alphaFeedback

WorksPhysics and Astronomy

Observation of Scaling of Higher-Order Flow in a Unitary Fermi Gas

AI contributions
Not recorded for this paper
View details

Abstract

Collective flow emerging from spatially anisotropic many-body systems is a fundamental manifestation of strongly interacting quantum matter, from ultracold quantum gases to the quark-gluon plasma created in relativistic heavy-ion collisions. Yet how collective flow emerges across different spatial harmonics and how dissipation modifies its evolution remain largely unexplored. Here we investigate the nonequilibrium expansion of a unitary Fermi gas initially confined in nearly homogeneous potentials with engineered angular deformations. By suddenly releasing the confinement, we resolve anisotropic flow harmonics up to the seventh order. Remarkably, after normalization and rescaling by the characteristic expansion timescale, the different harmonics and system sizes exhibit a universal early-time evolution. At longer times, this universality breaks down and we observe an approximately quadratic dependence of the harmonic attenuation on harmonic order, consistent with viscous acoustic scaling. Furthermore, temperature-dependent measurements reveal the role of shear viscosity in the dissipative evolution of higher-order flow. Our results open a new route to exploring the interplay between universal hydrodynamic expansion and dissipative transport, connecting collective dynamics in ultracold quantum gases with anisotropic flow in strongly interacting nuclear matter.

Collective flow provides a powerful probe of emergent behavior in strongly interacting many-body systems. In relativistic heavy-ion collisions, the expansion of the hot and dense matter produced by colliding nuclei converts initial spatial anisotropies into correlations in the final momentum distribution [1]. The resulting azimuthal flow harmonics, conventionally denoted by vnv_n, have become central observables for understanding the transport properties and collective behavior of the quark–gluon plasma (QGP) [2, 3, 4, 5]. In particular, elliptic flow (v2v_2) and triangular flow (v3v_3) encode the response to spatial deformations and their harmonic dependence offers a sensitive probe of dissipative transport [6, 7, 8], as viscosity preferentially attenuates shorter-wavelength excitations [9]. Higher-order harmonics probe smaller spatial structures [10, 11, 12, 13, 14]; acoustic-scaling analyses organize their relative suppression approximately through n2/Rn^2/R, where RR characterizes the initial transverse size [15, 16, 17]. However, the fluctuating initial geometry and the predominantly final-state access to momentum harmonics make it difficult to resolve how a selected harmonic develops and evolves during expansion [18, 19].

Ultracold Fermi gases (UFG) offer a unique experimental platform to address such emergent collective flow [20, 21, 22]. Their initial density geometry can be precisely engineered, and the temporal evolution of the expansion can be fully reconstructed. Furthermore, the well-characterized equation of state and control of temperature and density provide independent thermodynamic scales for testing hydrodynamic predictions [23, 24, 25]. At

a Feshbach resonance, the scattering length of two-component Fermi gases diverges, where interactions are as strong as allowed by quantum mechanics (so-called the unitarity limit) and the system becomes scale invariant. Their thermodynamic and transport properties are then governed by universal functions of density and temperature [26, 27]. Experiments have demonstrated the effects of strong interactions on anisotropic expansion [28, 29], scale invariant dynamics [30, 31, 32], shear viscosity [33, 34, 35], sound and density response [36, 37, 38, 39, 40]. More recently, interaction-induced elliptic flow has been observed in few-fermion systems [41], while comparisons between ultracold atomic gases and heavy-ion collisions have revealed common features of anisotropic expansion [42].

Despite these advances, the dynamical emergence of higher-order flow remains unexplored in ultracold Fermi gases. Most previous expansion studies have focused on global cloud deformation or second-order momentum anisotropy. Higher harmonics are particularly valuable because they probe spatial structures on progressively shorter length scales and therefore provide enhanced sensitivity to viscosity, nonlinear mode coupling and the breakdown of hydrodynamic behavior [12, 43]. Moreover, the influence of the initial density distribution can obscure the interpretation of collective flow in conventional harmonic confinement.

