Log abundance in numerical dimension one for threefolds in positive characteristic
Abstract
We prove the numerical-dimension-one case of log abundance for threefolds over algebraically closed fields of characteristic p > 3. If is a projective log canonical threefold pair with effective rational boundary, and is ℚ-Cartier, nef, and of numerical dimension one, then is semiample. Neither terminality nor ℚ-factoriality of X is required.
Introduction
The abundance conjecture predicts that a nef log canonical divisor on a projective log canonical pair is semiample: some positive Cartier multiple is generated by its global sections. Semiampleness turns the numerical positivity of the divisor into a morphism. We consider threefolds in positive characteristic and the case of numerical dimension one. For a nef -Cartier divisor on a threefold, this condition means that, for an ample Cartier divisor ,
Theorem 1.1. Let be an algebraically closed field of characteristic . Let be a projective log canonical threefold pair over , where is normal, is an effective -divisor, and is -Cartier. If is nef and has numerical dimension one, then is semiample.
The boundary coefficients are arbitrary rational numbers allowed by log canonicity, and neither terminality nor -factoriality is assumed for the original variety. The theorem proves the numerical-dimension-one case of threefold log abundance in this characteristic range.
Over the complex numbers, Miyaoka proved abundance for minimal threefolds of numerical dimension one [16]; Kawamata completed abundance for minimal threefolds and gave another proof of this case [11]. Keel, Matsuki, and McKernan established log abundance for log canonical threefold pairs [13, 14]. In positive characteristic, Keel’s semiampleness criterion [12] and the basepoint-freeness methods of Cascini, Tanaka, and Xu [3] provided foundations. The threefold minimal model program developed through the work of Hacon–Xu, Birkar, and Birkar–Waldron in characteristic greater than five [8, 1, 2], the log canonical and relative extensions of Waldron and Hashizume–Nakamura–Tanaka [20, 9], and Hacon–Witaszek’s treatment of characteristic five [7].
For abundance, Xu–Zhang proved nonvanishing for terminal minimal threefolds in characteristic greater than five [22]. Witaszek obtained klt nonvanishing and abundance in nef dimension at most two in that characteristic range [21]. The nef dimension is the dimension of the nef reduction of . On a threefold over an uncountable algebraically closed field, means that no curve of -degree zero passes through a very general point. Zheng Xu established nonvanishing for pseudoeffective log canonical divisors on projective lc threefold pairs in characteristic greater than three, together with abundance in nef dimension at most two [23]; he subsequently proved abundance in numerical dimension two [17]. For the present problem, the remaining case has numerical dimension one and nef dimension three.
The companion paper [17] treats terminal threefolds with nef canonical divisor of numerical dimension one. Its proof isolates a stronger structural result: certain connected nef Cartier divisors on smooth threefolds cannot exist. We state this cycle obstruction in Theorem 2.1, with all its hypotheses. The present paper constructs such a divisor from a log canonical pair with arbitrary rational boundary. The companion’s obstruction is an essential input to the proof.
The boundary and the proof strategy
After an uncountable field extension and a crepant birational change, we may suppose that the underlying variety is terminal and -factorial. Nonvanishing gives a nonzero effective Cartier divisor . We assume for contradiction that . The main additional issue is to obtain a relation for a power of the canonical bundle near a component of this log canonical divisor. The boundary and the exceptional divisors of a resolution must both be controlled there.
Proposition 3.1 supplies that control for the boundary: it proves and shows that every boundary component is either contained in or disjoint from it. If the intersection were positive, complete-intersection curves would have arbitrarily small ratios of -degree to anticanonical degree. Quantitative bend-and-break [10] would then produce -trivial rational curves through very general points. This separation argument is formulated independently of the MMP.
Next we adapt the isolation construction of [17]. Raising the boundary to its log canonical threshold along gives a coefficient-one component on a dlt model. A partial MMP, trivial for the resulting full log canonical class, makes this component disjoint from the rest of the divisor. We use Xu’s partial-MMP formulation [23], whose ray argument adapts [13]. Reduced-boundary adjunction and surface abundance [19, 18] then yield torsion on a Cartier multiple of that component. We include the companion’s extension argument across finitely many points, since the required torsion is on the full nonreduced Cartier scheme.
Finally, terminality makes the singular locus finite, so the exceptional divisors of a common resolution obey the same support separation as the boundary. A finite separable cover removes the prime-to- part of the pluricanonical exponent. A connected component of the pulled-back Cartier divisor, divided by the gcd of its multiplicities, has exactly the numerical, torsion, and canonical properties forbidden by Theorem 2.1.
