Introduction

The abundance conjecture predicts that a nef log canonical divisor KX+BK_X + B on a projective log canonical pair is semiample: some positive Cartier multiple is generated by its global sections. Semiampleness turns the numerical positivity of the divisor into a morphism. We consider threefolds in positive characteristic and the case of numerical dimension one. For a nef Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier divisor LL on a threefold, this condition means that, for an ample Cartier divisor HH,

LH2>0andL2H=0.LH^2 > 0 \qquad\text{and} \qquad L^2H = 0.

Theorem 1.1. Let kk be an algebraically closed field of characteristic p>3p > 3. Let (X,B)(X, B) be a projective log canonical threefold pair over kk, where XX is normal, BB is an effective Q\mathbb{Q}-divisor, and KX+BK_X + B is Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier. If KX+BK_X + B is nef and has numerical dimension one, then KX+BK_X + B is semiample.

The boundary coefficients are arbitrary rational numbers allowed by log canonicity, and neither terminality nor Q\mathbb{Q}-factoriality is assumed for the original variety. The theorem proves the numerical-dimension-one case of threefold log abundance in this characteristic range.

Over the complex numbers, Miyaoka proved abundance for minimal threefolds of numerical dimension one [16]; Kawamata completed abundance for minimal threefolds and gave another proof of this case [11]. Keel, Matsuki, and McKernan established log abundance for log canonical threefold pairs [13, 14]. In positive characteristic, Keel’s semiampleness criterion [12] and the basepoint-freeness methods of Cascini, Tanaka, and Xu [3] provided foundations. The threefold minimal model program developed through the work of Hacon–Xu, Birkar, and Birkar–Waldron in characteristic greater than five [8, 1, 2], the log canonical and relative extensions of Waldron and Hashizume–Nakamura–Tanaka [20, 9], and Hacon–Witaszek’s treatment of characteristic five [7].

For abundance, Xu–Zhang proved nonvanishing for terminal minimal threefolds in characteristic greater than five [22]. Witaszek obtained klt nonvanishing and abundance in nef dimension at most two in that characteristic range [21]. The nef dimension n(L)n(L) is the dimension of the nef reduction of LL. On a threefold over an uncountable algebraically closed field, n(L)=3n(L)=3 means that no curve of LL-degree zero passes through a very general point. Zheng Xu established nonvanishing for pseudoeffective log canonical divisors on projective lc threefold pairs in characteristic greater than three, together with abundance in nef dimension at most two [23]; he subsequently proved abundance in numerical dimension two [17]. For the present problem, the remaining case has numerical dimension one and nef dimension three.

The companion paper [17] treats terminal threefolds with nef canonical divisor of numerical dimension one. Its proof isolates a stronger structural result: certain connected nef Cartier divisors on smooth threefolds cannot exist. We state this cycle obstruction in Theorem 2.1, with all its hypotheses. The present paper constructs such a divisor from a log canonical pair with arbitrary rational boundary. The companion’s obstruction is an essential input to the proof.

The boundary and the proof strategy

After an uncountable field extension and a crepant birational change, we may suppose that the underlying variety is terminal and Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial. Nonvanishing gives a nonzero effective Cartier divisor N0∼m(KX+B)N_0 \sim m(K_X+B). We assume for contradiction that n(N0)=3n(N_0)=3. The main additional issue is to obtain a relation for a power of the canonical bundle near a component of this log canonical divisor. The boundary and the exceptional divisors of a resolution must both be controlled there.

Proposition 3.1 supplies that control for the boundary: it proves BN0H=0BN_0H=0 and shows that every boundary component is either contained in Supp⁡N0\operatorname{Supp} N_0 or disjoint from it. If the intersection were positive, complete-intersection curves would have arbitrarily small ratios of N0N_0-degree to anticanonical degree. Quantitative bend-and-break [10] would then produce N0N_0-trivial rational curves through very general points. This separation argument is formulated independently of the MMP.

Next we adapt the isolation construction of [17]. Raising the boundary to its log canonical threshold along N0N_0 gives a coefficient-one component on a dlt model. A partial MMP, trivial for the resulting full log canonical class, makes this component disjoint from the rest of the divisor. We use Xu’s partial-MMP formulation [23], whose ray argument adapts [13]. Reduced-boundary adjunction and surface abundance [19, 18] then yield torsion on a Cartier multiple of that component. We include the companion’s extension argument across finitely many points, since the required torsion is on the full nonreduced Cartier scheme.

Finally, terminality makes the singular locus finite, so the exceptional divisors of a common resolution obey the same support separation as the boundary. A finite separable cover removes the prime-to-pp part of the pluricanonical exponent. A connected component of the pulled-back Cartier divisor, divided by the gcd of its multiplicities, has exactly the numerical, torsion, and canonical properties forbidden by Theorem 2.1.

Section 2 states the obstruction and makes the initial reductions. Section 3 proves boundary separation, and Section 4 isolates a component. Section 5 proves torsion on its Cartier thickening. Section 6 constructs the final cycle and completes the proof.

The cycle obstruction and the initial reductions

We first state the precise input from the companion paper. We then reduce Theorem 1.1 to constructing the forbidden cycle. Throughout, a variety is integral. Boundaries are effective Q\mathbb{Q}-divisors, and a pair (X,B)(X,B) has XX normal and KX+BK_X+B Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier. We use the usual discrepancy definitions of log canonical (lc), Kawamata log terminal (klt), divisorial log terminal (dlt), and terminal singularities; see [15]. Canonical divisors on birational models are chosen compatibly. Restrictions and intersections of Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier divisors are computed using Cartier multiples.

The obstruction supplied by the companion

For a nef divisor LL over an uncountable algebraically closed field, its nef dimension n(L)n(L) is the dimension of the target of its nef reduction. We use only the following characterization in dimension three: n(L)=3n(L)=3 if and only if no curve of LL-degree zero passes through a very general point. Here “very general” means outside a countable union of proper closed subsets. These properties and existence of nef reduction are recalled in [23]. Numerical dimension and nef dimension need not agree.

Theorem 2.1 (Cycle obstruction from the companion). Let kk be an uncountable algebraically closed field of characteristic p>3p>3. There do not exist a smooth projective threefold VV, a very ample Cartier divisor HVH_V, and a nonzero effective Cartier divisor D=∑αmαDαD=\sum_{\alpha}m_{\alpha}D_{\alpha} satisfying all the following conditions:

  1. The DαD_{\alpha} are distinct prime divisors, mα∈Z>0m_{\alpha}\in\mathbb{Z}_{>0}, the support of DD is connected and has simple normal crossings, and gcd⁡αmα=1\gcd_{\alpha}m_{\alpha}=1.

  1. DD is nef, its restriction to every DαD_{\alpha} is numerically trivial, and

DHV2>0,D2HV=0,n(D)=3.D H_V^2>0,\qquad D^2H_V=0,\qquad n(D)=3.
  1. The line bundle OD(D)\mathcal{O}_D(D) on the possibly nonreduced Cartier scheme DD is torsion.

  1. For some integer b≥0b\geq0 and integers bαb_{\alpha}, there is an isomorphism on a neighborhood of Supp⁡D\operatorname{Supp}D,

ωV⊗pb≃OV(∑αbαDα).(1)\omega_V^{\otimes p^b}\simeq\mathcal{O}_V\left(\sum_{\alpha}b_{\alpha}D_{\alpha}\right). \tag*{(1)}

This is the obstruction proved in [17] for the data listed in its Proposition 2.1. The end of Section 2 of that manuscript explicitly retains only VV, DD, HVH_V, the torsion order, and the local canonical relation. Under these hypotheses, its Sections 3–5 prove Corollary 5.4, and its Proposition 6.8 gives the contradiction. Thus the obstruction applies to any cycle with the displayed properties. In particular, the construction below may start from a log canonical divisor with boundary.

