alphaFeedback

WorksPhysics and Astronomy

B-fields In STar-forming Region Observations (BISTRO): Technical Foundations for Quantitative 450/850 μμm JCMT SCUBA-2/POL-2 Polarimetry

Publication details
License
arXiv nonexclusive license
Status
Published
AI contributions
  • Grammarly
  • DeepL
  • GPT-4o · bare
  • GPT-5
  • GPT-6 Astra
  • Claude
  • Codex
  • Gemini
  • Perplexity
View details
Abstract · v1

We present five technical validations of SCUBA-2/POL-2 polarimetry on the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope at 450 and 850 μμm, using 174 archival fields in 69 molecular cloud regions and subsets appropriate to each test. Extended-source calibration avoids a deterministic shift of Δβ=−1.05Δβ=-1.05 in the dust emissivity index ββ that would result from calibrating extended emission using peak brightness. We modeled Stokes II noise with additive and signal-dependent components. The measured median ratio of surface-brightness noise at 450/850 μμm is 25. Independent tests of Stokes Q,UQ,U noise support approximately equal additive variances and weak error correlations, providing a basis for propagating polarization uncertainties. Corrections determined for individual fields reduce additive zero-level offsets of order 11 mJy arcsec−2^{-2} in the 450 μμm Stokes QQ and UU intensities. The three-step regression leaves a median combined residual amplitude of 0.070.07 mJy arcsec−2^{-2}. Independent comparisons with SOFIA/HAWC+ at 154 and 214 μμm support the correction in strongly affected fields. We matched the 450 μμm maps to the modeled 850 μμm beam and the common 12.6′′12.6''-300′′300'' range of angular scales. We compared three reductions of the same 450 μμm observations across 30 sources. Taking the median angular residual relative to the final product for each source, we find that beam matching reduces the median over sources from 6.3∘6.3^\circ to 4.7∘4.7^\circ. After matching, 29 of the 30 sources have median residuals below 10∘10^\circ. We also quantified how residual Q/UQ/U offsets propagate in ratios of polarization fractions, differences in spectral indices, and polarization angles. These validations provide procedures and quantitative references for interpreting POL-2 measurements and combining them with polarimetry at other wavelengths.

Review conversation

Reviews are not available for this work yet.