Introduction

The pluricanonical systems of an algebraic fiber space reflect both the geometry of its fibers and the positivity available from its base. When the geometric generic fiber has Kodaira dimension zero, the easy-addition bound says that the total space has Kodaira dimension at most the dimension of the base. The zero-Kodaira case of Schnell’s question asks whether a numerical comparison with an ample divisor on the base forces equality. Here an algebraic fiber space means a surjective morphism with connected fibers between projective varieties.

We approach this question through a good canonical model of the total space. The geometric argument below shows what such a model supplies; the smooth canonical good-model theorem of [7 Corollary 11.2] then provides the model. Its nonvanishing consequence also permits Schnell’s reduction to pass from zero-Kodaira fibers to the Campana–Peternell inequality and the general fiber-space conclusion stated below.

The formulation in [6 Conjecture 1.2] compares a positive multiple of KXK_X with the pullback of an ample Cartier divisor on the base. The difficulty is that pseudo-effectivity concerns a numerical divisor class, whereas Kodaira dimension measures actual sections. The following theorem gives the positive conclusion in this formulation; its assertion has also been proved by Zou, as discussed below.

Theorem 1.1 (Schnell’s zero-Kodaira fiber-space conclusion). Let f:X→Yf:X \to Y be a surjective morphism with connected fibers between smooth connected projective complex varieties. Let FF be its smooth geometric generic fiber and assume κ(F)=0\kappa(F)=0. Suppose that there are an ample Cartier divisor HH on YY and a positive integer m0m_0 such that m0KX−f∗Hm_0K_X-f^*H is pseudo-effective. Then

κ(X)=dim⁡Y.\kappa(X)=\dim Y.

The ample comparison is essential. For example, let FF be smooth, connected and projective with torsion canonical bundle. The projection F×P1→P1F \times\mathbb{P}^1 \to\mathbb{P}^1 has fibers of Kodaira dimension zero, but its total space has Kodaira dimension −∞-\infty. The class m0KF×P1−f∗Hm_0K_{F \times\mathbb{P}^1}-f^*H has negative degree on the moving curves {x}×P1\{x\}\times\mathbb{P}^1 for every ample HH; it therefore cannot be pseudo-effective: for any fixed effective divisor, a general member of this family is not contained in its support and has nonnegative intersection with it. In contrast, for a smooth connected projective YY with KYK_Y ample, the projection F×Y→YF \times Y \to Y satisfies the numerical hypothesis with H=KYH = K_Y for every m0≥1m_0 \ge1, since the compared class is numerically (m0−1)f∗KY(m_0 - 1)f^*K_Y. Its Kodaira dimension is dim⁡Y\dim Y.

The canonical good-model theorem used below also supplies canonical nonvanishing in every dimension. With this input, Schnell’s reduction [9 Sections 4–10] promotes Theorem 1.1 to the Kodaira-dimension form of the Campana–Peternell conjecture.

Corollary 1.2 (Campana–Peternell). Let XX be a smooth connected projective complex variety, let DD be an effective Cartier divisor on XX, and let m0m_0 be a positive integer. If m0KX−Dm_0K_X-D is pseudo-effective, then

κ(X)≥κ(D).\kappa(X) \ge\kappa(D).

The same reduction gives the general fiber-space conclusion, including the existence of sections after subtracting the original ample pullback.

Corollary 1.3 (Schnell’s general fiber-space conclusion). Let f:X→Yf:X \to Y be a surjective morphism with connected fibers between smooth connected projective complex varieties, and let FF be a very general smooth fiber. Suppose that HH is an ample Cartier divisor on YY and m0m_0 is a positive integer such that m0KX−f∗Hm_0K_X-f^*H is pseudo-effective. Then

κ(X)=κ(F)+dim⁡Y.\kappa(X) = \kappa(F) + \dim Y.

Moreover, there are positive integers rr and ℓ0\ell_0 such that

H0(X,OX(ℓrKX−f∗H))≠0for every integer ℓ≥ℓ0.H^0(X,\mathcal{O}_X(\ell rK_X-f^*H)) \ne0 \qquad\text{for every integer } \ell\ge\ell_0.

The last assertion is effectivity for all sufficiently large and divisible pluricanonical degrees, with no uniform choice of rr or ℓ0\ell_0 asserted. The numerical hypothesis itself implies κ(F)≥0\kappa(F) \ge0 by restriction and canonical nonvanishing; it is not replaced by that weaker fiber condition. Corollary 1.2 also applies to an effective rational divisor after clearing denominators, as explained in Section 4.

