alphaFeedback

WorksMathematics

A Zariski-Open Family of Proper Septic Polynomials with Full Traceless Images

AI contributions
  • OpenAI ChatGPT 6 Pro
View details

Abstract

Let KK be an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero. We identify a 762762-dimensional space of proper multilinear degree-seven polynomials in the third power of the commutator ideal, with zero formal cyclic trace and annihilated by every repeated-input identification of type (3,3,1)(3,3,1). A nonempty Zariski-open subset of this space consists of polynomials pp whose sets of individual matrix values satisfy p(Mn(K)7)=sln(K)p(M_n(K)^7)=\mathfrak{sl}_n(K) for every n≥3n\geq3. The ambient proper and formal trace-zero spaces have dimensions 12601260 and 10491049, respectively. An explicit polynomial certifies nonemptiness of this coefficient-open family. The proof combines a symmetric-group decomposition, exact finite determinant witnesses, an additive-size argument and a separate 3×33\times3 matrix argument.

Introduction and principal result

The L’vov–Kaplansky problem asks whether the values of every ordinary multilinear polynomial on a full matrix algebra form a vector subspace. We study individual values, rather than spans or closures, for proper degree-seven polynomials in the third power of the commutator ideal. A nonempty Zariski-open family has image sln(K)\mathfrak{sl}_n(K) in every order n≥3n \ge3.

The 3×33 \times3 classification of Kanel-Belov, Malev and Rowen [3] is used at the smallest order. Other relevant work includes image criteria of Fagundes and Koshlukov [2], methods of Tang [7] and Pan [5], and the standard-polynomial classification [4]. Higher orders are treated through regular matrix evaluations and size transfer.

Fix an algebraically closed field KK of characteristic zero and the free unital associative algebra F=K⟨X0,…,X6⟩F = K\langle X_0, \ldots, X_6\rangle. Let J=[F,F]idealJ = [F,F]_{\mathrm{ideal}} be the commutator ideal.

A multilinear polynomial is proper if setting any one input equal to the identity makes it vanish. Define

W=(J3)7mult∩{proper polynomials},V=W∩ker⁡tr⁡cyc,W = (\mathcal{J}^{3})_{7}^{\mathrm{mult}} \cap\{\text{proper polynomials}\}, \qquad V = W \cap\ker\operatorname{tr}_{\mathrm{cyc}},
K331=⋂ρ∈R331ker⁡(ρ∣V).(1)K_{331} = \bigcap_{\rho\in\mathcal{R}_{331}} \ker(\rho|_{V}). \tag*{(1)}

Here tr⁡cyc\operatorname{tr}_{\mathrm{cyc}} is the formal map recording sums of coefficients in the cyclic classes of seven-letter words; in particular tr⁡cyc(p)=0\operatorname{tr}_{\mathrm{cyc}}(p)=0 implies tr⁡p(A0,…,A6)=0\operatorname{tr}p(A_0,\ldots,A_6)=0 for every matrix size. The set R331\mathcal{R}_{331} consists of every assignment of the seven labelled slots to three named inputs, with multiplicities three, three, and one. Its kernel in (1) is not the kernel of one particular substitution.

For a polynomial pp and n≥1n \ge1, write

Im⁡n(p)={p(A0,…,A6):Ai∈Mn(K)}.\operatorname{Im}_{n}(p)=\{p(A_0,\ldots,A_6): A_i \in M_n(K)\}.

All equalities of images below refer to this set of single evaluations.

Theorem 1.1 (Coefficient-open image theorem). The spaces in (1) have dimensions

dim⁡KW=1260,dim⁡KV=1049,dim⁡KK331=762.\dim_K W = 1260,\qquad\dim_K V = 1049,\qquad\dim_K K_{331} = 762.

There exists one nonempty Zariski-open subset UU of the affine coefficient space K331K_{331} such that

Im⁡n(p)=sln(K)for every p∈U and every integer n≥3.(2)\operatorname{Im}_{n}(p)=\mathfrak{sl}_{n}(K) \qquad\text{for every }p\in U\text{ and every integer }n\ge3. \tag*{(2)}

The open set can be described by the nonvanishing of an explicit homogeneous coefficient polynomial of degree 76 obtained from fixed integral matrix data.

The subset UU is independent of nn, so each p∈Up\in U has the stated image in every order n≥3n\ge3.

The proper septic space and the common kernel

All dimensions in this section are over KK. We use the natural action of the symmetric group S7S_7 by permuting variable labels.

A concrete basis and the cyclic-trace kernel

For each three-element set {a,b,c}\{a,b,c\}, a<b<ca<b<c, take the two cubic Lie words

[[Xa,Xb],Xc],[[Xa,Xc],Xb].[[X_a,X_b],X_c],\qquad[[X_a,X_c],X_b].

