alphaFeedback

WorksMathematics

Transfer kernels and the Schur multiplier

AI contributions
  • Claude
View details

Abstract

In this article we prove that if HH is a normal subgroup of a finite group GG with G/HG/H cyclic, then the kernel of the transfer map G/G′⟶H/H′G/G' \longrightarrow H/H' equals (G:H)(G:H) times the order of the cokernel of the natural map M(H)⟶M(G)M(H) \longrightarrow M(G).

In this article we will prove that the capitulation kernel in cyclic unramified extensions is bounded in terms of the Schur multiplier of Galois groups. We include the relevant background information, and the actual proof takes up little more than a page. We begin with the history of the transfer map, present an elementary introduction to the Schur multiplier, describe the connection with the capitulation kernel in unramified abelian extensions of number fields, and give a proof of the conjecture in two special cases (of which the proof for groups with commutator groups G′G' of order 2 is longer than the general proof), and finally give the proof of the main result, which actually takes up less than a page.

The Transfer Map

One of Hilbert’s conjectures on what we now call Hilbert class fields concerned the capitulation of ideal classes. If kk is a number field with Hilbert class field k1k^1, then the principal ideal theorem states that every ideal in kk becomes principal in k1k^1. More generally, let K/kK/k be an unramified abelian extension, let K1K^1 be the Hilbert class field of KK, let G=Gal⁡(K1/k)G=\operatorname{Gal}(K^1/k) be its Galois group over kk, and let H=Gal⁡(K1/K)H=\operatorname{Gal}(K^1/K). Since K⊆k1⊆K1K\subseteq k^1\subseteq K^1, we have G/G′≃Gal⁡(k1/k)G/G'\simeq\operatorname{Gal}(k^1/k). The map ιk→K:Cl⁡(k)⟶Cl⁡(K)\iota_{k\to K}:\operatorname{Cl}(k)\longrightarrow\operatorname{Cl}(K) induced by sending an ideal a\mathfrak a in Ok\mathcal O_k to aOK\mathfrak a\mathcal O_K is called the transfer of ideal classes; its kernel κK/k=ker⁡ιk→K\kappa_{K/k}=\ker\iota_{k\to K} consists of classes of ideals that become principal in KK. Artin’s reciprocity law induces a corresponding homomorphism Ver⁡\operatorname{Ver} (also called transfer) from G/G′G/G' to HH:

Cl⁡(k)→∼G/G′ιk→K↓↓Ver⁡Cl⁡(K)→∼H\begin{CD} \operatorname{Cl}(k) @>{\sim}>> G/G' \\ @V{\iota_{k\to K}}VV @VV{\operatorname{Ver}}V \\ \operatorname{Cl}(K) @>{\sim}>> H \end{CD}

This allowed Artin to reduce the principal ideal theorem to a statement in group theory: If GG is a finite group, then the transfer map Ver⁡:G/G′⟶G′/G′′\operatorname{Ver}:G/G'\longrightarrow G'/G'' is the trivial map. The name transfer (Verlagerung) was introduced by Helmut Hasse in his report [6]. The transfer map is defined as follows. Let HH be a subgroup of finite index nn in a finite group GG; write G=Hg1∪⋯∪HgnG=Hg_1\cup\cdots\cup Hg_n. For each g∈Gg\in G and each ii there is an hi∈Hh_i\in H such that gig=higσ(i)g_i g=h_i g_{\sigma(i)} for a permutation σ\sigma of {1,…,n}\{1,\ldots,n\}. Then t(g)=h1h2⋯hnH′t(g)=h_1h_2\cdots h_nH' defines a homomorphism G⟶H/H′G\longrightarrow H/H' whose kernel contains G′G'. Thus tt induces a homomorphism

Ver⁡:G/G′⟶H/H′\operatorname{Ver}:G/G' \longrightarrow H/H'

called the transfer map.

The transfer map was first used by Issai Schur in his article [13] published in 1902. It was Schur’s student Arnold Scholz who pointed out this fact in his Jahrbuch review (JFM 60.0895.01) of Iyanaga’s article [7] on the principal ideal theorem, which appeared in 1934 (contrary to the claims in [3 p. 166–167], it was not Iyanaga who had credited Schur with inventing the transfer map). Here’s what happened: Issai Schur wanted to publish the results of his PhD student Roberto Frucht in his journal, the Mathematische Zeitschrift. His co-editor Leon Lichtenstein objected to publishing a thesis in the journal and mentioned that Schur’s recent related results had appeared in Crelle’s journal. Thus Schur asked Hasse whether he would publish Frucht’s manuscript, and Hasse agreed to do that. When reading the submission (see [4]), Hasse noted similarities between some of Frucht’s formulas and those appearing in Furtwängler’s proof of the principal ideal theorem. He asked Schur whether he could explain these similarities, but Schur did not answer this question immediately.

When Artin visited Schur in September 1930 (Artin’s parents-in-law were living in Berlin), Artin worked on the proper definition of his LL-series at ramified primes, and he talked with Schur about these things. Schur picked up Hasse’s report [6] and discovered that Artin’s transfer map in Furtwängler’s proof was the same map he had used in 1902. In a letter (see [15]) to Hasse written on December 30, 1930, he explained the connection in detail.

We do not know whether Scholz learned about Schur’s priority from Hasse or from his former teacher himself. Scholz used the transfer map after giving a talk in Hamburg in 1928, where he must have talked to Artin. Scholz later gave his student G. Hannink a topic on the transfer for his dissertation (Verlagerung und Nichteinfachheit von Gruppen, Kiel 1935).

Only in the 1970s was it discovered that the first example of the transfer map is Gauss’s Lemma in the third proof of the quadratic reciprocity law (see [12] and [17]).

