, giving a global solution. Uniqueness follows from local uniqueness on overlapping intervals. This continuation uses completeness and bounded derivative, not compactness of a bounded ball.
Apply Lemma 3.3 in with initial tuple . Let be its solution and let evaluate the formal generators at . Unitarity makes this a well-defined evaluation on the formal algebra for each .
Lemma 3.4 (Moment invariance). For every and ,
Proof. The differential equation and the product rule give, for every integer ,
We verify that these derivatives give an actual convergent Taylor expansion for the trace. Choose fixed polynomial representatives for the derivatives of the formal letters in eq:5. There are constants and such that replacing any one letter by its derivative increases monomial length by at most and produces total absolute coefficient sum at most . These constants are finite because the have finite support. If a representative of has degree at most , where , and total absolute coefficient sum , repeated replacement gives a representative of with degree at most and coefficient sum at most
Let . All the evaluated group letters are unitary, so (3.9) implies, uniformly for real ,
The last inequality uses .
Set and . The integral form of Taylor’s remainder and (13) bound the remainder after degree at increment by . Consequently is real-analytic near every real time, with positive radius at least . By Lemma 3.2, all its positive-order derivatives at zero vanish. It is constant near zero and hence, by real-analytic continuation on the connected line , constant everywhere.
The constants here may depend on the fixed field and on . No radius common to all polynomials or to different choices of the is required. The bounds used only unitarity of the solution and boundedness of ; freeness at positive times has not been assumed.
Surjectivity, normal extension, and estimates
Proof of Proposition 3.1. For a fixed real , polynomial evaluation defines a map
This is well defined. If , then (11) applied to gives
so faithfulness implies . Thus any additional relations at the evaluated initial tuple are respected as a consequence of actual moment invariance. The map is unital, complex-linear, multiplicative, and adjoint-preserving because formal evaluation has those properties.
For an element of a finite von Neumann algebra with faithful tracial state,
For completeness, the upper bound is immediate; for the lower bound, every nonzero spectral projection of sufficiently near its norm has positive trace by faithfulness. Applying (11) to therefore shows that is isometric. It extends uniquely to a trace-preserving isometric -homomorphism on , with range
Indeed, its range is closed and is the norm closure of the polynomials in these time- generators.
We next prove , which establishes surjectivity. Apply Lemma 3.3 inside to the initial tuple , using the same fixed element and the same polynomial field. Its global solution, viewed in , must be by uniqueness. At it recovers the original tuple. Thus every belongs to , and already belongs to , giving . The forward construction gives the reverse inclusion. Hence is a -automorphism of fixing .
Since , the von Neumann algebra generated by is . Its vectors are therefore dense in , as in the density argument in Lemma 2.2. Trace preservation and surjectivity define a Hilbert-space unitary
on , fixing . If denotes left multiplication, then on the dense set of vectors coming from ,
The faithful normal left representation identifies the von Neumann closure of with . Conjugation by therefore gives a normal -automorphism of extending . It is trace-preserving because fixes , and it fixes . This normal extension is unique by ultraweak density of .
The maps form a one-parameter group. For fixed , the path satisfies the same polynomial equation, because is a bounded -homomorphism fixing . Its initial tuple is , so uniqueness gives
The equality on the generators and on yields on , and uniqueness of normal extension gives on . Also is the identity. Norm continuity on polynomials in the generators follows from the solution paths; density and the common isometry bound extend it to point-norm continuity on . No point-norm continuity on arbitrary elements of is needed.
It remains to prove the bounds. For each finitely supported real ,
by eq:2. Integrating between zero and proves (6).
For a fixed , evaluation of (9) along the flow gives
Moreover . Direct differentiation, with the order of factors retained, yields
The exterior factors are unitary, so its norm is at most . Integrating between zero and and multiplying on the left by proves (7).
