Introduction

Let XX be a normal projective klt variety with KX∼Q0K_X \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} 0. Its canonical index is the least positive integer rr for which rKXrK_X is an integral principal divisor. The index problem asks for a bound depending only on the dimension. More generally, for a log Calabi–Yau pair one allows dependence on the boundary coefficients. In dimension three, Jiang obtains a common canonical multiple for all klt Calabi–Yau threefolds, using boundedness modulo flops to handle the noncanonical case [23], Theorem 1.6 and Corollary 1.7. Xu’s inductive results give the lc threefold index theorem and the klt fourfold theorem with nonzero boundary [41], Theorems 1.13–1.14. Jiang and Haidong Liu bound surface log pluricanonical representations and, through Fujino’s gluing framework, obtain the index theorem for slc pairs through dimension three and connected non-klt lc fourfold pairs [22], Theorem 1.4 and Corollaries 1.6–1.7. Birkar also proves an index bound in every fixed dimension for rationally connected klt log Calabi–Yau pairs with coefficients in a fixed rational set satisfying the descending chain condition (DCC) [4], Corollary 1.8. The distinction between zero and nonzero boundary, and between rationally connected and non-uniruled varieties, is therefore central to the remaining fourfold argument.

Theorem 1.1 (Uniform canonical index). There is a positive integer N4N_4 such that N4KX∼0N_4K_X \sim0 for every normal projective klt complex fourfold XX with KX∼Q0K_X \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} 0.

The conclusion concerns integral Weil divisors: it gives a trivialization in one degree for all the fourfolds in the statement. Combined with the preceding non-klt and nonzero-boundary results, it gives the lc fourfold index theorem for any fixed finite rational coefficient set. In applying Xu’s theorem, a finite set is included in the hyperstandard set generated by its complementary coefficients. No assertion for arbitrary real coefficient sets is intended.

Our effective application concerns the map determined by a log canonical divisor. For a rational Cartier divisor DD on a normal integral projective variety, fix a divisor representative and put

Vm(D)=H0(X,OX(⌊mD⌋)),m≥1.V_m(D) = H^0\left(X, \mathcal{O}_X\left(\left\lfloor mD\right\rfloor\right)\right), \qquad m \ge1.

The sheaf here is the rank-one reflexive divisorial sheaf, so this definition does not require mDmD to be Cartier. The Iitaka field K(D)⊂C(X)K(D) \subset\mathbb{C}(X) is generated by ratios of nonzero sections in the same Vm(D)V_m(D), over all mm. A complete system gives the Iitaka fibration when its ratios generate this entire field. Merely obtaining the correct image dimension would not rule out a finite extension.

Theorem 1.2 (Uniform effective log Iitaka fibrations). Let Φ⊂[0,1]∩Q\Phi\subset[0,1] \cap\mathbb{Q} be finite. There is a positive integer m=m(Φ)m = m(\Phi) such that the following holds. Suppose XX is a normal integral projective complex fourfold, Δ≥0\Delta\ge0 is a rational Weil divisor whose nonzero coefficients lie in Φ\Phi, (X,Δ)(X,\Delta) is lc, and D=KX+ΔD = K_X + \Delta is rational Cartier and pseudo-effective. Then the complete system ∣⌊mD⌋∣\lvert\lfloor mD\rfloor\rvert is nonempty and its section ratios generate K(D)K(D) inside C(X)\mathbb{C}(X). The same integer works for every choice of canonical divisor on XX.

In Kodaira dimension four the system is birational; in Kodaira dimension zero it is nonempty with image a point. Nonvanishing follows from pseudo-effectivity by the good-model theorem and effective exceptional comparison in OpenAI, Log abundance in characteristic zero [34], Theorems 1.1 and 11.1, Lemma 2.2. This qualitative step supplies a section in some positive degree, not a uniform degree; the uniform m(Φ)m(\Phi) comes from the index and fibration arguments below.

Earlier effective results separate the big case from lower-dimensional Iitaka bases. Hacon–McKernan–Xu give a uniform birational degree for big lc adjoints with coefficients in any fixed DCC set [20], Theorem 1.3. Viehweg–Zhang treat smooth varieties of Kodaira dimension two. Their degree depends on invariants of the general fibre; for fourfolds the fibre is a surface of Kodaira dimension zero, and boundedness of those invariants makes the degree universal [40], Theorem 0.2 and the discussion preceding Corollary 0.4. Todorov–Xu treat klt pairs of log Kodaira codimension two in dimensions two, three and four, with coefficients in a rational DCC set [39], Theorem 1.2. For fourfolds their hypothesis is κ(KX+Δ)=2\kappa(K_X + \Delta) = 2. Chen, Han and Jihao Liu formulate the effective log Iitaka conjecture for lc pairs of nonnegative Kodaira dimension with coefficients in an arbitrary DCC subset of [0,1][0,1], and prove it through dimension three [9], Conjecture 1.2 and Corollary 1.5.

The canonical bundle formula relates this question to effective birationality on the base. Birkar–Zhang prove effective Iitaka fibrations for smooth projective varieties of nonnegative Kodaira dimension, with constants depending on the dimension, the least nonvanishing pluricanonical degree on the general fibre, and the middle Betti number of a smooth model of its canonical cover. In fixed dimension and for a fixed DCC coefficient set, their polarized effective birationality theorem gives a uniform degree for a big base adjoint once the nef part has bounded denominator [3], Theorems 1.2–1.3. Theorem 1.2 gives the fourfold conclusion for finite rational coefficient sets, across all nonnegative Kodaira dimensions and for lc singularities. Its coefficient scope is narrower than that of the DCC conjecture and the earlier big and klt results. The uniform degree uses the canonical-index theorem and the relative denominator theorem below. The passage from pseudo-effectivity to nonvanishing is the separate qualitative input described above.

The model comparison and the index reductions

The uniform argument needs a model on which the adjoint defines a morphism. The comparison in Proposition 2.2 preserves every space Vm(D)V_m(D) under a crepant dlt modification and an adjoint-negative program. Its semiampleness output uses the abundance-after-nonvanishing theorem of OpenAI, Lifting sections from the reduced support of an adjoint [33], Theorem 1.2. That theorem applies to projective lc rational pairs over C\mathbb{C} of dimension at most four: a nef rational Cartier adjoint of nonnegative Kodaira dimension is semiample. In Kodaira dimension zero it is rationally linearly trivial. We state the model comparison before the index reduction because it is needed there as well as in the final effective application.

The singular Beauville–Bogomolov decomposition gives a finite quasi-étale cover by a product of an abelian variety and nonflat Calabi–Yau or symplectic factors. Druel proves the needed dimension-at-most-five result [11]; Höring–Peternell prove the arbitrary-dimensional version [21], using Druel’s integrability results and the holonomy decomposition of Greb–Guenancia–Kebekus [18]. Here quasi-étale means étale outside a subset of codimension at least two. Integral cohomology bounds the abelian characters, and lower-dimensional pluricanonical characters handle products. The remaining single-factor case has rationally connected proper rational images. Its noncanonical quotients are handled by a relative torsion bound; canonical quotients admit a crepant terminal model VV with the same canonical index, irregularity zero and countable birational self-map group.

An effective divisor DD of Iitaka dimension one, two or three on VV would give another bounded-index case. A small rational boundary δD\delta D produces a semiample contraction, but the relative index theorem is applied only after proving that the underlying canonical divisors remain crepant. The resulting fibration has boundary zero, so the relative denominator and rationally connected torsion theorems [35] have constants independent of DD and δ\delta. Consequently, in the unbounded-index case every effective divisor of positive Iitaka dimension is big. This implies the precise fibration property used in the scalar estimate: every intermediate equivariant rational fibration of the canonical cover has a geometric generic fibre of general type on a smooth projective resolution. It is a conclusion of the reduction.

Curves on the canonical cover and its products

Let rr be the canonical index of the remaining terminal fourfold VV. A rational function trivializing rKVrK_V defines its canonical cyclic cover π:Y→V\pi: Y \to V, a connected degree-rr quasi-étale cover with deck group μr\mu_r and trivial canonical class upstairs. The minimality of rr is what makes this the primitive cover. Choose an ample rational divisor LL on VV, scaled so that its volume is bounded above and below by absolute positive constants. Then (π∗L)4=rL4(\pi^*L)^4 = rL^4.

For an ample rational divisor PP, two local measurements will be used. The number γ(P;V)\gamma(P; V) is the supremum of the order of vanishing of a section in degree kk, divided by kk, at a very general smooth point; degrees are sufficiently divisible to make the divisor Cartier. Its precise definition is given in Definition 5.3. For an integral curve CC through a smooth marked point xx, the ratio

P⋅Cmult⁡xC\frac{P \cdot C}{\operatorname{mult}_x C}

compares its degree with its multiplicity at that point. The infimum over such curves is the Seshadri constant ε(P;x)\varepsilon(P; x). The scalar estimates bound γ\gamma above and ε\varepsilon below by absolute multiples of the fourth root of the volume, under the fibration hypothesis just obtained. Applied upstairs, the lower bound makes every such curve ratio grow at least as r1/4r^{1/4}.

Now take tt copies of YY and divide by the simultaneous deck action:

Zt=Yt/μr,diag,θt:Zt⟶Vt.Z_t = Y^t/\mu_{r,\mathrm{diag}}, \qquad\theta_t : Z_t \longrightarrow V^t.

The polarization PtP_t is the pullback by θt\theta_t of the sum of the tt copies of LL. On ZtZ_t, the product estimate gives curves through very general points whose degree divided by marked multiplicity is bounded by a constant times t2t^2, independently of rr. This estimate concerns the quotient by the diagonal group; it does not assert the same bound on YtY^t. The maps are displayed in Figure 1.

Diagram showing the maps from $Y^t$ to $Z_t$ to $V^t$ and their projections

Figure 1. The product polarization is pulled back through θt\theta_t. The geometric generic fibre of q1q_1 is Yt−1Y^{t-1}: choosing one lift of the marked point in VV removes the simultaneous deck action. This identification allows the growing scalar curve bound upstairs to be tested inside a product whose curve cost is bounded independently of rr.

The product estimate is proved by reducing a fixed set of data to positive characteristic and comparing ordinary jets with Frobenius jets. The local comparison is that of Mustaţă–Schwede [32], Equation (2.8)]. The canonical filtration described by Sun [37], Theorem 3.7 and Lemma 4.2], in the ideal-theoretic description of Kitadai–Sumihiro [25], Definition 3.1 and Remark 3.2], supplies the truncated symmetric powers and their determinant factors. We prove the slope estimates and the diagonal rank comparison needed for these products. For each variety, cover and product size, the arithmetic model is fixed before the characteristic tends to infinity. The later contradiction fixes a finite list of product sizes before allowing rr to grow. These are separate limits; neither requires a uniform arithmetic model for all rr.

From chains of curves to birational maps

The curve estimates concern different spaces. We compare them by forming chains from finitely many covering families of marked curves on ZtZ_t, chosen compatibly with coordinate projections and the group actions. Each movement follows a chosen curve from its marked point to a generic point. The closures of the generically reachable sets are fibres of a rational quotient, called chain leaves. The construction uses Campana’s stabilization strategy [8], Theorem 1.1 and its proof sketch]; parameter differentiation in the manner of Ein–Küchle–Lazarsfeld [12], Proposition 2.3] retains a degree bound. In our setting a generic point of an ee-dimensional leaf can be reached in at most ee movements. If the marked curve ratios are at most BB, the leaf degree is at most (eB)e(eB)^e. We prove the projection and finite-quotient compatibilities needed to use these bounds together.

Write Ht⊂ZtH_t \subset Z_t for a generic leaf and Wt=θt(Ht)⊂VtW_t = \theta_t(H_t) \subset V^t. A positive-dimensional fibre of Ht→VH_t \to V would lie, after choosing one lift of the marked base point, in Yt−1Y^{t-1}. The scalar lower bound there grows with rr, contradicting the bounded leaf degree. Thus, for sufficiently large rr, the maps to each coordinate are generically finite onto their images and the leaf dimensions lie between one and four. Among a sufficiently long finite list of product sizes, stabilization of dimensions and a comparison of forgetting-map degrees force one map Wt+1→WtW_{t+1} \to W_t to have degree one.

This birational forgetting map produces more than a dimension contradiction. The leaf tangent spaces identify positive-dimensional subspaces Ax⊂TxVA_x \subset T_xV at different points. We show that the resulting linear transports depend only on their two endpoints and compose. A vector transported from one fixed point then defines a rational vector field. Degree-one forgetting supplies rational evaluation of its local flow, and inverse flow gives birational self-maps. The resulting uncountable family contradicts the countability of Bir⁡(V)\operatorname{Bir}(V), completing the index argument.

Finally, the model comparison turns the effective theorem into a question on the base of a semiampl[e] contraction. For every positive-dimensional base the relative big-base theorem [35], Proposition 6.1] gives the whole base field in a uniform complete floor system, including when the contraction is birational. In Kodaira dimension zero, the three index cases give a nonzero section in one uniform degree. The comparison of all integer degrees brings these systems back to the original pair. The relative results used in this argument are proved independently of Theorem 1.1. The abundance-after-nonvanishing input from [33] and the uniform and index arguments above do not require logarithmic or orbifold subadditivity. The full pseudo-effective statement of Theorem 1.2, however, first uses [34] to obtain nonvanishing and inherits that companion’s logarithmic Iitaka subadditivity input.

Organization and conventions

Section 2 constructs the semiample model and compares all rounded systems. Section 3 records the exact relative inputs. Section 4 removes product and rationally connected cases and proves the fibration condition needed by the scalar estimate. Sections 5–8 prove the chain, scalar, product and transport statements in that order. Section 9 applies them to the remaining canonical covers. Section 10 derives the effective theorem.

Varieties are over C\mathbb{C} unless a geometric generic fibre or an arithmetic reduction is specified. Canonical divisors in a birational or finite comparison are chosen compatibly by rational top forms. We distinguish linear equivalence ∼\sim, rational linear equivalence ∼Q\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}, and numerical equivalence ≡\equiv. A pair has an effective rational boundary and a Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier actual adjoint. Subpairs may have negative boundary coefficients. Log discrepancies are ordinary discrepancies plus one; canonical and terminal singularities for zero boundary are defined by nonnegative and positive ordinary discrepancies on exceptional divisors. We use the usual dlt and slc conventions, including conductor gluing in slc adjunction; see [27].

A contraction is a surjective projective morphism f ⁣:X→Zf \colon X \to Z of normal varieties with f∗OX=OZf_*\mathcal{O}_X=\mathcal{O}_Z. A rational fibration is understood through a relatively algebraically closed base field inside the total function field. A log Calabi–Yau adjoint is Q\mathbb{Q}-linearly trivial. A uniform index means a common positive integer giving an integral linearly trivial multiple, not merely a numerical relation. Quasi-étale means finite surjective and étale outside codimension at least two. Rational connectedness on singular spaces refers to a smooth projective model when used in a birational argument.

Divisorial sheaves test rational sections at prime divisors. In particular, v≠0v \ne0 belongs to H0(X,OX(⌊mD⌋))H^0(X,\mathcal{O}_X(\lfloor mD\rfloor)) precisely when Div⁡(v)+mD≥0\operatorname{Div}(v)+mD \ge0. Numerical positivity of a rational divisor always concerns its rational Cartier class. Section-order and volume limits may be taken in sufficiently divisible degrees: powering a section preserves its normalized order. DCC and ACC stand for the descending and ascending chain conditions.

Semiample models and rounded section spaces

We pass from the original pair to a semiample model while preserving every rounded section space. The following comparison keeps every integer degree, even when the corresponding adjoint multiple is not Cartier.

We use the following precise theorem of the companion Lifting sections from the reduced support of an adjoint [33].

Theorem 2.1 (Abundance after nonvanishing). Let (X,Δ)(X,\Delta) be a projective lc rational pair over C\mathbb{C} of dimension at most four, with effective boundary and nef Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier adjoint D=KX+ΔD=K_X+\Delta. If κ(X,D)≥0\kappa(X,D)\ge0, then DD is semiample. If κ(X,D)=0\kappa(X,D)=0, then D∼Q0D\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}0.

This is the companion’s independent after-nonvanishing theorem. Its proof uses the supported-boundary theorem and lower-dimensional abundance; it does not use the separate fourfold non-vanishing companion. The boundary coefficients may be arbitrary rational numbers in [0,1][0,1]. The conclusion is qualitative: it supplies neither a uniform index nor a uniform section degree. If a generated Cartier multiple has Iitaka dimension zero, its morphism has image a point and a generating section is nowhere zero, which explains the actual rational linear triviality.

For the original pair we first run an adjoint-negative program and compare all section spaces. For the moving-divisor application in Lemma 4.6, the same procedure applies to a small rational perturbation (V,δD)(V,\delta D). There it supplies only a contraction. Uniform statements enter after the boundary is restored to zero and canonical crepancy is proved separately.

Proposition 2.2. Let (X,Δ)(X,\Delta) be a projective lc rational pair of dimension four over C\mathbb{C}, with D=KX+ΔD=K_X+\Delta Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier and κ(X,D)≥0\kappa(X,D)\ge0. There is a projective Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial dlt pair (X′,Δ′)(X',\Delta') with semiample adjoint D′=KX′+Δ′D'=K_{X'}+\Delta' such that, under the identification of rational function fields and compatible canonical divisors,

H0(X,OX(⌊mD⌋))=H0(X′,OX′(⌊mD′⌋))(m≥1).(1)H^0\left(X,\mathcal{O}_X(\lfloor mD\rfloor)\right)=H^0\left(X',\mathcal{O}_{X'}(\lfloor mD'\rfloor)\right)\qquad(m\ge1). \tag*{(1)}

The coefficients of Δ′\Delta' belong to those of Δ\Delta together with 11. The map is obtained by a crepant dlt modification followed by adjoint-negative birational steps. For a Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial klt input the latter steps can be taken directly, with klt outputs. The semiample contraction f:X′→Zf:X'\to Z has dim⁡Z=κ(X,D)\dim Z=\kappa(X,D) and

D′∼Qf∗AD'\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}f^*A

for an ample rational Cartier divisor AA on the normal projective variety ZZ.

Proof. We first establish the section comparison used throughout the construction. For a nonzero rational function vv and a rational divisor LL on a normal variety,

v∈H0(O(⌊mL⌋))  ⟺  Div⁡(v)+mL≥0.(2)v\in H^0\left(\mathcal{O}(\lfloor mL\rfloor)\right)\iff\operatorname{Div}(v)+mL\ge0. \tag*{(2)}

The equivalence holds because the coefficients of Div⁡(v)\operatorname{Div}(v) are integers. Effective Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier pullback and pushforward give both inclusions for any crepant birational morphism. More generally, suppose that two models have a common resolution with maps p,qp,q to their input and output, and that their adjoints satisfy

p∗Din=q∗Dout+E,E≥0,E is q-exceptional.p^{*}D_{\mathrm{in}}=q^{*}D_{\mathrm{out}}+E,\qquad E\geq0,\qquad E\text{ is }q\text{-exceptional}.

A section on the output pulls back, remains effective after adding mEmE, and pushes down to a section on the input. A section on the input pulls back and pushes by qq to a section on the output, since q∗E=0q_{*}E=0. Applying (2) proves equality for every mm, without assuming that mDmD is Cartier. Thus the equality survives any sequence of these comparisons.

We now construct the models to which this comparison applies. Take a crepant projective Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial dlt modification. This is the usual dlt modification theorem; see, for example, [13], Theorem 2.8. Its boundary consists of the strict transform of Δ\Delta and exceptional components of coefficient one.

Run an adjoint-negative minimal model program. We recall the existence and termination inputs needed here. On a fixed negative extremal ray, slightly decreasing the coefficient-one part gives a klt boundary for which that ray is still negative. Klt contraction and flip existence apply [2]. To identify its flip with that of the original adjoint, write the perturbed klt adjoint as DϵD_{\epsilon} and the contraction as gg. Relative Picard number one gives a positive rational number aa such that L=D−aDϵL=D-aD_{\epsilon} is numerically trivial over gg. For sufficiently divisible kk, both kLkL and −kL-kL are Cartier, and their differences from DϵD_{\epsilon} are relatively ample. The relative base point free theorem makes both relatively semiample. Their associated maps are constant on each connected fibre of gg, so a further multiple of LL descends to a Cartier divisor on the normal contraction base. Thus LL is a rational pullback. On the small flipped model, the transform of DD is consequently a positive rational multiple of the relatively ample transform of DϵD_{\epsilon} plus that pullback. It is relatively ample as required. The original dlt condition is preserved by these negative steps. A fibre-type end is excluded by Q\mathbb{Q}-linear effectivity of the adjoint, which follows from κ≥0\kappa\geq0. Indeed, a curve in a general fibre not contained in the support of an effective representative cannot have negative intersection with that representative. Divisorial contractions decrease the Picard number, and the remaining flips terminate by [10], Theorem 1.1, applied with zero nef data to the pseudo-effective rational lc adjoint. The output is therefore nef and Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial dlt. Starting with a klt pair keeps all these outputs klt.

The initial modification is crepant, and discrepancy comparison for each adjoint-negative step has exactly the effective exceptional form used above. Iteration proves (1); in particular the nef output still has nonnegative Kodaira dimension. Theorem 2.1 makes it semiample. A generated Cartier multiple, followed by Stein factorization, gives the stated contraction and ample rational divisor.

We also identify its field with the whole embedded Iitaka field. For sufficiently divisible aa, the divisor aD′aD' differs from f∗(aA)f^{*}(aA) by an integral principal divisor. Complete systems of sufficiently high multiples of the ample divisor aAaA generate C(Z)\mathbb{C}(Z), so C(Z)⊂K(D′)\mathbb{C}(Z)\subset K(D'). Conversely, take two nonzero sections in any Vm(D′)V_m(D'). Raising both to a sufficiently divisible common power puts them in such a pullback degree. Their ratio to that power lies in C(Z)\mathbb{C}(Z) by f∗OX′=OZf_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X'}=\mathcal{O}_{Z}. The original ratio is algebraic over C(Z)\mathbb{C}(Z), which is relatively algebraically closed in C(X′)\mathbb{C}(X') because ff is a contraction. Thus every rounded-degree ratio already lies in C(Z)\mathbb{C}(Z). Together with (1), this proves K(D)=K(D′)=C(Z)K(D)=K(D')=\mathbb{C}(Z) inside the common function field.

Lemma 2.3. Let DD be a rational Cartier divisor on a normal projective variety such that D∼Qf∗AD\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}f^{*}A for a contraction f:X→Zf:X\to Z and an ample rational Cartier divisor AA. If one nonempty complete system ∣⌊mD⌋∣| \lfloor mD\rfloor| generates C(Z)\mathbb{C}(Z) inside C(X)\mathbb{C}(X), then every positive integer multiple of mm does so as well. Proof. The field identification just proved uses only D∼Qf∗AD \sim_{\mathbb Q} f^*A and the contraction property, so every rounded-degree ratio lies in C(Z)\mathbb{C}(Z). Fix a nonzero section ss in degree mm. For each k≥1k \ge1, multiplication by sk−1s^{k-1} embeds Vm(D)V_m(D) in Vkm(D)V_{km}(D): the pole inequalities add, without a Cartier assumption. Ratios of the resulting sections are unchanged. Hence the degree-kmkm ratios contain the whole field generated in degree mm, and cannot generate anything beyond C(Z)\mathbb{C}(Z).

Relative adjunction inputs

The index reductions use uniform torsion on rationally connected bases; the effective application uses full field generation over a big base. We record the three exact results proved in the companion Relative denominators and effective systems for log Calabi–Yau fibrations [35]. Their proofs are independent of the canonical-index theorem proved here and of abundance after nonvanishing.

A generalized pair (Z,BZ+MZ)(Z, B_Z + M_Z) includes a rational b-divisor M\mathbf{M} that is the pullback of a nef rational Cartier divisor on a higher projective model. The divisor MZM_Z is its trace on ZZ. The expression “pMp\mathbf{M} b-Cartier” means that this nef divisor has a Cartier multiple pMWpM_W on one determination WW, whose pullbacks give the data on all higher models. Generalized discrepancies are computed after subtracting the nef data on such a model. The following result concerns an exact presentation by rational divisors.

