WorksPhysics and Astronomy
Liouvillian Kramers Degeneracy
Abstract
The Kramers theorem generally guarantees the spectral degeneracy of time-reversal-invariant Hamiltonian operators with half-integer spin, underlying a variety of physical phenomena. Despite its fundamental significance, the Kramers degeneracy has been argued to be absent in Liouvillian superoperators acting on mixed states because of the double structure of the Hilbert space. Here, we instead demonstrate that the interplay of time-reversal symmetry and parity symmetry enforces the Kramers degeneracy in Liouvillians. We explicitly construct dissipative many-body models of interacting fermions and spins exhibiting the Kramers degeneracy and show that their complex spectral statistics follow those of non-Hermitian random matrices in the corresponding symplectic symmetry classes. Of the three fundamental universality classes of non-Hermitian random matrices, the symplectic class has never been realized in symmetry-resolved many-body Liouvillians. Our constructions provide its explicit realizations and spectral signatures of nonintegrability in symplectic open quantum systems.
The Kramers theorem guarantees the degeneracy of energy eigenstates in quantum systems with half-integer spin [1, 2, 3, 4]. Mathematically, it arises from antiunitary time-reversal symmetry with negative sign, which defines the symplectic class in the Wigner-Dyson threefold way of Hermitian random matrices [5, 6, 7] and plays a fundamental role in the characterization of quantum chaos [8, 9, 10, 11, 12]. The Kramers degeneracy also underlies various condensed matter phenomena, such as the Anderson localization transitions [13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18] and Z topological insulator phases [19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26].
Meanwhile, the physics of open quantum systems has attracted considerable interest. Unlike isolated quantum systems, open quantum systems interact with their environment, and the reduced dynamics is no longer governed solely by Hermitian Hamiltonians [27, 28, 29]. Instead, the open quantum dynamics is generally described by Liouvillian superoperators acting on density matrices. Understanding such dynamics is important for protecting quantum coherence against dissipation. By contrast, engineered dissipation can also be useful as a resource for quantum computation and state preparation [30, 31]. In contrast to Hamiltonians, Liouvillians act on operator spaces with a double Hilbert-space structure, giving rise to a richer symmetry framework for open quantum systems [32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41].
The Kramers theorem was extended to generic non-Hermitian operators under generalized time-reversal symmetry†, with negative sign [42, 43]. Although many-body Liouvillians are also non-Hermitian superoperators, their double Hilbert-space structure makes the Kramers degeneracy elusive. Indeed, whereas the Kramers degeneracy was investigated in dissipative fermionic systems at thermal equilibrium within the Lindblad master equation [44], Ref. [45] subsequently argued that the double Hilbert-space structure of many-body Lindbladians excludes the Kramers degeneracy within individual symmetry-resolved subspaces. This issue also has important implications for dissipative quantum chaos [46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61]. In particular, the complex spectral statistics of nonintegrable open quantum systems are expected to exhibit the universal behavior of non-Hermitian random matrices in the same symmetry classes. Among the 38 symmetry classes of non-Hermitian random matrices [43, 62], 11 support the Kramers degeneracy, whereas the remaining 27 do not. Consequently, only a restricted subset of universality classes can appear in open quantum systems, if the Kramers degeneracy is indeed forbidden in Liouvillians.
In this Letter, we show how the Kramers degeneracy arises within individual symmetry subspaces of many-body Liouvillians. We find that the argument of Ref. [45] relies on restrictive assumptions about the algebra of symmetry operators and demonstrate that the interplay between time-reversal symmetry† and parity symmetry enforces the Liouvillian Kramers degeneracy. In contrast to Ref. [44], our Liouvillian Kramers degeneracy theorem is independent of particle statistics and applicable to both fermionic and bosonic systems. To illustrate this, we explicitly construct Lindbladian models of interacting fermions and spins exhibiting the Kramers degeneracy. We further show that their complex spectral statistics follow those of non-Hermitian random matrices in the corresponding symmetry classes, providing characterization of nonintegrability for open quantum systems in the symplectic class.
