alphaFeedback

WorksMathematics

An Ito-Michler type theorem and the prime class graph of weakly integral braided fusion categories

AI contributions
  • ChatGPT Pro · OpenAI
View details

Abstract

In a weakly integral braided fusion category, a prime divides none of the conjugacy-class dimensions if and only if it does not divide the Frobenius-Perron dimension of the adjoint subcategory. We prove that these conditions hold precisely when the corresponding Sylow subgroup of the group of invertible objects generates a braided Deligne factor whose dimension is the largest power of that prime dividing the Frobenius-Perron dimension of the category. We also prove that the prime graph of the conjugacy-class dimensions has at most two connected components. If the graph is disconnected, the category is solvable. The bound is attained by the representation category of the Drinfeld double of the symmetric group on three letters.

Introduction

Let GG be a finite group and pp a prime divisor of ∣G∣|G|. The Itô–Michler theorem characterizes the absence of pp from the degrees of irreducible characters of GG by the existence of a normal abelian Sylow pp-subgroup [29, 34]. For conjugacy-class sizes the criterion has a different group-theoretic conclusion [15 Lemma 2.1].

p∤∣gG∣ for every g∈G⟺a Sylow p-subgroup of G is central.(1)p \nmid|g^G| \text{ for every } g \in G \qquad\Longleftrightarrow\qquad\text{a Sylow } p\text{-subgroup of } G \text{ is central.} \tag*{(1)}

Such a Sylow subgroup is a direct factor. Our Theorem 1.1 gives a categorical version of (1). Theorem 1.2 bounds the number of connected components formed by the primes that can occur in the prime class graph.

Let C\mathcal{C} be a weakly integral braided fusion category over C\mathbb{C}. Its conjugacy classes are by definition the simple summands ZiZ_i of the canonical algebra I(1)I(\mathbf{1}) in its Drinfeld center, where II is right adjoint to the forgetful functor F:Z(C)→CF: Z(\mathcal{C}) \to\mathcal{C}. Their Frobenius–Perron dimensions are positive integers. We denote by Δcl(C)\Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{C}) the graph whose vertices are the primes dividing some FPdim⁡(Zi)\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i), with an edge between pp and qq when pqpq divides a single FPdim⁡(Zi)\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i). For C=Rep⁡(G)\mathcal{C}=\operatorname{Rep}(G) the class dimensions are the ordinary class sizes ∣gG∣|g^G|. As usually, we write Cad\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}} for the subcategory generated by the objects X⊗X∗X \otimes X^* with XX simple, and Cpt\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{pt}} for the subcategory of invertible objects and their direct sums.

Theorem 1.1 (Class Itô–Michler theorem). Let C\mathcal{C} be a weakly integral braided fusion category over C\mathbb{C}. Let ZiZ_i range over its conjugacy-class objects in Z(C)Z(\mathcal{C}), and let Cad\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}} denote its adjoint subcategory. Write FPdim⁡(C)=paN\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C})=p^aN with pp prime, a≥1a \ge1 and NN a positive integer coprime to pp. The following conditions are equivalent.

(i) p∤FPdim⁡(Zi)p \nmid\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i) for every conjugacy class of C\mathcal{C}.

(ii) There is a braided equivalence

C≃P⊠B,P pointed,FPdim⁡(P)=pa,FPdim⁡(B)=N.(2)\mathcal{C} \simeq\mathcal{P} \boxtimes\mathcal{B}, \qquad\mathcal{P}\ \text{pointed}, \qquad\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{P})=p^a, \qquad\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{B})=N. \tag*{(2)}

(iii) p∤FPdim⁡(Cad)p \nmid\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}}).

Here P\mathcal{P} is generated by the Sylow pp-subgroup of Inv⁡(C)\operatorname{Inv}(\mathcal{C}), and B\mathcal{B} is the sum of the universal grading components whose degrees have order prime to pp. In particular,

Vert⁡Δcl(C)=π(FPdim⁡(Cad)),(3)\operatorname{Vert}\Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{C})=\pi(\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}})), \tag*{(3)}

where π(n)\pi(n) denotes the prime divisors of nn.

