Introduction

A nef line bundle admits smooth metrics whose curvatures approach semipositivity. A limit of those metrics may acquire singularities. For an adjoint bundle, the question is whether the canonical and boundary terms prevent logarithmic poles in a least singular semipositive metric. We prove that they do for projective klt pairs, and use zero-Lelong endpoint metrics to establish an injectivity theorem in ordinary coherent cohomology.

We use the convention that a local metric weight φ\varphi gives squared norm ∣ξ∣2e−φ|\xi|^2 e^{-\varphi}. Semipositivity means that its curvature current i∂∂ˉφi\partial\bar\partial\varphi is nonnegative. Such a metric has minimal singularities if every other semipositive weight ψ\psi on the same line bundle satisfies ψ≤φ+Cψ\psi\le\varphi+C_\psi for a constant CψC_\psi. Weights on rational line bundles are defined by clearing denominators and dividing by the same positive integer. Lelong numbers measure the logarithmic singularities of these weights; in particular, zero Lelong numbers imply local integrability of e−tφe^{-t\varphi} for every fixed t>0t>0.

For a normal variety HH and an effective rational divisor Θ\Theta, the klt condition means that KH+ΘK_H+\Theta is Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier and, on a log resolution π:V→H\pi: V \to H, the crossing divisor BB in π∗(KH+Θ)=KV+B\pi^*(K_H+\Theta)=K_V+B has every coefficient less than one. The actual rational line bundle, rather than its numerical class, is the object in the following theorem.

Theorem 1.1. Let (H,Θ)(H,\Theta) be a normal connected projective complex klt pair, with Θ\Theta an effective rational divisor. Suppose that DH=KH+ΘD_H=K_H+\Theta is a nef Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier divisor. For every projective log resolution π:V→H\pi: V \to H, the rational line bundle N=π∗DHN = \pi^*D_H has the following property: every semipositive singular Hermitian metric with minimal singularities on NN has Lelong number zero at every point of VV. Such a metric exists. Neither KHK_H nor Θ\Theta is required to be separately Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier.

Consequently, for every minimal weight ϕ\phi on π∗(KH+Θ)\pi^*(K_H+\Theta),

I(tϕ)=OV(t>0),\mathcal{I}(t\phi)=\mathcal{O}_V \qquad(t>0),

where I(tϕ)\mathcal{I}(t\phi) consists of holomorphic germs ff for which ∣f∣2e−tϕ|f|^2e^{-t\phi} is locally integrable. We record the precise independence of the metric and the Cartier multiple in Corollary 2.4.

Demailly–Peternell–Schneider constructed minimal-singularity metrics on pseudoeffective line bundles and proved zero Lelong numbers in the big and nef case [2 Theorem 1.5 and Proposition 1.7]. Nefness alone does not give this conclusion. For example, on a ruled surface over an elliptic curve, a nef divisor bundle can have its divisor metric as a minimal metric, with a positive Lelong number along the divisor [14 Corollary 1.2 and Example 3.5]. Gongyo–Matsumura asked how to construct a zero-Lelong semipositive metric on a nef log canonical bundle in their study of injectivity and abundance [11 Question 5.6]. Theorem 1.1 gives a positive answer in the projective klt setting on every projective log resolution, without bigness or nonvanishing. Once one zero-Lelong semipositive metric exists, every minimal metric is no more singular and therefore also has zero Lelong numbers. Thus the universal assertion about minimal metrics expresses the same existence conclusion on each pullback bundle.

Interior boundaries and restriction of sections

Our second result concerns a family of effective rational divisors between two fixed endpoints. Their coefficients may cross integers. The resulting changes in the integral part of the divisor give natural inclusions of line bundles. Zero-Lelong metrics at the endpoints control the induced map on ordinary H1H^1.

Theorem 1.2. Let VV be a smooth projective complex variety, let LL be an integral divisor, and let 0≤C0≤C20 \le C_0 \le C_2 be effective rational divisors whose combined support is simple normal crossing. Suppose that both rational line bundles L−C0L-C_0 and L−C2L-C_2 admit singular Hermitian metrics of semipositive curvature with zero Lelong numbers at every point. For a rational number 0<λ<10 < \lambda< 1, set

C1=(1−λ)C0+λC2,Li=L−⌊Ci⌋(i=0,1).C_1=(1-\lambda)C_0+\lambda C_2,\qquad L_i=L-\lfloor C_i\rfloor\quad(i=0,1).

Then the natural inclusion of line bundles induces an injection

H1(V,OV(KV+L1))⟶H1(V,OV(KV+L0)).H^1(V,\mathcal{O}_V(K_V+L_1))\longrightarrow H^1(V,\mathcal{O}_V(K_V+L_0)).

The strict inequality λ<1\lambda<1 provides a positive coefficient in the curvature comparison. Effectivity and the common crossing support provide integrability for the fractional boundary weights. The theorem concerns the displayed integral line bundles and the natural sheaf map; its endpoint assumptions are on the actual rational bundles L−CiL-C_i.

One direct consequence explains the connection with restriction of sections. Put E=[C1]−[C0]E=[C_1]-[C_0], an effective integral divisor, which may be nonreduced. If E≠0E\ne0, then

H0(V,OV(KV+L0))⟶H0(E,OV(KV+L0)∣E)(1)H^0(V,\mathcal{O}_V(K_V+L_0))\longrightarrow H^0(E,\mathcal{O}_V(K_V+L_0)|_E) \tag*{(1)}

is surjective.

Indeed, the connecting homomorphism for 0→OV(KV+L1)→OV(KV+L0)→OV(KV+L0)∣E→00\to\mathcal{O}_V(K_V+L_1)\to\mathcal{O}_V(K_V+L_0)\to\mathcal{O}_V(K_V+L_0)|_E\to0 has image equal to the kernel of the injective H1H^1 map. Thus the comparison lifts sections from the entire divisor scheme EE at once.

Classical root-cover injectivity, including a reduced boundary, appears in Esnault–Viehweg [7] Theorem 5.1. Fujino’s transcendental approach develops complete metrics on an analytic complement and comparison with coherent cohomology [10], Section 3, Lemmas 3.1–3.2 and Claim 1. Matsumura extends analytic injectivity to metrics with transcendental singularities and obtains uniform estimates for primitives [19], Theorem 1.3 and Sections 5.2–5.3. Our proof uses the same harmonic-form and local-primitive methods, with a comparison of two endpoint weights. We prove the required uniform primitive estimate and the return to ordinary cohomology explicitly.

The two analytic arguments

For the metric theorem, write N=π∗(KH+Θ)=KV+BN = \pi^*(K_H + \Theta) = K_V + B. The adjoint hypothesis enters twice. The klt coefficients make the adjoint density integrable, even where BB has negative exceptional coefficients. Klt vanishing and nefness then give one ample bundle AHA_H on HH whose pullback A=π∗AHA = \pi^* A_H makes mN+AmN + A globally generated for every positive integer mm with m(KH+Θ)m(K_H + \Theta) Cartier. Normalize a section ss by its integral

Qm(s)=∫V∣s∣2/me−a/m−b,Q_m(s) = \int_V |s|^{2/m}e^{-a/m-b},

where aa is a smooth weight of AA and bb the divisor weight of BB. Choose a normalized section maximizing its value at a proposed positive-Lelong point.

The L2/mL^{2/m} normalization has its origin in Narasimhan–Simha’s work on ample canonical bundles [20]; its role in the later envelope construction is explained in [1], Section 5. Tsuji constructs canonical singular metrics using normalized sections of A+mKXA + mK_X with a fixed sufficiently ample twist [22], Sections 1.2 and 2. Berman–Demailly develop integral-normalized adjoint envelopes and their algebraic approximation [1], Definition 5.3 and Proposition 5.19. Their general pseudoeffective approximation allows twists pmAp_mA with pm→∞p_m \to\infty and pm/m→0p_m/m \to0 [1 Equation (5.24)]. Here the fixed twist and the klt density support an extremal argument: a localization estimate produces a better normalized section whenever the minimal weight has a positive Lelong number.

The normalized extremal sections have a semipositive limit after the twist is divided by mm. Minimality bounds that limit by the chosen minimal weight. Consequently a fixed sublevel set of the difference of the weights has adjoint mass tending to zero. A localized ∂ˉ\bar{\partial} equation, solved on an affine open set, produces a holomorphic competitor whose weighted norm is bounded by that mass. The exact localization constant is independent of mm and of the affine open set. Positive Lelong number forces this competitor to have the same value at the chosen point. A Hölder estimate whose final bound is independent of mm makes its normalization strictly smaller, contradicting extremality.

Two details keep the construction uniform and valid on a log resolution. The weak limits in the localization lemma are taken in fixed weighted Hilbert spaces. Extension across negative exceptional coefficients is performed on the normal base HH in the actual Cartier bundle m(KH+Θ)+AHm(K_H + \Theta) + A_H, and then pulled back. The complete Kähler L2L^2 estimate supplies the local analytic solution [4], Theorem 5.1; the localization and extension arguments are given in Section 2.

For injectivity, regularize both endpoint metrics, retaining arbitrarily small curvature loss and uniform integrability at every fixed exponent. A logarithm of a sum of endpoint weights makes the inclusion of line bundles a contraction. On the complement of the crossing divisor, a complete Kähler metric with bounded local potentials allows local L2L^2 solutions. Their holomorphic differences extend across the divisor and define ordinary Čech classes. An open-mapping argument on one fixed finite cover gives a uniform bound for primitives of forms whose ordinary class vanishes.

A Bochner comparison then makes the image of a harmonic representative small. All approximating representatives embed into a single fixed Hilbert space; weak convergence there preserves the original ordinary cohomology class. This is the final step from weighted estimates on the complement to the coherent-cohomology injection. The argument is independent of the adjoint metric theorem: it uses only the endpoint metrics stated in Theorem 1.2.

