Introduction
Let G G G be a finite group and p p p a prime divisor of ∣ G ∣ |G| ∣ G ∣ . The Itô–Michler theorem characterizes the absence of p p p from the degrees of irreducible characters of G G G by the existence of a normal abelian Sylow p p p -subgroup [29 , 34 ] . For conjugacy-class sizes the criterion has a different group-theoretic conclusion [15 Lemma 2.1] .
p ∤ ∣ g G ∣ for every g ∈ G ⟺ a Sylow p -subgroup of G is central. (1) p \nmid|g^G| \text{ for every } g \in G \qquad\Longleftrightarrow\qquad\text{a Sylow } p\text{-subgroup of } G \text{ is central.} \tag*{(1)} p ∤ ∣ g G ∣ for every g ∈ G ⟺ a Sylow p -subgroup of G is central. (1)
Such a Sylow subgroup is a direct factor. Our Theorem 1.1 gives a categorical version of (1) . Theorem 1.2 bounds the number of connected components formed by the primes that can occur in the prime class graph.
Let C \mathcal{C} C be a weakly integral braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C . Its conjugacy classes are by definition the simple summands Z i Z_i Z i of the canonical algebra I ( 1 ) I(\mathbf{1}) I ( 1 ) in its Drinfeld center, where I I I is right adjoint to the forgetful functor F : Z ( C ) → C F: Z(\mathcal{C}) \to\mathcal{C} F : Z ( C ) → C . Their Frobenius–Perron dimensions are positive integers. We denote by Δ c l ( C ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{C}) Δ cl ( C ) the graph whose vertices are the primes dividing some FPdim ( Z i ) \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i) FPdim ( Z i ) , with an edge between p p p and q q q when p q pq pq divides a single FPdim ( Z i ) \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i) FPdim ( Z i ) . For C = Rep ( G ) \mathcal{C}=\operatorname{Rep}(G) C = Rep ( G ) the class dimensions are the ordinary class sizes ∣ g G ∣ |g^G| ∣ g G ∣ . As usually, we write C a d \mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}} C ad for the subcategory generated by the objects X ⊗ X ∗ X \otimes X^* X ⊗ X ∗ with X X X simple, and C p t \mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{pt}} C pt for the subcategory of invertible objects and their direct sums.
Theorem 1.1 (Class Itô–Michler theorem). Let C \mathcal{C} C be a weakly integral braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C . Let Z i Z_i Z i range over its conjugacy-class objects in Z ( C ) Z(\mathcal{C}) Z ( C ) , and let C a d \mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}} C ad denote its adjoint subcategory. Write FPdim ( C ) = p a N \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C})=p^aN FPdim ( C ) = p a N with p p p prime, a ≥ 1 a \ge1 a ≥ 1 and N N N a positive integer coprime to p p p . The following conditions are equivalent.
(i) p ∤ FPdim ( Z i ) p \nmid\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i) p ∤ FPdim ( Z i ) for every conjugacy class of C \mathcal{C} C .
(ii) There is a braided equivalence
C ≃ P ⊠ B , P pointed , FPdim ( P ) = p a , FPdim ( B ) = N . (2) \mathcal{C} \simeq\mathcal{P} \boxtimes\mathcal{B}, \qquad\mathcal{P}\ \text{pointed}, \qquad\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{P})=p^a, \qquad\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{B})=N. \tag*{(2)} C ≃ P ⊠ B , P pointed , FPdim ( P ) = p a , FPdim ( B ) = N . (2) (iii) p ∤ FPdim ( C a d ) p \nmid\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}}) p ∤ FPdim ( C ad ) .
Here P \mathcal{P} P is generated by the Sylow p p p -subgroup of Inv ( C ) \operatorname{Inv}(\mathcal{C}) Inv ( C ) , and B \mathcal{B} B is the sum of the universal grading components whose degrees have order prime to p p p . In particular,
Vert Δ c l ( C ) = π ( FPdim ( C a d ) ) , (3) \operatorname{Vert}\Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{C})=\pi(\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}})), \tag*{(3)} Vert Δ cl ( C ) = π ( FPdim ( C ad )) , (3)
where π ( n ) \pi(n) π ( n ) denotes the prime divisors of n n n .
Under hypothesis (i), one already has p a ∣ FPdim ( C p t ) p^{a}\mid\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{pt}}) p a ∣ FPdim ( C pt ) by [5 Theorem 1.2] . The modular pointed splitting and its iteration were given in [5 Proposition 1.3 and Theorem 1.4] in terms of simple dimensions. In the weakly integral modular case, the prime divisors must be taken from the integer squares FPdim ( X ) 2 \operatorname{FPdim}(X)^2 FPdim ( X ) 2 , as explained in § 3.2 . Theorem 1.1 gives the braided splitting for possibly degenerate C \mathcal{C} C , specifies its complement, and characterizes it by the adjoint subcategory. The pointed factor can be degenerate. If C \mathcal{C} C is nondegenerate, both factors are nondegenerate.
The conjugacy-class prime graph Δ c l ( C ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{C}) Δ cl ( C ) has vertex set ⋃ i π ( FPdim ( Z i ) ) \bigcup_i\pi(\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i)) ⋃ i π ( FPdim ( Z i )) . Two distinct vertices p p p and q q q are adjacent if and only if p q ∣ FPdim ( Z i ) pq\mid\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i) pq ∣ FPdim ( Z i ) for some conjugacy class Z i Z_i Z i .
Theorem 1.2 (Components and solvability). Let C \mathcal{C} C be a weakly integral braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C . Then Δ c l ( C ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{C}) Δ cl ( C ) has at most two connected components. If it has two, then C \mathcal{C} C is solvable.
We note that this bound is sharp. In Rep ( D ( S 3 ) ) \operatorname{Rep}(D(S_3)) Rep ( D ( S 3 )) , the nontrivial class dimensions are 4 and 9, so the graph consists of the two isolated vertices 2 and 3 (Example 6.5).
The history of the finite-group bound involves two graphs. In 1981 Kazarin classified groups admitting a pair of isolated conjugacy classes [31 main theorem] . In 1990 Bertram, Herzog and Mann proved that the graph on noncentral conjugacy classes, with adjacency defined by a common prime divisor of their sizes, has at most two components [3 ] . This also bounds the number of components of the prime graph. Indeed, both are obtained from the incidence graph between primes and noncentral classes by joining vertices on one side with a common neighbor. Alfandary gave the result directly for the graph on primes in 1994 and characterized the disconnected case in terms of a Frobenius quotient [1 ] . Theorem 1.2 extends the component bound from Rep ( G ) \operatorname{Rep}(G) Rep ( G ) to arbitrary weakly integral braided fusion categories.
For comparison, in [36 ] , Natale and Rodríguez studied the graph built from the dimensions of simple objects . For integral nondegenerate braided categories their Theorem 1.1 gives at most three components in general and at most two under solvability. The bound of two also holds when all Tannakian subcategories are pointed [36 Remark 2.2 and Proposition 10.4] and for every group-theoretical modular category [36 Theorem 1.2(ii)] . For a modular category the class dimensions are precisely FPdim ( X ) 2 \operatorname{FPdim}(X)^2 FPdim ( X ) 2 , X ∈ Irr ( C ) X\in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{C}) X ∈ Irr ( C ) (Lemma 6.2 (1)). In the integral modular case, squaring preserves every prime support, so these two graphs coincide. Theorem 1.2 therefore gives the bound of two for the simple-dimension graph of every integral modular category. For strictly weakly integral modular categories the graph here uses the integer squares FPdim ( X ) 2 \operatorname{FPdim}(X)^2 FPdim ( X ) 2 .
The solvability assertion also has a precursor in the group-theoretical modular case. The proof of [36 Theorem 1.2(ii)] realizes C \mathcal{C} C as a braided factor of a twisted double Rep ( D ω ( G ) ) \operatorname{Rep}(D^{\omega}(G)) Rep ( D ω ( G )) with pointed complement, so the two categories have the same prime graph. When that graph is disconnected, G / Z ( G ) G/Z(G) G / Z ( G ) is Frobenius with abelian kernel and complement [36 Theorem 8.5(iii)] . Thus G G G is solvable. Solvability passes from Vec C G \operatorname{Vec}^{G}_{\mathcal{C}} Vec C G to its center and then to C \mathcal{C} C by [24 Proposition 4.5(i),(ii)] . Theorem 1.2 obtains solvability from disconnectedness for every weakly integral braided fusion category.
Two properties of the class objects enter the graph arguments. First, Proposition 2.2 identifies the underlying class objects Y i = F ( Z i ) Y_i=F(Z_i) Y i = F ( Z i ) as internal endomorphism objects, and Proposition 2.3 proves that their character values are nonnegative. Using orthogonality, Theorem 3.1 gives the regular-product formula
∏ i [ Y i ] = ∏ i FPdim ( Z i ) FPdim ( C a d ) ∑ X ∈ Irr ( C a d ) FPdim ( X ) [ X ] . (4) \prod_i [Y_i] = \frac{\prod_i \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{Z}_i)}{\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}})} \sum_{X \in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}})} \operatorname{FPdim}(X)[X]. \tag*{(4)} i ∏ [ Y i ] = FPdim ( C ad ) ∏ i FPdim ( Z i ) X ∈ Irr ( C ad ) ∑ FPdim ( X ) [ X ] . (4)
The coefficient of the tensor unit gives the divisibility used in Theorem 1.1 . In the modular case this recovers [11 Theorem 1.16] . Second, Theorem 2.6 gives the individual divisibility (23) under restriction to a braided fusion subcategory. Under equivariantization of a non-pointed base, every component of the new graph contains a prime from the base graph (Theorem 7.6 ). The pointed case follows from the character-fiber formula (169) of Proposition 7.7 .
The proof of Theorem 1.2 has two parts. Theorem 6.4 establishes the bound for modular categories. Proposition 6.7 constructs a modular extension with the same class graph for each weakly integral slightly degenerate category. De-equivariantization by the even part of the Müger center reduces the general bound to these two cases (Theorem 7.11 ). For solvability, Proposition 8.7 uses centralizer descent to reduce a hypothetical minimal counterexample to a weakly group-theoretical category, where the structure of its core gives the contradiction (Theorem 8.9 ). The stronger assertion that class characters vanish across components holds for categories tensor equivalent to Rep ( G ) \operatorname{Rep}(G) Rep ( G ) and for untwisted Drinfeld doubles (Propositions 9.3 and 9.5 ). In the modular case it also holds when every Tannakian subcategory is pointed, by (107) in the proof of Theorem 6.4 . The general vanishing question remains open.
Section 2 proves that character values on class images are nonnegative and that class dimensions divide under restriction. Section 3 derives the Sylow splitting of Theorem 1.1 from the regular-product identity (32) of Theorem 3.1 . Section 4 treats products and gradings and proves solvability for prime-power class dimensions (Theorem 4.10 ). Section 5 uses coprime class dimensions to prove the two-component bound when every Tannakian subcategory is pointed (Theorem 5.16 ). Section 6 treats modular categories, slightly degenerate categories, and categories with cyclic Tannakian Müger center. In the slightly degenerate case, the two fermion quotients give all class dimensions (Proposition 6.22). Section 7 proves the general two-component bound by equivariantization (Theorem 7.11 ), and Section 8 deduces solvability from disconnectedness by centralizer descent (Theorem 8.9 ). Section 9 studies vanishing across components for finite-group representation categories and untwisted Drinfeld doubles. Appendix A uses the relative vanishing theorem (Theorem A.1 ) to bound the total weight of characters vanishing on a class image (Corollary A.6 ).
Class objects, formal codegrees and restriction
For a fusion category C \mathcal{C} C , write Irr ( C ) \operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{C}) Irr ( C ) for its simple isomorphism classes and [ V : X ] = dim Hom ( X , V ) [V:X] = \dim\operatorname{Hom}(X,V) [ V : X ] = dim Hom ( X , V ) for the multiplicity of a simple X X X in V V V . The pointed subcategory C p t \mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{pt}} C pt is generated by the invertible simple objects, equivalently those with dimension one. Their isomorphism classes form a group Inv ( C ) \operatorname{Inv}(\mathcal{C}) Inv ( C ) , which is abelian when C \mathcal{C} C is braided. The adjoint subcategory C a d \mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}} C ad is generated by X ⊗ X ∗ X \otimes X^* X ⊗ X ∗ for X ∈ Irr ( C ) X \in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{C}) X ∈ Irr ( C ) . The universal grading is the faithful grading
C = ⨁ g ∈ U ( C ) C g , C e = C a d , FPdim ( C ) = ∣ U ( C ) ∣ FPdim ( C a d ) . (5) \mathcal{C} = \bigoplus_{g \in U(\mathcal{C})} \mathcal{C}_g,\qquad\mathcal{C}_e = \mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}},\qquad\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}) = \lvert U(\mathcal{C})\rvert\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}}). \tag*{(5)} C = g ∈ U ( C ) ⨁ C g , C e = C ad , FPdim ( C ) = ∣ U ( C )∣ FPdim ( C ad ) . (5)
For weakly integral C \mathcal{C} C , the subcategory C a d \mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}} C ad is integral [27 ] . The Deligne tensor product is denoted by ⊠ \boxtimes ⊠ ; its simple objects are external tensor products and its dimension is the product of the dimensions of its factors.
