alphaFeedback

WorksPhysics and Astronomy

Molecular Doping of MoS2_2 with N-Heterocyclic Carbenes: A Raman Study of Interfacial Charge Transfer

AI contributions
  • large language models
View details

Abstract

We demonstrate efficient electron doping of exfoliated MoS2_2 through the deposition of N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) molecules onto its surface. Raman spectroscopy reveals a pronounced softening of the optical A1g_{1g} phonon mode after NHC deposition, consistent with electron transfer from the NHC molecules to the MoS2_2 layers. The largest phonon-energy shifts are observed in monolayer and bilayer flakes whereas changes in bulk-like MoS2_2 are negligible, indicating that the doping efficiency depends on the number of layers. This thickness dependence highlights the dominant role of interfacial charge transfer at the NHC/MoS2_2 interface. Quantitative analysis of the Raman modes of as-exfoliated and NHC-covered MoS2_2, together with comparison with literature values, allows us to estimate an increase in the two-dimensional electron density of about two-orders of magnitude in MoS2_2 mono- and bilayers. These results demonstrate that NHC-based surface deposition is a promising approach for chemically tuning the carrier density of semiconducting transition-metal dichalcogenides and provide a potential route toward molecularly tunable two-dimensional electronic devices, in which, analogous to modulation doping, the donors reside outside the semiconductor lattice.

Introduction

The field of two-dimensional (2D) materials has undergone rapid development, driven by their distinctive physical properties and broad potential for technological applications. Among these materials, semiconducting transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs), such as MoS2MoS_{2}, have emerged as particularly promising systems. In the monolayer limit, TMDs exhibit a direct bandgap [1, 2], large exciton binding energies [3, 4], and strong light-matter interactions [5, 6], making them attractive for applications in photovoltaics, sensing, and optoelectronics at room temperature [7, 8, 9, 10].

A key feature of MoS2MoS_{2} is the high degree of tunability of its electronic and optical properties. This can be achieved through a variety of approaches, including strain engineering [11, 12], electrostatic or chemical doping [13, 14, 15], and the assembly of mono- and few-layer structures into vertical hetero- and hybrid structures [16, 17]. In addition, molecular deposition has recently gained attention as a versatile strategy for modifying the properties of MoS2MoS_{2} and other semiconducting TMDs in a controlled manner [18, 19, 20]. Depending on the molecular structure and the interfacial electronic alignment, molecular deposition can enable several mechanisms for tailoring material behavior. These include defect passivation or modification of defect-related states [20, 21, 22], charge doping mediated by interfacial charge transfer [15, 23, 24], and, under resonant conditions, non-radiative energy transfer processes such as Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) [20, 25].

Recently, N-heterocyclic carbenes (NHCs) have emerged as a particularly suitable class of molecules for the controlled electron doping of TMDs such as MoS2_2 [26, 27]. NHCs offer strong σ\sigma-donor character, molecular tunability, and the ability to form self-assembled monolayers on gold [28, 29, 30, 31, 32] and other coinage metals [33, 34, 35, 36, 37], base metals [38, 39, 40, 41, 42], and selected semiconductors [43, 44, 45, 46]. On such surfaces, covalent binding models [35, 47, 48, 49, 50], self-assembly [47, 51, 52], stability [28, 53, 54, 55], competing adsorption geometries [31, 37, 56, 57, 58] and interfacial electron transfer [45, 59, 60, 61] have been well explored. In contrast, the binding mode of NHCs on semiconducting TMDs is more complex. Proposed interaction mechanisms range from covalent binding between the carbene and the chalcogenide atoms [27, 62], to frustrated Lewis acid-base pairing between the carbene and the metal atoms at defect sites [26], to physisorption of so-called masked carbenes [63].

Recent studies [27, 28, 63, 64] indicate that NHC-derived species produce substantial interfacial electron doping in TMDs; however, the dominant binding mode and the charge transfer mechanism may depend on the molecular precursor, preparation conditions, defect density, and surface structure. Consequently, molecular deposition can affect the optical, electronic and vibrational properties, in particular the optical phonon modes through various contributions, including charge transfer, strain, and defect- or bonding-related perturbations. A quantitative comparison of as-exfoliated and NHC-covered MoS2_2 samples is therefore required to distinguish these effects.

From an application perspective, controlled n-type doping of two-dimensional semiconductors is essential for reducing the contact resistance, adjusting the threshold voltage of field-effect transistors, and realizing complementary 2D logic and efficient photodetectors. Substitutional doping, however, introduces impurities into the channel lattice and thereby degrades the transport properties, whereas electrostatic gating requires additional device layers. In conventional semiconductors, modulation doping, in which the donors are spatially separated from the conducting channel, resolved this conflict and enabled high-mobility two-dimensional electron systems [65]. Molecular surface doping is a promising analogue for 2D semiconductors, because the donor molecules reside outside the lattice of the atomically thin channel and leave it unperturbed.

The central question addressed in this study is whether NHC deposition produces a reproducible electron-doping response in exfoliated MoS2_2 that can be distinguished from strain, defect-related perturbations, and changes in the surrounding atmosphere.

In this work, we employ micro-Raman spectroscopy to investigate the impact of NHC deposition on exfoliated MoS2_2 samples of varying thickness, ranging from monolayers to bulk-like flakes. From hyperspectral Raman maps acquired on three several micrometer sized samples containing mono-, bi-, few-layer and bulk-like regions, we perform a comparative statistical analysis of the optical phonon modes before and after NHC deposition. By quantitatively evaluating the mode frequencies and their relative shifts, we disentangle the contributions of changes in carrier density, strain, and defect- or covalent-bonding-related perturbations, building on previously established Raman-based analyses [5]. Our analysis reveals a pronounced n-type doping response after NHC deposition, which is strongest in monolayer and bilayer MoS2_2 and negligible in bulk-like samples. The absence of Raman signatures of strain modification or defect generation after NHC deposition is consistent with a weak chemical perturbation of the MoS2_2 lattice, although the binding mode cannot be determined from the present data. Comparison of the evolution of the A1g_{1g} Raman-mode frequency in as-exfoliated and NHC-covered MoS2_2 bilayers with literature values used for calibration [5, 64, 66] indicates an increase in the two-dimensional electron density by about two-orders of magnitude (up to 101310^{13} cm−2^{-2}) due to interfacial charge transfer. This behavior resembles a molecular analogue of modulation doping [65], in which donor species located outside the MoS2_2 lattice supply carriers to the conducting channel while leaving the lattice of the channel unperturbed. NHC deposition may therefore provide a route toward molecular doping in semiconducting TMDs for fundamental studies and optoelectronic applications.

EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Sample preparation

MoS2_2 samples were cleaved by micromechanical exfoliation [67], dry-transferred onto Si/SiO2_2 (300 nm) substrates, and characterized by micro-Raman measurements at room temperature using a commercial Raman microscope (Witec Alpha 300).

Prior NHC deposition, the MoS2_2 samples were annealed in a vacuum chamber (10−510^{-5} mbar) at 190°C for approximately one hour. The vacuum chamber and the physical vapor deposition (PVD) chamber were located in a glove bag in nitrogen atmosphere to ensure a controlled environment. After annealing, the MoS2_2 samples were not exposed to air and were transferred to the PVD chamber within 5 minutes (the setup is described in the Supporting Information, Figure S11). The NHC precursor IMe·CO2_2 was heated to 120 °C, and the vapor deposition time was about 30 minutes.