A fourfold application and organization

The metric theorem also gives a short abundance argument for a projective complex klt fourfold (X,Δ)(X,\Delta) with nef rational adjoint and χ(X,OX)≠0\chi(X,\mathcal{O}_X) \ne0. Lazić–Peternell’s nonvanishing theorem uses generalized algebraic singularities of a semipositive metric [17] (Corollary D); zero Lelong numbers satisfy that condition with no divisorial part. With a first section obtained, Gongyo–Matsumura’s criterion gives semiample-ness [11] (Corollary 5.3). The precise application is Corollary 4.1; it has no numerical-dimension restriction. For nef adjoints of numerical dimension at most one, Liu–Xu already obtain good minimal models for projective klt pairs of dimension at most four with nonzero Euler characteristic [18] (Corollary 5.2); in the nef case this gives semiample-ness. Lazić’s work supplies a semiample-ness criterion using uniform multiplier-ideal comparisons, and an algebraic approximation theorem for supercanonical currents, under their respective hypotheses [16] (Theorems A–B).

In the compact Kähler setting, Höring–Lazić–Lehn obtain nonvanishing for non-uniruled Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial klt pairs with nef adjoint of numerical dimension one and nonzero Euler characteristic [13] (Theorem A). Under these hypotheses in dimension four, they obtain semiample-ness when the minimal pullback current has zero Lelong numbers [13] (Corollary B).

Section 2 proves the metric theorem, the arbitrary-data localization estimate and the multiplier-ideal consequence. Section 3 proves the independent interior injectivity theorem. Section 4 states the two published fourfold criteria and applies them to the same minimal metric.

Zero Lelong numbers for nef klt adjoints

We prove Theorem 1.1. The construction uses sections only after one fixed twist pulled back from an ample bundle on the normal base. Its central estimate must reduce a normalized section’s mass without changing its value at a point of positive Lelong number. We first recall the top-degree L2L^2 estimate, then construct the normalized extremal sections. The affine localization lemma turns their small sublevel mass into the required competitor.

Weights and the complete L2L^2 estimate

A local weight φ\varphi of a Hermitian metric gives the squared norm ∣ξ∣2e−φ|\xi|^2e^{-\varphi} in its local frame. Semipositive curvature means that the local weights are plurisubharmonic. A metric on a rational line bundle is defined by taking a positive integral tensor power and dividing its weights by that integer. All identifications below are identifications of rational line bundles, rather than of numerical classes.

If a weight η\eta is a weight on KVK_V, the expression eηe^\eta denotes a density: in a canonical coordinate frame it is multiplied by the corresponding coordinate volume. Likewise, for an FF-valued top form vv, the expression ∣v∣2e−ψ|v|^2e^{-\psi}, with ψ\psi a weight on FF, denotes a density. These densities are invariant under changes of coordinates and frames. In particular, the integral of the latter does not depend on an auxiliary Kähler metric.

We shall use the following form of the complete L2L^2 theorem. The matrix observation in its statement will be responsible for the uniform constants.

Lemma 2.1. Let (M,ωM)(M,\omega_M) be a complete Kähler manifold of dimension nn, and let FF be a holomorphic line bundle with a smooth Hermitian metric of local weight ψ\psi and strictly positive curvature θ\theta. Write ΛωM\Lambda_{\omega_M} for the adjoint of wedging with ωM\omega_M. If β\beta is an FF-valued, ∂ˉ\bar\partial-closed (n,1)(n,1) form which is square integrable and satisfies

I(β)=∫M⟨[θ,ΛωM]−1β,β⟩ψ,ωM dVωM<∞,I(\beta)=\int_M\langle[\theta,\Lambda_{\omega_M}]^{-1}\beta,\beta\rangle_{\psi,\omega_M}\,dV_{\omega_M}<\infty,

then there is an FF-valued (n,0)(n,0) form vv with

∂ˉv=β,∫M∣v∣2e−ψ≤I(β).\bar\partial v=\beta,\qquad\int_M|v|^2e^{-\psi}\leq I(\beta).

In local coordinates, the inverse-curvature density in I(β)I(\beta) is the inverse Hermitian curvature matrix acting on the remaining (0,1)(0,1) covector, multiplied by the coordinate top-form density. It is independent of the complete background metric. Consequently:

  1. if θ≥ω0>0\theta\geq\omega_0>0, this density is bounded by the (n,1)(n,1) norm density computed with ω0\omega_0;

  1. if gg is a smooth real function and θ≥a i∂g∧∂ˉg\theta\geq a\,i\partial g\wedge\bar\partial g with a>0a>0, the inverse-curvature squared norm of ∂ˉg\bar\partial g is at most a−1a^{-1}.

Proof. The existence statement is the complete Kähler L2L^2 theorem with positive curvature operator and finite inverse-curvature integral [4 Theorem 5.1, p. 33]. It requires pointwise positivity and the displayed integral, not a uniform lower spectral bound relative to ωM\omega_M.

For the density calculation, write a top-form-valued (0,1)(0,1) form as ∑jβj dz1∧⋯∧dzn∧dzˉj\sum_j\beta_j\,dz_1\wedge\cdots\wedge dz_n\wedge d\bar z_j. The determinant in the squared norm of the top form cancels the volume determinant. Diagonalizing the curvature relative to ωM\omega_M shows that applying the inverse commutator leaves ∑j,k(θ−1)jkˉβjβk‾\sum_{j,k}(\theta^{-1})^{j\bar k}\beta_j\overline{\beta_k} against the coordinate volume and line weight. All formulas use the same standard normalization of forms and volume. Matrix order gives θ−1≤ω0−1\theta^{-1}\leq\omega_0^{-1} in (i). For (ii), conjugate the rank-one inequality a ∂g⊗∂ˉg≤θa\,\partial g\otimes\bar\partial g\leq\theta by θ−1/2\theta^{-1/2}.

The fixed twist and normalization

The zero-dimensional case is immediate, so put n=dim⁡V>0n=\dim V>0 and fix a Kähler form ω\omega on VV. Choose compatible canonical divisors and write

N=KV+B.(2.1)N=K_V+B. \tag*{(2.1)}

The support of BB is simple normal crossing, every coefficient is strictly less than one, and the negative part B−B^- is exceptional over HH. The last assertion follows because the nonexceptional coefficients are those of the effective boundary Θ\Theta.

Let b=[B]b=[B] be the divisor weight, a rational linear combination of logarithms of squared absolute values of local divisor equations. In crossing coordinates it has the form

b=∑j=1aβjlog⁡∣zj∣2+O(1),βj<1.b=\sum_{j=1}^{a}\beta_j\log|z_j|^2+O(1),\qquad\beta_j<1.

Thus e−be^{-b} is locally integrable. Negative coefficients cause no failure of this integrability statement.

Fix a very ample Cartier divisor H0H_0 on HH, and set AH=(n+1)H0A_H=(n+1)H_0 and A=π∗AHA=\pi^*A_H. Give AA a smooth semipositive metric with weight aa. For every positive integer mm for which mDHmD_H is Cartier, the line bundle mDH+AHmD_H+A_H is globally generated. Indeed, for 1≤j≤n1\le j\le n,

mDH+AH−jH0−(KH+Θ)=(m−1)DH+(n+1−j)H0mD_H+A_H-jH_0-(K_H+\Theta)=(m-1)D_H+(n+1-j)H_0

is ample. Klt Kawamata–Viehweg vanishing, in the form of [9 Theorem 3.2], gives the cohomology vanishings for Castelnuovo–Mumford regularity. The global-generation conclusion of [15 Theorem 1.8.5(i)] then applies. Pullback proves that mN+AmN+A is globally generated as well.

Since NN is nef, it is pseudo-effective. Choose a semipositive metric ϕ\phi on NN with minimal singularities. Such a metric is obtained as the upper envelope, relative to a smooth reference weight, of the normalized plurisubharmonic weights; see [2 Definition 1.4 and Theorem 1.5]. Its defining property is that every other semipositive weight ψ\psi on NN satisfies

ψ≤ϕ+Cψ(2.2)\psi\le\phi+C_\psi \tag*{(2.2)}

for a constant CψC_\psi. We shall show that ϕ\phi has zero Lelong numbers.

Suppose, to the contrary, that its Lelong number at p∈Vp\in V is positive. For each allowed mm define

Qm(s)=∫V∣s∣2/me−a/m−b,s∈H0(V,mN+A).(2.3)Q_m(s)=\int_V |s|^{2/m}e^{-a/m-b},\qquad s\in H^0(V,mN+A). \tag*{(2.3)}

The integrand is a canonical density by (2.1). The integral is finite, continuous in ss, positive for s≠0s\ne0, and homogeneous of degree 2/m2/m. These facts also show that Qm(s)=1Q_m(s)=1 is a compact subset of the finite-dimensional section space: restrict QmQ_m first to the unit sphere of any vector-space norm and use its positive minimum. Choose sms_m maximizing the absolute evaluation at pp on this compact set, using any fixed norm on the one-dimensional fiber for this mm. Global generation implies

Qm(sm)=1,sm(p)≠0.(2.4)Q_m(s_m)=1,\qquad s_m(p)\ne0. \tag*{(2.4)}

Put τm=m−1log⁡∣sm∣2\tau_m=m^{-1}\log|s_m|^2, a weight on N+A/mN+A/m.

Claim 2.2. After passage to an unbounded subsequence of allowed integers, the weights τm−a/m\tau_m-a/m are uniformly locally bounded above and converge locally in L1L^1 and almost everywhere to a semipositive weight τ∞\tau_\infty on NN. This compactness assertion holds for every sequence of sections with Qm(sm)=1Q_m(s_m)=1; it does not require their extremality at pp.

Proof. Choose a smooth reference weight ϕref\phi_{\mathrm{ref}} on NN and write um=τm−a/m−ϕrefu_m=\tau_m-a/m-\phi_{\mathrm{ref}}. These are global quasi-psh functions whose complex Hessians have one common lower bound −Cω-C\omega on the compact connected manifold VV. Normalize them by subtracting Mm=sup⁡VumM_m=\sup_V u_m. The compactness theorem for sup-normalized quasi-psh functions [12 Proposition 2.7] gives, along a subsequence, local L1L^1 and almost-everywhere convergence of um−Mmu_m-M_m to a quasi-psh function u∞u_\infty that is finite almost everywhere. In particular the normalized functions do not converge identically to −∞-\infty.