Recall that a fusion category is nilpotent if repeated passage to the adjoint subcategory eventually gives Vec. It is weakly group-theoretical if it is categorically Morita equivalent to a nilpotent fusion category, and solvable if it is Morita equivalent to one obtained from Vec by successive extensions by cyclic groups of prime order. Here categorical Morita equivalence means equivalence to the dual category of an indecomposable semisimple module category; see [24 ] .
All categories are over C = C \mathbb{C}=\mathcal{C} C = C . A fusion category B \mathcal{B} B is weakly integral if FPdim ( B ) \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{B}) FPdim ( B ) is an integer, and integral if every simple object has integer Frobenius–Perron dimension. A braided category is nondegenerate if its Müger center is Vec \operatorname{Vec} Vec , slightly degenerate if its Müger center is braided equivalent to sVec \operatorname{sVec} sVec , and symmetric if its Müger center is the entire category. For weakly integral categories we use the canonical positive spherical structure, under which a nondegenerate braided fusion category is modular. Unless otherwise specified, C \mathcal{C} C is weakly integral and braided. Write
F : Z ( C ) ⟶ C , I : C ⟶ Z ( C ) , (6) F: Z(\mathcal{C})\longrightarrow\mathcal{C},\qquad I:\mathcal{C}\longrightarrow Z(\mathcal{C}), \tag*{(6)} F : Z ( C ) ⟶ C , I : C ⟶ Z ( C ) , (6)
where I I I is the right adjoint of the forgetful functor F F F . Since K 0 ( C ) K_0(\mathcal{C}) K 0 ( C ) is commutative, the canonical algebra is multiplicity-free [38 Theorem 2.13] . It decomposes as
A = I ( 1 ) = ⨁ i ∈ J Z i . (7) \mathcal{A}=I(\mathbf{1})=\bigoplus_{i\in J}Z_i. \tag*{(7)} A = I ( 1 ) = i ∈ J ⨁ Z i . (7)
The Z i Z_i Z i are the conjugacy-class objects. Put
Y i = F ( Z i ) , FPdim ( Z i ) = FPdim ( Y i ) , f i = FPdim ( C ) FPdim ( Z i ) . (8) Y_i=F(Z_i),\qquad\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i)=\operatorname{FPdim}(Y_i),\qquad f_i=\frac{\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C})}{\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i)}. \tag*{(8)} Y i = F ( Z i ) , FPdim ( Z i ) = FPdim ( Y i ) , f i = FPdim ( Z i ) FPdim ( C ) . (8)
Under weak integrality both FPdim ( Z i ) \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i) FPdim ( Z i ) and f i f_i f i are positive integers. Here f i f_i f i is the formal codegree of the associated algebra character μ i \mu_i μ i of K ( C ) = K 0 ( C ) ⊗ Z C K(\mathcal{C})=K_0(\mathcal{C})\otimes_{\mathbb{Z}}\mathbb{C} K ( C ) = K 0 ( C ) ⊗ Z C . Here a character is a unital algebra homomorphism to C \mathbb{C} C . For a braided fusion category B \mathcal{B} B and a character ν \nu ν of K ( B ) K(\mathcal{B}) K ( B ) , write Z ν B Z^\mathcal{B}_\nu Z ν B for the corresponding conjugacy-class object in Z ( B ) Z(\mathcal{B}) Z ( B ) . We use unnormalized S S S -matrices throughout. We denote the set of connected components of a graph by π 0 \pi_0 π 0 and the Müger center by Z 2 ( C ) Z_2(\mathcal{C}) Z 2 ( C ) (also written C ′ \mathcal{C}' C ′ ).
For n ∈ Z > 0 n\in\mathbb{Z}_{>0} n ∈ Z > 0 let π ( n ) \pi(n) π ( n ) be the set of prime divisors of n n n ; thus π ( 1 ) = ∅ \pi(1)=\varnothing π ( 1 ) = ∅ . The graph Δ c l ( C ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{C}) Δ cl ( C ) has vertex set ⋃ i π ( FPdim ( Z i ) ) \bigcup_i\pi(\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i)) ⋃ i π ( FPdim ( Z i )) , with an edge between distinct primes p , q p,q p , q if p q ∣ FPdim ( Z i ) pq\mid\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i) pq ∣ FPdim ( Z i ) for some i i i . A class dimension FPdim ( Z i ) > 1 \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i)>1 FPdim ( Z i ) > 1 is said to belong to a component when its prime support does; its support is a clique and hence lies in a unique component. We count zero components for the empty graph and call a graph disconnected when it has at least two nonempty components. The common-divisor graph on the nontrivial class dimensions has the same number of connected components, but not necessarily the same diameter.
Let X + = ι + ( X ) X^+=\iota_+(X) X + = ι + ( X ) and X − = ι − ( X ) X^-=\iota_-(X) X − = ι − ( X ) denote the two canonical lifts to the center. Their images satisfy
( C + ) ′ = C − , ( C − ) ′ = C + . (9) (\mathcal{C}^+)^\prime=\mathcal{C}^-,\qquad(\mathcal{C}^-)^\prime=\mathcal{C}^+. \tag*{(9)} ( C + ) ′ = C − , ( C − ) ′ = C + . (9)
We write N X , Y W = [ X ⊗ Y : W ] N^W_{X,Y}=[X\otimes Y:W] N X , Y W = [ X ⊗ Y : W ] for the fusion multiplicities. For a full fusion subcategory B \mathcal{B} B and an object V V V , the notation V ∩ B V\cap\mathcal{B} V ∩ B denotes the sum of the simple constituents of V V V belonging to B \mathcal{B} B , with multiplicities.
For a commutative fusion ring, let τ \tau τ denote the coefficient of the unit. The primitive idempotents, the trace decomposition, and character orthogonality are given by
e μ = 1 f μ ∑ X ∈ Irr ( C ) μ ( X ∗ ) [ X ] , τ ( v ) = ∑ μ μ ( v ) f μ , e_\mu=\frac{1}{f_\mu}\sum_{X\in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{C})}\mu(X^*)[X],\qquad\tau(v)=\sum_\mu\frac{\mu(v)}{f_\mu}, e μ = f μ 1 X ∈ Irr ( C ) ∑ μ ( X ∗ ) [ X ] , τ ( v ) = μ ∑ f μ μ ( v ) ,
∑ X ∈ Irr ( C ) μ ( X ) ν ( X ) ‾ = δ μ , ν f μ , f μ = ∑ X ∈ Irr ( C ) ∣ μ ( X ) ∣ 2 . (10) \sum_{X\in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{C})}\mu(X)\overline{\nu(X)}=\delta_{\mu,\nu}f_\mu,\qquad f_\mu=\sum_{X\in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{C})}|\mu(X)|^2. \tag*{(10)} X ∈ Irr ( C ) ∑ μ ( X ) ν ( X ) = δ μ , ν f μ , f μ = X ∈ Irr ( C ) ∑ ∣ μ ( X ) ∣ 2 . (10)
Indeed, the simple basis is orthonormal for τ ( v v ∗ ) \tau(vv^*) τ ( v v ∗ ) and multiplication by [ X ∗ ] [X^*] [ X ∗ ] is the adjoint of multiplication by [ X ] [X] [ X ] . Simultaneous diagonalization gives (10) .
For W ∈ Irr ( Z ( C ) ) W \in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{Z}(\mathcal{C})) W ∈ Irr ( Z ( C )) , write χ W ( V ) = S V , W / FPdim ( W ) \chi_W(V) = S_{V,W}/\operatorname{FPdim}(W) χ W ( V ) = S V , W / FPdim ( W ) . The labelling theorem [38 Theorem 2.13] identifies the character μ i ∘ F \mu_i \circ F μ i ∘ F with χ Z i \chi_{Z_i} χ Z i and gives
S W , Z i = FPdim ( Z i ) μ i ( F ( W ) ) , f i = FPdim ( C ) FPdim ( Z i ) , [ Y i : 1 ] = [ I ( 1 ) : Z i ] = 1. (11) S_{W,Z_i} = \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i)\mu_i(F(W)), \qquad f_i = \frac{\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C})}{\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i)}, \qquad[Y_i : \mathbf{1}] = [I(\mathbf{1}) : Z_i] = 1. \tag*{(11)} S W , Z i = FPdim ( Z i ) μ i ( F ( W )) , f i = FPdim ( Z i ) FPdim ( C ) , [ Y i : 1 ] = [ I ( 1 ) : Z i ] = 1. (11)
By the usual description of induction, ⨁ i Y i ≃ F ( I ( 1 ) ) ≃ ⨁ X ∈ Irr ( C ) X X ∗ \bigoplus_i Y_i \simeq F(I(\mathbf{1})) \simeq\bigoplus_{X \in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{C})} XX^* ⨁ i Y i ≃ F ( I ( 1 )) ≃ ⨁ X ∈ Irr ( C ) X X ∗ . Thus the Y i Y_i Y i lie in and generate C a d \mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}} C ad . If C \mathcal{C} C is weakly integral, this subcategory is integral by the dimension grading [27 Theorem 3.10] . In particular, the class dimensions and their formal codegrees are integers, the latter being rational algebraic integers.
Restricted modular orthogonality
Lemma 2.1 (Orthogonality for a fusion subcategory). Let L \mathcal{L} L be a pseudo-unitary nondegenerate braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C with its canonical positive spherical structure. Let S S S be its unnormalized modular S S S -matrix, T ⊆ L \mathcal{T} \subseteq\mathcal{L} T ⊆ L a full fusion subcategory with the inherited braiding, and T L ′ \mathcal{T}'_{\mathcal{L}} T L ′ its Müger centralizer in L \mathcal{L} L . For any U , V ∈ Irr ( L ) U,V \in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{L}) U , V ∈ Irr ( L ) , one has
∑ T ∈ Irr ( T ) S T , U S T , V ‾ = FPdim ( T ) ∑ W ∈ Irr ( T L ′ ) FPdim ( W ) N W , V U . (12) \sum_{T \in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{T})} S_{T,U}\overline{S_{T,V}} = \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{T}) \sum_{W \in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{T}'_{\mathcal{L}})} \operatorname{FPdim}(W)N^U_{W,V}. \tag*{(12)} T ∈ Irr ( T ) ∑ S T , U S T , V = FPdim ( T ) W ∈ Irr ( T L ′ ) ∑ FPdim ( W ) N W , V U . (12) Proof. Evaluate ∑ T ∈ Irr ( T ) FPdim ( T ) [ T ] \sum_{T \in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{T})} \operatorname{FPdim}(T)[T] ∑ T ∈ Irr ( T ) FPdim ( T ) [ T ] under χ W \chi_W χ W . This regular element has value FPdim ( T ) \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{T}) FPdim ( T ) if χ W ∣ T = FPdim \chi_W|_{\mathcal{T}} = \operatorname{FPdim} χ W ∣ T = FPdim and zero otherwise. The former condition is equivalent to W ∈ T L ′ W \in\mathcal{T}'_{\mathcal{L}} W ∈ T L ′ by the pseudo-unitary centralizer criterion [20 Section 3] . The character property of χ T \chi_T χ T gives S T , U S T , V ‾ = FPdim ( T ) ∑ W N W , V U S T , W ‾ S_{T,U}\overline{S_{T,V}} = \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{T})\sum_W N^U_{W,V}\overline{S_{T,W}} S T , U S T , V = FPdim ( T ) ∑ W N W , V U S T , W . Sum over T T T , use S T , V ‾ = S T , V \overline{S_{T,V}} = S_{T,V} S T , V = S T , V and apply N V , ∗ U = N W , V U N^U_{V,*} = N^U_{W,V} N V , ∗ U = N W , V U .
Internal endomorphisms and positivity Proposition 2.2 (Diagonal multiplicities). Let C \mathcal{C} C be a pseudo-unitary braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C with its canonical positive spherical structure. Let F : Z ( C ) → C F:\mathcal{Z}(\mathcal{C}) \to\mathcal{C} F : Z ( C ) → C be the forgetful functor with right adjoint I I I , let A = I ( 1 ) = ⨁ i ∈ J Z i \mathcal{A} = I(\mathbf{1}) = \bigoplus_{i \in J} Z_i A = I ( 1 ) = ⨁ i ∈ J Z i be the decomposition into simple class objects, and put Y i = F ( Z i ) Y_i = F(Z_i) Y i = F ( Z i ) . For a simple X ∈ C X \in\mathcal{C} X ∈ C let X + = ι + ( X ) X^+ = \iota_+(X) X + = ι + ( X ) be its central lift using the given braiding of C \mathcal{C} C . Then for i , j ∈ J i,j \in J i , j ∈ J ,
N X + , Z j Z i = 0 ( i ≠ j ) , [ Y i : X ] = N X + , Z i Z i . (13) N^{Z_i}_{X^+,Z_j} = 0 \quad(i \ne j), \qquad[Y_i : X] = N^{Z_i}_{X^+,Z_i}. \tag*{(13)} N X + , Z j Z i = 0 ( i = j ) , [ Y i : X ] = N X + , Z i Z i . (13) Thus Y i Y_i Y i is the internal endomorphism object of Z i Z_i Z i for the C \mathcal{C} C -action on Z ( C ) \mathcal{Z}(\mathcal{C}) Z ( C ) through ι + \iota_+ ι + , and carries a connected separable algebra structure.