The problem and previous approaches

Campana and Peternell formulated the comparison NKX=A+BNK_X = A + B, with NN a positive integer, AA effective and BB pseudo-effective, in their study of positivity of the cotangent bundle [2 Conjecture 2.4]. The proposed inequality κ(X)≥κ(A)\kappa(X) \ge\kappa(A) includes canonical nonvanishing when A=0A = 0: pseudo-effective KXK_X should have a nonzero pluricanonical section. For general AA, the conclusion also requires the canonical systems to have at least the image dimension supplied by AA. When κ(X)≥0\kappa(X) \ge0, Campana and Peternell reduce this comparison to the general fibers of the Iitaka fibration of XX, which have Kodaira dimension zero [2 Proposition 2.6]. In that zero-Kodaira setting, a good minimal model has torsion canonical class; their pushforward argument then forces κ(A)=0\kappa(A) = 0 [2 Proposition 2.7]. This already exhibits how a good model can convert numerical information into a statement about sections.

Schnell developed this circle of questions in his study of singular metrics, nonvanishing and the Campana–Peternell conjecture [9 Sections 4–10]. His Conjecture 10.1 allows fibers of nonnegative Kodaira dimension and asks for nonvanishing after subtracting an ample pullback. Under canonical nonvanishing, his Section 9 reduces the conjecture to fibers of Kodaira dimension zero; Lemma 7.1 supplies an effective pluricanonical divisor after a positive base twist. If the fiber has positive Kodaira dimension, the Iitaka fibration of that divisor has a strictly larger base, while retaining the numerical comparison. Iteration reaches the zero-Kodaira case. Section 8 connects the resulting equality to effectivity after subtracting the original ample pullback. This uses the Iitaka-addition criterion of Fujita and Mori, in the form recorded in [8], Lemma 4.6. He proves a special case when the canonical divisor of the base is pseudo-effective [9], Theorem 12.1.

Kim applies the canonical bundle formula to the same fiber-space problem. His Theorem 1.3 proves the conclusion when KY+(1−ε)BYK_Y + (1 - \varepsilon)B_Y is pseudo-effective for some ε>0\varepsilon> 0, where BYB_Y is the discriminant on the birational setup of that theorem, or when the canonical class of the general fiber is rigid [6]. Here rigidity means uniqueness of the closed positive (1,1)(1,1)-current representing that class. Kim also recalls a known algebraic proof under the existence of a good minimal model of the general fiber [6], Section 1.3. Zou obtains the same conclusion as Theorem 1.1, without these additional hypotheses, by a canonical-bundle-formula argument [10], Theorems 1.3 and 5.1.

We give a direct mixed-intersection proof of Theorem 1.1 from a good minimal model of the total space. We separate that geometric argument from the model-existence theorem that it uses. The latter is the smooth canonical good-model theorem of [7], Corollary 11.2, quoted in Theorem 3.1. Its nonvanishing consequence and Schnell’s published reduction then yield Corollaries 1.2 and 1.3.

How the numerical condition produces the lower bound

A good klt minimal model of XX consists of a normal projective Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial klt variety VV with semiample canonical divisor and a KXK_X-negative birational contraction X⇢VX \dashrightarrow V. For compatible canonical divisors, the comparison on a smooth common resolution X←pW→qVX \xleftarrow{p} W \xrightarrow{q} V has the form

p∗KX=q∗KV+E,E≥0,q∗E=0.p^*K_X = q^*K_V + E,\qquad E \ge0,\qquad q_*E = 0.

The last condition means that every component of EE is exceptional over VV. The model therefore provides sections and also specifies the error in transferring them to XX.

Choose a globally generated Cartier multiple rKVrK_V. The comparison makes rErE an effective Cartier divisor. Pulling back sections of rKVrK_V and multiplying by the canonical section of rErE gives a pluricanonical subsystem on XX with the same image dimension. It remains to force that dimension to be at least dim⁡Y\dim Y.

If the image were smaller, Lemma 2.3 would provide a mixed complete-intersection curve class CC on WW with three properties: it pairs nonnegatively with every pseudo-effective divisor, it annihilates both q∗KVq^*K_V and EE, and it pairs positively with (fp)∗H(f p)^*H. Its divisor factors are pulled back from VV, so the exceptional vanishing follows from the Cartier projection formula. The strict positivity uses a cotangent direction from the map to YY beyond those supplied by the canonical morphism. Thus

(m0p∗KX−(fp)∗H)⋅C=−(fp)∗H⋅C<0,\left(m_0p^*K_X-(fp)^*H\right)\cdot C = -(fp)^*H\cdot C < 0,

contrary to the pulled-back numerical hypothesis. Section 2 constructs the class and proves each of these properties.

This argument uses the classical intersection theory of Cartier divisors and proper pushforward [3], Chapter 2. In particular, the maps to YY and to the canonical image need no factorization relation. Section 2 gives the complete geometric proof, including the upper bound and the transfer of sections. Section 3 states the exact good-model input, verifies its hypotheses and completes Theorem 1.1. Section 4 explains the nonvanishing and fiber interfaces, then proves the Campana–Peternell and general Schnell conclusions.

