WorksPhysics and Astronomy
Electric Hidden Unconventional Collinear Magnetism in 2D -Symmetric Antiferromagnets
Abstract
Electric hidden unconventional collinear magnetism, in which a perpendicular electric field () lifts the -enforced degeneracy and selectively releases the hidden crystallographic constraints in conventional 2D antiferromagnets to drive emergent magnetic phases, has remained largely unexplored. Here we establish a complete symmetry classification of all 88 collinear spin layer groups (cSLGs) compatible with conventional -symmetric antiferromagnets, and show that the drives the system into three distinct classes of unconventional collinear magnetism: type-IV magnetism (Class-I, 23 cSLGs), altermagnetism (Class-II, 34 cSLGs), and fully compensated ferrimagnetism (Class-III, 31 cSLGs). We illustrate these categories using the most common and feasibly exfoliable 2D candidate materials. These include SrCaCrPO and SrCaCrAsO (Class-I), BaMnGe and MnPS (Class-II), and SrFeOCl and bilayer MnBiTe (Class-III). We further demonstrate that the generates distinctly different spin-splitting fingerprints across the three classes, yielding distinct spin-dependent responses: the electric Hall effect in Class-I, spin-polarized transport in Class-II, and the electric reversible magneto-optical Kerr effect in Class-III. Our work not only closes a complete internal cycle from conventional to unconventional collinear magnetism in 2D antiferromagnets, but also establishes a viable all-electrical compensated magnetism platform and control scheme for future spintronic applications.
Introduction.—The intimate connection between magnetic order and crystalline symmetry is a central theme in condensed matter physics for understanding and designing novel magnetic states [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13]. The long-established paradigm holds that a system’s magnetic symmetry classification and electronic spin structure are constrained by the symmetry operations connecting its spin sublattices in the nonrelativistic collinear limit, an approach that has successfully categorized current crystal-symmetry-compensated magnets [13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19]. Yet, what if this seemingly complete classification is merely part of a larger hidden landscape? What if symmetries beyond the primitive cell, concealed beneath the protection of these dominant operations, hold the key to emergent phases previously invisible to the conventional framework?
Among various magnetic systems [5, 11, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54], conventional -symmetric antiferromagnets precisely embody this tension [5, 11, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38]. These materials possess the combined symmetry of spatial inversion () and time reversal () in relativistic case, which protects their degenerate band structures and ensures zero net magnetization [11, 36, 37, 38]. Yet, it is this very protection that also masks the influence of other crystallographic operations on the electronic structure, leading to a common perception that conventional -symmetric antiferromagnets form a single rigid class with very limited tunability [33, 34, 35]. In three dimensions, -symmetric antiferromagnets have been extensively studied, but the effect of an out-of-plane electric field () on breaking is often limited by sample thickness and electrostatic screening. In two dimensions, however, the situation changes dramatically and field control is emerging to serve as an efficient method for manipulating spin transport [55, 56, 57, 58, 59]. The reduced dimensionality not only enriches the possible magnetic ground states but also allows to efficiently penetrate the material and selectively break a subset of crystallographic operations while preserving others, thereby offering an unprecedented route to unveil hidden magnetic phases that are strictly forbidden in the pristine -symmetric state [60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65]. Despite its great potential, a complete symmetry-based framework that systematically classifies how transforms conventional -symmetric antiferromagnets into unconventional collinear magnetic phases is still lacking. Previous classifications either rely on spin space groups and are limited to three dimensions, or do not consider the selective symmetry breaking by the electric field, leaving the -driven magnetic phase transitions and their full classification in two-dimensional (2D) -symmetric antiferromagnets largely unexplored.