The Schur multiplier

The results in this section are well known; see e.g. [9]. The Schur multiplier of a finite group GG is an important invariant that plays a major role in the investigation of class field towers. A group extension

0⟶A⟶Γ⟶G⟶00 \longrightarrow A \longrightarrow\Gamma\longrightarrow G \longrightarrow0

is called a central extension if A⊆Z(Γ)A \subseteq Z(\Gamma) is contained in the center of Γ\Gamma; in particular, AA is abelian. The group extension is called a stem extension if A⊆Γ′A \subseteq\Gamma' is contained in the commutator group Γ′\Gamma' of Γ\Gamma. Schur has shown that for central stem extensions

0⟶A⟶D⟶G⟶0,0 \longrightarrow A \longrightarrow D \longrightarrow G \longrightarrow0,

the order of AA is bounded, and that the groups AA for which the order of AA is maximal are all isomorphic. In this case, A=M(G)A=M(G) is called the Schur multiplier of GG, and the group extension DD is called a Schur cover of GG. The Klein 4-group G=C2×C2G=C_2 \times C_2 has Schur multiplier M(G)≅C2M(G) \cong C_2, and its Schur cover groups are the dihedral group D8D_8 and the quaternionion group Q8Q_8 of order 8.

In our proof below, we will use the following standard facts on Schur multipliers (see [9]).

(F0) M(G)≅H2(G,Z)M(G) \cong H_2(G,\mathbb{Z}). This is a finite abelian group annihilated by ∣G∣|G|.

(F1) (Hopf’s formula) If G≅F/RG \cong F/R with FF free, then M(G)≅(R∩F′)/[F,R]M(G) \cong(R \cap F')/[F,R].

(F2) If G≅⨁i=1rCmiG \cong\bigoplus_{i=1}^{r} C_{m_i} is abelian, then

M(G)≅G∧G=⨁i<jCgcd⁡(mi,mj).M(G) \cong G \wedge G = \bigoplus_{i<j} C_{\gcd(m_i,m_j)}.

In particular, M(G)=1M(G)=1 if GG is cyclic.

(F3) If 1→A→Γ→G→11 \to A \to\Gamma\to G \to1 is a central stem extension, then any set of lifts to Γ\Gamma of a generating set of GG generates Γ\Gamma. In fact, if YY is the subgroup generated by the lifts, then Γ=YA\Gamma=YA; as AA is central, Γ′=Y′⊆Y\Gamma'=Y'\subseteq Y, hence A⊆Γ′⊆YA\subseteq\Gamma'\subseteq Y and Γ=Y\Gamma=Y.

Next we prove a special case of the Ganea sequence (see [9]):

Lemma 1. Let ZZ be a central subgroup of a finite group GG. Then

coker⁡(M(G)→M(G/Z))≅Z∩G′.\operatorname{coker}(M(G)\to M(G/Z)) \cong Z\cap G'.

Proof. Write G=F/RG=F/R and let S⊇RS\supseteq R be the preimage of ZZ, so G/Z=F/SG/Z=F/S and S/R=ZS/R=Z. By (F1), M(G/Z)=(S∩F′)/[S,F]M(G/Z)=(S\cap F')/[S,F], and M(G)→M(G/Z)M(G)\to M(G/Z) is induced by the identity of FF (note [R,F]⊆[S,F][R,F]\subseteq[S,F]). Its image is (R∩F′)[S,F]/[S,F](R\cap F')[S,F]/[S,F], hence

coker⁡=(S∩F′)/((R∩F′)[S,F]).\operatorname{coker}=(S\cap F')/((R\cap F')[S,F]).

Consider φ:S∩F′→S/R[S,F]\varphi:S\cap F'\to S/R[S,F]. An element rcrc with r∈Rr\in R, c∈[S,F]⊆F′c\in[S,F]\subseteq F' lies in F′F' if and only if r∈F′r\in F'; so ker⁡φ=(S∩F′)∩R[S,F]=(R∩F′)[S,F]\ker\varphi=(S\cap F')\cap R[S,F]=(R\cap F')[S,F], and coker⁡≅im⁡φ\operatorname{coker}\cong\operatorname{im}\varphi. Since ZZ is central, [S,F]⊆R[S,F]\subseteq R, hence R[S,F]=RR[S,F]=R and S/R[S,F]=S/R=ZS/R[S,F]=S/R=Z. Finally im⁡φ={fR:f∈F′∩S}=Z∩F′R/R=Z∩G′\operatorname{im}\varphi=\{fR:f\in F'\cap S\}=Z\cap F'R/R=Z\cap G' (if f∈F′f\in F' and fR∈S/RfR\in S/R then f∈Sf\in S). □

Theorems of Furtwängler and Kisilevsky

Furtwängler [5] observed that if a number field kk has 2-class group of type (2,2)(2,2), then the 2-class group of its Hilbert 2-class field k1k^1 is trivial or cyclic; the 2-class field tower of kk then terminates at k1k^1 in the first case and at the second Hilbert 2-class field k2k^2 in the second. In addition, the Galois group of k2/kk^2/k is either the Klein 4-group (2,2)(2,2), a dihedral group, a semi-dihedral group or a quaternion group. Kisilevsky [10] studied this situation in detail and showed that the Galois group Gal⁡(k2/k)\operatorname{Gal}(k^2/k) is determined by the capitulation in the three unramified quadratic subextensions k1k_1, k2k_2 and k3k_3 of k1/kk^1/k. In the following, let κj\kappa_j denote the capitulation kernel in kj/kk_j/k and Cj=Nkj/kCl⁡2(kj)⊂Cl⁡2(k)C_j=N_{k_j/k}\operatorname{Cl}_2(k_j)\subset\operatorname{Cl}_2(k) the subgroup of ideal classes corresponding to kj/kk_j/k via Artin’s reciprocity law. The following table contains the results of Furtwängler and Kisilevsky; in the last column we have added the order of the Schur multiplier of GG:

G=Gal⁡(k2/k)G = \operatorname{Gal}(k^{2}/k)capitulation∣M(G)∣|M(G)|
(2,2)(2,2)κ1=κ2=κ3=Cl⁡2(k)\kappa_{1} = \kappa_{2} = \kappa_{3} = \operatorname{Cl}_{2}(k)2
Q8Q_{8}κ1=C1,κ2=C2,κ3=C3\kappa_{1} = C_{1}, \kappa_{2} = C_{2}, \kappa_{3} = C_{3}1
DmD_{m}κ1=Cl⁡2(k),κ2=C3,κ3=C2\kappa_{1} = \operatorname{Cl}_{2}(k), \kappa_{2} = C_{3}, \kappa_{3} = C_{2}2
SD⁡m\operatorname{SD}_{m}κ1∩C1=1,κ2=C3,κ3=C2\kappa_{1} \cap C_{1} = 1, \kappa_{2} = C_{3}, \kappa_{3} = C_{2}1
Qm,m≥24Q_{m}, m \ge2^{4}κ1=C1,κ2=C3,κ3=C2\kappa_{1} = C_{1}, \kappa_{2} = C_{3}, \kappa_{3} = C_{2}1

Table 1.

