alphaFeedback

WorksMathematics

Toward Quillen stratification for the odd primary Steenrod algebra

AI contributions
Not recorded for this paper
View details

Abstract

Fix an odd prime pp and let AA be the mod pp Steenrod algebra. There is a normal sub-Hopf algebra DD of AA, and we show that the cohomology of AA is FF-isomorphic to the subalgebra of the cohomology of DD which is invariant under the AA-action. We also show that the sub-Hopf algebras of AA with bounded profile function detect nilpotence in cohomology.

Introduction

Throughout, pp will be an odd prime number.

Let AA be the mod pp Steenrod algebra. The cohomology of AA, Ext⁡A∗(Fp,Fp)\operatorname{Ext}^{*}_{A}(\mathbb{F}_{p},\mathbb{F}_{p}), is the E2E_{2}-page of the classical Adams spectral sequence converging to the pp-component of the stable homotopy groups of spheres, an object of great interest in stable homotopy theory. The goal of this paper is to try to understand the cohomology of AA along the lines of the so-called Quillen stratification for the mod 2 Steenrod algebra, as presented in [19] and [20 Chapter 5].

As Milnor [12] tells us, the Steenrod algebra is the Hopf algebra with graded dual

A∨=Fp[ξ1,ξ2,ξ3,…]⊗Λ(τ0,τ1,τ2,…),A^{\vee}=\mathbb{F}_{p}[\xi_{1},\xi_{2},\xi_{3},\ldots]\otimes\Lambda(\tau_{0},\tau_{1},\tau_{2},\ldots),

graded by deg⁡ξn=2(pn−1)\deg\xi_{n}=2(p^{n}-1) and deg⁡τn=2pn−1\deg\tau_{n}=2p^{n}-1, with coproduct

ξn↦∑i=0nξn−ipi⊗ξi,\xi_{n}\mapsto\sum_{i=0}^{n}\xi_{n-i}^{p^{i}}\otimes\xi_{i},
τn↦τn⊗1+∑i=0nξn−ipi⊗τi,\tau_{n}\mapsto\tau_{n}\otimes1+\sum_{i=0}^{n}\xi_{n-i}^{p^{i}}\otimes\tau_{i},

where ξ0=1\xi_{0}=1 when it appears in these formulas.

To understand a Hopf algebra like AA, a good first step is to understand its sub-Hopf algebras. Any sub-Hopf algebra CC of AA is dual to a quotient Hopf algebra C∨C^{\vee} of A∨A^{\vee}, and by a theorem of Adams and Margolis [1], those quotients must have the form

C∨=A∨/(ξ1pc1,ξ2pc2,ξ3pc3,…;τ0e0,τ1e1,τ2e2,…).C^{\vee}=A^{\vee}/(\xi_{1}^{p^{c_{1}}},\xi_{2}^{p^{c_{2}}},\xi_{3}^{p^{c_{3}}},\ldots;\tau_{0}^{e_{0}},\tau_{1}^{e_{1}},\tau_{2}^{e_{2}},\ldots).

for some exponents ((c1,c2,c3,…);(e0,e1,e2,…))((c_{1},c_{2},c_{3},\ldots);(e_{0},e_{1},e_{2},\ldots)), where cic_{i} is either a non-negative integer or ∞\infty and ei∈{1,2}e_{i}\in\{1,2\}. The list of exponents is called the profile function for the Hopf algebra.

Adams and Margolis characterized precisely which such lists correspond to sub-Hopf algebras, thus providing a complete classification. We review the details in the next section and for now just mention one case: we let DD be the sub-Hopf algebra of AA with profile function

((1,2,3,…,n,…);(2,2,2,…)).((1,2,3,\ldots,n,\ldots);(2,2,2,\ldots)).

This algebra is normal in AA, and more generally, for any sub-Hopf algebra CC of AA, C∩DC\cap D is normal in CC. The inclusion map i:C∩D→Ci:C\cap D\to C induces a restriction map i∗:Ext⁡C∗(Fp,Fp)→Ext⁡C∩D∗(Fp,Fp)i^{*}:\operatorname{Ext}^{*}_{C}(\mathbb{F}_{p},\mathbb{F}_{p})\to\operatorname{Ext}^{*}_{C\cap D}(\mathbb{F}_{p},\mathbb{F}_{p}). Because C∩DC\cap D is normal in CC, the restriction map factors through the subalgebra of invariants under the action of the quotient Hopf algebra C//(C∩D):=C⊗C∩DFpC//(C \cap D) := C \otimes_{C \cap D} \mathbb{F}_p:

Ext⁡C∗(Fp,Fp)→i∗Ext⁡C∩D∗(Fp,Fp)↘↑(Ext⁡C∩D∗(Fp,Fp))C//C∩D\begin{aligned} \operatorname{Ext}^{*}_{C}(\mathbb{F}_p,\mathbb{F}_p) &\xrightarrow{i^*} \operatorname{Ext}^{*}_{C\cap D}(\mathbb{F}_p,\mathbb{F}_p) \\ &\searrow\qquad\uparrow\\ &\left(\operatorname{Ext}^{*}_{C\cap D}(\mathbb{F}_p,\mathbb{F}_p)\right)_{C//C\cap D} \end{aligned}

The map ıˉ∗\bar{\imath}^{*} will make an appearance in Theorem B below.

Quillen stratification involves understanding cohomology algebras up to FF-isomorphism, so recall:

Definition 1.1. A map φ\varphi of graded commutative algebras over a field of characteristic pp is an FF-isomorphism if

  • every element in the kernel of φ\varphi is nilpotent, and

  • for every yy in the codomain of φ\varphi, there is an nn so that ypny^{p^n} is in the image of φ\varphi.

We can strengthen the first part of the definition of FF-isomorphism to echo the nilpotence theorem of Devinatz, Hopkins, and Smith. To do that, we work in a category which behaves like the classical stable homotopy category: given a sub-Hopf algebra CC of AA, let Stable⁡(C∨)\operatorname{Stable}(C^\vee) be the category as defined in [5 Section 9.5] and examined in detail in [20]. The objects of Stable⁡(C∨)\operatorname{Stable}(C^\vee) are cochain complexes of injective graded left comodules over C∨C^\vee, and the morphisms are cochain homotopy classes of maps. This category is a stable homotopy category in the sense of [5], and we may refer to its objects as “spectra.” In this category, the sphere object SS is an injective resolution of Fp\mathbb{F}_p, and if XX is any object, then we may write π∗(X)\pi_*(X) for the chain homotopy classes of maps from SS to XX. If XX is the injective resolution of a comodule MM, then π∗(X)≅Ext⁡C∗(Fp,M)\pi_*(X) \cong\operatorname{Ext}^{*}_{C}(\mathbb{F}_p,M). (Note that if MM is a C∨C^\vee-comodule, then MM can also be viewed as a CC-comodule, and so here Ext is computed in the category of CC-modules.) Also in this category, any sub-Hopf algebra BB of CC defines a ring spectrum called HBHB: this is an injective resolution of C∨□BFp≅(C⊗BFp)∨C^\vee\square_B \mathbb{F}_p \cong(C \otimes_B \mathbb{F}_p)^\vee, and its coefficient ring is π∗HB=HB∗≅Ext⁡B∗(Fp,Fp)\pi_*HB = HB_* \cong\operatorname{Ext}^{*}_{B}(\mathbb{F}_p,\mathbb{F}_p). If XX is the injective resolution of a C∨C^\vee-comodule MM, then the quotient map C∨→B∨C^\vee\to B^\vee gives MM the structure of a B∨B^\vee-comodule, and we have HB∗(X)≅Ext⁡B∗(Fp,M)HB_*(X) \cong\operatorname{Ext}^{*}_{B}(\mathbb{F}_p,M).

Definition 1.2. Given a Hopf algebra CC, we say that a collection SS of sub-Hopf algebras of CC detects nilpotence in Stable⁡(C∨)\operatorname{Stable}(C^\vee) if the following conditions hold:

(a) Fix a ring spectrum RR and α∈π∗(R)\alpha\in\pi_*(R). Then α\alpha is nilpotent if HB∗α=0HB_*\alpha= 0 for all B∈SB \in S.

(b) Fix a finite spectrum YY and a self-map f:Y→Yf:Y \to Y. Then ff is nilpotent if and only if HB∗fHB_*f is nilpotent for all B∈SB \in S.

(c) Fix a finite spectrum FF, an arbitrary spectrum XX, and a map f:F→Xf:F \to X. Then ff is smash-nilpotent if $1_{HB} \wedge f:HB \wedge F \to HB \wedge X$ is zero for all B∈SB \in S.

We have three main results in this paper; here are the first two.

Theorem A. Fix an odd prime pp and suppose that CC is a sub-Hopf algebra of AA. The sub-Hopf algebra C∩DC \cap D detects nilpotence in Stable⁡(C∨)\operatorname{Stable}(C^\vee).