**Kramers theorem.—**Suppose that a generic non-Hermitian operator respects time-reversal symmetry† [43]
where is an antiunitary operator (i.e., and for ). Although this symmetry is equivalent to time-reversal symmetry for Hermitian , the two symmetries are generally distinct for non-Hermitian [63]. Let be an eigenvalue of , and and be the corresponding right and left eigenvectors, respectively (i.e., , ). Equation (1) leads to
showing that is also a right eigenvector of with the same eigenvalue .
Depending on or , the relevant symmetry class becomes class AI or AII, respectively. Specifically, enforces the Kramers degeneracy for arbitrary complex eigenvalues [42, 43]. Indeed, from , we have
leading to . Accordingly, is biorthogonal to [64] and constitutes an independent eigenvector with the same eigenvalue , establishing the Kramers degeneracy [65]. The Kramers degeneracy underlies various physical phenomena, such as non-Hermitian topology and skin effect [66, 67, 68, 69]. Furthermore, time-reversal symmetry governs the fundamental threefold universality classes of non-Hermitian random matrices [70], serving as a non-Hermitian counterpart of the Wigner-Dyson threefold way [5, 6].
In the presence of additional unitary symmetry that commutes with , such as parity symmetry considered below, the symmetry classification must be performed separately within each subspace of the corresponding conserved charge. For example, analyzing the full spectrum without resolving these subspaces obscures the characteristic spectral correlations within individual subspaces, since the spectra of different subspaces are generally uncorrelated. For Lindbladians, Ref. [45] argued that the double Hilbert-space structure excludes the Kramers degeneracy within individual symmetry subspaces. By contrast, we below demonstrate the Liouvillian Kramers degeneracy by combining time-reversal symmetry with parity symmetry.
Liouvillian Kramers theorem.—We consider a Liouvillian superoperator acting on operators , where denotes operator space equipped with the Hilbert-Schmidt inner product. Similar to Eq. (1), we impose time-reversal symmetry on :
where is an antiunitary superoperator satisfying
with a parity superoperator . If is irreducible and possesses no conserved quantities, must take a definite sign of either or . However, since Eqs. (4) and (5) imply , the entire operator space decomposes into invariant parity subspaces, for which takes different signs. Specifically, in the subspace with , the Liouvillian respects time-reversal symmetry with and thus exhibits the Kramers degeneracy.
In general, physical Liouvillians preserve Hermiticity of operators [i.e., for ]. Accordingly, respects
where is an antiunitary modular conjugation satisfying for [41]. The symmetry classification of is determined by the interplay between and , as well as whether parity is strong or weak [32, 34]. Weak parity acts on an operator as , with a unitary and Hermitian operator . In the following physical realizations, we take the representation with . Since commutes with , is respected within each subspace of . Consequently, the Liouvillian belongs to
where denotes the operator subspace with fixed weak parity , and the notation of symmetry classes follows the 38-fold classification of non-Hermitian operators [43].
On the other hand, when parity is strong symmetry, the left- and right-acting parity superoperators are separately conserved: and . The operator space then decomposes into four invariant subspaces (), labeled by the corresponding strong parity and . Within each subspace, the time-reversal superoperator satisfies . Moreover, since modular conjugation exchanges and , it preserves individual subspace only for . Consequently, the relevant symmetry classes are identified as
These constructions circumvent the argument of Ref. [45], which relies on specific assumptions about the representations of symmetry operators. In our constructions, yields . Since preserves each parity subspace of the Hilbert space, acts within and separately while squaring to , enforcing the Kramers degeneracy even within each subspace. Notably, class AII in Eq. (8) and class DIII in Eq. (7) were previously argued to be absent from Lindbladians [45]. Below, we explicitly demonstrate their realizations in open quantum systems.