To fill this gap, we establish a complete symmetry classification of conventional 2D -symmetric antiferromagnets within the collinear spin layer groups (cSLGs) framework [66], and show that an can drive them into three distinct classes of hidden unconventional collinear magnetism. According to the symmetry operations that survive the -induced selective symmetry breaking, the 88 cSLGs describing 2D -symmetric antiferromagnetism fall into three categories: Class-I (electric type-IV magnetism, 23 cSLGs), Class-II (electric altermagnetism, 34 cSLGs), and Class-III (electric fully compensated ferrimagnetism, 31 cSLGs). To illustrate these categories, we select the most common or feasibly exfoliated 2D candidates, including SrCaCrPO and SrCaCrAsO (Class-I), BaMnGe and MnPS (Class-II), and SrFeOCl and bilayer MnBiTe (Class-III). We demonstrate that efficiently lifts Kramers degeneracy and generates qualitatively different spin patterns, which manifest as distinct spin-polarized responses: Class-I systems can exhibit the electric Hall effect, Class-II systems can exhibit spin-dependent transport, and Class-III systems can exhibit the electric reversible magneto-optical Kerr effect (MOKE). These responses depend on the specific symmetry and electronic structure and are not universal to all systems within each class. Our work establishes a unified framework bridging conventional antiferromagnets and emerging magnetic phases, opening a viable route for low-power multifunctional spintronics based on 2D magnets.
Theoretical analysis.—The cSLGs theory provides the natural language for classifying 2D collinear magnets [66]. Compared with spin space groups [17, 18, 19, 67], cSLGs more accurately capture the non-relativistic symmetries of 2D systems. Within this framework, conventional 2D -symmetric antiferromagnetism is defined as collinear magnetism carrying symmetry, which, in the relativistic limit, reduces to the combined (representing the combined operation of spatial inversion and time reversal ) symmetry and enforces Kramers spin degeneracy. Our previous cSLG classification of 2D magnets has already identified type-IV magnetism as a phase absent in three dimensions [41, 42]. Here, we generalize this approach to all 88 cSLGs compatible with conventional -symmetric antiferromagnetism, which can be expressed as , where is an index-two normal subgroup of consisting of spin-invariant operations.
Previous studies have frequently grouped conventional -symmetric antiferromagnetism as a single class, as the -enforced spin degeneracy hides the influence of other symmetries. In 2D systems, however, an breaks . This selective symmetry breaking divides all symmetry operations into two sets: , which remain intact under , and , which are broken [68]. Here, represents identity element, is an -fold in-plane rotation, and denotes any mirror perpendicular to the plane; denotes an improper rotation. Consequently, the symmetry operations in (after field application) that survive the field dictate the band structure. This yields three distinct scenarios (Figure 1): (i) if , , the spin degeneracy cannot be lifted by . In this case, the -applied system can then be regarded as an electric type-IV magnetism (Class-I); (ii) if , , then after is applied the system still possesses the symmetry, which can be regarded as electric altermagnetism (Class-II); (iii) if , , then every operation that connects opposite spin sublattices will be destroyed by . The system is regarded as electric ferrimagnetism (Class-III). If the system remains semiconducting under , it becomes an electrically induced fully compensated ferrimagnet [69].

Figure 1. Schematic illustration of how a vertical electric field drives a conventional 2D -symmetric antiferromagnet (a) into three distinct classes of unconventional collinear magnets: (b) type-IV magnet (Class-I), (c) altermagnet (Class-II), and (d) fully compensated ferrimagnet (Class-III). For each class, we show the schematic spin configurations of the two opposite sublattices and the symmetry operations , , , and that connect them. The yellow cross marks the breaking of the symmetry under . We also show the corresponding spin-resolved band structures for the three classes in the nonrelativistic limit. The gray bands represent the spin-degenerate states without , while the red and blue bands display the opposite spin-splitting patterns induced by .
Applying these criteria to all 88 cSLGs compatible with 2D conventional -symmetric antiferromagnetism yields a complete classification: 23 belong to Class-I, 34 to Class-II, and 31 to Class-III (see Supplemental Material (SM) [70]). Two representative examples illustrate the physical consequences. Bilayer MnBiTe, as a widely studied intrinsic magnetic topological insulator, is described by cSLG L.72.69.1.1, which falls into Class-III; an thus induces ferromagnetic spin splitting in its originally degenerate bands. Monolayer MnPS, a layered antiferromagnetic semiconductor, belongs to cSLG L.71.67.1.1 (Class-II), and hence an applied electric field produces altermagnetic spin splitting. These examples demonstrate that the classification is not merely formal, and each class directly maps onto experimentally accessible electric-field responses in known 2D materials.
