I Compact Kähler fourfolds

Introduction

The good minimal model problem asks whether a pseudo-effective canonical adjoint can be made nef and generated by its sections on a birational model. It joins two different questions: construction of a minimal model and abundance of its nef adjoint. In the compact Kähler category, the existence of the first pluricanonical section is itself a substantial part of the problem. Positivity is analytic, and even the passage from a cohomological identity to an identity of holomorphic line bundles must be kept explicit.

The projective minimal model program provides the birational framework [56, 9]. In dimension three the Kähler theory has developed through nonvanishing, minimal models and abundance [27, 47, 16, 17, 41]. Work on fourfolds and on pseudo-effective adjoints supplies further analytic and birational tools [19, 46]. Our concern is the precise additional nonvanishing argument needed when a pseudo-effective fourfold MMP and abundance after nonvanishing are available.

We make three explicit hypotheses, stated in Section 2: full orbifold Iitaka subadditivity in Fujiki class C\mathcal{C}, the specified pseudo-effective klt fourfold MMP conditional on that subadditivity, and abundance for nef klt fourfold adjoints of nonnegative Kodaira dimension. Under these premises we resolve positively the good-minimal-model assertion in the following category.

Theorem 1.1 (Conditional good minimal models). Assume Assumptions 2.2, 2.3, and 2.4. Let XX be a normal connected compact Kähler fourfold, and let BB be an effective rational Weil divisor. Suppose that (X,B)(X,B) is klt, that its actual adjoint D=KX+BD = K_X + B is Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier and analytically pseudo-effective, and that XX is globally strongly Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial in the sense of Definition 2.1.

Then there are a normal connected globally strongly Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial compact Kähler fourfold YY and a bimeromorphic map ϕ:X⇢Y\phi: X \dashrightarrow Y such that:

  • (i) ϕ\phi extracts no prime divisor, and BY=ϕ∗BB_Y = \phi_*B;

  • (ii) (Y,BY)(Y,B_Y) is klt and its actual adjoint DY=KY+BYD_Y = K_Y + B_Y is Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier and analytically nef;

  • (iii) a(E;Y,BY)≥a(E;X,B)a(E;Y,B_Y) \ge a(E;X,B) for every prime divisor over the models, with strict inequality for each prime on XX contracted by ϕ\phi;

  • (iv) for some m>0m > 0, the Cartier line bundle OY(mDY)\mathcal{O}_Y(mD_Y) is globally generated.

The exponent may depend on the pair. Zero boundary, smooth fourfolds and all numerical dimensions are included. Global strong Q\mathbb{Q}-factoriality concerns all rank-one reflexive sheaves on the whole space; it is not an assumption of local analytic Q\mathbb{Q}-factoriality on every open subset. The conclusion concerns the actual holomorphic adjoint line on the specified endpoint.

Assumption 2.3 already produces a nef minimal model with properties (i)–(iii). The new conclusion needed before Assumption 2.4 can be applied is the following.

Theorem 1.2 (Nonvanishing on the nef endpoint). Under Assumptions 2.2, 2.3, and 2.4, let (Y,Δ)(Y,\Delta) be an ordinary klt pair on a normal connected globally strongly Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial compact Kähler fourfold. If Δ\Delta is effective and rational and the actual Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier adjoint J=KY+ΔJ = K_Y + \Delta is analytically nef, then κ(Y,J)≥0\kappa(Y,J) \ge0.

Structure of the proof

The projective case uses conditional projective log abundance. We include its complete proof in Appendices A–I; Lemma 3.1 derives its precise logarithmic-Iitaka premise from Assumption 2.2. Thus the projective branch introduces no further conditional premise. For a nonprojective endpoint, rational quotients, the Albanese map and lower-dimensional nonvanishing reduce the problem to canonical nonvanishing on a smooth non-uniruled fourfold, principally with irregularity zero.

When algebraic dimension is positive, we first construct an actual canonical pullback model over a projective base. The construction uses sufficiently large ample twists, whose sections are already known, and steps of a single empty-boundary program. Relative rationality allows the twist to be chosen separately at each stage without changing that program. The base has dimension at most three. For a surface base, fiber powers convert subadditivity into the intersection inequality needed for nonvanishing. For a threefold base, the genus-one Hodge line and two modular forms give an explicit crepant klt adjoint on the base. Their common divisorial order is determined by one integrability calculation, including exceptional base valuations.

The algebraic-dimension-zero argument has four parts.

  1. A nef ordinary klt adjoint has a metric of minimal singularities with zero Lelong numbers. The proof combines a volume-normalized capacity estimate, a differentiated Monge–Ampère equation and a Bochner transport estimate. The comparison at the end controls a concentrating residual measure on the same sublevel set.

  1. If the divisorial locus is empty and no signed canonical frame exists, holomorphic forms produce a transverse spherical structure. A fixed point on the full compact convex set of positive currents and the compactification of its holonomy lead to a contradiction with algebraic dimension zero.

  1. Relative analytic constructions produce nef reduced-boundary models while retaining actual line identities and the global reflexive-sheaf condition. The required dlt special termination is proved in the dimension order used by the construction.

  1. Adjunction and gluing give a section on the whole reduced floor. In the nonprojective torsion case, the ambient Kähler class controls the pluricanonical scalars around gluing cycles. This extra structure is what makes the cycle argument finite.

Finally, finite divisorial support and hard Lefschetz with multiplier ideals extend a high power of the floor section if ambient nonvanishing were to fail. Two choices of reduced boundary, according to whether a signed meromorphic pluricanonical tensor exists, finish canonical nonvanishing. The result then returns to the original nef endpoint of the stipulated MMP.

Several of these constructions have a scope beyond their immediate use here: the metric lemma is dimension independent; the relative descent argument treats global reflexive sheaves directly; the genus-one calculation determines actual crepant orders; and the floor argument isolates the role of a single ambient Kähler class in nonprojective gluing. The long projective appendices are organized separately so that the nonprojective argument can be read with their precise theorem statement, while every new argument used by that theorem remains available in the same manuscript.

Figure 1 records these uses and the return to the original nef endpoint. In the projective appendices, Assumption B.1 is the lower-dimensional induction hypothesis, discharged in Appendix I.

Reading map under Assumptions 2.2–2.4

Figure 1. Reading map under Assumptions 2.2–2.4. Lemma 3.1 derives the sole premise of Theorem A.2 from Assumption 2.2, so the projective appendices add no independent conditional input. The groupings indicate uses in this proof, not the full scope of the component lemmas. Assumption 2.4 also enters intermediate constructions. All routes return nonvanishing to the original nef pair before its final application on that endpoint.

Conventions and the three hypotheses

All spaces are over C\mathbb{C}, unless a statement in the projective appendices explicitly specifies another field of characteristic zero. A compact Kähler space means a complex analytic space with a Kähler form given by local smooth strictly plurisubharmonic potentials on local embeddings. Our spaces are normal and connected, hence irreducible. Smooth compact Kähler resolutions and resolutions of meromorphic maps are obtained by projective modifications. We use the usual resolution and Kähler modification theorems [45, 74].

Actual adjoints and positivity

The canonical object on a normal space XX is its reflexive canonical sheaf ωX\omega_X. For an effective rational Weil divisor BB, the notation D=KX+BD = K_X + B is an actual rational holomorphic line bundle when, for some positive integer rr clearing the coefficients of BB,

Lr=(ωX[r]⊗OX(rB))∗∗L_r = \left(\omega_X^{[r]} \otimes\mathcal{O}_X(rB)\right)^{**}

is invertible. Its positive tensor powers define OX(krD)\mathcal{O}_X(krD). Here ωX[r]=(ωX⊗r)∗∗\omega_X^{[r]} = \left(\omega_X^{\otimes r}\right)^{**}, and divisorial sheaves and their products are interpreted reflexively. An identity D1∼QD2D_1 \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} D_2 means an isomorphism of actual holomorphic line bundles after a common positive integral multiple. Numerical equivalence alone is never used to infer this identity.

Canonical divisor calculations can be performed with compatible local canonical divisors on a common smooth model p:W→Xp: W \to X. We use log discrepancies

a(E;X,B)=1+coeff⁡E(KW−p∗(KX+B)).(1)a(E; X, B) = 1 + \operatorname{coeff}_{E}\left(K_{W} - p^{*}(K_{X} + B)\right). \tag*{(1)}

The pair is klt if these numbers are positive for every prime divisor over XX, including primes on XX. In particular the boundary coefficients are less than one. We do not assume at the outset that a positive canonical power has a nonzero meromorphic section.

The adjoint DD is analytically pseudo-effective if c1(Lr)/rc_{1}(L^{r})/r is represented by a closed positive (1,1)(1,1)-current with local potentials. It is analytically nef if this class is in the closure of the Kähler cone in real Bott–Chern cohomology. Equivalently, for a fixed Kähler form ω\omega and every ε>0\varepsilon> 0, the line bundle has a smooth Hermitian metric whose curvature, divided by rr, is bounded below by −εω-\varepsilon\omega. On singular spaces the forms and potentials are understood through local embeddings. Nonnegativity on compact curves is a consequence of nefness, not its definition.

The Iitaka dimension κ(X,D)\kappa(X,D) is −∞-\infty if all positive Cartier multiples have zero sections. Otherwise it is the maximum dimension of the images of their complete linear systems. A rational line bundle is semiample if some positive Cartier multiple is globally generated. In particular, a semiample rational line of Iitaka dimension zero is torsion as an actual rational line bundle. We write a(X)a(X) for algebraic dimension, and q(M)=h1(M,OM)q(M) = h^{1}(M,\mathcal{O}_{M}) on smooth compact Kähler models.

Definition 2.1 (Global strong Q\mathbb{Q}-factoriality). A normal compact space XX is globally strongly Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial if every coherent rank-one reflexive sheaf F\mathcal{F} on the whole XX has an invertible positive reflexive power F[m]=(F⊗m)∗∗\mathcal{F}^{[m]} = (\mathcal{F}^{\otimes m})^{**}.

Definition 2.1 is a condition on global sheaves. It does not assert the same condition on every analytic open subset. Smooth spaces satisfy it. The constructions below retain this global condition when it is required; local analytic factoriality is not inserted as an intermediate assumption.

Orbifold subadditivity

We give the model convention in the first hypothesis because the distinction between the invariant base and the base on an arbitrary model is used in the proof.

For a smooth compact space ZZ with an effective rational SNC boundary Γ\Gamma having coefficients in [0,1][0,1], set

mΓ(E)={(1−coeff⁡EΓ)−1,coeff⁡EΓ<1,∞,coeff⁡EΓ=1m_{\Gamma}(E) = \begin{cases} (1-\operatorname{coeff}_{E}\Gamma)^{-1}, & \operatorname{coeff}_{E}\Gamma< 1,\\ \infty, & \operatorname{coeff}_{E}\Gamma= 1 \end{cases}

for every prime divisor EE. Thus the multiplicity off the boundary is one; finite multiplicities need not be integers. If g:(Z,Γ)→Sg:(Z,\Gamma)\to S is a surjective morphism with connected fibers and smooth base, put

m(g,Γ;P)=min⁡E:g(E)=P(ord⁡E(g∗P)mΓ(E)),m(g,\Gamma;P) = \min_{E:g(E)=P}\left(\operatorname{ord}_{E}(g^{*}P)m_{\Gamma}(E)\right),
B(g,Γ)=∑P(1−1m(g,Γ;P))P.(2)B(g,\Gamma) = \sum_{P}\left(1-\frac{1}{m(g,\Gamma;P)}\right)P. \tag*{(2)}

Only divisors dominating PP enter the minimum; the convention is 1/∞=01/\infty= 0. The sum has finite support. This is the inf-multiplicity convention.

An elementary equivalence of smooth source/base fibrations is a commuting bimeromorphic diagram

(Z′,Γ′)→p(Z,Γ)g′↓↓gS′→qS\begin{CD} (Z',\Gamma') @>p>> (Z,\Gamma) \\ @V{g'}VV @VVgV \\ S' @>q>> S \end{CD}

where the maps are proper holomorphic modifications, p∗Γ′=Γp_*\Gamma'=\Gamma, and pp is an orbifold morphism: for every prime DD on ZZ and every prime EE on Z′Z' with t=ord⁡E(p∗D)>0t=\operatorname{ord}_E(p^*D)>0,

t mΓ′(E)≥mΓ(D).(3)t\,m_{\Gamma'}(E) \ge m_\Gamma(D). \tag*{(3)}

Infinite multiplicities are compared in the usual order, with ∞≥∞\infty\ge\infty. All boundaries in these diagrams are rational SNC boundaries in [0,1][0,1]. Equivalence is generated by these diagrams with arrows allowed in either direction, not by arbitrary boundary changes on a fixed space. Define

κ(g∣Γ)=inf⁡g′∼gκ(S′,KS′+B(g′,Γ′)).(4)\kappa(g\mid\Gamma)=\inf_{g'\sim g}\kappa(S',K_{S'}+B(g',\Gamma')). \tag*{(4)}

For an initially normal possibly singular base, first resolve that base and the main fiber product. On the resulting smooth source use the strict transform of the original boundary plus the full reduced exceptional divisor, and resolve the total support to SNC. These modifications are isomorphisms over very general base points. The invariant is independent of these choices.

A smooth-base fibration is neat if there is a proper bimeromorphic orbifold morphism of its source pair to a smooth pair, with the boundary pushing forward, which contracts every source prime mapping to codimension at least two in the given base. The hypothesis below includes existence of suitable neat models and the formula

κ(g∣Γ)=κ(S,KS+B(g,Γ))on a neat model.(5)\kappa(g\mid\Gamma)=\kappa(S,K_S+B(g,\Gamma)) \quad\text{on a neat model.} \tag*{(5)}

Assumption 2.2 (Full orbifold Iitaka subadditivity). Let XX be a smooth compact connected manifold in Fujiki class C\mathcal{C}, let Δ\Delta be an effective rational SNC boundary with coefficients in [0,1][0,1], and let f:X→Yf:X\to Y be a surjective holomorphic map with connected fibers onto a normal compact irreducible complex space. In arbitrary dimensions,

κ(X,KX+Δ)≥κ(F,KF+Δ∣F)+κ(f∣Δ),(6)\kappa(X,K_X+\Delta)\ge\kappa(F,K_F+\Delta|_F)+\kappa(f\mid\Delta), \tag*{(6)}

where FF is a very general smooth fiber with SNC boundary restriction, and the invariant base is defined by (2)–(5).

Here very general means outside a countable union of proper closed analytic subsets, as well as the critical values and unsuitable boundary-stratum loci. The zero boundary is allowed, a point has Kodaira dimension zero, and a sum with −∞-\infty is −∞-\infty. Neither source nor base need be projective. There is no abundance, positivity or good-model premise in Assumption 2.2. The displayed statement is the orbifold subadditivity theorem of [63], Theorem 1.1. For later use, on a smooth base the invariant is at least κ(Y,KY)\kappa(Y,K_Y), by effectivity of the orbifold boundaries and smooth birational invariance.

The pseudo-effective fourfold program

The closed analytic cone NA⁡‾(X)\overline{\operatorname{NA}}(X) consists of positive closed bidimension-(1,1)(1,1) currents, modulo their pairings with all real Bott–Chern (1,1)(1,1)-classes. We use its negative extremal rays in the following hypothesis.

Assumption 2.3 (Pseudo-effective fourfold MMP). Assume Assumption 2.2. Start from an ordinary klt pair (X,B)(X,B), where XX is a normal irreducible globally strongly Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial compact Kähler fourfold, BB is effective and rational, and the actual adjoint D=KX+BD=K_X+B is Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier and analytically pseudo-effective. No initial modification is inserted. The following program exists and terminates.

At every non-nef stage (Xi,Bi)(X_i,B_i) there is a nonzero DiD_i-negative extremal ray of NA‾(Xi)\overline{\mathrm{NA}}(X_i), and every such ray RR may be chosen. It has a nef supporting class α\alpha with

NA‾(Xi)∩α⊥=R,α−c1(Di) Ka¨hler.\overline{\mathrm{NA}}(X_i)\cap\alpha^\perp=R,\qquad\alpha-c_1(D_i)\ \text{Kähler}.

For every chosen ray there is a projective surjective bimeromorphic contraction with connected fibers fi:Xi→Zif_i:X_i\to Z_i, where ZiZ_i is normal compact Kähler, ρBC(Xi/Zi)=1\rho_{\mathrm{BC}}(X_i/Z_i)=1, and −Di-D_i is relatively ample. For some Kähler class ωi\omega_i on ZiZ_i,

NA‾(Xi)∩(fi∗ωi)⊥=R.\overline{\mathrm{NA}}(X_i)\cap(f_i^*\omega_i)^\perp=R.

A divisorial contraction gives the next pair by pushforward. For a small contraction the canonical log-canonical-positive flip is the relative analytic Proj of

⨁m≥0(fi)∗OXi(mrDi)\bigoplus_{m\geq0}(f_i)_*\mathcal{O}_{X_i}(mrD_i)

for a sufficiently divisible positive Cartier index rr. This algebra is locally finitely generated. Its Proj is normal and its map to ZiZ_i is projective, small and has connected fibers. The boundary is strictly transformed; the new actual adjoint is relatively ample, and its divisible Cartier multiple is the tautological line bundle. Passing to a Veronese does not change the model.

Each new pair is klt, compact Kähler and globally strongly Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial, with Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier analytically pseudo-effective actual adjoint. Every nonterminal finite prefix can be extended. Every program so obtained has finitely many steps, irrespective of the choices of negative rays. It ends at an analytically nef pair. The composite map extracts no prime and satisfies the minimal-model discrepancy inequalities, weakly for every prime over the models and strictly for every original prime contracted.

Assumption 2.3 is supplied by [62] in the stated pseudo-effective subcase, without an orbifold Iitaka hypothesis. The assumption gives neither a first plurisection nor semiampleness. It includes no non-pseudo-effective program and no dlt or generalized-pair extension. Fiber-type contractions are not stopping outcomes in this program. The Cartier index may change at every stage; no positive-side relative Bott–Chern dimension or identification of absolute Bott–Chern spaces across a flip is assumed. Trivial flops, inserted blowups and arbitrary birational walks are not steps of the program. These distinctions matter when auxiliary boundaries are used below.

Abundance after nonvanishing

Assumption 2.4 (Effective fourfold abundance). Let XX be a normal connected compact Kähler fourfold and Δ\Delta an effective rational boundary such that (X,Δ)(X,\Delta) is klt and the actual adjoint J=KX+ΔJ=K_X+\Delta is Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier. If JJ is analytically nef and κ(X,J)≥0\kappa(X,J)\geq0, then a positive Cartier multiple of JJ is globally generated.

Assumption 2.4 is the abundance-after-nonvanishing theorem of [61], Theorem 1.1. It needs no strong factoriality hypothesis and includes the actual torsion conclusion when κ=0\kappa=0. Its nonvanishing premise is explicit. No auxiliary statement from its proof is granted separately.

The proof uses all three hypotheses. Apart from them, established literature is invoked at its stated scope. The separate projective abundance theorem used in the Moishezon branch is proved in Appendices A–I; Lemma 3.1 establishes its sole subadditivity premise from Assumption 2.2.

Reductions to canonical nonvanishing

We first discharge the hypothesis of the projective theorem proved in the appendices. We then reduce the remaining problem to canonical nonvanishing on a smooth compact Kähler fourfold of irregularity zero. Throughout, a fibration means a surjective holomorphic map with connected fibers. Smooth source and target spaces do not mean that the map is everywhere a submersion.

The projective case

Lemma 3.1 (The logarithmic premise). Assumption 2.2 implies the following statement. Let f ⁣:M→Sf \colon M \to S be a fibration between smooth connected complex projective varieties, and let DM,DSD_M,D_S be reduced effective simple normal crossing divisors, possibly zero, such that

Supp⁡(f∗DS)⊆Supp⁡(DM).(7)\operatorname{Supp}(f^{*}D_S) \subseteq\operatorname{Supp}(D_M). \tag*{(7)}

For a very general smooth fiber FF, with DF=DM∣FD_F = D_M|_F, one has

κ(M,KM+DM)≥κ(F,KF+DF)+κ(S,KS+DS).(8)\kappa(M,K_M+D_M) \ge\kappa(F,K_F+D_F) + \kappa(S,K_S+D_S). \tag*{(8)}

The usual convention for a −∞-\infty summand applies.

Proof. It suffices to prove

κ(f∣DM)≥κ(S,KS+DS),(9)\kappa(f \mid D_M) \ge\kappa(S,K_S+D_S), \tag*{(9)}

because Assumption 2.2 can then be applied to the original pair (M,DM)(M,D_M). We construct a neat model in the precise equivalence class occurring in that assumption.

Flatten ff by a projective modification of its base and resolve that base, obtaining q ⁣:S′→Sq \colon S' \to S with S′S' smooth projective. The main strict transform before resolving the source can be taken equidimensional over S′S'. Indeed, start with the flat strict transform provided by flattening and then base-change to the smooth resolved base. Flatness persists; the unchanged smooth connected generic fiber is irreducible, and flatness rules out vertical components. The main space consequently has pure fibers of dimension dim⁡M−dim⁡S\dim M - \dim S. Resolve it and its boundary to obtain a commuting diagram

M′→pMf′↓↓fS′→qS\begin{CD} M' @>p>> M \\ @V{f'}VV @VVfV \\ S' @>q>> S \end{CD}

Here pp is a projective birational morphism, M′M' is smooth projective, and f′f' has connected fibers: its general fiber is connected, so Stein factorization over the normal base S′S' has trivial finite factor. Set DM′D_{M'} equal to the strict transform of DMD_M plus the full reduced pp-exceptional divisor, and arrange that its support is simple normal crossing.

This is an allowed orbifold modification of the source pair. It pushes DM′D_{M'} to DMD_M. If a prime upstairs has positive pullback order over a coefficient-one prime of DMD_M, it is either that prime’s strict transform or a pp-exceptional prime; in both cases its coefficient upstairs is one. Thus the infinite-multiplicity condition in the definition of an orbifold morphism is satisfied.

Moreover, pp witnesses neatness. Let E⊂M′E \subset M' be a divisor whose image in S′S' has codimension c≥2c \ge2. In the equidimensional main space its image has dimension at most

(dim⁡S−c)+(dim⁡M−dim⁡S)=dim⁡M−c.(\dim S-c)+(\dim M-\dim S)=\dim M-c.

Its image in MM therefore has codimension at least two, so EE is pp-exceptional. Subsequent resolutions preserve this argument.

Let Bf′B_{f'} be the orbifold base divisor on S′S'. Every component of a pullback over a prime of (q−1Supp⁡DS)red(q^{-1}\operatorname{Supp}D_S)_{\mathrm{red}} belongs to DM′D_{M'}: this follows from (7) if it is not exceptional over MM, and from the definition of DM′D_{M'} otherwise. The multiplicity assigned to each such source component is infinite. Consequently

Bf′≥(q−1Supp⁡DS)red.(10)B_{f'} \ge(q^{-1}\operatorname{Supp}D_S)_{\mathrm{red}}. \tag*{(10)}

There is also an effective qq-exceptional divisor ESE_S such that

KS′+(q−1Supp⁡DS)red=q∗(KS+DS)+ES(11)K_{S'}+(q^{-1}\operatorname{Supp}D_S)_{\mathrm{red}}=q^*(K_S+D_S)+E_S \tag*{(11)}

for compatible canonical divisors. Above the boundary, this is the nonnegativity of log discrepancies of the simple normal crossing pair (S,DS)(S,D_S); away from the boundary, it is the nonnegativity of the ordinary discrepancies of the smooth space SS. Equivalently, a blowup of a smooth center of codimension cc contained in ss boundary components contributes c−sc-s if the center lies in the boundary, and c−1c-1 otherwise, both nonnegative.

The neat-model formula in Assumption 2.2, followed by (10) and (11), now gives

κ(f∣DM)=κ(S′,KS′+Bf′)≥κ(S,KS+DS).\kappa(f\mid D_M)=\kappa(S',K_{S'}+B_{f'})\ge\kappa(S,K_S+D_S).

This proves (9). In particular, the infimum in the definition of the invariant has been computed on an allowed neat model, rather than replaced by the divisor of an arbitrary base model.

Corollary 3.2 (Projective abundance in the present setting). Under Assumption 2.2, a nef Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier adjoint of a normal projective log canonical pair over C\mathbb{C}, with effective rational boundary, is semiample.

Proof. Lemma 3.1 is exactly the logarithmic-Iitaka hypothesis of Theorem A.2. Apply that theorem, whose full proof is included in the appendices.

In particular, the Moishezon case of Theorem 1.2 is settled. A compact Kähler Moishezon space with rational singularities is projective by Namikawa’s criterion [60]. Analytic klt singularities are rational; this follows as well from relative vanishing on a projective log resolution [31]. Thus a Moishezon klt endpoint (Y,Δ)(Y,\Delta) of Assumption 2.3 is projective. Its rational analytic boundary and adjoint are algebraic by Chow’s theorem and GAGA, and analytic nefness implies nonnegative degree on every curve. Corollary 3.2 applies to its actual adjoint line.

Lower-dimensional inputs and restriction to fibers

We use smooth compact Kähler resolutions of spaces, pairs, and graphs. The resolution and Kähler-modification theorems ensure that these can be obtained by projective modifications and remain Kähler [45, 74]. A space in Fujiki class C\mathcal{C} has a smooth compact Kähler model. The quantities κ(KW)\kappa(K_W), q(W)=h0(W,ΩW1)q(W)=h^0(W,\Omega_W^1), and a(W)a(W) for smooth compact Kähler WW are bimeromorphic invariants.

We recall precisely the lower-dimensional nonvanishing facts used below. A smooth non-uniruled compact Kähler manifold of dimension at most three has nonnegative canonical Kodaira dimension. In nonprojective dimension three this is [47], Corollary 1.4. More explicitly, take a terminal minimal model by Höring–Peternell and apply canonical nonvanishing [27], Theorem 0.3 to its nef canonical class. Terminal discrepancy comparison pulls its plurisections back to the smooth model. In the projective case, the klt minimal model program and log abundance in dimensions at most three imply nonvanishing for every effective rational klt pair with pseudo-effective adjoint [53], [51], [52]. Finally, Ou’s Theorem 1.1 identifies non-uniruledness of a smooth compact Kähler manifold with analytic pseudo-effectivity of its canonical class [64]. These inputs have no four-dimensional nonvanishing conclusion.

We will repeatedly use the following elementary parameter observation. Let f:Z→Sf: Z \to S be a proper fibration between smooth compact complex manifolds, and let a pseudo-effective rational adjoint on ZZ have a closed positive representative with local potentials. Its restriction to a smooth fiber is defined and positive for almost every parameter: local plurisubharmonic potentials restrict unless they are identically minus infinity, and Fubini excludes the latter event for almost every parameter. This full-measure set meets the complement of any countable union of proper analytic subsets. If the lower-dimensional results give nonvanishing on those fibers, a fixed multiple has sections generically. Indeed, on a connected smooth parameter open set the loci

{s:h0(Zs,mL∣Zs)≥1},\{s : h^0(Z_s,mL|_{Z_s}) \ge1\},

for divisible positive integers mm, are analytic jumping loci by proper semicontinuity. If every one were proper, their union would have measure zero. Some such locus is therefore the whole open set. Generic base change gives a direct image of positive rank. The same reasoning allows all required very-general smoothness and boundary conditions to be imposed simultaneously.

The uniruled and irregular cases

Lemma 3.3 (The uniruled reduction). Assume Assumption 2.2. Let (Y,Δ)(Y,\Delta) be a non-Moishezon compact Kähler klt fourfold with effective rational boundary and pseudo-effective Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier adjoint J=KY+ΔJ=K_Y+\Delta. If a smooth compact Kähler resolution of YY is uniruled, then κ(Y,J)≥0\kappa(Y,J) \ge0.

Proof. Take the almost-holomorphic rational-chain quotient of a smooth resolution WW of YY. Campana’s rational quotient theorem in class C\mathcal{C} gives a quotient with base in that class and very general fibers rationally connected after resolution [14], Theorem 2.6. Resolve the quotient and the pair simultaneously to a fibration

f:W′⟶T,p:W′⟶Y,f: W' \longrightarrow T,\qquad p: W' \longrightarrow Y,

with W′,TW', T smooth compact Kähler. The very general fibers are projective: rational-chain-connected manifolds in class C\mathcal{C} are Moishezon by Campana’s algebraic connectedness criterion [13], and a smooth Kähler Moishezon manifold is projective. They are then rationally connected.

The quotient base is not uniruled; see also [64], Lemma 8.10. For completeness, suppose otherwise and choose a covering rational curve through a very general point of TT. Pull the fibration back to its normalization P1\mathbb{P}^1 and resolve the main component, obtaining a smooth compact Kähler space ZZ over P1\mathbb{P}^1 with rationally connected very general fiber. Such a fiber has no holomorphic one- or two-forms. A global two-form on ZZ restricts to zero on those fibers; the relative differential sequence over the smooth locus then places it in the base-one-form times relative-one-form piece. Its restriction there is again zero, so the two-form vanishes on a dense open and hence everywhere. Thus H0(Z,ΩZ2)=0H^0(Z,\Omega_Z^2)=0. Rational approximation of a Kähler class, followed by Kodaira’s criterion, makes ZZ projective. The Graber–Harris–Starr theorem supplies a section of Z→P1Z \to\mathbb{P}^1 [39].

The chosen base point can be taken so that its original quotient fiber is not contained in any of the countably many analytic exceptional sets in the very-general quotient property. This follows from the proper fiber-dimension theorem on the resolved quotient. Consequently the rational curve is contained in none of the corresponding bad parameter sets. Choose two distinct good parameters on it. In each smooth projective rationally connected fiber, rational chains join a very general point to the point of the section. The section joins these two chains. Their projection to WW is a rational chain joining points of different very general rational-quotient fibers, where the original almost-holomorphic quotient is defined. This contradicts the quotient property. Hence TT is not uniruled. Its dimension is positive, since a point quotient would make WW Moishezon, and is at most three; the fiber dimension is likewise between one and three.

On the simultaneous log resolution write

KW′+Γ∼Qp∗J+E,0≤Γ<1,E≥0,(12)K_{W'}+\Gamma\sim_{\mathbb{Q}} p^*J+E,\qquad0\leq\Gamma<1,\qquad E\geq0, \tag*{(12)}

where Γ\Gamma is simple normal crossing and EE is pp-exceptional. Concretely, take the nonnegative part of the crepant log pullback boundary; its negative part becomes EE. The adjoint in (12) is pseudo-effective. At a very general smooth fiber FF we can impose the klt simple normal crossing restriction and also restrict its positive current, by the parameter observation above. Projective nonvanishing in dimension at most three gives κ(F,KF+Γ∣F)≥0\kappa(F,K_F+\Gamma|_F)\geq0. The non-uniruled base similarly satisfies κ(T,KT)≥0\kappa(T,K_T)\geq0.

For a smooth base, the invariant orbifold-base dimension is at least its ordinary canonical Kodaira dimension: on every equivalent smooth model the orbifold divisor is effective, and the smooth canonical Kodaira dimension is birationally invariant. Assumption 2.2 therefore gives κ(W′,KW′+Γ)≥0\kappa(W',K_{W'}+\Gamma)\geq0. A resulting section pushes through (12) to a section of a positive multiple of JJ. The exceptional pole allowance disappears away from a codimension-two subset of the normal target, and reflexive extension fills that subset.

Lemma 3.4 (Irregular canonical nonvanishing). Assume Assumption 2.2. If WW is a smooth non-uniruled compact Kähler fourfold with q(W)>0q(W)>0, then κ(W,KW)≥0\kappa(W,K_W)\geq0.

Proof. Resolve the Stein-factor base of the Albanese map and its main pullback. This gives a fibration on smooth compact Kähler models, with a positive-dimensional smooth base TT mapping generically with full rank to the Albanese torus. A suitable wedge of the invariant one-forms on that torus pulls back to a nonzero section of KTK_T. The very general fiber has dimension at most three; if its dimension is zero, it is a point. The pseudo-effective canonical class of the total space restricts to the canonical class of almost every smooth fiber. Lower-dimensional canonical nonvanishing and the parameter observation supply κ(KF)≥0\kappa(K_F)\geq0 on very general fibers. Assumption 2.2, with zero boundary, now gives canonical nonvanishing on the resolved total space and hence on WW.

Proposition 3.5 (Canonical reduction). Under the three assumptions of the main theorem, it is enough for Theorem 1.2 to prove canonical nonvanishing for every smooth non-uniruled non-Moishezon compact Kähler fourfold WW with q(W)=0q(W)=0.

Proof. Let (Y,Δ)(Y,\Delta) be the nef klt endpoint in Theorem 1.2, and put J=KY+ΔJ=K_Y+\Delta. The Moishezon case was settled by Corollary 3.2. Let WW be a smooth compact Kähler resolution in the remaining case. If WW is uniruled, Lemma 3.3 applies. Otherwise Ou’s theorem makes KWK_W pseudo-effective. A section of a divisible canonical power on WW pushes to the corresponding reflexive canonical power on YY, and multiplication by the effective boundary section, at a common multiple, gives a section of JJ. Thus canonical nonvanishing on WW suffices. Lemma 3.4 handles q(W)>0q(W)>0, leaving exactly the stated case.

Once nonvanishing on this original endpoint is established, Assumption 2.4 makes its adjoint semiample. Its other good-minimal-model and discrepancy properties have already been supplied by Assumption 2.3. None of the auxiliary models constructed later needs to replace this endpoint.

Positive algebraic dimension

Proposition 4.1. Assume Assumptions 2.2, 2.3, and 2.4. Let WW be a smooth non-uniruled compact Kähler fourfold with q(W)=0q(W) = 0 and 0<a(W)<40 < a(W) < 4. Then κ(W,KW)≥0\kappa(W, K_W) \ge0.

The first step constructs an actual canonical pullback over a projective base. We then prove nonvanishing of that base line in each of its three possible dimensions.

A contraction index bound

Lemma 4.2 (A local rationality bound). Let (Z,Δ)(Z, \Delta) be an ordinary rational klt pair on a normal nn-dimensional compact Kähler space, with actual Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier adjoint J=KZ+ΔJ = K_Z + \Delta. Let π:Z→T\pi: Z \to T be a projective bimeromorphic morphism with connected fibers to a normal compact Kähler space. Assume that −J-J is relatively ample and that all contracted curves have class in one JJ-negative ray RR of NA(Z)\mathrm{NA}(Z). Let k>0k > 0 be an integer such that kJkJ is Cartier, and let LL be a line bundle with L⋅R>0L \cdot R > 0. For any nontrivial fiber FF of π\pi,

rF:=sup⁡{u:L+uJ has nonnegative degree on all curves of F}≥1k(n+1).(13)r_F := \sup\{u : L + uJ \text{ has nonnegative degree on all curves of } F\} \ge\frac{1}{k(n+1)}. \tag*{(13)}

No local analytic Q\mathbb{Q}-factoriality is required. In particular, this applies to the contractions in Assumption 2.3, with n=4n = 4.

Proof. Every curve CC in FF has nonzero class, since a Kähler class has positive degree on it, and its class belongs to RR. Therefore

rF=L⋅C−J⋅C>0r_F = \frac{L \cdot C}{-J \cdot C} > 0

is independent of CC. The restriction of LL to the projective fiber is numerically a positive multiple of the relatively ample rational line −J-J. It is thus ample on FF, and the openness of fiberwise ampleness makes LL relatively ample after shrinking around the image point of FF.

Work over a small Stein neighborhood of that point, with compactum equal to the point. At rFr_F, the restriction of L+rFJL + r_F J is numerically trivial, hence nef but not ample on the nontrivial fiber. Fujino’s relative rationality theorem applies to this finite positive threshold: in lowest terms its denominator is at most k(dim⁡F+1)k(\dim F + 1) [32], Theorem 4.3.1. The non-lc-locus condition is empty for a klt pair, and the singleton compactum satisfies the required local condition on the Stein base. The relative numerical space over it is finite dimensional, as is also seen by restriction to the projective fiber. The theorem consequently gives rF≥1/(k(dim⁡F+1))r_F \ge1/(k(\dim F + 1)), which implies (13).

The line-bundle formulation is expressly permitted by [32], Remark 4.3.4; the nearby ampleness assertion is [32], Lemma 2.2.4. Canonical divisors in that theorem may be handled locally, in its formal canonical-class convention. Alternatively, over the Stein neighborhood the proper direct image of a rank-one canonical sheaf is coherent of rank one, since the contraction is bimeromorphic. Cartan’s theorem supplies a generically nonzero section, hence a meromorphic canonical representative there. This requires no global meromorphic canonical frame on the compact source and no local Q\mathbb{Q}-factoriality. The Cartier index used in the bound belongs to this stage alone.

An actual canonical pullback

Put d=a(W)d=a(W). Resolve a map defined by dd algebraically independent meromorphic functions on WW. Stein factorization has a projective base, since its finite map has projective image. Resolving that base and the main graph, we may replace WW by a smooth compact Kähler model on which there is a fibration

b:W⟶S0,S0 smooth connected projective,dim⁡S0=d.b: W \longrightarrow S_0,\qquad S_0\ \text{smooth connected projective},\qquad\dim S_0=d.

The generic fibers remain connected through these modifications; Stein factorization over the normal resolved base gives connected fibers everywhere. Fix a very ample line bundle HH on S0S_0.

Since KWK_W is pseudo-effective and 4−d≤34-d\leq3, the restriction and parameter argument in Section 3 gives rk⁡b∗OW(ℓKW)>0\operatorname{rk} b_*\mathcal{O}_W(\ell K_W)>0 for some positive integer ℓ\ell. Coherence and ample twisting on the projective base imply that b∗OW(ℓKW)⊗HℓNb_*\mathcal{O}_W(\ell K_W)\otimes H^{\ell N} has a nonzero global section for every sufficiently large integer NN. Thus there is N0N_0 such that

κ(KW+Nb∗H)≥0for every integer N≥N0.(14)\kappa(K_W+N b^*H)\geq0\qquad\text{for every integer }N\geq N_0. \tag*{(14)}

Proposition 4.3 (The pullback model). There are a canonical globally strongly Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial compact Kähler fourfold VV, a normal projective variety TT of dimension dd, a fibration g:V→Tg:V\to T, and an actual rational line bundle AT∈Pic⁡(T)⊗QA_T\in\operatorname{Pic}(T)\otimes\mathbb{Q}, such that

KV∼Qg∗AT.(15)K_V\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}g^*A_T. \tag*{(15)}

The space VV is obtained from the current smooth WW by a finite empty-boundary KK-program allowed by Assumption 2.3, and KVK_V remains pseudo-effective.

Proof. At a stage ViV_i of the empty-boundary program that still maps to S0S_0, write bi:Vi→S0b_i:V_i\to S_0 and Hi=bi∗HH_i=b_i^*H. All these stages are canonical. Indeed, a common projective resolution of a negative canonical step gives the comparison

p∗Kbefore∼Qq∗Kafter+G,G≥0,(16)p^*K_{\mathrm{before}}\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}q^*K_{\mathrm{after}}+G,\qquad G\geq0, \tag*{(16)}

with GG exceptional over the after model. The comparison follows from the projective analytic negativity lemma over the contraction base: there is no extraction, and canonical negativity supplies the relative sign. For flips both sides and their common resolution are projective over that base. Compatible local canonical comparisons glue to the intrinsic discrepancy divisor in (16). Discrepancies therefore do not decrease. Starting from smooth WW, this preserves canonicity. The remaining category and pseudo-effectivity properties are part of Assumption 2.3.

Choose a Cartier index kik_i for KViK_{V_i}, and choose an integer

N≥N0,N>5ki.(17)N\geq N_0,\qquad N>5k_i. \tag*{(17)}

This choice is made anew at the current stage. The actual line KVi+NHiK_{V_i}+NH_i has an effective rational klt boundary representative: take a general divisor in a sufficiently high free multiple of NHiNH_i and divide by that multiple. On a fixed log resolution the system has no fixed exceptional component, and Bertini makes the chosen member transverse to the exceptional strata; its small coefficient preserves klt. Its adjoint is pseudo-effective because KViK_{V_i} is pseudo-effective and HiH_i is semipositive.

If this adjoint is not analytically nef, Assumption 2.3 supplies an extremal ray on which KVi+NHiK_{V_i}+NH_i is negative. Since HiH_i is the pullback of a semipositive form, the ray is also KViK_{V_i}-negative. Take its contraction and its negative step for the empty-boundary program. In fact

Hi⋅Ri=0.(18)H_i\cdot R_i=0. \tag*{(18)}

Otherwise Lemma 4.2, with L=HiL=H_i and J=KViJ=K_{V_i}, gives

15ki≤Hi⋅C−KVi⋅C<1N\frac{1}{5k_i} \le\frac{H_i\cdot C}{-K_{V_i}\cdot C} < \frac{1}{N}

on any curve of a nontrivial contraction fiber, contrary to (17).

Every connected projective fiber of the contraction maps to a point under bib_i. If its image had positive dimension, some curve in that fiber would map nontrivially to the projective base and have positive HiH_i-degree. Proper descent over the normal contraction target therefore factors bib_i through it. In a flip, composition with the positive-side morphism gives bi+1b_{i+1}. Thus the actual pullback line HiH_i, not merely its numerical class, continues to be the pullback of the fixed HH.

Repeat this procedure as long as the selected twist is not nef. Every step actually taken is a step of the single empty-boundary KK-program starting from WW. The changing integers NN select rays; they do not change that program’s boundary. If the procedure were infinite, it would contradict the arbitrary termination assertion in Assumption 2.3. It therefore reaches a stage ViV_i at which its selected KVi+NHiK_{V_i}+NH_i is nef. In particular, if the canonical program reaches a nef canonical class, the selected semipositive twist is nef there as well.

For this final value of NN, (14) already gave a section on the original WW. Clear the finitely many Cartier indices of the chosen program. Since no step extracts a prime and all maps agree to S0S_0, that section pushes through every step as a section of the corresponding actual twisted canonical power. Reflexive extension across codimension two on each normal target justifies the pushforward. Hence κ(KVi+NHi)≥0\kappa(K_{V_i}+NH_i)\ge0 before abundance is invoked. Assumption 2.4, applied to the klt representative above, makes this actual line semiample.

Set V=ViV=V_i, choose a free integral multiple m(KV+NHi)m(K_V+NH_i), and let h:V→Prh:V\to\mathbb{P}^r be its morphism. Take the Stein factorization g:V→Tg:V\to T of (bi,h)(b_i,h). The variety TT is normal and finite over the projective image, hence projective. Let a:T→S0a:T\to S_0 and c:T→Prc:T\to\mathbb{P}^r be the induced maps. We have dim⁡T≥d\dim T\ge d because aa is surjective, and dim⁡T≤a(V)=d\dim T\le a(V)=d because TT is projective. Define

AT=1mc∗OPr(1)−Na∗Hin Pic⁡(T)⊗Q.(19)A_T=\frac{1}{m}c^*\mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^r}(1)-Na^*H \quad\text{in }\operatorname{Pic}(T)\otimes\mathbb{Q}. \tag*{(19)}

The defining evaluation isomorphism for hh and the actual identity Hi=g∗a∗HH_i=g^*a^*H prove (15).

Choose a smooth projective resolution μ:S→T\mu:S\to T, and resolve the main graph to obtain a smooth compact Kähler MM with p:M→Vp:M\to V and a fibration f:M→Sf:M\to S. Put A=μ∗ATA=\mu^*A_T. Canonicity and the fixed actual isomorphism in (15) give

KM∼Qf∗A+R,R≥0 and R is p-exceptional.(20)K_M\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}f^*A+R,\qquad R\ge0\text{ and }R\text{ is }p\text{-exceptional}. \tag*{(20)}

This is an identity of rational line bundles; all further resolutions use its canonical transform. Pullback of holomorphic one-forms gives q(S)≤q(M)=q(W)=0q(S)\le q(M)=q(W)=0.

The rational line AA is pseudo-effective. To see this with the analytic definition, pull a positive representative Θ\Theta of c1(KV)c_1(K_V), with local potentials, to MM. The map pp is dominant, so its plurisubharmonic potentials do not become identically minus infinity. If ω\omega is a Kähler form on MM, then

f∗(p∗Θ∧ω4−d)f_*(p^*\Theta\wedge\omega^{4-d})

is a closed positive (1,1)(1,1)-current. The projection formula puts its class in νc1(A)\nu c_1(A), where the degree-zero closed current f∗(ω4−d)=νf_*(\omega^{4-d})=\nu is the positive constant volume of a smooth general fiber. Division by ν\nu proves the assertion. Since SS is projective, this also gives numerical divisor pseudo-effectivity [][12].

It remains to prove κ(S,A)≥0\kappa(S,A) \ge0. A section then pulls back through (20), multiplied by the effective exceptional section, to a canonical plurisection on MM, and hence on WW. If d=1d = 1, the smooth projective curve SS has q(S)=0q(S) = 0, so it is P1\mathbb{P}^{1}; a pseudo-effective rational line on it has nonnegative degree and has a section at a divisible multiple. The two remaining dimensions require more information from the fibration.

A surface base and fiber powers

Assume d=2d = 2. Fix a sufficiently divisible positive integer m0m_{0} for (20). On very general smooth fibers one has

h0(F,mKF)=1(m>0, m0∣m).(21)h^{0}(F,mK_{F}) = 1 \qquad(m > 0,\ m_{0} \mid m). \tag*{(21)}

At least one section is supplied by the effective divisor R∣FR|_{F}. If for a fixed divisible mm the generic dimension were at least two, generic base change and ample twisting of f∗OM(mKM)f_{*}\mathcal{O}_{M}(mK_{M}) would give two sections whose ratio is nonconstant on a general fiber. Together with meromorphic functions from the two-dimensional projective base this would give algebraic dimension at least three, contrary to a(M)=2a(M) = 2. The analytic jumping loci for the countably many mm’s can be excluded simultaneously, proving (21).

Lemma 4.4 (A base intersection inequality). There are nonnegative rational numbers cPc_{P}, indexed by the finitely many μ\mu-exceptional curves on SS, such that

(A−KS+∑PcPP)⋅H′≥0(22)\left(A - K_{S} + \sum_{P} c_{P}P\right) \cdot H' \ge0 \tag*{(22)}

for every ample divisor H′H' on SS.

Proof. Choose a dense open set of SS over which ff is smooth and the generator supplied by (20) is not identically zero on any fiber. This requires deleting a proper analytic subset: a horizontal divisor cannot contain a whole fiber over a divisor in the base without being vertical, by the fiber-dimension theorem; the remaining degeneracies are proper analytic images or jumping loci. Include all μ\mu-exceptional curves among the finitely many complementary curves.

For each such curve PP, fix a component DD of f∗Pf^{*}P dominating PP, write

e=ord⁡D(f∗P),h=coeff⁡DR,e = \operatorname{ord}_{D}(f^{*}P), \qquad h = \operatorname{coeff}_{D}R,

and make these choices before choosing any ample test curve or fiber power. If PP is not exceptional over TT, take DD with h=0h = 0. Indeed, over a general point of its image divisor in the normal TT, a local equation pulls back under the holomorphic gg to a divisor on VV dominating that base divisor. The strict transform of one such component has zero coefficient in the pp-exceptional RR. For an exceptional PP, set

cP=h/e.(23)c_{P} = h/e. \tag*{(23)}

Replace H′H' by a sufficiently large very ample multiple and choose a smooth member CC of genus at least one. It can be chosen transverse to all complementary curves at their general points, avoiding their finitely many excluded points and any isolated bad base points. Moreover, MC=f−1(C)M_{C} = f^{-1}(C) is smooth by Bertini for the pulled-back free system, and connected because ff has connected fibers. To retain (21), choose CC through one parameter where all those countably many equalities hold. A high enough linear system through that point is free away from it; on its fiber ff is a submersion, so the same Bertini conclusion holds there. Each jumping locus then cuts a proper analytic subset of CC. Thus very general fibers of fC:MC→Cf_{C}: M_{C} \to C satisfy all the equalities in (21).

By adjunction,

KMC/C∼QfC∗((A−KS)∣C)+RC,RC=R∣MC≥0.(24)K_{M_C/C} \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} f_C^*((A-K_S)|_C)+R_C,\qquad R_C=R|_{M_C}\geq0. \tag*{(24)}

At each z∈C∩Pz\in C\cap P, a general point of the chosen component DD over zz admits coordinates (x,y1,y2)(x,y_1,y_2) on MCM_C and a parameter tt on CC in which

t=xe,RC=h{x=0}(25)t=x^e,\qquad R_C=h\{x=0\} \tag*{(25)}

in that chart. A unit in the pullback equation is absorbed into xx. Such charts exist over general points of PP: the map D→PD\to P is generically submersive, and its intersections with the other divisorial supports have smaller generic fiber dimension. Properness and the fiber-dimension theorem allow the exceptional base points to be discarded before CC is chosen. These choices are independent of the next integer rr.

For r≥1r\geq1, take the main component of the rr-fold fiber product of MCM_C over CC, and a smooth compact Kähler resolution ZrZ_r of it. Over the good open set this fiber product is smooth with connected fibers FrF^r, hence has a unique main component. It is an analytic subspace of a product of compact Kähler spaces; the required Kähler resolution and connected-fiber morphism to CC follow as above. The general fiber has a canonical section by (21), and κ(C)≥0\kappa(C)\geq0. Assumption 2.2, with zero boundary and in dimension 2r+12r+1, gives a nonzero section of mKZrmK_{Z_r} for some m>0m>0. By taking a power, make mm divisible by m0m_0 and all indices in use. It may depend on rr and CC.

Over good parameters, the product formula and (21) make the fiberwise pluriform space one-dimensional. The chosen section is therefore the product of the rr relative generators in (24), times a base pluriform and a scalar base coefficient. This coefficient is a section on the good open of the line

OC(m(KC+r(A−KS)∣C)).(26)\mathcal{O}_C\bigl(m(K_C+r(A-K_S)|_C)\bigr). \tag*{(26)}

Indeed, its quotient by the displayed product is constant on very general fibers; local submersion sections and analytic continuation give meromorphic descent to that open. Evaluation at points where the product does not vanish identically on the fiber makes the descended coefficient holomorphic there.

We compute its order at a missing point zz. In (25), a frame of OC(m(A−KS)∣C)\mathcal{O}_C(m(A-K_S)|_C) maps, up to a unit, to

xmh(dx∧dy1∧dy2dt)m.x^{mh}\left(\frac{dx\wedge dy_1\wedge dy_2}{dt}\right)^m.

On a normalization branch of the local rr-fold product we have x1=xx_1=x, xj=ζjxx_j=\zeta_jx, where ζje=1\zeta_j^e=1. Multiplying the rr relative factors by one base factor (dt)m(dt)^m, and using dt=exe−1dxdt=ex^{e-1}dx, gives order

m(rh−(r−1)(e−1))(27)m\bigl(rh-(r-1)(e-1)\bigr) \tag*{(27)}

along x=0x=0. This smooth normalization branch belongs to the main component, being a closure of points with t≠0t\ne0. The global pluriform on ZrZ_r has no pole at its generic divisor, by birational comparison. Its scalar coefficient uu, pulled back by t=xet=x^e, therefore extends meromorphically, with

eord⁡z(u)+m(rh−(r−1)(e−1))≥0.e\operatorname{ord}_z(u)+m\bigl(rh-(r-1)(e-1)\bigr)\geq0.

In particular,

ord⁡z(u)≥−mrhe.(28)\operatorname{ord}_z(u)\geq-\frac{mrh}{e}. \tag*{(28)}

There is no pole allowance at a nonexceptional base curve, where h=0h=0. The exceptional allowances are exactly mrcPmrc_P, with the fixed cPc_P in (23).

The nonzero meromorphic coefficient in (26), with these pole bounds, implies

deg⁡KC+r(A−KS+∑PcPP)⋅C≥0.\deg K_C+r\left(A-K_S+\sum_P c_P P\right)\cdot C\ge0.

Divide by rr and let r→∞r\to\infty, keeping CC fixed. Since CC is a positive multiple of H′H', this proves (22).

Take the surface Zariski decomposition [4]

A=P0+N0,(29)A=P_0+N_0, \tag*{(29)}

where P0P_0 is nef, N0≥0N_0\ge0 has negative-definite support if nonzero, and P0P_0 is orthogonal to every component of N0N_0. The negative-part linear equations give rational coefficients, so P0=A−N0P_0=A-N_0 remains an actual rational line. For a μ\mu-exceptional curve PP, A⋅P=0A\cdot P=0. If PP belongs to Supp⁡N0\operatorname{Supp}N_0, orthogonality gives P0⋅P=0P_0\cdot P=0; otherwise both P0⋅PP_0\cdot P and N0⋅PN_0\cdot P are nonnegative, and their sum is zero. Hence every such PP is orthogonal to P0P_0.

If P0≡0P_0\equiv0, the equality q(S)=0q(S)=0 makes a divisible multiple of P0P_0 torsion, so P0P_0 is zero in Pic⁡(S)⊗Q\operatorname{Pic}(S)\otimes\mathbb{Q}. If P02>0P_0^2>0, the nef line P0P_0 is big. Either case supplies sections of a positive multiple of AA. In the remaining case, P0≢0P_0\not\equiv0 and P02=0P_0^2=0. Test (22) on ample classes approaching P0P_0. The exceptional terms and A⋅P0A\cdot P_0 vanish, giving KS⋅P0≤0K_S\cdot P_0\le0. For large divisible ℓ\ell,

χ(S,ℓP0)=χ(OS)−ℓ2KS⋅P0>0,(30)\chi(S,\ell P_0)=\chi(\mathcal{O}_S)-\frac{\ell}{2}K_S\cdot P_0>0, \tag*{(30)}

since χ(OS)=1+h2,0(S)>0\chi(\mathcal{O}_S)=1+h^{2,0}(S)>0. Serre duality gives H2(S,ℓP0)=0H^2(S,\ell P_0)=0 for large ℓ\ell: the divisor KS−ℓP0K_S-\ell P_0 has negative degree against a fixed ample divisor. Thus h0(S,ℓP0)>0h^0(S,\ell P_0)>0; multiplication by the section of ℓN0\ell N_0 proves κ(S,A)≥0\kappa(S,A)\ge0.

A threefold base and genus-one orders

Assume d=3d=3. The general fibers of g:V→Tg:V\to T are smooth connected genus-one curves. Indeed, the singular locus of normal VV has dimension at most two, so misses a general fiber; generic smoothness then applies, and (15) makes its canonical line torsion. Also all components of RR in (20) are vertical over SS: their images on VV have dimension at most two.

Choose one integer m>0m>0, divisible by 12, that clears the Cartier data and the actual isomorphism in (15). It clears (20) on every smooth model subsequently used. In fact, the pullback of a local frame of the Cartier line OV(mKV)\mathcal{O}_V(mK_V), regarded on the regular locus as an mm-pluriform, has integral orders on every resolution. Those orders are precisely mcoeff⁡ERm\operatorname{coeff}_E R. There is thus no need to choose a new index after a base blowup.

The actual Hodge line and its growth

Shrink to a dense open U⊂TregU\subset T_{\mathrm{reg}}, also viewed on SS, on which the family is smooth and agrees with its resolution. Let H\mathcal{H} be its line of holomorphic fiberwise one-forms. It is a holomorphic line by Grauert base change; periods against local integral cycles are holomorphic. Give it the Hodge norm, so that ∥α∥2\lVert\alpha\rVert^2 is, up to a fixed convention, the fiber integral of −1α∧α‾\sqrt{-1}\alpha\wedge\overline{\alpha}.

Evaluation f∗H→ωM/Uf^*\mathcal{H}\to\omega_{M/U} is an isomorphism: a nonzero holomorphic one-form on a smooth genus-one curve has no zero. Its mm-th power, together with the fixed actual pullback identity, gives an isomorphism of pullbacks of lines on UU. Applying f∗f_* and f∗OM=OUf_*\mathcal{O}_M=\mathcal{O}_U yields the actual identification

H⊗m≃Lm∣U,Lm=OS(m(A−KS)).(31)\mathcal{H}^{\otimes m}\simeq\mathcal{L}_m|_U,\qquad\mathcal{L}_m=\mathcal{O}_S\bigl(m(A-K_S)\bigr). \tag*{(31)}

It is compatible on all birational base models over their common open. No section of the genus-one fibration is needed: its first integral cohomology, periods, and invariant differentials are defined without an origin. In particular, (31) leaves no unspecified flat line factor.

Let E4E_4 and Δmod\Delta_{\mathrm{mod}} be the classical modular forms of weights four and twelve for SL2(Z)\mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbb{Z}) [68], Chapter VII. A local symplectic period basis gives a parameter τ\tau in the upper half-plane and a normalized Hodge frame with periods 1,τ1,\tau. The weight transformation laws compensate the frame transformation, so these forms define sections of H4\mathcal{H}^4 and H12\mathcal{H}^{12}. Define sections of Lm∣U\mathcal{L}_m|_U by

e1=E4m/4,e2=Δmodm/12,(32)e_1=E_4^{m/4},\qquad e_2=\Delta_{\mathrm{mod}}^{m/12}, \tag*{(32)}

where the tensor powers of the normalized frame are understood.

Near a general point of a complementary prime divisor on any smooth base model, let t=0t=0 be its equation. There are positive constants c,C,bc,C,b, locally uniform in the remaining coordinates, such that

c≤(∥e1∥+∥e2∥)2/m≤C(1+∣log⁡∣t∣∣)b(t≠0).(33)c\leq\left(\lVert e_1\rVert+\lVert e_2\rVert\right)^{2/m}\leq C\left(1+\left|\log|t|\right|\right)^b\qquad(t\ne0). \tag*{(33)}

Here is the full growth argument. In the standard fundamental domain the normalized frame has squared norm proportional to Im⁡τ\operatorname{Im}\tau. Both scalar modular forms are bounded there, Δmod\Delta_{\mathrm{mod}} has no zero in the upper half-plane, and E4→1E_4\to1 at the cusp. On the compact part their joint norm has a positive minimum; at the cusp the E4E_4 term supplies the same positive lower bound. This also covers the case where e1e_1 is identically zero on the given family.

For the upper bound, restrict to punctured disks transverse to the prime, with the other parameters in a small compact set and with t≠0t\ne0 inside UU. Lift the period map to universal covers. Schwarz–Pick makes it distance-decreasing for the hyperbolic metrics. The radial hyperbolic distance in a punctured disk, from a fixed radius to ∣t∣|t|, is O(1)+O(log⁡∣log⁡∣t∣∣)O(1)+O(\log|\log|t||). Starting period representatives at that radius can be chosen in a bounded part of the fundamental domain, uniformly in angle and the other parameters, by compactness inside the smooth locus. Since log⁡Im⁡τ\log\operatorname{Im}\tau changes by at most hyperbolic distance, both Im⁡τ\operatorname{Im}\tau and its inverse are bounded by powers of 1+∣log⁡∣t∣∣1+|\log|t|| along the lifted radial paths. Returning to the fundamental domain preserves such a bound, because for γ∈SL2(Z)\gamma\in\mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbb{Z}),

Im⁡(γτ)≤max⁡{Im⁡τ,(Im⁡τ)−1}.\operatorname{Im}(\gamma\tau)\leq\max\{\operatorname{Im}\tau,(\operatorname{Im}\tau)^{-1}\}.

The bounded scalar modular forms and the Hodge-frame norm now prove the upper inequality in (33).

The integration threshold and meromorphic extension

Fix a prime P⊂SP\subset S, a local parameter tt at its general point, and a frame ss of Lm\mathcal{L}_m. On a simultaneous log resolution of RR and f∗Pf^*P, recompute RR by the canonical comparison in (20). Define

tP=min⁡E↦P1+coeff⁡ERord⁡E(f∗P).(34)t_P=\min_{E\mapsto P}\frac{1+\operatorname{coeff}_E R}{\operatorname{ord}_E(f^*P)}. \tag*{(34)}

The minimum is taken over components above the general point of PP. It is positive because R≥0R\geq0.

Lemma 4.5 (The divisorial order identity). The sections e1,e2e_1,e_2 extend meromorphically to SS. If

ℓP=min⁡iord⁡P(ei/s),\ell_P=\min_i\operatorname{ord}_P(e_i/s),

omitting an identically zero section, then

ℓPm=1−tP.(35)\frac{\ell_P}{m}=1-t_P. \tag*{(35)}

The same identity holds on every subsequent smooth base model, using its actual line O(m(A−KS))\mathcal{O}(m(A-K_S)) and the fixed integer mm.

Proof. First identify the weighted integrability threshold of the frame:

tP=sup⁡{u∈R:∣t∣−2u∥s∥2/m is locally integrable near general P}.(36)t_P=\sup\left\{u\in\mathbb{R}: |t|^{-2u}\lVert s\rVert^{2/m}\text{ is locally integrable near general }P\right\}. \tag*{(36)}

Multiply ss by a local mm-canonical base frame. Under (20), the resulting total-space pluriform has divisor mRmR. On a smooth good fiber it is the mm-th tensor of a one-form, up to a scalar, so integrating its 2/m2/m-density along the fiber gives ∥s∥2/m\lVert s\rVert^{2/m} times the smooth base coordinate density. Fubini and change of variables therefore identify the weighted base integral with the total-space integral. In simple normal crossing coordinates the latter has, at a component EE, a factor

∣xE∣2(hE−ueE),hE=coeff⁡ER,eE=ord⁡E(f∗P).|x_E|^{2(h_E-ue_E)},\qquad h_E=\operatorname{coeff}_E R,\quad e_E=\operatorname{ord}_E(f^*P).

Such a factor is integrable exactly when hE−ueE>−1h_E-ue_E>-1. Choose the point of PP generally to exclude components not dominating it, and use properness for a finite covering of its inverse image. The conditions are exactly those in (34), proving (36).

We next establish a polynomial lower bound on the Hodge norm of ss, without assuming meromorphic extension of the modular coefficients. Choose one component EE above general PP, of multiplicity ee and coefficient hh in RR. At a general point of EE, the map has local coordinates

(t,z1,z2)=(xe,z1,z2)(t,z_1,z_2)=(x^e,z_1,z_2)

on the base, with one further fiber coordinate yy on the source. The map E→PE\to P is submersive there, units have been absorbed into xx, and no other divisorial support meets the chart. The total pluriform associated with ss is a unit times xmh(dx∧dz1∧dz2∧dy)mx^{mh}(dx\wedge dz_1\wedge dz_2\wedge dy)^m. After division by the base pluriform, its relative coefficient is a unit times xm(h−e+1)x^{m(h-e+1)}. Integrating on a fixed smaller disk in the yy-coordinate gives

∥s∥2/m≥c∣t∣2(h−e+1)/e.(37)\lVert s\rVert^{2/m}\geq c|t|^{2(h-e+1)/e}. \tag*{(37)}

These charts are available above every point of PP outside a proper analytic subset. Indeed, the non-submersive locus and intersections with the removed supports are proper subsets of EE; those that dominate PP have strictly smaller generic fiber dimension. Properness and the fiber-dimension theorem show that a general fiber of E→PE\to P is not exhausted by them. We also omit the singular and intersection loci of complementary base divisors.