Proof. Take L = Z ( C ) \mathcal{L} = \mathcal{Z}(\mathcal{C}) L = Z ( C ) , T = C − \mathcal{T} = \mathcal{C}^{-} T = C − , U = Z i U = Z_i U = Z i and V = Z j V = Z_j V = Z j in the orthogonality relation (12) of Lemma 2.1. Since ( C − ) ′ = C + (\mathcal{C}^{-})' = \mathcal{C}^{+} ( C − ) ′ = C + and F ( X − ) = X F(X^{-}) = X F ( X − ) = X , (2.7) and character orthogonality (2.6) yield
∑ X ∈ Irr ( C ) FPdim ( X ) N X + , Z j Z i = FPdim ( Z i ) FPdim ( Z j ) FPdim ( C ) ∑ X ∈ Irr ( C ) μ i ( X ) μ j ( X ) ‾ = δ i j FPdim ( Z i ) . (14) \sum_{X \in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{C})} \operatorname{FPdim}(X)N^{Z_i}_{X^+,Z_j}
=
\frac{\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i)\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_j)}{\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C})}
\sum_{X \in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{C})} \mu_i(X)\overline{\mu_j(X)}
=
\delta_{ij}\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i). \tag*{(14)} X ∈ Irr ( C ) ∑ FPdim ( X ) N X + , Z j Z i = FPdim ( C ) FPdim ( Z i ) FPdim ( Z j ) X ∈ Irr ( C ) ∑ μ i ( X ) μ j ( X ) = δ ij FPdim ( Z i ) . (14) Nonnegativity gives the off-diagonal vanishing. Adjunction and the projection formula (27) give [ Y i : X ] = [ I ( X ) : Z i ] = [ X + I ( 1 ) : Z i ] = N X + , Z i Z i [Y_i : X] = [I(X) : Z_i] = [X^+I(\mathbf{1}) : Z_i] = N^{Z_i}_{X^+,Z_i} [ Y i : X ] = [ I ( X ) : Z i ] = [ X + I ( 1 ) : Z i ] = N X + , Z i Z i . These multiplicities characterize Y i Y_i Y i as the internal end of Z i Z_i Z i for the action through ι + \iota_+ ι + .
We recall why these internal ends are connected separable algebras. For a fusion subcategory E ⊆ L \mathcal{E} \subseteq\mathcal{L} E ⊆ L acting on L \mathcal{L} L by left tensoring and a simple W ∈ L W \in\mathcal{L} W ∈ L , the internal end of W W W is ( W W ∗ ) ∩ E (WW^*) \cap\mathcal{E} ( W W ∗ ) ∩ E .
Its multiplication is induced by evaluation on W W ∗ W W^* W W ∗ , and its unit has multiplicity one by rigidity. For Q = End E ( W ) Q = \operatorname{End}_{\mathcal{E}}(W) Q = End E ( W ) , the category of right Q Q Q -modules in E \mathcal{E} E is the indecomposable semisimple module component generated by W W W [22 Theorem 7.10.1] . Its dual, the Q Q Q -bimodule category up to tensor reversal, is semisimple [22 Corollary 9.3.3] . Multiplication Q ⊗ Q → Q Q \otimes Q \to Q Q ⊗ Q → Q is an epimorphism of bimodules, so it splits. This proves separability, both in E \mathcal{E} E and in a containing fusion category.
Proposition 2.3 (Positivity and support). Let C \mathcal{C} C be a pseudo-unitary braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C with its canonical positive spherical structure. For the forgetful functor F : Z ( C ) → C F: Z(\mathcal{C}) \to\mathcal{C} F : Z ( C ) → C and its right adjoint I I I , write I ( 1 ) = ⨁ i Z i I(1) = \bigoplus_i Z_i I ( 1 ) = ⨁ i Z i and Y i = F ( Z i ) Y_i = F(Z_i) Y i = F ( Z i ) . Let μ i \mu_i μ i denote the algebra character of K ( C ) K(\mathcal{C}) K ( C ) corresponding to Z i Z_i Z i . For every algebra character μ \mu μ of K ( C ) K(\mathcal{C}) K ( C ) and every i i i ,
μ ( Y i ) ≥ 0 , [ Y i : 1 ] = 1 , Y i ∈ C a d . (15) \mu(Y_i) \ge0,\qquad[Y_i:1] = 1,\qquad Y_i \in\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}}. \tag*{(15)} μ ( Y i ) ≥ 0 , [ Y i : 1 ] = 1 , Y i ∈ C ad . (15) The Y i Y_i Y i are self-dual and generate C a d \mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}} C ad . With S S S the unnormalized S S S -matrix of Z ( C ) Z(\mathcal{C}) Z ( C ) and X + X^+ X + the lift of X ∈ Irr ( C ) X \in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{C}) X ∈ Irr ( C ) through the given braiding, the center-character normalizations are
S Z i , X + FPdim ( Z i ) = μ i ( X ) , S Z i , Z j FPdim ( Z i ) = μ i ( Y j ) . (16) \frac{S_{Z_i,X^+}}{\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i)} = \mu_i(X),\qquad
\frac{S_{Z_i,Z_j}}{\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i)} = \mu_i(Y_j). \tag*{(16)} FPdim ( Z i ) S Z i , X + = μ i ( X ) , FPdim ( Z i ) S Z i , Z j = μ i ( Y j ) . (16) Proof. Let π \pi π be the action by X + X^+ X + on the vector space with orthonormal basis v W v_W v W , W ∈ Irr ( Z ( C ) ) W \in\operatorname{Irr}(Z(\mathcal{C})) W ∈ Irr ( Z ( C )) . Rigidity gives π ( [ X ] ) † = π ( [ X ∗ ] ) \pi([X])^\dagger= \pi([X^*]) π ([ X ] ) † = π ([ X ∗ ]) , so π ( e μ ) \pi(e_\mu) π ( e μ ) is an orthogonal projection. Its diagonal coefficient at Z i Z_i Z i is, by the multiplicity formula (13) of Proposition 2.2,
μ ( Y i ∗ ) f μ = 1 f μ ∑ X μ ( X ∗ ) [ Y i : X ] = ∥ π ( e μ ) v Z i ∥ 2 . (17) \frac{\mu(Y_i^*)}{f_\mu} = \frac{1}{f_\mu}\sum_X \mu(X^*)[Y_i:X] = \lVert\pi(e_\mu)v_{Z_i}\rVert^2. \tag*{(17)} f μ μ ( Y i ∗ ) = f μ 1 X ∑ μ ( X ∗ ) [ Y i : X ] = ∥ π ( e μ ) v Z i ∥ 2 . (17) Thus μ ( Y i ∗ ) = μ ( Y i ) \mu(Y_i^*) = \mu(Y_i) μ ( Y i ∗ ) = μ ( Y i ) is real and nonnegative. The characters separate elements, giving Y i ≃ Y i ∗ Y_i \simeq Y_i^* Y i ≃ Y i ∗ as claimed. The character normalizations in (16) follow from (11) with W = X + W = X^+ W = X + and W = Z j W = Z_j W = Z j . This projection argument uses only pseudo-unitarity.
Restriction of class characters
Proposition 2.4 (Extent of a character fiber). Let C \mathcal{C} C be a pseudo-unitary braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C with its canonical positive spherical structure. Let B ⊆ C \mathcal{B} \subseteq\mathcal{C} B ⊆ C be a full fusion subcategory with the inherited braiding. For each algebra character ν \nu ν of K ( B ) K(\mathcal{B}) K ( B ) , summing over the algebra characters μ \mu μ of K ( C ) K(\mathcal{C}) K ( C ) that restrict to ν \nu ν gives
∑ μ ∣ B = ν FPdim ( Z μ C ) = FPdim ( C ) FPdim ( B ) FPdim ( Z ν B ) . (18) \sum_{\mu|_{\mathcal{B}}=\nu} \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_\mu^{\mathcal{C}}) = \frac{\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C})}{\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{B})}\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_\nu^{\mathcal{B}}). \tag*{(18)} μ ∣ B = ν ∑ FPdim ( Z μ C ) = FPdim ( B ) FPdim ( C ) FPdim ( Z ν B ) . (18) Every character of K ( B ) K(\mathcal{B}) K ( B ) has an extension to K ( C ) K(\mathcal{C}) K ( C ) .
Proof. For a braided inclusion B ⊆ C \mathcal{B} \subseteq\mathcal{C} B ⊆ C , the image of a primitive idempotent e ν ∈ K ( B ) e_\nu\in K(\mathcal{B}) e ν ∈ K ( B ) is ∑ μ ∣ B = ν e μ \sum_{\mu|_{\mathcal{B}}=\nu} e_\mu ∑ μ ∣ B = ν e μ . This sum is nonzero by injectivity, so each character extends. The unit-coefficient traces agree under inclusion and give 1 / f ν = ∑ μ ∣ B = ν 1 / f μ 1/f_\nu= \sum_{\mu|_{\mathcal{B}}=\nu} 1/f_\mu 1/ f ν = ∑ μ ∣ B = ν 1/ f μ . Multiplying by FPdim ( C ) \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}) FPdim ( C ) and using (11) in both categories gives the formula.
Let C μ C_\mu C μ and C ν B C_\nu^{\mathcal{B}} C ν B denote the class sums indexed by these characters, and let π e \pi_e π e be the map on central elements dual to inclusion of the character algebras. Normalizing the class sums to be dual to the primitive idempotents gives
π e ( C μ FPdim ( Z μ C ) ) = C μ ∣ B B FPdim ( Z μ ∣ B B ) . (19) \pi_e\left(\frac{C_\mu}{\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_\mu^{\mathcal{C}})}\right) = \frac{C_{\mu|_{\mathcal{B}}}^{\mathcal{B}}}{\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_{\mu|_{\mathcal{B}}}^{\mathcal{B}})}. \tag*{(19)} π e ( FPdim ( Z μ C ) C μ ) = FPdim ( Z μ ∣ B B ) C μ ∣ B B . (19)
Indeed, pairing each side with e ν e_\nu e ν gives one if μ ∣ B = ν \mu|_B=\nu μ ∣ B = ν and zero otherwise [5 Proposition 3.1 and Theorem 3.3] . Write Λ ^ C = ∑ μ C μ \widehat{\Lambda}_C=\sum_\mu C_\mu Λ C = ∑ μ C μ and Λ ^ B = ∑ ν C ν B \widehat{\Lambda}_B=\sum_\nu C^B_\nu Λ B = ∑ ν C ν B . With the canonical positive spherical structure, the identity π e ( Λ ^ C ) = ( FPdim ( C ) / FPdim ( B ) ) Λ ^ B \pi_e(\widehat{\Lambda}_C)=(\operatorname{FPdim}(C)/\operatorname{FPdim}(B))\widehat{\Lambda}_B π e ( Λ C ) = ( FPdim ( C ) / FPdim ( B )) Λ B of [8 (3.4)] , together with (19) , gives, on comparing the coefficients of C ν B C^B_\nu C ν B ,
∑ μ ∣ B = ν FPdim ( Z μ C ) FPdim ( Z ν B ) = FPdim ( C ) FPdim ( B ) . (20) \sum_{\mu|_B=\nu}\frac{\operatorname{FPdim}(Z^C_\mu)}{\operatorname{FPdim}(Z^B_\nu)}=\frac{\operatorname{FPdim}(C)}{\operatorname{FPdim}(B)}. \tag*{(20)} μ ∣ B = ν ∑ FPdim ( Z ν B ) FPdim ( Z μ C ) = FPdim ( B ) FPdim ( C ) . (20)
Multiplying by FPdim ( Z ν B ) \operatorname{FPdim}(Z^B_\nu) FPdim ( Z ν B ) gives (18) . The missing factor FPdim ( Z ν B ) \operatorname{FPdim}(Z^B_\nu) FPdim ( Z ν B ) on the right-hand side of [8 Proposition 3.1, (3.3)] is a typographical omission in the published formula. The same omission appears in its formal-order version [8 Remark 3.2, (3.6)] . For the dimension character ν = FPdim ∣ K ( B ) \nu=\operatorname{FPdim}|_{K(B)} ν = FPdim ∣ K ( B ) , the downstairs class is the unit, so the unnormalized mass equals the index. For the identity inclusion of Rep ( S 3 ) \operatorname{Rep}(S_3) Rep ( S 3 ) , the fiber over evaluation at a transposition is a singleton of mass three and the index is one. For Rep ( S 3 ) ⊂ Rep ( S 3 ) ⊠ Vec C 2 \operatorname{Rep}(S_3)\subset\operatorname{Rep}(S_3)\boxtimes\operatorname{Vec}_{\mathbb{C}_2} Rep ( S 3 ) ⊂ Rep ( S 3 ) ⊠ Vec C 2 , the same downstairs character has two extensions of class dimension three each. Dividing their total mass by three recovers the index two.
In the modular case, Bantay’s extent of a restriction class is the reciprocal of the sum of the squared normalized vacuum-row entries in that class [2 Definition 3, (3.4)] . In our notation these entries are FPdim ( X ) / FPdim ( C ) \operatorname{FPdim}(X)/\sqrt{\operatorname{FPdim}(C)} FPdim ( X ) / FPdim ( C ) , so the extent of the fiber over ν \nu ν is its downstairs formal codegree f ν f_\nu f ν by (18) and (11) .
