alphaFeedback

WorksMathematics

Rational Dyck Excursion Counts as Sums of Generalized Fuss-Catalan Products

AI contributions
  • ChatGPT 6
View details

Abstract

For walks with jumps +p and -q, where p,q are coprime positive integers, we express the weak and strict rational Dyck excursion counts as finite weighted sums of generalized Fuss-Catalan products. Both sums run over the same partitions of q for every path size. Reversing the order of the steps and changing their signs transforms a returning walk with jumps +p and -q into one with jumps +q and -p, with the same heights in reverse order. This preserves both weak and strict excursions. Applying the formulas with p and q exchanged therefore gives sums over partitions of p, so we can choose the smaller of the two jump magnitudes. The indices of the Fuss-Catalan factors satisfy certain divisibility conditions that are determined by the jump magnitudes and the partition parts. The weak formula alternates in sign with the number of parts, whereas every term in the strict formula is positive. We prove both formulas by cutting unrestricted walks at their first and last visits to their lowest height. Expanding the resulting factors produces the partitions of q and the different signs. We also give equivalent binomial convolutions. Multiplying each Fuss-Catalan factor by q in the weak formula or p in the strict formula gives a positive integer. For q=1, the weak and strict counts reduce to Fuss-Catalan and shifted Raney numbers, respectively; for q=2 and q=3, the formulas yield explicit convolution identities.

Introduction

A nonempty walk can return to zero only if its increments have opposite signs. We write these increments as +p+p and −q-q, where pp and qq are coprime positive integers denoting the jump magnitudes. A weak excursion starts and ends at zero and stays nonnegative; a strict excursion is positive between its endpoints. A weak meander starts at zero and stays nonnegative, but need not return to zero. A positive meander starts at zero and stays strictly positive at every later step. In the special case where the downward jump has magnitude one (q=1q = 1), the weak and strict excursion counts are given by Fuss–Catalan and shifted Raney numbers, respectively. We seek expressions for these counts in terms of the same coefficient family when q>1q > 1. We give weighted sums of generalized Fuss–Catalan products. These formulas sum over partitions of the jump magnitude qq, rather than partitions of the path size. For each partition, the indices in the products must satisfy certain divisibility conditions.

For original jump magnitudes p0p_0, q0q_0, put g=gcd⁡(p0,q0)g = \gcd(p_0, q_0) and p=p0/gp = p_0/g, q=q0/gq = q_0/g. We call this normalization; dividing all heights by gg preserves the weak and strict excursion counts. After normalization, a returning walk of size nn has qnqn upward steps and pnpn downward steps, hence (p+q)n(p + q)n steps altogether.

Figure 1 shows three walks with jumps +4 and −3 that return to zero after fourteen steps. The first is strict, the second is weak with an interior return to zero, and the third goes below zero.

Three walks with jumps +4 and −3: strict excursion, weak excursion, and returning walk

Figure 1. Walks with jumps +4 and −3. Each has six upward and eight downward steps and returns to zero after fourteen steps. (a) A strict excursion. (b) A weak excursion with an interior return to zero at step 7. (c) A returning walk that reaches height −2 and is therefore not an excursion. The vertical coordinate records height; the horizontal coordinate records the number of steps.

These formulas include Duchon’s sequence A060941, the corresponding strict excursion sequence A293946 at positive indices, and the weak excursion sequences A300386, A300390, and A300391 in the On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences [16]. When one jump has magnitude one, they recover the integer-parameter Fuss–Catalan and Raney sequences. The contribution is a common product representation for these established excursion sequences.

To express the excursion counts in one coefficient family, we use the two-parameter Fuss–Catalan coefficients. For α>1\alpha> 1, let Fα(x)F_\alpha(x) be the formal power series with constant term one satisfying

Fα=1+xFαα.F_\alpha= 1 + xF_\alpha^\alpha.

For β>0\beta> 0 and a nonnegative integer mm, define

Cα,β(m)=[xm]Fα(x)β=βαm+β(αm+βm).(1)C_{\alpha,\beta}(m) = [x^m]F_\alpha(x)^\beta= \frac{\beta}{\alpha m + \beta}\binom{\alpha m + \beta}{m}. \tag*{(1)}

Brackets denote coefficient extraction: [xm]f(x)[x^m]f(x) is the coefficient of xmx^m in f(x)f(x). With two variables, [taxb]f(t,x)[t^a x^b]f(t, x) is the coefficient of taxbt^a x^b in f(t,x)f(t, x). The same convention applies with any choice of variables. When α\alpha is an integer, β=1\beta= 1 gives the usual Fuss–Catalan numbers, and positive integer β\beta gives their Raney extension. Our formulas use positive rational values of α\alpha and β\beta, so the individual coefficients need not be integers.