On the punctured chart, write ei=aise_i=a_i s. Combining (33) with (37) gives an upper bound for ∣ai∣|a_i| by a fixed power of ∣t∣−1|t|^{-1}, after absorbing a logarithmic power into an arbitrarily small additional power. Thus aia_i has at most a pole across general PP. The integer pole allowance can be fixed for that prime because the exponent in (37) depends on the one fixed component EE. There are finitely many complementary prime divisors. Twist Lm\mathcal{L}_m by their bounded pole allowances; both sections are then holomorphic away from an analytic set of codimension at least two. Hartogs extension on the smooth SS gives global meromorphic sections of the original Lm\mathcal{L}_m.

At a general point of PP, the two meromorphic scalar coefficients satisfy

∣a1∣+∣a2∣≍∣t∣ℓP.|a_1|+|a_2|\asymp|t|^{\ell_P}.

Equation (33) therefore gives

c∣t∣−2ℓP/m≤∥s∥2/m≤C∣t∣−2ℓP/m(1+∣log⁡∣t∣∣)b.(38)c|t|^{-2\ell_P/m} \le\lVert s\rVert^{2/m} \le C|t|^{-2\ell_P/m}(1+|\log|t||)^b. \tag*{(38)}

The supremum of the exponents uu for which the weighted expression is integrable is consequently 1−ℓP/m1-\ell_P/m: it is integrable for strictly smaller uu, and the lower bound makes it nonintegrable for strictly larger uu. Its possible behavior at the endpoint does not change the supremum. Comparison with (36) proves (35). At a good divisor the identity is immediate.

On a further smooth base modification the same argument uses its canonical line and a simultaneous resolution of the total space. The integer mm still clears the actual identity, as explained above. The sections agree on the common open by (31), and hence over the meromorphic field. Thus the calculation applies with the same mm on every model needed below.

For a prime PP that is not exceptional over TT, one also has

tP≤1.(39)t_P \le1. \tag*{(39)}

Indeed, as in the surface argument, a component of the inverse image of its image divisor on TT is a divisor on VV dominating it. Its strict transform has coefficient zero in RR and positive integral pullback multiplicity. It is one of the components tested in (34). No such upper bound is required for a base-exceptional prime.

A klt adjoint on the original base

Resolve the meromorphic pencil [e1:e2][e_1:e_2] by projective blowups of SS, and then resolve the divisorial supports, including the exceptional locus over TT. A constant pencil is allowed. If ρ:S′→S\rho:S'\to S is such a smooth modification, its actual line is

Lm′=ρ∗Lm⊗OS′(−mKS′/S).(40)\mathcal{L}'_m=\rho^*\mathcal{L}_m\otimes\mathcal{O}_{S'}(-mK_{S'/S}). \tag*{(40)}

Consequently both section divisors transform by their pullbacks minus the same relative canonical Jacobian term. Resolving the pencil and subtracting its full signed fixed divisor therefore leaves a free moving system; subsequent blowups pull back that free system and preserve its freeness.

Rename this smooth model SS. Its fixed divisor is ∑PℓPP\sum_P \ell_P P, with simple normal crossing support. A general complex linear combination ee of e1,e2e_1,e_2 has

1mdiv⁡S(e)=∑P(1−tP)P+1mQ=:BS,(41)\frac{1}{m}\operatorname{div}_S(e)=\sum_P(1-t_P)P+\frac{1}{m}Q=:B_S, \tag*{(41)}

where QQ is a general member of the free moving system, possibly zero. Bertini makes it smooth, reduced, and transverse to all the chosen strata, with no fixed component. Every coefficient of this simple normal crossing divisor is strictly less than one: the fixed coefficients are 1−tP<11-t_P<1, and the moving coefficient is 1/m<11/m<1. The fixed coefficients over exceptional primes may be negative.

Regard ee downstairs as a rational section of the rank-one reflexive difference mAT−mKTmA_T-mK_T, and define

Ξ=1mdiv⁡T(e).(42)\Xi=\frac{1}{m}\operatorname{div}_T(e). \tag*{(42)}

Equation (39) shows that Ξ≥0\Xi\ge0. There is an actual rational-linear identity

KT+Ξ∼QAT.(43)K_T+\Xi\sim_{\mathbb{Q}} A_T. \tag*{(43)}

To verify both this identity and crepancy, choose over the rational function field a frame aa of mATmA_T and a rational canonical form ω\omega, and write e=ua/ωme=u a/\omega^m. With canonical divisor chosen by ω\omega,

m(KT+Ξ)=div⁡(u)+div⁡(a).m(K_T+\Xi)=\operatorname{div}(u)+\operatorname{div}(a).

The right side is Cartier. Pull it back to SS and subtract mdiv⁡S(ω)m\operatorname{div}_S(\omega); the result is precisely div⁡S(e)\operatorname{div}_S(e), with the canonical Jacobian term in (40). Thus

KS+BS=μ∗(KT+Ξ)(44)K_S+B_S=\mu^*(K_T+\Xi) \tag*{(44)}

for compatible rational divisor representatives. This proves that (T,Ξ)(T,\Xi) is klt: BSB_S is its simple normal crossing crepant boundary with every coefficient less than one. Only the sum KT+ΞK_T+\Xi has been proved Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier; a separate Q\mathbb{Q}-Gorenstein hypothesis on TT was not used.

Finally put ΓS=(BS)+\Gamma_S=(B_S)_+. It is an effective rational klt simple normal crossing boundary, and

KS+ΓS∼QA+ES,ES≥0 and ES is μ-exceptional.K_S+\Gamma_S\sim_{\mathbb{Q}} A+E_S,\qquad E_S\ge0\text{ and }E_S\text{ is }\mu\text{-exceptional}.

The exceptionality follows from Ξ≥0\Xi\ge0: negative coefficients of the crepant boundary occur only over TT’s codimension-two locus. This adjoint is numerically pseudo-effective on the smooth projective threefold SS. Projective klt threefold nonvanishing, in the scope recalled in Section 3, gives a section of a positive multiple of KS+ΓSK_S+\Gamma_S. Push it to TT. The exceptional pole allowance disappears in codimension one, and normality extends the section of the actual line mATmA_T across codimension two, after taking a common multiple. Hence κ(T,AT)≥0\kappa(T,A_T)\ge0, as required.

Proof of Proposition 4.1. Proposition 4.3 gives (20) with AA pseudo-effective and q(S)=0q(S)=0. The curve, surface, and threefold arguments above each give κ(S,A)≥0\kappa(S,A)\ge0 in the corresponding dimension. Pull a divisible section back to MM and multiply by the section of mRmR in (20). This gives a nonzero canonical plurisection on MM, and smooth birational invariance gives κ(W,KW)≥0\kappa(W,K_W)\ge0.

Minimal singularities of nef klt adjoints

We prove the metric statement needed in the remaining nonprojective case. The proof does not require sections of a positive twist. We use ddc=−1∂∂ˉdd^c=\sqrt{-1}\partial\bar{\partial}, and identify the class of a line bundle with its curvature class; thus the usual factor 2π2\pi in its first Chern class is understood. Weights on a rational line bundle mean weights obtained by taking a root of a metric on a fixed Cartier power. All the line identifications below are actual rational line-bundle identifications.

Lemma 5.1 (Minimal metric of a nef klt adjoint). Let p:M→Zp:M\to Z be a compact Kähler log resolution of a normal compact Kähler klt pair (Z,Δ)(Z,\Delta), where Δ≥0\Delta\ge0 is rational and KZ+ΔK_Z+\Delta is a nef rational line bundle. Then a semipositive metric with minimal singularities on

L=p∗(KZ+Δ)L=p^*(K_Z+\Delta)

has zero Lelong numbers at every point of MM.

Proof. We may suppose that MM is connected. The assertion is immediate in dimension zero, so write n=dim⁡M>0n=\dim M>0.

The proof is by contradiction from a positive Lelong number. We construct the normalized Monge–Ampère family (54) and transport its tail to obtain (86). Keeping the potentially concentrating residual measure, we compare on the same sublevel set to obtain (89). We then take k→∞k\to\infty at fixed tt; the upper Lelong estimate (90) contradicts the lower bound (93) as $t\to 0.

Resolution data and regularized measures

The log pullback gives

L=KM+∑igiDi,gi<1,gi<0⟹Di is p-exceptional,(45)L = K_M + \sum_i g_i D_i,\qquad g_i < 1,\qquad g_i < 0 \Longrightarrow D_i\text{ is }p\text{-exceptional}, \tag*{(45)}

with simple normal crossings support. Choose a smooth weight ℓ\ell on LL, pulled back from downstairs, and write θ\theta for its curvature. Fix Kähler forms ω\omega on MM and ωZ\omega_Z on ZZ, and a smooth probability volume dVdV on MM. On a singular space, smooth forms and weights are understood through smooth local potentials.

For 0<t≤10 < t \le1, put

βt0=θ+tp∗ωZ.(46)\beta_t^0 = \theta+ t p^*\omega_Z. \tag*{(46)}

Analytic nefness gives a smooth function qt≤0q_t \le0 such that βt0+ddcqt\beta_t^0 + dd^c q_t is semipositive and positive definite on a dense open set. Indeed one can spend only half the available tωZt\omega_Z in the nef approximation downstairs. Consequently

∫M(βt0)n>0,∫Di(βt0)n−1=0if gi<0.(47)\int_M (\beta_t^0)^n > 0,\qquad\int_{D_i}(\beta_t^0)^{n-1} = 0\quad\text{if }g_i < 0. \tag*{(47)}

The second equality follows from the dimension of the image of an exceptional divisor and the fact that βt0\beta_t^0 is pulled back.

Nefness and weak compactness give a positive current in [θ][\theta]. Let

Φ=Vθ:=(sup⁡{v∈PSH⁡(M,θ):v≤0})∗.(48)\Phi= V_\theta:= \left(\sup\{v \in\operatorname{PSH}(M,\theta): v \le0\}\right)^*. \tag*{(48)}

The weight ℓ+Φ\ell+ \Phi has minimal singularities. Suppose, for a contradiction, that its Lelong number is positive at a point. In local coordinates xx centered at that point, choose λ>0\lambda> 0 such that

Φ(x)≤λlog⁡∣x∣2+O(1).(49)\Phi(x) \le\lambda\log|x|^2 + O(1). \tag*{(49)}

In a local frame for O(Di)\mathcal{O}(D_i), write sis_i for its canonical section and di=log⁡∣si∣2d_i = \log|s_i|^2. Set b=∑igidib = \sum_i g_i d_i. The actual identification (45) defines a global volume μb\mu_b: locally its density is eℓ−be^{\ell-b}, with the coordinate volume associated with the canonical frame. Choose smooth weights di0d_i^0 on O(Di)\mathcal{O}(D_i) and set

di,ε=log⁡(∣si∣2+εedi0),με=eℓ−∑igidi,ε,0<ε≤1.(50)d_{i,\varepsilon} = \log(|s_i|^2 + \varepsilon e^{d_i^0}),\qquad\mu_\varepsilon= e^{\ell-\sum_i g_i d_{i,\varepsilon}},\qquad0 < \varepsilon\le1. \tag*{(50)}

These local expressions respect the line transitions. The measures με\mu_\varepsilon are smooth and positive, and their densities converge almost everywhere to that of μb\mu_b. The simple normal crossings description and gi<1g_i < 1 give constants p>1p > 1 and CC such that

∥μεdV∥Lp(dV)≤C,∫M(μbdV)−s/(1−s)dV<∞(51)\left\|\frac{\mu_\varepsilon}{dV}\right\|_{L^p(dV)} \le C,\qquad\int_M \left(\frac{\mu_b}{dV}\right)^{-s/(1-s)}dV < \infty \tag*{(51)}

for some fixed 0<s<10 < s < 1. To obtain the second assertion, take ss small enough for the finitely many negative coefficients in (45). Fix

C0>nsλ.(52)C_0 > \frac{n}{s\lambda}. \tag*{(52)}

Let t↓0t \downarrow0 along a sequence, and for each tt take k=1,2,…k = 1, 2, \ldots. We shall choose

0<δ=δt,k≤min⁡(t,1/k),β=βt0+δω,V=∫Mβn.0 < \delta= \delta_{t,k} \le\min(t,1/k),\qquad\beta= \beta_t^0 + \delta\omega,\qquad V = \int_M \beta^n.

The class of β\beta is Kähler, although the chosen smooth representative β\beta need not be positive. After choosing δ\delta, choose a smooth β\beta-psh function ψ=ψt,k\psi=\psi_{t,k} such that

qt−k−1≤ψ≤1,q_t-k-1\leq\psi\leq1,
∥ψ−max⁡(Φ,qt−k)∥L1(dV)≤min⁡(t,1/k).(53)\lVert\psi-\max(\Phi,q_t-k)\rVert_{L^1(dV)}\leq\min(t,1/k). \tag*{(53)}

The maximum is bounded and βt0\beta_t^0-psh. Regularization with arbitrarily small curvature loss gives smooth approximants because the bounded potential has no positive Lelong numbers [22]. A smooth convex regularized maximum with qt−kq_t-k, and the upper bound from Hartogs’ lemma, give the stated pointwise bounds. Finally choose 0<ε=εt,k≤min⁡(t,1/k)0<\varepsilon=\varepsilon_{t,k}\leq\min(t,1/k). Additional smallness requirements on δ\delta and ε\varepsilon will be imposed below, in this order. None of these data depends on the parameter cc.

For 0≤c≤C00\leq c\leq C_0, solve

T=β+ddcu>0,ρ=TnV=e(1+c)u−cψμε=eu+cHμε,H=u−ψ.(54)T=\beta+dd^c u>0,\qquad\rho=\frac{T^n}{V}=e^{(1+c)u-c\psi}\mu_\varepsilon=e^{u+cH}\mu_\varepsilon,\qquad H=u-\psi. \tag*{(54)}

Here and below ρ\rho denotes a probability measure. The Aubin–Yau theorem applies in the Kähler class [2, 76]. More precisely, the positive coefficient 1+c1+c is the negative-λ\lambda case of [3], Theorem 7.14; it gives uniqueness and an invertible linearized operator. Thus uu depends smoothly on cc.

A capacity estimate independent of the class volume

We first establish estimates uniform in tt, kk, δ\delta, ε\varepsilon, cc whenever the displayed conditions hold. All the representatives β\beta have a common upper bound by a fixed multiple of ω\omega. We use the following standard uniform integrability consequence of Skoda’s theorem and semicontinuity of complex singularity exponents: for fixed BB, there are aB,CB>0a_B,C_B>0 such that

sup⁡Mv=0,ddcv≥−Bω⟹∫Me−aBv dV≤CB.(55)\sup_M v=0,\qquad dd^c v\geq-B\omega\quad\Longrightarrow\quad\int_M e^{-a_Bv}\,dV\leq C_B. \tag*{(55)}

One obtains uniformity by compactness of normalized quasi-psh functions, local Skoda integrability at each limit, and Demailly–Kollár semicontinuity [70, 26].

Put E=VβE=V_\beta, with the same envelope convention as in (48). For each of our Kähler classes, EE is bounded and sup⁡E=0\sup E=0. Define the normalized capacity by

cap⁡β(A)=1Vsup⁡v∈PSH⁡(M,β)E−1≤v≤E∫A(β+ddcv)n.(56)\operatorname{cap}_{\beta}(A)=\frac{1}{V}\sup_{\substack{v\in\operatorname{PSH}(M,\beta)\\ E-1\leq v\leq E}}\int_A(\beta+dd^c v)^n. \tag*{(56)}

We suppress the subscript when there is no ambiguity. In particular, 0≤cap⁡(A)≤10\leq\operatorname{cap}(A)\leq1. There are constants a,C>0a,C>0, independent of the class volume VV, such that

με(A)≤Cexp⁡(−acap⁡(A)−1/n)(57)\mu_\varepsilon(A)\leq C\exp\left(-a\operatorname{cap}(A)^{-1/n}\right) \tag*{(57)}

for every Borel set AA, with the usual value zero on the right when the capacity is zero. Here is the normalization argument. For a compact nonpluripolar set AA, let FAF_A be the upper regularization of the global β\beta-psh extremal with obstacle zero on AA, and put m=sup⁡MFAm=\sup_M F_A. The compact Kähler extremal theory gives a bounded function, at most zero on AA outside a pluripolar set, maximal outside AA, with Monge–Ampère mass VV carried by AA [40], Sections 5–7.

These statements also hold for our possibly nonpositive smooth representative. Indeed the defining family has a bounded competitor. If its supremum were unbounded, sup-normalization, quasi-psh compactness and a rapidly convergent weighted sum would produce a quasi-psh pole on AA, contradicting nonpluripolarity. The obstacle constraint survives upper regularization outside a pluripolar set. A quasi-everywhere constraint gives the same envelope: mix a competitor with arbitrarily small weight on a nonpositive β\beta-psh function having a pole on the exceptional pluripolar set, whose existence is the global pluripolarity theorem in a Kähler class. Finally local balayage off AA proves maximality there. This explains why no normalization E=0E=0 is being assumed.

By its defining property and sup-normalization,

E≤FA≤E+m.E \leq F_A \leq E+m.

If bA=max⁡(m,1)b_A=\max(m,1), then

E+FA−EbA−1E+\frac{F_A-E}{b_A}-1

is admissible in (56). Positivity of mixed products and the mass support of FAF_A give

cap⁡(A)≥1bAnV∫A(β+ddcFA)n=bA−n.(58)\operatorname{cap}(A) \geq\frac{1}{b_A^n V}\int_A(\beta+\mathrm{d}\mathrm{d}^{c}F_A)^n=b_A^{-n}. \tag*{(58)}

In particular bA≥cap⁡(A)−1/nb_A\geq\operatorname{cap}(A)^{-1/n}. The volume has canceled exactly. The function FA−mF_A-m satisfies (55), and is at most −m-m on AA almost everywhere. Hence dV(A)≤Ce−amdV(A)\leq Ce^{-am}. If the capacity is less than one, (58) implies m≥cap⁡(A)−1/nm\geq\operatorname{cap}(A)^{-1/n}; capacity one is absorbed in the constant. Hölder and (51) prove (57). Pluripolar compact sets have zero volume, and inner approximation proves the Borel-set assertion.

Initial comparison and a uniformly small shell

First,

sup⁡Mu≤C.(59)\sup_M u\leq C. \tag*{(59)}

Otherwise normalize uu by its supremum and take an almost-everywhere convergent subsequence using quasi-psh compactness. The limits are finite almost everywhere. The measures με\mu_\varepsilon also subconverge almost everywhere to a density positive almost everywhere, including when ε→0\varepsilon\to0. Since ψ≤1\psi\leq1, Fatou’s lemma applied to (54) would make its total mass tend to infinity. This contradicts ∫Mρ=1\int_M\rho=1.

Fix

C01+C0<r<1,v∗=rψ+(1−r)E.\frac{C_0}{1+C_0}<r<1,\qquad v_* = r\psi+(1-r)E.

For a capacity test vv and 0<τ≤1−r0<\tau\leq1-r, put

vτ=rψ+(1−r−τ)E+τv,Al={u<v∗−l}.v_\tau=r\psi+(1-r-\tau)E+\tau v,\qquad A_l=\{u<v_*-l\}.

Since v∗−τ≤vτ≤v∗v_*-\tau\leq v_\tau\leq v_*, the set B={u<vτ−l}B=\{u<v_\tau-l\} satisfies Al+τ⊂B⊂AlA_{l+\tau}\subset B\subset A_l. On BB, for l≥0l\geq0,

(1+c)u−cψ≤((1+c)r−c)ψ+(1+c)(1−r)E−(1+c)l≤C−l.(1+c)u-c\psi\leq\bigl((1+c)r-c\bigr)\psi+(1+c)(1-r)E-(1+c)l \leq C-l.

We used (1+c)r−c>0(1+c)r-c>0, ψ≤1\psi\leq1, and E≤0E\leq0. The Bedford–Taylor comparison principle on this same set BB and mixed-product positivity therefore give

τncap⁡(Al+τ)≤Ce−lμε(Al).(60)\tau^n\operatorname{cap}(A_{l+\tau})\leq Ce^{-l}\mu_\varepsilon(A_l). \tag*{(60)}

For completeness, write g(l)=cap⁡(Al)1/ng(l)=\operatorname{cap}(A_l)^{1/n}. A fixed τ>0\tau>0 in (60) first makes g(l)g(l) uniformly small for large ll. Then (57) gives, after enlarging a uniform constant,

τg(l+τ)≤C1g(l)2.\tau g(l+\tau)\leq C_1g(l)^2.

Choose an initial ll so that 2C1g(l)≤1−r2C_1g(l)\leq1-r, and successively take τ=2C1g(l)\tau=2C_1g(l). Each step halves gg, and the sum of the increments is bounded by a geometric series. Monotonicity gives zero capacity above the limiting level. The resulting almost everywhere inequality extends to the quasi-psh representatives. Thus

u≥rψ+(1−r)E−C.(61)u\geq r\psi+(1-r)E-C. \tag*{(61)}

Since E≥ψ−1E\geq\psi-1, and ψ\psi has a uniform lower L1L^1 bound by (53), we obtain

H≥−C,−C≤sup⁡Mu≤C.(62)H\geq-C,\qquad-C\leq\sup_M u\leq C. \tag*{(62)}

In particular, uu and HH have two-sided pointwise bounds depending on tt, kk, but independent of the extra smallness of δ\delta, ε\varepsilon, and independent of the permissible choice of ψ\psi.

In the rest of the proof, o(1)o(1) means a quantity tending to zero as t→0t\to0, uniformly in kk and cc, after the choices specified below. We can choose one fixed large RR for which

dV{H>R−1}=o(1).(63)dV\{H>R-1\}=o(1). \tag*{(63)}

To see the uniformity, consider any sequence with t→0t\to0, allowing both kk and cc to vary. A subsequence of uu converges in L1L^1 and almost everywhere to a θ\theta-psh function bounded above by Φ+C\Phi+C. Moreover,

∥(Φ−ψ)+∥L1(dV)≤t.\lVert(\Phi-\psi)_+\rVert_{L^1(dV)}\leq t.

The asserted tail estimate follows by taking R>C+2R>C+2. Absolute continuity for μb\mu_b, the uniform LpL^p bound for με\mu_\varepsilon, and (54) now imply that the shell

S={R≤H≤R+1}(64)\mathcal{S}=\{R\leq H\leq R+1\} \tag*{(64)}

has o(1)o(1) mass for μb,με,ρ\mu_b,\mu_\varepsilon,\rho. At c=0c=0, the whole tail {H>R}\{H>R\} has ρ\rho-mass o(1)o(1). At a general cc, only the bounded-shell assertion has so far been proved.

Differentiating the Monge–Ampère equation

Set

h=−∂cu,ΔT=tr⁡Tddc.h=-\partial_cu,\qquad\Delta_T=\operatorname{tr}_Tdd^c.

Differentiating both sides of (54) gives

∂cρ=(H−(1+c)h)ρ=−ΔTh ρ,ΔTh=(1+c)h−H.(65)\partial_c\rho=\bigl(H-(1+c)h\bigr)\rho=-\Delta_T h\,\rho,\qquad\Delta_T h=(1+c)h-H. \tag*{(65)}

Also

ΔTH=n−tr⁡T(β+ddcψ)≤n.\Delta_T H=n-\operatorname{tr}_T\bigl(\beta+dd^c\psi\bigr)\leq n.

At a minimum of hh, the last equation in (65) and H≥−CH\geq-C give h≥−Ch\geq-C. If F=(1+c)h−HF=(1+c)h-H, then ΔTF≥(1+c)F−n\Delta_TF\geq(1+c)F-n; the maximum principle gives

h≥−C,(1+c)h≤H+n1+c.(66)h\geq-C,\qquad(1+c)h\leq H+\frac{n}{1+c}. \tag*{(66)}

Consequently

∣∂cρ∣≤C(1+H+)ρ.(67)|\partial_c \rho| \leq C(1+H_+)\rho. \tag*{(67)}

For every fixed a>0a>0, integration by parts on the compact manifold gives

a∫Me−ah∣∂h∣T2ρ=∫Me−ahΔTh ρ≤n∫Me−ahρ≤Ca.(68)a\int_M e^{-ah}|\partial h|^2_T\rho=\int_M e^{-ah}\Delta_T h\,\rho\leq n\int_M e^{-ah}\rho\leq C_a. \tag*{(68)}

Choose a fixed C∗C_* so large that h+C∗>0h+C_*>0, and put

G=(h+C∗)nTn−1V.ddcG=−∂cρ.(69)G=(h+C_*)\frac{nT^{n-1}}{V}. \qquad\mathrm{d}\mathrm{d}^cG=-\partial_c\rho. \tag*{(69)}

The last identity is spatial: at a fixed value of cc, TT is closed, so no parameter derivative of Tn−1T^{n-1} enters it.

The order of the smallness choices

Set

Mi=max⁡(0,⌈−gi⌉),N=∑iMiDi,dN,ε=∑iMidi,ε,M_i=\max(0,\lceil-g_i\rceil),\qquad N=\sum_i M_iD_i,\qquad d_{N,\varepsilon}=\sum_i M_id_{i,\varepsilon},

and let sNs_N be the canonical section of NN. We impose

sup⁡M(h+C∗)∫M∣tr⁡T(ddcdN,ε)∣ρ=o(1),\sup_M(h+C_*)\int_M|\operatorname{tr}_T(\mathrm{d}\mathrm{d}^cd_{N,\varepsilon})|\rho=o(1),
∫M(1−∣sN∣dN,ε2)∣∂cρ∣=o(1).(70)\int_M(1-|s_N|_{d_{N,\varepsilon}}^2)|\partial_c\rho|=o(1). \tag*{(70)}

We verify that these choices respect the order already prescribed.

For fixed t,kt,k, Equations (53), (59), and (66) give a bound Bt,kB_{t,k} for sup⁡(h+C∗)\sup(h+C_*) before choosing δ\delta, ψ\psi, or ε\varepsilon. The signed trace integral is

∫Mtr⁡T(ddcdN,ε)ρ=n(2π)c1(N)[β]n−1V.(71)\int_M\operatorname{tr}_T(\mathrm{d}\mathrm{d}^cd_{N,\varepsilon})\rho =\frac{n(2\pi)c_1(N)[\beta]^{n-1}}{V}. \tag*{(71)}

At δ=0\delta=0, its numerator is zero by (47), and its denominator is positive for this fixed tt. Choose δ\delta, still at most min⁡(t,1/k)\min(t,1/k), so that Bt,kB_{t,k} times the modulus of (71) is at most tt. Now choose ψ\psi as in (53).

It remains to control an absolute trace, not just its signed integral. The regularization satisfies

ddcdi,ε≥−Cε∣si∣2e−di0+εω.(72)\mathrm{d}\mathrm{d}^cd_{i,\varepsilon}\geq-C\frac{\varepsilon}{|s_i|^2e^{-d_i^0}+\varepsilon}\omega. \tag*{(72)}

For fixed t,k,δt,k,\delta, the measures Tn−1∧ωT^{n-1}\wedge\omega are controlled uniformly in ε,c\varepsilon,c by a multiple of ordinary ω\omega-capacity. Here is a direct way to make the dependence explicit. We have β≤Aω\beta\leq A\omega and ∣u∣≤B|u|\leq B, for constants fixed at this stage. Take L0≥max⁡(2A,2B,1)L_0\geq\max(2A,2B,1), enlarging it if necessary, and set v=(u−B)/L0v=(u-B)/L_0. Then −1≤v≤0-1\leq v\leq0, ω+ddcv≥ω/2\omega+\mathrm{d}\mathrm{d}^cv\geq\omega/2, and T≤L0(ω+ddcv)T\leq L_0(\omega+\mathrm{d}\mathrm{d}^cv). Thus

Tn−1∧ω≤2L0n−1(ω+ddcv)n.T^{n-1}\wedge\omega\leq2L_0^{n-1}(\omega+\mathrm{d}\mathrm{d}^cv)^n.

The capacity of tubes shrinking to a divisor tends to zero. The factor on the right of (72) is uniformly bounded and tends uniformly to zero outside any fixed such tube. Consequently the negative part of the trace integral tends to zero uniformly in cc as ε→0\varepsilon\to0, at this fixed tt, kk, δ\delta. The elementary inequality

∫∣f∣ ρ≤∣∫f ρ∣+2∫f− ρ\int|f|\,\rho\le\left|\int f\,\rho\right| + 2\int f_{-}\,\rho

then proves the first assertion of (70), with an error O(t)O(t), after decreasing ε\varepsilon.

For the second assertion, observe that 0≤∣sN∣dN,ε2≤10 \le|s_N|^2_{d_{N,\varepsilon}} \le1, with convergence to one almost everywhere. At this stage ∣∂cρ∣≤Ct,kμε|\partial_c\rho| \le C_{t,k}\mu_\varepsilon. Uniform integrability from (51) gives the assertion, again with an error at most tt after decreasing ε\varepsilon. We have therefore chosen δ\delta, then ψ\psi, then ε\varepsilon, for every tt, kk; all errors are O(t)O(t), and all choices are independent of cc.

A Bochner estimate with a residual term

Choose a smooth nondecreasing cutoff χ\chi with

χ(H)=0 for H≤R,χ(H)=1 for H≥R+1.\chi(H)=0\ \text{for }H\le R,\qquad\chi(H)=1\ \text{for }H\ge R+1.

Choose a smooth convex function ff on R\mathbb{R} and a constant dd such that

C0+2≤f′≤d−1,f′′>0 on [−R−1,−R].C_0+2\le f'\le d-1,\qquad f''>0\ \text{on }[-R-1,-R].

Define

W0=e−f(−H)−cH.(73)W_0=e^{-f(-H)-cH}. \tag*{(73)}

It is bounded above on S\mathcal{S}. Since H≥−CH\ge-C, the lower bound for f′f' and (66) give, with fixed positive constants,

W0≥C−1e2H,W0≥C−1(1+H+2),W0≥C−1(h+C∗),W0≥C−1eh.(74)W_0\ge C^{-1}e^{2H},\qquad W_0\ge C^{-1}(1+H_+^2),\qquad W_0\ge C^{-1}(h+C_*),\qquad W_0\ge C^{-1}e^h. \tag*{(74)}

On M∘=M∖⋃iDiM^\circ=M\setminus\bigcup_iD_i, use the following weight on −KM+N-K_M+N:

P=−ℓ−u+b+∑iMidi+f(−H).(75)P=-\ell-u+b+\sum_i M_i d_i+f(-H). \tag*{(75)}

The divisor weights are pluriharmonic on this open set. Therefore

ddcP=−T+(β−θ)−f′(−H)ddcH+f′′(−H)−1∂H∧∂ˉH≥−dT+f′′(−H)−1∂H∧∂ˉH.(76)\begin{aligned} dd^cP&=-T+(\beta-\theta)-f'(-H)dd^cH+f''(-H)\sqrt{-1}\partial H\wedge\bar\partial H\\ &\ge-dT+f''(-H)\sqrt{-1}\partial H\wedge\bar\partial H. \tag*{(76)} \end{aligned}

We used β−θ=tp∗ωZ+δω≥0\beta-\theta=tp^*\omega_Z+\delta\omega\ge0 and ddcH=T−(β+ddcψ)≤Tdd^cH=T-(\beta+dd^c\psi)\le T.

We claim that there is an NN-valued section w=sNχ(H)−Uw=s_N\chi(H)-U on M∘M^\circ such that

∫M∘(∣U∣dN,ε2+∣∂ˉw∣dN,ε,T2)W0ρ=o(1).(77)\int_{M^\circ}\left(|U|^2_{d_{N,\varepsilon}}+|\bar\partial w|^2_{d_{N,\varepsilon},T}\right)W_0\rho=o(1). \tag*{(77)}

The residual derivative in this assertion is essential: the curvature lower bound in (76) is not semipositive.

Identify NN-valued sections with top-degree forms valued in −KM+N-K_M+N. Choose a complete Kähler form Ω\Omega on M∘M^\circ, using logarithmic cusp terms along the simple normal crossings divisor, and use the complete metrics Tκ=T+κΩT_\kappa=T+\kappa\Omega, κ>0\kappa>0. Let

g=∂ˉ(sNχ(H))=sNχ′(H)∂ˉH.g=\bar\partial(s_N\chi(H))=s_N\chi'(H)\bar\partial H.

This is a closed square-integrable (n,1)(n,1)-form for fixed parameters. For a ∂ˉ\bar\partial-closed (n,1)(n,1)-form ζ\zeta in the domain of ∂ˉ∗\bar\partial^*, complete-metric Bochner–Kodaira and (76) yield

∣⟨g,ζ⟩∣2≤C(∫Seu−f(−H)μb)(∥∂ˉ∗ζ∥2+d∥ζ∥2).(78)|\langle g,\zeta\rangle|^2 \leq C\left(\int_\mathcal{S} e^{u-f(-H)}\mu_b\right)\left(\|\bar\partial^*\zeta\|^2+d\|\zeta\|^2\right). \tag*{(78)}

For clarity, on (n,1)(n,1)-forms the curvature contribution of −dT-dT is bounded below by −d∥ζ∥2-d\|\zeta\|^2, because T≤TκT\leq T_\kappa. The positive rank-one curvature term controls contraction with ∂H\partial H. Cauchy–Schwarz in that direction gives (78), since (χ′)2/f′′(−H)(\chi')^2/f''(-H) is bounded on the shell. The squared top-form density of sNs_N in the weight PP is exactly eu−f(−H)μbe^{u-f(-H)}\mu_b. This density, and hence the estimate’s constant, is independent of the complete base metric. Approximation on a complete Kähler manifold justifies the indicated weak tests; see [23], Sections 4–5.

The integral in (78) is o(1)o(1) by the shell estimate. Apply the Riesz representation theorem to the functional defined on pairs

(∂ˉ∗ζ,d ζ)⟼⟨g,ζ⟩.(\bar\partial^*\zeta,\sqrt{d}\,\zeta)\longmapsto\langle g,\zeta\rangle.

After extending this bounded functional, and projecting its second component to the closed subspace ker⁡∂ˉ\ker\bar\partial, we obtain

∂ˉU+d V1=g,∂ˉV1=0,∥U∥2+∥V1∥2=o(1).(79)\bar\partial U+\sqrt{d}\,V_1=g,\qquad\bar\partial V_1=0,\qquad\|U\|^2+\|V_1\|^2=o(1). \tag*{(79)}

Although the initial tests were closed, this is an equation against all appropriate tests. Indeed, orthogonal projection of a test ζ∈Dom⁡∂ˉ∗\zeta\in\operatorname{Dom}\bar\partial^* to ker⁡∂ˉ\ker\bar\partial preserves its adjoint domain and adjoint value: the range of ∂ˉ\bar\partial from (n,0)(n,0)-forms is contained in that kernel. It also preserves its pairings with the closed forms gg, V1V_1.

Let κ↓0\kappa\downarrow0. The norms of top-degree (n,0)(n,0)-forms are unchanged by the base metric, while the (n,1)(n,1)-norms increase to the norm for TT. For a countable decreasing sequence of κ\kappa’s, weak compactness in each preceding norm and a diagonal subsequence give limits satisfying (79) for TT. Monotone convergence of the norms preserves its bound.

Finally, the ratio of the PP-density for sections to the density ∣⋅∣dN,ε2W0ρ|\cdot|^2_{d_{N,\varepsilon}}W_0\rho is

∏i(∣si∣2+εedi0∣si∣2)gi+Mi≥1.(80)\prod_i\left(\frac{|s_i|^2+\varepsilon e^{d_i^0}}{|s_i|^2}\right)^{g_i+M_i}\geq1. \tag*{(80)}

The same comparison applies to derivative norms measured with TT. Since ∂ˉw=d V1\bar\partial w=\sqrt{d}\,V_1, this proves (77).

For fixed parameters, its smooth positive weights imply ordinary L2L^2 bounds on ww and its displayed derivative up to the divisor. To extend the derivative distributionally, use simple normal crossings cutoffs whose derivatives are O(τ−1)O(\tau^{-1}) on tubes of volume O(τ2)O(\tau^2). Their derivative L2L^2 norms are bounded. The boundary error is bounded by this fixed bound times the L2L^2 norm of ww on the shrinking tubes, and tends to zero by absolute continuity. Thus ∂ˉw\bar\partial w extends as its distributional derivative across the divisor. Ellipticity on sections gives

w∈W1,2(M,N).(81)w\in W^{1,2}(M,N). \tag*{(81)}

The nonholomorphic logarithm and one-sided transport

Write dN=dN,εd_N=d_{N,\varepsilon} for this subsection and put z=1+∣w∣dN2z=1+|w|^2_{d_N}. For a smooth section, set

Aw=⟨∂ˉw,w⟩dNz.A_w=\frac{\langle\bar\partial w,w\rangle_{d_N}}{z}.

where the Hermitian pairing is linear in the first variable. In a holomorphic frame normal for the line metric at the point, direct differentiation gives

ddclog⁡z=−1∂Aw−−1∂ˉA‾w−∣w∣dN2zddcdN+−1z2(∂w∧∂ˉwˉ−∂wˉ∧∂ˉw).(82)\mathrm{d}\mathrm{d}^{c}\log z=\sqrt{-1}\partial A_{w}-\sqrt{-1}\bar\partial\overline{A}_{w}-\frac{|w|_{d_{N}}^{2}}{z}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{d}^{c}d_{N}+\frac{\sqrt{-1}}{z^{2}}\left(\partial w\wedge\bar\partial\bar w-\partial\bar w\wedge\bar\partial w\right). \tag*{(82)}

The last line is evaluated in that normal frame, or equivalently using the Chern derivatives. Its first summand is nonnegative; its negative summand is controlled by ∣∂wˉ∣2|\partial\bar w|^{2}. Thus no estimate for the positive ∂w\partial w term is required.

Integrate (82) against the positive form GG in (69). By (74) and (77), the negative-gradient contribution is at most

C∫M(h+C∗)∣∂ˉw∣dN,T2ρ=o(1).C\int_{M}(h+C_{*})|\bar\partial w|_{d_{N},T}^{2}\rho=o(1).

The curvature cost is bounded by the first error in (70). For the two exact terms, integration by parts differentiates only hh, since TT is closed. Using ∣w∣/(1+∣w∣2)≤1/2|w|/(1+|w|^{2})\leq1/2, their absolute value is at most

C(∫M∣∂ˉw∣dN,T2W0ρ∫M∣∂h∣T2W0−1ρ)1/2=o(1).(83)C\left(\int_{M}|\bar\partial w|_{d_{N},T}^{2}W_{0}\rho\int_{M}|\partial h|_{T}^{2}W_{0}^{-1}\rho\right)^{1/2}=o(1). \tag*{(83)}

The second integral is bounded by (68) and W0−1≤Ce−hW_{0}^{-1}\leq Ce^{-h}. Approximation by smooth sections in W1,2W^{1,2} justifies these calculations for (81): the logarithm has bounded first and second derivatives as a function of the section, and the derivative products converge in L1L^{1} for fixed smooth data. We conclude

∫Mddclog⁡z∧G≥−o(1),∫Mlog⁡z ∂cρ≤o(1).(84)\int_{M}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{d}^{c}\log z\wedge G\geq-o(1),\qquad\int_{M}\log z\,\partial_{c}\rho\leq o(1). \tag*{(84)}

The second assertion follows from (69) by integration by parts.

We can replace log⁡z\log z in the last integral by log⁡(1+χ(H)2)\log(1+\chi(H)^{2}). First the globally Lipschitz radial function ξ↦log⁡(1+∣ξ∣2)\xi\mapsto\log(1+|\xi|^{2}), followed by Cauchy–Schwarz, gives

∫M∣log⁡(1+∣w∣dN2)−log⁡(1+∣sNχ(H)∣dN2)∣∣∂cρ∣≤C∫M∣U∣dN(1+H+)ρ=o(1).\int_{M}\left|\log(1+|w|_{d_{N}}^{2})-\log(1+|s_{N}\chi(H)|_{d_{N}}^{2})\right||\partial_{c}\rho| \leq C\int_{M}|U|_{d_{N}}(1+H_{+})\rho=o(1).

Here W0≥C−1(1+H+2)W_{0}\geq C^{-1}(1+H_{+}^{2}) pays for the second Cauchy–Schwarz factor. Next,

∣log⁡(1+∣sN∣dN2χ2)−log⁡(1+χ2)∣≤1−∣sN∣dN2,\left|\log(1+|s_{N}|_{d_{N}}^{2}\chi^{2})-\log(1+\chi^{2})\right|\leq1-|s_{N}|_{d_{N}}^{2},

so the second error in (70) pays for this replacement.

Set

η(H)=log⁡(1+χ(H)2)log⁡2.\eta(H)=\frac{\log(1+\chi(H)^{2})}{\log2}.

The preceding estimate, ∂cH=−h≤C\partial_{c}H=-h\leq C, and the shell support of the bounded nonnegative function η′\eta' give

∂c∫Mη(H)ρ=∫Mη(H)∂cρ+∫Mη′(H)(−h)ρ≤o(1).(85)\partial_{c}\int_{M}\eta(H)\rho=\int_{M}\eta(H)\partial_{c}\rho+\int_{M}\eta'(H)(-h)\rho\leq o(1). \tag*{(85)}

The section ww need not be chosen smoothly in cc: its estimate was used separately at each cc, whereas the left side here depends only on the smooth family (54). At c=0c=0 the integral is o(1)o(1) by the initial tail estimate. Integrating (85) up to C0C_{0} proves, uniformly in kk,

∫{H>R+1}ρ=o(1)(c=C0).(86)\int_{\{H>R+1\}}\rho=o(1)\qquad(c=C_{0}). \tag*{(86)}

Canceling the residual measure on the comparison set

Work now at c=C0c=C_0. Take a smooth cutoff ξ(H)\xi(H) which is zero for H≤R+1H\le R+1, one for H≥R+2H\ge R+2, and lies between zero and one. The smooth positive measure ξ(H)ρ+t dV\xi(H)\rho+t\,dV has mass at,k>0a_{t,k}>0, with at,k≤mt→0a_{t,k}\le m_t\to0 uniformly in kk, by (86). Solve the prescribed-volume equation [76]

(β+ddcv)nV=ξ(H)ρ+t dVat,k,sup⁡Mv=0.\frac{(\beta+dd^c v)^n}{V}=\frac{\xi(H)\rho+t\,dV}{a_{t,k}},\qquad\sup_M v=0.

The complementary part of ρ\rho has H≤R+2H\le R+2. Therefore

ρ≤CRμε+mt(β+ddcv)nV.(87)\rho\le C_R\mu_\varepsilon+m_t\frac{(\beta+dd^c v)^n}{V}. \tag*{(87)}

Choose rt→0r_t\to0 with rtn≥mtr_t^n\ge m_t. We may assume rt≤1/2r_t\le1/2 for all the remaining tt's. We prove a uniform estimate

u≥rtv+(1−rt)E−C.(88)u\ge r_t v+(1-r_t)E-C. \tag*{(88)}

Put v∗=rtv+(1−rt)Ev_* =r_t v+(1-r_t)E, and for an arbitrary capacity test φ\varphi and 0<τ≤1−rt0<\tau\le1-r_t, put

vτ=rtv+(1−rt−τ)E+τφ,Al={u<v∗−l},B={u<vτ−l}.v_\tau=r_t v+(1-r_t-\tau)E+\tau\varphi,\qquad A_l=\{u<v_*-l\},\qquad B=\{u<v_\tau-l\}.

Again Al+τ⊂B⊂AlA_{l+\tau}\subset B\subset A_l. On precisely this same set BB, comparison and positivity give

rtn∫B(β+ddcv)nV+rtn∫B(β+ddcφ)nV≤∫B(β+ddcvτ)nV≤∫Bρ≤CRμε(B)+mt∫B(β+ddcv)nV.r_t^n\int_B\frac{(\beta+dd^c v)^n}{V}+r_t^n\int_B\frac{(\beta+dd^c\varphi)^n}{V} \le\int_B\frac{(\beta+dd^c v_\tau)^n}{V}\le\int_B\rho \le C_R\mu_\varepsilon(B)+m_t\int_B\frac{(\beta+dd^c v)^n}{V}.

Since rtn≥mtr_t^n\ge m_t, the residual measure cancels on BB. Taking the supremum over φ\varphi yields

τncap⁡(Al+τ)≤CRμε(Al).(89)\tau^n\operatorname{cap}(A_{l+\tau})\le C_R\mu_\varepsilon(A_l). \tag*{(89)}

There is no comparison of residual masses on different sets.

To start the iteration uniformly, note that v∗≤0v_*\le0, so Al⊂{u<−l}A_l\subset\{u<-l\}. Equations (55) and (62), followed by Hölder with (51), make με(Al)\mu_\varepsilon(A_l) uniformly small as l→∞l\to\infty. A fixed τ=1/4\tau=1/4 in (89) therefore makes its capacity uniformly small. Combining with (57), the same quadratic iteration used after (60) applies; the allowed upper bound 1−rt1-r_t is at least 1/21/2. It proves (88) with a constant independent of t,kt,k.

The fixed-tt limit and Lelong contradiction

Fix one sufficiently small t>0t>0, and let k→∞k\to\infty. Quasi-psh compactness, (62), and sup⁡v=0\sup v=0 give a subsequence converging in L1L^1 and almost everywhere to βt0\beta_t^0-psh functions ut,vtu_t,v_t. Since E≥qtE\ge q_t, Equation (88) gives

ut≥rtvt−Ct,ν(ut,x)≤rtν(vt,x)≤Crt.(90)u_t\ge r_t v_t-C_t,\qquad\nu(u_t,x)\le r_t\nu(v_t,x)\le Cr_t. \tag*{(90)}

The last constant is independent of tt: the normalized potentials vtv_t have a common lower curvature bound, so their Lelong numbers are uniformly bounded, for example by (55). The additive constant CtC_t is allowed to depend on tt and does not affect Lelong numbers.

At fixed tt, (53) gives ψt,k→Φ\psi_{t,k} \to\Phi in L1L^1. Choose the subsequence also to converge almost everywhere. Since εt,k→0\varepsilon_{t,k} \to0, Fatou’s lemma in (54) at c=C0c=C_0 gives

∫Me(1+C0)ut−C0Φ μb≤1.(91)\int_M e^{(1+C_0)u_t-C_0\Phi}\,\mu_b \le1. \tag*{(91)}

Writing fb=μb/dVf_b=\mu_b/dV, Hölder and the second moment in (51) yield

∫Mes(1+C0)ut−sC0Φ dV≤(∫Me(1+C0)ut−C0Φfb dV)s(∫Mfb−s/(1−s) dV)1−s<∞.\int_M e^{s(1+C_0)u_t-sC_0\Phi}\,dV \le\left(\int_M e^{(1+C_0)u_t-C_0\Phi}f_b\,dV\right)^s \left(\int_M f_b^{-s/(1-s)}\,dV\right)^{1-s}<\infty.

By (49), this implies near the chosen point

∫eaut(x)∣x∣−2b0 dV(x)<∞,a=s(1+C0),b0=sC0λ>n.(92)\int e^{a u_t(x)}|x|^{-2b_0}\,dV(x)<\infty,\qquad a=s(1+C_0),\quad b_0=sC_0\lambda>n. \tag*{(92)}

Add a local smooth potential for βt0\beta_t^0 to make utu_t plurisubharmonic. Its exponential is subharmonic, and the smooth addition changes the following estimates only by bounded factors. For x≠0x\ne0 sufficiently close to zero, the submean inequality on B(x,∣x∣/2)B(x,|x|/2) gives

eaut(x)≤Ct∣x∣−2n∫B(x,∣x∣/2)eaut(y) dV(y)≤Ct′∣x∣2b0−2n,\begin{aligned} e^{a u_t(x)}\le C_t|x|^{-2n}\int_{B(x,|x|/2)}e^{a u_t(y)}\,dV(y) \\ &\le C'_t|x|^{2b_0-2n}, \end{aligned}

where the second inequality uses (92) and ∣y∣≍∣x∣|y|\asymp|x| on that ball. Hence

ut(x)≤sC0λ−ns(1+C0)log⁡∣x∣2+Ot(1).(93)u_t(x)\le\frac{sC_0\lambda-n}{s(1+C_0)}\log|x|^2+O_t(1). \tag*{(93)}

The coefficient is positive and independent of tt, contradicting (90) as t→0t\to0. Thus Φ\Phi has zero Lelong numbers everywhere. Any two metrics with minimal singularities differ by bounded weights, so the conclusion holds for every such metric on LL.

The empty divisorial locus

The obstruction considered in this section is the absence of a meromorphic pluricanonical section, including one with poles. We keep this distinction throughout: a rational line bundle on a nonalgebraic compact complex space need not have a global meromorphic frame.

Proposition 6.1. Assume Assumption 2.2. Let YY be a normal compact Kähler fourfold with klt singularities, and suppose that the actual rational canonical line bundle KYK_Y is analytically nef. Suppose that YY contains no prime divisors. Let p:M→Yp:M\to Y be a smooth compact Kähler log resolution. If a(M)=0a(M)=0 and KMK_M is analytically pseudo-effective, then some positive tensor power of KMK_M has a nonzero meromorphic section.

We prove the proposition by contradiction. Until the end of the section, assume its hypotheses and, in addition, assume that

H0(M,MM⊗OM(mKM))=0for every integer m>0,H^0(M,\mathcal{M}_M\otimes\mathcal{O}_M(mK_M))=0\qquad\text{for every integer }m>0,

where MM\mathcal{M}_M is the sheaf of meromorphic functions. Put

L=p∗KY,KM=L+C,α=2πc1(L).(94)L=p^*K_Y,\qquad K_M=L+C,\qquad\alpha=2\pi c_1(L). \tag*{(94)}

Here CC is the rational exceptional discrepancy divisor, and the middle identity is an identity of actual rational line bundles, using the canonical comparison on the isomorphism locus of pp. No sign is imposed on CC. Every prime divisor on MM is pp-exceptional, because YY has none. We use the weight convention ddc=−1∂∂ˉdd^c=\sqrt{-1}\partial\bar{\partial}, so a metric weight on LL has curvature class α\alpha.

Virtual vanishings and holomorphic forms

The starting Euler-characteristic/Hodge-theoretic route to holomorphic forms was informed by the related forms strategy of Vikash [75]. That work considers smooth minimal fourfolds without effective divisors or surfaces. The present normal klt setting has different hypotheses, and the required vanishings and forms construction are proved below.

Lemma 6.2. Let f:N→Mf:N\to M be a proper surjective generically finite morphism, where NN is a connected smooth compact Kähler manifold. Then

a(N)=q(N)=0,KN is pseudo-effective.(95)a(N)=q(N)=0,\qquad K_N\text{ is pseudo-effective}. \tag*{(95)}

and no positive tensor power of KNK_N has a nonzero meromorphic section. These conclusions also hold after any further smooth compact Kähler modification or finite cover followed by resolution.

Proof. First consider meromorphic functions and tensors. A proper generically finite map of normal complex spaces factors, by Stein factorization, as a proper modification followed by a finite map. Meromorphic functions on a modification descend to the normal target, and finite maps have local meromorphic traces and norms. These constructions use local meromorphic function fields and therefore do not require a global meromorphic frame.

If uu is a meromorphic function on NN, its characteristic polynomial over MM, computed on the finite part of the factorization, has meromorphic coefficients on MM. These coefficients are constant because a(M)=0a(M)=0. Thus uu satisfies a polynomial with constant coefficients. Connectedness then makes uu constant, and a(N)=0a(N)=0.

Suppose that ss is a nonzero meromorphic section of mKNmK_N. Over a coordinate neighborhood U⊂MU\subset M, choose a nowhere vanishing local frame τ\tau of mKMmK_M. The differential pullback f∗τf^*\tau is a holomorphic pluricanonical tensor, generically nonzero, so s/(f∗τ)s/(f^*\tau) is a meromorphic function over f−1Uf^{-1}U; zeros of the Jacobian merely contribute a meromorphic divisor to this quotient. If dd is the generic degree of ff, its norm is the coefficient of a meromorphic section of mdKMmdK_M; replacing τ\tau by gτg\tau divides the norm by gdg^d. The local sections consequently glue and are nonzero. This contradicts (94). The ordinary Jacobian formula

KN=f∗KM+Rf,Rf≥0,K_N=f^*K_M+R_f,\qquad R_f\geq0,

proves pseudo-effectivity of KNK_N.

It remains to prove q(N)=0q(N)=0. If q(N)>0q(N)>0, the Albanese map has a positive-dimensional image. Let h:N→Bh:N\to B be its Stein factorization onto its normal image. The space BB is finite over a subvariety of a torus. On a smooth compact Kähler model B′B' of BB, the pullbacks of suitable ambient one-forms have a nonzero wedge of degree dim⁡B\dim B. Hence κ(B′)≥0\kappa(B')\geq0. On every neat smooth model used to compute the invariant base in Assumption 2.2, the orbifold boundary is effective; birational invariance of ordinary Kodaira dimension therefore gives

κ(h∣0)≥κ(B′)≥0.\kappa(h\mid0)\geq\kappa(B')\geq0.

This comparison concerns the invariant base term, not a boundary on an arbitrarily chosen initial model.

Choose a positive singular metric on KNK_N. Its local potentials restrict to almost every smooth fiber of hh, by local integrability and Fubini’s theorem. We may choose such a fiber outside the countably many proper analytic subsets excluded by the very-general-fiber convention in Assumption 2.2. If FF is that fiber, then KFK_F is pseudo-effective and dim⁡F≤3\dim F\leq3. Ordinary canonical nonvanishing for smooth compact Kähler manifolds of dimension at most three gives κ(F)≥0\kappa(F) \ge0. In dimension three this follows from the Kähler threefold minimal model theorem and abundance for nef normal compact Kähler threefold pairs; see [47, 21]. In dimensions at most two it is the classical curve and surface statement. Applying Assumption 2.2 to (N,0)(N,0) and hh gives

κ(N)≥κ(F)+κ(h∣0)≥0,\kappa(N) \ge\kappa(F) + \kappa(h \mid0) \ge0,

contrary to the absence of a meromorphic pluricanonical section on NN. The same proof applies to any further morphism of the stated kind.

In particular, q(M)=0q(M) = 0. Moreover,

α≠0.(96)\alpha\ne0. \tag*{(96)}

Indeed, if c1(L)=0c_1(L) = 0 in real cohomology, a multiple of LL has torsion integral first Chern class. After a further multiple that class vanishes. The exponential sequence and H1(M,OM)=0H^1(M,\mathcal{O}_M) = 0 make that line bundle trivial. Equation (94) would then give a meromorphic section of a positive multiple of KMK_M.

Lemma 6.3. For every holomorphic vector bundle V\mathcal{V} on MM,

H0(M,V⊗OM(mL))=0H^0(M,\mathcal{V} \otimes\mathcal{O}_M(mL)) = 0

for every sufficiently large positive integer mm divisible by the index of LL. Furthermore,

χ(M,OM)=0,h2,0(M)≥1,h3,0(M)≥2.(97)\chi(M,\mathcal{O}_M) = 0,\qquad h^{2,0}(M) \ge1,\qquad h^{3,0}(M) \ge2. \tag*{(97)}

Proof. Choose an integer r>0r > 0 such that A=rLA = rL is a line bundle. A section of V⊗Ak\mathcal{V} \otimes A^k is a morphism A−k→VA^{-k} \to\mathcal{V}. Among all nonzero sections with k>0k > 0, choose a tuple s1,…,sts_1,\ldots,s_t, of twists k1,…,ktk_1,\ldots,k_t, which is generically independent and has maximal possible cardinality. If there are no such sections the assertion is immediate. Otherwise t≤rk⁡Vt \le\operatorname{rk}\mathcal{V}. Let W⊂V\mathcal{W} \subset\mathcal{V} be the saturation of the image of the corresponding direct sum of line bundles. Every further section lies in W\mathcal{W} generically, by maximality, and hence everywhere as a map into this saturated subsheaf.

A further nonzero section ss of twist kk replaces at least one sis_i while preserving generic independence. The two determinants are nonzero sections, respectively, of

det⁡W⊗A∑kjanddet⁡W⊗A∑kj+k−ki,\det\mathcal{W} \otimes A^{\sum k_j} \quad\text{and}\quad \det\mathcal{W} \otimes A^{\sum k_j+k-k_i},

where determinants are reflexive. Their ratio is a nonzero meromorphic section of Ak−kiA^{k-k_i}. For k>max⁡ikik > \max_i k_i, this is a positive multiple of LL. After clearing denominators in C\mathbb{C}, multiplication by its canonical meromorphic divisor section converts it into a meromorphic section of a positive multiple of KMK_M, contradicting (94). This proves the eventual vanishing without choosing a meromorphic frame of AA.

By Lemma 5.1, LL has a semipositive metric with zero Lelong numbers everywhere. The multiplier ideal of every positive integral multiple of this metric is trivial by Skoda integrability [70]. The hard Lefschetz theorem with multiplier ideals [28] (Theorem 0.1) therefore gives, for every 0≤j≤40 \le j \le4, a surjection

H0(M,ΩM4−j⊗OM(mL))⟶Hj(M,OM(KM+mL))H^0(M,\Omega_M^{4-j} \otimes\mathcal{O}_M(mL)) \longrightarrow H^j(M,\mathcal{O}_M(K_M + mL))

for divisible m>0m > 0. The source is zero for all sufficiently large such mm. Riemann–Roch makes χ(M,OM(KM+mL))\chi(M,\mathcal{O}_M(K_M + mL)) a polynomial in mm; its vanishing on all these multiples implies that its constant term χ(M,OM(KM))\chi(M,\mathcal{O}_M(K_M)) is zero. Serre duality in dimension four yields χ(M,OM)=0\chi(M,\mathcal{O}_M) = 0.

Equation (94) gives h4,0=0h^{4,0} = 0, and Lemma 6.2 gives h1,0=0h^{1,0} = 0. If h2,0=0h^{2,0} = 0, then all of H2(M,R)H^2(M,\mathbb{R}) is of type (1,1)(1,1). Approximating a Kähler class by a rational one and applying the Kodaira embedding theorem would make MM projective, contrary to a(M)=0a(M) = 0. Thus h2,0≥1h^{2,0} \ge1. Finally, Hodge symmetry and the Euler characteristic identity give h3,0=1+h2,0≥2h^{3,0} = 1 + h^{2,0} \ge2.

A saturated integrable conormal line

Write K=KMK = K_M. Choose 0≠σ∈H0(M,ΩM2)0 \ne\sigma\in H^0(M,\Omega^2_M). Holomorphic forms on MM are closed, and σ2=0\sigma^2 = 0 because it is a canonical section. Thus σ\sigma has rank two wherever it is nonzero. The kernel of σ\sigma is integrable there, and its saturated conormal is a rank-two subsheaf

F⊂ΩM1,G=ΩM1/F.F \subset\Omega^1_M,\qquad G = \Omega^1_M/F.

All determinants and line factors below are taken reflexively. The form σ\sigma is a nonzero section of det⁡F\det F, so

det⁡F=OM(H),det⁡G=OM(K−H)(98)\det F = \mathcal{O}_M(H),\qquad\det G = \mathcal{O}_M(K-H) \tag*{(98)}

for an effective divisor HH.

We use the natural identification ΩM3≃K⊗TM\Omega^3_M \simeq K \otimes T_M, obtained by contraction with a local volume form. Global linearly independent three-forms are generically independent: coefficients of a dependence relative to a maximal generically independent tuple are global meromorphic functions, hence constants. The same observation applies to their projections into F∗⊗KF^* \otimes K.

If vv and ww are the KK-valued vector fields associated with two three-forms, then σ(v,w)\sigma(v,w) is a section of 2K2K, so it is zero. Since the form induced by σ\sigma on the rank-two quotient of TMT_M is nondegenerate at a general point, the projections of all these vector fields to F∗⊗KF^* \otimes K have rank at most one. On the other hand, two generically independent tangent vector fields would have a nonzero wedge in

2K⊗(det⁡G)∗=OM(K+H).2K \otimes(\det G)^* = \mathcal{O}_M(K+H).

Removing the divisor factor would give a prohibited meromorphic canonical section. The space of global three-forms has dimension at least two, so we can choose associated vector fields v1,v2v_1,v_2 such that v1v_1 is nonzero and tangent to the kernel of σ\sigma, while v2v_2 is not tangent. Denote their three-forms by β1,β2\beta_1,\beta_2.

Let E⊂FE \subset F be the saturation of the line defined by the nonzero KK-valued one-form

η=ιv2σ.\eta= \iota_{v_2}\sigma.

It follows that

E=OM(−K+e)(99)E = \mathcal{O}_M(-K+e) \tag*{(99)}

for a divisor ee (its divisorial zero divisor). Saturation makes EE a reflexive rank-one sheaf, hence a line bundle on MM. Its inclusion in ΩM1\Omega^1_M is a subbundle away from a set of codimension at least two. Likewise, all the rank-two sheaves and quotients just used are vector bundles at general points of every prime divisor.

The rank-two identity

K⊗G∗≃OM(H)⊗GK \otimes G^* \simeq\mathcal{O}_M(H) \otimes G

turns v1v_1 into a section of OM(H)⊗G\mathcal{O}_M(H) \otimes G. Saturating its image produces a line factor OM(j−H)⊂G\mathcal{O}_M(j-H) \subset G, where jj is a divisor; by the determinant identity the other factor is OM(K−j)\mathcal{O}_M(K-j).

Lemma 6.4. The line EE is an integrable saturated conormal. On a dense open set, its line is the intersection of the degree-one wedge annihilators of σ\sigma and β2\beta_2.

Proof. Work first on the complement of a codimension-at-least-two set where FF, GG, EE and the line factors above are bundles. Let D⊂TMD \subset T_M be the integrable distribution annihilated by FF. Lie derivative along DD defines the partial Bott connection on FF. Its second fundamental form for EE is a morphism

BE:E⟶(F/E)⊗D∗=(F/E)⊗G.(100)B_E: E \longrightarrow(F/E) \otimes D^* = (F/E) \otimes G. \tag*{(100)}

For clarity, this is tensorial in both variables: for w∈Dw \in D and a local section ss of EE, the terms introduced by replacing ss by fsfs are multiples of ss, while the additional term in Lfws\mathcal{L}_{fw}s is s(w) df=0s(w)\,df=0.

If the composite of BEB_E with the second line factor of GG is nonzero, it is a nonzero section of the line bundle of class

(H−E)+(K−j)−E=3K+H−j−2e.(H-E)+(K-j)-E=3K+H-j-2e.

If that composite vanishes and BE≠0B_E \ne0, it factors through the first line factor and gives a nonzero section of class

(H−E)+(j−H)−E=2K+j−2e.(H-E)+(j-H)-E=2K+j-2e.

These sections extend across the omitted set by reflexivity and Hartogs’ theorem. Removing their divisor factors gives a nonzero meromorphic section of 3K3K or 2K2K, respectively, contradicting (94). Thus BE=0B_E=0.

