WorksMathematics
Triviality of -homology classes of Euler characteristic operators of stratified pseudomanifolds
Abstract
We show that the -homology classes of the Euler characteristic operators associated with the minimal and maximal ideal boundary conditions of the de Rham differential on the regular part of a connected compact Thom-Mather stratified pseudomanifold, equipped with an adapted metric, are trivial beyond their indices. These indices are the Euler characteristics of the corresponding -cohomologies. This generalizes a result of J. Rosenberg for manifolds. The proof uses Witten deformation of the de Rham operator associated with a stratified Morse function, following the work of Álvarez López and Calaza.
Introduction
Let be a closed oriented real manifold. The de Rham operator acting on differential forms of is a formally self-adjoint operator and is essentially self-adjoint on the Hilbert space of sections of differential forms on . There are two natural gradings on the bundle of differential forms: with the grading by parity of degree, denoted by , becomes the Euler characteristic operator, and with the nontrivial signature grading, denoted by , defined by the Hodge operator, is the signature operator when is even-dimensional.
The indices of these two operators are two essential topological invariants of , respectively the Euler characteristic , which can be defined as the alternating sum of Betti numbers of , and the signature of , defined as the signature of the pairing induced by Poincaré duality on singular cohomology (assuming is divisible by 4, the pairing in middle-dimensional cohomology is symmetric; in other dimensions the signature is zero). The signature is richer than the Euler characteristic as it remembers some data of the Poincaré pairing. The signature can be lifted to characteristic classes called L-classes, which historically are used in surgery theory and classification of higher-dimensional manifolds by Browder and Novikov, and the famous Novikov conjecture concerns those.
By Kasparov theory, the Euler characteristic and signature operator give rise to -homology classes,
where . There is a homological Chern character (which is defined for any finite CW complex )
When is compact and connected, its degree-zero component , for a class represented by a graded Dirac operator , is identified with its graded index. By K-theoretic Atiyah-Singer theory [3 A3], the Chern character of is the Poincare dual of cohomological Atiyah-Singer L-classes, which differs from the usual Hirzebruch homological L-classes by powers of 2. Interestingly, the -homology class of the Euler characteristic operator is trivial beyond its index.
2020 Mathematics Subject Classification. 19K33, 19K35, 55N33, 58A12, 58A35.
Key words and phrases. de Rham operator, Euler characteristic, analytic -homology, stratified Morse function.
Theorem 1.1. (Rosenberg [18]) Let be a connected manifold (either compact or non-compact). The analytic -homology class of , defined by any complete Riemannian metric, is trivial beyond its index, in the sense that it is in the image of (induced by the inclusion of a basepoint into ).
Rosenberg’s theorem is formulated in real -homology. Here we work with complex -homology.
The goal of this paper is to prove the analogue of the above result for compact Thom–Mather stratified pseudomanifolds.
The analytic study of pseudomanifolds started with the foundational work of Cheeger [9] by equipping the regular part with a piecewise flat conical metric. In this paper we use an adapted metric as in the terminology of [8, 2] (Definition 2.1), which can be put on any stratum of a Thom–Mather stratified space. Such metrics are quasi-isometric to metrics of piecewise-flat conic type on the regular part considered by Cheeger [9].
On a pseudomanifold there are different (Hilbert-complex) closed extensions of de Rham differential , called ideal boundary conditions, initially defined as an unbounded operator on the Hilbert space of differential forms on the regular part . There are minimal and maximal extensions of , denoted by . Then we may form de Rham operators
Equipping with the parity-of-degree grading, are odd operators, which are also called Euler characteristic operators. They give rise to -homology classes in denoted by and .
Theorem 1.2. Let be a compact Thom–Mather stratified pseudomanifold. The Euler characteristic operators of endowed with an adapted metric, acting on equipped with the usual parity grading, define classes . These classes do not depend on the choice of the adapted metric.
We note that if satisfies the Witt condition, then , and hence . In this case if, in addition, is oriented and even-dimensional and is equipped with the signature grading , the common operator defines the signature operator and gives rise to a -homology class whose Chern character differs from the Goresky–MacPherson -class by certain powers of 2; see [1, 17].
Theorem 1.3. Let be a connected compact Thom–Mather stratified pseudomanifold. Then
are in the image of induced by the inclusion of a point of .