Source: [35].

Theorem 3.1 (Uniform relative denominators). Fix a finite set Φ⊂[0,1]∩Q\Phi\subset[0,1] \cap\mathbb{Q} and an integer 1≤d≤41 \le d \le4. There are positive integers p0∣pp_0 \mid p, with p0p_0 clearing Φ\Phi, and a DCC set B⊂[0,1]∩Q\mathcal{B} \subset[0,1] \cap\mathbb{Q}, depending only on dd and Φ\Phi, with the following property.

Let (X,B)(X, B) be a projective lc pair of dimension dd, with effective rational boundary having coefficients in Φ\Phi. Suppose that f ⁣:X→Zf \colon X \to Z is a contraction onto a projective base ZZ, with dim⁡Z>0\dim Z > 0, and

KX+B∼Qf∗DK_X + B \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} f^*D

for a Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier divisor DD on ZZ. There exist ψ∈C(X)∗\psi\in\mathbb{C}(X)^* and a Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier divisor DZ∼QDD_Z \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} D such that

KX+B+1p0Div⁡(ψ)=f∗DZ,DZ=KZ+BZ+MZ.(3)K_X + B + \frac{1}{p_0}\operatorname{Div}(\psi) = f^*D_Z,\qquad D_Z = K_Z + B_Z + M_Z. \tag*{(3)}

Here BZB_Z is effective with coefficients in B\mathcal{B}, (Z,BZ+MZ)(Z, B_Z + M_Z) is generalized lc, and M\mathbf{M} is b-nef with pMp\mathbf{M} b-Cartier. If (X,B)(X, B) is klt, the generalized pair on ZZ is generalized klt.

The constant p0p_0 trivializes the geometric generic adjoint, while pp controls the moduli divisor on a determination. These are actual divisor statements, not numerical equivalences. A varying coefficient introduced only to construct a contraction will not enter the fixed coefficient set when this theorem is applied with boundary zero.

Source: [35].

Proposition 3.2. Under the hypotheses of Theorem 3.1, suppose in addition that DD is big. There is a positive integer m=m(d,Φ)m = m(d,\Phi) such that, for every positive multiple ll of mm, the complete divisorial system

∣l(KX+B)∣\left\lvert l(K_X + B) \right\rvert

is nonempty and generates precisely the subfield C(Z)⊂C(X)\mathbb{C}(Z) \subset\mathbb{C}(X). Its rational map is therefore birationally equivalent to ff and to the Iitaka fibration of KX+BK_X + B.

Here the complete floor system generates the entire relatively algebraically closed base field, including its algebraic part. The conclusion holds for every positive multiple of the stated degree. Source: [35].

Proposition 3.3. Fix an integer 1≤d≤41 \le d \le4, a DCC set I⊂[0,1]∩QI \subset[0,1] \cap\mathbb{Q}, and a positive integer pp. There exists a positive integer ℓ=ℓ(d,I,p)\ell= \ell(d,I,p) with the following property. Let ZZ be a normal projective complex variety of dimension dd with a rationally connected smooth projective resolution. Suppose that (Z,B+MZ)(Z,B+M_Z) is generalized klt, that B≥0B \ge0 has coefficients in II, and that the bb-nef rational bb-divisor MM has pMpM bb-Cartier. If

D=KZ+B+MZ∼Q0,D = K_Z + B + M_Z \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} 0,

then ℓD\ell D is an integral principal divisor. Consequently, for every integer a≥1a \ge1, the divisor aℓDa\ell D is principal and

h0(Z,OZ(aℓD))=1.h^0\left(Z,\mathcal{O}_Z(a\ell D)\right)=1.

The same integer can be chosen for all dimensions in any fixed subset of {1,2,3,4}\{1,2,3,4\}.

The last statement will be used directly with zero boundary and zero nef data on a klt variety with rationally connected resolution. It also applies to the generalized base of the first statement. After taking a common multiple with p0p_0, its principal divisor pulls back to an integral principal canonical multiple on the total space. This is the only uniform-torsion step in Lemma 4.6.

Structural reductions for the canonical index

We reduce the canonical-index theorem to a particular terminal case. First we bound the volume-form characters when the decomposition has several factors or is purely abelian. A remaining single nonflat factor has only rationally connected proper rational images. This bounds the index for noncanonical quotients and for terminal models carrying an effective divisor of intermediate Iitaka dimension. The cases left over have irregularity zero and the fibration property needed for the scalar bounds of Section 6.

All covers and all varieties in this section are connected unless otherwise specified. For a normal variety, ΩX[j]\Omega_X^{[j]} denotes the reflexive extension of ΩXregj\Omega_{X_{\mathrm{reg}}}^{j}. The order of KX∼Q0K_X \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} 0 is the least positive integer rr such that rKX∼0rK_X \sim0, with linear equivalence understood for integral Weil divisors.

Finite covers and canonical characters

We first record the relation between the canonical order and the action on a volume form. Suppose that q:R→Xq:R \to X is a finite Galois quasi-étale cover of normal projective varieties, with group GG, and that KR∼0K_R \sim0. Choose a generating reflexive top form ω\omega on RR. Since a regular function on RR is constant, the action on this one-dimensional space has the form

g∗ω=χ(g)ω,χ:G⟶C∗.g^*\omega=\chi(g)\omega,\qquad\chi:G\longrightarrow\mathbb{C}^*.

Then

mKX∼0⟺χm=1.mK_X\sim0 \quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad\chi^m=1.

Indeed, an invariant rational pluricanonical form on RR descends at the function-field level to XX. Since qq is étale at the generic points of divisors, the descended form has neither zeros nor poles in codimension one when the original form does not. It therefore trivializes the divisorial sheaf OX(mKX)\mathcal{O}_X(mK_X). Conversely, a trivializing form downstairs pulls back to a scalar multiple of ω⊗m\omega^{\otimes m}, so this power is invariant. In particular, bounding the order of χ\chi bounds the exact linear-equivalence order, including the Cartier index.

For any klt XX with KX∼Q0K_X \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} 0, its cyclic index cover is obtained by normalizing the cover of XregX_{\mathrm{reg}} defined by an rr-th root of a primitive trivialization of rKXrK_X. Minimality of rr, or equivalently the Kummer description of this cyclic extension, makes the cover connected of degree rr. It is quasi-étale and has a generating reflexive volume form. The finite discrepancy formula shows that it is klt. Its canonical divisor is Cartier and linearly trivial, so its ordinary discrepancies are integers greater than −1-1; it is consequently canonical. We use the finite discrepancy formula in this form throughout; see [28].

The singular Beauville–Bogomolov decomposition theorem applied to this cover gives a finite quasi-étale cover

P=A×P1×⋯×Ps⟶X,P = A \times P_1 \times\cdots\times P_s \longrightarrow X,

where AA is an abelian variety, possibly a point, and the positive dimensional PiP_i are irreducible Calabi–Yau or irreducible holomorphic symplectic varieties in the singular sense [21]. In dimension four the decomposition is already supplied by Druel [11]. The arbitrary-dimensional formulation above combines the algebraic integrability and holonomy methods discussed by Höring–Peternell in the introduction to [21]; in particular they identify the contributions of Druel and of Greb–Guenancia–Kebekus [18]. We use the following precise properties. Each PiP_i is normal, projective and canonical, with KPi∼0K_{P_i} \sim0 and dimension di≥2d_i \ge2. For every connected normal finite quasi-étale cover of PiP_i, its algebra of reflexive forms is generated by a volume form in the Calabi–Yau case, and by a generically nondegenerate symplectic form in the symplectic case. In particular, there are no reflexive one-forms or reflexive (di−1)(d_i - 1)-forms on these covers. A one-dimensional factor is included in AA.

Proposition 4.1. There is a uniform positive integer NprodN_{\mathrm{prod}} with the following property. If a projective klt fourfold XX, with KX∼Q0K_X \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} 0, admits a cover as in (4.2) having at least two positive dimensional factors, or having only an abelian factor, then NprodKX∼0N_{\mathrm{prod}}K_X \sim0.

Proof. Preserving the product directions. First suppose that the product has at least two positive dimensional factors. Denote these factors by B1,…,BtB_1, \ldots, B_t, counting the abelian factor, when present, as a single factor. Thus t≤4t \le4, 1≤dim⁡Bi≤31 \le\dim B_i \le3, and at most one BiB_i is abelian. Take the normal Galois closure R→XR \to X of the cover, with group GG. This is still quasi-étale: over the smooth locus of XX the original cover is finite étale by purity, and its Galois closure is finite étale there as well. The map R→PR \to P is also quasi-étale. In particular, RR is canonical and KR∼Q0K_R \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} 0. Here and below purity is used in its usual form for a finite generically étale map to a regular variety [38].

The product directions pull back, and extend reflexively, to a splitting

TR=⨁i=1tEi.(4)\mathcal{T}_R = \bigoplus_{i=1}^{t}\mathcal{E}_i. \tag*{(4)}

There are no homomorphisms between two distinct summands. To check this, choose a nonabelian factor among the corresponding two factors, say BiB_i, and fix general smooth points on all the other factors. After shrinking the complementary parameter space, the morphism R→∏j≠iBjR \to\prod_{j \ne i} B_j has normal, pure-dimensional fibres. This follows from normality of the geometric generic fibre in characteristic zero, generic flatness, and openness of geometric normality. Each of its connected components is therefore normal and finite surjective over BiB_i. The codimension-two locus excluded from the quasi-étale map R→PR \to P meets a general slice in codimension at least two, so these component covers are quasi-étale.

On the smooth big open of such a component, Ei\mathcal{E}_i restricts to its tangent sheaf and every complementary summand restricts to a trivial bundle. The component has no reflexive one-forms by the defining property of BiB_i. It has no vector fields either: contraction with its generating volume form identifies its reflexive tangent sheaf with its sheaf of reflexive (dim⁡Bi−1)(\dim B_i-1)-forms. A homomorphism in either direction between the two summands thus restricts to zero: the resulting forms or vector fields on the big open extend reflexively across its codimension-two complement. These slices sweep a dense open of RR, proving the assertion.

Consequently the projections in (4) are central idempotents in the finite-dimensional algebra End⁡R(TR)\operatorname{End}_{R}(\mathcal{T}_{R}). Its center is a finite-dimensional commutative algebra. Its primitive idempotents determine nonzero direct summands of positive generic rank, whose ranks sum to four; there are at most four of them. The group GG permutes these primitive idempotents. The kernel G0G_0 of that permutation action has index at most 4!4! and fixes every block projection, since each block projection is a sum of primitive central idempotents. It therefore preserves every Ei\mathcal{E}_i.

Recovering the factor fields. Let FiF_i be the relative algebraic closure of C(Bi)\mathbb{C}(B_i) in C(R)\mathbb{C}(R), and let Ri→BiR_i \to B_i be the normalization in this finite field extension. At the generic point, the complementary directions in (4) span Der⁡C(Bi)C(R)\operatorname{Der}_{\mathbb{C}(B_i)}\mathbb{C}(R): this follows first on the product and then under the finite separable extension C(P)⊂C(R)\mathbb{C}(P) \subset\mathbb{C}(R). In characteristic zero the elements annihilated by all these derivations are exactly those algebraic over C(Bi)\mathbb{C}(B_i). Thus G0G_0 preserves FiF_i, and acts by birational maps on RiR_i.

The finite map Ri→BiR_i \to B_i is quasi-étale. For completeness, the regular extension obtained by adjoining the geometrically integral product of the other factors is linearly disjoint from the finite extension Fi/C(Bi)F_i/\mathbb{C}(B_i). Hence the function field of Ri×∏j≠iBjR_i \times\prod_{j\ne i} B_j is an intermediate field between C(P)\mathbb{C}(P) and C(R)\mathbb{C}(R). This product is normal, so the normalization property gives finite maps

R⟶Ri×∏j≠iBj⟶P.R \longrightarrow R_i \times\prod_{j\ne i} B_j \longrightarrow P.

Ramification over a prime divisor of BiB_i would persist after taking this product. Its ramification index would then divide the ramification index at any prolongation to C(R)\mathbb{C}(R), contradicting quasi-étaleness of R→PR \to P. Thus RiR_i is projective and canonical with KRi∼0K_{R_i} \sim0. Choose its generating volume ωi\omega_i to be the pullback of a generating volume on BiB_i.

Bounding the characters in lower dimension. The varieties RiR_i have dimension at most three. We now use their finite birational actions to bound the characters on their volume lines. Let JiJ_i be the image of G0G_0 in Bir⁡(Ri)\operatorname{Bir}(R_i). Resolve the graph of its finite birational action to obtain a smooth projective JiJ_i-variety WiW_i with a birational morphism to RiR_i. One can first take the closure of the graph in the product indexed by the group, where the action permutes the factors, and then use functorial resolution [1]. Canonicity implies that the pullback of ωi\omega_i is a regular top form on WiW_i. For every positive integer mm,

H0(Wi,mKWi)=C ωi⊗m.(5)H^0(W_i,mK_{W_i})=\mathbb{C}\,\omega_i^{\otimes m}. \tag*{(5)}

Indeed, any section on WiW_i gives a rational pluricanonical form on RiR_i with no pole at any prime divisor there. It extends reflexively, and ORi(mKRi)≃ORi\mathcal{O}_{R_i}(mK_{R_i})\simeq\mathcal{O}_{R_i} has only constant global sections. This also proves that the character in degree mm is the mm-th power of the character χi\chi_i on the volume line.

Form the finite quotient qi:Wi→Qi=Wi/Jiq_i: W_i \to Q_i=W_i/J_i. Its branch boundary is

BQi=∑D(1−1/eD)D,B_{Q_i}=\sum_D(1-1/e_D)D,

where eDe_D is the ramification order along DD; unramified primes have coefficient zero. The quotient ramification formula gives

KWi=qi∗(KQi+BQi).K_{W_i}=q_i^*(K_{Q_i}+B_{Q_i}).

The total divisor on the right is Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier and the pair (Qi,BQi)(Q_i,B_{Q_i}) is klt. These are the finite quotient and discrepancy properties of a smooth variety with zero boundary [28]; Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartierness can also be seen by descending a sufficiently divisible local canonical power, or by taking a norm after trivializing near the finite fibre. Since JiJ_i is finite, some power of ωi\omega_i is invariant. Galois descent of rational forms, followed by the displayed ramification formula, gives

κ(Qi,KQi+BQi)≥0.\kappa(Q_i,K_{Q_i}+B_{Q_i})\ge0.

The coefficients of these boundaries lie in the fixed DCC set {1−1/e:e∈Z>0}\{1-1/e:e\in\mathbb{Z}_{>0}\}, and 1≤dim⁡Qi≤31\le\dim Q_i\le3. Effective log Iitaka fibrations in these dimensions [9] therefore give a uniform integer m∗m_*, made common to the three possible dimensions, for which

H0(Qi,OQi(⌊m∗(KQi+BQi)⌋))≠0.H^0\left(Q_i,\mathcal{O}_{Q_i}\left(\left\lfloor m_*(K_{Q_i}+B_{Q_i})\right\rfloor\right)\right)\ne0.

A section here pulls back as a rational m∗m_*-canonical form on WiW_i. The ramification formula and coefficientwise effectiveness show that it has no divisorial poles, so it is a nonzero regular form. It is invariant because it was pulled back from QiQ_i. Equation (5) now implies χim∗=1\chi_i^{m_*}=1.

Combining the factor characters. The wedge of the rational pullbacks of the ωi\omega_i to RR is the pullback of the product volume on PP. It therefore generates KRK_R, even though RR need not itself split as a product. Its character on G0G_0 is the product of the block characters, and is killed by m∗m_*. A further factor depending only on [G:G0]≤4![G:G_0]\le4! kills the character on all of GG. For example, one may multiply by the least common multiple of the integers from one to 4!4!. Equation (4.1) proves the desired uniform canonical multiple in this case.

The purely abelian case. If P=AP=A is an abelian fourfold, take the same normal Galois closure R→XR\to X. The quasi-étale map R→AR\to A is étale by purity. A connected finite étale cover of a complex abelian variety is again abelian: analytically it is obtained from a finite-index sublattice of the lattice in its universal cover, and it is projective here. Each element of GG acts integrally on H4(R,Z)H^4(R,\mathbb{Z}), a free group of rank (84)=70\binom{8}{4}=70. Its eigenvalue on the one-dimensional space H4,0(R)H^{4,0}(R) is the canonical character. If that eigenvalue has order dd, its cyclotomic polynomial divides an integral characteristic polynomial of degree 7070, and hence φ(d)≤70\varphi(d)\le70. There are only finitely many such dd. Their least common multiple kills every value of the character, and (4.1) again gives a uniform trivial multiple of KXK_X. Taking a common multiple for the two cases proves the proposition. □

Rational images of a single nonflat factor

Lemma 4.2. Suppose that a projective klt fourfold XX, with KX∼Q0K_X\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}0, has a finite quasi-étale cover P→XP\to X in which PP is one four-dimensional irreducible Calabi–Yau or irreducible holomorphic symplectic factor as above. Then the following statements hold.

(i) There is no dominant rational map from XX to a positive dimensional non-uniruled smooth projective variety of dimension less than four.

(ii) Every positive dimensional rational image of dimension less than four has rationally connected smooth projective resolution.

(iii) Every smooth projective model of XX has irregularity zero. Proof. Suppose that X⇢TX \dashrightarrow T contradicts (i), and set j=dim⁡T∈{1,2,3}j=\dim T\in\{1,2,3\}. Non-uniruledness implies that KTK_T is pseudo-effective by [6]. The minimal-model and abundance theorems in dimension at most three imply κ(T,KT)≥0\kappa(T,K_T)\ge0. In dimension three, one takes a projective Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial terminal minimal model and applies abundance for minimal threefolds [26, 24]; canonical sections are unchanged on a resolution. The lower dimensional cases are the corresponding curve and surface statements, or follow by first taking a product with an abelian variety of dimension 3−j3-j and applying the same three-dimensional results.

Choose a nonzero section η∈H0(T,mKT)\eta\in H^0(T,mK_T). Resolve the composite rational map from PP to TT, obtaining a smooth projective u ⁣:W→Pu\colon W\to P and a morphism f ⁣:W→Tf\colon W\to T. Pullback by differentials gives a nonzero tensor

s=f∗η∈H0(W,(ΩWj)⊗m).s=f^*\eta\in H^0\left(W,\left(\Omega_W^j\right)^{\otimes m}\right).

It is nonzero because the map is dominant in characteristic zero. At the function-field level it has the form s=aβ⊗ms=a\beta^{\otimes m}, where a∈C(P)∗a\in\mathbb{C}(P)^* and β\beta is a nonzero decomposable rational jj-form, obtained by pulling back a rational top form on TT.

We claim that the divisorial zero locus of ss is uu-exceptional. Choose an ample Cartier divisor HPH_P on PP, and put H=u∗HPH=u^*H_P. Since PP is canonical with trivial canonical class, KWK_W is Q\mathbb{Q}-linearly equivalent to an effective exceptional divisor. Thus it is pseudo-effective and KW⋅H3=0K_W\cdot H^3=0. Generic semipositivity gives nonnegative degrees for torsion-free quotients of ΩW1\Omega_W^1 with respect to any ample polarization [7]. It gives the same conclusion for torsion-free quotients of V=(ΩWj)⊗m\mathcal{V}=(\Omega_W^j)^{\otimes m}.

Here is the tensor step explicitly. Use an ample rational perturbation H+ϵH0H+\epsilon H_0, where H0H_0 is ample and ϵ>0\epsilon>0. The Harder–Narasimhan factors of ΩW1\Omega_W^1 have nonnegative slopes. On a sufficiently high general complete-intersection curve the filtration restricts to a filtration by semistable bundles [31]; the curve can avoid all the codimension-two loci where the sheaves or quotients fail to be locally free. Tensor products of semistable bundles in characteristic zero are semistable, with the sum of the slopes [36]. Tensor powers consequently have filtrations whose slopes are nonnegative. Exterior powers are quotients of tensor powers, so the same lower slope bound applies to V\mathcal{V} and to its torsion-free quotients. Letting ϵ\epsilon decrease to zero proves the required nonnegative degree against H3H^3.

Saturate the rank-one subsheaf generated by ss in V\mathcal{V}. It is a line bundle OW(Z)\mathcal{O}_W(Z), with Z≥0Z\ge0 the divisorial zero divisor of ss, and the quotient is torsion-free. The first Chern class of V\mathcal{V} is a positive integral multiple of KWK_W. It has degree zero against H3H^3; the preceding quotient inequality therefore gives

Z⋅H3≤0.Z\cdot H^3\le0.

Every nonexceptional prime divisor has strictly positive intersection with H3H^3, by the projection formula and ampleness on PP. Since ZZ is effective, it follows that ZZ is exceptional, as claimed.

At the generic point of a prime divisor on PP, write the rational form β\beta in a regular frame of ΩPj\Omega_P^j, and let b∈Zb\in\mathbb{Z} be the minimum order of its coefficients. The absence of divisorial zeros of ss at that point says

ord⁡(a)+mb=0.\operatorname{ord}(a)+mb=0.

Hence every coefficient of Div⁡P(a)\operatorname{Div}_P(a) is divisible by mm. Normalize PP in a field component of the extension obtained by adjoining zz with zm=az^m=a. This cover is finite and quasi-étale: at any divisorial discrete valuation, removing the uniformizer to its mm-divisible order reduces the equation to a root of a unit, which is unramified in characteristic zero. The rational form zβz\beta has no divisorial poles. It is therefore a nonzero reflexive jj-form on the cover, and remains decomposable at its generic point.

This contradicts the defining form algebra of PP. For a four-dimensional irreducible Calabi–Yau factor there are no such forms in degrees one, two or three on any quasi-étale cover. For a four-dimensional irreducible symplectic factor the only possible degree is two, and every such form is a scalar multiple of the generically nondegenerate symplectic form. Its square is nonzero, whereas the square of a decomposable two-form is zero. This proves (i).

For (ii), resolve the rational image and take its maximal rationally connected fibration. Its smooth projective base is non-uniruled [17]. A positive dimensional such base would be a rational image of XX of dimension less than four, contrary to (i). The base must be a point, which is exactly rational connectedness of the resolution.

Finally let WXW_X be a smooth projective model of XX. A regular one-form on WXW_X pulls back under the dominant generically finite rational map P⇢WXP \dashrightarrow W_X to a reflexive one-form on PP. Indeed, the rational map to the proper target is defined at all codimension-one points, and the pulled-back form is regular there; reflexive extension completes it. Pullback is injective at the function-field level in characteristic zero. The absence of one-forms on PP forces the original form to vanish. Hodge decomposition and symmetry on the smooth projective WXW_X then give h1(WX,OWX)=h0(WX,ΩWX1)=0h^1(W_X,\mathcal{O}_{W_X}) = h^0(W_X,\Omega^1_{W_X}) = 0, proving (iii).

We also need the following numerical fact about exceptional divisors. Its constants depend on the fixed birational morphism only; no uniform birational boundedness is involved.

Lemma 4.3. Let u:W→Xu: W \to X be a projective birational morphism from a smooth projective fourfold to a normal projective variety. A pseudo-effective uu-exceptional real divisor on WW is effective.

Proof. Fix a very ample Cartier divisor LL on XX, put A=u∗LA = u^*L, and fix an ample Cartier divisor HH on WW. Because AA is big, there are an integer b>0b > 0 and an effective Cartier divisor FF such that bA∼H+FbA \sim H + F. If SS is a nonexceptional prime divisor not contained in Supp⁡F\operatorname{Supp} F, then F⋅SF \cdot S is an effective codimension-two cycle. Both bAbA and HH are nef, and factoring their cubes gives

(bA)3⋅S−H3⋅S=F⋅S⋅((bA)2+bAH+H2)≥0.(bA)^3 \cdot S - H^3 \cdot S = F \cdot S \cdot\left((bA)^2 + bA H + H^2\right) \ge0.