The fixed density eϕref−be^{\phi_{\mathrm{ref}}-b} is integrable. Since um−Mm≤0u_m-M_m\le0, dominated convergence gives

Jm:=∫Veum−Mmeϕref−b⟶J∞:=∫Veu∞eϕref−b∈(0,∞).J_m:=\int_V e^{u_m-M_m}e^{\phi_{\mathrm{ref}}-b}\longrightarrow J_\infty:=\int_V e^{u_\infty}e^{\phi_{\mathrm{ref}}-b}\in(0,\infty).

The positivity uses finiteness of u∞u_\infty almost everywhere, not a pointwise lower bound. The normalization in (2.4) says eMmJm=1e^{M_m}J_m=1. Thus MmM_m converges to a finite real number, proving the asserted upper bounds and convergence without the sup normalization. Finally, i∂∂ˉ(τm−a/m)≥−m−1i∂∂ˉai\partial\bar\partial(\tau_m-a/m)\ge-m^{-1}i\partial\bar\partial a; the error tends to zero. The limit weight is therefore semipositive. ▫

Define the globally scalar difference, almost everywhere,

gm=ϕ+a/m−τm.g_m=\phi+a/m-\tau_m.

Its values on the zero divisor of sms_m may be assigned arbitrarily when taking integrals; that divisor has measure zero. By (2.2), τ∞≤ϕ+C∞\tau_\infty\le\phi+C_\infty. Choose once and for all R>C∞+1R>C_\infty+1. The preceding convergence and domination imply

εm:=∫{gm<−R}eτm−a/m−b⟶0.(2.5)\varepsilon_m:=\int_{\{g_m<-R\}}e^{\tau_m-a/m-b}\longrightarrow0. \tag*{(2.5)}

Indeed, the indicators tend to zero almost everywhere, because ϕ−τ∞≥−C∞\phi-\tau_\infty\ge-C_\infty where both weights are finite; the densities have one integrable majorant on a fixed finite coordinate cover.

It is now enough to construct sections wm∈H0(V,mN+A)w_m\in H^0(V,mN+A) such that

wm(p)=sm(p),Qm(wm)m≤C0εm,w_m(p)=s_m(p),\qquad Q_m(w_m)^m\le C_0\varepsilon_m,

where C0C_0 is independent of mm. For large mm this gives Qm(wm)<1Q_m(w_m)<1, so scalar normalization would produce a section of gauge one with larger absolute evaluation at pp. We next construct these competitors and prove the two displayed properties.

A singular weighted equation with a fixed constant

We will cut off sms_m on {gm<−R}\{g_m<-R\} and correct the resulting ∂‾\overline{\partial} error. The weight for this equation must serve two purposes. Its singularity near pp must force the correction to vanish at pp after the holomorphic competitor has been extended. Its growth where gmg_m is positive must also allow a uniform conversion from the quadratic estimate to QmQ_m. The first requirement determines its slope cc near −∞-\infty; a fixed upper slope bound dd will give the second.

Positive Lelong number gives local coordinates at pp and a sufficiently small fixed α>0\alpha>0 with ϕ(z)≤αlog⁡∣z∣2+O(1)\phi(z)\le\alpha\log|z|^2+O(1). On a cone of positive angular measure on which all crossing coordinates have modulus comparable to ∣z∣|z|, the weight e−cϕ−be^{-c\phi-b} is bounded below by a positive constant times ∣z∣−2(cα+∑βj)|z|^{-2(c\alpha+\sum\beta_j)}. Choose a fixed c>0c>0 large enough that cα+∑βj≥nc\alpha+\sum\beta_j\ge n. Then

e−cϕ−b(2.6)e^{-c\phi-b} \tag*{(2.6)}

is not locally integrable at pp.

This choice is valid even if some βj\beta_j are negative.

Choose a smooth function 0≤χ≤10\le\chi\le1 equal to one on (−∞,−R−1](-\infty,-R-1] and to zero on [−R,∞)[-R,\infty). Choose a smooth convex increasing function ff which is affine of slope cc near −∞-\infty, has f′′>0f^{\prime\prime}>0 on the closed transition interval [−R−1,−R][-R-1,-R], and satisfies c≤f′≤dc\le f^\prime\le d for one fixed dd. Such a function is obtained by prescribing a nonnegative compactly supported second derivative positive on that interval. In particular there is a fixed constant CfC_f with

f(t)≤dmax⁡(0,t)+Cf(t∈R).(2)f(t)\le d\max(0,t)+C_f\qquad(t\in\mathbb{R}). \tag*{(2)}

All of R,c,χ,f,d,CfR,c,\chi,f,d,C_f remain fixed as mm varies.

For a fixed mm, choose a dense smooth affine open U=Um⊂VU=U_m\subset V avoiding the supports of BB and div⁡(sm)\operatorname{div}(s_m). This open set need not contain pp. We will recover the value at pp only after extending the resulting holomorphic section to all of VV. On UU the function g=gmg=g_m is psh, since the weight τm\tau_m is locally pluriharmonic there and the metrics ϕ,a\phi,a are semipositive. Put

Fm=mN+A−KV,S=(m−1)τm+a/m+b.(2.8)F_m=mN+A-K_V,\qquad S=(m-1)\tau_m+a/m+b. \tag*{(2.8)}

This is a smooth semipositive weight on Fm∣UF_m|_U. Divisor weights and τm\tau_m are pluriharmonic on UU, so its curvature is m−1i∂∂ˉam^{-1}i\partial\bar\partial a. We regard sms_m as an FmF_m-valued top form.

Lemma 2.3 (Localization of top forms). Let UU be a smooth connected affine complex variety of dimension n≥1n \ge1. Let FF be a holomorphic line bundle on UU with a smooth semipositive metric of weight SS, let gg be a global plurisubharmonic function not identically −∞-\infty, and let ss be a holomorphic FF-valued (n,0)(n,0)-form. Fix R∈RR \in\mathbb{R}, a smooth cutoff 0≤χ≤10 \le\chi\le1 equal to one for t≤−R−1t \le-R-1 and zero for t≥−Rt \ge-R, and a smooth convex function ff that is affine of positive slope cc near −∞-\infty, with c≤f′≤dc \le f' \le d for some dd and f′′>0f'' > 0 on [−R−1,−R][-R-1,-R]. If

M=∫{g<−R}∣s∣2e−S<∞,M = \int_{\{g<-R\}} |s|^2 e^{-S} < \infty,

there is a measurable FF-valued top form uu such that

∂ˉu=∂ˉ(χ(g)s),∫U∣u∣2e−S−f(g)≤Cχ,fM,(3)\bar{\partial}u = \bar{\partial}(\chi(g)s), \qquad\int_U |u|^2 e^{-S-f(g)} \le C_{\chi,f}M, \tag*{(3)}

where the equation is distributional and

Cχ,f=max⁡[−R−1,−R]∣χ′∣2e−ff′′.(2.10)C_{\chi,f} = \max_{[-R-1,-R]} \frac{|\chi'|^2e^{-f}}{f''}. \tag*{(2.10)}

The constant is independent of UU, FF, SS, gg, ss and of the auxiliary complete Kähler metrics. At g=−∞g=-\infty we set χ(g)=1\chi(g)=1 and f(g)=−∞f(g)=-\infty; that locus has measure zero.

Proof. Embed UU as a closed complex submanifold of some Ca\mathbb{C}^a and let ρ=∣z∣2∣U\rho=|z|^2|_U. The tubular-neighborhood theorem supplies a holomorphic retraction of a neighborhood onto UU [6]; see also the formulation in [8 Theorem 3.1]. Compose gg with the retraction. Radial convolution in that neighborhood, at radii decreasing to zero, gives smooth psh functions gj↓gg_j \downarrow g on common smaller domains. More precisely, choose increasing regular exhaustion values aj→∞a_j \to\infty and Ωj={ρ<aj}\Omega_j=\{\rho<a_j\}. Use one fixed nonnegative smooth radial averaging kernel of total mass one. The convolution radius at stage jj is at most 1/j1/j, is small enough to work near Ω‾j\overline{\Omega}_j, and is smaller than all previous radii. Radial averages of a psh function are monotone in the radius, so these choices give monotonicity wherever two of the functions are defined. They also give gj≥gg_j \ge g.

Each Ωj\Omega_j has a complete Kähler metric dominating i∂∂ˉρi\partial\bar{\partial}\rho, for example the metric with potential ρ−log⁡(aj−ρ)\rho-\log(a_j-\rho). For a decreasing positive sequence δj→0\delta_j \to0, use the line weight

Pj=S+f(gj)+δjρ.P_j = S + f(g_j) + \delta_j\rho.

It is smooth near Ω‾j\overline{\Omega}_j, its curvature is strictly positive, and

i∂∂ˉPj≥f′′(gj)i∂gj∧∂ˉgj.i\partial\bar{\partial}P_j \ge f''(g_j)i\partial g_j \wedge\bar{\partial}g_j.

The smooth closed datum βj=χ′(gj)∂ˉgj∧s\beta_j=\chi'(g_j)\bar{\partial}g_j\wedge s is square integrable for the complete metric. To see this even near the boundary of Ωj\Omega_j, use the top-degree density calculation: enlarging the background metric decreases the (n,1)(n,1) density, and all coefficients and line weights are smooth on a neighborhood of the relatively compact closure.

By Lemma 2.1, the inverse-curvature integral is at most

C∫Ωj∩{gj<−R}∣s∣2e−S≤C∫{g<−R}∣s∣2e−S,C=sup⁡[−R−1,−R]∣χ′∣2e−ff′′.C\int_{\Omega_j\cap\{g_j<-R\}} |s|^2e^{-S} \le C\int_{\{g<-R\}} |s|^2e^{-S}, \qquad C=\sup_{[-R-1,-R]} \frac{|\chi'|^2e^{-f}}{f''}.

The nonnegative term δjρ\delta_j\rho only decreases the integrand. The last integral is MM by definition. Thus we obtain solutions uju_j on Ωj\Omega_j with ∫Ωj∣uj∣2e−Pj≤CM\int_{\Omega_j}|u_j|^2e^{-P_j}\le CM. The background complete metrics have introduced no comparison factor. For completeness, the singular passage uses fixed Hilbert spaces. If k≤lk \le l are fixed and j≥lj \ge l, then on Ωk\Omega_k we have Pj≤PlP_j \le P_l, and hence

∫Ωk∣uj∣2e−Pl≤CM.\int_{\Omega_k} |u_j|^2 e^{-P_l} \le CM.