Theorem 2.5 (Exact modular quotient). Let M \mathcal{M} M be a pseudo-unitary nondegenerate braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C with its canonical positive spherical structure, and let B ⊆ M \mathcal{B}\subseteq\mathcal{M} B ⊆ M be a full fusion subcategory with the inherited braiding. For W ∈ Irr ( M ) W\in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{M}) W ∈ Irr ( M ) let ν \nu ν be the restriction of its Verlinde character, given on X ∈ Irr ( B ) X\in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{B}) X ∈ Irr ( B ) by ν ( X ) = S X , W / FPdim ( W ) \nu(X)=S_{X,W}/\operatorname{FPdim}(W) ν ( X ) = S X , W / FPdim ( W ) for the unnormalized S S S -matrix of M \mathcal{M} M . If B M ′ \mathcal{B}'_{\mathcal{M}} B M ′ denotes the Müger centralizer in M \mathcal{M} M , then
FPdim ( W ) 2 FPdim ( Z ν B ) = FPdim ( ( W W ∗ ) ∩ B M ′ ) . (21) \frac{\operatorname{FPdim}(W)^2}{\operatorname{FPdim}(Z^B_\nu)}=\operatorname{FPdim}((WW^*)\cap\mathcal{B}'_{\mathcal{M}}). \tag*{(21)} FPdim ( Z ν B ) FPdim ( W ) 2 = FPdim (( W W ∗ ) ∩ B M ′ ) . (21) The quotient is a positive algebraic integer. If M \mathcal{M} M is weakly integral, it is a positive integer.
Proof. Let ν = χ W ∣ B \nu=\chi_W|_B ν = χ W ∣ B for W ∈ Irr ( M ) W\in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{M}) W ∈ Irr ( M ) . Applying Lemma 2.1 with U = V = W U=V=W U = V = W in (12) gives
FPdim ( W ) 2 FPdim ( Z ν B ) = FPdim ( W ) 2 f ν FPdim ( B ) = ∑ T ∈ Irr ( B M ′ ) FPdim ( T ) N W , W ∗ T . (22) \frac{\operatorname{FPdim}(W)^2}{\operatorname{FPdim}(Z^B_\nu)}
=\frac{\operatorname{FPdim}(W)^2f_\nu}{\operatorname{FPdim}(B)}
=\sum_{T\in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{B}'_{\mathcal{M}})}\operatorname{FPdim}(T)N^T_{W,W^*}. \tag*{(22)} FPdim ( Z ν B ) FPdim ( W ) 2 = FPdim ( B ) FPdim ( W ) 2 f ν = T ∈ Irr ( B M ′ ) ∑ FPdim ( T ) N W , W ∗ T . (22)
The right-hand side is the Frobenius–Perron dimension of an object containing the unit. Under weak integrality, each contributing T T T belongs to the integral subcategory M a d \mathcal{M}_{\mathrm{ad}} M ad .
Theorem 2.6 (Individual braided divisibility). Let C \mathcal{C} C be a pseudo-unitary braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C with its canonical positive spherical structure. Let B ⊆ C \mathcal{B}\subseteq\mathcal{C} B ⊆ C be a full fusion subcategory with the inherited braiding, and let μ \mu μ be an algebra character of K ( C ) K(\mathcal{C}) K ( C ) . The quotient FPdim ( Z μ C ) / FPdim ( Z μ ∣ B B ) \operatorname{FPdim}(Z^C_\mu)/\operatorname{FPdim}(Z^B_{\mu|_B}) FPdim ( Z μ C ) / FPdim ( Z μ ∣ B B ) is a positive algebraic integer. If C \mathcal{C} C is weakly integral, this gives ordinary integer divisibility
FPdim ( Z μ ∣ B B ) ∣ FPdim ( Z μ C ) . (23) \operatorname{FPdim}(Z^B_{\mu|_B})\mid\operatorname{FPdim}(Z^C_\mu). \tag*{(23)} FPdim ( Z μ ∣ B B ) ∣ FPdim ( Z μ C ) . (23) In the weakly integral case Δ c l ( B ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{B}) Δ cl ( B ) is a subgroup of Δ c l ( C ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{C}) Δ cl ( C ) .
Proof. For B ⊆ C \mathcal{B}\subseteq\mathcal{C} B ⊆ C take W = Z i ∈ Z ( C ) W=Z_i\in\mathcal{Z}(\mathcal{C}) W = Z i ∈ Z ( C ) and put ν = μ i ∣ B \nu=\mu_i|_B ν = μ i ∣ B . In Z ( C ) \mathcal{Z}(\mathcal{C}) Z ( C ) let E = ( C + ) ⊥ ⊆ L = ( B + ) ⊥ \mathcal{E}=(\mathcal{C}^+)^\perp\subseteq\mathcal{L}=(\mathcal{B}^+)^\perp E = ( C + ) ⊥ ⊆ L = ( B + ) ⊥ . Write Q E = ( W W ∗ ) ∩ E Q_{\mathcal{E}}=(WW^*)\cap\mathcal{E} Q E = ( W W ∗ ) ∩ E and Q L = ( W W ∗ ) ∩ L Q_{\mathcal{L}}=(WW^*)\cap\mathcal{L} Q L = ( W W ∗ ) ∩ L . Each is the internal end of W W W for the indicated subcategory. Because both multiplications are restrictions of that on W W ∗ WW^* W W ∗ , Q E ⊆ Q L Q_{\mathcal{E}}\subseteq Q_{\mathcal{L}} Q E ⊆ Q L is a unital subalgebra. By (11) , χ W \chi_W χ W restricts to μ i \mu_i μ i on C + \mathcal C^+ C + , and hence to ν \nu ν on B + \mathcal B^+ B + . Applying the modular quotient formula (21) of Theorem 2.5 twice gives
FPdim ( Q E ) = FPdim ( Z i ) , FPdim ( Q L ) = FPdim ( Z i ) 2 FPdim ( Z ν B ) . (24) \operatorname{FPdim}(Q_{\mathcal E})=\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i),\qquad\operatorname{FPdim}(Q_{\mathcal L})=\frac{\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i)^2}{\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_\nu^{\mathcal B})}. \tag*{(24)} FPdim ( Q E ) = FPdim ( Z i ) , FPdim ( Q L ) = FPdim ( Z ν B ) FPdim ( Z i ) 2 . (24)
Set Q = Q E Q=Q_{\mathcal E} Q = Q E . By the internal-end argument in the proof of Proposition 2.2, Q Q Q is connected and separable, so its bimodules in L \mathcal L L form a multifusion category. Its tensor unit Q Q Q is simple because End Q -bimod ( Q ) ⊆ Hom L ( 1 , Q ) = C \operatorname{End}_{Q\text{-bimod}}(Q)\subseteq\operatorname{Hom}_{\mathcal L}(\mathbf{1},Q)=\mathbb{C} End Q -bimod ( Q ) ⊆ Hom L ( 1 , Q ) = C under evaluation at the unit. Thus the bimodules form a fusion category. In this category Q L Q_{\mathcal L} Q L is a bimodule by multiplication. The bimodule dimension normalization [22 Exercise 7.16.9(i)] gives
FPdim ( Z i ) FPdim ( Z ν B ) = FPdim ( Q L ) FPdim ( Q ) = FPdim Q -Bimod ( L ) ( Q L ) . (25) \frac{\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i)}{\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_\nu^{\mathcal B})}
=\frac{\operatorname{FPdim}(Q_{\mathcal L})}{\operatorname{FPdim}(Q)}
=\operatorname{FPdim}_{Q\text{-Bimod}(\mathcal L)}(Q_{\mathcal L}). \tag*{(25)} FPdim ( Z ν B ) FPdim ( Z i ) = FPdim ( Q ) FPdim ( Q L ) = FPdim Q -Bimod ( L ) ( Q L ) . (25)
A nonzero object of a fusion category has positive algebraic-integer Frobenius–Perron dimension. Under weak integrality both class dimensions are integers, so their quotient is rational and hence an integer. In that case every downstairs character extends by Proposition 2.4, which gives the inclusion of class graphs.
Corollary 2.7. Let C \mathcal C C be a weakly integral braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C . Let B ⊆ C \mathcal B\subseteq\mathcal C B ⊆ C be a full fusion subcategory with the inherited braiding. For an algebra character ν \nu ν of K ( B ) K(\mathcal B) K ( B ) , the quotients FPdim ( Z μ C ) / FPdim ( Z ν B ) \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_\mu^{\mathcal C})/\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_\nu^{\mathcal B}) FPdim ( Z μ C ) / FPdim ( Z ν B ) indexed by its extensions μ \mu μ to K ( C ) K(\mathcal C) K ( C ) form a partition of FPdim ( C ) / FPdim ( B ) \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal C)/\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal B) FPdim ( C ) / FPdim ( B ) .
Proof. Combine the individual divisibility (23) of Theorem 2.6 with (20) , the normalized form of Proposition 2.4.
Proposition 2.8 (Tannakian restriction). Let C \mathcal C C be a weakly integral braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C . Let Rep ( G ) ⊆ C \operatorname{Rep}(G)\subseteq\mathcal C Rep ( G ) ⊆ C be a Tannakian fusion subcategory for a finite group G G G , and let Z i ∈ Z ( C ) Z_i\in\mathcal Z(\mathcal C) Z i ∈ Z ( C ) be the class object corresponding to an algebra character μ i \mu_i μ i of K ( C ) K(\mathcal C) K ( C ) . If μ i \mu_i μ i restricts to evaluation at g ∈ G g\in G g ∈ G on K ( Rep ( G ) ) K(\operatorname{Rep}(G)) K ( Rep ( G )) , then ∣ g G ∣ ∣ FPdim ( Z i ) |g^G|\mid\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i) ∣ g G ∣ ∣ FPdim ( Z i ) . If C \mathcal C C is also nondegenerate, with its canonical modular structure, and μ i \mu_i μ i is the Verlinde character of X ∈ Irr ( C ) X\in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal C) X ∈ Irr ( C ) , then ∣ g G ∣ 2 ∣ FPdim ( X ) 2 |g^G|^2\mid\operatorname{FPdim}(X)^2 ∣ g G ∣ 2 ∣ FPdim ( X ) 2 .
Proof. In Rep ( G ) \operatorname{Rep}(G) Rep ( G ) a character indexed by [ g ] [g] [ g ] has formal codegree ∣ C G ( g ) ∣ |C_G(g)| ∣ C G ( g ) ∣ by column orthogonality (10) for Rep ( G ) \operatorname{Rep}(G) Rep ( G ) . Its class has dimension ∣ g G ∣ |g^G| ∣ g G ∣ . The first assertion now follows from the individual divisibility (23) of Theorem 2.6. For the square assertion suppose C \mathcal C C is modular and let X X X be the simple indexing the character. In the de-equivariantization by Rep ( G ) \operatorname{Rep}(G) Rep ( G ) choose a constituent V V V of its forgetful image, of degree h h h . The action conjugates degrees, so the inertia subgroup G V G_V G V is contained in C G ( h ) C_G(h) C G ( h ) . For a charge U ∈ Rep ( G ) U\in\operatorname{Rep}(G) U ∈ Rep ( G ) the normalized monodromy trace on each degree-h h h constituent evaluates its character at h h h by the crossed braiding [20 Section 4.4] . Thus ∣ h G ∣ = ∣ g G ∣ |h^G|=|g^G| ∣ h G ∣ = ∣ g G ∣ (the inverse degree convention gives [ g − 1 ] [g^{-1}] [ g − 1 ] and the same size). For the projective inertia representation ρ \rho ρ labelling X X X , the equivariantization dimension formula of [10 Corollary 2.13] and the inclusion G V ⊆ C G ( h ) G_V\subseteq C_G(h) G V ⊆ C G ( h ) give
FPdim ( X ) = [ G : G V ] dim ( ρ ) FPdim ( V ) , \operatorname{FPdim}(X)=[G:G_V]\dim(\rho)\operatorname{FPdim}(V), FPdim ( X ) = [ G : G V ] dim ( ρ ) FPdim ( V ) ,
FPdim ( X ) ∣ g G ∣ = [ C G ( h ) : G V ] dim ( ρ ) FPdim ( V ) . (26) \frac{\operatorname{FPdim}(X)}{|g^G|}=[C_G(h):G_V]\dim(\rho)\operatorname{FPdim}(V). \tag*{(26)} ∣ g G ∣ FPdim ( X ) = [ C G ( h ) : G V ] dim ( ρ ) FPdim ( V ) . (26)
The right side of the second equality is an algebraic integer. Its square is rational since FPdim ( X ) 2 \operatorname{FPdim}(X)^2 FPdim ( X ) 2 is an integer, proving ∣ g G ∣ 2 ∣ FPdim ( X ) 2 |g^G|^2\mid\operatorname{FPdim}(X)^2 ∣ g G ∣ 2 ∣ FPdim ( X ) 2 .