Here we program angular deformations of nearly homogeneous potentials to investigate the expansion of a unitary Fermi gas. We measure anisotropic flow harmonics up to the seventh order. We find that, after appropriate normalization, the flow dynamics exhibit a common early-time evolution across different harmonic orders and system sizes. This universal behavior subsequently breaks down, with the different harmonics developing distinct dynamics. We further identify a quadratic harmonic-order dependence of n2/R0n^{2}/R_{0} analogous to acoustic scaling in nuclear collisions in the measured response and establish a temperature-dependent dissipative contribution to the expansion. The temperature dependence and time evolution of this scaling provide new constraints on the interplay of pressure-driven conversion and transport. These observations reveal how universal flow generation evolves into harmonic-dependent transport and provide a connection between strongly interacting atomic gases and the acoustic attenuation of anisotropic flow in heavy-ion collisions.

Experiment.— We prepare a balanced mixture of the two lowest hyperfine states of 6Li{}^{6}\mathrm{Li} close to the broad Feshbach resonance at a magnetic field B≃832 GB \simeq832\ \mathrm{G}, where the system enters the unitary regime. A digital micromirror device (DMD) generates a nearly uniform transverse density bounded by an engineered boundary shape Figure 1(a)

Schematic of the experiment setup and measured density images for harmonic orders n=2–7

Figure 1. Programmable generation of higher-order anisotropic flow. (a) The schematic of the experiment setup. The DMD generates a programmable repulsive hollow beam, preparing a near-uniform 6Li{}^{6}\mathrm{Li} cloud in the xx-yy plane. The optical confinement, is released for three-dimensional expansion. Simultaneous front and side imaging provides full information of the expansion and enables thermometry. DM: dichroic mirror. (b) Measured in-situ, intermediate-, and long-TOF density images (top to bottom) for n=2−7n=2-7, colorbar: optical density (OD).

R(ϕ)=R0+Acos⁡[n(ϕ−Φn)],(1)R(\phi)=R_{0}+A\cos[n(\phi-\Phi_{n})], \tag*{(1)}

where AA sets the deformation amplitude and Φn\Phi_{n} its orientation. We vary R0R_{0} and harmonic order nn from 3 to 7 while fixing A/R0=0.25A/R_{0}=0.25. For n=2n=2, we prepare a uniform ellipse with a mean radius of R0R_{0}. Before release, the third direction along zz-axes is harmonically trapped with frequency ωz/(2π)=120(5) Hz\omega_{z}/(2\pi)=120(5)\ \mathrm{Hz}. Simultaneous front and side imaging provides thermometry using the equation of state [23, 30]. The samples have typical Fermi energy EF∼kB×350 nKE_{\mathrm{F}}\sim k_{\mathrm{B}}\times350\ \mathrm{nK} and total atom number N∼1.2×105N\sim1.2\times10^{5} for R0∼30 μmR_{0}\sim30\ \mu\mathrm{m}. We prepare dimensionless temperatures T/TF≃0.15−0.35T/T_{\mathrm{F}}\simeq0.15-0.35, where TF=EF/kBT_{\mathrm{F}}=E_{\mathrm{F}}/k_{\mathrm{B}}. All optical confinement is suddenly removed, initiating interaction-driven expansion.

In contrast to harmonically trapped gases, the equilibrium density is nearly uniform and expansion begins through rarefaction waves launched from the boundaries [44], providing a well-defined measurement from spatial deformation to anisotropic collective flow.

The gas evolves for a controlled time of flight (TOF) tt at unitarity, and then a standard absorption imaging is performed. The effect from a weak residual magnetic saddle is corrected through a calibrated affine transformation.

For each image we compute the unweighted, signed angular moment of the column density Σ(r,t)\Sigma(\mathbf{r},t),

Vn(t)=∫d2r Σ(r,t)cos⁡[n(ϕ−Ψnf)]∫d2r Σ(r,t),(2)\mathcal{V}_{n}(t)=\frac{\int d^{2}r\,\Sigma(\mathbf{r},t)\cos[n(\phi-\Psi_{n}^{\mathrm{f}})]}{\int d^{2}r\,\Sigma(\mathbf{r},t)}, \tag*{(2)}