Lindblad master equation.—While the preceding discussion applies to generic Liouvillians, we now consider the Kramers degeneracy in the Lindblad master equation , with [27, 28, 29, 72, 73]
where is a Hermitian Hamiltonian governing the unitary dynamics, and ’s are jump operators describing the dissipative coupling to the environment. To realize the Lindbladian Kramers degeneracy, we impose time-reversal symmetry on , as in Eq. (1). We further require the set of jump operators to be invariant under both time reversal and Hermitian conjugation,
where the coefficient matrices and are unitary. A simple realization of these conditions is provided by the set of jump operators, , where denotes an arbitrary operator with definite parity, . Defining the time-reversal superoperator by for , we find that the Lindbladian exhibits the Kramers degeneracy in the weak-parity subspace . In the following, we provide explicit fermionic and bosonic Lindbladians exhibiting the Kramers degeneracy. In the End Matter, we also demonstrate its realization in a random Lindbladian (Appendix A) and an exactly solvable dissipative spinful fermion (Appendix B).
Dissipative interacting fermions.— Let us consider the Hilbert space consisting of spinful complex fermions (; ). Time reversal is implemented by the antiunitary transformation,
satisfying
We take the Hamiltonian to be
which respects time-reversal symmetry in Eq. (1) by construction. Here, denotes the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model [74, 75, 76, 77, 78]
where ’s () are Majorana fermion operators (, ) constructed from , and the real-valued couplings are independently drawn from the Gaussian distribution ().
from the Gaussian distribution (). While may possess additional symmetry [79, 80, 81, 82], the chemical potential term breaks such symmetry.
We introduce random dephasing through the jump operators
which transform under time reversal and Hermitian conjugation as
satisfying Eq. (10). Consequently, the Lindbladian exhibits the Kramers degeneracy in the subspace of weak fermion parity . Furthermore, these jump operators preserve strong fermion parity [i.e., ], and the symmetry classification follows Eq. (8).
In Figure 1(a), we show the complex Lindbladian spectra for and . In our numerical calculations, we sample the dephasing rates independently and uniformly from for each . The overall spectra form a characteristic lemon-shaped structure, reminiscent of that observed in random Lindbladians [49, 50]. Whereas the spectrum in is symmetric about the real axis, that in lacks this symmetry, consistent with the presence or absence of modular conjugation symmetry. To test the strongly correlated nature of the Lindbladian, we investigate the distributions of complex spacing ratios [53, 71]. Given a reference eigenvalue , let and denote its nearest- and next-to-nearest-neighbor eigenvalues, respectively. Then, we define as

Figure 1. Dissipative interacting fermions for strong parity , (blue) and , (orange) (, , , ; is an independent random variable uniformly distributed on ). (a) Complex spectrum for a single realization. (b, c) Probability densities of the (b) modulus and (c) argument of complex spacing ratios . and for , , and and for , . The densities are numerically obtained by averaging over 5000 independent realizations, restricted to the central 50% away from the real axis for , , and the central 30% including the real axis for , . Black dashed curves: non-Hermitian random matrices in classes A, AI, and AII[71].
whose statistics characterize the local geometry and correlations of the complex spectrum. In , each complex eigenvalue forms a Kramers pair, which is counted only once for calculations of . In Figure 1 (b, Figure 1c), we show the probability densities of and , which agree well with those for non-Hermitian random matrices with time-reversal symmetry1. Specifically, the negative weak-fermion-parity subspace realizes the symplectic random-matrix statistics coexisting with the Kramers degeneracy, providing the spectral signatures of nonintegrability for open quantum systems in the symplectic class.
Dissipative spin chain.—Beyond fermionic systems, our Liouvillian Kramers theorem also applies to bosonic systems. As an explicit realization, we construct a dissipative quantum spin chain exhibiting the Kramers degeneracy. Let , , and denote Pauli matrices at site () of a spin-1/2 chain with even length . We choose the Hamiltonian as
where and are the bond-dependent transverse and longitudinal exchange interactions, respectively, and is the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction along the direction. We further introduce the jump operators
for , with . The two-spin terms in the jumps break conservation of magnetization while preserving parity .
