alphaFeedback

WorksPhysics and Astronomy

Early panchromatic spectra reveal helium in the thermonuclear supernova 2024kce

AI contributions
Not recorded for this paper
View details
Ancillary data
1 code link
View

Abstract

Faint Type I supernovae blur the boundaries between spectroscopic classes, obscuring their progenitors and explosion mechanisms. One proposed origin is a double detonation, in which ignition of an accreted helium shell triggers the explosion of a carbon oxygen white dwarf. Surviving helium is a direct prediction of this mechanism, but its strongest near-infrared feature overlaps with carbon and is ambiguous in isolation. Here we present SN 2024kce, observed with simultaneous optical and near-infrared spectroscopy eleven days before maximum light. We identify He I absorption at three wavelengths, all consistent with a velocity of 16,400 km/s, well above the photosphere. This is the first detection of helium before maximum light in a thermonuclear supernova. Helium at these velocities requires nearby radioactive material for non-thermal excitation, pointing to ash from a detonated surface helium shell. A double detonation model reproduces the optical spectral evolution, suppressed blue flux, and He I 1.083 micron absorption feature. SN 2024kce shares properties with both subluminous Type Ia supernovae and Ia-like calcium-rich transients, providing evidence that the same explosion mechanism operates across these classes. From early optical and near-infrared spectra to Rubin's First Look images, SN 2024kce showcases the full reach of modern observatories in exposing the physics of rare explosions.

affiliation: aff-11 | | | | affiliation: aff-12 | | | | affiliation: aff-13 | | | | affiliation: aff-14 | | | | affiliation: aff-15 | | | |

Main:

Type Ia supernovae (SNe) are the thermonuclear explosions of white dwarfs (WDs), and their role as cosmological distance indicators makes the question of how WDs explode, one of the most consequential open problems in astrophysics. A leading theory is the double detonation mechanism, in which the ignition of an accreted helium shell drives a shock into the WD and detonates its carbon oxygen (C/O) core [1, 2, 3]. Operating across a range of core and shell masses, this mechanism has been proposed for normal SNe Ia [4, 5] as well as the faint outskirts of the thermonuclear population, from subluminous 91bg-like SNe Ia [6, 7] to calcium-rich transients (Ca-RTs) [8, 9]. The mechanism carries a testable prediction: some helium should survive the shell detonation and, in systems with a large helium shell, imprint high velocity absorption on the earliest spectra [6, 10]. Testing this prediction requires observations that are both early and panchromatic. The strongest NIR helium line, He I λ1.083 µm, can overlap with C I λ1.069 µm, making the feature ambiguous in isolation. A secure identification requires simultaneous optical and NIR spectroscopy that covers the weaker corroborating helium transitions while the outer ejecta still shape the spectrum.

Here we present SN 2024kce, a peculiar Type I SN observed with simultaneous optical and NIR spectroscopy eleven days before maximum light, when the spectrum still probes the outermost ejecta. We establish a thermonuclear origin for SN 2024kce and identify high velocity helium in its outer layers through absorption at three separate wavelengths, providing the first detection of helium before maximum light in a thermonuclear SN. A double detonation model reproduces the spectral evolution and exhibits He I λ1.083 µm absorption from surviving helium that is co-located with radioactive shell ashes. We therefore identify SN 2024kce as the product of a helium shell double detonation. Because SN 2024kce shares properties with both subluminous SNe Ia and Ia-like Ca-RTs, establishing its origin provides evidence that the same explosion mechanism operates across these observational classes.

SN 2024kce, a Peculiar Thermonuclear Transient:

SN 2024kce was discovered by the Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF) on 02 June 2024 [13] in M49 (see Figure 1) and classified as a peculiar Type Ia SN three days later [14]. Including the classification spectrum, our spectroscopic follow-up began three days after discovery. The following night we obtained simultaneous optical and near-infrared (NIR) spectra eleven days before peak, while the outermost ejecta still shaped the spectrum. The series spans −12 to +39 days relative to peak, with three additional late-time spectra at +190, +210, and +233 days, taken after the SN entered the nebular phase (Figure 2). These are among the earliest panchromatic spectra obtained of a faint Type I SN and include the earliest NIR spectrum to date of a transient that evolves to show the strong nebular calcium emission characteristic of a calcium rich transient (Ca-RT).

M49, the host galaxy of SN 2024kce

Figure 1. M49, the host galaxy of SN 2024kce. We examine the host M49 and location of SN 2024kce. The purple square shows the host imaged by DESI DR10 [11]; the location of SN 2024kce (pink plus), 61.4 kpc projected offset from galactic center, appears to be outside of the galactic halo. SN 2024kce was captured in the first look images for the Vera C. Rubin Observatory [12] (the large panel). A zoom in of the host (teal square) shows that SN 2024kce resides within the diffuse stellar light of M49, in a remote stellar population with no evidence for an underlying satellite or other galactic substructure. A final zoom in (pink square) reveals the SN roughly a year after explosion. The spiral galaxy near SN 2024kce in the zoomed in region is a background galaxy, not associated with SN 2024kce or M49. Image adapted from The Cosmic Treasure Chest. NSF–DOE Vera C. Rubin Observatory/NOIRLab/SLAC/NSF/DOE/AURA

Spectroscopic evolution of SN 2024kce

Figure 2. Spectroscopic evolution of SN 2024kce. Top: Optical spectra spanning −12 days before peak to +233 days after peak. Photospheric spectra are shown above and nebular spectra below. Greyed out flux denotes an artifact from the dichroic in the SNIFs spectra. Dashed lines show tellurics. Bottom: NIR spectra spanning −11 days before peak to +39 days after peak. Greyed out regions denote un-recovered telluric contamination.

Across its evolution, SN 2024kce does not map cleanly onto an established spectroscopic subtype. At early times it exhibits absorption from intermediate-mass elements including Si, S, and Ca, supporting a thermonuclear origin, together with the strong Ti absorption typical of 91bg-like SNe Ia. In the nebular phase, however, SN 2024kce

develops the strong [Ca II] emission seen in Ca-RTs. Weak [Fe II] and [Fe III] emission also remain present, indicating either a larger quantity of iron-group material, or that the iron-group material remains less mixed with the calcium, than in a typical Ca-RT [15].

The environment of SN 2024kce provides independent evidence for a thermonuclear origin. The transient lies 61.4 kpc in projection from the center of M49, a remote location similar to those of many Ca-RTs [16]. In previous surveys, its position appeared to lie outside the galactic light entirely (purple square, Figure 1, left). Imaging obtained roughly one year after the explosion by the Vera C. Rubin Observatory shows that SN 2024kce instead lies within the diffuse stellar light of M49, with no visible underlying satellite (teal square, Figure 1, right). The small galaxy that sits near SN 2024kce in the most zoomed in panel of our figure (pink square, Figure 1) is a background galaxy with photo-z = 0.114 ± 0.0336 [17, 18] which we rule out as host. The remote stellar population at the location of SN 2024kce favors an old progenitor such as a WD, independently supporting the thermonuclear interpretation of its spectra.

Our early panchromatic spectra provide a direct probe of the material in the outer ejecta. Figure 3 shows the simultaneous optical and NIR spectra obtained −11 days before peak, together with two more panchromatic epoch at −8, and +39 days. Most absorption features in the earliest spectrum lie near the photospheric velocity of 12,500 ± 170 km/s (measured from Si II λ6355\lambda6355 Å), and are unusually narrow for such high velocities. In addition to the broad trough that sits around the photospheric velocity the Ca II NIR triplet also exhibits a high velocity component, by time of peak brightness this high velocity feature stabilizes at a velocity around 20,000 km/s becomes detached from the broader feature starting in our +14 day spectrum. The Si II λ6355\lambda6355 feature also exhibits a similar feature at 17,000 km/s, although here the high velocity component is detached from the earliest spectrum on. The NIR spectrum also contains a trough at λ1.024 μm\lambda1.024\,\mu\mathrm{m} that can be produced by either He I or C I. Distinguishing between these identifications requires confirmation from other spectral lines covered by the simultaneous optical and NIR spectra.

Panchromatic optical and NIR spectra of SN 2024kce

Figure 3. Panchromatic optical and NIR spectra of SN 2024kce. Our panchromatic spectra consist of two early epochs (-11 and -8 days before peak) and one late time epoch (+39 days post peak). Common lines are drawn to guide the eye, blue-shifted to an ejecta velocity of 12,500 km/s (characteristic of the photosphere at -11 days). He I features are shown at 16,400 km/s. We focus on the feature at 1.024 μ\mum (denoted with a question mark) and examine whether it arises from He I or C I.