Physical vapor phase deposition chamber

Figure S11. Physical vapor phase deposition chamber made from aluminum with Teflon sealings. The bottom part is compatible with standard laboratory heating plates. It contains a sample stage, a small crucible and a vacuum/nitrogen valve.

Along with the MoS2_2 sample, a thin-film gold substrate was treated simultaneously as a control sample (Au-NHC). The Au-NHC sample was characterized via XPS (Figure S12 and Table S1). The successful deposition of NHCs on the gold surface proves the presence of free NHCs in the gas phase and, hence, the exposure of theMoS2_2 samples to free NHC.

Pass energy [eV]Dwell time [ms]Step size [eV]No. of scans
Survey2001000.902
Au4f501000.055
N1s1001000.0510
C1s50500.055
O1s50500.055

Table S1. XPS measurement parameters.

XPS spectra of IMe on Au

Figure S12. XPS spectra of IMe on Au. Peaks in the survey spectrum were marked with color according to the respective element as annotated in the atomic orbital spectra below: Oxygen red, nitrogen purple, carbon green and gold blue.

The NHC-covered MoS2_2 samples were placed inside a small sample chamber (Linkam Cell) filled with dry nitrogen gas directly evaporated from the liquid phase for highest purity. In this way, the Raman measurements of the NHC-covered samples were done in inert nitrogen atmosphere.

Optical measurements

All optical measurements were conducted on a commercial Raman confocal microscope (Witec Alpha 300) with 488 nm (2.54 eV) laser excitation and a diffraction-limited spot size. For Raman measurements, a grating with 1800 lines per mm was used. For as-exfoliated MoS2_2 (NHC covered MoS2_2) samples, a Neofluar 100x (50x) objective with 1 (9.1) mm working distance was employed, with laser power up to 1 mW (2 mW) and integration time up to 2 s (1.5 s). The laser power was increased for the NHC-deposited MoS2_2 samples to maintain a comparable power density, accounting for the different objective and optical losses introduced by the cell window. No degradation or laser-induced modifications were observed in any of the samples, consistent with the low power densities used. Since the analysis focused exclusively on the Raman peak frequencies and full widths at half maximum (FWHMs), rather than on peak intensities, variations in laser power do not affect the reported parameters. For the as-exfoliated MoS2_2 sample, additional measurements conducted in ambient and N2_2 atmospheres were performed with a Neofluar 50x objective with a 9.1 mm working distance, a laser power of 2 mW and integration time of 2 s. All measurements were conducted at room temperature. Because the as-exfoliated and NHC-covered samples were measured with different objectives and laser powers, the bulk-like region of each flake serves as an internal reference. For simplicity, the bulk notation A1g_{1g} and E2g_{2g} is used for all thicknesses.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

A schematic illustration of NHC molecules deposited on the surface of few-layer MoS2_2 sample is shown in Figure 1a. Figure 1b shows typical Raman spectra of exfoliated monolayer (1L), bilayer (2L), and few-layer (FL) MoS2_2 samples before and after NHC deposition (sample shown in Figure 3). Here, the in-plane E2g_{2g} phonon mode is centered at a Raman shift of (386.19 ± 0.03) cm−1^{-1} and the out-of-plane A1g_{1g} phonon mode at a Raman shift of (405.26 ± 0.05) cm−1^{-1} for the as-exfoliated MoS2_2 monolayer [68, 69, 70]. As depicted in Figure 1b and elaborated in detail later on, the frequency separation between A1g_{1g} and E2g_{2g} phonon modes was found to decrease after NHC deposition due to softening of the A1gA_{1g} mode, while the E2gE_{2g} mode shows no shift relative to the as-exfoliated sample. This A1gA_{1g} softening after NHC deposition depends on layer number.

Schematic representation of NHC deposition and Raman spectra of MoS₂ samples

Figure 1. a) Schematic representation of NHC deposition on a few-layer MoS2_2 sample. Image was generated based on crystallographic MoS2_2 data (ID mp-2815) using Avogadro-1.2.0 and ChemDraw-25.0.2. b) Raman spectra acquired from mono- (1L), bi- (2L), few-layer (FL) and bulk regions of sample 2 before and after NHC deposition (positions marked by X in Figure 3). Spectra are normalized to the E2gE_{2g} phonon mode intensity and vertically offset for clarity. Frequency separation Δν\Delta\nu between A1gA_{1g} and E2gE_{2g} phonon modes decreases after NHC deposition due to softening of the A1gA_{1g}. This relative shift depends on the layer-number. Softening of the A1gA_{1g} optical phonon mode together with increased FWHM are indicative of an increased electron-density due to charge transfer from the NHC molecules.

Spatial maps and histograms of frequency separation between E2g and A1g modes

Figure 3. a), b) Spatial maps of the frequency separation Δν\Delta\nu between the E2g_{2g} and A1g_{1g} modes for sample 2 before and after NHC deposition, respectively. Dashed lines outline regions with monolayer (1L), bilayer (2L), and few-layer (FL) thicknesses. The “X” symbols mark the positions at which the point spectra shown in Figure 1 were acquired. c) Histograms of frequency separation Δν\Delta\nu between E2g_{2g} and A1g_{1g} modes before and after NHC deposition. The literature ranges for monolayer (1L), bilayer (2L), and bulk-like samples are indicated by vertical lines on the top axis [68, 69, 70].

To quantify this energy shift, all Raman spectra were fitted to a sum of two Lorentzian functions, from which information about their frequency shift, intensity, and full width at half maximum was extracted. With increasing number of layers, the frequency of the A1gA_{1g} mode increases due to stiffening of the lattice, while the frequency of the E2gE_{2g} mode decreases due to the combined effect of enhanced dielectric screening of the long-range Coulomb interaction and interlayer hybridization effect [71]. The opposite trend in their thickness-dependent frequency makes the frequency separation of these two modes a reliable indicator of the MoS2_2 layer number [5, 70, 72]. Additional layer-number dependent Raman data are as shown in Figure S1,Figure S1). In the monolayer limit, the frequency difference between these two modes is below 20 cm−1^{-1}, whereas for bilayers it increases to 20-22 cm−1^{-1}; for bulk-like samples, the frequency difference is ≥25\ge25 cm−1^{-1}. These values provide useful boundaries, particularly for distinguishing monolayers and bilayers, although the exact values depend on the charge-carrier density [5, 64, 66] and other parameters such as strain and defects. It is worth mentioning that this method for determining the number of layers is valid for exfoliated samples, whereas for as-grown samples the frequency difference has been reported to depend on the synthesis parameters [73].

Layer-dependent Raman spectra and frequency separations

Figure S1. a) Layer-dependent Raman spectra of an additional as-exfoliated MoS2_2 reference sample taken at room temperature with 488nm (2.54 eV) excitation. b) Frequency separation of A1g_{1g} and E2g_{2g} modes as a function of number of layers in MoS2_2. c) Frequency separation of the A1g_{1g} and E2g_{2g} modes as a function of the change in charge-carrier density in monolayer MoS2_2 measured in dependence of a solid electrolyte gate voltage (similar as described in [65]).