In contrast to the preceding fermionic model, the relevant antiunitary operation is not conventional spin time reversal but its combination with a uniform rotation about the axis. Specifically, we introduce an effective antiunitary time-reversal operator
satisfying
Under this effective time reversal, the Hamiltonian is invariant as in Eq. (1), and the jump operators satisfy . Accordingly, the resulting Lindbladian exhibits the Kramers degeneracy in the weak-parity subspace . Similarly to the fermionic model, the jump operators also preserve strong parity [i.e., ], leading to the symmetry classification in Eq. (8). Notably, in the discussion following Eq. (46) of Ref. [45], defined through are assumed to be unimodular complex numbers (i.e., proportional to the identity), where
correspond to the unitary part of . By contrast, in our model satisfies , violating the assumption made in Ref. [45].
In Figure 2, we investigate the complex-spacing-ratio distributions, focusing on the complex eigenvalues around the spectral center . These probability distributions show good agreement with the random-matrix distributions in the corresponding symmetry classes, despite deviations near within . Notably, the dissipative quantum spin chain considered here is spatially local, and the corresponding Lindbladians are represented by sparse matrices, as opposed to dense random matrices. Nevertheless, the complex spectral statistics of exhibit the random-matrix universality, providing a spectral diagnostic of nonintegrability for open quantum systems in the symplectic class.

Figure 2. Dissipative quantum spin chain for strong parity , (blue) and , (orange) [, , , , , ; and are independent random variables uniformly distributed on ]. Probability densities of the (a) modulus and (b) argument of complex spacing ratios , and for , , and and for , . The densities are numerically obtained by averaging over 5000 independent realizations, restricted to the spectral window , for , , and , for , .
Discussion.—We have established the Kramers degeneracy theorem for Liouvillians and demonstrated their random-matrix universality in the symplectic class. While we have identified classes AII and DIII as the simplest realizations, additional symmetry can yield a broader range of symplectic classes, which can be distinguished through the spectral statistics around the symmetry-invariant lines and point [83]. As in isolated quantum systems, the Liouvillian Kramers degeneracy can underlie unique phenomena of open quantum systems. Although a stationary density matrix can always be chosen in the subspace, the subspace contains no density matrices. Nevertheless, the Kramers pairs describe independent dynamical modes, which can be probed through two-time correlations of operators. Our results also motivate revisiting the fragility of time-reversalinvariant topological insulators in open quantum systems [37] and exploring possible connections to symmetry fractionalization [84].
K.K. is supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grants No. JP26H02015, No. JP26K06970, No. JP26K17046, and JST FOREST Program Grant No. JPMJFR256P.
End Matter
Symplectic random Lindbladian
In a similar manner to Refs. [49, 50], we construct a random-matrix model of a Lindbladian exhibiting the Kramers degeneracy. Let () be the dimension of the Hilbert space. We take the Hamiltonian to be
where and are Hermitian random matrices drawn from the Gaussian orthogonal and symplectic ensembles, respectively. Specifically, introducing Hermitian random matrices with the entries
we define
with and . Here, [] denotes a real (complex) Gaussian distribution with and . We choose the jump operators as
where is a non-Hermitian random matrix drawn from the Ginibre unitary ensemble, with the independent entries distributed according to .
The Hamiltonian respects time-reversal symmetry in Eq. (1), implemented by the antiunitary operator
Here, defines a parity operator. Moreover, the jump operators transform into each other under time reversal and Hermitian conjugation [Eq. (10)]:
Consequently, the Liouvillian exhibits the Kramers degeneracy in the subspace of weak parity .
In Figure 3 (a), we show the complex spectrum for a single realization. In both weak-parity subspaces, the complex spectrum is symmetric about the real axis, owing to modular conjugation symmetry. We also note that we have and . Accordingly, choosing and to be constants of order unity ensures that the Hamiltonian and dissipation contributions have comparable characteristic scales. In Figure 3 (b, Figure 3c), we show the complex-spacing ratio distributions, which agree with those of non-Hermitian random matrices in class AI (AII) for weak parity (). Reference [45] argued that time-reversal symmetry in Eq. (4) with always leads to strong symmetry of Lindbladians. However, our random symplectic Lindbladian exhibits the Kramers degeneracy protected by time-reversal symmetry with , despite the absence of strong symmetry.