Helium in a Thermonuclear Transient:

Identifying the λ1.024 μm\lambda1.024\,\mu\mathrm{m} absorption requires distinguishing between two plausible contributors, He I λ1.083 μm\lambda1.083\,\mu\mathrm{m} and C I λ1.069 μm\lambda1.069\,\mu\mathrm{m}, the latter of which has been used to explain similar features in other thermonuclear SNe [19, 20, 21, 22, 23]. Our simultaneous optical and NIR spectra allow us to test these identifications through the other transitions of each ion.

In Figure 4, we examine whether the λ1.024 μm\lambda1.024\,\mu\mathrm{m} feature in our early NIR spectrum should be attributed to He I or C I. The two identifications imply different velocities in our earliest spectrum: a high-velocity He I feature at 16,400 km/s or C I near the photospheric velocity at 12,770 km/s. We trace the evolution of the feature through the optical and NIR spectra, searching for accompanying absorption at each of these velocities. The panels are ordered by expected line strength. We identify accompanying He I λ2.058 μm\lambda2.058\,\mu\mathrm{m} absorption in the NIR and He I λ7065\lambda7065 Å in the optical at consistent velocities across the ions, with a tentative detection of He I λ7281\lambda7281 Å. Together, these features support identifying the λ1.024 μm\lambda1.024\,\mu\mathrm{m} trough with He I λ1.083 μm\lambda1.083\,\mu\mathrm{m}. We also a tentative carbon detection. While there is no detection of C II λ\lambda6580 Å which is typically the strongest optical carbon line in thermonuclear SNe, we do see hints of C I λ\lambda9406 Å and C I λ\lambda11330 Å, particularly in the earliest spectra, indicating that the carbon sits at a lower ionization level than typically seen in thermonuclear SNe. Therefore it is reasonable to conclude that carbon also contributes to the λ\lambda1.024 μ\mum feature. The apparent contribution of both helium and carbon to the λ\lambda1.024 μ\mum NIR feature in SN 2024kce has important implications for interpreting similar features in other Type I SNe. Identifying corroborating features from one element is not sufficient to rule out a contribution from the other.

Analysis of the 1.024 µm feature

Figure 4. Analysis of the λ\lambda1.024 μ\mum feature. The colored dashed lines represent the estimated velocities of He I (blue) and C I (orange) implied by the λ\lambda1.024 μ\mum feature in our -11d NIR spectrum. The shaded wedges are placed to guide the eye to the feature minima along the right edge of the shaded region. The grey dotted lines show the rest frame wavelengths. Panels are plotted in order of expected line strength. We determine positive detections for He I λ\lambda20581 and 7065 Å, with tentative detections for He I λ\lambda7281A˚aswellasCIÅ as well as C I\lambda$9406, and 11330 Å. We therefore infer both He I λ\lambda1.083 μ\mum and C I λ\lambda1.069 μ\mum contribute to the feature seen at λ\lambda1.024 μ\mum.

In total, we conclusively identify He I absorption at λ\lambda1.083 μ\mum and λ\lambda2.058 μ\mum in the NIR and He I λ\lambda7065 Å in the optical, with a tentative detection of He I λ\lambda7281 Å. This is the first thermonuclear supernova with helium absorption detected before maximum light, and the first in which the identification is verified by absorption at three separate wavelengths. The identification is further supported by the persistence of He I λ\lambda1.083 μ\mum and He I λ\lambda7065 Å across multiple pre-maximum epochs, allowing us to follow the helium as the ejecta evolves. The He I λ\lambda2.058 μ\mum NIR feature is particularly difficult to recover because it lies near a strong telluric band, requiring careful telluric correction. We recover it only with the observing strategy employed in the earliest NIR epoch, observed with the Folded-port InfraRed Echellette (FIRE) spectrometer [24], emphasizing the importance of the early observations and careful telluric reduction for securing the identification.

In SNe Ib the strongest optical He feature is He I λ\lambda5876 Å, but in SN 2024kce we do not identify a distinct absorption trough from this line. This region contains many blended lines, including Si II λ\lambda5972 Å and the Ti II forest, which could obscure the helium absorption. We see a shoulder at the expected wavelength, but without the other He I lines present we would not identify it as a detection. The strengths of the optical He I lines are not solely proportional to the helium mass, depending instead on the distribution of radioactive material, the composition, and the radiation field [25]. A weak He I λ\lambda5876 Å therefore does not argue against the identification. He I λ\lambda7065 Å, however, is present and grows in strength over time, as expected from the behavior of this line in SNe Ib [26].

The detection tells us something about where this helium must reside. Its velocity places it significantly above the photosphere, and the broad line with a lack of a P-Cygni feature indicates the helium lies within the SN ejecta rather than in a helium rich circumstellar medium. Therefore, the helium must lie in the outer most SN ejecta.

He I lines are not thermally populated at the temperatures found in the outskirts of SN ejecta; they require non-thermal electrons, produced when gamma rays from radioactive decay Compton scatter in the ejecta, to excite and ionize the helium [27]. The helium we observe must therefore lie close enough to radioactive material to be excited by it, and only a modest helium mass mixed with that material is needed to produce a visible line [28]. In thermonuclear SNe the radioactive material is typically synthesized in the core of the explosion, not the outer layers. An exception is when the explosion is initiated by a helium-shell detonation, which leaves radioactive ash in the outermost ejecta. Together, the high velocity of the helium and its need for nearby radioactive material point to a detonated surface helium shell.

The Nature of SN 2024kce:

Typical C/O WDs retain little to no helium of their own, so this material must generally be supplied by a binary companion. In the double detonation scenario, the amount of helium on the surface of the C/O WD depends on the nature of that companion. Very little helium is transferred when the donor is a He WD or another C/O WD undergoing a dynamical merger (the D6 mechanism) [29]. These thin shell systems can produce normal Type Ia SNe [4, 6] (see SN 2018aoz [30, 31]). A non-degenerate companion, such as a He sub-dwarf, can donate substantially more helium before the explosion. These thick shell double detonations produce peculiar thermonuclear SNe with red colors at early times and can imprint strong line blanketing at blue wavelengths through peak brightness [6, 32] (see SN 2018byg [33]). The shell mass required for detonation decreases as the WD mass increases [8]. In addition to Type Ia SNe, a helium shell detonation has also been proposed for the Ia-like Ca-RT SN 2016hnk [34], although a Chandrasekhar-mass origin has also been proposed [35].

With the exception of the late-time detection in SN 2022an [36], for which the lack of early data makes it difficult to establish a double detonation candidate had a conclusive detection of helium in its ejecta. This absence is not necessarily evidence that helium is missing: theoretical studies indicate that enough unburnt helium should remain in the outermost layers to produce a high velocity absorption feature [10, 37], and just as we see in SN 2024kce, such features are strongest in early NIR spectra, which have rarely been obtained.

The high velocity features SN 2024kce exhibits associated with Ca II NIR and Si II λ6355\lambda6355 are also explained nicely by a double detonation. These features require a kinematically detached region of calcium and silicon which sit at in a higher velocity region than the bulk of the respective element. A double detonation can naturally produce this condition should the helium shell be large enough that intermediate mass elements are synthesized in the helium shell ashes that sit in the outermost ejecta.

To test a double detonation origin for SN 2024kce, we compare our observations with ejecta models computed using the moving-mesh hydrodynamics code Cattails [38]. The model that best reproduces the spectroscopic evolution of SN 2024kce consists of a 0.69 M⊙0.69\ M_{\odot} C/O WD triggered by the ignition of a 0.09 M⊙0.09\ M_{\odot} helium shell. The explosion model retains 0.051 M⊙0.051\ M_{\odot} of unburnt helium between 13,300 and 22,000 km/s. This helium is co-located with the radioactive ash of the shell detonation, including 48Cr^{48}\mathrm{Cr}, 52Fe^{52}\mathrm{Fe}, and 56Ni^{56}\mathrm{Ni}. The model therefore places high velocity unburnt helium beside a source of non-thermal energy, as required by the line identification. The model also retains 0.01 M⊙0.01\ M_{\odot} unburnt carbon that lies in a thin layer just beneath the He shell ashes at a velocity of 12,300–13,300 km/s, consistent with the inferred velocity of the observed features.