Beyond their thickness dependence, the frequencies and FWHM of these two phonon modes are also sensitive to external perturbations including strain [74, 75], defects [66, 76], and changes in the electron density induced by electronic or structural dopants [20, 64, 77, 78, 79], as illustrated in Figure S1 and Figure S2. In particular, changes in electron density can modify the phonon frequencies of the A1gA_{1g} mode through electron–phonon coupling [66] (see also Figure S2). Figure 2 a) shows an optical micrograph of an exfoliated multilayer MoS2_2 flake, in which regions with different layer thicknesses can be identified from their optical contrast arising from the interference effects [80]. Regions with 2L and FL thickness are outlined with dashed white lines. Most of the flake exhibits a bulk-like thickness and appears yellow. Figure 2 b) and Figure 2c) show spatial maps of the frequency separation Δν=ν(A1g)−ν(E2g)\Delta\nu= \nu(\mathrm{A}_{1g}) - \nu(\mathrm{E}_{2g}) between A1g\mathrm{A}_{1g} and E2g\mathrm{E}_{2g} phonon modes for the MoS2_2 flake (sample 1) before and after NHC deposition, respectively. Through careful analysis of the E2g\mathrm{E}_{2g} and A1g\mathrm{A}_{1g} mode frequencies in the pristine and NHC-deposited flake, we identify a clear redshift for the A1g\mathrm{A}_{1g} mode after NHC deposition, while the E2g\mathrm{E}_{2g} mode shows no systematic shift. The absence of a measurable shift in the E2g\mathrm{E}_{2g} mode together with the absence of the defect-activated LA(M) mode (∼227\sim227 cm−1^{-1}[66]) largely rules out strain- and defect-induced effects and indicates that the observed changes predominantly originate from the electronic modulation. Accordingly, we attribute the observed reduction in Δν\Delta\nu to the enhanced electron doping resulting from charge transfer from the NHC molecules to MoS2_2. This interpretation is consistent with the opposite Raman response reported for adsorbed water molecules, which deplete MoS2_2 of electrons via molecular gating [64]. This interfacial charge-transfer mechanism is conceptually related to modulation doping, in which spatially separated donor species transfer carriers to a two-dimensional conducting channel, while the lattice of the channel remains unperturbed. The modulation-doping approach was originally demonstrated in GaAs/AlGaAs heterostructures, where it enabled the formation of high-mobility two-dimensional electron systems [65, 81].

Optical micrograph and spatial maps of MoS2 frequency separation

Figure 2. a) Optical micrograph of an exfoliated multilayer MoS2_2 sample, with bilayer (2L) and few-layer (FL) regions marked with dashed line. b), c) Spatial maps of the frequency separation Δν\Delta\nu, between the E2g_{2g} and A1g_{1g} modes of sample 1 before and after NHC deposition, respectively.

Raman spectra on 1L MoS₂ in different environments

Figure S2. a) Raman spectra of the E2gE_{2g} and A1gA_{1g} modes under different conditions (vacuum, ambient and deionized water) in monolayer (1L) MoS2\mathrm{MoS}_{2} at room temperature.

Following NHC deposition, the bulk-like region of the MoS2_2 sample remains largely unchanged, whereas the thinner regions exhibit a reduction in optical phonon frequency separation Δν\Delta\nu of between 1-2 cm−1^{-1}, depending on the flake’s thickness. This observation is consistent with the expected decrease in the molecular-doping effect with increasing layer number NN, since the maximum amount of interfacial charge transfer per unit area nn is limited by the molecular coverage [64]. Consequently, the transferred electron-density per layer approximately follows the relation n/Nn/N, therefore reducing the doping-induced phonon-frequency shift and making it unresolvable in thicker flakes [64]. We emphasize that a decrease in the frequency separation Δν\Delta\nu is indicative for n-type doping [20, 64, 77, 82]. This interpretation is further supported by the mode-resolved maps in Figure S3: only the A1g\mathrm{A}_{1g} mode exhibits a pronounce softening [83, 84, 85].

Four Raman maps showing E2g mode frequencies for pristine MoS2 and NHC covered MoS2, and A1g mode frequencies for pristine MoS2 and NHC covered MoS2, with panels a–d and color scales

Figure S3. Frequencies of E2gE_{2g} and A1gA_{1g} modes of sample 1 before (a,b) and after (c,d) NHC deposition.

It is also worth noting that, in addition to the frequency softening, the FWHM of the A1g\mathrm{A}_{1g} mode increases after NHC deposition, from approximately 7 cm−1^{-1} to 15 cm−1^{-1} in the bilayer region, while the FWHM of E1g\mathrm{E}_{1g} mode shows no systematic changes. The broadening of A1g\mathrm{A}_{1g} mode is consistent with substantial n-type doping, although inhomogeneous broadening may also contribute [64, 77].

To verify the reproducibility of the effect of NHC deposition on the vibrational modes of MoS2_2, we performed measurements on two additional exfoliated samples (samples 2 and 3) each containing regions of flakes with different thicknesses, as shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4. These measurements confirm that NHC deposition results in shifts of the Raman frequencies with a thickness dependence similar to that observed in the initial analysis: monolayer MoS2_2 regions show a larger change in the frequency separation Δν\Delta\nu between as-exfoliated and NHC-deposited flakes than thicker regions (Figure 3c and Figure 4c). Based on the change in the frequency separation Δν\Delta\nu, the resulting change in charge-carrier density can be estimated using an established calibration [64]. For mono- and bilayer MoS2_2, changes in Δν\Delta\nu of approximately 2 cm−1^{-1} and 1.2–1.5 cm−1^{-1}, respectively, are observed. For monolayers, the calibration in Figure S1 yields an increase in electron density of Δn≈9×1012\Delta n \approx9 \times10^{12} cm−2^{-2}, or ≈7×1012\approx7 \times10^{12} cm−2^{-2} after subtracting the atmosphere contribution (Figure 5). Such shifts are consistently observed in all investigated MoS2_2 samples after NHC deposition. The frequency changes of the E2g_{2g} and A1g_{1g} modes before (as-exfoliated) and after NHC deposition for three samples are shown in Figure S3, Figure S5, Figure S7 in the SI. Finally, the changes in the FWHMs of both modes before and after NHC depositions are shown in Figure S4, Figure S6 and Figure S8, with a significant broadening of A1g_{1g} mode after NHC deposition.

Spatial maps and histograms of frequency separation

Figure 4. a), b) Spatial maps of the frequency separation Δν\Delta\nu between the E2g\mathrm{E}_{2g} and A1g\mathrm{A}_{1g} modes for sample 3 before and after NHC deposition, respectively. Dashed lines outline regions with bilayer (2L) thickness. c) Histograms of frequency separation Δν\Delta\nu between E2g\mathrm{E}_{2g} and A1g\mathrm{A}_{1g} modes before and after NHC deposition. The literature ranges for monolayer (1L), bilayer (2L), and bulk-like samples are indicated by vertical lines on the top axis [68, 69, 70].

Histograms of frequency separation between E2g and A1g modes of an as-exfoliated MoS2 reference sample in N2 and ambient atmosphere

Figure 5. Histograms of frequency separation between E2g_{2g} and A1g_{1g} modes of an as-exfoliated MoS2_2 reference sample in N2_2 and ambient atmosphere. The literature ranges for monolayer (1L), bilayer (2L), and bulk-like samples are indicated by vertical lines on the top axis [68, 69, 70]. Inset in the bottom left corner shows an optical image of the exfoliated MoS2_2 sample. Dashed lines outline regions with monolayer (1L), and bilayer (2L) thicknesses. Scalebar is 4μ\mum.