Under hypothesis (i), one already has pa∣FPdim⁡(Cpt)p^{a}\mid\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{pt}}) by [5 Theorem 1.2]. The modular pointed splitting and its iteration were given in [5 Proposition 1.3 and Theorem 1.4] in terms of simple dimensions. In the weakly integral modular case, the prime divisors must be taken from the integer squares FPdim⁡(X)2\operatorname{FPdim}(X)^2, as explained in § 3.2. Theorem 1.1 gives the braided splitting for possibly degenerate C\mathcal{C}, specifies its complement, and characterizes it by the adjoint subcategory. The pointed factor can be degenerate. If C\mathcal{C} is nondegenerate, both factors are nondegenerate.

The conjugacy-class prime graph Δcl(C)\Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{C}) has vertex set ⋃iπ(FPdim⁡(Zi))\bigcup_i\pi(\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i)). Two distinct vertices pp and qq are adjacent if and only if pq∣FPdim⁡(Zi)pq\mid\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i) for some conjugacy class ZiZ_i.

Theorem 1.2 (Components and solvability). Let C\mathcal{C} be a weakly integral braided fusion category over C\mathbb{C}. Then Δcl(C)\Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{C}) has at most two connected components. If it has two, then C\mathcal{C} is solvable.

We note that this bound is sharp. In Rep⁡(D(S3))\operatorname{Rep}(D(S_3)), the nontrivial class dimensions are 4 and 9, so the graph consists of the two isolated vertices 2 and 3 (Example 6.5).

The history of the finite-group bound involves two graphs. In 1981 Kazarin classified groups admitting a pair of isolated conjugacy classes [31 main theorem]. In 1990 Bertram, Herzog and Mann proved that the graph on noncentral conjugacy classes, with adjacency defined by a common prime divisor of their sizes, has at most two components [3]. This also bounds the number of components of the prime graph. Indeed, both are obtained from the incidence graph between primes and noncentral classes by joining vertices on one side with a common neighbor. Alfandary gave the result directly for the graph on primes in 1994 and characterized the disconnected case in terms of a Frobenius quotient [1]. Theorem 1.2 extends the component bound from Rep⁡(G)\operatorname{Rep}(G) to arbitrary weakly integral braided fusion categories.

For comparison, in [36], Natale and Rodríguez studied the graph built from the dimensions of simple objects. For integral nondegenerate braided categories their Theorem 1.1 gives at most three components in general and at most two under solvability. The bound of two also holds when all Tannakian subcategories are pointed [36 Remark 2.2 and Proposition 10.4] and for every group-theoretical modular category [36 Theorem 1.2(ii)]. For a modular category the class dimensions are precisely FPdim⁡(X)2\operatorname{FPdim}(X)^2, X∈Irr⁡(C)X\in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{C}) (Lemma 6.2(1)). In the integral modular case, squaring preserves every prime support, so these two graphs coincide. Theorem 1.2 therefore gives the bound of two for the simple-dimension graph of every integral modular category. For strictly weakly integral modular categories the graph here uses the integer squares FPdim⁡(X)2\operatorname{FPdim}(X)^2.

The solvability assertion also has a precursor in the group-theoretical modular case. The proof of [36 Theorem 1.2(ii)] realizes C\mathcal{C} as a braided factor of a twisted double Rep⁡(Dω(G))\operatorname{Rep}(D^{\omega}(G)) with pointed complement, so the two categories have the same prime graph. When that graph is disconnected, G/Z(G)G/Z(G) is Frobenius with abelian kernel and complement [36 Theorem 8.5(iii)]. Thus GG is solvable. Solvability passes from Vec⁡CG\operatorname{Vec}^{G}_{\mathcal{C}} to its center and then to C\mathcal{C} by [24 Proposition 4.5(i),(ii)]. Theorem 1.2 obtains solvability from disconnectedness for every weakly integral braided fusion category.

Two properties of the class objects enter the graph arguments. First, Proposition 2.2 identifies the underlying class objects Yi=F(Zi)Y_i=F(Z_i) as internal endomorphism objects, and Proposition 2.3 proves that their character values are nonnegative. Using orthogonality, Theorem 3.1 gives the regular-product formula

∏i[Yi]=∏iFPdim⁡(Zi)FPdim⁡(Cad)∑X∈Irr⁡(Cad)FPdim⁡(X)[X].(4)\prod_i [Y_i] = \frac{\prod_i \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{Z}_i)}{\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}})} \sum_{X \in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}})} \operatorname{FPdim}(X)[X]. \tag*{(4)}

The coefficient of the tensor unit gives the divisibility used in Theorem 1.1. In the modular case this recovers [11 Theorem 1.16]. Second, Theorem 2.6 gives the individual divisibility (23) under restriction to a braided fusion subcategory. Under equivariantization of a non-pointed base, every component of the new graph contains a prime from the base graph (Theorem 7.6). The pointed case follows from the character-fiber formula (169) of Proposition 7.7.