In local Frobenius coordinates for DD, write its transverse coordinates as (z1,z2)(z_1,z_2) and a frame of EE as a dz1+b dz2a\,dz_1+b\,dz_2. Vanishing of BEB_E says that the ratio a/ba/b, where defined, is constant along the plaques of DD. After multiplication by an invertible local function, the frame is therefore a one-form on the two-dimensional transversal. Every rank-one conormal on a smooth surface is integrable. The resulting Frobenius identity extends to the entire regular locus of EE by holomorphic equality, including general points of divisorial zeros of the original forms.

The wedge annihilator of σ\sigma in degree one is FF. The annihilator of β2\beta_2 is the hyperplane of one-forms vanishing on v2v_2. Since v2v_2 is not tangent to DD, their intersection is a line. It contains ιv2σ\iota_{v_2}\sigma, which both wedges to zero with σ\sigma and evaluates to zero on v2v_2. Hence that line is EE. □

Lemma 6.5. For every closed positive (1,1)(1,1)-current TT in the class α\alpha, one has

T∧σ∧σ‾=0,T∧β2∧β‾2=0(101)T \wedge\sigma\wedge\overline{\sigma}=0,\qquad T \wedge\beta_2 \wedge\overline{\beta}_2=0 \tag*{(101)}

on the open subset where pp is an isomorphism onto a smooth open subset of YY. In particular,

T∧η=0(102)T \wedge\eta=0 \tag*{(102)}

on a dense open subset with analytic complement.

Proof. Off the singular set of the saturated codimension-one foliation, whose codimension is at least two, holomorphic first integrals give frames dzdz for EE. If dza=gabdzbdz_a=g_{ab}dz_b on an overlap, then dlog⁡gabd\log g_{ab} belongs to EE: differentiating the transition identity gives dgab∧dzb=0dg_{ab}\wedge dz_b=0. Consequently the first Chern cocycle wedges to zero with both σ\sigma and β2\beta_2 there.

These vanishings extend in Dolbeault cohomology to all of MM. Indeed, for a locally free sheaf V\mathcal{V} on a smooth manifold and an analytic set AA of codimension at least two, HAj(V)=0\mathcal{H}^j_A(\mathcal{V})=0 for j=0,1j=0,1, by depth and Hartogs’ theorem. The local-to-global sequence for cohomology with support therefore gives an injection H1(M,V)→H1(M∖A,V)H^1(M,\mathcal{V})\to H^1(M\setminus A,\mathcal{V}). Apply it to ΩM3\Omega^3_M and ΩM4\Omega^4_M. We obtain

c1(E)∧[σ]=0,c1(E)∧[β2]=0.(103)c_1(E)\wedge[\sigma]=0,\qquad c_1(E)\wedge[\beta_2]=0. \tag*{(103)}

We next dispose of the exceptional divisor terms. Fix a Kähler form ωY\omega_Y on YY. For every exceptional prime PP on MM,

∫Pσ∧σ‾∧p∗ωY=0,∫P−1 β2∧β‾2=0.(104)\int_P \sigma\wedge\overline{\sigma}\wedge p^*\omega_Y=0,\qquad\int_P \sqrt{-1}\,\beta_2\wedge\overline{\beta}_2=0. \tag*{(104)}

Here and below integration on a prime divisor can be computed on a smooth resolution. To see the assertion, rationality of klt singularities gives Rp∗OM=OYR p_*\mathcal{O}_M=\mathcal{O}_Y, hence Hk(Y,OY)≃Hk(M,OM)H^k(Y,\mathcal{O}_Y)\simeq H^k(M,\mathcal{O}_M). Resolve PP and the image p(P)p(P), and resolve the graph so that the resulting smooth compact Kähler space P^\widehat{P} maps to a smooth model BB of p(P)p(P). Functoriality of restriction makes the classes of σˉ∣P^\bar{\sigma}|_{\widehat{P}} and βˉ2∣P^\bar{\beta}_{2}|_{\widehat{P}} pullbacks from H2(B,OB)H^2(B,\mathcal{O}_B) and H3(B,OB)H^3(B,\mathcal{O}_B), respectively. Conjugation and compact Kähler Hodge theory give the corresponding pullback assertions for their de Rham classes. The class of p∗ωYp^*\omega_Y restricts from BB as well. Since dim⁡B≤2\dim B \le2, the degree-six products in (105) vanish.

By (100) and (95), c1(E)=−c1(L)c_1(E)=-c_1(L) modulo exceptional divisor classes. Combining (104) and (105) gives

∫MT∧σ∧σˉ∧p∗ωY=0,∫MT∧−1β2∧βˉ2=0.\int_M T\wedge\sigma\wedge\bar{\sigma}\wedge p^*\omega_Y=0,\qquad\int_M T\wedge\sqrt{-1}\beta_2\wedge\bar{\beta}_2=0.

The integrands are nonnegative: σ\sigma is decomposable wherever nonzero, and every three-form on a four-dimensional vector space is decomposable. The form p∗ωYp^*\omega_Y is strictly positive on the isomorphism locus. Thus the zero-mass equalities imply (102) there.

This positivity argument applies to currents as well as smooth forms. Locally, write the coefficient matrix of TT as a positive semidefinite matrix of Radon–Nikodym derivatives with respect to its trace measure. The two wedge equalities imply, almost everywhere for that measure, that each one-form direction of the matrix annihilates both σ\sigma and β2\beta_2 by wedge product. Lemma 6.4 identifies their intersection with EE. This proves (103).

Index charts and a closed transverse current

We will repeatedly use the following local integrability fact. All integrals in its proof are computed in fixed smooth coordinate volumes.

Lemma 6.6. Let f:V→Uf:V\to U be a proper generically finite holomorphic map between smooth complex manifolds of the same dimension. Let φ\varphi be a plurisubharmonic function on UU such that e−sφ∈Lloc1(U)e^{-s\varphi}\in L^1_{\mathrm{loc}}(U) for every s>0s>0. Then

e−s(φ∘f)∈Lloc1(V)(s>0).e^{-s(\varphi\circ f)}\in L^1_{\mathrm{loc}}(V)\qquad(s>0).

The assertion is locally uniform for a family of functions for which all the indicated exponential integrals downstairs are locally uniformly bounded.

Proof. Take relatively compact coordinate charts upstairs and downstairs so that ff maps the former into the latter. Let JJ be the local holomorphic Jacobian determinant; it is not identically zero. A sufficiently small negative power of ∣J∣|J| is locally integrable. Choose P>1P>1 large enough that ∣J∣−2/(P−1)|J|^{-2/(P-1)} is integrable on the chosen compact set. Hölder’s inequality gives

∫e−sφ∘f≤(∫e−sPφ∘f∣J∣2)1/P(∫∣J∣−2/(P−1))(P−1)/P.(105)\int e^{-s\varphi\circ f}\leq\left(\int e^{-sP\varphi\circ f}|J|^2\right)^{1/P}\left(\int|J|^{-2/(P-1)}\right)^{(P-1)/P}. \tag*{(105)}

Change of variables bounds the first factor by the degree of ff times the corresponding exponential integral downstairs, up to fixed coordinate-volume constants. Covering compact sets by finitely many charts proves both assertions.

A positive closed (1,1)(1,1)-current with zero Lelong numbers has no mass on any proper analytic subset. We recall precisely the form used here. The Skoda–El Mir extension theorem says that restricting such a current off an analytic set and then extending by zero gives a closed current. The difference is a positive closed current supported on that set. The support theorem reduces it to its divisorial components, whose coefficients are the corresponding generic Lelong numbers, so the difference is zero. These current-theoretic facts, together with Skoda integrability and Siu decomposition below, are used in their ordinary smooth-manifold forms; see [25].

Lemma 6.7. Let TT be a positive current in α\alpha with zero Lelong numbers everywhere. Choose local plurisubharmonic metric weights ϕ\phi for TT on LL. On the isomorphism locus of pp, write η=η⊗τ\eta=\eta\otimes\tau in the corresponding local canonical frame τ\tau. The expression

ΘT=−1e−ϕη∧ηˉ(106)\Theta_T=\sqrt{-1}e^{-\phi}\eta\wedge\bar{\eta} \tag*{(106)}

has a canonical extension to a nonzero positive closed (1,1)(1,1)-current on MM. This extension has no mass on proper analytic subsets and satisfies

α⌣[ΘT]=0.(107)\alpha\smile[\Theta_T]=0. \tag*{(107)}

The weights are understood with a fixed global additive normalization when ΘT\Theta_T is compared for different currents.

Proof. We first specify the extension through the singular model. Cover YY by neighborhoods UU on which a Cartier pluricanonical power has a nowhere vanishing frame. Take the ordinary local index cover U^→U\widehat U\to U defined by a root of that frame, and normalize. The cover is quasi-étale and klt, by the index-cover discrepancy formula; in particular it has rational singularities. On its smooth locus the root is a canonical frame.

Resolve a main component of U^×Up−1(U)\widehat U\times_U p^{-1}(U), obtaining a diagram

U~→U^f↓↓p−1(U)→U\begin{CD} \widetilde U @>>> \widehat U \\ @VfVV @VVV \\ p^{-1}(U) @>>> U \end{CD}

Here ff is proper and generically finite. The resolution is chosen isomorphic over the dense smooth open where the index cover is unramified and pp is an isomorphism. The coefficient η\eta in the root frame is an ordinary holomorphic one-form on that open. It extends reflexively to U^\widehat U by Hartogs’ theorem, since the complement of the relevant smooth locus downstairs has codimension at least two. The extension theorem for rational complex spaces then extends it holomorphically to U~\widetilde U; we use [50], Corollary 1.8. We continue to write η\eta for this holomorphic form and ϕ\phi for the pulled metric weight in the root frame.

Zero Lelong numbers downstairs give e−sϕ∈Lloc1e^{-s\phi}\in L^1_{\mathrm{loc}} for every s>0s>0. By Lemma 6.6, the same is true on U~\widetilde U. In particular the pulled weight has zero Lelong numbers, and the pulled curvature has no analytic-subset mass. The upstairs expression in (106) has LlocrL^r_{\mathrm{loc}} coefficients for every finite rr. This holds also after multiplication by ϕ\phi: on a compact set ϕ\phi is bounded above, while ∣ϕ∣e−ϕ|\phi|e^{-\phi} is bounded by a constant times 1+e−2ϕ1+e^{-2\phi}.

Define ΘT\Theta_T on p−1(U)p^{-1}(U) as f∗f_* of this expression divided by deg⁡f\deg f. On the good open this is the original formula. It is independent of the root frame: if τ′=gτ\tau'=g\tau, then η′=g−1η\eta'=g^{-1}\eta and ϕ′=ϕ−log⁡∣g∣2\phi'=\phi-\log|g|^2. A pushforward of the indicated LrL^r coefficient forms has no mass on the analytic complement, because its inverse image is a proper analytic subset and hence has zero smooth volume upstairs. Consequently these local pushforwards agree on overlaps and define a global positive current. It is nonzero since η\eta is generally nonzero.

We now prove closedness, rather than assuming that a transverse-looking density is closed. On U~\widetilde U, the saturation of the line defined by η\eta gives an integrable codimension-one conormal. Integrability holds first on the good open by Lemma 6.4 and then everywhere by holomorphic equality. Its singular set AA has codimension at least two. On a regular foliated chart, including one through a divisorial zero of η\eta, write

η=f0 dz(108)\eta=f_0\,dz \tag*{(108)}

with zz a holomorphic submersion and f0f_0 holomorphic. Lemma 6.5 gives ddcφ∧dz=0\mathrm{d}\mathrm{d}^c\varphi\wedge\mathrm{d}z = 0 on the good part where f0≠0f_0 \ne0. It holds on the whole chart because the positive closed curvature has no mass on the remaining analytic set.

In coordinates (z,w1,w2,w3)(z,w_1,w_2,w_3), positivity shows that the only coefficient of ddcφ\mathrm{d}\mathrm{d}^c\varphi is its −1 dz∧dzˉ\sqrt{-1}\,\mathrm{d}z \wedge\mathrm{d}\bar{z} coefficient. Closedness of that current makes this coefficient independent, as a distribution, of every wjw_j and wˉj\bar{w}_j. Thus it is the pullback of a positive measure on the zz-disc. Taking a one-variable subharmonic potential and then solving the pluriharmonic difference on a smaller polydisc gives

φ=φ0(z)+g+gˉ,g holomorphic.(109)\varphi= \varphi_0(z) + g + \bar{g}, \qquad g\ \text{holomorphic}. \tag*{(109)}

With h=f0e−gh=f_0e^{-g}, the upstairs current becomes

−1e−φ0(z)∣h(z,w)∣2dz∧dzˉ.\sqrt{-1}e^{-\varphi_0(z)}|h(z,w)|^2\mathrm{d}z \wedge\mathrm{d}\bar{z}.

Its ddc\mathrm{d}\mathrm{d}^c is positive. More explicitly, only differentiation in the ww directions survives wedging with dz∧dzˉ\mathrm{d}z \wedge\mathrm{d}\bar{z}, and

ddcΘT=e−φ0(z)−1∂wh∧∂wˉhˉ∧−1dz∧dzˉ≥0(110)\mathrm{d}\mathrm{d}^c\Theta_T=e^{-\varphi_0(z)}\sqrt{-1}\partial_w h\wedge\partial_{\bar{w}}\bar{h}\wedge\sqrt{-1}\mathrm{d}z\wedge\mathrm{d}\bar{z}\ge0 \tag*{(110)}

on the regular foliated chart. This is a distributional identity; the one-variable coefficient is locally integrable, and no transverse derivative of it contributes to the displayed wedge.

We give the extension estimate across AA. On a relatively compact coordinate ball, choose smooth cutoffs χϵ\chi_\epsilon equal to zero on an ϵ\epsilon-tube around AA and equal to one outside a 3ϵ3\epsilon-tube, with

∣∇χϵ∣≤Cϵ−1,∣∇2χϵ∣≤Cϵ−2.|\nabla\chi_\epsilon|\le C\epsilon^{-1}, \qquad|\nabla^2\chi_\epsilon|\le C\epsilon^{-2}.

They may be constructed by smoothing the distance cutoffs. The tubes have volume O(ϵ4)O(\epsilon^4). To justify the bound also when AA is singular, use locally finite area for its analytic components and monotonicity to bound the number of disjoint balls of radius ϵ/4\epsilon/4 centered on each component by Cϵ−2dC\epsilon^{-2d}, where d≤2d\le2 is its complex dimension. Enlarging this cover to the tube gives volume O(ϵ8−2d)=O(ϵ4)O(\epsilon^{8-2d})=O(\epsilon^4); a compact subset meets finitely many local components.

If BB denotes either ΘT\Theta_T or φΘT\varphi\Theta_T upstairs and r>2r>2, then for any fixed smooth test form the second-derivative cutoff terms are bounded by

Cϵ−2∥B∥Lrvol⁡(N3ϵ(A))1−1/r≤Cr∥B∥Lrϵ2−4/r⟶0.(111)C\epsilon^{-2}\lVert B\rVert_{L^r}\operatorname{vol}(N_{3\epsilon}(A))^{1-1/r}\le C_r\lVert B\rVert_{L^r}\epsilon^{2-4/r}\longrightarrow0. \tag*{(111)}

Terms with only one derivative are smaller. Testing (110) against χϵ\chi_\epsilon times a positive test form and passing to the limit therefore proves ddcΘT≥0\mathrm{d}\mathrm{d}^c\Theta_T\ge0 on all of U~\widetilde{U}.

Proper pushforward commutes with ddc\mathrm{d}\mathrm{d}^c, so ddcΘT\mathrm{d}\mathrm{d}^c\Theta_T is a global positive exact (2,2)(2,2)-current on MM. Pairing with the square of a Kähler form gives zero; positivity then makes it the zero current. On the good open the chart maps are local biholomorphisms. All branch contributions to the pushforward are positive, so each upstairs Hessian in (110) vanishes there separately. Since e−φ0>0e^{-\varphi_0}>0 almost everywhere, the holomorphic derivatives ∂wh\partial_w h vanish there, and hence on every regular foliated chart by holomorphic continuation. Thus

h=f0e−g depends only on z.(112)h=f_0e^{-g}\ \text{depends only on }z. \tag*{(112)}

Equations (109) and (112) imply, on these charts,

dΘT=0,ddc(φΘT)=0.\mathrm{d}\Theta_T=0,\qquad\mathrm{d}\mathrm{d}^c(\varphi\Theta_T)=0.

For the second identity, the coefficient depending only on zz causes no derivative after wedging with dz∧dzˉ\mathrm{d}z\wedge\mathrm{d}\bar{z}, while the remaining g+gˉg+\bar{g} is pluriharmonic in the leaf directions. The first- and second-derivative versions of (111) extend both identities across AA.

Finally choose a smooth reference metric on LL, with local weights ψ\psi and curvature θ\theta. The difference u=φ−ψu=\varphi-\psi is a global function downstairs. The local pushforwards defining uΘTu\Theta_T agree: upstairs they are locally integrable by the exponential estimates, they agree on the good open, and they have no analytic-subset mass. Closedness and the last displayed identities give the global current identity

ddc(uΘT)=−θ∧ΘT.(113)\mathrm{d}\mathrm{d}^{c}(u\Theta_T)=-\theta\wedge\Theta_T. \tag*{(113)}

It proves (107).

Hodge index and the space of positive currents

Lemma 6.8. Let XX be a smooth compact Kähler fourfold, with Kähler form ω\omega, and let RR be a positive closed (1,1)(1,1)-current with no divisorial mass. Then

∫X[R]2[ω]2≥0.\int_X [R]^2[\omega]^2\geq0.

Proof. Regularization with analytic singularities gives currents Rk∈[R]R_k\in[R] and numbers ϵk↓0\epsilon_k\downarrow0 such that Rk≥−ϵkωR_k\geq-\epsilon_k\omega and ν(Rk,x)≤ν(R,x)\nu(R_k,x)\leq\nu(R,x) at every point; see [11], Theorem 2.1(ii). In particular the analytic pole sets of RkR_k have codimension at least two. Resolve these pole sets by a projective modification fk:Xk→Xf_k:X_k\to X. For βk=[R]+ϵk[ω]\beta_k=[R]+\epsilon_k[\omega], the pulled positive current has a decomposition

fk∗βk=Pk+[Dk],f_k^*\beta_k=P_k+[D_k],

where DkD_k is an effective exceptional real divisor and PkP_k is nef. With the usual smooth-remainder version of analytic regularization, PkP_k is represented by a smooth semipositive form. The bounded-remainder version gives a positive residual current with bounded potentials, which is nef by a further regularization.

Since fk∗[Dk]=0f_{k*}[D_k]=0, the projection formula gives

∫Xkfk∗βk[Dk](fk∗[ω])2=0.\int_{X_k}f_k^*\beta_k[D_k](f_k^*[\omega])^2=0.

Consequently

∫Xβk2[ω]2=∫Xkfk∗βkPk(fk∗[ω])2≥0.(114)\int_X\beta_k^2[\omega]^2=\int_{X_k}f_k^*\beta_kP_k(f_k^*[\omega])^2\geq0. \tag*{(114)}

The inequality pairs a pseudo-effective class with three nef classes. It follows by approximating the nef factors by Kähler classes and pairing with a positive current. Passing to the limit proves the lemma. In particular, no positivity of the self-intersection of the exceptional divisor has been used.

For a Kähler form ω\omega on MM, write

Qω(ξ,ζ)=∫Mξζ[ω]2(ξ,ζ∈H1,1(M,R)).Q_\omega(\xi,\zeta)=\int_M\xi\zeta[\omega]^2\qquad(\xi,\zeta\in H^{1,1}(M,\mathbb{R})).

The Hodge index theorem says that this quadratic form has signature (1,h1,1−1)(1,h^{1,1}-1). We use its following elementary consequence: two nonzero classes with nonnegative square, positive pairing with [ω][\omega], and zero mutual pairing must both lie on the same isotropic ray.

Choose the zero-Lelong current supplied by Lemma 5.1, and let Θ\Theta be the current of Lemma 6.7. The nef class α\alpha has nonnegative square, and Lemma 6.8 applies to Θ\Theta. Both classes have positive mass against ω3\omega^3; (96) is used here. Their mutual pairing is zero by (107). Thus

Qω(α,α)=0,[Θ]=cαfor some c>0.(115)Q_\omega(\alpha,\alpha)=0,\qquad[\Theta]=c\alpha\quad\text{for some }c>0. \tag*{(115)}

In fact,

α2=0in H4(M,R).(116)\alpha^2 = 0 \quad\text{in } H^4(M,\mathbb{R}). \tag*{(116)}

To check the stronger assertion, choose Kähler representatives of α+ϵ[ω]\alpha+\epsilon[\omega]. Their positive squares have mass against ω2\omega^2 tending to zero by (116). Their cohomology classes tend to α2\alpha^2, whereas their currents tend weakly to zero, because their positive masses tend to zero. Thus the limiting cohomology class is zero.

Lemma 6.9. Every positive closed current in α\alpha has zero Lelong numbers everywhere.

Proof. Suppose T∈αT\in\alpha has a positive Lelong number at a point, and let f:X→Mf:X\to M be its blowup. The pullback has a positive generic Lelong number on the exceptional divisor. Write its Siu decomposition as

f∗T=R+∑jaj[Dj],aj>0,(117)f^*T=R+\sum_j a_j[D_j], \qquad a_j>0, \tag*{(117)}

where RR has no divisorial mass and the sum is not zero. Fix a Kähler form ωX\omega_X on XX, and set αX=f∗α\alpha_X=f^*\alpha. The class αX\alpha_X is nef, nonzero, and αX2=0\alpha_X^2=0. Pairing (118) with αX[ωX]2\alpha_X[\omega_X]^2 gives zero. All terms are nonnegative, since a nef class paired with a positive current and two Kähler classes has nonnegative intersection. Therefore

QωX(αX,[R])=0,QωX(αX,[Dj])=0for every j.Q_{\omega_X}(\alpha_X,[R])=0,\qquad Q_{\omega_X}(\alpha_X,[D_j])=0\quad\text{for every }j.

Lemma 6.8 and Hodge index give [R]=bαX[R]=b\alpha_X with b≥0b\geq0; this includes b=0b=0 when R=0R=0. Comparing masses in (118) gives b<1b<1, because the divisorial sum has positive mass. Hence

(1−b)αX=∑jajc1(OX(Dj)).(118)(1-b)\alpha_X=\sum_j a_jc_1(\mathcal{O}_X(D_j)). \tag*{(118)}

The real span of the integral classes c1(OX(Dj))c_1(\mathcal{O}_X(D_j)) is a finite-dimensional, hence closed, subspace. The convergent series in (119) therefore places the rational class c1(f∗L)=αX/(2π)c_1(f^*L)=\alpha_X/(2\pi) in that real span. Choose a finite subset of these integral classes forming a basis of the span. Solving the corresponding rational linear system shows that a rational vector in their real span is in their rational span. Thus, for some rational divisor DD with finite support,

c1(f∗L)=c1(OX(D))in H2(X,Q).c_1(f^*L)=c_1(\mathcal{O}_X(D))\quad\text{in }H^2(X,\mathbb{Q}).

After clearing denominators and integral torsion, the difference line bundle has zero integral first Chern class. By Lemma 6.2, q(X)=0q(X)=0, so the exponential sequence makes this difference line bundle trivial. A positive multiple of f∗Lf^*L consequently has a nonzero meromorphic section. The discrepancy identity for X→M→YX\to M\to Y converts it to a meromorphic section of a positive multiple of KXK_X, contradicting Lemma 6.2. □

The normalized-current fixed-point construction is inspired by Touzet’s method [73]. The singular extension, including continuity on the higher charts, is proved here.

Lemma 6.10. There is a positive current T∈αT\in\alpha such that, on all the smooth index charts constructed in Lemma 6.7,

−1∂∂ˉϕ=−1be−ϕη∧ηˉ(119)\sqrt{-1}\partial\bar{\partial}\phi=\sqrt{-1}be^{-\phi}\eta\wedge\bar{\eta} \tag*{(119)}

for one constant b>0b>0. On these charts ϕ\phi is smooth and

dη=∂ϕ∧η.(120)\mathrm{d}\eta=\partial\phi\wedge\eta. \tag*{(120)}

Proof. Fix a smooth reference weight for LL, with curvature θ\theta, and a smooth probability volume on MM. The set

Cα={T≥0:T closed of type (1,1), [T]=α}\mathcal{C}_{\alpha}=\{T\ge0:T\text{ closed of type }(1,1),\ [T]=\alpha\}

is nonempty, compact, and convex in the weak topology of currents. Its mass against ω3\omega^{3} is fixed. Write T=θ+ddcuTT=\theta+\mathrm{dd}^{c}u_{T}, uniquely normalized by ∫MuT dV=0\int_{M}u_{T}\,\mathrm{d}V=0. Thus all local weights used for TT have a fixed common additive normalization.

By Lemma 6.9, the construction of Lemma 6.7 applies to every T∈CαT\in\mathcal{C}_{\alpha}. Applying Hodge index as in (115) shows that [ΘT][\Theta_{T}] is a positive multiple of α\alpha. Define

F(T)=∫Mα[ω]3∫MΘT∧ω3ΘT.(121)\mathcal{F}(T)=\frac{\int_{M}\alpha[\omega]^{3}}{\int_{M}\Theta_{T}\wedge\omega^{3}}\Theta_{T}. \tag*{(121)}

This is a selfmap of Cα\mathcal{C}_{\alpha}.

We verify continuity, including on the higher charts. If Tj→TT_{j}\to T weakly, compactness for quasi-plurisubharmonic functions with fixed lower curvature bound and the chosen normalization gives uTj→uTu_{T_{j}}\to u_{T} in L1L^{1}. Indeed every subsequential limit has the same ddc\mathrm{dd}^{c} and normalization as uTu_{T}. On a coordinate chart the metric weights are plurisubharmonic and converge in L1L^{1}. All complex singularity exponents of the limit are infinite, by Lemma 6.9 and Skoda integrability. The effective semicontinuity theorem [26], Theorem 0.2(2), consequently gives locally uniform bounds for e−sφje^{-s\varphi_{j}} for every fixed s>0s>0, and in fact convergence of these exponentials in L1L^{1} on smaller neighborhoods.

Apply (105) on the fixed proper chart diagrams. It gives locally uniform upstairs bounds for every inverse exponential power as well. After extraction, the weights converge almost everywhere off the exceptional and critical analytic sets. Pullback preserves almost-everywhere convergence there, because the chart maps are local biholomorphisms; the omitted analytic sets have measure zero. Uniform LrL^{r} bounds for some r>1r>1 then give convergence in L1L^{1} of the densities defining ΘTj\Theta_{T_{j}} upstairs. Proper pushforward gives ΘTj→ΘT\Theta_{T_{j}}\to\Theta_{T} downstairs. The argument applies to each subsequence and so proves continuity for the whole sequence. Their masses also converge, and the limiting mass is positive. Thus F\mathcal{F} is continuous. The Schauder–Tychonoff fixed-point theorem yields a fixed point.

Let bb be the positive normalization factor in (121) at this fixed point. Its equality T=bΘTT=b\Theta_{T} holds upstairs on the good locus, giving (119). Both sides extend with no analytic-subset mass, so the equality holds on each entire smooth higher chart.

Taking a smooth Euclidean trace on a smaller coordinate ball gives a scalar Poisson equation whose right side belongs to every finite LrL^{r}, because η\eta is holomorphic and all inverse exponential moments of ϕ\phi are finite. Interior elliptic regularity gives ϕ∈Wloc2,r\phi\in W_{\mathrm{loc}}^{2,r} for every finite rr. Choosing r>8r>8 gives continuous first derivatives, after which the semilinear equation and ordinary elliptic bootstrap make ϕ\phi smooth. On a regular foliated chart, (109) and (112) give η=egh(z) dz\eta=e^{g}h(z)\,\mathrm{d}z. Therefore dη=dg∧η=dϕ∧η\mathrm{d}\eta=\mathrm{d}g\wedge\eta=\mathrm{d}\phi\wedge\eta there. Both sides are now smooth on the entire higher chart, and the identity extends by density. This proves (120). □

Spherical developing maps and boundary meridians

Fix the current given by Lemma 6.10. On a smooth higher chart put

γ=b/2e−ϕ/2η,a=∂ϕ−∂ˉϕ2.(122)\gamma=\sqrt{b/2}e^{-\phi/2}\eta,\qquad a=\frac{\partial\phi-\bar{\partial}\phi}{2}. \tag*{(122)}

Equations (119) and (120) imply

dγ=a∧γ,da=−2γ∧γˉ.(123)\mathrm{d}\gamma=a\wedge\gamma,\qquad\mathrm{d}a=-2\gamma\wedge\bar{\gamma}. \tag*{(123)}

Indeed differentiating e−ϕ/2ηe^{-\phi/2}\eta gives the first identity, while da=−∂∂ˉϕda=-\partial\bar{\partial}\phi gives the second. Consequently the matrix-valued one-form

A=(a/2γˉ−γ−a/2)(124)A=\begin{pmatrix} a/2 & \bar{\gamma} \\ -\gamma& -a/2 \end{pmatrix} \tag*{(124)}

is skew-Hermitian, trace-free, and satisfies dA+A∧A=0dA+A\wedge A=0. On a simply connected small ball it therefore has the form U−1dUU^{-1}dU with UU valued in SU(2)\mathrm{SU}(2).

The map

F:x⟼U(x)Ce1∈P1F:x\longmapsto U(x)\mathbb{C}e_1\in\mathbb{P}^{1}

is holomorphic. In fact, ∂ˉ(Ue1)=12a0,1Ue1\bar{\partial}(Ue_1)=\frac{1}{2}a^{0,1}Ue_1, because γ\gamma has type (1,0)(1,0); hence the line spanned by Ue1Ue_1 is a holomorphic line. This argument remains valid at zeros of η\eta. For the Fubini–Study normalization ωFS=−1∂∂ˉlog⁡(1+∣z∣2)\omega_{\mathrm{FS}}=\sqrt{-1}\partial\bar{\partial}\log(1+|z|^2), the usual unitary-frame computation gives F∗ωFS=−1γ∧γˉF^*\omega_{\mathrm{FS}}=\sqrt{-1}\gamma\wedge\bar{\gamma}. Thus, with ωsph=2ωFS\omega_{\mathrm{sph}}=2\omega_{\mathrm{FS}},

F∗ωsph=T(125)F^*\omega_{\mathrm{sph}}=T \tag*{(125)}

on the higher chart, where the right side is pulled back from MM.

Choose a connected dense open subset S⊂MS\subset M with analytic complement such that pp identifies SS with a smooth open subset of YY, the relevant forms have their generic ranks, and η\eta is nowhere zero on SS. The index charts are unramified over SS, and their resolutions can be chosen isomorphic there. Equation (126) gives local holomorphic submersions from SS to P1\mathbb{P}^{1}. Two such submersions with the same pullback form differ locally by a constant element of PU(2)\mathrm{PU}(2). Indeed their kernels agree, so one factors locally through the other on a transverse disc; the resulting local holomorphic isometry of the round sphere is the restriction of a projective unitary transformation. The transformation is unique on each connected overlap because the image of a submersion contains an open subset.

These local maps and their constant transitions give a developing map and a monodromy homomorphism

dev⁡:S~⟶P1,ρ:π1(S)⟶PU(2).(126)\operatorname{dev}:\widetilde{S}\longrightarrow\mathbb{P}^{1},\qquad\rho:\pi_1(S)\longrightarrow\mathrm{PU}(2). \tag*{(126)}

The developing map is nonconstant and is equivariant for ρ\rho.

Lemma 6.11. Let XX be a smooth space with a proper generically finite map to MM that is unramified over SS, and let SXS_X be the inverse image of SS. After any further modification supported outside SXS_X, the monodromy of a small meridian about every prime divisor in the complement of SXS_X has finite order.

Proof. The assertion is local at a general point of a boundary prime DD. Choose a small disc Δ\Delta transverse to DD at a smooth point not on another boundary component, with Δ∗=Δ∖{0}\Delta^*=\Delta\setminus\{0\} contained in SXS_X. Choose an original proper higher chart over a neighborhood of the image point in MM, take its fiber product with XX, and resolve a main component. The resulting map g:W⟶Xg:W\longrightarrow X is proper and generically finite, and is unramified over SXS_X. Near every point of WW there is an ambient holomorphic map to P1\mathbb{P}^{1}: compose its map to the original higher chart with the map constructed in (125). Over the good open these maps agree with the developing germs up to constant projective unitary transformations.

A component of the inverse image of Δ\Delta dominating Δ\Delta is a curve, finite over Δ∗\Delta^*. Its normalization has a point over 00, and its local map to Δ\Delta can be written, after changing a parameter, as t↦trt\mapsto t^r for some positive integer rr. For a sufficiently small circle in the tt-disc, the lifted loop stays inside one neighborhood on which an ambient map to P1\mathbb{P}^{1} is defined. Continuing this ambient map around the lifted loop returns the same germ. On the punctured part, gg is locally biholomorphic, so this is the analytic continuation of the original developing germ around the rr-th power of the meridian. A projective unitary transformation fixing that germ must be the identity, since it is a submersive ambient germ on the good open. Thus the meridian has monodromy whose rr-th power is the identity. It is essential here to use the ambient germ: even if the transverse disc happens to be tangent to the foliation, the argument does not infer identity of holonomy merely from its action on the values of the map along that disc. The same fiber-product construction applies after the further modifications specified in the statement.

We record the compactification fact in the precise analytic category needed here.

Lemma 6.12. Let XX be a smooth compact Kähler manifold and DD a simple normal crossing divisor. Every finite unramified cover of X∖DX \setminus D extends to a finite normal cover of XX. It has a smooth compact Kähler resolution which is unchanged over the original cover, and whose complement of that cover can be made a simple normal crossing divisor.

Proof. Near a point of DD, choose a polydisc on which its complement is (Δ∗)r×Δn−r(\Delta^*)^r \times\Delta^{n-r}. Each connected finite cover is described by a finite-index subgroup of its fundamental group Zr\mathbb{Z}^r. Such a subgroup contains NZrN\mathbb{Z}^r for some N>0N > 0. The cover is consequently dominated by the coordinate power cover

(t1,…,tr,w)⟼(t1N,…,trN,w).(t_1,\ldots,t_r,w) \longmapsto(t_1^N,\ldots,t_r^N,w).

It extends across the coordinate hyperplanes as the normal quotient of the full polydisc power cover by the corresponding finite subgroup of its deck group. The normal finite extensions glue uniquely: an isomorphism on the dense punctured locus extends between the normal finite algebras, equivalently by their integral closures. This gives a finite normal cover X‾→X\overline{X} \to X.

For completeness, a finite source over a compact Kähler space is Kähler in the local-embedding sense. Over finitely many small base neighborhoods choose relative embeddings of the finite source into products with affine spaces, with relative coordinates waw_a. Choose a smooth partition of unity λa\lambda_a on the base and put

h=∑a(λa∘f)∣wa∣2h = \sum_a (\lambda_a \circ f)|w_a|^2

on the source, extending each summand by zero outside its support. This is a smooth function on the complex space. At a point where λa>0\lambda_a > 0, use the corresponding relative embedding. The other relative coordinate functions have local holomorphic extensions to its ambient space. On vertical tangent directions the Levi form of hh is ∑aλa∣dwa∣2\sum_a \lambda_a|dw_a|^2 and is strictly positive. The terms arising from derivatives of the partition have a base-direction factor. A sufficiently large multiple of the pulled base Kähler form dominates their horizontal and mixed contributions. Compactness allows one such multiple on the finite cover. Thus

Cf∗ωX+ddchC f^*\omega_X + \mathrm{d}\mathrm{d}^c h

has strictly plurisubharmonic local potentials in the chosen ambient embeddings and defines a Kähler form on the normal source. Finally take a projective resolution and then an embedded resolution of the boundary, both unchanged over the smooth covered open. Projective modifications of compact Kähler spaces remain Kähler, by the usual relative ample curvature construction. This proves the claim.

Resolve M∖SM \setminus S by a projective modification, unchanged on SS, so that the complement is a simple normal crossing divisor. The fundamental group of SS is finitely generated: a complement of this kind in a compact smooth manifold has the homotopy type of a finite complex, or one may retract onto a compact manifold with corners obtained by removing sufficiently small tubular neighborhoods. The group PU(2)\mathrm{PU}(2) is linear, for example through the adjoint embedding into GL3(C)\mathrm{GL}_3(\mathbb{C}). Selberg's lemma therefore gives a finite-index torsion-free subgroup of ρ(π1(S))\rho(\pi_1(S)). Take the connected finite unramified cover S0→SS_0 \to S associated with its inverse image in π1(S)\pi_1(S). By Lemma 6.12, it is contained in a smooth compact Kähler manifold M0M_0, with simple normal crossing complement, and there is a proper generically finite morphism M0→MM_0 \to M. Its monodromy image is torsion-free.

Every boundary meridian of M0∖S0M_0 \setminus S_0 has finite-order monodromy by Lemma 6.11, hence trivial monodromy. The inclusion S0↪M0S_0 \hookrightarrow M_0 induces a surjection of fundamental groups whose kernel is normally generated by those meridians. One way to see both assertions is to put loops and homotopies in general position relative to the normal crossing divisor: loops avoid it, and a homotopy meets its smooth part in finitely many transverse points, each contributing a meridian; it avoids the intersections of components. Consequently the representation descends to

ρ0:π1(M0)→PU⁡(2).(127)\rho_0:\pi_1(M_0) \to\operatorname{PU}(2). \tag*{(127)}

Finite holonomy and the contradiction

Lemma 6.13. Let XX be a connected smooth compact Kähler manifold such that a(X)=0a(X) = 0 and q(X′)=0q(X') = 0 for every connected finite étale cover X′→XX' \to X. Every representation π1(X)→PU⁡(2)\pi_1(X) \to\operatorname{PU}(2) with torsion-free image has trivial image.

Proof. Let Γ\Gamma be the image, and take its complex Zariski closure in PSL⁡2(C)\operatorname{PSL}_2(\mathbb{C}), regarded as a linear algebraic group through the adjoint representation.

If this closure is all of PSL⁡2(C)\operatorname{PSL}_2(\mathbb{C}), apply the semisimple Shafarevich theorem [15], Theorem 1. Its hypotheses are exactly a smooth compact Kähler source and a representation Zariski dense in a semisimple linear group; for torsion-free image the Shafarevich base is normal projective of general type, and the representation factors through a smooth model of that base. Algebraic dimension zero forces this base to be a point: a positive-dimensional projective base would supply a nonconstant meromorphic function on XX. Factorization through a point makes Γ\Gamma trivial, contradicting its supposed Zariski density.

If the Zariski closure is proper, its identity component is solvable, by the classification of proper connected algebraic subgroups of PSL⁡2(C)\operatorname{PSL}_2(\mathbb{C}). Thus Γ\Gamma is virtually solvable. Pass to a finite-index subgroup whose image Γ0\Gamma_0 is solvable and let X0→XX_0 \to X be the corresponding finite étale cover. For every further finite-index subgroup HH of π1(X0)\pi_1(X_0), its abelianization is finite: it is the first integral homology of a compact Kähler finite cover with q=0q = 0, hence is finitely generated of rank 2q=02q = 0.

Now induct along the derived series of Γ0\Gamma_0. The quotient Γ0/Γ0ab\Gamma_0/\Gamma_0^{\mathrm{ab}} is an image of π1(X0)ab\pi_1(X_0)^{\mathrm{ab}}, so it is finite. Its preimage has finite index in π1(X0)\pi_1(X_0); that subgroup again has finite abelianization, making Γ0′/Γ0′′\Gamma_0'/\Gamma_0'' finite. Repeating gives finite successive indices down to the identity, because the derived series has finite length. Thus Γ0\Gamma_0, and then Γ\Gamma, is finite. A finite torsion-free group is trivial. □

Lemma 6.2 supplies the hypotheses of Lemma 6.13 for M0M_0 and all its finite étale covers. The representation (128) is therefore trivial. The developing map descends to a single-valued nonconstant holomorphic map

F0:S0⟶P1.F_0:S_0 \longrightarrow\mathbb{P}^1.

We finish by proving its meromorphic extension, rather than appealing to compactness of the target. Over a neighborhood in M0M_0, form the proper generically finite higher charts used in Lemma 6.11. Each small ball upstairs has an ambient sphere map obtained by composition from (125). On the good part of the ball this map and the lift of F0F_0 have the same transverse round metric, so they differ by a constant projective unitary transformation. The good part, being the complement of a proper analytic subset in a ball, is connected; uniqueness on submersive germs makes that transformation constant throughout it. After this transformation the ambient map extends the lift of F0F_0. The extensions agree on intersections by density and glue to a holomorphic map on the higher chart.

Choose a scalar projective coordinate on P1\mathbb{P}^1. Composing with these extensions gives a meromorphic function on each proper generically finite chart. Its meromorphic trace, divided by the chart degree, is a meromorphic function on the base neighborhood. To define the trace, first descend through the proper modification in the chart’s Stein factorization and then take the ordinary trace of the finite normal map. On the good open every branch is the same pullback of the chosen coordinate of F0F_0, so its trace is exactly the degree times that coordinate. The resulting local meromorphic functions on M0M_0 consequently agree on overlaps and give a global meromorphic extension of the coordinate of F0F_0. It is nonconstant, contradicting a(M0)=0a(M_0)=0 from Lemma 6.2.

This contradiction proves Proposition 6.1.

Birational constructions and reduced-boundary models

This section supplies the ordinary dlt constructions needed in the algebraic-dimension-zero argument. We prove special termination through dimension four, using arbitrary klt termination through dimension three, and then apply Assumption 2.3 only to ordinary effective klt fourfold pairs. In particular, arbitrary dlt fourfold termination is not an input.

Conventions, comparison, and integral descent

All pairs in this section are ordinary rational pairs with effective boundary and rationally invertible adjoint. Auxiliary programs start on normal globally strongly Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial compact Kähler spaces. Thus every global coherent rank-one reflexive sheaf has an invertible reflexive power. This condition will be used for global sheaves; no claim of Q\mathbb{Q}-factoriality on arbitrary analytic open subsets is made. Divisors over a space mean divisorial places represented on proper modifications, identified on common higher models. This convention does not distinguish places by their action on global meromorphic functions.

Definition 7.1 (Elementary birational steps). An elementary step for an adjoint J=KT+BJ=K_T+B is either a nontrivial projective bimeromorphic divisorial contraction, with the pair pushed forward, or a diagram

T→fZ←f+T+,(128)T \xrightarrow{f} Z \xleftarrow{f^+} T^+, \tag*{(128)}

whose morphisms are projective, bimeromorphic, and small, with strict transform boundary on T+T^+. The base is normal compact Kähler, and the source and next space are normal globally strongly Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial compact Kähler spaces. All curves contracted by the negative morphism span one nonzero ray for degrees of global rational line bundles. The line −J-J is relatively ample; in a small step J+J^+ is relatively ample. No positive-side Bott–Chern rank condition is imposed in this definition.

A projective morphism here has a relatively ample holomorphic line bundle. In the relative constructions, “relatively nef” means nonnegative degree on curves in its fibers. Absolute nefness continues to mean analytic nefness.

We use common projective resolutions and the natural meromorphic comparisons of canonical bundles, defined by Jacobians in local canonical frames, together with boundary pullback. No global meromorphic canonical frame is presumed. A global rank-one reflexive sheaf is transported through a bimeromorphic correspondence by pullback to a common resolution, proper direct image, and double dual. For a small correspondence this is the unique reflexive strict transform.

Lemma 7.2 (Exceptional comparison of global sheaves). Let h:Y→Th:Y\to T be a projective modification of normal spaces and let P\mathcal{P} be a global rank-one reflexive sheaf on YY. Suppose that (h∗P)∗∗(h_*\mathcal{P})^{**} is rationally invertible. Then, for some positive integer ll, an invertible sheaf MM on TT and an integral hh-exceptional Weil divisor EE satisfy

P[l]≃(h∗M⊗OY(E))∗∗.(129)\mathcal{P}^{[l]} \simeq(h^*M \otimes\mathcal{O}_Y(E))^{**}. \tag*{(129)}

Proof. Choose ll so that the corresponding reflexive power of (h∗P)∗∗(h_*\mathcal{P})^{**} is invertible. This is (h∗P[l])∗∗(h_*\mathcal{P}^{[l]})^{**}, since the two sheaves agree where hh is an isomorphism, including the general points of all prime divisors of TT. Call this line MM. Evaluation of local sections of h∗P[l]h_*\mathcal{P}^{[l]}, and their images in MM, gives meromorphic comparisons with h∗Mh^*M. These comparisons are the same on their common domain and hence define a divisorial comparison globally. Its orders vanish away from the exceptional primes. The resulting integral exceptional divisor gives (130) in codimension one and therefore everywhere by reflexivity. Local meromorphic generators are enough for this argument; it does not represent an arbitrary global line bundle by a global divisor. □\square

We shall use the projective analytic negativity lemma [31, 56]: if a rational Cartier divisor on a projective bimeromorphic morphism is relatively nef and has nonpositive pushforward, it is nonpositive. The local-over-target proof of [56], Lemma 3.39 applies in this setting.

Lemma 7.3 (Comparison in an elementary step). On a common smooth projective resolution of an elementary step, with projections pp to the negative model and qq to the next model, the natural adjoint comparison is

p∗J=q∗J′+F,F≥0,q∗F=0.(130)p^*J=q^*J'+F,\qquad F\geq0,\qquad q_*F=0. \tag*{(130)}

Log discrepancies do not decrease. They increase strictly for a place whose center on either side is contained over the non-isomorphism locus in the contraction base. Consequently an elementary step preserves klt, respectively dlt, singularities.

Proof. The codimension-one comparison gives q∗F=0q_*F=0. The signs of the two adjoints make −F-F nef over the contraction base, and hence over the target of qq. Negativity gives F≥0F\geq0.

In a small diagram the non-isomorphism sets in ZZ are the same on both sides. Otherwise, over a region where one side is an isomorphism, smallness identifies the other adjoint with a pullback, contradicting its relative ample sign on a contracted curve. A non-isomorphism fiber is positive-dimensional by normality. Over any such point, lift a negative curve to the common resolution. Its FF-degree is strictly negative, so the fiber meets Supp⁡F\operatorname{Supp} F. A connected projective fiber meeting the support of an effective relatively anti-nef Cartier divisor is contained in that support: if a component outside the support met it, a curve section through an intersection point would have positive intersection. Clearing denominators gives the same statement for FF. Thus Supp⁡F\operatorname{Supp} F contains the full fibers in question. Pullback to any higher model now proves strict increase at each specified place.

For dlt preservation use the characterization by log canonicity and an SNC open set meeting every lc center. A new discrepancy-zero place was already a zero place, and strictness keeps the general point of its center out of the subboundary. The SNC characterization, checked on global log resolutions, is therefore preserved. The klt assertion is immediate. Finally, on a globally strongly Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial dlt pair, slightly decreasing the coefficients of the floor gives a klt pair: the floor is effective rational Cartier, and every discrepancy-zero place has center in it and positive order on its pullback. □\square

We recall several analytic projective facts used in these arguments. Projective modifications and projective spaces over compact Kähler bases are Kähler, also for singular spaces. To see the needed positivity directly, give a relatively ample line a metric by local relative embeddings and Fubini–Study metrics on a finite base cover, scaling back from the relatively very ample powers. Patch weights on the actual line by a partition from the base. In a local embedding, the active coordinates and frame changes lift to ambient holomorphic germs. Base cutoffs have zero first and second derivatives in vertical directions, so the patched weight has positive Levi form on vertical Zariski tangent vectors. Add a large multiple of a pulled-back base Kähler potential. One multiplier works on compact regions: otherwise a sequence of unit tangent vectors on shrinking compact charts would limit to a vertical tangent vector contradicting the strict vertical positivity. The Zariski tangent spaces vary in a closed set in a fixed local embedding. Squared absolute values of defining equations adjust the extensions to strict ambient positivity. This also treats finite morphisms, for which the trivial line is relatively ample; compare [74].

Common resolutions in projective diagrams are obtained by graph or fiber products followed by projective log resolution. Relative ampleness composes after adding sufficiently large pullback multiples from below, locally over compacta. A curve on the base of a projective surjection has a curve lift: pull back to its normalization, a projective curve, and use relative generation and base twists to make the total space projective; then take curve sections. This justifies all curve lifts above and below. Individual projective fibers permit the usual curve sections and the projective Kleiman criterion.

The established local inputs are the relative klt cone and base point free theorems for projective analytic morphisms over Stein neighborhoods of compacta satisfying property (P), and the big-klt adjoint finite-generation theorem. We can take arbitrarily small compact coordinate neighborhoods cut out by balls or polydiscs, with Stein ambient neighborhoods and the required finite-component intersection property. We use the cone theorem with its finite negative-ray decomposition after a positive relatively ample truncation. We use base point freeness in the following integral form: if LL is relatively nef Cartier and aL−(K+Γ)aL-(K+\Gamma) is relatively ample for some positive integer aa, then every sufficiently high integral power of LL is relatively generated after shrinking. See [31], Theorems 6.2, 6.5, and 7.2.

Lemma 7.4 (Integral klt descent). Let f ⁣:T→Zf\colon T\to Z be projective bimeromorphic with normal target. Suppose an ordinary klt adjoint is ff-antiample. If an integral line bundle LL has degree zero on every contracted curve, then f∗Lf_*L is a line bundle and evaluation is an isomorphism

f∗(f∗L)≃L.(131)f^*(f_*L) \simeq L. \tag*{(131)}

Proof. The line LL is relatively nef, and the base point free hypothesis holds by fiberwise ampleness. Locally over a smaller base neighborhood, all sufficiently high powers are generated. The induced maps are constant on each connected fiber, since their tautological lines have degree zero on every curve there. They factor through ZZ: the graph projection is finite bimeromorphic onto the normal base. The pulled-back tautological lines descend two consecutive powers of LL, and their quotient descends LL itself. The projection formula identifies the descent with f∗Lf_*L and the pullback map with evaluation. These intrinsic identifications agree on overlaps. □\square

Finite generation, nonextraction, and continuation

The finite-generation result we use is [19], Theorem 3.1: on a smooth space projective over the indicated analytic base, multigraded rings of rational adjoints with simultaneous SNC effective subunit boundaries and a common relatively ample rational part are locally finitely generated, after clearing denominators. The relevant sums are klt. All applications here are over bimeromorphic projective bases, so the relative bigness conditions hold. The analytic projective big-klt framework and finiteness of models are also described in [31], Theorem E. Neither citation is used as an arbitrary termination theorem over a nonprojective base.

We spell out the reduction to that theorem. Over a Stein base in the bimeromorphic case, the direct image of either sign of an actual line bundle is a coherent sheaf of generic rank one. Cartan generation therefore supplies a nonzero section after shrinking. Thus both signs have local-over-base effective meromorphic representatives. Local canonical representatives can be obtained in the same way, or from forms pulled back from general local projections downstairs.

For finitely many effective rational klt boundaries containing a common positive relatively ample part, take a simultaneous projective log resolution a:S→Ta:S\to T. Add effective exceptional corrections to their log pullbacks so that the resulting SNC boundaries Γj\Gamma_j are effective and have exceptional coefficients strictly between zero and one. Choose an effective exceptional divisor EE with −E-E resolution-ample, by composing the exceptional antiample choices for the successive blowups. If HH is the common effective ample part below, then a∗H−βEa^*H-\beta E is relatively ample for sufficiently small β>0\beta>0. A common small multiple can be removed from each Γj\Gamma_j while preserving effectiveness and subunit coefficients: the strict transforms contain the common part, and the exceptional coefficients have positive margins. Relatively ample summands may also be represented by divided free general divisors after relative generation, Stein sections, and analytic Bertini. The smooth theorem applies. Effective exceptional corrections leave the cleared adjoint rings unchanged by projection to a normal space. The finitely many actual bundle identifications can be powered and tensored simultaneously, so they identify the multigraded rings multiplicatively.

In particular, a single rational klt adjoint has locally finitely generated ring in this setting. Add a sufficiently small positive rational multiple of the sum of effective representatives of opposite relatively ample integral bundles. Their sum is actually linearly equivalent to zero. The addition supplies the common ample part and preserves klt on a fixed resolution near the compactum. This replacement uses the projective bimeromorphic Stein setting essentially.

Lemma 7.5 (Relative Proj extracts no divisors). Let X0X_0 be normal and projective bimeromorphic over a normal compact base T0T_0. Let LL be a rational line whose cleared relative ring is locally finitely generated. The normalized main component YY of the relative Proj is projective bimeromorphic over T0T_0; X0⇢YX_0\dashrightarrow Y extracts no divisors, and the reflexive trace of LL on YY is an actual relatively ample rational line.

Proof. Compactness permits a common divisible integer mm such that the relative ring of mLmL is generated in degree one. Resolve its base ideal and graph, and denote the maps to X0X_0 and YY by pp and qq. The map to Proj lifts to the normalization. There is an actual moving/fixed decomposition

p∗(mL)=q∗H+G,G≥0,(132)p^*(mL)=q^*H+G,\qquad G\geq0, \tag*{(132)}

where HH is the relatively ample tautological line on YY. Degree-one generation and projection show that every relative section of p∗(kmL)p^*(kmL) has vanishing at least kGkG.

First, GG is qq-exceptional. If a component mapped to a prime on YY, then qq would be an isomorphism at its general point. For large kk, relative ample generation of q∗O(G)⊗H⊗kq_*\mathcal{O}(G)\otimes H^{\otimes k} gives a local-over-base section having a pole at that prime relative to H⊗kH^{\otimes k}. Multiplying its pullback by the section of (k−1)G(k-1)G gives a section of p∗(kmL)p^*(kmL) whose vanishing is less than kGkG, a contradiction.

Second, every pp-exceptional prime PP is qq-exceptional. Otherwise relative generation of q∗O(P)⊗H⊗kq_*\mathcal{O}(P)\otimes H^{\otimes k} gives a section with a pole at the image prime. Add kGkG to obtain a section of p∗(kmL)+Pp^*(kmL)+P. Since p∗O(P)=OX0p_*\mathcal{O}(P)=\mathcal{O}_{X_0} by normality, it comes from the original ring. As a section of the enlarged line it must vanish once along PP, whereas the chosen pole prevents that vanishing. Here the coefficient of GG at PP is zero by the first part. This is again a contradiction. Thus no divisor is extracted. Taking the trace of (132) gives LY=H/mL_Y = H/m as actual rational lines.

Lemma 7.6 (Finitely many marked models). For a rational polytope of actual adjoints satisfying the preceding local multigraded finite-generation hypotheses, only finitely many marked normalized main relative Proj models occur at rational parameters.

Proof. After a common Veronese and shrinking, choose finitely many homogeneous generators of the multigraded ring. Diagonal rings on rational degree rays are finitely generated by the semigroup argument for monomial degrees. Their Proj charts can be taken with homogeneous monomials as denominators. The subsets of generators that occur as supports of monomials on the specified positive degree ray form a finite pattern. Localization at such a monomial inverts exactly its support, and the multidegree-zero subring is the degree-zero localization of the diagonal ring. Intersections use unions of supports with the canonical localization maps. Thus parameters with the same pattern have the same charts and gluing. Taking the main component and normalization preserves finiteness. The base identification fixes the marking on the common bimeromorphic open. A finite collection of the smaller neighborhoods covers the compact base. If two marked models agree on each neighborhood, their identifications over the base agree on the common dense open, hence everywhere, and glue uniquely. There are consequently only finitely many global marked possibilities.

Proposition 7.7 (Relative continuation in the global strong category). Let (T,B)(T,B) be an effective rational klt or dlt pair satisfying the conventions above, and suppose TT is projective bimeromorphic over a normal compact Kähler space VV. If KT+BK_T+B is not curve-nef over VV, there is an elementary negative step over VV. Its next space remains projective over VV, compact Kähler, and globally strongly Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial, and the appropriate singularity type is preserved.

Proof. Use the finite-dimensional space of degrees of global rational line bundles on curves contracted over VV; finite dimensionality follows from first Chern classes in finite-dimensional cohomology. For a fixed relatively ample HH, the closed curve cone has a compact slice of HH-degree one. Indeed, for every global line LL, both kH+LkH+L and kH−LkH-L are relatively ample for sufficiently large kk, so all coordinates on the normalized slice are bounded.

Choose a negative extremal ray. For dlt input decrease the floor coefficients rationally just enough to obtain a klt adjoint J0J_0 still negative on this ray; for klt input let J0=KT+BJ_0=K_T+B. Cover the base by interiors of finitely many Stein compacta as above. Projecting the local cone decompositions to global degrees shows that, for each positive rational δ\delta, the normalized slice lies in the convex hull of its compact part J0+δH≥0J_0+\delta H\geq0 and finitely many points of actual contracted curves. A projected remainder stays in the global closed cone, and a remainder of zero HH-degree contributes zero. The stated convex hull is compact.

Choose δ\delta so that the selected ray is strictly in the truncated negative region. It is therefore represented by an actual curve. Separating its point on the slice from the compact hull of the remaining generators and remainder gives a supporting nef class vanishing only on this ray. In the open set of such supports one can choose a rational global line NN in the rational annihilator of the ray, so that a positive multiple of NN minus J0J_0 is relatively ample. Strict positivity on the compact slice and fiberwise ampleness give this last assertion. Local klt base point freeness on the finite cover generates a common multiple of NN. Its section morphism and Stein factorization give a projective bimeromorphic contraction f:T→Zf:T\to Z over VV, with normal target and connected fibers, contracting precisely the ray. The line −J0-J_0 is ff-ample by fiberwise ampleness. If an exceptional prime EE exists, it is rational Cartier and negativity gives EE strictly negative degree on the ray. All contracted curves lie in EE; they cover the nontrivial fibers. There can be no second exceptional prime, since its negative ray degree would force the same curves, and hence EE, into it. For a global rank-one reflexive sheaf on ZZ, take its reflexive pullback to TT. It is rationally invertible. Add a rational multiple of EE to kill its ray degree and apply Lemma 7.4 after clearing denominators. The descended rational line agrees with the given sheaf off codimension two on ZZ and hence everywhere by reflexivity. Thus ZZ has the required global strong property.

If ff is small, apply the preceding finite generation over ZZ to J0J_0. Lemma 7.5 gives a projective positive model with no extracted divisors; it is therefore small over ZZ. The transformed adjoint is relatively ample and rationally invertible. For any global line LL on TT, killing the ray degree and applying integral descent gives an actual rational identity

L=cJ0+f∗M,c∈Q.(133)L = cJ_0 + f^*M,\qquad c \in\mathbb{Q}. \tag*{(133)}

Smallness gives the corresponding identity on the positive model. Any global rank-one reflexive sheaf there first transports to TT, where a power is such an LL. Transforming back and using (133) proves the global strong property on the positive model. The positive morphism cannot be an isomorphism, since that would make J0J_0 a pullback from ZZ.

For dlt input the unperturbed adjoint has negative degree on the ray. Its version of (133) has c>0c > 0, so its transform has the positive sign as well. Lemma 7.3 preserves the required singularities. All resulting spaces are projective bimeromorphic over VV and hence compact Kähler, so the construction can continue whenever relative curve-nefness fails.

Two finiteness counts and transversal adjunction

Lemma 7.8 (Divisorial count). A sequence of bimeromorphic transformations extracting no divisors between normal irreducible compact Kähler nn-folds contracts divisors only finitely often.

Proof. Count the dimension of the span of prime (n−1)(n-1)-cycle classes in H2n−2(−,R)H_{2n-2}(-,\mathbb{R}). This is a finite nonnegative integer, since compact analytic spaces are triangulable and have finite-dimensional homology. Nonextraction provides common isomorphic opens whose complement in the target has dimension at most n−2n-2. The localization sequence identifies the target’s degree-2n−22n-2 homology with the Borel–Moore homology of that open. Restriction from the source maps its prime-cycle span onto the target’s span by strict transforms, killing the classes of lost primes. Each lost prime has nonzero class by its positive Kähler volume, so the count strictly drops.

For completeness, that volume detects a topological class also on a normal singular space. Kähler potentials with pluriharmonic differences determine a class in H2(−,R)H^2(-,\mathbb{R}) through the real-part sequence 0→−1R→O→PH→00 \to\sqrt{-1}\mathbb{R} \to\mathcal{O} \to\mathcal{PH} \to0, with a fixed normalization. If pluriharmonicity is initially known only on the regular locus, pull the difference to a resolution. Its smooth pullback is pluriharmonic. Near the compact fiber over a point, choose holomorphic real-part primitives and adjust imaginary constants to make their values on that fiber agree. The real part is constant there, and each irreducible fiber germ forces the holomorphic primitive to be constant there. The primitives therefore agree on overlaps near the fiber. A finite cover and smaller neighborhoods glue them on a neighborhood of the whole fiber, and properness and normality descend them. Thus the original difference is locally a holomorphic real part. Resolving a compact prime cycle now evaluates the corresponding class power as the strictly positive integral of the pulled-back Kähler form. Its fundamental class pushes to the stated cycle class. □

Lemma 7.9 (Strict low-discrepancy counts). For a compact ordinary rational klt pair there exists 0<ϵ≤10 < \epsilon\le1 such that every discrepancy is at least ϵ\epsilon and only finitely many exceptional places have log discrepancy strictly less than 1+ϵ1+\epsilon. In particular all exceptional places of discrepancy at most one can be realized on a single projective SNC resolution. For a terminal pair with largest boundary coefficient b0b_0 (zero for empty boundary), the exceptional places of discrepancy strictly less than 2−b02-b_0 are finite. For an lc pair the first assertion has the same form when restricted to centers not contained in its non-klt locus.

Proof. On an SNC resolution let the log-pullback coefficients be dj<1d_j<1, put wj=1−djw_j=1-d_j, and take ϵ=min⁡(1,min⁡jwj)\epsilon=\min(1,\min_j w_j), with value one if the list is empty. For a place still exceptional over this resolution, choose at the general point of its center normal coordinates x1,…,xsx_1,\ldots,x_s, the first bb defining the boundary components through the center. The top exterior Jacobian calculation gives

aE≥∑j=1bwjord⁡E(xj)+∑j=b+1sord⁡E(xj).(134)a_E \ge\sum_{j=1}^{b} w_j\operatorname{ord}_E(x_j)+\sum_{j=b+1}^{s}\operatorname{ord}_E(x_j). \tag*{(134)}

At most one differential saves one order by normal differentiation along the place. This proves the lower bound. A place in the strict cutoff must have center a stratum: an additional normal coordinate would give at least 1+ϵ1+\epsilon (or at least two if no boundary is present).

Blow up that closed stratum. Its new SNC weight is the sum of the passing weights, and the next center lies in the new exceptional component. Until the place is divisorial, only strata of codimension at least two can occur; each next weight increases by at least ϵ\epsilon. The fixed strict cutoff bounds the chain length, and there are finitely many strata at each stage. The finitely many exceptionals already on the starting resolution complete the count. All these blowups can be made globally and projectively.

