alphaFeedback

WorksMathematics

Long-root \SL_2 dual pairs in split exceptional groups: Compact types, cone geometry, and theta correspondence

AI contributions
  • ChatGPT-6 Astra
View details

Abstract

The paper establishes a case of Howe duality for an exceptional theta correspondence using the ping-pong of types method. To that end, one needs to compute lifts of types of maximal compact subgroups. A brand new ingredient enters here: The graded module of the minimal representations is the coordinate ring of an affine cone whose projectivization is a Grassmannian. Via the filtered Nakayama lemma the problem of lifting types becomes a problem in algebraic geometry: compute certain linear sections of the Grassmannian.

Introduction

Let HH be the group of real points of a split simply connected algebraic group of type EnE_n, with n=6,7,8n = 6, 7, 8, and let Π\Pi be its spherical minimal Harish–Chandra module. A long root determines a subgroup G1≃SL2(R)G_1 \simeq\mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbb{R}) whose centralizer G2G_2 is, respectively, SL6(R)\mathrm{SL}_6(\mathbb{R}), split Spin12\mathrm{Spin}_{12}, or split simply connected E7E_7. The multiplication map G1×G2→HG_1 \times G_2 \to H has central kernel μ2\mu_2, the group of square roots of 1. All restrictions below are understood through this map. Choose compatible maximal compact subgroups K⊂HK \subset H and Ki⊂GiK_i \subset G_i, with K1=SO(2)K_1 = \mathrm{SO}(2), and write h=k⊕p\mathfrak{h} = \mathfrak{k} \oplus\mathfrak{p} and gi=ki⊕pi\mathfrak{g}_i = \mathfrak{k}_i \oplus\mathfrak{p}_i for their complexified Cartan decompositions.

For a (sl2,K1)(\mathfrak{sl}_2,K_1) Harish–Chandra module π\pi, let π∨\pi^\vee denote its K1K_1-finite contragredient. We define its big theta lift by coinvariants:

Θ(π)=(Π⊗π∨)(sl2,K1),\Theta(\pi) = (\Pi\otimes\pi^\vee)_{(\mathfrak{sl}_2,K_1)},

where the subscript denotes coinvariants for the diagonal action. This construction does not require π\pi to be irreducible and defines a contravariant functor to (g2,K2)(\mathfrak{g}_2,K_2)-modules. If π\pi is irreducible, then π⊠Θ(π)\pi\boxtimes\Theta(\pi) is the largest π\pi-isotypic quotient of Π\Pi, recovering the usual definition; see Bakić–Loke–Savin [1].

Our purpose is to prove that, for every irreducible π\pi, the big lift Θ(π)\Theta(\pi) is a nonzero finite-length (g2,K2)(\mathfrak{g}_2,K_2)-module with a unique irreducible quotient, using the ping-pong method of [11]. To that end we compute the lifts of types of the maximal compact subgroups of G1G_1 and G2G_2.

Let vω∈p∗v_\omega\in\mathfrak{p}^* be a nonzero highest-weight vector for KK. The highest-weight vector cone is

X^=KC⋅vω‾⊂p∗.\widehat{X} = \overline{K_{\mathbb{C}} \cdot v_\omega} \subset\mathfrak{p}^*.

2020 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 22E47; Secondary 11F27, 14M15. where KCK_{\mathbb{C}} is the complexification of KK. Throughout, we identify p∗\mathfrak{p}^{*} with p\mathfrak{p} using the Killing form. Write X=P(X^)X=\mathbb{P}(\widehat{X}) for the projectivization of the cone. With its standard filtration, Π\Pi has associated graded module

R=gr⁡Π=C[X^].R=\operatorname{gr}\Pi=\mathbb{C}[\widehat{X}].

The quotient R/(p2)R/(\mathfrak{p}_2) is the coordinate ring of the scheme-theoretic linear section X^∩p2⊥\widehat{X}\cap\mathfrak{p}_2^{\perp}. Computing this quotient is the algebraic-geometric problem that underlies the lifting of types.

Two calculations drive the argument. First, R/(p2)R/(\mathfrak{p}_2) describes finite generating sets for the lifts of the characters of SO(2)\mathrm{SO}(2). More precisely, as an SO(2)×K2\mathrm{SO}(2)\times K_2-module this quotient decomposes as

R/(p2)=⨁k∈Zχk⊠Qk.R/(\mathfrak{p}_2)=\bigoplus_{k\in\mathbb{Z}}\chi_k\boxtimes Q_k.

where each QkQ_k is a finite-dimensional graded K2K_2-module. Let N(k)=Hom⁡K1(χk,R)N(k)=\operatorname{Hom}_{K_1}(\chi_k,R) be the lift of χk\chi_k in the graded model. Since p2\mathfrak{p}_2 has circle weight zero, Qk=N(k)/p2N(k)Q_k=N(k)/\mathfrak{p}_2N(k). The graded Nakayama lemma shows that homogeneous K2K_2-equivariant lifts of QkQ_k to N(k)N(k) generate N(k)N(k) over Sym⁡(p2)\operatorname{Sym}(\mathfrak{p}_2). We then lift these generators to the corresponding filtration degrees in Hom⁡K1(χk,Π)\operatorname{Hom}_{K_1}(\chi_k,\Pi). Induction on the filtration shows that they generate this lift over U(g2)U(\mathfrak{g}_2). Thus, in the filtered setting, the lift of χk\chi_k is a quotient of the universal module induced from QkQ_k:

U(g2)⊗U(k2)Qk↠Hom⁡K1(χk,Π).U(\mathfrak{g}_2)\otimes_{U(\mathfrak{k}_2)}Q_k\twoheadrightarrow\operatorname{Hom}_{K_1}(\chi_k,\Pi).

The K2K_2-types occurring in these finite-dimensional spaces QkQ_k are the relevant types. As described in § 4, they form two ordered sequences σ0=1,σ±1,σ±2,…\sigma_0=1,\sigma_{\pm1},\sigma_{\pm2},\ldots, with

Q±N=⨁r=0∣N/2∣σ±(N−2r)(N≥0).Q_{\pm N}=\bigoplus_{r=0}^{\lvert N/2\rvert}\sigma_{\pm(N-2r)}\qquad(N\geq0).

Ordering each sequence by its nonnegative index, QkQ_k has σk\sigma_k as its largest K2K_2-type.

The second calculation describes reverse lifts of the relevant types σk\sigma_k. We have

RK2=C[a,b]=Sym⁡(p1),p1=Ca⊕Cb,wt⁡(a)=−2,wt⁡(b)=2.R^{K_2}=\mathbb{C}[a,b]=\operatorname{Sym}(\mathfrak{p}_1),\qquad\mathfrak{p}_1=\mathbb{C}a\oplus\mathbb{C}b,\qquad\operatorname{wt}(a)=-2,\quad\operatorname{wt}(b)=2.

Here wt⁡(a)\operatorname{wt}(a) and wt⁡(b)\operatorname{wt}(b) denote the weights for the circle K1=SO(2)K_1=\mathrm{SO}(2). Since RR is a domain, it is a torsion-free RK2R^{K_2}-module. The multiplicity space Mk=Hom⁡K2(σk,R)M_k=\operatorname{Hom}_{K_2}(\sigma_k,R) is therefore torsion-free as well. The calculation in § 5 gives its Poincaré series:

PMk(t,z)=t∣k∣zk(1−tz−2)(1−tz2).P_{M_k}(t,z)=\frac{t^{\lvert k\rvert}z^k}{(1-tz^{-2})(1-tz^2)}.

where tt records degree and zz records circle weight. A nonzero element of MkM_k in degree ∣k∣\lvert k\rvert and weight kk generates a free rank-one RK2R^{K_2}-submodule, by torsion-freeness. The displayed series shows that this submodule exhausts MkM_k, so MkM_k is itself free of rank one over RK2R^{K_2}. Passing back to Π\Pi, the reverse lift of σk\sigma_k is the universal module induced from the SO(2)\mathrm{SO}(2)-type χk\chi_k:

Hom⁡K2(σk,Π)≅U(sl2)⊗U(so2)Ck.\operatorname{Hom}_{K_2}(\sigma_k,\Pi)\cong U(\mathfrak{sl}_2)\otimes_{U(\mathfrak{so}_2)}\mathbb{C}_k.

With this indexing, σk\sigma_k has its primitive occurrence in degree ∣k∣\lvert k\rvert and circle weight kk. The representations σk\sigma_k are listed in § 4. Our main conclusion is the following.

Theorem 1.1. For each of the three dual pairs and every irreducible (sl2,SO(2))(\mathfrak{sl}_2,\mathrm{SO}(2))-module π\pi, its big theta lift Θ(π)\Theta(\pi) is nonzero and of finite length, with a unique irreducible quotient θ(π)\theta(\pi). If kk is a weight of π\pi of minimal absolute value, then Θ(π)\Theta(\pi) is generated by one copy of σk\sigma_k. The type σk\sigma_k occurs in θ(π)\theta(\pi) with multiplicity one, and no relevant type σl\sigma_l with ∣l∣<∣k∣|l|<|k| occurs there.

The reverse big lift Θ(θ(π))\Theta(\theta(\pi)) has π\pi as its unique irreducible quotient. Consequently π↦θ(π)\pi\mapsto\theta(\pi) is a bijection from Irr⁡(sl2,SO(2))\operatorname{Irr}(\mathfrak{sl}_2,\mathrm{SO}(2)) onto the irreducible G2\mathrm{G}_2-modules that occur as partners in this theta correspondence, and

dim⁡Hom⁡G1×G2(Π,π⊠θ(π))=1.\dim\operatorname{Hom}_{G_1\times G_2}\bigl(\Pi,\pi\boxtimes\theta(\pi)\bigr)=1.

Here and below homomorphisms intertwine the indicated Lie algebra and compact-group actions.

The theorem concerns the irreducible quotient of the big lift; it does not assert that the big lift itself is irreducible. A minimal weight is allowed to have either sign. If both 11 and −1-1 are minimal weights of π\pi, either can be used: its small lift contains both σ1\sigma_1 and σ−1\sigma_{-1} with multiplicity one and is generated by either.

We use the branching rules of Loke–Savin [8 Proposition 5.1] to prove the invariant and multiplicity identities needed for the present pairs. The minimal representation and its compact spectrum are supplied by Brylinski–Kostant [2]; see also [5]. For related exceptional dual pairs and their rational forms, see [7].

Section 2 fixes the groups and cone models. Sections 3 and 4 give the forward and reverse compact-type lifts. Section 5 proves the theorem. Sections 6–8 establish the three linear-section calculations, including their scheme structures. In each case the projective scheme of R/(p2)R/(\mathfrak{p}_2) has two disjoint components, each a projective cone. The bases of these cones vary with the exceptional group. They are the projectivizations of the affine cones of symmetric 4×44\times4 matrices of rank at most one, arbitrary 4×44\times4 matrices of rank at most one, and skew-symmetric 8×88\times8 matrices of rank at most two, respectively. These give the quadratic Veronese variety ν2(P3)\nu_2(\mathbb{P}^3), the Segre variety P3×P3\mathbb{P}^3\times\mathbb{P}^3, and the Grassmannian Gr⁡(2,8)\operatorname{Gr}(2,8) in its Plücker embedding. The three matrix spaces realize the simple complex Jordan algebras of rank four occurring in the Brylinski–Kostant construction [2]: the complexifications of the Jordan algebras of 4×44\times4 Hermitian matrices over R\mathbb{R}, C\mathbb{C}, and the quaternions, respectively. In each case the affine cone is the locus of elements of Jordan rank at most one; in the skew-symmetric realization, Jordan rank one corresponds to matrix rank two.

A pp-adic variant of the one-to-one correspondence in Theorem 1.1 is established by Hanzer–Savin [6]. For the same long-root dual pairs in split E6E_6, E7E_7, E8E_8 over a pp-adic field, they determine the exceptional theta correspondence and its reverse lifts; see in particular Sections 5 and 6 of that paper.

Acknowledgments

I thank Wee Teck Gan for reading a draft of this paper. I gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation through gift No. 946504, and thank the University of Utah for providing access to OpenAI. The paper was written with the help of ChatGPT-6 Astra. In addition to harmless assistance with writing, the software was used to compute the ring R/(p2)R/(\mathfrak{p}_2). The write up of this result is self contained: calculating R/(p2)R/(\mathfrak{p}_2) involves restricting the Plücker relations to p2\mathfrak{p}_2, a pleasant exercise easily done by hand, in this particular case.