with coordinates r\mathbf{r} centered on the cloud and a fixed final-state direction Ψnf=Φn+π/n\Psi_{n}^{\mathrm{f}}=\Phi_{n}+\pi/n. We use the ratio Vn/ϵn\mathcal{V}_{n}/\epsilon_{n} to quantify the efficiency with which the initial spatial anisotropy is converted into collective flow, where ϵn=⟨rneinϕ⟩/⟨rn⟩\epsilon_{n}=\langle r^{n}e^{in\phi}\rangle/\langle r^{n}\rangle is evaluated from the programmed initial profile, adopting the conventional radial weight in nuclear-flow analyses [6, 16]. During early expansion, Vn\mathcal{V}_{n} measures spatial anisotropy; after sufficiently long TOF into the ballistic regime, it approaches the corresponding velocity-angle harmonic. At the experimentally accessible TOF, the observed evolution of Vn\mathcal{V}_{n} reflects the coupled density and velocity dynamics.

Geometric scaling and universal early-time response.— We present Vn(t)\mathcal{V}_{n}(t) normalized to its initial magnitude in

Figure 2(a),(b), showing distinct dynamics for different nn and R0R_0, respectively. The anisotropy begins negative, crosses zero, and subsequently develops resolved maxima for the higher harmonics. At the same temperature T/TF=0.15(1)T/T_F=0.15(1), rescaling the TOF tt with q=nt/R0q=nt/R_0 approximately collapses the early trajectories and further to the peak time for higher n>3n>3 [Figure 2(c)], identifying a geometric timescale R0/nR_0/n.

Universal early-time dynamics of anisotropic flow

Figure 2. Universal early-time dynamics of anisotropic flow. (a) Normalized anisotropy Vn(t)\mathcal{V}_n(t) for harmonic orders (colors) of n=2−7n=2-7 versus the TOF at R0=31 μmR_0=31\,\mu\mathrm{m}. (b) Typical normalized Vn(t)\mathcal{V}_n(t) of different sizes (markers) for n=6n=6 versus the TOF. (c) Normalized anisotropy Vn(t)\mathcal{V}_n(t) for all six harmonic orders and three sizes as a function of scaled time q=nt/R0q=nt/R_0. Dashed vertical lines identify q1q_1 and q2q_2 used in Figure 3. (d),(e) Normalized Vn(t)\mathcal{V}_n(t) for different harmonic orders for two dimensionless temperatures (colors) plotted against qq and τ=ncst/R0\tau=nc_st/R_0, with n=2−7n=2-7 from dark to light. All early time dynamics collapse with further rescaling by the sound speed. The black dashed curve denotes the quadratic τ\tau scaling by the hydrodynamic prediction in Eq. (3).

At different temperatures, the trajectories remain distinguishable in qq [Figure 2(d)]. For nearly homogeneous unitary Fermi gas, the initial density-weighted sound speed is cs2=5∫P0 d3r/(3mN)c_s^2=5\int P_0\,d^3r/(3mN) giving an acoustic scale τ=csq\tau=c_sq, where P0P_0 is the initial pressure and mm is the atomic mass. When plotted as functions of τ\tau, we observe that the early flow dynamics obtained for different nn, sizes, and temperatures all collapse onto a common curve [Figure 2(e)], exhibiting the universal early-time response.

This universal behavior can be understood from the boundary driven hydrodynamics of the expansion. Immediately after the gas is released, the initially near uniform interior remains approximately unperturbed, while rarefaction waves propagate inward from the boundaries. At unitarity, a locally rarefaction wave follows a self-similar solution of the Euler equations. Its density and velocity profiles depend on distance from the released boundary only through the ratio of that distance to cstc_st. For zero initial flow and a weak deformation of a uniform transverse disk, Vn(0)≃−A/R0\mathcal{V}_n(0)\simeq-A/R_0, V˙n(0)/∣Vn(0)∣≃(n2/R02)∫P0 d3r/(mN)\dot{\mathcal{V}}_n(0)/|\mathcal{V}_n(0)|\simeq(n^2/R_0^2)\int P_0\,d^3r/(mN) and V˙n(0)=0\dot{\mathcal{V}}_n(0)=0, this yields

Vn(t)∣Vn(0)∣≃−1+310τ2.(3)\frac{\mathcal{V}_n(t)}{|\mathcal{V}_n(0)|}\simeq-1+\frac{3}{10}\tau^2. \tag*{(3)}

Remarkably, all the rescaled data agree well with this universal prediction up to τ≈1\tau\approx1. The subsequent separation of the trajectories, including their inversion times, probes the evolving pressure and flow during three-dimensional expansion.