The above classification is not limited to specific compounds but applies universally to all 88 cSLGs describing 2D conventional -symmetric antiferromagnetism. To explicitly demonstrate the distinct electronic responses of each class, we perform first-principles calculations on three representative materials, one for each class: monolayer SrCaCrPO (Class-I), BaMnGe (Class-II) and SrFeOCl (Class-III). Our classification thus unveils a purely electrical paradigm for 2D -symmetric antiferromagnets: a simple static means enables selective and reversible switching between three distinct unconventional magnetic phases, paving the way for multifunctional all-electrical spintronics.
Class-I: electric type-IV magnetism.—Monolayer SrCaCrXO (X=P, As) family serves as a potential representative, belonging to the electric type-IV cSLG L.41.31.1.1. Taking SrCaCrPO as an example, its magnetic atoms occupy the 4k Wyckoff position, and the two spin sublattices are related by , , , and [Figure 2(a) and Figure 2(b)]. In the absence of , the spin-up and spin-down bands remain degenerate along the ---- path [Figure 2(c)]. This degeneracy follows from the symmetry constraint enforced by for all collinear magnets [27, 71, 72]; together with the symmetry relations above, it yields:

Figure 2. Crystal structure of monolayer SrCaCrPO: (a) side and (b) top views. Spin-polarized band structures in the nonrelativistic limit (w/o SOC): (c) without and (d) with a vertical electric field . The red solid and blue dashed lines represent spin-up and spin-down channels, respectively. In the presence of , (e) -resolved relativistic (w SOC) band structure and (f) anomalous Hall conductivity , with the Néel vector oriented along the [10] direction.
Upon applying , the band dispersions are significantly modified, while the spin-up and spin-down bands remain degenerate because is broken whereas is preserved [Figure 2(d)]. In the nonrelativistic limit, this -unbreakable spin degeneracy identifies the system as Class-I.
When relativistic effects are taken into account, type-IV magnets often give rise to fascinating physical properties [41, 42]. In particular, after considering spin-orbit coupling (SOC), many physical phenomena may emerge in Class-I. For example, in monolayer SrCaCrPO with the magnetic moment oriented along the [10] direction, the recently defined electric-field-induced Hall effect [68] can also appear. Moreover, the Hall conductivity exhibits a sign reversal when the electric field is reversed. Without , monolayer SrCaCrPO will maintain Kramers degeneracy due to its symmetry, and the Hall conductivity is also constrained to be 0 (see details in SM[70]). When eV/Å is further applied, the band exhibits a subtle splitting [see Figure 2(e) and the enlarged view in the green box]. Consequently, the sum of the Berry curvatures contributed by the band-inversion points in the conduction band and the valence band is no longer zero, thereby giving rise to a significant Hall conductivity [Figure 2(f)]. When the electric-field direction is reversed ( eV/Å), the spin component near the gaps also changes sign and the corresponding
Hall conductivity reverses sign accordingly (see details in SM[70]). From a symmetry perspective, a Class-I under an applied essentially belongs to the recently discovered type-IV magnetism [41, 42]. Therefore, it may host many of the physical properties recently uncovered in this class of magnetism and holds great promise for applications.
Class-II: electric altermagnetism.—Monolayer BaMnGe belongs to cSLG L.64.59.1.1, where the two spin sublattices are connected by the symmetry operations and [Figure 3(a) and Figure 3(b)]. Here, , with denoting a distinct sliding operation. In the absence of , protects the degeneracy between the spin channels (see details in SM[70]).

Figure 3. (a) Side and (b) top views of monolayer BaMnGe. Spin-resolved band structures obtained in the nonrelativistic limit (w/o SOC): with a vertical electric field (c) and (d) . (e), (f) Corresponding conductivities and corresponding spin polarizations as functions of energy for (c) and (d).
Upon applying an , the symmetries , , and are broken, whereas and are retained. The remaining symmetries impose directional constraints on the splitting, leading to an alternating, momentum-dependent spin splitting throughout the Brillouin zone [Figure 3(c) and Figure 3(d)]. Such a symmetry-driven evolution is characteristic of the electric altermagnetic response discussed within the cSLG framework.