The exceptional groups, dual pairs, and graded models

We describe the three dual pairs, their Cartan decompositions, and the graded models of the minimal representations.

Cartan decompositions and compact groups

All Lie algebras and algebraic varieties in the calculations are over C\mathbb{C}. The real groups are split. We use Sp⁡(4)\operatorname{Sp}(4) for the compact symplectic group of rank four, with standard complex representation of dimension eight. The ambient Cartan decompositions are as follows.

HHKKk\mathfrak{k}p\mathfrak{p}
E6E_{6}Sp⁡(4)/μ2\operatorname{Sp}(4)/\mu_{2}sp8\mathfrak{sp}_{8}Λ04C8\Lambda^{4}_{0}\mathbb{C}^{8}
E7E_{7}SU⁡(8)/μ2\operatorname{SU}(8)/\mu_{2}sl8\mathfrak{sl}_{8}Λ4C8\Lambda^{4}\mathbb{C}^{8}
E8E_{8}Spin⁡(16)/μ2\operatorname{Spin}(16)/\mu_{2}so16\mathfrak{so}_{16}S+S^{+}

Table 1.

The subscript 0 means the kernel of symplectic contraction. In the last row μ2\mu_{2} is the kernel of the chosen half-spin representation S+S^{+}; the compact group is the corresponding semispin quotient. The dimensions of p\mathfrak{p} are 42, 70, 128.

For G1≃SL⁡2(R)G_{1}\simeq\operatorname{SL}_{2}(\mathbb{R}), fix its maximal compact subgroup K1=G1∩K≃SO⁡(2)K_{1}=G_{1}\cap K\simeq\operatorname{SO}(2). Choose H0∈k1H_{0}\in\mathfrak{k}_{1} so that iH0iH_{0} is the real rotation generator, with period 2π2\pi, and put

kθ:=exp⁡(iθH0)∈K1,χm(kθ)=eimθ,m∈Z.k_{\theta}:=\exp(i\theta H_{0})\in K_{1},\qquad\chi_{m}(k_{\theta})=e^{im\theta},\qquad m\in\mathbb{Z}.

Thus H0H_{0} acts on the character χm\chi_{m} by mm. The complexified Cartan decomposition of g1\mathfrak{g}_{1} is

g1=k1⊕p1,k1=CH0,p1=CE⊕CF,[H0,E]=2E,[H0,F]=−2F.(1)\mathfrak{g}_{1}=\mathfrak{k}_{1}\oplus\mathfrak{p}_{1},\qquad\mathfrak{k}_{1}=\mathbb{C}H_{0},\qquad\mathfrak{p}_{1}=\mathbb{C}E\oplus\mathbb{C}F,\qquad[H_{0},E]=2E,\qquad[H_{0},F]=-2F. \tag*{(1)}

Thus p1=χ2⊕χ−2\mathfrak{p}_{1}=\chi_{2}\oplus\chi_{-2} with the usual integer weights of SO⁡(2)⊂SL⁡2(R)\operatorname{SO}(2)\subset\operatorname{SL}_{2}(\mathbb{R}). For the centralizers we have

HHG2G_{2}K2K_{2}p2\mathfrak{p}_{2}
E6E_{6}SL⁡6(R)\operatorname{SL}_{6}(\mathbb{R})SO⁡(6)≃SU⁡(4)/μ2\operatorname{SO}(6)\simeq\operatorname{SU}(4)/\mu_{2}Sym⁡02C6\operatorname{Sym}^{2}_{0}\mathbb{C}^{6}
E7E_{7}split Spin⁡12\operatorname{Spin}_{12}(SU⁡(4)×SU⁡(4))/μ2diag⁡(\operatorname{SU}(4)\times\operatorname{SU}(4))/\mu_{2}^{\operatorname{diag}}Λ2C4⊗Λ2C4\Lambda^{2}\mathbb{C}^{4}\otimes\Lambda^{2}\mathbb{C}^{4}
E8E_{8}split E7E_{7}SU⁡(8)/μ2\operatorname{SU}(8)/\mu_{2}Λ4C8\Lambda^{4}\mathbb{C}^{8}

Table 2.

The corresponding k2\mathfrak{k}_{2} are so6\mathfrak{so}_{6}, so6⊕so6\mathfrak{so}_{6}\oplus\mathfrak{so}_{6}, and sl8\mathfrak{sl}_{8}. The dimensions of p2\mathfrak{p}_{2} are 20, 36, 70. The adjoint branching under g1⊕g2\mathfrak{g}_{1}\oplus\mathfrak{g}_{2} is

e6=(sl2,1)⊕(1,sl6)⊕(C2⊗Λ3C6),e7=(sl2,1)⊕(1,so12)⊕(C2⊗S12),e8=(sl2,1)⊕(1,e7)⊕(C2⊗V56).(2)\begin{aligned} \mathfrak{e}_{6}&=(\mathfrak{sl}_{2},1)\oplus(1,\mathfrak{sl}_{6})\oplus(\mathbb{C}^{2}\otimes\Lambda^{3}\mathbb{C}^{6}),\\ \mathfrak{e}_{7}&=(\mathfrak{sl}_{2},1)\oplus(1,\mathfrak{so}_{12})\oplus(\mathbb{C}^{2}\otimes S_{12}),\\ \mathfrak{e}_{8}&=(\mathfrak{sl}_{2},1)\oplus(1,\mathfrak{e}_{7})\oplus(\mathbb{C}^{2}\otimes V_{56}). \tag*{(2)} \end{aligned}

Here S12S_{12} is a half-spin module of dimension 32, and V56V_{56} is the 56-dimensional fundamental E7E_{7}-module. These descriptions identify the long-root centralizers directly from the adjoint branching.

Under the inclusion K1⊂KK_{1}\subset K, the element kθk_{\theta} is exp⁡K(iθH0)\exp_{K}(i\theta H_{0}), with H0H_{0} viewed in k\mathfrak{k}. For example, in E7E_{7} write U=V⊕WU=V\oplus W with dim⁡V=dim⁡W=4\dim V=\dim W=4. The images in k=sl(U)\mathfrak{k}=\mathfrak{sl}(U) and K=SU⁡(8)/μ2K=\operatorname{SU}(8)/\mu_{2} are

H0=12diag⁡(IV,−IW),H_{0}=\frac{1}{2}\operatorname{diag}(I_{V},-I_{W}),
kθ=exp⁡K(iθH0)=[diag⁡(eiθ/2IV,e−iθ/2IW)].k_{\theta}=\exp_{K}(i\theta H_{0})=[\operatorname{diag}(e^{i\theta/2}I_{V},e^{-i\theta/2}I_{W})].

When θ\theta increases by 2π2\pi, the representative in SU⁡(8)\operatorname{SU}(8) changes by −I-I, which is trivial in KK. This realizes the period 2π2\pi of K1K_{1}. The auxiliary spaces V,WV,W have H0H_{0}-weights 1/21/2, −1/2-1/2 on the cover, while the actual K1K_{1}-modules have integer weights. In particular the weights of p1\mathfrak{p}_{1} are 2, −2-2, as in (2.1).

The minimal representation and its filtration

Let v0v_0 be a nonzero spherical vector in Π\Pi, and let ω\omega be the highest weight of p\mathfrak{p} as a KK-module. The compact spectrum is Π∣K=⨁d≥0VK(dω)\left.\Pi\right|_K = \bigoplus_{d\geq0} V_K(d\omega), with multiplicity one. Its standard filtration has

FdΠ=⨁0≤e≤dVK(eω),gr⁡Π=R=⨁d≥0H0(X,OX(d)).F_d\Pi= \bigoplus_{0\leq e\leq d} V_K(e\omega), \qquad\operatorname{gr}\Pi= R = \bigoplus_{d\geq0} H^0(X,\mathcal{O}_X(d)).

The associated graded action of Sym⁡(p)\operatorname{Sym}(\mathfrak{p}) is multiplication on the cone ring, using the Killing-form identification of p\mathfrak{p} with p∗\mathfrak{p}^*. These are the graded models of the spherical minimal representations in [2]. Explicitly:

HHXXRdR_ddim⁡X\dim X
E6E_6LG⁡(4,8)\operatorname{LG}(4,8)VC4(dω4)∗V_{C_4}(d\omega_4)^*10
E7E_7Gr⁡(4,8)\operatorname{Gr}(4,8)S(d4)(C8)∗\mathbf{S}^{(d^4)}(\mathbb{C}^8)^*16
E8E_8OGr⁡+(8,16)\operatorname{OGr}^{+}(8,16)VD8(dω8)∗V_{D_8}(d\omega_8)^*28

Table 1 (PDF p. 5).

The first two embeddings are Plücker embeddings. For E8E_8 we label the selected half-spin weight by ω8\omega_8 and use the spinor embedding. In each case RR is generated in degree one and is an integral domain.

The circle decomposition and the Jordan algebra

Let JJ be the rank-four complex Jordan algebra associated with HH in the introduction. Write Cm\mathbb{C}_m for a one-dimensional space on which K1K_1 acts by χm\chi_m, and write J1J_1 and J−1∗J^*_{-1} for JJ and its dual with circle weights 11 and −1-1, respectively. The circle decomposition of p\mathfrak{p} is

p=C−2⊕J−1∗⊕p2⊕J1⊕C2.(3)\mathfrak{p} = \mathbb{C}_{-2} \oplus J^*_{-1} \oplus\mathfrak{p}_2 \oplus J_1 \oplus\mathbb{C}_2. \tag*{(3)}

The middle term has circle weight zero, and the two K2K_2-trivial scalar lines form p1\mathfrak{p}_1. The Killing form pairs opposite weight spaces and identifies p2\mathfrak{p}_2 with linear functions on the cone; (p2)(\mathfrak{p}_2) denotes the ideal they generate in RR.

Lifts of the SO(2)-types: the common pattern

We determine generators for the lifts of SO(2)-types in RR and Π\Pi using the quotient R/(p2)R/(\mathfrak{p}_2).

Cone bases and relevant types

Put Q=R/(p2)Q = R/(\mathfrak{p}_2). We call a K2K_2-type relevant if it occurs in QQ. By (3), setting p2\mathfrak{p}_2 equal to zero cuts the highest-weight vector cone by

p2⊥=(C2⊕J1)⊕(C−2⊕J−1∗).\mathfrak{p}_2^\perp= (\mathbb{C}_2 \oplus J_1) \oplus(\mathbb{C}_{-2} \oplus J^*_{-1}).

Sections 6–8 show that this section is reduced and that Proj⁡Q=X+⊔X−\operatorname{Proj} Q = X_+ \sqcup X_-, where

X+={[λ:u]∈P(C2⊕J1):rank⁡Ju≤1},X_+ = \{[\lambda:u] \in\mathbb{P}(\mathbb{C}_2 \oplus J_1) : \operatorname{rank}_J u \leq1\},
X−={[λ:v]∈P(C−2⊕J−1∗):rank⁡J∗v≤1}.X_- = \{[\lambda:v] \in\mathbb{P}(\mathbb{C}_{-2} \oplus J^*_{-1}) : \operatorname{rank}_{J^*} v \leq1\}.

Here the ranks are Jordan ranks in the two dual matrix realizations. The vertex of X+X_+ is [1:0][1:0], representing the line C2\mathbb{C}_2. Its base is the rank-one locus in P(J1)=P(J)\mathbb{P}(J_1) = \mathbb{P}(J), embedded by [u]↦[0:u][u] \mapsto[0:u]. The cone X+X_+ is the union of the projective lines [λ:μu][\lambda:\mu u], with [λ:μ]∈P1[\lambda:\mu] \in\mathbb{P}^1, joining the vertex to these base points. Similarly, X−X_- has vertex the line C−2\mathbb{C}_{-2} and base the rank-one locus in P(J−1∗)\mathbb{P}(J^*_{-1}). The vertices belong to the two components, while the affine cones meet only at the origin. The bases, with their projective embeddings, are as follows.