Section 2 states the obstruction and makes the initial reductions. Section 3 proves boundary separation, and Section 4 isolates a component. Section 5 proves torsion on its Cartier thickening. Section 6 constructs the final cycle and completes the proof.
The cycle obstruction and the initial reductions
We first state the precise input from the companion paper. We then reduce Theorem 1.1 to constructing the forbidden cycle. Throughout, a variety is integral. Boundaries are effective -divisors, and a pair has normal and -Cartier. We use the usual discrepancy definitions of log canonical (lc), Kawamata log terminal (klt), divisorial log terminal (dlt), and terminal singularities; see [15]. Canonical divisors on birational models are chosen compatibly. Restrictions and intersections of -Cartier divisors are computed using Cartier multiples.
The obstruction supplied by the companion
For a nef divisor over an uncountable algebraically closed field, its nef dimension is the dimension of the target of its nef reduction. We use only the following characterization in dimension three: if and only if no curve of -degree zero passes through a very general point. Here “very general” means outside a countable union of proper closed subsets. These properties and existence of nef reduction are recalled in [23]. Numerical dimension and nef dimension need not agree.
Theorem 2.1 (Cycle obstruction from the companion). Let be an uncountable algebraically closed field of characteristic . There do not exist a smooth projective threefold , a very ample Cartier divisor , and a nonzero effective Cartier divisor satisfying all the following conditions:
The are distinct prime divisors, , the support of is connected and has simple normal crossings, and .
is nef, its restriction to every is numerically trivial, and
The line bundle on the possibly nonreduced Cartier scheme is torsion.
For some integer and integers , there is an isomorphism on a neighborhood of ,
This is the obstruction proved in [17] for the data listed in its Proposition 2.1. The end of Section 2 of that manuscript explicitly retains only , , , the torsion order, and the local canonical relation. Under these hypotheses, its Sections 3–5 prove Corollary 5.4, and its Proposition 6.8 gives the contradiction. Thus the obstruction applies to any cycle with the displayed properties. In particular, the construction below may start from a log canonical divisor with boundary.
The companion uses the torsion normal line and the local canonical relation to control differential forms on the completion along with poles allowed along . Cartier descent then makes the Picard group of that punctured formal neighborhood -divisible. The numerical conditions give a nonzero integer-valued degree homomorphism on the same group, which contradicts that divisibility. We use this obstruction as a theorem; the present proof constructs all its input data for a log canonical pair.
The canonical relation also implies an intersection identity that occurs in the companion. Indeed, a rational section giving (1) has global divisor , with disjoint from . Since , for every Cartier divisor on we have
Numerical observations
The following elementary observation will convert zero intersection numbers into restrictions that are numerically trivial.
Lemma 2.2. Let be an integral projective surface, an ample Cartier divisor, and a nef -Cartier divisor on . If , then . Moreover, a nonzero effective Cartier divisor on has positive intersection with .
Proof. For any integral curve , a sufficiently large multiple of has an effective Cartier member containing . The effective one-cycle of has positive coefficient along . Every component has nonnegative -degree, whereas , so . This proves the first assertion. The second is positivity of the ample degree of each component of the effective one-cycle of a nonzero Cartier divisor.
In particular, if is a nonzero effective nef Cartier divisor on a projective threefold and for an ample Cartier divisor , then
Indeed, writing , the nonnegative numbers have positive-coefficient sum , and Lemma 2.2 applies.
Reduction to a terminal underlying variety
We use three results of Xu for projective lc threefolds in characteristic greater than three: nonvanishing for a pseudoeffective log canonical divisor, termination of its flips in the pseudoeffective case, and abundance when the divisor is nef of nef dimension at most two [23]. All permit rational boundaries. The relative MMP and crepant -factorial dlt modifications are available in this characteristic range, including characteristic five [7], [23]. We also use projective resolution of threefolds, preserving the regular locus, and resolution of divisor supports, preserving their complement on a regular variety; the required forms of these results are recalled in [17], from [5], [6], [4].
Proposition 2.3. To prove Theorem 1.1, it suffices to rule out the following data: an uncountable algebraically closed field of characteristic , a terminal -factorial projective threefold , an lc pair , and a nonzero effective Cartier divisor
such that and are Cartier, is nef, , and .