We compute the predicted spectra with the radiative transport code Sedona [39]. Our treatment in Sedona is predominantly performed under the assumption of local thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE) with the exception of helium, and magnesium, for which we implement a full non-LTE (NLTE) treatment. This is vital for modeling our feature of interest as both He I, and Mg II require the non-thermal excitations not produced in LTE calculations.

Figure 5 shows the comparison between our Sedona results and SN 2024kce. The synthetic spectra match the optical evolution of SN 2024kce from −11.8-11.8 to +6.2+6.2 days, including the strong Ti and Fe absorption blueward of 5000 Å driving the red colors of SN 2024kce, which can result from line blanketing by helium burning ashes at blue wavelengths (Figure 5a, top, teal). The main systematic discrepancy is a lack of O I λ7773\lambda7773 Å in the optical spectrum, a feature known to depend sensitively on NLTE corrections [40]. The strength of the Si II λ6355\lambda6355 line is weaker in the model, but it does produce the high velocity component of the feature. For our three earliest epochs the model reproduces the NIR continuum as well as the absorption feature at λ1.024 μm\lambda1.024\ \mu\mathrm{m} (Figure 5a, bottom, orange). We start to see divergence between the model and SN 2024kce in the +8+8 d spectrum, likely due to the ejecta becoming optically thin in the NIR earlier than the optical, requiring more NLTE corrections to properly capture.

SN 2024kce compared with a double detonation model

(a) SN 2024kce (black) compared with our best fit double detonation model, a 0.69 M⊙M_\odot WD with a 0.09 M⊙M_\odot He shell. Top: Optical spectra (teal). Bottom: NIR spectra (orange) with a zoom-in on the λ\lambda 1.024μ\mum feature we attribute to He I λ\lambda1.083 μ\mum.

The 1.024 micrometre feature modeled with four NLTE species combinations

(b) The λ\lambda 1.024μ\mum feature modeled with four different combinations of NLTE species activated in the radiative transport calculations. The LTE version (purple) makes no feature in this region, and our NLTE helium (blue) and magnesium (green) runs show contributions from both elements in the 1μ\mum region. The combination of both NLTE helium and magnesium (orange) reproduces the feature observed in SN 2024kce.

Figure 5. A double detonation model compared to the spectroscopic behavior of SN 2024kce.

Figure 5b compares the λ1.024μm\lambda1.024\mu\mathrm{m} feature in the −9-9 day SN 2024kce spectrum to our model when activating different choices of species in NLTE during the radiative transport calculations. We in turn try a full LTE calculation (purple), calculations where we turn on only NLTE magnesium and helium in turn (green and blue), and our final model where both helium and magnesium are treated in NLTE (orange). When the radiative transport is performed fully in LTE the λ1.024μm\lambda1.024\mu\mathrm{m} feature is not created, so while there is carbon in the modeled ejecta, a contribution from C I λ1.069 μm\lambda1.069\ \mu\mathrm{m} is not strong enough to create this feature on its own. The runs in which magnesium and helium are each treated in NLTE alone show that both elements can contribute to the absorption trough. We note that these runs cannot be taken as additive, treating both elements in NLTE changes the electron density, temperature, and non-thermal energy budget that each species sees, so the combined spectrum is not the sum of the two separate NLTE models. Our final, combined, run shows that both NLTE magnesium and helium are necessary to achieve the feature as we see it in SN 2024kce.

Throughout the photospheric evolution of SN 2024kce the double detonation model reproduces the red colors, the NIR continuum, the photospheric feature velocities, and the high velocity He I absorption. The excellent agreement between these independent spectral constraints supports a helium shell double detonation origin for SN 2024kce.

Implications for Understanding the Thermonuclear Landscape

Figure 6 compares SN 2024kce with low luminosity, fast declining SNe Ia and Ca-RTs. No single comparison object resembles the full spectral evolution. At optical wavelengths, SN 2024kce exhibits the strong Ti and Fe absorption associated with 91bg-like SNe Ia. Its optical spectra also show a strong resemblance to the Ia-like Ca-RTs SN 2016hnk and PTF09dav. SN 2024kce, however, is considerably redder than the comparison SNe. The degree of blue suppression in SN 2024kce lies between these events and the thick he-shell double detonation candidate SN 2018byg, whose blue wavelengths are almost entirely blanketed through peak light [33]. This intermediate amount of line blanketing is consistent with the helium shell ashes produced in the model presented above.

SN 2024kce compared with fast declining SNe Ia and Ca-RTs

Figure 6. SN 2024kce compared with fast declining SNe Ia and Ca-RTs. Optical spectra are shown on the left (separated by SNe Ia on the top and Ca-RTs on the bottom) and NIR spectra on the right. SN 2024kce lies between the two classes, optically appearing more like a Ia-like Ca-RT, while resembling a sub-luminous SN Ia in the NIR.

The NIR spectra reveal a similarly mixed set of characteristics. The early NIR continuum shows a reasonable match to the SNe Ia, although absorption features are all stronger in SN 2024kce than other SNe Ia at similar phases. In the +8 day spectrum SN 2024kce exhibits a sharp rise in flux near 1.5 μ\mum, resembling an H-band break [41], although not nearly as strong as that seen in 91bg-like SN 2022xkq. This feature is consistent with blended Fe and Co absorption, providing an independent indication that SN 2024kce contains the iron-group ejecta characteristic of a thermonuclear explosion. At any given phase SN 2024kce looks less like the Ca-RTs in the NIR. Neither Ca-RT exhibits an H-band break, and SN 2016hnk shows overall stronger and narrower features than SN 2024kce. The Ca feature near near 1.2 μ\mum is stronger in SN 2024kce than in the SNe Ia, but weaker than in the Ca-RTs. Perhaps most peculiar is the strong resemblance between the rising -8 day SN 2024kce spectrum and the post maximum +10 day spectrum of the Ib/c-like Ca-RT SN 2021gno. Several of the SNe Ia also show the double absorption feature near λ\lambda1.02 μ\mum that we attribute to He I and Mg II in SN 2024kce. In those events, the blue component has instead been attributed to C I because no corroborating helium absorption was identified elsewhere in their spectra.

SN 2022an provides the closest comparison to the helium absorption in SN 2024kce, although in SN 2022an the λ\lambda1.02μ\mum feature was first observed a month or more after maximum light at a velocity of ∼\sim 13,000 km/s [36]. A direct velocity comparison remains difficult due to the lack in overlap of NIR spectral phases where the feature is strongest. We also note that the He I λ\lambda7065 becomes too blended to measure reliably in SN 2024kce beyond +21 days, while the absorption in SN 2022an persists to nearly +90 days. Perhaps indicating that there is more, or longer lived, radioactive material co-located with the helium in SN 2022an, hinting towards a larger helium shell.

It has been suggested that the strong NIR feature at ∼\sim1 μ\mum in the +23 d spectrum of SN 2020jgb also arises from unburnt helium in a double detonation, which would require a velocity of ∼\sim22,000 km/s [42]. A similar feature is present in the +7 d spectrum of SN 2016hnk [34]. If this identification is correct, it would require the

radioactive ash in the helium shell to extend to significantly higher velocities than in our model, since the helium must be co-located with the radioactive material that excites it. We note, however, that the red shoulder adjacent to this feature aligns much more closely with the helium velocities we infer for SN 2024kce. The Ca II NIR features in double detonation candidates SN 2020jgb and SN 2018byg span a considerably larger velocity range than in SN 2024kce, covering both high-velocity and photospheric components, and both were well fit by double-detonation models with more massive helium shells than we infer for SN 2024kce [33, 42]. It is therefore possible that the radioactive species in such massive shells extend to high enough velocities to excite helium where the SN 2020jgb feature forms. An NLTE investigation would be needed to establish whether a feature so qualitatively different from the one we model can arise by this mechanism.