For a terminal pair, exceptional log-pullback coefficients are negative. The same calculation uses the strict cutoff 2−b02-b_0; non-stratum centers and centers involving such exceptional components cannot contribute new places below it. For the lc version take the minimum of one and the strictly positive weights. A center not contained in the non-klt locus meets no zero-weight component generically, so the same argument applies.

Lemma 7.10 (Transversal surface calculation). Let a normal analytic space carry an ordinary rational Weil boundary with rationally Cartier adjoint. At an analytically general point of a codimension-two irreducible locus, a general transversal surface cut is normal and the crepant formula on a simultaneous log resolution restricts to its exact surface crepant formula. For a coefficient-one prime, normalized divisorial adjunction is computed by normalized curve adjunction on this cut.

Proof. Choose local parameters t1,…,tn−2t_1,\ldots,t_{n-2} along the locus from an embedding. Take a sufficiently general nearby common value, regular on the smooth locus, upstairs on a projective log resolution, and on all relevant smooth strata; discard images of nondominating strata. The cut upstairs is a smooth surface, with the required SNC support, and no component is exceptional. Codimension-two bad loci are cut to isolated points.

The surface downstairs has dimension two and is regular in codimension one. It is Cohen–Macaulay as well. Indeed the non-Cohen–Macaulay locus of a normal analytic space has codimension at least three, by the local depth/coherent Ext criterion and normality at height at most two. Thus at the chosen general point the parameters are a regular sequence. The cut is generically reduced and Cohen–Macaulay, hence reduced; Serre’s criterion gives normality. Read the restricted boundary transversely as a cycle and take its closure. Complete intersection adjunction off the isolated bad set, followed by reflexive extension, identifies the restricted rational adjoint with KS+BSK_S+B_S, using division by the same parameter volume form upstairs and downstairs. The restriction of the crepant formula has the correct nonexceptional coefficients. Any difference from the surface crepant formula is exceptional and relatively numerically zero, hence zero by both signs of negativity. This also restricts klt formulas, or dlt formulas from resolutions preserving an SNC good open, with their stated discrepancies.

For a coefficient-one prime, first subtract its smooth strict transform in the resolved formula, then take residue and push to its normalization. At general points over the chosen codimension-two locus, the cut of that strict transform is a smooth curve germ, finite and generically an isomorphism onto its branch of the reduced surface curve. It is therefore the curve normalization. Transversality preserves coefficient orders. Restricting first to the surface and then taking residue gives the same result. Only the indicated sums need be rational Cartier on the normalization; the individual canonical and boundary terms need not be.

Extraction of prescribed low places

Proposition 7.11 (Low extraction). Let (T,B)(T,B) be an ordinary rational klt pair on a normal globally strongly Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial compact Kähler space. Any specified set of exceptional places of log discrepancy at most one can be extracted, and no other exceptional prime extracted, by a projective crepant morphism Y→TY \to T with effective klt boundary, where YY is normal, compact Kähler, and globally strongly Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial.

Proof. The set is finite by Lemma 7.9. Choose a projective SNC resolution h:R→Th:R \to T carrying it. Put an effective SNC klt boundary Θ\Theta on RR, retaining the strict boundary and the crepant coefficients of the specified primes, and choosing every other exceptional coefficient strictly above its crepant value. With J=KT+BJ=K_T+B this gives

D(0)=KR+Θ=h∗J+P,P≥0,(135)D(0)=K_R+\Theta=h^*J+P,\qquad P\geq0, \tag*{(135)}

where PP is supported exactly on the undesired exceptionals.

Fix an hh-ample line H0H_0 and let E1,…,ENE_1,\ldots,E_N be all exceptional primes of RR. On a small full-dimensional rational polytope in formal coefficient space consider

D(u)=D(0)+u0H0+∑i=1NuiEi,u0≥0,∣ui∣≤ηu0.(136)D(u)=D(0)+u_0H_0+\sum_{i=1}^{N}u_iE_i,\qquad u_0\geq0,\quad|u_i|\leq\eta u_0. \tag*{(136)}

Choose η>0\eta>0 small enough that the perturbation is relatively ample at every nonzero parameter, and then make the polytope small enough. On the finitely many Stein neighborhoods choose effective representatives of H0H_0, −H0-H_0, and ±Ei\pm E_i. A small common positive multiple of the effective sum representing H0−H0∼0H_0-H_0\sim0 supplies a common ample part. Taking the other coefficients sufficiently small on a simultaneous resolution gives equivalent ordinary klt adjoints at the vertices. Lemmas 7.5 and 7.6 give finitely many marked normal relatively ample models over TT for all rational parameters.

For each model occurring arbitrarily near zero, take the affine spans of its parameter sets in successively smaller punctured neighborhoods. These nested affine spaces eventually stabilize. Discard models not accumulating at zero. If every eventual span were proper, finitely many proper affine subspaces would cover all sufficiently small rational points in the full-dimensional cone, which is impossible. Thus one marked model YY occurs arbitrarily near zero with full eventual affine span.

Choose affinely independent rational parameters for this model. Their actual ample adjoint traces solve a rational linear system for the traces of D(0),H0,E1,…,END(0),H_0,E_1,\ldots,E_N in the group of rank-one reflexive sheaves tensored with Q\mathbb{Q}. All these traces are therefore actual rational line bundles. A sequence of its parameters tending to zero makes D(0)YD(0)_Y curve-nef over TT. Taking (136) in codimension one gives the actual identity D(0)Y=hY∗J+PYD(0)_Y=h_Y^*J+P_Y, with PYP_Y effective exceptional. Negativity forces PY=0P_Y=0. No specified prime is lost. At a nonzero parameter defining YY, the relative system of a divisible power of D(u)D(u) contains the system of the ample perturbation, multiplied by the section of the corresponding power of PP and a base pullback. It embeds relatively at general points outside Supp⁡P\operatorname{Supp} P. Every specified prime has generic point there, including a discrepancy-one prime whose crepant boundary coefficient is zero. It cannot be contracted. Thus Y→TY \to T is crepant with precisely the prescribed exceptional primes and effective klt boundary.

Each surviving exceptional prime is rational Cartier by the traces of the EiE_i. For an arbitrary global rank-one reflexive sheaf on YY, its trace on TT has an invertible power by the global strong hypothesis. Lemma 7.2 expresses the corresponding power upstairs as a pullback line with an integral exceptional correction. Clearing the rational Cartier denominators of that correction makes a further power invertible. This proves the global strong property. Projectivity over the compact Kähler base gives the remaining category assertions.

Arbitrary klt birational termination through dimension three

Proposition 7.12 (Terminal threefold termination). An arbitrary sequence of elementary birational steps for an effective rational terminal pair of dimension at most three is finite. Here terminal means that all exceptional log discrepancies are greater than one. No pseudo-effectivity hypothesis is required.

Proof. In dimensions at most two there are no nontrivial small diagrams, and Lemma 7.8 handles divisorial contractions. In dimension three discard a finite prefix to make all steps small. Terminality persists by Lemma 7.3. The underlying threefold singularities are ordinary terminal: deleting the effective rational Cartier boundary does not decrease discrepancies. In particular they are smooth at general curve points. This conclusion also holds for local analytic places. On a global resolution the exceptional coefficients for the empty boundary are negative; local places still exceptional over that smooth resolution have ordinary log discrepancy at least two.

Let bb be the largest boundary coefficient, or zero for empty boundary. The coefficient set is fixed under small steps. If b>0b > 0, test each step whose positive side has a flipped curve contained in a coefficient-bb component. If b=0b = 0, test every step with any flipped curve; a nontrivial positive side exists by the ample-sign argument in Lemma 7.3. Blowing up the generic point of that curve on the positive side gives an exceptional place with log discrepancy

t=2−∑jmjbj≤2−b,(137)t = 2 - \sum_j m_j b_j \le2 - b, \tag*{(137)}

where mjm_j are nonnegative integral multiplicities. One can realize this place by the normalized blowup of the whole curve. Positivity and the fixed boundary denominators make the possible tt a finite set. For each such tt, the number of exceptional places with discrepancy strictly below tt is finite by Lemma 7.9. These counts do not increase. At a tested step its tested place had discrepancy strictly below tt before the step and equals tt afterwards, so the corresponding count drops. Only finitely many tested steps occur.

If b>0b > 0, consider the normalizations of the finitely many coefficient-bb surfaces on the remaining tail. Both sides map birmeromorphically to the normalization of their common image in the contraction base. The positive map contracts no curve and is therefore an isomorphism. The negative normalization consequently maps projectively bimeromorphically to the next normalization, contracting a curve whenever the corresponding surface contains a flipping curve. These are compact Kähler surfaces. The cycle count leaves a tail on which no maximal-coefficient component contains a contracted curve on either side.

Remove all maximal-coefficient components from the boundary on this tail. The new adjoint is still negative, because an effective rational Cartier divisor has nonnegative degree on a curve not contained in it. Its one-ray identity with the original adjoint, obtained by Lemma 7.4, has a positive rational coefficient. Smallness then makes its transform relatively positive. Terminality persists after decreasing the boundary. Induct on the number of distinct positive boundary coefficients. The empty-boundary case was handled by testing every step, so the sequence is finite.

We require a uniform index statement to pass from klt to terminal pairs. The local terminal-point results used are the classical complex analytic threefold theorems of Mori–Reid and Kawamata. If a terminal point has canonical index r>1r>1, there is an exceptional place centered there with ordinary log discrepancy 1+1/r1+1/r; see [49]. Also, the index of every integral Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier Weil divisor germ divides rr, including when r=1r=1. For the latter statement, the analytic index-one cover is smooth or an isolated cDV hypersurface, with simply connected punctured small neighborhood. The connectivity theorem for isolated hypersurface links and the analytic Kummer sequence make its germ divisor class group torsion-free. Pulling up a Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier divisor therefore makes it principal, and the norm gives the divisibility downstairs. The small-discrepancy place can be detected globally on a compact terminal space: on a global resolution the empty-boundary exceptional coefficients are negative, so a local place still exceptional over the resolution has discrepancy at least two. A place of discrepancy 1+1/r<21+1/r<2 must already be a component of its restricted exceptional divisor and hence a global exceptional place.

Lemma 7.13 (A surface estimate for a single extraction). Let h:U→Th: U \to T extract only a prime PP from an effective rational klt threefold pair as in Proposition 7.11. Write its crepant boundary as Bstr+(1−a)PB^{\mathrm{str}}+(1-a)P, where 0<a≤10<a\leq1. There is a contracted curve C⊂PC\subset P, not contained in Supp⁡Bstr\operatorname{Supp} B^{\mathrm{str}}, such that

(KU+P)⋅C≥−3.(138)(K_U+P)\cdot C\geq-3. \tag*{(138)}

Proof. First −P-P is hh-ample. Compare any hh-ample line with its rationally invertible trace downstairs. Their difference is a rational multiple of the unique exceptional prime PP, by Lemma 7.2. Negativity makes that multiple strictly negative, proving the assertion.

Divisorial adjunction of KU+PK_U+P to the normalization PνP^\nu gives an actual rational line of the form KPν+ΔK_{P^\nu}+\Delta, with Δ≥0\Delta\geq0, even though (U,P)(U,P) need not be lc. We justify the sign, without requiring the individual terms on PνP^\nu to be rational Cartier. Take residue along the smooth strict prime on a log resolution and push its restricted crepant boundary to PνP^\nu. This identifies the actual restricted line in codimension one, then by reflexivity. Lemma 7.10 computes a tested coefficient on a klt normal surface germ with the reduced curve of all sliced branches of PP. Such a surface germ is a quotient of a smooth germ by a small finite group, by the analytic klt surface classification; see [56], Chapter 4.

On the smooth chart, adjunction to a normalized branch of a reduced plane curve has effective different: the conductor contribution from normalization and the intersections with other branches are nonnegative. More explicitly, hypersurface adjunction makes the plane curve dualizing sheaf a line, and finite duality identifies the normalization’s dualizing sheaf with its pullback multiplied by the conductor ideal. The quotient pullback of the reduced divisor is reduced. Frames of a Cartier log-adjoint power pull to the corresponding frames by the codimension-one étale property, and their meromorphic residues are related by pluricanonical pullback. Therefore the different downstairs pulls to the different upstairs plus the ramification divisor on the normalized branch. This proves Δ≥0\Delta\geq0.

On a minimal smooth resolution π:S→Pν\pi:S\to P^\nu the restricted adjoint is KS+ΔSK_S+\Delta_S with ΔS≥0\Delta_S\geq0. Indeed KSK_S is relatively nef by curve adjunction, negative definiteness, and the absence of exceptional smooth rational (−1)(-1)-curves. The correction ΔS=π∗(KPν+Δ)−KS\Delta_S = \pi^*(K_{P^\nu} + \Delta) - K_S is relatively anti-nef with effective pushforward; negativity applied to −ΔS-\Delta_S gives the sign.

If PP maps to a curve, take a general smooth fiber on SS, after Stein factorization. Its KSK_S-degree is at least −2-2. If PP maps to a point, PP and SS are projective. The classification of smooth projective surfaces supplies moving curves covering SS with KSK_S-degree at least −3-3: use ample curves if the minimal canonical class is nef, ruling fibers in the ruled case, or lines on P2\mathbb{P}^2, and general strict transforms; see [4]. In either case choose a curve not contained in the correction or in the finitely many excluded curves, including the inverse image of Supp⁡Bstr∩P\operatorname{Supp} B^{\mathrm{str}} \cap P. It maps birationally to a curve CC and the effective correction has nonnegative degree there. This proves (139).

Proposition 7.14 (Uniform global reflexive index). Fix 0<ϵ≤10 < \epsilon\le1 and an integer n≥0n \ge0. For effective rational klt threefold pairs on normal globally strongly Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial compact Kähler spaces, suppose every discrepancy is at least ϵ\epsilon, at most nn exceptional places have discrepancy at most one, and every exceptional discrepancy greater than one is at least 1+ϵ1 + \epsilon. There is an integer I(n,ϵ)>0I(n,\epsilon) > 0 such that F[I(n,ϵ)]\mathcal{F}^{[I(n,\epsilon)]} is invertible for every global rank-one reflexive sheaf F\mathcal{F} on each such space.

Proof. For n=0n = 0 the underlying space is terminal with the ordinary exceptional discrepancy gap 1+ϵ1 + \epsilon. The terminal-point statement above bounds every canonical index by ⌊1/ϵ⌋\lfloor1/\epsilon\rfloor. A global rank-one reflexive sheaf has Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier germs by the global strong hypothesis, so its local indices divide those canonical indices. Their bounded common multiple gives I(0,ϵ)I(0,\epsilon).

Induct on nn, seeking a multiple of previous bounds. If there is no low place use the previous case. Otherwise extract only a place PP of discrepancy a∈[ϵ,1]a \in[\epsilon,1] by Proposition 7.11. The pair on UU has effective crepant boundary Bstr+(1−a)PB^{\mathrm{str}} + (1-a)P. Its exceptional places are exceptional downstairs, except that PP is no longer counted; all hypotheses hold with n−1n-1. Set I′=I(n−1,ϵ)I' = I(n-1,\epsilon).

For the curve in Lemma 7.13, crepancy and effectiveness of BstrB^{\mathrm{str}} give

−3≤(KU+P+Bstr)⋅C=aP⋅C<0.(139)-3 \le(K_U + P + B^{\mathrm{str}}) \cdot C = aP \cdot C < 0. \tag*{(139)}

Let F\mathcal{F} be a global rank-one reflexive sheaf on TT, and let FU\mathcal{F}_U denote its reflexive sheaf pullback. Distinguish this from the rational line pullback defined by an invertible power of F\mathcal{F}. Their meromorphic comparison has the actual rational-line form

h∗F=FU+sP.(140)h^*\mathcal{F} = \mathcal{F}_U + sP. \tag*{(140)}

Both I′FUI'\mathcal{F}_U and I′PI'P are integral lines. Degree zero of the left side on CC gives

s=I′FU⋅C−I′P⋅C,1≤−I′P⋅C≤3I′ϵ.(141)s = \frac{I'\mathcal{F}_U \cdot C}{-I'P \cdot C}, \qquad1 \le-I'P \cdot C \le\frac{3I'}{\epsilon}. \tag*{(141)}

The numerator and denominator are integers. Put

I=I′lcm⁡{1,…,⌊3I′/ϵ⌋}.(142)I = I' \operatorname{lcm}\{1,\ldots,\lfloor3I'/\epsilon\rfloor\}. \tag*{(142)}

Then II and IsI_s are multiples of I′I', so IFU+(Is)PI\mathcal{F}_U + (I_s)P is an integral line of zero degree on all contracted curves. Increase the crepant coefficient of PP by a sufficiently small positive rational number. The pair remains klt, and its adjoint is relatively antiample because −P-P is ample. Lemma 7.4 descends this integral line. Its descent agrees with F[I]\mathcal{F}^{[I]} away from the codimension-two center of the extraction, hence everywhere by reflexivity. This proves the induction.

Theorem 7.15 (Klt termination through dimension three). Every arbitrary sequence of elementary birational steps for effective rational klt pairs of dimension at most three is finite, without a pseudo-effectivity hypothesis. Proof. Only dimension three remains. Suppose there is an infinite sequence; after the cycle count all steps are small. The finite sets of exceptional places of discrepancy at most one are nonincreasing, so stabilize to a set E\mathcal{E}. There is a uniform positive ϵ\epsilon of the type in Proposition 7.14 on this tail. Indeed start with Lemma 7.9 on its first model. Only finitely many places lie below its strict cutoff 1+ϵ01+\epsilon_0; outside E\mathcal{E} their discrepancies are greater than one, with a positive minimum gap. Take the minimum of this gap, ϵ0\epsilon_0, and the positive starting discrepancy lower bound. All subsequent comparisons are nondecreasing.

The boundary denominators are fixed. Proposition 7.14 gives a common denominator for the actual adjoints on all models of the tail, and hence for all discrepancies by the crepant formulas. The nondecreasing values on E\mathcal{E}, bounded above by one, therefore eventually become constant. Over the first model of this stabilized tail extract exactly E\mathcal{E} crepantly. The resulting pair is terminal with effective boundary and is globally strongly Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial.

Lift a flip X−⇢X+X_- \dashrightarrow X_+ over ZZ from its extracted terminal model Y0→X−Y_0 \to X_-. Run relative elementary steps over ZZ using Proposition 7.7. On a common projective resolution of any finite prefix ending at YY, denote the pulled-back adjoints of Y0,Y,X+Y_0,Y,X_+ by P0,P,P+P_0,P,P_+ respectively. The comparisons give

P0=P+G=P++F,G,F≥0,(143)P_0=P+G=P_++F,\qquad G,F\geq0, \tag*{(143)}

where GG is exceptional over YY and FF is exceptional over X+X_+. The line P+P_+ is nef over ZZ. Over YY the divisor G−F=P+−PG-F=P_+-P is nef and has nonpositive pushforward; negativity gives G≤FG\leq F, before any termination is known. A lost prime of Y0Y_0 would have positive coefficient in GG, but zero coefficient in FF: this follows from smallness below for old primes and from constancy of discrepancies on E\mathcal{E} for the extracted ones. Thus no prime is lost. The run stays small and terminal, so Proposition 7.12 makes it finite. Its endpoint has PP nef over ZZ.

At the endpoint negativity over X+X_+ applied to F−G=P−P+F-G=P-P_+ gives the opposite inequality, hence P=P+P=P_+. Since the adjoint on X+X_+ is relatively ample, its projection from the common resolution is constant on the fibers over YY: otherwise a curve in a connected projective fiber would have positive pullback degree. Factoring the graph over the normal space YY gives a projective crepant morphism Y→X+Y\to X_+. It extracts the same places, by smallness below and the absence of lost primes, so the construction repeats.

Each nontrivial flip below forces a negative step in its lift, by lifting a negative curve. Infinitely many flips would concatenate to an infinite small terminal sequence with effective strictly transformed boundary, contrary to Proposition 7.12. This proves the theorem.

Adjunction and special termination for dlt pairs

Lemma 7.16 (Actual adjunction on normalized strata). Let (V,A)(V,A) be an ordinary effective rational dlt pair, and let TT be the normalization of an lc center, with map ν:T→V\nu:T\to V. A chain of coefficient-one primes through its generic SNC stratum gives an effective dlt adjunction pair (T,AT)(T,A_T) and an actual rational-line identification

JT=KT+AT=ν∗(KV+A).(144)J_T=K_T+A_T=\nu^*(K_V+A). \tag*{(144)}

Its lc centers map to proper lc subcenters of the given center. If the ambient coefficients belong to a DCC subset of [0,1][0,1], the adjunction coefficients belong to a DCC set depending only on that set and the chain length. In sufficiently divisible even powers, the identification is the canonical meromorphic residue identification, independent of the resolution and of the order of the generic residues. No global strong Q\mathbb{Q}-factoriality of TT is asserted. Proof. The lc centers are the images of the finitely many coefficient-one strata on a log resolution, and each is generically an SNC floor stratum. Order the floor components defining the chosen generic chain. Take a projective log resolution isomorphic over an SNC open meeting all lc centers. Successively restrict its crepant formula to the smooth strict strata by residue, then push the adjunction boundaries in codimension one to their normalizations. At each stage the SNC log pullback has coefficients at most one, and its rational adjoint is the restriction of the ambient actual line. Reflexive extension gives (144); any exceptional difference from the crepant comparison is numerically zero and vanishes by both signs of negativity. A discrepancy-zero stratum of a restricted formula comes from an ambient coefficient-one stratum whose image meets the good open. This gives the sub-dlt discrepancy and good-open properties, and identifies nested lc centers by the generic SNC calculation.

There is also a canonical meromorphic comparison, not merely an abstract equality of line classes. On a smooth strict stratum the residue of the ambient log-pullback frame has exactly the pole and zero orders of the remaining crepant boundary. It therefore gives the frame of the pushed adjunction in codimension one on the normalization. Extending the line identification reflexively and composing with the natural embedding of its divisorial adjoint sheaf into meromorphic pluricanonical tensors gives the claimed map. Different resolutions give the same map on the dense generic SNC stratum, and hence everywhere meromorphically. Permuting the residues changes only signs, removed in even degree. Sequential adjunction through normalized intermediate strata agrees with this strict-chain calculation by the same dense-open test. In particular all codimension-one boundary orders agree.

We prove effectivity and the DCC assertion at one restriction step; iteration then proves the statement. By Lemma 7.10, a tested different coefficient is a normalized-curve coefficient on a normal dlt surface with a coefficient-one branch. If the tested point is an lc center, the surface pair is SNC there. Indeed on a sliced log resolution preserving the good open, a zero center must lift to the intersection of two strict floor curves, with no exceptional locus through it; the resolution is an isomorphism there.

Otherwise deleting the boundary leaves a numerically klt surface germ. The Mumford numerical pullbacks of effective terms are effective by negative definiteness. We recall why this is ordinary klt even if rational Cartierness of the separate canonical term has not yet been established. On the minimal resolution of the singular germ, write

M=(Ei⋅Ej)<0,KS−πnum∗K=∑iaiEi.M = (E_i \cdot E_j) < 0,\qquad K_S - \pi^*_{\mathrm{num}} K = \sum_i a_i E_i.

The numerical klt condition gives ai>−1a_i > -1. Relative nefness of KSK_S, from minimality and curve adjunction, gives Ma≥0Ma \ge0 and hence ai≤0a_i \le0. For any nonzero effective integral exceptional cycle Y=∑niEiY = \sum n_i E_i, set ci=ni+ai>0c_i = n_i + a_i > 0 on its support and ci=0c_i = 0 elsewhere. Off-diagonal entries of MM are nonnegative, so

ctM(n+a)≤ctMc<0.(145)c^{t}M(n+a) \le c^{t}Mc < 0. \tag*{(145)}

Thus some supported EiE_i has (KS+Y)⋅Ei<0(K_S+Y)\cdot E_i < 0. Consequently OEi(−Y+Ei)\mathcal{O}_{E_i}(-Y+E_i) has degree greater than 2pa(Ei)−22p_a(E_i)-2 and has zero H1H^1 by curve duality. Peeling off such components with the cycle exact sequences proves H1(OY)=0H^1(\mathcal{O}_Y)=0 for every exceptional cycle YY. Grauert formal functions gives rationality; multiples of the full exceptional curve are cofinal with the maximal-ideal thickenings.

An integral multiple of the numerical pullback of any Weil divisor is now a line-bundle divisor on the resolution with all exceptional degrees zero. Its class restricts to zero in H2H^2 of the exceptional curve, by normalization and the degree description of the curve’s top cohomology. Continuity around the compact fiber, or topological proper base change, makes that class zero after shrinking. On the preimage of a small Stein neighborhood, H1(O)=0H^1(\mathcal{O})=0 by rationality. The exponential sequence makes this line actually trivial there. Pushing in codimension one proves that the original Weil divisor is rational Cartier; in particular the canonical divisor is. The numerical klt test is therefore the ordinary one.

The analytic log-terminal surface classification now realizes the germ as a smooth germ modulo a small finite group [56], Chapter 4. Pull up the full boundary by canonical pullback, which is étale in codimension one. No exceptional place over the origin on the chart has nonpositive discrepancy, by finite discrepancy comparison with positive ramification factor. The point blowup therefore tests total boundary multiplicity strictly below two. There is exactly one smooth coefficient-one branch. The finite group preserves it and acts faithfully on its tangent: finite actions linearize, and a nonidentity element with trivial tangential eigenvalue would be a quasi-reflection. Thus the group is cyclic of order rr, also the branch ramification index; r=1r = 1 is allowed.

Residue and ramification give 1−1/r1 - 1/r for the branch alone. Other components of coefficients djd_j contribute intersection multiplicities kj≥0k_j \ge0 on the chart. The different coefficient is consequently

1−1r+∑jkjdjr,0≤∑jkjdj≤1.(146)1 - \frac{1}{r} + \frac{\sum_j k_j d_j}{r}, \qquad0 \le\sum_j k_j d_j \le1. \tag*{(146)}

The upper bound follows from the sub-lc resolution formula. This proves effectivity and hence the full dlt condition at this step. Positive elements of a nonnegative DCC set have a positive minimum, if any occur. The sums in (146) thus have a bounded number of positive terms, counted with multiplicity, and satisfy DCC. In a decreasing sequence of coefficients below one, rr is bounded as well, since 1−1/r1 - 1/r is a lower bound. This proves DCC for each restriction and for its iterations. □

Lemma 7.17 (Strict comparison on strata). Suppose a small dlt elementary step preserves the generic points of an lc center and its chosen adjunction chain. The normalized strata on both sides map projectively bimeromorphically to the normalization SS of their common image in the contraction base. Their adjoints are relatively antiample and ample, respectively. On a common higher model their canonical pullback comparison satisfies

PT−PT+≥0.(147)P_T - P_{T^+} \ge0. \tag*{(147)}

The resulting discrepancy increase is strictly positive at any place whose center on either stratum maps into the ambient exceptional locus on that side.

Proof. The morphisms are the restrictions of the ambient projective morphisms followed through finite normalizations. The relative ample signs restrict as stated. Choose a common ambient resolution preserving the generic SNC chain. By Lemma 7.3 its effective pullback difference has support containing the full fibers over the non-isomorphism set. Restrict the two crepant formulas along the common strict chain. The same coefficient-one terms are subtracted, and Lemma 7.16 identifies the remaining canonical comparisons. Their difference is precisely the restriction of that effective divisor. The stratum itself is not contained in its support, since its generic point is preserved. The full inverse image of any indicated center is contained in the support, so pullback gives strictly positive multiplicity at each such place. This proves both assertions for actual crepant boundaries, rather than only for restricted first Chern classes. □

Theorem 7.18 (Dlt special termination and modifications). The following hold for ordinary rational pairs in the analytic projective setting above.

(i) In dimension d≤4d \le4, any dlt elementary sequence has a tail whose exceptional loci on both sides are disjoint from every lc center. (ii) An ordinary rational lc pair of dimension d≤4d \le4 on a normal compact Kähler space, with rationally invertible adjoint, has a projective crepant dlt modification whose total space is globally strongly Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial and compact Kähler. The boundary is effective, and every exceptional prime has coefficient one.

(iii) For d≤3d \le3, every dlt elementary sequence is finite.

The bases of the elementary steps may vary. Assertion (iii) is not asserted in dimension four.

Proof. We induct simultaneously on dimension. The order within a dimension is (i), then (ii), then (iii) when d≤3d \le3. Dimension zero is immediate. In proving (i) in dimension dd, discard a prefix so that all steps are small, by Lemma 7.8. A zero-discrepancy place on a new space was already a zero place. Strictness in Lemma 7.3 excludes containment of its center in the exceptional locus. The finite lists of lc centers therefore stabilize, and the generic point of every remaining center is preserved at every subsequent step.

Induct increasingly on the dimension ee of a surviving center; the point case is already settled by preservation of its generic point. Normalize its successive transforms and use the same generic adjunction chain. By the smaller-center conclusion, the stratum diagrams and adjunction pairs are isomorphisms near their non-klt loci on a tail. Their discrepancies are nondecreasing by Lemma 7.17.

If a prime is extracted by a stratum transformation, it lies on the new side over the ambient exceptional locus. Its earlier discrepancy is strictly smaller than its new discrepancy, the latter being at most one by effectivity. At the start of this tail it therefore had discrepancy less than one and center outside the non-klt locus, since the diagrams are unchanged near that locus. Lemma 7.9 gives finitely many possible exceptional places; the possible nonexceptional positive-boundary primes add only finitely many. For each such place, repeated extraction would give a strictly decreasing sequence of boundary coefficients, by the strict comparisons. The fixed adjunction DCC set of Lemma 7.16 excludes infinitely many such occurrences. After discarding a prefix there are no stratum extractions.

The cycle count then leaves no prime contractions by stratum transformations either; for normal curves the diagrams are already isomorphisms. The primes now match. Their coefficients do not increase, and finite positive support and DCC stabilize the whole boundary. Neither morphism of a stratum diagram to SS can contract a prime on this tail: its generic point would lie over the ambient exceptional locus, and strict discrepancy increase would contradict the matched coefficients. Thus the stratum diagrams are small, allowing isomorphisms, and their effective pullback differences are exceptional over the positive stratum. If the stratum transformation is an isomorphism, its discrepancies agree, and strictness excludes any ambient exceptional intersection with the stratum. One may test a divisor over a point of such an intersection, or the point itself for a curve.

For each remaining nontrivial stratum diagram, its dimension is e<de<d. Use the modification assertion already proved in dimension ee to start on a projective globally strong crepant dlt model of the negative stratum. Run relative elementary steps over SS by Proposition 7.7. The lower-dimensional termination assertion makes this run finite, with a relatively nef endpoint. On a common higher model write

P0=P+G=P++F,(148)P_0 = P + G = P_+ + F, \tag*{(148)}

where P0P_0, PP, P+P_+ are the initial, endpoint, and positive-stratum adjoint pullbacks. The divisors G,FG,F are effective and exceptional over the respective endpoint sides. Both PP and P+P_+ are relatively nef, so negativity in both directions gives G=FG=F and P=P+P=P_+. Relative ampleness on the positive stratum makes its projection constant on the connected projective fibers over the endpoint, as in the proof of Theorem 7.15. The graph therefore factors into a projective crepant morphism to that stratum. Remaining exceptional primes came from old exceptional primes, since there was no extraction upstairs and the stratum transformation was small; they retain coefficient one. This endpoint can start the next lift.

Each nontrivial stratum surgery forces at least one negative step in its lift. Its negative morphism is nontrivial as well, by smallness, matched boundary data, and the ample signs; lift a negative curve to see the assertion. Infinitely many surgeries would concatenate to an infinite lower-dimensional dlt elementary sequence across possibly varying bases, contrary to (iii) in dimension ee. This proves disjointness for the chosen center. There are finitely many centers, completing (i) in dimension dd.

For (ii), take a projective SNC resolution of the lc pair with boundary equal to the strict boundary plus the full reduced exceptional divisor. Its adjoint is the pullback of the original adjoint plus an effective exceptional correction, by log canonicity; the correction is supported in the floor. Run relative elementary steps over the original space. At every stage the same identity holds with the pushed-forward correction. If the run were infinite, (i) and the cycle count would leave a tail disjoint from the floor on both sides. The current adjoint could not have negative degree on a contracted curve there, since its correction is supported in the floor and its other term is a base pullback. Thus the run ends. Relative nefness and negativity kill its effective exceptional correction. The endpoint is crepant dlt and globally strongly Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial by continuation. Every remaining exceptional prime came from an exceptional prime on the resolution and still has coefficient one. This proves (ii).

Finally, if d≤3d \le3, an infinite dlt sequence would, by (i) and the cycle count, have a small tail disjoint from the floor on both sides. Delete the floor. The resulting pair is klt, using the global strong condition and the dlt discrepancy characterization. The ample signs are unchanged by disjointness on both sides. This contradicts Theorem 7.15, proving (iii) and completing the induction.

A reduced-boundary model with a nef klt interval

Lemma 7.19 (Transport of canonical pseudo-effectivity). Suppose a bimeromorphic transformation of normal globally strongly Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial spaces extracts no divisors, and a Cartier power of the canonical line on its source has a semipositive singular metric. Then a Cartier power of the canonical line on its target has such a metric as well.

Proof. Choose a common canonical power on the two spaces. On their isomorphic open, the actual canonical identification transports the metric. Nonextraction makes the complement of this open in the target have codimension at least two. In a local frame of the target line we must extend a psh weight over that complement.

Here is the local upper bound needed for this Hartogs argument on a normal germ. Take a finite local projection to a ball. Off the branch locus and the image of the missing set, the maximum of the weight on the finite fibers is psh. It extends across the branch locus while the fibers still avoid the missing set, by local upper boundedness. The bad image has codimension at least two, so psh Hartogs extension on the smooth ball extends this maximum there as well. It bounds the original weight on a dense analytic complement. The bound holds on its whole original domain by the disc test, using discs generically outside the excluded analytic sets through any tested point. Normality and the psh Riemann extension theorem on locally irreducible spaces now give the psh extension by upper regularization. These extensions respect the transition functions of the actual line. They define the required semipositive metric. For a related actual-line statement under rational singularities, see [46], Lemma 3.6.

Proposition 7.20 (Reduced-boundary model). *Assume Assumption 2.3. Let (T0,G0)(T_0,G_0) be an ordinary rational dlt fourfold pair with reduced boundary, on a normal irreducible globally strongly Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial compact Kähler space. Assume that KT0K_{T_0} has a semipositive singular metric on a Cartier power. The boundary may be empty. There is a nonextracting bimeromorphic map T0⇢TT_0 \dashrightarrow T such that:

(i) TT is normal, compact Kähler, globally strongly Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial, and klt for zero boundary; KTK_T remains pseudo-effective with such a semipositive metric.

(ii) The pushforward GG is reduced, (T,G)(T,G) is lc, and the actual rational line A=KT+GA = K_T + G is analytically nef. There is a rational t0∈[0,1)t_0 \in[0,1) such that (T,tG)(T,tG) is klt and KT+tGK_T + tG is analytically nef for every rational t∈[t0,1)t \in[t_0,1).

(iii) There is a projective crepant dlt modification

h:(V,D)⟶(T,G),J:=KV+D=h∗A,(149)h : (V,D) \longrightarrow(T,G), \qquad J := K_V + D = h^*A, \tag*{(149)}

where VV is normal, compact Kähler, and globally strongly Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial, and DD is reduced. The line JJ is analytically nef. If G≠0G \ne0, then D≠0D \ne0.

(iv) On a simultaneous smooth compact Kähler projective resolution μ:M→V\mu: M \to V of the displayed models and boundaries, the line μ∗J\mu^*J has a semipositive metric with minimal singularities and zero Lelong numbers everywhere.

The construction uses the fourfold MMP assumption only for ordinary effective klt pairs with pseudo-effective adjoint.

Proof. We give the two phases separately. In the first phase the current pair (Ti,Gi)(T_i,G_i) stays dlt with reduced boundary, and we make a step whenever KTi+GiK_{T_i} + G_i has a negative extremal ray of the cone NA⁡‾(Ti)\overline{\operatorname{NA}}(T_i) specified in Assumption 2.3. The underlying zero-boundary pair is klt by the dlt floor perturbation argument, and canonical pseudo-effectivity is retained by Lemma 7.19.

For a chosen negative ray, take a rational t<1t < 1 sufficiently close to one that it stays negative for KTi+tGiK_{T_i} + tG_i. This is an effective klt pair, and its adjoint is pseudo-effective because KTiK_{T_i} is. Assumption 2.3 supplies the projective bimeromorphic ray step with its prescribed face, negative-side Bott–Chern rank, global strong condition, and Kähler category. The full adjoint has negative degree on this ray, hence the negative relative ample sign. Its one-ray degree-zero adjustment and Lemma 7.4, applied to the klt contraction, give the positive relative ample sign on a flip. Thus it is an elementary dlt step for the full adjoint, and Lemma 7.3 keeps the transformed pair dlt.

This first phase is finite. Otherwise the cycle count and Theorem 7.18(i) leave a small tail disjoint from the boundary on both sides. It is then a genuine zero-boundary KK-negative klt program. The same rays are KK-negative, as tested by their actual contracted curves; the contraction faces and negative-side Bott–Chern conditions are the ones already supplied. Both relative canonical signs are unchanged because the floor is disjoint from all fibers involved in the surgery. Moreover these are the actual canonical flips stipulated by the assumption: under a small map, direct images of common Cartier canonical powers agree as reflexive sheaves, and the positive canonical powers are relatively ample. They give the required relative canonical algebra and tautological line. The supporting-class existence for these zero-boundary negative rays is also supplied by the same assumption. This infinite tail would therefore be one of the programs excluded by its arbitrary termination clause, starting from its first zero-boundary klt model. No dlt fourfold termination assertion has been used.

At the end of phase one write Ai=Ki+GiA_i = K_i + G_i. It has no negative extremal ray and, in particular, is nonnegative on curves. We justify this conclusion without asserting an absolute curve criterion for nefness. The normalized Kähler-mass slice of the positive closed current cone defining NA⁡‾(Ti)\overline{\operatorname{NA}}(T_i) is compact for smooth Bott–Chern pairings. Indeed positive closed currents of unit mass have locally bounded order-zero coefficients by positivity and the Kähler mass; weak limits remain positive and closed. Their pairing image is compact in the product of the pairing coordinates, or in the finite-dimensional realization when used. Its positive cone with zero is closed, since the mass coordinate and normalized coordinates control every convergent sequence. Thus this is the full cone in the definition. A negative value of AiA_i would give a negative minimum face of the compact convex slice and hence an extreme point, contradicting the absence of a negative extremal ray. Only curve nonnegativity is needed at this stage.

In the second phase we make AiA_i-trivial steps of a single zero-boundary KK program. Maintain the properties that AiA_i is nonnegative on curves, (Ti,Gi)(T_i,G_i) is lc, (Ti,0)(T_i,0) is klt, and KiK_i is pseudo-effective. If some rational t0∈[0,1)t_0 \in[0,1) already has Ki+t0GiK_i+t_0G_i analytically nef, every rational t∈[t0,1)t \in[t_0,1) does as well. Indeed these pairs are klt by interpolation between the zero-boundary klt pair and (Ti,Gi)(T_i,G_i), and their adjoints are pseudo-effective. Their degrees are nonnegative by convexity between Ki+t0GiK_i+t_0G_i and the curve-nonnegative AiA_i. A non-nef one would, by Assumption 2.3, have a negative ray with a projective contraction and an actual negative contracted curve, a contradiction. Closedness of the analytic nef cone then makes AiA_i analytically nef as tt tends to one.

Suppose instead that every rational Ki+tGiK_i+tG_i, 0≤t<10 \le t < 1, is non-nef. Choose current positive integers m,rm,r with mAimA_i and rKirK_i Cartier. Choose a rational tt so close to one that

m(1−t)t<1r(dim⁡Ti+1).(150)\frac{m(1-t)}{t}<\frac{1}{r(\dim T_i+1)}. \tag*{(150)}

The klt assumption gives a negative extremal ray RR for

Ki+tGi=tAi+(1−t)Ki.K_i+tG_i=tA_i+(1-t)K_i.

Its contraction supplies an actual curve class. Since AiA_i is nonnegative on curves, RR is KiK_i-negative. Choose the prescribed contraction and step for this same ray now from the zero-boundary application of Assumption 2.3.

We claim Ai⋅R=0A_i\cdot R=0. If this degree were positive, the Cartier line mAimA_i would be relatively ample on that contraction, since its fiber-curve degrees are a positive multiple of those of −Ki-K_i. Work over a Stein neighborhood with a property-(P) compactum containing a point with nontrivial fiber. The local projective analytic rationality theorem for the ample Cartier line mAimA_i and the klt canonical adjoint gives denominator at most r(dim⁡Ti+1)r(\dim T_i+1) for its positive finite relative nef threshold; see [32], Theorem 4.3.1 and Remark 4.3.4. All contracted curve degrees are proportional, so for a curve CC of the ray that threshold is exactly

mAi⋅C−Ki⋅C≥1r(dim⁡Ti+1).(151)\frac{mA_i\cdot C}{-K_i\cdot C}\ge\frac{1}{r(\dim T_i+1)}. \tag*{(151)}

The actual line data and canonical representatives needed for the theorem are available locally over this bimeromorphic Stein base, as in Section 7.2. On the other hand, negativity for the test boundary gives

mAi⋅C−Ki⋅C<m(1−t)t,\frac{mA_i\cdot C}{-K_i\cdot C}<\frac{m(1-t)}{t},

contradicting (151). This proves the claim using only current-stage indices, with no uniform index assumption on the fourfold sequence.

By Lemma 7.4, a Cartier multiple of AiA_i descends to an actual line on the contraction base. The pushed adjoint on a divisorial step, or the transformed adjoint on a small positive model, is the corresponding pullback by codimension-one identification and reflexivity. On a common projective model any remaining exceptional comparison is relatively numerically zero, and hence zero by negativity. Thus the step is crepant for the actual adjoint AiA_i, and the pair stays lc. Curve nonnegativity on the next model follows by lifting each curve to a common model and using the equality of pullbacks. The zero-boundary klt and canonical pseudo-effective hypotheses persist by Assumption 2.3 and Lemma 7.19.

Repeat this procedure whenever no rational nef parameter exists. Every step is a prescribed KiK_i-negative step of the same zero-boundary program. Arbitrary termination in Assumption 2.3 excludes indefinite repetition. We therefore reach the asserted T,G,AT,G,A and nef klt interval. Neither phase extracts divisors, so their composite is nonextracting.

Apply Theorem 7.18(ii) to (T,G)(T,G) to obtain (150). The boundary DD is the strict transform of GG plus coefficient-one exceptional primes, hence reduced. If GG is nonzero its strict transform is nonzero. Analytic nefness pulls back, giving that of JJ.

Finally take the stated simultaneous resolution and write ρ=h∘μ:M→T\rho=h\circ\mu:M\to T. For every rational tt in the nef klt interval, Lemma 5.1 applied to (T,tG)(T,tG) gives a semipositive metric with minimal singularities and zero Lelong numbers on ρ∗(KT+tG)\rho^*(K_T+tG). Add the metric of the effective rational divisor (1−t)ρ∗G(1-t)\rho^*G. This is a semipositive metric on the fixed actual line

ρ∗A=ρ∗(KT+tG)+(1−t)ρ∗G=μ∗J.(152)\rho^*A=\rho^*(K_T+tG)+(1-t)\rho^*G=\mu^*J. \tag*{(152)}

A metric with minimal singularities on that line is no more singular than each of these metrics, up to an additive constant in weights. At every x∈Mx\in M its Lelong number is therefore at most (1−t)ν([ρ∗G],x)(1-t)\nu([\rho^*G],x). The latter is finite and tends to zero as rational tt tends to one. All Lelong numbers of the minimal metric vanish. This proves (iv) and the proposition.

A section on the entire reduced boundary

This section proves the adjunction statement needed on the reduced-boundary model. The distinction between a section on one component and a section on the whole reduced boundary is essential. In particular, none of the gluing below follows merely from abundance on the normal components.

Proposition 8.1 (Whole-boundary nonvanishing). Let (V,D)(V,D) be the compact Kähler dlt fourfold supplied by Proposition 7.20, where VV is globally strongly Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial and D≠0D\ne0 is reduced. Put

J=KV+D.J=K_V+D.

If the actual rational adjoint line bundle JJ is analytically nef, then, for some positive integer mm for which mJmJ is Cartier on VV,

H0(D,OD(mJ))≠0.(153)H^0(D,\mathcal{O}_D(mJ))\ne0. \tag*{(153)}

We prove the proposition by constructing sections on the normalized components with matching canonical residues. All adjunction boundaries in the argument are the full effective rational differents; their fractional parts are never discarded. All sufficiently divisible degrees will also be even. Evenness removes the sign obtained by interchanging two residue operations, but does not permit a change of the actual adjunction line bundle.

Adjunction and the descent locus

Write D=∑iDiD=\sum_iD_i and let Yi=DiνY_i=D_i^\nu denote the normalization of a component. Dlt chain adjunction gives an effective rational dlt pair (Yi,Γi)(Y_i,\Gamma_i) and an equality of actual rational line bundles

Ji:=J∣Yi=KYi+Γi.(154)J_i:=J|_{Y_i}=K_{Y_i}+\Gamma_i. \tag*{(154)}

Here and below restriction includes pullback by the indicated normalization. Further adjunction is always performed with the full boundary in (154).

We use the good SNC opens and chain-adjunction construction of Lemma 7.16. Every lc center is generically a stratum of distinct coefficient-one primes. In the particular modification used here, this can also be seen by following a discrepancy-zero place from the starting SNC resolution: strict discrepancy increase over a nonisomorphism locus, as in Lemma 7.17, forces the general point of its center to remain unchanged at every step. The distinct primes at that stratum consequently remain distinct.

Keeping only one component DiD_i in the ambient boundary gives a plt pair. Indeed, any exceptional place with zero log discrepancy for (V,Di)(V,D_i) would also have zero log discrepancy for (V,D)(V,D) and would have its center generically in one of these unchanged SNC strata. For a single smooth coefficient-one branch there is no such exceptional zero-discrepancy place. Comparisons are legitimate because the components are effective rationally Cartier divisors. Adjunction for (V,Di)(V,D_i) therefore supplies an effective rational klt pair on YiY_i. In particular, YiY_i has rational singularities. A Moishezon YiY_i is projective by Namikawa’s theorem, since it is also compact Kähler [60].

Lemma 8.2 (Codimension-one matching suffices). The reduced space DD is S2S_2 and has only smooth points and ordinary double crossings in codimension one. Its codimension-one conductor branches are the normalizations of the primes of ⌊Γi⌋\lfloor\Gamma_i\rfloor. They are paired between distinct components Di,DjD_i,D_j. For a sufficiently divisible even mm, a tuple

si∈H0(Yi,OYi(mJi))s_i \in H^0(Y_i,\mathcal{O}_{Y_i}(mJ_i))

descends to H0(D,OD(mJ))H^0(D,\mathcal{O}_D(mJ)) if its restrictions agree on every paired normalized conductor surface under the canonical adjunction identifications.

Proof. First, both OV\mathcal{O}_V and OV(−D)\mathcal{O}_V(-D) are Cohen–Macaulay. The first assertion follows from klt rationality: decreasing the reduced dlt boundary makes the zero-boundary space klt. For the second, work locally and trivialise a Cartier multiple of the integral Weil divisor DD. The resulting normal cyclic index cover is étale in codimension one: divisorial orders in the defining equation are multiples of the index. The cover is klt by the finite canonical pullback and discrepancy formula, hence Cohen–Macaulay. The desired divisorial sheaf is an eigensummand of the pushforward of its structure sheaf, so is Cohen–Macaulay as well. Normality identifies the reduced ideal of DD with OV(−D)\mathcal{O}_V(-D). The sequence

0⟶OV(−D)⟶OV⟶OD⟶00 \longrightarrow\mathcal{O}_V(-D) \longrightarrow\mathcal{O}_V \longrightarrow\mathcal{O}_D \longrightarrow0

now shows that DD is Cohen–Macaulay, in particular S2S_2.

For the codimension-one description, take general transverse surface germs in the dlt adjunction calculation. At a single coefficient-one branch the plt local model is a cyclic quotient of a smooth pair, and its boundary curve is smooth. At two coefficient-one branches, the different and the sub-lc condition give an ordinary double SNC point; these are precisely the generic deeper lc strata described above. The branches come from distinct primes. To lift the assertion about a single-branch transverse curve to regularity at the corresponding point of DD, note that the transverse boundary curve is generically reduced and has no embedded points by Cohen–Macaulayness. Its regularity lifts by lifting generators of the maximal ideal through the transverse parameters. This proves the asserted codimension-one description.

Let SS be a normalized conductor surface on YiY_i. Chain adjunction gives

JS=KS+ΞS=J∣S.J_S=K_S+\Xi_S=J|_S.

The matching branch on YjY_j is the normalization of the same image, and the two normalizations agree. At a general SNC point the two iterated residue maps differ by the sign from interchanging two differentials. Their even powers are equal. On a common smooth model the two invertible pullback subsheaves of meromorphic pluricanonical forms are therefore equal: they have the same invertible domain and the same meromorphic map on a dense open. Thus this is an equality of the actual residue lines, not only a numerical comparison. The same argument applies to further normalized lc strata. Proper subcenters are generically deeper SNC strata, so the chains on either side identify the same further centers and the same even residue maps.

At an ordinary double point the usual two-branch local calculation glues sections precisely when their values agree on the intersection. Hence a matching tuple is a section of the ambient invertible restriction away from a subset of codimension at least two in DD. For a reduced S2S_2 analytic ring, regularity of a meromorphic element is tested in its height-one localizations. Applied after trivializing OD(mJ)\mathcal{O}_D(mJ), this extends the section across the omitted subset. Equivalently, the class of the normalization-pushforward section modulo the invertible sheaf has support of codimension at least two and vanishes by the S2S_2 Hartogs criterion. The residue comparisons used here are the comparisons induced by the one ambient line bundle; no arbitrary scalar choices in adjunction enter the descent.

Lemma 8.3 (Systems on the normal components). Each JiJ_i is semiample as an actual rational line bundle. There is a holomorphic connected-fiber map to a normal projective variety and an ample rational line bundle such that

fi:Yi⟶Zi,Ji=fi∗Hi.f_i:Y_i \longrightarrow Z_i,\qquad J_i=f_i^*H_i.

Proof. The normal compact Kähler threefold log-abundance theorem applies to the effective rational adjunction pair (155): its actual adjoint is analytically nef. One may first pass to a projective crepant dlt modification and use the Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial dlt form of the theorem. We use here Das–Ou’s normal threefold theorem, together with their dlt-modification theorem [21], Corollary 1.3 [20, Theorem 5.2]. Generation on the modification descends by projection to the normal target. These inputs concern normal pairs; no nonnormal gluing assertion is being invoked.

For completeness, the passage to divisor representatives in these theorems does not impose an additional global-frame hypothesis. One can first produce a section of a power of JiJ_i as follows. If YiY_i is projective, use projective threefold log abundance. Otherwise resolve it by a smooth compact Kähler space. If that space is non-uniruled, smooth threefold canonical nonvanishing gives a section which pushes to JiJ_i, since Γi≥0\Gamma_i \ge0. If it is uniruled and non-Moishezon, take a resolved rational quotient. Its smooth non-uniruled compact Kähler base has nonnegative Kodaira dimension, and its very general smooth quotient fibers are projective of dimension at most two. On a simultaneous resolution of the pair, use the strict boundary and all reduced exceptional divisors as an effective SNC boundary Γ~\widetilde{\Gamma}. Log canonicity gives

KY~+Γ~=p∗Ji∗+E,E≥0p-exceptional.K_{\widetilde{Y}}+\widetilde{\Gamma}=p^*J_i^*+E,\qquad E\ge0\quad p\text{-exceptional}.

This adjoint restricts pseudo-effectively on a very general quotient fiber. Projective log nonvanishing in dimensions one and two supplies fiberwise sections. Assumption 2.2, including unit coefficients and its invariant-base interpretation, now supplies a section upstairs exactly as in the rational-quotient reduction. It pushes to a section of an actual power of JiJ_i by normality and reflexivity. The rational-quotient and uniruledness inputs are used in their smooth compact Kähler scopes [14, 64].

Cancelling the boundary contribution in such a section gives a meromorphic pluricanonical tensor. Its divisor divided by its degree is a rational canonical representative, compatible with pullback to resolutions. The discrepancies are the local canonical discrepancies, and the divisible systems are still the actual systems of JiJ_i. Thus the divisor formulation of threefold abundance gives precisely the claimed semiampleness. The Stein factorization of a sufficiently high generated system yields (157).

Dominant clusters and a finite-product construction

Set ri=dim⁡Zir_i = \dim Z_i and r=max⁡irir = \max_i r_i. At a vertex with ri=rr_i = r, call a normalized conductor surface SS dominant when it surjects onto ZiZ_i. By (156) and (157), this is equivalent to κ(S,JS)=r\kappa(S,J_S) = r. On the opposite side of a matched conductor surface, the same equality forces rj=rr_j = r, and the surface is dominant there too. Thus dominance is symmetric.

Form the finite graph whose vertices have ri=rr_i = r and whose edges are the dominant conductor surfaces. Fix a connected component of this graph, called a cluster. It is enough to construct a nonzero matching tuple on this cluster which vanishes on every nondominant branch, including nondominant edges within the cluster; we then put zero on every other component. The finitely many nondominant images are proper subvarieties of the relevant ZiZ_i. An ample power has a nonzero section vanishing on their union. An isolated vertex is therefore immediate. If r=0r = 0, there are no nonempty nondominant branch images. If the cluster has an edge, then r≤2r \le2, since an edge is a surface. This also settles any vertex with r=3r = 3.

We shall use normalized strata with the full chain adjunction

(L,ΔL),JL=KL+ΔL=J∣L.(L,\Delta_L), \qquad J_L = K_L + \Delta_L = J|_L.

Each chosen object LL dominates the corresponding ZiZ_i and has semiample JLJ_L. An arrow between objects means a BB-bimeromorphic comparison: on a common resolution, the actual adjunction lines and their meromorphic pluricanonical pullback maps agree. In sufficiently divisible even degrees, arrows consequently give isomorphisms of section spaces. These isomorphisms commute with multiplication.

Lemma 8.4 (Finite products of transported sections). Consider finitely many such objects and invertible arrows. Suppose that in one sufficiently divisible even degree mm the image of every group of loops on its section space is finite. At each object choose a nonzero section in that degree, obtained by restricting a base section which vanishes on the prescribed nondominant images. Then, in a common higher degree, there are nonzero sections at all objects, invariant under every arrow, and retaining the prescribed vanishing.

Proof. Fix one orbit of objects. At an object LL, take the set of all sections transported to LL from all chosen initial sections in that orbit, along all paths. The set is finite: there are finitely many starting objects, and two paths from the same object differ by a loop, whose image is finite. Arrows biject these finite sets. Multiply all their distinct members. The resulting section is nonzero because the object is irreducible, and the products are carried to one another because pullback is multiplicative. They have equal degree within the orbit. The initial section at LL occurs among its factors, so its prescribed zeros remain. Taking further powers makes the degrees equal across the finitely many orbits.

In each application with r>0r > 0 we shall verify that the invariant sections on the objects descend to sections of the node’s base polarization. This will also preserve the required vanishing: a dominating object’s section contains the pullback of the initial vanishing base section as a factor.

We record the residue calculation used to construct internal arrows. Suppose a log rational-curve fibration has, on its general fiber, two distinct coefficient-one points. The total horizontal weighted degree of the boundary is two, so there are no other horizontal markings. After ordering the points, choose a rational coordinate xx with them as zero and infinity. A local base frame of an adjoint power has, in relative log differentials, the form

a(dlog⁡x)⊗m,(155)a\left(\mathrm{d}\log x\right)^{\otimes m}, \tag*{(155)}

where aa is constant on the compact general rational fiber. The residues at zero and infinity differ by (−1)m(-1)^m, and hence agree for even mm. A change x↦cxx \mapsto cx adds a base differential, which disappears in the top-form expression. This proves that pairing the two marks preserves restrictions of base sections. For two degree-one branches it gives a bimeromorphic map between their normalizations; for one degree-two branch it gives the involution exchanging the two generic sheets. The latter is defined by normalization of the other main component of the relative fiber square. Since the lines on a common resolution pull back the same base line, equality of the meromorphic residue maps on this dense open proves the full BB-crepant comparison.

Clusters containing a non-Moishezon vertex

We first describe the geometry of such a vertex; as before we omit its subscript and write (Y,Γ)(Y,\Gamma), JY=f∗HJ_Y=f^*H, and ZZ.

Lemma 8.5 (The rational-quotient surface). At a non-Moishezon vertex with a dominant conductor branch there is a diagram of compact Kähler spaces

W→gPp↓↓uY→fZ(156)\begin{CD} W @>{g}>> P \\ @V{p}VV @VV{u}V \\ Y @>{f}>> Z \tag*{(156)} \end{CD}

in which WW is smooth and resolves the pair, PP is a smooth nonprojective compact Kähler surface, both gg and uu have connected fibers, the very general gg-fiber is P1\mathbb{P}^{1}, and every pp-exceptional divisor is vertical over PP. The horizontal crepant boundary on WW is effective, with weighted degree two on a general gg-fiber. Moreover r≤1r \le1 and H0(P,KP)≠0H^0(P,K_P) \ne0.

Proof. On an initial smooth projective log resolution of YY, restrict the crepant equality

KW+ΓW=p∗JYK_W+\Gamma_W=p^*J_Y

to a very general smooth connected fiber of the map to ZZ. Its right side is trivial. Pair with the appropriate power of the pullback of a Kähler class from YY. Exceptional terms have zero pairing, because their images have codimension at least two on this general fiber, or they do not meet it. Strict boundary terms have nonnegative pairing; a dominant coefficient-one branch gives a strictly positive term. Hence the canonical class of this smooth fiber is not pseudo-effective. Ou’s theorem implies that the fiber is uniruled [64]. For r=0r=0 this argument is applied to the total space.

Take the almost holomorphic rational quotient of the smooth Kähler resolution. Its fiber has positive dimension, since the rational curves through very general points of the fibers just considered are quotient-contracted [14]. Its base cannot have dimension at most one. Indeed, rational connectedness of the general quotient fibers and the differential sequence would then force every holomorphic two-form on a resolved total space to vanish. The Kähler projectivity criterion would make that total space projective, a contradiction. The quotient base is therefore a surface, and the general quotient fiber is a smooth rational curve. Those curves are vertical over ZZ, so ff factors meromorphically through the quotient. Resolving the graphs and the base gives (159). Stein factorization and very general connectedness give connected gg-fibers; the fibers of uu are connected as images of the connected fibers of fpf p.

If PP were projective, the rational-curve fibration would have Moishezon total space. For example, coherence and GAGA give meromorphic sections of g∗OW(−KW/P)g^*\mathcal{O}_W(-K_{W/P}) generating its general fibers. Evaluation embeds the general smooth rational fiber, and these sections together with base functions give full algebraic dimension. Thus PP is nonprojective.

Every exceptional prime of the initial projective resolution of YY is projective over a compact curve or a point, hence Moishezon. It cannot dominate PP: a dominant generically finite map of surfaces preserves algebraic dimension, by the norm or characteristic-polynomial argument after finite Stein factorization. The strict transform of a Moishezon prime remains Moishezon. The further graph resolutions can be made isomorphisms over a general quotient-base open, so their new exceptional primes are vertical too. Consequently all horizontal crepant boundary terms are strict transforms of effective boundary components. Adjunction on the general rational fiber makes their weighted degrees sum to two.

A nonprojective compact Kähler surface has a nonzero holomorphic two-form, again by the Kähler projectivity criterion. Finally, if r=2r=2, then P→ZP \to Z would be generically finite over a projective surface, forcing PP to be Moishezon and projective. Thus r≤1r \leq1. □

We use two elementary consequences of nonprojectivity for surfaces. If QQ is a smooth nonprojective compact Kähler surface, then the intersection form on

NQ=NS⁡(Q)RN_Q = \operatorname{NS}(Q)_{\mathbb{R}}

is nonpositive. Indeed, a positive-square vector in this rational subspace can be approximated by a rational one, with sign chosen to have positive Kähler degree. The corresponding line bundle has quadratic section growth by Riemann–Roch: its high powers have no top cohomology by Serre duality and the Kähler degree test. This would make QQ Moishezon and hence projective. Moreover, if Q→CQ \to C is a map to a projective curve, QQ has no multisection. For a curve BB dominating CC, the class B+tFB+tF, with FF the rational fiber class and t≫0t \gg0, would have positive square.

Lemma 8.6 (Horizontality, including fractional boundaries). Every dominant conductor branch at the non-Moishezon vertex of Lemma 8.5 is horizontal over PP. A cluster containing such a vertex consists entirely of non-Moishezon vertices. At a vertex there are at most two dominant branches, counted with their generic degrees over PP.

Proof. If r=1r=1, a vertical surface which dominates ZZ would have image a curve in PP dominating ZZ. This contradicts the preceding no-multisection observation. It remains to prove horizontality when r=0r=0, so that JY∼Q0J_Y \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} 0.

Choose a nonzero η∈H0(P,KP)\eta\in H^0(P,K_P). On the general rational fiber write the distinct horizontal marked points and their coefficients as

b1,…,bq∈Q,0<bj≤1,∑j=1qbj=2.b_1,\ldots,b_q \in\mathbb{Q}, \qquad0 < b_j \leq1, \qquad\sum_{j=1}^{q} b_j = 2.

Take a smooth compact Kähler generically finite base change b ⁣:P+→Pb\colon P^+ \to P splitting and ordering the markings. It can be constructed from a main component of a fiber product of the horizontal prime normalizations over PP, on the finite étale locus parametrizing an ordering of the distinct marks, and then resolved. Resolve the main component of the pulled-back rational fibration, obtaining

h ⁣:W+⟶W,g+ ⁣:W+⟶P+.h\colon W^+ \longrightarrow W,\qquad g^+\colon W^+ \longrightarrow P^+.

Let HjH_j be the prime closures of the ordered generic sections. The very general rational fibers are unchanged by these resolutions.

For j≠kj \ne k there is a meromorphic top form

βjk=dlog⁡xjk∧(g+)∗b∗η(157)\beta_{jk}=d\log x_{jk}\wedge(g^+)^*b^*\eta \tag*{(157)}

where xjkx_{jk} has horizontal divisor Hj−HkH_j-H_k. This description is valid meromorphically even across degenerations. To see its local construction on the base, the coherent sheaf (g+)∗OW+(Hj−Hk)(g^+)_*\mathcal{O}_{W^+}(H_j-H_k) has generic rank one, because its restriction to a general rational fiber has degree zero and is trivial. Divide the canonical meromorphic section by the evaluation of a locally chosen generically nonzero direct-image section. Different choices change xjkx_{jk} by a base function on the general fibers. Its logarithmic differential wedges to zero with the pulled-back top form of P+P^+, so (160) is independent of the choices. Reversing j,kj,k changes its sign.