Proof. First extend the given field to an uncountable algebraically closed field. Integrality and normality persist, and a log resolution with its discrepancy calculation proves that the base-changed pair remains lc. The canonical divisor can be defined by a rational top form on the smooth locus, so the log canonical class also base changes. Nefness persists by ample approximation, and the prescribed intersection numbers are unchanged.
Semi-ampleness descends under this extension. After making a generated multiple also divisible by the original Cartier index, it is the base change of a line bundle on the original variety. Global sections commute with field extension, and faithful flatness detects surjectivity of its evaluation map. We may therefore work over the enlarged field.
Write for the original log canonical class. If , Xu’s abundance theorem applies. Suppose . Take a crepant projective -factorial dlt modification , and resolve projectively. Run a relative canonical MMP of this smooth resolution over . The MMP with scaling applies by [7], Theorem 1.2. Its output cannot be of fibre type over the three-dimensional birational base, and it gives a projective birational morphism
with terminal and -factorial and nef over . Here terminality is preserved by a canonical MMP: discrepancies do not decrease, and a divisor contracted in a negative divisorial step has strictly positive ordinary discrepancy over the output. Relative pseudoeffectivity causes no restriction for this birational morphism; adding a sufficiently large pullback of an ample divisor makes the canonical class big.
The exceptional divisor is -nef. The negativity lemma gives . Since is -factorial, the divisor
is effective and satisfies . Crepancy makes lc.
The new log canonical class is nef of numerical dimension one. To check the square after pullback, observe first that for every prime surface on the original variety: place in an effective member of a multiple of the ample divisor in the hypothesis, and use nonnegativity of on all its components. Projection formula proves the vanishing upstairs. Numerical nontriviality persists because a curve downstairs can be dominated by a curve upstairs. Finally, the no-zero-degree-curve property persists over the birational isomorphism locus. Thus the new class still has nef dimension three.
Relabel this pair as . By nonvanishing [23], Theorem 1.4, a positive multiple of has an effective representative . It is nonzero because is not numerically trivial. Increasing the multiple makes , , and Cartier, as required.
From now until the proof of Theorem 1.1, we work with the data of Proposition 2.3. Fix a very ample divisor on . Then , , and (3) holds. The next step is to establish the same numerical triviality on the boundary components.
Separating the boundary from the log canonical cycle
The numerical relation initially controls the log canonical divisor, whereas Theorem 2.1 requires a relation for a power of the canonical bundle. We now show that the boundary contributes only components of the cycle or divisors entirely disjoint from it. The argument uses maximal nef dimension and bend-and-break, and is independent of the subsequent MMP.
Proposition 3.1 (Boundary separation). Let be a normal -factorial projective threefold over an uncountable algebraically closed field, and let be an effective -divisor. Suppose that is a nonzero effective nef Cartier divisor with , , and for some rational . For every ample Cartier divisor , one has
Consequently is numerically trivial on each prime component of , and every such component is either contained in or disjoint from .
Proof. We may replace by a very ample multiple. The number is nonnegative. If it were positive, the identity would give .
For each sufficiently large integer , choose positive integers such that and are very ample. Their general complete intersection is an integral curve contained in the smooth locus of . Indeed, normality gives a singular locus of dimension at most one; the first general member meets this locus in finitely many points, and the second avoids them. Bertini’s theorem on the smooth open gives the desired integral curve. Its intersections satisfy
and for large .
The quantitative bend-and-break theorem of Jovinelly, Lehmann, and Riedl [10] applies to an integral curve in the smooth locus of a projective variety over an algebraically closed field, with negative canonical degree, and any nef Cartier test divisor. In dimension three it supplies, through every closed point of , a rational curve satisfying
Fix so large that the right-hand side is strictly less than one. Since is Cartier, it follows that .
For completeness, these complete intersections pass through points to which the very-general-point condition applies. For the two fixed very ample systems, the incidence of a point of and a pair of members through it is a product of projective bundles over , hence is irreducible and dominates . Restricting to the nonempty open set of pairs giving the curves just considered leaves a dense open incidence and a dominant evaluation map. Its image is constructible and contains a nonempty open subset of . Over the uncountable field, this open contains a closed point outside the countable union excluded by . The curve through that point is a contradiction. This proves (5).
Write with . All numbers are nonnegative, so (5) gives for each . Lemma 2.2 yields . If is not a component of , the canonical section of restricts to a nonzero section on the integral surface . Were nonempty, its zero scheme would be a nonzero effective Cartier divisor on and would have positive ample degree. This contradicts , so the two supports are disjoint.