There are only finitely many nonexceptional primes in Supp⁡F\operatorname{Supp} F, and each has positive A3A^3-degree. Increasing a constant to handle these primes gives

H3⋅S≤CA3⋅S=CL3⋅u∗SH^3 \cdot S \le CA^3 \cdot S = CL^3 \cdot u_*S

for every nonexceptional prime SS.

Let E=∑iaiEiE = \sum_i a_iE_i be exceptional and pseudo-effective. Choose effective real divisors DnD_n whose numerical classes converge to [E][E]. Write Dn=Sn+TnD_n = S_n + T_n, where SnS_n has no exceptional components and TnT_n is supported on the finitely many exceptional prime divisors of uu. Projection gives

A3⋅Sn=A3⋅Dn⟶A3⋅E=0.A^3 \cdot S_n = A^3 \cdot D_n \longrightarrow A^3 \cdot E = 0.

(4.6) implies H3⋅Sn→0H^3 \cdot S_n \to0. Choose divisor classes Q1,…,QρQ_1,\ldots,Q_\rho forming a basis of N1(W)RN^1(W)_{\mathbb{R}}, and choose cj>0c_j > 0 so that both cjH+Qjc_jH + Q_j and cjH−Qjc_jH - Q_j are ample. Effectivity gives

∣Qj⋅H2⋅Sn∣≤cjH3⋅Sn⟶0.\lvert Q_j \cdot H^2 \cdot S_n\rvert\le c_jH^3 \cdot S_n \longrightarrow0.

The Hodge index theorem makes the form (D,Q)↦D⋅Q⋅H2(D,Q) \mapsto D \cdot Q \cdot H^2 nondegenerate on N1(W)RN^1(W)_{\mathbb{R}}. Thus [Sn]→0[S_n] \to0, and consequently [Tn]→[E][T_n] \to[E].

The numerical classes of the exceptional prime divisors are linearly independent. In fact, an exceptional numerically trivial linear combination and its negative are both relatively nef. The negativity lemma forces both to be nonpositive, hence forces the combination to vanish as a divisor [28] (Lemma 3.39). Their positive cone is therefore closed and has unique coordinates in these classes. Since all TnT_n belong to that cone, so does [E][E]; independence then gives ai≥0a_i \ge0 for every ii.

Corollary 4.4. The canonical orders of the noncanonical varieties in Lemma 4.2 are uniformly bounded.

Proof. Choose a smooth projective resolution u:W→Xu : W \to X exhibiting a negative ordinary discrepancy. Its canonical divisor satisfies

KW=u∗KX+E∼QE,K_W = u^*K_X + E \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} E,

where EE is exceptional with a negative coefficient. By Lemma 4.3, KWK_W is not pseudo-effective. The uniruledness criterion of [6] implies that WW is uniruled. Its maximal rationally connected quotient consequently has dimension less than four, and its base is non-uniruled [17] (Corollary 1.4). If that base had positive dimension, the induced rational map from XX would contradict Lemma 4.2(i). Thus WW is rationally connected. Apply Proposition 3.3 directly to (X,0)(X, 0), with zero nef data. Its hypotheses are precisely klt singularities, KX∼Q0K_X \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} 0, and a rationally connected smooth resolution, all of which have been checked. Its uniform integer bounds the canonical order.

Terminal models and intermediate fibrations

Lemma 4.5. A normal projective canonical variety XX with KX∼Q0K_X \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} 0 has a projective crepant Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial terminalization V→XV \to X. The canonical orders of VV and XX are equal.

Proof. On a fixed smooth resolution, the discrepancy divisor of XX is effective. Any divisor exceptional over that resolution has positive ordinary discrepancy over the smooth resolution, and adding the pullback of an effective discrepancy divisor preserves positivity. Consequently only the finitely many exceptional divisors already on the fixed resolution can have ordinary discrepancy zero over $X.

The projective extraction theorem [2] (Corollary 1.4.3) extracts this finite list and gives a Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial variety. One may arrange its klt application as follows. Fix an integer rr with rKXrK_X Cartier, and choose an effective ample Cartier divisor HH containing all the centers of the selected valuations. Since XX is klt, choose c>0c > 0 such that (X,cH)(X, cH) is lc. Then, for every divisorial valuation EE,

ord⁡E(H)≤AX(E)c.\operatorname{ord}_E(H) \le\frac{A_X(E)}{c}.

Every exceptional log discrepancy greater than one is at least 1+1/r1 + 1/r. Choosing a positive rational δ\delta with δ/c<1/(r+1)\delta/c < 1/(r + 1) keeps all those discrepancies greater than one, while the selected log discrepancies equal to one decrease strictly below one. Take δ\delta still smaller if necessary so that (X,δH)(X, \delta H) is klt, and apply the extraction theorem to this pair and exactly the selected list. The list can be empty, in which case the theorem gives a small Q\mathbb{Q}-factorialization.

Restore boundary zero. The extracted divisors have ordinary discrepancy zero for XX, so the resulting morphism is crepant. All divisors still exceptional over the extracted variety have positive ordinary discrepancy; hence the variety is terminal. Finally, compatible canonical divisors satisfy KV=u∗KXK_V = u^*K_X. A principal multiple downstairs pulls back to the same principal multiple upstairs, and a principal multiple upstairs pushes forward to the same one downstairs. This proves equality of their exact orders.

Lemma 4.6. There is a uniform positive integer NmovN_{\mathrm{mov}} with the following property. Let VV be a projective Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial terminal fourfold with KV∼Q0K_V \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} 0, and suppose that every positive dimensional rational image of dimension less than four has rationally connected smooth projective resolution. If VV has an effective Weil divisor DD with $1 \le \kappa(V,D) \le 3,then, thenN_{\mathrm{mov}}K_V \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} 0. Proof. By Q\mathbb{Q}-factoriality, DD is Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier. Choose a small positive rational number δ\delta for which (V,δD)(V,\delta D) is klt. Its adjoint has Iitaka dimension κ(V,D)\kappa(V,D), since KV∼Q0K_V \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} 0. Apply Proposition 2.2, starting its birational program at VV, to obtain a Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial klt model V′V' and its semiample contraction

f:V′⟶Z,1≤dim⁡Z=κ(V,D)≤3.f: V' \longrightarrow Z,\qquad1 \leq\dim Z = \kappa(V,D) \leq3.

We check the canonical divisor separately from the perturbed adjoint. Choose compatible canonical representatives and a rational function hh with rKV=Div⁡(h)rK_V=\operatorname{Div}(h). Each birational contraction in the program pushes this same relation to the target, and each flip carries it to the new model by its codimension-one identification. All these models are Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial. On a common resolution their canonical pullbacks are therefore the same divisor r−1Div⁡(h)r^{-1}\operatorname{Div}(h). In particular, KV′∼Q0K_{V'}\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}0, the zero-boundary varieties are crepant, and their canonical orders are equal. They remain klt; alternatively, this follows from crepant equality starting at the terminal VV.

Now use Theorem 3.1 on the contraction f:(V′,0)→Zf:(V',0)\to Z, with zero boundary and base class zero. It gives uniform integers p0∣pp_0\mid p, a rational function ψ\psi, and generalized klt data satisfying

KV′+1p0Div⁡(ψ)=f∗DZ,DZ=KZ+BZ+MZ∼Q0,(6)K_{V'}+\frac{1}{p_0}\operatorname{Div}(\psi)=f^*D_Z,\qquad D_Z=K_Z+B_Z+M_Z\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}0, \tag*{(6)}

where BZ≥0B_Z\geq0 has coefficients in a fixed DCC set and the nef b-divisor has Cartier denominator dividing pp. The base ZZ is a rational image of VV, so its smooth projective resolution is rationally connected. Proposition 3.3 gives a uniform ll, which we enlarge to a multiple of p0p_0, such that lDZ∼0lD_Z\sim0. Multiplying (4.7) by ll then gives lKV′∼Q0lK_{V'}\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}0, hence $lK_V\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}0.

The coefficient δ\delta and the divisor DD were used only to produce a semiample model. The two uniform statements were applied afterward with boundary exactly zero, in one of the three fixed base dimensions. Their integers thus depend on neither DD nor δ\delta. A common multiple for these dimensions is NmovN_{\mathrm{mov}}.

Lemma 4.7. Let VV be a projective Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial terminal fourfold with KV∼Q0K_V\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}0. Suppose that every effective Weil divisor on VV of positive Iitaka dimension is big. Let π:Y→V\pi:Y\to V be its cyclic index cover, with deck group GG. Then every GG-equivariant rational fibration of YY with positive dimensional base and fibre has a geometric generic fibre of general type on a smooth resolution. The same conclusion holds for every such rational fibration of VV.

Proof. The variety YY is terminal. In fact, an exceptional divisorial valuation over YY restricts to an exceptional valuation over VV, and the finite discrepancy formula multiplies its log discrepancy by its positive ramification index. The log discrepancy remains strictly greater than one. Also KY∼Q0K_Y\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}0.

Consider a GG-equivariant rational fibration Y⇢TY\dashrightarrow T. Its base field C(T)\mathbb{C}(T) is relatively algebraically closed in C(Y)\mathbb{C}(Y). The invariant field C(T)G\mathbb{C}(T)^G lies in C(Y)G=C(V)\mathbb{C}(Y)^G=\mathbb{C}(V), has the same positive transcendence degree as C(T)\mathbb{C}(T), and is relatively algebraically closed in C(V)\mathbb{C}(V). For the last assertion, an element of C(V)\mathbb{C}(V) algebraic over C(T)G\mathbb{C}(T)^G is algebraic over C(T)\mathbb{C}(T), hence belongs to C(T)\mathbb{C}(T), and then is invariant. A projective model of the invariant field therefore gives a descended dominant rational map V⇢ZV\dashrightarrow Z, where 0<dim⁡Z<40<\dim Z<4.

Fix smooth projective resolutions of the maps and the bases. Thus we may use a smooth projective birational morphism u:U→Yu:U\to Y, a morphism f:U→T′f:U\to T' to a smooth model of the unquotiented base, and a morphism g:U→Z′g:U\to Z' to a projective model of the quotient base. The map gg is constant on the generic fibre of ff. Take a general hyperplane divisor HH for a very ample embedding of Z′Z'. On the domain of V⇢Z′V\dashrightarrow Z', pull it back and take its closure to obtain an effective Weil divisor DD on VV. The domain contains every codimension-one point, because VV is normal and Z′Z' is proper. The hyperplane pulls form a moving system of linearly equivalent divisors: the rational-function ratios on the domain extend as the same principal-divisor relations on VV. Some ratio is nonconstant, since dim⁡Z′>0\dim Z' > 0. Thus κ(V,D)≥1\kappa(V,D) \ge1, and DD is big by hypothesis. Write q=π∘uq = \pi\circ u. We have

q∗D=g∗H+E,q^*D = g^*H + E,

where EE is an effective uu-exceptional rational divisor. The pullback exists because VV is Q-factorial. At every nonexceptional generic divisorial point of UU, the two terms q∗Dq^*D and g∗Hg^*H agree: the finite cover takes that point to a codimension-one point of VV, where the original rational map is defined. Thus their difference is exceptional. After the resolution has been fixed, choose HH general enough that it contains none of the generic images under gg of its finitely many exceptional prime divisors. The coefficient of g∗Hg^*H at each such prime is then zero, while q∗Dq^*D is effective. This proves the claimed effectivity of EE.

Let FF be the smooth geometric generic fibre of ff. The divisor q∗Dq^*D is big on UU, and its restriction to FF is big as well. Indeed, write a big rational class as the sum of an ample rational class and an effective rational class. The integral geometric generic fibre is not contained in the support of the effective term, and the ample term restricts amply. The class g∗Hg^*H restricts trivially to FF, so (4.8) implies that E∣FE|_F is big.

Terminality and KY∼0K_Y \sim0 give

KU∼Q∑iaiEi,ai>0,K_U \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} \sum_i a_i E_i,\qquad a_i > 0,

where the sum runs over all uu-exceptional prime divisors. Since EE is effective and supported on this finite set, there is a positive rational number cc such that ∑iaiEi−cE≥0\sum_i a_i E_i - cE \ge0. Restriction to the geometric generic fibre is effective. Smooth-fibre adjunction identifies KU∣FK_U|_F with KFK_F, and therefore KFK_F is the sum, up to Q-linear equivalence, of the big divisor cE∣FcE|_F and an effective divisor. It is big, which proves that FF is of general type.

For a rational fibration of VV, use the identical argument with Y=VY = V, π=id⁡\pi= \operatorname{id}, and the trivial group. Terminality of VV provides the same positive discrepancy comparison.

We have now removed the product, noncanonical and intermediate-divisor cases by uniform index bounds. In a hypothetical sequence of unbounded indices, its remaining terminal models VV therefore have irregularity zero and no effective nonbig divisor of positive Iitaka dimension. Lemma 4.7 gives the requisite general-type fibres for both VV and its canonical cover YY. The next three sections establish chain degree bounds and the scalar and product curve estimates for these varieties; Section 8 will turn their discrepancy into birational self-maps, and Section 9 will finish the contradiction.

Generic chains and orders of sections

The canonical-index argument will produce curves of uniformly bounded degree divided by their marked multiplicity on finite product covers. We need to replace those curves by the fibres of a rational map and retain quantitative degree bounds under projection and finite quotient. This section carries out that step. Its order propagation uses the parameter-differentiation method of Ein–Küchle–Lazarsfeld [12], applied here along generic chains. For the quotient we use the stabilization strategy in Campana’s chain-equivalence construction [8], with the generic-point formulation and quantitative estimates required here. We prove the projection and finite-quotient compatibilities as well.

We work in characteristic zero and first specify the generic-point conventions used in the arguments. All finite collections of varieties, line bundles, morphisms, and sections over C\mathbb{C} descend to countable subfields. After enlarging such a field and taking its algebraic closure, we may take successive geometric generic points inside a sufficiently large algebraically closed extension. A point chosen generically at a particular stage is generic over the field of all the data already chosen. We always specify a smaller field when taking the closure of that point.

Conditions on jet-kernel dimensions involve only countably many pairs of integers: a degree and an order. For each pair, generic base change and semicontinuity on smooth opens give the corresponding generic condition. Thus their simultaneous validity at a geometric generic point is consistent with the usual very-general-point convention over C\mathbb{C}. Countably many exceptional closed sets can be included in the initial field of definition. Conversely, finite data at a geometric generic point, including a section or a marked curve, can be realized over C\mathbb{C} while preserving its genericity over that field.

We also use the following spreading convention. If new finite-type data are chosen on a geometric generic member of a family, they are defined over a field finitely generated over its function field. Spreading that field gives a dominant extension of the parameter space, and the new geometric generic fibre realizes the chosen data. Resolutions and graphs can be spread in this fashion. Section spaces and their jet kernels commute with algebraically closed field extension. No assertion about constancy of all-degree section invariants on special fibres is intended.

The rational quotient generated by marked families

Fix an integral projective variety VV. A marked covering family on VV consists of an integral parameter space SS, a dominant marked-point map u:S→Vu:S \to V, and a family of subvarieties Cb⊂VC_b \subset V containing u(b)u(b). After restricting to a dense open of SS, we require its geometric generic member to be integral of positive dimension. We use the reduced incidence in S×VS \times V; its endpoint evaluation dominates VV because it contains the graph of uu. All generic choices below are made on these opens.

Starting from a generic point aa of VV, a generic movement chooses one of the marked families, a generic point bb of a geometric component of u−1(a)u^{-1}(a) over the field of the existing path, and then a generic endpoint on CbC_b over that field together with bb.

Lemma 5.1 (Generic chains). Let a nonempty finite list of marked covering families be given on an integral projective variety VV in characteristic zero. There is a dominant rational map

ζ:V⇢M\zeta: V \dashrightarrow M

with geometrically integral generic fibre, whose fibre closures Hp⊃pH_p \supset p have a constant positive dimension ee for general pp. Starting at a generic pp, a path of at most ee generic movements reaches a point generic in HpH_p over the algebraic closure of the field of pp. Every generic movement preserves the value of ζ\zeta. In particular, a generic family member CbC_b is contained in Hu(b)H_{u(b)}.

The assignment is equivariant under any finite automorphism group preserving the family list.

Proof. Choose an algebraically closed field of definition k∗k_* and a point pp generic in VV over k∗k_*. For a tuple aa of points write Ka=k∗(a)‾K_a = \overline{k_*(a)} inside one sufficiently large algebraically closed extension. Fields for successive choices include the entire preceding path.

Every point encountered in a generic path is individually generic in its ambient space over k∗k_*. Indeed, over a generic mark of VV, all components of the geometric generic fibre of a dominant map S→VS \to V have dimension dim⁡S−dim⁡V\dim S - \dim V. A parameter generic in such a component is therefore generic in SS. The endpoint is then generic in the incidence with that parameter, and hence in VV.

We will compare paths after enlarging KpK_p. The closure of a finite path tuple over the algebraically closed field KpK_p is geometrically integral. A generic point of its base change realizes the same path after an algebraically closed field extension, with the same projected loci. For a fixed sequence of families, a prefix of length jj has total transcendence degree

∑i=1j(dim⁡Si−dim⁡V+dim⁡Cbi)\sum_{i=1}^{j}(\dim S_i-\dim V+\dim C_{b_i})

over its initial-point field: these are precisely the increments from the parameter and endpoint choices. Any tuple satisfying those incidences has at most this transcendence degree. A path generic after an algebraically closed field extension has the displayed degree there, and cannot have a smaller degree before the extension. Thus all prefix degrees agree with their upper bounds, proving the converse comparison as well. This observation also applies when a path is begun at a later endpoint and earlier path data are subsequently adjoined to its ground field.

Let djd_j be the largest dimension of the closure over KpK_p of an endpoint after jj generic movements; set d0=0d_0=0. These loci can be obtained from components of the finite-step path spaces and their projections. Appending a step makes the new endpoint locus contain the old one. To see this, the new locus contains, after extension to the field of the preceding path and the new parameter, the whole integral member of that last step. It therefore contains the previous endpoint, and hence its closure over KpK_p. Consequently djd_j is nondecreasing, d1>0d_1>0, and the first equality has the form

dh=dh+1=e,1≤h≤e≤dim⁡V.d_h=d_{h+1}=e,\qquad1\le h\le e\le\dim V.

Choose an endpoint locus HpH_p of dimension ee at length hh and a corresponding generic endpoint yy. Every possible generic next movement, made over the preceding path, has its member and endpoint in HpH_p: its endpoint locus contains HpH_p, and the equality of dimensions forces equality. By the field-extension observation this is also true for all generic choices over Kp,yK_{p,y}, without retaining the rest of the path. The new endpoint is again generic in HpH_p over KpK_p. For each family and each geometric component of its parameter fibre over the generic point of HpH_p, choose the new parameter independently of the previous path. The stabilized dimension calculation says that the endpoint image of this generic incidence is contained in HpH_p. This is an identity on the incidence over HpH_p, so it persists after each subsequent independent generic base change. Induction therefore keeps all later paths in HpH_p, with endpoints generic there over KpK_p. We use fresh generic realizations in this argument; a previously chosen endpoint need not remain generic after arbitrary old data are adjoined.

Now form endpoint loci of paths intrinsically over KyK_y, and realize their generic choices also over Kp,yK_{p,y}. They are contained in HpH_p. Because yy is generic in VV over k∗k_*, their maximum dimension at length hh is the same number ee. Every maximizing locus therefore becomes HpH_p after extension. This proves uniqueness of the maximizing locus at yy. Transporting the statement between generic points of VV proves uniqueness at a generic starting point and shows

Hy=Hpwhen y is generic in Hp over Kp.H_y=H_p\quad\text{when }y\text{ is generic in }H_p\text{ over }K_p.

Uniqueness gives descent to k∗(p)k_*(p). More explicitly, choose a projective embedding over k∗k_* and take the equation subspaces of the saturated homogeneous ideal of HpH_p through a degree generating that ideal. Every algebraic conjugate is again the unique maximizing locus. Its Grassmann coordinates are therefore invariant, and belong to k∗(p)k_*(p) in characteristic zero. They define a rational map ζ\zeta to the closure of their image, naming HpH_p. We may replace the image by its normalization. Equality of names means equality of subvarieties.

For a next step from the point yy just considered, both endpoints are generic in HpH_p over KpK_p, so (5.1) gives equality of their names. Realizing each choice generically after field extension shows that this equality holds at a generic parameter and endpoint of each family. It is therefore a rational identity on its incidence. It follows that every generic movement from a generic point preserves ξ\xi, including movements that are not part of the original maximizing path.

For completeness, fix a generic name m=ξ(p)m=\xi(p) and work over KmK_m. A generic point of any component of the geometric fibre of ξ\xi is generic in VV over k∗k_*. It belongs to the subvariety bearing its own name, so each such component is contained in the integral subvariety named mm. Conversely, a generic point of that subvariety, chosen also generically over KpK_p, has name mm by (5.1). Thus the closures of these fibres equal that integral subvariety. Characteristic zero gives geometric reducedness as well. The graph closure supplies a rational family with geometrically integral generic fibre; geometric integrality and constant dimension spread to an open of the base, by generic flatness and the constructibility of geometric fibre properties [19]. This proves the fibre assertions. Finally, a finite automorphism preserving the family list takes a maximizing locus to a maximizing locus. Uniqueness proves equivariance. The induced rational action on the name space can, if desired, be made regular by taking the closure of its graph in the product of the finitely many translates. This leaves the generic leaves unchanged.

Projection and finite-quotient compatibility

Corollary 5.2. Suppose a dominant rational map between two ambient varieties sends generic movements of an upper family list to generic movements of a lower family list, or to stationary steps. Then the image of a generic upper leaf is contained in the corresponding lower leaf.

If a finite group preserves a family list on VV and θ:V→V′\theta: V \to V' is its quotient, the subvarieties θ(Hp)\theta(H_p) are the closures of the geometrically integral generic fibres of a rational fibration on V′V'.

Proof. The lower rational name is unchanged along every projected step. Following a path that fills the upper leaf proves the first assertion. It is enough here that equality of the lower names holds at the generic point of each projected incidence: that rational identity persists when the step is realized over the additional upper path data.

For the second assertion, let p′p' be generic in V′V' and lift it to p∈Vp \in V. All lifts are conjugate, and equivariance gives the same image

Wp′=θ(Hp)W_{p'} = \theta(H_p)

for every lift. Because pp is algebraic over p′p', their algebraic closures in the fixed overfield agree: Kp=Kp′K_p = K_{p'}. The image equation subspaces descend to k∗(p′)k_*(p') by conjugation invariance, just as in the proof of Lemma 5.1. They give a rational name for Wp′W_{p'}. A point generic in Wp′W_{p'} over Kp′K_{p'} lifts to a point generic in HpH_p over KpK_p, and hence has the same name as p′p'. Conversely every ambient generic point belongs to the subvariety with its own name. The preceding fibre-of-the-name argument proves geometric integrality and identifies its fibre closure with Wp′W_{p'}.

From marked-member bounds to leaf degree

The quotient and its compatibilities depend only on the marked families. We now put a polarization on the ambient variety. The estimate below bounds the degree of a leaf by propagating section orders along a path that fills it. We first define the section-order invariant used in this argument and later in the scalar estimates.

Definition 5.3. Let VV be an integral projective variety of positive dimension, and let PP be a big, nef, semiample rational Cartier divisor on VV. For a smooth projective birational resolution π:V~→V\pi:\widetilde{V}\to V, set

γ(P;V)=sup⁡k>0 sufficiently divisible0≠s∈H0(V~,kπ∗P)ord⁡x(s)k,ρ(P;V)=(Pdim⁡V)1/dim⁡V.\gamma(P;V)=\sup_{\substack{k>0\text{ sufficiently divisible}\\0\ne s\in H^0(\widetilde{V},k\pi^*P)}}\frac{\operatorname{ord}_x(s)}{k},\qquad\rho(P;V)=(P^{\dim V})^{1/\dim V}.

where xx is very general in the smooth isomorphism locus, identified with its lift to V~\widetilde{V}. If a specified smooth point xx is used instead, write γ(P;V,x)\gamma(P;V,x), with the resolution chosen to be an isomorphism near xx. For a subvariety AA, the notation γ(P;A)\gamma(P;A) means the same invariant for the restriction of PP, pulled back to a resolution of AA.