Four Raman maps showing FWHM of E2g mode for pristine MoS2 and NHC covered MoS2, and FWHM of A1g mode for pristine MoS2 and NHC covered MoS2, with panels a–d and color scales

Figure S4. FWHM of E2gE_{2g} and A1gA_{1g} modes of sample 1 before (a,b) and after (c,d) NHC deposition.

Raman maps of sample 2 showing frequencies of $E_{2g}$ and $A_{1g}$ modes before and after NHC deposition

Figure S5. Frequencies of E2gE_{2g} and A1gA_{1g} modes of sample 2 before (a,b) and after (c,d) NHC deposition.

Raman maps of sample 2 showing FWHM of $E_{2g}$ and $A_{1g}$ modes before and after NHC deposition

Figure S6. FWHM of E2gE_{2g} and A1gA_{1g} modes of sample 2 before (a,b) and after (c,d) NHC deposition.

Frequencies of E$_{2g}$ and A$_{1g}$ modes of sample 3 before and after NHC deposition

Figure S7. Frequencies of E2g_{2g} and A1g_{1g} modes of sample 3 before (a,b) and after (c,d) NHC deposition.

FWHM of E$_{2g}$ and A$_{1g}$ modes of sample 3 before and after NHC deposition

Figure S8. FWHM of E2g_{2g} and A1g_{1g} modes of sample 3 before (a,b) and after (c,d) NHC deposition.

To assess whether the surrounding atmosphere influences the intralayer vibrational modes of MoS2\mathrm{MoS}_{2} and to distinguish environmental effects from NHC-induced doping, we performed a complementary Raman experiment under ambient and nitrogen atmospheres. In this comparison, a separate as-exfoliated MoS2\mathrm{MoS}_{2} reference sample (not NHC-treated) was measured first under ambient conditions, which include exposure to water vapor and oxygen, and subsequently under an inert N2\mathrm{N}_{2} gas atmosphere [64] using the same measurement configuration as for the NHC-covered flakes. As shown in Figure 5, switching from ambient air to N2\mathrm{N}_{2}-gas decreases the frequency separation Δν\Delta\nu by only 0.5 cm−1\mathrm{cm}^{-1} in the monolayer and bilayer region, while the frequency separation of the bulk-like region remains unchanged. The reduced frequency separation observed under an N2\mathrm{N}_{2} atmosphere is attributed to a slight increase in the charge-carrier density resulting from reduced depletion, which is predominantly caused by molecular gating by water molecules present in the ambient atmosphere [64]. These comparatively small changes are substantially less pronounced than those observed after NHC deposition. Since the NHC-covered samples were measured in N2\mathrm{N}_{2} and the as-exfoliated samples in ambient air, this contribution of ≈0.5 cm−1\approx0.5\ \mathrm{cm}^{-1} is contained in the shifts discussed above; the NHC-induced change thus amounts to ≈1.5 cm−1\approx1.5\ \mathrm{cm}^{-1} for monolayers. The control experiment therefore indicates that changing the atmosphere from ambient air to N2\mathrm{N}_{2} has only a minor effect on the Raman response and that the dominant contribution to the A1g\mathrm{A}_{1g} softening, indicative for electron doping, arises from interfacial charge transfer between the NHC molecules and MoS2\mathrm{MoS}_{2}. Thus, NHC deposition provides an effective route for electron doping of MoS2\mathrm{MoS}_{2} through molecularly induced interfacial charge transfer.

Conclusions

In summary, a comparative Raman analysis of exfoliated MoS2_2 samples before and after NHC deposition with MoS2_2 thicknesses ranging from monolayers to bulk-like flakes reveals pronounced n-type doping after NHC deposition. The dominant response is a red-shift and broadening of the A1g_{1g} mode, whereas the E2g_{2g} mode shows no systematic shift before and after NHC deposition. Together with the absence of substantial changes attributable to strain or defect generation, these observations are consistent with electron transfer from the deposited NHC molecules to MoS2_2 and with limited chemical perturbation of the lattice. The effect is strongly thickness dependent: frequency shifts of up to approximately 2 cm−1^{-1} are observed in monolayer regions, whereas the A1g_{1g}–E2g_{2g} frequency separation in bulk-like regions remains essentially unchanged. For monolayer MoS2_2, the change in the A1g_{1g}–E2g_{2g} frequency separation corresponds, based on established Raman calibrations, to an increase in the electron density on the order of 1013^{13} cm−2^{-2} (typically two-orders of magnitude). This trend is reproduced across multiple samples. Measurements of an as-exfoliated MoS2_2 reference sample under ambient and N2_2 atmospheres show substantially smaller changes, indicating that the dominant contribution to the observed doping arises from NHC-induced interfacial charge transfer rather than from the change in the surrounding atmosphere. The NHC/MoS2_2 system therefore provides a molecular charge-transfer-doping scheme that is conceptually related to modulation doping, although the donor layer is directly adjacent to the MoS2_2 rather than separated by a conventional spacer layer. Because the donors reside outside the MoS2_2 lattice, NHC deposition offers a promising route for molecular control of the carrier density in semiconducting TMDs that leaves the channel lattice unperturbed, which is relevant for contact engineering, field-effect transistors, and optoelectronic devices.

Associated Content

Supporting Information: Layer-dependent Raman reference data and Raman spectra of 1L MoS2_2 in different environments; Raman frequency and FWHM maps of samples 1–3; synthesis and NMR characterization of IMe·CO2_2; physical vapor deposition setup; XPS of IMe on Au (PDF)

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support by the German Science Foundation (DFG) via Grants 443274199 and 556436549 (WU 637/7-2,-8-1), No.426726249 (DE 2749/2-1 and DE 2749/2-2), and the Priority Program 2244 (2DMP). A.S. acknowledges the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation for a research fellowship. During the preparation of this work, the authors used large language models to refine the manuscript regarding grammar, readability, and clarity; the authors reviewed and edited the content and take full responsibility for the publication.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Molecular Doping of MoS2_2 with N-Heterocyclic Carbenes: A Raman Study of Interfacial Charge Transfer

Ana Senkić; Arne Nalop; Xenia Sieverding; Ariane Ufer; Sebastian Roling; Frank Glorius; Ursula Wurstbauer

Supporting Information

◇ equally contributed

Additional layer-dependent Raman spectra

Raman spectra on 1L MoS21\mathrm{L}\,\mathrm{MoS}_{2} in different environments: impact of adsorbed environmental molecules

Additional Raman maps of sample 1 (Figure 2) before and after NHC deposition

Additional Raman maps of sample 2 (Figures 1 and 3) before and after NHC deposition

Additional Raman maps of sample 3 (Figure 4) before and after NHC deposition

Chemical Synthesis

Reactions were stirred using oven-dried PTFE-coated magnetic stir bars with a rotation speed of 750 rpm. Solids were weighted under ambient conditions except otherwise mentioned, liquids handled with pipettes or syringes. Reaction temperatures are reported as the temperature of metal heating blocks or cooling baths surrounding the reaction vessel. The following solvents were purchased from ACROS Organics, Sigma-Aldrich and Fischer Scientific and used from a solvent purification system, which dried HPLC grade solvents over alumina under a positive pressure of argon according to Grubb’s procedure: Tetrahydrofuran (THF), toluene and dichloromethane (CH2_2Cl2_2). Other solvents were also purchased from ACROS Organics, Sigma-Aldrich and Fischer Scientific and stored over activated molecular sieves. Solvents for standard work-up or purification procedures were simply purified by distillation (nn-pentane, CH2_2Cl2_2, EtOAc, Et2_2O).