Apply Proposition 3.1 to and set
This is a closed subset disjoint from . Thus , a union of two disjoint closed sets. We retain this separation while isolating one component of .
Isolating a log canonical component
The effective divisor constructed above may have several intersecting components. We now make one of them disjoint from the others, while preserving the pullback of the nef divisor. The construction adapts [17]: raise the boundary to a log canonical threshold, then lower the coefficient of one component and run an MMP that is trivial for the restored log canonical divisor. The resulting neffness forces the required disjointness.
Proposition 4.1. Let be an algebraically closed field of characteristic . Let be a terminal, -factorial projective threefold, let be log canonical with rational boundary, and let
be an effective nef Cartier divisor, where is a positive integer. Assume that is numerically trivial on each component of its support, and that every component of is either contained in or disjoint from . Denote by the union of the latter components and put
There exist a projective -factorial klt threefold birational to , a rational boundary , an effective nef -Cartier divisor , and a prime divisor with the following properties.
The pair is log canonical, has coefficient one in , and is positive. For rational numbers and ,
The divisor is numerically trivial on every component of its support. Every component of is either contained in or disjoint from .
The divisor is disjoint from every other component of and from . In particular,
on a neighborhood of , and .
The birational correspondence identifies with an open subset of . On a smooth projective common resolution , that is an isomorphism over this open,
The same equality holds after passing to any further common resolution.
One may take , where .
Proof. We first find a coefficient-one boundary component lying over . On a log resolution of , the log canonical threshold is the minimum of the finitely many ratios
where denotes log discrepancy and the divisors considered include the strict transforms of the components of . Thus is finite and rational, possibly zero, and is log canonical. There is a log canonical place of this pair for which .
Take a projective crepant -factorial dlt modification
with every extracted divisor having coefficient one; see [23], Theorem 2.27. Set
Then
The divisor is nef and numerically trivial on every component of its support: a curve in that support maps to a point or to a curve in , and the assertion follows by the projection formula.
Every component of is either contained in or disjoint from . For strict transforms of components of this follows from the hypothesis, while those coming from are contained in the support. An extracted divisor has center in , since is klt and the boundary vanishes outside this union. Its irreducible center lies in one of these two disjoint closed sets. In the first case its order on is positive, and in the second case the divisor is disjoint from .
The center on of the place lies in and, by crepancy and the dlt property, in . Choose a component of containing this center. The preceding separation then implies . This argument also covers ; it does not require all components of to occur in .
The modification is an isomorphism outside . Indeed it has no exceptional divisors there, and a projective small birational morphism to a -factorial variety is an isomorphism. To recall the latter fact, push down a relatively ample Cartier divisor. A Cartier multiple of its pushdown pulls back to the same multiple upstairs, because there are no exceptional divisors. It has degree zero on every contracted curve, contradicting relative ampleness if such a curve exists.
Choose a rational sufficiently small that
Apply the partial MMP with lowered boundary and restoration divisor [23] 1. Its steps are -negative and -trivial. The lowered pair is dlt, and its log canonical divisor is pseudoeffective by (11) and (12). The termination required here is therefore supplied by [23]. The threefold MMP package used in this application, including in characteristic five, is recalled in [17].
The partial-MMP conclusion is either a Mori fiber contraction for the lowered log divisor, trivial for the restored divisor, or nefness of the restored divisor minus times the transform of for every sufficiently small rational . We first track , the pullbacks of , and support separation through the steps, and then exclude the fiber-type alternative. Write for a step, with transforms , , . The equality persists by pushforward, so its contracted ray satisfies
In particular cannot be the exceptional divisor of a divisorial step: the negativity lemma would give a contracted curve of negative -degree. Hence survives throughout the MMP.
Let and be a common resolution of a step. The divisor
is -exceptional. If a curve on is contracted by , its image on is a point or a curve contracted to the common contraction target. Thus has degree zero on every such curve by (13). The negativity lemma applied to and gives
This applies to divisorial contractions and flips. The same argument for the full log divisors gives
Consequently the restored pair remains log canonical.
(14) also preserves nefness and numerical triviality on the support. For the latter assertion, lift a curve in to a curve on dominating it. Its image on lies in or is a point: the inverse image of the support of an effective -Cartier divisor is exactly the support of its pullback. The projection formula now gives degree zero. Boundary components contained in remain contained in the transformed support. If a boundary component is disjoint from that support, its strict transform on is disjoint from , hence from . Since that strict transform maps onto its image on , the transformed boundary component is still disjoint from .