A small cocycle with a prescribed word value
Let and , with free generators . We use the left regular action on coefficient vectors,
and write for the canonical trace on . Given finitely supported real vectors , let be the cocycle determined by
The construction in this section makes both and small in , with all the other generator coefficients zero. At time one, Proposition 3.1 converts these two coefficient bounds into operator-norm bounds for the generator displacement and the error between the moved word and . The word and the support of are allowed to depend on the required accuracy. This coefficient rule is the cocycle form of Fox’s free differential calculus [4] [Section 1, equations (1.2), (1.5)–(1.6), and Section 2, equations (2.1)–(2.2)]: successive letters contribute their generator coefficients translated by the preceding prefix. We use that rule explicitly below.
Lemma 4.1 (Small coefficients with a prescribed word value). Let and . There exist a word and a finitely supported real coefficient vector such that the cocycle determined by
satisfies
Free prefix words
For , set
For also set
Lemma 4.2 (Free prefixes and the cocycle value). For each , the elements freely generate a free subgroup of . If and for , then
Proof. First consider a nonempty reduced word in . Combining consecutive powers with the same index writes it as
Its expansion in is
Every displayed power is nonzero, and each intervening power is nonzero. This word cannot reduce to the identity. Thus the are a free basis of the subgroup they generate. The free product decomposition
then shows that freely generate their subgroup: an alternating product of nonidentity elements from and is also reduced in the displayed free product.
In the abstract free group on , the substitution fixing and sending each to has inverse given by , again fixing . Consequently
form a free family. On the abstract free group with free basis , define two endomorphisms by
For every , cancellation gives
and the second identity also holds for . Thus and are inverse automorphisms. Since , this proves the assertion about the .
For the cocycle assertion, the inverse rule shows that vanishes on the subgroup generated by . In particular, . The positive occurrences of in have respective prefixes , and there are no other occurrences of or . Applying the cocycle identity successively therefore gives
The spectral measures of the prefix sums
Put
for Borel sets . These are probability measures by the spectral theorem and the normalization of .
We seek a small vector with close to . The spectral limit below has no atom at zero. It will let us choose a small fixed cutoff in the normalized spectrum and then make large enough that the discarded projection has small trace. On the remaining spectrum, the inverse of has norm at most a fixed constant times . The inverse bound controls the coefficient norm, while the discarded trace controls the approximation error. The Catalan count below is the moment calculation associated with circular systems in Voiculescu’s free-probability framework; see [14] and [15]. We give the word count and the normalization of the limiting density explicitly.
Lemma 4.3 (Spectral limit of the prefix sums). The measures converge weakly to the probability measure
In particular, .
Proof. Write and . Lemma 4.2 implies that a word in and their inverses has trace one if its word in these free symbols reduces to the identity, and trace zero otherwise. This trace rule applies inside the given regular representation. Indeed, for , the spaces , as ranges over the right cosets of , are reducing copies of the left regular representation of . The vector lies in the copy . Its vector state therefore agrees with the canonical trace of on polynomials and on the spectral projections under consideration.
Fix an integer . Expanding gives
Each summand is zero or one. In a summand equal to one, every nonzero index used must occur at least twice, since a generator occurring only once cannot disappear under free reduction. There are therefore at most distinct nonzero indices.
If exactly distinct nonzero indices occur, all positions are nonidentity and each index occurs exactly twice. The two occurrences have opposite exponents, as follows already by abelianizing the identity word. Pair the two positions with the same index. This matching is unique for the chosen word. A sequence of adjacent inverse cancellations produces a noncrossing matching: a pair deleted after other pairs can only enclose pairs already deleted, and two deleted pairs cannot cross. Conversely, a noncrossing matching with opposite exponents at its endpoints reduces to the identity by deleting an innermost pair and proceeding by induction. Every noncrossing perfect matching of has opposite parity at the two endpoints of each pair. To see this, the positions strictly inside that pair must be matched among themselves, so their number is even. The signs in (4.7) alternate; therefore every noncrossing perfect matching has the required opposite signs.