The failure of any single comparison object to reproduce SN 2024kce is itself informative. Its Ti and Fe absorption and H-band break are characteristic of a subluminous thermonuclear SN, while its strong calcium and resemblance to SN 2016hnk place it among the Ia-like Ca-RTs. Because the helium shell double detonation mechanism has been proposed for both groups, identifying this explosion mechanism in an event with properties between them strengthens the case that low luminosity SNe Ia and at least some Ca-RTs share a common origin. The helium detection may extend this connection further. Ca-RTs are commonly separated into Ia-like and Ib/c-like events in part through the presence or absence of helium. The detection of helium in the outer ejecta of a thermonuclear explosion shows that helium absorption alone cannot distinguish between thermonuclear and stripped-envelope progenitors. Some events classified as Ib/c-like Ca-RTs may therefore also arise from thermonuclear explosions, although SN 2024kce does not establish that all Ca-RTs share a single origin.

The faint, fast transients that populate the edges of the thermonuclear population have been difficult to understand in part because so few have been observed. The Rubin Observatory will discover these events in far greater numbers [43], but SN 2024kce demonstrates that finding them is not sufficient. Reading the composition of their outermost ejecta requires optical and NIR spectra obtained together and early, while that material still shapes the spectrum. The feature near λ1.02 μm\lambda1.02\ \mu\mathrm{m} is ambiguous in isolation. Simultaneous optical and NIR spectroscopy reveals the corroborating He I transitions needed to identify it as helium. The infrared is equally valuable at the opposite end of the evolution. Our nebular spectra already place SN 2024kce between the classes it resembles, with the strong [Ca II] emission of a Ca-RT alongside iron-group emission that a typical Ca-RT alone would not produce. In the optical those iron features are heavily blended, and the abundances they imply are correspondingly uncertain. Late time nebular infrared spectroscopy could resolve this tension and for events like SN 2024kce it could establish whether the inner ejecta more closely resemble those of a subluminous SN Ia or something distinct. Looking forward, the combination of early panchromatic follow-up and late-time JWST spectroscopy is essential to bracket these explosions, constraining both the helium shell and the C/O core.

Methods

Observations

SN 2024kce (ZTF24aaqaroi) was discovered by the Zwicky Transient Facility [13, 44] on 2024 June 2 (MJD 60463.195) at mg=17.55±0.05m_g = 17.55 \pm0.05 mag and classified as a peculiar Type Ia supernova on 2024 June 5 [14]. The last physically constraining non-detection was an ATLAS oo-band limit of 19.51 mag at MJD 60462.340, followed by an ATLAS cc-band detection at 18.22±0.1618.22 \pm0.16 mag at MJD 60463.065 [45]. These observations constrain the emergence of detectable emission to a 0.72 d interval.

Phases throughout this work are quoted in rest-frame days relative to rr-band maximum mr=13.5m_r = 13.5 at MJD 60478.076 (2024 June 17) shared by private communication with Sears et al. (in preparation).

Optical spectroscopy

Our optical spectroscopic series consists of 16 spectra: 13 photospheric-phase spectra obtained from −12-12 to +39+39 d relative to rr-band maximum and 3 nebular spectra obtained at +190+190, +210+210, and +233+233 d (Figure 2 and Table 1). The first spectrum, taken on 2024 June 5 with the Kast double spectrograph on the Lick Shane 3 m telescope [46], was obtained from the TNS classification report [14]. One photospheric-phase spectrum was obtained on 2024 June 6 with IMACS on the Magellan Baade 6.5 m telescope [47]. IMACS was also used to take the two nebular spectra on 2024 December 24 and 2025 January 13. Ten epochs were obtained with the SuperNova Integral Field Spectrograph (SNIFS) on the University of Hawai‘i 2.2 m telescope [48] through the Spectroscopic Classification of Astronomical Transients (SCAT) survey [49]. The −7-7 d spectrum was observed using the Wide Field Spectrograph (WiFeS) which is mounted on the Australian National University (ANU)’s 2.3 m telescope at Siding Springs Observatory [50, 51, 52]. Another nebular spectrum was obtained with the Keck Cosmic Web Imager (KCWI) [53] on 2025 February 5.

UT DateMJDPhase (d)TelescopeInstrumentRange (μ\mum)Exp. (s)
2024 Jun 5.2360466.23−11.8Lick Shane 3 mKast0.35–1.03
2024 Jun 6.1260467.12−11.0Magellan BaadeFIRE0.80–2.508×1278 \times127
2024 Jun 6.1660467.16−10.9Magellan BaadeIMACS0.42–0.942×1202 \times120
2024 Jun 8.3760469.37−8.7Gemini-NorthGNIRS0.83–2.534×3004 \times300
2024 Jun 9.3260470.32−7.8Gemini-NorthGNIRS0.85–2.534×3004 \times300
2024 Jun 9.3660470.36−7.7UH 2.2 mSNIFS0.34–0.911800
2024 Jun 10.4060471.40−6.7ANU 2.3 mWiFeS0.34–0.95600
2024 Jun 11.2960472.29−5.8UH 2.2 mSNIFS0.34–0.911200
2024 Jun 13.3260474.32−3.8UH 2.2 mSNIFS0.34–0.911800
2024 Jun 19.3360480.33+2.3UH 2.2 mSNIFS0.34–0.911800
2024 Jun 23.3060484.30+6.2UH 2.2 mSNIFS0.34–0.911800
2024 Jun 25.2760486.27+8.2NASA IRTFSpeX0.69–2.5410×12010 \times120
2024 Jul 1.2960492.29+14.2UH 2.2 mSNIFS0.34–0.911800
2024 Jul 3.2960494.29+16.2UH 2.2 mSNIFS0.34–0.911800
2024 Jul 8.2760499.27+21.2UH 2.2 mSNIFS0.34–0.911800
2024 Jul 21.2960512.29+34.2UH 2.2 mSNIFS0.34–0.911800
2024 Jul 26.2660517.26+39.2UH 2.2 mSNIFS0.34–0.911800
2024 Jul 26.2660517.26+39.2Gemini-NorthGNIRS0.83–2.538×2008 \times200
2024 Dec 24.3160668.31+190.2Magellan BaadeIMACS0.42–0.942×18002 \times1800
2025 Jan 13.3060688.30+210.2Magellan BaadeIMACS0.42–0.943×12003 \times1200
2025 Feb 5.4060711.40+233.3Keck IIKCWI (blue)0.34–0.562×700+6202 \times700 + 620
KCWI (red)0.56–0.926×300+656 \times300 + 65

Table 1. Spectroscopic observations of SN 2024kce. Phases are in days relative to rr-band maximum (MJD 60478.08). Exposures are listed as Nexp×texpN_{\mathrm{exp}} \times t_{\mathrm{exp}} where the final spectrum is a combination of individual frames.

Near-infrared spectroscopy

We obtained five NIR spectra between −11-11 and +39+39 d relative to rr-band maximum. The earliest was obtained on UT 2024 June 6.12 (−11.0-11.0 d) with the Folded-port InfraRed Echellette (FIRE) [24] on the Magellan Baade 6.5 m telescope at Las Campanas Observatory. This observation began within an hour of the IMACS optical spectrum, providing the −11-11 d panchromatic view from 0.42 to 2.5 μ\mum shown in Figure 3.

FIRE was configured in its high-throughput prism mode with the 0.6″ slit, providing continuous coverage from 0.8 to 2.5 μ\mum at resolving powers of R∼500R \sim500, ∼450\sim450, and ∼300\sim300 in the JJ, HH, and KK bands, respectively. The target was nodded along the slit in an ABBA sequence, and the science frames were obtained in sample-up-the-ramp readout mode to suppress read noise.

Three additional spectra were obtained with GNIRS on Gemini North [54] on 2024 June 8.37, 9.32, and 26.26, corresponding to phases of −8.7-8.7, −7.8-7.8 d, and +39.2+39.2 d as part of the Hawai‘i Infrared Supernova Study (HISS; [55, 56, 57]). The latter was obtained contemporaneously with a SNIFS spectrum, providing the −8-8 d panchromatic epoch shown in Figure 3. The final NIR spectrum was also obtained by HISS at +8.2+8.2 d with SpeX [58] on the NASA Infrared Telescope Facility.

Data reduction

SNIFS data were reduced by the SCAT pipeline [49]. IMACS data were reduced with IRAF [59, 60]. Reductions included bias subtraction, flat fielding, wavelength calibration with arc lamp exposures obtained right before or after the SN observation, and flux calibration with spectra of spectrophotometric standard stars observed during the same night as the science targets.

SpeX data were reduced using the SPEXTOOL [61] and XTELLCOR packages [62] following standard HISS reduction steps [55, 56, 57].

The KCWI cubes were reduced with the Keck-supported Keck Cosmic Web Imager data reduction pipeline [63]. The spectrum was extracted using a 0.80.8″ radius aperture centered on the SN.