Raney [18] develops the composition and reversion framework behind these coefficients, and Gessel [11, Section 3.3] gives the power identity in (1). Lin [14] treats their integer-parameter interpretations. Partition-indexed Fuss–Catalan product identities also arise from the determinant expansions of Goy and Shattuck [12]. Here the partitioned integer is the jump qq, and the parameters and residue restrictions of the factors are determined by pp, qq and the partition parts.

The enumeration of rational Dyck paths is well known in the literature. Bizley [5] proves Grossman’s formula and counts paths with prescribed numbers of boundary contacts, covering both weak and strict excursions. Birmajer, Gil, and Weiner [4] express these counts using Bell polynomials. The factor-free words studied in these works and by Duchon [7] satisfy a stronger restriction than strict excursions. A strict excursion starts and ends at zero and stays strictly positive in between. Within such an excursion, a shorter segment may start and end at the same positive height and stay at or above that height throughout. Such a segment is a Dyck factor above zero.

Put h=p+qh = p + q, and let E(z)E(z) and T(z)T(z) be the generating functions for weak and nonempty strict excursions, respectively, with znz^n marking length hnhn. The empty path contributes one to E(z)E(z). Cutting a weak excursion at its interior returns to zero gives a unique ordered sequence of strict excursions. Multiplication counts successive choices of pieces, so

E(z)=1+T(z)+T(z)2+⋯=11−T(z).E(z) = 1 + T(z) + T(z)^2 + \cdots= \frac{1}{1 - T(z)}.

The Grossman–Bizley formula for E(z)E(z) and the resulting expression for T(z)T(z) are

E(z)=exp⁡(∑j≥11hj(hjqj)zj),T(z)=1−E(z)−1.(2)E(z) = \exp\left(\sum_{j \ge1} \frac{1}{hj}\binom{hj}{qj}z^j\right), \qquad T(z) = 1 - E(z)^{-1}. \tag*{(2)}

Expanding the exponential results in sums indexed by partitions of the path size nn. Theorem 1 instead indexes the products by partitions of the jump magnitude qq: the weak formula alternates in sign with the number of partition parts, whereas every strict summand is positive.

The proof uses the walk factorization of Gessel [10] and Xin [22], obtained by cutting an unrestricted walk at its first and last visits to its minimum height. The middle piece is a weak excursion relative to that height. Deleting the final −q-q step of a strict excursion leaves a positive walk ending at qq. Expanding the positive endpoint factor distributes the endpoint height qq among partition parts and gives the strict product formula. The weak formula comes from the reciprocal of the negative endpoint factor, whose expansion produces the alternating signs. Section 4 gives a combinatorial interpretation of the integer multiples of the Fuss–Catalan factors.

Related convolution formulas have been obtained using the kernel method for paths below a line of rational slope. Sato’s matrix formulation [19] is reproduced by Krattenthaler [13, Section 10.5]; Banderier and Flajolet [1, Example 5] give a convolution of generalized binomial coefficients whose number of factors is independent of the path size, and attribute it to Sato.

Banderier and Wallner [3] use roots of unity and Lagrange inversion, while Bousquet-Mélou [6] expresses elementary symmetric functions in terms of power sums. In contrast, here we express weak and strict excursion counts as Fuss–Catalan products with explicit congruence conditions and positive parameters in the strict formula.

Panfil, Stošić, and Sułkowski [17] reproduce a root-of-unity convolution in their study of lattice paths and torus knots. Ek [8] develops computational methods for lattice-walk generating functions, and Firoozi, Jedwab, and Rattan [9] count paths according to the number of lattice points above a boundary of rational slope. The minimal bridges studied by Lou and Brown [15] avoid interior lattice points on the boundary but may cross it, whereas strict excursions stay strictly on one side between their endpoints.

The authors’ original motivation came from additive wealth processes [20, 21], which also provide an application context. For independent increments +p+p and −q-q with fixed probabilities, all walks with fixed numbers of upward and downward steps have the same probability of occurring. In Section 7, we use this fact to convert the excursion counts into probabilities of weak and strict returns. We also give probabilities for first entry at or below zero from initial height pp, distinguishing exact landings at zero from overshoots.

Section 2 states the product formulas; Section 3 derives them from endpoint factorization and then gives their shifted forms. Their integer scalings are developed in Section 4. Sections 5 and 6 give sequence specializations and OEIS indexing. Appendix A collects expanded binomial formulas.