The proof of Theorem 1.2 has two parts. Theorem 6.4 establishes the bound for modular categories. Proposition 6.7 constructs a modular extension with the same class graph for each weakly integral slightly degenerate category. De-equivariantization by the even part of the Müger center reduces the general bound to these two cases (Theorem 7.11). For solvability, Proposition 8.7 uses centralizer descent to reduce a hypothetical minimal counterexample to a weakly group-theoretical category, where the structure of its core gives the contradiction (Theorem 8.9). The stronger assertion that class characters vanish across components holds for categories tensor equivalent to Rep⁡(G)\operatorname{Rep}(G) and for untwisted Drinfeld doubles (Propositions 9.3 and 9.5). In the modular case it also holds when every Tannakian subcategory is pointed, by (107) in the proof of Theorem 6.4. The general vanishing question remains open.

Section 2 proves that character values on class images are nonnegative and that class dimensions divide under restriction. Section 3 derives the Sylow splitting of Theorem 1.1 from the regular-product identity (32) of Theorem 3.1. Section 4 treats products and gradings and proves solvability for prime-power class dimensions (Theorem 4.10). Section 5 uses coprime class dimensions to prove the two-component bound when every Tannakian subcategory is pointed (Theorem 5.16). Section 6 treats modular categories, slightly degenerate categories, and categories with cyclic Tannakian Müger center. In the slightly degenerate case, the two fermion quotients give all class dimensions (Proposition 6.22). Section 7 proves the general two-component bound by equivariantization (Theorem 7.11), and Section 8 deduces solvability from disconnectedness by centralizer descent (Theorem 8.9). Section 9 studies vanishing across components for finite-group representation categories and untwisted Drinfeld doubles. Appendix A uses the relative vanishing theorem (Theorem A.1) to bound the total weight of characters vanishing on a class image (Corollary A.6).

Class objects, formal codegrees and restriction

For a fusion category C\mathcal{C}, write Irr⁡(C)\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{C}) for its simple isomorphism classes and [V:X]=dim⁡Hom⁡(X,V)[V:X] = \dim\operatorname{Hom}(X,V) for the multiplicity of a simple XX in VV. The pointed subcategory Cpt\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{pt}} is generated by the invertible simple objects, equivalently those with dimension one. Their isomorphism classes form a group Inv⁡(C)\operatorname{Inv}(\mathcal{C}), which is abelian when C\mathcal{C} is braided. The adjoint subcategory Cad\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}} is generated by X⊗X∗X \otimes X^* for X∈Irr⁡(C)X \in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{C}). The universal grading is the faithful grading

C=⨁g∈U(C)Cg,Ce=Cad,FPdim⁡(C)=∣U(C)∣FPdim⁡(Cad).(5)\mathcal{C} = \bigoplus_{g \in U(\mathcal{C})} \mathcal{C}_g,\qquad\mathcal{C}_e = \mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}},\qquad\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}) = \lvert U(\mathcal{C})\rvert\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}}). \tag*{(5)}

For weakly integral C\mathcal{C}, the subcategory Cad\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}} is integral [27]. The Deligne tensor product is denoted by ⊠\boxtimes; its simple objects are external tensor products and its dimension is the product of the dimensions of its factors.

Recall that a fusion category is nilpotent if repeated passage to the adjoint subcategory eventually gives Vec. It is weakly group-theoretical if it is categorically Morita equivalent to a nilpotent fusion category, and solvable if it is Morita equivalent to one obtained from Vec by successive extensions by cyclic groups of prime order. Here categorical Morita equivalence means equivalence to the dual category of an indecomposable semisimple module category; see [24].