Conventions

All varieties are integral and projective over C\mathbb{C} unless specified otherwise. Smoothness of an algebraic fiber space refers here to its source and target; special fibers of the morphism may be singular.

Canonical divisors on birational models are chosen compatibly. For a rational Cartier divisor LL, the Iitaka dimension κ(L)\kappa(L) is the maximum dimension of the rational images of its nonempty complete systems ∣mL∣|mL|, with m>0m > 0 clearing the Cartier index. It is −∞-\infty if all these systems are empty. We write κ(X)=κ(KX)\kappa(X) = \kappa(K_X).

We write Eff⁡‾(X)\overline{\operatorname{Eff}}(X) for the closure of the cone of effective real divisor classes in N1(X)RN^1(X)_{\mathbb{R}}. A divisor is pseudo-effective when its numerical class belongs to this cone. A rational Cartier divisor is semiample when a positive Cartier multiple is globally generated. The section constructions below use this actual line-bundle property.

The numerical argument on a good minimal model

We prove the fiber-space conclusion assuming that the total space has a good klt minimal model. The upper bound comes from the geometric generic fiber. For the lower bound, we construct a mixed intersection that detects the ample class from the base and kills both terms in the canonical comparison.

Theorem 2.1 (The good-model case). Let f ⁣:X→Yf \colon X \to Y be a surjective morphism with connected fibers between smooth connected projective complex varieties. Let FF be its smooth geometric generic fiber and suppose κ(F)=0\kappa(F) = 0. Assume that XX has a projective good klt minimal model. If HH is an ample Cartier divisor on YY and m0m_0 is a positive integer such that

m0KX−f∗H∈Eff⁡‾(X),m_0K_X - f^*H \in\overline{\operatorname{Eff}}(X),

then κ(X)=dim⁡Y\kappa(X) = \dim Y.

We use the good-model convention and effective comparison (1.1) stated in the introduction. This is the KXK_X-negative convention of [1], Definitions 3.6.1 and 3.6.7.

The upper bound from the generic fiber

We first account for the use of κ(F)=0\kappa(F) = 0. It bounds every pluricanonical image of XX, before any model is chosen.

Lemma 2.2 (The geometric generic fiber bound). Let f ⁣:X→Yf \colon X \to Y be a surjective morphism with connected fibers between smooth connected projective complex varieties. If its smooth geometric generic fiber FF satisfies κ(F)=0\kappa(F) = 0, then κ(X)≤dim⁡Y\kappa(X) \le\dim Y.

Proof. Put K=C(Y)K = \mathbb{C}(Y) and η=Spec⁡K\eta= \operatorname{Spec} K. Generic smoothness and Stein factorization give a smooth geometrically integral generic fiber XηX_\eta [4], III, Sections 10–11. The cotangent sequence along this fiber gives

ωX∣Xη≃ωXη/K⊗Kℓ,ℓ=ωY∣η.\omega_X|_{X_\eta} \simeq\omega_{X_\eta/K} \otimes_K \ell,\qquad\ell= \omega_Y|_\eta.

Here ℓ\ell is a one-dimensional KK-vector space. The factor from the base therefore cancels in ratios of pluricanonical sections.

Fix m>0m > 0 such that H0(X,mKX)≠0H^0(X,mK_X) \ne0, and choose a basis s0,…,sNs_0,\ldots,s_N with s0≠0s_0 \ne0. A nonzero section is nonzero at the generic point of XX, so it stays nonzero on XηX_\eta and after extension to the geometric generic fiber. By (2.2), the restricted system on FF is a nonzero subsystem of ∣mKF∣|mK_F|. Its image has dimension zero, since κ(F)=0\kappa(F) = 0.

Let ϕm\phi_m be the rational map of the complete system ∣mKX∣|mK_X|, and let TT be the closure of the image of (f,ϕm) ⁣:X⇢Y×PN(f,\phi_m) \colon X \dashrightarrow Y \times\mathbb{P}^N. Its function field is

L=K(s1/s0,…,sN/s0)⊆C(X).L = K(s_1/s_0,\ldots,s_N/s_0) \subseteq\mathbb{C}(X).

The dimension of its generic image over YY is trdeg⁡KL\operatorname{trdeg}_K L. This dimension is unchanged by algebraic extension of KK. Geometric integrality of XηX_\eta identifies that extended image with the image of the same section ratios on FF. Thus trdeg⁡KL=0\operatorname{trdeg}_K L = 0, and dim⁡T=dim⁡Y\dim T = \dim Y. Projection to PN\mathbb{P}^N gives dim⁡ϕm(X)≤dim⁡Y\dim\phi_m(X) \leq\dim Y. Taking the maximum over all nonempty pluricanonical systems proves the lemma. If every system is empty, the inequality is immediate. □\square

A curve class that detects the base

The lower bound requires a different ingredient. The following lemma constructs a numerical test from a globally generated divisor on VV. All its factors come from VV, which is why exceptional errors vanish. Its strict positivity uses the independent morphism to YY.