Projection, balancing and dimension formulas
For the forgetful functor F F F and its right adjoint I I I , rigidity and adjunction give the projection formula
I ( F ( U ) ⊗ V ) ≃ U ⊗ I ( V ) , U ∈ Z ( C ) , V ∈ C . (27) I(F(U) \otimes V) \simeq U \otimes I(V), \qquad U \in Z(\mathcal{C}), \quad V \in\mathcal{C}. \tag*{(27)} I ( F ( U ) ⊗ V ) ≃ U ⊗ I ( V ) , U ∈ Z ( C ) , V ∈ C . (27)
In a pseudo-unitary braided fusion category C \mathcal{C} C with its canonical ribbon structure, write θ X \theta_X θ X for the twist of a simple object X X X . The balancing identity gives the monodromy scalar on each simple constituent T T T of X ⊗ Y X \otimes Y X ⊗ Y . Its trace gives the unnormalized S S S -entry.
c Y , X c X , Y ∣ T = θ T θ X θ Y id T , S X , Y = ∑ T ∈ Irr ( C ) N X , Y T θ T θ X θ Y FPdim ( T ) . (28) c_{Y,X}c_{X,Y}\big|_T = \frac{\theta_T}{\theta_X\theta_Y}\operatorname{id}_T,\qquad S_{X,Y} = \sum_{T \in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{C})} N^T_{X,Y}\frac{\theta_T}{\theta_X\theta_Y}\operatorname{FPdim}(T). \tag*{(28)} c Y , X c X , Y T = θ X θ Y θ T id T , S X , Y = T ∈ Irr ( C ) ∑ N X , Y T θ X θ Y θ T FPdim ( T ) . (28)
Let A , B \mathcal{A}, \mathcal{B} A , B be fusion subcategories of a braided fusion category L \mathcal{L} L . Write primes for centralizers in L \mathcal{L} L and ∨ \vee ∨ for the join. By [20 Corollary 3.11 and Theorem 3.14] , the double-centralizer identity and the centralizer dimension formula take the form
A ′ ′ = A ∨ Z 2 ( L ) , FPdim ( A ) FPdim ( A ′ ) = FPdim ( L ) FPdim ( A ∩ Z 2 ( L ) ) . (29) \mathcal{A}^{\prime\prime} = \mathcal{A} \vee\mathcal{Z}_2(\mathcal{L}),\qquad\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{A})\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{A}^{\prime}) = \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{L})\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{A} \cap\mathcal{Z}_2(\mathcal{L})). \tag*{(29)} A ′′ = A ∨ Z 2 ( L ) , FPdim ( A ) FPdim ( A ′ ) = FPdim ( L ) FPdim ( A ∩ Z 2 ( L )) . (29)
The join dimension formula [20 Lemma 3.38] gives
FPdim ( A ∨ B ) = FPdim ( A ) FPdim ( B ) FPdim ( A ∩ B ) . (30) \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{A} \vee\mathcal{B}) = \frac{\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{A})\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{B})}{\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{A} \cap\mathcal{B})}. \tag*{(30)} FPdim ( A ∨ B ) = FPdim ( A ∩ B ) FPdim ( A ) FPdim ( B ) . (30)
For the trivial action of C n C_n C n on C × \mathbb{C}^{\times} C × , the cyclic cohomology formula [33 Chap. IV, §7, Thm. 7.1] gives
H 2 j ( C n , C × ) ≃ C × / ( C × ) n = 0 ( j ≥ 1 ) . (31) H^{2j}(C_n,\mathbb{C}^{\times}) \simeq\mathbb{C}^{\times}/(\mathbb{C}^{\times})^n = 0 \qquad(j \ge1). \tag*{(31)} H 2 j ( C n , C × ) ≃ C × / ( C × ) n = 0 ( j ≥ 1 ) . (31)
The regular product and the Itô–Michler splitting
Theorem 3.1 (Regular product). Let C \mathcal{C} C be a weakly integral braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C . For the forgetful functor F : Z ( C ) → C F: Z(\mathcal{C}) \to\mathcal{C} F : Z ( C ) → C and its right adjoint I I I , write I ( 1 ) = ⨁ i ∈ J Z i I(\mathbb{1}) = \bigoplus_{i\in J} Z_i I ( 1 ) = ⨁ i ∈ J Z i and Y i = F ( Z i ) Y_i = F(Z_i) Y i = F ( Z i ) . Let R C a d = ∑ X ∈ Irr ( C a d ) FPdim ( X ) [ X ] R_{\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}}} = \sum_{X\in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}})} \operatorname{FPdim}(X)[X] R C ad = ∑ X ∈ Irr ( C ad ) FPdim ( X ) [ X ] denote the regular element of the adjoint subcategory. In K ( C ) K(\mathcal{C}) K ( C ) one has
∏ i ∈ J [ Y i ] = ∏ i ∈ J FPdim ( Z i ) FPdim ( C a d ) R C a d , ∏ i ∈ J FPdim ( Z i ) FPdim ( C a d ) ∈ Z > 0 . (32) \prod_{i\in J} [Y_i] = \frac{\prod_{i\in J}\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i)}{\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}})}R_{\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}}},\qquad\frac{\prod_{i\in J}\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i)}{\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}})} \in\mathbb{Z}_{>0}. \tag*{(32)} i ∈ J ∏ [ Y i ] = FPdim ( C ad ) ∏ i ∈ J FPdim ( Z i ) R C ad , FPdim ( C ad ) ∏ i ∈ J FPdim ( Z i ) ∈ Z > 0 . (32) This identity involves the product of all class images. Its two-factor analogue (59) in Proposition 5.1 holds under the cross-component vanishing hypothesis.
Proof. Fix i i i with FPdim ( Z i ) > 1 \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i) > 1 FPdim ( Z i ) > 1 . We first show that μ j ( Y i ) = 0 \mu_j(Y_i) = 0 μ j ( Y i ) = 0 for some j j j . The argument uses the Galois-product method of [11 Theorem 4.17] , with the class dimensions themselves as weights. Since τ ( [ Y i ] ) = [ Y i : 1 ] = 1 \tau([Y_i]) = [Y_i:\mathbb{1}] = 1 τ ([ Y i ]) = [ Y i : 1 ] = 1 , the trace expansion (10) gives
∑ j ∈ J FPdim ( Z j ) FPdim ( C ) μ j ( Y i ) = 1 , ∑ j ∈ J FPdim ( Z j ) FPdim ( C ) = 1. (33) \sum_{j\in J}\frac{\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_j)}{\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C})}\mu_j(Y_i) = 1,\qquad\sum_{j\in J}\frac{\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_j)}{\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C})} = 1. \tag*{(33)} j ∈ J ∑ FPdim ( C ) FPdim ( Z j ) μ j ( Y i ) = 1 , j ∈ J ∑ FPdim ( C ) FPdim ( Z j ) = 1. (33)
All the values in the first mean are nonnegative by (17) in the proof of Proposition 2.3. The Galois group of a normal number field containing the character values permutes the μ j \mu_j μ j . It preserves their formal codegrees because f j = ∑ X μ j ( X ) μ j ( X ∗ ) f_j = \sum_X \mu_j(X)\mu_j(X^*) f j = ∑ X μ j ( X ) μ j ( X ∗ ) is an integer. It therefore preserves their weights FPdim ( Z j ) \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_j) FPdim ( Z j ) . If all the values were positive, the product
∏ j ∈ J μ j ( Y i ) FPdim ( Z j ) (34) \prod_{j\in J}\mu_j(Y_i)^{\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_j)} \tag*{(34)} j ∈ J ∏ μ j ( Y i ) FPdim ( Z j ) (34)
would be a positive Galois-invariant algebraic integer, hence an integer at least one. The weighted geometric mean would then be at least one. By (33) the weighted arithmetic mean is one, so equality would force every value to be one. The dimension character takes the value FPdim ( Y i ) = FPdim ( Z i ) > 1 \operatorname{FPdim}(Y_i)=\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i)>1 FPdim ( Y i ) = FPdim ( Z i ) > 1 , a contradiction.
By symmetry of the S S S -matrix and (11) ,
FPdim ( Z i ) μ i ( Y j ) = FPdim ( Z j ) μ j ( Y i ) . (35) \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i)\mu_i(Y_j)=\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_j)\mu_j(Y_i). \tag*{(35)} FPdim ( Z i ) μ i ( Y j ) = FPdim ( Z j ) μ j ( Y i ) . (35)
Thus for every i i i with FPdim ( Z i ) > 1 \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i)>1 FPdim ( Z i ) > 1 the row μ i \mu_i μ i vanishes on some class image. If FPdim ( Z i ) = 1 \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i)=1 FPdim ( Z i ) = 1 , then Y i ≃ 1 Y_i\simeq1 Y i ≃ 1 , and the reciprocity identity (35) gives μ i ( Y j ) = FPdim ( Y j ) \mu_i(Y_j)=\operatorname{FPdim}(Y_j) μ i ( Y j ) = FPdim ( Y j ) for every j j j . As ∣ μ i ( X ) ∣ ≤ FPdim ( X ) |\mu_i(X)|\leq\operatorname{FPdim}(X) ∣ μ i ( X ) ∣ ≤ FPdim ( X ) for every simple X X X , attaining the full dimension of an object forces equality with the dimension character on each constituent. The simples on which μ i \mu_i μ i equals FPdim \operatorname{FPdim} FPdim are closed under products, constituents, and duality. Since the Y j Y_j Y j generate C a d \mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}} C ad , the restriction of this row to K ( C a d ) K(\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}}) K ( C ad ) is the dimension character. Conversely, any character agreeing there with FPdim \operatorname{FPdim} FPdim satisfies μ i ( X X ∗ ) = FPdim ( X ) 2 \mu_i(XX^*)=\operatorname{FPdim}(X)^2 μ i ( X X ∗ ) = FPdim ( X ) 2 for every simple X X X , hence f i = FPdim ( C ) f_i=\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}) f i = FPdim ( C ) and FPdim ( Z i ) = 1 \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i)=1 FPdim ( Z i ) = 1 .
It follows that ∏ j [ Y j ] \prod_j[Y_j] ∏ j [ Y j ] evaluates to ∏ j FPdim ( Z j ) \prod_j\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_j) ∏ j FPdim ( Z j ) on the rows restricting to FPdim \operatorname{FPdim} FPdim on C a d \mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}} C ad and to zero on all other rows. The regular element R C a d R_{\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}}} R C ad evaluates to FPdim ( C a d ) \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}}) FPdim ( C ad ) on the first set of rows and to zero on the second. Characters separate elements of K ( C ) K(\mathcal{C}) K ( C ) , which proves (32) . Its coefficient at the unit is the positive integer [ ⨂ j Y j : 1 ] [\bigotimes_jY_j:1] [ ⨂ j Y j : 1 ] .
The Sylow factor and its complement
Proof of Theorem 1.1. By the regular-product identity (32) of Theorem 3.1, FPdim ( C a d ) \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}}) FPdim ( C ad ) divides ∏ i FPdim ( Z i ) \prod_i\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i) ∏ i FPdim ( Z i ) , proving (i)⇒ \Rightarrow ⇒ (iii). Under (ii) the canonical algebra factors over the Deligne product. The class dimensions of a braided pointed category are one, and each class dimension in B \mathcal{B} B divides N N N since the quotient is a rational formal codegree and hence an integer. This gives (ii)⇒ \Rightarrow ⇒ (i). We prove (iii)⇒ \Rightarrow ⇒ (ii).
Let P P P be the Sylow p p p -quotient of the abelian group U ( C ) U(\mathcal{C}) U ( C ) and let B \mathcal{B} B be the neutral component of the induced faithful P P P -grading of C \mathcal{C} C . The hypothesis gives
∣ P ∣ = p a , FPdim ( B ) = ∣ U ( C ) ∣ ∣ P ∣ FPdim ( C a d ) = N . (36) |P|=p^a,\qquad\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{B})=\frac{|U(\mathcal{C})|}{|P|}\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}})=N. \tag*{(36)} ∣ P ∣ = p a , FPdim ( B ) = ∣ P ∣ ∣ U ( C ) ∣ FPdim ( C ad ) = N . (36)
Put S = Z 2 ( B ) \mathcal{S}=\mathcal{Z}_2(\mathcal{B}) S = Z 2 ( B ) . Its centralizer S C ′ \mathcal{S}'_{\mathcal{C}} S C ′ contains B \mathcal{B} B . Every fusion subcategory containing B \mathcal{B} B is a union of full grading components. Indeed, if it contains a simple X X X , then for any simple Y Y Y in the same degree it contains Y X ∗ ∈ B YX^*\in\mathcal{B} Y X ∗ ∈ B and hence the summand Y Y Y of ( Y X ∗ ) X (YX^*)X ( Y X ∗ ) X . Its index is therefore a power of p p p . On the other hand, the centralizer dimension formula (29) gives
FPdim ( C ) FPdim ( S C ′ ) = FPdim ( S ) FPdim ( S ∩ Z 2 ( C ) ) . (37) \frac{\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C})}{\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{S}'_{\mathcal{C}})}
=
\frac{\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{S})}{\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{S}\cap\mathcal{Z}_2(\mathcal{C}))}. \tag*{(37)} FPdim ( S C ′ ) FPdim ( C ) = FPdim ( S ∩ Z 2 ( C )) FPdim ( S ) . (37)
The right side is an integer dividing FPdim ( S ) \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{S}) FPdim ( S ) , which divides N N N . Thus the index is one and S ⊆ Z 2 ( C ) \mathcal{S}\subseteq\mathcal{Z}_2(\mathcal{C}) S ⊆ Z 2 ( C ) . For Q = B C ′ \mathcal{Q}=\mathcal{B}'_{\mathcal{C}} Q = B C ′ we now have Q ∩ B = B ∩ Z 2 ( C ) \mathcal{Q}\cap\mathcal{B}=\mathcal{B}\cap\mathcal{Z}_2(\mathcal{C}) Q ∩ B = B ∩ Z 2 ( C ) . Applying (29) to B \mathcal{B} B gives FPdim ( Q ) = ∣ P ∣ FPdim ( S ) \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{Q})=|P|\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{S}) FPdim ( Q ) = ∣ P ∣ FPdim ( S ) , so the restriction of the P P P -grading to Q \mathcal{Q} Q is faithful.