Figure 3. Symplectic random Lindbladian for weak parity (blue) and (orange) (, ). (a) Complex spectrum for a single realization. (b, c) Probability densities of the (b) modulus and (c) argument of complex spacing ratios . and for , and and for . The densities are numerically obtained by averaging over 1000 independent realizations, restricted to the spectral window and . Black dashed curves: non-Hermitian random matrices in classes A, AI, and AII[71].
Exactly solvable dissipative spinful fermion
We illustrate the Lindbladian Kramers degeneracy with a single spinful orbital, described by fermion operators and . We take the Hamiltonian to be
with , , and . This Hamiltonian respects time-reversal symmetry in Eq. (1) with
Although the superconducting pairing term breaks particle-number conservation, fermion parity remains preserved:
We introduce a set of four jump operators
with . The jump coherently combines single-fermion loss and gain for up spin, with the loss amplitude depending on the occupation of down spin. Since these jump operators change fermion parity, the resulting Lindbladian only preserves weak fermion parity . By construction, this set of jump operators is closed under both time reversal and Hermitian conjugation [Eq. (10)]. Consequently, the Lindbladian exhibits the Kramers degeneracy in the subspace of weak fermion parity .
Specifically, the characteristic polynomials in the respective weak-fermion-parity subspaces are given as
with . The perfect-square form of demonstrates the Kramers degeneracy.
References
- [1]H. A. Kramers, Théorie générale de la rotation paramagnétique dans les cristaux, Proc. K. Ned. Akad. Wet. 33, 959 (1930).
- [2]E. Wigner, Über die Operation der Zeitumkehr in der Quantenmechanik, Nachr. Ges. Wiss. Göttingen 1932, 546 (1932).
- [3]J. J. Sakurai and J. Napolitano, Modern Quantum Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2020).
- [4]H. Tasaki, Physics and Mathematics of Quantum Many-Body Systems (Springer, Cham, 2020).DOI
- [5]E. P. Wigner, On the statistical distribution of the widths and spacings of nuclear resonance levels, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 47, 790 (1951); On the Distribution of the Roots of Certain Symmetric Matrices, Ann. Math. 67, 325 (1958).DOI
- [6]F. J. Dyson, The Threefold Way. Algebraic Structure of Symmetry Groups and Ensembles in Quantum Mechanics, J. Math. Phys. 3, 1199 (1962).DOI
- [7]M. L. Mehta, Random Matrices (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2004).
- [8]M. V. Berry and M. Tabor, Level clustering in the regular spectrum, Proc. R. Soc. A 356, 375 (1977).DOI
- [9]O. Bohigas, M. J. Giannoni, and C. Schmit, Characterization of Chaotic Quantum Spectra and Universality of Level Fluctuation Laws, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1 (1984).
- [10]F. Haake, S. Gnutzmann, and M. Kuś, Quantum Signatures of Chaos (Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2018).
- [11]R. Nandkishore and D. A. Huse, Many-Body Localization and Thermalization in Quantum Statistical Mechanics, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 6, 15 (2015).DOI
- [12]L. D’Alessio, Y. Kafri, A. Polkovnikov, and M. Rigol, From quantum chaos and eigenstate thermalization to statistical mechanics and thermodynamics, Adv. Phys. 65, 239 (2016).DOI
- [13]S. Hikami, A. I. Larkin, and Y. Nagaka, Spin-Orbit Interaction and Magnetoresistance in the Two Dimensional Random System, Prog. Theor. Phys. 63, 707 (1980).DOI
- [14]T. Ando, Numerical study of spin dependent effects on localization in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 40, 5325 (1989).pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9992560
- [15]T. Kawarabayashi, T. Ohtsuki, K. Slevin, and Y. Ono, Anderson Transition in Three-Dimensional Disordered Systems with Symplectic Symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3593 (1996).DOI
- [16]Y. Asada, K. Slevin, and T. Ohtsuki, Anderson Transition in Two-Dimensional Systems with Spin-Orbit Coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 256601 (2002).pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12484908
- [17]K. Efetov, Supersymmetry in Disorder and Chaos (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1996).