HHbase of X+X_{+}base of X−X_{-}dim⁡X±\dim X_{\pm}
E6E_{6}ν2(P(V∗))\nu_{2}(\mathbb{P}(V^{*}))ν2(P(V))\nu_{2}(\mathbb{P}(V))4
E7E_{7}P(V∗)×P(W)\mathbb{P}(V^{*}) \times\mathbb{P}(W)P(V)×P(W∗)\mathbb{P}(V) \times\mathbb{P}(W^{*})7
E8E_{8}Gr⁡(2,V∗)\operatorname{Gr}(2,V^{*})Gr⁡(2,V)\operatorname{Gr}(2,V)13

Here dim⁡V=4\dim V = 4 in E6E_{6}, dim⁡V=dim⁡W=4\dim V = \dim W = 4 in E7E_{7}, and dim⁡V=8\dim V = 8 in E8E_{8}. The embeddings are the second Veronese, the Segre, and the Plücker embedding, respectively. Accordingly, the K2K_{2}-module JJ is Sym⁡2V∗\operatorname{Sym}^{2}V^{*}, V∗⊗WV^{*} \otimes W, or Λ2V∗\Lambda^{2}V^{*}, respectively.

Let S+=⨁j≥0Sj+S^{+} = \bigoplus_{j\geq0} S^{+}_{j} and S−=⨁j≥0Sj−S^{-} = \bigoplus_{j\geq0} S^{-}_{j} be the coordinate rings of the rank-at-most-one cones in JJ and J∗J^{*}, respectively, that is, the affine cones over the two bases in the table. By the standard homogeneous coordinate-ring decompositions [3, 4], each degree-jj piece is irreducible under K2K_{2}; denote its K2K_{2}-type by τj±\tau^{\pm}_{j}. Including the circle action, we have

Sj+≃χ−j⊠τj+,Sj−≃χj⊠τj−,τ0±=1.S^{+}_{j} \simeq\chi_{-j} \boxtimes\tau^{+}_{j}, \qquad S^{-}_{j} \simeq\chi_{j} \boxtimes\tau^{-}_{j}, \qquad\tau^{\pm}_{0}=1.

The coordinate weights are opposite to the vector weights on J1J_{1} and J−1∗J^{*}_{-1}. Besides the common trivial type, these are the relevant types; for j≥1j \geq1 they are listed below.

HHτj+\tau^{+}_{j}τj−\tau^{-}_{j}
E6E_{6}Sym⁡2jV\operatorname{Sym}^{2j} VSym⁡2jV∗\operatorname{Sym}^{2j} V^{*}
E7E_{7}Sym⁡jV⊗Sym⁡jW∗\operatorname{Sym}^{j} V \otimes\operatorname{Sym}^{j} W^{*}Sym⁡jV∗⊗Sym⁡jW\operatorname{Sym}^{j} V^{*} \otimes\operatorname{Sym}^{j} W
E8E_{8}S(j,j)V=Vjω2\mathbf{S}_{(j,j)}V = V_{j\omega_{2}}(S(j,j)V)∗=Vjω6(\mathbf{S}_{(j,j)}V)^{*} = V_{j\omega_{6}}

The notation τj±\tau^{\pm}_{j} records only the K2K_{2}-type; the circle weights are recorded separately above. All these types descend through the compact quotients in § 3. Geometrically, they are the irreducible constituents of H0(X±,OX±(d))H^{0}(X_{\pm}, \mathcal{O}_{X_{\pm}}(d)), for d≥0d \geq0, where O(1)\mathcal{O}(1) is the ambient Plücker line bundle in E6E_{6}, E7E_{7} and the spinor line bundle in E8E_{8}. Sections 6–8 establish the ring descriptions. The section interpretation follows from projective normality of the Veronese, Segre, and Grassmannian embeddings and their projective cones.

In the formulas below, a,b∈RK2a,b \in R^{K_{2}} are coordinates on the scalar summands C2,C−2\mathbb{C}_{2},\mathbb{C}_{-2}, extended by zero on the other summands; we use the same notation for their images in QQ. They have degree one and weights −2,2-2,2, since coordinate weights are opposite to vector weights.

Theorem 3.1. In each case Q=R/(p2)Q = R/(p_{2}), the coordinate ring of the linear section, is reduced and has graded character

ch⁡t,zQ=∑j≥0tjz−jch⁡(τj+)1−tz−2+∑j≥0tjzjch⁡(τj−)1−tz2−1.(4)\operatorname{ch}_{t,z} Q = \frac{\sum_{j\geq0} t^{j}z^{-j}\operatorname{ch}(\tau^{+}_{j})}{1-tz^{-2}} + \frac{\sum_{j\geq0} t^{j}z^{j}\operatorname{ch}(\tau^{-}_{j})}{1-tz^{2}} - 1. \tag*{(4)}

More precisely, as a graded K1×K2K_{1} \times K_{2}-algebra,

Q≃S+[a]×CS−[b].(5)Q \simeq S^{+}[a] \mathop{\times}_{\mathbb{C}} S^{-}[b]. \tag*{(5)}

The fiber product consists of pairs with the same constant term. In particular QQ is admissible even under SO⁡(2)\operatorname{SO}(2) alone. For N>0N > 0,

Q−N=⨁r=0⌊N/2⌋τN−2r+,QN=⨁r=0⌊N/2⌋τN−2r−,Q0=1.(6)Q_{-N} = \bigoplus_{r=0}^{\lfloor N/2 \rfloor} \tau^{+}_{N-2r}, \qquad Q_{N} = \bigoplus_{r=0}^{\lfloor N/2 \rfloor} \tau^{-}_{N-2r}, \qquad Q_{0}=1. \tag*{(6)}

The summand indexed by rr has degree $N-r.

The scheme and graded-ring calculations proving this theorem are given in Sections 6–8. To make the circle action entirely explicit, forgetting the degree, (3.2) means

Q=⨁q∈Zχ2q⊠1⊕⨁j≥1, q≥0χ−j−2q⊠τj+⊕⨁j≥1, q≥0χj+2q⊠τj−.(7)Q = \bigoplus_{q\in\mathbb{Z}} \chi_{2q}\boxtimes1 \oplus\bigoplus_{j\geq1,\,q\geq0} \chi_{-j-2q}\boxtimes\tau_j^{+} \oplus\bigoplus_{j\geq1,\,q\geq0} \chi_{j+2q}\boxtimes\tau_j^{-}. \tag*{(7)}

The degree in the first sum is ∣q∣|q|, and in the other sums it is j+qj+q. In particular the weight-zero lift in this quotient is just 11.

Passage to the minimal representation

For k∈Zk\in\mathbb{Z} set

N(k)=Hom⁡K1(χk,R),A(k)=Hom⁡K1(χk,Π).N(k)=\operatorname{Hom}_{K_1}(\chi_k,R), \qquad A(k)=\operatorname{Hom}_{K_1}(\chi_k,\Pi).

The graded Sym⁡(p2)\operatorname{Sym}(\mathfrak{p}_2)-module N(k)N(k) retains the grading of RR: its degree-dd part is Hom⁡K1(χk,Rd)\operatorname{Hom}_{K_1}(\chi_k,R_d). The filtered module A(k)A(k) is a (g2,K2)(\mathfrak{g}_2,K_2)-module. Define the signed notation

σ0=1,σ−j=τj+,σj=τj−(j≥1).(8)\sigma_0=1,\qquad\sigma_{-j}=\tau_j^{+},\qquad\sigma_j=\tau_j^{-}\quad(j\geq1). \tag*{(8)}

Thus the index of σk\sigma_k is its primitive circle weight.

For k≠0k\ne0, put

F(k)=⨁r=0⌊∣k∣/2⌋σsgn⁡(k)(∣k∣−2r),F(0)=1.(9)F(k)=\bigoplus_{r=0}^{\lfloor|k|/2\rfloor}\sigma_{\operatorname{sgn}(k)(|k|-2r)},\qquad F(0)=1. \tag*{(9)}

When ∣k∣|k| is even the last summand is σ0\sigma_0, included only once.

Corollary 3.2. The module A(k)A(k) is generated over U(g2)U(\mathfrak{g}_2) by filtered lifts of F(k)F(k). The summand indexed by rr lifts in filtration degree ∣k∣−r|k|-r. In particular every A(k)A(k) is finitely generated, and A(0)A(0) is generated by the spherical vector.

Proof. Taking a fixed compact type commutes with associated graded because compact representations are semisimple. Thus gr⁡A(k)=N(k)\operatorname{gr} A(k)=N(k). Since p2\mathfrak{p}_2 has circle weight zero, N(k)/p2N(k)=Qk=F(k)N(k)/\mathfrak{p}_2N(k)=Q_k=F(k) with the degrees specified above. Choose homogeneous lifts of a basis of this quotient. Induction on degree shows that they generate N(k)N(k) over Sym⁡(p2)\operatorname{Sym}(\mathfrak{p}_2): after subtracting their constant coefficients, an element lies in p2N(k)\mathfrak{p}_2N(k), and its coefficients have smaller degree. Lift these generators K2K_2-equivariantly to A(k)A(k) and apply the same filtration induction using U(g2)U(\mathfrak{g}_2). This proves the claim.

Reverse lifts of the relevant types

For a K2K_2-type τ\tau define

M(τ)=Hom⁡K2(τ,R),B(τ)=Hom⁡K2(τ,Π).M(\tau)=\operatorname{Hom}_{K_2}(\tau,R),\qquad B(\tau)=\operatorname{Hom}_{K_2}(\tau,\Pi).

Their gradings and filtrations retain the circle action. We compute only the reverse lifts needed for the relevant types.

Theorem 4.1. In each of the three cases,

RK2=C[a,b]=Sym⁡(p1).(10)R^{K_2}=\mathbb{C}[a,b]=\operatorname{Sym}(\mathfrak{p}_1). \tag*{(10)}

For every signed relevant type σk\sigma_k, its graded multiplicity space M(σk)M(\sigma_k) is free of rank one over this invariant ring, with generator in degree ∣k∣|k| and weight kk. Its Poincaré series is

Pσk(t,z)=t∣k∣zk(1−tz−2)(1−tz2).(11)P_{\sigma_k}(t,z)=\frac{t^{|k|}z^k}{(1-tz^{-2})(1-tz^2)}. \tag*{(11)}

Moreover, as a (sl2,SO(2))(\mathfrak{sl}_2,\mathrm{SO}(2))-module,

B(σk)≃I(k):=U(sl2)⊗U(so2)Ck,(12)B(\sigma_k)\simeq I(k):=U(\mathfrak{sl}_2)\otimes_{U(\mathfrak{so}_2)}\mathbb{C}_k, \tag*{(12)}

with its generating line in filtration degree ∣k∣|k|.

Branching and the Poincaré series

We use the restriction of RdR_d to K1×K2K_1\times K_2, retaining both its circle weights and its K2K_2-types. The branching rules are given by Loke–Savin [8 Proposition 5.1], with m=4m=4 in each of its three cases. We state only their consequence for the relevant types, in the notation and integer circle-weight normalization of Section 3.

For every k∈Zk\in\mathbb{Z} and d≥0d\geq0, the K1K_1-module of multiplicities is

Hom⁡K2(σk,Rd)=⨁r,s≥0r+s=d−∣k∣χk−2r+2s.(13)\operatorname{Hom}_{K_2}(\sigma_k,R_d)=\bigoplus_{\substack{r,s\geq0\\r+s=d-|k|}}\chi_{k-2r+2s}. \tag*{(13)}

The sum is empty when d<∣k∣d<|k|. Thus σk\sigma_k first occurs in degree ∣k∣|k|, with circle weight kk. In degree ∣k∣+n|k|+n, its occurrences have the distinct weights

k−2n, k−2n+4, …, k+2n,k-2n,\ k-2n+4,\ \ldots,\ k+2n,

each with multiplicity one. Equivalently, the σk\sigma_k-isotypic part of RdR_d, as a K1×K2K_1\times K_2-module, is the sum of χk−2r+2s⊠σk\chi_{k-2r+2s}\boxtimes\sigma_k over the same indices. This statement includes k=0k=0, for which σ0=1\sigma_0=1.

Writing d=∣k∣+r+sd=|k|+r+s, we obtain at once

Pσk(t,z)=∑r,s≥0t∣k∣+r+szk−2r+2s=t∣k∣zk(1−tz−2)(1−tz2).P_{\sigma_k}(t,z)=\sum_{r,s\geq0}t^{|k|+r+s}z^{k-2r+2s}=\frac{t^{|k|}z^k}{(1-tz^{-2})(1-tz^2)}.

This proves (11) uniformly in the three cases.

