alphaFeedback

WorksMathematics

Solution of Erdős problem #443\# 443

AI contributions
Not recorded for this paper
View details

Abstract

We prove that the size #{k(m−k):1≤k≤m/2}∩{l(n−l):1≤l≤n/2}\# \{ k(m-k) : 1\leq k\leq m/2\} \cap \{ l(n-l) : 1\leq l\leq n/2\} is (mn)o(1)(mn)^{o(1)}, but can be arbitrarily large. This resolves Erdős problem #443\# 443.

In [1], p.88, Erdős and Graham posed the following problem;

Let mm and nn be positive integers and consider the two sets

{k(m−k):1≤k≤m2}and{ℓ(n−ℓ):1≤ℓ≤n2}.\left\{ k(m-k): 1 \le k \le\frac{m}{2} \right\} \quad\text{and} \quad\left\{ \ell(n-\ell): 1 \le\ell\le\frac{n}{2} \right\}.

Can one estimate the number of integers common to both? Is this number unbounded? It should certainly be less than (mn)ε(mn)^{\varepsilon} for every ε>0\varepsilon> 0 if mnmn is sufficiently large.

The problem is listed in the online database of Erdős problems as problem #443 (as of the time of publication), https://www.erdosproblems.com/443.

We will use the notation S(m)={k(m−k):1≤k≤m2}S(m) = \left\{ k(m-k): 1 \le k \le\frac{m}{2} \right\} for such sets, and let f(n,m)=#(S(m)∩S(n))f(n,m) = \#(S(m) \cap S(n)).

Observe that f(n,m)≤f(2n,2m)f(n,m) \le f(2n,2m) by doubling each of n,m,k,ℓn,m,k,\ell in an equality k(m−k)=ℓ(n−ℓ)k(m-k) = \ell(n-\ell). Without loss of generality, we will assume m>nm > n.

Writing k(2m−k)=m2−(m−k)2=m2−c2k(2m-k) = m^2 - (m-k)^2 = m^2-c^2, for c=m−kc=m-k, we deduce that the number of solutions is bounded by half of the number of divisors of m2−n2m^2-n^2, since m2−c2=n2−d2⇔m2−n2=c2−d2=(c−d)(c+d)m^2-c^2 = n^2-d^2 \Leftrightarrow m^2-n^2 = c^2-d^2 = (c-d)(c+d) and c−dc-d is thus a divisor bounded by m2−n2\sqrt{m^2-n^2}.

A well-known result [3] states that the number of divisors of xx, τ(x)\tau(x), is bounded by 2(1+o(1))log⁡xlog⁡log⁡x=xo(1)2^{(1+o(1))\frac{\log x}{\log\log x}} = x^{o(1)} and this is sharp (for highly composite numbers), up to the o(1)o(1) term which is a function tending to zero (as x→∞x \to\infty). Since m2−n2<(mn)2m^2-n^2 < (mn)^2, we obtain that f(m,n)≤f(2m,2n)≤⌊τ(m2−n2)2⌋=(mn)o(1)f(m,n) \le f(2m,2n) \le\left\lfloor\frac{\tau(m^2-n^2)}{2} \right\rfloor= (mn)^{o(1)}, as expected.

When m=n+1m=n+1, f(2m,2n)=⌊τ(2n+1)2⌋−1f(2m,2n) = \left\lfloor\frac{\tau(2n+1)}{2} \right\rfloor- 1 is unbounded, concluding the other question. For this we note that for every factorization 2n+1=pq2n+1=pq with p≥q≥2p \ge q \ge2 (both odd), c=p+q2c=\frac{p+q}{2} and d=p−q2d=\frac{p-q}{2} are integers for which c<mc<m and 0≤d<n0 \le d<n.

Remark.

Norbert Hegyvári [2] solved the problem independently, 40 years earlier. His proof appeared recently, after submission of this note.

References

  1. [1]P. Erdős and R. L. Graham. Old and new problems and results in combinatorial number theory, volume 28 of Monogr. Enseign. Math. L’Enseignement Mathématique, Université de Genève, Genève, 1980.
  2. [2]N. Hegyvári. An elementary question of Erdős and Graham. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2503.24201, Mar. 2025.
  3. [3]S. Ramanujan. Highly composite numbers. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (2), 14:347–409, 1915.DOI

Paper details

vlnc:W_medajvxt
v1 · latestHistory (1)

published ·

added ·

Usage

views · 0

downloads · 0

A view counts once per browser per day, a download each time the PDF is requested.

CC BY 4.0

Original source

  • Mathematics

Not recorded for this paper · View statement →

Looking for related papers…
Contents