Lemma 2.3 (A mixed intersection test). Let q:W→Vq: W \to V be a birational morphism from a smooth projective complex dd-fold to a normal projective variety. Let DD be a globally generated Cartier divisor on VV, and let g:V→Z⊆PNg: V \to Z \subseteq\mathbb{P}^N be the morphism of ∣D∣|D| onto its image. Write k=dim⁡Zk = \dim Z, and let AA be a very ample Cartier divisor on VV. Suppose h:W→Yh: W \to Y is a surjective morphism to a smooth projective variety with y=dim⁡Y>ky = \dim Y > k. For every ample Cartier divisor HH on YY, the numerical one-cycle class

C=(q∗D)k(q∗A)d−k−1C = (q^*D)^k(q^*A)^{d-k-1}

satisfies the following properties:

  1. B⋅C≥0B \cdot C \geq0 for every pseudo-effective real divisor class BB on WW;

  2. E⋅C=0E \cdot C = 0 for every qq-exceptional rational divisor EE;

  3. q∗D⋅C=0q^*D \cdot C = 0 and h∗H⋅C>0h^*H \cdot C > 0.

Proof. The inequality k<y≤dk < y \leq d makes all exponents nonnegative; a product with no factors has its usual meaning. We prove first that the test is nonnegative, then that it has the two required vanishing properties, and finally that it detects the ample divisor from YY.

Nonnegativity. The divisors q∗Dq^*D and q∗Aq^*A are globally generated. If BB is effective, choose their members successively so that no member contains an irreducible component of the preceding intersection on BB. Global generation permits all the finitely many required avoidances. The resulting Cartier intersections form an effective zero-cycle, possibly empty. Hence B⋅C≥0B \cdot C \geq0 [3 Chapter 2]. Extend by linearity to effective real divisors and by continuity on N1(W)RN^1(W)_{\mathbb{R}} to its closed effective cone. This proves (1).

Vanishing on exceptional and semiample classes. For a qq-exceptional divisor the Cartier projection formula gives

E⋅(q∗D)k(q∗A)d−k−1=q∗E⋅DkAd−k−1=0;E \cdot(q^*D)^k(q^*A)^{d-k-1} = q_*E \cdot D^k A^{d-k-1} = 0;

see [3 Proposition 2.3(c)]. Indeed, every component of EE maps to codimension at least two, so q∗E=0q_*E = 0 as a divisor cycle. This reasoning is valid on the possibly singular variety VV. Also D=g∗OZ(1)D = g^*\mathcal{O}_Z(1), and k+1k+1 general hyperplanes miss the kk-dimensional image ZZ. Consequently (q∗D)k+1=0(q^*D)^{k+1} = 0. For k=0k = 0, the morphism gg is constant and OV(D)\mathcal{O}_V(D) is trivial, which gives the same conclusion. These observations prove (2) and the first assertion of (3).

Strict positivity. Choose b>0b > 0 such that bHbH is very ample. Use this divisor to embed YY, and use AA to embed VV. There is a point w∈Ww \in W at which qq is an isomorphism onto a smooth open subset of VV and

rank⁡d(gq)w=k,rank⁡dhw=y,rank⁡dqw=d.\operatorname{rank} d(gq)_w = k,\qquad\operatorname{rank} dh_w = y,\qquad\operatorname{rank} dq_w = d.

Each condition holds on a dense open subset. For the rank statements, the generic differential rank in characteristic zero equals the dimension of the image, by separability of the function-field extension. We choose ww in the intersection of these open subsets.

The differentials of pulled-back hyperplanes through gq(w)gq(w) span a kk-dimensional subspace U⊆Tw∗WU \subseteq T_w^*W. Choose kk of them whose differentials form a basis of UU. The hyperplanes through h(w)h(w) supply a yy-dimensional subspace. Since y>ky > k, one such hyperplane pulls back to a divisor with differential outside UU. Finally, hyperplanes from the embedding by AA supply all cotangent directions at ww, because qq is a local isomorphism there. Choose d−k−1d-k-1 of them completing the chosen differentials to a basis of Tw∗WT_w^*W. These dd divisors meet transversely at ww.

To use this local intersection in the global intersection number, perturb the hyperplanes slightly in their complex parameter spaces. The transverse point persists for every sufficiently small perturbation, by the implicit function theorem. Tuples whose pullbacks meet properly at every successive step form a nonempty Zariski open subset of the product of the hyperplane parameter spaces. Nonemptiness follows by successively avoiding the finitely many components already present, using global generation; openness follows from upper semicontinuity of fiber dimension for the projective universal intersections. This parameter space is irreducible, so the open subset is dense also in the complex analytic topology. It therefore meets the perturbation neighborhood.

The resulting proper global intersection is an effective zero-cycle that contains a transverse point of multiplicity one. It follows that

h∗(bH)⋅(q∗D)k(q∗A)d−k−1>0.h^*(bH) \cdot(q^*D)^k(q^*A)^{d-k-1} > 0.