From the series to free and universal modules

Taking k=0k=0 in (13) gives

ch⁡t,zRK2=1(1−tz−2)(1−tz2).\operatorname{ch}_{t,z}R^{K_2}=\frac{1}{(1-tz^{-2})(1-tz^2)}.

The elements a,ba,b are nonzero in the domain RR. Their monomials are nonzero and have distinct pairs of degree and weight. They are therefore linearly independent and realize every occurrence in this series. This proves (10), including the algebraic independence of a,ba,b.

Choose a nonzero homogeneous equivariant map gk:σk→R∣k∣g_k:\sigma_k\to R_{|k|} of circle weight kk. Multiplication defines

C[a,b] gk⟶M(σk).\mathbb{C}[a,b]\,g_k\longrightarrow M(\sigma_k).

It is injective: a nonzero polynomial cannot annihilate the nonzero image of gkg_k in the domain RR. The source and target have the same degree-and-weight series (11), so the map is surjective. This proves the rank-one assertion. A Poincaré series by itself would not establish freeness; the injective multiplication map is essential.

Now lift gkg_k K1K_1-equivariantly to B(σk)B(\sigma_k). Filtered generation gives a surjection I(k)→B(σk)I(k) \to B(\sigma_k). PBW gives

gr⁡I(k)=Sym⁡(p1)⊗Ck,\operatorname{gr} I(k) = \operatorname{Sym}(\mathfrak{p}_1) \otimes\mathbb{C}_k,

with the generating line placed in degree ∣k∣|k|. The associated graded map is the rank-one isomorphism just proved, so the filtered map is an isomorphism. This finishes the proof of Theorem 4.1.

Write πk=Hom⁡K1(χk,π)\pi_k = \operatorname{Hom}_{K_1}(\chi_k,\pi) for the weight-kk multiplicity space. The universal property we need is

Hom⁡g1,K1(I(k),π)=πk.(14)\operatorname{Hom}_{\mathfrak{g}_1,K_1}(I(k),\pi)=\pi_k. \tag*{(14)}

Remark 4.2. The same argument applies to every K2K_2-type τ\tau occurring in RR. Indeed, fixing its highest-weight differences in [8 Proposition 5.1] leaves two nonnegative parameters. There is a unique first occurrence, in degree dτd_\tau and circle weight wτw_\tau, and

Hom⁡K2(τ,Rd)=⨁r,s≥0r+s=d−dτχwτ−2r+2s,Pτ(t,z)=tdτzwτ(1−tz−2)(1−tz2).\operatorname{Hom}_{K_2}(\tau,R_d)=\bigoplus_{\substack{r,s\geq0\\r+s=d-d_\tau}}\chi_{w_\tau-2r+2s},\qquad P_\tau(t,z)=\frac{t^{d_\tau}z^{w_\tau}}{(1-tz^{-2})(1-tz^2)}.

Since RR is a domain, multiplication by a nonzero first-occurrence map identifies M(τ)M(\tau) with a free rank-one RK2R^{K_2}-module. The filtered argument then gives B(τ)≃I(wτ)B(\tau)\simeq I(w_\tau), with its generating line in degree dτd_\tau. For τ=σk\tau=\sigma_k these parameters are dτ=∣k∣d_\tau=|k| and wτ=kw_\tau=k; in general dτd_\tau need not equal ∣wτ∣|w_\tau|.

Ping-pong and the uniform theta correspondence

We prove finite length of the big theta lifts and use the compact-type calculations to establish Theorem 1.1.

Finiteness and compact-type reciprocity

For an irreducible (g1,K1)(\mathfrak{g}_1,K_1)-module π\pi, recall that π⊠Θ(π)\pi\boxtimes\Theta(\pi) is the maximal π\pi-isotypic quotient of Π\Pi. Define the reverse big lift of an irreducible (g2,K2)(\mathfrak{g}_2,K_2)-module ρ\rho similarly, with quotient Θ(ρ)⊠ρ\Theta(\rho)\boxtimes\rho. Compact-type reciprocity reads

Hom⁡K2(Θ(π),τ)≃Hom⁡(g1,K1)×K2(Π,π⊠τ)≃Hom⁡g1,K1(B(τ),π),(15)\operatorname{Hom}_{K_2}(\Theta(\pi),\tau)\simeq\operatorname{Hom}_{(\mathfrak{g}_1,K_1)\times K_2}(\Pi,\pi\boxtimes\tau)\simeq\operatorname{Hom}_{\mathfrak{g}_1,K_1}(B(\tau),\pi), \tag*{(15)}
Hom⁡K1(Θ(ρ),χl)≃Hom⁡K1×(g2,K2)(Π,χl⊠ρ)≃Hom⁡g2,K2(A(l),ρ).(16)\operatorname{Hom}_{K_1}(\Theta(\rho),\chi_l)\simeq\operatorname{Hom}_{K_1\times(\mathfrak{g}_2,K_2)}(\Pi,\chi_l\boxtimes\rho)\simeq\operatorname{Hom}_{\mathfrak{g}_2,K_2}(A(l),\rho). \tag*{(16)}

The first isomorphisms use the maximal isotypic quotients, and the second use the compact isotypic components. For a locally finite KK-module MM and an irreducible KK-type η\eta, Hom⁡K(M,η)≃Hom⁡K(η,M)∗\operatorname{Hom}_K(M,\eta)\simeq\operatorname{Hom}_K(\eta,M)^*, with algebraic dual, so finite-dimensionality is equivalent to finite multiplicity.

Proposition 5.1. Both big theta lifts have finite length whenever the input is irreducible. Moreover, for every relevant type,

dim⁡Hom⁡K2(σl,Θ(π))=dim⁡πl.(17)\dim\operatorname{Hom}_{K_2}(\sigma_l,\Theta(\pi))=\dim\pi_l. \tag*{(17)}

In particular Θ(π)≠0\Theta(\pi)\ne0 for every irreducible π\pi.

Proof. For any K2K_2-type τ\tau occurring in RR, Remark 4.2 gives B(τ)≃I(wτ)B(\tau)\simeq I(w_\tau). Thus (5.1) and (4.5) identify Hom⁡K2(Θ(π),τ)\operatorname{Hom}_{K_2}(\Theta(\pi),\tau) with πwτ\pi_{w_\tau}, which is finite-dimensional. Types absent from RR have zero multiplicity. Likewise, Corollary 3.2 and (5.2) give

dim⁡Hom⁡K1(Θ(ρ),χl)=dim⁡Hom⁡g2,K2(A(l),ρ)≤dim⁡Hom⁡K2(F(l),ρ)<∞.\dim\operatorname{Hom}_{K_1}(\Theta(\rho),\chi_l)=\dim\operatorname{Hom}_{\mathfrak{g}_2,K_2}(A(l),\rho)\leq\dim\operatorname{Hom}_{K_2}(F(l),\rho)<\infty.

The preceding duality now proves that both big lifts are admissible. To obtain finite length, we also verify finite generation using the compact-type lifts.

Every circle weight space of an irreducible (sl2,SO(2))(\mathfrak{sl}_2,\mathrm{SO}(2))-module is at most one-dimensional. For any occurring kk, taking weight kk in Π↠π⊠Θ(π)\Pi\twoheadrightarrow\pi\boxtimes\Theta(\pi) gives A(k)↠Θ(π)A(k) \twoheadrightarrow\Theta(\pi), proving finite generation. For the reverse direction, choose a K2K_2-type τ\tau occurring in ρ\rho. Taking its isotypic multiplicity space gives a surjection B(τ)↠Θ(ρ)⊗Hom⁡K2(τ,ρ)B(\tau) \twoheadrightarrow\Theta(\rho) \otimes\operatorname{Hom}_{K_2}(\tau,\rho); projection to a nonzero factor proves finite generation of Θ(ρ)\Theta(\rho). Admissible finitely generated modules have finite length [12]. Finally (17) follows from (15), Theorem 4.1, and (14). Some πl\pi_l is nonzero, proving nonvanishing.

The two passes

For an arbitrary pair (g,K)(\mathfrak{g},K), let MM be a nonzero (g,K)(\mathfrak{g},K)-module of finite length as a U(g)U(\mathfrak{g})-module. If MM is generated over U(g)U(\mathfrak{g}) by one copy of an irreducible KK-type η\eta and that type has multiplicity one in MM, then MM has a unique irreducible quotient. Indeed every nonzero quotient must contain the image of its generating copy of η\eta. The semisimple head therefore has only one irreducible summand, with multiplicity one.

Proof of Theorem 1.1. Choose a circle weight kk of π\pi with minimal absolute value. Equation (17) gives

[Θ(π):σk]K2=1,[Θ(π):σl]K2=0(∣l∣<∣k∣).(18)[\Theta(\pi):\sigma_k]_{K_2}=1,\qquad[\Theta(\pi):\sigma_l]_{K_2}=0\quad(|l|<|k|). \tag*{(18)}

The surjection A(k)↠Θ(π)A(k) \twoheadrightarrow\Theta(\pi) and Corollary 3.2 show that the big lift is generated by the image of F(k)F(k). All its summands except σk\sigma_k vanish by (18). Thus Θ(π)\Theta(\pi) is generated by one copy of σk\sigma_k, and the observation gives its unique irreducible quotient ρ=θ(π)\rho=\theta(\pi). Its generating type survives and still has multiplicity one. Since maps to ρ\rho are determined by their restriction to this generating type, dim⁡Hom⁡g2,K2(Θ(π),ρ)=1\dim\operatorname{Hom}_{\mathfrak{g}_2,K_2}(\Theta(\pi),\rho)=1, which gives the multiplicity-one assertion of the theorem. The smaller relevant types are absent.

For the return pass, the quotient Π↠π⊠ρ\Pi\twoheadrightarrow\pi\boxtimes\rho makes π\pi a quotient of Θ(ρ)\Theta(\rho). By (16),

dim⁡Θ(ρ)k=dim⁡Hom⁡g2,K2(A(k),ρ)≤dim⁡Hom⁡K2(F(k),ρ)=1.\dim\Theta(\rho)_k=\dim\operatorname{Hom}_{\mathfrak{g}_2,K_2}(A(k),\rho)\leq\dim\operatorname{Hom}_{K_2}(F(k),\rho)=1.

The inequality follows by restricting a homomorphism to the chosen generators. The quotient onto π\pi makes the dimension at least one, so it equals one. On the other hand, taking the σk\sigma_k-multiplicity space of the reverse maximal quotient gives

I(k)=B(σk)↠Θ(ρ)⊗Hom⁡K2(σk,ρ)≅Θ(ρ).I(k)=B(\sigma_k)\twoheadrightarrow\Theta(\rho)\otimes\operatorname{Hom}_{K_2}(\sigma_k,\rho)\cong\Theta(\rho).

Therefore Θ(ρ)\Theta(\rho) is generated by its single weight-kk line. Every nonzero quotient contains that line, so the same observation proves that its unique irreducible quotient is π\pi.

The linear section in type E6E_6

We compute Q=R/(p2)Q=R/(\mathfrak{p}_2) for the long-root SL2×SL6\mathrm{SL}_2\times\mathrm{SL}_6 pair in E6E_6. We identify its two Veronese cones and their scheme structure, then read off the graded SO(2)×K2\mathrm{SO}(2)\times K_2-decomposition from their coordinate rings to prove Theorem 3.1.

The two Veronese cones and their equations

Let U=V⊕V∗U = V \oplus V^*, dim⁡V=4\dim V = 4, with symplectic form

⟨(v,ϕ),(w,ψ)⟩=ψ(v)−ϕ(w).\langle(v,\phi),(w,\psi)\rangle= \psi(v) - \phi(w).

A point L∈LG⁡(4,U)L \in\operatorname{LG}(4,U) is a four-dimensional Lagrangian subspace of UU. The ambient Cartan space is p=Λ04U\mathfrak{p} = \Lambda^4_0 U, the kernel of symplectic contraction, and it contains the Plücker vectors of LG⁡(4,U)\operatorname{LG}(4,U). As an SU⁡(V)\operatorname{SU}(V)-module it decomposes as

p≃C⊕Sym⁡2V∗⊕S(2,2)V⊕Sym⁡2V⊕C.\mathfrak{p} \simeq\mathbb{C} \oplus\operatorname{Sym}^2 V^* \oplus S_{(2,2)}V \oplus\operatorname{Sym}^2 V \oplus\mathbb{C}.