Write S = Rep ( H , z ) \mathcal{S}=\operatorname{Rep}(H,z) S = Rep ( H , z ) and L = H / ⟨ z ⟩ L=H/\langle z\rangle L = H / ⟨ z ⟩ , allowing z = 1 z=1 z = 1 . The even part Rep ( L ) \operatorname{Rep}(L) Rep ( L ) is transparent in Q \mathcal{Q} Q . Its de-equivariantization R = Q L \mathcal{R}=\mathcal{Q}_L R = Q L inherits a faithful P P P -grading preserved degree by degree by L L L [20 Proposition 4.30(i)–(ii)] . The neutral component is S L \mathcal{S}_L S L , which is Vec for z = 1 z=1 z = 1 and transparent sVec otherwise. Every component has the dimension of the neutral component. In the first case each component consists of one invertible simple. In the second case p p p is odd, since ∣ H ∣ = FPdim ( S ) |H|=\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{S}) ∣ H ∣ = FPdim ( S ) is prime to p p p . The transparent fermion acts freely on simples: the balancing identity (28) gives θ f X = − θ X \theta_{fX}=-\theta_X θ f X = − θ X . Each component of dimension two thus consists of a pair of invertibles. In both cases R \mathcal{R} R is pointed. The degree homomorphism from its abelian group of invertibles induces an isomorphism from its Sylow p p p -subgroup A p A_p A p onto P P P , because its kernel has order ∣ ⟨ z ⟩ ∣ |\langle z\rangle| ∣ ⟨ z ⟩ ∣ . Hence L L L fixes every element of A p A_p A p .
We check that each x ∈ A p x \in A_p x ∈ A p lifts to an invertible of Q ≃ R L \mathcal{Q} \simeq\mathcal{R}^L Q ≃ R L . Choosing isomorphisms s ( x ) → x s(x) \to x s ( x ) → x for s ∈ L s \in L s ∈ L gives the scalar obstruction α x ∈ H 2 ( L , C × ) \alpha_x \in H^2(L,\mathbb{C}^{\times}) α x ∈ H 2 ( L , C × ) to an equivariant structure. Tensoring the chosen isomorphisms using the action tensorators gives α x y = α x α y \alpha_{xy} = \alpha_x\alpha_y α x y = α x α y . Since α 1 = 1 \alpha_1 = 1 α 1 = 1 , the order of α x \alpha_x α x divides the order of x x x . It also divides ∣ L ∣ |L| ∣ L ∣ , since the order of a finite group annihilates its positive-degree cohomology with arbitrary module coefficients [13 Chap. XII, §2, Prop. 2.5, p. 236] . See also [33, Chap. IV, §5, Prop. 5.3, p. 117. Coprimality therefore gives α x = 1 \alpha_x = 1 α x = 1 . The group of invertibles of Q \mathcal{Q} Q lying over A p A_p A p consequently maps onto A p A_p A p with kernel Hom ( L , C × ) \operatorname{Hom}(L,\mathbb{C}^{\times}) Hom ( L , C × ) . Its Sylow p p p -subgroup maps isomorphically onto A p A_p A p . The corresponding pointed subcategory P \mathcal{P} P of Q \mathcal{Q} Q therefore has dimension ∣ P ∣ |P| ∣ P ∣ and has an invertible in every degree. It centralizes B \mathcal{B} B and meets B \mathcal{B} B in Vec \operatorname{Vec} Vec . Tensoring with its invertible in a given degree identifies B \mathcal{B} B with that component. Multiplication thus gives the braided equivalence (2) .
Since FPdim ( B ) = N \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{B}) = N FPdim ( B ) = N is prime to p p p , the invertibles of P \mathcal{P} P form the unique Sylow p p p -subgroup of Inv ( C ) \operatorname{Inv}(\mathcal{C}) Inv ( C ) . By construction, B \mathcal{B} B consists of the universal components whose degrees have order prime to p p p . Finally, a prime outside π ( FPdim ( C ) ) \pi(\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C})) π ( FPdim ( C )) divides neither a class dimension nor FPdim ( C a d ) \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}}) FPdim ( C ad ) . This proves (3) . □
Corollary 3.2. Let C \mathcal{C} C be a weakly integral braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C . Let C p t \mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{pt}} C pt and C a d \mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}} C ad denote its pointed and adjoint subcategories, respectively, and Δ c l ( C ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{C}) Δ cl ( C ) its class prime graph. The prime divisors of FPdim ( C ) / FPdim ( C p t ) \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C})/\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{pt}}) FPdim ( C ) / FPdim ( C pt ) are vertices of Δ c l ( C ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{C}) Δ cl ( C ) , and in particular divide FPdim ( C a d ) \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}}) FPdim ( C ad ) . If C \mathcal{C} C is also nondegenerate, then
⋃ X ∈ Irr ( C ) π ( FPdim ( X ) 2 ) = π ( FPdim ( C a d ) ) . (38) \bigcup_{X\in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{C})}\pi\left(\operatorname{FPdim}(X)^2\right)=\pi\left(\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}})\right). \tag*{(38)} X ∈ Irr ( C ) ⋃ π ( FPdim ( X ) 2 ) = π ( FPdim ( C ad ) ) . (38)
Proof. If p p p is absent, then its full p p p -part splits off in C p t \mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{pt}} C pt by Theorem 1.1 . The assertion for modular categories follows because their classes have dimensions FPdim ( X ) 2 \operatorname{FPdim}(X)^2 FPdim ( X ) 2 by Lemma 6.2 (1). □
Corollary 3.3 (Prime support of conjugacy-class dimensions). Let C \mathcal{C} C be a weakly integral braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C . Let Vert Δ c l ( C ) \operatorname{Vert}\Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{C}) Vert Δ cl ( C ) be the set of primes dividing the Frobenius–Perron dimension of at least one conjugacy class of C \mathcal{C} C , and let v p v_p v p denote the p p p -adic valuation. There is a braided equivalence
C ≃ P ⊠ E , \mathcal{C}\simeq\mathcal{P}\boxtimes\mathcal{E}, C ≃ P ⊠ E , FPdim ( P ) = ∏ p ∣ FPdim ( C ) p ∉ Vert Δ c l ( C ) p v p ( FPdim ( C ) ) , FPdim ( E ) = ∏ p ∈ Vert Δ c l ( C ) p v p ( FPdim ( C ) ) . (39) \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{P})=
\prod_{\substack{p\mid\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C})\\p\notin\operatorname{Vert}\Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{C})}}
p^{v_p(\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}))},
\qquad
\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{E})=
\prod_{p\in\operatorname{Vert}\Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{C})}
p^{v_p(\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}))}. \tag*{(39)} FPdim ( P ) = p ∣ FPdim ( C ) p ∈ / Vert Δ cl ( C ) ∏ p v p ( FPdim ( C )) , FPdim ( E ) = p ∈ Vert Δ cl ( C ) ∏ p v p ( FPdim ( C )) . (39) where P \mathcal{P} P is pointed and empty products are interpreted as 1 1 1 . The following consequences hold.
(i) If ∣ Vert Δ c l ( C ) ∣ ≤ 2 |\operatorname{Vert}\Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{C})|\leq2 ∣ Vert Δ cl ( C ) ∣ ≤ 2 , then C \mathcal{C} C is solvable.
(ii) If ∣ Vert Δ c l ( C ) ∣ ≤ 1 |\operatorname{Vert}\Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{C})|\leq1 ∣ Vert Δ cl ( C ) ∣ ≤ 1 , then C \mathcal{C} C is nilpotent.
(iii) If Vert Δ c l ( C ) = ∅ \operatorname{Vert}\Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{C})=\varnothing Vert Δ cl ( C ) = ∅ , then C \mathcal{C} C is pointed.
Proof. Apply Theorem 1.1 successively to the primes dividing FPdim ( C ) \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}) FPdim ( C ) which do not belong to Vert Δ c l ( C ) \operatorname{Vert}\Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{C}) Vert Δ cl ( C ) . At each step the class dimensions of the category before splitting are the class dimensions of the remaining factor, each repeated the rank of the pointed factor by Proposition 4.3. Hence prime avoidance is preserved for all subsequent steps. The product of the pointed factors and the remaining category have the dimensions in (39) .
If ∣ Vert Δ c l ( C ) ∣ ≤ 2 |\operatorname{Vert}\Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{C})|\leq2 ∣ Vert Δ cl ( C ) ∣ ≤ 2 , then FPdim ( E ) \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{E}) FPdim ( E ) has the form p a q b p^aq^b p a q b , allowing zero exponents. Theorem 1.6 of [24 ] shows that E \mathcal{E} E is solvable. The group of invertible objects of the braided pointed
category P \mathcal{P} P is abelian, so P \mathcal{P} P is solvable by [24 Proposition 4.5(ii)] . Solvability is preserved by Deligne products [24 Proposition 4.5(i)] , proving (i).
If ∣ Vert Δ c l ( C ) ∣ = 1 |\operatorname{Vert}\Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{C})|=1 ∣ Vert Δ cl ( C ) ∣ = 1 , then E \mathcal{E} E has prime-power dimension and is nilpotent [27 Example 4.5(1)] . A pointed category has trivial adjoint subcategory, and the adjoint construction commutes with Deligne products. It follows that P ⊠ E \mathcal{P}\boxtimes\mathcal{E} P ⊠ E is nilpotent. If Vert Δ c l ( C ) = ∅ \operatorname{Vert}\Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{C})=\varnothing Vert Δ cl ( C ) = ∅ , then FPdim ( E ) = 1 \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{E})=1 FPdim ( E ) = 1 and E = Vec \mathcal{E}=\operatorname{Vec} E = Vec , proving both the remaining case of (ii) and (iii).
Symmetric and modular specializations
For C = Rep ( G ) \mathcal{C}=\operatorname{Rep}(G) C = Rep ( G ) with its symmetric braiding, Y i Y_i Y i is the permutation representation on a conjugacy class K i K_i K i . Thus the value μ j ( Y i ) \mu_j(Y_i) μ j ( Y i ) counts the elements of K i K_i K i commuting with a representative of the class indexed by j j j . The product in (32) of Theorem 3.1 is the permutation representation on ∏ i K i \prod_i K_i ∏ i K i under diagonal conjugation. Any tuple in this product generates G G G . Indeed, the subgroup H H H generated by its entries meets every conjugacy class, so every group element fixes a coset in G / H G/H G / H . The average number of fixed cosets is one by transitivity. The identity fixes [ G : H ] [G:H] [ G : H ] cosets, forcing H = G H=G H = G . The stabilizer of each tuple is therefore Z ( G ) Z(G) Z ( G ) . Every orbit affords a copy of the regular representation of G / Z ( G ) G/Z(G) G / Z ( G ) , and its multiplicity is
∏ i ∣ K i ∣ ∣ G / Z ( G ) ∣ . (40) \frac{\prod_i |K_i|}{|G/Z(G)|}. \tag*{(40)} ∣ G / Z ( G ) ∣ ∏ i ∣ K i ∣ . (40)
This recovers (32) since Rep ( G ) a d = Rep ( G / Z ( G ) ) \operatorname{Rep}(G)_{\mathrm{ad}}=\operatorname{Rep}(G/Z(G)) Rep ( G ) ad = Rep ( G / Z ( G )) . Indeed, the common kernel of the representations X ⊗ X ∗ X\otimes X^* X ⊗ X ∗ consists of the elements acting by a scalar on every irreducible representation, precisely Z ( G ) Z(G) Z ( G ) . Theorem 1.1 specializes to the central-Sylow criterion (1) .
In a weakly integral modular category with FPdim ( C ) = p a N \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C})=p^aN FPdim ( C ) = p a N and ( p , N ) = 1 (p,N)=1 ( p , N ) = 1 , Theorem 1.1 and the universal grading dimension formula (5) give
p ∤ FPdim ( X ) 2 for all X ∈ Irr ( C ) ⟺ p a ∣ ∣ U ( C ) ∣ . (41) p\nmid\operatorname{FPdim}(X)^2\text{ for all }X\in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{C})
\quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad
p^a\mid|U(\mathcal{C})|. \tag*{(41)} p ∤ FPdim ( X ) 2 for all X ∈ Irr ( C ) ⟺ p a ∣ ∣ U ( C ) ∣. (41)
The reverse implication, with FPdim ( X ) 2 \operatorname{FPdim}(X)^2 FPdim ( X ) 2 , holds for every weakly integral braided category by [8 Theorem 1.6] . For integral modular categories the equivalence also holds with FPdim ( X ) \operatorname{FPdim}(X) FPdim ( X ) , since an integer and its square have the same prime divisors. Outside the integral case, the forward implication of the unsquared statements in [5 Proposition 1.3] and [8 Corollary 1.7] fails if divisibility is taken in the ring of algebraic integers. To see the distinction, put m = FPdim ( X ) 2 ∈ Z > 0 m=\operatorname{FPdim}(X)^2\in\mathbb{Z}_{>0} m = FPdim ( X ) 2 ∈ Z > 0 . Then FPdim ( X ) / p \operatorname{FPdim}(X)/p FPdim ( X ) / p is an algebraic integer if and only if p 2 ∣ m p^2\mid m p 2 ∣ m . Indeed, its square m / p 2 m/p^2 m / p 2 is rational, so integrality forces m / p 2 ∈ Z m/p^2\in\mathbb{Z} m / p 2 ∈ Z . Conversely, the square root of an integer is an algebraic integer. Thus the two divisibility conditions differ precisely when v p ( m ) = 1 v_p(m)=1 v p ( m ) = 1 . For example, an Ising category has simple dimensions 1 , 1 , 2 1,1,\sqrt{2} 1 , 1 , 2 . Since 2 ∣ 2 2\mid2 2 ∣ 2 but 4 ∤ 2 4\nmid2 4 ∤ 2 , the prime 2 2 2 divides the square of the noninvertible simple’s dimension and divides none of the simple dimensions in the ring of algebraic integers. Yet FPdim ( C ) = 4 \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C})=4 FPdim ( C ) = 4 and ∣ U ( C ) ∣ = 2 |U(\mathcal{C})|=2 ∣ U ( C ) ∣ = 2 . The class belonging to the noninvertible simple has dimension 2 2 2 , as required by (41) .