Take a diagonal weakly convergent subsequence in these countably many fixed earlier smooth weighted spaces. Their limits agree as distributions on overlaps, and define uu on UU. Weak lower semicontinuity, then monotone convergence as l→∞l \to\infty, gives

∫Ωk∣u∣2e−S−f(g)≤CM.\int_{\Omega_k} |u|^2 e^{-S-f(g)} \le CM.

Exhausting UU proves the required global inequality. Finally χ(gj)s→χ(g)s\chi(g_j)s \to\chi(g)s locally in L2L^2 by bounded convergence, where χ(−∞)=1\chi(-\infty)=1. Thus the equations pass to distributions and give (3).

We apply the lemma to the adjoint data already fixed on UU. The exact density identity is

∣sm∣2e−S=eτm−a/m−b,(2.11)|s_m|^2 e^{-S}=e^{\tau_m-a/m-b}, \tag*{(2.11)}

so its sublevel mass is M=ϵmM=\epsilon_m. Applying Lemma 2.3 with F=FmF=F_m, g=gmg=g_m, and s=sms=s_m gives an FmF_m-valued top form uu on UU with

∂ˉu=∂ˉ(χ(g)sm),∫U∣u∣2e−S−f(g)≤Cϵm,(4)\bar{\partial}u=\bar{\partial}(\chi(g)s_m), \qquad\int_U |u|^2e^{-S-f(g)}\le C\epsilon_m, \tag*{(4)}

where C=Cχ,fC=C_{\chi,f} is independent of mm and of UU.

Extension, evaluation, and the extremal contradiction

For m>d+1m>d+1 set

G=S+dmax⁡(0,g),wm=χ(g)sm−u on U.G=S+d\max(0,g), \qquad w_m=\chi(g)s_m-u \text{ on } U.

(4) shows that wmw_m is holomorphic. Since G≥SG\ge S, the cutoff term has GG-norm squared at most ϵm\epsilon_m. Since S+f(g)≤G+CfS+f(g)\le G+C_f, the GG-norm squared of uu is at most eCfCϵme^{C_f}C\epsilon_m. Therefore

∫U∣wm∣2e−G≤C′ϵm,C′=2+2eCfC.(5)\int_U |w_m|^2e^{-G}\le C'\epsilon_m, \qquad C'=2+2e^{C_f}C. \tag*{(5)}

This constant is independent of mm.

To extend the section, rewrite its weight as

G=b+a/m+(m−1−d)τm+dmax⁡{τm,ϕ+a/m}.(2.14)G=b+a/m+(m-1-d)\tau_m+d\max\{\tau_m,\phi+a/m\}. \tag*{(2.14)}

It is locally bounded above away from Supp⁡B−\operatorname{Supp} B^{-}: the coefficient m−1−dm-1-d is positive, the psh weights in the last two terms are locally bounded above, and bb has that property away from its negative components. Consequently (5) gives ordinary local L2L^2 bounds there. Holomorphic L2L^2 removal across analytic sets extends wmw_m to V∖Supp⁡B−V\setminus\operatorname{Supp} B^{-}.

There is an open H∘⊂HH^\circ\subset H, with complement of codimension at least two, over which π\pi is an isomorphism. It misses the image of B−B^{-}. The section just obtained descends on H∘H^\circ to a section of the actual Cartier bundle OH(mDH+AH)\mathcal{O}_H(mD_H+A_H). Normality extends it across H∖H∘H\setminus H^\circ: after trivializing that line bundle, this is the Hartogs extension of regular holomorphic functions on a normal space. Pullback now gives a global section, again denoted wmw_m, of mN+AmN+A. By projectivity and GAGA it is an algebraic global section as well. It agrees with the constructed section on UU by the identity theorem. In particular (5) continues to concern the same section. No estimate across the negative exceptional divisor was needed for this extension.

Near pp, the weight τm\tau_m is smooth by (2.4), whereas g→−∞g \to-\infty. Thus χ(g)=1\chi(g) = 1 and f(g)=cg+constantf(g) = cg + \text{constant} near pp on UU, so

u=sm−wm,S+f(g)=b+cϕ+Om(1).u = s_m-w_m,\qquad S+f(g)=b+c\phi+O_m(1).

If sm(p)−wm(p)s_m(p)-w_m(p) were nonzero, its holomorphic coefficient would have a positive lower bound on a smaller neighborhood. The finite weighted integral in (4) would then contradict (2.6). Removing the analytic null set V∖UV \setminus U does not change this divergence. This also applies when pp lies on B−B^{-}, since both sections are now holomorphic at pp. We conclude

wm(p)=sm(p)≠0.(2.15)w_m(p)=s_m(p)\ne0. \tag*{(2.15)}

The bounded factor denoted Om(1)O_m(1) is used only to test integrability for a fixed mm; it never enters (5).

It remains to convert that quadratic estimate to the original gauge. Hölder’s inequality gives

Qm(wm)m≤C′εm(∫Ue(G−a−mb)/(m−1))m−1.(2.16)Q_m(w_m)^m \le C'\varepsilon_m\left(\int_U e^{(G-a-mb)/(m-1)}\right)^{m-1}. \tag*{(2.16)}

There is no unbounded factor hidden in the second integral. Put η=d/(m−1)∈(0,1)\eta=d/(m-1)\in(0,1). Direct expansion yields

G−a−mbm−1=(1−η)(τm−a/m−b)+η(max⁡{τm−a/m,ϕ}−b).(2.17)\frac{G-a-mb}{m-1}=(1-\eta)(\tau_m-a/m-b)+\eta\bigl(\max\{\tau_m-a/m,\phi\}-b\bigr). \tag*{(2.17)}

Both exponentials on the right are canonical densities. The first has integral one; the second has integral at most 1+I1+I, where

I=∫Veϕ−b<∞.I=\int_V e^{\phi-b}<\infty.

Finiteness follows from local upper bounds for ϕ\phi and local integrability of e−be^{-b} on a fixed finite coordinate cover. Applying Hölder to (2.17) gives

(∫Ue(G−a−mb)/(m−1))m−1≤(1+I)η(m−1)=(1+I)d.\left(\int_U e^{(G-a-mb)/(m-1)}\right)^{m-1}\le(1+I)^{\eta(m-1)}=(1+I)^d.

All integrals are unchanged by the omitted analytic null set. Together with (2.5) and (2.16), this proves

Qm(wm)m≤C′εm(1+I)d⟶0.Q_m(w_m)^m\le C'\varepsilon_m(1+I)^d\longrightarrow0.

For large mm, therefore, 0<Qm(wm)<10<Q_m(w_m)<1. Multiply wmw_m by Qm(wm)−m/2>1Q_m(w_m)^{-m/2}>1. The new section has gauge one and, by (2.15), strictly larger absolute evaluation than sms_m. This contradicts the choice of sms_m, regardless of the rate at which sm(p)s_m(p) or εm\varepsilon_m tends to zero. Hence ϕ\phi has no positive Lelong number at any point. This proves Theorem 1.1.

Corollary 2.4. Under the hypotheses of Theorem 1.1, let ϕ\phi be a minimal weight on the actual rational line bundle NN. Then

I(tϕ)=OVfor every real t>0,\mathcal{I}(t\phi)=\mathcal{O}_V\qquad\text{for every real }t>0,

where the ideal is defined by local integrability of ∣f∣2e−tϕ|f|^2e^{-t\phi}. The conclusion is independent of the choice of minimal metric and of the Cartier multiple used to normalize its weights.

Proof. Skoda’s integrability theorem gives local integrability of e−tφe^{-t\varphi} for every fixed t>0t>0 when the Lelong numbers vanish [21 Proposition 7.1]; for this formulation for arbitrary plurisubharmonic weights, see [5 Property 1.4(8)] and [4 Lemma 5.6(a)]. Every holomorphic germ is bounded on a smaller neighborhood, so the multiplier ideal is the structure sheaf. Two metrics with minimal singularities have weights differing by a bounded function, directly from their defining comparison. Dividing the weight of a positive Cartier multiple by that multiple preserves the stated normalization. These observations prove the independence assertions.

An interior injectivity theorem

We prove Theorem 1.2 from its two endpoint metrics, using the top-degree L2L^2 estimate in Lemma 2.1. The proof does not use Theorem 1.1 or its extremal-section construction. The output is the natural map on ordinary coherent cohomology. The proof therefore needs both a weighted estimate on the complement of the crossing divisor and a comparison that retains the original ordinary class. The fixed-cover construction below supplies this comparison together with a uniform bound for primitives.

For a class in the kernel, we will construct weighted harmonic representatives whose images have norms tending to zero. The endpoint metrics make multiplication a contraction and supply the curvature comparison for this estimate. Local solutions of the ∂ˉ\bar{\partial} equation leave holomorphic differences on overlaps; controlling a splitting of these differences on one fixed cover gives uniformly bounded global primitives. The extended differences form a cocycle representing the ordinary cohomology class of the original form. Finally, comparison in one fixed Hilbert space lets the small images force the original ordinary class to vanish. Classical injectivity for roots of divisors, including an additional reduced boundary, is proved in [7 Theorem 5.1]. The local and uniform-primitive methods have precedents in [19 Sections 5.2–5.3]; the precise comparison needed for the present line bundles is proved here.

Endpoint regularization and the comparison weights

Fix a Kähler form ω\omega on VV, and put n=dim⁡Vn=\dim V. The zero-dimensional assertion is trivial, so assume n>0n>0. We use the following consequence of regularization and exponential integrability.

Lemma 3.1. Let FF be a rational line bundle on a smooth projective complex variety VV equipped with a Kähler form ω\omega, and suppose that FF has a semipositive singular metric ψ\psi having zero Lelong numbers everywhere. There are smooth weights ψk\psi_k on FF and numbers ϵk↓0\epsilon_k\downarrow0 such that

i∂∂ˉψk≥−ϵkω.i\partial\bar{\partial}\psi_k\geq-\epsilon_k\omega.

In fixed local frames these weights are uniformly bounded above on relatively compact coordinate neighborhoods, and, for every fixed b>0b>0, their exponentials e−bψke^{-b\psi_k} have uniformly bounded local L1L^1 norms.