Fuss–Catalan product formulas

Throughout, pp, qq are coprime positive integers and h=p+qh=p+q. We index returning walks by their size nn, so size nn means hnhn steps. For a walk represented by an increment sequence (x1,…,xhn)(x_1,\ldots,x_{hn}) in {p,−q}\{p,-q\}, put H0=0H_0=0 and Hj=x1+⋯+xjH_j=x_1+\cdots+x_j for 1≤j≤hn1\leq j\leq hn. For n≥0n\geq0, let En(p,q)E_n^{(p,q)} count weak excursions of size nn, that is, walks with Hhn=0H_{hn}=0 and Hj≥0H_j\geq0 for 0≤j≤hn0\leq j\leq hn. For n≥1n\geq1, let Tn(p,q)T_n^{(p,q)} count strict excursions of size nn, with Hhn=0H_{hn}=0 and Hj>0H_j>0 for 1≤j<hn1\leq j<hn. We take E0(p,q)=1E_0^{(p,q)}=1 and T0(p,q)=0T_0^{(p,q)}=0. Let uu and dd be the numbers of upward and downward steps.

A return to zero requires pu=qdpu=qd, and the total length gives u+d=hnu+d=hn. Together these equations yield u=qnu=qn and d=pnd=pn. Replacing each upward step by an east step and each downward step by a north step gives a lattice path from (0,0)(0,0) to (qn,pn)(qn,pn). At a vertex (x,y)(x,y), the height of the original walk is px−qypx-qy. This implies that a weak excursion corresponds to a path on or below the line y=(p/q)xy=(p/q)x. Furthermore, a strict excursion corresponds to a path that starts and ends on this line and stays strictly below it in between.

Write λ=(λ1,…,λℓ)⊢q\lambda=(\lambda_1,\ldots,\lambda_\ell)\vdash q for a partition of qq into ℓ=ℓ(λ)\ell=\ell(\lambda) positive parts, listed in nonincreasing order. Let mr(λ)m_r(\lambda) be the number of occurrences of the part rr, and define

mr(λ)=#{j:λj=r},zλ=∏r=1qrmr(λ)mr(λ)!.(3)m_r(\lambda)=\#\{j:\lambda_j=r\},\qquad z_\lambda=\prod_{r=1}^{q}r^{m_r(\lambda)}m_r(\lambda)!. \tag*{(3)}

For q=3q=3, we obtain:

λ\lambdaℓ(λ)\ell(\lambda)Nonzero multiplicitieszλz_\lambda
(3)(3)11m3=1m_3=1311!=33^1 1! = 3
(2,1)(2,1)22m2=m1=1m_2=m_1=1211!111!=22^1 1! 1^1 1! = 2
(1,1,1)(1,1,1)33m1=3m_1=3133!=61^3 3! = 6

Table 2. Partitions of 3, their lengths and nonzero multiplicities, and the corresponding values of zλz_\lambda.

In the last row, m1=3m_1=3 gives the factor 3!3!; all other multiplicities are zero. For every path size nn, the formulas below sum over these same partitions of qq. All summation indices are nonnegative integers. A sum over an empty index set is zero, and each displayed congruence is imposed separately on every factor. Congruences modulo 1 impose no restriction.

We use the coefficients Cα,β(m)C_{\alpha,\beta}(m) defined in (1). In the weak formula, their parameters are α=h/q\alpha=h/q and β=λj/q\beta=\lambda_j/q, and their index uju_j is the number of upward steps in the associated auxiliary walk. In the strict formula, their parameters are α=h/p\alpha=h/p and β=λj/p\beta=\lambda_j/p, and their index djd_j is the number of downward steps in its auxiliary walk.

Theorem 1 (Fuss–Catalan product formulas). For n≥0n \ge0, the weak excursion number is

En(p,q)=∑λ⊢q(−1)ℓ−1qℓzλ∑u1+⋯+uℓ=qnpuj+λj≡0(modq)∏j=1ℓCh/q,λj/q(uj).(4)E_n^{(p,q)}=\sum_{\lambda\vdash q}\frac{(-1)^{\ell-1}q^\ell}{z_\lambda} \sum_{\substack{u_1+\cdots+u_\ell=qn\\pu_j+\lambda_j\equiv0\pmod q}} \prod_{j=1}^{\ell}C_{h/q,\lambda_j/q}(u_j). \tag*{(4)}

For n≥1n \ge1, the strict excursion number is

Tn(p,q)=∑λ⊢qpℓzλ∑d1+⋯+dℓ=pn−1qdj+λj≡0(modp)∏j=1ℓCh/p,λj/p(dj).(5)T_n^{(p,q)}=\sum_{\lambda\vdash q}\frac{p^\ell}{z_\lambda} \sum_{\substack{d_1+\cdots+d_\ell=pn-1\\qd_j+\lambda_j\equiv0\pmod p}} \prod_{j=1}^{\ell}C_{h/p,\lambda_j/p}(d_j). \tag*{(5)}

All Fuss–Catalan factors have positive rational parameters, nonnegative integer indices, and integer upper binomial arguments. Every summand in (5) is positive.

