WorksMathematics
Robin's Inequality at Colossally Abundant Numbers and Nicolas' Inequality at Their Largest Prime Factor
Abstract · v1
Robin's criterion states that the Riemann Hypothesis holds if and only if for every , and Nicolas' criterion states that it holds if and only if for every prime , where is the primorial of and is the Chebyshev function. Let be a colossally abundant number, let be the real number associated with by Nicolas, and let be the largest prime not exceeding . Writing , we prove without any hypothesis that, whenever , . Thus Robin's inequality at and Nicolas' inequality at differ by up to an explicit error of smaller order. As consequences, every colossally abundant counterexample to Robin's inequality yields a prime with ; conversely, every prime with and yields a colossally abundant counterexample, so that Nicolas' oscillation theorem implies Robin's theorem on colossally abundant counterexamples; and under the Riemann Hypothesis every colossally abundant number with satisfies , in accordance with the constant of Ramanujan's bound. For superabundant counterexamples, using the exponent bound of Nazardonyavi and Yakubovich, which gives for the largest prime factor , we prove , and we show that the least colossally abundant number not smaller than the least counterexample is itself a counterexample with .
Review conversation
Reviews are not available for this work yet.