Harmonic scaling at later times

At longer expansion times, the normalized flow harmonics depart from their common trajectory. The dynamics become harmonic dependent, revealing a crossover beyond the initial universal regime. Figure 3 compares measurements at two later common rescaled times q1<q2q_1<q_2 as marked in Figure 2(c) at T/TF=0.15(1)T/T_F=0.15(1). Each slice includes two initial radii and harmonic orders up to n=7n=7, and is evaluated at tj=qjR0/nt_j=q_jR_0/n. Remarkably, the normalized angular moments at these times show an approximately exponential dependence on n2/R0n^2/R_0:

Quadratic harmonic scaling of late-time anisotropy

Figure 3. Quadratic harmonic scaling of late-time anisotropy. Normalized VnV_n versus n2/R0n^2/R_0 on logarithmic scale at (a) q1=0.62 ms/μmq_1=0.62\ \mathrm{ms}/\mu\mathrm{m} and (b) q2=0.77 ms/μmq_2=0.77\ \mathrm{ms}/\mu\mathrm{m}. Each panel combines two initial radii (colors) and six harmonic orders (brightness) at T/TF=0.15(1)T/T_F=0.15(1), including the uniform ellipse labeled n=2n=2. Black lines are linear fits using Eq. (4). Inset of (b): varying R0R_0 at fixed n=3n=3 tests the radius dependence separately in a wider range. The two-time ratio (c) provides a normalization-independent test of the harmonic scaling. Error bars represent ±1\pm1 standard error.

ln⁡Vn(tj)ϵn≃A0,j−Kjn2R0,j=1,2.(4)\ln\frac{\mathcal{V}_n(t_j)}{\epsilon_n}\simeq A_{0,j}-K_j\frac{n^2}{R_0},\qquad j=1,2. \tag*{(4)}

Here KjK_j is an effective attenuation length and A0,jA_{0,j}, the logarithmic intercept. Linear fits yield K1=1.22(3) μmK_1=1.22(3)\,\mu\mathrm{m} and K2=1.68(4) μmK_2=1.68(4)\,\mu\mathrm{m}, with a goodness of fit R2R^2 all above $0.99. The inset of Figure 3(b) fixes n=3n=3 and varies R0R_0 from 1818 to 54 μm54\,\mu\mathrm{m}: the logarithmic response again scales approximately linearly with 1/R01/R_0 at fixed TF=249(6) nKT_F=249(6)\,\mathrm{nK} and T/TF=0.26(7)T/T_F=0.26(7). This further confirms the radius dependence over a wider range.

To test this scaling independently of the normalization convention [16, 18], we plot the two-time logarithmic ratio in Figure 3(c), ln⁡[Vn(q1)/Vn(q2)]≃−ΔA0+ΔKn2/R0\ln[\mathcal{V}_n(q_1)/\mathcal{V}_n(q_2)]\simeq-\Delta A_0+\Delta K n^2/R_0, where ΔA0=A0,2−A0,1\Delta A_0=A_{0,2}-A_{0,1} and ΔK=K2−K1\Delta K=K_2-K_1. The ϵn\epsilon_n and any time-independent multiplicative normalization cancel. The observed linearity therefore confirms the n2/R0n^2/R_0 dependence of the late-time attenuation independently of the normalization method.

The observed quadratic harmonic order dependence suggests the acoustic attenuation. For a nonrelativistic unitary Fermi gas, the shear-viscous contribution to the sound dispersion is

ω±(k)=±csk−i2η3mn0k2+⋯ ,(5)\omega_{\pm}(k)=\pm c_s k-\mathrm{i}\frac{2\eta}{3mn_0}k^2+\cdots, \tag*{(5)}