- [18]F. Evers and A. D. Mirlin, Anderson transitions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1355 (2008).
- [19]C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Quantum Spin Hall Effect in Graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 226801 (2005); Z2 Topological Order and the Quantum Spin Hall Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 146802 (2005).pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16384250
- [20]R. Roy, Z2 classification of quantum spin Hall systems: An approach using time-reversal invariance, Phys. Rev. B 79, 195321 (2009); Topological phases and the quantum spin Hall effect inDOI
- [21]J. E. Moore and L. Balents, Topological invariants of time-reversal-invariant band structures, Phys. Rev. B 75, 121306(R) (2007).DOI
- [22]L. Fu, C. L. Kane, and E. J. Mele, Topological Insulators in Three Dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 106803 (2007).
- [23]B. A. Bernevig, T. L. Hughes, and S.-C. Zhang, Quantum Spin Hall Effect and Topological Phase Transition in HgTe Quantum Wells, Science 314, 1757 (2006).
- [24]M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: Topological insulators, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045 (2010).
- [25]X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators and superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057 (2011).DOI
- [26]C.-K. Chiu, J. C. Y. Teo, A. P. Schnyder, and S. Ryu, Classification of topological quantum matter with symmetries, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 035005 (2016).DOI
- [27]M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2000).
- [28]H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione, The Theory of Open Quantum Systems (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2007).DOI
- [29]A. Rivas and S. F. Huelga, Open Quantum Systems (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012).
- [30]F. Verstraete, M. M. Wolf, and J. I. Cirac, Quantum computation and quantum-state engineering driven by dissipation, Nat. Phys. 5, 633 (2009).DOI
- [31]S. Diehl, A. Micheli, A. Kantian, B. Kraus, H. P. Büchler, and P. Zoller, Quantum states and phases in driven open quantum systems with cold atoms, Nat. Phys. 4, 878 (2008).DOI
- [32]B. Buča and T. Prosen, A note on symmetry reductions of the Lindblad equation: transport in constrained open spin chains, New J. Phys. 14, 073007 (2012).DOI
- [33]T. Prosen, PT-Symmetric Quantum Liouvillian Dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 090404 (2012).DOI
- [34]V. V. Albert and L. Jiang, Symmetries and conserved quantities in Lindblad master equations, Phys. Rev. A 89, 022118 (2014).DOI
- [35]F. Minganti, A. Biella, N. Bartolo, and C. Ciuti, Spectral theory of Liouvillians for dissipative phase transitions, Phys. Rev. A 98, 042118 (2018).DOI
- [36]S. Lieu, M. McGinley, and N. R. Cooper, Tenfold Way for Quadratic Lindbladians, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 040401 (2020).DOI
- [37]M. McGinley and N. R. Cooper, Fragility of time-reversal symmetry protected topological phases, Nat. Phys. 16, 1181 (2020).DOI
- [38]A. Altland, M. Fleischhauer, and S. Diehl, Symmetry Classes of Open Fermionic Quantum Matter, Phys. Rev. X 11, 021037 (2021).
- [39]D. Roberts, A. Lingenfelter, and A. A. Clerk, Hidden Time-Reversal Symmetry, Quantum Detailed Balance and Exact Solutions of Driven-Dissipative Quantum Systems, PRX Quantum 2, 020336 (2021).
- [40]M. Kawasaki, K. Mochizuki, and H. Obuse, Topological phases protected by shifted sublattice symmetry in dissipative quantum systems, Phys. Rev. B 106, 035408 (2022).DOI
- [41]K. Kawabata, A. Kulkarni, J. Li, T. Numasawa, and S. Ryu, Symmetry of Open Quantum Systems: Classification of Dissipative Quantum Chaos, PRX Quantum 4, 030328 (2023).DOI
- [42]M. Sato, K. Hasebe, K. Esaki, and M. Kohmoto, Time-Reversal Symmetry in Non-Hermitian Systems, Prog. Theor. Phys. 127, 937 (2012); K. Esaki, M. Sato, K. Hasebe, and M. Kohmoto, Edge states and topological phases in non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. B 84, 205128 (2011).DOI
- [43]K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, M. Ueda, and M. Sato, Symmetry and Topology in Non-Hermitian Physics, Phys. Rev. X 9, 041015 (2019).DOI
- [44]S. Lieu, M. McGinley, O. Shtanko, N. R. Cooper, and A. V. Gorshkov, Kramers’ degeneracy for open systems in thermal equilibrium, Phys. Rev. B 105, L121104 (2022).DOI
- [45]L. Sá, P. Ribeiro, and T. Prosen, Symmetry Classification of Many-Body Lindbladians: Tenfold Way and Beyond, Phys. Rev. X 13, 031019 (2023).