Division by bb proves (3). Only one cotangent direction from hh outside UU was needed; the two morphisms gqgq and hh need not factor through each other.

Sections and the numerical contradiction

We now combine the two lemmas. The good model supplies actual sections on XX. The mixed test forces their image to have at least the dimension of YY.

Proof of Theorem 2.1. If YY is a point, then F=XF = X and κ(F)=0\kappa(F) = 0 is the required conclusion. Hence assume d=dim⁡X≥y=dim⁡Y>0d = \dim X \geq y = \dim Y > 0.

Let VV be a good klt minimal model of XX. Resolve the closure of the graph of X⇢VX \dashrightarrow V projectively [5], obtaining a smooth projective common resolution X←pW→qVX \xleftarrow{p} W \xrightarrow{q} V. By the good-model comparison, compatible canonical divisors satisfy

p∗KX=q∗KV+E,E≥0,q∗E=0.p^*K_X = q^*K_V + E,\qquad E \geq0,\qquad q_*E = 0.

Pulling back to a further common resolution preserves the effectivity and target-exceptionality of this error.

Choose r>0r > 0 such that D=rKVD = rK_V is Cartier and globally generated, and let g ⁣:V→Z⊆PNg\colon V \to Z \subseteq\mathbb{P}^N be its morphism onto its image. Put k=dim⁡Zk = \dim Z. Since KXK_X is Cartier, (2.4) shows that rE=p∗(rKX)−q∗DrE = p^*(rK_X)-q^*D is an integral Cartier divisor on WW. The two maps whose dimensions we will compare appear in Figure 1.

Common resolution diagram showing $W$ mapping to $X$ and $V$, which map to $Y$ and $Z$

Figure 1. The common resolution carries the two morphisms h=fph = fp to YY and gqgq to ZZ. The divisor factors defining the mixed class are pulled back from VV, so the class annihilates the qq-exceptional error. Its pairing with h∗Hh^*H detects the ample class from the separate base YY.

Pull back sections of DD by qq and multiply by the canonical section of the effective Cartier divisor rErE. We obtain an injection

H0(V,D)↪H0(W,rp∗KX)=H0(X,rKX).H^0(V,D) \hookrightarrow H^0(W,rp^*K_X)=H^0(X,rK_X).

The equality follows from p∗OW=OXp_*\mathcal{O}_W=\mathcal{O}_X and the sheaf projection formula for the proper birational map to the normal variety XX [4 III, Corollary 11.4 and its proof; II, Exercise 5.1(d)]. Multiplication by the section of rErE leaves section ratios unchanged on the complement of its support. Thus the subsystem in (2.5) has image dimension kk, and

κ(X)≥k.\kappa(X) \ge k.

Suppose, for a contradiction, that k<yk < y. Choose a very ample Cartier divisor AA on VV and apply Lemma 2.3 with

h=fp,C=(q∗D)k(q∗A)d−k−1.h = fp,\qquad C = (q^*D)^k(q^*A)^{d-k-1}.

The canonical comparison and the vanishing assertions of the lemma give

p∗KX⋅C=1rq∗D⋅C+E⋅C=0.p^*K_X \cdot C = \frac{1}{r}q^*D \cdot C + E \cdot C = 0.

Pullback by pp preserves pseudo-effectivity: on smooth varieties it takes effective real divisors to effective real divisors and induces a continuous linear map on numerical divisor spaces. Therefore the pullback of (2.1), paired with CC, yields

0≤(m0p∗KX−h∗H)⋅C=−h∗H⋅C<0,0 \le(m_0p^*K_X - h^*H) \cdot C = -h^*H \cdot C < 0,

a contradiction. Hence k≥yk \ge y. Equation (2.6) and Lemma 2.2 now give y≤k≤κ(X)≤yy \le k \le\kappa(X) \le y, proving the theorem. □

The proof includes k=0k = 0, d−k−1=0d-k-1 = 0 and relative dimension zero. Effectivity of EE supplies the section injection, while target-exceptionality makes its mixed pairing vanish. These are separate uses of the canonical comparison, and both are needed.

The canonical good model and the main theorem

The geometric argument has used the existence of a good model of XX through its sections and its effective exceptional comparison. We now supply exactly that model. The following theorem is [7 Corollary 11.2]; its proof belongs to that companion article.

Theorem 3.1 (Smooth canonical good models). Let TT be a smooth connected projective complex variety with pseudo-effective KTK_T. Then there exist a normal projective Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial klt variety VV and a KTK_T-negative birational contraction T⇢VT \dashrightarrow V such that KVK_V is Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier and semiample. On a smooth projective common resolution T←pW→qVT \xleftarrow{p} W \xrightarrow{q} V, compatible canonical divisors satisfy

p∗KT=q∗KV+E,E≥0,q∗E=0.p^*K_T = q^*K_V + E,\qquad E \ge0,\qquad q_*E = 0.