GNIRS data were reduced using standard procedures implemented in PypeIt [64, 65] following the standard HISS data reduction [56, 57]. For the data taken on 2024 July 26, we use the calibration files from 2024 June 08. Features in the +39+39 day NIR spectrum should be viewed as approximate, and we limit the use of this spectrum to qualitative statements.

WiFeS data were reduced using the updated pyWiFeS reduction pipeline [52, 66], while flux calibration was obtained using a spectrophotometric standard star that was observed on the same night.

The FIRE observing strategy and reduction procedures are designed to recover features from the edges of the telluric region. This methodology was essential for recovering the He I λ2.06 μm\lambda2.06\ \mu\mathrm{m} feature in our −11-11 d NIR spectrum. Data were wavelength-calibrated using Ne and Ar arc-lamp exposures and reduced with the FIREHOSE IDL pipeline [24]. Telluric absorption was removed with the XTELLCOR package [62]. During the night we run an analysis to find the best choice for telluric standard at the time of our observation which selects for a A0V standard at as similar an airmass and sky location as the science object. We then observe that A0V standard using the same instrumental configuration immediately adjacent to the science exposures. Its intrinsic hydrogen Paschen and Brackett absorption was removed through comparison with a model spectrum of Vega, and the resulting telluric correction was applied to the SN spectrum. The standard also provided the flux calibration. This procedure was developed by previous studies [67, 68], for which the performance of the correction in the strong telluric region containing the blueshifted He I λ2.058 μm\lambda2.058\ \mu\mathrm{m} feature has been tested through the recovery of Paschen-α\alpha in SNe II [69].

All spectra shown in this work were shifted to the host-galaxy rest frame using z=0.003z = 0.003.

Host association, distance, and extinction

SN 2024kce lies at α=187.4565∘\alpha= 187.4565^\circ and δ=+8.213469∘\delta= +8.213469^\circ (J2000), at a projected separation of 61.4 kpc from the center of M49 (NGC 4472), the brightest member of the Virgo Cluster. Vera C. Rubin Observatory First Look imaging shows that the SN position falls within the faint extended halo light of M49, with no obvious underlying satellite or galactic substructure (Figure 1) [12]. The exposure time, filters, and limiting surface brightness of the release image have not been reported, so we use it only qualitatively and do not derive a limiting luminosity for an undetected satellite.

A faint galaxy, SDSS J122950.02+081300.9, lies close to SN 2024kce in projection, and we considered whether it, rather than M49, could be the host. The SDSS DR20 catalog gives zphot=0.114±0.034z_{\mathrm{phot}} = 0.114 \pm0.034 for this object [18], computed with a local linear regression method [17], placing it well behind the Virgo Cluster. Two independent checks rule it out as the host. First, the implied luminosity: at z=0.114z = 0.114 the distance modulus is μ=38.6\mu= 38.6 mag, so the observed peak of mr=13.5m_r = 13.5 mag would correspond to Mr≈−25M_r \approx-25, six magnitudes brighter than a normal SN Ia (Mr≈−19.1M_r \approx-19.1). At the M49 distance, by contrast, the peak corresponds to Mr=−17.5M_r = -17.5, 1.6 mag fainter than a normal SN Ia and typical of the fast-declining, subluminous Ia. Second, the ejecta kinematics would imply a photosphere velocity of ∼43,700\sim43{,}700 km/s (0.15c0.15c) (as measured from the Si II λ6355\lambda6355 trough) as opposed to the more typical ∼12,500\sim12{,}500 km/s with host M49. Velocities of this magnitude are not seen in any thermonuclear or stripped-envelope supernova at these epochs. We therefore rule out this galaxy as the host.

Given the host identification of M49 we adopt a distance modulus of μ=31.091±0.071\mu= 31.091 \pm0.071 mag [70], corresponding to a distance of d=16.5±0.5d = 16.5 \pm0.5 Mpc, and a heliocentric redshift of z=0.003z = 0.003.

We apply no correction for host-galaxy extinction. The remote halo environment and the absence of Na I D absorption at the host redshift in our highest-S/N spectra support negligible host extinction. We therefore interpret the unusually red spectral shape of SN 2024kce as intrinsic to the SN rather than the result of dust reddening.

Explosion models and radiative transfer

We simulate double detonation explosions of sub-Chandrasekhar mass white dwarfs using Cattails [32], a spherically symmetric moving-mesh nuclear hydrodynamics code [38]. Nuclear energy generation is calculated with a 13-isotope reaction network spanning 4He{}^{4}\mathrm{He} to 56Ni{}^{56}\mathrm{Ni}, generated with pynucastro [71, 72]. In order to best approximate the multi-dimensional nature of a helium shell ignition in our hydrodynamic simulations we ignite the white dwarf at the most combustible region, the pre-mixed material at the transition from core to shell. Each model starts by flipping up to 20% of the 4He{}^{4}\mathrm{He}, 12C{}^{12}\mathrm{C}, and 16O{}^{16}\mathrm{O} to 20Ne{}^{20}\mathrm{Ne} in a small region within the pre-mixed material and transferring the binding energy directly to thermal energy. The resulting hot spot will immediately burn past 20Ne{}^{20}\mathrm{Ne} to heavier intermediate mass elements and radioactive isotopes driving burning in the shell while sending a shockwave to the core to trigger the second detonation. In this manner we allow for the shell to burn and expand outwards for the full duration of shock wave convergence and core thermonuclear runaway, as seen in multi-D simulations (e.g. [5, 9]).

Our model grid spans total masses (MWD+MHeM_{\mathrm{WD}} + M_{\mathrm{He}}) of 0.74 to 0.84 M⊙M_{\odot} with helium shell masses of 0.05 to 0.14 M⊙M_{\odot}. Each calculation follows the helium shell detonation, shock convergence, and subsequent core detonation until the ejecta reach homologous expansion.

The homologous density, velocity, and composition profiles are mapped into the time dependent Monte Carlo radiative transfer code Sedona [39] to calculate synthetic light curves and spectra. The calculations assume local thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE) for all elements except helium and magnesium, for which we solve the full non-LTE (NLTE) statistical equilibrium in every zone at every time step: level populations and ionization follow from radiative rates driven by the Monte Carlo radiation field, collisional rates with thermal electrons, and non-thermal ionization and excitation by the fast electrons from radioactive decay, while the remaining species take Saha-Boltzmann populations at the local temperature and electron density. The electron density and gas temperature are solved for the mixture as a whole, with the NLTE species entering the energy balance through their explicit heating and cooling rates and the LTE species through Kirchhoff’s law. Atomic data are taken from the cmfgen compilation [73], including tabulated photoionization cross sections for helium. Because the electron density, temperature, radiation field, and non-thermal energy budget are shared by all species in a zone, the effects of treating helium or magnesium in NLTE are not additive, and we run the helium-only, magnesium-only, and combined cases as separate self-consistent calculations. We include energy contributions from the radioactive decay chains of 56Ni{}^{56}\mathrm{Ni}, 52Fe{}^{52}\mathrm{Fe}, and 48Cr{}^{48}\mathrm{Cr}. The latter two isotopes constitute most of the radioactive material synthesized in the helium shell and provide a local source of radioactive energy in the outer ejecta where the helium is distributed.

Among the calculated models, the model with a total mass of 0.78 M⊙0.78\,M_\odot, consisting of a 0.69 M⊙0.69\,M_\odot C/O core and a 0.09 M⊙0.09\,M_\odot helium shell, provides the closest agreement with the observed spectral evolution. The light curves and composition of this model are shown in Figure 7. We selected this model by first comparing the spectral colors from continuum shape, the suppression of flux blueward of 5000 A˚\mathring{\mathrm{A}}, and the velocity of the principal optical absorption features from −11.8-11.8 to +6.2+6.2 d, then narrowing our selection using the peak rr-band magnitude provided by Sears et al. (in prep). The final model is 0.2 mag brighter at rr-band maximum than SN 2024kce. Because the photometry of SN 2024kce is unpublished, the peak rr-band magnitude is the only photometric constraint currently available, and the model was therefore not overly tuned to the light curve. Matching the observed peak would require fine tuning the helium shell mass at the 10−3 M⊙10^{-3}\,M_\odot level on the basis of a single measurement.