Starting materials were bought from commercial suppliers such as ABCR, Acros Organics, Alfa Aesar, BLD Pharm, Carbolution, Combi-Blocks, Fisher Scientific, Fluka, Fluorchem, Merck, Sigma-Aldrich, Strem Chemicals, or TCI and used as received. Air or moisture sensitive compounds were stored and handled in an argon filled glove-box with oxygen and water levels below 1 ppm.

1^{1}H- and 13^{13}C-NMR spectra were recorded at room temperature on an Avance II 400 MHz instrument. Chemical shifts (δ\delta) are given in ppm. Residual solvent signals were used as references for 1^{1}H-NMR spectra: D2_2O (δH\delta_{\mathrm{H}} 4.79 ppm). Spectra were analyzed with MestReNova from Mestrelab Research S.L. and multiplicity described with standard abbreviations.

ESI mass spectra (HRMS, high resolution mass spectrometry) were recorded on a Thermo Fisher Scientific Orbitrap LTQ XL or a Thermo Fisher Scientific Orbitrap Velos Pro.

Chemical structure of 1,3-dimethyl-1H-imidazol-3-ium-2-carboxylate

Figure 6 (PDF p. 17). 1,3-dimethyl-1H-imidazol-3-ium-2-carboxylate

1,3-dimethyl-1H-imidazolium iodide (IMeH·I) was synthesized according to a known literature procedure.[1, 2] 1,3-dimethyl-1H-imidazol-3-ium-2-carboxylate (IMe·CO2_2) was synthesized according to adapted literature procedures:[1, 2] IMeH·I (10 g, 44.6 mmol, 1 eq.) and potassium tert-butoxide (6.0 g, 53.6 mmol, 1.2 eq., weighed under inert argon atmosphere) were placed in a oven dired Schlenk flask under argon. At -78 °C, 250 ml dry and degassed tetrahydrofuran (THF) were added. Whilst warming slowly to rt., the mixture was stirred for 2.5 hours. The mixture was filtered over Celite under argon. The filter was washed with THF (two times 250 ml). Still under argon, CO2_2 was infiltrated into the yellow carbene solution and white precipitate was formed. After one hour, the white precipitate was filtered under ambient condition, washed with 100 ml THF and 400 ml CH2_2Cl2_2, sonicated in MeOH, washed again with CH2_2Cl2_2 and nn-pentane, dried under reduced pressure and stored inside a glovebox fridge (4.8 g, 34.0 mmol, 76 % yield).

1^{1}H NMR (400 MHz, D2_2O) δ\delta = 7.36 (s, 2H), 3.98 (s, 6H).

13^{13}C NMR (101 MHz, D2_2O) δ\delta = 160.53, 158.36, 123.05, 36.73.

Pushrod (thermal evaporation coupled to EI): m/zm/z calculated for [IMe]+⋅^{+\mathord\cdot} 96.1, found 96.2.

HRMS (ESI): m/zm/z calculated for [IMe·H]+^{+} 97.0760, found 97.0760.

1H NMR spectrum of IMe·CO2

Figure S9. 1H^{1}\mathrm{H} NMR (400 MHz, D2O\mathrm{D}_{2}\mathrm{O}) spectrum of IMe·CO2\mathrm{CO}_{2}.

13C NMR spectrum of IMe·CO2

Figure S10. 13C^{13}\mathrm{C} NMR (101 MHz, D2O\mathrm{D}_{2}\mathrm{O}) spectrum of IMe·CO2\mathrm{CO}_{2}.

Thermal Annealing and Physical Vapor Deposition

The annealing chamber and the deposition chamber were placed side by side in a glove-bag, which was filled with dry nitrogen (evaporated from liquid phase) and operated under constant nitrogen flow. Annealing was conducted at 10−510^{-5} mbar pressure at 190°C for approximately one hour. The annealed substrates were transferred from the annealing chamber into the deposition chamber without leaving the inert nitrogen atmosphere.

Physical vapor phase deposition (PVD) was carried out with a house-made deposition chamber (see Figure S11) which was kept inside the glovebag in nitrogen atmosphere during operation. In order to clean the chamber, its valve was connected to a vacuum pump (0.1–1.0 mbar) whilst the setup was heated to T>150T > 150 °C for one hour. After cooling down to room temperature, the chamber was flooded with nitrogen, 2 mg of IMe⋅\cdotCO2_2 was loaded in the crucible and two substrates were placed on the sample stage. One substrate was gold (Au) and the other Si/SiO2_2 with exfoliated MoS2_2 flakes of varying thickness. The chamber was flushed with nitrogen, evacuated (0.1 mbar) and the valve was closed. Now, the setup was heated to 120 °C for 30 minutes (p<5p < 5 mbar). During cooling down, vacuum was restored upon reaching T<80T < 80 °C. At room temperature, the chamber was flushed with nitrogen to take out the samples.

XPS Analysis

The XPS measurement parameters and spectra are shown in Table S1 and Figure S12, respectively. All spectra were referenced relative to the Au 4f7/24f_{7/2} peak at a binding energy (BE) of 84 eV. An Al Kα\alpha X-ray source was used (12 kV filament, hνh\nu = 1486.7 eV), the spot size was 100 µm (72 W max), X-ray incidence and take-off angle amount to 60° and 0°, respectively, relative to surface normal. For charge compensation metallic clips on thin film connected to grounded sample stage and an argon flood gun were used.

The presence of the N 1s signal is a clear indication of chemisorbed IMe on Au since it's N 1s BE of 401.1 eV agrees well with previous reports.[1] However, the successful binding of IMe to Au is solely an indication for the general working principle of the experimenal PVD procedure. It solely proofs that free carbenes have been present in the gas phase. At this state, no assumption can be made about IMe binding to MoS2\mathrm{MoS}_{2}.

We also attempted XPS measurements of pristine and NHC-modified MoS2\mathrm{MoS}_{2} flakes. However, the small lateral dimensions of the flakes, combined with the intrinsically low sensitivity factor of the N 1s core level, resulted in an insufficient signal-to-noise ratio. In addition, the Mo 3p emission overlaps with the N 1s region, preventing reliable separation and quantification of the two contributions. To avoid overinterpretation, the corresponding XPS data and analysis are therefore not included.

[1] A. Bakker, A. Timmer, E. Kolodzeiski, M. Freitag, H. Y. Gao, H. Mönig, S. Amirjalayer, F. Glorius, H. Fuchs, Journal of the American Chemical Society 2018, 140, 11889.

[2] M. Franz, A. Das, S. Chandola, M. Kubicki, M. Das, A. Sette, D. Corona, M. Palummo, L. Chiodo, R. Schöder et al., Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) 2025, 64, e202511094.

