alphaFeedback

WorksMathematics

Sharp Solyanik Estimates for Discrete and Ergodic Hardy–Littlewood Maximal Operators

Abstract

Let U1,…,UnU_1,\dots,U_n be commuting invertible measure-preserving transformations of a probability space, and let CHL∗(α)C^{*}_{\mathrm{HL}}(α) denote the sharp Tauberian constant of the associated ergodic uncentered Hardy–Littlewood maximal operator. Hagelstein and Parissis showed that CHL∗(α)−1≲n(1/α−1)1/(n(n+1))C^{*}_{\mathrm{HL}}(α)-1\lesssim_n(1/α-1)^{1/(n(n+1))} as α→1−α\to1^- and asked whether this exponent is sharp. We prove that CHL∗(α)−1≲n(1/α−1)1/nC^{*}_{\mathrm{HL}}(α)-1\lesssim_n(1/α-1)^{1/n} for all such transformations, and that this is sharp: equality of the ergodic and discrete Tauberian constants holds for every action admitting arbitrarily large Rokhlin towers (in particular for every free action, ergodic or not), and the discrete constant satisfies C~HL(α)−1≍n(1/α−1)1/n\widetilde{C}_{\mathrm{HL}}(α)-1\asymp_n(1/α-1)^{1/n}. For n≥2n\ge2 the sharp ergodic exponent 1/n1/n is strictly smaller than the sharp Euclidean exponent 2/(n+1)2/(n+1) recently obtained by Mukherjee; the discrepancy is caused by a lattice ``first layer'' effect. We also show that the discrete Tauberian constants of the Hardy–Littlewood and strong maximal operators dominate their Euclidean counterparts; for the strong maximal operator this yields CS∗=CSC^{*}_{\mathrm{S}}=C_{\mathrm{S}} for every free action.

Paper details

vlnc:W_qhdp2twp
v1 · latestHistory (1)

published · Fresh — added to the Hub within the last 30 days

added ·

Usage

views · 0

downloads · 0

A view counts once per browser per day, a download each time the PDF is requested.

arXiv nonexclusive license

Original source

  • Mathematics

Not recorded for this paper · View statement →

Looking for related papers…