The graded indices of are the Euler characteristics of Hilbert complexes
respectively. When is oriented, we have
where are lower-middle and upper-middle perversities, and intersection cohomology is defined by dualizing the intersection-chain complex as in [6]. This is a result of Cheeger [9] in the case of conic metrics. For a general compact stratified pseudomanifold and a more general family of metrics (a weighted version of adapted metrics), see a result of F. Bei [6 Thm. 4].
Corollary 1.4. Let be a connected compact oriented Thom–Mather stratified pseudomanifold. Then
where are lower-middle and upper-middle perversities, denotes Euler characteristic and is understood as .
Corollary 1.5. Let be a connected compact oriented Thom–Mather stratified Witt pseudomanifold, then hence and we denote , then
where is the Euler characteristic of intersection cohomology of .
For the proof of Theorem 1.3 we follow Rosenberg [18] in the stratified setting. In loc. cit., Rosenberg considers a deformation of the de Rham operator where is a zero-order operator defined by Clifford multiplication by a vector field. This idea goes back to Witten [W] and is known as Witten deformation. When the vector field is the gradient of a real-valued function the deformation takes the form,
where is a parameter.
The point of this deformation is that when satisfies some boundedness assumptions the de Rham complex of (minimal and maximal extensions of) is isomorphic to that of , and the K-homology class of is the same as that of , but as , develops a growing spectral gap away from the critical points. We choose to be a stratified Morse function (Definition 3.2) in the sense of [2], which satisfies the required boundedness assumptions.
The relation between the Euler characteristic of a manifold and a Morse function is old and goes back to Morse [16]; Morse established the inequalities relating the numbers of critical points of each index to the Betti numbers.
Morse theory in the stratified setting was originally considered by Goresky–MacPherson [11] and later studied by others including [2]. Different conditions can be imposed on a stratified Morse function. In this paper we follow the work of Álvarez López–Calaza [2], where they use the term rel-Morse functions; these are different from those considered in [11]. Such a stratified Morse function restricts to a smooth function on , with bounded derivatives and Hessians, and has isolated critical points. Witten deformation of the de Rham operator by a stratified Morse function was studied by Ursula Ludwig and Álvarez López–Calaza; see [14, 2].
The steps of the proof of Theorem 1.3 are as follows. Using the spectral gap of away from the critical points, we show that the restriction of to the complement of a union of sufficiently small compact stratified neighborhoods of critical points vanishes. Then by the long exact sequence of K-homology, the class comes from the neighborhoods, which can be chosen to be contractible.
For completeness we mention that the local contribution of (rel-)critical points to Euler characteristic is given explicitly in [2 Theorem 1.2] as
where is a number which can be expressed in terms of the -Betti numbers of the links appearing in the local model of around the rel-critical point (see [2 Def. 4.8]). Here is the metric completion of and rel-critical points of , in the sense of loc. cit., are points in this space, but there is a finite surjective continuous map , and by the critical points of on we mean the images of the rel-critical points under this map.
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank Pierre Albin for patiently answering my various questions over the course of the past year.
de Rham operators
Let be a compact Thom–Mather stratified pseudomanifold (e.g., see [1] for definitions of these notions in detail). Let denote the dense regular part, the union of the top-dimensional strata. Note that we don’t require the Witt condition. In this paper we equip the regular part of with an adapted metric .
Definition 2.1. [2, 8] Let be a Thom–Mather stratified pseudomanifold. An adapted metric on is defined inductively on the depth of the stratification of . If depth , then is a manifold, and any Riemannian metric on is called adapted. A neighborhood of a point is of the form centered at where is an open ball ( is the dimension of the stratum that contains ), and is a stratified space of lower dimension (link), then is of the form where is the regular part of . On this neighborhood is quasi isometric to the model metric
where is the Euclidean metric on , is an adapted metric on , and is the radial coordinate on the cone. For the existence of adapted metrics on Thom-Mather stratified spaces see [8].
Remark 2.2. A metric quasi-isometric to a piecewise flat conic metric, in the sense of [9], and an iterated edge (wedge) metric in the sense of [1] is an adapted metric.
Remark 2.4. Any two adapted metrics are homotopic, in fact the space of such metrics is convex; if are such metrics then for , is also an adapted metric.