Thus the input provides both the actual globally generated multiple used for sections and the exceptional equality used for intersections.

Proof of Theorem 1.1. If YY is a point, then its geometric generic fiber is XX, and the conclusion is the hypothesis κ(F)=0\kappa(F)=0. For a positive-dimensional base, a positive multiple of the ample divisor HH has an effective representative. Its pullback shows that f∗Hf^{*}H is pseudo-effective. Adding it to the original numerical hypothesis gives

KX=1m0((m0KX−f∗H)+f∗H)∈Eff⁡‾(X).K_{X}=\frac{1}{m_{0}}\left((m_{0}K_{X}-f^{*}H)+f^{*}H\right)\in\overline{\operatorname{Eff}}(X).

The variety XX is smooth, connected, projective and complex, so Theorem 3.1 applies. Its output is the projective good klt minimal model required by Theorem 2.1. Applying that theorem to the original ff, HH and m0m_{0} gives κ(X)=dim⁡Y\kappa(X)=\dim Y.

Throughout the proof the assumed comparison is numerical. The pluricanonical sections are obtained from the semiample model through (2.5); they are not assumed as a reformulation of pseudo-effectivity.

Campana–Peternell and general Schnell fiber spaces

The good-model input supplies canonical nonvanishing as well as the model used in the mixed-intersection argument. These two outputs fit the reduction of [9], Sections 4–10.

Nonvanishing and very general fibers

Let TT be a smooth connected projective complex variety with pseudo-effective KTK_{T}, and take the model VV and comparison divisor EE supplied by Theorem 3.1. Choose a positive multiple rKVrK_{V} that is Cartier and globally generated. The comparison then makes rErE an effective integral Cartier divisor. The section transfer in (2.5) gives

0≠H0(V,OV(rKV))↪H0(T,OT(rKT)).0\ne H^{0}(V,\mathcal{O}_{V}(rK_{V}))\xhookrightarrow{} H^{0}(T,\mathcal{O}_{T}(rK_{T})).

Consequently,

KT∈Eff⁡‾(T)⟹κ(T)≥0.K_{T}\in\overline{\operatorname{Eff}}(T)\quad\Longrightarrow\quad\kappa(T)\ge0.

This is the canonical nonvanishing input used by Schnell.

We will use smooth closed complex fibers when applying (4.1). They have the same Kodaira dimension as the geometric generic fiber when chosen very generally. Indeed, let f:X→Yf:X\to Y be a surjective morphism with connected fibers between smooth connected projective complex varieties, and write XηˉX_{\bar{\eta}} for its geometric generic fiber. Over a nonempty open subset, ff is smooth; there ωX/Y=ωX⊗f∗ωY−1\omega_{X/Y}=\omega_{X}\otimes f^{*}\omega_{Y}^{-1} restricts to the canonical bundle of each fiber. For each positive integer mm, after shrinking this open subset, formation of f∗(ωX/Y⊗m)f_{*}(\omega_{X/Y}^{\otimes m}) commutes with base change. Outside the union of the resulting countably many proper closed subsets, a smooth fiber FF therefore satisfies

h0(F,ωF⊗m)=h0(Xηˉ,ωXηˉ⊗m)for every m>0.h^{0}(F,\omega_{F}^{\otimes m})=h^{0}(X_{\bar{\eta}},\omega_{X_{\bar{\eta}}}^{\otimes m})\quad\text{for every }m>0.

Here the dimension on the right is over the algebraic closure of C(Y)\mathbb{C}(Y). Thus the plurigenus sequences, and hence the Kodaira dimensions, agree. Such complex fibers exist because C\mathbb{C} is uncountable. In particular, the zero-Kodaira fiber condition in the reduction below is precisely the geometric generic fiber condition of Theorem 1.1.

We also use the restriction observation in [9], Section 7. A pseudo-effective real Cartier divisor LL on XX restricts to a pseudo-effective divisor on a very general fiber. To see this, choose effective real divisors whose numerical classes converge to [L][L]. After excluding a countable union of proper closed subsets of YY, a fiber is contained in none of their supports. Their restrictions are effective, and their numerical classes converge to the class of L∣FL|_F. Applying this to L=m0KX−f∗HL=m_0K_X-f^*H gives

KF∈Eff⁡‾(F),κ(F)≥0,K_F \in\overline{\operatorname{Eff}}(F), \qquad\kappa(F) \ge0,

where the second assertion follows from (4.1). The very general fiber can be chosen to satisfy this restriction property and the plurigenus comparison simultaneously.

The Campana–Peternell inequality

Proof of Corollary 1.2. Since DD is effective, κ(D)≥0\kappa(D) \ge0. Also

KX=1m0((m0KX−D)+D)∈Eff⁡‾(X).K_X = \frac{1}{m_0}\left((m_0K_X-D)+D\right) \in\overline{\operatorname{Eff}}(X).