Here DmD_{m}, QmQ_{m} and SD⁡m\operatorname{SD}_{m} denote the dihedral, the quaternion and the semi-dihedral group of order m=2nm = 2^{n}. In the case G=SD⁡mG = \operatorname{SD}_{m} we have κ1=C2\kappa_{1} = C_{2}, where k2k_{2} is the quadratic subextension of k1k^{1} for which Gal⁡(k2/k1)\operatorname{Gal}(k^{2}/k_{1}) is a dihedral group.

One cannot fail to notice that if the Schur multiplier M(G)M(G) is trivial, then ∣κj∣=2|\kappa_{j}| = 2 for each quadratic unramified subextension kjk_{j} of k1/kk^{1}/k. Computing capitulation kernels for other groups of order 16 with trivial Schur multiplier suggests the following conjecture:

Conjecture 1. If the Galois group G=Gal⁡(k2/k)G = \operatorname{Gal}(k^{2}/k) of the second Hilbert class field of a number field kk has trivial Schur multiplier, then in each unramified quadratic subextension kj/kk_{j}/k of k1/kk^{1}/k, exactly one nontrivial ideal class capitulates:

M(G)=1implies∣κj∣=2.M(G) = 1 \quad\textit{implies} \quad|\kappa_{j}| = 2.

We can formulate this conjecture without any reference to number fields by replacing the capitulation kernel with the kernel of the transfer map: If GG is a finite 2-group with trivial Schur multiplier, then ∣ker⁡Ver⁡G/G′→H/H′∣=2|\ker\operatorname{Ver}_{G/G'}\to H/H'| = 2 for each subgroup HH of index 2 in GG.

Computing the kernels of the transfer maps for 2-groups of small order with nontrivial Schur multiplier suggests that much more is true:

Conjecture 2. For every finite 2-group and each subgroup HH of index 2 in GG we have

∣ker⁡Ver⁡G/G′→H/H′∣≤2⋅∣M(G)∣.(1)|\ker\operatorname{Ver}_{G/G'}\to H/H'| \le2 \cdot|M(G)|. \tag*{(1)}

This conjecture goes back to [11 (7.20)]; there I have proved that if kk is a number field whose pp-class field tower terminates with k∞k^{\infty} and where G=Gal⁡(k∞/k)G = \operatorname{Gal}(k^{\infty}/k), then for every cyclic unramified pp-extension K/kK/k we have

(K:k)≤∣κK/k∣≤(K:k)⋅∣M(G)∣.(K : k) \le|\kappa_{K/k}| \le(K : k) \cdot|M(G)|.

Jack Schmidt and Derek Holt have verified this inequality for all 2-groups of order ≤256\le256.

The natural generalization of our conjecture to arbitrary pp-groups is the following result, which is a special case of Theorem 7.

Theorem 2. For each finite pp-group GG and each subgroup HH with index pp we have

∣ker⁡Ver⁡G/G′→H/H′∣≤p⋅∣M(G)∣.(2)|\ker\operatorname{Ver}_{G/G'}\to H/H'| \le p \cdot|M(G)|. \tag*{(2)}

The more general conjecture that

∣ker⁡Ver⁡G/G′→H/H′∣≤(G:H)⋅∣M(G)∣|\ker\operatorname{Ver}_{G/G'}\to H/H'| \le(G : H) \cdot|M(G)|

for non-cyclic subgroups is not true: the groups [?, ?] and [?, ?] have Schur multiplier of order 2 and possess two subgroups of index 4 in which the kernel of the transfer map has order 16.

Simple Cases

Theorem 2 is easy to prove when the group GG is abelian:

Proposition 3. If GG is an abelian 2-group, then ∣ker⁡Ver⁡∣≤2∣M(G)∣|\ker\operatorname{Ver}| \le2|M(G)|.

Proof. Write G=H∪tHG=H\cup tH. Since GG is abelian, gt=gg^t=g. For g∈Hg\in H the transfer is Ver⁡(g)=ggt=g2\operatorname{Ver}(g)=gg^t=g^2, and for g∉Hg\notin H it is Ver⁡(g)=g2\operatorname{Ver}(g)=g^2. So Ver⁡\operatorname{Ver} is the squaring map and ker⁡Ver⁡=G[2]\ker\operatorname{Ver}=G[2]. Write G≅⨁i=1rC2aiG\cong\bigoplus_{i=1}^{r}C_{2^{a_i}}; then ∣ker⁡Ver⁡∣=2r|\ker\operatorname{Ver}|=2^r. By (F2), M(G)≅⨁i<jC2min⁡(ai,aj)M(G)\cong\bigoplus_{i<j}C_{2^{\min(a_i,a_j)}}, hence ∣M(G)∣≥2r(r−1)/2|M(G)|\ge2^{r(r-1)/2}. But

2r≤2⋅2r(r−1)/2⟺(r−1)(r−2)2≥0,2^r\le2\cdot2^{r(r-1)/2}\Longleftrightarrow\frac{(r-1)(r-2)}{2}\ge0,

which is true for all r≥1r\ge1. Equality occurs exactly for r=1r=1, or r=2r=2 with min⁡(a1,a2)=1\min(a_1,a_2)=1. □

A similar proof for groups with ∣G′∣=2|G'|=2 requires considerably more work; we include it here because it involves classifying all 2-groups GG with ∣G′∣=2|G'|=2 and trivial Schur multiplier.

Proposition 4. If GG is a 2-group with G′G' of order 2, then ∣ker⁡Ver⁡∣≤2∣M(G)∣|\ker\operatorname{Ver}|\le2|M(G)|.

Proof. Assume that G′=⟨z⟩G'=\langle z\rangle (where G′G' is central and G′≤HG'\le H, so H′≤G′H'\le G'), G‾=G/G′≅⨁C2ai\overline{G}=G/G'\cong\bigoplus C_{2^{a_i}} of rank rr, and b=min⁡aib=\min a_i.