The companion uses the torsion normal line and the local canonical relation to control differential forms on the completion along DD with poles allowed along DD. Cartier descent then makes the Picard group of that punctured formal neighborhood pp-divisible. The numerical conditions give a nonzero integer-valued degree homomorphism on the same group, which contradicts that divisibility. We use this obstruction as a theorem; the present proof constructs all its input data for a log canonical pair.

The canonical relation also implies an intersection identity that occurs in the companion. Indeed, a rational section giving (1) has global divisor ∑αbαDα+E\sum_{\alpha}b_{\alpha}D_{\alpha}+E, with Supp⁡E\operatorname{Supp}E disjoint from Supp⁡D\operatorname{Supp}D. Since D∣Dα≡0D|_{D_{\alpha}}\equiv0, for every Cartier divisor AA on VV we have

KVDA=0.(2)K_VDA=0. \tag*{(2)}

Numerical observations

The following elementary observation will convert zero intersection numbers into restrictions that are numerically trivial.

Lemma 2.2. Let TT be an integral projective surface, HH an ample Cartier divisor, and PP a nef Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier divisor on TT. If PH=0PH = 0, then P≡0P \equiv0. Moreover, a nonzero effective Cartier divisor on TT has positive intersection with HH.

Proof. For any integral curve C⊂TC \subset T, a sufficiently large multiple of HH has an effective Cartier member EE containing CC. The effective one-cycle of EE has positive coefficient along CC. Every component has nonnegative PP-degree, whereas PE=0PE = 0, so PC=0PC = 0. This proves the first assertion. The second is positivity of the ample degree of each component of the effective one-cycle of a nonzero Cartier divisor.

In particular, if NN is a nonzero effective nef Cartier divisor on a projective threefold and N2H=0N^{2}H = 0 for an ample Cartier divisor HH, then

N∣T≡0for every prime component T of N.(3)N|_{T} \equiv0 \qquad\text{for every prime component } T \text{ of } N. \tag*{(3)}

Indeed, writing N=∑aTTN = \sum a_T T, the nonnegative numbers NHTNHT have positive-coefficient sum N2H=0N^{2}H = 0, and Lemma 2.2 applies.

Reduction to a terminal underlying variety

We use three results of Xu for projective lc threefolds in characteristic greater than three: nonvanishing for a pseudoeffective log canonical divisor, termination of its flips in the pseudoeffective case, and abundance when the divisor is nef of nef dimension at most two [23]. All permit rational boundaries. The relative MMP and crepant Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial dlt modifications are available in this characteristic range, including characteristic five [7], [23]. We also use projective resolution of threefolds, preserving the regular locus, and resolution of divisor supports, preserving their complement on a regular variety; the required forms of these results are recalled in [17], from [5], [6], [4].

Proposition 2.3. To prove Theorem 1.1, it suffices to rule out the following data: an uncountable algebraically closed field kk of characteristic p>3p > 3, a terminal Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial projective threefold XX, an lc pair (X,B)(X, B), and a nonzero effective Cartier divisor

N0∼m(KX+B),m∈Z>0,(4)N_{0} \sim m(K_{X} + B), \qquad m \in\mathbb{Z}_{>0}, \tag*{(4)}

such that mKXmK_{X} and mBmB are Cartier, N0N_{0} is nef, ν(N0)=1\nu(N_{0}) = 1, and n(N0)=3n(N_{0}) = 3.

Proof. First extend the given field to an uncountable algebraically closed field. Integrality and normality persist, and a log resolution with its discrepancy calculation proves that the base-changed pair remains lc. The canonical divisor can be defined by a rational top form on the smooth locus, so the log canonical class also base changes. Nefness persists by ample approximation, and the prescribed intersection numbers are unchanged.

Semi-ampleness descends under this extension. After making a generated multiple also divisible by the original Cartier index, it is the base change of a line bundle on the original variety. Global sections commute with field extension, and faithful flatness detects surjectivity of its evaluation map. We may therefore work over the enlarged field.

Write L=KX+BL = K_X + B for the original log canonical class. If n(L)≤2n(L) \le2, Xu’s abundance theorem applies. Suppose n(L)=3n(L) = 3. Take a crepant projective Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial dlt modification (Xd,Bd)(X_d, B_d), and resolve XdX_d projectively. Run a relative canonical MMP of this smooth resolution over XdX_d. The MMP with scaling applies by [7], Theorem 1.2. Its output cannot be of fibre type over the three-dimensional birational base, and it gives a projective birational morphism

g:Xt⟶Xdg : X_t \longrightarrow X_d

with XtX_t terminal and Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial and KXtK_{X_t} nef over XdX_d. Here terminality is preserved by a canonical MMP: discrepancies do not decrease, and a divisor contracted in a negative divisorial step has strictly positive ordinary discrepancy over the output. Relative pseudoeffectivity causes no restriction for this birational morphism; adding a sufficiently large pullback of an ample divisor makes the canonical class big.

The exceptional divisor F=KXt−g∗KXdF = K_{X_t} - g^*K_{X_d} is gg-nef. The negativity lemma gives F≤0F \le0. Since XdX_d is Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial, the divisor

Bt=g∗Bd−FB_t = g^*B_d - F

is effective and satisfies KXt+Bt=g∗(KXd+Bd)K_{X_t} + B_t = g^*(K_{X_d} + B_d). Crepancy makes (Xt,Bt)(X_t, B_t) lc.

The new log canonical class is nef of numerical dimension one. To check the square after pullback, observe first that L2T=0L^2T = 0 for every prime surface TT on the original variety: place TT in an effective member of a multiple of the ample divisor in the hypothesis, and use nonnegativity of L2L^2 on all its components. Projection formula proves the vanishing upstairs. Numerical nontriviality persists because a curve downstairs can be dominated by a curve upstairs. Finally, the no-zero-degree-curve property persists over the birational isomorphism locus. Thus the new class still has nef dimension three.

Relabel this pair as (X,B)(X, B). By nonvanishing [23], Theorem 1.4, a positive multiple of KX+BK_X + B has an effective representative N0N_0. It is nonzero because KX+BK_X + B is not numerically trivial. Increasing the multiple makes N0N_0, mKXmK_X, and mBmB Cartier, as required. □\square

From now until the proof of Theorem 1.1, we work with the data of Proposition 2.3. Fix a very ample divisor HH on XX. Then N0H2>0N_0H^2 > 0, N02H=0N_0^2H = 0, and (3) holds. The next step is to establish the same numerical triviality on the boundary components.

Separating the boundary from the log canonical cycle

The numerical relation N0∼Qm(KX+B)N_0 \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} m(K_X + B) initially controls the log canonical divisor, whereas Theorem 2.1 requires a relation for a power of the canonical bundle. We now show that the boundary contributes only components of the cycle or divisors entirely disjoint from it. The argument uses maximal nef dimension and bend-and-break, and is independent of the subsequent MMP.

Proposition 3.1 (Boundary separation). Let XX be a normal Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial projective threefold over an uncountable algebraically closed field, and let BB be an effective Q\mathbb{Q}-divisor. Suppose that NN is a nonzero effective nef Cartier divisor with ν(N)=1\nu(N) = 1, n(N)=3n(N) = 3, and N∼Qa(KX+B)N \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} a(K_X + B) for some rational a>0a > 0. For every ample Cartier divisor HH, one has

BNH=0.(5)BNH = 0. \tag*{(5)}

Consequently NN is numerically trivial on each prime component of BB, and every such component is either contained in Supp⁡N\operatorname{Supp} N or disjoint from Supp⁡N\operatorname{Supp} N.