The number of noncrossing perfect matchings is
For completeness, splitting a matching at the partner of its first position gives the recurrence and . Its formal generating series satisfies , so the solution with constant term one is ; the binomial expansion gives the displayed coefficient . For each matching, labeling its pairs with distinct indices from gives
choices, with the value zero when . Ordering the pairs by their first endpoints makes this count unambiguous, and the uniqueness of the equal-index matching prevents double counting. Thus the contribution from exactly distinct indices is .
Every remaining contributing term has at most distinct nonzero indices. This includes every term with an identity summand: such a term has at most nonidentity positions, while each index it uses occurs at least twice. For fixed , there are only finitely many patterns specifying the identity positions and the partition of the other positions into equal-index classes. A pattern with classes has at most labelings. Summing over those patterns gives an bound, with its constant depending only on . We have proved
We next justify passage from moments to weak convergence. For , direct expansion gives , so the first moments of are bounded by two. Markov’s inequality gives tightness on . For each fixed integer , the moment convergence in (16), applied also at , gives
as . Consequently, if a subsequence converges weakly to a probability measure , its moments pass to the limit. More explicitly, apply weak convergence to the bounded continuous functions and use the displayed tail bound; the corresponding bound for follows by first applying weak convergence to bounded truncations of . Letting $R\to\infty proves
The density in (4.6) realizes these moments, including the zeroth moment. Write for the Euler beta integral. The substitution and the beta integral give, for every integer ,
The middle equality follows from and the recurrence . In particular the density has total mass one.
These moments determine a probability measure on uniquely. Indeed, . If a measure satisfying (17) had mass on for some , then
for every , a contradiction for large . Its support is therefore contained in . On this compact interval, uniform polynomial approximation of continuous functions shows that equality of all moments implies equality of the measures. Every subsequential weak limit is consequently . Tightness now gives weak convergence of the full sequence to . Finally, has the displayed integrable density and thus has no atom at zero.
Cutoff inversion and finite coefficients
Proof of Lemma 4.1. Use the operators , and the measures above. Since , choose a fixed so small that
The interval is closed, so weak convergence and the Portmanteau inequality give
We may therefore choose sufficiently large that both
hold. Keep this and this fixed for the remainder of the construction.
Set
Thus is a bounded positive operator, with . The spectral theorem gives
In particular, these operations allow a kernel or arbitrarily small nonzero spectrum of . Define the coefficient vector
Using in the indicated order gives
The vector has real coefficients. To check this directly, let denote coefficientwise complex conjugation on . Each left shift is real in the standard basis, so commutes with , and , and . Commutation with real polynomials in extends by uniform approximation to real continuous functions of . The continuous functions
converge pointwise, with a uniform bound, to on the spectrum of . Their functional calculi converge strongly to , hence also commutes with . Finally,
where is real and continuous on . Thus commutes with as well, proving .
Real finitely supported coefficient vectors are dense in the real subspace of . Choose such a vector with
The elementary bound and (4.13)–(4.14) yield
For this finitely supported , form the cocycle with and all other generator values zero, and take . Equation (4.4) gives , proving (4.1).
The choices have been made in the order , then , then the finite coefficient approximation. The last approximation uses the norm of the already fixed operator ; the lemma requires no bound on the support size of uniform in .
Perturbation and a generating limit
We combine the flow estimate with the small-cocycle construction to approximate the extra generator by a word in a slightly perturbed -tuple. We then arrange these approximations so that the limiting -tuple generates the entire von Neumann algebra. We call a completion of when is a freely generating Haar tuple in .
One-step perturbation
Proposition 5.1 (Approximating the extra generator in one step). Let , and let be a freely generating Haar tuple in a finite von Neumann algebra . For every there are a trace-preserving normal automorphism of and a word such that, with ,
The tuple , where , is again freely generating Haar. Here the target in the second estimate is the original ; the new completion is
where is evaluated on the original -tuple.
