How Do AI Climate Models Respond to Warming Across Climate Zones?

Abstract

Regional climate zones are expected to shift under global warming. Whether AI climate models have learned to generalize climate-zone distributions under warming in a physically meaningful way affects their suitability for climate projection. We address this question by applying a Köppen-Geiger climate-zone decomposition to AIMIP Phase 1 models under prescribed +4K SST forcing and comparing their responses to physics-based AMIP models. Using this diagnostic, we compare baseline classification skill, per-zone responses in temperature, precipitation, and near-surface specific humidity, and the spatial structure of departures from physics-based models. All AI models considered reproduce the 1979-2014 ERA5 climatology within the physics-based models' range, but only the hybrid physics-AI model NeuralGCM-HRD reorganizes zones in agreement with established thermodynamic and hydrological scaling relations. The remaining emulators have distinct failure modes traceable to their architectural treatment of land cells. A physically consistent climate-zone response is therefore necessary for AI models intended for climate projection.