Proof. Choose a smooth reference metric on FF. Apply the attenuation form of Demailly’s regularization theorem to the specified current T=i∂∂ˉψT=i\partial\bar{\partial}\psi, using the global difference between ψ\psi and the reference weight as its potential [3 Main Theorem 1.1]. Fix a positive attenuation level cc. Adding the reference weight back to the approximating potentials gives weights ψk\psi_k on the same rational line bundle, with ψk↓ψ\psi_k\downarrow\psi. They are smooth outside the Lelong level set Ec(T)={x:ν(T,x)≥c}E_c(T)=\{x:\nu(T,x)\geq c\}, which is empty. Their curvature lower bounds have the form −min⁡(λk,c)u−δkω-\min(\lambda_k,c)u-\delta_k\omega, where uu is one fixed smooth nonnegative form, δk→0\delta_k\to0, and the continuous functions λk\lambda_k decrease to the Lelong-number function. That function is zero here. Dini’s theorem on the compact manifold gives sup⁡Vλk→0\sup_V \lambda_k \to0, and u≤Cωu \le C\omega gives the stated loss ϵk→0\epsilon_k \to0. Passing to a subsequence makes the losses decrease. Work first on a common integral tensor power of FF and divide all weights by that integer afterwards.

On each fixed coordinate neighborhood the decreasing approximants satisfy ψ≤ψk≤ψ1\psi\le\psi_k \le\psi_1. The upper bound is smooth on a slightly larger neighborhood, and hence is bounded on the chosen compact subset. For every fixed b>0b > 0,

e−bψk≤e−bψ.e^{-b\psi_k} \le e^{-b\psi}.

The right side is locally integrable by the zero-Lelong case of Skoda’s integrability criterion [21]; see [5 Property 1.4(8)] for the formulation for arbitrary plurisubharmonic weights. This proves the uniform fixed-exponent bounds directly.

Apply the lemma simultaneously to L−C0L - C_0 and L−C2L - C_2, obtaining weights ψ0,k,ψ2,k\psi_{0,k}, \psi_{2,k} with a common sequence 0<ϵk≤10 < \epsilon_k \le1 tending to zero. Let

D=Supp⁡(C0+C2)red,U=V∖D.D = \operatorname{Supp}(C_0 + C_2)_{\mathrm{red}}, \qquad U = V \setminus D.

For a rational divisor CC, write [C][C] for its divisor weight. The endpoint weights ψi,k\psi_{i,k} live on the rational bundles L−CiL - C_i. Adding [Ci][C_i] gives weights on LL. We first raise the weight at the first endpoint above that at the second, so that the natural inclusion of the eventual integral bundles will be a contraction. The symbols Φi,k\Phi_{i,k} below are weights on LL, whereas hi,kh_{i,k} are weights on Li=L−⌊Ci⌋L_i = L - \lfloor C_i \rfloor. On UU set

ψ0,k′=log⁡(eψ0,k+eψ2,k+[C2−C0]),(6)\psi'_{0,k} = \log\left(e^{\psi_{0,k}} + e^{\psi_{2,k}+[C_2-C_0]}\right), \tag*{(6)}
Φ0,k=ψ0,k′+[C0],Φ2,k=ψ2,k+[C2],Φ1,k=(1−λ)Φ0,k+λΦ2,k,(7)\Phi_{0,k} = \psi'_{0,k} + [C_0], \qquad\Phi_{2,k} = \psi_{2,k} + [C_2], \qquad\Phi_{1,k} = (1-\lambda)\Phi_{0,k} + \lambda\Phi_{2,k}, \tag*{(7)}
hi,k=Φi,k−[⌊Ci⌋],i=0,1.(8)h_{i,k} = \Phi_{i,k} - [\lfloor C_i\rfloor], \qquad i = 0,1. \tag*{(8)}

The two summands in (6) are weights on the same rational line bundle L−C0L - C_0, so the expression is intrinsically well-defined. The logarithm of a sum of exponentials preserves the common curvature lower bound: locally add a potential for ϵkω\epsilon_k\omega to both summands and use the psh log-sum inequality. Moreover ψ0,k′≥ψ0,k\psi'_{0,k} \ge\psi_{0,k}. Effectivity of C2−C0C_2 - C_0 gives a uniform local upper bound for its divisor weight, so ψ0,k′\psi'_{0,k} retains both the upper bounds and all the fixed-exponent integrability bounds of Lemma 3.1.

The weights hi,kh_{i,k} are smooth metrics on Li∣UL_i|_U. They have uniform local upper bounds in frames extending across DD, and

sup⁡k∫B∩Ue−hi,k dλB<∞(i=0,1)(9)\sup_k \int_{B\cap U} e^{-h_{i,k}}\,d\lambda_B < \infty\qquad(i=0,1) \tag*{(9)}

on every relatively compact coordinate neighborhood BB, where dλBd\lambda_B is coordinate volume. To verify the last assertion, write

h0,k=ψ0,k′+[C0−⌊C0⌋],h1,k=(1−λ)ψ0,k′+λψ2,k+[C1−⌊C1⌋].h_{0,k} = \psi'_{0,k} + [C_0 - \lfloor C_0\rfloor], \qquad h_{1,k} = (1-\lambda)\psi'_{0,k} + \lambda\psi_{2,k} + [C_1 - \lfloor C_1\rfloor].

Every coefficient of either fractional divisor lies in [0,1)[0,1). Choose one Hölder exponent a>1a > 1 so close to one that its product with each of these finitely many coefficients is still less than one. The exponential of the fractional divisor weight is in LaL^a by the crossing-coordinate integral. The conjugate Hölder exponent for the remaining weights is allowed by the fixed-exponent bounds; a second Hölder inequality handles the two summands in h1,kh_{1,k}. This proves (9) uniformly in kk.

Let E=⌊C1⌋−⌊C0⌋≥0E=\lfloor C_1\rfloor-\lfloor C_0\rfloor\ge0, and let s:L1→L0s:L_1\to L_0 be multiplication by the canonical section of EE. Since Φ2,k≤Φ0,k\Phi_{2,k}\le\Phi_{0,k}, we have Φ1,k≤Φ0,k\Phi_{1,k}\le\Phi_{0,k} and

∣s∣2eh1,k−h0,k=eΦ1,k−Φ0,k≤1.(10)\lvert s\rvert^2 e^{h_{1,k}-h_{0,k}}=e^{\Phi_{1,k}-\Phi_{0,k}}\le1. \tag*{(10)}

Thus multiplication is a contraction on all form degrees for any one fixed background metric. On UU the curvatures are θi,k=i∂∂ˉΦi,k\theta_{i,k}=i\partial\bar{\partial}\Phi_{i,k}; divisor weights contribute no curvature there.

A complete metric with bounded local potentials

The singular set must be removed to use smooth weighted harmonic forms. We choose the complete metric carefully so that local solvability still has a uniform comparison with the given weights. The bounded-potential construction follows the complete-metric method of [10], Lemma 3.1; we include the calculation because both bounded potentials and completeness are needed in the uniform primitive estimate.

Lemma 3.2. There is a complete Kähler metric ωc≥ω\omega_c\ge\omega on UU such that, on sufficiently small coordinate neighborhoods in VV, it has potentials bounded even on approach to DD.

Proof. If DD is empty, take ωc=ω\omega_c=\omega. Otherwise choose a smooth metric on OV(D)\mathcal{O}_V(D) and scale it so that t=log⁡∣sD∣sm2<−e2t=\log\lvert s_D\rvert_{\mathrm{sm}}^2<-e^2 on UU. Set f0(t)=1/log⁡(−t)f_0(t)=1/\log(-t). For x=−tx=-t,

f0′(t)=1x(log⁡x)2,f0′′(t)=1x2(1(log⁡x)2+2(log⁡x)3).f_0'(t)=\frac{1}{x(\log x)^2},\qquad f_0''(t)=\frac{1}{x^2}\left(\frac{1}{(\log x)^2}+\frac{2}{(\log x)^3}\right).

In particular f0′f_0' is bounded and f0′′(t)≥(tlog⁡(−t))−2f_0''(t)\ge(t\log(-t))^{-2}. Off DD the form i∂∂ˉti\partial\bar{\partial}t is the negative of a fixed smooth curvature form, so it is bounded by a multiple of ω\omega. For a sufficiently large fixed MM the form

ωc=Mω+i∂∂ˉf0(t)\omega_c=M\omega+i\partial\bar{\partial}f_0(t)

is positive and dominates both ω\omega and i∂t∧∂ˉt/(tlog⁡(−t))2i\partial t\wedge\bar{\partial}t/(t\log(-t))^2.

A path leaving every compact subset of UU approaches DD, because VV is compact; along such an approach t→−∞t\to-\infty. The displayed radial term bounds its length below by a positive constant times the total variation of log⁡log⁡(−t)\log\log(-t), which diverges. Hence the metric is complete, including at crossings of components of DD. Finally, if ω=i∂∂ˉρ\omega=i\partial\bar{\partial}\rho on a small coordinate neighborhood, then Mρ+f0(t)M\rho+f_0(t) is a local potential for ωc\omega_c. The smooth function ρ\rho is bounded on a smaller relatively compact neighborhood, and f0(t)f_0(t) is bounded and tends to zero at DD.

Fix this metric for the rest of the section. When D≠∅D\ne\varnothing, the function r=log⁡log⁡(−t)r=\log\log(-t) is a smooth proper exhaustion of UU with bounded gradient in ωc\omega_c. If ζ\zeta is a smooth function equal to one on (−∞,1](-\infty,1] and zero on [2,∞)[2,\infty), then ζ(r/R)\zeta(r/R), as R→∞R\to\infty, gives compactly supported smooth cutoffs tending to one and with gradient O(R−1)O(R^{-1}). When DD is empty, the constant cutoff one suffices.

The curvature comparison following (7) becomes

θ1,k+ϵkωc≥(1−λ)(θ0,k+ϵkωc)≥0,(11)\theta_{1,k}+\epsilon_k\omega_c\ge(1-\lambda)(\theta_{0,k}+\epsilon_k\omega_c)\ge0, \tag*{(11)}

since θ2,k+ϵkωc≥0\theta_{2,k}+\epsilon_k\omega_c\ge0 as well.