Proof. We may replace HH by a very ample multiple. The number BNHBNH is nonnegative. If it were positive, the identity (KX+B)NH=N2H/a=0(K_X+B)NH=N^2H/a=0 would give KXNH<0K_XNH<0.

For each sufficiently large integer ll, choose positive integers ul,vlu_l,v_l such that ulHu_lH and vl(H+lN)v_l(H+lN) are very ample. Their general complete intersection is an integral curve ClC_l contained in the smooth locus of XX. Indeed, normality gives a singular locus of dimension at most one; the first general member meets this locus in finitely many points, and the second avoids them. Bertini’s theorem on the smooth open gives the desired integral curve. Its intersections satisfy

NCl−KXCl=NH2−KXH2−lKXHN⟶0,(6)\frac{NC_l}{-K_XC_l}=\frac{NH^2}{-K_XH^2-lK_XHN}\longrightarrow0, \tag*{(6)}

and −KXCl>0-K_XC_l>0 for large ll.

The quantitative bend-and-break theorem of Jovinelly, Lehmann, and Riedl [10] applies to an integral curve in the smooth locus of a projective variety over an algebraically closed field, with negative canonical degree, and any nef Cartier test divisor. In dimension three it supplies, through every closed point of ClC_l, a rational curve Γ\Gamma satisfying

0≤NΓ≤4NCl−KXCl.0\leq N\Gamma\leq4\frac{NC_l}{-K_XC_l}.

Fix ll so large that the right-hand side is strictly less than one. Since NN is Cartier, it follows that NΓ=0N\Gamma=0.

For completeness, these complete intersections pass through points to which the very-general-point condition applies. For the two fixed very ample systems, the incidence of a point of XX and a pair of members through it is a product of projective bundles over XX, hence is irreducible and dominates XX. Restricting to the nonempty open set of pairs giving the curves just considered leaves a dense open incidence and a dominant evaluation map. Its image is constructible and contains a nonempty open subset of XX. Over the uncountable field, this open contains a closed point outside the countable union excluded by n(N)=3n(N)=3. The curve Γ\Gamma through that point is a contradiction. This proves (5).

Write B=∑TbTTB=\sum_T b_TT with bT>0b_T>0. All numbers NHTNHT are nonnegative, so (5) gives NHT=0NHT=0 for each TT. Lemma 2.2 yields N∣T≡0N|_T\equiv0. If TT is not a component of NN, the canonical section of OX(N)\mathcal{O}_X(N) restricts to a nonzero section on the integral surface TT. Were T∩Supp⁡NT\cap\operatorname{Supp}N nonempty, its zero scheme would be a nonzero effective Cartier divisor on TT and would have positive ample degree. This contradicts N∣T≡0N|_T\equiv0, so the two supports are disjoint.

Apply Proposition 3.1 to N0N_0 and set

Pout=⋃T a prime component of BT⊄Supp⁡N0T.(7)P_{\mathrm{out}}=\bigcup_{\substack{T\text{ a prime component of }B\\T\not\subset\operatorname{Supp}N_0}}T. \tag*{(7)}

This is a closed subset disjoint from Supp⁡N0\operatorname{Supp}N_0. Thus Supp⁡B⊂Supp⁡N0∪Pout\operatorname{Supp}B\subset\operatorname{Supp}N_0\cup P_{\mathrm{out}}, a union of two disjoint closed sets. We retain this separation while isolating one component of N0N_0.

Isolating a log canonical component

The effective divisor constructed above may have several intersecting components. We now make one of them disjoint from the others, while preserving the pullback of the nef divisor. The construction adapts [17]: raise the boundary to a log canonical threshold, then lower the coefficient of one component and run an MMP that is trivial for the restored log canonical divisor. The resulting neffness forces the required disjointness.

Proposition 4.1. Let kk be an algebraically closed field of characteristic p>3p > 3. Let XX be a terminal, Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial projective threefold, let (X,B)(X,B) be log canonical with rational boundary, and let

0≠N0∼m(KX+B)0 \ne N_0 \sim m(K_X+B)

be an effective nef Cartier divisor, where mm is a positive integer. Assume that N0N_0 is numerically trivial on each component of its support, and that every component of BB is either contained in or disjoint from Supp⁡N0\operatorname{Supp} N_0. Denote by PoutP_{\mathrm{out}} the union of the latter components and put

UX=Xreg∖(Supp⁡N0∪Pout).U_X = X_{\mathrm{reg}} \setminus(\operatorname{Supp} N_0 \cup P_{\mathrm{out}}).

There exist a projective Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial klt threefold YY birational to XX, a rational boundary GYG_Y, an effective nef Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier divisor NYN_Y, and a prime divisor SYS_Y with the following properties.

  1. The pair (Y,GY)(Y,G_Y) is log canonical, SYS_Y has coefficient one in GYG_Y, and s:=mult⁡SYNYs := \operatorname{mult}_{S_Y} N_Y is positive. For rational numbers τ>0\tau> 0 and δ>0\delta> 0,

KY+GY∼QτNY,KY+GY−δSY is nef.(8)K_Y + G_Y \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} \tau N_Y, \qquad K_Y + G_Y - \delta S_Y \text{ is nef}. \tag*{(8)}
  1. The divisor NYN_Y is numerically trivial on every component of its support. Every component of GYG_Y is either contained in or disjoint from Supp⁡NY\operatorname{Supp} N_Y.

  1. The divisor SYS_Y is disjoint from every other component of NYN_Y and from Supp⁡(GY−SY)\operatorname{Supp}(G_Y-S_Y). In particular,

NY=sSY,GY=SY,KY+SY∼QτsSY(9)N_Y = sS_Y, \qquad G_Y = S_Y, \qquad K_Y + S_Y \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} \tau sS_Y \tag*{(9)}

on a neighborhood of SYS_Y, and SY∣SY≡0S_Y|_{S_Y} \equiv0.

  1. The birational correspondence identifies UXU_X with an open subset of YY. On a smooth projective common resolution q:V0→Xq : V_0 \to X, r:V0→Yr : V_0 \to Y that is an isomorphism over this open,

q∗N0=r∗NY.(10)q^*N_0 = r^*N_Y. \tag*{(10)}

The same equality holds after passing to any further common resolution.

One may take τ=m−1+λ\tau= m^{-1} + \lambda, where λ=lct⁡(X,B)(N0)≥0\lambda= \operatorname{lct}_{(X,B)}(N_0) \ge0.

Proof. We first find a coefficient-one boundary component lying over Supp⁡N0\operatorname{Supp} N_0. On a log resolution of (X,B+N0)(X,B+N_0), the log canonical threshold is the minimum of the finitely many ratios

a(E,X,B)ord⁡E(N0)(ord⁡E(N0)>0),\frac{a(E,X,B)}{\operatorname{ord}_E(N_0)} \qquad \left(\operatorname{ord}_E(N_0)>0\right),

where a(E,X,B)a(E,X,B) denotes log discrepancy and the divisors considered include the strict transforms of the components of N0N_0. Thus λ\lambda is finite and rational, possibly zero, and (X,B+λN0)(X,B+\lambda N_0) is log canonical. There is a log canonical place EE of this pair for which ord⁡E(N0)>0\operatorname{ord}_E(N_0)>0.

Take a projective crepant Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial dlt modification

μ:(W,G)⟶(X,B+λN0),\mu: (W,G) \longrightarrow(X,B+\lambda N_0),

with every extracted divisor having coefficient one; see [23], Theorem 2.27. Set

N=μ∗N0,τ=m−1+λ.N = \mu^*N_0, \qquad\tau= m^{-1}+\lambda.