  1. ker⁡Ver⁡⊂G[2]\ker\operatorname{Ver}\subset G[2]. For g∈Hg\in H, gt=g[g,t]g^t=g[g,t] with [g,t]∈G′[g,t]\in G'. Modulo G′G' the transfer therefore becomes squaring G‾→H/G′⊂G‾\overline{G}\to H/G'\subset\overline{G}, so ker⁡Ver⁡⊂G‾[2]\ker\operatorname{Ver}\subset\overline{G}[2] and ∣ker⁡Ver⁡∣≤2r|\ker\operatorname{Ver}|\le2^r.

  1. ∣M(G)∣≥∣G‾∧G‾∣/2|M(G)|\ge|\overline{G}\wedge\overline{G}|/2. Apply Lemma 1 to Z=G′Z=G'; then coker⁡(M(G)⟶M(G/G′))=G′\operatorname{coker}(M(G)\longrightarrow M(G/G'))=G' has order 2, hence ∣M(G)∣≥12∣M(G/G′)∣=2r(r−1)/2−1|M(G)|\ge\frac{1}{2}|M(G/G')|=2^{r(r-1)/2-1}, and for r=2r=2, ∣M(G)∣≥2b−1|M(G)|\ge2^{b-1}.

  1. r≥3r\ge3. Then 2r≤2r(r−1)/2≤2∣M(G)∣2^r\le2^{r(r-1)/2}\le2|M(G)|, so the conjecture holds.

  1. r=2r=2, b≥2b\ge2. Then ∣M(G)∣≥2|M(G)|\ge2 and ∣ker⁡Ver⁡∣≤4≤2∣M(G)∣|\ker\operatorname{Ver}|\le4\le2|M(G)|.

  1. r=2r=2, b=1b=1 (G≅C2a×C2G\cong C_{2^a}\times C_2). The bound 4 suffices if ∣M(G)∣≥2|M(G)|\ge2. The remaining case is M(G)=1M(G)=1, where ker⁡Ver⁡\ker\operatorname{Ver} must be smaller than G‾[2]\overline{G}[2].

The groups in the remaining case are, as we will show below, the quaternion group if GG has order 8 and the modular groups of order n≥16n\ge16. For these groups, it is well known that the result is true. □

Call a finite 2-group GG a PP-group if ∣G′∣=2|G'|=2 and M(G)=1M(G)=1. Let

M2n=⟨x,y∣x2n−2=y2=1, y−1xy=x1+2n−2⟩,n≥4.M_{2^n}=\langle x,y\mid x^{2^{n-2}}=y^2=1,\ y^{-1}xy=x^{1+2^{n-2}}\rangle,\qquad n\ge4.

Lemma 5. Let GG be a PP-group.

(a) M(G/G′)≅G′≅C2M(G/G')\cong G'\cong C_2.

(b) If Z≤Z(G)Z\le Z(G) has order 2 and Z≠G′Z\ne G', then G/ZG/Z is again a PP-group.

Proof. (a) G′G' is central; apply Lemma 1 with Z=G′Z=G': M(G)=1M(G)=1 gives M(G/G′)≅G′M(G/G')\cong G'.

(b) Z∩G′=1Z\cap G'=1, so by Lemma 1 M(G)→M(G/Z)M(G)\to M(G/Z) is onto; thus M(G/Z)=1M(G/Z)=1. Also (G/Z)′=G′Z/Z≅G′(G/Z)'=G'Z/Z\cong G' has order 2. □

Theorem 6. The PP-groups are exactly Q8Q_8 and the modular groups M2nM_{2^n}, n≥4n \ge4.

Step 1: G‾/G‾′≅C2a×C2\overline{G}/\overline{G}' \cong C_{2^a} \times C_2. By Lemma 5(a), ∣M(G‾)∣=2|M(\overline{G})|=2 for G‾=G/G′=⨁iC2ai\overline{G}=G/G'=\bigoplus_i C_{2^{a_i}} (a1≥⋯≥ar≥1a_1 \ge\cdots\ge a_r \ge1). By (F2), ∑i<jmin⁡(ai,aj)=1\sum_{i<j}\min(a_i,a_j)=1. This forces r=2r=2, a2=1a_2=1 (for r≤1r \le1 the sum is 0; for r≥3r \ge3 it is ≥3\ge3). Put a=a1a=a_1; then ∣G∣=2a+2|G|=2^{a+2}.

Step 2: generators and relations. Choose x,y∈Gx,y \in G whose images generate G‾\overline{G} with orders 2a2^a and 2. By (F3) (applied to the central stem extension 1→G′→G→G‾→11 \to G' \to G \to\overline{G} \to1), G=⟨x,y⟩G=\langle x,y\rangle. The subgroup G′G' is the normal closure of z:=[x,y]z:=[x,y]; being central of order 2, G′=⟨z⟩G'=\langle z\rangle, z≠1z\ne1, zz central. Also x2a,y2∈G′x^{2^a},y^2\in G':

x2a=zα,y2=zβ,α,β∈{0,1},y−1xy=x[x,y]=xz.x^{2^a}=z^\alpha,\qquad y^2=z^\beta,\qquad\alpha,\beta\in\{0,1\},\qquad y^{-1}xy=x[x,y]=xz.

Note that xx has order 2a2^a and ⟨x⟩∩G′=1\langle x\rangle\cap G'=1 if α=0\alpha=0 (xk∈G′x^k\in G' forces 2a∣k2^a\mid k).

Step 3: α=0\alpha=0 is impossible. We prove by induction on a≥1a\ge1: no PP-group as in Step 2 has α=0\alpha=0.

  • a=1a=1: then x2=1x^2=1 and x∉G′x\notin G', ∣G∣=8|G|=8, ∣G′∣=2|G'|=2. Q8Q_8 has a unique involution, which lies in G′G'; so G≅D8G\cong D_8. But ∣M(D8)∣=2|M(D_8)|=2, so D8D_8 is no PP-group.

  • a≥2a\ge2: x2x^2 is central ([x2,y]=[x,y]2=[x,y2]=z2=1[x^2,y]=[x,y]^2=[x,y^2]=z^2=1), hence Z=⟨x2a−1⟩≤⟨x2⟩Z=\langle x^{2^{a-1}}\rangle\le\langle x^2\rangle is central of order 2, and Z∩G′⊆⟨x⟩∩G′=1Z\cap G'\subseteq\langle x\rangle\cap G'=1. By Lemma 5(b), G/ZG/Z is a PP-group. In G/ZG/Z the images of x,yx,y generate, x‾2a−1=1\overline{x}^{2^{a-1}}=1, (G/Z)′=⟨z⟩(G/Z)'=\langle z\rangle, and the abelianization of G/ZG/Z is G/G′Z≅C2a−1×C2G/G'Z\cong C_{2^{a-1}}\times C_2 with x,yx,y of orders 2a−1,22^{a-1},2. So G/ZG/Z is a PP-group of the type of Step 2 with parameter a−1a-1 and α=0\alpha=0, contradicting the induction hypothesis.