These definitions do not depend on the chosen smooth resolution: proper birational pushforward of the structure sheaf between normal varieties and the projection formula preserve the pulled-back section spaces. Common resolutions then compare any two choices. They also allow any additional fixed divisibility requirement on kk, since taking a power of a section preserves its normalized order. The invariant is finite: on a smooth model, restrict a given nonzero section to a general complete-intersection curve through the mark, chosen not to lie in its zero divisor. Its order is at most the degree of the restricted line bundle, which is a fixed constant times kk. The invariant is positively homogeneous under rational scaling of PP and is unchanged by rational linear equivalence at a very general mark.

We will repeatedly use

γ(P;V)≥ρ(P;V).\gamma(P;V)\ge\rho(P;V).

Indeed, put n=dim⁡Vn=\dim V and choose q>0q>0 such that qπ∗Pq\pi^*P is Cartier and basepoint-free on V~\widetilde{V}. Its morphism ff to its projective image is generically finite by bigness. The Hilbert polynomial of f∗OV~f_*\mathcal{O}_{\widetilde{V}}, twisted by the hyperplane bundle of the image, gives

h0(V~,qtπ∗P)=Pnn!(qt)n+O(tn−1).h^0(\widetilde{V},qt\pi^*P)=\frac{P^n}{n!}(qt)^n+O(t^{n-1}).

The leading coefficient is the generic rank of f∗OV~f_*\mathcal{O}_{\widetilde{V}} times the degree of the image, divided by n!n!; it equals (qπ∗P)n/n!(q\pi^*P)^n/n! by the projection formula. Vanishing to order at least ll at a smooth point imposes at most (n+l−1n)\binom{n+l-1}{n} conditions. Taking l/kl/k below, and then arbitrarily close to, (Pn)1/n(P^n)^{1/n} proves (5.2).

Lemma 5.4 (Orders and degrees of chain leaves). Let the marked families and their rational quotient be as in Lemma 5.1, and let ee be the dimension of a generic leaf. Suppose that PP is a big, nef, semiample rational Cartier divisor on VV. Assume that, for every family, its geometric generic marked member satisfies one of the following bounds, with a common number B≥0B\ge0:

(i) the mark is smooth on CbC_b and γ(P;Cb,u(b))≤B\gamma(P;C_b,u(b))\le B;

(ii) CbC_b is a curve and P⋅Cb/mult⁡u(b)Cb≤BP\cdot C_b/\operatorname{mult}_{u(b)}C_b\le B.

Then on the geometric generic leaf,

γ(P;Hp)≤eB,Pe⋅Hp≤(eB)e.\gamma(P;H_p)\le eB,\qquad P^e\cdot H_p\le(eB)^e.

Proof. Choose an algebraically closed field of definition k∗k_* for the data. Let mm be a generic point of the quotient base and put Km=k∗(m)‾K_m=\overline{k_*(m)} inside the fixed algebraically closed overfield. The restriction of PP to the geometric generic leaf over KmK_m is big: the leaf sweeps VV, so it meets the generically finite locus of the morphism defined by a basepoint-free multiple of PP. Take a smooth projective resolution JJ of this leaf over KmK_m. The generic marked families and paths lift to JJ wherever the resolution is an isomorphism. A point generic in the leaf over KmK_m is generic in VV over k∗k_*. For a generic mark pp on this leaf, put Kp=k∗(p)‾K_p = \overline{k_*(p)}. Its name mm belongs to k∗(p)k_*(p). Lemma 5.1 supplies a path of length h≤eh \le e reaching a point generic in the whole leaf over KpK_p. Every intermediate mark and endpoint is generic in JJ over KmK_m: it is generic in VV and has name mm, and consequently has transcendence degree ee over KmK_m. In particular all their evaluation maps dominate JJ.

Suppose that, in a divisible degree kk, a nonzero section of kPkP has order at least an integer m0>hkBm_0 > hkB at the variable generic mark pp of JJ. In a fixed KmK_m-basis of H0(J,kP)H^0(J,kP), the kernel of the generic jet-evaluation matrix lets us choose such a section σ(p)\sigma(p) with coefficients rational in pp. Follow a path of length hh that fills the leaf generically over KpK_p.

Assume inductively that the same section has multiplicity at least mjm_j at the current mark. Let TT be the closure over KmK_m of the path tuple through the parameter bb chosen for the next step; the original point pp varies in this closure. Let I⊂T×JI \subset T \times J be the incidence obtained by adjoining the new endpoint. Both the graph of the current mark and II dominate JJ. Over the generic point of TT, the generic fibre of II is the chosen member, lifted to JJ.

Differentiate in parameter directions, keeping the variable on JJ fixed. Concretely, use derivations of Km(T)K_m(T) over KmK_m on the coefficients of σ\sigma in the fixed section basis. A line-bundle frame from JJ is regular and nonvanishing at the generic point of JJ, so it is unaffected by these derivations. At the graph of the moving mark, the multiplicity assumption is membership in the mjm_jth power of the graph ideal, after localizing over the generic parameter. Parameter differentiation drops its powers by at most one. This can also be tested after field extension to make the mark rational, using faithful flatness.

Put

rj=mj−⌊kB⌋.r_j = m_j - \lfloor kB \rfloor.

Every iterated derivative of length less than rjr_j still has order strictly greater than kBkB at the moving mark. Each such derivative vanishes identically on the chosen member. In case (i), a nonzero restriction, pulled back to its smooth resolution, would violate the assumed order bound at the smooth mark. The resolutions used in this comparison agree near the mark and can otherwise be compared on a common resolution.

In case (ii), a section with order at least ll at the ambient mark restricts to an element of the llth power of the maximal ideal of the local curve ring AA. On its normalized branches its order is at least lvi(mA)l v_i(\mathfrak m_A). The identity

mult⁡A=∑ivi(mA)\operatorname{mult} A = \sum_i v_i(\mathfrak m_A)

then shows that a nonzero restriction has degree at least lmult⁡Al\operatorname{mult} A. One way to verify this identity is to use the finite semilocal normalization A‾\overline{A}. Its quotient by mAtA‾\mathfrak m_A^t\overline{A} has length ∑ivi(mA)\sum_i v_i(\mathfrak m_A) over the algebraically closed residue field. The conductor gives a fixed cc such that

mAt+cA‾⊂mAtA⊂mAtA‾.\mathfrak m_A^{t+c}\overline{A} \subset\mathfrak m_A^t A \subset\mathfrak m_A^t\overline{A}.

Comparing leading terms in the Hilbert–Samuel lengths gives the identity. Here l>kBl > kB, whereas the degree of a nonzero restricted section is kl⋅Cb≤kBmult⁡Akl \cdot C_b \le kB\operatorname{mult} A, a contradiction.

Thus all parameter derivatives of length less than rjr_j vanish at the generic point of II. We explain why this forces order at least rjr_j along that incidence. Let

R=OT×J,ηI,F=Km(J).R = \mathcal O_{T \times J,\eta_I}, \qquad F = K_m(J).

Since II dominates both factors, this ring localizes over their generic points. It is regular, using a smooth open of TT. The conormal map

mR/mR2⟶ΩR/F⊗κ(I)\mathfrak{m}_R/\mathfrak{m}_R^2 \longrightarrow\Omega_{R/F} \otimes\kappa(I)

is injective. Indeed the residue extension is separable in characteristic zero; in the cotangent sequence the dimensions of the ambient differentials and residue differentials differ by dim⁡R\dim R, which is the conormal dimension. Equivalently, this is the generic smoothness computation for the incidence over JJ. Parameter derivations span the dual of this conormal after reduction, since RR is a localization of Km(T)⊗KmFK_m(T) \otimes_{K_m} F. Regularity identifies the associated graded ring with the symmetric algebra of the conormal. A nonzero initial form of degree a<rja < r_j is detected by a length-aa iterated parameter derivative, by the symmetric-power pairing and the invertibility of a!a!. The derivative vanishings therefore imply that our section, in the chosen frame, lies in mRrj\mathfrak{m}_R^{r_j}.

Pass to the generic parameter field and then extend it so that the independently generic endpoint is rational. The map from the ambient product to this fibre induces a local homomorphism from RR to the local ring of JJ at that endpoint. A denominator outside the incidence prime has nonzero value at its generic point and stays a unit after this extension. The incidence ideal maps into the endpoint maximal ideal; its rjr_jth power therefore maps into that maximal ideal’s rjr_jth power. The same section consequently has multiplicity at least

mj+1=rj=mj−⌊kB⌋m_{j+1}=r_j=m_j-\lfloor kB\rfloor

at the next endpoint. After hh steps it still has positive multiplicity, since m0>hkBm_0>hkB. But the endpoint is generic in JJ over KpK_p, while σ(p)\sigma(p) is a nonzero section defined over KpK_p. This is impossible. Hence γ(P;Hp)≤hB≤eB\gamma(P;H_p)\le hB\le eB. Applying (5.2) on the leaf gives the second inequality of (5.3).

Scalar jet bounds

The next result compares section orders and curve degrees with the volume of an ample rational divisor. Its hypothesis on equivariant fibrations is essential to both estimates. In the index argument, Lemma 4.7 establishes this hypothesis on the varieties to which we apply the result.

We use the normalized order invariant of Definition 5.3. The following estimates apply to rational polarizations of arbitrary denominator. All orders and section spaces are taken in sufficiently divisible degrees; taking powers shows that imposing any further fixed divisibility does not change the normalized supremum.

Theorem 6.1 (Scalar bounds). There are constants C,c>0C,c>0 with the following property. Let VV be a normal projective canonical fourfold with KV∼Q0K_V\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}0, and let a finite group GG act on VV. Suppose that every GG-equivariant rational fibration with geometrically integral generic fibre and with both base and fibre of positive dimension has geometric generic fibre of general type on a smooth projective resolution. It is enough to impose this condition on the rational quotients supplied by Lemma 5.1. If PP is an ample rational Cartier divisor satisfying g∗P∼QPg^*P\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}P for every g∈Gg\in G, then

γ(P;V)≤C(P4)1/4,ε(P;x)≥c(P4)1/4\gamma(P;V)\le C(P^4)^{1/4},\qquad\varepsilon(P;x)\ge c(P^4)^{1/4}

at a very general smooth point x∈Vx\in V, where

ε(P;x)=inf⁡x∈D⊂VD an integral curveP⋅Dmult⁡xD.\varepsilon(P;x)=\inf_{\substack{x\in D\subset V\\D\ \mathrm{an\ integral\ curve}}}\frac{P\cdot D}{\operatorname{mult}_xD}.

The constants are independent of VV, GG, and $P.

The upper estimate is the main geometric step. If a section can have large normalized order on a polarization of very small volume, its moving base locus produces smaller-dimensional covering members. Numerical subadjunction bounds their canonical degrees. Repeatedly passing to their Iitaka fibres will produce members of Kodaira dimension zero with very small section orders. If their chains fill VV, the chain-order bound contradicts the initial large section order. Otherwise they give a proper general-type leaf covered by Kodaira-dimension-zero members, contradicting Lemma 6.4. Once the upper bound is proved, a thickening of a small-degree chain leaf gives the lower curve bound.

We first establish the local numerical input. For rational Cartier classes AA, BB, we write A⪯BA \preceq B when B−AB-A is rationally linearly equivalent to an effective rational divisor. A restriction of such a comparison will always be made to a member not contained in that effective divisor.

Numerical subadjunction and moving base components

Lemma 6.2 (Numerical subadjunction at a generic lc centre). Let ZZ be a projective Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial klt variety, let Θ≥0\Theta\ge0 be a rational divisor, and let S⊂ZS \subset Z be an integral subvariety of dimension d>0d>0. Suppose that (Z,Θ)(Z,\Theta) is lc over a neighbourhood of the generic point of SS, and that SS is an lc centre there. For a nef rational Cartier divisor AA on ZZ and a smooth projective resolution S∗→SS^* \to S, one has

KS∗⋅(A∣S∗)d−1≤(KZ+Θ)∣S⋅(A∣S)d−1.K_{S^*}\cdot(A|_{S^*})^{d-1} \le(K_Z+\Theta)|_S\cdot(A|_S)^{d-1}.

Here the right-hand side means the intersection of the restricted rational line bundle with the cycle SS.

Proof. The arbitrary-boundary dlt blow-up theorem [15], Theorem 2.10 gives a projective birational morphism p:Q→Zp:Q \to Z, with QQ Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial, such that

KQ+BQ+E=p∗(KZ+Θ),(Q,BQ) dlt,E≥0,(7)K_Q+B_Q+E=p^*(K_Z+\Theta), \qquad(Q,B_Q)\ \text{dlt}, \qquad E\ge0, \tag*{(7)}

and Supp⁡E\operatorname{Supp} E lies above the non-lc locus of (Z,Θ)(Z,\Theta). The theorem allows coefficients of Θ\Theta greater than one: BQB_Q is the truncated strict transform together with the reduced exceptional divisor, and the remaining crepant boundary is the effective excess EE.

Choose a dlt stratum RR minimal by inclusion among the strata mapping onto SS. Such a stratum exists. Indeed, over the lc neighbourhood of the generic point of SS, the morphism in (6.3) is crepant, and the centre on QQ of an lc place with centre SS is a dlt stratum mapping onto SS. Dlt adjunction, in the form of the lc-centre and different theorem [27], 4.16, gives a normal RR and an effective different. Adding the restriction of EE gives an effective rational divisor ΔR\Delta_R with

KR+ΔR∼Q(KZ+Θ)∣R.K_R+\Delta_R \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} (K_Z+\Theta)|_R.

The restriction of EE is defined and effective: EE is rational Cartier and misses the generic fibre of R→SR \to S. Moreover (R,ΔR)(R,\Delta_R) is klt over the generic point of SS. Any lc centre of the dlt different dominating SS would give a smaller dlt stratum of QQ dominating SS, contrary to the choice of RR; the added excess is zero over that generic point.

Let SνS^\nu be the normalization of SS and factor the map through its normal Stein base:

R→fS′→hSν⟶S,f∗OR=OS′,h finite.R \xrightarrow{f} S' \xrightarrow{h} S^\nu\longrightarrow S, \qquad f_*\mathcal{O}_R=\mathcal{O}_{S'}, \qquad h\ \text{finite}.

Write DD for the pullback of (KZ+Θ)∣S(K_Z+\Theta)|_S to SνS^\nu. The morphism f:(R,ΔR)→S′f:(R,\Delta_R)\to S' satisfies the definition of a klt-trivial fibration in [14], Definition 3.1. It is projective, generically subklt, and its adjoint is rationally linearly equivalent to f∗h∗Df^*h^*D. The rank-one condition also holds: on a resolution over the generic base point, the rounded discrepancy divisor is effective and exceptional over RR. Allowing poles along such a divisor does not enlarge regular functions on the normal variety RR, and connectedness of the fibres then gives rank one.

Ambro’s canonical bundle formula, in the form recalled in [14], Theorem 3.5, therefore gives

h∗D∼QKS′+BS′+MS′(8)h^{*}D \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} K_{S'} + B_{S'} + M_{S'} \tag*{(8)}

where MS′M_{S'} is the trace of b-nef rational data. The discriminant BS′B_{S'} is effective. To see this even where the total pair is not lc, let PP be a prime of S′S'. Over its generic point, f∗Pf^{*}P has a divisor of multiplicity at least one and ΔR\Delta_R has nonnegative coefficient on that divisor. The corresponding threshold is therefore at most one. It can be negative, but its discriminant coefficient, one minus the threshold, remains nonnegative.

Let A′A' be the pullback to S′S' of A∣SνA|_{S_{\nu}}. Intersect (6.4) with (A′)d−1(A')^{d-1}. Both the effective discriminant and the b-nef moduli trace contribute nonnegatively. For the latter assertion, compute on a model where the moduli divisor is nef and apply the projection formula. If e=deg⁡he=\deg h, codimension-one ramification for the finite map of normal varieties gives

KS′⋅(A′)d−1≥eKSν⋅(A∣Sν)d−1.K_{S'}\cdot(A')^{d-1} \ge eK_{S_{\nu}}\cdot(A|_{S_{\nu}})^{d-1}.

These are intersections of Weil divisors with Cartier powers, so the calculation can be made on the smooth codimension-one loci. Finally, the pushforward of KS′∗K_{S' *} is KSνK_{S_{\nu}}, and its exceptional divisors pair to zero with the pulled-back power of AA. Dividing by ee proves (6.2).

The moving-base-component strategy below adapts the jets construction in [34], Sections 7–8. This method credit is distinct from the qualitative nonvanishing input in the introduction; the public jet-base-locus method and the present estimates are specified in the proof.

Lemma 6.3 (Tracking a moving base component). Let ZZ be a projective Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial klt variety of dimension n≥2n\ge2, and let NN be a big nef semiample rational Cartier divisor. Suppose there are n+1n+1 positive rational numbers, with consecutive spacing δ>0\delta>0, all strictly between (Nn)1/n(N^n)^{1/n} and γ(N;Z)\gamma(N;Z). There is a covering family of integral subvarieties S⊂ZS\subset Z of some dimension 0<d<n0<d<n such that, on a smooth projective resolution S∗S^* of its geometric generic member,

Nd⋅S≤(2/δ)n−dNn(9)N^d\cdot S\le(2/\delta)^{n-d}N^n \tag*{(9)}
KS∗⋅(N∣S∗)d−1≤(KZ+(2n/δ)N)∣S⋅(N∣S)d−1.(10)K_{S^*}\cdot(N|_{S^*})^{d-1}\le\left(K_Z+(2n/\delta)N\right)|_S\cdot(N|_S)^{d-1}. \tag*{(10)}

Proof. The moving-parameter argument follows the jet-base-locus method of [12], Proposition 2.3. We keep the subadjunction and degree estimates explicit for the rational polarizations used here. Choose a sufficiently divisible positive integer ll, clearing the denominators of NN and of the levels. It can be chosen arbitrarily large so that every jet space under consideration is nonzero: first choose a section witnessing an order above the highest level, and then take powers. At a variable very general smooth point xx, write

Vτ(x)=H0(Z,OZ(lN)⊗mx⌊lτ⌋).V_{\tau}(x)=H^0\left(Z,\mathcal{O}_Z(lN)\otimes\mathfrak{m}_x^{\lfloor l\tau\rfloor}\right).

These spaces are the fibres of generic jet kernels, and thus have rationally varying bases after restricting the parameter space.

At each level the base locus through xx is proper and has no isolated component at xx. For the second assertion, if its local base ideal were primary to mx\mathfrak{m}_x, then nn general members would have local intersection multiplicity at least (ℓτ)n(\ell\tau)^n. Successive proper cuts, discarding other base components before each cut, would give

ℓnNn≥(ℓτ)n,\ell^nN^n \ge(\ell\tau)^n,

contrary to τ>(Nn)1/n\tau> (N^n)^{1/n}. This degree argument is also detailed below for the positive-dimensional component that we use.

The base loci are nested as the level increases. Choose successively an irreducible component through xx, each contained in the next. Their dimensions are in {1,…,n−1}\{1,\ldots,n-1\}, so two consecutive components agree. Denote their common reduced component by SS, and spread it over a parameter space containing the varying mark xx. A finite extension of the parameter field may be used to name a geometric component. The resulting incidence dominates ZZ because it contains the graph of the mark.

Let τ\tau and τ+δ\tau+\delta be the two levels. We claim that the base ideal of Vτ+δ(x)V_{\tau+\delta}(x) has order at least ℓδ/2\ell\delta/2 at the generic point of SS. Differentiate a rationally varying basis of this jet space in parameter directions, keeping the spatial variable and a fixed basis of H0(Z,ℓN)H^0(Z,\ell N) constant. A derivative of length r<ℓδr<\ell\delta has order at least ℓ(τ+δ)−r>ℓτ\ell(\tau+\delta)-r>\ell\tau at the varying mark, so it belongs to the lower jet space and vanishes along the incidence of SS.

Here these derivative vanishings detect the order of the original section along the incidence. At its generic point, the ambient product is regular and both projections are dominant. Since the incidence dominates the spatial factor in characteristic zero, parameter derivations span the dual of its conormal space. The associated graded ring of the regular local ring is the symmetric algebra of that conormal space. A nonzero initial form of degree rr is detected by some iterated parameter derivative of length rr, by the characteristic-zero symmetric-power pairing. Thus all the vanishings just obtained force order at least ℓδ\ell\delta, and in particular the asserted weaker bound. This is the same local Taylor argument used in Lemma 5.4. Passing to the geometric generic parameter fibre preserves it.

Put a=n−da=n-d. The local ring of ZZ at the generic point of SS is regular of dimension aa: a sweeping member meets the smooth open of ZZ. Since SS is a component of the higher base locus, its base ideal there is primary to the maximal ideal m\mathfrak{m}, and it is contained in m⌈ℓδ/2⌉\mathfrak{m}^{\lceil\ell\delta/2\rceil}. General choices of aa members form a parameter ideal. Their intersection length, equal to its multiplicity in this regular local ring, is at least (ℓδ/2)a(\ell\delta/2)^a. Globally, take the cuts successively and discard components already contained in the base locus before the next cut. No discarded component contains the generic point of SS, since SS is itself an irreducible component of that base locus. The cuts are therefore proper at the generic point being tracked. Nefness of NN makes all discarded degree contributions nonnegative, and gives

(ℓδ/2)a(Nd⋅S)≤ℓaNn.(\ell\delta/2)^a(N^d\cdot S)\le\ell^aN^n.

This proves (6.5), as well as the isolated base-point calculation used above.

Let tt be the local lc threshold of this base ideal over the generic point of SS. A log resolution shows that tt is positive and rational. Blowing up the smooth transverse centre, whose log discrepancy is aa, gives

t≤2aℓδ.t\le\frac{2a}{\ell\delta}.

For a=1a=1 the same inequality follows by testing SS itself. Average sufficiently many general members of the higher jet space and multiply this average by tt. On a log resolution of the ideal the free parts are general and their coefficients can be made arbitrarily small. This constructs an effective rational divisor

Θ∼QbN,b=ℓt≤2aδ,\Theta\sim_{\mathbb{Q}} bN,\qquad b=\ell t\le\frac{2a}{\delta},

such that (Z,Θ)(Z,\Theta) is lc near the generic point of SS and SS is an lc centre there. Indeed a place computing the threshold has positive base-ideal order; the primary condition makes its centre equal to SS after localization. Lemma 6.2 with A=NA=N now gives (6.6), since a≤na \le n.

We will also need the following elementary consequence of a covering family.

Lemma 6.4 (Canonical dimension of a covering member). Let XX be a projective variety birational to a smooth projective variety with a nonzero pluricanonical section. A smooth projective resolution of the geometric generic member of a covering family of integral subvarieties of XX has nonnegative Kodaira dimension. If XX is of general type, that resolution is of general type.

Proof. Pass to a smooth projective model of XX and to strict transforms of the moving members. Shrink the parameter space so that the incidence has fibres of pure constant dimension. If the incidence has dimension larger than dim⁡X\dim X, intersect the parameter space in a projective closure with general hyperplanes, in number equal to that excess. Over the generic point of XX the incidence fibre embeds into the parameter space, so a general such section meets its top-dimensional part and makes the evaluation generically finite. A component of the cut incidence dominating XX dominates a component of the parameter slice, by dimension.

Choose the cutting hyperplanes with independent generic coefficients over the original field of definition. A generic point of the selected parameter slice remains generic in the original parameter space over that field: every original proper closed subset has smaller dimension after the same general cuts. Thus the argument tests the original geometric generic member, rather than a special subfamily.

Resolve and compactify the cut incidence and its evaluation to XX. The resulting generically finite morphism between smooth projective varieties satisfies

KI=q∗KX+R,R≥0.K_I = q^*K_X + R,\qquad R \ge0.