A fixed-cover primitive estimate and the ordinary class map

Fix a holomorphic line bundle FF on VV. The local L2L^2 theorem gives primitives on coordinate neighborhoods, but a global primitive requires their holomorphic differences on overlaps to split. We use one finite cover and its fixed spaces of holomorphic sections to make that splitting estimate uniform in the weights. The extended differences also define a class in the ordinary group H1(V,KV⊗F)H^1(V,K_V\otimes F). Thus the class map below has ordinary coherent cohomology as its target, and the primitive estimate shows that its kernel consists of actual weighted exact forms. This local-solutions and holomorphic-cocycle comparison follows the method of [10], Section 3, Claim 1 and Lemma 3.2. For a smooth metric hh on F∣UF|U, write Lh2(n,q)L_h^2(n,q) for the Hilbert space of FF-valued (n,q)(n,q) forms using hh and ωc\omega_c. The Dolbeault operator is its maximal distributional realization, and Zh1=ker⁡(∂ˉ:Lh2(n,1)→Lh2(n,2))Z_h^1=\ker(\bar\partial:L_h^2(n,1)\to L_h^2(n,2)).

Proposition 3.3. Let FF be a fixed holomorphic line bundle on VV, and let hkh_k be smooth metric weights on F∣UF|U. Suppose that, for a fixed constant A0≥0A_0\ge0,

i∂∂ˉhk≥−A0ωc,i\partial\bar\partial h_k\ge-A_0\omega_c,

and that in local frames on VV the weights are uniformly bounded above and the functions e−hke^{-h_k} have uniformly bounded local integrals on punctured coordinate neighborhoods. Then:

(i) There is a continuous linear map

κk:Zhk1⟶H1(V,KV⊗F)\kappa_k:Z_{h_k}^1\longrightarrow H^1(V,K_V\otimes F)

agreeing with the ordinary Dolbeault class on smooth closed forms on VV. It annihilates the closure in Lhk2(n,1)L_{h_k}^2(n,1) of the image of ∂ˉ:Lhk2(n,0)→Lhk2(n,1)\bar\partial:L_{h_k}^2(n,0)\to L_{h_k}^2(n,1).

(ii) There is a constant CC independent of kk such that every f∈Zhk1f\in Z_{h_k}^1 with κk(f)=0\kappa_k(f)=0 has a global primitive on UU satisfying

∂ˉv=f,∥v∥hk≤C∥f∥hk.\bar\partial v=f,\qquad\lVert v\rVert_{h_k}\le C\lVert f\rVert_{h_k}.

No continuous linear choice of these global primitives is asserted.

Proof. Choose a finite collection of coordinate and frame balls

Vj⋐Uj⋐U^jV_j\Subset U_j\Subset\widehat U_j

such that the VjV_j still cover VV and ωc\omega_c has a bounded local potential ρj\rho_j on U^j∩U\widehat U_j\cap U. These sets and potentials are independent of kk.

Local solutions. On Uj∩UU_j\cap U, replace the line weight by hk+(A0+1)ρjh_k+(A_0+1)\rho_j. Its curvature dominates ωc\omega_c, and the bounded potential compares its top-form norms with those of hkh_k by fixed constants. Equip Uj∩UU_j\cap U with the complete metric ωc+ωball\omega_c+\omega_{\mathrm{ball}}, where ωball\omega_{\mathrm{ball}} is a complete metric for the coordinate ball. This sum is complete at both the deleted divisor and the ball boundary. An (n,1)(n,1) datum square integrable for ωc\omega_c remains so for the larger background metric: its density uses the inverse background matrix on its one remaining covector. By Lemma 2.1, the inverse-curvature density for the modified weight is bounded by the original ωc\omega_c datum density. The top-form solution density is independent of the auxiliary complete metric. Consequently there is a local solution operator Tj,kT_{j,k} with

∂ˉTj,kf=f,∥Tj,kf∥hk,Uj∩U≤Cj∥f∥hk,Uj∩U.(12)\bar\partial T_{j,k}f=f,\qquad\lVert T_{j,k}f\rVert_{h_k,U_j\cap U}\le C_j\lVert f\rVert_{h_k,U_j\cap U}. \tag*{(12)}

where CjC_j is independent of kk. For each fixed kk, choose the solution of smallest norm in the modified metric. Orthogonal projection onto the complement of the holomorphic kernel makes this a linear continuous choice. The affine solution set is closed because the distributional operator is closed.

Holomorphic cocycles. Given f∈Zhk1f \in Z^1_{h_k}, put wj=Tj,k(f∣Uj∩U)w_j=T_{j,k}(f|_{U_j\cap U}). On (Ui∩Uj)∩U(U_i\cap U_j)\cap U, the difference wj−wiw_j-w_i is holomorphic. Uniform upper bounds for hkh_k turn (12) into ordinary local L2L^2 bounds in frames on VV. Holomorphic L2L^2 removal therefore extends the differences uniquely across DD. One can see the removal locally by Laurent expansion in the crossing coordinates and Fubini: a nonzero negative power is not square integrable. The extended differences cij=wj−wic_{ij}=w_j-w_i, sections of KV⊗FK_V\otimes F on Ui∩UjU_i\cap U_j, form a holomorphic Čech cocycle.

For later use, this family of cocycles is bounded in every fixed compact-convergence seminorm whenever ∥f∥hk\|f\|_{h_k} is bounded, uniformly in kk. Indeed, for any compact set in an overlap, choose a slightly larger compact neighborhood still in that overlap. The ordinary L2L^2 bound there and the holomorphic mean-value inequality bound the supremum on the smaller compact. Each such compact has positive separation from the ball boundaries. Its constant may depend on that compact, but not on kk. No bound on the supremum over an entire open overlap is required.

The ordinary class. Let Z1\mathcal{Z}^1 be the Fréchet space of holomorphic cocycles on this finite cover, with compact-convergence topology. The cocycle equations make it a closed subspace of the finite product of overlap section spaces. Choose a smooth partition of unity (ηi)(\eta_i) with Supp⁡ηi⋐Ui\operatorname{Supp}\eta_i\Subset U_i. For a cocycle cc put bj=∑iηicijb_j=\sum_i\eta_i c_{ij} on UjU_j, extending each summand by zero outside its overlap. Then bj−bi=cijb_j-b_i=c_{ij}, so the forms ∂ˉbj\bar\partial b_j agree and define a global smooth form βc\beta_c. This defines the continuous linear map

κ:Z1⟶H1(V,KV⊗F),c⟼[βc].\kappa:\mathcal{Z}^1\longrightarrow H^1(V,K_V\otimes F),\qquad c\longmapsto[\beta_c].

Continuity follows from the compact support of the partition and Cauchy estimates for derivatives on slightly larger compact sets; ordinary cohomology is finite-dimensional and Hausdorff on the compact manifold. Define κk(f)=κ((cij))\kappa_k(f)=\kappa((c_{ij})). Changing the local primitives changes the cocycle by a holomorphic coboundary: the differences of two primitives extend by the same ordinary L2L^2 argument. The local solution estimates and the compact-seminorm estimates just proved make κk\kappa_k continuous and linear.

If ff is smooth on VV, choose smooth local primitives on the larger balls. On the smaller balls they have finite weighted norms, because their coefficients are bounded and the local integrals of e−hke^{-h_k} are finite. Comparison with these primitives shows that κk\kappa_k agrees with the ordinary Dolbeault class. If instead f=∂ˉvf=\bar\partial v for a global weighted L2L^2 primitive on UU, then wj−vw_j-v is holomorphic on Uj∩UU_j\cap U and ordinary locally L2L^2. Its extension gives a holomorphic splitting of cijc_{ij}, so κk(f)=0\kappa_k(f)=0. Continuity therefore annihilates the closure of the actual exact forms, as in (i).

A uniformly bounded splitting. Let C0=∏jH0(Uj,KV⊗F)\mathcal{C}^0=\prod_j H^0(U_j,K_V\otimes F), again with compact-convergence topology, and let B1\mathcal{B}^1 be the image of its coboundary map δ\delta in Z1\mathcal{Z}^1. We need the equality

B1=ker⁡κ.(13)\mathcal{B}^1=\ker\kappa. \tag*{(13)}

The forward inclusion is immediate. For the reverse inclusion, construct smooth local cochains from a partition of unity for a cocycle in ker⁡κ\ker\kappa. Their common ∂ˉ\bar\partial is a global smooth form with zero ordinary Dolbeault class. Subtract a global smooth primitive from every cochain. The resulting cochains are holomorphic and split the original cocycle. This proves (13) without any assumption that the coordinate cover is a Leray cover.

It follows that B1\mathcal{B}^1 is a closed Fréchet subspace. The continuous surjection δ:C0→B1\delta:\mathcal{C}^0\to\mathcal{B}^1 is open. Prescribe only the single continuous seminorm

q((aj))=max⁡jsup⁡Vj‾∣aj∣.q((a_j))=\max_j\sup_{\overline{V_j}}|a_j|.

where the norms are those of fixed smooth frames or a fixed smooth bundle metric. Openness says that the image of {q<1}\{q < 1\} contains a zero neighborhood of B1\mathcal{B}^1 described by finitely many compact seminorms. The cocycles arising from all kk and all data of norm at most one are bounded in those seminorms. A single rescaling therefore gives, for every such cocycle in B1\mathcal{B}^1, a splitting (aj)(a_j) with q((aj))≤Csplitq((a_j)) \le C_{\mathrm{split}} for a fixed CsplitC_{\mathrm{split}}. This uses no assertion that a bounded subset has a lift bounded in every Fréchet seminorm.

When κk(f)=0\kappa_k(f) = 0, choose this splitting and set v=wj−ajv = w_j - a_j on Uj∩UU_j \cap U. The expressions agree on the full overlaps, and hence define a global primitive on UU. Estimate its norm on the smaller VjV_j, which cover VV. The local primitives are controlled by (12); the corrections are controlled by their supremum on Vj‾\overline{V_j} and the uniform integral of e−hke^{-h_k} there. Summing over the finite cover proves a uniform bound for unit-norm data. Scaling proves (ii).

Both sequences h0,kh_{0,k} and h1,kh_{1,k} satisfy this proposition, by Equations (3.4) and (3.6). For each weight, parts (i) and (ii) give

ker⁡κk=im⁡∂ˉ=im⁡∂ˉ‾ inside Zhk1.\ker\kappa_k = \operatorname{im} \bar{\partial} = \overline{\operatorname{im} \bar{\partial}}\ \text{inside}\ Z^1_{h_k}.