Step 4: α=1\alpha=1. Now z=x2az=x^{2^a}, xx has order 2a+12^{a+1}, and y−1xy=xz=xey^{-1}xy=xz=x^e with e=1+2ae=1+2^a. Put n=a+2n=a+2; then e=1+2n−2e=1+2^{n-2}, ∣G∣=2n|G|=2^n.

  • a=1a=1 (n=3n=3): x4=1x^4=1, y−1xy=x3=x−1y^{-1}xy=x^3=x^{-1}. If β=0\beta=0 this is D8D_8, excluded. If β=1\beta=1 then y2=x2y^2=x^2 and G=Q8G=Q_8.

  • a≥2a\ge2 (n≥4n\ge4): if β=0\beta=0 then x,yx,y already satisfy the defining relations of M2nM_{2^n}. If β=1\beta=1 (y2=x2ay^2=x^{2^a}), put y′=yx2a−1y'=yx^{2^{a-1}}. Since xky=yxekx^k y=yx^{ek},

y′2=y2x(e+1)2a−1=x2ax2a+22a−1=x2a+1+22a−1=1,y'^2=y^2x^{(e+1)2^{a-1}}=x^{2^a}x^{2^a+2^{2a-1}}=x^{2^{a+1}+2^{2a-1}}=1,

as x2a+1=1x^{2^{a+1}}=1 and 2a−1≥a+12a-1\ge a+1 for a≥2a\ge2; and y′−1xy′=xey'^{-1}xy'=x^e. So again x,y′x,y' satisfy the relations of M2nM_{2^n}.

In the last case GG is a quotient of M2nM_{2^n} (generated by x,y′x,y' satisfying its relations); since ∣M2n∣=2n=∣G∣|M_{2^n}|=2^n=|G| (a split extension of ⟨x⟩≅C2n−1\langle x\rangle\cong C_{2^{n-1}} by C2C_2, as e2≡1(mod2n−1)e^2\equiv1\pmod{2^{n-1}}), G≅M2nG\cong M_{2^n}.

Proof of the Main Theorem

Let GG be a finite group and H⊲GH\lhd G a normal subgroup with C=G/H=⟨τ⟩C=G/H=\langle\tau\rangle cyclic of order p≥2p\ge2. For a pp-group GG and a subgroup HH of index pp, this is automatic (HH is normal, and a group of prime order is cyclic).

Fix t∈Gt\in G and set τ=tH\tau=tH. Since G/HG/H is abelian we have G′⊆HG'\subseteq H, and since G/H=⟨tH⟩G/H=\langle tH\rangle we have G=⟨H,t⟩=⋃j=0p−1tjHG=\langle H,t\rangle=\bigcup_{j=0}^{p-1}t^jH. Put A=H/H′A=H/H' (written additively unless stated otherwise). Since AA is abelian, HH acts trivially on AA by conjugation, so the conjugation action of GG on AA factors through CC; this makes AA a Z[C]\mathbb{Z}[C]-module, with t‾h=t−1ht\overline{t}h=t^{-1}ht (independent of the choice of tt). We write Aτ=ker⁡(τ−1)A^\tau=\ker(\tau-1) for the group of τ\tau-fixed points and N=1+τ+⋯+τp−1∈Z[C]N=1+\tau+\cdots+\tau^{p-1}\in\mathbb{Z}[C] for the norm element. Let Ver⁡:G/G′→A\operatorname{Ver}:G/G' \to A be the transfer and M(G)=H2(G,Z)M(G)=H_2(G,\mathbb{Z}) the Schur multiplier of GG; put κ=ker⁡Ver⁡\kappa=\ker\operatorname{Ver} and Q=coker⁡(M(H)→M(G))Q=\operatorname{coker}(M(H)\to M(G)).

Theorem 7. Let GG be a finite group and HH a normal subgroup such that G/HG/H is cyclic of order pp. Then there is an exact sequence

0⟶κ⟶G/G′→Ver⁡Aτ⟶Q⟶00 \longrightarrow\kappa\longrightarrow G/G' \xrightarrow{\operatorname{Ver}} A^\tau\longrightarrow Q \longrightarrow0

with Q≅Aτ/Ver⁡(G/G′)Q\cong A^\tau/\operatorname{Ver}(G/G'), and

∣ker⁡Ver⁡∣=p⋅∣coker⁡(M(H)→M(G))∣.\lvert\ker\operatorname{Ver}\rvert=p\cdot\lvert\operatorname{coker}(M(H)\to M(G))\rvert.

In particular, for a pp-group GG and [G:H]=p[G:H]=p,

∣ker⁡Ver⁡∣=p∣coker⁡(M(H)→M(G))∣≤p∣M(G)∣,\lvert\ker\operatorname{Ver}\rvert=p\lvert\operatorname{coker}(M(H)\to M(G))\rvert\leq p\lvert M(G)\rvert,

with equality if and only if M(H)→M(G)M(H)\to M(G) is the zero map.

Corollary 8. In the situation of Theorem 7:

(a) pp divides ∣ker⁡Ver⁡∣\lvert\ker\operatorname{Ver}\rvert; in particular ∣ker⁡Ver⁡∣≥p\lvert\ker\operatorname{Ver}\rvert\geq p;

(b) ∣ker⁡Ver⁡∣≤p∣M(G)∣\lvert\ker\operatorname{Ver}\rvert\leq p\lvert M(G)\rvert;

(c) ∣ker⁡Ver⁡∣=p\lvert\ker\operatorname{Ver}\rvert=p if and only if M(H)→M(G)M(H)\to M(G) is onto; thus ∣ker⁡Ver⁡∣=p\lvert\ker\operatorname{Ver}\rvert=p whenever M(G)=1M(G)=1.