Partition the four complementary labels into unordered pairs, form the commutator for each pair, and order these three factors in all six ways. The resulting family B\mathcal{B} consists of 1260 polynomials, since

(73)⋅2⋅3⋅3!=1260.(3)\binom{7}{3}\cdot2\cdot3\cdot3! = 1260. \tag*{(3)}

Proposition 2.1. The family B\mathcal{B} is a basis of WW. The formal cyclic-trace map on WW has rank 211 over Q\mathbb{Q} and hence over KK. In particular, dim⁡W=1260\dim W = 1260 and dim⁡V=1049\dim V = 1049.

Proof. In multilinear total degree seven, a product of three factors from J3J^3 consists, after standard commutator expansion, of three simple commutators and one additional labelled letter, either occurring as an external letter or inside a cubic commutator. Moving any external letter through the simple commutators, using X[A,B]=[A,B]X−[[A,B],X]X[A,B]=[A,B]X-[[A,B],X], expresses such a product as a sum of a term XigiX_i g_i, where gig_i is a product of three disjoint simple commutators, and terms with one cubic Lie factor and two disjoint simple commutators. By the Jacobi identity, each cubic factor lies in the span of the two displayed Lie words. Thus every multilinear element of J3J^3 has an expression

∑i=06Xigi+w,w∈span⁡KB.\sum_{i=0}^{6}X_i g_i+w,\qquad w\in\operatorname{span}_{K}\mathcal{B}.

Every element of B\mathcal{B} is proper. Substituting Xi=IX_i=I into a proper expression leaves gig_i, while the other external-letter terms and ww vanish. Hence properness forces all gi=0g_i=0, proving spanning.

Independence is certified by reducing the 1260 coefficient rows in the ordinary seven-letter word basis modulo 32003: their rank is 1260. Because there are exactly 1260 proposed generators, nonzero maximal rank modulo a prime proves independence over Q\mathbb{Q} and over every characteristic-zero field. The cyclic trace has 7!/7=7207!/7=720 cyclic-word columns. Exact sparse rational elimination on the 1260×7201260\times720 cyclic coefficient matrix gives rank 211; a separate modular elimination on the same coefficient data also gives 211. The explicit generators, reductions and reproducibility details are supplied in Appendix A. The rank assertion in characteristic zero follows directly from the exact rational calculation. □

Why all (3,3,1)(3,3,1) assignments matter

The basis identifies the S7\mathfrak{S}_7-module

W≃3Ind⁡S3×S2×S2S7(Lie⁡(3)⊠sgn⁡⊠sgn⁡).(4)W\simeq3\operatorname{Ind}_{\mathfrak{S}_3\times\mathfrak{S}_2\times\mathfrak{S}_2}^{\mathfrak{S}_7}\bigl(\operatorname{Lie}(3)\boxtimes\operatorname{sgn}\boxtimes\operatorname{sgn}\bigr). \tag*{(4)}

Here Lie⁡(3)\operatorname{Lie}(3) is the two-dimensional multilinear Lie module, and the factor 3 records the possible positions of the cubic factor among three products. The module interpretation and its character use standard free-Lie and symmetric-group representation theory; see [6].

Let H=S{0,2,4}×S{1,3,5}×S{6}H=\mathfrak{S}_{\{0,2,4\}}\times\mathfrak{S}_{\{1,3,5\}}\times\mathfrak{S}_{\{6\}}. A fixed identification ρ0\rho_0 taking X0,X2,X4X_0,X_2,X_4 to AA, X1,X3,X5X_1,X_3,X_5 to BB, and X6X_6 to ZZ satisfies ρ0(p)=0\rho_0(p)=0 exactly when the average of pp over HH is zero: polarization recovers the invariant multilinear component in these repeated slots. All other assignments are obtained by permuting the variable slots. Thus

K331=⋂g∈S7ker⁡(eHg−1∣V),eH=1∣H∣∑h∈Hh.(5)K_{331}=\bigcap_{g\in\mathfrak{S}_7}\ker(e_Hg^{-1}\vert_V),\qquad e_H=\frac{1}{\lvert H\rvert}\sum_{h\in H}h. \tag*{(5)}

On each simple S7\mathfrak{S}_7-constituent SλS^\lambda, the intersection in (5) is either all of SλS^\lambda or zero by invariance and irreducibility; it is all precisely when (Sλ)H=0(S^\lambda)^H=0. This applies to each multiplicity copy.

Computing the character of (4), subtracting the character of the cyclic-trace quotient, and taking irreducible character inner products gives the following complete decomposition data. The last column is dim⁡(Sλ)H\dim(S^\lambda)^H, obtained by ∣H∣−1∑h∈Hχλ(h)|H|^{-1}\sum_{h\in H}\chi^\lambda(h).

