alphaFeedback

WorksMathematics

A modular theory of contractive projections on Banach spaces with applications to noncommutative Lp\mathrm{L}^p-spaces

AI contributions
Not recorded for this paper
View details

Abstract

We develop a differential-geometric approach to contractive projections on complex Banach spaces based on Levi forms of plurisubharmonic functions. We show that if a projection PP contracts a C2\mathrm{C}^2 plurisubharmonic function Φ\Phi, then, at any point of its range, the Levi form of Φ\Phi defines a tangent Hilbertian geometry for which PP becomes an orthogonal projection. When the range is finite-dimensional and the relevant Levi forms are nondegenerate, comparing the Levi geometries associated with different points leads naturally to positive relative operators and associated one-parameter groups. We apply this framework to tracial noncommutative L4\mathrm{L}^4-spaces. Exploiting the cubic form of the duality mapping, we characterize contractive projections by a Jordan triple orthogonality property and prove that a projection on L4(M)\mathrm{L}^4(\mathcal{M}) is 22-contractive if and only if it is completely contractive. When the ambient von Neumann algebra is finite-dimensional, we identify the relative operator associated with the left and right tangent forms on the range with a restriction of an inverse square root of a modular operator on a linking von Neumann algebra. This entails that the range of any 22-contractive projection is completely isometric to a rectangular noncommutative L4\mathrm{L}^4-space associated with a W∗\mathrm{W}^*-ternary ring of operators. As a consequence, every such projection is contractively decomposable. Finally, for every 1<p<∞1 < p < \infty with p≠2p \neq 2, we prove that every finite-rank 22-contractive projection on a tracial noncommutative Lp\mathrm{L}^p-space is completely contractive. For p>2p > 2, we obtain a weighted ternary description of its range in terms of a finite-dimensional W∗\mathrm{W}^*-TRO\mathrm{TRO}.

Introduction

The study of contractive projections and contractively complemented subspaces is one of the classical themes of the isometric theory of Banach spaces. Given a Banach space XX and a closed subspace Y⊂XY \subset X, the basic problem is to decide whether there exists a projection P:X→XP : X \to X such that

P2=P,Ran⁡P=Y,∥P∥X→X≤1,(1)P^2 = P,\qquad\operatorname{Ran} P = Y,\qquad\lVert P\rVert_{X\to X} \le1, \tag*{(1)}

and, when such a projection exists, to understand both the intrinsic geometry of YY and the structure of PP. These two questions are closely related. Indeed, on a smooth Banach space, a subspace can be the range of at most one projection of norm one, see [24]. Since noncommutative LpL^p-spaces are smooth for 1<p<∞1 < p < \infty, the classification of their contractively complemented subspaces is, in this range, essentially equivalent to the classification of their contractive projections.

For classical LpL^p-spaces, this problem admits a rigid answer. By the work of Ando [2], completed in greater generality by Bernau and Lacey [11], a contractively complemented subspace of a classical LpL^p-space, for 1<p<∞1 < p < \infty and p≠2p \ne2, is itself isometric to an LpL^p-space. Moreover, the corresponding projections are described in terms of weighted conditional expectations. Thus, in the commutative setting, norm-one complementation essentially preserves the category of LpL^p-spaces.

The noncommutative situation is substantially richer. The first obstruction already occurs for Schatten spaces. If σ:Sp→Sp\sigma: S^p \to S^p denotes the transpose map, then

P=12(Id⁡+σ)(2)P = \frac{1}{2}(\operatorname{Id} + \sigma) \tag*{(2)}

is a contractive projection whose range is the space of symmetric matrices. This range is not, in general, a Schatten space. More generally, the seminal work of Arazy and Friedman [3] gives a complete description of contractively complemented subspaces of Schatten spaces in terms of the LpL^p-versions of Cartan factors of types I–IV. In particular, rectangular operator spaces, symmetric and antisymmetric operator spaces, and spin factors all occur naturally. The same work explicitly raises the problem of describing the contractively complemented subspaces of general noncommutative LpL^p-spaces.