Indeed, part (i) kills the closure of the exact forms, while part (ii) provides a primitive for every form in the kernel. We will keep track of the closures explicitly when comparing different weighted spaces. The proposition also applies to a fixed smooth line metric from VV: its curvature is bounded below by −A0ωc-A_0\omega_c for some fixed A0A_0, and its local upper and integral bounds are automatic. This last observation will allow us to compare all approximation parameters in one Hilbert space.

Harmonic representatives and the Bochner comparison

Take a class in the kernel of the map in Theorem 1.2, and represent it by a smooth closed L1L_1-valued (n,1)(n,1) form γ\gamma on VV. All norms in this subsection use ωc\omega_c; a subscript i,ki,k indicates the line weight hi,kh_{i,k}, and integrals of pointwise inner products use dVωcdV_{\omega_c}. The norms ∥γ∥1,k\|\gamma\|_{1,k} are bounded uniformly. Indeed, enlarging ω\omega to ωc\omega_c decreases the top-form-valued (0,1)(0,1) density, and the coefficients of γ\gamma are bounded on a finite cover, where (9) applies.

In the maximal L1,k2L^2_{1,k} Dolbeault complex, the closure of the image of degree-zero forms lies in the closed kernel of the degree-one operator. Subtract its orthogonal projection from γ\gamma, obtaining uku_k. Thus

γ−uk∈im⁡∂ˉ‾,∂ˉuk=0,∂ˉ1,k∗uk=0,∥uk∥1,k≤∥γ∥1,k.(14)\gamma-u_k \in\overline{\operatorname{im}\bar{\partial}},\qquad\bar{\partial}u_k=0,\qquad\bar{\partial}^{*}_{1,k}u_k=0,\qquad\|u_k\|_{1,k}\leq\|\gamma\|_{1,k}. \tag*{(14)}

The adjoint assertion follows from orthogonality to the actual range; it does not require that range to be closed. Local elliptic regularity for the smooth weighted Dolbeault Laplacian on UU makes uku_k smooth there.

Write Λ=Λωc\Lambda=\Lambda_{\omega_c} and let Di,k′D'_{i,k} be the (1,0)(1,0) Chern derivative. In bidegree (n,1)(n,1) put

Ai,k=[θi,k+ϵkωc,Λ].A_{i,k}=[\theta_{i,k}+\epsilon_k\omega_c,\Lambda].

These are pointwise nonnegative operators, and A1,k≥(1−λ)A0,kA_{1,k}\geq(1-\lambda)A_{0,k}. The smooth compact-support Bochner–Kodaira identity is

∥∂ˉv∥i,k2+∥∂ˉi,k∗v∥i,k2=∥Di,k′∗v∥i,k2+∫U⟨[θi,k,Λ]v,v⟩i,k.(15)\|\bar{\partial}v\|^2_{i,k}+\|\bar{\partial}^{*}_{i,k}v\|^2_{i,k} =\|D'^{*}_{i,k}v\|^2_{i,k}+\int_U\langle[\theta_{i,k},\Lambda]v,v\rangle_{i,k}. \tag*{(15)}

Here Di,k′v=0D'_{i,k}v=0 in top holomorphic degree, and [ωc,Λ][\omega_c,\Lambda] is the identity in this bidegree. The same identity on complete manifolds, with the indicated domain interpretation and lower curvature bound, is discussed in [19 Proposition 2.4].

To justify its use without already knowing the extra terms are integrable, use the compactly supported smooth cutoffs constructed above, whose gradients tend uniformly to zero in ωc\omega_c. Apply (15) to the cutoff multiples of uku_k and add ϵk\epsilon_k times their squared norms. The left-hand derivative terms tend to zero by (14) and the gradient bound. The two terms retained on the right are nonnegative, so lower semicontinuity gives

∥D1,k′∗uk∥1,k2+∫U⟨A1,kuk,uk⟩1,k≤ϵk∥uk∥1,k2.(16)\lVert D'^{*}_{1,k}u_k\rVert_{1,k}^{2}+\int_U\langle A_{1,k}u_k,u_k\rangle_{1,k}\leq\epsilon_k\lVert u_k\rVert_{1,k}^{2}. \tag*{(16)}

The commutators with the cutoffs contain only their derivatives; they do not introduce constants from derivatives of the varying line metrics.

The Kähler identity D′∗=i[Λ,∂ˉ]D'^{*}=i[\Lambda,\bar{\partial}] shows that this formal operator commutes with holomorphic multiplication by ss. Combining (10) and (11) with (16) therefore gives

∥D0,k′∗(suk)∥0,k2+∫U⟨A0,ksuk,suk⟩0,k≤Cλϵk∥uk∥1,k2.(17)\lVert D'^{*}_{0,k}(su_k)\rVert_{0,k}^{2}+\int_U\langle A_{0,k}su_k,su_k\rangle_{0,k}\leq C_{\lambda}\epsilon_k\lVert u_k\rVert_{1,k}^{2}. \tag*{(17)}

For the curvature term one first uses A1,k≥(1−λ)A0,kA_{1,k}\geq(1-\lambda)A_{0,k} and then the line-norm contraction. One may take Cλ=(1−λ)−1C_{\lambda}=(1-\lambda)^{-1}: this factor bounds both the derivative term and the curvature term in the source energy. The strict interior hypothesis keeps this comparison factor finite.

We also need the target ∂ˉ\bar{\partial} adjoint. The form suksu_k is smooth, closed, and square integrable. Apply the compact-support identity to cutoff multiples of this form. On its right-hand side use (17), replace the curvature commutator by the larger nonnegative A0,kA_{0,k}, and let the gradient errors tend to zero. It follows that the formal adjoint is square integrable and

∥∂ˉ0,k∗(suk)∥0,k≤Cϵk.(18)\lVert\bar{\partial}^{*}_{0,k}(su_k)\rVert_{0,k}\leq C\sqrt{\epsilon_k}. \tag*{(18)}

This also verifies the Hilbert-adjoint domain condition. In detail, complete-metric cutoffs and local smooth approximation give density in the maximal graph norm, so integration by parts against compactly supported forms extends to that domain. The formal adjoint, now known to be L2L^2, is its Hilbert adjoint. Thus (18) has not assumed the existence of a global primitive or an adjoint-domain statement in advance.

We have shown that the image of the harmonic representative has a small adjoint norm. The fixed-cover proposition supplies a uniformly bounded primitive for this image; pairing these two statements will make its entire target norm tend to zero.

From a small image to vanishing of the ordinary class

Multiplication by ss is bounded in degrees zero and one and commutes with the distributional Dolbeault operator. Hence (14) implies that sγ−suks\gamma-su_k is in the target closure of the actual exact forms. Apply the target class map in Proposition 3.3. It annihilates that closure and agrees with ordinary cohomology on sγs\gamma. The latter class is zero by the choice of γ\gamma. Consequently κ0,k(suk)=0\kappa_{0,k}(su_k)=0.

The norms of suksu_k are uniformly bounded by (10) and (14). Part (ii) of Proposition 3.3 gives global forms vkv_k on UU with

∂ˉvk=suk,sup⁡k∥vk∥0,k<∞.\bar{\partial}v_k=su_k,\qquad\sup_k\lVert v_k\rVert_{0,k}<\infty.

The adjoint-domain conclusion above now justifies

∥suk∥0,k2=⟨∂ˉvk,suk⟩0,k=⟨vk,∂ˉ0,k∗(suk)⟩0,k⟶0.(19)\lVert su_k\rVert_{0,k}^{2}=\langle\bar{\partial}v_k,su_k\rangle_{0,k}=\langle v_k,\bar{\partial}^{*}_{0,k}(su_k)\rangle_{0,k}\longrightarrow0. \tag*{(19)}

To retain the original class while passing to a limit, fix a smooth metric on L1L_1 over all of VV, with local weight h∗h_* and use the same complete background ωc\omega_c on UU. Uniform upper bounds in a finite framed cover give the global metric comparison

h1,k≤h∗+C∗,e−h∗≤eC∗e−h1,k.(20)h_{1,k} \le h_* + C_*, \qquad e^{-h_*} \le e^{C_*}e^{-h_{1,k}}. \tag*{(20)}

It gives one bounded inclusion from each varying weighted space into the fixed space, in both degrees zero and one. In particular the uku_k have uniformly bounded fixed norms.

On any compact subset K⊂UK \subset U the multiplier ss is nowhere zero, and the target weights h0,kh_{0,k} have uniform upper bounds. Thus Equation (19) implies that uk→0u_k \to0 in the fixed L2L^2 norm on KK. This local strong convergence and the global bound imply global weak convergence to zero. Indeed, approximate any fixed L2L^2 test form by one supported in a compact subset of UU; its pairing tends to zero by local convergence, and the norm of the remaining tail controls its pairing uniformly in kk. Concentration of norm near DD does not affect this weak convergence.

For each kk, choose actual exact forms ∂ˉzk,l\bar{\partial}z_{k,l} converging to γ−uk\gamma-u_k in Equation (14). By Equation (20), their primitives belong to the fixed degree-zero space and their derivatives converge in the fixed degree-one norm. Therefore γ−uk\gamma-u_k belongs to the fixed closure of actual exact forms. Apply Proposition 3.3 once more, now to the fixed smooth metric with weight h∗h_*. Its continuous class map κ∗\kappa_* annihilates that fixed closure, so

κ∗(uk)=κ∗(γ)=[γ]for every k.\kappa_*(u_k)=\kappa_*(\gamma)=[\gamma]\quad\text{for every }k.

The fixed closed-form space is a closed Hilbert subspace, and a continuous linear map from it to finite-dimensional ordinary cohomology is weakly continuous. Since uk⇀0u_k \rightharpoonup0, the last displayed identity forces [γ]=0[\gamma]=0.

This proves analytic Dolbeault injectivity. Dolbeault theory and GAGA identify it with the natural map in algebraic coherent cohomology, proving Theorem 1.2.