Without , the spin-up and spin-down contributions to both and are essentially identical, consistent with the spin-degenerate band structure (see details in SM[70]). We define the spin polarization of conductivities as:
Accordingly, the corresponding spin polarizations and remain zero. A strikingly different behavior emerges under [Figure 3(e) and Figure 3(f)]: the spin-up and spin-down longitudinal conductivities become clearly separated in both the and directions, accompanied by finite and . This demonstrates that the electric field converts the initially spin-degenerate charge transport into spin-selective transport. Importantly, and exhibit distinct energy dependencies and opposite tendencies, indicating that the spin polarization is strongly direction-dependent. Therefore, the system supports electrically tunable spin-polarized currents along orthogonal directions.
Class-III: electric fully compensated ferrimagnetism.—In the monolayer shown in Figure 4(a) and Figure 4(b), the two spin sublattices are correlated by the symmetry operations , where . In the absence of , the symmetry protects the degeneracy between the two opposite-spin channels (see details in SM[70]). Upon applying , all symmetries are broken and the spin degeneracy is lifted, as shown in Figure 4(c) and Figure 4(d). The band exhibits ferromagnetic splitting while the overall magnetic moment of the system remains zero, a phenomenon known as fully compensated ferrimagnetism [69]. The -induced ferromagnetic band structure and ferromagnetic properties characterize monolayer as Class-III.

Figure 4. Crystal structure of monolayer SrFeOCl in (a) side and (b) top views. (c, d) Spin-polarized band structures in relativistic case with the Néel vector oriented along the [1] direction. Spin-resolved band structures with (c) positive and (d) negative . (e), (f) Corresponding Kerr rotation angle and Kerr ellipticity as functions of frequency in (c) and (d).
As an effective probe of magnetic moments, MOKE can also reveal the properties of Class-III [73, 74, 75, 76]. When SOC is included, the symmetry of simultaneously protects the band spin degeneracy and forbids all Hall photoconductivity components; consequently, the pristine system exhibits no MOKE (see details in SM[70]). Since monolayer is a soft magnet (see details in SM[70]), its magnetization direction can be easily manipulated. When its magnetic moment is oriented along [1] and an is applied, the symmetry is broken, pronounced spin splitting appears [Fig. 4(c)], and MOKE emerges. The calculated results for are shown in Figure 4(e); when the electric field is reversed to , the band exhibits opposite chiral splitting and MOKE undergoes a sign reversal as well [Figs. 4(d) and (f)].
Conclusion
We have unveiled a hidden landscape of unconventional collinear magnetism in 2D -symmetric antiferromagnets, where the combined symmetry has long obscured the role of other crystallographic symmetries in shaping the electronic structure. By constructing the full classification of 88 cSLGs, we demonstrate that an serves as a universal knob to release these hidden constraints, yielding three exhaustive classes of emergent magnetic phases. Notably, the distinct spin-splitting patterns and spin-dependent transport responses, including electric Hall effect, spin-dependent transport, and electric reversible MOKE, are not accidental but are dictated by the underlying symmetry of each class. Our work thus establishes a symmetry-based taxonomy for electric hidden unconventional magnetism, transforming what was previously a set of disparate phenomena into a coherent, complete, and predictive framework. The identified candidate materials, all amenable to exfoliation, provide an experimentally accessible testbed for realizing and controlling these phases; moreover, our classification scheme can be readily extended to other layered magnets with similar hidden-symmetry structures.
References
References
- [1]S. Alexander, Symmetry Considerations in the Determination of Magnetic Structures, Phys. Rev. 127, 420 (1962).DOI
- [2]J. O. Dimmock, Use of Symmetry in the Determination of Magnetic Structures, Phys. Rev. 130, 1337 (1963).DOI
- [3]G. Donnay, L. M. Corliss, J. D. H. Donnay, N. Elliott, and J. M. Hastings, Symmetry of Magnetic Structures: Magnetic Structure of Chalcopyrite, Phys. Rev. 112, 1917 (1958).DOI
- [4]Y. Tokura, K. Yasuda, and A. Tsukazaki, Magnetic Topological Insulators, Nat. Rev. Phys. 1, 126 (2019).DOI
- [5]Y. Deng, Y. Yu, M. Z. Shi, Z. Guo, Z. Xu, J. Wang, X. H. Chen, and Y. Zhang, Quantum anomalous Hall effect in intrinsic magnetic topological insulator MnBi2Te4, Science 367, 895 (2020).DOI
- [6]L. Elcoro, B. J. Wieder, Z. Song, Y. Xu, B. Bradlyn, and B. A. Bernevig, Magnetic Topological Quantum Chemistry, Nat. Commun. 12, 5965 (2021).