where η\eta denotes shear viscosity and n0n_0 is the initial atomic density. The amplitude of a weakly damped sound perturbation therefore decays as Ak(t)∝exp⁡[−Dk2t]A_k(t)\propto\exp[-Dk^2t], where D=2η/3mn0D=2\eta/3mn_0. For a smooth angular harmonic of order nn, the characteristic wave number is approximately k(t)≃n/R(t)k(t)\simeq n/R(t). For a scale invariant expansion, R(t)2≃R02+vexp2t2R(t)^2\simeq R_0^2+v_{\mathrm{exp}}^2t^2 [30], where the expansion speed vexpv_{\mathrm{exp}} is on the order of csc_s. Therefore, the accumulated attenuation exponent at fixed scaled time qq is given by Dn∼∫0qR0/ndt′ Dk2(t′)∼(n2D/R0vexp)arctan⁡(vexpq/n)D_n\sim\int_0^{qR_0/n}dt'\,Dk^2(t')\sim(n^2D/R_0v_{\mathrm{exp}})\arctan(v_{\mathrm{exp}}q/n). In the late-time limit vexpq/n≫1v_{\mathrm{exp}}q/n\gg1, this yields the shear-acoustic scaling

Dn∼πD2vexpn2R02∝ηmn0csn2R02.(6)D_n\sim\frac{\pi D}{2v_{\mathrm{exp}}}\frac{n^2}{R_0^2}\propto\frac{\eta}{mn_0c_s}\frac{n^2}{R_0^2}. \tag*{(6)}

Wavelength stretching then makes further attenuation small, so the accumulated n2/R0n^2/R_0 factor persists at later common qq. The precise value of DnD_n is sensitive to the sound diffusivity, the expansion history, and the duration of hydrodynamic evolution. Quantitative comparison with hydrodynamic calculations can disentangle these contributions and constrain transport coefficients.

The n2/R0n^2/R_0 dependence is particularly noteworthy in light of the acoustic scaling of the final momentum anisotropy in relativistic heavy-ion collisions [15, 16]. In that setting, the damping of flow harmonics is governed by the shear viscosity relative to the relativistic entropy density. For a nonrelativistic Fermi gas, the corresponding inertial quantity is the mass density mn0mn_0. However, the expanding potential differs from a small amplitude sound-wave problem. The flow harmonics are generated dynamically from an initially isotropic velocity distribution, and the sharp boundaries excite the dynamical expansion with spatial wavelengths. Thus, the observed quadratic scaling has to be understood as an effective collective response rather than a single-mode damping law.

Temperature dependence of harmonic attenuation.—We prepare various temperatures at R0≃31 μmR_0\simeq31\ \mu\mathrm{m} for n=2−7n=2-7 at fixed TF=352(6) nKT_F=352(6)\ \mathrm{nK}. Figure 4(a) shows the harmonic scalings at q1q_1 with the fitted slopes and intercepts shown in (b),(c) as a function of the dimensionless temperature.

Temperature dependence of the harmonic attenuation

Figure 4. Temperature dependence of the harmonic attenuation. (a) Vn/ϵn\mathcal{V}_n/\epsilon_n versus n2/R0n^2/R_0 for various dimensionless temperatures at R0≃31 μmR_0 \simeq31\ \mu\mathrm{m}, with fits at the scaled time q1=0.62 ms/μmq_1 = 0.62\ \mathrm{ms}/\mu\mathrm{m}. (b),(c) The slopes KK and intercepts A0A_0 versus T/TFT/T_F. The gray solid line and the black dashed line in (b) are fits proportional to T/TFT/T_F and (T/TF)1/2(T/T_F)^{1/2}, respectively, showing that the data are consistent with a range of temperature scaling.

The fits proportional to T/TFT/T_F and (T/TF)1/2(T/T_F)^{1/2} in Figure 4(b) illustrate that our data are consistent with a range of temperature scaling of KK. The linear dependence, on the one hand, has a simple high-temperature argument from Eq. (6): when attenuation dominates the harmonic slope, KK is proportional to D/vexpD/v_{\mathrm{exp}}. At temperatures above the superfluid transition, the gas is a strongly interacting normal quantum fluid. Its shear viscosity can be expressed in a universal form. The high temperature unitary-gas transport gives η∝T3/2\eta\propto T^{3/2} at fixed density and cs∝T1/2c_s\propto T^{1/2} [26, 37, 45], hence

K∝1kFTTF,(7)K\propto\frac{1}{k_F}\frac{T}{T_F}, \tag*{(7)}

where kF=(3π2n0)1/3k_F=(3\pi^2n_0)^{1/3} is nearly constant for these preparations. On the other hand, the explored temperature range T/TF≃0.15T/T_F \simeq0.15–0.350.35 is nevertheless highly degenerate, so Pauli exclusion is expected to play a role that affects the attenuation through both viscosity, expansion speed, and thermal transport. An effective temperature scaling closer to (T/TF)1/2(T/T_F)^{1/2} in this temperature range is also consistent with previous measurements of the sound diffusivity [37, 38]. Our measurements thus provide new constraints on the interplay of pressure-driven conversion and transport.