This problem remains one of the basic structural questions concerning noncommutative LpL^p-spaces. Its difficulty is not merely technical. The examples above indicate that the range of a contractive projection need not carry an associative structure and that Jordan and ternary structures are unavoidable. At the endpoint p=1p=1, this phenomenon is reflected by the appearance of preduals of JBW∗JBW^*-triples, see [39]. On the other hand, once the canonical operator space structure of a noncommutative LpL^p-space is taken into account, rectangular structures become especially natural. In the Schatten setting, Le Merdy, Ricard and Roydor [57] showed that completely 1-complemented subspaces are precisely, up to the appropriate direct sums, spaces of the form Sp(H,K)S^p(H,K). These are the LpL^p-counterparts of ternary rings of operators.

This suggests that the problem of contractive complementation has several levels of rigidity. A scalar norm-one condition may detect a Jordan structure, whereas matricial contractivity should remember the non-symmetrized ternary product. This principle is consistent with a number of results obtained in recent years. The range of a 2-positive contractive projection on an arbitrary noncommutative LpL^p-space is completely order and completely isometrically isomorphic to another noncommutative LpL^p-space [6]; in the σ\sigma-finite case the projection can be viewed as a conditional expectation modulo a symmetric two-sided change of density. Positive contractive projections lead more generally to Jordan conditional expectations and to nonassociative LpL^p-spaces associated with JW∗JW^*-algebras, see [4, 7]. In a different direction, contractively decomposable projections are naturally related to W∗W^*-ternary rings of operators and to rectangular noncommutative LpL^p-spaces [5]. Recent results give a more intrinsic description of their ranges in terms of rectangular LpL^p-spaces [BoI26, Arh26c].

The general contractive case, however, is much less understood. In particular, there is no general mechanism which starts only from the metric inequality

∥P(x)∥Lp(M)≤∥x∥Lp(M)(3)\lVert P(x)\rVert_{L^p(\mathcal{M})} \le\lVert x\rVert_{L^p(\mathcal{M})} \tag*{(3)}

and recovers the hidden Jordan or ternary structure of the range. The main purpose of the present paper is to introduce such a mechanism. Our approach is based on the differential geometry of the norm, and more precisely on the Levi forms of plurisubharmonic functions on complex Banach spaces.

Differential methods have appeared before in the study of norm-one projections. In particular, second derivatives of norms were successfully used in [56] to study contractive complementation in vector-valued spaces. Here we take a different point of view. Instead of considering only the real Hessian of the norm, we exploit the complex structure and the associated Levi form. Levi forms on complex Banach spaces were investigated in [58]. The key observation is that a contractive projection produces, at any point of its range, a canonical Hilbertian geometry.

More precisely, let Ω\Omega be an open subset of a complex Banach space XX, let Φ ⁣:Ω→R\Phi\colon\Omega\to\mathbb{R} be a C2C^2 plurisubharmonic function and suppose that a projection P ⁣:X→XP\colon X \to X satisfies P(Ω)⊆ΩP(\Omega) \subseteq\Omega and

Φ(Px)≤Φ(x),x∈Ω.(4)\Phi(Px) \le\Phi(x), \qquad x \in\Omega. \tag*{(4)}

If a∈Ω∩Ran⁡Pa \in\Omega\cap\operatorname{Ran} P, then the Levi form LΦ,a\mathcal{L}_{\Phi,a} satisfies

LΦ,a(Pz)≤LΦ,a(z),z∈X.(5)\mathcal{L}_{\Phi,a}(Pz) \le\mathcal{L}_{\Phi,a}(z), \qquad z \in X. \tag*{(5)}

After quotienting by the null space of the Levi form and completing, one obtains a Hilbert space on which PP becomes an orthogonal projection. Consequently, although the complement Id−P\mathrm{Id}-P need not be contractive for the original Banach norm, both PP and Id−P\mathrm{Id}-P are contractive for every tangent Levi geometry based at a point of Ran⁡P\operatorname{Ran} P. Equivalently, the involution

2P−Id(6)2P-\mathrm{Id} \tag*{(6)}

becomes a unitary involution on each of these tangent Hilbert spaces.