These steps also preserve the open complement of the support. Indeed every contracted curve has negative degree against the effective divisor , so is contained in . A connected positive-dimensional projective fiber contains a curve through each of its closed points. Connectedness of fibers therefore implies that a fiber meeting the complement of consists of a single point and does not meet the support. Properness and normality show that the contraction is an isomorphism from this complement onto an open subset of its target. For a flip, this open in the target is -factorial, being isomorphic to the corresponding open of . The new small morphism is therefore also an isomorphism over it.
There is no Mori fiber output. The effective representative persists on each model, as does for every rational . A curve in a fiber through a general point outside this effective support has nonnegative degree, whereas the log divisor driving a Mori fiber contraction has negative degree on every contracted curve. This rules out the fiber-type alternative for the lowered class and for every such smaller perturbation of the restored class.
Let be the resulting model. The partial-MMP conclusion gives (8) for some rational . Negative MMP steps preserve the -factorial dlt pair with lowered boundary, so is dlt. In particular its -factorial underlying variety is klt: every place of zero log discrepancy for a dlt pair has center in its reduced boundary, and removing that effective -Cartier boundary strictly increases its discrepancy. Here dlt preservation is used for the lowered boundary; for the restored boundary we use the crepant comparison just proved.
It remains to see why nefness isolates . If is a component of , numerical triviality of and (8) imply that is nef. On the other hand, is an effective -Cartier divisor. If it were nonzero, its intersection with an ample Cartier divisor on the integral projective surface would be positive, contradicting anti-nefness. Therefore . Each other component of is either such a component of , or is disjoint from its support. This proves the asserted separation and the local identities (9). The equality gives .
Finally, all models share the stated open . Resolve the graph of the correspondences among all the models, keeping this smooth open unchanged, to obtain . Composing (14) with proves (10). Pullback preserves this equality on every further common resolution.
For adjunction we replace the isolated log canonical pair by a dlt pair. The klt property of ensures that all divisors extracted in this last operation belong to the total transform of .
Corollary 4.2. With the notation of Proposition 4.1, there is a projective crepant -factorial dlt modification
such that is reduced,
and is an isomorphism off . On a neighborhood of ,
Moreover, is numerically trivial on each component of , and shares the open with and .
Proof. The pair is log canonical since is log canonical and . Take a crepant dlt modification extracting only log canonical places. Its boundary consists of the strict transform of and its exceptional divisors, all with coefficient one. Every extracted divisor has center contained in : outside the pair is the klt variety . Such a divisor has positive order on , which proves (15). There are no exceptional divisors off ; since is -factorial, the small-morphism argument in the preceding proof shows that is an isomorphism there. Crepancy and (9) give (16). Every curve in maps to a point or to a curve in , where is numerically trivial. The projection formula proves the final numerical assertion. Under the identification in Proposition 4.1, is disjoint from and hence is unchanged by .
Torsion on the full boundary cycle
The reduced dlt boundary of Corollary 4.2 is a surface to which adjunction and surface abundance apply. The prepared-cycle obstruction, however, requires torsion on an effective Cartier divisor, including its multiplicities. We first give the extension argument that passes from the reduced surface to this possibly nonreduced scheme.
Lemma 5.1 ([17]). Let be a normal projective threefold over an algebraically closed field of characteristic , and let be a nonzero effective Cartier divisor on . Suppose that is numerically trivial on every integral component of its support. If
for a finite set of closed points, then is torsion.
Proof. We reproduce the proof because both the finite exceptional set and the nonreduced divisor will occur in our application. Replace by . At , write , with maximal ideal , and let be a local equation of . Normality gives
Here the second assertion uses the dimension-three hypothesis. Indeed, present with regular local of dimension and essentially of finite type over the field. Each nonmaximal localization of is normal of dimension at most two, hence Cohen–Macaulay. Catenarity gives for a prime above ; the Auslander–Buchsbaum formula therefore gives projective dimension over . Thus is supported only at the closed point. It is a finite module, so it has finite length; local duality gives the assertion for .
Choose such that annihilates at every point of . A single works because is finite. For every integer , the restriction sequences give a commutative diagram
In local trivializations the left vertical map is multiplication by . Local cohomology with support in the finite set is the direct sum of the corresponding local groups. The vanishing of the ambient makes the connecting maps from the of the rightmost terms to the ambient injective. Naturality and our choice of therefore imply
is zero for every .
The same works for every twist: locally the invertible sheaves in the diagram are free of rank one, and the annihilating map is still multiplication by .