- [7]B. A. Bernevig, C. Felser, and H. Beidenkopf, Progress and Prospects in Magnetic Topological Materials, Nature 603, 41 (2022).DOI
- [8]X. Zhang, X. Wang, T. He, L. Wang, W.-W. Yu, Y. Liu, G. Liu, and Z. Cheng, Magnetic Topological Materials in Two-Dimensional: Theory, Material Realization and Application Prospects, Sci. Bull. 68, 2639 (2023).DOI
- [9]W. Wu, Nodal Surface Semimetals: Theory and Material Realization, Phys. Rev. B 97, 115125 (2018).DOI
- [10]T. V. Trevisan, P. V. Arribi, O. Heinenen, R.-J. Slager, and P. P. Orth, Bicircular Light Floquet Engineering of Magnetic Symmetry and Topology and Its Application to the Dirac Semimetal Cd3As2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 066602 (2022).DOI
- [11]P. Tang, Q. Zhou, G. Xu, and S.-C. Zhang, Dirac Fermions in an Antiferromagnetic Semimetal, Nat. Phys. 12, 1100 (2016).DOI
- [12]H. Kurebayashi, J. H. Garcia, S. Khan, J. Sinova, and S. Roche, Magnetism, Symmetry and Spin Transport in van der Waals Layered Systems, Nat. Rev. Phys. 4, 150 (2022).arxiv.org/abs/2107.03763
- [13]Y. Liu, X. Chen, Y. Yu, J. Etxebarria, J. M. Perez-Mato, and Q. Liu, Symmetry Classification of Magnetic Orders Using Oriented Spin Space Groups, Nature 652, 869 (2026).DOI
- [14]C. J. Bradley and A. P. Cracknell, The Mathematical Theory of Symmetry in Solids: Representation Theory for Point Groups and Space Groups (Oxford University Press, New York, 1972).
- [15]L.-D. Yuan, Z. Wang, J.-W. Luo, E. I. Rashba, and A. Zunger, Giant Momentum-Dependent Spin Splitting in Centrosymmetric Low-Z Antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 102, 014422 (2020).DOI
- [16]L.-D. Yuan, Z. Wang, J.-W. Luo, and A. Zunger, Prediction of Low-Z Collinear and Noncollinear Antiferromagnetic Compounds Having Momentum-Dependent Spin Splitting Even without Spin-Orbit Coupling, Phys. Rev. Mater. 5, 014409 (2021).
- [17]X. Chen, J. Ren, Y. Zhu, Y. Yu, A. Zhang, P. Liu, J. Li, Y. Liu, C. Li, and Q. Liu, Enumeration and Representation Theory of Spin Space Groups, Phys. Rev. X 14, 031038 (2024).
- [18]Y. Jiang, Z. Song, T. Zhu, Z. Fang, H. Weng, Z.-X. Liu, J. Yang, and C. Fang, Enumeration of Spin-Space Groups: Toward a Complete Description of Symmetries of Magnetic Orders, Phys. Rev. X 14, 031039 (2024).DOI
- [19]Z. Xiao, J. Zhao, Y. Li, R. Shindou, and Z.-D. Song, Spin Space Groups: Full Classification and Applications, Phys. Rev. X 14, 031037 (2024).
- [20]H.-Y. Ma, M. Hu, N. Li, J. Liu, W. Yao, J.-F. Jia, and J. Liu, Multifunctional Antiferromagnetic Materials with Giant Piezomagnetism and Noncollinear Spin Current, Nat. Commun. 12, 2846 (2021).