The rational vector (bj)(b_j) lies in the convex hull of the vectors ej+ek\mathbf{e}_j+\mathbf{e}_k for j<kj<k. These are exactly the vertices of the rational polytope

{(xj):0≤xj≤1, ∑jxj=2}.\{(x_j):0\le x_j\le1,\ \sum_j x_j=2\}.

Average a rational convex decomposition over the permutations which preserve the coefficients. After clearing denominators and multiplying by an even integer, we obtain nonnegative even integers ljkl_{jk} and an integer m>0m>0 such that

∑j<kljk=m,∑k≠jlmin⁡{j,k},max⁡{j,k}=mbj.(158)\sum_{j<k}l_{jk}=m,\qquad\sum_{k\ne j}l_{\min\{j,k\},\max\{j,k\}}=mb_j. \tag*{(158)}

We also make mm divisible by all adjunction indices. The tensor

β=⨂j<kβjk⊗ljk(159)\beta=\bigotimes_{j<k}\beta_{jk}^{\otimes l_{jk}} \tag*{(159)}

is a nonzero meromorphic mm-canonical tensor, invariant under the permutations of the ordered marks. Evenness removes the signs from reversed pairs. It therefore descends to WW. More explicitly, relative to the pullback of a local canonical power frame, its coefficient is the same on all generic sheets. Factoring hh through its finite Stein part, normalized trace descends this meromorphic coefficient, and modifications do not change meromorphic functions. Formula (158) shows that the descended tensor has exactly the allowed horizontal poles, of orders mbjmb_j.

We must also control every vertical prime, including a prime whose image on PP is a point. Let EE be a vertical prime of WW, and choose a prime E+E^+ above it, with ramification index ee under hh. At its general point the tangential map is generically finite and separable, so the canonical Jacobian has order e−1e-1. Near a general point of the image in PP, take coordinates t,st,s with tt vanishing on that image. Whether the image is a curve or a point,

ord⁡E+(h∗g∗t)≥e.\operatorname{ord}_{E^+}(h^*g^*t)\ge e.

In logarithmic differential coordinates at E+E^+, the differential of this function retains that order. Both dlog⁡xjkd\log x_{jk} and the pullback of dsds are at most logarithmic. A logarithmic top form has at most one simple pole. Writing η\eta in the dt∧dsdt\wedge ds frame, with its holomorphic coefficient, gives

ord⁡E+(βjk)≥e−1.(160)\operatorname{ord}_{E^+}(\beta_{jk})\ge e-1. \tag*{(160)}

Thus (162) has order at least m(e−1)m(e-1), exactly paying the canonical ramification in descending an mm-canonical tensor. The descended tensor on WW is regular at EE.

Push it to YY. The horizontal pole orders are allowed by the effective boundary, and at vertical primes it is regular; hence normality gives a nonzero section of mJYmJ_Y. Since JYJ_Y is torsion, this section has no zeros: after trivializing a torsion power, a nonzero section is a nonzero holomorphic function on a connected compact normal space. A vertical floor prime would give a positive zero in the adjoint section, since its coefficient is one and the canonical tensor is regular there. This is impossible. Horizontality follows also for r=0r=0.

A horizontal conductor surface is generically finite over the nonprojective surface PP, so is non-Moishezon. A Moishezon neighbor would be projective, and its normalized conductor surfaces would be projective. Thus every vertex reached across a dominant edge remains non-Moishezon. Finally, each dominant branch has coefficient one and contributes its generic degree to the horizontal degree sum two. This proves the last claim.

At a non-Moishezon node, if there are two degree-one branches or one degree-two branch, we consequently have the internal arrows from (158), pairing the two marks over PP. They are over ZZ and preserve the restrictions of base sections. One degree-one branch requires no internal arrow.

Lemma 8.7 (Finite loop action for a surface with a curve system). Let SS be a normal non-Moishezon conductor surface in a cluster with r=1r=1. A group of BB-bimeromorphic loops on its semiample adjunction pair acts through a finite group on every sufficiently divisible adjoint section space.

Proof. Let CC be the normal connected-fiber system base of JSJ_S. It is a polarized projective curve. A sufficiently divisible system embeds CC, and the loop action induces automorphisms of CC preserving a fixed ample power. Take the smooth minimal compact Kähler surface QQ in the bimeromorphic class of SS. Classical compact-surface theory will be used in its Kähler and elliptic-surface forms [4]. Here a(Q)=1a(Q)=1 and H0(Q,KQ)≠0H^0(Q,K_Q)\ne0; bimeromorphic self-maps of this minimal surface of nonnegative Kodaira dimension are automorphisms. The map to CC is holomorphic on QQ. Indeed, on a common resolved model no curve can dominate CC by the nonpositive Néron–Severi test, so the blowdowns to QQ factor the map. Its general fibers are connected. Every meromorphic function on QQ comes from CC: the function field has transcendence degree one and is algebraic over that of CC, so the function is constant on connected general smooth fibers and descends meromorphically.

Let FF be the general fiber class. It is nonzero, rational and isotropic. Since the intersection form on NS⁡(Q)R\operatorname{NS}(Q)_{\mathbb{R}} is nonpositive, KQ⋅F=0K_Q\cdot F=0. Adjunction gives genus one for a general smooth fiber. The induced cohomology group preserves the rational line QF\mathbb{Q}F. On

F⊥/QF(161)F^\perp/\mathbb{Q}F \tag*{(161)}

it preserves an integral lattice and the Hodge summands. The form is positive definite on real (2,0)+(0,2)(2,0)+(0,2) and negative definite on the remaining (1,1)(1,1) quotient by the Hodge index theorem. Reversing the latter sign gives an invariant positive definite norm. Its integral isometry group is finite. In particular the action on H2,0(Q)H^{2,0}(Q) is finite.

The action on the base is also finite. For genus at least two this follows from finiteness of the curve automorphism group; for genus one the subgroup preserving a fixed ample line bundle is finite. Suppose C=P1C=\mathbb{P}^1. We claim q(Q)=0q(Q)=0. Restriction of holomorphic one-forms to a general smooth elliptic fiber is injective. Indeed, a form vanishing on one general fiber vanishes on all general fibers by constancy of periods, since holomorphic forms on a compact Kähler space are closed. It is then pulled back from a one-form on the smooth base open. This base form extends at a critical value: at a general point of a fiber divisor the local parameter is t=wdt=w^d, and a pole or a nonremovable singularity cannot pull back to a regular form. There is no nonzero holomorphic one-form on P1\mathbb{P}^{1}. Thus q(Q)≤1q(Q) \le1. If equality held, the elliptic Albanese map would be nonconstant on a general elliptic fiber. A general Albanese fiber would then contain a curve dominating P1\mathbb{P}^{1}, contradicting the absence of multisections. This proves the claim.

It follows that

χ(OQ)=1+h2,0(Q)≥2,e(Q)=12χ(OQ)−KQ2≥24.(162)\chi(\mathcal{O}_{Q}) = 1 + h^{2,0}(Q) \ge2,\qquad e(Q) = 12\chi(\mathcal{O}_{Q}) - K_{Q}^{2} \ge24. \tag*{(162)}

There are at least three critical values of the relatively minimal elliptic fibration. Otherwise the smooth base is P1\mathbb{P}^{1} with at most two points removed. Its universal cover is compact or parabolic, so the genus-one period map to the upper half-plane is constant. The integral linear monodromy is then finite. Kodaira’s singular-fiber and monodromy classification, including multiple fibers, bounds the Euler number of a fiber with finite linear monodromy by ten. The types InI_{n} and their multiples for n>0n > 0, and In∗I_{n}^{*} for n>0n > 0, have infinite monodromy. Euler addition with at most two critical values would therefore give e(Q)≤20e(Q) \le20, contrary to (165). The finite set of critical values is preserved by the base action, and an automorphism of P1\mathbb{P}^{1} fixing three points is the identity. The base image is finite in this final case too.

Pass to the finite-index kernel fixing both CC and all holomorphic top forms. Choose a nonzero holomorphic top form η\eta on QQ. Any meromorphic mm-canonical tensor, divided by η⊗m\eta^{\otimes m}, is a meromorphic function and hence comes from CC. The kernel fixes it. It therefore fixes all the adjoint section spaces under their meromorphic canonical realizations. The original loop action has finite image. □\square

Lemma 8.8 (Matching in non-Moishezon clusters with r=1r = 1). Such a cluster admits the required nonzero matching tuple, with zero restriction on every nondominant branch.

Proof. Use the dominant surfaces as objects, with conductor matchings and the internal arrows just constructed. Lemma 8.7 supplies loop finiteness, so Lemma 8.4 gives invariant nonzero sections in a common degree m′m'.

We verify their descent at each node. A degree-one branch SS is bimeromorphic to PP, so its general fibers over ZZ are connected. Its section of m′JSm'J_{S} is therefore pulled back from m′Hm'H on ZZ. When there are two such branches, the internal arrow makes these base sections identical. For a degree-two branch, resolve S⇢PS \dashrightarrow P. Over a general z∈Zz \in Z, every component of the fiber dominates the connected smooth curve PzP_{z}, with total degree two. Indeed, an exceptional or bad curve on PP cannot dominate ZZ, by the no-multisection observation. Divide the section by the pullback of a local frame of m′Hm'H. This holomorphic function is constant on each compact connected component of the fiber. Invariance under the sheet-exchange arrow equates the two generic values. It descends meromorphically to ZZ, and then holomorphically: a meromorphic function on a normal base whose pullback by a proper surjection is regular has no pole, as can also be checked through finite Stein factorization.

Pull these base sections back to YY. Their restrictions match along dominant edges because the object sections do. They vanish on the prescribed nondominant images because the invariant object sections retain the initial vanishing factor and dominate ZZ. This gives the desired tuple. □\square

Lemma 8.9 (Matching in non-Moishezon clusters with r=0r = 0). Such a cluster also admits a nonzero matching tuple.

Proof. All node adjoints are torsion. Choose a common sufficiently divisible even degree and a trivializing section at each node. Conductor comparison across an edge is multiplication by a nonzero constant on these sections. A graph with no cycles permits all comparisons to be solved by rescaling. In general it is enough to prove that the oriented product of these constants around each cycle is a root of unity, and then to take one further common power.

The graph has degree at most two by Lemma 8.6. At a node on a cycle, including a cycle formed by parallel edges, the two distinct branches must each have degree one over its PiP_i. The section from the proof of Lemma 8.6 is now a power of dlog⁡x∧ηid\log x \wedge\eta_i: the two unit points exhaust the horizontal weighted degree. Its even residues on the two branches are the corresponding powers of the base top form ηi\eta_i. Following the cycle gives bimeromorphic identifications of the PiP_i and hence isomorphisms of their smooth minimal models QiQ_i, since they have nonnegative Kodaira dimension. The cycle constant is the scalar on η⊗m\eta^{\otimes m}, or its inverse, for the resulting automorphism ϕ\phi of one minimal model QQ.

The existence of a single ambient Kähler class restricts this automorphism. Fix a Kähler form ω\omega on VV. At the two branches of a cycle node, choose smooth branch resolutions and maps

rk:Bk⟶Wi,αk:Bk⟶Qi,k=1,2,r_k:B_k\longrightarrow W_i,\qquad\alpha_k:B_k\longrightarrow Q_i,\qquad k=1,2,

where αk\alpha_k is bimeromorphic. Put

vk=(αk)∗rk∗[ω]∈H1,1(Qi,R).v_k=(\alpha_k)_*r_k^*[\omega]\in H^{1,1}(Q_i,\mathbb{R}).

Each vkv_k has positive square. In fact, the pulled-back ambient class βk\beta_k on BkB_k has positive square because the branch maps generically birationally onto its surface image in VV. Write βk=αk∗vk+ek\beta_k=\alpha_k^*v_k+e_k with eke_k exceptional. Orthogonality and negative definiteness of exceptional surface classes give

vk2=βk2−ek2>0.(163)v_k^2=\beta_k^2-e_k^2>0. \tag*{(163)}

Furthermore,

v1−v2∈NS⁡(Qi)R.(164)v_1-v_2\in\operatorname{NS}(Q_i)_{\mathbb{R}}. \tag*{(164)}

Indeed, the rational Hodge morphism

(α1)∗r1∗−(α2)∗r2∗:H2(Wi,Q)⟶H2(Qi,Q)(\alpha_1)_*r_1^*-(\alpha_2)_*r_2^*:H^2(W_i,\mathbb{Q})\longrightarrow H^2(Q_i,\mathbb{Q})

kills H2,0H^{2,0} and H0,2H^{0,2}. Holomorphic two-forms are basic on the smooth rational-fiber open, by the differential sequence and the absence of fiberwise one-forms; their restrictions to the two birational sections agree. Hence the rational image of this Hodge morphism has type (1,1)(1,1), and is contained in the rational Néron–Severi space. Apply it to the ambient real class to obtain (167). Across a conductor edge the corresponding branch maps to VV agree on a common higher model. The transported vkv_k therefore agree across that edge. Going around the cycle yields

ϕ∗v−v∈N:=NS⁡(Q)R,v2>0.(165)\phi^*v-v\in N:=\operatorname{NS}(Q)_{\mathbb{R}},\qquad v^2>0. \tag*{(165)}

The form on NN is nonpositive. If it is negative definite (including N=0N=0), project vv orthogonally to N⊥N^\perp. The result ww has positive square and is fixed by ϕ∗\phi^*, by (168). The Hodge index theorem makes the (1,1)(1,1) complement of ww negative definite; the real (2,0)+(0,2)(2,0)+(0,2) summand is positive definite. Together these give a positive definite real norm on H2(Q,R)H^2(Q,\mathbb{R}) preserved by the integral action. The cyclic image is finite, so in particular its eigenvalues on H2,0(Q)H^{2,0}(Q) are roots of unity. If NN has a radical, the Hodge index theorem makes it a rational invariant isotropic line. Its orthogonal quotient has the definite Hodge summands and integral lattice used in (164); the image on H2,0H^{2,0} is again finite.

These exhaust the possibilities for NN. Since ϕ∗η⊗m\phi^*\eta^{\otimes m} is proportional to η⊗m\eta^{\otimes m}, the nonzero form η\eta itself is an eigenform: its meromorphic ratio to its pullback has an mmth power which is constant, and hence is constant. Its eigenvalue, and thus the cycle constant, is a root of unity. Taking a common power over the finitely many cycles and then rescaling the node sections solves all conductor comparisons.

Projective clusters and log-trivial linking

Every remaining cluster consists of projective vertices. Indeed, Lemma 8.6 excludes a dominant edge from a non-Moishezon vertex to a Moishezon one, and a Moishezon vertex is projective by the klt-type and Namikawa argument above. All the strata and birational diagrams used in such a cluster are algebraic in characteristic zero.

For loop finiteness we use the projective BB-pluricanonical-representation theorem: for a projective lc pair with effective rational boundary and semiample rational adjoint, its BB-birational group acts with finite image on sufficiently divisible log-pluricanonical systems [33], Theorem 1.1. This applies to our normal projective stratum objects with their full adjunction boundaries. The remaining issue is to specify enough internal arrows so that the invariant object sections descend to the nodes. We give the required linking arguments.

Lemma 8.10 (Connected components of the non-klt locus). Let two effective projective lc pairs be crepant bimeromorphic, and suppose each is klt after decreasing its floor. On a common projective log resolution write their common crepant subboundary as Θ\Theta, and put

TΘ=Θ=1,N=−⌊Θ<1⌋.T_{\Theta} = \Theta^{=1}, \qquad N = -\lfloor\Theta^{<1} \rfloor.

Then NN is effective and exceptional for each projection, and TΘT_{\Theta} maps with connected fibers onto the non-klt locus of either pair. In particular their floor supports have the same number of connected components.

Proof. Fix either projection dd. Nonexceptional coefficients are those of an effective subboundary, so the negative part contributing to NN is exceptional. The divisor

N−TΘ=−⌊Θ⌋N-T_{\Theta}=-\lfloor\Theta\rfloor

differs from the smooth klt adjoint K+{Θ}K+\{\Theta\} by −(K+Θ)-(K+\Theta), a pullback from the base. It is thus relatively nef and big; relative bigness here uses that dd is birational. Relative Kawamata–Viehweg vanishing gives

R1d∗O(N−TΘ)=0(166)R^{1}d_{*}\mathcal{O}(N-T_{\Theta})=0 \tag*{(166)}

[48]. Normality gives d∗O(N)=Od_{*}\mathcal{O}(N)=\mathcal{O}. The divisor sequence and (169) therefore give a surjection

O⟶d∗OTΘ(N).\mathcal{O}\longrightarrow d_{*}\mathcal{O}_{T_{\Theta}}(N).

It factors through d∗OTΘd_{*}\mathcal{O}_{T_{\Theta}}, which injects into d∗OTΘ(N)d_{*}\mathcal{O}_{T_{\Theta}}(N) because NN has no component in TΘT_{\Theta}. Thus d∗OTΘd_{*}\mathcal{O}_{T_{\Theta}} is the structure sheaf of the reduced image of TΘT_{\Theta}. This image is the non-klt locus. Stein factorization, or the absence of nontrivial fiberwise idempotents in this equality, shows that the fibers are connected. A proper surjection with connected fibers induces a bijection on connected components. The common TΘT_{\Theta} gives the assertion for both projections. Since the pairs become klt after decreasing the floor, their non-klt loci are exactly their floor supports.

We also use the following elementary consequence of relative degree zero. Let E≥0E \ge0 be a rationally Cartier divisor on a connected projective fiber of a contraction, with E⋅C=0E \cdot C=0 for every contracted curve CC. If the fiber meets EE, its whole support is contained in EE. Otherwise a chain of projective curves joining the part in EE to a point outside it contains a curve not in EE which meets EE. Its intersection with EE is positive, a contradiction. We shall refer to this as the whole-fiber property. In particular, a vertical floor prime of degree zero which meets a fiber meets every horizontal floor component, since each horizontal component subjects onto the contraction base.

Lemma 8.11 (Log-trivial internal linking in dimension at most three). Let (Y,Γ)(Y,\Gamma) be a connected normal projective dlt pair of dimension at most three, with effective rational boundary, nonempty floor, and KY+Γ∼Q0K_Y+\Gamma\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}0. Suppose the underlying space admits an effective rational klt pair. Then the normalized minimal lc centers, with chain adjunction, can be connected by BB-birational comparisons preserving the canonical residues of a common trivializing log-pluricanonical section in sufficiently divisible even degrees.

Proof. Take a projective small Q\mathbb{Q}-factorialization for the underlying klt pair [9]. It is crepant for the full adjunction pair and isomorphic at general SNC stratum points. The full pair remains dlt, its centers correspond bimeromorphically, and the chain adjunctions and even residue maps correspond on common resolutions. We may therefore work on this Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial model.

Proceed by dimension. In dimension one, a unit marking on a log-trivial curve forces a rational curve; there are at most two unit markings. For two markings the even residues of the logarithmic generator agree by (155). A single marking requires no comparison.

Suppose first that ⌊Γ⌋\lfloor\Gamma\rfloor is connected. Each normalized floor component with full adjunction again has a dlt log-trivial pair, and it admits a klt pair by adjunction keeping only that component in the ambient boundary. Within it use induction if there are proper lc subcenters; otherwise that component is itself the minimal lc center. For two successive intersecting floor components choose a minimal lc center in their intersection. Such centers exist by ordinary dlt stratum adjunction; intersecting distinct unit primes meet in lc strata, as is also seen on a general transverse surface. The two even chain restrictions through this shared center agree. Connectedness of the floor then links all the minimal centers.

Suppose instead that the floor is disconnected. Decrease all its coefficients by one fixed small positive rational ϵ\epsilon. The resulting pair is klt, and its adjoint is Q\mathbb{Q}-linearly equivalent to −ϵ⌊Γ⌋-\epsilon\lfloor\Gamma\rfloor, so is not pseudo-effective. The projective klt MMP in dimension at most three ends in a Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial elementary Mori fiber space

Y′⟶PY' \longrightarrow P

[53, 9]. These steps are crepant for the full log-trivial pair. One may see this by transporting a trivializing pluricanonical tensor: there is no extraction, its divisor remains the negative of the corresponding multiple of the pushed full boundary, and the resulting pullback formulas agree. Equivalently, the exceptional comparison of the full, relatively numerically trivial adjoints is zero by negativity.

The pushed floor is relatively ample and supports the entire non-klt locus, because its decrease is klt. Lemma 8.10 shows that it is still disconnected. Some floor component is horizontal by relative ampleness. A vertical floor prime has degree zero on the Mori ray, since it misses a general fiber. By the whole-fiber property it contains every fiber it meets, and so meets every horizontal floor component. Every other vertical prime is likewise connected to the horizontal components. The presence of any vertical floor would consequently connect the entire floor. There are therefore no vertical floor primes.

Disconnectedness is now visible on a general fiber, since every component is horizontal. That fiber must be a curve. Indeed, on a normal projective Cohen–Macaulay fiber of dimension at least two an effective ample divisor has connected support. To check this, take a large Cartier multiple AA of it. Serre duality and Serre vanishing give H1(O(−kA))=0H^1(\mathcal{O}(-kA))=0 for k≫0k\gg0; the divisor sequence then gives H0(OkA)=CH^0(\mathcal{O}_{kA})=\mathbb{C}, implying connected support. The general fiber here is of klt type and hence Cohen–Macaulay, and the floor restricts to an effective ample divisor. Its restriction is lc and becomes klt after decreasing the floor, as can be checked on the restricted common log resolution.

The general fiber is consequently a rational curve with exactly two degree-one unit markings: it has a nonempty boundary and log-trivial adjoint, the total weighted degree is two, and disconnectededness gives two different horizontal components. Over a smooth projective model RR of PP we obtain a bimeromorphic model P1×R\mathbb{P}^{1} \times R with these marks as zero and infinity. The trivializing tensor is, over the function field and hence meromorphically, a power of the two-pointed dlog⁡d\log generator times a meromorphic pluricanonical tensor on RR. Resolving its divisor on RR, the crepant subboundary on the product is therefore

{0}×R+{∞}×R+pr⁡R∗BR,(167)\{0\} \times R + \{\infty\} \times R + \operatorname{pr}_{R}^{*} B_{R}, \tag*{(167)}

where BRB_{R} may be signed, is log smooth, and has all coefficients at most one.

No vertical coefficient in (167) can equal one. Such a prime would connect the two sections by an SNC path of unit components. This path remains connected through unit components on a common resolution mapping to Y′Y'. Explicitly, when a smooth blowup separates two adjacent unit components at their general codimension-two crossing, its exceptional divisor has coefficient one and joins their strict transforms. Blowups not separating that crossing leave the connection. The image of the path would lie in the non-klt locus of Y′Y' and meet both disconnected floor components, a contradiction.

All vertical coefficients are therefore strictly below one. The log-smooth discrepancy formula now says that the only zero-log-discrepancy places are the two horizontal sections themselves. In fact zero places of a log-smooth subboundary with coefficients at most one are generated by its unit strata; here the two unit divisors are disjoint and there are no deeper unit strata. Both section valuations occur as divisors on the original pair, since its floor is disconnected. They are exactly its minimal lc centers. Pair them bimeromorphically through RR. Their residue restrictions from the common generator agree in even powers by (155). Since these restrictions trivialize their adjunction lines, equality as meromorphic tensors on a common resolution gives BB-crepancy. This finishes the disconnected case and the induction. □

Lemma 8.12 (Matching in projective clusters with r=0r = 0). Every projective cluster with r=0r = 0 has a nonzero matching tuple.

Proof. Use as objects the normalized minimal lc centers of the nodes, with their iterated full adjunction pairs. Their adjoints are torsion. Lemma 8.11 supplies internal arrows connecting all objects at a node and preserving even restrictions from a trivializing node section.

For a matched conductor surface choose a minimal lc center inside it. More precisely, choose a minimal ambient lc stratum contained in the double stratum. It is a minimal center for the chains on both sides: any further subcenter would again be a nested ambient stratum, by the generic SNC description. Its shared normalization gives an arrow between the two node objects, with the symmetric even residue comparison from VV.

The projective representation theorem gives finite loop images. Lemma 8.4 therefore provides nonzero invariant sections in a common degree. They are trivializing sections on the objects. At a fixed node, their scalar ratios to restrictions of one trivializing node section agree by the internal arrows, so one node section induces all of them. Across a conductor surface the two node restrictions are trivializations of the same torsion line. Their ratio is constant on that connected normal surface. It is one on the chosen minimal center by the even residue comparison, so it is one everywhere. The node sections thus match on every conductor surface. □

The preceding linking argument also explains the usual construction of pre-admissible sections; compare [37], Section 5 and [54]. We have given it here to retain the actual residue comparisons needed for the present ambient line.

Lemma 8.13 (Matching in projective clusters with r=2r = 2). Every projective cluster with r=2r = 2 admits a nonzero matching tuple vanishing on all nondominant branches.

Proof. At a node with a dominant branch, the general fif_i-fiber is a smooth connected rational curve. Indeed it has KF+ΓF∼Q0K_F+\Gamma_F\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}0 and a unit marking, so adjunction forces genus zero and horizontal weighted boundary degree two. Use dominant surface branches as objects. If there are two degree-one unit branches, or one degree-two unit branch, the two-mark calculation (155) gives their internal comparison or sheet-exchange involution over ZiZ_i. These are BB-crepant and preserve restrictions of base sections. A single degree-one unit branch needs no internal comparison, even if other horizontal markings have fractional coefficients.

Combine these arrows with conductor matchings and apply the projective representation theorem and Lemma 8.4. At a degree-one object, a section descends to the base by the birational comparison. At a degree-two object, divide by a local base frame. Invariance under the involution equates the two generic values, so the ratio is a meromorphic base function; normality and properness give holomorphic descent. For two degree-one objects the internal arrow equates their descended sections. Pulling back gives the desired node sections. Conductor matchings and the retained initial vanishing factors give exactly the required matching and nondominant vanishing. □

Projective clusters with a curve system

It remains to treat r=1r=1. Fix a projective node (Y,Γ)(Y,\Gamma) with system map f:Y→Zf:Y\to Z, where ZZ is a projective curve. On sufficiently general fibers, including fibers on simultaneous log resolutions, we have a connected normal projective dlt log surface

(F,ΓF),KF+ΓF∼Q0,ΣF:=⌊ΓF⌋≠0.(168)(F,\Gamma_F), \qquad K_F+\Gamma_F\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}0, \qquad\Sigma_F:=\lfloor\Gamma_F\rfloor\ne0. \tag*{(168)}

Normality follows from the general-slice and Cohen–Macaulay properties, and dlt follows from the restricted discrepancy formula and general transversality. Horizontal boundary components restrict reduced, while vertical components are absent on this general fiber. The floor curves are smooth and their intersections are ordinary double lc points. Effective curve adjunction shows that a floor curve meeting another is rational and meets the other floor curves at at most two points. If there are two points, its entire log boundary is precisely these two unit markings.

Lemma 8.14 (Disconnected floor on a general surface fiber). If ΣF\Sigma_F in (168) is disconnected, it consists of exactly two disjoint floor curves and there is no deeper lc center in FF. The corresponding dominant floor data on YY admit an internal pairing over an intermediate projective surface P→ZP\to Z with connected general fibers. Generically they are the two unit markings of log rational-curve fibers on a model crepant over ZZ. The two curves over a general z∈Zz\in Z are bimeromorphic to the same smooth connected curve PzP_z. Globally the pairing is either between two surfaces or an involution of one surface.

Proof. Start on a projective crepant Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial dlt model of YY. Decrease all floor coefficients by a fixed small rational ϵ>0\epsilon>0 and run the projective klt threefold MMP over ZZ. The decreased adjoint restricts to a negative multiple of the nonzero effective floor on a general fiber, so it is not relatively pseudo-effective. The program ends in a relatively elementary Mori fiber contraction

Y′⟶P⟶Z,(169)Y'\longrightarrow P\longrightarrow Z, \tag*{(169)}

with Y′Y' Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial. The full adjoint remains the actual pullback of HH at every step: all steps are over ZZ and extract no divisors, and negativity kills the exceptional relatively numerically trivial comparison. Thus the full lc data are crepant throughout. The transformed floor Σ′\Sigma' is relatively ample over PP and supports the full non-klt locus, since its decrease is klt. Both maps in (169) have connected fibers; for the second this also follows by pushing the structure sheaf of the connected system map through the first.

On a common smooth projective resolution of the general fibers FF and F′=Yz′F'=Y'_z, the crepant subboundary is the same. Lemma 8.10, applied to these surfaces, shows that the floor support on F′F' remains disconnected. This application does not require that the transformed full pair be dlt: it is lc, and its decrease is klt, which are the hypotheses used in that lemma.

If dim⁡P=1\dim P=1, the floor on F′F' would be ample and connected. One may use the connected-support argument in the proof of Lemma 8.11, or the surface Hodge index theorem: a disjoint splitting of an ample rational divisor would give orthogonal classes with positive square. Consequently dim⁡P=2\dim P=2. A general Mori fiber over PP is rational, with total horizontal weighted boundary degree two and at least one unit marking. A vertical floor prime has degree zero on the Mori ray. If it dominates ZZ, the whole-fiber property gives, on a general F′F', a full fiber over a point of PzP_z, meeting every horizontal floor curve. Every other vertical floor contribution likewise joins the horizontal ones. All components restricted from a horizontal surface dominate PzP_z for general zz, after discarding the finitely many nongeneral base values. Thus such a vertical floor prime would connect the entire floor of F′F', which is impossible.

There are therefore no vertical floor contributions on general F′F'. Disconnectedness and the degree sum two force exactly two disjoint degree-one floor curves over PzP_z. The curve PzP_z is smooth and connected for general zz: the normal surface base has only isolated singularities, and generic smoothness and connected fibers apply.

We also need to exclude hidden deeper zero-discrepancy places. Choose the rational fiber coordinate xx over PzP_z with these two curves as zero and infinity. This gives a bimeromorphic product model P1×Pz\mathbb{P}^1 \times P_z of F′F'. A divisible pluricanonical tensor trivializing its full log adjoint is, in relative notation,

(dlog⁡x)⊗m⊗γ,(170)(\mathrm{d}\log x)^{\otimes m}\otimes\gamma, \tag*{(170)}

where γ\gamma is a meromorphic mm-canonical tensor on PzP_z. There are no other horizontal boundary terms because the two unit marks exhaust the degree. The crepant subboundary on the product is the two unit sections and vertical fibers with coefficients −ord⁡p(γ)/m≤1-\operatorname{ord}_p(\gamma)/m \le1.

A coefficient-one vertical fiber would join the two sections by an SNC unit path. Successive point blowups preserve this path through unit components: a blowup at a crossing of two unit components inserts a unit exceptional curve. On a common resolution its image in F′F' would join the two disconnected floor curves inside the non-klt locus. Thus every vertical coefficient is strictly below one. The log-smooth discrepancy calculation now leaves only the two horizontal sections as zero-log-discrepancy places. They must both appear as divisors on FF, since its floor is disconnected. Hence its floor consists of those two curves and has no deeper lc center.

In particular, no zero-discrepancy place horizontal over ZZ is extracted or lost between YY and Y′Y': restricting such a place to a general surface fiber would give another zero-discrepancy place there. The two Mori marks consequently correspond bimeromorphically to the original dominant floor data. Pair them over PP, using normalization of the degree-two cover when the two marks belong globally to one surface. The full crepant equalities over ZZ transport local base frames, and the even dlog⁡d\log-residue calculation gives the asserted internal BB-comparison. □

Classify a node as type I if it has a deeper curve lc center dominating ZZ, and as type II otherwise. In type I the floor of the general surface fiber is connected and has crossings, by Lemma 8.14. Every dominant floor surface contains a deeper dominant center: every vertex of the connected floor graph meets another, and its crossings trace such centers. In type II the floor is either a single smooth curve, or the disconnected pair of that lemma. These types are constant across dominant edges. A shared surface has the same full adjunction on both sides; a further lc center which dominates the system curve on one side does so on the other, equivalently because its curve adjoint, the restriction of J\mathcal{J}, has positive degree. The generic SNC nesting identifies the further center on both chains. Since every branch of a type I node contains such a center, the type propagates through the cluster.

Lemma 8.15 (Type II matching). A type II projective cluster with r=1r = 1 admits a nonzero matching tuple with the required nondominant vanishing.

Proof. Use dominant surface branches as objects. For a single smooth floor curve on a general fiber, the corresponding surface has connected general fibers over ZZ, so its sections come from ZZ. In the disconnected case use the internal arrows of Lemma 8.14. Over a general zz, the two curves are bimeromorphic to the connected curve PzP_z. The values of a section relative to a local base frame are constant on each of them, and internal invariance equates the constants. This remains true when the two curves are in one global surface and the arrow is an involution. Thus invariant sections descend meromorphically and then holomorphically to ZZ, using normality and properness.

The projective representation theorem and Lemma 8.4 provide the invariant nonzero object sections. Their descended base sections pull back to node sections. Matching follows from the conductor arrows, and vanishing from the retained initial base factors.

Lemma 8.16 (Type I matching by flagged curves). A type I projective cluster with r=1r = 1 also admits a nonzero matching tuple with the required nondominant vanishing.

Proof. The objects now are normalized curve strata, flagged by the node YiY_i, a dominant surface branch SS at that node, and a further normalized curve branch on SS dominating ZiZ_i. The flag records the actual chain of residue maps. Give each curve its full effective adjunction boundary and the actual restricted line JLJ_L.

There are three kinds of arrows. First, identify the corresponding flags across a shared conductor surface. Second, identify the flags through the two surface branches at a deeper curve center within one node. The generic SNC calculation and even residues identify these chains. Third, consider a fixed SS and the curve Stein factor of S→ZiS \to Z_i. If a general connected fiber has two floor crossings, pair these two markings over that Stein curve. They give a bimeromorphic map between curve objects or an involution of one object. By the surface-fiber description preceding Lemma 8.14, this fiber is log rational with exactly these two unit points. Thus (158), now applied to the full adjunction on SS, gives a BB-crepant arrow preserving restrictions of base sections. A floor fiber curve with only one crossing requires no internal pairing of points.

These arrows connect all flagged crossing points over a general z∈Ziz \in Z_i within a node. Indeed, the whole floor graph of FF is connected, each floor curve meets another at one or two points, the two crossings on a curve are paired by the third kind of arrow, and the two flags at a crossing are paired by the second. This connects the flags along every path in the connected graph.

All curve objects are projective lc pairs with semiample adjoints, so the projective representation theorem gives finite loop images. Apply Lemma 8.4, with initial sections pulled from the respective node bases and vanishing on the required nondominant images. In the common final degree, divide the invariant curve sections by a local pulled-back base frame. The preceding connectivity says that their values coincide on all flag sheets over a general zz. They therefore define one meromorphic base section. It is holomorphic, since its pullbacks to the finite dominating curve covers are holomorphic and the base is normal. Pulling it back gives a section on the node.

Across a dominant conductor surface SS, equality on a chosen dominant further curve implies equality of the two node restrictions on all of SS. To see this precisely, both restrictions are sections of the semiample actual line mJSmJ_S, hence are pulled from its connected-fiber Stein system base. That base is a curve, and the chosen curve stratum dominates it, since it dominates ZiZ_i. Pullback of sections to that stratum is injective. The canonical even adjunction compares these pullbacks, which agree by the first kind of arrow; hence the original restrictions agree. Finally, the initial vanishing factors and dominance of the objects show that the node sections vanish on every nondominant branch. This proves the claim.

Completion of whole-boundary nonvanishing

Proof of Proposition 8.1. Take a cluster of vertices of maximal system dimension rr. If it is isolated, choose a nonzero high base section vanishing on all nondominant branch images, as explained above. Otherwise r≤2r \le2. A cluster containing a non-Moishezon vertex is entirely non-Moishezon and has r≤1r \le1; Lemmas 8.8 and 8.9 handle its two possibilities. Every other cluster is projective. Lemmas 8.12, 8.13, 8.15, and 8.16 cover all its possibilities.

In each case we have, in one sufficiently divisible even degree, a nonzero tuple of node sections matching on dominant edges and vanishing on all nondominant branches. Put zero on components outside the chosen cluster and take a further common power if necessary so that mJmJ is Cartier on the ambient VV. At every conductor surface either the two sections match by construction or both restrictions are zero. Lemma 8.2 therefore descends the tuple to an actual section of OD(mJ)\mathcal{O}_D(mJ). It is nonzero because its restriction to a node in the chosen cluster is nonzero. This proves (153) on the whole reduced boundary.

Extension and completion in algebraic dimension zero

We now combine the preceding constructions. The point of using a reduced boundary is that its whole floor has a section by Proposition 8.1, while the zero-Lelong metric makes the obstruction to extending that section vanish if the ambient adjoint has no sections. We first isolate the elementary finiteness argument needed for this extension.

Finite divisorial support and eventual vanishing

Lemma 9.1. Let MM be a smooth compact Kähler manifold with a(M)=q(M)=0a(M) = q(M) = 0. Then MM has finitely many prime divisors, and their cohomology classes are linearly independent over R\mathbb{R}.

Proof. Suppose a finite collection of distinct prime divisors satisfies a nonzero rational relation in H2(M,Q)H^2(M, \mathbb{Q}). Clearing denominators and then torsion gives a nonzero integral divisor EE with c1(OM(E))=0c_1(\mathcal{O}_M(E)) = 0 in integral cohomology. The exponential sequence and H1(M,OM)=0H^1(M, \mathcal{O}_M) = 0 imply OM(E)≃OM\mathcal{O}_M(E) \simeq\mathcal{O}_M. Its canonical meromorphic section is then a meromorphic function with divisor EE. Since a(M)=0a(M) = 0, every meromorphic function is constant, so E=0E = 0, a contradiction. The classes are rational, so a real dependence would give a rational dependence by linear algebra. They are therefore linearly independent over R\mathbb{R}; their number is bounded by dim⁡H2(M,R)\dim H^2(M, \mathbb{R}).

Lemma 9.2 (Eventual vanishing). Let MM be as in Lemma 9.1, and let LL be a rational holomorphic line bundle with κ(M,L)=−∞\kappa(M,L) = -\infty. For every fixed holomorphic vector bundle E\mathcal{E},

H0(M,E⊗OM(mL))=0(171)H^0(M,\mathcal{E} \otimes\mathcal{O}_M(mL)) = 0 \tag*{(171)}

for all sufficiently large mm in any fixed sufficiently divisible sequence of integral multiples.

Proof. Assume the contrary. Interpret a section as a morphism OM(−mL)→E\mathcal{O}_M(-mL) \to\mathcal{E}; this requires no meromorphic frame of LL. Among all such morphisms choose a tuple s1,…,sks_1,\ldots,s_k, with respective indices m1,…,mkm_1,\ldots,m_k, whose generic rank is maximal. Let H⊂E\mathcal{H} \subset\mathcal{E} be the saturation of the image of their direct sum. Every further such morphism has image in H\mathcal{H}: otherwise adding it would increase generic rank. A nonzero further section can replace at least one of the sjs_j while preserving generic rank.

There are infinitely many increasing indices mm with a nonzero section, so one fixed replacement index jj works for infinitely many of them. Taking the nonzero determinant gives effective integral divisors in the actual line bundles

det⁡H⊗OM((c+m)L),c=∑i≠jmi.(172)\det\mathcal{H} \otimes\mathcal{O}_M((c+m)L), \qquad c = \sum_{i\ne j} m_i. \tag*{(172)}

The determinant is interpreted reflexively; on the smooth space its double dual is a line bundle, and the wedge morphism extends to it.

By Lemma 9.1, all the effective divisors in (172) have the same finite set of possible prime components. Their coefficient vectors lie in Z≥0N\mathbb{Z}_{\geq0}^N. Such an infinite sequence has an infinite componentwise nondecreasing subsequence: successively pass to a constant or increasing subsequence in each coordinate. Choose two members with indices m′<m′′m' < m''. Subtracting their divisors gives an effective divisor in the actual line (m′′−m′)L(m''-m')L, contrary to κ(M,L)=−∞\kappa(M,L)=-\infty. This determinant argument is related to the nonvanishing method in [46].

Extension from a nonempty reduced boundary

Let T0T_0 be a smooth compact Kähler non-uniruled fourfold with a(T0)=q(T0)=0a(T_0)=q(T_0)=0, and let G0G_0 be a reduced SNC divisor. Apply Proposition 7.20. Write its nonextracting output as (T,G)(T,G), with

A=KT+G,h ⁣:(V,D)⟶(T,G),J=KV+D=h∗A.A = K_T + G, \qquad h \colon(V,D) \longrightarrow(T,G), \qquad J = K_V + D = h^*A.

Here TT is globally strongly Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial and klt, KTK_T remains pseudo-effective, AA is analytically nef, and (V,D)(V,D) is the projective crepant dlt auxiliary model with reduced boundary. The pullback of JJ to a smooth resolution has a semipositive singular metric with zero Lelong numbers.

Proposition 9.3. In this situation, G≠0G \ne0 implies κ(T,A)≥0\kappa(T,A) \ge0.

Proof. If G≠0G \ne0, then D≠0D \ne0. By Proposition 8.1, a positive Cartier multiple of J∣DJ|_D has a nonzero section on the whole reduced divisor DD. Increase this multiple to clear the ambient index. We show that, under the contrary assumption κ(T,A)=−∞\kappa(T,A)=-\infty, high powers of this section extend to VV.

Take a simultaneous projective compact Kähler log resolution p ⁣:M→Vp \colon M \to V also resolving the map to (T,G)(T,G), and put

L=p∗J,KM+F∼QL.(173)L = p^*J, \qquad K_M + F \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} L. \tag*{(173)}

The support of FF is SNC and every coefficient is at most one; negative coefficients are allowed. All comparisons here are actual rational line-bundle comparisons. Normality and projection give κ(M,L)=κ(V,J)=κ(T,A)\kappa(M,L)=\kappa(V,J)=\kappa(T,A). The space MM still has a=q=0a=q=0.

For every sufficiently divisible mm,

p∗OM(mL−⌊F⌋)=ID⊗OV(mJ).(174)p_*\mathcal{O}_M(mL-\lfloor F\rfloor)=\mathcal{I}_D\otimes\mathcal{O}_V(mJ). \tag*{(174)}

Indeed, the nonexceptional coefficient-one components of FF are the strict transforms of the primes of DD. Every other coefficient-one component has center in DD, since (V,D)(V,D) is dlt and is klt away from DD. A holomorphic function vanishing on the reduced DD pulls back with order at least one along all of these components. Conversely, any poles allowed by negative coefficients of ⌊F⌋\lfloor F\rfloor are exceptional. Normality and Hartogs extension remove them downstairs, while vanishing is required along each prime of DD. This proves (174), after the actual pullback line is removed by projection.

The low-degree Leray sequence therefore gives an injection

H1(V,ID⊗OV(mJ))↪H1(M,OM(mL−⌊F⌋)).(175)H^{1}(V,\mathcal{I}_{D}\otimes\mathcal{O}_{V}(mJ))\hookrightarrow H^{1}(M,\mathcal{O}_{M}(mL-\lfloor F\rfloor)). \tag*{(175)}

No vanishing of a higher direct image is needed for this injection. Write the line on the right as KM+LmK_{M}+\mathcal{L}_{m}, where

Lm=OM(−KM−⌊F⌋+mL)∼Q(m−1)L+{F}.(176)\mathcal{L}_{m}=\mathcal{O}_{M}(-K_{M}-\lfloor F\rfloor+mL)\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}(m-1)L+\{F\}. \tag*{(176)}

For m≥1m\ge1, give Lm\mathcal{L}_{m} the metric obtained from the zero-Lelong semipositive metric on LL and the divisor metric of {F}\{F\}, taking roots of identified powers if necessary. Its curvature is semipositive and its multiplier ideal is trivial. To see the latter directly, the zero-Lelong weight has every finite local exponential integrability exponent by Skoda’s theorem. The SNC coefficients of {F}\{F\} are strictly below one, and hence their divisor weight has an integrability margin. Hölder’s inequality combines that margin with a sufficiently high finite exponent for the zero-Lelong weight.

Hard Lefschetz with multiplier ideals [28] gives a surjection

H0(M,ΩM3⊗Lm)⟶H1(M,KM+Lm).H^{0}(M,\Omega_{M}^{3}\otimes\mathcal{L}_{m})\longrightarrow H^{1}(M,K_{M}+\mathcal{L}_{m}).

Its source vanishes for all large divisible mm by Lemma 9.2, applied to the fixed bundle ΩM3⊗OM(−KM−⌊F⌋)\Omega_{M}^{3}\otimes\mathcal{O}_{M}(-K_{M}-\lfloor F\rfloor). It follows from (178) that

H1(V,ID⊗OV(mJ))=0.H^{1}(V,\mathcal{I}_{D}\otimes\mathcal{O}_{V}(mJ))=0.

The exact sequence for the reduced divisor DD now makes restriction of sections of OV(mJ)\mathcal{O}_{V}(mJ) onto DD surjective. High divisible powers of the nonzero floor section remain nonzero because DD is reduced, and therefore extend. Their extensions push to TT, since J=h∗AJ=h^{*}A and h∗OV=OTh_{*}\mathcal{O}_{V}=\mathcal{O}_{T}. This contradicts κ(T,A)=−∞\kappa(T,A)=-\infty.

Canonical nonvanishing

Theorem 9.4. Assume Assumptions 2.2, 2.3, and 2.4. If WW is a smooth compact Kähler non-uniruled fourfold with a(W)=0a(W)=0, then κ(W,KW)≥0\kappa(W,K_{W})\ge0.

Proof. Suppose κ(W,KW)=−∞\kappa(W,K_{W})=-\infty. The Albanese argument of Lemma 3.4 gives q(W)=0q(W)=0. Both a=q=0a=q=0 persist on every smooth compact Kähler model used below. Their canonical classes are pseudo-effective by non-uniruledness [64]. We distinguish the existence of a nonzero meromorphic section of a positive canonical power. That property is birationally invariant on smooth spaces: Jacobian comparison gives it on a common resolution, and meromorphic tensors extend over codimension two.

No signed canonical frame. Suppose first that no positive power of KWK_{W} has a nonzero meromorphic section. Resolve the finitely many prime divisors on WW, and on the resulting smooth model T0T_{0} let G0G_{0} be the reduced union of their strict transforms and all exceptional divisors, with SNC support. This union contains every prime of T0T_{0}: each such prime is either exceptional or maps to a prime on WW. The union may be empty.

Apply Proposition 7.20. A section of a positive multiple of A=KT+GA=K_{T}+G would, after pullback to a resolution and division by the meromorphic divisor factors, give a signed meromorphic pluricanonical tensor. Here GG is rational Cartier by the global strong condition, and the canonical comparison has a signed rational exceptional divisor. This is impossible. By Proposition 9.3, it follows that G=0G=0.

The space TT has no prime divisors: its map from T0T_{0} extracts none, and the full prime support was included in G0G_{0}. It is klt and has nef KT=AK_{T}=A. Its smooth resolution has algebraic dimension zero, pseudo-effective canonical class, and no meromorphic pluricanonical tensor. These are precisely the hypotheses of Proposition 6.1, which excludes this case.

A signed canonical frame. Otherwise resolve the signed divisor of a meromorphic section of mKWmK_W. On the resulting smooth model write the actual identity

KT0∼QP−N,(177)K_{T_0} \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} P-N, \tag*{(177)}

where P,N≥0P,N \ge0 have SNC total support and no common prime. The pullback tensor includes the resolution discrepancy, so (177) is an actual canonical identity. Set G0=(Supp⁡P)redG_0=(\operatorname{Supp} P)_{\mathrm{red}}, and again apply Proposition 7.20. Nonextraction and reflexive extension preserve

KT∼QPT−NT,G=(Supp⁡PT)red.K_T \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} P_T-N_T,\qquad G=(\operatorname{Supp} P_T)_{\mathrm{red}}.

If G=0G=0, then PT=0P_T=0, and pseudo-effectivity of KTK_T forces NT=0N_T=0. Indeed, after pullback to a resolution a nonzero effective rational Cartier divisor has strictly positive Kähler mass, whereas its negative cannot represent a pseudo-effective class.

If G≠0G\ne0, Proposition 9.3 gives a section of a multiple of AA. The signed divisor PT+G−NTP_T+G-N_T representing AA is unique: two meromorphic sections of the same power differ by a meromorphic function, and a(T)=0a(T)=0. The section’s divisor is effective. Since PT+GP_T+G and NTN_T have disjoint support, we again obtain NT=0N_T=0. Thus in both cases KTK_T has nonvanishing.

Run Assumption 2.3 on the exact ordinary klt pair (T,0)(T,0), and denote its nef endpoint by T′T'. Its input is globally strongly Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial and its canonical class is pseudo-effective, as required. Canonical sections push forward through the nonextracting program. Applying Assumption 2.4 therefore makes KT′K_{T'} semiample. Algebraic dimension zero forces the resulting map to have a point image, so KT′K_{T'} is actually torsion.

It remains to return to a smooth canonical bundle. On a smooth compact Kähler resolution μ:M′→T′\mu:M'\to T',

KM′∼Qμ∗KT′+E∼QE(178)K_{M'}\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}\mu^*K_{T'}+E\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}E \tag*{(178)}

for a possibly signed exceptional rational divisor EE. Let Θ\Theta be a positive current in the pseudo-effective class c1(KM′)c_1(K_{M'}). If ωT′\omega_{T'} is a Kähler form on T′T', exceptionality gives

∫M′Θ∧μ∗ωT′3=0.\int_{M'}\Theta\wedge\mu^*\omega_{T'}^3=0.

The measure is nonnegative and μ∗ωT′\mu^*\omega_{T'} is strictly positive on the isomorphism locus. Hence Θ\Theta is supported in the analytic exceptional/non-isomorphism locus. The support theorem for positive closed (1,1)(1,1)-currents expresses it as an effective real sum of divisorial currents [25]. By Lemma 9.1, the prime classes on M′M' are linearly independent. Comparison with (178) therefore forces every coefficient of EE to be nonnegative. The actual identity KM′∼QE≥0K_{M'}\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}E\ge0 contradicts smooth birational invariance of Kodaira dimension and completes the proof.

The good minimal model

Proof of Theorems 1.2 and 1.1. The reduction in Proposition 3.5 treats the projective, uniruled and irregular cases and leaves smooth non-uniruled non-Moishezon fourfolds with q=0q=0. Positive algebraic dimension is handled by Proposition 4.1; algebraic dimension zero is handled by Theorem 9.4. The sections push to the actual adjoint of the nef pair exactly as in the reduction. This proves Theorem 1.2.

Finally start Assumption 2.3 from the original pair (X,B)(X,B). Its endpoint (Y,BY)(Y,B_Y) is in the required global strong category, with nef actual adjoint, no extraction, and all the stated discrepancy inequalities. Theorem 1.2 gives a first section there. Assumption 2.4 then makes a positive Cartier multiple of that same endpoint adjoint globally generated. These are all the assertions of Theorem 1.1.

Projective abundance from logarithmic subadditivity

Conditional projective log abundance

Appendices A–I establish the conditional projective abundance theorem used in the main proof. Its logarithmic-Iitaka premise, Assumption A.1, follows from the reduction in Lemma 3.1. We give the complete argument, including its signed-boundary, current-theoretic, and Frobenius constructions.

The log abundance conjecture asserts that a nef log canonical divisor on a projective log canonical pair is semiample. Its conclusion turns a numerical positivity condition into a morphism defined by pluricanonical sections. In the minimal model program, abundance complements the existence of minimal models: a nef adjoint should determine the appropriate canonical fibration. The existence and finite-generation theorems for big klt adjoints are central foundations of this program [9]. The lower-dimensional reductions relevant here are developed in [44, 35].

These appendices prove the full rational-boundary assertion under one explicit subadditivity assumption. The result is a positive conditional resolution of the log abundance conjecture. It is not an unconditional abundance theorem.

The assumption and the theorem

Assumption A.1 (Logarithmic Iitaka subadditivity). Let f:X→Yf : X \to Y be a surjective morphism with connected fibers between smooth connected projective complex varieties. Let DX,DYD_X,D_Y be reduced effective simple normal crossing divisors, allowing zero boundaries, such that

Supp⁡(f∗DY)⊆Supp⁡(DX).\operatorname{Supp}(f^*D_Y) \subseteq\operatorname{Supp}(D_X).

For a very general smooth fiber FF, put DF=DX∣FD_F = D_X|_F. Then

κ(X,KX+DX)≥κ(F,KF+DF)+κ(Y,KY+DY).\kappa(X,K_X+D_X) \ge\kappa(F,K_F+D_F) + \kappa(Y,K_Y+D_Y).

Here DFD_F is reduced with simple normal crossings and KF+DF∼(KX+DX)∣FK_F+D_F \sim(K_X+D_X)|_F. The convention (−∞)+b=−∞(-\infty)+b=-\infty applies also when b=−∞b=-\infty, and the zero divisor on a point has Iitaka dimension zero.

Assumption A.1 requires no nefness, abundance, bigness, or good-model hypothesis, and does not require ff to be smooth away from the boundary. The divisor DXD_X may contain additional components. No fractional-boundary, orbifold, nonprojective, Hodge-conjectural, or arithmetic extension is assumed. In fact, the proof uses only DX=DY=0D_X=D_Y=0, in the Albanese reduction in Appendix F.

Theorem A.2 (Conditional log abundance). Assume Assumption A.1. Let kk be an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero, and let (X,B)(X,B) be a normal projective log canonical pair over kk, where BB is an effective Q\mathbb{Q}-divisor and KX+BK_X+B is Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier. If KX+BK_X+B is nef, then it is semiample: for some integer m>0m>0, the divisor m(KX+B)m(K_X+B) is Cartier and OX(m(KX+B))\mathcal{O}_X(m(K_X+B)) is generated by its global sections.

Main constructions

The proof proceeds by simultaneous induction on smooth nonvanishing and existence of good log minimal models, as set out in Appendix B. Its principal constructions are as follows.

First, Appendices C–E prove an abundance criterion for a nef reduced dlt adjoint that has a signed rational representative supported on its boundary. Semiampleness on that boundary is supplied inductively. A normalized root construction separates its positive and negative parts. An infinitesimal obstruction is placed in the lowest piece of a projective Hodge-module direct image. Negative-ample vanishing on a finite cover of a root gerbe kills the obstruction. Algebraization then produces compact numerically trivial subvarieties, and nef reduction yields rational-linear descent to a big divisor on a base.

Second, Appendix F subjects a hypothetical smooth nonvanishing counterexample to geometric exclusions. Algebraic webs and positive currents force very-general proper subvarieties to be of general type. An ascending chain condition for the Lelong numbers of a fixed current at valuations of bounded discrepancy converts asymptotically small intersection gaps into exact zero gaps. This rules out canonical-class positive currents that are pulled back from a lower-dimensional base on a dense open, as well as moving curves of bounded normalized degree and genus.

Third, Appendices G and H compare two jet estimates. Moving base-locus estimates on a projective bundle over a product create a large Seshadri constant while the corresponding one-factor section orders remain small. After all geometric choices have been fixed, reduction modulo large primes converts these two estimates into incompatible determinant multiplicities. The Frobenius diagonal filtration and a uniform curve-slope bound are the numerical ingredients of this final comparison.

These constructions are proved below; they are not additional parts of Assumption A.1. Established results from the minimal model program, Hodge modules, and positivity theory are invoked with their hypotheses at the point of use. The order of the induction is important: the proof of smooth nonvanishing in dimension nn uses good models only in dimensions below nn. Appendix I closes the induction and transfers the complex conclusion to arbitrary algebraically closed fields of characteristic zero.

Conventions

A variety is integral. Canonical divisors are chosen compatibly on birational models. For a divisor EE on a smooth model p:W→Xp: W \to X, our log discrepancy is

a(E;X,B)=1+ord⁡E(KW−p∗(KX+B)).a(E;X,B)=1+\operatorname{ord}_{E}\left(K_W-p^*(K_X+B)\right).

Log canonicity means nonnegative log discrepancies, and klt means strictly positive log discrepancies. We use the usual dlt and slc conventions. A Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier divisor LL is nef if L⋅C≥0L \cdot C \ge0 for every integral curve CC. Its numerical dimension, when nef, is

ν(L)=max⁡{j:LjHdim⁡X−j>0},\nu(L)=\max\{j:L^jH^{\dim X-j}>0\},

with HH ample. For non-nef pseudo-effective divisors, statements about numerical dimension use Nakayama’s κσ\kappa_{\sigma}, as specified in the relevant reduction. These notions are not interchanged without a hypothesis that justifies doing so.

The Iitaka dimension is the maximum dimension of the images of the complete systems of integral multiples, and is −∞-\infty when all these systems are empty. Numerical and rational-linear equivalence are denoted by ≡\equiv and ∼Q\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}, respectively. Unless a different base field is specified, the constructions are over C\mathbb{C}. A very general point avoids a countable union of proper closed subvarieties.

The transfer to arbitrary algebraically closed characteristic-zero fields is made only after the complex argument has been completed.

The inductive framework

All varieties in this section are projective over C\mathbb{C}. We first isolate the established minimal-model results that will be used, and explain exactly where the new signed-representative theorem enters the induction.

For an effective real boundary Δ\Delta, a good log minimal model of (X,Δ)(X,\Delta) is a log minimal model on which the adjoint divisor is semiample. For real divisors, semiampleness means real linear equivalence to the pullback of an ample real divisor by a contraction. We allow the usual definition of a log minimal model in which extracted prime divisors are included in its boundary with coefficient one. For a pseudo-effective divisor AA, we use κσ(X,A)\kappa_\sigma(X,A) for Nakayama’s numerical dimension. When AA is nef this agrees with the intersection-theoretic numerical dimension ν(X,A)\nu(X,A).

Fix an integer n≥1n \ge1.

Assumption B.1 (Lower-dimensional good models). Every projective log canonical pair of dimension less than nn, with real boundary and pseudo-effective adjoint divisor, has a good log minimal model.

The dimension-zero case is immediate. Our inductive step will first prove smooth nonvanishing in dimension nn under Assumption B.1, and then apply Proposition B.6 below. The propositions on boundary restrictions and special termination preceding that reduction do not assume smooth nonvanishing in dimension nn.

Comparison and boundary restrictions

Lemma B.2 (Comparison with a nef model). Let (X,Δ)(X,\Delta) be log canonical and let (X′,Δ′)(X',\Delta') be a log minimal model. On a common resolution

X←uW→vX′X \xleftarrow{u} W \xrightarrow{v} X'

there is an effective vv-exceptional divisor FF such that

u∗(KX+Δ)=v∗(KX′+Δ′)+F.(179)u^*(K_X+\Delta)=v^*(K_{X'}+\Delta')+F. \tag*{(179)}

If KX+ΔK_X+\Delta is nef, then F=0F=0. Consequently a nef rational adjoint is semiample whenever it has a good log minimal model. If (X,Δ)(X,\Delta) is klt, its log minimal model is klt and extracts no divisors.

Proof. Put F=u∗(KX+Δ)−v∗(KX′+Δ′)F=u^*(K_X+\Delta)-v^*(K_{X'}+\Delta'). Discrepancy improvement on divisors of XX gives u∗F≥0u_*F \ge0, while −F-F is uu-nef because KX′+Δ′K_{X'}+\Delta' is nef. The negativity lemma therefore gives F≥0F \ge0. At a prime of WW that is not vv-exceptional, the coefficient of FF is zero unless that prime is extracted on X′X'. In the latter case it equals the negative of its log discrepancy over (X,Δ)(X,\Delta). It is therefore nonpositive, and hence zero. Thus FF is vv-exceptional. If the source adjoint is nef, then FF is also vv-nef, so the negativity lemma gives F=0F=0.

Equality of the pullbacks transfers semiampleness, since a proper birational morphism onto a normal variety has direct image of its structure sheaf equal to the structure sheaf. More explicitly, global sections of a Cartier multiple and its pullback coincide; generation upstairs implies generation downstairs. Finally, for a klt source the coefficient at an extracted prime would be strictly negative, which is impossible. The remaining discrepancy inequalities show that the model is klt. ∎

Proposition B.3 (Semiample­ness on the reduced boundary). Assume Assumption B.1. Let (V,D)(V,D) be a projective Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial dlt nn-fold with DD reduced and M=KV+DM=K_V+D nef. Then M∣DM|_D is semiample as a rational line bundle on the reduced scheme DD.

Proof. The ambient variety VV is klt. The reduced floor of a Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial dlt pair is S2S_2, and it has ordinary double crossings in codimension one; its irreducible components are normal. For the S2S_2 assertion one can work locally with the cyclic class cover of the Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier divisor DD. This cover is quasi-étale and klt, hence Cohen–Macaulay. The eigensheaf OV(−D)\mathcal{O}_V(-D), being a direct summand of its finite direct image, is Cohen–Macaulay. The divisor sequence then shows that DD is Cohen–Macaulay.

Divisorial adjunction on the normalization ∐Di→D\coprod D_i\to D gives lc pairs (Di,Diff⁡Di(D−Di))(D_i,\operatorname{Diff}_{D_i}(D-D_i)). The different includes the conductor with coefficient one. Removing that conductor contribution defines an effective boundary on DD; together with DD it is an slc pair whose adjoint line bundle is M∣DM|_D. The divisible residue identifications hold in codimension one, with even powers eliminating residue signs at double crossings, and extend by S2S_2.

Each normalized adjoint is nef and semiample by Assumption B.1 and Lemma B.2. Semiampleness descends from the normalization by the slc gluing theorem [33], Theorem 1.5, equivalently Theorem 4.3. This gives the required statement on the whole reduced scheme, not merely on its individual components.

The special termination needed below

Proposition B.4 (Special termination over a point). Assume Assumption B.1. Let (V,Δ)(V,\Delta) be a projective Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial dlt nn-fold with rational boundary and pseudo-effective adjoint. Choose an effective ample rational divisor AA such that (V,Δ+A)(V,\Delta+A) is dlt and KV+Δ+AK_V+\Delta+A is nef. The LMMP for KV+ΔK_V+\Delta with scaling of AA has special termination: if the program is infinite, its flipping loci are eventually disjoint from the round-down of the boundary.

In particular, if at every stage the adjoint is rationally linearly equivalent to a signed divisor supported on that round-down, the program terminates at a log minimal model.

Proof. In an infinite ample-scaling program the scaling limit is zero: a positive limit is covered by the termination theorem for a dlt pair with an ample summand in the scaling divisor [8], Theorem 1.9(ii), equivalently Theorem 4.1(ii). Discard the finitely many divisorial contractions and write the flips as Vi⇢Vi+1/ZiV_i\dashrightarrow V_{i+1}/Z_i, with scaling numbers λi>0\lambda_i>0 tending to zero. Fix a component S1S_1 of ⌊Δ1⌋\lfloor\Delta_1\rfloor, write SiS_i for its normal strict transform, and let TiT_i be the normalization of its image in ZiZ_i. Since the ambient contraction is small, Si→TiS_i\to T_i is projective birational. The standard discrepancy argument makes Si⇢Si+1S_i\dashrightarrow S_{i+1} an isomorphism in codimension one after finitely many steps [6], proof of Lemma 3.6.