λ\lambdadim⁡Sλ\dim S^\lambdamultiplicity in VVdim⁡(Sλ)H\dim(S^\lambda)^H
(4,3)(4,3)1432
(4,2,1)(4,2,1)3541
(4,1,1,1)(4,1,1,1)2030
(3,3,1)(3,3,1)2151
(3,2,2)(3,2,2)2150
(3,2,1,1)(3,2,1,1)35100
(3,1,1,1,1)(3,1,1,1,1)1550
(2,2,2,1)(2,2,2,1)1460
(2,2,1,1,1)(2,2,1,1,1)1450
(2,1,1,1,1,1)(2,1,1,1,1,1)630

Table 1. Irreducible constituents of VV and their HH-invariants.

Proposition 2.2 (Common repeated-input kernel). A single fixed (3,3,1)(3,3,1) identification has rank 15 on VV and kernel dimension 1034. The common kernel over all assignments satisfies

dim⁡K331=1049−(3⋅14+4⋅35+5⋅21)=762.\dim K_{331}=1049-(3\cdot14+4\cdot35+5\cdot21)=762.

Proof. Table 1 and (5) show that exactly the three isotypic constituents with positive HH-invariant dimension are removed by intersecting all the conjugate kernels. Their total dimension is 42+140+105=28742+140+105=287, proving the common dimension 762. For one fixed assignment the image dimension instead equals the dimension of the HH-invariant subspace of VV, namely 3⋅2+4⋅1+5⋅1=153\cdot2+4\cdot1+5\cdot1=15. Direct repeated-word substitution gives the same rank.

For reproducibility, the trace-image character is computed on the cyclic-trace row space modulo 32003; the induced-module character is computed from (4). These modular character residues determine the exact characteristic-zero values: the trace image is a 211-dimensional rational representation, so each character value is an integer of absolute value at most 211, well within the unique centered residue interval modulo 32003. Exact character inner products then give Table 1. Irreducibility gives the intersection over every identification.

A border differential criterion and size transfer

Fix an ordinary multilinear polynomial in m+1m+1 variables, denoted p(X0,…,Xm−1,Y)p(X_0,\ldots,X_{m-1},Y), with distinguished last input YY. Later m=6m=6 and Y=X6Y=X_6. The following normal-map and size-transfer construction adapts the standard-polynomial method of [4 Lemma 11.1 and Theorem 11.3] to a general multilinear polynomial. We record the normal equations and their implications for individual polynomial values.

Fix B=(B0,…,Bm−1)∈MN(K)mB=(B_0,\ldots,B_{m-1})\in M_N(K)^m and u∈KNu\in K^N. In the following sums, w=aYbw=aYb denotes an ordinary word with coefficient cwc_w, and a(B),b(B)a(B),b(B) are ordered products (empty products are INI_N). Put

RB=∑w=aYcwa(B),QB=∑w=Ybcwb(B),(6)R_B=\sum_{w=aY}c_wa(B),\qquad Q_B=\sum_{w=Yb}c_wb(B), \tag*{(6)}
LB(Z)=p(B,Z),LB∗(P)=∑w=aYbcwb(B)Pa(B),(7)L_B(Z)=p(B,Z),\qquad L_B^*(P)=\sum_{w=aYb}c_wb(B)Pa(B), \tag*{(7)}
TB,i(P)=∑w=aYXibcwb(B)Pa(B),(8)T_{B,i}(P)=\sum_{w=aYX_i b}c_wb(B)Pa(B), \tag*{(8)}
ΓB,u0(P)=(LB∗(P),TB,0(P)u,…,TB,m−1(P)u).(9)\Gamma^0_{B,u}(P)=\bigl(L_B^*(P),T_{B,0}(P)u,\ldots,T_{B,m-1}(P)u\bigr). \tag*{(9)}

The condition w=aYXibw=aYX_i b specifies adjacent occurrences of Y,XiY,X_i. The trace pairing tr⁡(PLB(Z))=tr⁡(LB∗(P)Z)\operatorname{tr}(PL_B(Z))=\operatorname{tr}(L_B^*(P)Z) fixes the order of the factors in (7). In (9), ΓB,u0:MN→MN⊕(KN)m\Gamma^0_{B,u}:M_N\to M_N\oplus(K^N)^m is a matrix with N2N^2 columns and N2+mNN^2+mN rows after choosing matrix-unit bases.

Lemma 3.1 (Regular rank-one value). Suppose pp has formal cyclic trace zero, RBR_B and QBQ_B are invertible, and ΓB,u0\Gamma^0_{B,u} is injective. Then

Im⁡N+1(p)=slN+1(K).\operatorname{Im}_{N+1}(p)=\mathfrak{sl}_{N+1}(K).