For modular C \mathcal{C} C , the equivalence Z ( C ) ≃ C ⊠ C r e v \mathcal{Z}(\mathcal{C})\simeq\mathcal{C}\boxtimes\mathcal{C}^{\mathrm{rev}} Z ( C ) ≃ C ⊠ C rev identifies the summands of A \mathcal{A} A with X ⊠ X ∗ X\boxtimes X^* X ⊠ X ∗ . The underlying object is X ⊗ X ∗ X\otimes X^* X ⊗ X ∗ , and μ ( [ X ⊗ X ∗ ] ) = ∣ μ ( [ X ] ) ∣ 2 \mu([X\otimes X^*])=|\mu([X])|^2 μ ([ X ⊗ X ∗ ]) = ∣ μ ([ X ]) ∣ 2 . Duality permutes Irr ( C ) \operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{C}) Irr ( C ) , so in a weakly integral modular category
∏ i [ Y i ] FPdim ( Z i ) = ∏ X ∈ Irr ( C ) [ X ⊠ X ∗ ] FPdim ( X ) 2 = ( ∏ X ∈ Irr ( C ) [ X ] FPdim ( X ) ) 2 = R C a d FPdim ( C a d ) . (42) \begin{aligned}
\prod_i\frac{[Y_i]}{\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i)}
=
\prod_{X\in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{C})}\frac{[X\boxtimes X^*]}{\operatorname{FPdim}(X)^2}
=
\left(\prod_{X\in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{C})}\frac{[X]}{\operatorname{FPdim}(X)}\right)^2 \\
&=\frac{R_{\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}}}}{\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}})}. \tag*{(42)}
\end{aligned} i ∏ FPdim ( Z i ) [ Y i ] = X ∈ Irr ( C ) ∏ FPdim ( X ) 2 [ X ⊠ X ∗ ] = X ∈ Irr ( C ) ∏ FPdim ( X ) [ X ] 2 = FPdim ( C ad ) R C ad . (42)
The last equality follows from [11 Theorem 1.16] . Its Burnside hypothesis holds for every weakly integral modular category. Theorem 3.1 extends this identity to degenerate braidings.
The product in the regular-product identity (32) uses multiplication in the Grothendieck ring. The related identity of [6 Theorem 1.2] uses multiplication of normalized class sums in the algebra of central elements.
Weak integrality matters even in the modular case. In the Fibonacci category, write X ⊗ X ≃ 1 ⊕ X X \otimes X \simeq1 \oplus X X ⊗ X ≃ 1 ⊕ X and φ = FPdim ( X ) = ( 1 + 5 ) / 2 \varphi= \operatorname{FPdim}(X) = (1 + \sqrt{5})/2 φ = FPdim ( X ) = ( 1 + 5 ) /2 . The nontrivial class has underlying object 1 ⊕ X 1 \oplus X 1 ⊕ X . Its two character values are 1 + φ 1 + \varphi 1 + φ and 1 − φ − 1 1 - \varphi^{-1} 1 − φ − 1 , both positive. Here C a d = C \mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}} = \mathcal{C} C ad = C , so the normalized regular element has value zero at the second character by the defining property of the regular element. The normalized product of the underlying classes has positive value there. Thus pseudo-unitarity suffices for Proposition 2.3, while the regular-product identity (32) of Theorem 3.1 can fail beyond weak integrality.
Prime supports, products and gradings
The group case and Deligne products
For a finite group G G G , the conjugacy classes of Rep ( G ) \operatorname{Rep}(G) Rep ( G ) have dimensions ∣ g G ∣ |g^G| ∣ g G ∣ . Thus Δ c l ( Rep ( G ) ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\operatorname{Rep}(G)) Δ cl ( Rep ( G )) is the usual prime graph of conjugacy-class sizes, denoted by Δ ′ ( G ) \Delta'(G) Δ ′ ( G ) in [36 ] . The character-degree graph uses the dimensions of the irreducible representations of G G G .
Theorem 4.1 (Classical finite-group results). Let G G G be a finite group and let Rep ( G ) \operatorname{Rep}(G) Rep ( G ) be its category of finite-dimensional complex representations with the usual symmetric braiding. Its class graph Δ c l ( Rep ( G ) ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\operatorname{Rep}(G)) Δ cl ( Rep ( G )) has at most two connected components. It has two components precisely when G / Z ( G ) G/Z(G) G / Z ( G ) is a Frobenius group and the inverse images in G G G of its kernel and complement are abelian. Both components are then complete. A connected class graph has diameter at most three. If G G G is nonsolvable, it is connected and has diameter at most two.
For the graph on primes, all four assertions appear together in [36 Theorem 2.5] . The component bound also follows from the bound for the graph on noncentral classes in [3 ] by prime–class incidence. For the characterization of disconnectedness and the diameter results on the graph on primes, see [1 , 14 ] . For example, the nonsolvable group A 5 A_5 A 5 has class sizes 1 , 12 , 12 , 15 , 20 1, 12, 12, 15, 20 1 , 12 , 12 , 15 , 20 , and its class graph is complete on { 2 , 3 , 5 } \{2, 3, 5\} { 2 , 3 , 5 } .
Remark 4.2 (Absent primes and possible extensions). A prime dividing ∣ G ∣ |G| ∣ G ∣ is absent from the class graph exactly when its Sylow subgroup is central [36 Remark 2.4] . The categorical analogue is Theorem 1.1, and the corresponding two-component bound is Theorem 7.11. The completeness of the two components and the existence of a uniform diameter bound for connected graphs remain open for general braided fusion categories.
Proposition 4.3 (Deligne products). Let C \mathcal{C} C and D \mathcal{D} D be weakly integral braided fusion categories over C \mathbb{C} C , and equip C ⊠ D \mathcal{C} \boxtimes\mathcal{D} C ⊠ D with its product braiding. Its class dimensions are precisely the products FPdim ( Z i C ) FPdim ( Z j D ) \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i^{\mathcal{C}})\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_j^{\mathcal{D}}) FPdim ( Z i C ) FPdim ( Z j D ) , with the corresponding class objects indexed by pairs ( i , j ) (i,j) ( i , j ) . A pointed factor does not change the class graph. If both factors are non-pointed, the class graph of their product is connected and has diameter at most two.
Proof. The center, forgetful functor, and induction of the unit factor over a Deligne product. This gives the assertion on class dimensions. A braided pointed category has all its class dimensions equal to one. Conversely, if every class dimension of a weakly integral braided category equals one, then FPdim ( C ) = rank ( C ) \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}) = \operatorname{rank}(\mathcal{C}) FPdim ( C ) = rank ( C ) , so every simple object is invertible.
Write P P P and Q Q Q for the nonempty sets of class primes of the two non-pointed factors. Any distinct p ∈ P p \in P p ∈ P and q ∈ Q q \in Q q ∈ Q are adjacent in the product graph. Two primes lying in the same factor can be joined through any prime of the other factor; if that prime equals an endpoint, the path has length one. This proves the diameter assertion even when P P P and Q Q Q overlap. □ \square □
Proposition 4.4 (Braided nilpotent categories). Let C \mathcal{C} C be a nilpotent braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C . Such a category is weakly integral. Its class graph is complete. More precisely, a single class dimension is divisible by every vertex of the graph.
Proof. Use the Sylow decomposition for braided nilpotent categories, C ≃ ⊠ p C p \mathcal{C} \simeq\boxtimes_p \mathcal{C}_p C ≃ ⊠ p C p , where FPdim ( C p ) \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}_p) FPdim ( C p ) is a power of p p p ; see [19 Theorem 1.1] . Every integral class dimension of C p \mathcal{C}_p C p divides FPdim ( C p ) \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}_p) FPdim ( C p ) : its quotient is a formal codegree, hence a rational algebraic integer. Thus the nontrivial class dimensions of C p \mathcal{C}_p C p are powers of p p p . For each p p p which occurs as a vertex choose a nontrivial class in C p \mathcal{C}_p C p , and choose the unit class in all remaining factors. The product class supplied by Proposition 4.3 has all the required prime divisors.
Class dimensions under equivariantization and grading
In an equivariantization, the acting group permutes characters of the category being equivariantized. In a grading, the dual of the grading group acts on characters of the graded category by degree twists.
Lemma 4.5 (The identity fiber of an equivariantization). Let G G G be a finite group with a categorical action by braided tensor autoequivalences on a weakly integral braided fusion category D \mathcal{D} D over C \mathbb{C} C . Equip the equivariantization C = D G \mathcal{C} = \mathcal{D}^G C = D G with its induced braiding. Let F : C → D F:\mathcal{C} \to\mathcal{D} F : C → D be the forgetful functor and F ∗ F_* F ∗ the induced map of complexified Grothendieck rings. For an algebra character ν \nu ν of K ( D ) K(\mathcal{D}) K ( D ) put μ = ν ∘ F ∗ \mu= \nu\circ F_* μ = ν ∘ F ∗ , write f ν f_\nu f ν and f μ f_\mu f μ for their respective formal codegrees, and let G ν G_\nu G ν be the stabilizer of ν \nu ν under the action
( g ⋅ ν ) ( [ X ] ) = ν ( [ g − 1 ( X ) ] ) . (43) (g \cdot\nu)([X]) = \nu([g^{-1}(X)]). \tag*{(43)} ( g ⋅ ν ) ([ X ]) = ν ([ g − 1 ( X )]) . (43) Then
f μ = ∣ G ν ∣ f ν , FPdim ( Z μ C ) = [ G : G ν ] FPdim ( Z ν D ) . (44) f_\mu= |G_\nu|f_\nu,\qquad\operatorname{FPdim}(Z^C_\mu) = [G:G_\nu]\operatorname{FPdim}(Z^D_\nu). \tag*{(44)} f μ = ∣ G ν ∣ f ν , FPdim ( Z μ C ) = [ G : G ν ] FPdim ( Z ν D ) . (44) The resulting characters μ \mu μ are indexed by G G G -orbits of characters of K ( D ) K(\mathcal{D}) K ( D ) . They exhaust the restriction fiber over the dimension character of the canonical subcategory Rep ( G ) ⊆ C \operatorname{Rep}(G) \subseteq\mathcal{C} Rep ( G ) ⊆ C .
Proof. We work with complexified Grothendieck algebras. Their characters satisfy the orthogonality relations (10) , and f ν = ∑ X ∈ Irr ( D ) ∣ ν ( [ X ] ) ∣ 2 f_\nu= \sum_{X\in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{D})}|\nu([X])|^2 f ν = ∑ X ∈ Irr ( D ) ∣ ν ([ X ]) ∣ 2 . The simple objects of an equivariantization are indexed by an orbit of X ∈ Irr ( D ) X \in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{D}) X ∈ Irr ( D ) and an irreducible projective representation π \pi π of the inertia group G X G_X G X . Their forgetful images are
F ( S X , π ) = dim ( π ) ⨁ Y ∈ G ⋅ X Y , ∑ π dim ( π ) 2 = ∣ G X ∣ ; (45) F(S_{X,\pi}) = \dim(\pi)\bigoplus_{Y\in G\cdot X}Y,\qquad\sum_\pi\dim(\pi)^2 = |G_X|; \tag*{(45)} F ( S X , π ) = dim ( π ) Y ∈ G ⋅ X ⨁ Y , π ∑ dim ( π ) 2 = ∣ G X ∣ ; (45)
see [10 Corollary 2.13] . Therefore
f μ = ∑ G ⋅ X ∣ G X ∣ ∣ ∑ Y ∈ G ⋅ X ν ( [ Y ] ) ∣ 2 (46) f_\mu= \sum_{G\cdot X}|G_X|\left|\sum_{Y\in G\cdot X}\nu([Y])\right|^2 \tag*{(46)} f μ = G ⋅ X ∑ ∣ G X ∣ Y ∈ G ⋅ X ∑ ν ([ Y ]) 2 (46)
= 1 ∣ G ∣ ∑ X ∈ Irr ( D ) ∣ ∑ g ∈ G ν ( [ g ( X ) ] ) ∣ 2 = ∣ G ν ∣ f ν . (47) = \frac{1}{|G|}\sum_{X\in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{D})}\left|\sum_{g\in G}\nu([g(X)])\right|^2 = |G_\nu|f_\nu. \tag*{(47)} = ∣ G ∣ 1 X ∈ Irr ( D ) ∑ g ∈ G ∑ ν ([ g ( X )]) 2 = ∣ G ν ∣ f ν . (47)
For the last equality, expand the square and use character orthogonality (10) . Then the pair ( g , h ) (g,h) ( g , h ) contributes precisely when the two corresponding translates of ν \nu ν coincide. Since FPdim ( C ) = ∣ G ∣ FPdim ( D ) \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}) = |G|\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{D}) FPdim ( C ) = ∣ G ∣ FPdim ( D ) , the formal-codegree formula (8) gives the class dimension in (44) .