Composition profiles and light curves of the best fit double detonation model

Figure 7. Additional aspects of our best fit double detonation model. Left: Composition of the ejecta. The shaded region shown both in the left panel and in the zoomed in panel denotes the region above a photosphere of 12,500 km/s indicated by the velocities in the −11 d spectrum. This region begins just below the base of the helium shell ashes. Right: Sedona light curves of our best fit model. The grey region denotes where the LTE assumption starts to break down as the ejecta begins to become optically thin. NLTE effects and emission features not produced by our LTE species contribute more to the ejecta flux as time from explosion increases.

Spectral line identification and velocity measurements

To measure the velocity evolution of the absorption complex near 1.02 μm1.02\,\mu\mathrm{m}, we normalize each NIR spectrum by a local linear pseudo-continuum anchored on either side of the feature. We fit the continuum-normalized spectrum from 9900 to 11100 A˚\mathring{\mathrm{A}} with two Gaussian absorption components using nonlinear least squares, masking regions affected by telluric absorption. We model the blue component as either He I λ1.083 μm\lambda1.083\,\mu\mathrm{m} or C I λ1.069 μm\lambda1.069\,\mu\mathrm{m} and identify the red component with Mg II λ1.093 μm\lambda1.093\,\mu\mathrm{m}. Under the helium identification, the blue component has a velocity of 16,400±12016{,}400 \pm120 km/s at −11.0-11.0 d and declines to 14,100±29014{,}100 \pm290 km/s by +8.2+8.2 d. Interpreting the same component as carbon would instead give 12,770±12012{,}770 \pm120 km/s at −11.0-11.0 d, consistent with the photospheric velocity of 12,500±17012{,}500 \pm170 km/s measured from Si II λ6355\lambda6355 at −10.9-10.9 d. The Mg II component has a velocity of 12,970±13012{,}970 \pm130 km/s at −10.9-10.9 d, also consistent with the photosphere.

Data availability

Upon publication the reduced optical and near-infrared spectra of SN 2024kce presented in this work will be made publicly available from the Weizmann Interactive Supernova Data Repository (WISeREP) [74] under the object name SN 2024kce. We will additionally include both observed and modeled data in a Zenodo deposit that will contain the Cattails ejecta profiles (density, velocity and composition) and the Sedona synthetic spectra and light curves for our model suite.

Code availability

All data reduction pipelines used in this work are publicly available. Cattails is publicly available at https://github.com/DHasenour/Cattails. Input files will be made available in the Zenodo release upon paper acceptance for publication.

The earliest optical spectrum is the TNS classification spectrum [14].

Acknowledgments

We thank Saurabh Jha for helpful discussions and for sharing the peak magnitude and time of maximum of SN 2024kce in advance of publication.

This paper includes data gathered with the 6.5 meter Magellan Telescopes located at Las Campanas Observatory, Chile. This data was acquired from time awarded when A.P. was a postdoc supported by a Carnegie Fellowship.

Based in part on data acquired at the ANU 2.3-metre telescope under program 2410166. The automation of the telescope was made possible through an initial grant provided by the Centre of Gravitational Astrophysics and the Research School of Astronomy and Astrophysics at the Australian National University and through a grant provided by the Australian Research Council through LE230100063. The Lens proposal system is maintained by the AAO Research Data & Software team as part of the Data Central Science Platform. We acknowledge the traditional custodians of the land on which the telescope stands, the Gamilaraay people, and pay our respects to elders past and present.

Some of the data presented herein were obtained at Keck Observatory, which is a private 501(c)3 non-profit organization operated as a scientific partnership among the California Institute of Technology, the University of California, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The Observatory was made possible by the

SNTypeUT DatePhase (d)Telescope/InstrumentRef.
SN 1999byIa-91bg1999 May 6−4 (NIR)MDM 2.4 m/TIFKAM[75]
1999 May 14+4 (Opt)FLWO 1.5 m/FAST[76]
PTF09davCa-rich2009 Aug 14+1 (Opt)WHT/ISIS[77]
2009 Aug 20+7 (Opt)P200/DBSP[77]
iPTF13ebhSN Ia2013 Nov 15−12 (Opt)HCT/HFOSC[19]
2013 Nov 16−11 (NIR)Magellan Baade/FIRE[19, 23]
2013 Nov 20−7 (NIR)Magellan Baade/FIRE[19, 23]
2013 Nov 23−4 (Opt)NOT/ALFOSC[19]
2013 Dec 9+12 (NIR)Magellan Baade/FIRE[19, 23]
2013 Dec 31+34 (Opt)Magellan Baade/IMACS[19]
SN 2016hnkCa-Ia2016 Oct 30+2 (Opt)SOAR/Goodman[34]
2016 Nov 2+5 (Opt)NTT/EFOSC2[35]
2016 Nov 4+7 (NIR)Gemini-S/FLAMINGOS-2[35]
2016 Nov 18+21 (Opt)NTT/EFOSC2[35]
SN 2018bygIa-pec2018 May 8−12 (Opt)P200/DBSP[33]
2018 May 17−2 (Opt)P200/DBSP[33]
SN 2020jgbIa-pec2020 May 13−4 (Opt)NOT/ALFOSC[42]
(double-det)2020 May 21+4 (Opt)P60/SEDM[42]
2020 Jun 9+23 (NIR)Gemini-N/GNIRS[42]
SN 2021gnoCa-rich2021 Mar 29+10 (NIR)IRTF/SpeX[78]
SN 2022anIa-91bg2022 Jan 7+6 (Opt)SOAR/Goodman[36, 79]
SN 2022jojSN Ia2022 May 11−12 (Opt)FTN/FLOYDS-N[80]
2022 May 23+0 (Opt)Lick Shane 3 m/Kast[81]
2022 Jun 7+15 (NIR)Keck II/NIRES[81]
SN 2022xkqIa-91bg2022 Oct 17−12 (Opt)SOAR/Goodman[20]
2022 Oct 17−12 (NIR)NTT/SofI[20]
2022 Oct 31+2 (Opt)NOT/ALFOSC[20]
2022 Nov 6+8 (NIR)Keck II/NIRES[20]
2022 Nov 13+17 (Opt)SALT/RSS[20]

Table 2. Comparison spectra used in Figure 6. Phases are in days relative to each object’s maximum light, using the peak epochs adopted in this work. Spectra were retrieved from WISeREP [74] and the Transient Name Server.

The following SNe have been proposed as double detonation candidates: SN 2016hnk [34], SN 2018byg [33], SN 2020jgb [42], SN 2022an [36], SN 2022joj [80, 81].

generous financial support of the W. M. Keck Foundation. The raw Keck Observatory data presented herein, once public, can be accessed from the Keck Observatory Archive (KOA), which is operated by the W. M. Keck Observatory and the NASA Exoplanet Science Institute (NExScI), under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The authors wish to recognize and acknowledge the very significant cultural role and reverence that the summit of Maunakea has always had within the Native Hawai‘ian community. We are most fortunate to have the opportunity to conduct observations from this mountain.

Funding Acknowledgments

A.P. acknowledges support from JWST-AR-10953.001-A awarded by the Space Telescope Science Institute (STScI), which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., for NASA, under contract NAS5-03127. J.H. acknowledges support from the NASA Hubble Fellowship program. D.O.J. acknowledges support from NSF grants AST-2407632, AST-2429450, AST-2510993, and AST-2607081, NASA grants 80NSSC24M0023 and 80NSSC24K0353, and JWST-GO-05324.031, awarded by the Space Telescope Science Institute (STScI), which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., for NASA, under contract NAS5-26555. This work is also funded in part by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation through Grant GBMF13900 to D.O.J.