In fact, the differential of the (m+1)(m+1)-input evaluation map is surjective onto slN+1\mathfrak{sl}_{N+1} at an input whose value is nonzero, square-zero and rank one.

Proof. Use the enlarged matrices

Ai=(Bi000),Y∗=(0u00).A_i=\begin{pmatrix}B_i&0\\0&0\end{pmatrix},\qquad Y_*=\begin{pmatrix}0&u\\0&0\end{pmatrix}.

Only words ending in YY survive, so

p(A0,…,Am−1,Y∗)=(0RBu00).p(A_0,\ldots,A_{m-1},Y_*)= \begin{pmatrix}0&R_Bu\\0&0\end{pmatrix}.

Since the formal trace vanishes, LB∗(IN)=0L_B^*(I_N)=0. If u=0u=0, the identity matrix would lie in ker⁡ΓB,u0\ker\Gamma^0_{B,u}, contrary to injectivity. Therefore u≠0u\ne0 and the displayed value is a nonzero rank-one square-zero matrix.

We compute the differential normal using the trace pairing. Variations of the top-right and bottom-left blocks of YY give v↦RBvv\mapsto R_Bv and c↦cQBc\mapsto cQ_B, respectively. Their invertibility forces the normal to be block diagonal, diag⁡(P,s)\operatorname{diag}(P,s). Since the differential takes values in slN+1(K)\mathfrak{sl}_{N+1}(K), subtracting a scalar normal sets s=0s=0 without changing its class. A variation Y↦diag⁡(Z,0)Y \mapsto\operatorname{diag}(Z,0) gives the old-block equation LB∗(P)=0L_B^*(P)=0. A lower-left row variation in one AiA_i can contribute an old-block diagonal term precisely when YY is immediately followed by that occurrence of XiX_i. Its trace pairing with PP is the row paired against TB,i(P)uT_{B,i}(P)u. Possible contributions to the bottom-right scalar equation disappear after the scalar-normal normalization. All remaining variations vanish against the normalized diagonal normal or lie in already controlled off-diagonal blocks. Hence the normalized normal equations are exactly

LB∗(P)=0,TB,i(P)u=0(0≤i<m).L_B^*(P)=0,\qquad T_{B,i}(P)u=0\quad(0\le i<m).

Their only solution is P=0P=0 by injectivity, and the differential is surjective onto slN+1\mathfrak{sl}_{N+1}.

Surjectivity of this differential at the attained rank-one square-zero value implies actual surjectivity. The source and target affine spaces are smooth, so the evaluation morphism is smooth at this input and its image contains a Zariski-open neighborhood of that value. The image is invariant under simultaneous conjugation and, by multilinearity, under multiplication by any nonzero scalar. For any nonscalar T∈slN+1T\in\mathfrak{sl}_{N+1}, choose a basis with T12≠0T_{12}\ne0. The curve

t↦t2D(t)TD(t)−1,D(t)=diag⁡(t−1,t,1,…,1),t\mapsto t^2D(t)TD(t)^{-1},\qquad D(t)=\operatorname{diag}(t^{-1},t,1,\ldots,1),

extends regularly to t=0t=0 with value T12E12T_{12}E_{12}. Conjugating and rescaling the open neighborhood to one of this rank-one matrix, the curve meets it at some t≠0t\ne0, since KK is infinite. Thus TT itself belongs to the image. Zero is obtained by setting one input to zero. Hence every traceless matrix is attained by a single evaluation of pp. □

Definition 3.2. For a fixed pp and the same distinguished slot YY, a positive integer NN is admissible if some pair (B,u)(B,u) of size NN satisfies the three conditions of Lemma 3.1.

Lemma 3.3 (Additive-size transfer). For the same polynomial pp and the same slot YY, the set of admissible core sizes is closed under addition. Thus, if 3, 4, 5 are admissible for pp, then every core size N≥3N\ge3 is admissible.

Proof. Take witnesses (A,ua)(A,u_a) and (C,ub)(C,u_b) of core sizes a,ba,b. In the same variables set

Bi(t)=diag⁡(Ai,tCi),u=(ua,ub)t.B_i(t)=\operatorname{diag}(A_i,tC_i),\qquad u=(u_a,u_b)^t.