Conclusions.— Our measurements revealed the emergence and subsequent evolution of higher-order collective flow in a strongly interacting, scale-invariant, nearly homogeneous quantum fluid. Programmable angular deformations revealed an early universal acoustic response and later n2/R0n^2/R_0 scaling for harmonic orders up to n=7n = 7. Ideal hydrodynamics quantitatively explained the initial quadratic evolution, while viscous acoustic attenuation captured the late-time harmonic scaling and its temperature dependence.

Looking forward, harmonic-resolved expansion measurements could provide access to temperature dependent transport coefficients to test string theory limit [21, 46] and nonlinear flow couplings, including the conversion of lower-order modes into higher harmonics. The

approach developed here could also be straightforwardly generalized across the entire BEC–BCS crossover regime, enabling the investigation of how changes in interaction strength and scale invariance affect the emergence of collective flow. This work thereby extends quantum gas experiments from elliptic flow to higher-order anisotropic flows, opening up new opportunities to connect programmable ultracold quantum gases with collective dynamics in strongly interacting nuclear matter.

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgments.— The project was supported by National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2022YFA1404202), National Science Foundation of China (No. 12234008, No. 12688101, No. 12547102), the Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project (No. 2019SHZDZX01, No. 25LZ2600400), Innovation Program for Quantum Science and Technology (No. 2021ZD0302100), and Shanghai QiYuan Innovation Foundation.