- [46]R. Grobe, F. Haake, and H.-J. Sommers, Quantum Distinction of Regular and Chaotic Dissipative Motion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1899 (1988); R. Grobe and F. Haake, University of cubiclevel repulsion for dissipative quantum chaos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2893 (1989).pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10038927
- [47]F. Haake, F. Izrailev, N. Lehmann, D. Saher, and H.-J. Sommers, Statistics of complex levels of random matrices for decaying systems, Z. Physik B 88, 359 (1992).DOI
- [48]R. Hamazaki, K. Kawabata, and M. Ueda, Non-Hermitian Many-Body Localization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 090603 (2019).DOI
- [49]S. Denisov, T. Laptyeva, W. Tarnowski, D. Chruściński, and K. Życzkowski, Universal Spectra of Random Lindblad Operators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 140403 (2019).DOI
- [50]T. Can, Random Lindblad dynamics, J. Phys. A 52, 485302 (2019).
- [51]L. Sá, P. Ribeiro, and T. Prosen, Spectral and steady-state properties of random Liouvillians, J. Phys. A 53, 305303 (2020).DOI
- [52]G. Akemann, M. Kieburg, A. Mielke, and T. Prosen, Universal Signature from Integrability to Chaos in Dissipative Open Quantum Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 254101 (2019).
- [53]L. Sá, P. Ribeiro, and T. Prosen, Complex Spacing Ratios: A Signature of Dissipative Quantum Chaos, Phys. Rev. X 10, 021019 (2020).
- [54]K. Wang, F. Piazza, and D. J. Luitz, Hierarchy of Relaxation Timescales in Local Random Liouvillians, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 100604 (2020).DOI
- [55]J. Li, T. Prosen, and A. Chan, Spectral Statistics of Non-Hermitian Matrices and Dissipative Quantum Chaos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 170602 (2021).DOI
- [56]W. Tarnowski, I. Yusipov, T. Laptyeva, S. Denisov, D. Chruściński, and K. Życzkowski, Random generators of Markovian evolution: A quantum-classical transition by superdecoherence, Phys. Rev. E 104, 034118 (2021).DOI
- [57]A. M. García-García, L. Sá, and J. J. M. Verbaarschot, Symmetry Classification and Universality in Non-Hermitian Many-Body Quantum Chaos by the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev Model, Phys. Rev. X 12, 021040 (2022).
- [58]M. Prasad, H. K. Yadalam, C. Aron, and M. Kulkarni, Dissipative quantum dynamics, phase transitions, and non-Hermitian random matrices, Phys. Rev. A 105, L050201 (2022).DOI
- [59]S. Ghosh, S. Gupta, and M. Kulkarni, Spectral properties of disordered interacting non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. B 106, 134202 (2022).DOI
- [60]K. Kawabata and S. Ryu, Non-Hermitian Disordered Systems, arXiv:2603.20393 (2026).arxiv.org/abs/2603.20393
- [61]L. Sá, P. Ribeiro, and S. Denisov, What We Talk About When We Talk About Dissipative Quantum Chaos, arXiv:2605.21628 (2026).arxiv.org/abs/2605.21628
- [62]D. Bernard and A. LeClair, A Classification of Non-Hermitian Random Matrices, in Statistical Field Theories, NATO Science Series, Vol. 73, edited by A. Cappelli and G. Mussardo (Springer, Dordrecht, 2002) p. 207.DOI
- [63]Whereas time-reversal symmetry† enforces the Kramers degeneracy for arbitrary complex eigenvalues E ∈ C, time-reversal symmetry ensures the degeneracy only for real eigenvalues E ∈ R.