References

  1. [1]Nomoto, K. Accreting white dwarf models for type 1 supernovae. II - Off-center detonation supernovae. Astrophys. J. 257, 780–792 (1982).DOI
  2. [2]Woosley, S. E. & Weaver, T. A. Sub-Chandrasekhar mass models for Type IA supernovae. Astrophys. J. 423, 371–379 (1994).
  3. [3]Livne, E. Successive detonations in accreting white dwarfs as an alternative mechanism for type I supernovae. Astrophys. J. Lett. 354, L53–L55 (1990).DOI
  4. [4]Shen, K. J., Kasen, D., Miles, B. J. & Townsley, D. M. Sub-Chandrasekhar-mass White Dwarf Detonations Revisited. Astrophys. J. 854, 52 (2018).DOI
  5. [5]Boos, S. J., Townsley, D. M., Shen, K. J., Caldwell, S. & Miles, B. J. Multidimen- sional Parameter Study of Double Detonation Type Ia Supernovae Originating from Thin Helium Shell White Dwarfs. Astrophys. J. 919, 126 (2021).
  6. [6]Polin, A., Nugent, P. & Kasen, D. Observational Predictions for Sub- Chandrasekhar Mass Explosions: Further Evidence for Multiple Progenitor Systems for Type Ia Supernovae. Astrophys. J. 873, 84 (2019).
  7. [7]Shen, K. J. & Bildsten, L. The Ignition of Carbon Detonations via Converging Shock Waves in White Dwarfs. Astrophys. J. 785, 61 (2014).DOI
  8. [8]Bildsten, L., Shen, K. J., Weinberg, N. N. & Nelemans, G. Faint Thermonuclear Supernovae from AM Canum Venaticorum Binaries. Astrophys. J. Lett. 662, L95–L98 (2007).DOI
  9. [9]Morán-Fraile, J., Holas, A., Röpke, F. K., Pakmor, R. & Schneider, F. R. N. Faint calcium-rich transient from a double detonation of a 0.6 M⊙ carbon-oxygen white dwarf star. Astron. & Astrophys. 683, A44 (2024).
  10. [10]Collins, C. E. et al. Helium as a signature of the double detonation in Type Ia supernovae. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 524, 4447–4454 (2023).
  11. [11]Dey, A. et al. Overview of the DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys. Astron. J. 157, 168 (2019).
  12. [12]NSF–DOE Vera C. Rubin Observatory. The Cosmic Treasure Chest. NSF NOIR-Lab image release noirlab2521a (2025). URL https://noirlab.edu/public/images/noirlab2521a/. RubinObs/NOIRLab/SLAC/NSF/DOE/AURA. Released 2025 June 23.
  13. [13]Sollerman, J., Fremling, C., Perley, D. & Laz, T. D. ZTF Transient Discovery Report for 2024-06-02. Transient Name Server Discovery Report 2024-1768, 1 (2024).
  14. [14]Taggart, K., Foley, R. J. & Izzo, L. UCSC Transient Classification Report for 2024-06-05. Transient Name Server Classification Report 2024-1809, 1 (2024).
  15. [15]Polin, A., Nugent, P. & Kasen, D. Nebular Models of Sub-Chandrasekhar Mass Type Ia Supernovae: Clues to the Origin of Ca-rich Transients. Astrophys. J. 906, 65 (2021).DOI
  16. [16]Lyman, J. D., Levan, A. J., Church, R. P., Davies, M. B. & Tanvir, N. R. The progenitors of calcium-rich transients are not formed in situ*. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 444, 2157–2166 (2014).DOI
  17. [17]Beck, R., Dobos, L., Budavári, T., Szalay, A. S. & Csabai, I. Photometric redshifts for the SDSS Data Release 12. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 460, 1371–1381 (2016).DOI
  18. [18]SDSS Collaboration et al. The Twentieth Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: First All-Sky BOSS Spectra, eROSITA-SDSS-V Mapper Coordinated Observations, and a Preview of the Local Volume Mapper. arXiv e-prints arXiv:2607.26149 (2026).
  19. [19]Hsiao, E. Y., Burns, C. R., Contreras, C., Höflich, P. et al. Strong near-infrared carbon in the Type Ia supernova iPTF13ebh. Astron. & Astrophys. 578, A9 (2015).DOI
  20. [20]Pearson, J. et al. Strong Carbon Features and a Red Early Color in the Underluminous Type Ia SN 2022xkq. Astrophys. J. 960, 29 (2024).arxiv.org/abs/2309.10054
  21. [21]Wyatt, S. D. et al. Strong Near-infrared Carbon Absorption in the Transitional Type Ia SN 2015bp. Astrophys. J. 914, 57 (2021).DOI
  22. [22]Li, Z. et al. SN 2012ij: A Low-luminosity Type Ia Supernova and Evidence for a Continuous Distribution from a 91bg-like Explosion to Normal Ones. Astrophys. J. 927, 142 (2022).DOI
  23. [23]Lu, J., Hsiao, E. Y., Phillips, M. M., Burns, C. R. et al. Carnegie Supernova Project. II. Near-infrared Spectral Diversity and Template of Type Ia Supernovae. Astrophys. J. 948, 27 (2023).
  24. [24]Simcoe, R. A. et al. FIRE: A Facility Class Near-Infrared Echelle Spectrometer for the Magellan Telescopes. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 125, 270 (2013).DOI
  25. [25]Lu, J. et al. Physics-driven Explosions of Stripped High-mass Stars: Synthetic Light Curves and Spectra of Stripped-envelope Supernovae with Broad Light Curves. Astrophys. J. 979, 148 (2025).
  26. [26]Liu, Y.-Q., Modjaz, M., Bianco, F. B. & Graur, O. Analyzing the Largest Spectroscopic Data Set of Stripped Supernovae to Improve Their Identifications and Constrain Their Progenitors. Astrophys. J. 827, 90 (2016).DOI
  27. [27]Lucy, L. B. Nonthermal Excitation of Helium in Type Ib Supernovae. Astrophys. J. 383, 308 (1991).DOI
  28. [28]Hachinger, S. et al. How much H and He is ’hidden’ in SNe Ib/c? - I. Low-mass objects. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 422, 70–88 (2012).
  29. [29]Shen, K. J. et al. Three Hypervelocity White Dwarfs in Gaia DR2: Evidence for Dynamically Driven Double-degenerate Double-detonation Type Ia Supernovae. Astrophys. J. 865, 15 (2018).DOI
  30. [30]Ni, Y. Q. et al. Infant-phase reddening by surface Fe-peak elements in a normal type Ia supernova. Nature Astronomy 6, 568–576 (2022).DOI
  31. [31]Ni, Y. Q. et al. The Origin and Evolution of the Normal Type Ia SN 2018aoz with Infant-phase Reddening and Excess Emission. Astrophys. J. 946, 7 (2023).
  32. [32]Hasenour, D., Duffell, P. & Polin, A. Double Detonations on a Moving Mesh with Cattails: Characterizing Early Reddening in SNe Ia. arXiv e-prints arXiv:2610.16899 (2026).arxiv.org/abs/2610.16899
  33. [33]De, K. et al. ZTF 18aaqeasu (SN2018byg): A Massive Helium-shell Double Detonation on a Sub-Chandrasekhar-mass White Dwarf. Astrophys. J. 873, L18 (2019).
  34. [34]Jacobson-Galán, W. V. et al. Ca hnk: The Calcium-rich Transient Supernova 2016hnk from a Helium Shell Detonation of a Sub-Chandrasekhar White Dwarf. Astrophys. J. 896, 165 (2020).
  35. [35]Galbany, L., Ashall, C., Höflich, P., González-Gaitán, S. et al. Evidence for a Chandrasekhar-mass explosion in the Ca-strong 1991bg-like type Ia supernova 2016hnk. Astron. & Astrophys. 630, A76 (2019).DOI
  36. [36]Chen, P. et al. Detection of Persistent Helium Absorption in the 91bg-like Type Ia Supernova 2022ann. Astrophys. J. Lett. 1004, L42 (2026).
  37. [37]Callan, F. P. et al. Exploring the range of impacts of helium in the spectra of double detonation models for Type Ia supernovae. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 539, 1404–1413 (2025).
  38. [38]Hasenour, D. L. & Duffell, P. C. Quantifying Advantages of a Moving Mesh in Nuclear Hydrodynamics. Astrophys. J. 981, 63 (2025).DOI
  39. [39]Kasen, D., Thomas, R. C. & Nugent, P. Time-dependent Monte Carlo Radiative Transfer Calculations for Three-dimensional Supernova Spectra, Light Curves, and Polarization. Astrophys. J. 651, 366–380 (2006).DOI
  40. [40]Dessart, L., Hillier, D. J., Li, C. & Woosley, S. On the nature of supernovae Ib and Ic. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 424, 2139–2159 (2012).DOI
  41. [41]Ashall, C. et al. A Physical Basis for the H-band Blue-edge Velocity and Light-curve Shape Correlation in Context of Type Ia Supernova Explosion Physics. Astrophys. J. 878, 86 (2019).DOI
  42. [42]Liu, C. et al. SN 2020jgb: A Peculiar Type Ia Supernova Triggered by a Helium-shell Detonation in a Star-forming Galaxy. Astrophys. J. 946, 83 (2023).DOI