References

References

  1. [1]J.-Y. Ollitrault, Anisotropy as a signature of transverse collective flow, Phys. Rev. D 46, 229 (1992).pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10014754
  2. [2]U. Heinz and R. Snellings, Collective Flow and Viscosity in Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 63, 123 (2013).DOI
  3. [3]C. Shen and L. Yan, Recent development of hydrodynamic modeling in heavy-ion collisions, Nucl. Sci. Tech. 31, 122 (2020).arxiv.org/abs/2010.12377
  4. [4]L. Ma, G.-L. Ma, and Y.-G. Ma, Parton collisional effect on the conversion of geometry eccentricities into momentum anisotropies in relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C 103, 014908 (2021).DOI
  5. [5]ALICE Collaboration, The ALICE experiment: a journey through QCD, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 813 (2024).
  6. [6]D. Teaney and L. Yan, Triangularity and dipole asymmetry in relativistic heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C 83, 064904 (2011).DOI
  7. [7]B. Schenke, S. Jeon, and C. Gale, Elliptic and triangular flow in event-by-event (3+1)D viscous hydrodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 042301 (2011).pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21405324
  8. [8]L. Ma, G. L. Ma, and Y. G. Ma, Anisotropic flow and flow fluctuations for Au + Au at √sNN = 200 GeV in a multiphase transport model, Phys. Rev. C 89, 044907 (2014).DOI
  9. [9]X.-G. Deng, D.-Q. Fang, and Y.-G. Ma, Shear viscosity of nucleonic matter, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 136, 104095 (2024).DOI
  10. [10]J. Adams et al. (STAR Collaboration), Azimuthal Anisotropy at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider: The First and Fourth Harmonics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 062301 (2004).pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14995231
  11. [11]K. Aamodt et al. (ALICE Collaboration), Higher Harmonic Anisotropic Flow Measurements of Charged Particles in Pb-Pb Collisions at √sNN = 2.76 TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 032301 (2011).
  12. [12]B. Schenke, S. Jeon, and C. Gale, Higher flow harmonics from (3+1)D event-by-event viscous hydrodynamics, Phys. Rev. C 85, 024901 (2012).DOI
  13. [13]L. Yan and J.-Y. Ollitrault, v4, v5, v6, v7: Nonlinear hydrodynamic response versus LHC data, Phys. Lett. B 744, 82 (2015).
  14. [14]S. Acharya et al. (ALICE Collaboration), First measurement of symmetric cumulants of hexagonal flow harmonics in Pb-Pb collisions at √sNN = 5.02 TeV, Phys. Rev. C 112, 024905 (2025).DOI
  15. [15]R. A. Lacey, A. Taranenko, J. Jia, D. Reynolds, N. N. Ajitanand, J. M. Alexander, Y. Guan and A. Mwai, Beam Energy Dependence of the Viscous Damping of Anisotropic Flow in Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 082302 (2014).DOI
  16. [16]P. Liu and R. A. Lacey, Acoustic scaling of linear and mode-coupled anisotropic flow; implications for precision extraction of the specific shear viscosity, Phys. Rev. C 98, 021902(R) (2018).DOI
  17. [17]P. Staig and E. Shuryak, Fate of the initial state perturbations in heavy ion collisions. II. Glabuer fluctuations and sounds, Phys. Rev. C 84, 034908 (2011).DOI
  18. [18]L. X. Han, G. L. Ma, Y. G. Ma, X. Z. Cai, J. H. Chen, S. Zhang, and C. Zhong, Initial fluctuation effect on harmonic flows in high-energy heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C 84, 064907 (2011).DOI
  19. [19]L. Ma, G. L. Ma, and Y. G. Ma, Initial partonic eccentricity fluctuations in a multiphase transport model, Phys. Rev. C 94, 044915 (2016).DOI
  20. [20]S. Giorgini, L. P. Pitaevskii, and S. Stringari, Theory of ultracold atomic Fermi gases, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1215 (2008).DOI
  21. [21]A. Adams, L. D. Carr, T. Schäfer, P. Steinberg, and J. E. Thomas, Strongly correlated quantum fluids: ultracold quantum gases, quantum chromodynamic plasmas and holographic duality, New Journal of Physics 14, 115009 (2012).DOI
  22. [22]J. Berges, S. Brandstetter, J. Brewer, G. Bruun, T. Enss, S. Floerchinger, K. Fujii, M. Gałka, G. Giacalone, Q. Guan, C. Heintze, L. H. Heyen, I. Belyuzhenkov, S. Jochim, J. Levinsen, P. Lunt, S. Mascioсchi, A. Mazeli- auskas, N. Navon, A. Ohlson, M. Parish, S. M. Reimann, F. Scazza, T. Schäfer, D. Teaney, J. Thywissen, R. Venugopalan, Y. Yan, M. Zaccanti, and T. V. Zache, Few is different: deciphering many-body dynamics in mesoscopic quantum gases, Eur. Phys. J. A 62, 115 (2026).DOI
  23. [23]M. J. H. Ku, A. T. Sommer, L. W. Cheuk, and M. W. Zwierlein, Revealing the Superfluid Lambda Transition in the Universal Thermodynamics of a Unitary Fermi Gas, Science 335, 563 (2012).DOI
  24. [24]S. Nascimbène, N. Navon, K. J. Jiang, F. Chevy, and C. Salomon, Exploring the thermodynamics of a universal Fermi gas, Nature 463, 1057 (2010).DOI