Then

KW+G∼QτN.(11)K_W + G \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} \tau N. \tag*{(11)}

The divisor NN is nef and numerically trivial on every component of its support: a curve in that support maps to a point or to a curve in Supp⁡N0\operatorname{Supp} N_0, and the assertion follows by the projection formula.

Every component of GG is either contained in or disjoint from Supp⁡N\operatorname{Supp} N. For strict transforms of components of BB this follows from the hypothesis, while those coming from λN0\lambda N_0 are contained in the support. An extracted divisor has center in Supp⁡N0∪Pout\operatorname{Supp} N_0 \cup P_{\mathrm{out}}, since XX is klt and the boundary vanishes outside this union. Its irreducible center lies in one of these two disjoint closed sets. In the first case its order on N0N_0 is positive, and in the second case the divisor is disjoint from Supp⁡μ∗N0\operatorname{Supp} \mu^*N_0.

The center on WW of the place EE lies in Supp⁡N\operatorname{Supp} N and, by crepancy and the dlt property, in ⌊G⌋\lfloor G\rfloor. Choose a component SS of ⌊G⌋\lfloor G\rfloor containing this center. The preceding separation then implies S⊂Supp⁡NS \subset\operatorname{Supp} N. This argument also covers λ=0\lambda= 0; it does not require all components of NN to occur in GG.

The modification μ\mu is an isomorphism outside Supp⁡N0∪Pout\operatorname{Supp} N_0 \cup P_{\mathrm{out}}. Indeed it has no exceptional divisors there, and a projective small birational morphism to a Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial variety is an isomorphism. To recall the latter fact, push down a relatively ample Cartier divisor. A Cartier multiple of its pushdown pulls back to the same multiple upstairs, because there are no exceptional divisors. It has degree zero on every contracted curve, contradicting relative ampleness if such a curve exists.

Choose a rational ϵ>0\epsilon> 0 sufficiently small that

G−ϵS≥0,τN−ϵS≥0.(12)G - \epsilon S \geq0,\qquad\tau N - \epsilon S \geq0. \tag*{(12)}

Apply the partial MMP with lowered boundary G−ϵSG-\epsilon S and restoration divisor ϵS\epsilon S [23] 1. Its steps are (KW+G−ϵS)(K_W+G-\epsilon S)-negative and (KW+G)(K_W+G)-trivial. The lowered pair is dlt, and its log canonical divisor is pseudoeffective by (11) and (12). The termination required here is therefore supplied by [23]. The threefold MMP package used in this application, including in characteristic five, is recalled in [17].

The partial-MMP conclusion is either a Mori fiber contraction for the lowered log divisor, trivial for the restored divisor, or nefness of the restored divisor minus δ\delta times the transform of SS for every sufficiently small rational δ>0\delta> 0. We first track SS, the pullbacks of NN, and support separation through the steps, and then exclude the fiber-type alternative. Write Wi⇢Wi+1W_i \dashrightarrow W_{i+1} for a step, with transforms GiG_i, NiN_i, SiS_i. The equality KWi+Gi∼QτNiK_{W_i}+G_i \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} \tau N_i persists by pushforward, so its contracted ray RiR_i satisfies

Ni⋅Ri=0,Si⋅Ri>0.(13)N_i \cdot R_i = 0,\qquad S_i \cdot R_i > 0. \tag*{(13)}

In particular SiS_i cannot be the exceptional divisor of a divisorial step: the negativity lemma would give a contracted curve of negative SiS_i-degree. Hence SS survives throughout the MMP.

Let a:T→Wia:T \to W_i and b:T→Wi+1b:T \to W_{i+1} be a common resolution of a step. The divisor

F=a∗Ni−b∗Ni+1F = a^*N_i - b^*N_{i+1}

is bb-exceptional. If a curve on TT is contracted by bb, its image on WiW_i is a point or a curve contracted to the common contraction target. Thus FF has degree zero on every such curve by (13). The negativity lemma applied to FF and −F-F gives

a∗Ni=b∗Ni+1.(14)a^*N_i = b^*N_{i+1}. \tag*{(14)}

This applies to divisorial contractions and flips. The same argument for the full log divisors gives

a∗(KWi+Gi)=b∗(KWi+1+Gi+1).a^*(K_{W_i}+G_i)=b^*(K_{W_{i+1}}+G_{i+1}).

Consequently the restored pair remains log canonical.

(14) also preserves nefness and numerical triviality on the support. For the latter assertion, lift a curve in Supp⁡Ni+1\operatorname{Supp} N_{i+1} to a curve on TT dominating it. Its image on WiW_i lies in Supp⁡Ni\operatorname{Supp} N_i or is a point: the inverse image of the support of an effective Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier divisor is exactly the support of its pullback. The projection formula now gives degree zero. Boundary components contained in Supp⁡Ni\operatorname{Supp} N_i remain contained in the transformed support. If a boundary component is disjoint from that support, its strict transform on TT is disjoint from a∗Nia^*N_i, hence from b∗Ni+1b^*N_{i+1}. Since that strict transform maps onto its image on Wi+1W_{i+1}, the transformed boundary component is still disjoint from Supp⁡Ni+1\operatorname{Supp} N_{i+1}.

These steps also preserve the open complement of the support. Indeed every contracted curve has negative degree against the effective divisor τNi−ϵSi\tau N_i-\epsilon S_i, so is contained in Supp⁡Ni\operatorname{Supp} N_i. A connected positive-dimensional projective fiber contains a curve through each of its closed points. Connectedness of fibers therefore implies that a fiber meeting the complement of Supp⁡Ni\operatorname{Supp} N_i consists of a single point and does not meet the support. Properness and normality show that the contraction is an isomorphism from this complement onto an open subset of its target. For a flip, this open in the target is Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial, being isomorphic to the corresponding open of WiW_i. The new small morphism is therefore also an isomorphism over it.

There is no Mori fiber output. The effective representative τNi−ϵSi\tau N_i-\epsilon S_i persists on each model, as does τNi−tSi\tau N_i-tS_i for every rational 0<t≤ϵ0<t\leq\epsilon. A curve in a fiber through a general point outside this effective support has nonnegative degree, whereas the log divisor driving a Mori fiber contraction has negative degree on every contracted curve. This rules out the fiber-type alternative for the lowered class and for every such smaller perturbation of the restored class.

Let YY be the resulting model. The partial-MMP conclusion gives (8) for some rational 0<δ<ϵ0<\delta<\epsilon. Negative MMP steps preserve the Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial dlt pair with lowered boundary, so (Y,GY−ϵSY)(Y,G_Y-\epsilon S_Y) is dlt. In particular its Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial underlying variety YY is klt: every place of zero log discrepancy for a dlt pair has center in its reduced boundary, and removing that effective Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier boundary strictly increases its discrepancy. Here dlt preservation is used for the lowered boundary; for the restored boundary GYG_Y we use the crepant comparison just proved.

It remains to see why nefness isolates SYS_Y. If T≠SYT\ne S_Y is a component of NYN_Y, numerical triviality of NY∣TN_Y|_T and (8) imply that −SY∣T-S_Y|_T is nef. On the other hand, SY∣TS_Y|_T is an effective Q\mathbb{Q}-Cartier divisor. If it were nonzero, its intersection with an ample Cartier divisor on the integral projective surface TT would be positive, contradicting anti-nefness. Therefore SY∩T=∅S_Y\cap T=\varnothing. Each other component of GYG_Y is either such a component of NYN_Y, or is disjoint from its support. This proves the asserted separation and the local identities (9). The equality NY∣SY≡0N_Y|_{S_Y}\equiv0 gives SY∣SY≡0S_Y|_{S_Y}\equiv0.