Proof. All three statements follow from ∣ker⁡Ver⁡∣=p∣Q∣\lvert\ker\operatorname{Ver}\rvert=p\lvert Q\rvert, since QQ is a quotient of M(G)M(G) and ∣Q∣=1\lvert Q\rvert=1 iff M(H)→M(G)M(H)\to M(G) is onto. □

Proposition 9. Let K/kK/k be a cyclic unramified extension of number fields of degree pp (unramified at all places, including the infinite ones), let K1K^1 be the Hilbert class field of KK, G=Gal⁡(K1/k)G=\operatorname{Gal}(K^1/k) and H=Gal⁡(K1/K)H=\operatorname{Gal}(K^1/K). Then ∣κK/k∣=∣ker⁡Ver⁡∣\lvert\kappa_{K/k}\rvert=\lvert\ker\operatorname{Ver}\rvert (Section 1), and by Iwasawa’s formula [8] ∣κK/k∣=p(Ek:NEK)\lvert\kappa_{K/k}\rvert=p(E_k:NE_K). Hence

(Ek:NEK)=∣coker⁡(M(H)→M(G))∣.(E_k:NE_K)=\lvert\operatorname{coker}(M(H)\to M(G))\rvert.

Standard facts used

We use the following standard results on the homology groups Hn(G,B)H_n(G,B)

(H1) A short exact sequence of GG-modules gives a long exact homology sequence;

(H2) Shapiro’s lemma: let R=Z[G/H]R=\mathbb{Z}[G/H] with GG acting by left translation. Regard Z\mathbb{Z} as the trivial HH-module; then Ind⁡HGZ=Z[G]⊗Z[H]Z≅R\operatorname{Ind}_H^G\mathbb{Z}=\mathbb{Z}[G]\otimes_{\mathbb{Z}[H]}\mathbb{Z}\cong R (induced and coinduced modules agree because (G:H)<∞(G:H)<\infty), and Shapiro’s lemma [1 III.(6.2)] gives natural isomorphisms Hn(G,R)≅Hn(H,Z)H_n(G,R)\cong H_n(H,\mathbb{Z}) for all nn. Under these isomorphisms,

  • the augmentation ε:Z[G/H]→Z\varepsilon:\mathbb{Z}[G/H]\to\mathbb{Z} induces the map i∗:Hn(H,Z)→Hn(G,Z)i_*:H_n(H,\mathbb{Z})\to H_n(G,\mathbb{Z}) induced by the inclusion H⊆GH\subseteq G; [1 III.6]

  • the map ν:Z→Z[G/H]\nu:\mathbb{Z}\to\mathbb{Z}[G/H], 1↦∑gH∈G/HgH1\mapsto\sum_{gH\in G/H}gH, induces the transfer Hn(G,Z)→Hn(H,Z)H_n(G,\mathbb{Z})\to H_n(H,\mathbb{Z}); [1 III.9]

  • the GG-endomorphism of Z[C]=Z[G/H]\mathbb{Z}[C]=\mathbb{Z}[G/H] given by multiplication by τ\tau induces on Hn(H,Z)H_n(H,\mathbb{Z}) the map cτ∗c\tau_* induced by conjugation by tt; [1 III.8].

(H3) H0(G,Z)=ZH_0(G,\mathbb{Z})=\mathbb{Z}; H1(H,Z)=H/H′H_1(H,\mathbb{Z})=H/H'; H2(G,Z)=M(G)H_2(G,\mathbb{Z})=M(G) the Schur multiplier; on H1H_1 the transfer is the group-theoretic transfer Ver⁡\operatorname{Ver}; on H0H_0 the transfer Z→Z\mathbb{Z}\to\mathbb{Z} is multiplication by the index (G:H)(G:H) [1 III.9].

Two exact sequences

Let R=Z[C]R = \mathbb{Z}[C] with C=G/HC = G/H, regarded as a GG-module via G→CG \to C, and let ε:R→Z\varepsilon: R \to\mathbb{Z}, ∑ajτj↦∑aj\sum a_j\tau^j \mapsto\sum a_j be the augmentation with kernel II. Then I=(τ−1)RI = (\tau- 1)R: the inclusion “⊇\supseteq” is clear, and if ∑aj=0\sum a_j = 0 then ∑ajτj=∑aj(τj−1)=(τ−1)∑jaj(1+τ+⋯+τj−1)\sum a_j\tau^j = \sum a_j(\tau^j - 1) = (\tau- 1)\sum_j a_j(1+\tau+\cdots+\tau^{j-1}). Because CC is cyclic, the annihilator of τ−1\tau- 1 in RR is ZN\mathbb{Z}N: indeed (τ−1)∑ajτj=∑(aj−1−aj)τj(\tau- 1)\sum a_j\tau^j = \sum(a_{j-1}-a_j)\tau^j (indices mod pp) vanishes iff all aja_j are equal. Hence x↦(τ−1)xx \mapsto(\tau- 1)x gives a surjection R→IR \to I with kernel ZN\mathbb{Z}N, and ν(1)=N\nu(1) = N. We get

(I)0⟶I→jR→εZ⟶0,\text{(I)}\quad0 \longrightarrow I \xrightarrow{j} R \xrightarrow{\varepsilon} \mathbb{Z} \longrightarrow0,
(II)0⟶Z→νR→πI⟶0,π(x)=(τ−1)x,\text{(II)}\quad0 \longrightarrow\mathbb{Z} \xrightarrow{\nu} R \xrightarrow{\pi} I \longrightarrow0,\qquad\pi(x) = (\tau- 1)x,

and jπj\pi is multiplication by τ−1\tau- 1 on RR. All maps are GG-equivariant: jj is an inclusion of submodules; ε(τλ)=ε(λ)\varepsilon(\tau\lambda) = \varepsilon(\lambda) (so GG acts trivially on Z\mathbb{Z} in (I)); τN=N\tau N = N (so ν\nu is GG-linear); and π(τλ)=τ(τ−1)λ=τπ(λ)\pi(\tau\lambda) = \tau(\tau- 1)\lambda= \tau\pi(\lambda) because Z[C]\mathbb{Z}[C] is commutative.

Sequence (I)

The long exact sequence attached to (I) contains

H2(G,R)→ε∗H2(G,Z)→∂H1(G,I)→j∗H1(G,R).H_2(G,R) \xrightarrow{\varepsilon_*} H_2(G,\mathbb{Z}) \xrightarrow{\partial} H_1(G,I) \xrightarrow{j_*} H_1(G,R).