- [64]D. C. Brody, Biorthogonal quantum mechanics, J. Phys. A 47, 035305 (2014).DOI
- [65]Alternatively, Eq. (1) with T² = −1 leads to [(E − H) U_T]^T = −(E − H) U_T (T ≡ U_T𝒦) and hence det (E − H) = (Pf [(E − H) U_T])² / det U_T, implying at least the twofold degeneracy.
- [66]N. Okuma, K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, and M. Sato, Topological Origin of Non-Hermitian Skin Effects, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 086801 (2020); K. Kawabata, N. Okuma, and M. Sato, Non-Bloch band theory of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians in the symplectic class, Phys. Rev. B 101, 195147 (2020).DOI
- [67]Y. Yi and Z. Yang, Non-Hermitian Skin Modes Induced by On-Site Dissipations and Chiral Tunneling Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 186802 (2020).DOI
- [68]E. J. Bergholtz, J. C. Budich, and F. K. Kunst, Exceptional topology of non-Hermitian systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 015005 (2021).DOI
- [69]N. Okuma and M. Sato, Non-Hermitian Topological Phenomena: A Review, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 14, 83 (2023).DOI
- [70]R. Hamazaki, K. Kawabata, N. Kura, and M. Ueda, Universality classes of non-Hermitian random matrices, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 023286 (2020).DOI
- [71]K. Kawabata, Exact probability distributions of complex spacing ratios in non-Hermitian random matrices, arXiv:2609.35230 (2026).arxiv.org/abs/2609.35230
- [72]V. Gorini, A. Kossakowski, and E. C. G. Sudarshan, Completely positive dynamical semigroups of N-level systems, J. Math. Phys. 17, 821 (1976).DOI
- [73]G. Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups, Commun. Math. Phys. 48, 119 (1976).DOI
- [74]S. Sachdev and J. Ye, Gapless spin-fluid ground state in a random quantum Heisenberg magnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3339 (1993).DOI
- [75]A. Kitaev, A simple model of quantum holography (2015), KITP Program: Entanglement in Strongly-Correlated Quantum Matter.
- [76]S. Sachdev, Black Hole Entropy and Strange Metals, Phys. Rev. X 5, 041025 (2015).
- [77]J. Polchinski and V. Rosenhaus, The spectrum in the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model, J. High Energ. Phys. 2016 (4), 1.DOI
- [78]J. Maldacena and D. Stanford, Remarks on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model, Phys. Rev. D 94, 106002 (2016).DOI
- [79]Y.-Z. You, A. W. W. Ludwig, and C. Xu, Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model and thermalization on the boundary of many-body localized fermionic symmetry-protected topological states, Phys. Rev. B 95, 115150 (2017).DOI
- [80]W. Fu and S. Sachdev, Numerical study of fermion and boson models with infinite-range random interactions, Phys. Rev. B 94, 035135 (2016).DOI
- [81]A. M. García-García and J. J. M. Verbaarschot, Spectral and thermodynamic properties of the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model, Phys. Rev. D 94, 126010 (2016).
- [82]J. S. Cotler, G. Gur-Ari, M. Hanada, J. Polchinski, P. Saad, S. H. Shenker, D. Stanford, A. Streicher, and M. Tezuka, Black holes and random matrices, J. High Energ. Phys. 2017 (5), 118.
- [83]Z. Xiao, K. Kawabata, X. Luo, T. Ohtsuki, and R. Shindou, Level statistics of real eigenvalues in non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Research 4, 043196 (2022); Z. Xiao, R. Shindou, and K. Kawabata, Universal hard-edge statistics of non-Hermitian random matrices, Phys. Rev. Research 6, 023303 (2024).DOI
- [84]H. Yagi, K. Mochizuki, and Z. Gong, Threefold Way for Typical Entanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 150401 (2025).DOI