Finally, all models share the stated open UXU_X. Resolve the graph of the correspondences among all the models, keeping this smooth open unchanged, to obtain V0V_0. Composing (14) with N=μ∗N0N=\mu^*N_0 proves (10). Pullback preserves this equality on every further common resolution. □\square

For adjunction we replace the isolated log canonical pair by a dlt pair. The klt property of YY ensures that all divisors extracted in this last operation belong to the total transform of SYS_Y.

Corollary 4.2. With the notation of Proposition 4.1, there is a projective crepant Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial dlt modification

f:(Yd,Σ)⟶(Y,SY)f : (Y_d, \Sigma) \longrightarrow(Y, S_Y)

such that Σ\Sigma is reduced,

Supp⁡Σ=Supp⁡f∗SY,(15)\operatorname{Supp} \Sigma= \operatorname{Supp} f^*S_Y, \tag*{(15)}

and ff is an isomorphism off SYS_Y. On a neighborhood of Σ\Sigma,

KYd+Σ∼Qτsf∗SY.(16)K_{Y_d} + \Sigma\sim_{\mathbb{Q}} \tau s f^*S_Y. \tag*{(16)}

Moreover, f∗SYf^*S_Y is numerically trivial on each component of Σ\Sigma, and YdY_d shares the open UXU_X with XX and YY.

Proof. The pair (Y,SY)(Y,S_Y) is log canonical since (Y,GY)(Y,G_Y) is log canonical and GY≥SYG_Y \ge S_Y. Take a crepant dlt modification extracting only log canonical places. Its boundary Σ\Sigma consists of the strict transform of SYS_Y and its exceptional divisors, all with coefficient one. Every extracted divisor has center contained in SYS_Y: outside SYS_Y the pair is the klt variety YY. Such a divisor has positive order on SYS_Y, which proves (15). There are no exceptional divisors off SYS_Y; since YY is Q\mathbb{Q}-factorial, the small-morphism argument in the preceding proof shows that ff is an isomorphism there. Crepancy and (9) give (16). Every curve in Σ\Sigma maps to a point or to a curve in SYS_Y, where SYS_Y is numerically trivial. The projection formula proves the final numerical assertion. Under the identification in Proposition 4.1, UXU_X is disjoint from SYS_Y and hence is unchanged by ff. □\square

Torsion on the full boundary cycle

The reduced dlt boundary Σ\Sigma of Corollary 4.2 is a surface to which adjunction and surface abundance apply. The prepared-cycle obstruction, however, requires torsion on an effective Cartier divisor, including its multiplicities. We first give the extension argument that passes from the reduced surface to this possibly nonreduced scheme.

Lemma 5.1 ([17]). Let TT be a normal projective threefold over an algebraically closed field of characteristic p>0p > 0, and let EE be a nonzero effective Cartier divisor on TT. Suppose that EE is numerically trivial on every integral component of its support. If

OT(E)∣Ered∖Z≃OEred∖Z\mathcal{O}_T(E)|_{E_{\mathrm{red}}\setminus Z} \simeq\mathcal{O}_{E_{\mathrm{red}}\setminus Z}

for a finite set ZZ of closed points, then OE(E)\mathcal{O}_E(E) is torsion.

Proof. We reproduce the proof because both the finite exceptional set and the nonreduced divisor will occur in our application. Replace ZZ by Z∩Supp⁡EZ \cap\operatorname{Supp} E. At z∈Zz \in Z, write R=OT,zR = \mathcal{O}_{T,z}, with maximal ideal m\mathfrak{m}, and let tzt_z be a local equation of EE. Normality gives

Hm1(R)=0,ℓR(Hm2(R))<∞.H^1_{\mathfrak{m}}(R) = 0,\qquad\ell_R\left(H^2_{\mathfrak{m}}(R)\right) < \infty.

Here the second assertion uses the dimension-three hypothesis. Indeed, present R=A/IR = A/I with AA regular local of dimension nn and essentially of finite type over the field. Each nonmaximal localization of RR is normal of dimension at most two, hence Cohen–Macaulay. Catenarity gives dim⁡Aq−dim⁡Rp=n−3\dim A_{\mathfrak{q}}-\dim R_{\mathfrak{p}}=n-3 for a prime q\mathfrak{q} above p\mathfrak{p}; the Auslander–Buchsbaum formula therefore gives projective dimension n−3n-3 over AqA_{\mathfrak{q}}. Thus Ext⁡An−2(R,A)\operatorname{Ext}^{n-2}_A(R,A) is supported only at the closed point. It is a finite module, so it has finite length; local duality gives the assertion for Hm2(R)H^2_{\mathfrak{m}}(R).

Choose j≥1j \ge1 such that tzj−1t_z^{j-1} annihilates Hm2(R)H^2_m(R) at every point of ZZ. A single jj works because ZZ is finite. For every integer uu, the restriction sequences give a commutative diagram

0→OT((u−j)E)→OT(uE)→OjE(uE)→0 ↓∥↓ 0→OT((u−1)E)→OT(uE)→OE(uE)→0.\begin{CD} 0 @>>> \mathcal{O}_T((u-j)E) @>>> \mathcal{O}_T(uE) @>>> \mathcal{O}_{jE}(uE) @>>> 0 \\ @. @VVV @| @VVV @. \\ 0 @>>> \mathcal{O}_T((u-1)E) @>>> \mathcal{O}_T(uE) @>>> \mathcal{O}_E(uE) @>>> 0. \end{CD}

In local trivializations the left vertical map is multiplication by tzj−1t_z^{j-1}. Local cohomology with support in the finite set ZZ is the direct sum of the corresponding local groups. The vanishing of the ambient HZ1H^1_Z makes the connecting maps from the HZ1H^1_Z of the rightmost terms to the ambient HZ2H^2_Z injective. Naturality and our choice of jj therefore imply

HZ1(T,OjE(uE))⟶HZ1(T,OE(uE))(17)H^1_Z(T,\mathcal{O}_{jE}(uE)) \longrightarrow H^1_Z(T,\mathcal{O}_E(uE)) \tag*{(17)}

is zero for every u∈Zu \in\mathbb{Z}.

The same jj works for every twist: locally the invertible sheaves in the diagram are free of rank one, and the annihilating map is still multiplication by tzj−1t_z^{j-1}.

Now fix this thickening jEjE. The ideal of Ered∖ZE_{\mathrm{red}} \setminus Z in jE∖ZjE \setminus Z is nilpotent. Lift a chosen generator of OT(E)∣Ered∖Z\mathcal{O}_T(E)|_{E_{\mathrm{red}}\setminus Z} to local generating sections on a finite open cover of jE∖ZjE \setminus Z. On overlaps the lifts differ by sections in that nilpotent ideal times the line bundle. For u=peu=p^e sufficiently large, their uuth tensor powers agree: in local frames this is the identity (a+b)pe=ape+bpe(a+b)^{p^e}=a^{p^e}+b^{p^e}, with bpe=0b^{p^e}=0. They consequently glue to a generator

sj∈H0(jE∖Z,OjE(uE)).s_j \in H^0(jE \setminus Z,\mathcal{O}_{jE}(uE)).

Let ss be its restriction to E∖ZE \setminus Z. The obstruction to extending ss over EE is the image of the obstruction to extending sjs_j over jEjE. Equation (17), applied to the exact sequences for sections with support in ZZ, kills that image. Hence ss extends to a section of OE(uE)\mathcal{O}_E(uE).