References

  1. [1]Mak KF, Lee C, Hone J, Shan J, Heinz TF. Atomically Thin MoS₂: A New Direct-Gap Semiconductor. Phys Rev Lett 2010;105:136805. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.136805.
  2. [2]Splendiani A, Sun L, Zhang Y, Li T, Kim J, Chim C-Y, et al. Emerging Photoluminescence in Monolayer MoS₂. Nano Lett 2010;10:1271–5. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl903868w.
  3. [3]Mueller T, Malic E. Exciton physics and device application of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenide semiconductors. NPJ 2D Mater Appl 2018;2:29. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41699-018-0074-2.
  4. [4]Qiu DY, Da Jornada FH, Louie SG. Optical Spectrum of MoS₂: Many-Body Effects and Diversity of Exciton States. Phys Rev Lett 2013;111:216805. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.216805.
  5. [5]Wurstbauer U, Miller B, Parzinger M, Hollerith AW. Light–matter interaction in transition metal dichalcogenides and their heterostructures. J Phys D Appl Phys 2017;50:173001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/aa5f81.
  6. [6]Lei Y, Zhang T, Lin Y-C, Granzier-Nakajima T, Bepete G, Kowalczyk DA, et al. Graphene and Beyond: Recent Advances in Two-Dimensional Materials Synthesis, Properties, and Devices. ACS Nano 2018;12:2450–85. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.2c00017.
  7. [7]Mak KF, Shan J. Photonics and optoelectronics of 2D semiconductor transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat Photonics 2016;10:216–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2015.282.
  8. [8]Choi W, Choudhary N, Han GH, Park J, Akinwande D, Lee YH. Recent development of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides and their applications. Materials Today 2017;20:116–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2016.10.002.
  9. [9]Radasavljevic B, Radenovic A, Brivio J, Giacometti V, Kis A. Single-layer MoS₂ transistors. Nat Nanotechnol 2011;6:147–50. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2010.279.
  10. [10]Barua S, Dutta HS, Gogi S, Devi R, Khan R. Nanostructured MoS₂-Based Advanced Biosensors: A Review. ACS Appl Nano Mater 2018;1:2–25. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.7b00157.
  11. [11]Radatović B, Kacurňák J, Jadriško V, Fresinda R, Senkic A, Vujičić N, et al. Strain-Enhanced Large-Area Monolayer MoS₂ Photodetectors. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2024;16:15596–604. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.4c00458.
  12. [12]Daye IM, Dausa G, Dracy RW, Brenner K, Vaziri S, Pop E. Strain-Enhanced Mobility of Monolayer MoS₂. Nano Lett 2022;22:8052–9. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c01707.
  13. [13]Xu D, Jian P, Liu W, Tan S, Yang Y, Peng M, et al. Vanadium Metal Doping of Monolayer MoS₂ for p-Type Transistors and Fast-Speed Phototransistors. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2024. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.4c03154.
  14. [14]Song B, Gu H, Fang M, Guo Z, Ho Y-T, Chen X, et al. 2D Niobium-Doped MoS₂: Tuning the Exciton Transitions and Potential Applications. ACS Appl Electron Mater 2021;3:2564–72. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaelm.1c00121.
  15. [15]Bartlam C, Saigal N, Heiserer S, Lambers H, Wurstbauer UW, Duesberg GS. Orientation Dependent Interlayer Coupling in Organic–Inorganic Heterostructures. Adv Funct Mater 2024;34. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202315302.
  16. [16]Constantinescu GC, Hine NDM. Energy landscape and band-structure tuning in realistic MoS₂/MoSe₂ heterostructures. Phys Rev B 2015;91:194516. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.91.195416.
  17. [17]Gong Y, Lin J, Wang X, Shi G, Lei S, Lin Z, et al. Vertical and in-plane heterostructures from WS₂/MoS₂ monolayers. Nat Mater 2014;13:1135–42. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4091.
  18. [18]Song Z, Schultz T, Ding Z, Lei B, Han C, Amsalem P, et al. Electronic Properties of a 1D Intrinsic/p-Doped Heterojunction in a 2D Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Semiconductor. ACS Nano 2017;11:9128–35. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.7b03953.
  19. [19]Huang Y, Zhuge F, Hou J, Lv L, Luo P, Zhou N, et al. Van der Waals Coupled Organic Molecules with Monolayer MoS₂ for Fast Response Photodetectors with Gate-Tunable Responsivity. ACS Nano 2018;12:4062–73. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.8b02380.
  20. [20]Mandić S, Senkić A, Vujičić N. Defect healing and Förster resonant energy transfer in H₂Pc-TMD organic-inorganic heterostructures. Surfaces and Interfaces 2026;82:108444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2026.108444.
  21. [21]Urbanos FJ, Gullace S, Samorí P. MoS₂ Defect Healing for High-Performance Chemical Sensing of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons. ACS Nano 2022;16:11234–43. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.2c04503.
  22. [22]Ahn H, Huang Y-C, Lin C-W, Chiu Y-L, Lin E-C, Lai Y-Y, et al. Efficient Defect Healing of Transition Metal Dichalcogenides by Metallophthalocyanine. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2018;10:29145–52. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b09378.
  23. [23]Padgaonkar S, Amsterdam SH, Bergeron H, Su K, Marks TJ, Hersam MC, et al. Molecular-Orientation-Dependent Interfacial Charge Transfer in Phthalocyanine/MoS₂ Mixed-Dimensional Heterojunctions. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2019;123:13337–43. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b04063.
  24. [24]Kubota M, Akiyama M, Osterloh WR, Higashi M, Fuki M, Yamakata A, et al. Ultrafast Charge Transfer and Long-Lived Charge Separation in Covalently Linked MoS₂–Pyrene–Phenothiazine Heterojunction Monolayers. J Am Chem Soc 2026;148:5744–53. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5c22062.
  25. [25]Thompson JJ, Gerhard M, Witte G, Malic E. Optical signatures of Förster-induced energy transfer in organic/TMD heterostructures. NPJ 2D Mater Appl 2023;7:69. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41699-023-00430-z.
  26. [26]Gao J, Li N, Dai B, Yu W, Zhou X, Chen C, et al. N-Heterocyclic Carbene Functionalization of 2D Transition Metal Dichalcogenides via a Frustrated Lewis Pair Strategy. Adv Funct Mater 2025;35. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202502325.
  27. [27]Jones LO, Sadhukhan T, Schatz GC. Localized π Surface States on 2D Molybdenum Disulfide from Carbene-Functionalization as a Qubit Design Strategy. ACS Physical Chemistry Au 2022;2:277–81. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphchemau.1c00055.
  28. [28]Crudden CM, Horton JH, Ebralidze II, Zenkina OV, McLean AB, Drexler J, et al. Ultra stable self-assembled monolayers of N-heterocyclic carbenes on gold. Nat Chem 2014;6:409–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1891.
  29. [29]Amit E, Berg I, Jhuang W, Mondal R, Shema H, Gutkin V, et al. Selective Deposition of N-Heterocyclic Carbene Monolayers on Designated Au Microelectrodes within an Electrode Array. Small 2024;20. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202302317.