Now fix this thickening . The ideal of in is nilpotent. Lift a chosen generator of to local generating sections on a finite open cover of . On overlaps the lifts differ by sections in that nilpotent ideal times the line bundle. For sufficiently large, their th tensor powers agree: in local frames this is the identity , with . They consequently glue to a generator
Let be its restriction to . The obstruction to extending over is the image of the obstruction to extending over . Equation (17), applied to the exact sequences for sections with support in , kills that image. Hence extends to a section of .
This extended section has no zeros. On each integral projective surface component of , it is nonzero because it is a generator off . If its restriction to vanished anywhere, its zero scheme would be a nonempty effective Cartier divisor on , and would have positive intersection with an ample divisor. This contradicts the numerical triviality of . The argument uses only integrality of , not normality. The section is therefore a generator on the reduction, and then on , since an element invertible modulo a nilpotent ideal is invertible. Thus . □
We apply this lemma to the reduced dlt model obtained by isolation. Recall that is the multiplicity of in and is the rational number satisfying .
Proposition 5.2. For the projective crepant dlt modification of Corollary 4.2, there is a positive Cartier multiple of such that
Proof. The relations furnished by isolation are
Let be the finite -ification. It is unchanged away from a finite set [23], Proposition 2.14. Reduced-boundary adjunction gives an effective rational divisor such that is a projective semi-log-canonical surface pair and
We use adjunction in the form of [23], Lemma 2.19; see also [17], Section 2.5. The -ification is needed because the reduced boundary itself need not satisfy . Its codimension-one singularities are nodes, and on its normalization the adjunction boundary includes the conductor with coefficient one; the normalized pair is log canonical. These are precisely the semi-log-canonical conditions needed for surface abundance.
The surface is projective because it is finite over . The last class in (19) is numerically trivial, by (18) and the projection formula for curves. Posva’s abundance theorem for projective semi-log-canonical surfaces in positive characteristic therefore makes semiample [18], Theorem 3.1. A semiample numerically trivial rational line bundle is -linearly trivial: a globally generated Cartier multiple defines a morphism contracting every curve, hence constant on each connected component. Its line bundle is trivial there.
Since is positive and rational, clearing denominators in (19) yields a positive Cartier multiple of with trivial. In particular,
The divisor is effective, its reduction is , and it is numerically trivial on every component of its support. Applying Lemma 5.1 on the normal projective threefold proves torsion on the full Cartier scheme .
Construction of the prepared cycle
We now combine the isolated boundary with the original log canonical section. The boundary supplies a divisor with torsion normal line; the section supplies a canonical relation near its support. A finite cover removes the prime-to- part of the canonical exponent. This is the preparation of [17], Sections 2.7–2.8, with the support of the original boundary retained throughout the construction.
Proposition 6.1. Let be the data of Proposition 2.3 in the maximal-nef-dimension case. There exist a smooth projective threefold , a very ample divisor , and a nonzero effective Cartier divisor
having all the properties in Theorem 2.1. In particular, its support is connected with simple normal crossings, , and is torsion.
Proof. Equation (3) and Proposition 3.1 give the hypotheses of Proposition 4.1. Choose its isolated model and the reduced dlt modification of Corollary 4.2. Let be the positive Cartier multiple of supplied by Proposition 5.2.
The canonical section and its support. Let be a smooth projective common resolution of and , chosen to dominate the intervening models. Write
These models share the open set
where is the union of the boundary components disjoint from . We choose the common resolution to be an isomorphism over this open. Projective resolution and resolution of divisor supports in dimension three permit this choice [6, 4]. The pullback equalities through the partial MMP give
The integer was chosen so that and both and are Cartier. It gives a rational section of with
Indeed, the right side is an integral divisor linearly equivalent to . Put . Every prime component in (21) is either contained in or disjoint from it. For this follows from boundary separation on . For a -exceptional divisor, its irreducible center lies in .
A terminal threefold is regular in codimension two, so is finite [17]. The center is therefore contained in , or is disjoint from it. Taking inverse images gives the assertion for the exceptional divisor.
Let be the union of the components of outside . Thus
The disjointness is the point of this description. Components of can cancel in (21); we retain all of when choosing the open set preserved by the subsequent resolution.
Removing the prime-to- exponent. Write with and . Choose a nonzero rational generator of and write , where . Adjoin one root of and normalize in the resulting field. This is a finite separable cover, possibly of degree smaller than . Over , it is an integral component of the torsor of th roots of the invertible section . This description is independent of the rational generator . Since is invertible in , that torsor is finite étale.