This extended section has no zeros. On each integral projective surface component FF of EredE_{\mathrm{red}}, it is nonzero because it is a generator off ZZ. If its restriction to FF vanished anywhere, its zero scheme would be a nonempty effective Cartier divisor on FF, and would have positive intersection with an ample divisor. This contradicts the numerical triviality of OF(uE)\mathcal{O}_F(uE). The argument uses only integrality of FF, not normality. The section is therefore a generator on the reduction, and then on EE, since an element invertible modulo a nilpotent ideal is invertible. Thus OE(uE)≃OE\mathcal{O}_E(uE) \simeq\mathcal{O}_E. □

We apply this lemma to the reduced dlt model obtained by isolation. Recall that ss is the multiplicity of SYS_Y in NYN_Y and τ>0\tau> 0 is the rational number satisfying KY+GY∼QτNYK_Y+G_Y \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} \tau N_Y.

Proposition 5.2. For the projective crepant dlt modification f:(Yd,Σ)→(Y,SY)f:(Y_d,\Sigma) \to(Y,S_Y) of Corollary 4.2, there is a positive Cartier multiple MM of f∗SYf^*S_Y such that

Supp⁡M=Σ,M∣Σi≡0for every component Σi,OM(M) is torsion.\operatorname{Supp} M=\Sigma,\qquad M|_{\Sigma_i}\equiv0 \quad\text{for every component } \Sigma_i,\qquad\mathcal{O}_M(M) \text{ is torsion}.

Proof. The relations furnished by isolation are

KYd+Σ∼Qτsf∗SYon a neighborhood of Σ,f∗SY∣Σi≡0.(18)K_{Y_d}+\Sigma\sim_{\mathbb{Q}} \tau sf^*S_Y \quad\text{on a neighborhood of } \Sigma,\qquad f^*S_Y|_{\Sigma_i}\equiv0. \tag*{(18)}

Let σ:Σ′→Σ\sigma:\Sigma' \to\Sigma be the finite S2S_2-ification. It is unchanged away from a finite set Z⊂ΣZ \subset\Sigma [23], Proposition 2.14. Reduced-boundary adjunction gives an effective rational divisor Δ′\Delta' such that (Σ′,Δ′)(\Sigma',\Delta') is a projective semi-log-canonical surface pair and

KΣ′+Δ′∼Qσ∗((KYd+Σ)∣Σ)∼Qτsσ∗(f∗SY∣Σ).(19)K_{\Sigma'}+\Delta' \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} \sigma^*((K_{Y_d}+\Sigma)|_\Sigma) \sim_{\mathbb{Q}} \tau s\sigma^*(f^*S_Y|_\Sigma). \tag*{(19)}

We use adjunction in the form of [23], Lemma 2.19; see also [17], Section 2.5. The S2S_{2}-ification is needed because the reduced boundary itself need not satisfy S2S_{2}. Its codimension-one singularities are nodes, and on its normalization the adjunction boundary includes the conductor with coefficient one; the normalized pair is log canonical. These are precisely the semi-log-canonical conditions needed for surface abundance.

The surface Σ′\Sigma^{\prime} is projective because it is finite over Σ\Sigma. The last class in (19) is numerically trivial, by (18) and the projection formula for curves. Posva’s abundance theorem for projective semi-log-canonical surfaces in positive characteristic therefore makes KΣ′+Δ′K_{\Sigma^{\prime}}+\Delta^{\prime} semiample [18], Theorem 3.1. A semiample numerically trivial rational line bundle is Q\mathbb{Q}-linearly trivial: a globally generated Cartier multiple defines a morphism contracting every curve, hence constant on each connected component. Its line bundle is trivial there.

Since τs\tau s is positive and rational, clearing denominators in (19) yields a positive Cartier multiple MM of f∗SYf^{*}S_{Y} with σ∗OΣ(M)\sigma^{*}\mathcal{O}_{\Sigma}(M) trivial. In particular,

OYd(M)∣Σ∖Z≃OΣ∖Z.\mathcal{O}_{Y_{d}}(M)|_{\Sigma\setminus Z}\simeq\mathcal{O}_{\Sigma\setminus Z}.

The divisor MM is effective, its reduction is Σ\Sigma, and it is numerically trivial on every component of its support. Applying Lemma 5.1 on the normal projective threefold YdY_{d} proves torsion on the full Cartier scheme MM.

Construction of the prepared cycle

We now combine the isolated boundary with the original log canonical section. The boundary supplies a divisor with torsion normal line; the section supplies a canonical relation near its support. A finite cover removes the prime-to-pp part of the canonical exponent. This is the preparation of [17], Sections 2.7–2.8, with the support of the original boundary retained throughout the construction.

Proposition 6.1. Let (X,B,N0)(X,B,N_{0}) be the data of Proposition 2.3 in the maximal-nef-dimension case. There exist a smooth projective threefold VV, a very ample divisor HVH_{V}, and a nonzero effective Cartier divisor

D=∑αmαDαD=\sum_{\alpha}m_{\alpha}D_{\alpha}

having all the properties in Theorem 2.1. In particular, its support is connected with simple normal crossings, gcd⁡α(mα)=1\gcd_{\alpha}(m_{\alpha})=1, and OD(D)\mathcal{O}_{D}(D) is torsion.

Proof. Equation (3) and Proposition 3.1 give the hypotheses of Proposition 4.1. Choose its isolated model (Y,GY,NY,SY)(Y,G_{Y},N_{Y},S_{Y}) and the reduced dlt modification f:(Yd,Σ)→(Y,SY)f:(Y_{d},\Sigma)\to(Y,S_{Y}) of Corollary 4.2. Let MM be the positive Cartier multiple of f∗SYf^{*}S_{Y} supplied by Proposition 5.2.

The canonical section and its support. Let V0V_{0} be a smooth projective common resolution of XX and YdY_{d}, chosen to dominate the intervening models. Write

q:V0⟶X,h0:V0⟶Yd,r=f∘h0:V0⟶Y.q:V_{0}\longrightarrow X,\qquad h_{0}:V_{0}\longrightarrow Y_{d},\qquad r=f\circ h_{0}:V_{0}\longrightarrow Y.

These models share the open set

UX=Xreg∖(Supp⁡N0∪Pout),U_{X}=X_{\mathrm{reg}}\setminus(\operatorname{Supp}N_{0}\cup P_{\mathrm{out}}),

where PoutP_{\mathrm{out}} is the union of the boundary components disjoint from Supp⁡N0\operatorname{Supp}N_{0}. We choose the common resolution to be an isomorphism over this open. Projective resolution and resolution of divisor supports in dimension three permit this choice [6, 4]. The pullback equalities through the partial MMP give

q∗N0=r∗NY.(20)q^*N_0=r^*N_Y. \tag*{(20)}

The integer mm was chosen so that N0∼m(KX+B)N_0 \sim m(K_X+B) and both mKXmK_X and mBmB are Cartier. It gives a rational section θ\theta of ωV0⊗m\omega_{V_0}^{\otimes m} with

div⁡(θ)=q∗N0+m(KV0−q∗KX)−mq∗B.(21)\operatorname{div}(\theta)=q^*N_0+m(K_{V_0}-q^*K_X)-mq^*B. \tag*{(21)}

Indeed, the right side is an integral divisor linearly equivalent to mKV0mK_{V_0}. Put E0=Supp⁡q∗N0E_0=\operatorname{Supp}q^*N_0. Every prime component in (21) is either contained in E0E_0 or disjoint from it. For q∗Bq^*B this follows from boundary separation on XX. For a qq-exceptional divisor, its irreducible center lies in X∖UX=Supp⁡N0∪Pout∪Sing⁡XX\setminus U_X=\operatorname{Supp}N_0\cup P_{\mathrm{out}}\cup\operatorname{Sing}X.