Proof. Choose , with as in (2.2). Lemma 4.1 gives a finitely supported real coefficient vector , with for , and a word for which
Apply Proposition 3.1 to these coefficients and write . Its displacement estimates (3.3) and (3.4) give
Moreover, fixes and therefore fixes . The free-group basis transformation that fixes the first symbols and sends the last symbol to is invertible: its inverse fixes the first symbols and sends to . By Lemma 2.2, it induces a trace-preserving normal automorphism of satisfying
Set . Since fixes every and hence , we have the exact identities
An automorphism is isometric, so these identities prove (22), with the displayed order of the factors. The image under of the original freely generating Haar tuple is again such a tuple. Finally,
because and .
A generating limit
We record the elementary continuity estimate that will control the iteration. For two -tuples of unitaries and , put
If is a group word of length , telescoping its product gives
Indeed, multiplication on either side by a unitary preserves the tracial norm, and . Consequently, a finite word polynomial satisfies
The same telescoping argument also gives continuity in operator norm.
Proof of Theorem 1.1. Fix and let , with its canonical normalized trace and canonical freely generating Haar tuple
Write Choose a sequence that is dense in and consists of elements of the rational complex group word algebra of the initial tuple. Such a sequence exists by Lemma 2.2; coefficients in make this algebra countable. Put .
We construct freely generating Haar tuples and positive numbers by induction. Suppose the construction has reached stage , where . The choices at stage are made in the following order.
First, for each , choose a finite linear combination of group words in variables such that
This is possible because the current completed tuple generates and its group word algebra is dense in . Let be a common bound for the finitely many constants in (23). Choose
Next apply Proposition 5.1 to with tolerance . Let and be its automorphism and word, and set
The new completed tuple is freely generating Haar, and
In particular, the last expression is close to the old completion, as needed in (24).
Now define word polynomials in variables by
Since , equations (23), (24), and (26) imply
This estimate uses as a single unitary slot of . Thus the tolerance chosen in (25) does not depend on the length of the word that the perturbation subsequently produces.
Finally, let be a common -Lipschitz bound for the finitely many polynomials , and choose
These constants are finite by (23). They are chosen after is known, so any increase in word length is accommodated in the budget for future steps. Both quantities in the minimum are positive, and the induction can continue.
Figure 1 records this order of choices and the role of the budget in controlling all later perturbations.

Figure 1. The choices at stage follow the arrows. The witness word is found only after is fixed. A longer witness word may increase the Lipschitz bound of the substituted polynomials , so its length affects the future budget only. This budget bounds the total change after stage and preserves the target approximations in the limit.
For , the geometric decrease of the budgets gives
Using (26), we therefore obtain, for ,
Since , each sequence converges in operator norm to a unitary , and
The limits are unitaries because the unitary group is norm closed. For every nonidentity reduced word ,
by operator-norm continuity of each fixed word evaluation and of the trace. Thus the limiting tuple has the free Haar word distribution.
It remains to prove that this tuple generates . For every , equations (27), (28), and (29) yield
Fixing and letting through shows that belongs to the closure of the word algebra of . Since the are dense, this word algebra is dense in all of .
To pass from this density to von Neumann generation, set . The standard finite-trace conditional expectation is trace-preserving and extends to the orthogonal projection of onto . In particular it is -contractive and fixes every element of . Each belongs to , so
Hence the projection fixes the dense family and is the identity on . For , this implies by faithfulness of , and therefore .
The limiting tuple is now a freely generating Haar -tuple in . Lemma 2.2 supplies a unital trace-preserving normal -isomorphism from onto , proving the theorem.
Remark 5.2. Only the first generators are required to converge in operator norm. The completions may vary without a limit. The target approximations are in , and the conditional expectation argument permits the operator norms of the approximating polynomials to grow with .
Amplification to rank two
We recall the amplification convention for a factor . Let be the usual semifinite trace on , normalized to give every rank-one projection trace one. For , choose a projection in the stabilized factor with and set
Projections of every positive finite trace exist in this stabilized factor. Equivalence of projections of equal finite trace makes the normalized corner independent of the choice of , up to a normal trace-preserving -isomorphism.