The summands are ordered by the number 4,3,2,1,04,3,2,1,0 of VV factors in Λ4(V⊕V∗)\Lambda^4(V \oplus V^*). Their dimensions are 1,10,20,10,11,10,20,10,1, and their circle weights are 2,1,0,−1,−22,1,0,-1,-2. Determinant characters have been suppressed in this display because they are trivial on SU⁡(V)\operatorname{SU}(V).

To see the decomposition, the two extreme terms are det⁡V\det V and det⁡V∗\det V^*. The term Λ3V⊗V∗\Lambda^3 V \otimes V^* identifies with det⁡V⊗(V∗⊗V∗)\det V \otimes(V^* \otimes V^*); contraction vanishes on the symmetric part and is injective on the alternating part. Its kernel is therefore det⁡V⊗Sym⁡2V∗\det V \otimes\operatorname{Sym}^2 V^*, and the opposite term is dual. On the middle term Λ2V⊗Λ2V∗\Lambda^2 V \otimes\Lambda^2 V^*, contraction maps onto V⊗V∗V \otimes V^* and has the irreducible 20-dimensional kernel S(2,2)VS_{(2,2)}V. Equivalently, this is Sym⁡02(Λ2V)≃Sym⁡02C6\operatorname{Sym}^2_0(\Lambda^2 V) \simeq\operatorname{Sym}^2_0 \mathbb{C}^6, the Cartan space p2\mathfrak{p}_2 of the centralizer.

The coordinate functions have the opposite circle weights. Thus p2=0\mathfrak{p}_2 = 0 sets the middle Plücker coordinates to zero, leaving the four spaces with weights −2,−1,1,2-2,-1,1,2. To describe the resulting four-planes, put r=dim⁡(L∩V)r = \dim(L \cap V) and s=dim⁡(L∩V∗)s = \dim(L \cap V^*). Complete bases of these intersections by vectors vi+ϕiv_i + \phi_i in LL. The classes of the viv_i and of the ϕi\phi_i are independent in the respective quotient spaces. Expanding their wedge shows that the nonzero components have precisely r,r+1,…,4−sr,r+1,\ldots,4-s factors from VV. The middle component therefore vanishes exactly when r≥3r \ge3 or s≥3s \ge3. We obtain the two loci

X+={L∈LG⁡(4,U):dim⁡(L∩V)≥3},X−={L∈LG⁡(4,U):dim⁡(L∩V∗)≥3}.X_+ = \{L \in\operatorname{LG}(4,U) : \dim(L \cap V) \ge3\}, \qquad X_- = \{L \in\operatorname{LG}(4,U) : \dim(L \cap V^*) \ge3\}.

They are disjoint: the two indicated intersections cannot both have dimension at least three inside a four-dimensional space.

To understand X+X_+, take L≠VL \ne V and put A=L∩VA = L \cap V. Then dim⁡A=3\dim A = 3, and L/AL/A is a line in (V/A)⊕V∗(V/A) \oplus V^* with nonzero projection to V∗V^*. Isotropy forces this projection to annihilate AA: for a∈Aa \in A and v+ϕ∈Lv+\phi\in L, we have ⟨a,v+ϕ⟩=ϕ(a)=0\langle a,v+\phi\rangle= \phi(a) = 0. Since the annihilator

D=Ann⁡(A)={ϕ∈V∗:ϕ(A)=0}D = \operatorname{Ann}(A) = \{\phi\in V^* : \phi(A) = 0\}

is itself a line, the projected line must be DD. The choice of AA therefore determines DD; there is no additional choice of a line in V∗V^*. In particular the base will be Gr⁡(3,V)=P(V∗)\operatorname{Gr}(3,V) = \mathbb{P}(V^*).

Conversely, fix A∈Gr⁡(3,V)A \in\operatorname{Gr}(3,V), and put QA=V/AQ_A = V/A, so D=QA∗D = Q_A^*. The orthogonal complement for the symplectic form is A⊥=V⊕DA^\perp= V \oplus D, and

A⊥/A=QA⊕QA∗A^\perp/A = Q_A \oplus Q_A^*

is a two-dimensional symplectic space. Every line in this space is isotropic, and its inverse image in A⊥A^\perp is a Lagrangian four-plane containing AA. These four-planes form a P1\mathbb{P}^1. The line QAQ_A gives VV, and the line QA∗Q_A^* gives A⊕DA \oplus D. Every other member also has intersection exactly AA with VV. In the Plücker embedding this P1\mathbb{P}^{1} is the line joining VV to A⊕DA\oplus D. Indeed, if u1,u2,u3u_{1},u_{2},u_{3} is a basis of AA, v∈V∖Av\in V\setminus A, and 0≠ϕ∈D0\ne\phi\in D, its points are

[u1∧u2∧u3∧(λv+μϕ)],[λ:μ]∈P1.[u_{1}\wedge u_{2}\wedge u_{3}\wedge(\lambda v+\mu\phi)],\qquad[\lambda:\mu]\in\mathbb{P}^{1}.

To see the embedding of the base, use Λ3V≃det⁡V⊗V∗\Lambda^{3}V\simeq\det V\otimes V^{*}. Under this identification Λ3A\Lambda^{3}A corresponds to det⁡V⊗D\det V\otimes D. The Plücker line of A⊕DA\oplus D is consequently det⁡V⊗D⊗2\det V\otimes D^{\otimes2}. As DD varies through the lines in V∗V^{*}, this is exactly the second Veronese embedding ν2:P(V∗)→P(Sym⁡2V∗)\nu_{2}:\mathbb{P}(V^{*})\to\mathbb{P}(\operatorname{Sym}^{2}V^{*}), with the harmless common factor det⁡V\det V. Thus X+X_{+} is the projective cone over this Veronese variety, with vertex VV. Interchanging VV and V∗V^{*} gives X−X_{-} and its vertex V∗V^{*}.

We now check this description scheme-theoretically. Start with the Plücker ideal of Gr⁡(4,V⊕V∗)\operatorname{Gr}(4,V\oplus V^{*}), generated by its degree-two part I‾2\overline{I}_{2}. Passing to LG⁡(4,U)\operatorname{LG}(4,U) adds the linear contraction equations just described. On the surviving coordinates they make the two 4×44\times4 arrays x,yx,y symmetric, with the usual cofactor signs. Killing the middle summand p2\mathfrak{p}_{2} amounts to restricting the equations that kill the full middle coordinate space in the ordinary Grassmannian.

Thus the surviving coordinate spaces are

Ca,X=span⁡{xij:i≤j}≃Sym⁡2V,Y=span⁡{yij:i≤j}≃Sym⁡2V∗,Cb,\mathbb{C}a,\qquad\mathcal{X}=\operatorname{span}\{x_{ij}:i\le j\}\simeq\operatorname{Sym}^{2}V,\qquad\mathcal{Y}=\operatorname{span}\{y_{ij}:i\le j\}\simeq\operatorname{Sym}^{2}V^{*},\qquad\mathbb{C}b,

as SU⁡(V)\operatorname{SU}(V)-modules, with circle weights −2,−1,1,2-2,-1,1,2. Here xji=xijx_{ji}=x_{ij} and yji=yijy_{ji}=y_{ij}. Write I‾2\overline{I}_{2} for the image of the Plücker quadratic relation space after imposing these linear equations. It lies in S=C[a,b,x,y]S=\mathbb{C}[a,b,x,y], and the defining ideal of QQ is (I‾2)(\overline{I}_{2}). Let I‾2(x)\overline{I}_{2}(x) and I‾2(y)\overline{I}_{2}(y) denote its subspaces involving only xx or only yy, respectively. By the calculation in § 8, they are spanned by the 2×22\times2 minors of the corresponding symmetric matrices. These are spaces of quadratic polynomials; parentheses will denote the ideals they generate.

The SU⁡(V)\operatorname{SU}(V)-module structure of I‾2(x)\overline{I}_{2}(x) follows from multiplication of quadratic polynomials:

I‾2(x)=ker⁡(Sym⁡2(Sym⁡2V)⟶Sym⁡4V)=S(2,2)V.\overline{I}_{2}(x)=\ker\left(\operatorname{Sym}^{2}(\operatorname{Sym}^{2}V)\longrightarrow\operatorname{Sym}^{4}V\right)=\mathbf{S}_{(2,2)}V.

Indeed, the standard Schur decomposition is Sym⁡2(Sym⁡2V)=Sym⁡4V⊕S(2,2)V\operatorname{Sym}^{2}(\operatorname{Sym}^{2}V)=\operatorname{Sym}^{4}V\oplus\mathbf{S}_{(2,2)}V [9 Section 1.2]. The kernel is spanned by xijxkl−xilxkjx_{ij}x_{kl}-x_{il}x_{kj}, which vanish under xij↦sisjx_{ij}\mapsto s_{i}s_{j}. It has dimension 55−35=2055-35=20 and highest weight 2ω22\omega_{2}. The dual space I‾2(y)=S(2,2)V∗\overline{I}_{2}(y)=\mathbf{S}_{(2,2)}V^{*} is also isomorphic to this irreducible SU⁡(4)\operatorname{SU}(4)-module.

Specializing the generator decomposition of § 8 now gives

I‾2=I‾2(x)⊕aY⊕Cab⊕XY⊕bX⊕I‾2(y).\overline{I}_{2}=\overline{I}_{2}(x)\oplus a\mathcal{Y}\oplus\mathbb{C}ab\oplus\mathcal{X}\mathcal{Y}\oplus b\mathcal{X}\oplus\overline{I}_{2}(y).

To display its irreducible constituents, let VλV_{\lambda} denote the SU⁡(4)\operatorname{SU}(4)-module of highest weight λ\lambda, with fundamental weights ω1,ω2,ω3\omega_{1},\omega_{2},\omega_{3}. The tensor product in the middle is

XY≃Sym⁡2V⊗Sym⁡2V∗=C⊕Vω1+ω3⊕V2ω1+2ω3,\mathcal{X}\mathcal{Y}\simeq\operatorname{Sym}^{2}V\otimes\operatorname{Sym}^{2}V^{*}=\mathbb{C}\oplus V_{\omega_{1}+\omega_{3}}\oplus V_{2\omega_{1}+2\omega_{3}},

with dimensions 1,15,841,15,84. Grouping by the total VV-degree of the original Plücker indices, the quadratic generators are:

total VV-degreegenerator spaceSU⁡(4)\operatorname{SU}(4)-moduledimension
6I‾2(x)\overline{I}_{2}(x)V2ω2V_{2\omega_{2}}20
5aYa\mathcal{Y}V2ω3V_{2\omega_{3}}10
4Cab⊕XY\mathbb{C}ab\oplus\mathcal{X}\mathcal{Y}C⊕2⊕Vω1+ω3⊕V2ω1+2ω3\mathbb{C}^{\oplus2}\oplus V_{\omega_{1}+\omega_{3}}\oplus V_{2\omega_{1}+2\omega_{3}}101
3bXb\mathcal{X}V2ω1V_{2\omega_{1}}10
2I‾2(y)\overline{I}_{2}(y)V2ω2V_{2\omega_{2}}20

Table 1 (PDF p. 12).

The two copies of the trivial representation in degree 4 are CabCab and the invariant contraction in XYXY. All dimensions follow from the displayed modules; their sum is 161. The degree-two part of QQ consequently has dimension (232)−161=92\binom{23}{2}-161=92.

The relations in total VV-degrees 5, 4, 3 are exactly ayijay_{ij}, abab, xijyklx_{ij}y_{kl}, bxijbx_{ij}. They generate (a,x)(b,y)(a,x)(b,y), so they separate the two coordinate blocks, while the remaining relations impose rank at most one on the symmetric matrix in each block. Consequently,

Q=(C[x]/(I‾2(x)))[a]×C(C[y]/(I‾2(y)))[b].(19)Q=\left(\mathbb{C}[x]/(\overline{I}_2(x))\right)[a]\mathop{\times}_{\mathbb{C}}\left(\mathbb{C}[y]/(\overline{I}_2(y))\right)[b]. \tag*{(19)}

Here C[x]=C[xij:i≤j]\mathbb{C}[x]=\mathbb{C}[x_{ij}:i\leq j] and similarly for yy; each map to C\mathbb{C} evaluates at the origin. The substitution xij=sisjx_{ij}=s_i s_j identifies the first matrix ring with

C[x]/(I‾2(x))=C[sisj:1≤i≤j≤4]=⨁d≥0Sym⁡2dV,\mathbb{C}[x]/(\overline{I}_2(x))=\mathbb{C}[s_i s_j:1\leq i\leq j\leq4]=\bigoplus_{d\geq0}\operatorname{Sym}^{2d}V,

where a quadratic monomial in the sis_i has degree one in the matrix ring. This is the homogeneous coordinate ring of the quadratic Veronese variety ν2(P(V∗))\nu_2(\mathbb{P}(V^*)). Its affine spectrum consists of symmetric matrices of rank at most one; its projectivization consists of their nonzero rank-one classes. The second factor is dual. Adjoining the free vertex coordinates a,ba,b gives the two projective cones. The fibre product identifies their constant terms: the affine cones meet only at the origin, while their projectivizations are disjoint. Both factors are polynomial extensions of reduced Veronese rings, which proves the scheme assertion.