Restrict to a smooth geometric generic fibre of the parameter map. It is birational to the corresponding member, and adjunction identifies the restriction of KIK_I with its canonical divisor. A nonzero pluricanonical section of XX pulls back to a section not identically zero on this generic fibre, by dominance. This proves nonnegative Kodaira dimension. If KXK_X is big, restrict a rational decomposition of a multiple into an ample class and an effective divisor. The ample pullback is big on the generic parameter fibre, since evaluation is generically finite on its image. Its canonical class is then big.

Small adjoint volumes on Iitaka fibres

The tracking lemma produces a moving member of dimension at most three whose polarization has small volume and whose canonical degree is bounded by that volume. The next lemma isolates the lower-dimensional argument: its Iitaka fibres have Kodaira dimension zero, and adding the restricted polarization to their canonical divisor still gives small volume.

Lemma 6.5. Fix 1≤d≤31 \le d \le3 and a positive rational number C′C'. Let (Wi,Li)(W_i,L_i) be a sequence of smooth projective dd-folds with κ(Wi)≥0\kappa(W_i) \ge0 and big, nef, semiample rational Cartier divisors LiL_i. Suppose that

Lid⟶0,KWi⋅Lid−1≤C′Lid.(11)L_i^d \longrightarrow0,\qquad K_{W_i}\cdot L_i^{d-1} \le C'L_i^d. \tag*{(11)}

After passing to a subsequence and resolving the Iitaka fibrations, their smooth geometric generic fibres UiU_i have a fixed positive dimension, satisfy κ(Ui)=0\kappa(U_i)=0, and obey

vol⁡(KUi+Li∣Ui)⟶0.\operatorname{vol}(K_{U_i}+L_i|_{U_i}) \longrightarrow0.

Here LiL_i denotes its pullback to the resolved model; its restriction to UiU_i is big, nef, and semiample. When κ(Wi)=0\kappa(W_i)=0, the fibre UiU_i means WiW_i itself.

Proof. Suppress the sequence index. We first bound the volume of every fixed positive adjoint combination on WW, then compare it with the volume on an Iitaka fibre. For every fixed positive rational number aa, we claim that

vol⁡(aKW+L)⟶0.(12)\operatorname{vol}(aK_W+L) \longrightarrow0. \tag*{(12)}

Choose a general divided member of a sufficiently divisible free multiple of L/aL/a. It gives an effective klt boundary Γ∼QL/a\Gamma\sim_{\mathbb{Q}} L/a. This boundary is big, and so is KW+ΓK_W+\Gamma, since κ(W)≥0\kappa(W)\geq0. The klt log-general-type model and finite-generation theorem [2] gives a Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial klt log terminal model. Its nef big adjoint is semiample by the klt basepoint-free theorem [28]: apply it to a Cartier multiple of the adjoint, whose sufficiently large multiple minus the adjoint is again nef and big.

On a common smooth resolution, let PaP_a be aa times the pullback of this semiample adjoint. The negative-map comparison, using the negativity lemma [28], gives

aKW+L∼QPa+Fa,Fa≥0aK_W+L\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}P_a+F_a,\qquad F_a\geq0

after pullback, with FaF_a exceptional over the model. Sections in divisible degrees are unchanged by this exceptional part, so Pad=vol⁡(aKW+L)P_a^d=\operatorname{vol}(aK_W+L). All occurrences of LL on the resolution mean its nef pullback. The Khovanskii–Teissier inequality gives

(aKW+L)⋅Ld−1≥Pa⋅Ld−1≥(Pad)1/d(Ld)(d−1)/d.(aK_W+L)\cdot L^{d-1}\geq P_a\cdot L^{d-1}\geq(P_a^d)^{1/d}(L^d)^{(d-1)/d}.

For completeness, the nef mixed-intersection inequalities used here follow by ample perturbation and passage to the limit from the surface Hodge index theorem, applied on general complete-intersection surfaces. Combining with (6.7), we obtain the explicit bound

vol⁡(aKW+L)≤(aC′+1)dLd,(13)\operatorname{vol}(aK_W+L)\leq(aC'+1)^dL^d, \tag*{(13)}

which proves the claim.

Pass to a subsequence on which j=κ(W)j=\kappa(W) is fixed. Since d≤3d\leq3, effective Iitaka fibrations in the zero-boundary case give an integer m0=m0(d)>0m_0=m_0(d)>0 such that ∣m0KW∣|m_0K_W| gives the Iitaka fibration; see [9]. The case j=dj=d is impossible for large sequence index. Resolving that linear system would produce an integral free moving part with generically finite map and top self-intersection at least one. Thus vol⁡(KW)≥m0−d\operatorname{vol}(K_W)\geq m_0^{-d}, whereas vol⁡(KW+L)⟶0\operatorname{vol}(K_W+L)\longrightarrow0 by (6.8) and LL has effective multiples.

If 0<j<d0<j<d, resolve the Iitaka system, its Stein base, and the induced map to obtain a morphism of smooth projective varieties

f:W⟶Tf:W\longrightarrow T

with connected fibres. There is an integral big basepoint-free divisor HH on TT, pulled back from the hyperplane class of the system’s image, such that

f∗H⪯m0KW,Hj≥1.(14)f^*H\preceq m_0K_W,\qquad H^j\geq1. \tag*{(14)}

We continue to write WW for the resulting smooth model and LL for its pullback. The previous intersection estimates persist: canonical divisors under further smooth resolutions acquire effective exceptional terms, and these pair to zero against Ld−1L^{d-1}.

Let UU be a smooth integral geometric generic fibre of ff and put g=d−j>0g=d-j>0. Then KW∣U∼KUK_W|_U\sim K_U, and L∣UL|_U is big because these fibres move. We recall explicitly that κ(U)=0\kappa(U)=0. A nonzero canonical multiple on WW restricts nontrivially to the generic fibre, so κ(U)≥0\kappa(U) \ge0. If a system ∣kKU∣|kK_U| had positive-dimensional image, its sections would extend over the generic base after twisting kKWkK_W by vf∗Hv f^*H for a sufficiently large vv. Indeed the coherent direct image of kKWkK_W has the required generic fibre of sections, and a sufficiently large multiple of the big divisor HH makes it generically generated, using a decomposition into ample and effective parts. By (6.10), the twist is absorbed into a further canonical multiple. The resulting section ratio is nonconstant on the geometric generic fibre and hence transcendental over C(T)\mathbb{C}(T). Products with sections of ∣m0KW∣|m_0K_W| also preserve the jj independent base ratios. This would force κ(W)>j\kappa(W) > j, a contradiction. When j=0j = 0, simply put U=WU = W and g=dg = d.

We next show that

vol⁡(KU+L∣U)⟶0.(15)\operatorname{vol}(K_U + L|_U) \longrightarrow0. \tag*{(15)}

For j=0j = 0 this is (6.8). If j>0j > 0 and g=1g = 1, then κ(U)=0\kappa(U) = 0 implies deg⁡KU=0\deg K_U = 0, and the volume in question equals deg⁡(L∣U)\deg(L|_U). Set A=f∗HA = f^*H. Nef mixed-intersection log-concavity and (6.10) give

AjLd−j≤(ALd−1Ld)jLd≤(m0C′)jLd⟶0.A^jL^{d-j} \le\left(\frac{AL^{d-1}}{L^d}\right)^j L^d \le(m_0C')^jL^d \longrightarrow0.

One may add a positive multiple of LL to AA and pass to the limit if a mixed intersection vanishes. The projection formula and Hj≥1H^j \ge1 show that this bounds deg⁡(L∣U)\deg(L|_U) from above.

The only remaining case is d=3d = 3, j=1j = 1, and g=2g = 2. Now TT is a smooth curve and HH is ample. A basepoint-free pencil in ∣H∣|H| and its ramification divisor give KT+2H⪰0K_T + 2H \succeq0. Consequently

KW/T+L+2f∗H⪯(1+4m0)KW+L.(16)K_{W/T} + L + 2f^*H \preceq(1 + 4m_0)K_W + L. \tag*{(16)}

Choose an effective klt rational boundary linearly equivalent to LL from its semiample system. The twisted weak positivity theorem [16] [Theorem 1.1] applies to ff with this boundary. Thus for sufficiently divisible ll the locally free sheaf

El=f∗OW(l(KW/T+L))E_l = f_*\mathcal{O}_W\bigl(l(K_{W/T} + L)\bigr)

is weakly positive. Here smoothness, projectivity, connected fibres, and effectivity of the klt boundary are all satisfied; on the smooth curve a torsion-free direct image is locally free.

Choose l≥1l \ge1, separately for each member of the sequence, so that the ll-th Veronese of the section algebra of KU+L∣UK_U + L|_U is generated in degree one. Such an ll exists by the same big klt adjoint model and finite-generation theorem used above. Enlarge it to clear the chosen rational linear equivalence. Weak positivity gives b>0b > 0 for which

Sym⁡bEl⊗OT(bH)\operatorname{Sym}^b E_l \otimes\mathcal{O}_T(bH)

is generated by global sections at the generic point. For every positive multiple qq of bb, symmetric multiplication and the degree-one generation on the generic fibre therefore give global sections of

ql(KW/T+L)+qf∗Hql(K_{W/T} + L) + qf^*H

spanning the degree-qlql fibre sections. Select a basis over C(T)\mathbb{C}(T) among their restrictions, of cardinality h0(U,ql(KU+L∣U))h^0(U, ql(K_U + L|_U)). Multiplying by a basis of H0(T,qlH)H^0(T, qlH) gives linearly independent products over C\mathbb{C}: any relation can first be tested using independence over C(T)\mathbb{C}(T) and then independence of the base sections. Multiplication by a nonzero section of (ql−q)H(ql-q)H places these products in degree qlql of KW/T+L+2f∗HK_{W/T} + L + 2f^*H. Curve Riemann–Roch and the asymptotic fibre section formula, with ll fixed and q→∞q \to\infty through these multiples, yield

vol⁡((1+4m0)KW+L)≥vol⁡(KW/T+L+2f∗H)≥d!q!deg⁡(H)vol⁡(KU+L∣U).(17)\operatorname{vol}\left((1+4m_0)K_W+L\right)\ge\operatorname{vol}\left(K_{W/T}+L+2f^*H\right) \ge\frac{d!}{q!}\deg(H)\operatorname{vol}\left(K_U+L|_U\right). \tag*{(17)}

The first expression tends to zero by (6.8), and deg⁡H≥1\deg H \ge1. This proves (6.11) in every case.

The upper order estimate

Proof of the upper bound in Theorem 6.1. If no uniform C exists, rational rescaling gives a sequence of the data in the theorem, with polarizations denoted MM, such that

M4⟶0,γ(M;V)>1.(18)M^4 \longrightarrow0,\qquad\gamma(M;V)>1. \tag*{(18)}

The proof decreases the dimension while retaining small volume and an effective canonical upper bound. At each stage we first extract a moving base component, then pass to a Kodaira-dimension-zero fibre of its Iitaka fibration, and finally replace a big adjoint by its semiample model. The process stops when its section-order invariant tends to zero. Tracing the effective divisor comparisons back will construct covering families of positive-dimensional proper subvarieties A⊂VA \subset V whose geometric generic members satisfy

κ(A∗)=0,γ(M;A)⟶0.(19)\kappa(A^*)=0,\qquad\gamma(M;A)\longrightarrow0. \tag*{(19)}

All constructions can be made successively on geometric generic members. To be precise, choose countable fields of definition for the sequence. A geometric generic datum over such a field can be realized over C to apply the model and positivity theorems used here. The resulting finite collection of varieties, morphisms, and divisors descends again to a field finitely generated over the preceding generic parameter field. Spreading it out therefore gives a dominant extension of the preceding parameter space: the old generic parameter is never specialized. Formation of section spaces and of their jet kernels commutes with field extension, so the generic all-degree order comparisons are preserved. There are only finitely many stages for each variety, and countably many varieties in the sequence.

Begin with a small projective Q-factorialization Z→VZ \to V, which exists for the klt variety VV by [2], Corollary 1.4.3, and let NN be the pullback of MM to ZZ. We describe a stage of the construction. After passing to a subsequence, its dimension nn is fixed and the following properties hold:

(i) ZZ is projective Q-factorial klt and NN is big, nef, and semiample, with Nn→0N^n \to0;

(ii) a smooth projective model of ZZ has nonnegative Kodaira dimension;

(iii) KZ⪯a0NK_Z \preceq a_0N for a fixed positive rational number a0a_0;

(iv) γ(N;Z)\gamma(N;Z) is bounded below by a positive constant.

Initially these assertions follow from (6.14), canonicity, and crepantness of the small morphism. If n=1n=1, they cannot all hold, since the order of a section on a smooth curve is bounded by its degree. We may therefore assume n≥2n \ge2.

Choose n+1n+1 fixed rational jet levels, equally spaced by δ>0\delta>0, below the lower bound in (iv). For all sufficiently large sequence indices they are above (Nn)1/n(N^n)^{1/n}. Apply Lemma 6.3. Write $W=S^* for a resolution of its geometric generic moving member and L=N∣WL=N|_W, and pass to a subsequence with fixed d=dim⁡W<nd=\dim W<n. The divisor LL is nef and semiample, and is big because a sweeping member meets the open set on which the semiample map of NN is generically finite. Lemma 6.4 gives κ(W)≥0\kappa(W)\ge0. Restricting the effective comparison in (iii) to the moving member and using the tracking bounds yields

Ld⟶0,KW⋅Ld−1≤C′Ld(20)L^d \longrightarrow0,\qquad K_W\cdot L^{d-1}\le C'L^d \tag*{(20)}

with the fixed constant C′=a0+2n/δC'=a_0+2n/\delta at this stage.

Apply Lemma 6.5 to these moving members. After passing to a subsequence and resolving their Iitaka systems, let UU be the smooth geometric generic Iitaka fibre, with U=WU=W when κ(W)=0\kappa(W)=0, and put g=dim⁡Ug=\dim U. Then

0<g≤d<n,κ(U)=0,vol⁡(KU+L∣U)⟶0.0<g\le d<n,\qquad\kappa(U)=0,\qquad\operatorname{vol}(K_U+L|_U)\longrightarrow0.

The restricted divisor L∣UL|_U is big, nef, and semiample. The generic field and spreading convention above keeps these fibres in covering families over the preceding parameter space.

To continue the dimension descent, we need a semiample polarization that still bounds the original restricted sections from above. Take an effective klt boundary Γ∼QL∣U\Gamma\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}L|_U from the free system, and take a big klt good model of KU+ΓK_U+\Gamma, as in the proof of Lemma 6.5. Write Z′Z' for its Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial klt underlying variety and N′N' for its big semiample adjoint. Then

(N′)g=vol⁡(KU+L∣U)⟶0.(N')^g=\operatorname{vol}(K_U+L|_U)\longrightarrow0.

On a smooth common resolution with maps aa to UU and bb to Z′Z', the negative-map comparison reads

a∗(KU+Γ)=b∗N′+F,F≥0 exceptional over Z′.(21)a^*(K_U+\Gamma)=b^*N'+F,\qquad F\ge0\text{ exceptional over }Z'. \tag*{(21)}

For any effective ΔU∼QKU\Delta_U\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}K_U, we have

F≤a∗ΔU.(22)F\le a^*\Delta_U. \tag*{(22)}

Indeed, for sufficiently divisible mm, every effective divisor in ∣mb∗N′+mF∣|mb^*N'+mF| contains mFmF. Its pushforward is an effective divisor in ∣mN′∣|mN'| on the normal variety Z′Z', and pulling that Cartier divisor back leaves exactly the exceptional summand mFmF. But ma∗ΔU+Yma^*\Delta_U+Y belongs to this system when YY is a general member of the free system ∣ma∗(L∣U)∣|ma^*(L|_U)|. Choose YY avoiding every component of FF. Comparing coefficients proves (6.18). In particular,

a∗(L∣U)⪯b∗N′.(23)a^*(L|_U)\preceq b^*N'. \tag*{(23)}

If γ(N′;Z′)⟶0\gamma(N';Z')\longrightarrow0 on a subsequence, we stop. Otherwise, on a subsequence it is bounded below by a positive constant, and we repeat with (Z′,N′)(Z',N'). The four stage conditions hold: KZ′⪯N′K_{Z'}\preceq N' because the pushed-forward boundary is effective, and a smooth model of Z′Z' is birational to UU, which has Kodaira dimension zero. The dimension has decreased strictly, from nn to g≤d<ng\le d<n. The construction must stop, since on a curve maximum normalized section order is at most the degree.

We verify that the stopping condition proves (6.15) for the original polarization. Every moving member and fibre used above spreads to a covering family over the preceding generic parameter space. Its map to its image in that space, and ultimately in VV, is birational: a moving member meets the open set of isomorphism of each relevant birational model map. For a subsequent member in Z′Z', take its strict transform on the common resolution, so it has an actual morphism back to UU. The effective comparisons (6.19) restrict to these members, since they are not contained in the extra divisors. Their successive restrictions compare the pullback of the original MM with the final N′N' on a common resolution. Multiplication by the effective differences injects section spaces in divisible degrees, and at a generic marked point those differences do not vanish. Birational pullback between normal projective models preserves the section spaces. Thus the final image A⊂VA \subset V satisfies

γ(M;A)≤γ(N′;Z′)⟶0,κ(A∗)=κ(U)=0.\gamma(M; A) \leq\gamma(N'; Z') \longrightarrow0,\qquad\kappa(A^*) = \kappa(U) = 0.

Composing the dominant incidence evaluations proves that these images form a covering family. They have positive dimension and are proper because the first tracking step already decreased dimension.

Mark a generic smooth point on these members and add every GG-translate of the marked family. All data can be defined over one countable field; invariance of MM preserves the order bound. Lemma 5.1 gives a GG-equivariant rational quotient, and Lemma 5.4 bounds the section order on its geometric generic leaf by its dimension times BB, where B⟶0B \longrightarrow0. If the leaf has dimension four, this gives γ(M;V)≤4B\gamma(M; V) \leq4B, contradicting (6.14). Otherwise it gives a GG-equivariant rational fibration with positive-dimensional base and fibre. The geometric generic leaf is of general type by hypothesis.

That leaf is nevertheless covered by members of Kodaira dimension zero. To see that the assertion is about generic members, restrict the marked incidence to its generic leaf name. A component still dominates the leaf by marked-point evaluation. Its generic parameter is generic in the original parameter space over the original field, because it is obtained by geometric extension over the generic name. The quotient is generically constant on each such member, and its strict transforms give a covering family on a resolution of the leaf. This contradicts Lemma 6.4. The upper bound follows. □

The lower curve estimate

Proof of the lower bound in Theorem 6.1. Rescale rationally so that 1≤P4≤21 \leq P^4 \leq2. If no uniform positive lower bound exists, there is a sequence of marked covering families of integral curves with

P⋅Dmult⁡xD≤B,B⟶0.\frac{P \cdot D}{\operatorname{mult}_x D} \leq B,\qquad B \longrightarrow0.

Here the marks can be chosen generic over countable fields of definition. Indeed, failure of a very general bound still gives a bad mark after excluding the countably many proper closed subsets over such a field. Choose a curve witnessing a strict upper bound there and spread the curve and its mark over their field of definition. The mark evaluation is dominant, and degree and multiplicity agree with those of the geometric generic data. Include all GG-translates if necessary; they obey the same ratio bound.

Take the rational quotient from Lemma 5.1. After passing to a subsequence with fixed leaf dimension h>0h > 0, Lemma 5.4 gives, on its geometric generic leaf HH,

Ph⋅H≤(hB)h.(24)P^h \cdot H \leq(hB)^h. \tag*{(24)}

For large sequence index it cannot have dimension four, since P4≥1P^4 \geq1. Put s=4−h>0s = 4 - h > 0. Resolve the leaf fibration to a morphism f ⁣:X→Tf \colon X \to T between smooth projective varieties with geometrically integral generic fibre, and let π ⁣:X→V\pi\colon X \to V be the resulting birational morphism. Continue to write PP for π∗P\pi^*P.

Choose a smooth integral very general fibre FF of ff. It can be chosen not contained in any of the countably many proper closed sets excluded by the all-degree upper order bound, nor in the exceptional locus of π\pi. For clarity, over a smooth open of the base, each proper closed set of XX contains the whole fibre only over a proper closed subset of TT, by properness and upper semicontinuity of fibre dimension. Exclude these countably many subsets first, then choose a point x∈Fx \in F outside their intersections with FF. Thus π\pi is an isomorphism near xx and

γ(P;V)≤C21/4(25)\gamma(P;V) \le C2^{1/4} \tag*{(25)}

holds at π(x)\pi(x) in every divisible degree. The degree Ph⋅FP^h \cdot F equals the geometric generic degree in (24).

Let I=IF⊂OXI=I_F\subset\mathcal{O}_X. Since FF is a smooth fibre over a smooth point of the ss-dimensional base, it is regularly embedded and has trivial conormal bundle of rank ss. Consequently

Ik/Ik+1≃Sym⁡k(OF⊕s)≃OF⊕(k+s−1s−1).I^k/I^{k+1}\simeq\operatorname{Sym}^k(\mathcal{O}_F^{\oplus s})\simeq\mathcal{O}_F^{\oplus\binom{k+s-1}{s-1}}.

The filtration by powers of II therefore bounds the rank of restriction to the uu-th thickening, for every u≥1u\geq1 and every divisible ll, by

h0(X,OX(lP)⊗(OX/Iu))≤(u+s−1s)h0(F,lP∣F).(26)h^0\left(X,\mathcal{O}_X(lP)\otimes(\mathcal{O}_X/I^u)\right)\leq\binom{u+s-1}{s}h^0(F,lP|_F). \tag*{(26)}

No vanishing theorem uniform in uu is required for this inequality.

Fix D>C21/4D>C2^{1/4} and set u=⌈Dl⌉u=\lceil Dl\rceil. The pullback of PP is big and semiample on XX, and its restriction to FF is big and semiample because FF meets the birational isomorphism locus. The semiample Hilbert-polynomial asymptotics show that the leading coefficient, after division by l4l^4, on the right-hand side of (26) is

Ds(Ph⋅F)s!h!≤Ds(hB)hs!h!.\frac{D^s(P^h\cdot F)}{s!h!}\leq\frac{D^s(hB)^h}{s!h!}.

Choose the sequence index first so that this is strictly less than 1/4!1/4!, hence less than P4/4!P^4/4!. Then choose a sufficiently large divisible ll for this fixed example. Since

h0(X,lP)=P44!l4+O(l3),h^0(X,lP)=\frac{P^4}{4!}l^4+O(l^3),

restriction to the thickening has a nonzero kernel. A kernel section lies in IuI^u, and Ixu⊂mxuI_x^u\subset m_x^u. It therefore has order at least u≥Dlu\geq Dl at xx. Normality gives π∗OX=OV\pi_*\mathcal{O}_X=\mathcal{O}_V, so it is a section downstairs as well, with the same order at the point where π\pi is an isomorphism. This contradicts (25). Rescaling back proves the lower bound, and completes the theorem.

Quadratic jet cost for diagonal cyclic products

We prove a bound for diagonal products of the canonical cyclic cover. The constant in the bound depends only on an upper bound for normalized section orders on the original fourfold. In particular, it is independent of the order of the cover.

The diagonal rank-deficit and determinant-order strategy adapts the Frobenius construction of [34]. The cyclic many-factor weights, estimates, and constants needed here are supplied below; the abundance conclusion of that reference is not an input to this argument.