References

  1. [2]C. Banderier, M.-L. Lackner, and M. Wallner, Latticepathology and symmetric functions (extended abstract), in 31st International Conference on Probabilistic, Combinatorial and Asymptotic Methods for the Analysis of Algorithms, LIPICs 159 (2020), 2:1–2:16. doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.AofA.2020.2.DOI
  2. [3]C. Banderier and M. Wallner, The kernel method for lattice paths below a line of rational slope, in Lattice Path Combinatorics and Applications, Developments in Mathematics 58, Springer, 2019, pp. 119–154. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-11102-1_7.DOI
  3. [4]D. Birmajer, J. B. Gil, and M. D. Weiner, On rational Dyck paths and the enumeration of factor-free Dyck words, Discrete Appl. Math. 244 (2018), 36–43. doi:10.1016/j.dam.2018.02.020. arXiv:1606.02183.DOI
  4. [5]M. T. L. Bizley, Derivation of a new formula for the number of minimal lattice paths from (0, 0) to (km, kn) having just t contacts with the line my = nx and having no points above this line; and a proof of Grossman’s formula for the number of paths which may touch but do not rise above this line, J. Inst. Actuar. 80 (1954), 55–62. doi:10.1017/S002026810005424X. Digitized article.DOI
  5. [6]M. Bousquet-Mélou, Discrete excursions, Sém. Lothar. Combin. 57 (2008), Article B57d, 23 pp. arXiv:math/0701171.
  6. [7]P. Duchon, On the enumeration and generation of generalized Dyck words, Discrete Math. 225 (2000), 121–135. doi:10.1016/S0012-365X(00)00150-3.DOI
  7. [8]B. Ek, Lattice walk enumeration, preprint, 2018. arXiv:1803.10920.arxiv.org/abs/1803.10920
  8. [9]F. Firoozi, J. Jedwab, and A. Rattan, Combinatorial enumeration of lattice paths by flaws with respect to a linear boundary of rational slope, Electron. J. Combin. 33 (1) (2026), P1.3. doi:10.37236/13115.DOI
  9. [10]I. M. Gessel, A factorization for formal Laurent series and lattice path enumeration, J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 28 (1980), 321–337. doi:10.1016/0097-3165(80)90074-6.DOI
  10. [11]I. M. Gessel, Lagrange inversion, J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 144 (2016), 212–249. doi:10.1016/j.jcta.2016.06.018.DOI
  11. [12]T. Goy and M. Shattuck, Determinants of Toeplitz–Hessenberg matrices with Fuss–Catalan entries, J. Integer Sequences 29 (2026), Article 26.1.2. Journal version.
  12. [14]C.-H. Lin, Some combinatorial interpretations and applications of Fuss–Catalan numbers, ISRN Discrete Math. 2011 (2011), Article 534628, 8 pp. doi:10.5402/2011/534628.DOI
  13. [15]B. Lou and L. A. Brown, Minimal bridges and a rotation-based bijection, preprint, 2026. arXiv:2608.11005.arxiv.org/abs/2608.11005
  14. [16]OEIS Foundation Inc., The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences, 2026. Available at https://oeis.org. Individual entries and indexing conventions are given in Table 1; the cited entries and their indexing conventions were checked on October 9, 2026.
  15. [17]M. Panfil, M. Stosić, and P. Sułkowski, Donaldson–Thomas invariants, torus knots, and lattice paths, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018), Article 026022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.026022.DOI
  16. [18]G. N. Raney, Functional composition patterns and power series reversion, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 94 (1960), 441–451. doi:10.1090/S0002-9947-1960-0114765-9.DOI
  17. [19]M. Sato, Generating functions for the number of lattice paths between two parallel lines with a rational incline, Math. Japonica 34 (1989), 123–137.
  18. [20]A. Vanhoyweghen and V. Ginis, Human decision-making in a non-ergodic additive environment, Proc. R. Soc. A 479 (2023), Article 20230544. doi:10.1098/rspa.2023.0544.DOI
  19. [21]A. Vanhoyweghen, B. Verbeken, C. Macharis, and V. Ginis, The influence of ergodicity on risk affinity of timed and non-timed respondents, Sci. Rep. 12 (2022), Article 3744. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-07613-6.DOI
  20. [22]G. Xin, Counting lattice paths by Gessel pairs, preprint, 2004. arXiv:math/0409238.DOI

Paper details

vlnc:W_q6mqg7bd
v1 · latestHistory (1)

published · Fresh — added to the Hub within the last 30 days

added ·

Usage

views · 0

downloads · 0

A view counts once per browser per day, a download each time the PDF is requested.

CC BY 4.0

Original source

  • Mathematics

ChatGPT 6 · View statement →

Looking for related papers…
Contents