Resolve the normalization and the total inverse image of , preserving the regular étale open over . We obtain a smooth projective threefold and a generically finite separable morphism for which the total pullback support of is simple normal crossings. The morphisms used to compare divisors are
Here are birational; is generically finite and separable. Set and . By (20), , while the Cartier divisor supplied by Proposition 5.2 pulls back as .
The rational section is a section of . The determinant of the differential is a nonzero section of the rational line ; denote it by . Its nonvanishing at the generic point follows from separability. Consequently
is a rational section of . Both factors are invertible on : the first is a root of an invertible section, and the second is the Jacobian of an étale morphism. Thus the divisor of is supported on . By (22), each of its prime components lies in or is disjoint from that support.
A connected primitive Cartier divisor. Put and choose a connected component of . Since is a positive multiple of , and is disjoint from the other components of , the set is also a connected component of . Write the part of supported on as
The divisor is Cartier because is smooth, and its multiplicities are positive with gcd one. Its support is connected and simple normal crossings.
Every curve in maps under to a point or to a curve in . The projection formula and Proposition 5.2 therefore show that is numerically trivial on every component of its support. Near we have , so for every . For a curve not contained in , effectivity gives nonnegative intersection with . For a curve in its support, the intersection is zero. Thus is nef, and every very ample divisor satisfies
Torsion also survives on the entire Cartier scheme. Choose with . The pullback divisor is scheme-theoretically : its local equation is the pullback of a local equation of , which is a nonzero divisor since is integral and is dominant. Pulling back the trivialization gives ; no flatness assumption on is needed. Restricting along , and using near , gives
Hence is torsion.
The section of (23) has, on a neighborhood of , divisor supported on . Indeed, its other components are disjoint from and can be removed from that neighborhood. Thus there are integers such that
Numerical proportionality and very general points. It remains to show that no -trivial curve passes through a very general point of . Put . It is a nonzero nef divisor, numerically trivial on every component of its support by the projection formula. Since is contained in that support, we have
Together with (25), the Hodge index theorem gives
We verify that this is numerical equivalence on every curve, rather than only on a fixed hyperplane section, following [17].
Let be any integral curve. For , there is an integral surface containing . To see this, twist the ideal of sufficiently far and then multiply its generators by very ample sections. The resulting linear system has no fixed divisorial component and gives a birational map onto its image off . Bertini irreducibility gives an irreducible general member, which is generically reduced on that birational open. As a Cartier divisor on smooth , it has no embedded components, and is therefore integral. On a smooth projective resolution , let be the pullbacks of , respectively. Their intersections are
Hence has square zero and is orthogonal to . The Hodge index form is negative definite on the orthogonal complement of the positive-square class , so is numerically zero. The projective surjection supplies an integral curve dominating : take the closure of a closed point of the fiber over its generic point. The projection formula then gives . This proves (28).
Finally let be the countably many proper closed subsets excluded by the nef reduction of . Remove from the non-quasi-finite locus of and all the sets . These are proper closed subsets, since is dominant and generically finite. Their complement contains very general points because is uncountable. Every curve through any point of this complement maps to a curve on . If it were -trivial, then (28) and the projection formula would make its image -trivial, contradicting maximal nef dimension. All properties in Theorem 2.1 have now been established.
Proof of Theorem 1.1. Theorem 2.1 contradicts Proposition 6.1. The maximal-nef-dimension case is therefore impossible. By Proposition 2.3, it remains to apply abundance in nef dimension at most two [23], Theorem 1.8. This gives semiample-ness, and faithful descent along the algebraically closed field extension gives it over the original field.
References
- [1]Caucher Birkar, Existence of flips and minimal models for 3-folds in char p, Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér. (4) 49 (2016), no. 1, 169–212. doi:10.24033/asens.2279.DOI
- [2]Caucher Birkar and Joe Waldron, Existence of Mori fibre spaces for 3-folds in char p, Adv. Math. 313 (2017), 62–101. doi:10.1016/j.aim.2017.03.032.DOI
- [3]Paolo Cascini, Hiromu Tanaka and Chenyang Xu, On base point freeness in positive characteristic, Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér. (4) 48 (2015), no. 5, 1239–1272. doi:10.24033/asens.2269.DOI
- [4]Vincent Cossart, Uwe Jannsen and Shuji Saito, Canonical embedded and non-embedded resolution of singularities for excellent two-dimensional schemes, arXiv:0905.2191, version 2, February 18, 2013; first posted 2009. arXiv:0905.2191v2.