Amplification respects normal tracial isomorphisms. Indeed, if is such an isomorphism, the normal tensor-product map preserves the semifinite trace and sends to a projection of the same trace . Its restriction is an onto normal isomorphism between the corresponding corners. It sends the corner unit to and preserves their traces normalized by . We denote the resulting map by .
For real , let be the interpolated free group factor, with the usual group factor at integer parameters. The established amplification formula is
see [3], Theorem 2.4. This is an unconditional isomorphism formula for the interpolated family and does not assume that distinct parameters determine distinct isomorphism classes. It is the only interpolation theorem used in the proof of Theorem 1.2.
Proof of Theorem 1.2. Apply Theorem 1.1 with and to obtain
Let be the composition of these normal trace-preserving isomorphisms. Amplifying by gives a unital normal trace-preserving isomorphism
Formula (6.1) identifies its domain and range as follows:
These identifications and the amplified map compose to give . Every map in the composition is a unital normal trace-preserving -isomorphism. Thus is bijective and has all the asserted properties.
For completeness, we record the consequences for the whole interpolated family. Put and, for a factor , define its fundamental group by
Here and below the isomorphisms are normal and preserve the normalized traces. The classical free group factor alternative says that either all , , are isomorphic, or whenever . The inclusion of the infinite parameter uses Rădulescu’s dichotomy [11], Corollary 4.7, restated explicitly in [5], Theorem 1.1. Dykema’s corresponding dichotomy [3], Corollary 4.2 is stated for finite parameters.
Corollary 6.1. For all there is a unital normal trace-preserving -isomorphism . Moreover,
Proof. Theorem 1.2 rules out the pairwise-nonisomorphic alternative, so all parameters, including , give the same isomorphism class. For finite and every , formula (6.1) then gives
Thus . Finally, and functoriality of amplification give for every .
Free entropy dimensions and von Neumann generators
For a bounded self-adjoint tuple in a tracial von Neumann algebra, let and denote Voiculescu’s microstates free entropy dimensions. The second is the modified version using entropy in the presence of the perturbing semicircular family. Write and for the nonmicrostates dimensions defined through nonmicrostates free entropy and free Fisher information , respectively. We use the conventions in [17] and [2].
By their definitions, all four quantities depend only on the joint tracial -distribution of the tuple. This is weaker than invariance under a change of von Neumann generators: two tuples can generate the same von Neumann algebra without having the same joint distribution. The isomorphisms proved above show that the four dimensions do change under such a replacement.
Corollary 7.1 (Dependence on von Neumann generators). Let with its canonical trace. For every integer there are a self-adjoint -tuple and a self-adjoint -tuple such that
and
Consequently, none of is invariant under changing a finite self-adjoint -generating tuple of a tracial von Neumann algebra. Each takes unbounded values on such generating tuples of the single factor .
Proof. Fix an integer . Theorem 1.2 and successive applications of Theorem 1.1 provide a unital normal trace-preserving -isomorphism
for we may take the identity. If is any finite self-adjoint tuple in and is a noncommutative -polynomial, then
Thus coordinatewise transport by preserves the joint tracial -distribution and hence each of the four dimensions. Normality and surjectivity also give . Let be a freely independent variance-one semicircular tuple in the semicircular realization of [15]. It generates as a von Neumann algebra, and the standard semicircular computations give
see [17], Section 2.4(c) and (d) for and [1], Section 5, opening paragraph for . Set . The preceding transport observations prove the required generation and the two microstates values.
For the nonmicrostates dimensions, let be the canonical group unitaries in and put
The entries are self-adjoint, and and . Hence they generate the algebraic group algebra as a unital -algebra, and generate as a von Neumann algebra. Apply Mineyev and Shlyakhtenko’s group-algebra theorem [8], Theorem 4.1 to this tuple, before transporting it. It gives
Here and are the usual -Betti numbers of the free group; see [2], Section 2.1.1. Define . Again its joint tracial -distribution is unchanged and it generates , proving the remaining assertions. Taking and gives different values on generators of the same factor, and letting grow gives unboundedness.