Here are the precise auxiliary relative programs in that argument. Take a small projective Q\mathbb{Q}-factorialization pi:Si′→Sip_i:S'_i\to S_i, and put

Di=KSi′+Bi=pi∗((KVi+Δi)∣Si),Ci=pi∗(Ai∣Si).D_i=K_{S'_i}+B_i=p_i^*((K_{V_i}+\Delta_i)|_{S_i}),\qquad C_i=p_i^*(A_i|_{S_i}).

Adjunction gives a dlt pair (Si′,Bi)(S'_i,B_i), with Bi,Ci≥0B_i,C_i\geq0, and (Si′,Bi+λiCi)(S'_i,B_i+\lambda_iC_i) is lc. The scaling divisor has no floor component, so its restriction is effective. The number λi\lambda_i is rational, being the ratio of intersections of rational divisors on the contracted rational curve. The globally nef divisor Li=KVi+Δi+λiAiL_i=K_{V_i}+\Delta_i+\lambda_iA_i descends rationally linearly across Vi→ZiV_i\to Z_i. Indeed, for sufficiently small rational δ>0\delta>0, the pair (Vi,(1−δ)Δi)(V_i,(1-\delta)\Delta_i) is klt and its negative adjoint is ample over ZiZ_i. Relative basepoint freeness applies to a Cartier multiple of LiL_i; its numerical triviality and the connected fibers give descent. Restricting and pulling back yields

Di+λiCi∼Q0/Ti.(180)D_i+\lambda_i C_i\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}0/T_i. \tag*{(180)}

By [8], Theorem 1.1(3), a DiD_i-LMMP over TiT_i with scaling of a fresh ample divisor terminates. The theorem applies to the effective rational lc boundary Bi+λiCiB_i+\lambda_i C_i, with λiCi\lambda_i C_i rational Cartier and the driving pair Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial dlt. Since the base map is birational, the endpoint is a log minimal model, not a Mori fiber space. Comparison with the relatively ample model Si+1S_{i+1} identifies this endpoint with a small Q\mathbb{Q}-factorialization Si+1′S'_{i+1}, as in [8], Remarks 2.9–2.10.

These finite relative programs are genuine pieces of an absolute program with scaling of the transforms of C1C_1. Throughout the ii-th piece, Di+λiCiD_i+\lambda_i C_i remains the pullback of a nef divisor on TiT_i, hence is globally nef. Every contracted negative ray has positive CiC_i-degree, so its global scaling threshold is exactly λi\lambda_i. The relative cone is a face of the absolute cone, cut out by the pullback of an ample divisor on the projective base TiT_i; its extremal rays are therefore absolute extremal rays. Thus the pieces concatenate as asserted in the cited remarks. Rescaling the initial scaling divisor by λ1\lambda_1, if necessary, makes its sum with the initial boundary lc and nef.

If the concatenation were infinite, its positive scaling numbers would tend to zero. Its initial adjoint is pseudo-effective: for each late scaling value, pull back the corresponding nef scaled adjoint and use the effective comparison divisor for the preceding nonpositive steps, then take the limit. Assumption B.1 therefore gives an absolute log minimal model for that initial pair. The concatenation terminates by [8], Theorem 1.9(iii), since its zero limit is never attained. The floor-component argument of [6], Lemma 3.6 now gives special termination. No effective representative in dimension nn, nor any arbitrary relative good-model assertion, has been used.

For the final assertion, a curve disjoint from the round-down has degree zero against any signed divisor supported there. It therefore cannot generate an adjoint-negative flipping ray. Special termination rules out all sufficiently late flips. There are only finitely many divisorial contractions, since each lowers the Picard number, and pseudo-effectivity excludes a Mori fiber space as the endpoint. Thus the endpoint is nef.

A uniform trivial-perturbation argument

Lemma B.5. Let (Z,Δ)(Z,\Delta) be a projective Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial dlt rational pair, and suppose L=KZ+ΔL=K_Z+\Delta is nef. Set P=ΔP=\Delta if the pair is klt and P=⌊Δ⌋P=\lfloor\Delta\rfloor otherwise. Fix m>0m>0 such that mLmL is Cartier. For every rational

0<ϵ<14nm+2,0<\epsilon<\frac{1}{4nm+2},

every step of an LMMP for L−ϵPL-\epsilon P is LL-trivial. On all its models, the transform of LL is nef and its multiple by the same integer mm is Cartier.

Proof. Both Δ−ϵP\Delta-\epsilon P and Δ−12P\Delta-\frac{1}{2}P are effective klt boundaries. If RR is a ray negative for L−ϵPL-\epsilon P, nefness of LL shows that RR is also negative for L−12PL-\frac{1}{2}P. Choose a rational curve CC spanning this ray and satisfying the length bound

−(L−12P)⋅C≤2n.-\left(L-\frac{1}{2}P\right)\cdot C\leq2n.

Writing a=L⋅C≥0a=L\cdot C\geq0 and p=P⋅Cp=P\cdot C, we have

p≤2a+4n,a<ϵp,(1−2ϵ)a≤4nϵ.p\leq2a+4n,\qquad a<\epsilon p,\qquad(1-2\epsilon)a\leq4n\epsilon.

Our choice of ϵ\epsilon gives a<1/ma<1/m. Since mama is a nonnegative integer, a=0a=0. For the driving klt contraction, the line bundle OZ(mL)\mathcal{O}_Z(mL) is numerically trivial over the contraction base. The line-bundle clause of the contraction theorem gives its descent as a line bundle, with no change of mm [29], Theorem 3.74(3). One may also see the unchanged index directly from relative basepoint freeness: two consecutive sufficiently large powers descend, so their quotient descends. For a flip, pull this descended line bundle back on the other side. The transformed LL is nef, and mLmL remains Cartier.

The driving boundary remains klt throughout its LMMP. The transformed Δ−12P\Delta-\frac{1}{2}P remains effective and is smaller than the driving boundary, so it too is klt. The same estimate and the same integer mm apply inductively at every subsequent step.

Completion of the good-model step

Proposition B.6 (Inductive reduction to smooth nonvanishing). Assume Assumption B.1. Assume in addition that every smooth projective nn-fold with pseudo-effective canonical divisor has nonnegative Kodaira dimension. Then every projective lc nn-fold with real boundary and pseudo-effective adjoint has a good log minimal model. In particular, every nef rational lc adjoint in dimension nn is semiample.

Proof. Hashizume’s reduction gives nonvanishing and log minimal models for projective lc pairs with real boundary in dimensions at most nn [44], Theorem 1.4. Thus we may pass to a Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial dlt log minimal model. Fix the support of its boundary, impose the rational affine constraints that its coefficient-one components remain equal to one, and take a sufficiently small rational polytope around the given boundary within those constraints. On a fixed log resolution witnessing dlt, the strict discrepancy inequalities remain strict in this neighborhood; thus its boundaries remain dlt. The rational-polytope theorem for nef adjoints [7], Remark 3.1 and Proposition 3.2(3), applied to all extremal rays and intersected with this neighborhood, expresses the given real boundary in a finite rational simplex of dlt boundaries with nef adjoints. It is enough to prove semiampleness for these rational adjoints. Their positive real combinations are semiample, using the product of the associated contractions. For a rational adjoint, real semiampleness can also be rationalized: the finite linear equations expressing its divisor and principal-divisor coefficients have rational data, so a real solution with positive coefficients has a rational solution with the same positivity.

We therefore work with a rational dlt pair (Z,Δ)(Z,\Delta) and L=KZ+ΔL=K_Z+\Delta nef. Real nonvanishing gives rational nonvanishing in this case: retain the finitely many divisors and principal divisors in an effective real representative and solve the resulting rational linear system with nonnegative rational coefficients. If κ(Z,L)≥1\kappa(Z,L)\ge1, lower-dimensional good models give a good minimal model by [35]. Lemma B.2 transfers semiampleness back to ZZ. It remains to treat

κ(Z,L)=0.\kappa(Z,L)=0.

The non-pseudo-effective perturbation. Put P=ΔP=\Delta in the klt case and P=∣Δ∣P=\lvert\Delta\rvert in the other case. Suppose L−ϵPL-\epsilon P is not pseudo-effective for every sufficiently small ϵ>0\epsilon>0. Choose rational ϵ\epsilon as in Lemma B.5, and run the klt LMMP with scaling to a Mori fiber space

(Z,Δ−ϵP)⟶(Z′,Δ′−ϵP′)→fT.(Z,\Delta-\epsilon P)\longrightarrow(Z',\Delta'-\epsilon P') \xrightarrow{f} T.

Existence and termination in the non-pseudo-effective case are the established klt results of [9]. The program is crepant for LL. The line-bundle descent in Lemma B.5, applied also to the final contraction, gives a nef rational divisor AA on TT with

KZ′+Δ′∼Qf∗A.K_{Z'}+\Delta' \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} f^*A.

The base has dimension less than $n. If (Z,Δ)(Z,\Delta) is klt, the transformed original pair (Z′,Δ′)(Z',\Delta') is klt as well. Ambro’s descent theorem [1], Theorem 0.2 gives an effective rational boundary ΔT\Delta_T such that (T,ΔT)(T,\Delta_T) is klt and

A∼QKT+ΔT.A \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} K_T+\Delta_T.

All its hypotheses hold: the total pair is globally klt and effective, ff is a projective contraction, and its adjoint is rationally linearly pulled back. In particular, this use requires no conjecture about semiampleness of a moduli divisor. Assumption B.1 and Lemma B.2 make AA semiample.

Otherwise P′P' is effective and relatively ample, since KZ′+Δ′−ϵP′K_{Z'}+\Delta'-\epsilon P' is relatively antiample. Some component of the floor therefore dominates TT. On a dlt blowup of the original lc pair (Z′,Δ′)(Z',\Delta'), choose the strict transform SS of such a component. Adjunction produces an lc pair on SS whose nef adjoint is the pullback of AA. It is semiample by the lower-dimensional hypothesis. Semiampleness of a rational line bundle descends along a proper surjection: use the equality of sections for its connected-fiber Stein factor, and norms for the remaining finite morphism. For the latter assertion, a basepoint-free system has a section nonzero at every point of a chosen finite fiber; its norm is nonzero at the point downstairs. Hence AA is semiample also in this case. Crepancy transfers the conclusion back to LL.

The klt pseudo-effective perturbation. We next settle the klt case when L−ϵΔL-\epsilon\Delta is pseudo-effective for some small rational ϵ>0\epsilon>0. Nonvanishing gives

L∼QG0:=H0+ϵΔ,H0≥0.L \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} G_0:=H_0+\epsilon\Delta,\qquad H_0\geq0.

Take a resolution p:W→Zp:W\to Z with reduced SNC divisor DD consisting of all exceptionals and the strict support of H0+ΔH_0+\Delta. We have

KW+D=p∗L+R,R≥0.K_W+D=p^*L+R,\qquad R\geq0.

Here every component of DD has positive coefficient in

GW:=p∗G0+R∼QKW+D.G_W:=p^*G_0+R\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}K_W+D.

Indeed, at strict boundary components the difference between coefficient one and a klt boundary coefficient is positive, and at exceptional components the coefficient contributed by the adjoint comparison is the positive log discrepancy. The pushforward p∗GWp_*G_W is bounded coefficientwise by a fixed multiple of G0G_0. Section spaces inject under birational pushforward, so

0≤κ(W,KW+D)≤κ(Z,G0)=0.0\leq\kappa(W,K_W+D)\leq\kappa(Z,G_0)=0.

Take a Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial dlt log minimal model (V,DV)(V,D_V) of (W,D)(W,D). Its boundary is reduced. On a common resolution, the comparison divisor in Lemma B.2 is exceptional over VV. Pushing the pullback of GWG_W to VV therefore gives

KV+DV∼QGV=∑ibiDi,bi>0,Supp⁡GV=DV.K_V+D_V\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}G_V=\sum_i b_iD_i,\qquad b_i>0,\qquad\operatorname{Supp}G_V=D_V.

For completeness, positivity at a component extracted on VV also holds: its log discrepancy over (W,D)(W,D) is zero, its center lies in DD, and the pullback of the full-support effective GWG_W has positive order there. There is no comparison-divisor coefficient at a prime retained on VV. Effectivity and exceptionality in the comparison preserve the adjoint section ring, so the nef adjoint on VV still has Iitaka dimension zero.

The small-perturbation hypothesis of Theorem C.1 is now explicit. If DV≠0D_V \ne0, choose rational cc with 0<c<min⁡ibi0 < c < \min_i b_i. Then

KV+(1−c)DV∼Q∑i(bi−c)Di≥0.K_V + (1-c)D_V \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} \sum_i (b_i-c)D_i \ge0.

If DV=0D_V = 0, pseudo-effectivity is immediate. Proposition B.3 supplies the required semiample-ness on DVD_V. Theorem C.1 thus makes KV+DVK_V + D_V abundant. Its numerical dimension is zero, and its effective full-support representative forces GV=0G_V = 0, hence DV=0D_V = 0.

On a common resolution of W⇢VW \dashrightarrow V, the effective pullback of p∗G0p^*G_0 is now exceptional over VV. It is nef because it is rationally linearly equivalent to the pullback of LL. The negativity lemma forces this divisor to vanish. Therefore G0=0G_0 = 0 and L∼Q0L \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} 0. Together with the preceding cases, this proves the klt good-model assertion in dimension nn: for a non-nef pseudo-effective klt adjoint, first take its klt log minimal model and apply what was just proved.

The remaining non-klt case. Finally suppose the original pair is not klt and a small floor perturbation is pseudo-effective. Choose rational ϵ>0\epsilon> 0 so that both

L−ϵP,L−2ϵP,P=⌊Δ⌋,L-\epsilon P,\qquad L-2\epsilon P,\qquad P = \lfloor\Delta\rfloor,

are pseudo-effective klt adjoints. Their Iitaka dimensions are zero: nonvanishing gives the lower bound, and adding the effective perturbation bounds each by κ(Z,L)=0\kappa(Z,L) = 0. The klt result just proved gives good models for both. Consequently their Nakayama numerical dimensions are zero. Since

2(L−ϵP)=L+(L−2ϵP)2(L-\epsilon P) = L + (L-2\epsilon P)

and the last summand has an effective rational representative, monotonicity and homogeneity of κσ\kappa_\sigma give

κσ(Z,L)≤κσ(Z,2(L−ϵP))=0.\kappa_\sigma(Z,L) \le\kappa_\sigma\bigl(Z,2(L-\epsilon P)\bigr) = 0.

The nef divisor LL is therefore numerically trivial. Nonvanishing is already available in this finishing step: write L∼QE≥0L \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} E \ge0. For an ample divisor HH, the equality E⋅Hn−1=0E \cdot H^{n-1} = 0 forces E=0E = 0. Thus L∼Q0L \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} 0, without any additional nonvanishing or abundance premise.

All rational nef dlt adjoints are now semiample. The polytope reduction gives the real-boundary good-model assertion, and Lemma B.2 gives the final statement for every nef rational lc adjoint.

Geometry of a signed boundary representative

The next statement isolates the extension argument needed in the induction. Its boundary is reduced, but its prescribed representative need not be effective.

Theorem C.1 (Signed representative). Let (X,D)(X,D) be a projective Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial dlt pair over C\mathbb{C}, with D=∑iDiD = \sum_i D_i reduced. Suppose that

L=KX+D is nef,L−cD is pseudo-effective for some c>0,L = K_X + D \text{ is nef}, \qquad L-cD \text{ is pseudo-effective for some } c > 0,

and that

L∼QG=∑iaiDi,ai∈Q.L \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} G = \sum_i a_iD_i,\qquad a_i \in\mathbb{Q}.

If L∣DL|_D is semiample as a rational line bundle on the reduced scheme DD, then LL is abundant:

κ(X,L)=ν(X,L).\kappa(X,L) = \nu(X,L).

The proof occupies this section, the Hodge-theoretic lifting argument of Proposition D.3, and the descent argument in Appendix E. No Iitaka subadditivity assumption is used in this theorem.

The positive boundary and its small intersections

Write

G=G+−G−,D0=∑ai=0DiG=G_{+}-G_{-},\qquad D_{0}=\sum_{a_i=0}D_i

where G+G_{+} and G−G_{-} are effective with disjoint prime supports. Choose a positive integer mm such that mG±mG_{\pm}, mD0mD_{0}, and mLmL are integral Cartier divisors and

N0=OX(mG)≃OX(mL).N_{0}=\mathcal{O}_{X}(mG)\simeq\mathcal{O}_{X}(mL).

Increase mm so that N0∣DN_{0}|_{D} is generated by global sections. Fix the resulting morphism

ϕ:D⟶P=Ps,N0∣D≃ϕ∗OP(1),\phi:D\longrightarrow P=\mathbb{P}^{s},\qquad N_{0}|_{D}\simeq\phi^{*}\mathcal{O}_{P}(1),

and let s0s_{0} be the rational section of N0N_{0} with divisor mGmG. Set n=dim⁡Xn=\dim X and v=ν(X,L)v=\nu(X,L), and fix an ample Cartier divisor HH.

Lemma C.2. If v=nv=n, then LL is big. If v=0v=0, then D=0D=0 and L∼Q0L\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}0. In the remaining case 0<v<n0<v<n, put r=v−1r=v-1. Every component of DD has ϕ\phi-image of dimension at most rr, and some component of G+G_{+} has image of dimension rr. Moreover,

dim⁡ϕ(Supp⁡G+∩(Supp⁡G−∪D0))<r;\dim\phi\bigl(\operatorname{Supp}G_{+}\cap(\operatorname{Supp}G_{-}\cup D_{0})\bigr)<r;

when r=0r=0, the intersection in this formula is empty.

Proof. The assertion for v=nv=n is the numerical criterion for bigness of a nef divisor. Suppose v<nv<n. Intersecting the pseudo-effective class L−cDL-cD with a product of nef classes gives

0≤(L−cD)LvHn−v−1=−c∑iDiLvHn−v−1.0\leq(L-cD)L^{v}H^{n-v-1}=-c\sum_iD_iL^{v}H^{n-v-1}.

Every summand on the right is nonnegative. Thus each is zero. For v=0v=0, ampleness gives D=0D=0, and the signed representative gives L∼Q0L\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}0.

Now suppose v>0v>0. On a component of DD, the numerical dimension of L∣DL|_{D} equals its image dimension under ϕ\phi. The preceding vanishing gives the upper bound rr. On the other hand,

0<LvHn−v=∑iaiDiLrHn−v,0<L^{v}H^{n-v}=\sum_i a_iD_iL^{r}H^{n-v},

so a positive-coefficient component attains that bound.

Consider the symmetric matrix

Qij=DiDjLrHn−r−2.Q_{ij}=D_iD_jL^{r}H^{n-r-2}.

Its off-diagonal entries are nonnegative: distinct effective Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier divisors have effective intersection cycles. The mixed Hodge index theorem, obtained by approximation with ample classes and the ordinary Hodge index theorem on complete-intersection surfaces, says that the ambient intersection form has at most one positive direction. In this form, LL is isotropic, is orthogonal to every DiD_i, and has strictly positive pairing with HH. Its orthogonal space therefore has negative semidefinite form. The same applies after pullback to a resolution, so this argument does not require XX to be smooth.

The signed relation implies Q(ai)=0Q(a_i)=0. Write a=a+−a−a=a^{+}-a^{-} temporarily for the positive and negative coefficient vectors. Then

Q(a+,a+)=Q(a+,a−)≥0.Q(a^{+},a^{+})=Q(a^{+},a^{-})\geq0.

Negative semidefiniteness makes both sides zero and gives Qa+=0Q_{a^+}=0. The vanishing rows belonging to negative or zero coefficients show that each intersection of a positive component with a negative or zero component has zero LL-degree against Hn−r−2H^{n-r-2}. Semiamplemness on DD gives image dimension less than rr. If r=0r=0, an effective nonzero intersection has positive ample degree, proving emptiness.

We henceforth work in the case 0<v<n0 < v < n, and set N=n−1N=n-1.

A geometric package for infinitesimal lifting

The root gerbe

P=OP(1)ℓ\mathcal{P}=\sqrt[\ell]{\mathcal{O}_{P}(1)}

parametrizes ℓ\ell-th roots of the indicated line bundle, without a chosen section. Its tautological line is denoted by C\mathcal{C}, so Cℓ\mathcal{C}^{\ell} is the pullback of OP(1)\mathcal{O}_{P}(1). We use the same notation for further pullbacks of C\mathcal{C}.

Proposition C.3. Choose ℓ\ell divisible by mm and every nonzero integer ∣mai∣|ma_i|, and set a=ℓ/ma=\ell/m. There is a normal tame Deligne–Mumford stack X\mathcal{X}, considered on a neighborhood of a reduced Cartier divisor SS of pure dimension N=n−1N=n-1, together with a morphism to XX and a reduced boundary TT having no component in common with SS, with the following properties.

(i) The pair (X,S+T)(\mathcal{X},S+T) is log canonical, and a fixed isomorphism of reflexive sheaves is given by

ωX(S+T)≃OX(aS).(181)\omega_{\mathcal{X}}(S+T)\simeq\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{X}}(aS). \tag*{(181)}

The support of TT is locally set-theoretically principal. The ambient space and SS are Cohen–Macaulay on scheme charts. Off TT, the ambient space is Gorenstein and the displayed isomorphism is ordinary Cartier adjunction data.

(ii) Put J=(S∩T)redJ=(S\cap T)_{\mathrm{red}}. Both SS and JJ are Du Bois on scheme charts, the ideal IJ/S\mathcal{I}_{J/S} is maximal Cohen–Macaulay, and

B:=HomS(IJ/S,ωS)≃OS(aS).\mathcal{B}:=\mathcal{H}om_{S}(\mathcal{I}_{J/S},\omega_{S})\simeq\mathcal{O}_{S}(aS).

The identification agrees off JJ with the residue convention specified by (∗adj)(\ast_{\mathrm{adj}}).

(iii) There is a finite representable morphism

S⟶D×PPS\longrightarrow D\times_{P}\mathcal{P}

whose image covers Supp⁡G+\operatorname{Supp}G_{+}. The line OS(S)\mathcal{O}_{S}(S) is the pullback of C\mathcal{C}. The image of JJ in PP has dimension less than rr, whereas the image of SS has dimension rr.

(iv) There is a smooth projective bundle p:Y→Pp:\mathcal{Y}\to\mathcal{P} and a representable projective morphism g:S→Yg:S\to\mathcal{Y}. Writing h=p∘gh=p\circ g and T=Spec⁡Ph∗OS\mathcal{T}=\operatorname{Spec}_{P}h_{*}\mathcal{O}_{S}, the morphism gg factors through a closed embedding T↪Y\mathcal{T}\hookrightarrow\mathcal{Y}, and

g∗OS=OT,OS(S)=g∗C,B=g∗Ca.g_{*}\mathcal{O}_{S}=\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{T}},\qquad\mathcal{O}_{S}(S)=g^{*}\mathcal{C},\qquad\mathcal{B}=g^{*}\mathcal{C}^{a}.

(v) For a separated quasi-projective scheme chart U→YU\to\mathcal{Y} that is étale and of finite type, put SU=S×YUS_{U}=S\times_{\mathcal{Y}}U. The étale morphism SU→SS_{U}\to S extends compatibly to every nilpotent thickening qSqS in X\mathcal{X}. The resulting qSUqS_{U} are quasi-projective schemes, separated and quasi-finite over X\mathcal{X}. All the adjunction and duality identifications are compatible with changes of étale chart.

Proof. Start with the normalized simultaneous root stack of the Cartier divisors mG+mG_{+}, mG−mG_{-}, and mD0mD_{0}, taking an ℓ\ell-th root of each divisor with its section. Empty divisors cause no difficulty. Write S+,S−,S0S_{+},S_{-},S_{0} for the tautological root divisors. To check their reducedness, work at a generic prime where the downstairs multiplicity is bb. A normalized chart of yℓ=xby^{\ell}=x^{b} has ramification index ℓ/b\ell/b, and yy has order one. This applies to D0D_{0} because mm divides ℓ\ell. The divisors are Cartier; normality and their generic reducedness imply that they are reduced.

Log ramification gives a log canonical pair with this full reduced boundary and

K+S++S−+S0∼Qa(S+−S−).K+S_{+}+S_{-}+S_{0}\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}a(S_{+}-S_{-}).

Its ambient charts are klt. Indeed they are klt off the boundary, and decreasing all boundary coefficients slightly removes all zero-discrepancy places, as can be checked on a log resolution. The integral Weil class given by the difference of the two sides is torsion. Take the finite representable cover formed from its reflexive powers, with a chosen periodicity isomorphism, and normalize. On codimension-one charts this is the usual cover of a torsion line bundle, hence is etale there. The adjoint relation becomes a fixed linear equivalence; log canonicity, klt ambient singularities, and reduced Cartier boundary divisors persist. More explicitly, before taking this cover write B=S++S−+S0B=S_{+}+S_{-}+S_{0}. The torsion reflexive sheaf is

F=(ω(B)⊗O(−a(S+−S−)))∗∗.\mathcal{F}=\left(\omega(B)\otimes\mathcal{O}(-a(S_{+}-S_{-}))\right)^{**}.

The relative spectrum of its reflexive-power algebra, with a chosen periodicity F[q]≃O\mathcal{F}^{[q]}\simeq\mathcal{O}, has a tautological evaluation trivializing the pulled-back F\mathcal{F} in codimension one. This is a morphism of sheaves on the cover stack itself. The resulting adjoint isomorphism is therefore equivariant on every atlas, rather than a separately chosen nonequivariant trivialization.

Blow up the ideal of S+∩S−S_{+}\cap S_{-} and normalize. Locally the ideal has two generators, so the ordinary blowup embeds in a relative projective line. Its fibers, and those of its finite normalization, have dimension at most one. Every exceptional divisor therefore lies over a codimension-two component of the intersection. Such a component is a dlt stratum downstairs and is generically SNC. Separate normalized Kummer charts, followed by purity for the index cover at the smooth generic locus, give the same description upstairs.

It follows that the tautological exceptional divisor EE is reduced Cartier and

S+′=p1∗S+−E,S−′=p1∗S−−ES'_{+}=p_{1}^{*}S_{+}-E,\qquad S'_{-}=p_{1}^{*}S_{-}-E

are disjoint reduced Cartier divisors, where p1p_{1} denotes this normalized blowup. No codimension-two two-branch stratum is contained in S0S_{0}, so p1∗S0p_{1}^{*}S_{0} is reduced Cartier without an exceptional component. The boundary

S+′+S−′+E+p1∗S0S'_{+}+S'_{-}+E+p_{1}^{*}S_{0}

is crepant and log canonical. Write B′B' for this total boundary on a chart V′V'. The crepant equality establishes log canonicity for every valuation. Outside B′B', the blowup is an isomorphism to the klt complement of the old boundary. Thus a divisor FF with a(F;V′,B′)=0a(F;V',B')=0 has center in Supp⁡B′\operatorname{Supp}B'. As B′B' is effective Cartier, ord⁡F(B′)>0\operatorname{ord}_{F}(B')>0, and

a(F;V′,0)=a(F;V′,B′)+ord⁡F(B′)>0.a(F;V',0)=a(F;V',B')+\operatorname{ord}_{F}(B')>0.

Divisors with positive pair discrepancy remain positive after dropping the boundary. This proves that V′V' is klt, including at higher-codimension singular loci. Set S=S+′S=S'_{+} and T=S−′+E+p1∗S0T=S'_{-}+E+p_{1}^{*}S_{0} for the moment. Near SS, the disjoint divisor S−′S'_{-} contributes its unit section, and the fixed linear equivalence becomes

ω(S+T)≃O(aS).\omega(S+T) \simeq\mathcal{O}(aS).

The ambient charts remain klt and hence Cohen–Macaulay. Since all displayed boundary divisors are Cartier, this isomorphism also makes those charts Gorenstein.

The strict divisor SS is finite over S+S_{+}. Before normalization it lies in the zero section of the projective ratio coordinate: its fibers over S+S_{+} have at most one point. The morphism is proper, and normalization is finite. In particular a codimension-one point of S∩TS \cap T lies over a codimension-two intersection downstairs. The generic SNC description above shows that T∣ST|_{S} is generically reduced. It is Cartier on the Cohen–Macaulay scheme SS, so it is reduced everywhere.

We next remove the root characters that will not be used. The line O(S−S−′)\mathcal{O}(S-S'_{-}) has ℓ\ell-th power equal to the pullback of N0N_{0}. It defines a morphism to the gerbe of ℓ\ell-th roots of N0N_{0} on XX. Take the relative coarse space over this gerbe and call it X\mathcal{X}. On a trivializing chart this means quotienting by the kernel of the finite group character acting on the indicated root line. These are ordinary quasi-projective quotient schemes: the preceding covers are finite, the blowup is projective, and a finite quotient preserves quasi-projectivity. The chartwise construction patches.

Retain S,TS,T for their reduced images. Near SS, the pole section is a unit, so both the line of SS and its section descend through this kernel quotient. Thus SS remains Cartier. A finite-group norm of a local equation for the upstairs TT shows that its image is set-theoretically principal; we do not need reduced TT to be Cartier. The only divisorial ramification is on the boundary. Log ramification therefore preserves the lc pair and descends the equivariant adjoint isomorphism to (∗adj)(\ast_{\mathrm{adj}}). Cohen–Macaulayness of the ambient chart and of SS follows from the finite CM covers and their invariant direct summands. For clarity, the coarse kernel acts trivially on the retained root line, and hence on O(aS)\mathcal{O}(aS). Equivariance of the fixed adjoint isomorphism gives the same kernel character on ω(S+T)\omega(S+T). Taking invariants therefore descends the isomorphism, with log ramification identifying the invariant log dualizing sheaf. Off TT the descended adjoint isomorphism makes the canonical sheaf invertible, giving the claimed Gorenstein property there.

The reduced supports SS and JJ are unions of log canonical centers: intersections of lc centers are again unions of lc centers. Hence both are Du Bois by [55], Theorems 1.4 and 1.7. For the more precise coherent statement, on one quotient chart write Sup→SS^{\mathrm{up}} \to S for the finite cover used above. Since Tup∣SupT^{\mathrm{up}}|_{S^{\mathrm{up}}} is reduced,

IJ/S=(f∗OSup(−Tup∣Sup))inv.\mathcal{I}_{J/S}=\left(f_{*}\mathcal{O}_{S^{\mathrm{up}}}(-T^{\mathrm{up}}|_{S^{\mathrm{up}}})\right)^{\mathrm{inv}}.

Indeed an invariant function vanishes on the reduced quotient image precisely when its pullback vanishes on this reduced preimage. The sheaf on the right is maximal Cohen–Macaulay: upstairs it is invertible on a CM scheme, finite pushforward has the same depth over the quotient, and invariants are a direct summand in characteristic zero.

Finite-map duality with trace, followed by invariants, gives

HomS(IJ/S,ωS)=(f∗ωSup(Tup∣Sup))inv≃OS(aS).\mathcal{H}om_{S}(\mathcal{I}_{J/S},\omega_{S})=\left(f_{*}\omega_{S^{\mathrm{up}}}(T^{\mathrm{up}}|_{S^{\mathrm{up}}})\right)^{\mathrm{inv}}\simeq\mathcal{O}_{S}(aS).

This use of duality allows ramification and does not assert that ωS\omega_{S} itself is invertible. The last isomorphism is upstairs Cartier adjunction followed by descent of the SS line. Off JJ it is the ordinary residue determined by the fixed ambient isomorphism. Normalized trace preserves that convention, proving compatibility on overlaps.

Restricted to SS, the root gerbe of N0N_{0} is D×PPD \times_{P} P. The strict-divisor finiteness already proved, together with removal of the relative inertia kernel, makes S→D×PPS \to D \times_{P} P finite and representable. Its image covers the positive boundary, and its root line is OS(S)=C\mathcal{O}_{S}(S)=C. Lemma C.2 gives all the asserted image-dimension bounds, including the bound for JJ. The resulting h:S→Ph:S\to\mathcal{P} is representable projective.

Its Stein algebra defines a finite stack T=Spec⁡Ph∗OS\mathcal{T}=\operatorname{Spec}_{\mathcal{P}} h_*\mathcal{O}_S over P\mathcal{P}. There are enough vector bundles on P\mathcal{P} to generate this coherent algebra as a module. Namely, decompose by the finitely many inertia characters, twist each summand by a power of C\mathcal{C} to descend it to P\mathcal{P}, and apply Serre generation. A vector-bundle surjection gives an embedding of T\mathcal{T} in a vector bundle over P\mathcal{P}. Its closure in the projective completion is still T\mathcal{T}, since it is proper over the base. This gives Y\mathcal{Y} and gg. The Stein construction supplies g∗OS=OTg_*\mathcal{O}_S=\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{T}} and the required line identities.

Finally, etale morphisms extend uniquely over nilpotent thickenings, compatibly as qq varies. The reduction SUS_U is a scheme. The extension qSUqS_U has trivial inertia and is an algebraic space. It is separated over XX: the chosen chart is separated, the morphism to the root gerbe is finite, and that gerbe has finite diagonal. Its finite-type geometric fibers over XX are zero-dimensional, and this is unchanged by nilpotents. Thus qSU→XqS_U\to X is separated and quasi-finite. Zariski’s main theorem embeds it in a scheme finite over XX, proving that it is a quasi-projective scheme. This completes the construction.

Hodge theory and formal lifting

We retain the geometric package of Proposition C.3. In particular, P=OPs(1)ℓ\mathcal{P}=\sqrt[\ell]{\mathcal{O}_{P^s}(1)} is a root gerbe, C\mathcal{C} is its tautological line bundle, and

g:S⟶Y→pPg:S\longrightarrow\mathcal{Y}\xrightarrow{p}\mathcal{P}

is a representable projective morphism followed by a smooth projective bundle. The Stein image T⊂Y\mathcal{T}\subset\mathcal{Y} is finite over P\mathcal{P}, and g∗OS=OTg_*\mathcal{O}_S=\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{T}}. The reduced Cartier divisor S⊂XS\subset \mathcal{X} has dimension N=n−1N=n-1. If J=(S∩T)redJ=(S\cap\mathcal{T})_{\mathrm{red}}, then S,JS,J are Du Bois, IJ/S\mathcal{I}_{J/S} is maximal Cohen–Macaulay, and

B:=HomS(IJ/S,ωS)≃OS(aS)=g∗Ca,OS(S)=g∗C,(182)\mathcal{B}:=\mathop{\mathrm{Hom}}\nolimits_S(\mathcal{I}_{J/S},\omega_S)\simeq\mathcal{O}_S(aS)=g^*\mathcal{C}^a,\qquad\mathcal{O}_S(S)=g^*\mathcal{C}, \tag*{(182)}

where a>0a>0 is an integer. Off T\mathcal{T}, the fixed ambient isomorphism ωX(S)≃OX(aS)\omega_\mathcal{X}(S)\simeq\mathcal{O}_\mathcal{X}(aS) supplies these identifications by adjunction. We prove that functions and transverse parameters can be lifted through every infinitesimal neighborhood of SS.

A global vanishing statement

We use graded-polarizable mixed Hodge modules on ordinary complex algebraic varieties. The needed established results are projective strictness and the usual functorial operations [66] (Theorem 2.14 and Section 4), the comparison with the Du Bois complex and its coherent dual [67] (Theorem 0.2 and Corollary 0.3), and Kodaira–Saito vanishing [66] (Proposition 2.33). No Hodge-module theory on stacks is assumed. Our objects on smooth stacks will be compatible systems on scheme etale charts, whose filtered differential modules descend.

Throughout this section, differential modules are right modules with increasing filtration. The module itself is in degree zero in its Spencer de Rham complex. Thus, on a smooth chart VV, the term in degree −i-i of Gr⁡kFDR⁡V(M)\operatorname{Gr}^F_k\operatorname{DR}_V(M) is

Gr⁡k−iFM⊗OV⋀iTV.\operatorname{Gr}^F_{k-i}M\otimes_{\mathcal{O}_V}\bigwedge\nolimits^i T_V.

In particular, if F<0M=0F_{<0}M=0, the lowest graded de Rham complex is the sheaf F0MF_0M in degree zero.

Lemma D.1. Let MM be a compatible system of mixed Hodge modules in perverse degree zero on the scheme etale charts of Y\mathcal{Y}. Suppose its support is finite over P\mathcal{P}. Then, for every integer kk, every positive integer bb, and every j<0j<0,

Hj(Y,Gr⁡kFDR⁡Y(M)⊗p∗C−b)=0.\mathbb{H}^{j}\left(\mathcal{Y},\operatorname{Gr}_{k}^{F}\operatorname{DR}_{\mathcal{Y}}(M)\otimes p^{*}\mathbb{C}^{-b}\right)=0.

Here the graded de Rham complex is the descended coherent complex.

Proof. Because pp is finite on the support, its direct image has only perverse cohomology in degree zero. Denote that system on P\mathcal{P} by M′M'. Projective strictness on the ordinary scheme charts gives

Rp∗Gr⁡kFDR⁡Y(M)≃Gr⁡kFDR⁡P(M′).(183)Rp_{*}\operatorname{Gr}_{k}^{F}\operatorname{DR}_{\mathcal{Y}}(M)\simeq\operatorname{Gr}_{k}^{F}\operatorname{DR}_{\mathcal{P}}(M'). \tag*{(183)}

We first explain why this is a global identity of descended complexes, rather than a claim of local vanishing.

For right differential modules, the direct image is formed from the filtered transfer bimodule

DY→P=OY⊗p−1OPp−1DP,\mathcal{D}_{\mathcal{Y}\to\mathcal{P}}=\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{Y}}\otimes_{p^{-1}\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{P}}}p^{-1}\mathcal{D}_{\mathcal{P}},

with its order filtration, by derived tensor over DY\mathcal{D}_{\mathcal{Y}} and derived direct image. These operations may equivalently be performed on Rees modules. Applying de Rham on the base means further derived tensor with OP\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{P}}, whose filtration begins in degree zero. The filtered Spencer resolution, associativity of derived tensor, and projection formula identify the result with the direct image of de Rham upstairs: the transfer module tensored over the base differential operators with its structure sheaf is OY\mathcal{O}_{\mathcal{Y}}. These are canonical sheaf constructions on the etale site; the Spencer resolutions are locally free over differential operators. They therefore respect chart changes before passing to associated gradeds. Strictness and the concentration in perverse degree zero can be checked on the base charts by the ordinary projective direct-image theorem. Coherent cohomology on those charts is unchanged by using their etale sites. This proves (183) as an identity that computes global coherent hypercohomology. The same argument applies to the representable finite morphism used next.

There is a representable finite surjective morphism

v:Pzs⟶Pv:\mathbb{P}_{z}^{s}\longrightarrow\mathcal{P}

defined by the power map [z0:⋯:zs]↦[z0ℓ:⋯:zsℓ][z_{0}:\cdots:z_{s}]\mapsto[z_{0}^{\ell}:\cdots:z_{s}^{\ell}] and the root OPs(1)\mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^{s}}(1). In particular, v∗C=OPzs(1)v^{*}\mathbb{C}=\mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}_{z}^{s}}(1). On the standard affine opens of P\mathcal{P} choose the trivial root, obtaining scheme etale charts U˘i→P\breve{U}_{i}\to\mathcal{P}. On zi≠0z_{i}\ne0, the morphism vv factors through U˘i\breve{U}_{i}. Pull back M′M' on these charts and take perverse cohomology in degree zero. Functoriality and the chosen root identify these objects on overlaps, giving a system HH on the Zariski opens of Pzs\mathbb{P}_{z}^{s}.

For completeness, this is a global graded-polarizable mixed Hodge module on Pzs\mathbb{P}_{z}^{s}. The perverse, filtered, and weight data glue. The pure weight gradeds have strict-support decompositions, which glue by uniqueness. On a smooth connected dense stratum of an irreducible support, a polarization from a nonempty Zariski open extends as a flat pairing: the fundamental group of that open surjects onto the fundamental group of the stratum. Its Hodge compatibility extends by continuity; nondegeneracy and positivity persist for the extended flat pairing. Quasi-unipotence at the boundary is already supplied by the local Hodge modules. Saito’s extension theorem for polarizable variations [66], Section 3.b and uniqueness of strict-support extension identify this global pure object with the glued one. There is no additional boundary at infinity, since Pzs\mathbb{P}_{z}^{s} is projective. The weight extensions then give the stated mixed object.

The system M′M' is a retract of v+Hv_+H. To see this on a chart, use the whole base-changed finite cover. Over U~i\widetilde{U}_i it is a disjoint union of copies of the corresponding affine coordinate chart of Pzs\mathbb{P}^s_z. The unit on unshifted constants and its dual trace, using smooth duality in equal dimensions, have composition multiplication by the degree. On the finite étale locus the trace is summation over sheets. On each connected smooth base chart, the shifted constant Hodge module is the rank-one intersection complex and has endomorphism ring Q\mathbb{Q}; its endomorphisms are determined on a dense open. Thus the composition equals the degree globally, with no additional term supported on the branch locus. Ramification is therefore allowed. Tensoring with M′M', applying proper projection formula, and taking perverse cohomology in degree zero gives the claimed retraction, since finite direct image is perverse exact. Divide the trace by the degree. All maps are canonical under étale base change, so the retraction descends also on filtered differential modules.

Now apply the finite version of (183) and projection formula. The desired hypercohomology is a direct summand of

Hj(Pzs,Gr⁡kFDR⁡(H)⊗OPzs(−b)).\mathbb{H}^j\left(\mathbb{P}^s_z,\operatorname{Gr}^F_k\operatorname{DR}(H)\otimes\mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^s_z}(-b)\right).

This is zero for j<0j<0 by ordinary negative-ample Kodaira–Saito vanishing. One may apply it to the pure weight gradeds and then use the exact sequences of the weight filtration; the Hodge filtrations of those sequences are strict.

The lowest Hodge piece

Take a separated quasi-projective scheme étale chart U→YU\to\mathcal{Y}, of finite type. Write SU=S×YUS_U=S\times_\mathcal{Y} U, JU=J×YUJ_U=J\times_\mathcal{Y} U, and again g:SU→Ug:S_U\to U for the induced projective morphism. For j:SU∖JU↪SUj:S_U\setminus J_U\hookrightarrow S_U, put

AU∙=D(j!QSU∖JUH[N]),A0,U=p ⁣H0AU∙,MU=p ⁣H0g∗A0,U.A^\bullet_U=\mathbb{D}(j_!\mathbb{Q}^{H}_{S_U\setminus J_U}[N]),\qquad A_{0,U}={}^{p}\!H^0 A^\bullet_U,\qquad M_U={}^{p}\!H^0g_*A_{0,U}.

All these constructions commute with étale restriction. The MUM_U form a system supported on T\mathcal{T}, to which Lemma D.1 applies.

Lemma D.2. The following identifications hold compatibly on the charts:

F<0A0,U=0,F0A0,U=B∣SU,F<0MU=0,F0MU=R1g∗(B∣SU).F_{<0}A_{0,U}=0,\qquad F_0A_{0,U}=\mathcal{B}|_{S_U},\qquad F_{<0}M_U=0,\qquad F_0M_U=R^1g_*(\mathcal{B}|_{S_U}).

In a smooth ambient embedding SU↪VS_U\hookrightarrow V of codimension cc, the underlying module of A0,UA_{0,U} is HSUc(ωV)\mathcal{H}^c_{S_U}(\omega_V), localized off JUJ_U. The lowest-piece inclusion is the adjunction, or Ext-to-support, inclusion off JUJ_U, extended by meromorphic localization.

Proof. The difference triangle for the constant objects of SUS_U and JUJ_U, together with Du Bois comparison, identifies its degree-zero graded de Rham complex with IJU/SU\mathcal{I}_{J_U/S_U}. Coherent duality and the maximal-Cohen–Macaulay property therefore give

Gr⁡kFDR⁡(AU∙)=0(k<0),Gr⁡0FDR⁡(AU∙)=B∣SU[0].(184)\operatorname{Gr}^F_k\operatorname{DR}(A^\bullet_U)=0\quad(k<0),\qquad\operatorname{Gr}^F_0\operatorname{DR}(A^\bullet_U)=\mathcal{B}|_{S_U}[0]. \tag*{(184)}

The shift [N][N] cancels the dimension shift in the dualizing complex. In the smooth case this convention says D(QH[N])=QH[N](N)\mathbb{D}(\mathbb{Q}^H[N])=\mathbb{Q}^H[N](N); its right differential module has lowest piece ω\omega at index zero.

We spell out the passage from the complex to perverse cohomology. Let qq be the smallest filtration index occurring in any perverse cohomology object of AU∙A^\bullet_U, locally on a fixed chart. Such a lower bound exists because the complex is bounded and its filtrations are good. At index qq, the graded Spencer complex of every perverse cohomology object has only its degree-zero term. The spectral sequence from perverse truncation therefore has a single nonzero row and gives

HiGr⁡qFDR⁡(AU∙)=Fqp pHiAU∙.\mathcal{H}^{i}\operatorname{Gr}^{F}_{q}\operatorname{DR}(A_{U}^{\bullet})=F^{p}_{q}\,{}^{p}\mathcal{H}^{i}A_{U}^{\bullet}.

If q<0q<0, this contradicts (184). Thus all these objects have F<0=0F_{<0}=0. Applying the same argument at index zero gives F0A0,U=B∣SUF_{0}A_{0,U}=\mathcal{B}|_{S_{U}}, and gives zero for the lowest piece of the other perverse cohomology objects. No perversity assertion about the shifted constant complex is required.

For the unfiltered description, duality identifies the dual of the reduced constant complex, in the ambient VV, with

RΓ[SU](ωV)[c].R\Gamma_{[S_{U}]}(\omega_{V})[c].

Its degree-zero module is the first nonzero support cohomology HSUc(ωV)\mathcal{H}^{c}_{S_{U}}(\omega_{V}). The support of JUJ_{U} is locally set-theoretically principal in SUS_{U}, by the construction. Invert a local defining function, lifted to VV; this exact meromorphic localization realizes j∗j_{*} on the underlying module. It yields the asserted description of A0,UA_{0,U}.

We also need compatibility of the two descriptions of its lowest piece. On the smooth locus of SU∖JUS_{U}\setminus J_{U}, filtered duality and smooth graph pushforward identify it with the ordinary dualizing sheaf included by residue. This is the Ext-to-support inclusion, with the normalization fixed by the ambient adjunction isomorphism. Naturality in smooth etale coordinates fixes the same scalar on every chart. Agreement extends over SU∖JUS_{U}\setminus J_{U}: the first support-cohomology module has no sections supported on a smaller-dimensional subset. For example, this follows from the Cousin resolution of the smooth dualizing sheaf, whose first term supported on SUS_{U} is a sum of injective modules at its codimension-cc generic points. It extends across JUJ_{U} by localization. Hence the inclusion is the one stated in the lemma, not merely an abstract isomorphism of coherent sheaves.

Finally use a graph embedding followed by a smooth projection to compute g+g_{+}. At filtration zero the relative Spencer complex has only its top term, namely the direct image of B∣SU\mathcal{B}|_{S_{U}} on the graph. Projective strictness gives

F<0MU=0,F0MU=R1g∗(B∣SU),F_{<0}M_{U}=0,\qquad F_{0}M_{U}=R^{1}g_{*}(\mathcal{B}|_{S_{U}}),

and identifies this sheaf with its actual submodule in the unfiltered degree-one direct image. The constructions used here are canonical on etale changes of charts.

Lifting through the infinitesimal neighborhoods

Let I=OX(−S)I=\mathcal{O}_{X}(-S). The etale object SU→SS_{U}\to S extends uniquely and compatibly over every nilpotent thickening qSqS; denote its extension by qSUqS_{U}. These are quasi-projective schemes by Proposition C.3: they are separated and quasi-finite over XX, hence are open in schemes finite over the projective variety XX. Powers and quotients of II below are pulled back to the respective thickenings.

Proposition D.3. For every such chart UU, every j≥0j\geq0, and every k≥1k\geq1, the transition

g∗(Ij/Ij+k+1)⟶g∗(Ij/Ij+k)g_{*}(I^{j}/I^{j+k+1})\longrightarrow g_{*}(I^{j}/I^{j+k})

is surjective as a map of sheaves of abelian groups. Its kernel is OTU⊗CU−j−k\mathcal{O}_{T_{U}}\otimes\mathcal{C}^{-j-k}_{U}, where TU=T×YU\mathcal{T}_{U}=\mathcal{T}\times_{Y}U. The statements are compatible with further etale changes of charts. On an affine chart, these transitions are also surjective on global sections.

Proof. Define

Ej,k=g∗(Ij/Ij+k),j≥0,k≥1.E_{j,k}=g_{*}(I^{j}/I^{j+k}),\qquad j\geq0,\quad k\geq1.

Here g∗g_* uses the underlying topological map. We do not assume that a thickening already has a ringed-space map to UU. The first graded layer is

Ej,1=OTU⊗C−j.E_{j,1} = \mathcal{O}_{T_U} \otimes C^{-j}.

The exact sequence for adjacent lengths has kernel g∗OSU⊗C−j−kg_*\mathcal{O}_{S_U} \otimes C^{-j-k}, and its connecting homomorphism takes values in

R1g∗OSU⊗C−j−k.R^1g_*\mathcal{O}_{S_U} \otimes C^{-j-k}.

Induct on kk, proving the assertion simultaneously for all jj. Assume all shorter transitions are surjective. A section of Ej,kE_{j,k} with zero length-one term comes from Ej+1,k−1E_{j+1,k-1} when k>1k>1. By induction it locally lifts from Ej+1,kE_{j+1,k}, so its connecting class is zero. Also Ej,k→Ej,1E_{j,k} \to E_{j,1} is surjective. For k=1k=1 the factorization is immediate. The obstruction therefore factors through a map DkD_k on the graded algebra of length-one layers, with graded shift kk. Choose local lifts and take their Čech differences. The difference of a product is the sum of the two first-order differences; products of the errors vanish in the layer at issue. Thus DkD_k is a C\mathbb{C}-derivation from this graded algebra to the graded R1g∗OSUR^1g_*\mathcal{O}_{S_U}-module.

In degree zero, restrict it along OU→OTU\mathcal{O}_U \to\mathcal{O}_{T_U}. The resulting derivation factors through ΩU1\Omega^1_U, hence defines a section of TU⊗R1g∗OSU⊗C−kT_U \otimes R^1g_*\mathcal{O}_{S_U} \otimes C^{-k}. These local sections descend to

e∈H0(Y,TY⊗R1g∗OS⊗C−k)=H0(Y,TY⊗F0M⊗C−(a+k)).(185)e \in H^0\left(\mathcal{Y},T_\mathcal{Y} \otimes R^1g_*\mathcal{O}_S \otimes C^{-k}\right) = H^0\left(\mathcal{Y},T_\mathcal{Y} \otimes F_0M \otimes C^{-(a+k)}\right). \tag*{(185)}

The equality uses (182), Lemma D.2, and projection formula. For descent, lifts of functions pull back on the unique étale thickenings. Their Čech classes pull back by ordinary flat base change for the coherent obstruction sheaves on the reductions. Differentials pull back and generate under an étale map, proving the asserted compatibility.

Shrink UU and take étale coordinates t1,…,tdt_1,\ldots,t_d, where d=dim⁡Ud=\dim U, and a frame of C−1C^{-1}. Its pullback is a conormal frame, denoted by yy. By induction lift the coordinates along gg modulo IkI^k, and lift yy to I/Ik+1I/I^{k+1}. On an open cover of SUS_U, lift these one step further, obtaining functions hi,λh_{i,\lambda} modulo Ik+1I^{k+1} and generators yiy_i modulo Ik+2I^{k+2}. Formal étaleness of the coordinate map makes each hih_i a local map from (k+1)SU(k+1)S_U to UU. On overlaps write

hj,λ−hi,λ=eij,λyik,yj−yi=ηijyik+1.(186)h_{j,\lambda}-h_{i,\lambda}=e_{ij,\lambda}y_i^k,\qquad y_j-y_i=\eta_{ij}y_i^{k+1}. \tag*{(186)}

The reduced coefficients are Čech cocycles representing Dk(tλ)D_k(t_\lambda) and Dk(y)D_k(y) in the chosen frames. Let σ=y−a\sigma=y^{-a} denote the induced frame of B∣SU\mathcal{B}|_{S_U}.

Off JUJ_U, the fixed adjunction isomorphism gives

ω(k+1)SU≃OX((a+k)S)∣(k+1)SU.\omega_{(k+1)S_U}\simeq\mathcal{O}_\mathcal{X}((a+k)S)|_{(k+1)S_U}.

It therefore defines local dualizing sections bi=yi−(a+k)b_i=y_i^{-(a+k)}. Under the trace inclusion ωSU↪ω(k+1)SU\omega_{S_U}\hookrightarrow\omega_{(k+1)S_U}, the identities

bj−bi=−(a+k)ηijσ,yikbi=σ,yik+1bi=0(187)b_j-b_i=-(a+k)\eta_{ij}\sigma,\qquad y_i^k b_i=\sigma,\qquad y_i^{k+1}b_i=0 \tag*{(187)}

hold when the dualizing sheaves are realized in support cohomology. Indeed the first identity is the binomial expansion of (1+ηijyik)−(a+k)(1+\eta_{ij}y_i^k)^{-(a+k)}; its quadratic terms vanish because 2k≥k+12k\geq k+1. The other two identities describe Cartier trace and the annihilator of the thickening.

Embed (k+1)SU(k+1)S_U as a closed subscheme of a smooth open Z⊂Z‾=PmZ\subset\overline{Z}=\mathbb{P}^m. The graph of the reduced map gg is closed in Z‾×U\overline{Z}\times U, by its properness over UU. Use this reduced graph for an ambient realization of A0,UA_{0,U}. Each local graph lift hih_i maps bib_i, by Ext-to-support cohomology, to a section δi(bi)\delta_i(b_i) of the underlying graph module. We claim that

δj(bj)−δi(bi)=−(a+k)ηijσ+∑λ=1d(eij,λσ)⋅∂tλ.(188)\delta_j(b_j)-\delta_i(b_i)=-(a+k)\eta_{ij}\sigma+\sum_{\lambda=1}^{d}(e_{ij,\lambda}\sigma)\cdot\partial_{t_\lambda}. \tag*{(188)}

The reduced dualizing sections on the right use the inclusion of Lemma D.2.

Here is the local calculation, including the non-smooth case. Put c0=dim⁡Z−Nc_0=\dim Z-N. The Ext-to-support map identifies the dualizing sheaf of the thickening with its annihilator submodule in HSUc0(ωZ)\mathcal{H}^{c_0}_{S_U}(\omega_Z). One can obtain this from the support-cohomology spectral sequence: there is no support cohomology below c0c_0, so in total degree c0c_0 the Ext group is the homomorphisms from the thickening’s structure sheaf into that first support-cohomology module. Thus the calculation does not require SUS_U to be a local complete intersection in ZZ.

Lift hi,λh_{i,\lambda} locally to functions on ZZ. In Z×UZ\times U, the graph inclusion on a thickness-dualizing section bb is the generalized fraction

b dt1∧⋯∧dtd∏λ=1d(tλ−hi,λ).\frac{b\,dt_1\wedge\cdots\wedge dt_d}{\prod_{\lambda=1}^{d}(t_\lambda-h_{i,\lambda})}.

This is successive support cohomology in the additional coordinate equations, or equivalently the Koszul residue for the graph. It may be computed etale-locally near the graph branch. After first taking support cohomology from ZZ, the translated new coordinates form a regular sequence, so their support cohomology is concentrated in their top number. Localization in either set of translated coordinates gives the same localization on this support-torsion module: the two translations differ nilpotently on every section.

Changing from hih_i to hjh_j therefore gives a finite Taylor expansion on bjb_j. Products of two differences in Equation (186) annihilate bjb_j, again because 2k≥k+12k\geq k+1. Its linear term uses

(hj,λ−hi,λ)bj=eij,λσ.(h_{j,\lambda}-h_{i,\lambda})b_j=e_{ij,\lambda}\sigma.

For a top differential form the right action satisfies

(dtλtλ−h)⋅∂tλ=dtλ(tλ−h)2.\left(\frac{dt_\lambda}{t_\lambda-h}\right)\cdot\partial_{t_\lambda}=\frac{dt_\lambda}{(t_\lambda-h)^2}.

Consequently the doubled pole has the positive sign displayed in Equation (188). Together with Equation (187), this proves that identity. The calculation initially takes place off JUJ_U. The sections and identities extend meromorphically across JUJ_U in the unfiltered localized module; arbitrary finite pole orders there are allowed.

Now push by Z‾×U→U\overline{Z}\times U\to U, using relative Spencer. If ii denotes the closed reduced graph embedding and π\pi the projection, closed direct image is perverse exact and π+i+A0,U=g+A0,U\pi_+i_+A_{0,U}=g_+A_{0,U}. Thus degree-one holonomic differential-module cohomology of this Spencer direct image is precisely the underlying module of MU=pH1g∗A0,UM_U={}^{p}H^1g_*A_{0,U}. The cochain (δi(bi))(\delta_i(b_i)) lies in its top, degree-zero term, which has no outgoing relative Spencer differential. Its Cech difference is therefore a boundary in total degree one. A sufficiently refined ambient cover around the closed graph computes this assertion; all sheaves involved are supported there. The reduced cocycles in Equation (188) represent their R1g∗BR^1g_*\mathcal{B} classes inside F0MF_0M, by Lemma D.2. Right differentiation in the UU-coordinates acts on the pushforward complex. Hence the right side of Equation (188) represents zero in the unfiltered module MM.

That right side lies in F1MF_1M; the term involving η\eta lies in F0MF_0M. Since F1MF_1M is an actual subsheaf of MM, its vanishing in MM is vanishing in F1MF_1M. Taking the order-one symbol thus says that the global section ee of Equation (185) is killed by

TY⊗F0M⟶G1FM,(189)T_\mathcal{Y}\otimes F_0M\longrightarrow G_1^F M, \tag*{(189)}

after twisting by C−(a+k)C^{-(a+k)}. This reasoning places no Hodge-filtration bound on the auxiliary cochain (bi)(b_i).

There is no term preceding degree −1-1 in Gr⁡1FDR⁡(M)\operatorname{Gr}^{F}_{1}\operatorname{DR}(M), because F<0M=0F_{<0}M=0. Its degree-−1-1 hypercohomology after the indicated twist is therefore precisely the space of global sections of the kernel of (189). Since a+k>0a+k>0, Lemma D.1 makes that space zero. We conclude that e=0e=0.

In a local coordinate and line trivialization, this says that every class [eij,λσ][e_{ij,\lambda}\sigma] is already zero in F0MF_0M, hence in MM. Its actual differential-operator image is consequently zero, before taking symbols. The unfiltered relation now gives

(a+k)[ηijσ]=0.(a+k)[\eta_{ij}\sigma]=0.

Lowest-piece injectivity and a+k>0a+k>0 imply Dk(y)=0D_k(y)=0. The degree-zero derivation is zero as well: it vanishes on OU\mathcal{O}_U, which surjects onto OTU\mathcal{O}_{T_U}. Locally the whole graded length-one algebra is generated by that coefficient algebra and the conormal frame yy. Thus Dk=0D_k=0 in every degree, proving the induction and all sheaf transitions.

Their kernels are the coherent sheaves OTU⊗C−j−k\mathcal{O}_{T_U}\otimes C^{-j-k}. On an affine UU these have no first cohomology. The exact sequences of sheaves of abelian groups therefore also give surjectivity on global sections. Choosing lifts successively gives compatible formal lifts of any chosen functions on TU\mathcal{T}_U, and, when CC is trivialized, of its transverse conormal frame.

Compact null families and descent

We return to the setting of Theorem C.1, with 0<v<n0<v<n, r=v−1r=v-1, and the geometric construction of Proposition C.3. The infinitesimal lifting result now turns a boundary fiber into a compact subvariety outside the entire boundary.

Proposition E.1. Assume the transition surjectivity of Proposition D.3. There is a dominating algebraic family of integral projective subvarieties of XX of dimension

d=n−1−r=n−vd=n-1-r=n-v

whose general members avoid DD and on which LL is numerically trivial.

Proof. Choose a separated affine étale chart U→YU\to\mathcal{Y} around a general point of a top-dimensional component of TU\mathcal{T}_U. Shrink it so that CC is trivial, this component of TU\mathcal{T}_U is smooth of pure dimension rr, and SUS_U is flat over it. We may also ensure that SUS_U does not meet JUJ_U, because the image of JJ in PP has dimension less than rr. Choose a closed point tt of this open set and regular parameters t1,…,trt_1,\ldots,t_r on TU\mathcal{T}_U cutting out tt alone after further shrinking. Then

F=SU,tF=S_{U,t}

is projective of pure dimension dd, and the pulled-back parameters form a regular sequence along FF.

Put I=OX(−S)I=\mathcal{O}_\mathcal{X}(-S). Proposition D.3 gives surjections between all the sheaves g∗(Ij/Ij+k)g_*(I^j/I^{j+k}) as the length kk increases. Their transition kernels are coherent sheaves of the form g∗OSU⊗C−j−kg_*\mathcal{O}_{S_U}\otimes C^{-j-k}. Since UU is affine, the surjections hold on global sections as well. We may therefore lift the parameters compatibly to all thickenings and lift the chosen conormal frame to a compatible element y~\widetilde{y} generating II formally.

On qSUqS_U, cut out the lifted rr parameters and denote the resulting closed subscheme by ZqZ_q. Give it the structure of a scheme over

Rq=C[s]/(sq),s⟼y~.R_q=\mathbb{C}[s]/(s^q),\qquad s\longmapsto\widetilde{y}.

These schemes are compatible under reduction in qq. Their closed fiber is FF, and they are flat over RqR_q. Indeed the powers of the Cartier generator identify the successive ss-layers of qSUqS_U with OSU\mathcal{O}_{S_U}, proving flatness before cutting. The local flatness criterion then shows that quotienting by lifts of a closed-fiber regular sequence preserves flatness.

The map Zq→X×Spec⁡RqZ_q \to X \times\operatorname{Spec} R_q is quasi-finite. It is proper as well: its reduction is the map from the projective scheme FF, and properness of a finite-type morphism is unchanged by nilpotent thickenings. Hence this map is finite. Let R=C[[s]]R = \mathbb{C}[[s]]. Projective Grothendieck existence, including its full faithfulness, algebraizes the compatible finite algebra sheaves on X×Spec⁡RqX \times\operatorname{Spec} R_q to a finite algebra on XR=X×Spec⁡RX_R = X \times\operatorname{Spec} R; multiplication and the unit algebraize by full faithfulness [72], Lemmas 30.24.1 and 30.24.3. Its relative spectrum is a finite morphism

Z⟶XRZ \longrightarrow X_R

with the prescribed reductions. The scheme ZZ is projective over RR. Formal flatness proves flatness along the closed fiber, and flatness is automatic on the generic fiber over C((s))\mathbb{C}((s)), so ZZ is flat over RR.