We give precise definitions of de Rham operators. Let be the (complex-valued) smooth differential forms on with arbitrary support. Let
be the Hilbert space of differential forms on the possibly incomplete Riemannian manifold . The de Rham differential is an unbounded operator initially defined on , the smooth differential forms with compact support on . Similarly we have codifferential which is the formal adjoint of . Then the minimal domain is defined as
where denotes the graph closure, and in this case . The maximal domain is defined as
in this case . We have , and in general these domains are not equal. One can also define similarly.
The following properties, which are invariant under quasi-isometries, hold for any adapted metric. These are essentially proved by Cheeger but also see [2, 6, 1]. See [2 Thm. 1.1] for (5) in the case of adapted metric.
Theorem 2.5. [9, 10, 2] Let be compact Thom–Mather stratified pseudomanifold endowed with an adapted metric. Then
(1)
(2) If satisfies the Witt condition then , i.e., .
(3) The operators
are self-adjoint.
(4) As operators on their domain endowed with the graph norm, are Fredholm.
(5) and have discrete spectra with finite multiplicities.
Remark 2.6. In [2], the notation is used instead of , we avoid this notation because it may be confusing; need not coincide with the minimal extension of originally defined on , and need not coincide with the maximal extension of .
Remark 2.7. For an arbitrary adapted metric, need not be essentially self-adjoint, i.e., minimal and maximal extensions of may not coincide, even in the Witt case, as essential self-adjointness is not quasi-isometric invariant. There exists an adapted metric, such as an adapted rigid iterated edge metric in the sense of [1 Prop. 5.4] in the Witt case which is obtained by rescaling of the link metric of a wedge metric that satisfies a link spectral gap condition, such that becomes essential self-adjoint [1 Thm. 1.1], hence the self-adjoint extension is unique.
Kasparov cycles and K-homology
The unbounded formalism for the Kasparov KK-group [5] is as follows. Let be a second-countable locally compact Hausdorff space.
Definition 2.8. An even unbounded -cycle representing a class in consists of a tuple where is a separable graded Hilbert space graded by such that , , and is an even representation and is an odd self-adjoint unbounded operator with respect to such that
(1) There exists a dense -subalgebra such that is invariant under multiplication by elements of and extends to a bounded operator for every .
(2) For every ,
is compact.
When is compact and is unital, choosing , the second condition implies and is equivalent to that has compact resolvent, which is equivalent to having purely discrete spectrum with finite multiplicities.
The bounded description for the Kasparov K-homology is as follows:
Definition 2.9. An even bounded -cycle representing a class in consists of a tuple where is a separable -graded Hilbert space graded by such that , , is an even -representation, and is an odd bounded operator with respect to such that there is a dense -subalgebra such that for every ,
(1) is compact.
(2) is compact.
(3) is compact.
If is self-adjoint, the second condition is automatic.
Given an unbounded cycle one obtains a bounded representative of the same -homology class by taking the bounded transform
Thus
is a bounded -cycle and
Proof of Theorem 1.2
Proof. We use the unbounded description of -homology and follow the method of [17] and [1 Thm. 6.2]. Let or . Here . , so is an odd operator, and is the natural representation by multiplication of . For a dense subalgebra , one can take the subalgebra of Lipschitz functions with respect to the given metric structure on . Multiplication by such functions preserves (see the proof of Lemma 4.1), and for any Lipschitz function , the commutator is Clifford multiplication by , which exists almost everywhere and is bounded on . Compactness of the resolvent of follows from Theorem 2.5 (5). Invariance under the choice of adapted metric follows from the abstract operatorial homotopy argument of [12 Secs. 6.2–6.3]. For two adapted metrics let , . Since any two adapted metrics are globally quasi-isometric, the Hilbert spaces can be identified as vector spaces with uniformly equivalent norms. Moreover, their inner products vary continuously in operator norm in the sense of [12 Sec. 6.2]. The domains of and are independent of , by the definitions of these extensions and equivalence of the corresponding graph norms. Fix or . Then is a fixed densely defined closed operator satisfying . Let denote its adjoint with respect to the inner product induced by , and set . By [12 Prop. 6.1], the family is norm-continuous. Furthermore, the resolvents are compact by Theorem 2.5, and the commutators form a bounded continuous family for Lipschitz functions on . Therefore, the construction of [12 Prop. 6.4], with the fixed parity grading, gives an unbounded operatorial homotopy between the corresponding Kasparov cycles. Consequently, in .