Thus a single Banach space projection gives rise to a whole family of Hilbertian geometries indexed by the points of its range. At first order, contractivity is governed by duality mappings and norming functionals, in accordance with the classical characterization of Calvert [23]. The first-order condition identifies the directions annihilated by the corresponding norming functional. Differentiating this condition along the range yields the orthogonality relations for the Levi form. The role of the second-order viewpoint is therefore not to provide an independent contractivity condition, but to package these relations into a Hilbertian geometry. When the Levi form is positive, the decomposition

X=Ran⁡P⊕Ker⁡P(7)X=\operatorname{Ran} P\oplus\operatorname{Ker} P \tag*{(7)}

becomes orthogonal for this tangent geometry, making relative positive operators and their spectral calculus available.

Comparing two such Hilbertian geometries leads naturally to relative positive operators. Suppose first that Ran⁡P\operatorname{Ran} P is finite-dimensional and that the restrictions to Ran⁡P\operatorname{Ran} P of the Levi forms based at two points a,b∈Ω∩Ran⁡Pa,b \in\Omega\cap\operatorname{Ran} P are nondegenerate. If ⟨⋅,⋅⟩a\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle_a and ⟨⋅,⋅⟩b\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle_b denote the corresponding inner products on Ran⁡P\operatorname{Ran} P, there exists a unique positive invertible operator Δb∣a ⁣:Ran⁡P→Ran⁡P\Delta_{b|a}\colon\operatorname{Ran} P\to\operatorname{Ran} P characterized by

⟨x,y⟩b=⟨x,Δb∣ay⟩a,x,y∈Ran⁡P.(8)\langle x,y\rangle_b=\langle x,\Delta_{b|a}y\rangle_a,\qquad x,y\in\operatorname{Ran} P. \tag*{(8)}

It is selfadjoint for the first Hilbertian structure, and its imaginary powers form a one-parameter group of isometries for both tangent Hilbertian geometries.

A stronger phenomenon appears when the relative operator can be constructed on a common ambient Hilbert completion. More precisely, if the Levi forms at aa and bb are nondegenerate on XX and define equivalent Hilbertian norms, the corresponding ambient relative operator Δ^b∣a\widehat{\Delta}_{b|a} commutes with the orthogonal extension of PP. Consequently, the closures of Ran⁡P\operatorname{Ran} P and Ker⁡P\operatorname{Ker} P are reducing subspaces for Δ^b∣a\widehat{\Delta}_{b|a}, and

PΔ^b∣ait=Δ^b∣aitP,t∈R.(9)P\widehat{\Delta}_{b|a}^{\mathrm{i}t}=\widehat{\Delta}_{b|a}^{\mathrm{i}t}P,\qquad t\in\mathbb{R}. \tag*{(9)}

Thus the relative one-parameter group dynamically preserves the decomposition determined by the projection. This is the origin of the modular terminology used in this paper. The appearance of positive relative operators and their imaginary powers is reminiscent of modular constructions associated with standard subspaces, see for instance [28]. The important difference is that here the modular object is not given in advance: it is extracted directly from a norm-one projection and from the local differential geometry of the ambient Banach space.

The case of noncommutative L4L^4-spaces is particularly well suited to this approach. There are two reasons for this. First, the fourth power of the norm has an explicit Levi form. If

Φ4(x)=∥x∥L4(M)4,(10)\Phi_4(x)=\lVert x\rVert_{L^4(\mathcal{M})}^4, \tag*{(10)}

then

LΦ4,a(z)=2(∥a∗z∥L2(M)2+∥za∗∥L2(M)2).(11)\mathcal{L}_{\Phi_4,a}(z)=2\left(\lVert a^*z\rVert_{L^2(\mathcal{M})}^2+\lVert za^*\rVert_{L^2(\mathcal{M})}^2\right). \tag*{(11)}

Thus the tangent Hilbert geometry separates naturally into a left part and a right part. This is precisely the two-sided structure which is needed in order to recover rectangular operator spaces.