The images of the pole and coefficient-zero boundary parts do not meet FF. Their inverse images in ZZ are closed and proper over RR, so they do not meet ZZ: a nonempty closed subset of a proper RR-scheme has specialization in the closed fiber. Away from these parts and the graph exceptional divisor, the root construction identifies the divisor of s0s_0 with ℓS\ell S. The formal generator y~\widetilde{y} therefore supplies compatible trivializations in which

N0∣Z^≃OZ^,s0∣Z^=sℓ.N_0\big\vert_{\widehat{Z}} \simeq\mathcal{O}_{\widehat{Z}}, \qquad s_0\big\vert_{\widehat{Z}} = s^\ell.

Full faithfulness algebraizes this trivialization and the identity. Thus the generic fiber of ZZ avoids also the positive part of DD, and hence all of DD. Its finite image in XC((s))X_{\mathbb{C}((s))} has pure dimension dd. After a finite extension of C((s))\mathbb{C}((s)), a component can be reduced and chosen geometrically integral.

It remains to show that these compact subvarieties cover XX, rather than merely a neighborhood of one point. Choose a positive component DiD_i with image dimension rr, and a component of SS covering it. As the general chart and the point tt vary, images of points of FF contain a dense open subset of DiD_i. Every such point is in the specialization of a dd-dimensional generic finite image constructed above. Indeed flatness over the discrete valuation ring rules out vertical components of ZZ, and the dimension formula shows that the closures of its generic components have special-fiber components of dimension dd. Their finite images retain that dimension.

Consider now all Hilbert schemes of dd-dimensional subvarieties of XX. Their geometrically integral loci whose members avoid DD admit a countable stratification by integral parameter spaces with irreducible universal families. Let WαW_\alpha be the irreducible closures in XX of the corresponding evaluation images. A generic image over a field extension determines a Hilbert point of one of these strata. Properness of the Hilbert scheme gives its specialization, so every point of the dense open subset of DiD_i just described lies in some WαW_\alpha.

Over the uncountable field C\mathbb{C}, an irreducible variety cannot have a dense open covered by countably many proper closed subsets. Therefore one WαW_\alpha contains DiD_i. It also contains points outside DD, by its definition. Since DiD_i is a prime divisor in the integral variety XX, the only proper irreducible closed subset containing it is DiD_i itself. Consequently Wα=XW_\alpha= X, giving a dominating family. On every member of this family, the rational section s0s_0 is regular and nowhere zero, since the member avoids DD. It trivializes N0N_0, so LL is numerically trivial there. ∏का

Descent along the nef reduction

Lemma E.2. Let f:Y→Bf:Y \to B be a surjective projective morphism from a normal integral variety to a smooth projective variety, with geometrically connected integral generic fiber. Suppose all fibers have dimension at most dim⁡Y−dim⁡B\dim Y-\dim B. Let GYG_Y be a vertical Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier divisor that is relatively nef. Then

GY=f∗GBG_Y=f^{*}G_B

for a Q\mathbb{Q}-divisor GBG_B on BB.

Proof. If BB is a point, a vertical divisor is zero. If the relative dimension is zero, the fiber bound makes ff finite; its geometrically integral connected generic fiber makes it birational, and normality of BB makes it an isomorphism. Both cases are immediate. Assume henceforth that the base and the relative dimension are positive.

The fiber bound implies that every vertical prime divisor maps onto a prime divisor of BB. For each such base prime PP, write the full pullback as f∗P=∑jmjEjf^{*}P=\sum_j m_jE_j and let bjb_j be the coefficient of GYG_Y along EjE_j, including zero coefficients. Give PP coefficient min⁡j(bj/mj)\min_j(b_j/m_j) in GBG_B. Only finitely many coefficients are nonzero. Then

R′=GY−f∗GBR'=G_Y-f^{*}G_B

is effective, vertical, Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier, relatively nef, and misses at least one component over each base prime. We prove that R′=0R'=0.

If R′≠0R'\ne0, choose a base prime below its support. Take a general complete-intersection curve in BB meeting that prime at a general point; when dim⁡B=1\dim B=1 use BB itself. Its inverse image in YY is normal by normal Bertini. It is integral: generic geometric integrality gives the dominating component, and the fiber bound excludes additional vertical components. Next take dim⁡Y−dim⁡B−1\dim Y-\dim B-1 general very ample hyperplanes upstairs. This produces a normal integral surface over the base curve with geometrically connected generic fiber. At the chosen general base point, the cuts retain curves in the residual support and in a missing component of the full pullback; these curves are distinct because the original components were distinct at the generic point of the base prime.

Resolve the surface. The pulled-back residual divisor is effective, vertical, and relatively nef. Its intersection with the full fiber is zero, whereas its intersection with each fiber component is nonnegative. Every one of the latter intersections is therefore zero. The intersection matrix of a connected surface fiber is negative semidefinite with kernel generated by the full fiber. Thus the residual part at the chosen point is a multiple of that full fiber. A missing component forces this multiple to be zero, contradicting the component in its support. Connectedness of the fiber follows from generic connectedness and Stein factorization over the normal base curve. □

Completion of the proof of Theorem C.1. Lemma C.2 handles ν=0\nu=0 and ν=n\nu=n. In the remaining case, combine Propositions C.3, D.3, and E.1.

Apply the nef-reduction theorem to a Cartier multiple of LL [5] [Theorem 2.1]. It gives an almost holomorphic rational map with connected fibers, with LL numerically trivial on its compact general fibers, and with positive LL-degree on every noncontracted curve through a very general point of XX. Let its base dimension be bb. A compact LL-trivial dd-fold through such a point is contracted: otherwise general ample slices through the point yield a noncontracted curve of LL-degree zero. Hence

b≤n−d=ν.b \le n-d=\nu.

Resolve the graph, flatten the main component over a modification of the base, resolve that base, and normalize the main transform. We obtain projective morphisms

Y→πXf↓B\begin{CD} Y @>{\pi}>> X \\ @V{f}VV \\ B \end{CD}

with π\pi birational, BB smooth, YY normal, and geometrically connected integral generic fiber of ff. All fibers have dimension at most n−bn-b. Indeed the flat main transform remains integral after the base modification by flatness and generic integrality, and finite normalization preserves the fiber-dimension bound. Normalization need not preserve flatness; only this bound is used.

The pullback π∗D\pi^*D has no horizontal component. To see this, restrict to a very general fiber of ff. The class of π∗L\pi^*L is numerically trivial there, and π∗(L−cD)\pi^*(L-cD) restricts to a pseudo-effective class. The latter assertion follows by restricting effective approximants, avoiding the countably many fibers contained in their supports. Its restricted class is −cπ∗D-c\pi^*D. A negative nonzero effective divisor on a projective variety cannot be pseudo-effective, as intersection with an ample power shows. Thus the restriction of π∗D\pi^*D is zero. In particular b=0b=0 would force D=0D=0, contrary to v>0v>0.

Consequently GY=π∗GG_Y=\pi^*G is vertical and is relatively nef, since GY∼Qπ∗LG_Y\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}\pi^*L. Lemma E.2 gives

π∗L∼Qf∗GB\pi^*L\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}f^*G_B

for a Q\mathbb{Q}-divisor GBG_B on the smooth base. It is nef: every curve of BB is dominated by a curve of YY, on which the pullback has nonnegative degree. The intersection formula for a pullback gives ν(X,L)≤b\nu(X,L)\le b. Combined with b≤vb\le v, this yields b=vb=v and GBb>0G_B^b>0. Therefore GBG_B is big. Pulling back sections gives κ(X,L)≥b=v\kappa(X,L)\ge b=v, and the general inequality κ(X,L)≤ν(X,L)\kappa(X,L)\le\nu(X,L) for a nef divisor proves abundance.

Geometric exclusions for a nonvanishing counterexample

Throughout this section we assume the lower-dimensional good-model hypothesis of Assumption B.1. We suppose, towards a contradiction, that XX is smooth projective of dimension n>0n>0 and

KX is pseudo-effective,κ(X,KX)=−∞.(190)K_X\ \text{is pseudo-effective},\qquad\kappa(X,K_X)=-\infty. \tag*{(190)}

These properties persist on smooth projective birational models. All varieties in this section are complex. Numerical dimension for a pseudo-effective divisor means Nakayama’s numerical dimension κσ\kappa_\sigma; for a nef divisor it agrees with the intersection definition used in Theorem C.1.

The Albanese reduction and algebraic webs

Lemma F.1. Every smooth projective birational model of XX has irregularity zero. Consequently, on such a model, or on a projective Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial terminal birational model, numerical equivalence of rational divisors implies their Q\mathbb{Q}-linear equivalence.

Proof. If q(X)>0q(X)>0, resolve the Stein factorization of the Albanese map to obtain a morphism f:W→Bf:W\to B with connected fibers, with W,BW,B smooth projective and dim⁡B>0\dim B>0. The map from BB to a subvariety of Alb⁡(X)\operatorname{Alb}(X) is generically finite. Wedges of invariant one-forms on the abelian variety therefore give a nonzero section of KBK_B; at the generic point, choose dim⁡B\dim B independent pulled-back one-forms. Thus κ(B,KB)≥0\kappa(B,K_B)\ge0. For a very general smooth fiber FF, the restriction of the pseudo-effective class KWK_W is pseudo-effective. For example, restrict a positive current representing it to almost every fiber, or use effective approximations with arbitrarily small ample error. Adjunction identifies this restriction with KFK_F. If FF has positive dimension, the induction hypothesis gives κ(F,KF)≥0\kappa(F,K_F) \ge0; for a point the same assertion holds by convention. Applying Assumption A.1 with both boundaries empty gives κ(W,KW)≥0\kappa(W,K_W) \ge0, contradicting (190).

This is the only use of Assumption A.1 in the proof. Irregularity is a smooth birational invariant. Finally, when Pic⁡0=0\operatorname{Pic}^{0}=0, a numerically trivial line bundle is torsion, since the group of numerically trivial line bundles modulo Pic⁡0\operatorname{Pic}^{0} is finite. Clear denominators for rational divisors. On a terminal Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial model, pull back to a smooth resolution and then descend the rational linear equivalence.

We use covering families of proper subvarieties through very general points. They can be parameterized in countably many algebraic families, using Hilbert schemes followed by resolution and stratification. After shrinking a parameter space, the domains form a smooth projective family with integral fibers and have a dominant evaluation map. If the fiber maps are generically finite onto their images, general ample cuts of the parameter space make the total evaluation generically finite and still dominant. We always resolve and compactify this evaluation when applying ramification. Invariance of plurigenera for smooth projective families [65], Theorem 1, permits the same construction for the Iitaka fibers of general members: choose a divisible pluricanonical system on the general member, spread it by base change, and resolve its relative rational map.

Lemma F.2 (Algebraic web quotient). Let a smooth projective variety be dominated generically finitely by the total space of a family with smooth integral projective general fibers. On a dense regular open, form the distribution generated by the tangent spaces of the fiber images, taking spans, saturation, and Lie brackets. Its general leaves are dense opens of algebraic subvarieties. Their closures are the general fibers of a rational map, which has connected general fiber after Stein factorization.

Proof. Shrink to an open UU where the evaluation has finitely many etale sheets, the parameter map is smooth, and the generated involutive distribution F\mathcal{F} has constant rank. Its construction is algebraic: spans and brackets stabilize at the generic point after finitely many operations, and descend from the etale sheets. The nonempty open parts of the integral parameter fibers are connected. We use only chains of fiber-image steps lying in UU.

For x∈Ux \in U, endpoints of chains of at most kk steps form a constructible set, by the algebraic fiber-product construction and Chevalley’s theorem. Every endpoint lies in the analytic leaf through xx. A locally closed smooth variety contained in an analytic leaf has dimension at most rk⁡F\operatorname{rk}\mathcal{F}. Indeed, in a Frobenius chart the leaf meets at most countably many plaques: use finite plaque chains in a countable foliation atlas. The transverse coordinate map on any connected smooth piece then has countable image and is constant.

There is therefore a maximal dimension among the closures of all such endpoint loci; it is attained for some finite kk. The loci are nested because we allow at most kk steps, including the identity step. Choose an irreducible component VV of maximal dimension and a dense open O⊂VO \subset V of reachable points. For each etale sheet, restrict its fiber-equivalence relation to first coordinate in OO, and take the component through the diagonal section. Its second-image closure contains OO, hence VV, while its second image consists of endpoints reachable in at most k+1k+1 steps. Maximality forces that closure to equal VV. At a general diagonal point, smoothness of the parameter map identifies its vertical tangent with the corresponding web tangent. Every web tangent is consequently tangent to VV, and so is every bracket. Hence dim⁡V≥rk⁡F\dim V \ge\operatorname{rk}\mathcal{F}, while the reverse inequality was proved above. A plaque is thus open in VV. The equations of VV, pulled back to the connected immersed leaf, vanish on a nonempty open and hence on the entire leaf. Its closure is exactly VV.

These rank-dimensional invariant subvarieties have countably many Hilbert or Chow parameter spaces. Tangency on the regular locus is an algebraic condition after stratification, so one such family dominates. An invariant irreducible variety meeting UU contains the leaf through any of its points in UU: the tangent vector fields preserve its reduced ideal, first on its smooth locus and then everywhere by closure. A rank-dimensional leaf closure is therefore unique through a general point. Assigning that closure gives the desired rational map. Resolve its graph and take the Stein factorization. □

For positive closed (1,1)(1,1)-currents we shall use this quotient in the following way. If a current vanishes on almost every parameter fiber away from a fixed removed divisor, it annihilates the corresponding fiber tangents on a dense open. In submersion coordinates, choose locally integrable plurisubharmonic potentials. Fubini’s theorem makes the pure fiber Hessian zero as a distribution; positivity then makes the mixed coefficients in fiber directions zero as well. A generically etale evaluation transfers this assertion to the target. Annihilation passes to brackets by the identities

LvT=d(ιvT)+ιv(dT),ι[v,w]T=Lv(ιwT)−ιw(LvT).\mathcal{L}_vT=d(\iota_vT)+\iota_v(dT), \qquad\iota_{[v,w]}T=\mathcal{L}_v(\iota_wT)-\iota_w(\mathcal{L}_vT).

Pullbacks by dominant morphisms and restrictions to almost every smooth parameter fiber are defined by the same local potentials.

The general-type exclusion

Proposition F.3. Every positive-dimensional proper subvariety through a very general point of XX is of general type on resolution. The assertion holds also on every projective birational model.

Proof. Otherwise take a covering family of nongeneral-type subvarieties, with smooth domains VV, and slice its parameters as above. Restricting the ramification formula of its generically finite total evaluation shows that KVK_V dominates the restriction of the pulled-back KXK_X by an effective divisor. Thus KVK_V is pseudo-effective. The induction hypothesis gives a good minimal model of VV, so κ(V)≥0\kappa(V)\ge0. Since VV is not of general type, its general Iitaka fibers have positive dimension and Kodaira dimension zero. Spreading these fibers gives another covering family with smooth domains GG, of dimension less than nn, and κ(G)=0\kappa(G)=0. Each GG has a good minimal model and κσ(KG)=0\kappa_\sigma(K_G)=0.

Fix a positive current TT representing KXK_X. After slicing and resolving the total evaluation of the GG’s, its restriction to almost every parameter fiber, plus the effective restricted ramification divisor, is a positive current in KGK_G. Every positive current in that class is supported on the fixed canonical divisor of GG. To see this, take a common resolution with its good minimal model. The latter has torsion canonical divisor, so the canonical divisor upstairs is effective exceptional. Intersection with a pullback of an ample class to the power dim⁡G−1\dim G-1 forces any such positive current to vanish off the exceptional locus. The support theorem makes it divisorial, and independence of exceptional divisor classes, by negativity, fixes its coefficients. Pushing down proves the assertion on GG. The excluded support is algebraic in the family: it is the fixed divisor of a sufficiently divisible relative pluricanonical system after shrinking the parameter space.

It follows that TT annihilates the web distribution of the GG’s on a dense open. If that distribution has full rank, TT is supported on a proper algebraic set. The support theorem for positive closed (1,1)(1,1)-currents expresses it as a finite nonnegative real combination of prime divisors [69, 24]. Its rational cohomology class then has a nonnegative rational representative: solve the finite rational linear system for the coefficients on the same face of the nonnegative orthant. Lemma F.1 converts numerical effectivity to Q\mathbb{Q}-linear effectivity, a contradiction.

Otherwise Lemma F.2 gives a rational quotient with general smooth fiber FF on a smooth resolved graph, where 0<dim⁡F<n0 < \dim F < n. Its canonical divisor is pseudo-effective. The moving GG’s still generate its tangent space at general points. Indeed the quotient is constant on every general web member, hence induces a rational map on their parameter space; restricting to a general quotient fiber preserves dominance of evaluation. A pluricanonical rational map of FF is constant along each such GG. Slice the parameters inside FF to make the total evaluation generically finite: ramification injects the restricted pluricanonical sections into sections of a multiple of KGK_G, and these span a space of dimension at most one. Consequently their ratios are constant on GG. Their differentials vanish on the web and its brackets, so the pluricanonical map is constant on FF. Lower-dimensional nonvanishing therefore gives κ(F)=0\kappa(F) = 0, and its good minimal model gives κσ(KF)=0\kappa_\sigma(K_F) = 0.

Now apply the numerical-zero-fiber reduction of Gongyo–Lehmann [38], Theorem 1.3 and Corollary 4.5. For a projective Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial klt rational pair with a connected-fiber morphism and numerical dimension zero on the general fiber, that theorem produces a klt pair on a smooth birational base whose good-minimal-model existence is equivalent. Here the total space is the smooth graph, the boundary is zero, and the base has dimension less than nn. The required numerical dimension is κσ\kappa_\sigma, which is zero by the good model of FF; thus the numerical-dimension qualification, with the corrected convention discussed in [30], Section 3 and Theorem 3.2, causes no issue. The induction hypothesis supplies the base good model, hence nonvanishing upstairs, contradicting (191). □

Corollary F.4. Let YY be a projective Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial terminal birational model of XX. If a rational divisor PP has κ(Y,P)≥1\kappa(Y,P) \geq1, then KY+cPK_Y + cP is big for every rational c>0c > 0. Consequently, if α≠0\alpha\neq0 is a supporting functional of the pseudo-effective cone with α(KY)=0\alpha(K_Y) = 0, then α(P)>0\alpha(P) > 0.

Proof. Resolve a moving subsystem of a multiple of PP. If its map is generically finite, PP is big and the assertion follows from pseudoeffectivity of KYK_Y. Otherwise its general fiber is a proper positive-dimensional subvariety through very general points and is of general type by Proposition F.3. The canonical divisor of the smooth resolution is relatively big, so adding a sufficiently large ample pullback from the image makes it big. Since that pullback is bounded by a multiple of the resolved moving subsystem, pushforward gives KY+aPK_Y + aP big for some a>0a > 0. Convexity with the pseudo-effective KYK_Y, and then addition of the pseudo-effective PP, gives the assertion for every c>0c > 0. A nonzero nonnegative functional on a closed convex cone is strictly positive on its interior. Applying it to KY+cPK_Y + cP proves the last assertion. □

Valuations and positive currents

For a positive closed (1,1)(1,1)-current TT on a smooth projective variety VV, let νE(T)\nu_E(T) denote the generic Lelong number of its pullback at a divisorial valuation EE. The normalization is such that a reduced smooth divisor has generic number one. We write AV(E)=a(E;V,0)A_V(E) = a(E;V,0) for log discrepancy.

Lemma F.5. For a fixed TT and a fixed MM, the set

{νE(T):AV(E)≤M}\{\nu_E(T): A_V(E) \leq M\}

satisfies the ascending chain condition.

Proof. We induct on the integer part of MM; discrepancies over a smooth variety are positive integers. Suppose that a strictly increasing sequence exists, and discard initial terms so its members exceed a fixed positive number cc. Skoda integrability and change of variables give

νE(T)≤AV(E)νX(T)(191)\nu_E(T) \leq A_V(E)\nu_X(T) \tag*{(191)}

at a general point xx of the center. Indeed every exponent smaller than 1/νx(T)1/\nu_x(T) is locally integrable, whereas integrability after pullback imposes the corresponding discrepancy bound. Hence all centers lie in the fixed proper Siu locus {νx(T)≥c/M}\{\nu_x(T) \ge c/M\}, which is algebraic by Siu analyticity and projectivity [69].

If, after passage to a subsequence, the centers lie in a fixed codimension-at-least-two subvariety, principalize its ideal. All lifted centers lie in the exceptional locus, where the relative canonical divisor has positive integral order. The discrepancy bound for the new smooth ambient space has therefore decreased by at least one. Pull back TT and apply induction.

Otherwise the centers lie in a fixed prime divisor DD of the Siu locus. Write T=cD[D]+T′T = c_D[D] + T' with T′T' positive and with zero generic Lelong number along DD. The integers ord⁡E(D)\operatorname{ord}_E(D) are bounded: the fixed effective divisor DD has positive log canonical threshold, and lct⁡(D)ord⁡E(D)≤AV(E)\operatorname{lct}(D)\operatorname{ord}_E(D) \le A_V(E). Pass to a constant order. The residual numbers νE(T′)\nu_E(T') are still strictly increasing, and after discarding a term have a positive lower bound. (191) places their centers in a fixed Siu locus of T′T', which does not contain DD. Their intersection with DD has codimension at least two, so the preceding case applies.

We also record the multiplier-ideal approximation used below [24], Theorems 5.11, 6.27, and 14.2. On a smooth projective variety, if {T}\{T\} is a real algebraic class, one can choose integral line bundles LkL_k such that c1(Lk)−k{T}c_1(L_k) - k\{T\} stays in a bounded, uniformly sufficiently ample set and Lk⊗J(kT)L_k \otimes\mathcal{J}(kT) is globally generated. Round the coefficients of k{T}k\{T\} in a fixed integral basis and add a fixed sufficiently positive integral class. Nadel vanishing and Castelnuovo–Mumford regularity give generation. For every divisorial valuation,

ord⁡EJ(kT)≤kνE(T).(192)\operatorname{ord}_E \mathcal{J}(kT) \le k\nu_E(T). \tag*{(192)}

The local Bergman weight is bounded below by the original weight up to a constant; this inequality persists after pullback and gives (193). These are statements for a fixed current, not uniform assertions over all currents.

Proposition F.6. Let YY be a fixed projective Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial terminal birational model of XX, with KYK_Y nonbig. A positive current in the pullback class of KYK_Y on a smooth resolution cannot, on a dense regular Zariski open, annihilate the tangent spaces of the general fibers of a rational fibration of positive relative dimension.

Proof. Suppose otherwise, and choose a connected-fiber quotient of minimal base dimension bb. If b=0b = 0, the current vanishes on a dense open; the divisorial-current argument in Proposition F.3 contradicts (191). Thus 0<b<n0 < b < n. Resolve the graph and the space carrying the current:

W→pYh↓B\begin{CD} W @>p>> Y \\ @VhVV \\ B \end{CD}

Here W,BW,B are smooth projective and hh has connected general fiber. Flatten the main component over a modification of the base, resolve that base, normalize the main transform, and then resolve upstairs. Every vertical prime on the flat transform maps to a divisor of the base: a prime over base codimension cc would have generic fiber dimension at least n−b+c−1n-b+c-1, whereas all fibers have dimension at most n−bn-b. Consequently every vertical divisor on WW over base codimension at least two is exceptional over YY. This property persists under later resolutions and base modifications: a nonexceptional prime already maps onto a base prime and its generic image is unchanged. For divisors and numerical classes put

TB=p∗h∗.T_B = p_*h^*.

This strict pullback is well defined on numerical classes because YY is Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial: numerical classes upstairs decompose into pulled-back classes from YY and exceptional classes. It preserves pseudoeffectivity. For a higher base model r:B′→Br : B' \to B, its analogue satisfies TB′r∗=TBT_{B'}r^* = T_B, by computing on a common graph. It kills divisors exceptional over BB: otherwise a prime in such a pullback that dominates a divisor of YY would have center of codimension at least two on BB, contrary to the property just established.

Descent of the current. Let TT also denote the pulled-back current on WW. Shrink to a smooth open B0B^0 so that hh is smooth proper, the removed set contains no vertical divisor over B0B^0, and the remaining open in every fiber is nonempty and connected. Away from that fixed removed algebraic set upstairs, TT descends to a positive current S0S^0. Indeed in submersion coordinates the horizontal coefficient distributions are independent of fiber variables by closedness, and the open parts of general fibers are connected. They therefore glue to S0S^0 on B0B^0. The difference T−h∗S0T-h^*S^0 is closed of order zero and supported on the removed algebraic set. The support theorem expresses it as a signed divisor sum; a closed order-zero (1,1)(1,1)-current supported in codimension at least two is zero. Its horizontal coefficients are nonnegative, since a pullback has zero generic Lelong number along a horizontal divisor.

Subtract those finitely many global Siu components from TT, obtaining a positive current T′T' that equals h∗S0h^*S^0 on all of h−1(B0)h^{-1}(B^0). Choose a Kähler form ω\omega representing an ample algebraic class and put d=n−bd=n-b. Fiber integration gives h∗(ωd)=c>0h_*(\omega^d)=c>0, constant on B0B^0, by closedness. The projection formula therefore gives

c−1h∗(T′∧ωd)∣B0=S0.c^{-1}h_*(T'\wedge\omega^d)|_{B^0}=S^0.

The left side defines a global positive closed extension. Its class is real algebraic, since {T′}\{T'\} is the algebraic class p∗KYp^*K_Y minus real divisor classes and algebraic intersection and pushforward preserve such classes. Remove its divisorial parts along B∖B0B\setminus B^0, and call the result SS. On a dense open T=h∗ST=h^*S. Their difference is again closed of order zero, so the same support theorem leaves only a signed divisor sum. It has nonnegative coefficients at every prime dominating a base prime. For the latter assertion, the generic local map is a transverse power map times a submersion. A current with zero generic Lelong number along the base prime has zero generic number at such an upstairs prime: local target balls of a radius equal to a fixed power of the source radius give the usual Lelong comparison. The only possible negative coefficients lie over base codimension at least two and are exceptional over YY. It follows that

KY−TB{S} is pseudo-effective.(193)K_Y-T_B\{S\}\ \text{is pseudo-effective}. \tag*{(193)}

Horizontal parts subtracted above merely contribute effective divisors to this difference.

A negative canonical direction on the base. Choose a nonzero supporting functional α\alpha of the pseudo-effective cone at KYK_Y, and put η=TB∗α\eta=T_B^*\alpha. The corresponding functionals η′\eta' on higher smooth base models are movable classes by pseudo-effective/movable duality [12], Theorem 0.2. They annihilate base-exceptional divisors. Equation (193) gives η⋅{S}=0\eta\cdot\{S\}=0.

Only finitely many prime divisors on BB have positive divisorial Lelong coefficient for SS. Otherwise their nonzero strict pullbacks are effective divisors on YY killed by α\alpha, with pairwise disjoint prime supports. The supports are disjoint because a nonexceptional prime of YY cannot map into the intersection of two base primes. Only finitely many base primes have zero strict pullback, since their total pullbacks are supported in the finite exceptional locus of pp. In the finite-dimensional rational space of divisor classes, infinitely many remaining strict pullbacks have a rational relation. Its positive and negative sides are nonzero effective divisors with disjoint support; Lemma F.1 makes the relation Q\mathbb{Q}-linear. They define a moving pencil killed by α\alpha, contradicting Corollary F.4. We claim that

KB⋅η<0.(194)K_B \cdot\eta< 0. \tag*{(194)}

The smooth general fiber FF of hh is of general type by Proposition F.3. The relative-positivity theorem of Kovács–Patakfalvi [57] applies to a log canonical fiber space with smooth base, SNC total pair, and log-general-type geometric generic fiber; for a rational base divisor MM with κ(M)≥0\kappa(M) \ge0, it gives relative subadditivity with the term h∗Mh^*M. Here both spaces are smooth projective, the boundary is zero, and we take M=0M = 0. Invariance of plurigenera on the smooth locus identifies the generic-fiber Kodaira dimension with that of FF. Thus

κ(W,KW−h∗KB)≥κ(F,KF)=n−b>0.(195)\kappa(W, K_W - h^*K_B) \ge\kappa(F, K_F) = n - b > 0. \tag*{(195)}

This is an established general-type-fiber theorem, not another use or strengthening of Assumption A.1. Choose compatible canonical divisors and set P=KY−TB(KB)=p∗(KW−h∗KB)P = K_Y - T_B(K_B) = p_*(K_W - h^*K_B). For every sufficiently divisible mm, pushing forward an effective divisor div⁡W(φ)+m(KW−h∗KB)\operatorname{div}_W(\varphi) + m(K_W - h^*K_B) gives div⁡Y(φ)+mP≥0\operatorname{div}_Y(\varphi) + mP \ge0. The resulting injection of sections preserves their ratios, so κ(Y,P)≥1\kappa(Y, P) \ge1. Corollary F.4 now gives 0<α(P)=−KB⋅η0 < \alpha(P) = -K_B \cdot\eta, proving (195).

Rational curves and an exact zero gap. Apply the multiplier approximation to SS on BB, and principalize J(kS)\mathcal{J}(kS) by rk:Bk→Br_k : B_k \to B. If FkF_k is its divisor, the class

Pk=rk∗Lk−FkkP_k = \frac{r_k^*L_k - F_k}{k}

is nef. Put ηk=TBk∗α\eta_k = T_{B_k}^*\alpha. Since it kills exceptional divisors and Lk−k{S}L_k - k\{S\} stays bounded,

0≤Pk⋅ηk=O(k−1),KBk⋅ηk=KB⋅η<0.0 \le P_k \cdot\eta_k = O(k^{-1}), \qquad K_{B_k} \cdot\eta_k = K_B \cdot\eta< 0.

For a fixed ample HH on BB, polarize by Pk+k−1rk∗HP_k + k^{-1}r_k^*H plus a sufficiently small rational ample class on BkB_k. Approximate ηk\eta_k by positive sums of covering-curve classes. Discard terms with nonnegative canonical degree. Some remaining covering curve has the ratio of polarization degree to anticanonical degree O(k−1)O(k^{-1}). Quantitative bend-and-break [59], Theorem 5, supplies rational curves through its general points with polarization degree at most 2dim⁡B2\dim B times that ratio. Parameterization and uncountability give a covering family of rational curves RkR_k satisfying

Pk⋅Rk=O(k−1),H⋅rk∗Rk=O(1).(196)P_k \cdot R_k = O(k^{-1}), \qquad H \cdot r_{k*}R_k = O(1). \tag*{(196)}

The general parametrized member is free in characteristic zero. Consequently KBk⋅Rk≤−2K_{B_k} \cdot R_k \le-2, and

0≤KBk/B⋅Rk=KBk⋅Rk−KB⋅rk∗Rk=O(1).(197)0 \le K_{B_k/B} \cdot R_k = K_{B_k} \cdot R_k - K_B \cdot r_{k*}R_k = O(1). \tag*{(197)}

Here the upper bound follows from the fixed ample-degree bound in (197). Write R‾k=rk∗Rk\overline{R}_k = r_{k*}R_k. Every positive contact with an exceptional prime contributes a positive integer discrepancy times a positive integer contact degree to (198). Thus the number of such contacts, their discrepancies, and their contact degrees are uniformly bounded. Contacts with the finitely many strict transforms of divisorial Delong components of SS are bounded by their fixed degrees against R‾k\overline{R}_k. Subtracting these divisorial parts from rk∗Sr_k^*S leaves a positive current. Using (193) and (197) gives

0≤{S}⋅R‾k−∑EνE(S) E⋅Rk≤{S}⋅R‾k−(Fk/k)⋅Rk≤O(k−1).(198)0 \leq\{S\}\cdot\overline{R}_k-\sum_E\nu_E(S)\,E\cdot R_k \leq\{S\}\cdot\overline{R}_k-(F_k/k)\cdot R_k\leq O(k^{-1}). \tag*{(198)}

The sum includes exceptional primes and those strict divisorial components; terms with zero contact are irrelevant.

Bounded ample degree gives only finitely many numerical classes of the integral cycles R‾k\overline{R}_k. Pass to one class. By Lemma F.5, the sums in (198) belong to an ACC set: there are a bounded number of terms, their nonnegative integral multiplicities are bounded, and all relevant discrepancies are bounded. Finite sums of this kind preserve ACC, by successively taking nonincreasing subsequences of their entries. The nonnegative gaps in (198) must therefore equal zero for some covering families. Otherwise a sequence tending to zero has a strictly decreasing positive subsequence, giving a strictly increasing sequence of the complementary sums.

For such a family the residual positive current restricts to degree zero on almost every RkR_k, and hence vanishes there. Off its removed divisors it is the original current. The discussion following Lemma F.2 and that lemma itself yield a positive-relative-dimensional rational quotient of BB whose vertical directions are annihilated by SS on an open. Composing with hh gives a quotient of smaller base dimension whose vertical directions are annihilated by TT, contradicting the choice of bb. □

Excluding normalized bounded curves

Run a canonical LMMP on XX with scaling of a fixed very ample rational divisor AA. For rational t>0t>0, its positive-threshold stages give terminal Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial models YtY_t on which Kt+tAtK_t+tA_t is nef, big, and semiample [9]. There are only finitely many divisorial contractions, since each lowers Picard number. Fix a late model YY after the last such contraction. All subsequent maps Y⇢YtY\dashrightarrow Y_t are small, and are canonical nonpositive birational maps. If the program terminates, use the last model repeatedly. Define

μt=vol⁡(KX+tA)1/n.(199)\mu_t=\operatorname{vol}(K_X+tA)^{1/n}. \tag*{(199)}

Since KXK_X is not big, μt→0\mu_t\to0. In particular KYK_Y is nonbig. The transform AtA_t is effective up to rational linear equivalence; all intersections below use general covering curves, which are not contained in a chosen such representative.

Lemma F.7 (Exceptional current comparison). Fix a positive current TT on a smooth resolution in the pullback class of KYK_Y. On a common smooth resolution of Y⇢YtY\dashrightarrow Y_t, write

p∗KY=pt∗Kt+Jt,Jt≥0,p^*K_Y=p_t^*K_t+J_t,\qquad J_t\geq0,

where JtJ_t is exceptional over YtY_t. Then νE(T)≥coeff⁡EJt\nu_E(T)\geq\operatorname{coeff}_E J_t for every prime on that resolution.

Proof. Pass to a common smooth model VV also dominating the fixed resolution carrying TT. Choose on the fixed resolution a sufficiently positive line bundle HH. For sufficiently divisible kk, multiplier approximation gives a globally generated O(kp∗KY+H)⊗J(kT)\mathcal{O}(kp^*K_Y+H)\otimes\mathcal{J}(kT). Pull this system to VV. A general member DkD_k of its underlying effective divisor system has, at every specified prime EE, multiplicity ord⁡EJ(kT)\operatorname{ord}_E\mathcal{J}(kT); global generation after removal of the ideal ensures no additional generic vanishing. Here the notation HH also denotes its pullback to VV. Put Dk′=pt∗DkD'_k=p_{t*}D_k and Ht=pt∗HH_t=p_{t*}H. The first is effective, and both are Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier because YtY_t is Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial. Pushing the rational linear relation gives

Dk′∼QkKt+Ht.D'_k\sim_{\mathbb{Q}} kK_t+H_t.

Thus the exceptional divisor Dk−pt∗Dk′D_k-p_t^*D'_k is rationally equivalent to

kJt+H−pt∗Ht.kJ_t+H-p_t^*H_t.

The two exceptional divisors are equal: their difference is numerically trivial and exceptional, so the negativity lemma applied with both signs makes it zero. Since pt∗Dk′p_t^*D'_k is effective,

coeff⁡EDk≥kcoeff⁡EJt+coeff⁡E(H−pt∗Ht).\operatorname{coeff}_E D_k\geq k\operatorname{coeff}_E J_t+\operatorname{coeff}_E(H-p_t^*H_t).

The last coefficient is fixed for this model and tt. Combining with (192), dividing by kk, and letting k→∞k\to\infty proves the assertion. The same proof can be made on each common model, so the comparison applies to all divisorial valuations needed later. No uniformity in tt of the fixed error is required. □

Proposition F.8. There are no sequences tj↓0t_j\downarrow0 and covering families of curves on YtjY_{t_j}, with smooth projective domains CjC_j, for which both

g(Cj),(Ktj+tjAtj)⋅Cjμtjg(C_j),\qquad\frac{(K_{t_j}+t_jA_{t_j})\cdot C_j}{\mu_{t_j}}

are bounded by a fixed constant. Degrees mean degrees on the domains, or equivalently intersection with their pushforward cycles.

Proof. Suppose such families exist. Slice their parameters and resolve total evaluation, the map to the fixed YY, the fixed smooth resolution carrying TT, and the common models comparing YY and YtY_t. Denote the resulting generically finite dominant morphism by qt:Ut→Yq_t:U_t\to Y. The source is smooth near its complete general parameter fiber and has dimension nn, with parameter space of dimension n−1n-1. Rational maps from this smooth source to each required proper target extend at codimension-one points by the valuative criterion of properness. Their indeterminacy loci consequently have codimension at least two, and their images cannot dominate the parameter space. Shrink that space to avoid these finitely many images, and resolve and compactify preserving the remaining open. Equivalently, nontrivial smooth-center blowups have codimension-at-least-two centers; a codimension-one Cartier-center blowup is the identity. Thus the complete smooth general parameter fiber is still CtC_t, unchanged as a curve, and its genus is unchanged.

For a prime ZZ of UtU_t exceptional over YY, the restricted valuation of its function field is rZord⁡Er_Z\operatorname{ord}_E for a divisorial valuation EE over YY. The coefficient of ZZ in the ramification difference is

coeff⁡Z(KUt−qt∗KY)=rZa(E;Y,0)−1.(200)\operatorname{coeff}_Z(K_{U_t}-q_t^*K_Y)=r_Za(E;Y,0)-1. \tag*{(200)}

This follows by factoring through a model extracting EE and calculating the tame ramification of DVRs. It is positive and bounded away from zero: YY is terminal, so a(E;Y,0)>1a(E;Y,0)>1, and a fixed Cartier index of KYK_Y puts discrepancies in a fixed rational lattice. The remaining ramification coefficients are nonnegative. On the general parameter fiber,

KUt⋅Ct=2g(Ct)−2,qt∗KY⋅Ct≥0.K_{U_t}\cdot C_t=2g(C_t)-2,\qquad q_t^*K_Y\cdot C_t\geq0.

The latter inequality follows from pseudoeffectivity and the covering property. Therefore the total ramification cost is bounded. Formula (200) bounds the number of positive exceptional contacts, their discrepancies, their ramification indices, and their integral contact degrees. Moreover qt∗KY⋅Ctq_t^*K_Y \cdot C_t lies in a fixed rational lattice inside a bounded interval, so takes only finitely many values.

The generic Lelong number of qt∗Tq_t^*T at ZZ is rZνE(T)r_Z\nu_E(T). Extract EE, remove its generic divisorial part, and use the transverse-power-map comparison for the zero-generic-number remainder. Lemma F.7 shows that these coefficients dominate the coefficients of the pulled-back canonical difference JtJ_t. Its support is exceptional over YY as well as YtY_t, since the map between these models is small. Subtracting all exceptional divisorial parts of qt∗Tq_t^*T leaves a positive current. Consequently

0≤qt∗KY⋅Ct−∑Z exceptionalrZνE(T)Z⋅Ct≤Kt⋅Ct≤(Kt+tAt)⋅Ct=O(μt).(201)0 \leq q_t^*K_Y \cdot C_t-\sum_{Z\ \mathrm{exceptional}} r_Z\nu_E(T)Z \cdot C_t \leq K_t \cdot C_t \leq(K_t+tA_t)\cdot C_t=O(\mu_t). \tag*{(201)}

All divisor contacts used here are nonnegative, since the curves cover the total space.

On the fixed smooth resolution W→YW \to Y, one has

a(E;W,0)=a(E;Y,0)−ord⁡E(KW−p∗KY)≤a(E;Y,0),a(E;W,0)=a(E;Y,0)-\operatorname{ord}_E(K_W-p^*K_Y)\leq a(E;Y,0),

because the relative canonical divisor is effective. Thus Lemma F.5 applies with a fixed bound. The sums in (201) form an ACC set, their number of terms and integral multiplicities being bounded. Pass to a fixed value of qt∗KY⋅Ctq_t^*K_Y \cdot C_t. Since μt→0\mu_t \to0, the exact-zero argument of (198) gives a family for which the left gap is zero.

The residual positive current then restricts to zero on almost every curve in that family. On the dense open away from the removed exceptional divisors it agrees with the original current. Its curve tangents therefore generate, by Lemma F.2, an annihilated rational fibration of positive relative dimension on YY. This contradicts Proposition F.6.

The signed alternative

Proposition F.9. On any model YtY_t, let a signed rational divisor represent KtK_t up to Q\mathbb{Q}-linear equivalence. On a log resolution p:W→Ytp:W \to Y_t, let DD be the reduced SNC divisor consisting of its strict support and all exceptional divisors. Then KW+DK_W+D is big.

Proof. Put P=KW+DP=K_W+D, and suppose it is not big. It cannot have Iitaka dimension at least one: by Corollary F.4, KW+cPK_W+cP would be big, and (1+c)P=(KW+cP)+D(1+c)P=(K_W+cP)+D would then be big as well. Hence κ(W,P)≤0\kappa(W,P)\leq0.

Run the dlt LMMP for PP with ample scaling. The divisor PP has a signed rational representative supported on the floor DD, and its transforms retain that property. Every negative flip must meet the floor: on its complement the representing rational section is nowhere vanishing, so the adjoint has zero degree on every complete curve there. By Proposition B.4, an infinite sequence would eventually have all flips disjoint from the floor, a contradiction. Divisional contractions are finite in number. Thus the program terminates at a Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial dlt log minimal model (Z,DZ)(Z,D_Z).

The boundary is reduced, KZK_Z is pseudo-effective as the birational pushforward of KWK_W, and the nef adjoint has a signed rational representative supported on DZD_Z. Its restriction to DZD_Z is semiample by Proposition B.3. Theorem C.1 applies, with the pseudo-effective perturbation KZK_Z, and gives abundance. Since the Iitaka dimension is at most zero, the numerical dimension is zero. Intersecting KZ+DZ≡0K_Z+D_Z\equiv0 with an ample (n−1)(n-1)-fold product, and using pseudoeffectivity of KZK_Z, forces DZ=0D_Z=0. The signed relation then gives KZ∼Q0K_Z\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}0.

On a common resolution, the pullback of KWK_W is rationally equivalent to a signed divisor exceptional over ZZ. It is pseudo-effective. A positive current in that class has zero intersection with a pullback of an ample class on ZZ to the power n−1n-1, so is supported on the exceptional locus. The support theorem makes it effective divisorial, and independence of exceptional divisor classes by negativity says that the original signed coefficients are these nonnegative coefficients. Thus KWK_W is Q\mathbb{Q}-linearly effective, contradicting (190).

Very-general jet estimates

We retain the counterexample in Equation (190) and the induction hypothesis of Assumption B.1. Thus XX is smooth projective, KXK_X is pseudo-effective, and κ(X,KX)=−∞\kappa(X,K_X)=-\infty, whereas good minimal models exist in smaller dimensions. We use Propositions F.3, F.8, and F.9. Dimension one is impossible, since a smooth curve with pseudo-effective canonical divisor has genus at least one. Hence n=dim⁡X≥2n=\dim X\ge2.

Fix the late terminal Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial model YY from Proposition F.8. Write K=KYK=K_Y and A=AYA=A_Y. The subsequent scaling models YtY_t are small modifications of YY; the transforms AtA_t are effective up to Q\mathbb{Q}-linear equivalence, and Kt+tAtK_t+tA_t is nef, big, and semiample. Put

μt=vol⁡(X,KX+tA)1/n.\mu_t=\operatorname{vol}(X,K_X+tA)^{1/n}.

Here, in the volume on XX, AA denotes the original ample divisor. We have μt→0\mu_t\to0. Choose an integer m>0m>0 with mKmK Cartier.

Normalization and two local tools

Fix a small rational number ϵ>0\epsilon>0. An integer q>0q>0 will be chosen after ϵ\epsilon and before tt. As rational t↓0t\downarrow0, choose positive integers r=r(t)r=r(t) with

rμt⟶ϵ,L=r(K+tA),Lb=L+bmK(0≤b≤q).(202)r\mu_t\longrightarrow\epsilon,\qquad L=r(K+tA),\qquad L_b=L+bmK\qquad(0\le b\le q). \tag*{(202)}

Only rational weights bb are used for model constructions; volume functions in integrals are extended continuously to real weights. The positive part of LbL_b is the nef semiample class

Nb=(r+bm)(Ks+sAs)  on Ys,s=rtr+bm.N_b=(r+bm)(K_s+sA_s)\ \text{ on }Y_s,\qquad s=\frac{rt}{r+bm}.

When emphasizing the weight, denote this axis model by Y(b)=YsY(b)=Y_s and write AbA_b for its transform of $A. All references to positive parts below mean these classes on their scaling models, or their pullbacks to common resolutions. Monotonicity of volume in pseudo-effective order gives

vol⁡(L)≤vol⁡(Lb)≤(1+qmr)nvol⁡(L).(203)\operatorname{vol}(L)\le\operatorname{vol}(L_b)\le\left(1+\frac{qm}{r}\right)^n\operatorname{vol}(L). \tag*{(203)}

Indeed Lb−L=bmKL_b-L=bmK is pseudo-effective, and (1+bm/r)L−Lb=bmtA(1+bm/r)L-L_b=bmtA is effective up to equivalence. Consequently NbnN_b^n is bounded above and bounded away from zero, uniformly for b∈[0,q]b\in[0,q], and tends uniformly to ϵn\epsilon^n. More explicitly, for every fixed qq, once tt is sufficiently small depending on qq,

ϵn2≤Nbn≤2ϵn(0≤b≤q).(204)\frac{\epsilon^n}{2}\le N_b^n\le2\epsilon^n\qquad(0\le b\le q). \tag*{(204)}

The displayed constants are independent of qq. All unspecified constants in this section may depend on n,ϵ,q,Y,A,mn,\epsilon,q,Y,A,m, but not on sufficiently small tt or on bb.

A family of curves with uniformly bounded geometric genus and NbN_b-degree cannot cover the corresponding YsY_s for arbitrarily small tt. In fact s/t→1s/t \to1 uniformly in bb, and

(r+bm)μs=vol⁡(Lb)1/n(r+bm)\mu_s=\operatorname{vol}(L_b)^{1/n}

is bounded above and away from zero. Thus such curves would have uniformly bounded (Ks+sAs)(K_s+sA_s)-degree divided by μs\mu_s, contrary to Proposition F.8. We call this consequence the normalized curve exclusion.

The following numerical form of subadjunction is useful because an auxiliary pair need only be lc at the generic point of its center. All intersections with a divisor on a possibly nonnormal center mean intersections after normalization and resolution.

Lemma G.1 (Numerical subadjunction). Let ZZ be projective and Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial klt, let Θ≥0\Theta\ge0 be rational, and let VV be an lc center of (Z,Θ)(Z,\Theta) at whose generic point the pair is lc. If f=dim⁡V>0f=\dim V>0, PP is a nef Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier class on VV, and V∗→VV^* \to V is a resolution, then

KV∗Pf−1≤(KZ+Θ)∣VPf−1.(205)K_{V^*}P^{f-1}\le(K_Z+\Theta)|_V P^{f-1}. \tag*{(205)}

Proof. The dlt modification for an arbitrary effective boundary [36], Theorem 2.10, applied after truncating coefficients exceeding one, gives

KQ+B+E=p∗(KZ+Θ),K_Q+B+E=p^*(K_Z+\Theta),

where QQ is Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial, (Q,B)(Q,B) is dlt, and E≥0E\ge0 is supported above the non-lc locus. Choose, over the generic point of VV, a minimal lc stratum, and denote its closure by SS. The divisor EE does not contain SS. Iterated dlt adjunction, including the effective restriction of EE, produces an effective divisor BSB_S with

KS+BS∼Q(p∣S)∗((KZ+Θ)∣V).K_S+B_S\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}(p|_S)^*((K_Z+\Theta)|_V).

The pair is klt over the generic point of VV; singularities elsewhere are not asserted to be klt. Factor S→VνS\to V^\nu through its Stein base V′V'. This is a klt-trivial fibration: generic klt, effectivity of the boundary, and connected fibers give the rank-one condition. The canonical bundle formula, in precisely this generically subklt form, gives a discriminant and a b-nef moduli b-divisor [34], Definition 3.1 and Theorem 3.5. The discriminant trace on V′V' is effective. To see the sign, over a generic base prime a divisor in its inverse image has multiplicity at least one and a nonnegative boundary coefficient; the lc threshold of the fiber is therefore at most one. Coefficients exceeding one in the discriminant cause no difficulty for the present inequality.

Intersect the resulting base formula with the pullback of Pf−1P^{f-1}. The moduli term is nonnegative: on a model where it is nef this is a nef intersection, and exceptional terms vanish on pushing down. The effective discriminant is also nonnegative. Finally the codimension-one ramification formula for the finite map V′→VνV'\to V^\nu, followed by projection, can only increase the canonical intersection. Discrepancy terms on resolutions have images of codimension at least two and pair trivially with the pulled-back Pf−1P^{f-1}. Dividing by the finite degree gives (205). □

Lemma G.2 (Tracking a moving base component). Let PP be nef, semiample, and big on a projective dd-fold ZZ. Work at very general smooth marked points xx. Choose d+1d+1 levels

τ0<τ1<⋯<τd,τi+1−τi=δ>0.\tau_0<\tau_1<\cdots<\tau_d,\qquad\tau_{i+1}-\tau_i=\delta>0.

Suppose, in sufficiently large divisible degree kk, all the spaces

νi,x=H0(Z,kP⊗mx⌈kτi⌉)\nu_{i,x}=H^0(Z,kP\otimes\mathfrak{m}_x^{\lceil k\tau_i\rceil})

are nonzero, and the base locus of V0,xV_{0,x} has a positive-dimensional component through xx. Then one obtains an algebraic family of integral components V=VxV = V_x sweeping ZZ, of dimension 0<f<d0 < f < d, and a step for which VV is a component of both successive base loci. At its generic point the higher subseries has an isolated base component VV and vanishes to order at least kδ/2k\delta/2, once kk is sufficiently large. Moreover

Pf⋅V≤(2/δ)d−fPd,P^f \cdot V \le(2/\delta)^{d-f}P^d,
KV∗⋅Pf−1≤(KZ+cP)∣VPf−1,0<c≤2d/δ,(206)K_{V_*}\cdot P^{f-1} \le(K_Z+cP)|_V P^{f-1}, \qquad0 < c \le2d/\delta, \tag*{(206)}

whenever ZZ is Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial klt.

Proof. The base loci increase with the level. Following containing irreducible components through the marked point produces a nested chain of proper positive-dimensional subvarieties. There are only d−1d-1 possible dimensions, so two successive components agree. For fixed degree, jet kernels form vector bundles after shrinking the marked-point parameter space. Components of their base loci spread after a finite parameter extension and further shrinking. We may fix the chosen step, dimension, and component on an irreducible parameter space TT. Its incidence Γ⊂T×Z\Gamma\subset T \times Z dominates ZZ, because it contains the varying marked point.

Here is the multiplicity argument. Regard a local section of the higher kernel bundle as a varying element of the fixed vector space H0(Z,kP)H^0(Z,kP). A parameter derivative of order jj loses at most jj orders of vanishing along the moving diagonal. Thus, for j<kδ−O(1)j < k\delta- O(1), every such derivative belongs to the lower kernel and vanishes on the selected incidence Γ\Gamma. At a general smooth point of Γ\Gamma, the projection Γ→Z\Gamma\to Z is smooth. Therefore the pure parameter directions, together with TΓT\Gamma, span T(T×Z)T(T \times Z). In local coordinates over ZZ, this says that normal coordinates to Γ\Gamma can be chosen among parameter coordinates. Vanishing of all parameter derivatives of orders below hh is consequently equivalent there to membership in IΓI_\Gamma. Restricting to a parameter fiber proves generic multiplicity at least kδ−O(1)k\delta- O(1) along VV, hence at least kδ/2k\delta/2. This applies to a local basis of the higher kernel bundle, and therefore to every section of the higher subseries.

Put a=d−fa=d-f and h=⌈kδ/2⌉h=\lceil k\delta/2\rceil; the stronger bound kδ−O(1)k\delta-O(1) permits this choice for sufficiently large kk. At the smooth generic point of VV, the base ideal is maximal-ideal primary and lies in the hh-th power of that maximal ideal. Cut by a general members of the subseries. Their local intersection multiplicity along VV is at least hah^a. For completeness, global excess base components do not invalidate this bound: at each cut discard components wholly contained in the base locus before the next intersection. None contains the generic point of VV, since VV is a base-locus component. The discarded cycles have nonnegative PP-degree by nefness. The remaining proper intersections therefore have total PfP^f-degree at most kaPdk^aP^d. Since h≥kδ/2h \ge k\delta/2, this gives the first inequality.

The local threshold of this primary ideal is at most a/ha/h: the exceptional divisor of the blowup of its smooth closed point in the aa-dimensional transverse local scheme gives this bound. On a log resolution, a sufficiently long average of general members realizes the ideal threshold by an effective rational divisor Θ∼QcP\Theta\sim_{\mathbb{Q}} cP. It is lc at the generic point of VV, with VV an lc center, and c≤ka/h≤2d/δc \le ka/h \le2d/\delta. Lemma G.1 gives the second inequality. □\square

We record how these estimates give curves rather than merely bounded intersection numbers. Suppose a moving ff-fold VV is of general type, P∣VP|_V is nef and big, and

0<Pf⋅V≤C0,KV∗⋅Pf−1≤C1Pf⋅V.(207)0 < P^f \cdot V \le C_0,\qquad K_{V_*}\cdot P^{f-1} \le C_1P^f\cdot V. \tag*{(207)}

Effective birationality gives a uniform pluricanonical degree whose moving part, on a further resolution, is a big basepoint-free Cartier divisor HH defining a birational morphism [42], Theorem 4.0.1.

Thus HPf−1≤C2Pf.VHP^{f-1} \le C_2P^f.V. Mixed Hodge index gives

HjPf−j≤C2jPf.V(0≤j≤f);H^jP^{f-j} \le C_2^jP^f.V \qquad(0 \le j \le f);

no lower bound on Pf.VP^f.V is needed here. For f>1f > 1, cut by f−1f-1 general members of ∣H∣|H|. The resulting integral curves have bounded PP-degree and are birational to linear curve sections of a projective variety of bounded degree. Generic plane projection bounds their geometric genus. For f=1f = 1, the canonical-degree bound already bounds the genus. The same argument works for a log smooth pair of log general type with reduced boundary, using coefficients in the fixed set {1}\{1\} in effective birationality.

If such components sweep an ambient space mapping to YY, and their curves project nonconstantly with NbN_b-degree bounded by their PP-degree, we obtain forbidden covering curves on YsY_s. Nonconstant projection follows by choosing the complete intersections generally for the big birational system. The curves can be parameterized in covering algebraic families: the components sweep, the choices can avoid any prescribed countable exceptional union, and Hilbert schemes and spaces of maps have only countably many components. We will use this consequence of Equation (207) repeatedly.

Proposition G.3 (Scalar jet bound). For sufficiently small tt, let PP be the positive part of 2r(K+2tA)2r(K + 2tA), and put ρ=(Pn)1/n\rho= (P^n)^{1/n}. At a very general point, every nonzero section of every divisible multiple kPkP has order at most 4kρ4k\rho. The same statement holds on a common resolution after adding an effective exceptional divisor that does not change the section spaces. Moreover

2rμt≤ρ≤4rμt,2r\mu_t \le\rho\le4r\mu_t,

so in particular ρ≤8ϵ\rho\le8\epsilon for small tt.

Proof. The volume bounds follow from pseudo-effectivity of KK:

vol⁡(K+tA)≤vol⁡(K+2tA)≤2nvol⁡(K+tA).\operatorname{vol}(K + tA) \le\operatorname{vol}(K + 2tA) \le2^n\operatorname{vol}(K + tA).

Suppose the asserted order bound fails for arbitrarily small tt. Taking powers of the offending section permits arbitrarily large divisible degrees. Choose n+1n + 1 levels strictly between ρ\rho and 4ρ4\rho, with equal gaps comparable to ρ\rho. All corresponding subseries are nonzero. The base point at the lowest level cannot be isolated: local Bezout for nn general members would exceed the total intersection knPnk^nP^n. Lemma G.2 therefore supplies a moving proper positive-dimensional component VV.

The component is of general type by Proposition F.3. On the scaling model for K+2tAK + 2tA, the effective transform of AA does not contain a general such component, and KZ∣V≤(2r)−1P∣VK_Z|_V \le(2r)^{-1}P|_V in effective order. Equations (207) consequently imply Equation (207) with constants uniform in tt; the gap is bounded above and away from zero because ρ\rho is comparable to the fixed ϵ\epsilon. The resulting bounded-genus, bounded-normalized-degree covering curves contradict Proposition F.8. Exceptional additions preserve sections and their orders at general points, proving the additional assertion. □\square

The two-slot bundle

On Y×YY \times Y, let

Z0=P(mK1⊕mK2),ξ=OZ0(1),M=L1+L2+qξ.(208)Z_0 = \mathbb{P}(mK_1 \oplus mK_2), \qquad\xi= \mathcal{O}_{Z_0}(1), \qquad M = L_1 + L_2 + q\xi. \tag*{(208)}

We use the convention that sections of kξk\xi are symmetric powers of the indicated direct sum. Fixing one base slot gives the one-slot bundle P(OY⊕mK)\mathbb{P}(\mathcal{O}_Y \oplus mK), with class L+qξL + q\xi, up to a constant line from the fixed slot. We call it a slice. The torus open in either bundle is the complement of its two axes.

Lemma G.4 (Models, volume, and weights). *Both the total class MM and the slice class have big semiample positive parts PP on Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial klt models ZZ, with

KZ+Δ∼QctP,Δ≥0,K_Z+\Delta\sim_{\mathbb{Q}} c_tP,\qquad\Delta\geq0,

where ctc_t is bounded independently of small tt. Their volumes satisfy, respectively,

vol⁡(M)=(2n+1)!(n!)2∫0qvol⁡(Lb)vol⁡(Lq−b) db,(209)\operatorname{vol}(M)=\frac{(2n+1)!}{(n!)^2}\int_0^q\operatorname{vol}(L_b)\operatorname{vol}(L_{q-b})\,db, \tag*{(209)}
vol⁡(L+qξ)=(n+1)∫0qvol⁡(Lb) db.(210)\operatorname{vol}(L+q\xi)=(n+1)\int_0^q\operatorname{vol}(L_b)\,db. \tag*{(210)}

In particular both volumes are bounded above and below by positive constants times qq. For each rational weight, on common resolutions,

P∼QNb,1+Nq−b,2+Eb,Eb≥0,(211)P\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}N_{b,1}+N_{q-b,2}+E_b,\qquad E_b\geq0, \tag*{(211)}

with the analogous one-term formula on slices. At a generic point of a base divisor of a slice, and on a general torus fiber, the full system has no fixed subtraction.

Proof. The product Y×YY\times Y is Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial. Indeed on a product resolution the Picard group has no cross term because the smooth models have irregularity zero; the two factorwise Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial descent statements then apply. Products of canonical singularities are canonical, and the projective bundles are klt. The two disjoint Cartier axes form a plt boundary DD, and

KZ0+D=Ksum,D∼2ξ−mKsum.K_{Z_0}+D=K_{\mathrm{sum}},\qquad D\sim2\xi-mK_{\mathrm{sum}}.

The notation KsumK_{\mathrm{sum}} means K1+K2K_1+K_2, or KK on a slice.

For 0<σ≤10<\sigma\leq1, put

γ=2σ+q(1+σm)r,Ξt∼Qξ+(1+σm)tγAsum.\gamma=2\sigma+\frac{q(1+\sigma m)}{r},\qquad\Xi_t\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}\xi+\frac{(1+\sigma m)t}{\gamma}A_{\mathrm{sum}}.

Both endpoint weight systems are big, so there are effective rational representatives of Ξt\Xi_t containing neither axis. We first obtain a threshold bound independent of σ\sigma. Restrict to 0<t≤σ/(1+m)0<t\leq\sigma/(1+m). Since γ≥2σ\gamma\geq2\sigma, the coefficient

a=(1+σm)tγa=\frac{(1+\sigma m)t}{\gamma}

lies in (0,1](0,1]. Thus the numerical classes ξ+aAsum\xi+aA_{\mathrm{sum}}, and their restrictions to either fixed axis, range over bounded segments independent of σ,q,r,t\sigma,q,r,t. On a fixed smooth resolution their effective pullbacks have uniformly bounded degree against a fixed very ample class. That degree bounds their multiplicity at every point, including the coefficients of exceptional components. Rational denominators do not enter this estimate. The smooth lc threshold is at least the reciprocal of maximal multiplicity.

On the fixed klt space, write the crepant boundary on its resolution as an SNC divisor with coefficients below one. The minimum of one and the positive numbers one minus its positive coefficients bounds its log discrepancies below by a fixed positive multiple of smooth log discrepancies. Therefore the preceding smooth bound gives a common threshold η>0\eta>0 on the original space. The same reasoning on the axes gives, after decreasing η\eta, the same bound for both restricted divisors.

Now choose rational 0<σ<min⁡{1,η/4}0<\sigma<\min\{1,\eta/4\}, independently of q,tq,t, and then take tt small enough that t≤σ/(1+m)t\leq\sigma/(1+m) and q(1+σm)/r<σq(1+\sigma m)/r<\sigma. It follows that γ<3σ<η\gamma<3\sigma<\eta. Inversion of adjunction with the disjoint coefficient-one axes gives plt near them; away from them the threshold bound gives klt. Lowering their coefficients to 1−σ1-\sigma consequently shows that

(Z0,(1−σ)D+γΞt)\left(Z_0,(1-\sigma)D+\gamma\Xi_t\right)

is klt. This choice respects the order: first ϵ\epsilon, then qq, then sufficiently small tt with rr as in Equation (202). A direct calculation gives its adjoint class

KZ0+(1−σ)D+γΞt∼Q1+σmrM.K_{Z_0}+(1-\sigma)D+\gamma\Xi_t \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} \frac{1+\sigma m}{r}M.

The big klt adjoint has a good minimal model by [9]. Pushing the boundary to this model gives the stated Δ\Delta and ct=(1+σm)/rc_t=(1+\sigma m)/r.