For simplicity of notation, we alternate between , and when it is clear from the context which operator we are talking about. We also sometimes write instead of as all the representations of -cycles in this paper are pointwise multiplication by continuous functions .
Witten deformation of de Rham operator
Let be a real valued smooth function on with bounded derivative . On consider unbounded operators
where is a parameter. Note that , are zero-order operators which are bounded by the boundedness assumption on ; therefore their closures are themselves with maximal domain simply . Thus minimal and maximal extensions are
Define
therefore
Note that for functions and . is odd with respect to the parity grading, so is still an odd operator. It’s clear that defines a class in -homology just like , since is bounded and of zero order; it doesn’t affect the defining analytic conditions of a -cycle.
Theorem 3.1. For every
i.e., Witten deformation of the de Rham operator by a smooth function with bounded derivative does not change the -homology class.
Proof. Let or . Consider the homotopy
Then . Since is a bounded zero-order operator, defines a homotopy of -cycles between and . □
Stratified Morse function
From now on we assume is a stratified Morse function.
Definition 3.2. [2] Let be a compact Thom–Mather stratified pseudomanifold and fix an adapted metric on . A continuous function is called a stratified Morse function if
the restriction of to is a rel-Morse function in the sense of [2]; it’s a smooth function such that , , are all bounded (with respect to the chosen adapted metric), and there exists a specific local quadratic normal form near every rel-critical point.
the rel-critical points of are isolated.
We don’t use the local quadratic normal form in this paper, so we refer to [2] for the precise definition. In the sense of [2], a rel-critical point of is a point in the metric completion of , defined by
By [2 Remark 9], there is a finite continuous surjective map , so we consider the images of rel-critical points of on ; they are isolated points on , and we simply call them the critical points of on .
By [2 Proposition 4.9], the subset of functions in with continuous extensions to whose restrictions to all strata of are rel-Morse functions (with respect to some adapted metric) is dense in the sense of weak topology. Therefore, stratified Morse functions exist with respect to some adapted metric. Since the -homology class of the Euler characteristic operator is independent of the choice of adapted metric, we may choose and fix an adapted metric for which a stratified Morse function exists.
Boundedness of implies is Lipschitz on and therefore it has a unique continuous extension to its metric completion , then the set of rel-critical points is the zero set of this extension, hence closed, thus the number of rel-critical points is finite since is compact. Critical points do not necessarily lie in , and they can be on lower-dimensional strata. Let be the set of critical points. Choose compact, contractible, sufficiently small distinguished neighborhoods such that are in the interiors and they are pairwise disjoint. This is possible by the local picture of a Thom–Mather stratified space; for a point there is a distinguished open neighborhood
centered at , where is an open ball and is a truncated open cone within distance of the cone vertex over the link . Now one can take a smaller closed neighborhood such as
for a smaller ball and . Let
then is an open stratified subset of where its regular part is
Spectral gap away from critical points
We discuss the main point of Witten deformation, namely the spectral gap away from the critical points. Consider the Laplacians
For all , we have [2 §18]
(1)
(2)
where denotes the endomorphism of differential forms induced by the Riemannian Hessian. Recall that for a section means almost everywhere on . Note that in general
Remark 3.3. Notation: For simplicity, throughout this paper we use for Hilbert-space and operator norms, and for pointwise tensor norms. For example, for , denotes its norm, while for a bounded operator , denotes its operator norm.
Theorem 3.4. ([2 §18.2]) There exists , such that for any section with and
Proof. For simplicity we drop rel/abs from the notation of . For any , the identity (2) implies
Since is away from the set of critical points (note that is away from critical points from an -distance), there is a lower bound for on . Since is bounded there is such that , therefore for with we have
for large , .
Since is self-adjoint, , is dense in in the graph norm. Combined with boundedness of , , , this implies that the identity (3) extends continuously to , and the above inequality holds as well. □
See [13 Proposition 6.24] for this result in the case of a wedge metric.
Analytic estimates
In this section we prove the estimates needed to prove the vanishing of the restricted -homology class from Theorem 3.4. We drop rel/abs from and represents any of them.
Lemma 4.1. For with we have as
Proof. For simplicity of notation, let . We have
Note that . Therefore it suffices to show (4) for Lipschitz functions supported in , because such functions are uniformly dense in the class of continuous functions supported in . So assume with .