  30. [30]Mahapatra S, Li L, Jiang N. Surface Characterization of N-Heterocyclic Carbenes on Gold and Silver: Exploring Distinct Crystalline Facets. ChemPhysChem 2025;26. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.202500227.
  31. [31]Bakker A, Timmer A, Kolodziejski E, Freitag M, Gao HY, Mönig H, et al. Elucidating the Binding Modes of N-Heterocyclic Carbenes on a Gold Surface. J Am Chem Soc 2018;140:11889–92. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.8b06180.
  32. [32]Crudden CM, Horton JH, Narouz MR, Li Z, Smith CA, Munro K, et al. Simple direct formation of self-assembled N-heterocyclic carbene monolayers on gold and their application in biosensing. Nat Commun 2016;7:12654. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12654.
  33. [33]Navarro JJ, Das M, Tosoni S, Landwehr F, Bruce JP, Heyde M, et al. Covalent Adsorption of N-Heterocyclic Carbenes on a Copper Oxide Surface. J Am Chem Soc 2022;144:16267–71. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c06335.
  34. [34]Berg I, Amit E, Hale L, Toste FD, Gross E. N-Heterocyclic Carbene Based Nanolayer for Copper Film Oxidation Mitigation. Angew Chem Int Ed 2022;61. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202201093.
  35. [35]Jiang L, Zhang B, Médard G, Seitsonen AP, Haag F, Allegretti F, et al. N-Heterocyclic carbenes on close-packed coinage metal surfaces: bis-carbene metal adatom bonding scheme of monolayer films on Au, Ag and Cu. Chem Sci 2017;8:8301–8. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7SC03777E.
  36. [36]Li L, Schultz JF, Mahapatra S, Liu D, Zhang X, Jiang N. Optical Spectroscopic Probing and Atomic Visualization of the Motion of N-Heterocyclic Carbenes on Ag(111). ACS Nano 2025;19:15363–70. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.4c14363.
  37. [37]Nalop A, Sasmal HS, Schlosser L, Pawletz J, Tomut A-C, Daniliuc CG, et al. N-Heterocyclic carbenes on copper: a dynamic and sensitive interplay between surface functionalization and etching. Chem Sci 2026. https://doi.org/10.1039/D6SC04254F.
  38. [38]Gutheil C, Petti A, Geem J, Rendel NH, Amirjalayer S, Feld H, et al. N-Heterocyclic Carbenes on Nickel, Iron, and Steel by a Radical-to-Carbene Strategy. Angew Chem Int Ed 2026;65. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202518099.
  39. [39]Singh V, Suduwella TM, Messina A, Alosio MD, Cruden CM, et al. Electrodeposition of N-heterocyclic carbene on mild steel surfaces. J Mater Chem A Mater 2025;13:37604–13. https://doi.org/10.1039/D5TA05828G.
  40. [40]Laundry-Mottier L, Suduwella TM, Sennayake WGK, Turnbull MJ, Joneau A, Kaur E, et al. N-Heterocyclic Carbene Overlayers on Mild Steel. Chemistry of Materials 2025;37:76–86. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.4c01804.
  41. [41]Lomax JT, Goodwin E, Aloisio MD, Veinot AJ, Singh I, Shiu W-T, et al. Deposition of N-Heterocyclic Carbenes on Reactive Metal Substrates—Applications in Area-Selective Atomic Layer Deposition. Chemistry of Materials 2024;36:5500–7. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.4c00412.
  42. [42]Amit E, Mondal R, Berg I, Nairoukh Z, Gross E. N-Heterocyclic Carbene Monolayers on Metal-Oxide Films: Correlations between Adsorption Mode and Surface Functionality. Langmuir 2024;40:10374–83. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.4c01109.
  43. [43]Das M, Kohlstädt M, Enders M, Burger S, Sasmal HS, Zimmerman B, et al. Surface Modification of ITO with N-Heterocyclic Carbene Precursors Results in Electron Selective Contacts in Organic Photovoltaic Devices. Chemistry – A European Journal 2023;29. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.202301482.
  44. [44]Westmoreland DE, López-Arteaga R, Kantt LP, Wasielewski MR, Weiss EA. Dynamic Tuning of the Bandgap of CdSe Quantum Dots through Redox-Active Exciton-Delocalising N-Heterocyclic Carbene Ligands. J Am Chem Soc 2022;144:4300–4. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c12842.
  45. [45]Franz M, Chandola S, Koy M, Zielinski R, Aldahhak H, Das M, et al. Controlled growth of ordered monolayers of N-heterocyclic carbenes on silicon. Nat Chem 2021;13:828–35. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-021-00721-2.
  46. [46]Franz M, Das A, Chandola S, Kubicki M, Das M, Sette A, et al. N-Heterocyclic Carbenes on an III-V Semiconductor: From Chain Formation for Ordered Monolayers. Angew Chem Int Ed 2025;64. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202511094.
  47. [47]Ren J, Kov M, Osthus H, Lammers BS, Gutheil C, Nvenhuis M, et al. On-surface synthesis of ballot-type N-heterocyclic carbene polymers. Nat Chem 2023;15:1737–44. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-023-01310-1.
  48. [48]Hopkinson MN, Richter C, Schedler M, Glorius F. An overview of N-heterocyclic carbenes. Nature 2014;510:485–96. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13384.
  49. [49]Bellotti P, Koy M, Hopkinson MN, Glorius F. Recent advances in the chemistry and applications of N-heterocyclic carbenes. Nat Rev Chem 2021;5:711–25. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41570-021-00321-1.
  50. [50]Pan Y, Das A, Glorius F, Ren J. Insights into the surface chemistry of N-heterocyclic carbenes. Chem Soc Rev 2025;54:4626–50. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4CS01299B.
  51. [51]Wang G, Rühling A, Amirjalayer S, Knor M, Ernst JB, Richter C, et al. Ballbot-type motion of N-heterocyclic carbenes on gold surfaces. Nat Chem 2017;9:152–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.2622.
  52. [52]Inayeh A, Groome RRK, Singh I, Veinot AJ, de Lima FC, Miwa RH, et al. Self-assembly of N-heterocyclic carbenes on Au(111). Nat Commun 2021;12:4034. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23940-0.
  53. [53]Wróbel M, Cegiełka DM, Asyuda A, Kozieł K, Zharnikov M, Cyganik P. N-Heterocyclic carbenes – The design concept for densely packed and thermally ultra-stable aromatic self-assembled monolayers. Nano Today 2023;53:102024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2023.102024.
  54. [54]Jensen JM, Clark V, Kirby HL, Arroyo-Currás N, Jenkins DM. Tuning N-heterocyclic carbene wingtips to form electrochemically stable adlayers on metals. Mater Adv 2024;5:7052–60. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4MA00648H.
  55. [55]Smith CA, Narouz MR, Lummis PA, Singh I, Nazemi A, Li C-H, et al. N-Heterocyclic Carbenes in Materials Chemistry. Chem Rev 2019;119:4986–5056. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00514.
  56. [56]Gutheil C, Roß G, Amirjalayer S, Bo S, Schäfer AH, Dolitsin NL, et al. Tailored Monolayers of N-Heterocyclic Carbenes by Kinetic Control. ACS Nano 2024;18:3043–52. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.3c08045.
  57. [57]Larrea CR, Baddeley CJ, Narouz MR, Mosey NJ, Horton JH, Cruden CM. N-Heterocyclic Carbene Self-assembled Monolayers on Copper and Gold: Dramatic Effect of Wingtip Groups on Binding, Orientation and Assembly. ChemPhysChem 2017;18:3536–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.201701045.
  58. [58]Thimers RL, Santos AVB, Chen R, Kaur G, Jensen L, Jenkins DM, et al. Using Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy to Unravel the Wingtip-Dependent Orientation of N-Heterocyclic Carbenes on Gold Nanoparticles. J Phys Chem Lett 2023;14:4219–24. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.3c00588.