- [21]Z. Zhou, X. Cheng, M. Hu, R. Chu, H. Bai, L. Han, J. Liu, F. Pan, and C. Song, Manipulation of the Altermagnetic Order in CrSb via Crystal Symmetry, Nature 638, 645 (2025).DOI
- [22]L. Han, X. Fu, R. Peng, X. Cheng, J. Dai, L. Liu, Y. Li, Y. Zhang, W. Zhu, H. Bai, Y. Zhou, S. Liang, C. Chen, Q. Wang, X. Chen, L. Yang, Y. Zhang, C. Song, J. Liu, and F. Pan, Electrical 180° Switching of Néel Vector in Spin-Splitting Antiferromagnet, Sci. Adv. 10, eadn0479 (2024).DOI
- [23]R. Yu, W. Zhang, H.-J. Zhang, S.-C. Zhang, X. Dai, and Z. Fang, Quantized Anomalous Hall Effect in Magnetic Topological Insulators, Science 329, 61 (2010).
- [24]B. Chen, F. Fei, D. Zhang, B. Zhang, W. Liu, S. Zhang, P. Wang, B. Wei, Y. Zhang, Z. Zuo, J. Guo, Q. Liu, Z. Wang, X. Wu, J. Zong, X. Xie, W. Chen, Z. Sun, S. Wang, Y. Zhang, M. Zhang, X. Wang, F. Song, H. Zhang, D. Shen, and B. Wang, Intrinsic Magnetic Topological Insulator Phases in the Sb Doped MnBi2Te4 Bulks and Thin Flakes, Nat. Commun. 10, 4469 (2019).DOI
- [25]F. Zhan, J. Zeng, Z. Chen, X. Jin, J. Fan, T. Chen, and R. Wang, Floquet Engineering of Nonequilibrium Valley-Polarized Quantum Anomalous Hall Effect with Tunable Chern Number, Nano Lett. 23, 2166 (2023).
- [26]F. Zhan, R. Chen, Z. Ning, D.-S. Ma, Z. Wang, D.-H. Xu, and R. Wang, Perspective: Floquet Engineering Topological States from Effective Models towards Realistic Materials, Quantum Front. 3, 21 (2024).arxiv.org/abs/2409.02774
- [27]L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond Conventional Ferromagnetism and Antiferromagnetism: A Phase with Nonrelativistic Spin and Crystal Rotation Symmetry, Phys. Rev. X 12, 031042 (2022).DOI
- [28]L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging Research Landscape of Altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X 12, 040501 (2022).arxiv.org/abs/2204.10844
- [29]X. Duan, J. Zhang, Z. Zhu, Y. Liu, Z. Zhang, I. Žutić, and T. Zhou, Antiferroelectric Altermagnets: Antiferroelectricity Alters Magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 106801 (2025).
- [30]Z. Zhu, R. Huang, X. Chen, Z. Cui, X. Duan, J. Zhang, I. Žutić, and T. Zhou, Altermagnetic Proximity Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 186702 (2026).DOI
- [31]D.-F. Shao, Y.-Y. Jiang, J. Ding, S.-H. Zhang, Z.-A. Wang, R.-C. Xiao, G. Gu, W. J. Lu, Y. P. Sun, and E. Y. Tsymbal, Néel Spin Currents in Antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 216702 (2023).
- [32]S.-S. Zhang, Z.-A. Wang, B. Li, Y.-Y. Jiang, S.-H. Zhang, R.-C. Xiao, L.-X. Liu, X. Luo, W.-J. Lu, M. Tian, Y.-P. Sun, E. Y. Tsymbal, H. Du, and D.-F. Shao, X-Type Stacking in Cross-Chain Antiferromagnets, Newton 1, 100068 (2025).
- [33]R. Cheng, J. Xiao, Q. Niu, and A. Brataas, Spin Pumping and Spin-Transfer Torques in Antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 057601 (2014).
- [34]M. W. Daniels, W. Guo, G. M. Stocks, D. Xiao, and J. Xiao, Spin-Transfer Torque Induced Spin Waves in Antiferromagnetic Insulators, New J. Phys. 17, 103039 (2015).DOI
- [35]T. Jungwirth, X. Marti, P. Wadley, and J. Wunderlich, Antiferromagnetic Spintronics, Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 231 (2016).