Second, the duality mapping of L4(M)L^4(\mathcal{M}) is cubic:

j4(x)=xx∗x.(12)j_4(x)=xx^*x. \tag*{(12)}

Polarization of this cubic mapping produces the Jordan triple product

{x,y,z}=12(xy∗z+zy∗x).(13)\{x,y,z\}=\frac{1}{2}(xy^*z+zy^*x). \tag*{(13)}

The special role of the exponent 4 in noncommutative LpL^p-geometry also appears in the theory of 2-isometries, where selfpolar forms can be used to recover operator-algebraic structure; see [48]. Our situation is different: we start with a projection rather than an isometry, and no positivity or matricial assumption is imposed initially. Nevertheless, the cubic duality mapping allows us to extract a ternary structure directly from scalar contractivity.

Indeed, let P:L4(M)→L4(M)P:L^4(\mathcal{M})\to L^4(\mathcal{M}) be a contractive projection and set

Y=Ran⁡P,Y♯=Ran⁡P†,(14)Y=\operatorname{Ran}P,\qquad Y^\sharp=\operatorname{Ran}P^\dagger, \tag*{(14)}

where P†P^\dagger denotes the adjoint projection under the L4L^4–L4/3L^{4/3} trace duality. We prove that

Y♯=j4(Y)={xx∗x:x∈Y}.(15)Y^\sharp=j_4(Y)=\{xx^*x:x\in Y\}. \tag*{(15)}

In particular, the nonlinear image j4(Y)j_4(Y) is a linear subspace of L4/3(M)L^{4/3}(\mathcal{M}). Polarization then yields

{Y,Y,Y}⊂Y♯.(16)\{Y,Y,Y\}\subset Y^\sharp. \tag*{(16)}

Thus scalar contractivity forces Jordan triple relations taking values in the dual range. At this stage, however, the product is not internal to YY, so these relations do not yet equip YY with a Jordan triple structure. Recovering an internal ternary product requires the additional deweighting argument developed below.

The first nontrivial matrix level yields a stronger conclusion. One of the main results of this paper is that for projections on L4L^4 the level 2 condition already contains all matrix levels. More precisely, we prove that

P is 2-contractive⟺YY∗Y⊂Y♯⟺P is completely contractive.(17)P\text{ is 2-contractive}\quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad YY^*Y\subset Y^\sharp\quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad P\text{ is completely contractive}. \tag*{(17)}

Hence, for projections on noncommutative L4L^4-spaces, complete contractivity can be tested on 2×22\times2 matrices. This collapse of an infinite family of matricial norm inequalities to a single matrix level is one of the main rigidity phenomena established here.

By trace-adjoint duality, the same equivalence holds for projections on L4/3(M)L^{4/3}(\mathcal{M}), see Corollary 6.6.

For Schatten spaces, the equivalence between 2-contractive and completely contractive complementation follows from [57 Theorem 1.1]. The contribution of (1.17) is a direct duality-mapping proof beyond the Schatten setting, together with the intrinsic criterion YY∗Y⊂Y♯YY^*Y\subset Y^\sharp. Theorem 7.3 extends this equivalence to Haagerup L4L^4-spaces associated with arbitrary von Neumann algebras. We refer also to [Arl26], [15] and [76] for related results.

The mechanism behind (17) is transparent. Scalar contractivity gives only the symmetrized expression (13). By applying the scalar result to the amplification Id⁡S4d⊗P\operatorname{Id}_{S_4^d} \otimes P and choosing suitable 2×22 \times2 block matrices, one can separate the two outer variables and isolate the non-symmetrized product xy∗zxy^*z. Once

xy∗z∈Y#,x,y,z∈Y,(18)xy^*z \in Y^\#, \qquad x,y,z \in Y, \tag*{(18)}

is known, the same property at every matrix level follows entrywise, and the cubic characterization of contractivity implies complete contractivity. In this sense, scalar contractivity detects Jordan triple geometry, whereas 2-contractivity detects TRO geometry.