All categories are over C=C\mathbb{C}=\mathcal{C}. A fusion category B\mathcal{B} is weakly integral if FPdim⁡(B)\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{B}) is an integer, and integral if every simple object has integer Frobenius–Perron dimension. A braided category is nondegenerate if its Müger center is Vec⁡\operatorname{Vec}, slightly degenerate if its Müger center is braided equivalent to sVec⁡\operatorname{sVec}, and symmetric if its Müger center is the entire category. For weakly integral categories we use the canonical positive spherical structure, under which a nondegenerate braided fusion category is modular. Unless otherwise specified, C\mathcal{C} is weakly integral and braided. Write

F:Z(C)⟶C,I:C⟶Z(C),(6)F: Z(\mathcal{C})\longrightarrow\mathcal{C},\qquad I:\mathcal{C}\longrightarrow Z(\mathcal{C}), \tag*{(6)}

where II is the right adjoint of the forgetful functor FF. Since K0(C)K_0(\mathcal{C}) is commutative, the canonical algebra is multiplicity-free [38 Theorem 2.13]. It decomposes as

A=I(1)=⨁i∈JZi.(7)\mathcal{A}=I(\mathbf{1})=\bigoplus_{i\in J}Z_i. \tag*{(7)}

The ZiZ_i are the conjugacy-class objects. Put

Yi=F(Zi),FPdim⁡(Zi)=FPdim⁡(Yi),fi=FPdim⁡(C)FPdim⁡(Zi).(8)Y_i=F(Z_i),\qquad\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i)=\operatorname{FPdim}(Y_i),\qquad f_i=\frac{\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C})}{\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i)}. \tag*{(8)}

Under weak integrality both FPdim⁡(Zi)\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i) and fif_i are positive integers. Here fif_i is the formal codegree of the associated algebra character μi\mu_i of K(C)=K0(C)⊗ZCK(\mathcal{C})=K_0(\mathcal{C})\otimes_{\mathbb{Z}}\mathbb{C}. Here a character is a unital algebra homomorphism to C\mathbb{C}. For a braided fusion category B\mathcal{B} and a character ν\nu of K(B)K(\mathcal{B}), write ZνBZ^\mathcal{B}_\nu for the corresponding conjugacy-class object in Z(B)Z(\mathcal{B}). We use unnormalized SS-matrices throughout. We denote the set of connected components of a graph by π0\pi_0 and the Müger center by Z2(C)Z_2(\mathcal{C}) (also written C′\mathcal{C}').

For n∈Z>0n\in\mathbb{Z}_{>0} let π(n)\pi(n) be the set of prime divisors of nn; thus π(1)=∅\pi(1)=\varnothing. The graph Δcl(C)\Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{C}) has vertex set ⋃iπ(FPdim⁡(Zi))\bigcup_i\pi(\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i)), with an edge between distinct primes p,qp,q if pq∣FPdim⁡(Zi)pq\mid\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i) for some ii. A class dimension FPdim⁡(Zi)>1\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i)>1 is said to belong to a component when its prime support does; its support is a clique and hence lies in a unique component. We count zero components for the empty graph and call a graph disconnected when it has at least two nonempty components. The common-divisor graph on the nontrivial class dimensions has the same number of connected components, but not necessarily the same diameter.

Let X+=ι+(X)X^+=\iota_+(X) and X−=ι−(X)X^-=\iota_-(X) denote the two canonical lifts to the center. Their images satisfy

(C+)′=C−,(C−)′=C+.(9)(\mathcal{C}^+)^\prime=\mathcal{C}^-,\qquad(\mathcal{C}^-)^\prime=\mathcal{C}^+. \tag*{(9)}

We write NX,YW=[X⊗Y:W]N^W_{X,Y}=[X\otimes Y:W] for the fusion multiplicities. For a full fusion subcategory B\mathcal{B} and an object VV, the notation V∩BV\cap\mathcal{B} denotes the sum of the simple constituents of VV belonging to B\mathcal{B}, with multiplicities.