- [36]L. Šmejkal and T. Jungwirth, Symmetry and Topology in Antiferromagnetic Spintronics, in Topology in Magnetism, edited by J. Zang, V. Cros, and A. Hoffmann (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2018) pp. 267–298.arxiv.org/abs/1804.05628
- [37]H. Watanabe and Y. Yanase, Magnetic Parity Violation and Parity-Time-Reversal-Symmetric Magnets, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 36, 373001 (2024).DOI
- [38]Z. Zhang, C. Xin, and H. Liu, Parity-Time Symmetry in Magnetic Materials and Devices, Adv. Electron. Mater. 10, 2300674 (2024).DOI
- [39]B. Feng, R.-W. Zhang, Y. Feng, B. Fu, S. Wu, K. Miyamoto, S. He, L. Chen, K. Wu, K. Shimada, T. Okuda, and Y. Yao, Discovery of Weyl Nodal Lines in a Single-Layer Ferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 116401 (2019).DOI
- [40]R.-W. Zhang, Z. Zhang, C.-C. Liu, and Y. Yao, Nodal Line Spin-Gapless Semimetals and High-Quality Candidate Materials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 016402 (2020).DOI
- [41]L. Bai, R.-W. Zhang, W. Feng, and Y. Yao, Anomalous Hall Effect in Type IV 2D Collinear Magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 036702 (2025).DOI
- [42]M. Tian, C. Cui, Z. Zhang, J. Duan, W. Feng, and R.-W. Zhang, Symmetry Classification of Altermagnetism and Emergence of Type-IV Magnetism in Two Dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 206701 (2026).DOI
- [43]I. Mazin and The PRX Editors, Editorial: Altermagnetism—A New Punch Line of Fundamental Magnetism, Phys. Rev. X 12, 040002 (2022).DOI
- [44]R. A. de Groot, Half-Metallic Magnetism in the 1990s, Physica B 172, 45 (1991).
- [45]R. A. De Groot, F. M. Mueller, P. G. V. Engen, and K. H. J. Buschow, New Class of Materials: Half-Metallic Ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 2024 (1983).
- [46]X. Hu, Half-Metallic Antiferromagnet as a Prospective Material for Spintronics, Adv. Mater. 24, 294 (2012).arxiv.org/abs/1108.3645
- [47]M. I. Katsnelson, V. Y. Irkhin, L. Chioncel, A. I. Licht- enstein, and R. A. De Groot, Half-Metallic Ferromagnets: From Band Structure to Many-Body Effects, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 315 (2008).DOI
- [48]B. H. Rimmer, B. Pal, and S. S. P. Parkin, Non-Collinear Antiferromagnetic Spintronics, Nat. Rev. Mater. 10, 109 (2025).
- [49]H. Van Leuken and R. A. De Groot, Half-Metallic Antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 1171 (1995).pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10058952
- [50]X.-J. Luo, J.-X. Hu, M.-L. Hu, and K. T. Law, Spin Group Symmetry Criteria for Odd-Parity Magnets, arXiv:2510.05512 (2026).arxiv.org/abs/2510.05512
- [51]A. B. Hellenes, T. Jungwirth, R. Jaeschke-Ubiergo, A. Chakraborty, J. Sinova, and L. Šmejkal, P-wave magnets, arXiv:2309.01607 (2023).arxiv.org/abs/2309.01607
- [52]B. Brekke, P. Sukhaichov, H. G. Gill, A. Brataas, and J. Linde, Minimal models and transport properties of unconventional p-wave magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 236703 (2024).
- [53]R. Yang, T. Zhang, L. Zhou, Y. Dai, Z. Liao, H. Weng, and X. Qiu, Magnetization-induced band shift in ferromagnetic weyl semimetal Co₃Sn₂S₂, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 077403 (2020).
- [54]J. Li, Q. Wu, and H. Weng, Stacking-dependent electronic and topological properties in van der Waals antiferromagnet MnBi₂Te₄ films, npj Comput. Mater. 11, 53 (2025).DOI
- [55]F. Matsukura, Y. Tokura, and H. Ohno, Control of Magnetism by Electric Fields, Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 209 (2015).DOI
- [56]Y. Kajiwara, K. Hari, S. Takahashi, J. Ohe, K. Uchida, M. Mizuguchi, H. Umezawa, H. Kawai, K. Ando, K. Takanashi, S. Maekawa, and E. Saitoh, Transmission of Electrical Signals by Spin-Wave Interconversion in a Magnetic Insulator, Nature 464, 262 (2010).DOI
- [57]Z. Shen, J. Chen, X. Yao, and S. Dong, Magnetoelectric Torque in Polar Magnetic Bilayers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 016702 (2026).
