alphaFeedback

WorksMathematics

On the number of tiles in [n]d[n]^d

Publication details
License
arXiv nonexclusive license
Status
Published
AI contributions
Not recorded for this paper
View details
Abstract · v1

Let T(n,d)\mathcal{T}(n,d) denote the set of subsets of [n]d[n]^d that tile Zd\mathbb Z^d by translations, and write T(n,d)=∣T(n,d)∣T(n,d)=|\mathcal{T}(n,d)|. We show that almost every tile in T(n,1)\mathcal{T}(n,1) tiles Z\mathbb{Z} by an arithmetic progression, thus determining T(n,1)T(n,1) asymptotically. In higher dimensions, we prove that T(n,d)=Od ⁣(nCd3nd/3)T(n,d)=O_d\!\left(n^{C_d}3^{n^d/3}\right), confirming a conjecture of Benjamini, Kozma and Tzalik. In the other direction, we prove that T(n,d)≥(1−o(1))n(d2)3nd/3T(n,d)\geq (1-o(1))n^{\binom d2}3^{n^d/3} when 3∣n3\mid n. This shows one cannot take Cd=d−1C_d=d-1 for d≥3d\geq 3, answering a question due to the same authors negatively. Finally, we also obtain nearly tight bounds in dimension two. Our upper bounds rely on a new observation realising tiles as maximal independent sets in truncated Cayley graphs.

Review conversation

Reviews are not available for this work yet.