Let , let . is a bounded operator on and . Then
Recall and , . Moreover is bounded as a multiplication operator. Indeed, for a section
since is Lipschitz is bounded (note that , make sense since a Lipschitz function is differentiable almost everywhere on ). By taking graph-norm approximating sequence and distribution definition, this implies is bounded and preserves domains of , hence of (note that or ). Consider , then since , . Then ; therefore by Theorem 3.4 we have
We have
By (5)
Thus
So for some positive constants independent of . The rest is clear.
Now consider the bounded transform
This is the bounded operator corresponding to in the bounded description of -homology. Let and . This is a well-defined self-adjoint operator of operator norm at most 1 on , since the points where have measure zero. It is first defined on the dense subset and then extended uniquely to a bounded operator on .
Lemma 4.2. As
in the strong operator topology on
Proof. The argument of [18] does not apply directly as we don’t have a spectral gap on all of the domain of , just away from critical points. Consider smooth differential forms with compact support on away from the finitely many critical points of on , i.e.,
is dense, since
it suffices to show the strong convergence for a section ;
Let
There exists such that
It’s easier if we make use of resolvents of the operators . Denote, for
Define
We have the identity
The spectral theorem and functional calculus for self-adjoint operators [19 §5] imply (see also [7 p. 164])
(more precisely, for a bounded Borel measurable function and a self-adjoint operator , , where is the spectral measure. Then Fubini implies that if and is uniformly bounded, then . Now write the improper integral (9) as ; then pointwise and , therefore dominated convergence implies in the strong operator topology.)
Note that because of the support assumption on we have (see (14) below and the discussion that follows.)
We have the resolvent identity [19 §2.2], which can be obtained by basic algebra: (as )
We will prove that for ,
for some constant depending on . Assume (12); then
Then we have
where we used for
Therefore as
To prove (7) we have
so we need to show . Indeed, as
we have
therefore
where we used which follows from the support assumption of and (8).
Now it remains to prove the estimate (12). Without loss of generality, assume ; the case is the same. First, we have
Indeed, by self-adjointness of we have for
thus
maps to , hence for
proving (13). We can write
There are two cases. If then and
Consider
On this is a smooth bounded endomorphism of differential forms, and since and , , are all bounded, this implies that
for some constant . We have . This implies
for a constant depending on and independent of such that . Therefore
Similarly, if then and
By the same argument there is a constant independent of satisfying such that
Therefore (13), (15), and (16) imply
proving (12).
Lemma 4.3. For with we have as
Proof. Again by boundedness of , it suffices to show this for a Lipschitz function on . We mentioned in the proof of Lemma 4.1 that the commutator
is bounded as a multiplication operator; moreover, it is supported in . Consider a Lipschitz cutoff function such that
Note that . Recall
We can apply Lemma 4.1 to get
We have
for we have . By the boundedness of , and (18) we get
Consider the following formal identity for an operator
Applying this to , (which is valid since preserves and is bounded) we get
Using (10) we get (understood as a strong operator integral)
So
We will use dominated convergence theorem to show that the integral in (21) goes to zero as . Recall from (13)
By (19), (20), and (22), for a fixed with we have
thus the integrand in (21) goes to zero pointwise as . We need to show it’s uniformly bounded by an integrable function. Applying (22) twice to (20) we get
for
Since
is integrable. □
Restriction of K-homology to U
We continue to drop from for simplicity of notation, and represents any of them.
Let be the inclusion. Then the extension by zero defines a homomorphism
and thus induces a homomorphism [7 § 17.8]
This can be expressed in terms of the Kasparov product as follows. defines an element
and for
can be represented in terms of bounded -cycles simply by
i.e., we restrict the representation of to .
Therefore
Recall
Therefore the -cycle represented by is degenerate; thus its class in vanishes.
Theorem 5.1. As
is a homotopy of Kasparov modules which implies .
Proof. This follows from the above lemmas similar to the proof given in [18, 15]. More precisely, to construct a standard homotopy in the sense of [7 §17], consider the Hilbert -module
with for and . For to define a Kasparov module, we need to show (continuity and compactness at a finite are clear)
is strong-operator continuous as .
for a , is norm continuous as , which in this case means it should go to zero.
for a , is norm continuous as , which in this case also means it should go to zero.