- [58]Y. Xie, K. Ji, J. He, X. Shen, D. Wang, and J. Zhang, Manipulation of Topology by Electric Field in Breathing Kagome Lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 056701 (2025).DOI
- [59]L. Yu, H. J. Zhao, L. Bellaiche, and Y. Ma, Electrically Switchable Nonrelativistic Zeeman Spin Splittings in Collinear Antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 256704 (2025).DOI
- [60]H. Sun, P. Dong, C. Wu, and P. Li, Multifield-induced antiferromagnet transformation into altermagnet and realized anomalous valley Hall effect in monolayer VPSe₃, Phys. Rev. B 111, 253431 (2025).
- [61]S. Du, P. Tang, J. Li, Z. Lin, Y. Xu, W. Duan, and A. Rubio, Berry curvature engineering by gating two-dimensional antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 022025 (2020).DOI
- [62]G. Long and H. Huang, Anomalous Hall effect driven by electric field and sliding ferroelectricity in two-dimensional compensated antiferromagnetic MnS, Phys. Rev. B 112, 165136 (2025).
- [63]H. A. Qayyum, M. Mansha, and S. Sattar, Pt-symmetry breaking and spin control in 2D antiferromagnetic MnSe, ACS Omega 9, 47097 (2024).DOI
- [64]S.-D. Guo, Y.-L. Tao, Z.-Y. Zhuo, G. Zhu, and Y. S. Ang, Electric-field-tuned anomalous valley Hall effect in A-type hexagonal antiferromagnetic monolayers, Phys. Rev. B 109, 134402 (2024).DOI
- [65]D. Wang, H. Wang, L. Liu, J. Zhang, and H. Zhang, Electric-field-induced switchable two-dimensional altermagnets, Nano Lett. 25, 498 (2025).DOI
- [66]Z. Zhang, G.-B. Liu, M. Tian, R.-W. Zhang, Z.-M. Yu, and Y. Yao, Spin Layer Groups and Their Corepresentations, arXiv:2605.25484 (2026).arxiv.org/abs/2605.25484
- [67]X. Chen, Y. Liu, P. Liu, Y. Yu, J. Ren, J. Li, A. Zhang, and Q. Liu, Unconventional Magnons in Collinear Magnets Dictated by Spin Space Groups, Nature 640, 349 (2025).DOI
- [68]C. Cui, R.-W. Zhang, Y. Qiu, Y. Han, Z.-M. Yu, and Y. Yao, Electric Hall Effect and Quantum Electric Hall Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 116301 (2025).
- [69]Y. Liu, S.-D. Guo, Y. Li, and C.-C. Liu, Two-Dimensional Fully Compensated Ferrimagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 116703 (2025).DOI
- [70]See Supplemental Material for details about spin layer groups, candidate materials and DFT calculations.
- [71]D. B. Litvin and W. Opechowski, Spin Groups, Physica 76, 538 (1974).DOI
- [72]D. B. Litvin, Spin Point Groups, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 33, 279 (1977).DOI
- [73]H. Ebert, Magneto-Optical Effects in Transition Metal Systems, Rep. Prog. Phys. 59, 1665 (1996).DOI
- [74]G. Y. Guo and H. Ebert, Band-Theoretical Investigation of the Magneto-Optical Kerr Effect in Fe and Co Multilayers, Phys. Rev. B 51, 12633 (1995).pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9978034
- [75]P. Oppenpeer, Chapter 3 Magneto-optical Kerr Spectra (Elsevier, 2001) pp. 229–442.
- [76]D. Sangalli, A. Marini, and A. Debernardi, Pseudopotential-Based First-Principles Approach to the Magneto-Optical Kerr Effect: From Metals to the Inclusion of Local Fields and Excitonic Effects, Phys. Rev. B 86, 125139 (2012).DOI