WorksMathematics
A proof of a conjecture of Cazenave on graph eigenvalues
Abstract
We prove Cazenave's conjecture for connected graphs, where and are the second largest adjacency and Laplacian eigenvalues. We also characterize equality in this inequality and in the linear bound .
Let be a finite simple connected graph on vertices, with adjacency matrix and Laplacian . Write and for their second largest eigenvalues. Stars include . Cazenave [2 Theorem 1] proved the first inequality below and conjectured the second [2 Conjecture 6(ii)].
Theorem 1. Every such graph satisfies
Equality holds exactly for stars in the first bound, and for stars on at least three vertices in the second.
Let be with one edge subdivided, and let be the middle root of . Direct calculation gives
We use Laplacian subgraph monotonicity [1 Proposition 3.2.1(ii)], which does not require induced subgraphs. The following consequence of [3 Observation 3.3 and Theorem 3.4] has a short direct proof.
Lemma 2. Unless is a star, or , it satisfies .
Proof. We show that contains , or . If its maximum degree is at most two, it is a path or cycle, and the claim follows from the exclusions. Otherwise choose a vertex of degree at least three. Since is not a star, connectivity gives a neighbour of with a neighbour . If , then is a triangle. Otherwise two further neighbours of give the copy of . Subgraph monotonicity and the displayed spectra prove the bound.
The rounded bound below follows from Cazenave’s signed-degree estimate [2 Theorem 1 and the following remark]; we additionally prove strictness when .
Lemma 3. If , then and .
Proof. Set and let be a -eigenvector of . By Perron–Frobenius, has both signs. At a positive maximum and a negative minimum, the eigenvalue equation gives at least neighbours of the same sign. Retain such edges at each vertex, forming a spanning subgraph consisting of two disjoint ’s and isolated vertices.
Choose nonzero in the two-dimensional -eigenspace of , orthogonal to a top eigenvector of . Then
Thus . If , then and every omitted edge has equal -values at its endpoints. The support of is a nonempty union of whole stars (each star’s top Laplacian eigenvector is proportional to ), so no edge leaves it. Connectivity forces full support; hence has exactly positive and negative coordinates. Put and . Summing over gives
since on , all coordinates outside are negative, and connectivity supplies a crossing edge. This contradiction proves strictness.
Proof of Theorem 1. The pairs for , stars of order at least three, and are, respectively,
These give the stated equalities for stars and strict inequalities for . Together with Lemma 2, they also give for every non-star. Thus the linear bound is strict for non-stars with ; Lemma 3 handles .
For the quadratic bound, consider a non-star other than . If , Lemma 2 gives . Otherwise put and . Then
Equality requires and , contrary to Lemma 3.
Corollary 4. Put . Among connected graphs with , the minimum of is , attained by .
Proof. Stars, and have , so Lemma 2 gives the lower bound. The graph attains it, since . The threshold is sharp: and .
References
- [1]A. E. Brouwer and W. H. Haemers, Spectra of Graphs, Universiteit, Springer, New York, 2012. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-1939-6.DOI
- [2]T. Cazenave, Lemmas and Conjectures in Spectral Graph Theory, arXiv:2611.03879v1 [math.CO], 2 November 2026. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2611.03879.arxiv.org/abs/2611.03879
- [3]J. Li, J.-M. Guo and W. C. Shiu, On the second largest Laplacian eigenvalues of graphs, Linear Algebra Appl. 438 (2013), 2438–2446. doi:10.1016/j.laa.2012.10.047.DOI