The same polynomial principle gives a finite-level criterion at every even exponent. If p=2mp=2m for some integer m≥2m \ge2 and

Nm≔⌈2m3⌉,(19)N_m \coloneqq\left\lceil\frac{2m}{3} \right\rceil, \tag*{(19)}

we prove that, for an arbitrary von Neumann algebra M\mathcal{M}, an NmN_m-contractive projection on its Haagerup space L2m(M)L^{2m}(\mathcal{M}) is completely contractive.

The proof extracts an arbitrary alternating product of length 2m−12m-1 as a torus Fourier coefficient of the power duality mapping at the matrix level NmN_m. Trace-adjoint duality gives the analogous result at the conjugate exponent 2m2m−1\frac{2m}{2m-1}. In particular, level 2 suffices for p=6p=6 and p=65p=\frac{6}{5}. We do not claim that the level in (19) is optimal. Indeed, for Schatten spaces, level 2 is already known to suffice for any 1<p<∞1<p<\infty, p≠2p\ne2, by [57 Theorem 1.1].

The remaining difficulty is that the ternary products still belong a priori to the dual range Y#Y^\#, not to YY. In the finite-dimensional setting, the unsymmetrized ternary relation yields natural left and right multiplication maps from YY into Y#Y^\#. Choose a basis x1,…,xkx_1,\ldots,x_k of YY and define

a=∑j=1kxjxj∗,b=∑j=1kxj∗xj.(20)a=\sum_{j=1}^{k}x_jx_j^*, \qquad b=\sum_{j=1}^{k}x_j^*x_j. \tag*{(20)}

We prove the exact two-sided relation

aY=Y#=Yb.(21)aY=Y^\#=Yb. \tag*{(21)}

This algebraic relation has a natural tangent-Hilbert interpretation. Indeed, if Hℓ\mathcal{H}^{\ell} and Hr\mathcal{H}^{r} denote the sums of the left and right tangent forms associated with the points x1,…,xkx_1,\ldots,x_k, then