The degree-jj piece of the first matrix ring is therefore Sj+≃χ−j⊠Sym⁡2jVS_j^+\simeq\chi_{-j}\boxtimes\operatorname{Sym}^{2j}V, and the second is Sj−≃χj⊠Sym⁡2jV∗S_j^-\simeq\chi_j\boxtimes\operatorname{Sym}^{2j}V^*. Multiplication by aqa^q gives degree j+qj+q and circle weight −j−2q-j-2q; multiplication by bqb^q on the dual side gives weight j+2qj+2q. The fibre product in (6.1) retains one common constant. This proves the graded K1×K2K_1\times K_2-decomposition and completes Theorem 3.1 for E6E_6.

The linear section in type E7E_7

Here we compute Q=R/(p2)Q=R/(p_2) for the long-root SL2×Spin12\mathrm{SL}_2\times\mathrm{Spin}_{12} pair in E7E_7. The geometry of four-planes in a direct sum gives two Segre cones; their equations and graded coordinate rings prove Theorem 3.1 in this case.

The two Segre cones

Let U=V⊕WU=V\oplus W, with dim⁡V=dim⁡W=4\dim V=\dim W=4. A point L∈Gr⁡(4,U)L\in\operatorname{Gr}(4,U) is a four-dimensional subspace of UU. The vector decomposition

Λ4U=Λ4V⊕(Λ3V⊗W)⊕(Λ2V⊗Λ2W)⊕(V⊗Λ3W)⊕Λ4W\Lambda^4U=\Lambda^4V\oplus(\Lambda^3V\otimes W)\oplus(\Lambda^2V\otimes\Lambda^2W)\oplus(V\otimes\Lambda^3W)\oplus\Lambda^4W

has weights 2,1,0,−1,−22,1,0,-1,-2; its coordinate functions have the opposite weights. Here p2=Λ2V⊗Λ2Wp_2=\Lambda^2V\otimes\Lambda^2W is precisely the middle term. Under the Killing-form identification with linear functions, the equations p2=0p_2=0 set all middle Plücker coordinates to zero. Thus the middle component of a Plücker vector for LL must vanish. We first describe the resulting points geometrically; afterwards we check the scheme structure with equations.

For a four-plane L⊂V⊕WL\subset V\oplus W, put r=dim⁡(L∩V)r=\dim(L\cap V) and s=dim⁡(L∩W)s=\dim(L\cap W). Choose bases of these two intersections and complete them to a basis of LL by vectors vi+wiv_i+w_i. The classes of the viv_i in V/(L∩V)V/(L\cap V) are linearly independent, as are the classes of the wiw_i in W/(L∩W)W/(L\cap W). Expanding the wedge of this basis, its nonzero components have exactly the VV-degrees r,r+1,…,4−sr,r+1,\ldots,4-s: the terms of each such degree are distinct basis wedges and cannot cancel. In particular the middle component is nonzero exactly when r≤2r \le2 and s≤2s \le2. Its vanishing therefore gives

X+={L:dim⁡(L∩V)≥3},X−={L:dim⁡(L∩W)≥3}in Gr⁡(4,U).X_{+} = \{L : \dim(L \cap V) \ge3\}, \qquad X_{-} = \{L : \dim(L \cap W) \ge3\} \quad\text{in } \operatorname{Gr}(4,U).

These loci are disjoint, since a four-plane cannot contain both a three-plane in VV and a three-plane in WW.

Now let L∈X+L \in X_{+}, with L≠VL \ne V. Then A=L∩VA = L \cap V has dimension three, and L/AL/A is a line in

U/A=(V/A)⊕W.U/A = (V/A) \oplus W.

Its projection to WW is nonzero, so its image is a line D⊂WD \subset W. We have therefore associated to LL a pair

(A,D)∈Gr⁡(3,V)×Gr⁡(1,W)=P(V∗)×P(W).(A,D) \in\operatorname{Gr}(3,V) \times\operatorname{Gr}(1,W) = \mathbb{P}(V^{*}) \times\mathbb{P}(W).

Conversely, fix such a pair. The four-planes containing AA and contained in V⊕DV \oplus D are parameterized by P((V/A)⊕D)≃P1\mathbb{P}((V/A) \oplus D) \simeq\mathbb{P}^{1}. One of them is VV; all the others have intersection AA with VV and image DD in WW. Thus fixing (A,D)(A,D) gives a whole line of four-planes, with VV as one endpoint and A⊕DA \oplus D as the other distinguished point.

This is also a projective line in the Plücker embedding. Indeed, choose a basis u1,u2,u3u_{1},u_{2},u_{3} of AA, a vector v∈V∖Av \in V \setminus A, and a nonzero w∈Dw \in D. The four-plane A+C(λv+μw)A + \mathbb{C}(\lambda v + \mu w) has Plücker point

[λu1∧u2∧u3∧v+μu1∧u2∧u3∧w],[λ:μ]∈P1.[\lambda u_{1} \wedge u_{2} \wedge u_{3} \wedge v + \mu u_{1} \wedge u_{2} \wedge u_{3} \wedge w], \qquad[\lambda: \mu] \in\mathbb{P}^{1}.

The first endpoint is the fixed point [Λ4V][\Lambda^{4}V], representing VV. The second endpoint, representing A⊕DA \oplus D, varies over the Segre embedding of Gr⁡(3,V)×Gr⁡(1,W)\operatorname{Gr}(3,V) \times\operatorname{Gr}(1,W) in P(Λ3V⊗W)\mathbb{P}(\Lambda^{3}V \otimes W). Hence X+X_{+} is the projective cone over this product, with vertex VV. Projection from the vertex is exactly L↦(A,D)L \mapsto(A,D). Interchanging VV and WW gives X−X_{-}, the cone over P(V)×P(W∗)\mathbb{P}(V) \times\mathbb{P}(W^{*}) with vertex WW.

We now verify that these two cones give the entire linear section scheme-theoretically, with no additional nilpotents.

Index bases of V,WV,W by 1,…,41,\ldots,4 and 5,…,85,\ldots,8. Let II be the Plücker ideal in C[pJ]\mathbb{C}[p_{J}], and let I2I_{2} be its homogeneous degree-two part, the vector space of Plücker quadrics. These quadrics generate II. Set to zero the coordinates with two indices in each block, and denote the image of I2I_{2} by I‾2\overline{I}_{2}. The surviving coordinates are a=p1234a=p_{1234}, b=p5678b=p_{5678}, and two 4×44 \times4 arrays: xx has three VV indices and one WW index, while yy has one VV index and three WW indices. Thus I‾2\overline{I}_{2} is a space of quadratic polynomials in S=C[a,b,x,y]S=\mathbb{C}[a,b,x,y], and Q=S/(I‾2)Q=S/(\overline{I}_{2}), where parentheses mean the ideal generated by this space.

Write X=span⁡{xij}X=\operatorname{span}\{x_{ij}\} and Y=span⁡{yij}Y=\operatorname{span}\{y_{ij}\}. After the cofactor sign conventions, these are the SU⁡(V)×SU⁡(W)\operatorname{SU}(V) \times\operatorname{SU}(W)-modules V⊗W∗V \otimes W^{*} and V∗⊗WV^{*} \otimes W, respectively; a,ba,b are invariant. Let I‾2(x)\overline{I}_{2}(x) be the vector space spanned by the quadratic minors

xijxkl−xilxkj(i<k, j<l),x_{ij}x_{kl} - x_{il}x_{kj} \qquad(i<k,\ j<l),

and define I‾2(y)\overline{I}_{2}(y) similarly. In particular,

I‾2(x)≃Λ2V⊗Λ2W∗,I‾2(y)≃Λ2V∗⊗Λ2W,\overline{I}_{2}(x) \simeq\Lambda^{2}V \otimes\Lambda^{2}W^{*}, \qquad\overline{I}_{2}(y) \simeq\Lambda^{2}V^{*} \otimes\Lambda^{2}W,

each of dimension 6⋅6=366 \cdot6 = 36. The decomposition of the specialized quadratic relation space is

I‾2=I‾2(x)⊕aY⊕(Cab⊕XY)⊕bX⊕I‾2(y).(20)\overline{I}_{2} = \overline{I}_{2}(x) \oplus a\mathcal{Y} \oplus(\mathbb{C}ab \oplus\mathcal{X}\mathcal{Y}) \oplus b\mathcal{X} \oplus\overline{I}_{2}(y). \tag*{(20)}

Here XY\mathcal{X}\mathcal{Y} denotes the span of all products xijyklx_{ij}y_{kl}, naturally isomorphic to X⊗Y\mathcal{X} \otimes\mathcal{Y}. All summands in (7.1) are spaces of quadratic generators. They are grouped by total VV-degree, rather than into irreducible representations: the middle summand is reducible.

To verify the decomposition, substitute the middle-coordinate equations in the generating Plücker quadrics

∑r=15(−1)r−1pi1i2i3jrpj1⋯jr^⋯j5=0.(21)\sum_{r=1}^{5}(-1)^{r-1}p_{i_{1}i_{2}i_{3}j_{r}}p_{j_{1}\cdots\widehat{j_{r}}\cdots j_{5}}=0. \tag*{(21)}

Repeated indices give zero and permutation of indices changes signs. Grouping by the total number of VV indices gives the following summands:

total VV-degreequadratic generatorsSU(V)×SU(W)SU(V)\times SU(W)-moduledimension
6I‾2(x)\overline{I}_{2}(x)Λ2V⊗Λ2W∗\Lambda^{2}V\otimes\Lambda^{2}W^{*}36
5aYaYV∗⊗WV^{*}\otimes W16
4Cab⊕XY\mathbb{C}ab\oplus XY1⊕(End⁡V⊗End⁡W)1\oplus(\operatorname{End}V\otimes\operatorname{End}W)257
3bXbXV⊗W∗V\otimes W^{*}16
2I‾2(y)\overline{I}_{2}(y)Λ2V∗⊗Λ2W\Lambda^{2}V^{*}\otimes\Lambda^{2}W36

Table 1 (PDF p. 15).

The dimensions follow immediately from the displayed modules: 6⋅66\cdot6, 4⋅44\cdot4, 1+16⋅161+16\cdot16, 4⋅44\cdot4, and 6⋅66\cdot6. We verify directly that these spaces are exactly the specialized relations.

The minors of x,yx,y and the products ayij,bxijay_{ij},bx_{ij} follow at once from (21) after setting the middle coordinates to zero. For the mixed products, write v1,…,v4v_{1},\ldots,v_{4} and w1,…,w4w_{1},\ldots,w_{4} for the two indexed bases, with index sets V={v1,…,v4}V=\{v_{1},\ldots,v_{4}\} and W={w1,…,w4}W=\{w_{1},\ldots,w_{4}\}. Choose the cofactor signs

xij=(−1)i−1pv1⋯vi^⋯v4wj,yij=(−1)j−1pviw1⋯wj^⋯w4.x_{ij}=(-1)^{i-1}p_{v_{1}\cdots\widehat{v_{i}}\cdots v_{4}w_{j}},\qquad y_{ij}=(-1)^{j-1}p_{v_{i}w_{1}\cdots\widehat{w_{j}}\cdots w_{4}}.