- [5]Vincent Cossart and Olivier Piltant, Resolution of singularities of threefolds in positive characteristic. I. Reduction to local uniformization on Artin–Schreier and purely inseparable coverings, J. Algebra 320 (2008), no. 3, 1051–1082. doi:10.1016/j.jalgebra.2008.03.032.
- [6]Vincent Cossart and Olivier Piltant, Resolution of singularities of threefolds in positive characteristic II, J. Algebra 321 (2009), no. 7, 1836–1976. doi:10.1016/j.jalgebra.2008.11.030.DOI
- [7]Christopher Hacon and Jakub Witaszek, The minimal model program for threefolds in characteristic 5, Duke Math. J. 171 (2022), no. 11, 2193–2231. doi:10.1215/00127094-2022-0024.DOI
- [8]Christopher D. Hacon and Chenyang Xu, On the three dimensional minimal model program in positive characteristic, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 28 (2015), no. 3, 711–744. doi:10.1090/S0894-0347-2014-00809-2.DOI
- [9]Kenta Hashizume, Yusuke Nakamura and Hiromu Tanaka, Minimal model program for log canonical threefolds in positive characteristic, Math. Res. Lett. 27 (2020), no. 4, 1003–1054. doi:10.4310/MRL.2020.v27.n4.a3.DOI
- [10]Eric Jovinelly, Brian Lehmann and Eric Riedl, Optimal bounds in Bend-and-Break, Forum Math. Pi 14 (2026), e16, 1–4. doi:10.1017/fmp.2026.10033.DOI
- [11]Yujiro Kawamata, Abundance theorem for minimal threefolds, Invent. Math. 108 (1992), 229–246. doi:10.1007/BF02100604.DOI
- [12]Seán Keel, Basepoint freeness for nef and big line bundles in positive characteristic, Ann. of Math. (2) 149 (1999), no. 1, 253–286. doi:10.2307/121025.DOI
- [13]Sean Keel, Kenji Matsuki and James McKernan, Log abundance theorem for threefolds, Duke Math. J. 75 (1994), no. 1, 99–119. doi:10.1215/S0012-7094-94-07504-2.DOI
- [14]Sean Keel, Kenji Matsuki and James McKernan, Corrections to: “Log abundance theorem for threefolds”, Duke Math. J. 122 (2004), no. 3, 625–630. doi:10.1215/S0012-7094-04-12236-5.DOI
- [15]János Kollár and Shigefumi Mori, Birational Geometry of Algebraic Varieties, Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, vol. 134, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998; with the collaboration of C. H. Clemens and A. Corti. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511662560.DOI
- [16]Yoichi Miyaoka, Abundance conjecture for 3-folds: case ν = 1, Composition Math. 68 (1988), no. 2, 203–220. Numdam: CM_1988__68_2_203_0.
- [17]OpenAI, Abundance in numerical dimension one for terminal threefolds in positive characteristic, OpenAI Math Release preprint OAI:Abundance-in-numerical-dimension-one-for-terminal-threefolds-in-positive-characteristic-September-24-2026, 2026.
- [18]Quentin Posva, Abundance for slc surfaces over arbitrary fields, Épijournal Géom. Algébrique 7 (2023), article no. 5, 23 pp. doi:10.46298/epiga.2023.volume7.8803.DOI
- [19]Hiromu Tanaka, Abundance theorem for semi log canonical surfaces in positive characteristic, Osaka J. Math. 53 (2016), no. 2, 535–566. Osaka repository: doi:10.18910/58879.DOI
- [20]Joe Waldron, The LMMP for log canonical 3-folds in characteristic p > 5, Nagoya Math. J. 230 (2018), 48–71. doi:10.1017/nmj.2017.2.
- [21]Jakub Witaszek, On the canonical bundle formula and log abundance in positive characteristic, Math. Ann. 381 (2021), no. 3–4, 1309–1344. doi:10.1007/s00208-021-02231-5.DOI
- [22]Chenyang Xu and Lei Zhang, Nonvanishing for 3-folds in characteristic p > 5, Duke Math. J. 168 (2019), no. 7, 1269–1301. doi:10.1215/00127094-2018-0066.DOI
- [23]Zheng Xu, Note on the three-dimensional log canonical abundance in characteristic > 3, Nagoya Math. J. 255 (2024), 694–723. doi:10.1017/nmj.2024.3. Theorem numbering follows arXiv:2212.04039v2, February 3, 2024.DOI