The nonmicrostates computation uses algebraic generators of before transport. The transported tuples all generate as a von Neumann algebra, but their algebraic -algebras are not held fixed as varies. Thus the corollary concerns -generation and is compatible with the algebraic-generator invariance in [8], Theorem 4.1.
References
- [1]Michael Brannan, Floris Elzinga, Samuel J. Harris, and Makoto Yamashita. Crossed product equivalence of quantum automorphism groups of finite dimensional C*-algebras. International Mathematics Research Notices, 2023(20):17749–17787, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1093/imrn/rnad060.
- [2]Alain Connes and Dimitri Shlyakhtenko. L²-homology for von Neumann algebras. Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik, 586:125–168, 2005. Numbered references use the preprint version https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0309343v1.
- [3]Ken Dykema. Interpolated free group factors. Pacific Journal of Mathematics, 163(1):123–135, 1994. https://doi.org/10.2140/pjm.1994.163.123.
- [4]Ralph H. Fox. Free differential calculus. I. derivation in the free group ring. Annals of Mathematics. Second Series, 57(3):547–560, 1953. https://doi.org/10.2307/1969736.
- [5]Isaac Goldbring and Jennifer Pi. On the first-order free group factor elementary equivalence. Journal of Operator Theory, 94(1):129–150, 2025. Numbered references use the preprint entitled On the first-order free group factor alternative, https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.08168v2.
- [6]Alice Guionnet and Dimitri Shlyakhtenko. Free monotone transport. Inventiones Mathematicae, 197(3):613–661, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00222-013-0493-9.
- [7]Markus Haase. The functional calculus approach to the spectral theorem. Indagationes Mathematicae, 31(6):1066–1098, 2020. Numbered references use the preprint version https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.06130v2.
- [8]Igor Mineyev and Dimitri Shlyakhtenko. Non-microstates free entropy dimension for groups. Geometric and Functional Analysis, 15(2):476–490, 2005. https://mineyev.web.illinois.edu/art/non-microstates.pdf.
- [9]F. J. Murray and J. von Neumann. On rings of operators. IV. Annals of Mathematics. Second Series, 44(4):716–808, 1943. https://doi.org/10.2307/1969107.
- [10]Florin Rădulescu. The fundamental group of the von Neumann algebra of a free group with infinitely many generators is ℝ₊ \ {0}. Journal of the American Mathematical Society, 5(3):517–532, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1090/S0894-0347-1992-1142260-1.
- [11]Florin Rădulescu. Random matrices, amalgamated free products and subfactors of the von Neumann algebra of a free group, of noninteger index. Inventiones Mathematicae, 115(2):347–389, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01231764.
- [12]Éric Ricard and Quanhua Xu. Khintchine type inequalities for reduced free products and applications. Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik, 599:27–59, 2006. Numbered references use the preprint version https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0505302v2.
- [13]Dima Shlyakhtenko. On the II₁ factors of Fuchsian groups, 2026. Preprint, version 1, 10 September 2026. https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.11074v1.
- [14]Dan Voiculescu. Symmetries of some reduced free product C*-algebras. In Operator Algebras and their Connections with Topology and Ergodic Theory, volume 1132 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics, pages 556–588. Springer, Berlin, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0074909.
- [15]Dan Voiculescu. Circular and semicircular systems and free product factors. In Operator Algebras, Unitary Representations, Enveloping Algebras, and Invariant Theory, volume 92 of Progress in Mathematics, pages 45–60. Birkhäuser, Boston, 1990. https://math.berkeley.edu/~dvv/CircularSemi.pdf.
- [16]Dan Voiculescu. Cyclomorphy. International Mathematics Research Notices, 2002(6):299–332, 2002. Numbered references use the preprint version https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0105096v1.
- [17]Dan Voiculescu. Free entropy. Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society, 34(3):257–278, 2002. Numbered references use the preprint version https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0103168v1.