Abundance for fourfolds with nonzero Euler characteristic

The metric theorem gives abundance for klt fourfolds when the Euler characteristic is nonzero. A published nonvanishing criterion uses this Euler hypothesis to produce the first section; a second criterion then gives semi-ampleness. We state both inputs in terms of the actual adjoint bundle on a resolution, so that the same zero-Lelong metric supplies their analytic hypotheses.

Corollary 4.1. Let (X,Δ)(X,\Delta) be a projective complex klt fourfold with effective rational boundary and nef adjoint D=KX+ΔD=K_X+\Delta. If χ(X,OX)≠0\chi(X,\mathcal{O}_X)\ne0, then DD is semiample.

This proof combines Theorem 1.1 with published nonvanishing and semi-ampleness criteria. It isolates the use of χ(X,OX)≠0\chi(X,\mathcal{O}_X)\ne0: that condition enters the nonvanishing criterion, whereas the metric theorem has no Euler-characteristic hypothesis. Related work on multiplier-ideal approximations and supercanonical currents studies this analytic setting [16], Theorems A–B.

The two algebraic inputs

For a Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier divisor PP on a normal projective variety, the metric condition in [17], Definition 2.12 requires a positive integer rr, with rPrP Cartier, and a resolution f:Z→Xf:Z\to X carrying a singular metric on f∗OX(rP)f^*\mathcal{O}_X(rP) whose curvature has the form

T=T0+∑jaj[Ej],T0≥0,ν(T0,z)=0 (z∈Z),aj∈Q≥0.(21)T=T_0+\sum_j a_j[E_j],\qquad T_0\ge0,\qquad\nu(T_0,z)=0\ (z\in Z),\qquad a_j\in\mathbb{Q}_{\ge0}. \tag*{(21)}

The divisor sum is finite. This is called a metric with generalized algebraic singularities. The sum may be zero; in particular, every semipositive metric with zero Lelong numbers everywhere meets this definition.

Theorem 4.2 (Lazić–Peternell, fourfold nonvanishing). Let (X,Δ)(X,\Delta) be a normal projective complex klt pair of dimension four, with effective rational boundary, and put D=KX+ΔD=K_X+\Delta. Suppose DD is pseudoeffective and NN is a nef Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier divisor. If both DD and D+ND+N satisfy the metric condition (21) and χ(X,OX)≠0\chi(X,\mathcal{O}_X)\ne0, then some rational t0>0t_0>0 satisfies

κ(X,D+tN)≥0for every rational t∈[0,t0].\kappa(X,D+tN)\ge0 \qquad\text{for every rational }t\in[0,t_0].

This is [17 Corollary D], the unconditional four-dimensional consequence of their Theorem C(i). Its interval includes t=0t=0. We will take N=0N=0, so both metric assumptions concern DD.

Theorem 4.3 (Gongyo–Matsumura, fourfold semi­ampleness). Let (X,Δ)(X,\Delta) be a normal projective complex klt pair of dimension four, with effective rational boundary, and set D=KX+ΔD=K_X+\Delta. Suppose that for a projective birational morphism f:Z→Xf:Z\to X with ZZ smooth and some positive integer rr with rDrD Cartier, the bundle f∗OX(rD)f^*\mathcal{O}_X(rD) carries a semipositive singular Hermitian metric with zero Lelong numbers at every point of ZZ. If κ(X,D)≥0\kappa(X,D)\ge0, then DD is semiample.

This is the form of [11 Corollary 5.3] used here. Positivity of the Cartier multiple is also explicit in their Theorem 5.1, from which that corollary follows. Neither of these fourfold results requires XX to be Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial or non-uniruled. Their dimension-three inputs are already incorporated in the stated corollaries.

Application to the minimal metric

Proof of Corollary 4.1. Choose a projective log resolution π:Y→X\pi:Y\to X, a positive integer rr such that rDrD is Cartier, and a metric hmin⁡h_{\min} with minimal singularities on L=π∗DL=\pi^*D. Nefness makes DD pseudoeffective, so such a metric exists. By Theorem 1.1,

ν(hmin⁡,y)=0(y∈Y).\nu(h_{\min},y)=0 \qquad(y\in Y).

The tensor power hmin⁡⊗rh_{\min}^{\otimes r} is a metric on the actual line bundle π∗OX(rD)\pi^*\mathcal{O}_X(rD). Its local weights are rφr\varphi, so its curvature is semipositive and its Lelong numbers are rν(φ,y)=0r\nu(\varphi,y)=0. Consequently, (21) holds with T0T_0 equal to this curvature current and with zero divisor sum. Apply Theorem 4.2 with N=0N=0 and t=0t=0 to obtain

κ(X,D)≥0.\kappa(X,D)\ge0.

This is nonvanishing for DD itself: a positive Cartier multiple of DD has a nonzero global section. It is therefore the Kodaira dimension hypothesis of Theorem 4.3. The same resolution and the same metric hmin⁡⊗rh_{\min}^{\otimes r} supply its remaining hypothesis, and that theorem proves that DD is semiample.

The argument imposes no restriction on the numerical dimension of DD. The Euler-characteristic hypothesis is used only to obtain the first section; the interior-injectivity theorem of this article is not an input to this particular application.

References

  1. [1]R. Berman and J.-P. Demailly, Regularity of plurisubharmonic upper envelopes in big cohomology classes, in Perspectives in Analysis, Geometry, and Topology, Progress in Mathematics, vol. 296, Birkhäuser/Springer, 2012, 39–66. doi:10.1007/978-0-8176-8277-4_3. Locators refer to arXiv:0905.1246v1.DOI
  2. [2]J.-P. Demailly, T. Peternell, and M. Schneider, Pseudo-effective line bundles on compact Kähler manifolds, International Journal of Mathematics 12 (2001), no. 6, 689–741. Locators refer to arXiv:math/0006205v2.DOI
  3. [3]J.-P. Demailly, Regularization of closed positive currents and intersection theory, Journal of Algebraic Geometry 1 (1992), no. 3, 361–409.
  4. [4]J.-P. Demailly, Analytic Methods in Algebraic Geometry, Surveys of Modern Mathematics, vol. 1, International Press and Higher Education Press, Somerville, MA and Beijing, 2012. Locators refer to the July 2011 author manuscript.www-fourier.univ-grenoble-alpes.fr/~demailly/manuscripts/analmeth_book.pdf
  5. [5]J.-P. Demailly and J. Kollár, Semi-continuity of complex singularity exponents and Kähler–Einstein metrics on Fano orbifolds, Annales scientifiques de l’École Normale Supérieure (4) 34 (2001), no. 4, 525–556.
  6. [6]F. Docquier and H. Grauert, Levisches Problem und Rungescher Satz für Teilgebiete Steinscher Mannigfaltigkeiten, Mathematische Annalen 140 (1960), 94–123.
  7. [7]H. Esnault and E. Viehweg, Lectures on vanishing theorems, DMV Seminar, vol. 20, Birkhäuser, Basel, 1992.DOI
  8. [8]F. Forstnerič, The Oka principle for sections of stratified fiber bundles, Pure and Applied Mathematics Quarterly 6 (2010), no. 3, 843–874. Theorem 3.1 is cited from arXiv:0705.0591v5.arxiv.org/abs/0705.0591
  9. [9]O. Fujino, Fundamental theorems for the log minimal model program, Publications of the Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences 47 (2011), no. 3, 727–789.arxiv.org/abs/0909.4445
  10. [10]O. Fujino, A transcendental approach to Kollár’s injectivity theorem, Osaka Journal of Mathematics 49 (2012), no. 3, 833–852. Locators refer to the author manuscript dated 30 April 2011, version 1.25.math.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~fujino/kollar1-03.pdf
  11. [11]Y. Gongyo and S.-i. Matsumura, Versions of injectivity and extension theorems, Annales scientifiques de l’École Normale Supérieure (4) 50 (2017), no. 2, 479–502. Corollary 5.3 and Question 5.6 are cited from the published version, p. 499.arxiv.org/abs/1406.6132
  12. [12]V. Guedj and A. Zeriahi, Intrinsic capacities on compact Kähler manifolds, Journal of Geometric Analysis 15 (2005), no. 4, 607–639. doi:10.1007/BF02922247.DOI
  13. [13]A. Höring, V. Lazić, and C. Lehn, Nonvanishing results for Kähler varieties, arXiv:2508.14634v2, 21 October 2025.arxiv.org/abs/2508.14634v2
  14. [14]T. Koike, On the minimality of canonically attached singular Hermitian metrics on certain nef line bundles, Kyoto Journal of Mathematics 55 (2015), no. 3, 607–616. doi:10.1215/21562261-3089091. Locators refer to arXiv:1405.4698v1.DOI
  15. [15]R. Lazarsfeld, Positivity in Algebraic Geometry I: Classical Setting: Line Bundles and Linear Series, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete (3), vol. 48, Springer, Berlin, 2004.
  16. [16]V. Lazić, Metrics with minimal singularities and the Abundance conjecture, arXiv:2406.18233v1, 26 June 2024.arxiv.org/abs/2406.18233
  17. [17]V. Lazić and T. Peternell, On generalised abundance, II, Peking Mathematical Journal 3 (2020), 1–46. doi:10.1007/s42543-019-00022-1. Theorem locators refer to arXiv:1809.02500v4, 7 May 2019.DOI
  18. [18]J. Liu and Z. Xu, Non-vanishing implies numerical dimension one abundance, arXiv:2505.05250v2, 30 July 2025.arxiv.org/abs/2505.05250
  19. [19]S.-i. Matsumura, An injectivity theorem with multiplier ideal sheaves of singular metrics with transcendental singularities, Journal of Algebraic Geometry 27 (2018), no. 2, 305–337. Locators refer to arXiv:1308.2033v4, 27 April 2016.arxiv.org/abs/1308.2033v4
  20. [20]M. S. Narasimhan and R. R. Simha, Manifolds with ample canonical class, Inventiones Mathematicae 5 (1968), 120–128. doi:10.1007/BF01425543.DOI
  21. [21]H. Skoda, Sous-ensembles analytiques d’ordre fini ou infini dans Cⁿ, Bulletin de la Société Mathématique de France 100 (1972), 353–408.DOI
  22. [22]H. Tsuji, Canonical singular hermitian metrics on relative canonical bundles, arXiv:0704.0566v5, 5 November 2007.arxiv.org/abs/0704.0566

Paper details

Contents