By (H2) and (H3) this reads

M(H)→i∗M(G)→∂H1(G,I)→j∗H/H′.M(H) \xrightarrow{i_*} M(G) \xrightarrow{\partial} H_1(G,I) \xrightarrow{j_*} H/H'.

Exactness at M(G)M(G) and at H1(G,I)H_1(G,I) shows that ∂\partial induces an isomorphism

Q=coker⁡(M(H)⟶M(G))→∼ker⁡(j∗:H1(G,I)⟶H/H′).(3)Q = \operatorname{coker}(M(H) \longrightarrow M(G)) \xrightarrow{\sim} \ker(j_*: H_1(G,I) \longrightarrow H/H'). \tag*{(3)}

Sequence (II)

The relevant part of the long exact homology sequence of (II) is

G/G′→Ver⁡H/H′→π∗H1(G,I)→∂′H0(G,Z)→ν∗H0(G,R),G/G' \xrightarrow{\operatorname{Ver}} H/H' \xrightarrow{\pi_*} H_1(G,I) \xrightarrow{\partial'} H_0(G,\mathbb{Z}) \xrightarrow{\nu_*} H_0(G,R),

where we used H1(G,Z)=G/G′H_1(G,\mathbb{Z}) = G/G', H1(G,R)=H1(H,Z)=H/H′H_1(G,R) = H_1(H,\mathbb{Z}) = H/H' and ν∗=Ver⁡\nu_* = \operatorname{Ver} on H1H_1. Under H0(G,Z)=ZH_0(G,\mathbb{Z}) = \mathbb{Z} and H0(G,R)≅H0(H,Z)=ZH_0(G,R) \cong H_0(H,\mathbb{Z}) = \mathbb{Z} (the latter induced by ε\varepsilon), the map ν∗\nu_* is multiplication by pp, since ν(1)=N↦p\nu(1) = N \mapsto p. Thus

G/G′→Ver⁡H/H′→π∗H1(G,I)→∂′Z→⋅pZ.G/G' \xrightarrow{\operatorname{Ver}} H/H' \xrightarrow{\pi_*} H_1(G,I) \xrightarrow{\partial'} \mathbb{Z} \xrightarrow{\cdot p} \mathbb{Z}.

Exactness at the fourth term gives im⁡∂′=0\operatorname{im}\partial' = 0 since multiplication by pp is injective on Z\mathbb{Z}, so ∂′=0\partial' = 0, π∗\pi_* is onto, and exactness at H/H′H/H' gives

ker⁡π∗=Ver⁡(G/G′),H1(G,I)≅(H/H′)/Ver⁡(G/G′).(4)\ker\pi_* = \operatorname{Ver}(G/G'),\qquad H_1(G,I) \cong(H/H')/\operatorname{Ver}(G/G'). \tag*{(4)}

Combining the two sequences

Let us collect what we have so far. Since jπ:R⟶I⟶Rj\pi: R \longrightarrow I \longrightarrow R is multiplication by τ−1\tau- 1 on RR, the induced map on H1(G,R)≅A=H/H′H_1(G,R) \cong A = H/H' is the endomorphism j∗π∗:a↦aτ−1j_*\pi_*: a \mapsto a^{\tau-1}. Setting A[τ]=ker⁡(τ−1)A[\tau] = \ker(\tau- 1), the exact sequences extracted from the long exact homology sequences fit into the following exact and commutative diagram:

\begin{CD} 0 @>>> \kappa@>>> G/G' @>{\operatorname{Ver}}>> H/H' @>{\pi_*}>> H_1(G,I) @>>> 0 \\ @. @. @VVV @VV{\tau-1}V @VV{j_*}V @. \\ 0 @>>> H/H' @>{\operatorname{id}}>> H/H' @>>> 0 \\ @. @. @AAA @AAA @AAA \end{CD}

The commutativity of the left square follows from π∗Ver⁡=0\pi_*\operatorname{Ver}=0 and j∗π∗=τ−1j_*\pi_*=\tau-1. Applying the snake lemma then gives us an exact sequence

0⟶κ⟶G/G′→Ver⁡A[τ]⟶Q⟶00\longrightarrow\kappa\longrightarrow G/G'\xrightarrow{\operatorname{Ver}}A[\tau]\longrightarrow Q\longrightarrow0

(which is easily proved by a simple diagram chase in this case), and in particular we have

Q≃A[τ]/Ver⁡(G/G′).(5)Q \simeq A[\tau]/\operatorname{Ver}(G/G'). \tag*{(5)}

Proof of Theorem 7

Proposition 10. Let LL be the preimage of (τ−1)A(\tau-1)A under the natural projection H→AH\to A. Then G′=LG'=L, and we have ∣G/G′∣=p∣Aτ∣|G/G'|=p|A^\tau|.

Proof. L⊆G′L\subseteq G': For h∈Hh\in H we have, writing AA multiplicatively, (τ−1)hˉ=t−1hth−1H′=[t,h−1]H′(\tau-1)\bar{h}=t^{-1}ht h^{-1}H'=[t,h^{-1}]H'. Since AA is generated by the classes hˉ\bar{h} and τ−1\tau-1 is a homomorphism, (τ−1)A(\tau-1)A is generated by these elements; hence LL is generated by H′H' and the commutators [t,h−1][t,h^{-1}], h∈Hh\in H. All of these lie in G′G', so L⊆G′L\subseteq G'.

LL is normal in GG: The subgroup (τ−1)A(\tau-1)A is a Z[C]\mathbb{Z}[C]-submodule of AA, because τ\tau commutes with τ−1\tau-1. The conjugation action of GG on AA factors through CC, hence (τ−1)A(\tau-1)A is stable under all of GG. So for g∈Gg\in G and x∈Lx\in L we have g−1xg∈Hg^{-1}xg\in H (as H⊴GH\trianglelefteq G) and its class in AA lies in (τ−1)A(\tau-1)A, i.e. g−1xg∈Lg^{-1}xg\in L.