For a commutative fusion ring, let τ\tau denote the coefficient of the unit. The primitive idempotents, the trace decomposition, and character orthogonality are given by

eμ=1fμ∑X∈Irr⁡(C)μ(X∗)[X],τ(v)=∑μμ(v)fμ,e_\mu=\frac{1}{f_\mu}\sum_{X\in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{C})}\mu(X^*)[X],\qquad\tau(v)=\sum_\mu\frac{\mu(v)}{f_\mu},

References

  1. [1]G. Alfandary, On graphs related to conjugacy classes of groups, Israel J. Math. 86 (1994), 211–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02773678.
  2. [2]P. Bantay, FC sets and twisters: the basics of orbifold deconstruction, Comm. Math. Phys. 379 (2020), 693–721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-020-03855-5.
  3. [3]E. A. Bertram, M. Herzog, and A. Mann, On a graph related to conjugacy classes of groups, Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 22 (1990), 569–575. https://doi.org/10.1112/blms/22.6.569.
  4. [4]P. Bruillard, C. Galindo, T. Hagge, S.-H. Ng, J. Y. Plavnik, E. C. Rowell, and Z. Wang, Fermionic modular categories and the 16-fold way, J. Math. Phys. 58 (2017), 041704. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4982048; https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.09294.
  5. [5]S. Burciu, Frobenius–Perron dimensions of conjugacy classes and an Ito–Michler–type result in modular fusion categories, J. Inst. Math. Jussieu 24 (2025), 2523–2542. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474748025101126. Theorem numbering follows https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.05709v2.
  6. [6]S. Burciu, On Harada’s identity and some other consequences, Bull. Belg. Math. Soc. Simon Stevin 31 (2024), 211–219. https://doi.org/10.36045/j.bbms.231026. Theorem numbering follows https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.11721v1.
  7. [7]S. Burciu, On some Frobenius type divisibility results in a premudular category, arXiv:2209.12530. https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.12530.
  8. [8]S. Burciu, On some integral properties of dimensions in Isaacs fusion categories, Journal of the London Mathematical Society 114 (2026), no. 1, e70649; doi:10.1112/jlms.70649; arXiv:2507.07329.DOI
  9. [9]S. Burciu, J. Dong, and S. Palcoux, Arithmetic obstructions, weak group-theoreticity, and solvability of braided fusion categories, manuscript, 2026.
  10. [10]S. Burciu and S. Natale, Fusion rules of equivariantizations of fusion categories, J. Math. Phys. 54 (2013), 013511. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4774293; corrected preprint: https://arxiv.org/abs/1206.6625v2.
  11. [11]S. Burciu and S. Palcoux, Burnside type results for fusion categories, Communications in Contemporary Mathematics (2026), 2650007, doi:10.1142/S0219199726500070; arXiv:2302.07604v11. Theorem numbering follows arXiv version 11.DOI
  12. [12]R. D. Camina, A. Maróti, E. Pacifici, C. Parker, K. Rekvényi, J. Saunders, V. Sotomayor, G. Tracey, and M. van Beek, Groups with conjugacy classes of coprime sizes, Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 58 (2026), e70320. https://doi.org/10.1112/blms.70320.
  13. [13]H. Cartan and S. Eilenberg, Homological Algebra, Princeton Mathematical Series, vol. 19, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1956. https://doi.org/10.1515/97814008 83844.
  14. [14]C. Casolo and S. Dolfi, The diameter of a conjugacy class graph of finite groups, Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 28 (1996), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1112/blms/28.2.141.
  15. [15]C. Casolo and E. M. Tombari, Conjugacy class sizes of certain direct products, Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society 85 (2012), 217–231; doi:10.1017/S0004972711002735.DOI
  16. [16]A. Coste, T. Gannon and Ph. Ruelle, Finite group modular data, Nucl. Phys. B 581 (2000), 679–717. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0550-3213(00)00285-6.
  17. [17]A. Davydov, M. Müger, D. Nikshych, and V. Ostrik, The Witt group of non-degenerate braided fusion categories, arXiv:1009.2117. https://arxiv.org/abs/1009.2117.
  18. [18]S. Dolfi, R. Guralnick, C. E. Praeger, and P. Spiga, Coprime subdegrees for primitive permutation groups and completely reducible linear groups, arXiv:1109.6559v2. https://arxiv.org/abs/1109.6559.
  19. [19]V. Drinfeld, S. Gelaki, D. Nikshych, and V. Ostrik, Group-theoretical properties of nilpotent modular categories, arXiv:0704.0195. https://arxiv.org/abs/0704.0195.