For nonzero tt, the endpoint matrices of (6) are block diagonal with blocks RA,tmRCR_A,t^mR_C and QA,tmQCQ_A,t^mQ_C, so both remain invertible. The map LB(t)∗L_{B(t)}^* preserves each of the four matrix blocks. At t=0t=0, the two mixed-block restrictions of LB(t)∗L_{B(t)}^* are invertible: they are adjoint to X↦RAXX\mapsto R_AX and X↦XQAX\mapsto XQ_A on the corresponding rectangular spaces. Each determinant is a nonzero polynomial in tt, and so one may choose a common t≠0t\ne0 for which both mixed restrictions remain invertible. If ΓB(t),u0(P)=0\Gamma^{0}_{B(t),u}(P)=0, the first component LB(t)∗(P)=0L^{*}_{B(t)}(P)=0 now forces both mixed blocks of PP to vanish. The remaining diagonal equations split into the aa-core equations and the bb-core equations, scaled in the second block by the nonzero powers tmt^{m} for L∗L^{*} and tm−1t^{m-1} for each TiT_i. Injectivity at both cores forces the two diagonal blocks of PP to vanish. This constructs one larger witness for the same pp, using one tuple B(t)B(t) and one parameter tt.

Every integer N≥6N \ge6 is a sum of 3, 4, and 5, as is clear by induction from 6, 7, 8; the assertion for N=3,4,5N=3,4,5 is the hypothesis. Repeated application proves the last claim. □

An explicit polynomial and three regular cores

For r≥1r \ge1 let sr(X0,…,Xr−1)s_r(X_0,\ldots,X_{r-1}) be the unnormalized alternating sum over Sr\mathcal{S}_r. Define

q0=[s4(X0,X1,X2,X3)[X4,X5],X6].(10)q_0=[s_4(X_0,X_1,X_2,X_3)[X_4,X_5],X_6]. \tag*{(10)}

The standard identity

s4(X0,X1,X2,X3)={[X0,X1],[X2,X3]}−{[X0,X2],[X1,X3]}+{[X0,X3],[X1,X2]},{A,B}=AB+BA,s_4(X_0,X_1,X_2,X_3)=\{[X_0,X_1],[X_2,X_3]\}-\{[X_0,X_2],[X_1,X_3]\}+\{[X_0,X_3],[X_1,X_2]\},\qquad\{A,B\}=AB+BA,

shows that s4∈J2s_4 \in J^2; hence q0∈J3q_0 \in J^3. Each variable enters a commutator, so q0q_0 is proper, and its outer commutator gives trcyc⁡(q0)=0\operatorname{trcyc}(q_0)=0. Among four alternating inputs X0,…,X3X_0,\ldots,X_3 some two coincide under every three-value assignment, so every (3,3,1)(3,3,1) restriction vanishes. Thus

q0∈K331.(11)q_0 \in K_{331}. \tag*{(11)}

The verification data specify integer B0,…,B5∈MN(Z)B_0,\ldots,B_5 \in M_N(\mathbb{Z}) and u∈ZNu \in\mathbb{Z}^N for each N=3,4,5N=3,4,5, together with a prescribed N2N^2-row square minor of the complete normal matrix (9). Write δN(p)\delta_N(p) for the product of the two endpoint determinants and this fixed normal minor, calculated with the same integral inputs and rows but with pp in place of q0q_0. Then

deg⁡δN=2N+N2,Δcore=δ3δ4δ5,deg⁡Δcore=15+24+35=74.(12)\deg\delta_N=2N+N^2,\qquad\Delta_{\mathrm{core}}=\delta_3\delta_4\delta_5,\qquad\deg\Delta_{\mathrm{core}}=15+24+35=74. \tag*{(12)}

Every determinant here is a polynomial in the ordinary coefficients of pp, and so restricts to a polynomial on K331K_{331}.

Proposition 4.1 (Nonzero seed certificates). The coefficient polynomial Δcore∣K331\Delta_{\mathrm{core}}|_{K_{331}} is not identically zero. Every p∈K331p \in K_{331} for which Δcore(p)≠0\Delta_{\mathrm{core}}(p) \ne0 has

Im⁡n(p)=sln(K)for every n≥4.\operatorname{Im}_{n}(p)=\mathfrak{sl}_{n}(K)\qquad\text{for every }n\ge4.

Proof. The reproducible algorithm selects the rows of δN\delta_N; their zero-based indices appear in results/deep_minors.json. Table 2 gives the computed endpoint determinants, the full normal ranks, and the chosen normal-minor determinants modulo 101 at q0q_0. Each residue is nonzero. Since the inputs and q0q_0 have integral coefficients, the corresponding integer determinants are therefore nonzero. By (11), Δcore\Delta_{\mathrm{core}} is nonzero on K331K_{331}.