A terminal threefold is regular in codimension two, so Sing⁡X\operatorname{Sing}X is finite [17]. The center is therefore contained in Supp⁡N0\operatorname{Supp}N_0, or is disjoint from it. Taking inverse images gives the assertion for the exceptional divisor.

Let F0F_0 be the union of the components of div⁡(θ)\operatorname{div}(\theta) outside E0E_0. Thus

Z0:=E0∪Supp⁡div⁡(θ)=E0∪˙F0.(22)Z_0:=E_0\cup\operatorname{Supp}\operatorname{div}(\theta)=E_0\mathbin{\dot\cup}F_0. \tag*{(22)}

The disjointness is the point of this description. Components of q∗N0q^*N_0 can cancel in (21); we retain all of E0E_0 when choosing the open set preserved by the subsequent resolution.

Removing the prime-to-pp exponent. Write m=pbm′m=p^b m' with b≥0b\ge0 and (m′,p)=1(m',p)=1. Choose a nonzero rational generator η\eta of ωV0⊗pb\omega_{V_0}^{\otimes p^b} and write θ=uηm′\theta=u\eta^{m'}, where u∈k(V0)×u\in k(V_0)^\times. Adjoin one root vv of vm′=uv^{m'}=u and normalize V0V_0 in the resulting field. This is a finite separable cover, possibly of degree smaller than m′m'. Over V0∖Supp⁡div⁡(θ)V_0\setminus\operatorname{Supp}\operatorname{div}(\theta), it is an integral component of the torsor of m′m'th roots of the invertible section θ\theta. This description is independent of the rational generator η\eta. Since m′m' is invertible in kk, that torsor is finite étale.

Resolve the normalization and the total inverse image of Z0Z_0, preserving the regular étale open over V0∖Z0V_0\setminus Z_0. We obtain a smooth projective threefold and a generically finite separable morphism π:V→V0\pi:V\to V_0 for which the total pullback support of N0N_0 is simple normal crossings. The morphisms used to compare divisors are

V→πV0→qX h0↓ Yd→fY.\begin{CD} V @>{\pi}>> V_0 @>{q}>> X \\ @. @V{h_0}VV @. \\ @. Y_d @>{f}>> Y. \end{CD}

Here q,h0,fq,h_0,f are birational; π\pi is generically finite and separable. Set ρ=q∘π\rho=q\circ\pi and h=h0∘πh=h_0\circ\pi. By (20), ρ∗N0=(f∘h)∗NY\rho^*N_0=(f\circ h)^*N_Y, while the Cartier divisor supplied by Proposition 5.2 pulls back as h∗Mh^*M.

The rational section vηv\eta is a section of π∗ωV0⊗pb\pi^*\omega_{V_0}^{\otimes p^b}. The determinant of the differential is a nonzero section of the rational line ωV⊗π∗ωV0−1\omega_V\otimes\pi^*\omega_{V_0}^{-1}; denote it by JπJ_\pi. Its nonvanishing at the generic point follows from separability. Consequently

ψ=(vη)Jπpb(23)\psi=(v\eta)J_\pi^{p^b} \tag*{(23)}

is a rational section of ωV⊗pb\omega_V^{\otimes p^b}. Both factors are invertible on π−1(V0∖Z0)\pi^{-1}(V_0\setminus Z_0): the first is a root of an invertible section, and the second is the Jacobian of an étale morphism. Thus the divisor of ψ\psi is supported on π−1(Z0)\pi^{-1}(Z_0). By (22), each of its prime components lies in Supp⁡ρ∗N0\operatorname{Supp}\rho^*N_0 or is disjoint from that support.

  • A connected primitive Cartier divisor. Put MV=h∗MM_V = h^*M and choose a connected component CC of Supp⁡MV\operatorname{Supp} M_V. Since MM is a positive multiple of f∗SYf^*S_Y, and SYS_Y is disjoint from the other components of NYN_Y, the set CC is also a connected component of Supp⁡ρ∗N0\operatorname{Supp} \rho^*N_0. Write the part of MVM_V supported on CC as

aD,D=∑αmαDα,a=gcd⁡Dα⊂Cmult⁡Dα(MV).(24)aD,\qquad D = \sum_{\alpha}m_\alpha D_\alpha,\qquad a = \gcd_{D_\alpha\subset C}\operatorname{mult}_{D_\alpha}(M_V). \tag*{(24)}

The divisor DD is Cartier because VV is smooth, and its multiplicities are positive with gcd one. Its support is connected and simple normal crossings.

Every curve in Supp⁡MV\operatorname{Supp} M_V maps under hh to a point or to a curve in Σ\Sigma. The projection formula and Proposition 5.2 therefore show that MVM_V is numerically trivial on every component of its support. Near CC we have MV=aDM_V = aD, so D∣Dα≡0D|_{D_\alpha} \equiv0 for every α\alpha. For a curve not contained in Supp⁡D\operatorname{Supp} D, effectivity gives nonnegative intersection with DD. For a curve in its support, the intersection is zero. Thus DD is nef, and every very ample divisor HVH_V satisfies

DHV2>0,D2HV=0.(25)D H_V^2 > 0,\qquad D^2H_V = 0. \tag*{(25)}

Torsion also survives on the entire Cartier scheme. Choose t>0t > 0 with OM(tM)≃OM\mathcal{O}_M(tM) \simeq\mathcal{O}_M. The pullback divisor MVM_V is scheme-theoretically V×YdMV \times_{Y_d} M: its local equation is the pullback of a local equation of MM, which is a nonzero divisor since VV is integral and hh is dominant. Pulling back the trivialization gives OMV(tMV)≃OMV\mathcal{O}_{M_V}(tM_V) \simeq\mathcal{O}_{M_V}; no flatness assumption on hh is needed. Restricting along D⊂MVD \subset M_V, and using MV=aDM_V = aD near CC, gives

OD(taD)≃OD.(26)\mathcal{O}_D(taD) \simeq\mathcal{O}_D. \tag*{(26)}

Hence OD(D)\mathcal{O}_D(D) is torsion.

The section ψ\psi of (23) has, on a neighborhood WW of CC, divisor supported on DD. Indeed, its other components are disjoint from CC and can be removed from that neighborhood. Thus there are integers bαb_\alpha such that

ωV⊗pb∣W≃OW(∑αbαDα).(27)\left.\omega_V^{\otimes p^b}\right|_W \simeq\mathcal{O}_W\left(\sum_\alpha b_\alpha D_\alpha\right). \tag*{(27)}

Numerical proportionality and very general points. It remains to show that no DD-trivial curve passes through a very general point of VV. Put NV=ρ∗N0N_V = \rho^*N_0. It is a nonzero nef divisor, numerically trivial on every component of its support by the projection formula. Since Supp⁡D\operatorname{Supp} D is contained in that support, we have

NVHV2>0,NV2HV=NVDHV=0.N_VH_V^2 > 0,\qquad N_V^2H_V = N_VDH_V = 0.

Together with (25), the Hodge index theorem gives

D≡cNV,c=DHV2NVHV2>0.(28)D \equiv cN_V,\qquad c = \frac{DH_V^2}{N_VH_V^2} > 0. \tag*{(28)}

We verify that this is numerical equivalence on every curve, rather than only on a fixed hyperplane section, following [17].