Proposition 7.1. Let XX be a normal projective canonical fourfold over C\mathbb{C} with KX∼Q0K_X\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}0, and let rr be the least positive integer such that rKX∼0rK_X\sim0. Let π:Y→X\pi:Y\to X be its canonical cyclic cover, with group μr\mu_r. Fix C1∈Q>0C_1\in\mathbb{Q}_{>0}, and choose b0∈Q>0b_0\in\mathbb{Q}_{>0} satisfying

3(2b0)4<14,b0(C1+1)<34.(27)3(2b_0)^4<\frac{1}{4},\qquad b_0(C_1+1)<\frac{3}{4}. \tag*{(27)}

Suppose that LL is an ample rational Cartier divisor on XX such that

1≤L4≤2,γ(L;X)≤C1,1 \le L^4 \le2,\qquad\gamma(L;X) \le C_1,

where γ\gamma is as in Definition 5.3. For each integer t≥2t \ge2, set

Zt=Yt/μr,diag,θt:Zt⟶Xt,Pt=θt∗(∑i=1tpr⁡i∗L).Z_t = Y^t/\mu_{r,\mathrm{diag}},\qquad\theta_t: Z_t \longrightarrow X^t,\qquad P_t = \theta_t^*\left(\sum_{i=1}^{t}\operatorname{pr}_i^* L\right).

Then PtP_t is ample and, at a very general point zz of ZtZ_t,

ε(Pt;z)≤5t2b0.\varepsilon(P_t;z) \le\frac{5t^2}{b_0}.

Suppose the asserted curve bound fails. The resulting surplus of ordinary jets will produce, after reduction to characteristic pp, a map of vector bundles that has full rank at a general product point. On the diagonal its rank is at most one quarter of the target rank. A nonzero maximal minor must consequently vanish to high order there. The section-order bound downstairs will give a strictly smaller upper bound for that same minor at one diagonal point.

The next three lemmas supply the estimates in this comparison. The truncated-power slope bound controls the graded pieces on the Frobenius diagonal. The fixed flag converts those slopes into a bound for their spaces of sections, hence for the diagonal rank. The external-product order lemma bounds the minor by the sum of its slot orders and rules out a larger order caused by cancellation. We first establish these estimates on vector bundles. For a vector bundle EE on a smooth projective curve, write μmin⁡(E)\mu_{\min}(E) and μmax⁡(E)\mu_{\max}(E) for the smallest and largest slopes in its Harder–Narasimhan filtration.

Lemma 7.2. Let CC be a smooth projective integral curve of genus gg over an algebraically closed field kk of characteristic p>0p > 0. Let VV be a vector bundle of rank nn with μmin⁡(V)≥0\mu_{\min}(V) \ge0, and put

G=max⁡{0,2g−2},u=n(p−1),c2=n(n−1)G.G = \max\{0,2g-2\},\qquad u = n(p-1),\qquad c_2 = n(n-1)G.

Let A∙(V)A_\bullet(V) denote the symmetric algebra of VV modulo the ideal locally generated by the pp-th powers of its linear generators. Thus, in a local frame, A∙(V)A_\bullet(V) is the graded algebra OC[v1,…,vn]/(v1p,…,vnp)\mathcal{O}_C[v_1,\ldots,v_n]/(v_1^p,\ldots,v_n^p). Its graded pieces are locally free, it is zero in degrees above uu, and

μmax⁡(Aj(V))≤(p−1)deg⁡(V)+c2(0≤j≤u).\mu_{\max}(A_j(V)) \le(p-1)\deg(V)+c_2\qquad(0\le j\le u).

Proof. We use the canonical-connection approach to Frobenius instability; see Langer [29], §2, Corollaries 2.4 and 6.2. We give the estimate and tensor argument explicitly to retain the constants needed for the many-factor diagonal. Let FCF_C denote absolute Frobenius. For every vector bundle UU of rank nn, we first claim that

μmin⁡(FC∗U)≥pμmin⁡(U)−(n−1)G.\mu_{\min}(F_C^*U) \ge p\mu_{\min}(U)-(n-1)G.

The pullback FC∗UF_C^*U carries the connection given by componentwise differentiation in pulled-back frames: the transition matrices have pp-th-power entries. Write the strictly decreasing slopes of its Harder–Narasimhan factors as ν1>⋯>νa\nu_1 > \cdots> \nu_a. If some successive gap is greater than GG, take the last such gap, and let SS be the saturated filtration step immediately before that gap. Then

μmin⁡(S)>μmax⁡((FC∗U)/S)+deg⁡(ΩC1).\mu_{\min}(S) > \mu_{\max}\left((F_C^*U)/S\right)+\deg(\Omega_C^1).

Consequently the second fundamental map

S⟶((FC∗U)/S)⊗ΩC1S \longrightarrow((F_C^*U)/S) \otimes\Omega_C^1

vanishes, so SS is preserved by the connection.

Here this invariance gives Frobenius descent directly. At the function field K=k(C)K = k(C), choose a matrix whose columns form a basis of the subspace SKS_K and whose rows in a suitable index set form the identity matrix. Differentiating its columns gives vectors in SK⊗ΩK/k1S_K \otimes\Omega_{K/k}^1. Their identity rows are zero, so these differentiated columns are all zero. Every matrix entry therefore lies in KpK^p. Indeed [K:Kp]=p[K : K^p] = p for a one-variable function field over a perfect field, and the nonzero derivation d:K→ΩK/k1d : K \to\Omega_{K/k}^1 has kernel KpK^p. Extracting roots of the matrix entries produces a subspace of UKU_K. Let S0⊂US_0 \subset U be its saturation. Since CC is smooth, U/S0U/S_0 is locally free. Frobenius is flat, so FC∗S0F_C^*S_0 is saturated in FC∗UF_C^*U. It has the same generic fibre as SS, hence equals SS.

Put Q=(FC∗U)/SQ = (F_C^*U)/S. By descent it is the Frobenius pullback of a locally free quotient of UU, and therefore μ(Q)≥pμmin⁡(U)\mu(Q) \ge p\mu_{\min}(U). By the choice of the last large gap, all successive Harder–Narasimhan slope gaps of QQ are at most GG. Its average slope exceeds its smallest slope by at most (n−1)G(n-1)G. Moreover μmin⁡(Q)=μmin⁡(FC∗U)\mu_{\min}(Q) = \mu_{\min}(F_C^*U). These observations prove (7.4). If there is no gap greater than GG, the same argument applies with S=0S = 0 and Q=FC∗UQ = F_C^*U.

Iteration, using μmin⁡(V)≥0\mu_{\min}(V) \ge0, gives for every e≥1e \ge1

μmin⁡((FCe)∗V)≥−(n−1)Gpe−1p−1.\mu_{\min}\left((F_C^e)^*V\right) \ge-(n-1)G\frac{p^e-1}{p-1}.

We next deduce a tensor estimate without assuming tensor semistability in characteristic pp. For each ee, choose a line bundle TeT_e of integral degree ded_e such that

2g−μmin⁡((FCe)∗V)≤de<2g+1−μmin⁡((FCe)∗V).2g-\mu_{\min}\left((F_C^e)^*V\right) \le d_e < 2g+1-\mu_{\min}\left((F_C^e)^*V\right).

The bundle Ve=(FCe)∗V⊗TeV_e=(F_C^e)^*V\otimes T_e is globally generated. In fact, after subtracting any point its minimum slope is at least 2g−12g-1, so Serre duality and the slope criterion for a nonzero homomorphism give H1(C,Ve(−x))=0H^1(C,V_e(-x))=0; evaluation at xx is therefore surjective.

Let QiQ_i be any positive-rank torsion-free quotient of V⊗iV^{\otimes i}. Its pullback, twisted by Te⊗iT_e^{\otimes i}, is a quotient of Ve⊗iV_e^{\otimes i}, hence is globally generated and has nonnegative degree. Thus

peμ(Qi)+ide≥0.p^e\mu(Q_i)+id_e\ge0.

Divide by pep^e and let ee tend to infinity. The upper bound for ded_e and (7.5) imply

μ(Qi)≥−i(n−1)Gp−1.\mu(Q_i)\ge-\frac{i(n-1)G}{p-1}.

Since Ai(V)A_i(V) is a quotient of V⊗iV^{\otimes i}, the same lower bound holds for its minimum slope. For 0≤i≤u0\le i\le u, it is at least −c2-c_2.

Multiplication in the truncated algebra is a perfect pairing

Aj(V)⊗Au−j(V)⟶Au(V).A_j(V)\otimes A_{u-j}(V)\longrightarrow A_u(V).

In a frame, each monomial pairs with its unique complementary exponent monomial, with coefficient one. The top line has transition character (det⁡V)p−1(\det V)^{p-1}: this follows for diagonal changes of frame and for elementary changes of frame, which generate the general linear group. It follows that

Aj(V)∗⊗(det⁡V)p−1≃Au−j(V).A_j(V)^*\otimes(\det V)^{p-1}\simeq A_{u-j}(V).

Its minimum slope is at least −c2-c_2. Slope duality now gives (7.3).

Lemma 7.3. Let WW be a smooth projective fourfold over an algebraically closed field, and let HH be an ample rational Cartier divisor. Fix a smooth complete intersection flag, cut successively by divisors from ∣l1H∣\lvert l_1H\rvert, ∣l2H∣\lvert l_2H\rvert, and ∣l3H∣\lvert l_3H\rvert, ending in a smooth integral curve CC; here each liHl_iH is an integral ample divisor. Write di=liH⋅Cd_i=l_iH\cdot C. If EE is a vector bundle of rank ee and μmax⁡(E∣C)≤M\mu_{\max}(E\vert_C)\le M for a real number M≥0M\ge0, then

h0(W,E)≤e(M+1)∏i=13(1+Mdi).(28)h^0(W,E)\le e(M+1)\prod_{i=1}^{3}\left(1+\frac{M}{d_i}\right). \tag*{(28)}

Proof. Successive applications of the divisor exact sequences along the flag bound h0(W,E)h^0(W,E) by

∑k1,k2,k3≥0h0(C,E∣C⊗OC(−∑i=13kiliH)).(29)\sum_{k_1,k_2,k_3\ge0}h^0\left(C,E\vert_C\otimes\mathcal{O}_C\left(-\sum_{i=1}^{3}k_il_iH\right)\right). \tag*{(29)}

To justify the iterations, at each flag stage and with the preceding twists fixed, sufficiently negative ample twists have no sections. A vector bundle on that stage embeds into a finite direct sum of copies of a sufficiently positive ample line bundle, by dualizing a global generation map for its dual. This gives the required vanishing and allows each iteration of the exact sequence to terminate. Enlarging the resulting finite sums to (7.8) can only increase the bound.

A summand vanishes when ∑ikidi>M\sum_i k_id_i>M, because its maximum slope is then negative. Each summand is at most e(M+1)e(M+1): evaluation at ⌊M⌋+1\lfloor M\rfloor+1 distinct points is injective, since subtracting these points makes the maximum slope negative even before the additional nonpositive twists. There are at most ∏i(1+M/di)\prod_i(1+M/d_i) possible triples with ∑ikidi≤M\sum_i k_id_i\le M. This proves (7.7). □

Lemma 7.4. For 1≤i≤t1\le i\le t, let ViV_i be an integral projective variety over an algebraically closed field, let xi∈Vix_i\in V_i be a smooth point, and let MiM_i be a line bundle with H0(Vi,Mi)≠0H^0(V_i,M_i)\ne0. Put

ai=max⁡0≠s∈H0(Vi,Mi)ord⁡xi(s).a_i=\max_{0\ne s\in H^0(V_i,M_i)}\operatorname{ord}_{x_i}(s).

Every nonzero section ss of the external product ⨂ipr⁡i∗Mi\bigotimes_i\operatorname{pr}_i^*M_i satisfies

ord⁡(x1,…,xt)(s)≤∑i=1tai.\operatorname{ord}_{(x_1,\ldots,x_t)}(s)\le\sum_{i=1}^{t}a_i.

Proof. Each space of sections is finite dimensional, and its order filtration is separated; the numbers aia_i are therefore finite. Choose a basis adapted to this filtration in each slot. The initial forms of basis elements having a fixed order are linearly independent in that degree of the associated graded local ring. By the Künneth formula, every section of the external product is a linear combination of the tensor products of these bases. In the least total degree occurring in a nonzero combination, group its initial forms by their slot multidegrees. Different multidegrees cannot cancel. Within each multidegree the products are independent, since they are tensor products of independent initial forms in disjoint sets of smooth parameters. The section’s order is consequently the least total degree of one of its nonzero basis coefficients, and this is at most ∑iai\sum_i a_i. □

Proof of Proposition 7.1. The map θt\theta_t is finite, so PtP_t is ample. Fix XX, LL, rr, and tt; all auxiliary data below may depend on these choices. Set

b=b0t,q=2tr.b=\frac{b_0}{t},\qquad q=2tr.

Suppose, for a contradiction, that ε(Pt;z)>5t/b\varepsilon(P_t;z)>5t/b at a smooth very general point zz, whose image in every XX-slot lies in XregX_{\mathrm{reg}}.

Jets and the canonical torsor. Choose a rational number cc with

5t<c<bε(Pt;z).5t < c < b\varepsilon(P_t;z).

On the blow-up σ:Z~t→Zt\sigma:\widetilde{Z}_t \to Z_t at zz, with exceptional divisor EzE_z, the rational divisor σ∗(bPt)−cEz\sigma^*(bP_t)-cE_z is ample. To see this, choose a larger coefficient below bε(Pt;z)b\varepsilon(P_t;z) for which the corresponding divisor is nef, and interpolate it with the ample divisor obtained at a sufficiently small positive coefficient. Serre vanishing, applied to sufficiently large divisible multiples of σ∗(bPt)−cEz\sigma^*(bP_t)-cE_z, makes the restriction map to the corresponding thick exceptional divisor surjective. Pullback identifies sections of k0bPtk_0bP_t with sections of its pullback, by normality of ZtZ_t. At the smooth point zz, ordinary jets of order strictly less than k0ck_0c inject into the sections on k0cEzk_0cE_z. It follows, after choosing k0k_0 large and divisible, that

Q=k0bL is integral Cartier,Q=k_0bL\text{ is integral Cartier,}
H0(Zt,k0bPt)⟶OZt,z/mz5tk0+1 is surjective,(30)H^0(Z_t,k_0bP_t)\longrightarrow\mathcal{O}_{Z_t,z}/\mathfrak{m}_z^{5tk_0+1}\text{ is surjective,} \tag*{(30)}

where a local frame is understood in the displayed evaluation map.

Fix a section η\eta trivializing rKXrK_X. Over XregX_{\mathrm{reg}}, the cover Y→XY\to X is the torsor of frames τ\tau of the canonical line with τr=η\tau^r=\eta. Over tuples in this open locus the diagonal action is free, and Yt→ZtY_t\to Z_t is étale. Choose a lift z~\widetilde{z} of zz. Pulling back (7.10) preserves jet surjectivity at z~\widetilde{z}. The pulled-back sections are diagonal invariants. By the Künneth formula and decomposition into characters, they are linear combinations of pure tensors whose slot factors have the form

τ−misi,si∈H0(Xreg,O(Q+miKX)),\tau^{-m_i}s_i,\qquad s_i\in H^0\left(X_{\mathrm{reg}},\mathcal{O}(Q+m_iK_X)\right),
0≤mi<r,∑imi≡0(modr).(31)0\leq m_i<r,\qquad\sum_i m_i\equiv0\pmod r. \tag*{(31)}

Indeed multiplication of an eigenvector by the corresponding power of the tautological frame makes it invariant and hence descending to the indicated line bundle.

Take a smooth projective resolution u:W→Xu:W\to X, isomorphic over XregX_{\mathrm{reg}}, and write

KW=u∗KX+A,A≥0 exceptional.K_W=u^*K_X+A,\qquad A\geq0\text{ exceptional.}

We use the same letters L,QL,Q for their pullbacks to WW. Every sis_i in (7.11) extends to a section of Q+miKWQ+m_iK_W. In fact, its effective zero divisor extends by closure on the normal variety XX; this divisor is rational Cartier, since its class is Q+miKXQ+m_iK_X. Pulling it back and adding miAm_iA gives the effective divisor of the corresponding rational section on WW. Similarly η\eta extends to

ηW∈H0(W,rKW),Div⁡(ηW)=rA.\eta_W\in H^0(W,rK_W),\qquad\operatorname{Div}(\eta_W)=rA.

Let U=u−1(Xreg)U=u^{-1}(X_{\mathrm{reg}}). On the torsor of roots of ηW\eta_W over UU, a fixed finite list of the tensors (7.11), now using these sections on $W, spans the jets in (7.10) at the chosen lift.

A polarization, a flag, and a movable test. Fix an ample divisor HampH_{\mathrm{amp}} on WW. Since LL is nef and KWL3=0K_WL^3=0, a sufficiently small positive rational δ\delta makes H=L+δHampH=L+\delta H_{\mathrm{amp}} ample and ensures

H4≤3,LH3≤H4,(q+t−1)KWH3≤b0H4.(32)H^4\leq3,\qquad LH^3\leq H^4,\qquad(q+t-1)K_WH^3\leq b_0H^4. \tag*{(32)}

The equality KWL3=0K_WL^3=0 follows from KX∼Q0K_X\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}0 and the exceptionality of AA. The canonical class of WW is pseudoeffective. By [7], Theorem 2.1, ΩW1\Omega_W^1 is generically semipositive for this polarization. Apply [31], Theorem 6.1 to its finitely many Harder–Narasimhan factors. We can choose a smooth complete intersection flag, cut successively by sufficiently positive integral multiples liHl_iH, 1≤i≤31 \le i \le3, ending in a smooth integral curve CC such that

μmin⁡(ΩW1∣C)≥0.(33)\mu_{\min}(\Omega^1_W|_C) \ge0. \tag*{(33)}

The general curve avoids the codimension-two loci where the factors or their filtration quotients fail to be locally free. Their restricted slopes are the original slopes multiplied by the same positive factor l1l2l3l_1l_2l_3, so the restriction theorem gives (7.13).

Choose also a very general point x∈Ux \in U at which the all-degree bound defining γ(L;X)≤C1\gamma(L;X) \le C_1 holds. Let πx:W^→W\pi_x:\widehat{W} \to W be its blow-up, with exceptional divisor JJ, and put

D+=bL+(q+1)KW,d0=b(C1+1).D^+ = bL + (q+1)K_W,\qquad d_0 = b(C_1+1).

The divisor D+D^+ is big. In sufficiently divisible degrees its section spaces agree with those of bLbL, after multiplication by a fixed section whose zero divisor is exceptional over XX. This is because rKX∼0rK_X \sim0, AA is effective and exceptional, and u∗OW(E)=OXu_*\mathcal{O}_W(E)=\mathcal{O}_X for any effective integral exceptional divisor EE on this resolution. At xx these fixed sections have order zero. Thus every nonzero section of a sufficiently divisible multiple mD+mD^+ has order at most mbC1mbC_1 at xx.

It follows that πx∗D+−d0J\pi_x^*D^+-d_0J is not pseudoeffective. Otherwise, interpolating it with the big divisor πx∗D+\pi_x^*D^+ would make πx∗D+−dJ\pi_x^*D^+-dJ big for a rational dd with bC1<d<d0bC_1<d<d_0. An effective sufficiently divisible multiple would give a section of a multiple of D+D^+ with an excluded order at xx. The projective algebraic duality theorem of [6] therefore supplies a strongly movable class β\beta on W^\widehat{W} such that

D+⋅β<d0J⋅β,J⋅β>0.D^+\cdot\beta<d_0J\cdot\beta,\qquad J\cdot\beta>0.

Here and subsequently divisors on WW are pulled back when paired with β\beta. More precisely, we may take β=v∗(A1A2A3)\beta=v_*(A_1A_2A_3) for a smooth projective birational model v:T→W^v:T\to\widehat{W} and very ample divisors AiA_i on TT. The dual cone is the closure of the cone generated by such classes; strict negativity on that cone yields negativity on one generator. Also D+⋅β≥0D^+\cdot\beta\ge0, since LL is nef and KWK_W is pseudoeffective. The second inequality in (7.15) follows from the first and d0>0d_0>0. In particular,

L⋅β≥0,KW⋅β≥0.L\cdot\beta\ge0,\qquad K_W\cdot\beta\ge0.

Reduction of the fixed data. Spread the preceding finite algebraic data over an integral finitely generated Z\mathbb{Z}-subalgebra of C\mathbb{C}. This includes the smooth varieties, the flag, the points and the blow-up, the morphism vv and its very ample divisors, suitable integral multiples of the rational line bundles, the sections used in (7.11), the section ηW\eta_W, and the torsor and its marked lift over UU. After shrinking the base, the relevant fibres of WW, CC, TT, and W^\widehat{W} are smooth, projective, and geometrically integral; the testing morphism remains dominant; and all required ampleness and intersection data persist. The fixed finite jet evaluation remains surjective: it is a map of finite locally free modules obtained by restriction to a fixed-order infinitesimal neighbourhood of a section of a smooth morphism, and surjectivity is open. Invert rr and the finitely many denominators used in the data.

We can also retain (7.13) on every geometric fibre of this smaller base. To see this without imposing any Frobenius semistability condition, choose a fixed relative ample twist that makes the family ΩW1∣C\Omega^1_W|_C relatively globally generated. For every positive-rank quotient, its degree is then bounded below uniformly, in terms of its rank and this twist. Hence there are only finitely many possible negative degrees and ranks, and therefore finitely many Hilbert polynomials, for quotients of negative degree. The corresponding relative Quot schemes are projective. None has a point on the geometric generic fibre: such a point would persist after extension to the original complex field and contradict (33). This also excludes quotients with torsion and negative degree, since their torsion-free quotients have still smaller degree. Remove the images of these finitely many Quot schemes. The remaining geometric fibres have μmin⁡(ΩW∣C1)≥0\mu_{\min}(\Omega^1_{W|C}) \ge0.

There are geometric fibres in arbitrarily large characteristics pp: the base is nonempty, of finite type, and dominant over Spec⁡Z\operatorname{Spec}\mathbb{Z}. We take such fibres over algebraic closures of residue fields and keep the preceding notation. The genus of CC and all the intersection numbers used above are constant. The class β\beta continues to pair nonnegatively with every effective divisor: pull the divisor back under the dominant morphism vv and intersect with A1A2A3A_1A_2A_3. This argument applies also after a base-field twist. Thus only the fixed test, and not pseudoeffective-cone duality, is being specialized.

Full rank away from the diagonal. In one of these reductions, write F:W→W′F: W \to W' for relative Frobenius, where a prime denotes base-field twist. It is finite flat of degree p4p^4. Put

N=⌊p/k0⌋,B=NQ,E=F∗OW(B),N = \lfloor p/k_0 \rfloor,\qquad B = NQ,\qquad\mathcal{E} = F_*\mathcal{O}_W(B),
s=p4=rk⁡(E),R=st.(34)s = p^4 = \operatorname{rk}(\mathcal{E}),\qquad R = s^t. \tag*{(34)}

Products of NN of the fixed jet tensors span jets through degree 5tk0N5tk_0N at the chosen lift. Indeed every monomial of degree at most 5tk0N5tk_0N is a product of NN monomials of degree at most 5tk05tk_0. Choose representatives with these leading terms from the original jet-spanning space. Their products give a triangular spanning set for the jet filtration, in every characteristic. For all sufficiently large pp,

5tk0N≥4t(p−1).5tk_0N \ge4t(p-1).

The local monomial inclusion used here is the one in [32, proof of Proposition 2.12, eq:2.8], with smooth dimension 4t4t. The products therefore span on the thick point defined by the pp-th powers of 4t4t smooth parameters. Étaleness identifies the completed local ring at the torsor lift with the completed local ring at its tuple in UtU^t. Under this identification the thick point is the fibre of Ft:Wt→(W′)tF^t: W^t \to(W')^t over the Frobenius image of that tuple.

In a product of NN pure tensors, let mi′m'_i denote the new exponent in slot ii. Then

0≤mi′≤N(r−1)<pr,∑imi′≡0(modr).0 \le m'_i \le N(r-1) < pr,\qquad\sum_i m'_i \equiv0 \pmod r.

Since pp is prime to rr, choose integers aia_i with

r≤ai≤2r−1,pai≡mi′(modr).r \le a_i \le2r-1,\qquad pa_i \equiv m'_i \pmod r.