For any pp on this nonvanishing locus, the same determinant conditions give three admissible cores of orders 3, 4, 5. Lemma 3.3 transfers admissibility to every N≥3N\ge3 for that same pp; Lemma 3.1 then proves the asserted actual images in all orders n=N+1≥4n=N+1\ge4. □

NNtarget nndet⁡R\det Rdet⁡Q\det QΓ0\Gamma^0 sizerankminordegree
34257627×927 \times99815
454440×1640 \times16169124
56158655×2555 \times25253735

Table 2. Exact border certificates for q0q_0 modulo 101.

The full original-variable Jacobians were separately computed by word differentiation at the same three enlarged inputs, using the same q0q_0 word coefficients. Their ranks modulo 101 are respectively 15, 24, 35, equal to dim⁡sln\dim\mathfrak{sl}_n for n=4,5,6n=4,5,6. These computations check the full differential on the recorded examples; Lemma 3.3 supplies every larger size. A direct mixed-block check also joins the N=3N=3 and N=4N=4 witnesses at t=1t=1 into a core of size 7.

The separate 3-by-3 argument

The border certificates above begin at n=4n=4. We treat the 3×33\times3 case using a diagonal-slice argument.

Let EijE_{ij} (0≤i,j≤20\le i,j\le2) be the standard matrix units in M3(K)M_3(K), and fix the seven-input tuple

a=(E00,E01,E02,E20,E10,E01,E10).(13)a=(E_{00},E_{01},E_{02},E_{20},E_{10},E_{01},E_{10}). \tag*{(13)}

The directed multigraph associated with these seven matrix-unit factors is balanced at each vertex. Any nonzero ordered product is a directed trail traversing all seven edges and therefore a closed trail; its value is diagonal. Thus for p∈Wp\in W (indeed for any ordinary multilinear septic) the value

D(p)=p(a)D(p)=p(a)

is diagonal. For p∈Vp\in V its trace vanishes. Consider the quadratic coefficient polynomial

Q3(p)=tr⁡(D(p)2).(14)Q_3(p)=\operatorname{tr}(D(p)^2). \tag*{(14)}

Direct exact matrix-unit evaluation gives

D(q0)=diag⁡(2,−2,0),Q3(q0)=8.(15)D(q_0)=\operatorname{diag}(2,-2,0),\qquad Q_3(q_0)=8. \tag*{(15)}

Lemma 5.1 (A two-dimensional multilinear slice). Let F:U1×⋯×Ur→TF: U_1 \times\cdots\times U_r \to T be a multilinear map over an infinite field, where dim⁡T=2\dim T = 2. If the linear span of its individual values is TT, then one can fix all but one input in such a way that the remaining linear map is onto TT. Consequently, the set of individual values of FF equals TT.

Proof. Suppose every one-coordinate slice has rank at most one. Choose tuples a,ba,b such that F(a),F(b)F(a),F(b) are independent. The independence condition is a nonempty Zariski-open condition on pairs of tuples. Since FF is nonzero, the condition that each of the finitely many 2r2^r mixed tuples (choosing in each coordinate the value from aa or bb) have nonzero image is also a nonempty open condition. The product of the input affine spaces is irreducible; hence a pair (a,b)(a,b) satisfies both conditions simultaneously.

Connect aa to bb by successively changing one coordinate at a time. Two consecutive nonzero values lie in the same one-dimensional slice image and are therefore proportional. Repetition makes F(a)F(a) and F(b)F(b) proportional, a contradiction. Thus a one-coordinate slice has rank two; varying that coordinate produces every element of TT as a single value.

Lemma 5.2 (Every traceless diagonal is attained). If p∈Vp \in V and Q3(p)≠0Q_3(p) \ne0, then every trace-zero diagonal 3×33 \times3 matrix belongs to Im⁡3(p)\operatorname{Im}_3(p).

Proof. Use the cyclic diagonal Z/3Z\mathbb{Z}/3\mathbb{Z}-grading

M3(K)=⨁d∈Z/3ZGd,Gd=span⁡{Ei,i+d:i∈Z/3Z}.M_3(K) = \bigoplus_{d \in\mathbb{Z}/3\mathbb{Z}} G_d,\qquad G_d = \operatorname{span}\{E_{i,i+d}: i \in\mathbb{Z}/3\mathbb{Z}\}.

The seven entries of (13) have degrees

(0,1,2,1,2,1,2),(0,1,2,1,2,1,2),

whose sum is zero modulo three. Restrict the iith input of pp to its corresponding GdiG_{d_i}. All products, and hence every value of the resulting multilinear map, lie in G0G_0, the diagonal subspace. Since p∈Vp \in V, these values are trace zero. Thus we have a multilinear map into the two-dimensional space

T={diag⁡(a,b,c):a+b+c=0}.T = \{\operatorname{diag}(a,b,c): a+b+c=0\}.