If i≠ki\ne k, choose a third VV index mm. In (21) take the three-index list to be (V∖{vi,vm})∪{wj}(V\setminus\{v_{i},v_{m}\})\cup\{w_{j}\} and the five-index list to be {vm,vk}∪(W∖{wl})\{v_{m},v_{k}\}\cup(W\setminus\{w_{l}\}). Only the term xijyklx_{ij}y_{kl} survives, so this product vanishes. Interchanging the blocks gives the same conclusion when j≠lj\ne l. For the remaining products, fix jj and put ci=xijyijc_{i}=x_{ij}y_{ij}. Using the same three-index list and the five-index list {vm,vi}∪(W∖{wj})\{v_{m},v_{i}\}\cup(W\setminus\{w_{j}\}) gives ci+cm=0c_{i}+c_{m}=0 for every i≠mi\ne m. Taking three distinct indices yields ci=0c_{i}=0. Thus all xyxy products are relations. Finally, the three-index list V∖{vi}V\setminus\{v_{i}\} and the five-index list {vi}∪W\{v_{i}\}\cup W give abab plus a linear combination of these products, so abab is a relation as well.

Conversely, the proposed cones consist of decomposable four-vectors, so every specialized Plücker quadric vanishes on them. Their quadratic vanishing space is precisely the right side of (20): within each coordinate block the relations are the minors, and between the blocks they are all mixed products. This proves (20). Since II is generated by I2I_{2}, its specialization is generated by I‾2\overline{I}_{2}.

In particular, the relations of total VV-degrees 5, 4, 3 are exactly

ayij=0,ab=0,xijykl=0,bxij=0.ay_{ij}=0,\qquad ab=0,\qquad x_{ij}y_{kl}=0,\qquad bx_{ij}=0.

Together they generate the product ideal (a,x)(b,y)(a,x)(b,y). Thus a point has either (a,x)=0(a,x)=0 or (b,y)=0(b,y)=0; the remaining minors cut out the corresponding rank-one cone. The two affine components meet only at the origin, and their projectivizations are disjoint.

Let (I‾2(x))⊂C[x](\overline{I}_{2}(x))\subset\mathbb{C}[x] and (I‾2(y))⊂C[y](\overline{I}_{2}(y))\subset\mathbb{C}[y] be the ideals generated by the two spaces of minors. Adjoining the vertex coordinates and imposing the mixed quadratic generators gives

Q=(C[x]/(I‾2(x)))[a]×(C[y]/(I‾2(y)))[b].(22)Q=\bigl(\mathbb{C}[x]/(\overline{I}_{2}(x))\bigr)[a]\times\bigl(\mathbb{C}[y]/(\overline{I}_{2}(y))\bigr)[b]. \tag*{(22)}

Both factors are polynomial extensions of rank-one matrix rings, hence reduced. This proves the scheme assertion and the cone description.

The substitution xij=sitjx_{ij}=s_it_j identifies the degree-jj piece of the first matrix ring with the polynomials of bidegree (j,j)(j,j):

Sj+=(C[x]/(I2(x)))j≃χ−j⊠(Sym⁡jV⊗Sym⁡jW∗).S_j^+ = \left(\mathbb{C}[x]/(I_2(x))\right)_j \simeq\chi_{-j} \boxtimes\left(\operatorname{Sym}^j V \otimes\operatorname{Sym}^j W^*\right).

The second ring gives the dual K2K_2-type with circle weight jj. Adjoining a,ba,b, of degree one and weights −2,2-2,2, gives the terms aqSj+a^qS_j^+ and bqSj−b^qS_j^- in degree j+qj+q, with weights −j−2q-j-2q and j+2qj+2q. The fibre product in (7.3) retains one common constant, proving Theorem 3.1 for E7E_7.

The linear section in type E8E_8

This section computes Q=R/(p2)Q=R/(p_2) for the long-root SL2×E7\mathrm{SL}_2\times E_7 pair in E8E_8. We identify two cones over Grassmannians inside the spinor variety, verify their scheme structure, and read off the graded coordinate rings to prove Theorem 3.1.

Pure spinors and the two Grassmannian cones

Write the orthogonal space as U=V⊕V∗U=V\oplus V^*, dim⁡V=8\dim V=8, with the hyperbolic symmetric form

⟨(v,ϕ),(w,ψ)⟩=ϕ(w)+ψ(v).\langle(v,\phi),(w,\psi)\rangle=\phi(w)+\psi(v).

The variety OGr⁡+(8,U)\operatorname{OGr}^+(8,U) parameterizes one of the two components of maximal isotropic eight-planes; we choose the component containing VV. It also contains V∗V^*, since dim⁡V=8\dim V=8 is even. We write L∈OGr⁡+(8,U)L\in\operatorname{OGr}^+(8,U) for such an eight-dimensional maximal isotropic subspace of UU. We use the spinor embedding of OGr⁡+(8,U)\operatorname{OGr}^+(8,U). The subgroup of SO⁡(U)\operatorname{SO}(U) acting by (v,ϕ)↦(gv,(g−1)∗ϕ)(v,\phi)\mapsto(gv,(g^{-1})^*\phi), with g∈GL⁡(V)g\in\operatorname{GL}(V), is a Levi subgroup of the parabolic stabilizing VV. By the covering Levi we mean its inverse image in Spin⁡(U)\operatorname{Spin}(U). Explicitly, this group is

GL⁡~(V)={(g,z)∈GL⁡(V)×C×:z2=det⁡g}.\widetilde{\operatorname{GL}}(V)=\{(g,z)\in\operatorname{GL}(V)\times\mathbb{C}^{\times}:z^2=\det g\}.

Projection (g,z)↦g(g,z)\mapsto g is a double cover with kernel {(1,1),(1,−1)}\{(1,1),(1,-1)\}. Its compact form is the double cover of U(V)U(V) obtained by requiring gg unitary and ∣z∣=1|z|=1. Here VV has dimension eight, whereas U=V⊕V∗U=V\oplus V^* has dimension sixteen. The one-dimensional representation δ(g,z)=z\delta(g,z)=z is an actual character of this cover and satisfies δ2=det⁡V\delta^2=\det V. The exterior-algebra construction gives the ambient Cartan space p=S+=δ⊗ΛevenV∗\mathfrak p=S^+=\delta\otimes\Lambda^{\mathrm{even}}V^*. On the lifted copy g↦(g,1)g\mapsto(g,1) of SU⁡(V)\operatorname{SU}(V), the character δ\delta is trivial; a volume form identifies Λ6V∗≃Λ2V\Lambda^6V^*\simeq\Lambda^2V and Λ4V∗≃Λ4V\Lambda^4V^*\simeq\Lambda^4V. Thus, as an SU⁡(V)\operatorname{SU}(V)-module,

p≃C⊕Λ2V∗⊕Λ4V⏟p2⊕Λ2V⊕C.\mathfrak p\simeq\mathbb{C}\oplus\Lambda^2V^*\oplus\underbrace{\Lambda^4V}_{\mathfrak p_2}\oplus\Lambda^2V\oplus\mathbb{C}.

These five summands come from exterior degrees 0,2,4,6,80,2,4,6,8 in the spinor model. Their dimensions are 1,28,70,28,11,28,70,28,1, and their circle weights are 2,1,0,−1,−22,1,0,-1,-2: the factor δ\delta has weight 22, while V∗V^* has weight −1/2-1/2 on the cover. The half-spin action descends to the semispin quotient used for KK in Section 2.

Dually, the degree-one coordinate space is R1=(S+)∗=δ−1⊗ΛevenVR_1=(S^+)^*=\delta^{-1}\otimes\Lambda^{\mathrm{even}}V, whose five pieces have circle weights −2,−1,0,1,2-2,-1,0,1,2. The middle piece is the 70-dimensional Cartan space p2\mathfrak p_2 of the centralizer, identified with linear functions by the Killing form. Thus p2=0\mathfrak p_2=0 sets all exterior-degree-four spinor coordinates to zero. Let a,x,y,ba,x,y,b denote the remaining coordinate pieces, of exterior degrees 0,2,6,80,2,6,8, respectively. Using the fixed volume form, identify the yy coordinates with complementary two-index coordinates on the dual side.

We first examine the open chart a≠0a \ne0, consisting of eight-planes transverse to V∗V^*. Such a plane is the graph of a map B:V→V∗B: V \to V^*. Isotropy says B(v)(w)+B(w)(v)=0B(v)(w)+B(w)(v)=0, so BB is an alternating form, an element of Λ2V∗\Lambda^2 V^*. The spinor coordinates on this chart are its principal Pfaffians; equivalently its spinor line is represented by

δexp⁡(B)=δ(1+B+B∧B2!+B∧33!+B∧44!).\delta\exp(B)=\delta\left(1+B+\frac{B\wedge B}{2!}+\frac{B^{\wedge3}}{3!}+\frac{B^{\wedge4}}{4!}\right).

We use the usual Pfaffian chart conventions, as in [10 Section 2]. Killing the middle coordinates says B∧B=0B\wedge B=0. An alternating form has this property exactly when its rank is at most two. Thus B=0B=0, giving L=VL=V, or BB is a decomposable two-form with six-dimensional kernel. Since the graph meets VV in ker⁡B\ker B, this calculation leads to the locus X+X_+ below; the opposite chart gives X−X_-:

X+={L∈OGr⁡+(8,U):dim⁡(L∩V)≥6},X−={L∈OGr⁡+(8,U):dim⁡(L∩V∗)≥6}.X_+=\{L\in\operatorname{OGr}^{+}(8,U):\dim(L\cap V)\ge6\},\qquad X_-=\{L\in\operatorname{OGr}^{+}(8,U):\dim(L\cap V^*)\ge6\}.

They are disjoint, since 6+6>86+6>8. We next describe each entire locus, including the boundary of its graph chart. The equations in the next subsection will show that these are exactly the two components of the linear section, with no further components or nilpotents.

Take L∈X+L\in X_+ with L≠VL\ne V. In our chosen orthogonal component dim⁡(L∩V)\dim(L\cap V) is even, so it must be six. Set

A=L∩V,QA=V/A,D=Ann⁡(A)=QA∗⊂V∗.A=L\cap V,\qquad Q_A=V/A,\qquad D=\operatorname{Ann}(A)=Q_A^*\subset V^*.

Both QAQ_A and DD have dimension two. Isotropy forces LL to lie in A⊥=V⊕DA^\perp=V\oplus D, so L/AL/A is a maximal isotropic two-plane in the four-dimensional orthogonal space

A⊥/A=QA⊕QA∗.A^\perp/A=Q_A\oplus Q_A^*.

It belongs to the same component as QAQ_A.

For fixed AA, this component is a projective line. To see this directly, its two-planes transverse to QA∗Q_A^* are graphs of alternating maps QA→QA∗Q_A\to Q_A^*. These maps form the one-dimensional space Λ2QA∗=det⁡QA∗\Lambda^2Q_A^*=\det Q_A^*. The only remaining two-plane in this component is QA∗Q_A^* itself: intersection with QA∗Q_A^* has even dimension, so a nontransverse plane must equal it. Thus the affine line of graphs acquires one point at infinity, giving

OGr⁡+(2,QA⊕QA∗)=P(C⊕det⁡QA∗)≃P1.\operatorname{OGr}^{+}(2,Q_A\oplus Q_A^*)=\mathbb{P}(\mathbb{C}\oplus\det Q_A^*)\simeq\mathbb{P}^1.

The zero map gives QAQ_A, hence L=VL=V; the point at infinity gives QA∗Q_A^*, hence L=A⊕DL=A\oplus D. Every other member has intersection exactly AA with VV.

This projective line is a line in the spinor embedding as well. Choose 0≠η∈det⁡D⊂Λ2V∗0\ne\eta\in\det D\subset\Lambda^2V^*. Since η∧η=0\eta\wedge\eta=0, the graphs of multiples of η\eta have spinor points [δ(1+cη)][\delta(1+c\eta)]. Their closure is the line

[δ(λ+μη)],[λ:μ]∈P1,[\delta(\lambda+\mu\eta)],\qquad[\lambda:\mu]\in\mathbb{P}^1,

joining the vertex [δ][\delta], representing VV, to [δη][\delta\eta], representing A⊕DA\oplus D. As AA varies, its annihilator DD varies through Gr⁡(2,V∗)\operatorname{Gr}(2,V^*), and [η]=[det⁡D][\eta]=[\det D] is precisely its Plücker point. Consequently X+X_+ is the projective cone over the Plücker-embedded Gr⁡(2,V∗)\operatorname{Gr}(2,V^*), with vertex VV. Projection from the vertex sends L≠VL\ne V to D=Ann⁡(L∩V)D=\operatorname{Ann}(L\cap V). The description of X−X_- is dual, with base Gr⁡(2,V)\operatorname{Gr}(2,V) and vertex V∗V^*.