Let Γ⊂V\Gamma\subset V be any integral curve. For l≫0l \gg0, there is an integral surface T∈∣lHV∣T \in|lH_V| containing Γ\Gamma. To see this, twist the ideal of Γ\Gamma sufficiently far and then multiply its generators by very ample sections. The resulting linear system has no fixed divisorial component and gives a birational map onto its image off Γ\Gamma. Bertini irreducibility gives an irreducible general member, which is generically reduced on that birational open. As a Cartier divisor on smooth VV, it has no embedded components, and is therefore integral. On a smooth projective resolution T~→T\widetilde{T} \to T, let d,n,ed,n,e be the pullbacks of D∣T,NV∣T,HV∣TD|_{T},N_{V}|_{T},H_{V}|_{T}, respectively. Their intersections are

d2=n2=dn=0,e2>0,de=lDHV2,ne=lNVHV2.d^2=n^2=dn=0,\qquad e^2>0,\qquad de=lDH_V^2,\qquad ne=lN_VH_V^2.

Hence d−cnd-cn has square zero and is orthogonal to ee. The Hodge index form is negative definite on the orthogonal complement of the positive-square class ee, so d−cnd-cn is numerically zero. The projective surjection T~→T\widetilde{T}\to T supplies an integral curve dominating Γ\Gamma: take the closure of a closed point of the fiber over its generic point. The projection formula then gives (D−cNV)⋅Γ=0(D-cN_V)\cdot\Gamma=0. This proves (28).

Finally let Zi⊂XZ_i\subset X be the countably many proper closed subsets excluded by the nef reduction of N0N_0. Remove from VV the non-quasi-finite locus of ρ\rho and all the sets ρ−1(Zi)\rho^{-1}(Z_i). These are proper closed subsets, since ρ\rho is dominant and generically finite. Their complement contains very general points because kk is uncountable. Every curve through any point of this complement maps to a curve on XX. If it were DD-trivial, then (28) and the projection formula would make its image N0N_0-trivial, contradicting maximal nef dimension. All properties in Theorem 2.1 have now been established.

Proof of Theorem 1.1. Theorem 2.1 contradicts Proposition 6.1. The maximal-nef-dimension case is therefore impossible. By Proposition 2.3, it remains to apply abundance in nef dimension at most two [23], Theorem 1.8. This gives semiample-ness, and faithful descent along the algebraically closed field extension gives it over the original field.

References

  1. [1]Caucher Birkar, Existence of flips and minimal models for 3-folds in char p, Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér. (4) 49 (2016), no. 1, 169–212. doi:10.24033/asens.2279.DOI
  2. [2]Caucher Birkar and Joe Waldron, Existence of Mori fibre spaces for 3-folds in char p, Adv. Math. 313 (2017), 62–101. doi:10.1016/j.aim.2017.03.032.DOI
  3. [3]Paolo Cascini, Hiromu Tanaka and Chenyang Xu, On base point freeness in positive characteristic, Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér. (4) 48 (2015), no. 5, 1239–1272. doi:10.24033/asens.2269.DOI
  4. [4]Vincent Cossart, Uwe Jannsen and Shuji Saito, Canonical embedded and non-embedded resolution of singularities for excellent two-dimensional schemes, arXiv:0905.2191, version 2, February 18, 2013; first posted 2009. arXiv:0905.2191v2.
  5. [5]Vincent Cossart and Olivier Piltant, Resolution of singularities of threefolds in positive characteristic. I. Reduction to local uniformization on Artin–Schreier and purely inseparable coverings, J. Algebra 320 (2008), no. 3, 1051–1082. doi:10.1016/j.jalgebra.2008.03.032.
  6. [6]Vincent Cossart and Olivier Piltant, Resolution of singularities of threefolds in positive characteristic II, J. Algebra 321 (2009), no. 7, 1836–1976. doi:10.1016/j.jalgebra.2008.11.030.DOI
  7. [7]Christopher Hacon and Jakub Witaszek, The minimal model program for threefolds in characteristic 5, Duke Math. J. 171 (2022), no. 11, 2193–2231. doi:10.1215/00127094-2022-0024.DOI
  8. [8]Christopher D. Hacon and Chenyang Xu, On the three dimensional minimal model program in positive characteristic, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 28 (2015), no. 3, 711–744. doi:10.1090/S0894-0347-2014-00809-2.DOI
  9. [9]Kenta Hashizume, Yusuke Nakamura and Hiromu Tanaka, Minimal model program for log canonical threefolds in positive characteristic, Math. Res. Lett. 27 (2020), no. 4, 1003–1054. doi:10.4310/MRL.2020.v27.n4.a3.DOI
  10. [10]Eric Jovinel​ly, Brian Lehmann and Eric Riedl, Optimal bounds in Bend-and-Break, Forum Math. Pi 14 (2026), e16, 1–4. doi:10.1017/fmp.2026.10033.DOI
  11. [11]Yujiro Kawamata, Abundance theorem for minimal threefolds, Invent. Math. 108 (1992), 229–246. doi:10.1007/BF02100604.DOI
  12. [12]Seán Keel, Basepoint freeness for nef and big line bundles in positive characteristic, Ann. of Math. (2) 149 (1999), no. 1, 253–286. doi:10.2307/121025.DOI
  13. [13]Sean Keel, Kenji Matsuki and James McKernan, Log abundance theorem for threefolds, Duke Math. J. 75 (1994), no. 1, 99–119. doi:10.1215/S0012-7094-94-07504-2.DOI
  14. [14]Sean Keel, Kenji Matsuki and James McKernan, Corrections to: “Log abundance theorem for threefolds”, Duke Math. J. 122 (2004), no. 3, 625–630. doi:10.1215/S0012-7094-04-12236-5.DOI
  15. [15]János Kollár and Shigefumi Mori, Birational Geometry of Algebraic Varieties, Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, vol. 134, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998; with the collaboration of C. H. Clemens and A. Corti. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511662560.DOI
  16. [16]Yoichi Miyaoka, Abundance conjecture for 3-folds: case ν = 1, Composition Math. 68 (1988), no. 2, 203–220. Numdam: CM_1988__68_2_203_0.
  17. [17]OpenAI, Abundance in numerical dimension one for terminal threefolds in positive characteristic, OpenAI Math Release preprint OAI:Abundance-in-numerical-dimension-one-for-terminal-threefolds-in-positive-characteristic-September-24-2026, 2026.
  18. [18]Quentin Posva, Abundance for slc surfaces over arbitrary fields, Épijournal Géom. Algébrique 7 (2023), article no. 5, 23 pp. doi:10.46298/epiga.2023.volume7.8803.DOI
  19. [19]Hiromu Tanaka, Abundance theorem for semi log canonical surfaces in positive characteristic, Osaka J. Math. 53 (2016), no. 2, 535–566. Osaka repository: doi:10.18910/58879.DOI
  20. [20]Joe Waldron, The LMMP for log canonical 3-folds in characteristic p > 5, Nagoya Math. J. 230 (2018), 48–71. doi:10.1017/nmj.2017.2.
  21. [21]Jakub Witaszek, On the canonical bundle formula and log abundance in positive characteristic, Math. Ann. 381 (2021), no. 3–4, 1309–1344. doi:10.1007/s00208-021-02231-5.DOI
  22. [22]Chenyang Xu and Lei Zhang, Nonvanishing for 3-folds in characteristic p > 5, Duke Math. J. 168 (2019), no. 7, 1269–1301. doi:10.1215/00127094-2018-0066.DOI
  23. [23]Zheng Xu, Note on the three-dimensional log canonical abundance in characteristic > 3, Nagoya Math. J. 255 (2024), 694–723. doi:10.1017/nmj.2024.3. Theorem numbering follows arXiv:2212.04039v2, February 3, 2024.DOI

Paper details

Contents