If κ(D)=0\kappa(D)=0, canonical nonvanishing (4.1) proves the assertion. We may therefore assume κ(D)>0\kappa(D)>0.

Schnell’s reduction in [9], Sections 4–6 first resolves a system ∣nD∣|nD| whose image has dimension κ(D)\kappa(D), then takes its Stein factorization and resolves the base. It produces an algebraic fiber space f0:X0→Y0f_0:X_0\to Y_0 between smooth connected projective complex varieties, with X0X_0 birational to XX, an ample Cartier divisor H0H_0 on Y0Y_0, and a positive integer a0a_0 such that

dim⁡Y0=κ(D),a0KX0−f0∗H0∈Eff⁡‾(X0).\dim Y_0=\kappa(D), \qquad a_0K_{X_0}-f_0^*H_0\in\overline{\operatorname{Eff}}(X_0).

The effective exceptional terms from resolving XX preserve pseudo-effectivity; after resolving the base, Schnell replaces the big and nef pullback of the original ample divisor by a suitable ample divisor. In particular, the output has the precise ample Cartier hypothesis of Theorem 1.1.

We recall the finite iteration in [9], Sections 7 and 9. Suppose that fi:Xi→Yif_i:X_i\to Y_i is such a fiber space, with ample Cartier HiH_i and aiKXi−fi∗Hi∈Eff⁡‾(Xi)a_iK_{X_i}-f_i^*H_i\in\overline{\operatorname{Eff}}(X_i) for a positive integer aia_i. For a very general smooth fiber FiF_i, the preceding restriction and nonvanishing argument gives κ(Fi)≥0\kappa(F_i)\ge0. If κ(Fi)>0\kappa(F_i)>0, the construction in [9 Lemma 7.1] chooses positive integers ri,bir_i,b_i and an effective Cartier divisor LiL_i such that

Li∼riKXi+fi∗(biHi),κ(Li)=κ(Fi)+dim⁡Yi.L_i\sim r_iK_{X_i}+f_i^*(b_iH_i), \qquad\kappa(L_i)=\kappa(F_i)+\dim Y_i.

The resulting comparison is

(aibi+ri)KXi−Li∼bi(aiKXi−fi∗Hi).(a_ib_i+r_i)K_{X_i}-L_i\sim b_i(a_iK_{X_i}-f_i^*H_i).

Its right side is pseudo-effective, so the same is true of its left side, since linear equivalence preserves numerical classes. Applying the divisor-to-fiber-space reduction of Sections 4–6 of Schnell’s paper to LiL_i gives another algebraic fiber space fi+1:Xi+1→Yi+1f_{i+1}:X_{i+1}\to Y_{i+1} of the same smooth projective complex type, with Xi+1X_{i+1} birational to XiX_i, an ample Cartier divisor Hi+1H_{i+1}, and a positive integer ai+1a_{i+1} such that

dim⁡Yi+1=κ(Fi)+dim⁡Yi,ai+1KXi+1−fi+1∗Hi+1∈Eff⁡‾(Xi+1).\dim Y_{i+1}=\kappa(F_i)+\dim Y_i, \qquad a_{i+1}K_{X_{i+1}}-f_{i+1}^*H_{i+1}\in\overline{\operatorname{Eff}}(X_{i+1}).

As long as κ(Fi)>0\kappa(F_i)>0, the integer dim⁡Yi\dim Y_i strictly increases. It is bounded by dim⁡X\dim X, so this process reaches an index jj with κ(Fj)=0\kappa(F_j)=0. The geometric generic fiber has Kodaira dimension zero by the comparison above. Theorem 1.1 applies at this last stage. Birational invariance of Kodaira dimension and (4.2) give

κ(X)=κ(Xj)=dim⁡Yj≥dim⁡Y0=κ(D).\kappa(X)=\kappa(X_j)=\dim Y_j\ge\dim Y_0=\kappa(D).

If DD is an effective rational divisor instead, choose a positive integer qq such that qDqD is an integral Cartier divisor. Multiplying the numerical hypothesis by qq gives qm0KX−qD∈Eff⁡‾(X)qm_0K_X-qD\in\overline{\operatorname{Eff}}(X). Corollary 1.2 applied to qDqD gives the same conclusion because κ(qD)=κ(D)\kappa(qD)=\kappa(D). This extension still requires an effective divisor; it makes no assertion for an arbitrary pseudo-effective divisor in its place.

Equality and eventual effectivity for general fibers

Proof of Corollary 1.3. If YY is a point, then F=XF=X and HH is linearly equivalent to zero. The equality is tautological, and the numerical hypothesis gives pseudo-effective KXK_X. A nonzero section supplied by (4.1), together with its powers, gives the asserted sections.