The specialized quadratic generators

Put N={1,…,8}N = \{1,\ldots,8\} and label spinor coordinates pIp_I by even subsets I⊂NI \subset N. Let II be the pure-spinor ideal and I2I_2 its homogeneous degree-two part. This space is spanned by the Wick relations and generates II [10 Section 2]. For odd subsets S,TS,T, write S△T={i1<⋯<im}S \mathbin{\triangle} T = \{i_1 < \cdots< i_m\}; the relation is

∑r=1m(−1)r−1pS△{ir}pT△{ir}=0.(23)\sum_{r=1}^{m}(-1)^{r-1}p_{S\mathbin{\triangle}\{i_r\}}p_{T\mathbin{\triangle}\{i_r\}}=0. \tag*{(23)}

Set all pIp_I with ∣I∣=4|I|=4 to zero, and denote the image of I2I_2 by I‾2\overline{I}_2. The surviving coordinates are a=p∅a=p_{\varnothing}, b=pNb=p_N, and two skew arrays, which we normalize by

xij=p{i,j},yij=(−1)i+j−3pN∖{i,j}(i<j),xji=−xij,yji=−yij.x_{ij}=p_{\{i,j\}},\qquad y_{ij}=(-1)^{i+j-3}p_{N\setminus\{i,j\}}\quad(i<j),\qquad x_{ji}=-x_{ij},\qquad y_{ji}=-y_{ij}.

The sign on yy is the complement sign for the fixed volume form. As SU⁡(V)\operatorname{SU}(V)-modules, the coordinate spans are X≃Λ2V\mathcal{X}\simeq\Lambda^2V and Y≃Λ2V∗\mathcal{Y}\simeq\Lambda^2V^*, each of dimension 28. The full specialized ideal in C[a,b,x,y]\mathbb{C}[a,b,x,y] is (I‾2)(\overline{I}_2).

Write I‾2(x)\overline{I}_2(x) for the space spanned by the quadratic Pfaffians

xijxkl−xikxjl+xilxjk,i<j<k<l.x_{ij}x_{kl}-x_{ik}x_{jl}+x_{il}x_{jk},\qquad i<j<k<l.

and define I‾2(y)\overline{I}_2(y) similarly. These are the Plücker quadrics for Gr⁡(2,V∗)\operatorname{Gr}(2,V^*) and Gr⁡(2,V)\operatorname{Gr}(2,V), respectively. Their module structures are

I‾2(x)≃Λ4V,I‾2(y)≃Λ4V∗≃Λ4V.\overline{I}_2(x)\simeq\Lambda^4V,\qquad\overline{I}_2(y)\simeq\Lambda^4V^*\simeq\Lambda^4V.

Indeed, the Pfaffian map identifies the first space with the Λ4V\Lambda^4V summand in Sym⁡2(Λ2V)=S(2,2)V⊕Λ4V\operatorname{Sym}^2(\Lambda^2V)=S_{(2,2)}V\oplus\Lambda^4V; the second is dual. Each has dimension (84)=70\binom{8}{4}=70.

The full space of specialized quadratic generators is

I‾2=I‾2(x)⊕aY⊕(Cab⊕XY)⊕bX⊕I‾2(y).(24)\overline{I}_2=\overline{I}_2(x)\oplus a\mathcal{Y}\oplus(\mathbb{C}ab\oplus\mathcal{X}\mathcal{Y})\oplus b\mathcal{X}\oplus\overline{I}_2(y). \tag*{(24)}

Here XY≃Λ2V⊗Λ2V∗\mathcal{X}\mathcal{Y}\simeq\Lambda^2V\otimes\Lambda^2V^* is the span of all xyxy products. With VλV_\lambda denoting the irreducible SU⁡(8)\operatorname{SU}(8)-module of highest weight λ\lambda, it decomposes as

XY=C⊕Vω1+ω7⊕Vω2+ω6,dim⁡=1+63+720.\mathcal{X}\mathcal{Y}=\mathbb{C}\oplus V_{\omega_1+\omega_7}\oplus V_{\omega_2+\omega_6},\qquad\dim=1+63+720.

Consequently the summands of (8.2) are as follows:

circle weightgenerator spaceSU(8)-moduledimension
−2-2I‾2(x)\overline{I}_2(x)Vω4V_{\omega_4}70
−1-1aYa\mathcal{Y}Vω6V_{\omega_6}28
0Cab⊕XY\mathbb{C}ab\oplus\mathcal{X}\mathcal{Y}C⊕2⊕Vω1+ω7⊕Vω2+ω6\mathbb{C}^{\oplus2}\oplus V_{\omega_1+\omega_7}\oplus V_{\omega_2+\omega_6}785
1bXb\mathcal{X}Vω2V_{\omega_2}28
2I‾2(y)\overline{I}_2(y)Vω4V_{\omega_4}70

Table 3.

The two scalar summands at weight zero are Cab\mathbb{C}ab and the invariant contraction in XY\mathcal{X}\mathcal{Y}. The dimensions follow from the displayed modules and sum to 981.

We prove (8.2) directly from (8.1). Taking S={i}S=\{i\} and T={j,k,l}T=\{j,k,l\}, with four distinct indices, gives a Pfaffian in xx, since the term involving p{i,j,k,l}p_{\{i,j,k,l\}} vanishes. For a six-element set CC, taking S={i}S=\{i\} and T=C∖{i}T=C\setminus\{i\} with i∈Ci\in C leaves only apCap_C; all other terms contain a four-index coordinate. This gives aYa\mathcal{Y}. Complementing all index sets gives the dual Pfaffians and bXb\mathcal{X}.

For the mixed products there are three cases. If i,j,k,li,j,k,l are distinct, choose rr outside these four indices and take S={i,j,r}S=\{i,j,r\} and T=N∖{k,l,r}T=N\setminus\{k,l,r\}. Only the term proportional to xijyklx_{ij}y_{kl} survives, so it is a relation. If the pairs share one index, fix distinct i,li,l and put qj=xijyjlq_j=x_{ij}y_{jl} for j∉{i,l}j\notin\{i,l\}. The choices S={i,j,k}S=\{i,j,k\} and T=N∖{j,k,l}T=N\setminus\{j,k,l\} give qj+qk=0q_j+q_k=0 for distinct j,kj,k outside {i,l}\{i,l\}. Using three such indices yields qj=0q_j=0. Finally, put cij=xijyij=cjic_{ij}=x_{ij}y_{ij}=c_{ji}. Taking S={i,j,k}S=\{i,j,k\} and T=N∖ST=N\setminus S gives

cij+cik+cjk=0.c_{ij}+c_{ik}+c_{jk}=0.

Comparing the four triangle equations on four distinct indices yields cij=cklc_{ij}=c_{kl} for disjoint pairs. Any two pairs have a third pair disjoint from both, so all cijc_{ij} are equal. The triangle equation then forces them all to vanish. Thus every xyxy product is a relation. Taking S={i}S=\{i\} and T=N∖{i}T=N\setminus\{i\} now gives abab plus mixed products already shown to vanish, proving that abab is a relation.

Conversely, the cone in the (a,x)(a,x) coordinates consists of pure spinors: for a≠0a\ne0 it is represented by aexp⁡(B)a\exp(B) with BB decomposable, and the remaining points lie in its closure. The other cone is dual. Hence every specialized Wick quadric vanishes on these two cones. Their quadratic vanishing space is the right side of (24): the Pfaffians within each block and all products between the blocks. This proves equality of the generator spaces. Since I=(I2)I=(I_2), these quadrics generate the entire specialized ideal.

The generators at circle weights −1,0,1-1,0,1 generate (a,x)(b,y)(a,x)(b,y). They separate the two components; the remaining generators impose decomposability on each skew array. Writing parentheses for the ideals generated by the pure quadratic spaces, we obtain

Q=(C[x]/(I2(x)‾))[a]×C(C[y]/(I2(y)‾))[b].(25)Q=\left(\mathbb{C}[x]/(\overline{I_2(x)})\right)[a]\mathbin{\times_{\mathbb{C}}}\left(\mathbb{C}[y]/(\overline{I_2(y)})\right)[b]. \tag*{(25)}

Here C[x]=C[xij:i<j]\mathbb{C}[x]=\mathbb{C}[x_{ij}:i<j], and similarly for yy. The two matrix rings are the reduced homogeneous coordinate rings of the Plücker-embedded Gr⁡(2,V∗)\operatorname{Gr}(2,V^*) and Gr⁡(2,V)\operatorname{Gr}(2,V). Adjoining a,ba,b gives their projective cones with vertices V,V∗V,V^*. Both maps in the fibre product evaluate at the origins. Thus the two affine components meet only at the origin, while their projectivizations are disjoint. This proves the scheme assertion.

The standard graded decomposition of the Plücker coordinate ring of Gr⁡(2,V∗)\operatorname{Gr}(2,V^*) gives

Sj+=(C[x]/(I2(x)‾))j≃χ−j⊠S(j,j)V.S_j^+=\left(\mathbb{C}[x]/(\overline{I_2(x)})\right)_j\simeq\chi_{-j}\boxtimes\mathbb{S}_{(j,j)}V.

Here each xx-coordinate has degree one and circle weight −1-1. The second ring gives (S(j,j)V)∗(\mathbb{S}_{(j,j)}V)^* with weight jj. Thus aqSj+a^qS_j^+ and bqSj−b^qS_j^- have degree j+qj+q and weights −j−2q-j-2q and j+2qj+2q, respectively. The fibre product in (25) retains one common constant. This proves Theorem 3.1 for E8E_8. Mathematics Department, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112

Email address: [email protected]

References

  1. [1]P. Bakić, H. Y. Loke, and G. Savin, Exceptional dual pair correspondences; case of real groups of split rank one, Preprint, 2025. arXiv:2508.01551.arxiv.org/abs/2508.01551
  2. [2]R. Brylinski and B. Kostant, Minimal representations of E₆, E₇, and E₈ and the generalized Capelli identity, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91 (1994), 2469–2472. doi:10.1073/pnas.91.7.2469.DOI
  3. [3]W. Fulton, Young Tableaux: With Applications to Representation Theory and Geometry, London Mathematical Society Student Texts 35, Cambridge University Press, 1997.
  4. [4]W. Fulton and J. Harris, Representation Theory: A First Course, Graduate Texts in Mathematics 129, Springer, 1991. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0979-9.DOI
  5. [5]W. T. Gan and G. Savin, Uniqueness of Joseph ideal, Math. Res. Lett. 11 (2004), no. 5–6, 589–597.DOI
  6. [6]M. Hanzer and G. Savin, Multiplicity free Weil representations arising from exceptional groups, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2025 (2025), no. 13, rnaf184. doi:10.1093/imrn/rnaf184.DOI
  7. [7]H. Y. Loke and G. Savin, Rational forms of exceptional dual pairs, J. Algebra 422 (2015), 683–696.arxiv.org/abs/1212.1957
  8. [8]H. Y. Loke and G. Savin, Duality for spherical representations in exceptional theta correspondences, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 371 (2019), no. 9, 6359–6375.
  9. [9]G. Ottaviani, Five lectures on projective invariants, Rend. Sem. Mat. Univ. Politec. Torino 71 (2013), no. 1, 119–194. Open-access text.arxiv.org/abs/1305.2749
  10. [10]F. Rincón, Isotropical linear spaces and valuated Delta-matroids, J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 119 (2012), no. 1, 14–32. doi:10.1016/j.jcta.2011.08.001.DOI
  11. [11]G. Savin, Howe duality for the dual pair SL₂(R) × F₄,₁: a ping-pong of K-types, Pacific J. Math. 342 (2026), no. 2, 387–394. doi:10.2140/pjm.2026.342.387.DOI
  12. [12]N. R. Wallach, Real Reductive Groups I, Pure and Applied Mathematics 132, Academic Press, 1988.

Paper details

vlnc:W_gtzmkdft
v1 · latestHistory (1)

published · Fresh — added to the Hub within the last 30 days

added ·

Usage

views · 0

downloads · 0

A view counts once per browser per day, a download each time the PDF is requested.

CC BY 4.0

Original source

  • Mathematics

ChatGPT-6 Astra · View statement →

Looking for related papers…
Contents