  43. [43]Ivezić, Ž., Kahn, S. M., Tyson, J. A. et al. LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products. Astrophys. J. 873, 111 (2019).
  44. [44]Bellm, E. C. et al. The Zwicky Transient Facility: System Overview, Performance, and First Results. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 131, 018002 (2019).DOI
  45. [45]Tonry, J. L. et al. ATLAS: A High-cadence All-sky Survey System. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 130, 064505 (2018).DOI
  46. [46]Miller, J. S. & Stone, R. P. S. The kast double spectrograph. Lick Observatory Technical Reports 66, Lick Observatory, Santa Cruz, CA (1994).
  47. [47]Dressler, A. et al. IMACS: The Inamori-Magellan Areal Camera and Spectrograph on Magellan-Baade. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 123, 288 (2011).DOI
  48. [48]Lantz, B. et al. Mazuray, L., Rogers, P. J. & Wartmann, R. (eds) SNIFS: a wideband integral field spectrograph with microlens arrays. (eds Mazuray, L., Rogers, P. J. & Wartmann, R.) Optical Design and Engineering, Vol. 5249 of Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, 146–155 (2004).
  49. [49]Tucker, M. A. et al. The Spectroscopic Classification of Astronomical Transients (SCAT) Survey: Overview, Pipeline Description, Initial Results, and Future Plans. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 134, 124502 (2022).
  50. [50]Dopita, M. et al. The Wide Field Spectrograph (WiFeS). Astrophys. Space Sci. 310, 255–268 (2007).
  51. [51]Dopita, M. et al. The Wide Field Spectrograph (WiFeS): performance and data reduction. Astrophys. Space Sci. 327, 245–257 (2010).DOI
  52. [52]Price, I. et al. Converting the ANU 2.3 telescope to fully automated operation. Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust. 41, e057 (2024).DOI
  53. [53]Morrissey, P. et al. The Keck Cosmic Web Imager Integral Field Spectrograph. Astrophys. J. 864, 93 (2018).DOI
  54. [54]Elias, J. H. et al. McLean, I. S. & Iye, M. (eds) Design of the Gemini near-infrared spectrograph. (eds McLean, I. S. & Iye, M.) Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy, Vol. 6269 of Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, 62694C (2006).DOI
  55. [55]Medler, K. et al. The Hawaii Infrared Supernova Study (HISS): Spectroscopic Data Release 1. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 281, 28 (2025).arxiv.org/abs/2505.18507
  56. [56]Hoogendam, W. B. et al. Seeing the Outer Edge of the Infant Type Ia Supernova 2024epr in the Optical and Near Infrared. The Open Journal of Astrophysics 8, 120 (2025).DOI
  57. [57]Hoogendam, W. B. et al. Early and Extensive Ultraviolet through Near Infrared Observations of the Intermediate-luminosity Type Iax Supernovae 2024pxl. Astrophys. J. 988, 209 (2025).DOI
  58. [58]Rayner, J. T. et al. SpeX: A Medium-Resolution 0.8-5.5 Micron Spectrograph and Imager for the NASA Infrared Telescope Facility. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 115, 362–382 (2003).DOI
  59. [59]Tody, D. Crawford, D. L. (ed.) The IRAF Data Reduction and Analysis System. (ed.Crawford, D. L.) Instrumentation in astronomy VI, Vol. 627 of Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, 733 (1986).DOI
  60. [60]Tody, D. Hanisch, R. J., Brissenden, R. J. V. & Barnes, J. (eds) IRAF in the Nineties. (eds Hanisch, R. J., Brissenden, R. J. V. & Barnes, J.) Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems II, Vol. 52 of Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, 173 (1993).
  61. [61]Cushing, M. C., Vacca, W. D. & Rayner, J. T. Spextool: A Spectral Extraction Package for SpeX, a 0.8-5.5 Micron Cross-Dispersed Spectrograph. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 116, 362–376 (2004).DOI
  62. [62]Vacca, W. D., Cushing, M. C. & Rayner, J. T. A Method of Correcting Near-Infrared Spectra for Telluric Absorption. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 115, 389–409 (2003).DOI
  63. [63]Neill, D., Matuszewski, M., Martin, C., Brodheim, M. & Rizzi, L. KCWI_DRP: Keck Cosmic Web Imager Data Reduction Pipeline in Python. Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2301.019 (2023). ascl:2301.019.
  64. [64]Prochaska, J. et al. PypeIt: The Python Spectroscopic Data Reduction Pipeline. The Journal of Open Source Software 5, 2308 (2020).
  65. [65]Prochaska, J. X. et al. pypeit/PypeIt: Release 1.0.0, v1.0.0. Zenodo (2020). URL https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3743493.
  66. [66]Childress, M. J., Vogt, F. P. A., Nielsen, J. & Sharp, R. G. PyWiFeS: a rapid data reduction pipeline for the Wide Field Spectrograph (WiFeS). Astrophys. Space Sci. 349, 617–636 (2014).DOI
  67. [67]Hsiao, E. Y. et al. Carnegie Supernova Project-II: The Near-infrared Spectroscopy Program. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 131, 014002 (2019).DOI
  68. [68]Kumar, S. et al. The Search for Stable Nickel: Investigating the Origins of Type Ia Supernovae with Late-time Near-infrared Spectroscopy from the Carnegie Supernova Project-II. Astrophys. J. 1000, 178 (2026).DOI
  69. [69]Davis, S. et al. Carnegie Supernova Project-II: Near-infrared Spectroscopic Diversity of Type II Supernovae. Astrophys. J. 887, 4 (2019).DOI
  70. [70]Anand, G. S. et al. The TRGB-SBF Project. II. Resolving the Virgo Cluster with JWST. Astrophys. J. 982, 26 (2025).arxiv.org/abs/2408.16810
  71. [71]Smith, A. I. et al. pynucastro: A python library for nuclear astrophysics. The Astrophysical Journal 947, 65 (2023). URL https://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acbaff.
  72. [72]pynucastro development team et al. pynucastro/pynucastro: pynucastro 3.0.0, 3.0.0. Zenodo (2026). URL https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21934093.
  73. [73]Hillier, D. J. & Miller, D. L. The Treatment of Non-LTE Line Blanketing in Spherically Expanding Outflows. Astrophys. J. 496, 407–427 (1998).DOI
  74. [74]Yaron, O. & Gal-Yam, A. WISEReP - An Interactive Supernova Data Repository. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 124, 668 (2012).DOI
  75. [75]Höflich, P., Gerardy, C. L., Fesen, R. A. & Sakai, S. Infrared Spectra of the Subluminous Type Ia Supernova SN 1999by. Astrophys. J. 568, 791–806 (2002).DOI
  76. [76]Matheson, T. et al. Optical Spectroscopy of Type Ia Supernovae. Astron. J. 135, 1598–1615 (2008).
  77. [77]Sullivan, M., Kasliwal, M. M., Nugent, P. E., Howell, D. A. et al. The Subluminous and Peculiar Type Ia Supernova PTF 09dav. Astrophys. J. 732, 118 (2011).DOI
  78. [78]Jacobson-Galán, W. V. et al. The Circumstellar Environments of Double-peaked, Calcium-strong Transients 2021gno and 2021inl. Astrophys. J. 932, 58 (2022).
  79. [79]Jacobson-Galán, W. V. Transient Classification Report for 2022-01-08. Transient Name Server Classification Report 2022-68, 1 (2022).
  80. [80]Padilla Gonzalez, E., Howell, D. A. et al. SN 2022joj: A Potential Double Detonation with a Thin Helium Shell. Astrophys. J. 964, 196 (2024).arxiv.org/abs/2308.06334
  81. [81]Liu, C. et al. SN 2022joj: A Peculiar Type Ia Supernova Possibly Driven by an Asymmetric Helium-shell Double Detonation. Astrophys. J. 958, 178 (2023).

Paper details

vlnc:W_qhhkepcy
v1 · latestHistory (1)

published · Fresh — added to the Hub within the last 30 days

added ·

Usage

views · 0

downloads · 0

A view counts once per browser per day, a download each time the PDF is requested.

CC BY 4.0

Original source

  • Physics and Astronomy

Not recorded for this paper · View statement →

Looking for related papers…
Contents