For the volumes, the weight-ll summand in degree kk has base classes kLl/kkL_{l/k} and kLq−l/kkL_{q-l/k}; on a slice there is one such factor. The section decomposition and asymptotic Riemann–Roch give Equations (209)–(210) as Riemann sums. One can justify passage to the integral without assuming uniform asymptotic Riemann–Roch: partition [0,q][0,q] into rational bins, compare weight classes in each bin by adding and subtracting the bin width times a fixed very ample divisor dominating both mKmK and −mK-mK, take divisible-degree limits, and then shrink the bins. Volume continuity gives the formulas. Equation (203) supplies their uniform bounds and, in particular, proves bigness used above. In the range of Equation (204), the bounds needed when choosing qq are explicitly

vol⁡(M)≥(2n+1)!4(n!)2qϵ2n,vol⁡(L+qξ)≤2(n+1)qϵn.\operatorname{vol}(M)\ge\frac{(2n+1)!}{4(n!)^2}q\epsilon^{2n}, \qquad\operatorname{vol}(L+q\xi)\le2(n+1)q\epsilon^n.

Their coefficients are independent of qq; the smallness threshold for tt is allowed to depend on qq.

Compare a complete system on a common resolution with the subsystem at a fixed rational weight. The latter has fixed divisor consisting of its toric monomial and the base-model fixed differences. Subtracting the fixed divisor of the full system leaves an effective divisor EbE_b; its moving class is precisely the sum of the pullbacks of the indicated NbN_b’s. This proves Equation (211). The same comparison in individual sufficiently divisible degrees shows that every section at that weight, after the full fixed subtraction, contains the corresponding multiple of EbE_b.

At a generic base-divisor point the small base-model maps are isomorphisms. The two endpoint systems are free there in divisible degree, so together they have no common zero on the projective-line fiber. The full system therefore has no fixed subtraction there. The same holds on a general fiber. Finally, when restricting Equation (211) to a component sweeping the torus open, choose a general component not contained in Supp⁡Eb\operatorname{Supp} E_b. There are only countably many rational weights, so these effective restrictions can be required simultaneously. □

For a nef Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier class PP on a projective variety ZZ and a smooth point x∈Zx\in Z, its Seshadri constant is

ϵ(P;x)=inf⁡C⊂Zx∈CP⋅Cmult⁡xC.\epsilon(P;x)=\inf_{\substack{C\subset Z\\x\in C}}\frac{P\cdot C}{\operatorname{mult}_x C}.

Proposition G.5 (Large two-slot Seshadri constant). For each fixed sufficiently small ϵ>0\epsilon>0, there is an integer q>0q>0 such that, for all sufficiently small rational t>0t>0 and rr as in Equation (202), the positive part PP of Equation (208) has

ϵ(P;x)>2n+2\epsilon(P;x)>2n+2

at a very general smooth point of its torus open. In particular, for some sufficiently divisible integer k>0k>0, the complete system ∣kP∣|kP| separates jets of order strictly greater than (2n+2)k(2n+2)k at such a point. The section spaces and these general-point jets agree on the original bundle and on common birational resolutions.

Proof. Write d=2n+1d = 2n + 1. Choose qq sufficiently large that the volume root in (209) admits d+1d + 1 levels above 2n+32n + 3, with equal gap δ\delta as large as needed below. This is possible uniformly for small tt, since the volume is bounded below by a positive constant times qq. Assume that the Seshadri assertion fails for arbitrarily small tt. Jet counts show that the systems at all these levels are nonzero in sufficiently large divisible degree. A curve through the marked point with degree-to-multiplicity ratio below the lowest level is contained in that system’s base locus. Such a curve exists from the assumed Seshadri bound, whether or not the infimum defining the constant is attained. Lemma G.2 supplies a moving proper component VV and both estimates (206).

For all moving components under consideration, the effective boundary Δ\Delta of Lemma G.4 does not contain the component. Thus KZ∣V≤ctP∣VK_Z|_V \leq c_tP|_V in effective order. Whenever VV is of general type, the curve construction following (207) and weight domination give a contradiction. We must also handle components that are not generically finite over a proper base image.

Restriction to a slice. Fix a general value of one slot projection of VV, and suppose the corresponding fiber component FF has 0<dim⁡F<n+10 < \dim F < n + 1. It is an isolated high base component for the restricted subseries on the opposite slice.

We give the local justification. On a common isomorphic torus open, let II be the total high-series base ideal. Remove the other base components from a dense open V∘V^\circ of VV. On an ambient neighborhood UU of its generic point, Supp⁡(OU/I)=V∩U\operatorname{Supp}(\mathcal{O}_U/I) = V \cap U. After restricting VV and its image to smooth opens, generic smoothness makes the general projection fiber generically reduced. A general fiber component FF meets V∘V^\circ, and the ideal of VV restricts to the ideal of FF at its generic point. Near that point, restriction to the slice therefore has support exactly FF; the restricted ideal is maximal-ideal primary there. The inclusion in the hh-th power of the generic ideal of VV restricts to the hh-th power of the generic ideal of FF. The fixed differences of the full and slice models are units on a further common open, so dividing them out does not alter this statement. The restricted global sections are a subseries of the complete slice system after trivializing the fixed-slot lines. Thus the proof of Lemma G.2 applies to FF, using slice volume, with multiplicity at least kδ/2k\delta/2.

These FF’s may be chosen in families sweeping the opposite slice. Indeed the incidence of the VV-family dominates the total torus. Choose a general incidence point, not necessarily the original marked point, and then a general fiber of its first slot evaluation. Dominance gives the required dominant evaluation onto the opposite slice. Generic flatness permits the component choices just made. For each fixed q,tq,t, very general choices also avoid the exceptional sets for all rational weights.

Proper base images on a slice. If FF is generically finite over a proper positive-dimensional image WW in the remaining base, then WW, and hence FF, is of general type by Proposition F.3. The slice estimates, subadjunction, and weight domination give forbidden bounded curves.

Otherwise FF is saturated over its base image WW: on the original bundle it is the full projective-line bundle over WW. Put w=dim⁡W=dim⁡F−1w = \dim W = \dim F - 1. The nef weight comparison gives

qNbw.W≤Pw+1.F.(212)qN_b^w.W \leq P^{w+1}.F. \tag*{(212)}

Indeed P−π∗NbP - \pi^*N_b is effective on the resolved graph, so successive mixed nef intersections give Pw+1.F≥P(π∗Nb)w.FP^{w+1}.F \geq P(\pi^*N_b)^w.F. The latter is qNbw.WqN_b^w.W, since endpoint freeness gives fiber degree qq. If WW is a point, the lower bound qq contradicts the slice Bezout upper bound 2(n+1)qϵn(2/δ)n2(n+1)q^{\epsilon n}(2/\delta)^n, after qq has been chosen to make δ\delta large. In particular the coefficient used in this choice does not depend on qq.

Suppose w>0w > 0. We construct a small adjoint on WW, since the ruled FF itself need not be of general type. In degree kk, expand every section of the high-vanishing slice subseries into its toric weights. At the generic point of WW, let IlI_l be the ideal generated by the coefficients of the nonzero weight ll over all these sections. Put h=⌈kδ/2⌉h=\lceil k\delta/2\rceil. All IlI_l lie in mWh\mathfrak{m}_W^h: vanishing along the generic torus fiber says that the coefficient of every Laurent monomial vanishes to this order. Their sum is mW\mathfrak{m}_W-primary. Otherwise its larger common zero germ, times the generic torus fiber, would contradict isolation of FF.

Work in the regular local ring at the generic point of WW, of dimension c=codim⁡Wc=\operatorname{codim}W. Resolve the finitely many ideals simultaneously and consider the rational lc polytope

ul≥0,∑lulord⁡E(Il)≤a(E;Y,0).u_l\ge0,\qquad\sum_l u_l\operatorname{ord}_E(I_l)\le a(E;Y,0).

Include the exceptional divisor of the blowup of the closed point. Since every Il⊂mWhI_l\subset\mathfrak{m}_W^h, it gives

∑lul≤c/h.\sum_l u_l\le c/h.

The polytope is compact and has a positive rational maximum for ∑lul\sum_l u_l. At a maximizing point, each coordinate participates with positive order in an active inequality; otherwise that coordinate could be increased. The corresponding lc center ClC_l is contained in V(Il)V(I_l) and contains the generic point of WW. Their intersection is contained in V(∑lIl)V(\sum_l I_l), which is WW locally. The intersection property for lc centers [55], Theorem 1.7, applied to the identity morphism on the lc open, therefore makes WW an lc center generically. To realize the ideals, choose an integer M0>max⁡lulM_0>\max_l u_l and M0M_0 general coefficient divisors Dl,jD_{l,j} from each system. Set Θ=∑l(ul/M0)∑j=1M0Dl,j\Theta=\sum_l(u_l/M_0)\sum_{j=1}^{M_0}D_{l,j}. On the simultaneous resolution its fixed crepant coefficients are at most one, and its general moving divisors meet transversely with coefficients below one. Thus the pair is lc near the generic point of WW, and every active valuation remains an lc place. The intersection argument therefore applies to this actual effective rational divisor. It also applies when some maximizing coordinate ulu_l is zero: the active valuation blocking that coordinate still has center in V(Il)V(I_l).

Set

b=∑lul(l/k)∑lul,c′=k∑lul≤kch.b=\frac{\sum_l u_l(l/k)}{\sum_l u_l},\qquad c'=k\sum_l u_l\le\frac{kc}{h}.

Its class on the base is c′Lbc'L_b. Transform to the small scaling model for LbL_b, which is unchanged at the generic point under consideration. There its class is c′Nbc'N_b. Lemma G.1, effective AbA_b, and (212) give bounded adjoint intersection and bounded NbwN_b^w-degree for WW. Since c′c' is bounded by a dimension-dependent multiple of 1/δ1/\delta, these bounds are uniform in tt. The variety WW is of general type by Proposition F.3; normalized curve exclusion again gives a contradiction.

A slice multisection. The remaining proper positive-dimensional slice case is dim⁡F=n\dim F=n, with FF generically finite of degree ee over the whole base. Weight comparison and the slice degree bound give

eNbn≤Pn⋅F,eN_b^n\le P^n\cdot F,

so ee is bounded uniformly in tt. The closure of FF on the original bundle is neither axis. Its intersections with the two axes push to effective integral Weil divisors D1,D2D_1,D_2 on YY, and the projective-bundle relation gives

D1−D2∼Q±emK.(213)D_1-D_2\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}\pm emK. \tag*{(213)}

At the appropriate endpoint weight b∈{0,q}b\in\{0,q\}, the difference Eb∣FE_b|_F contains the corresponding toric-axis intersection with coefficient qq. There is no full fixed subtraction above generic base-divisor points by Lemma G.4. Intersecting with Nbn−1N_b^{n-1} and using mixed nef comparison yields

qNbn−1⋅Di≤Pn⋅F.qN_b^{n-1}\cdot D_i\le P^n\cdot F.

The other divisor has bounded degree for the same NbN_b, because of (213) and

0≤KY(b)Nbn−1≤Nbnr+bm.0\le K_{Y(b)}N_b^{n-1}\le\frac{N_b^n}{r+bm}.

On a log resolution add the reduced strict support of D1+D2D_1+D_2 and all exceptional divisors to the canonical divisor. This log canonical divisor is big by Proposition F.9. Its intersection with the pulled-back Nbn−1N_b^{n-1} is bounded: exceptionals vanish under projection, and reduced support has degree no larger than D1+D2D_1+D_2. Log effective birationality and the curve construction therefore contradict normalized curve exclusion on the base itself.

Reduction to a correspondence. We have excluded fiber dimensions strictly between zero and n+1n+1 over either slot. A full (n+1)(n+1)-dimensional fiber over one slot would mean that VV contains the whole opposite slice over its first image WW. Its fiber dimension over the other slot would then be dim⁡W+1\dim W+1, strictly between zero and n+1n+1, unless VV were the full total space. That is impossible. Hence VV projects generically finitely in both slots and dim⁡V≤n\dim V\le n. If either image is proper, general type and the total-space estimates give the previous curve contradiction. The same is true if VV is of general type. Only the case dim⁡V=n\dim V=n, dominant with bounded degree over both copies of YY, remains.

Moving branch divisors. Take the dominating algebraic family of these correspondences, resolving maps after shrinking the parameter space. Suppose a divisorial branch component of one projection moves. On a resolution V∗V^*, choose a ramified divisor RR above its generic point. There is a rational weight bb for which the effective difference Eb∣V∗E_b|_{V^*} does not contain RR. Indeed take a fixed free divisible degree of PP; some section does not vanish generically on RR. Monomial-weight sections span that degree, so one of them does not vanish there. Only finitely many weights are tested in this fixed family; their model comparisons can be resolved simultaneously.

Let JJ be the branch divisor on the corresponding small axis model. Nef comparison on RR, ramification into a terminal target, and pseudo-effectivity of its canonical divisor give

Nbn−1⋅J≤Pn−1⋅R≤KV∗⋅Pn−1≤Cq.(214)N_b^{n-1}\cdot J\le P^{n-1}\cdot R\le K_{V^*}\cdot P^{n-1}\le C_q. \tag*{(214)}

The ramification coefficient of RR is a positive integer, so is at least one; the other ramification and exceptional terms are nonnegative. The last bound is the total-space subadjunction estimate.

We spell out the adjunction needed for JJ, without assuming (Y(b),J)(Y(b),J) globally lc. Terminal Y(b)Y(b) is smooth in codimension two. Thus normalization and conductor adjunction along JJ give

KJν+C=(KY(b)+J)∣Jν,C≥0K_{J^\nu}+C=(K_{Y(b)}+J)|_{J^\nu},\qquad C\ge0

in codimension one. On resolving JνJ^\nu, exceptional divisors map to codimension at least two and pair trivially with the pulled-back Nbn−2N_b^{n-2}. Consequently, with dJ=Nbn−1⋅Jd_J=N_b^{n-1}\cdot J,

KJ∗⋅Nbn−2≤(KY(b)+J)JNbn−2≤dJr+bm+dJ2Nbn≤Cq′dJ.(215)\begin{aligned} K_{J^*}\cdot N_b^{n-2}&\le(K_{Y(b)}+J)J N_b^{n-2}\\ &\le\frac{d_J}{r+bm}+\frac{d_J^2}{N_b^n}\le C'_q d_J. \tag*{(215)} \end{aligned}

For the second line, a general moving JJ is not a component of a fixed effective representative of AbA_b, giving the first term; mixed Hodge index gives the second. The lower bound for NbN_b and (214) give the final uniform constant.

A moving JJ sweeps very general base points and is of general type by Proposition F.3. Equations (215)–(216) therefore give forbidden bounded curves. Branch components can be named after a finite parameter extension and shrinking. It follows that, for all sufficiently small tt, all divisorial branch components in the chosen family are fixed.

Fixed covers. For each such fixed tt, remove the fixed branch divisors and the singular locus from YY. Normalization and purity identify the covers over the resulting smooth open with finite étale covers. Their degrees are bounded. The topological fundamental group of a smooth complex quasi-projective variety is finitely generated, so it has only finitely many subgroups of bounded index. There are therefore only finitely many possible covers in each slot, up to isomorphism; their finite normalizations over YY are determined by these restrictions.

Some algebraic family of graphs of birational isomorphisms between two fixed covers must still dominate the base product. To justify the family assertion, parameterize the graphs by their Hilbert schemes, shrink for flatness and birationality of the two projections, and use countability of these parameter spaces together with the finite cover choices. Identify the two covers by one such birational isomorphism. The resulting birational selfmaps of a fixed cover move a general point densely through that cover, since their projected graphs dominate Y×YY \times Y.

The cover is non-uniruled, being generically finite over the non-uniruled YY. Hanamura’s non-uniruled birational-group theorem gives a smooth projective birational model for which the reduced birational group is a group scheme, locally of finite type, and its identity component is an abelian variety [43], Theorems 2.1–2.2; see also [10]. After conjugating the maps to that model, shrink the irreducible parameter variety anew so that their graph closures are flat and both graph projections remain birational on every fiber. They then define a morphism to the represented birational scheme; because the parameter variety is reduced, this morphism factors through its reduction. Its connected image lies in a single component, hence in a translate of the identity component. Dominance of evaluation makes the corresponding abelian variety action generically transitive. Its orbit is an abelian-variety quotient, so the fixed cover is birational to an abelian variety.

This is impossible for the original counterexample. Resolve the generically finite rational map from that abelian variety to XX: on a smooth model UU, ramification gives

KU=f∗KX+R,R≥0,K_U = f^*K_X + R,\qquad R \ge0,

where KUK_U is an effective divisor exceptional over the abelian variety. Let TT be a positive current in KXK_X. The current f∗T+[R]f^*T + [R] is positive and represents KUK_U. Intersecting with powers of the ample class pulled back from the abelian variety shows that this sum is supported on the exceptional locus. Its positive summand f∗Tf^*T is therefore supported there as well, and the support theorem makes f∗Tf^*T divisorial. Push forward this summand alone: f∗(f∗T)f_*(f^*T) is a positive divisorial current whose class is deg⁡(f)c1(KX)\deg(f)c_1(K_X) by the projection formula. Rationality of the numerical class supplies a rational effective representative, and irregularity zero turns numerical effectivity into nonvanishing, as in Lemma F.1. This contradicts κ(X,KX)=−∞\kappa(X,K_X)=-\infty.

All possible VV have now been excluded. This proves the Seshadri assertion. At a very general point the big semiampl[e] contraction is an isomorphism onto its image near that point. The jet interpretation of the Seshadri constant for the ample class downstairs gives the stated divisible jet-separating multiple. Complete systems agree under the model comparisons, so this conclusion transfers to the original torus open and to common resolutions.

Frobenius comparison and smooth nonvanishing

We now turn the two opposite jet estimates into a contradiction. The reduction to positive characteristic is used only for this comparison: no minimal-model statement or pseudo-effectivity assertion will be specialized to positive characteristic.

Theorem H.1 (The smooth nonvanishing step). Assume Assumption A.1 and the lower-dimensional real-boundary good-model hypothesis of Assumption B.1. If XX is a smooth projective complex variety of dimension nn and KXK_X is pseudo-effective, then κ(X,KX)≥0\kappa(X,K_X) \ge0.

The assertion is immediate in dimension zero. On a smooth curve, pseudo-effectivity of KXK_X gives g(X)≥1g(X) \ge1, hence h0(X,KX)=g(X)>0h^0(X,K_X) = g(X) > 0. We therefore suppose n≥2n \ge2 and argue by contradiction. We use the late terminal model YY, the divisors K=KYK = K_Y and A=AYA = A_Y, and the scaling models of the preceding section. Fix m>0m > 0 with mKmK Cartier, and write

μt=vol⁡(KX+tAX)1/n,L=r(K+tA).\mu_t = \operatorname{vol}(K_X + tA_X)^{1/n}, \qquad L = r(K+tA).

As before, rr is a positive integer chosen so that rμt⟶ϵr\mu_t \longrightarrow\epsilon as t↓0t \downarrow0. Choose the rational number ϵ>0\epsilon> 0 sufficiently small for Propositions G.3 and G.5, and also so that

(14ϵ)n<14,80ϵ<34.(216)(14\epsilon)^n < \frac{1}{4}, \qquad80\epsilon< \frac{3}{4}. \tag*{(216)}

The inequalities are strict. We next fix a sufficiently large integer qq as in Proposition G.5, and then fix a sufficiently small positive rational tt. In particular, we may require r>qm+1r > qm+1. All subsequent characteristic-zero choices will be made with these data fixed.

A small polarization and an actual moving curve

Choose a smooth common resolution WW of YY and the scaling model for K+tAK+tA. In this section KK, AA, LL also denote their pullbacks to WW, and

KW=K+E,E≥0.K_W = K+E, \qquad E \ge0.

Let H0H_0 be the pullback of the nef semiample positive part N0N_0 of LL on its scaling model. The comparison of canonical pullbacks and moving parts gives

H0n⟶ϵn,LH0n−1=H0n,KWH0n−1=KH0n−1≤rH0nr.(217)H_0^n \longrightarrow\epsilon^n, \qquad LH_0^{n-1} = H_0^n, \qquad K_WH_0^{n-1} = KH_0^{n-1} \le\frac{rH_0^n}{r}. \tag*{(217)}

The maps Y⇢YtY \dashrightarrow Y_t are small by the choice of the late model, so every divisor exceptional over YY is also exceptional over YtY_t. Indeed, the differences being discarded are exceptional over the scaling model, and the transform of AA is effective up to rational linear equivalence. Their intersections with H0n−1H_0^{n-1} therefore give the displayed equalities and inequality. For a fixed ample divisor HampH_{\mathrm{amp}}, choose a sufficiently small positive rational η\eta and put H=H0+ηHampH = H_0 + \eta H_{\mathrm{amp}}. By continuity, after the preceding choices of tt and rr, we have

Hn≤(2ϵ)n,KWHn−1≤2Hnr,(2L+qmK)Hn−1≤4Hn.(218)H^n \le(2\epsilon)^n, \qquad K_WH^{n-1} \le\frac{2H^n}{r}, \qquad(2L+qmK)H^{n-1} \le4H^n. \tag*{(218)}

The canonical divisor of WW is pseudo-effective. Generic semipositivity, applied with empty boundary [18], Theorem 2.1, and restriction to a sufficiently general complete-intersection curve give the following fixed data. Choose l>0l > 0 such that h=lHh = lH is integral and sufficiently very ample, and choose a smooth complete-intersection flag

W=Wn⊃Wn−1⊃⋯⊃W1=C,Wi−1∈∣h∣Wi,W = W_n \supset W_{n-1} \supset\cdots\supset W_1 = C, \qquad W_{i-1} \in|h|_{W_i},

for which

μmin⁡(ΩW1∣C)≥0.(219)\mu_{\min}(\Omega_W^1|_C) \ge0. \tag*{(219)}

Here and below slopes on CC mean degree divided by rank. One may obtain the flag by applying restriction to the finitely many Harder–Narasimhan quotients of ΩW1\Omega^1_W.

Choose also a very general point x∈Wx \in W, away from the exceptional loci, and let πx:W^→W\pi_x:\widehat{W}\to W be its blowup, with exceptional divisor JJ. Set

D+=2r(K+2tA)+2E.D^+ = 2r(K+2tA)+2E.

This divisor is big. Its sections, pushed to YY, are the scalar sections in Proposition G.3; the added exceptional part does not change them. If ρ=vol⁡(2r(K+2tA))1/n\rho=\operatorname{vol}(2r(K+2tA))^{1/n}, then

ρ≤4rμt≤8ϵ\rho\le4r\mu t \le8\epsilon

for our sufficiently small tt. Thus every section of a sufficiently divisible multiple of D+D^+ has normalized order at xx at most 4ρ≤32ϵ4\rho\le32\epsilon.

It follows that πx∗D+−40ϵJ\pi_x^*D^+-40\epsilon J is not pseudo-effective. Otherwise its convex combination with the big class πx∗D+\pi_x^*D^+ would make πx∗D+−cJ\pi_x^*D^+-cJ big for some rational 32ϵ<c<40ϵ32\epsilon<c<40\epsilon, giving a section of excessive order. Movable-curve duality [12], Theorem 2.2, therefore supplies an actual covering curve class γ\gamma on W^\widehat{W} such that

(πx∗D+)⋅γ<40ϵJ⋅γ,J⋅γ>0.(220)(\pi_x^*D^+)\cdot\gamma<40\epsilon J\cdot\gamma,\qquad J\cdot\gamma>0. \tag*{(220)}

For precision, the strict negative pairing can first be detected by a strongly movable curve: take the pushforward of a general complete intersection of very ample divisors on one fixed smooth birational model of W^\widehat{W}. Fix this model, its divisors, and the resulting covering family. This choice is finite algebraic data, rather than a limiting real movable class. Positivity of J⋅γJ\cdot\gamma follows from the strict inequality and pseudo-effectivity of πx∗D+\pi_x^*D^+.

Fixed jets and reduction modulo primes

On W×WW\times W, let

Z=P(mK1⊕mK2),ξ=OZ(1),M=L1+L2+qξ.Z=\mathbb{P}(mK_1\oplus mK_2),\qquad\xi=\mathcal{O}_Z(1),\qquad M=L_1+L_2+q\xi.

with the symmetric-power convention for the projective bundle. Proposition G.5 gives a semiample big model whose Seshadri constant exceeds 2n+22n+2 at a very general torus point. On the open set where its birational contraction is an isomorphism, the jet interpretation of the Seshadri constant consequently gives an integer k0>0k_0>0 such that ∣k0M∣|k_0M| generates jets of order at least (2n+2)k0(2n+2)k_0 at a fixed smooth torus point z∗∈Zz_*\in Z. Indeed, on the ample model choose a rational number cc strictly between 2n+22n+2 and its Seshadri constant. On the blowup of the selected smooth point, the pullback of the ample class minus cc times the exceptional divisor is ample. Serre vanishing and the exceptional-divisor sequence then give jets of order kc−1kc-1 for all sufficiently divisible large kk. Pulling sections back on the isomorphic open gives the asserted bound. Enlarge k0k_0 to clear every denominator, in particular that of LL, and fix finitely many sections realizing this jet surjection.

Spread the varieties, maps, divisors, flag, points, covering family, and these finitely many sections over an integral finitely generated Z\mathbb{Z}-algebra of characteristic zero. Shrink its spectrum so that the relevant fibers and flag are smooth, the maps defining the covering family remain dominant, and the fixed jet evaluation remains surjective. Spread also the Harder–Narasimhan filtration of ΩW1∣C\Omega^1_W|_C. Its quotients are vector bundles on the curve; their semistability is open, and their degrees are constant in the family. After another shrinking, Equation (219) holds on each reduction. Such an open set has closed points in arbitrarily large prime characteristics. We work over algebraic closures of their residue fields, retaining the notation W,C,h,x,γW,C,h,x,\gamma.

In particular, all numbers in Equations (218) and (220) are unchanged. We use the spread covering family to test effective divisors after reduction. We do not assert that the characteristic-zero pseudo-effective cones, or the scaling models, specialize.

Choose a fixed sufficiently ample integral divisor T0T_0 on WW, also spread with suitable sections, and for a prime pp put

Np=⌊pk0⌋,Bp=k0NpL+T0.(221)N_p=\left\lfloor\frac{p}{k_0}\right\rfloor,\qquad B_p=k_0N_pL+T_0. \tag*{(221)}

The difference Bp−pLB_p-pL belongs to a fixed finite set of rational divisor classes. The system

∣pqξ+Bp,1+Bp,2∣|pq\xi+B_{p,1}+B_{p,2}|

contains products of NpN_p members of ∣k0M∣|k_0M|, multiplied by a filler nonvanishing at z∗z_*. To see that one T0T_0 suffices, write p=k0Np+dp=k_0N_p+d, where 0≤d<k00\le d<k_0. The remainder systems have fiber degrees dqdq; their finitely many monomial weights require only the finitely many line bundles T0+amKT_0+amK for 0≤a≤(k0−1)q0\le a\le(k_0-1)q to have sections nonvanishing at the selected base points. A sufficiently ample T0T_0 has this property, and the chosen fillers can be spread at the same time.

Products of the fixed jet sections generate jets of order (2n+2)k0Np(2n+2)k_0N_p. Indeed each monomial of that degree or less is a product of NpN_p monomials of degree at most (2n+2)k0(2n+2)k_0; multiply sections with these leading monomials and then eliminate successive higher-order terms. No factorial is divided out. Since

(2n+2)k0Np>(2n+1)(p−1)(2n+2)k_0N_p>(2n+1)(p-1)

for all sufficiently large pp, the same system surjects onto the quotient of the local ring at z∗z_* by the pp-th powers of its 2n+12n+1 regular parameters.

Full rank away from the diagonal

Let F:W→W′F:W\to W' be relative Frobenius, and put

S0=mK,E=F∗OW(Bp),s=rk⁡E=pn,Ua=H0(W,OW(Bp+paS0))(0≤a≤q).S_0=mK,\qquad\mathcal{E}=F_*\mathcal{O}_W(B_p),\qquad s=\operatorname{rk}\mathcal{E}=p^n,\qquad U_a=H^0(W,\mathcal{O}_W(B_p+paS_0))\quad(0\le a\le q).

Primes on line bundles indicate the base twist, so F∗S0′=pS0F^*S'_0=pS_0. Projection formula gives an evaluation map

⨁a+b=qUa⊗Ub⊗OW′×W′(−aS0,1′−bS0,2′)⟶E⊠E.(222)\bigoplus_{a+b=q}U_a\otimes U_b\otimes\mathcal{O}_{W'\times W'}(-aS'_{0,1}-bS'_{0,2})\longrightarrow\mathcal{E}\boxtimes\mathcal{E}. \tag*{(222)}

Its generic rank is s2s^2.

Here is a coordinate verification of this assertion. Choose local frames of the projective-bundle axes and let zz be a torus coordinate at z∗z_*, with value z0≠0z_0\ne0. On its Frobenius fiber the relation is zp=z0pz^p=z_0^p. Over the two base Frobenius fibers, the fiber-coordinate part of the quotient is free with basis 1,z,…,zp−11,z,\ldots,z^{p-1}. Project the jet surjection just obtained to its coefficient of 11. The monomial zjz^j survives precisely when pp divides jj, in which case it becomes the nonzero scalar z0jz_0^j. The global section formula for the projective bundle has weights 0≤j≤pq0\le j\le pq. Its surviving terms j=paj=pa are exactly

H0(W,Bp+paS0)⊗H0(W,Bp+p(q−a)S0).H^0(W,B_p+paS_0)\otimes H^0(W,B_p+p(q-a)S_0).

They therefore span the tensor product of the two base Frobenius fibers. These have dimensions ss each, proving the rank assertion. The two base points used for this argument need not coincide with xx.

A small rank on the diagonal

Let

ΔF=W×W′W=(F×F)−1(ΔW′).\Delta_F = W \times_{W'} W = (F \times F)^{-1}(\Delta_{W'}).

On this scheme the two copies of pS0pS_0 are canonically identified, since both descend from S0′S'_0 on the diagonal. All source twists in (222) restrict on ΔW′\Delta_{W'} to OW′(−qS0′)\mathcal{O}_{W'}(-qS'_0), with these identifications pulled back to ΔF\Delta_F. Consequently every column, after restriction to the diagonal and this common one-dimensional twist, is evaluated from a global section on ΔF\Delta_F of

Lp=OΔF(Bp,1+Bp,2+pqS0,1).\mathcal{L}_p = \mathcal{O}_{\Delta_F}(B_{p,1} + B_{p,2} + pqS_{0,1}).

The rank on the diagonal is therefore at most h0(ΔF,Lp)h^0(\Delta_F,\mathcal{L}_p).

The first projection ΔF→W\Delta_F \to W is finite flat of degree ss. Filter its direct image by powers of the ideal of the reduced diagonal. Étale-locally in smooth coordinates its algebra is

OW[δ1,…,δn]/(δ1p,…,δnp).\mathcal{O}_W[\delta_1,\ldots,\delta_n]/(\delta_1^p,\ldots,\delta_n^p).

Its graded pieces, after the line twist, are thus the vector bundles

Gj=OW(2Bp+pqS0)⊗Aj(ΩW1),0≤j≤u=n(p−1),(223)\mathcal{G}_j = \mathcal{O}_W(2B_p + pqS_0) \otimes A_j(\Omega^1_W), \qquad0 \leq j \leq u = n(p-1), \tag*{(223)}

where Aj(V)A_j(V) is the degree-jj piece of the symmetric algebra of VV modulo pp-th powers. This coordinate calculation is also the canonical Frobenius filtration [71], Theorem 3.7. If ej=rk⁡Aj(ΩW1)e_j = \operatorname{rk} A_j(\Omega^1_W), then

∑j=0uej=pn=s.(224)\sum_{j=0}^{u} e_j = p^n = s. \tag*{(224)}

The sum is ss, rather than s2s^2; the second factor of ss will come from the bound for sections.

Lemma H.2 (Uniform slope bound). With all characteristic-zero choices fixed, uniformly for 0≤j≤n(p−1)0 \leq j \leq n(p-1),

μmax⁡(Gj∣C)≤7pln⁡−1Hn+O(1).\mu_{\max}(\mathcal{G}_j|_C) \leq7p\ln^{-1} H^n + O(1).

The constant implicit in O(1)O(1) is independent of pp and jj.

Proof. Put V=ΩW1∣CV = \Omega^1_W|_C. For a vector bundle on the smooth curve CC, write

Lmin⁡(V)=lim⁡e→∞μmin⁡((FCe)∗V)pe.L_{\min}(V) = \lim_{e\to\infty} \frac{\mu_{\min}((F_C^e)^*V)}{p^e}.

Langer’s Frobenius-instability estimate [58], Corollary 2.5, states that

μmin⁡(V)−Lmin⁡(V)≤(n−1)deg⁡ACp−1\mu_{\min}(V) - L_{\min}(V) \leq\frac{(n-1)\deg A_C}{p-1}

if ACA_C is nef and TC(AC)T_C(A_C) is globally generated. The genus is fixed, so ACA_C can be chosen with degree bounded independently of pp. (219) yields

Lmin⁡(V)≥−cp−1.(225)L_{\min}(V) \geq-\frac{c}{p-1}. \tag*{(225)}

with one fixed cc.

We need an estimate for tensor powers whose exponent grows with pp. For every i≥0i \ge0,

μmin⁡(V⊗i)≥iLmin⁡(V).(226)\mu_{\min}(V^{\otimes i}) \ge iL_{\min}(V). \tag*{(226)}

To prove this directly, twist (FCe)∗V(F_C^e)^*V by a line bundle of degree at most −μmin⁡((FCe)∗V)+2g(C)+2-\mu_{\min}((F_C^e)^*V)+2g(C)+2 so that it is globally generated. This follows from Serre duality and the slope criterion for the vanishing of H1H^1 after subtracting any point. The ii-th tensor power is then globally generated with the corresponding ii-fold twist. Pull back any quotient of V⊗iV^{\otimes i}, take degrees, divide by pep^e, and let ee tend to infinity. The bounded genus term disappears, proving (226). Thus every quotient of a tensor power with i≤n(p−1)i \le n(p-1) has minimum slope at least −nc-nc.

Multiplication to the socle of the truncated polynomial algebra is a perfect pairing in complementary degrees. The top monomial transforms by (det⁡V)p−1(\det V)^{p-1}, so, equivariantly,

Aj(V)∗⊗(det⁡V)p−1≃Au−j(V).A_j(V)^* \otimes(\det V)^{p-1} \simeq A_{u-j}(V).

The right side is a quotient of V⊗(u−j)V^{\otimes(u-j)}. Therefore

μmax⁡(Aj(V))≤(p−1)deg⁡KW∣C+nc.\mu_{\max}(A_j(V)) \le(p-1)\deg K_W|_C + nc.

By Equations (221) and (218),

(2Bp+pqS0)⋅C≤4pln−1Hn+O(1),(2B_p+pqS_0)\cdot C \le4p l^{n-1}H^n+O(1),
(p−1)KW⋅C≤2prln−1Hn.(p-1)K_W\cdot C \le\frac{2p}{r}l^{n-1}H^n.

Since r>1r>1, their sum is bounded by the claimed expression, with slack in its coefficient 77. □

Lemma H.3 (Uniform section bound). For the bundles in Equation (223),

h0(W,Gj)≤ejpn(7nHn+o(1)),h^0(W,\mathcal{G}_j)\le e_jp^n(7^nH^n+o(1)),

uniformly in jj. Consequently, for all sufficiently large pp,

h0(ΔF,Lp)≤s24.(227)h^0(\Delta_F,\mathcal{L}_p)\le\frac{s^2}{4}. \tag*{(227)}

Proof. Choose Mp=7pln−1Hn+c0M_p=7p l^{n-1}H^n+c_0, where c0c_0 bounds the error in Lemma H.2, and put dC=h⋅C=lnHnd_C=h\cdot C=l^nH^n. A bundle of rank eje_j and maximal slope at most MpM_p has at most ej(Mp+1)e_j(M_p+1) sections: evaluation at ⌊Mp⌋+1\lfloor M_p\rfloor+1 distinct points is injective. Its twist by −kh-kh has no sections if kdC>Mpkd_C>M_p. The divisor sequences on the fixed flag give

h0(W,Gj)≤∑k1,…,kn−1≥0h0(C,Gj∣C(−(k1+⋯+kn−1)h)).h^0(W,\mathcal{G}_j)\le\sum_{k_1,\ldots,k_{n-1}\ge0}h^0(C,\mathcal{G}_j|_C(-(k_1+\cdots+k_{n-1})h)).

One obtains this by successively summing the restriction inequalities; the remainders vanish for sufficiently negative ample twists at each stage. At most (1+⌊Mp/dC⌋)n−1(1+\lfloor M_p/d_C\rfloor)^{n-1} tuples contribute. Hence

h0(W,Gj)≤ej(Mp+1)(1+Mp/dC)n−1=ejpn(7nHn+o(1)).h^0(W,\mathcal{G}_j)\le e_j(M_p+1)(1+M_p/d_C)^{n-1}=e_jp^n(7^nH^n+o(1)).

The powers of ll cancel in the leading coefficient. All error constants are fixed before pp, and the same bound applies to every jj. Summing over the filtration and using Equation (224) gives

h0(ΔF,Lp)≤s2(7nHn+o(1)).h^0(\Delta_F,\mathcal{L}_p)\le s^2(7^nH^n+o(1)).

Now 7nHn≤(14ϵ)n<1/47^nH^n\le(14\epsilon)^n<1/4 by Equations (216) and (218). This proves Equation (227). □

The determinant contradiction

Put R=s2R=s^2. Choose RR columns of Equation (222) with nonzero determinant. Their determinant is a nonzero section σ\sigma of an external product Q1⊠Q2\mathcal{Q}_1 \boxtimes \mathcal{Q}_2 of line bundles on W′×W′W' \times W'. Indeed det⁡(E⊠E)=(det⁡E)s⊠(det⁡E)s\det(\mathcal{E} \boxtimes\mathcal{E})=(\det\mathcal{E})^s \boxtimes(\det\mathcal{E})^s, and the column twists add the sums of their respective weights. Consequently, under numerical identification with the base twists,

c1(Qi)R=c1(E)s+λiS0=Bpp+p−12pKW+λimK,0≤λi≤q.(228)\frac{c_1(\mathcal{Q}_i)}{R}=\frac{c_1(\mathcal{E})}{s}+\lambda_i S_0=\frac{B_p}{p}+\frac{p-1}{2p}K_W+\lambda_i mK,\qquad0\leq\lambda_i\leq q. \tag*{(228)}

The last equality is degree-one Grothendieck–Riemann–Roch for Frobenius [71], Lemma 4.2:

c1(F∗OW(Bp))=pn−1Bp′+pn−pn−12KW′.c_1(F_*\mathcal{O}_W(B_p))=p^{n-1}B'_p+\frac{p^n-p^{n-1}}{2}K_{W'}.

Here numerical identification through the base-field twist must not be confused with Frobenius pullback, which multiplies divisor classes by pp.

For 0≤λ≤q0\leq\lambda\leq q, write Qλ=L+KW/2+λmKQ_\lambda=L+K_W/2+\lambda mK. Direct calculation gives

D+−Qλ=(r−12−λm)K+3rtA+32E.(229)D^+-Q_\lambda=\left(r-\frac{1}{2}-\lambda m\right)K+3rtA+\frac{3}{2}E. \tag*{(229)}

This is pseudo-effective in characteristic zero because r>qm+1r>qm+1, KK is pseudo-effective, and A,EA,E are effective up to the indicated equivalence. Pairing with the fixed class γ\gamma therefore bounds Qλ⋅γQ_\lambda\cdot\gamma by (πx∗D+)⋅γ(\pi_x^*D^+)\cdot\gamma. This numerical inequality survives the spread: it concerns only intersections of fixed divisors with the fixed family. The difference between Equation (228) and QλiQ_{\lambda_i} is O(1/p)O(1/p) in a fixed finite-dimensional space, uniformly in the chosen columns.

Let x′∈W′x'\in W' be the twist of xx. For a nonzero section of Qi\mathcal{Q}_i, its effective divisor, strictly transformed on the blowup at x′x', has nonnegative intersection with the spread moving curve. Dividing this inequality by RJ⋅γRJ\cdot\gamma and using Equations (220)–(229) yields

ord⁡x′(τ)R≤40ϵ+o(1)for every 0≠τ∈H0(W′,Qi).(230)\frac{\operatorname{ord}_{x'}(\tau)}{R}\leq40\epsilon+o(1)\quad\text{for every }0\ne\tau\in H^0(W',\mathcal{Q}_i). \tag*{(230)}

This bounds all sections on the reduction, not merely the sections spread from characteristic zero.

An external-product section can have order at (x′,x′)(x',x') at most the sum of the two maximal slot orders. To verify this despite possible cancellation, choose bases in each section space adapted to its filtration by order at x′x'. Their leading homogeneous terms are linearly independent within each degree. Tensor products of these terms are independent in each bidegree in the two disjoint sets of local parameters. Thus the first nonzero homogeneous part of a nonzero tensor cannot be cancelled beyond the sum of the slot maxima. Künneth’s formula identifies the external-product section space with this tensor product. In particular,

ord⁡(x′,x′)(σ)≤R(80ϵ+o(1)).(231)\operatorname{ord}_{(x',x')}(\sigma)\leq R(80\epsilon+o(1)). \tag*{(231)}

On the other hand, Equation (227) says that the matrix of the chosen columns has rank at most R/4R/4 at (x′,x′)(x',x'). Trivialize its line bundles locally and perform invertible row and column operations on the constant matrix. At least 3R/43R/4 of the resulting rows have every entry in the maximal ideal. Every term of the determinant consequently has order at least 3R/43R/4, so

ord⁡(x′,x′)(σ)≥3R4.(232)\operatorname{ord}_{(x',x')}(\sigma)\geq\frac{3R}{4}. \tag*{(232)}

This is a pointwise maximal-ideal estimate; no stronger assertion about an order along the whole diagonal is required. Equations (231) and (232) contradict 80ϵ<3/480\epsilon<3/4 for all sufficiently large pp.

We have made the choices in the order

n, ϵ, q, (t,r), (W,H,h,flag,x,γ), (k0,T0,fixed sections), p.n,\ \epsilon,\ q,\ (t,r),\ (W,H,h,\mathrm{flag},x,\gamma),\ (k_0,T_0,\text{fixed sections}),\ p.

In particular every constant suppressed in the estimates is fixed before the last prime tends to infinity. This contradiction excludes the assumed counterexample and proves Theorem H.1.

Completion and change of ground field

Proof of Theorem A.2 over C\mathbb{C}. We prove existence of good log minimal models by dimension induction, in the form used in Proposition B.6. Dimension zero is immediate. Assume that good models exist in all smaller dimensions. The signed-representative argument (Theorem C.1), the exclusions, and the jet estimates are then available with exactly that lower-dimensional hypothesis. Theorem H.1 establishes smooth nonvanishing in the present dimension. Proposition B.6 therefore supplies the good-model statement in this dimension and closes the induction.

Apply this to the rational lc pair (X,B)(X,B) of Theorem A.2. On a common resolution of its dlt model and a good log minimal model, the pullbacks of the adjoints agree because the original adjoint is nef; this is the nef comparison in Lemma B.2. The pullback of KX+BK_X+B is thus semiample. If p:W→Xp:W\to X is this resolution, normality gives p∗OW=OXp_*\mathcal{O}_W=\mathcal{O}_X. Choose a sufficiently divisible Cartier multiple m(KX+B)m(K_X+B) whose pullback is globally generated. The projection formula identifies its sections with those of its pullback. Surjectivity of evaluation upstairs implies surjectivity downstairs: otherwise a base point downstairs would make every pulled-back section vanish on its nonempty fiber. Hence KX+BK_X+B is semiample.

Proposition I.1 (Change of algebraically closed field). The conclusion of Theorem A.2 over C\mathbb{C} implies its conclusion over every algebraically closed field of characteristic zero.

Proof. Let (X,B)(X,B) be defined over such a field kk. Choose a finitely generated subfield k1⊂kk_1\subset k over which the projective variety, the rational boundary, a Cartier multiple of its adjoint, and a log resolution are all defined. After enlarging k1k_1 if necessary, these data base change to the given data. Let k0k_0 be its algebraic closure inside kk. It embeds into C\mathbb{C}.

The discrepancies on the chosen resolution are unchanged by algebraically closed field extension. Since the resolution has simple normal crossing boundary, it tests log canonicity over both k0k_0 and C\mathbb{C}.

Nefness is also invariant under such extensions. Indeed, a curve over an extension is represented by a point of a relative Hilbert scheme after its finite defining data have been spread over a finite-type parameter scheme. The degree of a fixed line bundle is constant in the resulting flat family. Specializing to a closed point over the algebraically closed smaller field preserves a negative degree, if one existed; some irreducible component of the specialized curve would then have negative degree. This contradicts nefness over that field. Conversely, curves over the smaller field remain available after extension. Thus the k0k_0-model and its complex base change are nef.

The complex case supplies an integer m>0m>0, enlarged to a multiple of the Cartier index fixed over k0k_0, for which the Cartier line bundle M=OXk0(m(KXk0+Bk0))M=\mathcal{O}_{X_{k_0}}(m(K_{X_{k_0}}+B_{k_0})) becomes globally generated over C\mathbb{C}. Proper flat base change for sections identifies

H0(Xk0,M)⊗k0C=H0(XC,MC).H^0(X_{k_0},M)\otimes_{k_0}\mathbb{C}=H^0(X_{\mathbb{C}},M_{\mathbb{C}}).

The cokernel of the evaluation map for MM therefore becomes zero after the faithfully flat extension k0⊂Ck_0\subset\mathbb{C}, and is already zero over k0k_0. Base change from k0k_0 to kk preserves this surjectivity. The same integer mm proves the required semi-ampleness over kk. □

Together with Proposition I.1, the complex proof establishes Theorem A.2 in its stated generality.

References

  1. [1]Florin Ambro. The moduli b-divisor of an lc-trivial fibration. Compositio Mathematica, 141(2):385–403, 2005. Theorem 0.2.
  2. [2]Thierry Aubin. Équations du type Monge–Ampère sur les variétés kählériennes compactes. Bulletin des Sciences Mathématiques, 102(1):63–95, 1978.
  3. [3]Thierry Aubin. Some Nonlinear Problems in Riemannian Geometry. Springer Monographs in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1998.DOI
  4. [4]Wolf P. Barth, Klaus Hulek, Chris A. M. Peters, and Antonius van de Ven. Compact Complex Surfaces, volume 4 of Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete, 3. Folge. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, second enlarged edition, 2004.
  5. [5]Thomas Bauer, Frédéric Campana, Thomas Eckl, Stefan Kebekus, Thomas Peternell, Sławomir Rams, Tomasz Szemberg, and Lorenz Wotzlaw. A reduction map for nef line bundles. In Complex Geometry: Collection of Papers Dedicated to Hans Grauert, pages 27–36. Springer, Berlin, 2002. Theorem 2.1 in arXiv version 1. Version cited: https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0106147v1.
  6. [6]Caucher Birkar. On existence of log minimal models. Compositio Mathematica, 146(4):919–928, 2010. Lemma 3.6 in the cited arXiv version. Version cited: https://arxiv.org/abs/0706.1792v3.
  7. [7]Caucher Birkar. On existence of log minimal models II. Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik, 658:99–113, 2011. Theorem 1.5 and Corollary 1.7 in the cited arXiv version. Version cited: https://arxiv.org/abs/0907.4170v1.
  8. [8]Caucher Birkar. Existence of log canonical flips and a special LMMP. Publications Mathématiques de l’IHÉS, 115:325–368, 2012. Theorem 1.9, restated as Theorem 4.1. Version cited: https://arxiv.org/abs/1104.4981v3.
  9. [9]Caucher Birkar, Paolo Cascini, Christopher D. Hacon, and James McKernan. Existence of minimal models for varieties of log general type. Journal of the American Mathematical Society, 23(2):405–468, 2010.arxiv.org/abs/math/0610203
  10. [10]Jérémy Blanc. Algebraic structures of groups of birational transformations. In Algebraic Groups: Structure and Actions, volume 94 of Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, pages 17–30. American Mathematical Society, 2017. Theorems 3.8–3.9.
  11. [11]Sébastien Boucksom. Divisorial Zariski decompositions on compact complex manifolds. Annales scientifiques de l’École Normale Supérieure, 37(1):45–76, 2004.DOI
  12. [12]Sébastien Boucksom, Jean-Pierre Demailly, Mihai Păun, and Thomas Peternell. The pseudo-effective cone of a compact Kähler manifold and varieties of negative Kodaira dimension. Journal of Algebraic Geometry, 22(2):201–248, 2013. The uniruledness equivalence in this source is stated for projective manifolds. Theorem locators refer to arXiv version 1: https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0405285v1.
  13. [13]Frédéric Campana. Coréduction algébrique d’un espace analytique faiblement kählérien compact. Inventiones Mathematicae, 63:187–223, 1981.
  14. [14]Frédéric Campana. Orbifolds, special varieties and classification theory: an appendix. Annales de l’Institut Fourier, 54(3):631–665, 2004.
  15. [15]Frédéric Campana, Benoît Claudon, and Philippe Eyssidieux. Représentations linéaires des groupes kählériens: factorisations et conjecture de Shafarevich linéaire. Compositio Mathematica, 151(2):351–376, 2015.
  16. [16]Frédéric Campana, Andreas Höring, and Thomas Peternell. Abundance for Kähler threefolds. Annales scientifiques de l’École Normale Supérieure, 49(4):971–1025, 2016.
  17. [17]Frédéric Campana, Andreas Höring, and Thomas Peternell. Erratum and addendum to the paper: Abundance for Kähler threefolds. https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.10161v1, 2023. Version 1, 20 April 2023.
  18. [18]Frédéric Campana and Mihai Păun. Orbifold generic semi-positivity: an application to families of canonically polarized manifolds. Annales de l’Institut Fourier, 65(2):835–861, 2015.
  19. [19]Omprokash Das, Christopher Hacon, and Mihai Păun. On the 4-dimensional minimal model program for Kähler varieties. Advances in Mathematics, 443:109615, 2024.
  20. [21]Omprokash Das and Wenhao Ou. On the log abundance for compact Kähler threefolds II. https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.00671v4, 2025. Version 4, 12 June 2025; first submitted 2023.
  21. [22]Jean-Pierre Demailly. Regularization of closed positive currents and intersection theory. Journal of Algebraic Geometry, 1(3):361–409, 1992.
  22. [23]Jean-Pierre Demailly. L² vanishing theorems for positive line bundles and adjunction theory. In Fabrizio Catanese and Ciro Ciliberto, editors, Transcendental Methods in Algebraic Geometry, volume 1646 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics, pages 1–97. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1996.DOI
  23. [24]Jean-Pierre Demailly. Analytic Methods in Algebraic Geometry, volume 1 of Surveys of Modern Mathematics. International Press and Higher Education Press, Somerville, MA, and Beijing, 2012. Theorem numbering refers to the author manuscript dated July 2011. Version cited: https://www-fourier.univ-grenoble-alpes.fr/~demailly/manuscripts/analmeth_book.pdf.
  24. [25]Jean-Pierre Demailly. Complex analytic and differential geometry. https://www-fourier.univ-grenoble-alpes.fr/~demailly/manuscripts/agbook.pdf, 2012. Online book, version of 21 June 2012.
  25. [26]Jean-Pierre Demailly and János Kollár. Semi-continuity of complex singularity exponents and Kähler–Einstein metrics on Fano orbifolds. Annales scientifiques de l’École Normale Supérieure, 34(4):525–556, 2001.
  26. [27]Jean-Pierre Demailly and Thomas Peternell. A Kawamata–Viehweg vanishing theorem on compact Kähler manifolds. Journal of Differential Geometry, 63(2):231–277, 2003.
  27. [28]Jean-Pierre Demailly, Thomas Peternell, and Michael Schneider. Pseudo-effective line bundles on compact Kähler manifolds. International Journal of Mathematics, 12(6):689–741, 2001.
  28. [29]Osamu Fujino. Introduction to the log minimal model program for log canonical pairs. Unpublished manuscript, https://www.math.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~fujino/MMP21.pdf, 2009. Version 6.01, January 8, 2009; Theorem 3.74(3), p. 109.arxiv.org/abs/0907.1506
  29. [30]Osamu Fujino. Corrigendum to “On subadditivity of the logarithmic Kodaira dimension”. Journal of the Mathematical Society of Japan, 72(4):1181–1187, 2020. Accepted author version: https://www.math.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~fujino/corrigendum-fujino.pdf.DOI
  30. [31]Osamu Fujino. Minimal model program for projective morphisms between complex analytic spaces. https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.11315v1, 2022. Version 1, 27 January 2022; theorem numbering follows this version.
  31. [32]Osamu Fujino. Cone and contraction theorem for projective morphisms between complex analytic spaces. https://www.math.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~fujino/cone-and-contraction.pdf, 2023. Author manuscript, version 0.00, 9 October 2023; Theorem 4.3.1 and Remark 4.3.4.
  32. [33]Osamu Fujino and Yoshinori Gongyo. Log pluricanonical representations and the abundance conjecture. Compositio Mathematica, 150(4):593–620, 2014. Theorem 1.1 (finiteness of log pluricanonical representations); Theorem 1.5, restated as Theorem 4.3 (projective slc gluing). Final author version: https://www.math.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~fujino/fg-comp-final.pdf.DOI
  33. [34]Osamu Fujino and Yoshinori Gongyo. On the moduli b-divisors of lc-trivial fibrations. Annales de l’Institut Fourier, 64(4):1721–1735, 2014.arxiv.org/abs/1210.5052
  34. [35]Osamu Fujino and Yoshinori Gongyo. On log canonical rings. In Higher Dimensional Algebraic Geometry in honour of Professor Yujiro Kawamata’s sixtieth birthday, volume 74 of Advanced Studies in Pure Mathematics, pages 159–169. Mathematical Society of Japan, Tokyo, 2017. Lemma 3.5. Final author version: https://www.math.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~fujino/log-ring-asp m.pdf.arxiv.org/abs/1302.5194
  35. [36]Osamu Fujino and Kenta Hashizume. Existence of log canonical modifications and its applications. European Journal of Mathematics, 9(1), 2023. Paper No. 13, 32 pp.; Theorem 2.10 in the accepted author version. Version cited: https://www.math.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~fujino/lc-model-fujino-hashizume-draft-7-EJM-rev-normalstylefile.pdf.arxiv.org/abs/2103.01417
  36. [37]Yoshinori Gongyo. Abundance theorem for numerically trivial log canonical divisors of semi-log canonical pairs. Journal of Algebraic Geometry, 22(3):549–564, 2013.arxiv.org/abs/1005.2796
  37. [38]Yoshinori Gongyo and Brian Lehmann. Reduction maps and minimal model theory. Compositio Mathematica, 149(2):295–308, 2013. Read with the numerical-dimension erratum on Lehmann’s research page. Erratum: https://sites.bc.edu/lehmann/research/. Final author version: https://www.ms.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~gongyo/papers/redmapsmmp-final.pdf.DOI
  38. [39]Tom Graber, Joe Harris, and Jason Starr. Families of rationally connected varieties. Journal of the American Mathematical Society, 16(1):57–67, 2003.
  39. [40]Vincent Guedj and Ahmed Zeriahi. Intrinsic capacities on compact Kähler manifolds. The Journal of Geometric Analysis, 15(4):607–639, 2005.
  40. [41]Henri Guenancia and Mihai Păun. Bogomolov–Gieseker inequality for log terminal Kähler threefolds. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 78(11):2206–2244, 2025. With an appendix by Frédéric Campana, Andreas Höring, and Thomas Peternell.DOI
  41. [42]Christopher D. Hacon, James McKernan, and Chenyang Xu. Boundedness of varieties of log general type. In Algebraic Geometry: Salt Lake City 2015, Part 1, volume 97.1 of Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, pages 309–348. American Mathematical Society, 2018. Published Theorem 4.0.1; Theorem 3.0.1 in arXiv version 2. Published offprint: https://www.claymath.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Hacon-AG2015.pdf.
  42. [43]Masaki Hanamura. Structure of birational automorphism groups, I: non-uniruled varieties. Inventiones Mathematicae, 93:383–403, 1988. Theorems 2.1–2.2; statements also reproduced in Blanc, Theorems 3.8–3.9.DOI
  43. [44]Kenta Hashizume. On the non-vanishing conjecture and existence of log minimal models. Publications of the Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences, 54(1):89–104, 2018. Theorem 1.4; arXiv version 4. Version cited: https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.00121v4.
  44. [45]Heisuke Hironaka. Bimeromorphic smoothing of a complex-analytic space. Acta Mathematica Vietnamica, 2(2):103–168, 1977.
  45. [46]Andreas Höring, Vladimir Lazić, and Christian Lehn. Nonvanishing results for Kähler varieties. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.14634v2, 2025. Version 2, 21 October 2025.
  46. [47]Andreas Höring and Thomas Peternell. Minimal models for Kähler threefolds. Inventiones Mathematicae, 203(1):217–264, 2016.
  47. [48]Yujiro Kawamata. A generalization of Kodaira–Ramanujam’s vanishing theorem. Mathematische Annalen, 261(1):43–46, 1982. For the relative formulation used here, see also Kollár–Mori, Birational Geometry of Algebraic Varieties, Theorem 2.64.DOI
  48. [49]Yujiro Kawamata. The minimal discrepancy of a 3-fold terminal singularity. Russian Academy of Sciences. Izvestiya Mathematics, 40(1):193–195, 1993. Appendix to V. V. Shokurov, Three-fold log flips.
  49. [50]Stefan Kebekus and Christian Schnell. Extending holomorphic forms from the regular locus of a complex space to a resolution of singularities. Journal of the American Mathematical Society, 34(2):315–368, 2021.DOI
  50. [51]Sean Keel, Kenji Matsuki, and James McKernan. Log abundance theorem for threefolds. Duke Mathematical Journal, 75(1):99–119, 1994. Read with the 2004 corrections.DOI
  51. [52]Sean Keel, Kenji Matsuki, and James McKernan. Corrections to “Log abundance theorem for threefolds”. Duke Mathematical Journal, 122(3):625–630, 2004.DOI
  52. [53]János Kollár, editor. Flips and abundance for algebraic threefolds. Number 211 in Astérisque. Société Mathématique de France, 1992.
  53. [54]János Kollár. Sources of log canonical centers. In Minimal Models and Extremal Rays, volume 70 of Advanced Studies in Pure Mathematics, pages 29–48. Mathematical Society of Japan, Tokyo, 2016.
  54. [55]János Kollár and Sándor J. Kovács. Log canonical singularities are Du Bois. Journal of the American Mathematical Society, 23(3):791–813, 2010.
  55. [56]János Kollár and Shigefumi Mori. Birational Geometry of Algebraic Varieties, volume 134 of Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998.DOI
  56. [57]Sándor J. Kovács and Zsolt Patakfalvi. Projectivity of the moduli space of stable log-varieties and subadditivity of log-Kodaira dimension. Journal of the American Mathematical Society, 30(4):959–1021, 2017. Theorem 9.9 in the author version. Version cited: https://sites.math.washington.edu/~kovacs/current/papers/Kovacs_Patakfalvi_Projectivity.pdf.DOI
  57. [58]Adrian Langer. Semistable sheaves in positive characteristic. Annals of Mathematics, 159(1):251–276, 2004.DOI
  58. [59]Yoichi Miyaoka and Shigefumi Mori. A numerical criterion for uniruledness. Annals of Mathematics, 124(1):65–69, 1986.DOI
  59. [60]Yoshinori Namikawa. Projectivity criterion of Moishezon spaces and density of projective symplectic varieties. International Journal of Mathematics, 13(2):125–135, 2002.
  60. [61]OpenAI. Abundance after nonvanishing for compact Kähler fourfolds. OpenAI Math Release preprint OAI:Abundance-after-nonvanishing-for-compact-Kahler-fourfolds-September-27-2026, 2026. Theorem 1.1; semi ampleness of the actual nef adjoint under nonnegative Kodaira dimension.
  61. [62]OpenAI. Finite ordinary minimal model programs on compact Kähler fourfolds. OpenAI Math Release preprint OAI:Finite-ordinary-minimal-model-programs-on-compact-Kahler-fourfolds-October-5-2026, 2026. Theorem 6.20; Proposition 3.4 and its proof.
  62. [63]OpenAI. Orbifold and logarithmic Iitaka subadditivity. OpenAI Math Release preprint OAI:Orbifold-and-logarithmic-Iitaka-subadditivity-September-26-2026, 2026. Theorem 1.1.
  63. [64]Wenhao Ou. A characterization of uniruled compact Kähler manifolds. https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.18088v1, 2025. Version 1, 30 January 2025.
  64. [65]Mihai Păun. Siu’s invariance of plurigenera: a one-tower proof. Journal of Differential Geometry, 76(3):485–493, 2007. Theorem 1.DOI
  65. [66]Morihiko Saito. Mixed Hodge modules. Publications of the Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences, 26(2):221–333, 1990.
  66. [67]Morihiko Saito. Mixed Hodge complexes on algebraic varieties. Mathematische Annalen, 316(2):283–331, 2000. Theorem 0.2 and Corollary 0.3 in arXiv version 1. Version cited: https://arxiv.org/abs/math/9906088v1.
  67. [68]Jean-Pierre Serre. A Course in Arithmetic, volume 7 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1973.DOI
  68. [69]Yum-Tong Siu. Analyticity of sets associated to Lelong numbers and the extension of closed positive currents. Inventiones Mathematicae, 27:53–156, 1974.DOI
  69. [70]Henri Skoda. Sous-ensembles analytiques d’ordre fini ou infini dans Cⁿ. Bulletin de la Société Mathématique de France, 100:353–408, 1972.DOI
  70. [71]Xiaotao Sun. Direct images of bundles under Frobenius morphism. Inventiones Mathematicae, 173(2):427–447, 2008. Theorem 3.7 and Lemma 4.2 cited from arXiv version 2. Version cited: https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0611360v2.
  71. [72]The Stacks Project Authors. The Stacks Project: Grothendieck’s existence theorem, I. https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/087V, 2026. Tag 087V, Lemmas 30.24.1 and 30.24.3; accessed September 18, 2026.
  72. [73]Frédéric Touzet. Feuilletages holomorphes admettant une mesure transverse invariante. https://arxiv.org/abs/1409.3445v1, 2014.
  73. [74]Jean Varouchas. Kähler spaces and proper open morphisms. Mathematische Annalen, 283:13–52, 1989.DOI
  74. [75]Pisya Vikash. Classification of smooth minimal Kähler fourfolds without effective divisors and surfaces. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.04536v1, 2026. Version 1, 5 July 2026.
  75. [76]Shing-Tung Yau. On the Ricci curvature of a compact Kähler manifold and the complex Monge–Ampère equation, I. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 31(3):339–411, 1978.DOI

Paper details

Contents