Assume dim⁡Y>0\dim Y>0. The restriction argument above gives κ(F)≥0\kappa(F)\ge0. As in [9 Lemma 7.1], choose positive integers a,ba,b and an effective Cartier divisor LL with

L∼aKX+f∗(bH),κ(L)=κ(F)+dim⁡Y.L\sim aK_X+f^*(bH),\qquad\kappa(L)=\kappa(F)+\dim Y.

The linear equivalence

(m0b+a)KX−L∼b(m0KX−f∗H)(m_0b+a)K_X-L\sim b(m_0K_X-f^*H)

shows that its left side is pseudo-effective. Corollary 1.2, applied to the effective Cartier divisor LL, gives

κ(X)≥κ(L)=κ(F)+dim⁡Y.\kappa(X)\ge\kappa(L)=\kappa(F)+\dim Y.

The reverse inequality is the easy-addition inequality used in [9 Lemma 7.1]. This proves the equality.

To obtain sections after subtracting the original f∗Hf^*H, we use the Fujita–Mori criterion recalled in [8 Lemma 4.6]; this is the criterion behind [9 Section 8]. Since κ(F)≥0\kappa(F)\ge0, the equality just proved implies that there are a big Cartier divisor BB on YY and a positive integer uu with a nonzero section

σ∈H0(X,OX(uKX−f∗B)).\sigma\in H^0(X,\mathcal{O}_X(uK_X-f^*B)).

Bigness of BB gives a positive integer vv and a nonzero section τ∈H0(Y,OY(vB−H))\tau\in H^0(Y,\mathcal{O}_Y(vB-H)). Thus, with r=uvr=uv,

s=σvf∗τ∈H0(X,OX(rKX−f∗H))s=\sigma^v f^*\tau\in H^0(X,\mathcal{O}_X(rK_X-f^*H))

is nonzero. This step replaces the big divisor supplied by the criterion with the ample divisor in the original hypothesis.

Finally, ampleness of HH supplies a nonzero section τℓ∈H0(Y,OY((ℓ−1)H))\tau_\ell\in H^0(Y,\mathcal{O}_Y((\ell-1)H)) for every sufficiently large integer ℓ\ell. The products

sℓf∗τℓ∈H0(X,OX(ℓrKX−f∗H))s^\ell f^*\tau_\ell\in H^0(X,\mathcal{O}_X(\ell rK_X-f^*H))

are nonzero. Choosing ℓ0\ell_0 beyond this ampleness threshold proves the asserted conclusion for every integer ℓ≥ℓ0\ell\ge\ell_0.

References

  1. [1]Caucher Birkar, Paolo Cascini, Christopher D. Hacon, and James McKernan. Existence of minimal models for varieties of log general type. Journal of the American Mathematical Society, 23(2):405–468, 2010. Definitions 3.6.1 and 3.6.7 in the published version.arxiv.org/abs/math/0610203
  2. [2]Frédéric Campana and Thomas Peternell. Geometric stability of the cotangent bundle and the universal cover of a projective manifold. Bulletin de la Société Mathématique de France, 139(1):41–74, 2011. With an appendix by Matei Toma.arxiv.org/abs/math/0405093
  3. [3]William Fulton. Intersection Theory, volume 2 of Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete, 3. Folge. Springer-Verlag, New York, second edition, 1998.
  4. [4]Robin Hartshorne. Algebraic Geometry, volume 52 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1977.
  5. [5]Heisuke Hironaka. Resolution of singularities of an algebraic variety over a field of characteristic zero. I, II. Annals of Mathematics. Second Series, 79:109–203, 205–326, 1964. Part I: doi:10.2307/1970486; Part II: doi:10.2307/1970547.
  6. [6]Hyunsuk Kim. Canonical bundle formula and a conjecture on certain algebraic fiber spaces by Schnell. https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.19769v4, 2025. Version 4, October 8, 2025; Conjecture 1.2, Theorem 1.3, and Section 1.3.
  7. [7]OpenAI. Log abundance in characteristic zero. OpenAI Math Release preprint OAI:Log-abundance-in-characteristic-zero-September-24-2026, 2026. Corollary 11.2.
  8. [8]Mihnea Popa and Christian Schnell. On direct images of pluricanonical bundles. Algebra & Number Theory, 8(9):2273–2295, 2014. Lemma 4.6.
  9. [9]Christian Schnell. Singular metrics and a conjecture by Campana and Peternell. https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.01295v1, 2022. Version 1; numbering follows this version (Conjecture 1.1, Sections 4–10, Lemma 7.1, Conjecture 10.1, and Theorem 12.1). Published in Pure Appl. Math. Q. 21 (2025), no. 3, 1269–1281, doi:10.4310/PAMQ.250116023222.
  10. [10]Yongpan Zou. On the Kodaira dimension of some algebraic fiber spaces. https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.19981v4, 2025. Version 4, December 21, 2025; Theorems 1.3 and 5.1.

Paper details

Contents