References

  1. [1]J. F. Adams and H. R. Margolis, Sub-Hopf-algebras of the Steenrod algebra, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 76 (1974), 45–52. MR 49 #6238DOI
  2. [2]D. J. Benson, Representations and cohomology. II, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991, Cohomology of groups and modules.
  3. [3]Robert Burklund, Ishan Levy, and Piotr Pstragowski, Nilpotence, periodicity and thick subcategories in cellular motivic spectra, in preparation.
  4. [4]Hayden Harker, Cohomology of the sub-Hopf algebra D of the Steenrod algebra, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 210 (2007), no. 1, 93–112. MR MR2311174 (2008a:55014)DOI
  5. [5]M. Hovey, J. H. Palmieri, and N. P. Strickland, Axiomatic stable homotopy theory, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 128 (1997), no. 610, x+114. MR 98a:55017DOI
  6. [6]M. J. Hopkins, J. H. Palmieri, and J. H. Smith, Vanishing lines in generalized Adams spectral sequences are generic, Geom. Topol. 3 (1999), 155–165.DOI
  7. [7]M. J. Hopkins and J. H. Smith, Nilpotence and stable homotopy theory II, Ann. of Math. (2) 148 (1998), no. 1, 1–49.DOI
  8. [8]W. H. Lin, Cohomology of sub-Hopf-algebras of the Steenrod algebra, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 10 (1977/78), no. 2, 101–113.DOI
  9. [9]H. R. Margolis, Spectra and the Steenrod algebra, North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam-New York, 1983, Modules over the Steenrod algebra and the stable homotopy category.
  10. [10]J. P. May, Matric Massey products, J. Algebra 12 (1969), 533–568. MR 39 #289DOI
  11. [11]J. P. May, A general algebraic approach to Steenrod operations, The Steenrod Algebra and its Applications (Proc. Conf. to Celebrate N. E. Steenrod’s Sixtieth Birthday, Battelle Memorial Inst., Columbus, Ohio, 1970) (F. P. Peterson, ed.), Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 168, Springer, Berlin, 1970, pp. 153–231. MR 43 #6915DOI
  12. [12]J. W. Milnor, The Steenrod algebra and its dual, Ann. of Math. (2) 67 (1958), 150–171. MR 20 #6092
  13. [13]J. W. Milnor and J. C. Moore, On the structure of Hopf algebras, Ann. of Math. (2) 81 (1965), 211–264.
  14. [14]H. R. Miller and C. Wilkerson, Vanishing lines for modules over the Steenrod algebra, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 22 (1981), no. 3, 293–307.DOI
  15. [15]O. Nakamura, Some differentials in the mod 3 Adams spectral sequence, Bull. Sci. Engrg. Div. Univ. Ryukyus Math. Natur. Sci. (1975), no. 19, 1–25. MR 52 #6711
  16. [16]D. K. Nakano and J. H. Palmieri, Support varieties for the Steenrod algebra, Math. Z. 227 (1998), no. 4, 663–684. MR 99d:55011DOI
  17. [17]J. H. Palmieri, Nilpotence for modules over the mod 2 Steenrod algebra II, Duke Math. J. 82 (1996), 209–226.
  18. [18]———, A note on the cohomology of finite dimensional cocommutative Hopf algebras, J. Algebra 188 (1997), no. 1, 203–215.DOI
  19. [19]———, Quillen stratification for the Steenrod algebra, Ann. of Math. (2) 149 (1999), no. 2, 421–449. MR 2000g:55026
  20. [20]J. H. Palmieri, Stable homotopy over the Steenrod algebra, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 151 (2001), no. 716, xiv+172. MR 2002a:55019DOI
  21. [21]D. G. Quillen and B. B. Venkov, Cohomology of finite groups and elementary abelian subgroups, Topology 11 (1972), 317–318.DOI
  22. [22]C. T. C. Wall, Generators and relations for the Steenrod algebra, Ann. of Math. (2) 72 (1960), 429–444. MR MR0116326 (22 #7117)DOI
  23. [23]C. Wilkerson, The cohomology algebras of finite dimensional Hopf algebras, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 264 (1981), no. 1, 137–150. MR 82e:16019DOI

Paper details

vlnc:W_rxjdr282
v1 · latestHistory (1)

published · Fresh — added to the Hub within the last 30 days

added ·

Usage

views · 3

downloads · 0

A view counts once per browser per day, a download each time the PDF is requested.

CC BY 4.0

Original source

  • Mathematics

Not recorded for this paper · View statement →

Looking for related papers…
Contents