References

  1. [1][Ale81] A. B. Aleksandrov. Essays on non locally convex Hardy classes. In: Complex Analysis and Spectral Theory (V. P. Havin and N. K. Nikolksi, eds.), Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 864, pp. 1–89. Springer, Berlin, 1981. 36DOI
  2. [2][And66] T. Ando. Contractive projections in Lₚ spaces. Pacific J. Math. 17 (1966), 391–405. 2, 17
  3. [3][ArF92] J. Arazy and Y. Friedman. Contractive projections in Cₚ. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 459 (1992), 1–109. 3
  4. [4][Arh24a] C. Arhancet. Nonassociative Lᵖ-spaces and embeddings in noncommutative Lᵖ-spaces. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 537 (2024), no. 1, Paper No. 128307, 24 pp. 3DOI
  5. [5][Arh24b] C. Arhancet. Contractively decomposable projections on noncommutative Lᵖ-spaces. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 533 (2024), no. 2, Paper No. 128017, 36 pp. 3, 9, 51DOI
  6. [6][ArR24] C. Arhancet and Y. Raynaud. 2-positive contractive projections on noncommutative Lᵖ-spaces. J. Funct. Anal. 286 (2024), no. 11, Paper No. 110424, 34 pp. 3DOI
  7. [7][Arh26b] C. Arhancet. Positive contractive projections on noncommutative Lᵖ-spaces and nonassociative Lᵖ-spaces. Preprint. 3
  8. [10][ArG01] D. H. Armitage and S. J. Gardiner. Classical Potential Theory. Springer Monographs in Mathematics. Springer, London, 2001. 14DOI
  9. [11][BeL74] S. J. Bernau and H. E. Lacey. The range of a contractive projection on an Lᵖ-space. Pacific J. Math. 53 (1974), 21–41. 2
  10. [12]B. Blackadar. Operator algebras. Theory of C*-algebras and von Neumann algebras. Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences, 122. Operator Algebras and Non-commutative Geometry, III. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2006.DOI
  11. [13]J. Bergh and J. Löfström. Interpolation spaces. An Introduction. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1976.
  12. [14]D. Blecher and C. Le Merdy. Operator algebras and their modules-an operator space approach. London Mathematical Society Monographs. New Series, 30. Oxford Science Publications. The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004.
  13. [15]E. Boffy. Positive contractive projections in Schatten Space. Preprint, arXiv:2509.23701.arxiv.org/abs/2509.23701
  14. [17]L. J. Bunce, B. Feely and R. M. Timoney. Operator space structure of JC*-triples and TROs, I. Math. Z. 270 (2012), no. 3–4, 961–982.arxiv.org/abs/1007.1085
  15. [18]L. J. Bunce and R. M. Timoney. Universally reversible JC*-triples and operator spaces. J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 88 (2013), no. 1, 271–293.DOI
  16. [20]L. J. Bunce and R. M. Timoney. On decompositions of ternary rings of operators and their morphisms. Math. Proc. R. Ir. Acad. 119A (2019), no. 2, 173–186.
  17. [21]M. Cabrera Garcia and A. Rodriguez Palacios. Non-associative normed algebras. Vol. 1. The Vidav-Palmer and Gelfand-Naimark theorems. Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, 154. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014.
  18. [22]M. Cabrera Garcia and A. Rodriguez Palacios. Non-associative normed algebras. Vol. 2. Representation theory and the Zel’manov approach. Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, 167. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2018.
  19. [23]B. Calvert. Convergence sets in reflexive Banach Spaces. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 47 no. 2 (1975), 423–428.DOI
  20. [24]H. B. Cohen and F. E. Sullivan. Projecting onto cycles in smooth, reflexive Banach spaces. Pacific J. Math. 34 (1970), 355–364.DOI
  21. [25]J. B. Conway. A course in functional analysis. Second edition. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 96. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1990.
  22. [26]C.-H. Chu. Jordan structures in geometry and analysis. Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, 190. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012.DOI
  23. [27]I. Cioranescu. Geometry of Banach Spaces, Duality Mappings and Nonlinear Problems. Mathematics and Its Applications, vol. 62. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1990.DOI
  24. [28]R. Correa da Silva and G. Lechner. Inclusions of Standard Subspaces. Comm. Math. Phys. 406 (2025), no. 11, art. 283.arxiv.org/abs/2506.16085