  25. [25]M. Horikoshi, S. Nakajima, M. Ueda, and T. Mukaiyama, Measurement of universal thermodynamic functions for a unitary Fermi gas, Science 327, 442 (2010).
  26. [26]T. Enss, R. Haussmann, and W. Zwerger, Viscosity and scale invariance in the unitary Fermi gas, Ann. Phys. 326, 770 (2011).
  27. [27]A. Sommer, M. Ku, G. Roati, and M. W. Zwierlein, Universal spin transport in a strongly interacting Fermi gas, Nature 472, 201 (2011).DOI
  28. [28]K. M. O’Hara, S. L. Hemmer, M. E. Gehm, S. R. Granade, and J. E. Thomas, Observation of a Strongly Interacting Degenerate Fermi Gas of Atoms, Science 298, 2179 (2002).DOI
  29. [29]B. Clancy, L. Luo, and J. E. Thomas, Observation of nearly perfect irrotational flow in normal and superfluid strongly interacting Fermi gases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 140401 (2007).pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17930648
  30. [30]E. Elliott, J. A. Joseph, and J. E. Thomas, Observation of Conformal Symmetry Breaking and Scale Invariance in Expanding Fermi Gases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 040405 (2014).
  31. [31]S. Deng, Z.-Y. Shi, P. Diao, Q. Yu, H. Zhai, R. Qi, and H. Wu, Observation of the Efimovian expansion in scale-invariant Fermi gases, Science 353, 371 (2016).DOI
  32. [32]S. Deng, P. Diao, F. Li, Q. Yu, S. Yu, and H. Wu, Observation of Dynamical Super-Refmionian Expansion in a Unitary Fermi Gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 125301 (2018).DOI
  33. [33]C. Cao, E. Elliott, J. Joseph, H. Wu, J. Petricka, T. Schäfer, and J. E. Thomas, Universal Quantum Viscosity in a Unitary Fermi Gas, Science 331, 58 (2011).DOI
  34. [34]J. A. Joseph, E. Elliott, and J. E. Thomas, Shear Viscosity of a Unitary Fermi Gas Near the Superfluid Phase Transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 020401 (2015).pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26207450
  35. [35]M. Bluhm, J. Hou, and T. Schäfer, Determination of the Density and Temperature Dependence of the Shear Viscosity of a Unitary Fermi Gas Based on Hydrodynamic Flow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 065302 (2017).DOI
  36. [36]L. Baird, X. Wang, S. Roof, and J. E. Thomas, Measuring the Hydrodynamic Linear Response of a Unitary Fermi Gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 160402 (2019).DOI
  37. [37]P. B. Patel, Y. Yan, B. Mukherjee, R. J. Fletcher, J. Struck, and M. W. Zwierlein, Universal sound diffusion in a strongly interacting Fermi gas, Science 370, 1222 (2020).
  38. [38]X. Li, J. Huang, and J. E. Thomas, Universal density shift coefficients for the thermal conductivity and shear viscosity of a unitary Fermi gas, Phys. Rev. Research 6, L042021 (2024).DOI
  39. [39]M. Bohlen, L. Sobirey, N. Luick, H. Biss, T. Enss, T. Lompe, and H. Moritz, Sound Propagation and Quantum-Limited Damping in a Two-Dimensional Fermi Gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 240403 (2020).DOI
  40. [40]X. Li, X. Luo, S. Wang, K. Xie, X.-P. Liu, H. Hu, Y.-A. Chen, X.-C. Yao, and J.-W. Pan, Second sound attenuation near quantum criticality, Science 375, 528 (2022).DOI
  41. [41]S. Brandstetter, P. Lunt, C. Heintze, G. Giacalone, L. H. Heyen, M. Gałka, K. Subramanian, M. Holten, P. M. Preiss, S. Floerchinger, and S. Jochim, Emergent interaction-driven elliptic flow of few fermionic atoms, Nat. Phys. 21, 52 (2025).DOI
  42. [42]K. H. Li, H.-F. Song, H.-J. Xu, Y.-L. Sun, and F. Wang, Observation of universal expansion anisotropy from cold atoms to hot quark-gluon plasma, Newton 1, 100237 (2025).DOI
  43. [43]J. Qian, U. Heinz, and J. Liu, Mode-coupling effects in anisotropic flow in heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C 93, 064901 (2016).DOI
  44. [44]E. A. Wolf and M. W. Zwierlein, Riemann Rarefaction Waves in a Strongly Interacting Fermi Gas (2026), arXiv:2606.06659 [cond-mat.quant-gas].arxiv.org/abs/2606.06659
  45. [45]M. Braby, J. Chao, and T. Schäfer, Thermal conductivity and sound attenuation in dilute atomic Fermi gases, Phys. Rev. A 82, 033619 (2010).DOI
  46. [46]P. K. Kovtun, D. T. Son, and A. O. Starinets, Viscosity in Strongly Interacting Quantum Field Theories from Black Hole Physics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 111601 (2005).pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15903845

Paper details

vlnc:W_u8cx35rb
v1 · latestHistory (1)

published · Fresh — added to the Hub within the last 30 days

added ·

Usage

views · 0

downloads · 0

A view counts once per browser per day, a download each time the PDF is requested.

CC BY 4.0

Original source

  • Physics and Astronomy

Not recorded for this paper · View statement →

Looking for related papers…
Contents