Their sum is a multiple of rr and is at most 2tr−t<q2tr-t<q. Increase a1a_1 by the nonnegative multiple q−∑iaiq-\sum_i a_i of rr. We now have

ai≥0,∑iai=q,pai≥mi′.(35)a_i \ge0,\qquad\sum_i a_i=q,\qquad pa_i\ge m'_i. \tag*{(35)}

Multiply the corresponding slot section of B+mi′KWB+m'_iK_W by ηW(pai−mi′)/r\eta_W^{(pa_i-m'_i)/r}. This gives a section of B+paiKWB+pa_iK_W, and division by τpai\tau^{pa_i} gives exactly its previous torsor expression. In a local canonical frame, the coefficient of τ\tau is a unit. Its pp-th power is a nonzero constant on the thick Frobenius fibre, since the pp-th powers of all local parameters vanish there.

It follows that the projection-formula map

⨁ai≥0∑iai=q(⨂i=1tH0(W,OW(B+paiKW)))⊗O(W′)t(−∑i=1taipr⁡i∗KW′)⟶E⊠t(36)\bigoplus_{\substack{a_i\ge0\\ \sum_i a_i=q}} \left( \bigotimes_{i=1}^{t} H^0\left(W,\mathcal{O}_W(B+pa_iK_W)\right) \right) \otimes\mathcal{O}_{(W')^t}\left(-\sum_{i=1}^{t}a_i\operatorname{pr}_i^*K_{W'}\right) \longrightarrow\mathcal{E}^{\boxtimes t} \tag*{(36)}

has rank RR at one point, hence at the generic point. The products just constructed give the spanning values, up to the nonzero constant frame factors. By finite pushforward and base change these values are the fibre of the target. The identity used in the projection formula is F∗OW′(KW′)≃OW(pKW)F^*\mathcal{O}_{W'}(K_{W'}) \simeq\mathcal{O}_W(pK_W); it is an identity of line bundles, not the pullback map on differential forms. In compatible local frames its transitions are pp-th powers.

The loss of rank on the diagonal. On the diagonal W′⊂(W′)tW' \subset(W')^t, all the source line bundles in (36) equal OW′(−qKW′)\mathcal{O}_{W'}(-qK_{W'}). Let

ΔF=W×W′⋯×W′W⏟t factors,h:ΔF→W′,g:ΔF→W\Delta_F = \underbrace{W \mathop{\times}_{W'} \cdots\mathop{\times}_{W'} W}_{t\ \text{factors}}, \qquad h:\Delta_F \to W', \qquad g:\Delta_F \to W

be the common structure map and the first projection, respectively. Both are finite. The line bundle

L=OΔF(∑i=1tpr⁡i∗B+pqpr⁡1∗KW)(37)\mathcal{L}=\mathcal{O}_{\Delta_F}\left(\sum_{i=1}^{t}\operatorname{pr}_i^*B+pq\operatorname{pr}_1^*K_W\right) \tag*{(37)}

satisfies

h∗L≃(E⊗t)∣W′⊗OW′(qKW′).h_*\mathcal{L}\simeq\left(\mathcal{E}^{\otimes t}\right)|_{W'}\otimes\mathcal{O}_{W'}(qK_{W'}).

This is finite base change from FtF^t, followed by the projection formula; all the line bundles pr⁡i∗OW(pKW)\operatorname{pr}_i^*\mathcal{O}_W(pK_W) are the pullback of OW′(KW′)\mathcal{O}_{W'}(K_{W'}). The columns of (36), after twisting, thus restrict to global sections of h∗Lh_*\mathcal{L}. At every point of the diagonal their rank is at most h0(ΔF,L)h^0(\Delta_F,\mathcal{L}).

The two-factor diagonal filtration and its truncated symmetric pieces are the canonical filtration of [37] and [25]. We use the same local construction in t−1t-1 difference slots, and give the resulting ranks and determinant comparison explicitly. Filter L\mathcal{L} by powers of the ideal of the reduced diagonal W⊂ΔFW \subset\Delta_F and push forward by gg. The associated pieces are

Gj=OW(tB+pqKW)⊗Aj(V),V=(ΩW′1)⊕(t−1),\mathcal{G}_j=\mathcal{O}_W(tB+pqK_W)\otimes A_j(V), \qquad V=\left(\Omega^1_{W'}\right)^{\oplus(t-1)},
0≤j≤u0=4(t−1)(p−1).(38)0\leq j\leq u_0=4(t-1)(p-1). \tag*{(38)}

For completeness, in etale smooth coordinates the other slots add 4(t−1)4(t-1) difference variables with their pp-th powers zero and no other relations. This follows from the Cartesian relative Frobenius square for an etale chart. Modulo squares the differences transform by ordinary differentials, giving VV; the associated graded algebra is therefore intrinsically A∙(V)A_\bullet(V). The line bundle contributes its restriction OW(tB+pqKW)\mathcal{O}_W(tB+pqK_W) to each piece. In particular, with ej=rk⁡Aj(V)e_j=\operatorname{rk} A_j(V),

h0(ΔF,L)≤∑j=0u0h0(W,Gj),∑j=0u0ej=p4(t−1)=st−1.(39)h^0(\Delta_F,\mathcal{L})\leq\sum_{j=0}^{u_0}h^0(W,\mathcal{G}_j), \qquad\sum_{j=0}^{u_0}e_j=p^{4(t-1)}=s^{t-1}. \tag*{(39)}

Set n=4(t−1)n=4(t-1), G=max⁡{0,2g(C)−2}G=\max\{0,2g(C)-2\}, and c2=n(n−1)Gc_2=n(n-1)G. By the retained inequality (33), μmin⁡(V∣C)≥0\mu_{\min}(V|_C)\geq0. Lemma 7.2 gives, uniformly in jj and pp,

μmax⁡(Gj∣C)≤(tB+pqKW+(p−1)(t−1)KW)⋅C+c2≤Mp:=2b0pl1l2l3H4+c2.(40)\begin{aligned} \mu_{\max}(\mathcal{G}_j|_C)\leq\left(tB+pqK_W+(p-1)(t-1)K_W\right)\cdot C+c_2 \\ &\leq M_p:=2b_0p l_1l_2l_3H^4+c_2. \tag*{(40)} \end{aligned}

Indeed BH3≤pbLH3BH^3\leq pbLH^3, KWH3≥0K_WH^3\geq0, and (32) bounds the two contributions by pb0H4pb_0H^4 each, before multiplication by l1l2l3l_1l_2l_3.

Put a=l1l2l3H4a = l_1l_2l_3H^4 and di=liH⋅C=liad_i = l_iH \cdot C = l_ia. Applying Lemma 7.3 to each Gj\mathcal{G}_j yields

h0(W,Gj)≤ej(Mp+1)∏i=13(1+Mp/di)=ejp4((2b0)4H4+O(p−1)).(41)h^0(W,\mathcal{G}_j) \le e_j(M_p+1)\prod_{i=1}^{3}(1+M_p/d_i) = e_jp^4\left((2b_0)^4H^4+O(p^{-1})\right). \tag*{(41)}

The error is uniform in jj, since c2,a,dic_2,a,d_i were fixed before pp varied. Explicitly, the leading coefficient is (2b0)4a4/∏idi=(2b0)4H4(2b_0)^4a^4/\prod_i d_i=(2b_0)^4H^4. Summing (7.24), using (7.22), H4≤3H^4\le3, and the strict first inequality in (7.1), gives, for all sufficiently large pp,

h0(ΔF,L)≤R/4.(42)h^0(\Delta_F,\mathcal{L}) \le R/4. \tag*{(42)}

Thus the rank of (36) is at most R/4R/4 at every point of the diagonal.

The determinant contradiction. Choose RR columns of (36) with nonzero determinant, and write ai(ν)a_i^{(\nu)} for the weight of slot ii in column ν\nu. Their determinant is a nonzero section of the external product of the line bundles

Qi=(det⁡E)⊗R/s⊗OW′(∑ν=1Rai(ν)KW′).Q_i=(\det\mathcal{E})^{\otimes R/s}\otimes\mathcal{O}_{W'}\left(\sum_{\nu=1}^{R}a_i^{(\nu)}K_{W'}\right).

Let λi=R−1∑ν=1Rai(ν)\lambda_i=R^{-1}\sum_{\nu=1}^{R}a_i^{(\nu)}; then 0≤λi≤q0\le\lambda_i\le q. Identifying numerical classes through base-field twist, we have

c1(Qi)R=Bp+(p−12p+λi)KW.(43)\frac{c_1(Q_i)}{R}=\frac{B}{p}+\left(\frac{p-1}{2p}+\lambda_i\right)K_W. \tag*{(43)}

The first-Chern coefficient is the usual Frobenius direct-image coefficient; compare [37], Lemma 4.2. Here only its numerical divisor class is needed. To check it directly, finite base change identifies F∗EF^*\mathcal{E} with the pushforward from W×W′WW\times_{W'}W of the line bundle pulled back from its second slot. The same truncated-diagonal filtration used in (7.21), now with two slots, has pieces OW(B)⊗Aj(ΩW1)\mathcal{O}_W(B)\otimes A_j(\Omega^1_W). Across all p4=sp^4=s truncated monomials, the total exponent of each of the four variables is s(p−1)/2s(p-1)/2. Taking determinants gives

c1(F∗E)=sB+s(p−1)2KW.c_1(F^*\mathcal{E})=sB+\frac{s(p-1)}{2}K_W.

Relative Frobenius pullback multiplies divisor classes by pp after the base-twist identification. Since the determinant of E⊠t\mathcal{E}^{\boxtimes t} contributes (det⁡E)R/s(\det\mathcal{E})^{R/s} in each slot, this proves (7.26).

Use now the base twist of the blow-up of xx and of the test class β\beta. By B/p≤bLB/p\le bL on this test, (7.16), and λi≤q\lambda_i\le q, the normalized class in (7.26) pairs with the test to at most D+⋅βD^+\cdot\beta. Let sis_i be any nonzero section of QiQ_i, and let mi=ord⁡x′(si)m_i=\operatorname{ord}_{x'}(s_i). Its divisor has effective strict transform of class πx′∗c1(Qi)−miJ′\pi_{x'}^*c_1(Q_i)-m_iJ' on the twisted blow-up. The nonnegativity of the test on effective divisors and (7.15) imply

mi(J⋅β)≤c1(Qi)⋅β≤RD+⋅β<Rd0(J⋅β).m_i(J\cdot\beta)\le c_1(Q_i)\cdot\beta\le RD^+\cdot\beta<Rd_0(J\cdot\beta).

Here the pairings have been identified with their untwisted numerical values. As J⋅β>0J\cdot\beta>0, every such section has order strictly less than Rd0Rd_0 at x′x'.

The determinant section is nonzero, so the Künneth formula ensures that each slot section space is nonzero. By Lemma 7.4, its order at (x′,…,x′)(x',\ldots,x') is therefore strictly less than

Rtd0=Rb0(C1+1)<3R/4.Rtd_0=Rb_0(C_1+1)<3R/4.

On the other hand, (7.25) bounds the rank of its column matrix at this point by R/4R/4. Trivialize the source and target bundles locally, and perform constant invertible row operations so that at least R−⌊R/4⌋R-\lfloor R/4\rfloor rows vanish at the point. Every entry of these rows lies in the maximal ideal. Each term of the determinant is consequently in its (R−⌊R/4⌋)(R-\lfloor R/4\rfloor)-th power. The determinant has order at least 3R/43R/4, contradicting (7.27).

This excludes the assumed Seshadri inequality and proves (7.2). All varieties, line bundles, flags, points, and testing data were fixed before the characteristic grew. Their dependence on X,r,tX,r,t therefore affects only how large the characteristic must be, whereas the constant 5/b05/b_0 in the conclusion depends only on C1C_1.

Many factors and birational transports

We next turn the quadratic cost bound into a birational obstruction. The argument uses many factors, but their number is fixed before the order of the covering group tends to infinity. This order of choices will be important in the application. Rational evaluation on diagonal products also appears in algebraic formulations of Lie’s superposition theorem; compare [5] (§§3,6–7 and Theorem 7.1). We prove the rational evaluation needed here directly from a generically finite forgetting map of degree one.

Proposition 8.1. There is no sequence of finite cyclic covers

πν:Yν⟶Xν\pi_\nu:Y_\nu\longrightarrow X_\nu

of normal projective fourfolds, generically torsors for cyclic groups GνG_\nu of orders rν→∞r_\nu\to\infty, with the following properties. The group Bir⁡(Xν)\operatorname{Bir}(X_\nu) is countable, and there are ample rational Cartier divisors LνL_\nu on XνX_\nu and constants c,C>0c,C>0, independent of ν\nu, such that at very general points

ε(Lν)≥c,ε(πν∗Lν)≥crν1/4.\varepsilon(L_\nu)\ge c,\qquad\varepsilon(\pi_\nu^*L_\nu)\ge cr_\nu^{1/4}.

Moreover, for each fixed integer t≥2t\ge2, put

Zν,t=Yνt/Gν,diag,θν,t:Zν,t⟶Xνt,Pν,t=θν,t∗Lν⊞t.Z_{\nu,t}=Y_\nu^t/G_{\nu,\mathrm{diag}},\qquad\theta_{\nu,t}:Z_{\nu,t}\longrightarrow X_\nu^t,\qquad P_{\nu,t}=\theta_{\nu,t}^*L_\nu^{\boxplus t}.

Here L⊞t=∑i=1tpr⁡i∗LL^{\boxplus t}=\sum_{i=1}^{t}\operatorname{pr}_i^*L. The further required bound is

ε(Pν,t)≤Ct2\varepsilon(P_{\nu,t})\le Ct^2

at a very general point, for all sufficiently large ν\nu, with this threshold allowed to depend on tt.

Proof. Choose an integer TT, to be made sufficiently large in terms of c,Cc,C. Passing to a tail of the sequence, we may use all the upper bounds with 2≤t≤T2\le t\le T simultaneously. We suppress ν\nu from the notation until it is necessary to vary the cover. Write LY=π∗LL_Y=\pi^*L.

Since GG is abelian, the finite map θt\theta_t is the quotient by Gt/GdiagG^t/G_{\mathrm{diag}}. Indeed the quotient by the full product group has function field C(Xt)\mathbb{C}(X^t), by the generic torsor property, and the resulting finite birational map to the normal variety XtX^t is an isomorphism. In particular, PtP_t is ample.

Curve families and compatible leaves. Set

B=CT2+1.B=CT^2+1.

On each ZtZ_t, choose a marked covering family of integral curves whose degree divided by multiplicity at the mark is at most BB. Such a family is obtained by choosing a curve at a geometric generic point witnessing a strict bound below Ct2+1C t^2 + 1, and spreading the curve and its mark. We use the geometric generic conventions of Lemma 5.1: finite data can be defined over a countable field, and the relevant generic marked families can be realized over C\mathbb{C}.

Enlarge these lists by all deck translates, all permutations of the slots, and all nonconstant image families under ordered projections Zt→ZsZ_t \to Z_s, for $2 \le s < t \le T$. Close under these operations. The lists remain finite, although their sizes need not be bounded uniformly in the covering order.

Projection does not increase the marked curve cost. To see this, let D→D′D \to D' be the nonconstant map of an integral curve to its reduced image, let ee be its degree, and let zz and z′z' be the marks. A general local hyperplane through z′z', pulled to the normalizations of the curves, has total order emult⁡z′D′e\operatorname{mult}_{z'}D' over z′z'. The contribution of the branches through zz is at least mult⁡zD\operatorname{mult}_zD. Hence

emult⁡z′D′≥mult⁡zD.e\operatorname{mult}_{z'}D' \ge\operatorname{mult}_zD.

Since PtP_t minus the pullback of PsP_s is nef, we obtain

Ps⋅D′mult⁡z′D′≤Pt⋅Dmult⁡zD.\frac{P_s \cdot D'}{\operatorname{mult}_{z'}D'} \le\frac{P_t \cdot D}{\operatorname{mult}_zD}.

After shrinking parameter spaces we may use reduced integral geometric generic image curves. Their projected mark maps remain dominant.

Let HtH_t be a geometric generic leaf furnished by Lemma 5.1, and put ht=dim⁡Hth_t = \dim H_t. Lemma 5.4 gives

ht>0,Ptht⋅Ht≤(htB)ht.h_t > 0,\qquad P_t^{h_t} \cdot H_t \le(h_tB)^{h_t}.

Deck invariance and Corollary 5.2 imply that Wt=θt(Ht)W_t = \theta_t(H_t) is the geometric generic fibre closure of a rational quotient of XtX^t. We write

ξt:Xt⇢St\xi_t : X^t \dashrightarrow S_t

for such a quotient, with geometrically integral generic fibre. The leaves and their quotients are equivariant under permutations.

The leaves are also compatible with coordinate projections: an upper leaf projects into the lower leaf through the projected tuple. Here is the genericity justification. Retain the parameter space of a curve family when forming its projected image family. Every parameter and endpoint occurring in a generic upper chain is generic in its original parameter space and incidence over the initial field of definition. Its projected endpoint is generic in the image curve. For this lower family, the equality of leaf names at a mark and a generic endpoint is an identity on the generic incidence. Consequently it applies to the projected upper step, regardless of the additional upper history; a stationary projection gives the same equality immediately. A path reaching a generic point of the upper leaf therefore has constant lower name. This proves the asserted inclusion. Whenever different slot sizes are compared below, we take leaves through a generic tuple and its projections and extend their name fields to a common algebraically closed field.

Finite projections to each slot. For rr sufficiently large in terms of T,c,CT,c,C, the map from HtH_t to each single XX-slot is generically finite onto its image. Fix one slot, let its image be II, and write

ℓ=dim⁡I,d=ht−ℓ.\ell= \dim I,\qquad d = h_t-\ell.

The image contains an ambient generic point xx of XX, which is also generic in II over the leaf name. The Seshadri lower bound implies

Lℓ⋅I≥cℓ.(44)L^\ell\cdot I \ge c^\ell. \tag*{(44)}

where the assertion is immediate for ℓ=0\ell= 0.

Suppose d>0d > 0. Over this generic point xx, the geometric fibre of Zt→XZ_t \to X is Yt−1Y^{t-1}: choose a lift of xx in its torsor to identify the first coordinate. The restriction of PtP_t is the external sum of the remaining copies of LYL_Y. Every one of the marked coordinates is generic on YY. Projecting any curve through that mark to a nonconstant slot, with the preceding degree–multiplicity comparison, shows that the Seshadri constant of this restricted polarization is at least cr1/4cr^{1/4}.

Let JJ be a dd-dimensional component of the geometric generic fibre of Ht→IH_t \to I containing the chosen generic point. Then

Ptd⋅J≥(cr1/4)d.P_t^d \cdot J \ge(cr^{1/4})^d.

We recall the elementary degree bound being used twice here. If an ample rational divisor has Seshadri constant at least aa at a smooth point of an ee-dimensional subvariety, blow up that point and restrict the nef class consisting of the pulled-back divisor minus aa times the exceptional divisor. Its top intersection on the strict transform gives degree at least aea^e, since the point has multiplicity one. A limiting argument permits a Seshadri bound given as a supremum. Our image and fibre points are smooth generic points of their subvarieties. The ambient very general bounds continue to hold on the geometric generic data after the field extensions in use.

The pushforward of Ptd⋅HtP_t^d \cdot H_t to II has coefficient equal to the total degree on the geometric generic fibre, at least the contribution of JJ. Since Pt−pr⁡∗LP_t-\operatorname{pr}^{*}L is nef, equations (44) and (8.3) give

Ptht⋅Ht≥(pr⁡∗L)ℓPtd⋅Ht≥cℓ(cr1/4)d.P_t^{h_t}\cdot H_t \ge(\operatorname{pr}^{*}L)^{\ell}P_t^d\cdot H_t \ge c^{\ell}(cr^{1/4})^d.

For fixed TT, this contradicts (8.1) as r→∞r \to\infty, because ht≤4Th_t \le4T. There are only finitely many slot sizes and slots to consider. This proves the assertion simultaneously for all of them on a tail of the sequence. In particular,

1≤ht≤4.1 \le h_t \le4.

A forgetting map of degree one. The same single-slot finiteness holds for WtW_t. Let DtD_t denote the degree of its projection to its first-slot image. The degree of HtH_t over that image contains DtD_t as a factor, so (8.1) and (44) imply

Dt≤Ptht⋅Htcht≤KT8D_t \le\frac{P_t^{h_t}\cdot H_t}{c^{h_t}} \le KT^8

where one may take

K=max⁡1≤h≤4(h(C+1)c)h.K=\max_{1\le h\le4}\left(\frac{h(C+1)}{c}\right)^h.

Indeed ht≤4h_t \le4, B≤(C+1)T2B \le(C+1)T^2, and T2ht≤T8T^{2h_t} \le T^8. Thus KK depends only on c,Cc,C, before TT is selected.

Projection compatibility and finite first-slot projection give ht≤ht−1h_t \le h_{t-1}. If these ranks are equal, the image of WtW_t under forgetting its last slot equals the lower leaf: it is contained in that integral leaf and has the same dimension. The first-slot images therefore agree as well. The degree formula for the two generically finite maps is

DtDt−1=deg⁡(Wt⟶Wt−1)∈N.(45)\frac{D_t}{D_{t-1}}=\deg(W_t\longrightarrow W_{t-1})\in\mathbb{N}. \tag*{(45)}

All degrees are taken after the common geometric field extension described above, which preserves them.

By (8.4), among the T−1T-1 ranks there is a constant stretch of length at least (T−1)/4(T-1)/4. Choose TT, depending only on c,Cc,C, so that

T−14−1>log⁡2(KT8).\frac{T-1}{4}-1>\log_2(KT^8).

If every adjacent ratio on that stretch were larger than one, (8.6) would force the degrees to grow by a factor at least two at each step, contradicting (8.5). Hence for some k≥3k \ge3,

hk=hk−1=h>0,Wk⟶Wk−1 is birational.(46)h_k = h_{k-1} = h > 0,\qquad W_k \longrightarrow W_{k-1}\text{ is birational.} \tag*{(46)}

Permutation symmetry gives the same conclusion for every omission of one slot, with the corresponding lower leaf. In particular, no finite correspondence of degree greater than one remains in this step.

Rational transport of tangent directions. At a generic tuple of XkX^k, the tangent space along the leaf WkW_k is a rational rank-hh distribution Dk=ker⁡(dξk)D_k = \ker(d\xi_k). It projects injectively to each single-slot tangent space and isomorphically to the lower distribution for every omission. Indeed the corresponding maps of geometric generic leaves are generically finite, and in characteristic zero their differentials have rank hh at the generic point. By the equal-rank inclusion already proved, their images are exactly the lower tangent spaces.

Write Ai⊂TX,xiA_i \subset T_{X,x_i} for the image in slot ii. This plane depends rationally only on xix_i. To justify the descent, trivialize TXT_X rationally and use a Grassmann chart. The coordinates of AiA_i belong to the function field of each (k−1)(k-1)-tuple containing slot ii, because they are obtained from that lower distribution. The intersection of these coordinate subfields is the function field of slot ii. Similarly, the graph of the isomorphism from AiA_i to AjA_j, obtained by lifting to DkD_k and projecting to slot jj, depends only on (xi,xj)(x_i,x_j).

For completeness, the coordinate-field intersection can be checked by replacing an omitted coordinate by a fresh independent generic coordinate. A function pulled from the other coordinates is unchanged under that replacement. Repeating for every omitted coordinate, and then specializing the fresh coordinates to general constants, shows that the function belongs to the field of the common coordinates. This applies to the rational chart coordinates of the planes and graphs. It applies also when k=3k = 3.

Permutation symmetry thus gives a common rational plane distribution A(x)A(x) and isomorphisms

R(x,y):A(x)⟶∼A(y).R(x,y): A(x) \overset{\sim}{\longrightarrow} A(y).

Lifting a vector through the same hh-plane and using three slots gives the rational cocycle identity

R(y,z)R(x,y)=R(x,z).R(y,z)R(x,y) = R(x,z).