  59. [59]Lv A, Freitag M, Chepiga KM, Schäfer AH, Glorius F, Chi L. N-Heterocyclic-Carbene-Treated Gold Surfaces in Pentacene Organic Field-Effect Transistors: Improved Stability and Contact at the Interface. Angew Chem Int Ed 2018;57:4792–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201713415.
  60. [60]Li L, Mahapatra S, Schultz JF, Zhang X, Jiang N. Single-molecule spectroscopic probing of N-heterocyclic carbenes on a two-dimensional metal. Chem 2025;11:102290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chempr.2024.08.013.
  61. [61]Sasmal HS, Gupta A, Nalop A, Bhowmik DK, Schwab D, Tler BJ, et al. Chiral N-Heterocyclic Carbene On-Surface Induced Electronic Spin Filtration. J Am Chem Soc 2026;148:34173–83. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6c04854.
  62. [62]Dasgupta A, López-Arteaga R, Park HY, Kerwin BP, Utama MIB, Sadhukhan T, et al. Carbonyl Functionalization of Monolayer Tungsten Disulfide for Enhanced Quantum Emission. ACS Nano 2025;19:21844–57. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5c06400.
  63. [63]Tran QM, Choi Y, Chalmers N, Austin D, Hoiang S, Ariza Gonzalez M, et al. Robust Basal-Plane Functionalization with Masked N-Heterocyclic Carbenes Gives Semiconducting MoS₂ and WS₂ Nanoflakes. ACS Appl Nano Mater 2025;8:22400–17. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.5c04402.
  64. [64]Miller B, Parzinger E, Vernickel A, Holleitner AW, Wurstbauer U. Photogating of mono- and few-layer MoS₂. Appl Phys Lett 2015;106. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4916517.
  65. [65]Dingle R, Stormer HL, Gossard AC, Wiegmann W. Electron mobilities in modulation-doped semiconductor heterojunction superlattices. Appl Phys Lett 1978;33:665–7. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.90457.
  66. [66]Mignuzzi S, Pollard AJ, Bennan B, Gilmore IS, Pimenta MA, et al. Effect of disorder on Raman scattering of single-layer MoS₂. Phys Rev B 2015;91:195411. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.91.195411.
  67. [67]Saigal N, Klebl L, Lambers H, Bahmany ar S, Antic V, Kennes DM, et al. Collective Charge Excitations between Moiré Minibands in Twisted WSe₂ Bilayers Probed with Resonant Inelastic Light Scattering. Phys Rev Lett 2024;133:046902. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.046902.
  68. [68]Lee C, Yan H, Brus LE, Heinz TF, Hone J, Ryu S. Anomalous Lattice Vibrations of Single- and Few-Layer MoS₂. ACS Nano 2010;4:2695–700. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn1003937.
  69. [69]Li H, Zhang Q, Yap CCR, Tay BK, Edwin THT, Olivier A, et al. From Bulk to Monolayer MoS₂: Evolution of Raman Scattering. Adv Funct Mater 2012;22:1385–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201102111.
  70. [70]Zhang X, Qiao X-F, Shi W, Wu J-B, Jiang D-S, Tan P-H. Phonon and Raman scattering of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides from monolayer, multilayer to bulk material. Chem Soc Rev 2015;44:2757–85. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CS00282B.
  71. [71]Molina-Sánchez A, Wirtz L. Phonons in single-layer and few-layer MoS₂ and WS₂. Phys Rev B 2011;84:155413. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.84.155413.
  72. [72]Kim J, Lee J-U, Cheong H. Polarized Raman spectroscopy for studying two-dimensional materials. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 2020;32:343001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/ab8848.
  73. [73]Senkić A, Bajo J, Supina A, Radatović B, Vujičić N. Effects of CVD growth parameters on global and local optical properties of MoS₂ monolayers. Mater Chem Phys 2023;296:127185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2022.127185.
  74. [74]Chang C-H, Fan X, Lin S-H, Kuo J-L. Orbital analysis of electronic structure and phonon dispersion in MoS₂, MoSe₂, WS₂, and WSe₂ monolayers under strain. Phys Rev B 2013;88:195420. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.88.195420.
  75. [75]Zhu CR, Wang G, Liu BL, Marie X, Qiao XF, Zhang X, et al. Strain tuning of optical emission energy and polarization in monolayer and bilayer MoS₂. Phys Rev B 2013;88:121301. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.88.121301.
  76. [76]Klein J, Kuc A, Nolinder A, Altzsner M, Wierzbowski J, Sigger F, et al. Robust valley polarization of helium ion modified atomically thin MoS₂. 2d Mater 2017;5:011007. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1583/aa9642.
  77. [77]Chakraborty B, Bera A, Muthu DVS, Bhowmick S, Waghmare U V., Sood AK. Symmetry-dependent phonon renormalization in monolayer MoS₂ transition. Phys Rev B 2012;85:161403. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.85.161403.
  78. [78]Chen Y, Dumcenco DO, Zhu Y, Zhang X, Mao N, Feng Q, et al. Composition-dependent Raman modes of Mo₁₋ₓWₓS₂ monolayer alloys. Nanoscale 2014;6:2833–9. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3NR05630A.
  79. [79]Dumcenco DO, Chen KY, Wang YP, Huang YS, Tiong KK. Raman study of 2H-Mo₁₋ₓWₓS₂ layered mixed crystals. J Alloys Compd 2010;506:940–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.07.120.
  80. [80]Bing D, Wang Y, Bai J, Du R, Wu G, Liu L. Optical contrast for identifying the thickness of two-dimensional materials. Opt Commun 2018;406:128–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2017.06.012.
  81. [81]Shah J, Pinczuk A, Störmer HL, Gossard AC, Wiegmann W. Electric field induced heating of high mobility electrons in modulation-doped GaAs-AlGaAs heterostructures. Appl Phys Lett 1983;42:55–7. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.93771.
  82. [82]Zhang S, Hill HM, Moudgil K, Richter CA, Hight Walker AR, Barlow S, et al. Controllable, Wide-Ranging n-Doping and p-Doping of Monolayer Group 6 Transition-Metal Disulfides and Diselenides. Advanced Materials 2018;30. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201802991.
  83. [83]Heo K, Jo S-H, Shim J, Kang D-H, Kim J-H, Park J-H. Stable and Reversible Triphenylphosphine-Based n-Type Doping Technique for Molybdenum Disulfide (MoS₂). ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2018;10:32765–72. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b06767.
  84. [84]Andleeb S, Kumar Singh A, Eom J. Chemical doping of MoS₂ multilayer by p-toluene sulfonic acid. Sci Technol Adv Mater 2015;16:035009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1468-6996/16/3/035009.
  85. [85]Park H-Y, Dugasani SR, Kang D-H, Jeon J, Jang SK, Lee S, et al. n- and p-Type Doping Phenomenon by Artificial DNA and M-DNA on Two-Dimensional Transition Metal Dichalcogenides. ACS Nano 2014;8:11603–13. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn5048712.

Paper details

vlnc:W_dud2ve5b
v1 · latestHistory (1)

published · Fresh — added to the Hub within the last 30 days

added ·

Usage

views · 0

downloads · 0

A view counts once per browser per day, a download each time the PDF is requested.

CC BY 4.0

Original source

  • Physics and Astronomy

large language models · View statement →

Looking for related papers…
Contents