  25. [29]W. J. Davis, D. J. H. Garling, and N. Tomczak-Jaegermann. The complex convexity of quasi-normed linear spaces. J. Funct. Anal. 55 (1984), 110–150.DOI
  26. [30]R. Deville, G. Godefroy, and V. Zizler. Smoothness and Renormings in Banach Spaces. Pitman Monographs and Surveys in Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 64. Longman Scientific & Technical, Harlow, 1993.
  27. [31]J. Diestel. Geometry of Banach Spaces—Selected Topics. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 485. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1975.DOI
  28. [32]J. Dieudonné. Foundations of Modern Analysis, enlarged ed. Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 10-I. Academic Press, New York, 1969.
  29. [33]Z. Dong and Z.-J. Ruan. Weak* exactness for dual operator spaces. J. Funct. Anal. 253 (2007), no. 1, 373–397.DOI
  30. [34]G. A. Edgar. Complex martingale convergence. In: Banach Spaces (N. J. Kalton and E. Saab, eds.), Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1166, pp. 38–59. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1985.DOI
  31. [35]E. Effros, N. Ozawa and Z.-J. Ruan. On injectivity and nuclearity for operator spaces. Duke Math. J. 110 (2001), no. 3, 489–521.
  32. [36][EsM23] Y. Estaremi and M. Mathieu. On the range of TRO-conditional expectations. Linear Algebra Appl. 670 (2023), 78–103.DOI
  33. [37][FHHMPZ01] M. Fabian, P. Habala, P. Hajek, V. Montesinos Santalucia, J. Pelant and V. Zizler. Functional analysis and infinite-dimensional geometry. CMS Books in Mathematics/Ouvrages de Mathématiques de la SMC, 8. Springer-Verlag, New York, 2001.DOI
  34. [38][Fri05] Y. Friedman. Physical applications of homogeneous balls. With the assistance of Tzvi Scarr. Prog. Math. Phys., 40. Birkhäuser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, 2005.DOI
  35. [39][FrB85b] Y. Friedman and B. Russo. Structure of the predual of a JBW*-triple. J. Reine Angew. Math. 356 (1985), 67–89.
  36. [40][Ham92] M. Hamana. Injective envelopes of dynamical systems. Operator algebras and operator theory (Craiova, 1989), 69–77, Pitman Res. Notes Math. Ser., 271, Longman Sci. Tech., Harlow, 1992.
  37. [41][Ham99] M. Hamana. Triple envelopes and Silov boundaries of operator spaces. Math. J. Toyama Univ. 22 (1999), 77–93.DOI
  38. [42][HKPP20] J. Hamhalter, O. F. K. Kalenda, A. M. Peralta and H. Pfitzner. Measures of weak non-compactness in preduals of von Neumann algebras and JBW*-triples. J. Funct. Anal. 278 (2020), no. 1, 108300, 69 pp.DOI
  39. [43][HOS84] H. Hanche-Olsen and E. Størmer. Jordan operator algebras. Monographs and Studies in Mathematics, 21. Pitman (Advanced Publishing Program), Boston, MA, 1984.
  40. [44][Hor87a] G. Horn. Classification of JBW*-triples of type I. Math. Z. 196 (1987), no. 2, 271–291.DOI
  41. [45][HoN88] G. Horn and E. Neher. Classification of continuous JBW*-triples. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 306 (1988), no. 2, 553–578.DOI
  42. [46][Hor87b] G. Horn. Characterization of the predual and ideal structure of a JBW*-triple. Math. Scand. 61 (1987), no. 1, 117–133.
  43. [47][Isi19] J. M. Isidro. Jordan triple systems in complex and functional analysis. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, 243. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2019.
  44. [48][JRS05] M. Junge, Z.-J. Ruan and D. Sherman. A classification for 2-isometries of noncommutative Lp-spaces. Israel J. Math. 150 (2005), 285–314.
  45. [49][JuX03] M. Junge and Q. Xu. Noncommutative Burkholder/Rosenthal inequalities. Ann. Probab. 31 (2003), no. 2, 948–995.DOI
  46. [50][KaR97a] R. V. Kadison and J. R. Ringrose. Fundamentals of the theory of operator algebras. Vol. I. Elementary theory. Reprint of the 1983 original. Graduate Studies in Mathematics, 15. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1997.
  47. [51][KaR97b] R. V. Kadison and J. R. Ringrose. Fundamentals of the theory of operator algebras. Vol. II. Advanced theory. Corrected reprint of the 1986 original. Graduate Studies in Mathematics, 16. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1997.
  48. [52][Kan13] M. Kaneda. Ideal decompositions of a ternary ring of operators with predual. Pacific J. Math. 266 (2013), no. 2, 297–303.DOI
  49. [53][Kal03] N. Kalton. Quasi-Banach spaces. Handbook of the geometry of Banach spaces, vol. 2, 1099–1130. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2003.DOI