Choose a general complex reference point aa so that R(a,−)R(a,-) is generically defined and invertible and the specialized cocycle identity holds. Transporting a basis of A(a)A(a) gives rational vector fields v1,…,vhv_1,\ldots,v_h on XX, independent at a generic point. (8.8) says exactly that the simultaneous vector fields

(vj,…,vj),1≤j≤h,(v_j,\ldots,v_j),\qquad1 \le j \le h,

span DkD_k. No commutativity assertion about the vjv_j is needed.

Rational evaluation and local flows. Equal ranks were enough to construct the tangent transports. We now use the stronger degree-one assertion: it turns evaluation of the missing coordinate into a rational function rather than a finite correspondence. Consider the rational map to its image closure

Λ=(pr⁡<k,ζ~k):Xk⇢D.\Lambda= (\operatorname{pr}_{<k},\tilde{\zeta}_k): X^k \dashrightarrow D.

It is birational. Its restriction to a geometric generic leaf of ζ~k\tilde{\zeta}_k is the forgetting map in (8.7), and hence has degree one. More explicitly, let

F0⊂E⊂FF_0 \subset E \subset F

be the function fields of SkS_k, DD, XkX^k, included by pullback. The field EE is generated over F0F_0 by the first (k−1)(k-1)-slot functions. Since the geometric generic forgetting map is generically finite, FF and EE have the same transcendence degree over F0F_0; hence F/EF/E is finite. Geometric integrality of the generic fibre makes F/F0F/F_0 regular. Tensoring with an algebraic closure F0‾\overline{F_0} gives fields: each tensor is the union of the fields obtained by finite algebraic base extension. Their fraction fields are the function fields of the geometric generic leaf and its projected image. The degree-one geometric projection therefore gives [F:E]=1[F:E]=1. This also rules out an extra generic component or an unseen algebraic degree in Λ\Lambda.

Let ev⁡\operatorname{ev} be the last coordinate of its rational inverse. Choose a general complex tuple (u,y0)(u,y_0), with u∈Xk−1u \in X^{k-1}, in smooth open sets on which the vector fields, the quotient, and the inverse evaluation are regular. For small z=(z1,…,zh)∈Chz=(z_1,\ldots,z_h) \in\mathbb{C}^h, let EzE_z be the ordered composition of the local time-zjz_j flows of vjv_j. Let Ez−E_z^{-} be the reversed composition of the negative-time flows. These flows exist holomorphically in both the initial point and the times on sufficiently small neighbourhoods of all chosen coordinates. One may obtain this directly by Picard iteration in smooth coordinate polydiscs: bounded coefficients and derivatives make the integral operator a uniform contraction for small time. Uniqueness gives the opposite-time inverse, and reversing the order gives the inverse of the composition.

The simultaneous flows preserve ξˉk\bar{\xi}_k. Put λ(z)=Ez(u)\lambda(z)=E_z(u), acting in all the reference slots. For yy near y0y_0 and sufficiently small zz, birational evaluation therefore gives

Ez(y)=ev⁡(λ(z),ξˉk(u,y)).(47)E_z(y)=\operatorname{ev}\bigl(\lambda(z),\bar{\xi}_k(u,y)\bigr). \tag*{(47)}

For each fixed such zz, the right side is rational in yy. The equality on an analytic open shows that its input lies in DD and meets the domain of evaluation; an analytic open is Zariski dense. Thus it defines a rational self-map of XX, regular at y0y_0 after shrinking the neighbourhoods and times.

The same argument gives

Ez−(y)=ev⁡(Ez−(u),ξˉk(u,y)).E_z^{-}(y)=\operatorname{ev}\bigl(E_z^{-}(u),\bar{\xi}_k(u,y)\bigr).

on a neighbourhood of y0y_0. The resulting rational maps are mutually inverse because they are inverse on a smaller analytic neighbourhood. They are therefore birational self-maps of XX. Finally, z↦Ez(y0)z \mapsto E_z(y_0) has nonzero derivative, since the fields are independent and h>0h>0. Its image is uncountable, so the birational maps, all regular at y0y_0, are uncountably many distinct maps. This contradicts the assumed countability of Bir⁡(X)\operatorname{Bir}(X).

Lemma 8.2. Let XX be a normal projective terminal variety with KX∼Q0K_X \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} 0. If a smooth projective resolution of XX has irregularity zero, then Bir⁡(X)\operatorname{Bir}(X) is countable.

Proof. Let p:W→Xp:W \to X be a smooth projective resolution. Since H1(W,OW)=0H^1(W,\mathcal{O}_W)=0, the exponential sequence embeds the analytic Picard group in H2(W,Z)H^2(W,\mathbb{Z}). By GAGA the analytic and algebraic Picard groups agree, so Pic⁡(W)\operatorname{Pic}(W) is countable. Divisor pushforward induces a surjection Pic⁡(W)→Cl⁡(X)\operatorname{Pic}(W) \to\operatorname{Cl}(X): the strict transform of every Weil divisor on XX is Cartier on WW. Thus Cl⁡(X)\operatorname{Cl}(X) is countable.

Every birational self-map of XX is an isomorphism in codimension one. To see this, take a smooth common resolution of its graph, with projections p1,p2p_1,p_2 to XX. Choose a nonzero trivialization η\eta of a sufficiently divisible pluricanonical bundle of XX. Its two pullbacks are nonzero regular pluricanonical forms on the common resolution. That section space has dimension one: canonicity gives pullback regularity, and restriction to a big open of XX, followed by divisorial extension, identifies the sections with those of the trivial pluricanonical bundle on XX. Consequently the two pullbacks are proportional. Terminality says that their zero divisors have support exactly the exceptional prime divisors of p1p_1 and p2p_2, respectively. These supports must coincide. A prime divisor contracted by the self-map or its inverse would belong to only one of the two supports, which is impossible.

Fix a very ample divisor AA on XX. Group the birational self-maps according to the Weil linear equivalence class of the strict transform of AA back to the source. Within one class, the complete spaces of sections are identified by the codimension-one isomorphisms. The two maps to the embedding of XX by ∣A∣|A| therefore differ by a projective linear automorphism preserving that embedded variety. It is enough to prove that this stabilizer has finite effective image on XX.

Let SS be the identity component of the stabilizer in the projective linear group of the embedding. Its action on XX induces a rational action on the smooth projective resolution WW. The effective image is a connected linear algebraic group: the kernel of the action is a closed normal subgroup, and a quotient of a linear algebraic group is linear. As proved above, WW has a nonzero positive pluricanonical section. Matsumura’s obstruction therefore says that this effective image is trivial [30]. More precisely, that corollary excludes positive-dimensional linear algebraic subgroups of Bir⁡(W)\operatorname{Bir}(W) for a smooth complete variety with a nonzero pluricanonical system. It applies here to the rational action, without requiring that every birational self-map of WW be regular.

The identity component of the stabilizer consequently acts trivially. An algebraic group has only finitely many components, so the effective stabilizer is finite. There are countably many possible divisor classes and finitely many birational maps in each such class. Hence Bir⁡(X)\operatorname{Bir}(X) is countable. □

Completion of the canonical-index proof

Proof of Theorem 1.1. Apply the canonical cover and the decomposition (4.2) to XX. Proposition 4.1 settles all decompositions with at least two positive dimensional blocks and the purely abelian case. The remaining case is a single four-dimensional nonflat factor. Corollary 4.4 settles its noncanonical quotients. It remains to bound the orders when XX is canonical and has such a single-factor cover.

Suppose that these orders are unbounded, and choose a sequence whose orders rr tend to infinity. Replace each member by its crepant Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial terminalization VV, using Lemma 4.5. The order rr is unchanged. The conclusions of Lemma 4.2 are birational properties, so every proper positive dimensional rational image of VV has rationally connected resolution, and a smooth projective model of VV has irregularity zero.

By Lemma 4.6, any member carrying an effective nonbig divisor of positive Iitaka dimension has canonical order dividing the fixed integer NmovN_{\mathrm{mov}}. After discarding a finite initial part of the sequence, every effective Weil divisor of positive Iitaka dimension is therefore big. For the cyclic index cover π:Y→V\pi:Y\to V, Lemma 4.7 now verifies the precise intermediate-fibration hypothesis of Theorem 6.1, both for VV with the trivial group and for YY with its cyclic deck group.

Choose an ample rational Cartier divisor LL on each VV, scaling it by a positive rational number so that 1≤L4≤21\leq L^4\leq2. The scaling is possible without any uniform Cartier denominator. The scalar estimates give constants C,c>0C,c>0, independent of the member of the sequence, such that at very general points

γ(L;V)≤C21/4,ε(L;x)≥c,ε(π∗L;y)≥cr1/4.\gamma(L;V)\leq C2^{1/4},\qquad\varepsilon(L;x)\geq c,\qquad\varepsilon(\pi^*L;y)\geq cr^{1/4}.

For the last inequality we used (π∗L)4=rL4(\pi^*L)^4=rL^4; the polarization upstairs is ample and invariant under the deck group. Choose once and for all a rational number C1≥C21/4C_1\geq C2^{1/4} and put b0=1/(4(C1+1))b_0=1/(4(C_1+1)). Then b0(C1+1)=1/4<3/4b_0(C_1+1)=1/4<3/4 and 3(2b0)4<3/16<1/43(2b_0)^4<3/16<1/4, so both strict conditions in (27) hold. Proposition 7.1 therefore gives, for every fixed integer t≥2t\geq2,

ε(Pt)≤20(C1+1)t2.\varepsilon(P_t)\leq20(C_1+1)t^2.

The constants are independent of the member of the sequence. For each fixed product, its auxiliary choices are made before the characteristic tends to infinity in that proposition. We then use only finitely many such product sizes before letting the canonical orders rr tend to infinity in the transport argument.

Lemma 8.2 applies to the terminal VV, since KV∼Q0K_V \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} 0 and its smooth projective model has irregularity zero. Thus Bir⁡(V)\operatorname{Bir}(V) is countable. All hypotheses of Proposition 8.1 have now been checked: the cover is a finite cyclic torsor on a big smooth open, the polarizations have the two displayed lower bounds, the diagonal quotients have the uniform quadratic upper bounds, and the downstairs birational group is countable. That proposition rules out r→∞r \to\infty, a contradiction.

The orders are consequently bounded in this final case as well. There are only the cases just treated. Taking a common multiple of their bounded orders gives a single positive integer N4N_4 with N4KX∼0N_4K_X \sim0 for every input XX, as required.

Proof of the uniform Iitaka theorem

Proof of Theorem 1.2. First we deduce nonvanishing from pseudo-effectivity. The companion good-model theorem, with the Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial dlt choice in its construction [34], gives a log minimal model (Y,ΔY)(Y,\Delta_Y) of (X,Δ)(X,\Delta). Its boundary is the strict transform of Δ\Delta together with any extracted prime divisors of coefficient one. Hence it is rational, and DY=KY+ΔYD_Y=K_Y+\Delta_Y is nef and Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier. The companion’s rational abundance theorem [34] makes DYD_Y semiample. On a common smooth resolution

X←pW→qYX \xleftarrow{p} W \xrightarrow{q} Y

with compatible canonical divisors, its comparison lemma [34] gives

p∗D=q∗DY+E,E≥0,E is q-exceptional.p^{*}D=q^{*}D_Y+E,\qquad E\geq0,\qquad E\text{ is }q\text{-exceptional}.

Choose a positive integer rr such that rDYrD_Y is Cartier and globally generated, and a nonzero section s∈H0(Y,OY(rDY))s\in H^0(Y,\mathcal{O}_Y(rD_Y)), viewed in the common rational function field. Pulling the effective Cartier divisor Div⁡Y(s)+rDY\operatorname{Div}_Y(s)+rD_Y back by qq, adding rErE, and pushing forward by pp gives

Div⁡X(s)+rD≥0.\operatorname{Div}_X(s)+rD\geq0.

The pole test (2) therefore gives 0≠s∈Vr(D)0\ne s\in V_r(D). Choose a positive integer tt such that trDtrD is integral Cartier. Then ss is a nonzero section of OX(trD)\mathcal{O}_X(trD), so κ(X,D)≥0\kappa(X,D)\geq0. These auxiliary degrees need not be uniform: they only establish the hypothesis for the uniform argument, whose all-degree comparison will retain the full Iitaka field.

Enlarge the fixed coefficient set to Φ′=Φ∪{1}\Phi'=\Phi\cup\{1\}. Proposition 2.2 gives a semiample dlt model (X′,Δ′)(X',\Delta') with coefficients in Φ′\Phi' and identical rounded section spaces in every integer degree. Write its contraction as f:X′→Zf:X'\to Z and its adjoint as

KX′+Δ′∼Qf∗A,K_{X'}+\Delta'\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}f^{*}A,

where AA is ample rational Cartier and dim⁡Z=κ(X,KX+Δ)\dim Z=\kappa(X,K_X+\Delta). If dim⁡Z>0\dim Z>0, apply Proposition 3.2 to f:(X′,Δ′)→Zf:(X',\Delta')\to Z, with total-space dimension four and fixed coefficient set Φ′\Phi'. Since AA is ample, it is big. The proposition gives one degree depending only on Φ′\Phi' whose every positive multiple is nonempty and generates exactly C(Z)=K(D)C(Z)=K(D) inside the common rational function field. This same degree covers all positive base dimensions. When dim⁡Z=4\dim Z = 4, the contraction is birational and its field is C(X′)\mathbb{C}(X').

Suppose instead that ZZ is a point. The adjoint of (X′,Δ′)(X',\Delta') is then Q\mathbb{Q}-linearly trivial. There are three exhaustive cases. If the pair is not klt, the four-dimensional non-klt index theorem [22], Corollary 1.7 gives a common linearly trivial multiple depending only on Φ′\Phi'. If it is klt and Δ′≠0\Delta' \ne0, use [41], Theorem 1.14. Its hyperstandard coefficient convention includes any prescribed finite rational set: one may take the defining set {1−b:b∈Φ′}\{1-b : b \in\Phi'\} and denominator one. If it is klt and Δ′=0\Delta' = 0, use Theorem 1.1. A bound for the positive torsion order gives a common trivial multiple by taking the least common multiple of the finitely many possible orders.

Take a common multiple of these zero-dimensional degrees and of the degree obtained for positive-dimensional bases. The choice depends only on Φ\Phi and dimension four. In dimension zero it yields a nonempty system with image a point. In positive dimension, the every-multiple clause of Proposition 3.2 retains the whole Iitaka field. Finally (2.1) transfers the complete systems back to the original pair. This proves every assertion, including the rounded reflexive convention and recovery of the full Iitaka base field. If a canonical representative is replaced by KX+Div⁡(h)K_X+\operatorname{Div}(h), then the floor divisor changes by mDiv⁡(h)m\operatorname{Div}(h) in every integer degree. Multiplication by h−mh^{-m} identifies the two section spaces and leaves all ratios unchanged. The same integer therefore works for all canonical representatives.

References

  1. [1]E. Bierstone and P. D. Milman, Functoriality in resolution of singularities, Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. 44 (2008), no. 2, 609–639. doi:10.2977/PRIMS/1210167338.DOI
  2. [2]C. Birkar, P. Cascini, C. D. Hacon, and J. McKernan, Existence of minimal models for varieties of log general type, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 23 (2010), no. 2, 405–468. doi:10.1090/S0894-0347-09-00649-3. arXiv:math/0610203v2.DOI
  3. [3]C. Birkar and D.-Q. Zhang, Effectivity of Iitaka fibrations and pluricanonical systems of polarized pairs, Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 123 (2016), 283–331. doi:10.1007/s10240-016-0080-x.DOI
  4. [4]C. Birkar, Singularities on Fano fibrations and beyond, preprint, arXiv:2305.18770v2 (2025), Corollary 1.8.arxiv.org/abs/2305.18770
  5. [5]D. Blázquez-Sanz and J. J. Morales-Ruiz, Local and global aspects of Lie superposition theorem, J. Lie Theory 20 (2010), no. 3, 483–517. Published article.
  6. [6]S. Boucksom, J.-P. Demailly, M. Păun, and Th. Peternell, The pseudo-effective cone of a compact Kähler manifold and varieties of negative Kodaira dimension, J. Algebraic Geom. 22 (2013), no. 2, 201–248. doi:10.1090/S1056-3911-2012-00574-8. Cited preprint version: arXiv:math/0405285v1.DOI
  7. [7]F. Campana and M. Păun, Orbifold generic semi-positivity: an application to families of canonically polarized manifolds, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 65 (2015), no. 2, 835–861. doi:10.5802/aif.2945.DOI
  8. [8]F. Campana, Orbifolds, special varieties and classification theory: an appendix, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 54 (2004), no. 3, 631–665. doi:10.5802/aif.2028.DOI
  9. [9]G. Chen, J. Han, and J. Liu, On effective log Iitaka fibrations and existence of complements, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2024 (2024), no. 10, 8329–8349. doi:10.1093/imrn/rnad253. Also available as arXiv:2301.04813v1.DOI
  10. [10]G. Chen and N. Tsakanikas, On the termination of flips for log canonical generalized pairs, Acta Math. Sin. (Engl. Ser.) 39 (2023), 967–994. doi:10.1007/s10114-023-0116-3. Preprint: arXiv:2011.02236v2.DOI
  11. [11]S. Druel, A decomposition theorem for singular spaces with trivial canonical class of dimension at most five, Invent. Math. 211 (2018), no. 1, 245–296. doi:10.1007/s00222-017-0748-y. Author’s copy of the published text, Theorem 1.2, with the author’s erratum.DOI
  12. [12]L. Ein, O. Küchle, and R. Lazarsfeld, Local positivity of ample line bundles, J. Differential Geom. 42 (1995), no. 2, 193–219. Author’s copy of the published article.arxiv.org/abs/alg-geom/9408003
  13. [13]O. Fujino and Y. Gongyo, Log pluricanonical representations and the abundance conjecture, Compos. Math. 150 (2014), no. 4, 593–620. doi:10.1112/S0010437X13007495. Final author manuscript.DOI
  14. [14]O. Fujino and Y. Gongyo, On the moduli b-divisors of lc-trivial fibrations, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 64 (2014), no. 4, 1721–1735. doi:10.5802/aif.2894.DOI
  15. [15]O. Fujino and K. Hashizume, Existence of log canonical modifications and its applications, Eur. J. Math. 9 (2023), no. 1, Paper No. 13. doi:10.1007/s40879-023-00598-0. Accepted author version of 28 April 2022, version 0.21: author manuscript.DOI
  16. [16]O. Fujino, Notes on the weak positivity theorems, in Algebraic Varieties and Automorphism Groups, Adv. Stud. Pure Math., vol. 75, Math. Soc. Japan, Tokyo, 2017, pp. 73–118. doi:10.2969/aspm/07510073. Author version 0.54, dated 30 June 2015: author manuscript.
  17. [17]T. Graber, J. Harris, and J. Starr, Families of rationally connected varieties, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 16 (2003), no. 1, 57–67. doi:10.1090/S0894-0347-02-00402-2.DOI
  18. [18]D. Greb, H. Guenancia and S. Kebekus, Klt varieties with trivial canonical class: Holonomy, differential forms, and fundamental groups, Geom. Topol. 23 (2019), 2051–2124. doi:10.2140/gt.2019.23.2051. Corrected preprint version: arXiv:1704.01408v5, June 15, 2020. Theorem B and Proposition D.DOI
  19. [19]A. Grothendieck, with the collaboration of J. Dieudonné, Éléments de géométrie algébrique. IV. Étude locale des schémas et des morphismes des schémas. Troisième partie, Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 28 (1966), 5–255. Published article.
  20. [20]C. D. Hacon, J. McKernan, and C. Xu, ACC for log canonical thresholds, Ann. of Math. (2) 180 (2014), no. 2, 523–571. doi:10.4007/annals.2014.180.2.3.DOI
  21. [21]A. Höring and T. Peternell, Algebraic integrability of foliations with numerically trivial canonical bundle, Invent. Math. 216 (2019), no. 2, 395–419. doi:10.1007/s00222-018-00853-2. Author version.DOI
  22. [22]C. Jiang and H. Liu, Boundedness of log pluricanonical representations of log Calabi–Yau pairs in dimension 2, Algebra Number Theory 15 (2021), no. 2, 545–567. doi:10.2140/ant.2021.15.547. Preprint: arXiv:2002.11928v1.DOI
  23. [23]C. Jiang, A gap theorem for minimal log discrepancies of noncanonical singularities in dimension three, J. Algebraic Geom. 30 (2021), 759–800. doi:10.1090/jag/759. Cited final author version: arXiv:1904.09642v3.
  24. [24]Y. Kawamata, Abundance theorem for minimal threefolds, Invent. Math. 108 (1992), 229–246. doi:10.1007/BF02100604.DOI
  25. [25]Y. Kitadai and H. Sumihiro, Canonical filtrations and stability of direct images by Frobenius morphisms, Tohoku Math. J. (2) 60 (2008), no. 2, 287–301. doi:10.2748/tmj/1215442876.DOI
  26. [26]J. Kollár (ed.), Flips and abundance for algebraic threefolds: A summer seminar at the University of Utah (Salt Lake City, 1991), Astérisque 211, Société Mathématique de France, 1992. doi:10.24033/ast.198.
  27. [27]J. Kollár, with the collaboration of S. Kovács, Singularities of the minimal model program, Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, vol. 200, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139547895.DOI
  28. [28]J. Kollár and S. Mori, Birational Geometry of Algebraic Varieties, Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics 134, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511662560.DOI
  29. [29]A. Langer, Semistable sheaves in positive characteristic, Ann. of Math. (2) 159 (2004), no. 1, 251–276. doi:10.4007/annals.2004.159.251.DOI
  30. [30]H. Matsumura, On algebraic groups of birational transformations, Atti Accad. Naz. Lincei Rend. Cl. Sci. Fis. Mat. Natur. (8) 34 (1963), no. 2, 151–155. Digital archive.
  31. [31]V. B. Mehta and A. Ramanathan, Semistable sheaves on projective varieties and their restriction to curves, Math. Ann. 258 (1982), no. 3, 213–224. doi:10.1007/BF01450677.DOI
  32. [32]M. Mustață and K. Schwede, A Frobenius variant of Seshadri constants, Math. Ann. 358 (2014), no. 3–4, 861–878. doi:10.1007/s00208-013-0976-4. Cited preprint version: arXiv:1203.1081v1.DOI
  33. [33]OpenAI, Lifting sections from the reduced support of an adjoint, OpenAI Math Release preprint OAI:Lifting-sections-from-the-reduced-support-of-an-adjoint-September-27-2026, 2026.
  34. [34]OpenAI, Log abundance in characteristic zero, OpenAI Math Release preprint OAI:Log-abundance-in-characteristic-zero-September-24-2026, 2026.
  35. [35]OpenAI, Relative denominators and effective systems for log Calabi–Yau fibrations, OpenAI Math Release preprint OAI:Relative-denominators-and-effective-systems-for-log-Calabi-Yau-fibrations-September-27-2026, 2026.
  36. [36]S. Ramanan and A. Ramanathan, Some remarks on the instability flag, Tohoku Math. J. (2) 36 (1984), no. 2, 269–291. doi:10.2748/tmj/1178228852.DOI
  37. [37]X. Sun, Direct images of bundles under Frobenius morphism, Invent. Math. 173 (2008), no. 2, 427–447. doi:10.1007/s00222-008-0125-y. Cited preprint version: arXiv:math/0611360v2.DOI
  38. [38]The Stacks Project Authors, The Stacks Project, Lemma 58.21.4, Tag 0BMB, accessed 25 September 2026.
  39. [39]G. Todorov and C. Xu, Effectiveness of the log Iitaka fibration for 3-folds and 4-folds, Algebra Number Theory 3 (2009), 697–710. doi:10.2140/ant.2009.3.697.DOI
  40. [40]E. Viehweg and D.-Q. Zhang, Effective Iitaka fibrations, J. Algebraic Geom. 18 (2009), 711–730. doi:10.1090/S1056-3911-09-00515-3. Cited preprint version: arXiv:0707.4287v3.DOI
  41. [41]Y. Xu, Some results about the index conjecture for log Calabi–Yau pairs, preprint, arXiv:1905.00297v2 (2019).arxiv.org/abs/1905.00297

Paper details

Contents