Its image contains D(p)D(p). Simultaneously conjugating the fixed tuple by the cyclic permutation matrix keeps each input inside the same GdiG_{d_i} and yields a cyclic rotation CD(p)C−1CD(p)C^{-1} of this diagonal value.

If these two vectors of TT were proportional, then D(p)D(p) would lie in an eigenline of the cyclic rotation operator on TT. Over algebraically closed characteristic zero, those eigenlines are spanned by (1,ω,ω2)(1,\omega,\omega^2) and (1,ω2,ω)(1,\omega^2,\omega), with ω3=1\omega^3=1 and ω≠1\omega\ne1. Both have tr⁡(D2)=0\operatorname{tr}(D^2)=0, contradicting Q3(p)≠0Q_3(p) \ne0. Hence the multilinear map spans TT, and Lemma 5.1 realizes every member of TT by a single tuple of inputs.

Proposition 5.3 (Completion at order three). If p∈Vp \in V and Q3(p)≠0Q_3(p) \ne0, then

Im⁡3(p)=sl3(K).\operatorname{Im}_3(p)=\mathfrak{sl}_3(K).

Proof. The image is contained in sl3(K)\mathfrak{sl}_3(K) because tr⁡cyc(p)=0\operatorname{tr}_{\mathrm{cyc}}(p)=0. Theorem 2 of Kanel-Belov–Malev–Rowen [3] classifies the images of multilinear polynomials on M3(K)M_3(K) as zero, scalars, sl3\mathfrak{sl}_3 possibly lacking diagonalizable matrices of discriminant zero, a dense subset of M3M_3, the 3-scalar matrices, or scalars together with 3-scalar matrices. The traceless alternative permits this possible exception.

Our value D(p)D(p) is nonzero and satisfies tr⁡(D(p)2)≠0\operatorname{tr}(D(p)^2) \ne0. Since every value has trace zero, the scalar alternative (apart from zero), the traceful dense-M3M_3 alternative, and the corresponding scalar-plus-3-scalar alternative are excluded. For a 3-scalar matrix the three eigenvalues are β\beta, βω\beta\omega, βω2\beta\omega^2; their squares sum to zero, so Q3(p)≠0Q_3(p) \ne0 also excludes the 3-scalar alternative. Consequently the Kanel-Belov–Malev–Rowen theorem places the image in its traceless alternative.

Lemma 5.2 supplies all trace-zero diagonal matrices as actual values, including the potentially excluded diagonalizable discriminant-zero cases (those similar to diag⁡(c,c,−2c)\operatorname{diag}(c,c,-2c)). Similarity invariance fills their conjugacy classes. The remaining traceless Jordan forms already lie in the traceless alternative of the cited theorem. Thus no exceptional class remains and Im⁡3(p)=sl3(K)\operatorname{Im}_3(p)=\mathfrak{sl}_3(K).

Proof of Theorem 1.1. The dimension statements were proved in § 2. With the integral input tuples, endpoint determinants and normal minors fixed in § 4, define

U={p∈K331:Δcore(p)Q3(p)≠0}.(16)U=\{p\in K_{331}:\Delta_{\mathrm{core}}(p)Q_3(p)\ne0\}. \tag*{(16)}

Both factors are polynomial in the coefficients of pp. Their degrees are 74 and 2, so their product has homogeneous degree 76. Equations (11), the nonzero residues in Table 2, and (15) show that this polynomial is nonzero at q0∈K331q_0\in K_{331}. Thus UU is a nonempty coefficient-Zariski-open subset. Proposition 4.1 yields the actual full traceless image at every n≥4n\ge4, for each fixed p∈Up\in U; Proposition 5.3 supplies n=3n=3 for the same pp. This proves (2).

The full-image equality for the particular polynomial q0=[h6,X6]q_0=[h_6,X_6], where h6=s4(X0,…,X3)[X4,X5]h_6=s_4(X_0,\ldots,X_3)[X_4,X_5], also follows from earlier results. Indeed, the matrix-unit evaluation

tr⁡h6(E00,E01,E12,E20,E01,E10)=−1\operatorname{tr} h_6(E_{00},E_{01},E_{12},E_{20},E_{01},E_{10})=-1

shows that h6h_6 has nonzero formal cyclic trace. Pan’s degree-six classification [5 Theorem A] therefore gives Im⁡n(h6)=Mn(K)\operatorname{Im}_n(h_6)=M_n(K) for n≥3n\ge3; the classical single-commutator theorem [1] then gives Im⁡n(q0)=sln(K)\operatorname{Im}_n(q_0)=\mathfrak{sl}_n(K). In Theorem 1.1, q0q_0 serves to certify nonemptiness of the coefficient-open family.