The first one is Lemma 4.2, the second condition follows from the stronger result of Lemma 4.1, and the last one is Lemma 4.3. Lemmas 4.1, 4.3 are stated for a with , so they work for any by considering its extension by zero. Density of and uniform boundedness of , imply the lemmas hold for .
Proof of Theorem 1.3
Proof. We have proved . If there are no rel-critical points, then , so . We may therefore assume that the critical set is nonempty. Let be the inclusion. There is an exact sequence
implies
Since each is contractible to the critical point and they are pairwise disjoint, the homotopy invariance of the K-homology group implies
Therefore we can write, for some
Since is assumed to be connected (hence path connected as a Thom–Mather pseudomanifold is locally path connected), any two inclusions and are homotopic, so , therefore
M. ALIGHOLI: DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS, UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON, 480 LINCOLN DRIVE, MADISON WI 53706-1388, USA
Email address: [email protected]
References
- [1][ALMP] P. Albin, E. Leichtnam, R. Mazzeo, and P. Piazza, The signature package on Witt spaces, Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér. (4) 45 (2012), no. 2, 241–310.arxiv.org/abs/1112.0989
- [2][AC] J. A. Álvarez López and M. Calaza, Witten’s perturbation on strata, Asian J. Math. 21 (2017), no. 1, 47–126.arxiv.org/abs/1205.0348
- [3][A] M. F. Atiyah, “Global theory of elliptic operators,” in Functional Analysis and Related Topics, S. T. Kuroda, ed., University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, 1970, pp. 21–30.
- [5][BJ] S. Baaj and P. Julg, Théorie bivariante de Kasparov et opérateurs non bornés dans les C*-modules hilbertiens, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math. 296 (1983), no. 21, 875–878.
- [6]F. Bei, General perversities and L^2 de Rham and Hodge theorems for stratified pseudomanifolds, Bull. Sci. Math. 138 (2014), no. 1, 2–40.
- [7]B. Blackadar, K-Theory for Operator Algebras, 2nd ed., Mathematical Sciences Research Institute Publications, vol. 5, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998.
- [8]J.-P. Brasselet, G. Hector, and M. Saralegi, L^2-cohomologie des espaces stratifiés, Manuscripta Math. 76 (1992), 21–32.
- [9]J. Cheeger, Spectral geometry of singular Riemannian spaces, J. Differential Geom. 18 (1983), no. 4, 575–657.DOI
- [10]J. Cheeger, On the Hodge theory of Riemannian pseudomanifolds, in Geometry of the Laplace Operator, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., vol. 36, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1980, pp. 91–146.DOI
- [11]M. Goresky and R. MacPherson, Stratified Morse Theory, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete, 3. Folge, vol. 14, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1988.
- [12]M. Hilsum, Signature operator on Lipschitz manifolds and unbounded Kasparov bimodules, in Operator Algebras and Their Connections with Topology and Ergodic Theory (Buşteni, 1983), Lecture Notes in Math., vol. 1132, Springer, Berlin, 1985, pp. 254–288.DOI
- [13]G. Jayasinghe, An analytic approach to Lefschetz and Morse theory on stratified pseudomanifolds, preprint, arXiv:2309.15845 [math.DG].arxiv.org/abs/2309.15845
- [14]U. Ludwig, Comparison between two complexes on a singular space, J. Reine Angew. Math. 724 (2017), 1–52.
- [15]W. Lück and J. Rosenberg, Equivariant Euler characteristics and K-homology Euler classes for proper cocompact G-manifolds, Geom. Topol. 7 (2003), 569–613.
- [16]M. Morse, Relations between the critical points of a real function of n independent variables, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 27 (1925), no. 3, 345–396.
- [17]H. Moscovici and F. Wu, Straight Chern character for Witt spaces, in Cyclic Cohomology and Noncommutative Geometry (Waterloo, ON, 1995), Fields Inst. Commun., vol. 17, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1997, pp. 103–113.DOI
- [18]J. Rosenberg, The K-homology class of the Euler characteristic operator is trivial, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 127 (1999), no. 12, 3467–3474.arxiv.org/abs/math/9806073
- [19]K. Schmüdgen, Unbounded Self-adjoint Operators on Hilbert Space, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 265, Springer, Dordrecht, 2012.DOI