  50. [54][KaR02] M. Kaur and Z.-J. Ruan. Local properties of ternary rings of operators and their linking C*-algebras. J. Funct. Anal. 195 (2002), no. 2, 262–305.
  51. [55][Kos84] H. Kosaki. Applications of the complex interpolation method to a von Neumann algebra: noncommutative Lp-spaces. J. Funct. Anal. 56 (1984), no. 1, 29–78.
  52. [56][LRG07] B. Lemmens, F. Randrianantoanina, and O. van Gaans. Second derivatives of norms and contractive complementation in vector-valued spaces. Studia Math. 179 (2007), no. 2, 149–166.
  53. [57][LRR09] C. Le Merdy, É. Ricard and I. Roydor. Completely 1-complemented subspaces of Schatten spaces. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 361 (2009), no. 2, 849–887.
  54. [58][Lig76] E. Ligocka. Levi forms, differential forms of type (0, 1) and pseudoconvexity in Banach spaces. Ann. Polon. Math. 33 (1976), no. 1, 63–69.
  55. [59][Meg98] R. E. Megginson. An introduction to Banach space theory. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 183. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1998.DOI
  56. [60][Muj86] J. Mujica. Complex Analysis in Banach Spaces: Holomorphic Functions and Domains of Holomorphy in Finite and Infinite Dimensions. North-Holland Mathematics Studies, vol. 120. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1986.
  57. [61][NeR03] M. Neal and B. Russo. Operator space characterizations of C*-algebras and ternary rings. Pacific J. Math. 209 (2003), no. 2, 339–364.DOI
  58. [62][Pat18] H. K. Pathak. An Introduction to Nonlinear Analysis and Fixed Point Theory. Springer, Singapore, 2018.DOI
  59. [63][Pav91] M. Pavlović. On the complex uniform convexity of quasi-normed spaces. Math. Balkanica (N.S.) 5 (1991), no. 2, 92–98.
  60. [64][Pis98] G. Pisier. Non-commutative vector valued Lₚ-spaces and completely p-summing maps. Astérisque, 247, 1998.
  61. [66][PiX03] G. Pisier and Q. Xu. Non-commutative Lᵖ-spaces. 1459–1517 in Handbook of the Geometry of Banach Spaces, Vol. II, edited by W.B. Johnson and J. Lindenstrauss, Elsevier (2003).
  62. [67][PlR19] R. Pluta and B. Russo. On the structure of weakly closed ternary rings of operators. Math. Proc. R. Ir. Acad. 119A (2019), no. 2, 77–91.
  63. [68][Ray03] Y. Raynaud. Lₚ-spaces associated with a von Neumann algebra without trace: a gentle introduction via complex interpolation. Trends in Banach spaces and operator theory (Memphis, TN, 2001), 245–273, Contemp. Math., 321, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2003.DOI
  64. [69][Rua04] Z.-J. Ruan. Type decomposition and the rectangular AFD property for W*-TRO’s. Canad. J. Math. 56 (2004), no. 4, 843–870.DOI
  65. [70][SaS13] P. Salmi and A. Skalski. Inclusions of ternary rings of operators and conditional expectations. Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 155 (2013), no. 3, 475–482.DOI
  66. [71][SaS17] P. Salmi and A. Skalski. Actions of locally compact (quantum) groups on ternary rings of operators, their crossed products, and generalized Poisson boundaries. Kyoto J. Math. 57 (2017), no. 3, 667–691.DOI
  67. [72][Tak03] M. Takesaki. Theory of operator algebras. II. Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences, 125. Operator Algebras and Non-commutative Geometry, 6. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2003.DOI
  68. [73][Upm85] H. Upmeier. Symmetric Banach manifolds and Jordan C*-algebras. North Holland, Amsterdam, 1985.
  69. [74][WCW24] L. Wang, H. Chen, and N.-C. Wong. The linking von Neumann algebras of W*-TROs. Preprint, arXiv:2407.10154.arxiv.org/abs/2407.10154
  70. [75][Wei80] J. Weidman. Linear operators in Hilbert spaces. Translated from the German by Joseph Szücs. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 68. Springer-Verlag, New York-Berlin, 1980.
  71. [76][You83] M. A. Youngson. Completely contractive projections on C*-algebras. Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser. 2 (34) (1983), no. 136, 507–511.DOI
  72. [77][Zet83] H. Zettl. A characterization of ternary rings of operators. Adv. in Math. 48 (1983), no. 2, 117–143.DOI

Paper details

vlnc:W_parvqf3f
v1 · latestHistory (1)

published · Fresh — added to the Hub within the last 30 days

added ·

Usage

views · 0

downloads · 0

A view counts once per browser per day, a download each time the PDF is requested.

CC BY-SA 4.0

Original source

  • Mathematics

Not recorded for this paper · View statement →

Looking for related papers…
Contents