G′⊆LG'\subseteq L: The image of HH in G/LG/L is abelian since H′⊆LH'\subseteq L. For h∈Hh\in H we have [t,h−1]∈L[t,h^{-1}]\in L, i.e. t−1ht=ht^{-1}ht=h in G/LG/L, so tt commutes with the image of every element of HH. Since G=⟨H,t⟩G=\langle H,t\rangle, the group G/LG/L is generated by the images of HH and tt, which commute pairwise; hence G/LG/L is abelian and G′⊆LG'\subseteq L.

Counting: We have shown that G′=LG'=L, so (H:G′)=∣A/(τ−1)A∣=∣Aτ∣(H:G')=|A/(\tau-1)A|=|A^\tau|, because kernel and cokernel of an endomorphism of a finite group have the same order. Since G′⊆HG'\subseteq H we get ∣G:G′∣=∣G:H∣∣H:G′∣=p∣Aτ∣|G:G'|=|G:H||H:G'|=p|A^\tau|. □

Proof of Theorem 7. The exact sequence 0→κ→G/G′→Aτ→Q→00\to\kappa\to G/G'\to A^\tau\to Q\to0 was established in (5). Hence ∣G/G′∣=∣κ∣∣Ver⁡(G/G′)∣|G/G'|=|\kappa||\operatorname{Ver}(G/G')| and ∣Q∣=∣Aτ∣/∣Ver⁡(G/G′)∣|Q|=|A^\tau|/|\operatorname{Ver}(G/G')|. By Proposition 10,

∣ker⁡Ver⁡∣=∣G/G′∣∣Ver⁡(G/G′)∣=p∣Aτ∣∣Ver⁡(G/G′)∣=p∣Q∣=p∣coker⁡(M(H)→M(G))∣.|\ker\operatorname{Ver}|=\frac{|G/G'|}{|\operatorname{Ver}(G/G')|}=\frac{p|A^\tau|}{|\operatorname{Ver}(G/G')|}=p|Q|=p|\operatorname{coker}(\mathrm{M}(H)\to\mathrm{M}(G))|.

The cokernel is a quotient of M(G)\mathrm{M}(G), giving the inequality, with equality iff the cokernel is all of M(G)\mathrm{M}(G), i.e. iff M(H)→M(G)\mathrm{M}(H)\to\mathrm{M}(G) is zero. □

Remarks

In November 2025 I looked at Folk’s article [2]. He said that there is extra capitulation in a cyclic unramified extension K/kK/k if the order of κK/k\kappa_{K/k} is strictly larger than (K:k)(K:k). He showed that extra capitulation implies the existence of certain central extensions, which in turn, so I hoped, would show that the Schur multiplier of the Galois group of K1/kK^1/k cannot be trivial. Before I found the time to think this through, the AI revolution happened.

Now that the transfer conjecture is proved we might ask conversely how these field extensions corresponding to the cokernel of M(H)⟶M(G)M(H) \longrightarrow M(G) may be constructed.

Acknowledgement

The proof was found with the help of the free version of Claude in October 2026. Over several sessions, Claude suggested three proofs: the first used spectral sequences, the second replaced everything by explicit calculations based on Hopf’s formula; I chose to present the third version using standard homology groups in my own exposition.

I would like to dedicate this article to the memory of my dear friend Chip Snyder (1946–2026), who kept returning to these questions during the final years of his life. In particular, together with Elliot Benjamin (see [16]) he proved that the transfer conjecture holds in the following case: If GG is a finite 22-group and HH is a maximal abelian subgroup of GG, then rk⁡ker⁡Ver⁡(G/G′⟶H/H′)≤1+rk⁡M(G)\operatorname{rk} \ker\operatorname{Ver}(G/G^\prime\longrightarrow H/H^\prime) \le1 + \operatorname{rk} M(G).

References

  1. [1]K. S. Brown, Cohomology of Groups, Springer-Verlag 7
  2. [2]D. Folk, Extra capitulation and central extensions, J. Number Theory 50 (1995), 226–232 10DOI
  3. [3]G. Frei, F. Lemmermeyer, P. Roquette (eds.), Emil Artin and Helmut Hasse. The correspondence 1923–1958, Springer 2014 2DOI
  4. [4]R. Frucht, Über die Darstellung endlicher Abelscher Gruppen durch Kollineationen, J. Reine Angew. Math. 166 (1931), 16–29 2DOI
  5. [5]Ph. Furtwängler, Über das Verhalten der Ideale des Grundkörpers im Klassenkörper, Monatsh. f. Math. 27 (1916), 1–15 3DOI
  6. [6]H. Hasse, Bericht über neue Untersuchungen und Probleme aus der Theorie der algebraischen Zahlkörper, Leipzig 1930 1, 2
  7. [7]S. Iyanaga, Zum Beweise des Hauptidealsatzes, Abh. Math. Semin. Hamb. Univ. 10 (1934), 349–357 2DOI
  8. [8]K. Iwasawa, A note on the group of units of an algebraic number field, J. Math. Pures Appl. (9) 35 (1956), 189–192 7
  9. [9]G. Karpilovsky, The Schur multiplier, LMS Monographs, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1987 2, 3
  10. [10]H. Kisilevsky, Number fields with class number congruent to 4 mod 8 and Hilbert’s Theorem 94, J. Number Theory 8 (1976), 271–279 3
  11. [11]F. Lemmermeyer, Konstruktion von Klassenkörpern, Ph. D. dissertation 1995 4
  12. [12]A. Leutbecher, Das Gauß’sche Lemma ist Beispiel einer Verlagerung, Arch. Math. 23 (1972), 151–153 2DOI
  13. [13]I. Schur, Neuer Beweis eines Satzes über endliche Gruppen, Berl. Ber. 1902, 1013–1019 2
  14. [15]I. Schur, Letter to Hasse, December 30, 1930 (cod. Ms. Hasse, 1:1561) 2
  15. [16]C. Snyder, E. Benjamin, A proof of the abelian cases of the transfer conjecture of F. Lemmermeyer, preprint 2026 10
  16. [17]W. C. Waterhouse, A tiny note on Gauss’s lemma, J. Number Theory 30 (1988), 105–107 2DOI

Paper details

vlnc:W_q3h8pvtj
v1 · latestHistory (1)

published · Fresh — added to the Hub within the last 30 days

added ·

Usage

views · 0

downloads · 0

A view counts once per browser per day, a download each time the PDF is requested.

CC BY 4.0

Original source

  • Mathematics

Claude · View statement →

Looking for related papers…
Contents