Relation to earlier image methods

The smooth rank-one image criterion used in § 3 appears in Pan’s work [5, Lemma 1.7 and Corollary 1.8 and in the standard-polynomial setting [4 Lemma 9.1]. The present border construction accommodates general septic words through distinct endpoint operators RBR_B, QBQ_B and the adjacent-word normal maps TB,iT_{B,i}. Tang’s degree-five and degree-six methods [7] provide further context.

Fagundes and Koshlukov [2 Theorem 5.2] give a sufficient graded-identity criterion for the image of a multilinear polynomial to contain all traceless matrices. It requires that the specialization with all but one variable of neutral degree remain outside the graded TZT_Z-ideal generated by [y1,y2][y_1,y_2] for every non-neutral degree assigned to the remaining variable. For the present proper septics in J3J^3, every such specialization vanishes on diagonal neutral inputs, since three commutator-ideal factors cannot survive when only one input is non-diagonal. The regular border evaluations here provide a different sufficient condition. The representation and cyclic-trace bookkeeping draw on classical free-Lie methods [6]; full images follow from the additional regularity and M3M_3 arguments.

Exact finite records and reproduction

The source archive accompanying this manuscript includes code/, data/, results/, requirements.txt and run_checks.sh. The complete fixed matrices and column vectors for the three seed sizes are stored in data/deep_core_inputs.json; all coefficient expansions used for these certificates are reconstructed directly in the scripts. The scripts use Python 3 with the NumPy dependency specified in requirements.txt. From the archive root, install those requirements and run bash run_checks.sh.

The scripts have distinct tasks. code/verify_septic_trace.py expands all 1260 generators, checks their word independence modulo 32003 and computes the cyclic-trace rank 211 by exact rational sparse elimination and by reduction modulo 32003. code/verify_rep_filtration.py computes the induced and trace-image characters, irreducible multiplicities and Young-subgroup fixed spaces that give the common-kernel dimension 762. code/verify_deep_minors.py expands the 96 ordinary words of q0q_0, reconstructs RBR_B, QBQ_B, LB∗L_B^*, TB,iT_{B,i}, chooses and records explicit rows for the three N2N^2-column minors, and checks the nonzero residues of Table 2. The selected rows and residues are recorded in results/deep_minors.json. It also checks a sample combined size-7 core. code/verify_deep_jacobians.py differentiates the full seven-input matrix evaluation to check the rank n2−1n^2-1 at n=4,5,6n=4,5,6, and code/verify_deep_m3.py checks (13)–(15) by exact matrix-unit arithmetic.

The certificates use fixed integer data. Each nonzero minor modulo 101 certifies a nonzero integer determinant; the reported residues are reduced values, not the unreduced determinants. The proof for every matrix order combines these finite seed certificates with the representation-theoretic, additive-size and diagonal-slice arguments.

Use of AI

OpenAI’s GPT-6 Pro contributed substantially to mathematical development, computational verification, source analysis, and the preparation of this manuscript. The author directed the work and retains responsibility for the mathematical claims and their presentation.

References

  1. [1]A. A. Albert and Benjamin Muckenhoupt, On matrices of trace zeros, Michigan Math. J. 4 (1957), no. 1, 1–3, doi:10.1307/mmj/1028990168.DOI
  2. [2]Pedro Fagundes and Plamen Koshlukov, Images of multilinear graded polynomials on upper triangular matrix algebras, Canad. J. Math. 75 (2023), no. 5, 1540–1565, doi:10.4153/S0008414X22000438.DOI
  3. [3]Alexey Kanel-Belov, Sergey Malev, and Louis Rowen, The images of multilinear polynomials evaluated on 3 × 3 matrices, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 144 (2016), no. 1, 7–19, doi:10.1090/proc/12478.
  4. [4]Y. T. Miah, The L’vov–Kaplansky conjecture for standard polynomials, Hexagon preprint 2611.00184v1, 2026, doi:10.5281/zenodo.24031055.
  5. [5]Shengyong Pan, The L’vov–Kaplansky conjecture for multilinear polynomials of degrees four to six, Hexagon preprint 2611.00173v1, 2026.
  6. [6]Christopher Reutenauer, Free Lie algebras, London Mathematical Society Monographs, New Series, vol. 7, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1993, doi:10.1093/oso/9780198536796.001.0001.DOI
  7. [7]Qiyue Tang, The L’vov–Kaplansky conjecture in degrees five and six, aiXiv preprint 2611.00692v1, 2026.

Paper details

vlnc:W_gpgcunyt
v1 · latestHistory (1)

published · Fresh — published within the last 30 days

Usage

views · 0

downloads · 0

A view counts once per browser per day, a download each time the PDF is requested.

CC BY 4.0

Original source

  • Mathematics

OpenAI ChatGPT 6 Pro · View statement →

Looking for related papers…
Contents