  20. [20]V. Drinfeld, S. Gelaki, D. Nikshych, and V. Ostrik, On braided fusion categories I, Selecta Math. (N.S.) 16 (2010), 1–119. https://arxiv.org/abs/0906.0620.
  21. [21]M. Escañuela González and S. Natale, On fusion rules and solvability of a fusion category, arXiv:1512.05727 (2015). https://arxiv.org/abs/1512.05727.
  22. [22]P. Etingof, S. Gelaki, D. Nikshych, and V. Ostrik, Tensor categories, Math. Surveys Monogr., vol. 205, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2015. https://math.mit.edu/~etingof/egnoobkfinal.pdf.
  23. [23]P. Etingof, D. Nikshych, and V. Ostrik, Fusion categories and homotopy theory, with an appendix by E. Meir, Quantum Topol. 1 (2010), 209–273. https://doi.org/10.4171/QT/6; https://arxiv.org/abs/0909.3140.
  24. [24]P. Etingof, D. Nikshych, and V. Ostrik, Weakly group-theoretical and solvable fusion categories, Adv. Math. 226 (2011), 176–205. https://arxiv.org/abs/0809.3031.
  25. [25]C. Galindo and C. Jones, Equivariant fusion subcategories, Transform. Groups 30 (2025), 267–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00031-023-09838-9.
  26. [26]C. Galindo and C. F. Venegas-Ramírez, Categorical Fermionic Actions and Minimal Modular Extensions, SIGMA 21 (2025), 085, 35 pp. https://doi.org/10.3842/SIGMA.2025.085; https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.07097.
  27. [27]S. Gelaki and D. Nikshych, Nilpotent fusion categories, Adv. Math. 217 (2008), 1053–1071. https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0610726.
  28. [28]R. B. Howlett and I. M. Isaacs, On groups of central type, Math. Z. 179 (1982), 555–569. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01215066.
  29. [29]N. Itô, Some studies on group characters, Nagoya Mathematical Journal 2 (1951), 17–28; doi:10.1017/S002776300000100X.DOI
  30. [30]T. Johnson-Freyd and D. Reutter, Minimal nondegenerate extensions, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 37 (2024), 81–150. https://doi.org/10.1090/jams/1023; https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.15167.
  31. [31]L. S. Kazarin, On groups with isolated conjugacy classes, Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved. Mat. (1981), no. 7, 40–45. English translation, Soviet Math. (Iz. VUZ) 25 (1981), no. 7, 43–49. https://www.mathnet.ru/eng/ivm4892.
  32. [32]A. Kirillov, Jr., On G-equivariant modular categories, arXiv:math/0401119 (2004). https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0401119.
  33. [33]S. Mac Lane, Homology, Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, vol. 114, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1963. https://webhomes.maths.ed.ac.uk/~v1ranick/papers/maclane_homology.pdf.
  34. [34]G. O. Michler, Brauer’s conjectures and the classification of finite simple groups, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1178, Springer, Berlin, 1986, 129–142.DOI
  35. [35]S. Natale, The core of a weakly group-theoretical braided fusion category, arXiv:1704.03523 (2017). https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.03523.
  36. [36]S. Natale and E. Pacheco Rodríguez, Graphs attached to simple Frobenius–Perron dimensions of an integral fusion category, Monatsh. Math. 179 (2016), 615–649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00605-015-0734-7.
  37. [37]V. Ostrik, Module categories, weak Hopf algebras and modular invariants, Transform. Groups 8 (2003), 177–206. https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0111139.
  38. [38]V. Ostrik, Pivotal fusion categories of rank 3, Mosc. Math. J. 15 (2015), 373–396. https://arxiv.org/abs/1309.4822.
  39. [39]P. Schauenburg, The monoidal center construction and bimodules, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 158 (2001), 325–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4049(00)00040-2.
  40. [40]J.-P. Serre, Zéros de caractères, Enseign. Math. 71 (2025), no. 3/4, 433–457. doi:10.4171/LEM/1095.DOI
  41. [41]Z. Yu, On slightly degenerate fusion categories, J. Algebra 559 (2020), 408–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalgebra.2020.04.022.

Paper details

vlnc:W_udzrvuum
v1 · latestHistory (1)

published · Fresh — added to the Hub within the last 30 days

added ·

Usage

views · 0

downloads · 0

A view counts once per browser per day, a download each time the PDF is requested.

CC BY 4.0

Original source

  • Mathematics

ChatGPT Pro (OpenAI) · View statement →

Looking for related papers…
Contents