The image of K ( C ) → K ( D ) K(\mathcal{C}) \to K(\mathcal{D}) K ( C ) → K ( D ) is K ( D ) G K(\mathcal{D})^G K ( D ) G : it contains every orbit sum, by the forgetful-image formula (45) . Characters of this invariant algebra correspond to G G G -orbits of characters of K ( D ) K(\mathcal{D}) K ( D ) . All the resulting μ \mu μ restrict to the dimension character of Rep ( G ) \operatorname{Rep}(G) Rep ( G ) . Their class dimensions sum to
∑ G ⋅ ν [ G : G ν ] FPdim ( Z ν D ) = ∑ ν FPdim ( Z ν D ) = FPdim ( D ) . (48) \sum_{G\cdot\nu} [G:G_{\nu}] \operatorname{FPdim}(Z^{\mathcal{D}}_{\nu}) = \sum_{\nu} \operatorname{FPdim}(Z^{\mathcal{D}}_{\nu}) = \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{D}). \tag*{(48)} G ⋅ ν ∑ [ G : G ν ] FPdim ( Z ν D ) = ν ∑ FPdim ( Z ν D ) = FPdim ( D ) . (48)
The class-fiber identity (18) of Proposition 2.4 gives this same sum for the entire restriction fiber. Positivity of class dimensions proves exhaustion.
Lemma 4.6 (A faithful abelian grading). Let C \mathcal{C} C be a weakly integral braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C with a faithful grading C = ⨁ a ∈ A C a \mathcal{C} = \bigoplus_{a\in A} \mathcal{C}_a C = ⨁ a ∈ A C a by a finite abelian group A A A . Equip the neutral component B = C e \mathcal{B} = \mathcal{C}_e B = C e with the inherited braiding. The character group A ^ = Hom ( A , C × ) \widehat{A} = \operatorname{Hom}(A,\mathbb{C}^{\times}) A = Hom ( A , C × ) acts on the characters of K ( C ) K(\mathcal{C}) K ( C ) by
( χ ⋅ μ ) ( [ X ] ) = χ ( a ) μ ( [ X ] ) , X ∈ Irr ( C a ) . (49) (\chi\cdot\mu)([X]) = \chi(a)\mu([X]), \qquad X \in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{C}_a). \tag*{(49)} ( χ ⋅ μ ) ([ X ]) = χ ( a ) μ ([ X ]) , X ∈ Irr ( C a ) . (49) For every character μ \mu μ ,
FPdim ( Z μ C ) = ∣ Stab A ^ ( μ ) ∣ FPdim ( Z μ ∣ B B ) . (50) \operatorname{FPdim}(Z^{\mathcal{C}}_{\mu}) = |\operatorname{Stab}_{\widehat{A}}(\mu)|\operatorname{FPdim}(Z^{\mathcal{B}}_{\mu|_{\mathcal{B}}}). \tag*{(50)} FPdim ( Z μ C ) = ∣ Stab A ( μ ) ∣ FPdim ( Z μ ∣ B B ) . (50) The restriction fibers are exactly the A ^ \widehat{A} A -orbits.
Proof. Multiplication of homogeneous classes adds their degrees, so degree twisting is an algebra automorphism and carries algebra characters to algebra characters. Its invariant algebra is precisely K ( B ) K(\mathcal{B}) K ( B ) . For a finite-dimensional commutative semisimple algebra, the characters of the invariant algebra identify with the orbits on the character set. This proves the statement about fibers.
Formal codegrees are constant on such an orbit, since ∣ χ ( a ) ∣ = 1 |\chi(a)| = 1 ∣ χ ( a ) ∣ = 1 . Put ν = μ ∣ B \nu= \mu|_{\mathcal{B}} ν = μ ∣ B . The order of the stabilizer is ∣ Stab A ^ ( μ ) ∣ |\operatorname{Stab}_{\widehat{A}}(\mu)| ∣ Stab A ( μ ) ∣ . The fiber has ∣ A ∣ / ∣ Stab A ^ ( μ ) ∣ |A|/|\operatorname{Stab}_{\widehat{A}}(\mu)| ∣ A ∣/∣ Stab A ( μ ) ∣ elements, all of the same class dimension. Faithfulness gives FPdim ( C ) = ∣ A ∣ FPdim ( B ) \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}) = |A|\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{B}) FPdim ( C ) = ∣ A ∣ FPdim ( B ) , so the class-fiber identity (18) of Proposition 2.4 reads
∣ A ∣ ∣ Stab A ^ ( μ ) ∣ FPdim ( Z μ C ) = ∣ A ∣ FPdim ( Z ν B ) . (51) \frac{|A|}{|\operatorname{Stab}_{\widehat{A}}(\mu)|}\operatorname{FPdim}(Z^{\mathcal{C}}_{\mu}) = |A|\operatorname{FPdim}(Z^{\mathcal{B}}_{\nu}). \tag*{(51)} ∣ Stab A ( μ ) ∣ ∣ A ∣ FPdim ( Z μ C ) = ∣ A ∣ FPdim ( Z ν B ) . (51)
Cancelling ∣ A ∣ |A| ∣ A ∣ proves the formula.
Example 4.7 (The grading group and its dual in the Ising example). For an Ising category,
C e = ⟨ 1 , ψ ⟩ , C a = ⟨ σ ⟩ , A = Z / 2 Z . (52) \mathcal{C}_e = \langle1,\psi\rangle,\qquad\mathcal{C}_a = \langle\sigma\rangle,\qquad A = \mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}. \tag*{(52)} C e = ⟨ 1 , ψ ⟩ , C a = ⟨ σ ⟩ , A = Z /2 Z . (52) The nontrivial element of A ^ \widehat{A} A changes the sign of μ ( σ ) \mu(\sigma) μ ( σ ) and fixes μ ( ψ ) \mu(\psi) μ ( ψ ) . It exchanges the two characters with values μ ( σ ) = ± 2 \mu(\sigma) = \pm\sqrt{2} μ ( σ ) = ± 2 , whose class dimensions are one, and fixes the character with μ ( σ ) = 0 \mu(\sigma) = 0 μ ( σ ) = 0 , whose class dimension is two. All class dimensions of the neutral pointed category are one. This realizes both stabilizer sizes in the grading formula (50) of Lemma 4.6.
Corollary 4.8 (The odd-prime part of the weakly integral problem). Let C \mathcal{C} C be a weakly integral braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C . Let C i n t \mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{int}} C int be the full fusion subcategory generated by the simple objects of integer Frobenius–Perron dimension, equipped with the inherited braiding. Then
Δ c l ( C ) ∖ { 2 } = Δ c l ( C i n t ) ∖ { 2 } (53) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{C}) \setminus\{2\} = \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{int}}) \setminus\{2\} \tag*{(53)} Δ cl ( C ) ∖ { 2 } = Δ cl ( C int ) ∖ { 2 } (53) as induced graphs. Every edge of the latter category’s full class graph also persists in the graph of C \mathcal{C} C . If Δ c l ( C ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{C}) Δ cl ( C ) has more components than Δ c l ( C i n t ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{int}}) Δ cl ( C int ) , then 2 2 2 is a new isolated vertex and the number of components increases by one.
Proof. The canonical dimension grading of a weakly integral category has elementary abelian 2 2 2 -group A A A and neutral component C i n t \mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{int}} C int ; see [27 ] . Thus the grading formula (50) of Lemma 4.6 gives
FPdim ( Z μ C ) = 2 e ( μ ) FPdim ( Z μ ∣ C i n t C i n t ) . (54) \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{Z}^{\mathcal{C}}_{\mu})=2^{e(\mu)}\operatorname{FPdim}\left(\mathcal{Z}^{\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{int}}}_{\mu|_{\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{int}}}}\right). \tag*{(54)} FPdim ( Z μ C ) = 2 e ( μ ) FPdim ( Z μ ∣ C int C int ) . (54)
Every character of the neutral component occurs as a restriction. Hence the odd prime supports, and the simultaneous occurrence of pairs of odd primes, agree in the two categories. Equation (54) also preserves all old edges. Only the vertex 2 2 2 can be newly introduced, proving the final assertion.
Remark 4.9 (The vertex 2 and the integral subcategory). When 2 is absent from the class graph of C i n t \mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{int}} C int , the class Itô–Michler splitting (2) of Theorem 1.1 gives
C i n t ≃ P 2 ⊠ E , P 2 pointed of 2-power dimension , FPdim ( E ) odd . (55) \mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{int}}\simeq\mathcal{P}_2\boxtimes\mathcal{E},\qquad\mathcal{P}_2\text{ pointed of 2-power dimension},\qquad\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{E})\text{ odd}. \tag*{(55)} C int ≃ P 2 ⊠ E , P 2 pointed of 2-power dimension , FPdim ( E ) odd . (55)
If the integral part has two components supported on odd primes and 2 occurs in Δ c l ( C ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{C}) Δ cl ( C ) , Theorem 7.11 forces 2 to have an odd neighbor. Thus some even class dimension of C \mathcal{C} C has an odd prime divisor.
Prime-power class dimensions and solvability
Theorem 4.10 (Prime-power conjugacy-class dimensions). Let C \mathcal{C} C be a weakly integral braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C . Suppose that the Frobenius–Perron dimension of each conjugacy-class object of C \mathcal{C} C is either one or a power of a prime, where the prime may depend on the class. Then C \mathcal{C} C is solvable.
Proof. We argue by induction on FPdim ( C ) \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}) FPdim ( C ) . Suppose first that every Tannakian subcategory of C \mathcal{C} C is pointed. Then Theorem 5.16 gives at most two connected components.
The prime-power hypothesis makes the graph discrete, so its vertex set has at most two elements. Split off all absent primes by the class Itô–Michler splitting (2) of Theorem 1.1. The remaining braided factor has dimension p a q b p^a q^b p a q b , allowing either exponent to be zero, and is solvable by the categorical Burnside theorem [24 Theorem 1.6] . The split-off braided pointed factor is solvable as well.
Otherwise choose a non-pointed Tannakian subcategory Rep ( G ) ⊆ C \operatorname{Rep}(G)\subseteq\mathcal{C} Rep ( G ) ⊆ C . By Proposition 2.4, each character of K ( Rep ( G ) ) K(\operatorname{Rep}(G)) K ( Rep ( G )) extends to K ( C ) K(\mathcal{C}) K ( C ) . Tannakian restriction (Proposition 2.8) then gives the divisibility (23) for every conjugacy-class size of G G G . Every nontrivial class size of G G G is therefore a prime power. Its class graph is discrete and has at most two vertices by Theorem 4.1. Primes absent from that graph have central Sylow subgroups. Splitting off those central factors reduces G G G to a group of order p a q b p^a q^b p a q b , so G G G is solvable by Burnside’s theorem.
Let B = ( Rep ( G ) ) C ′ \mathcal{B}=(\operatorname{Rep}(G))'_{\mathcal{C}} B = ( Rep ( G ) ) C ′ and let T = C G \mathcal{T}=\mathcal{C}_G T = C G be the de-equivariantization. Its neutral component T e \mathcal{T}_e T e is braided and
B ≃ ( T e ) G . (56) \mathcal{B}\simeq(\mathcal{T}_e)^G. \tag*{(56)} B ≃ ( T e ) G . (56)
The category T e \mathcal{T}_e T e is weakly integral, and the induced G G G -action on it is braided. By Theorem 2.6, every class dimension of B \mathcal{B} B divides a class dimension of C \mathcal{C} C , so B \mathcal{B} B retains the prime-power property. By the identity-fiber formula (44) of Lemma 4.5, every class dimension of T e \mathcal{T}_e T e divides a class dimension of B \mathcal{B} B . Hence T e \mathcal{T}_e T e has the same property and is solvable by induction, since
FPdim ( T e ) = FPdim ( B ) ∣ G ∣ < FPdim ( C ) . (57) \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{T}_e)=\frac{\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{B})}{|G|}<\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}). \tag*{(57)} FPdim ( T e ) = ∣ G ∣ FPdim ( B ) < FPdim ( C ) . (57)
The faithful support of the crossed grading of T \mathcal{T} T is a subgroup of the solvable group G G G . Therefore T \mathcal{T} T is a solvable-group extension of the solvable category T e \mathcal{T}_e T e , and C ≃ T G \mathcal{C}\simeq\mathcal{T}^G C ≃ T G is solvable as well. Here we use closure of solvable fusion categories under extensions and equivariantizations by solvable finite groups [24 ] .
The general component bound of Theorem 7.11 gives another proof of Theorem 4.10 . The prime-power hypothesis makes the graph discrete, so at most two primes occur. The assertion then follows from Corollary 3.3(i) on prime supports.
Remark 4.11 (Comparison with simple-object dimensions). If the Frobenius–Perron dimension of every simple object is one or a prime power, [36 Theorem 1.3] gives weak group-theoreticity. It gives solvability if at most two primes occur or every prime that occurs exceeds seven. Here the prime-power assumption concerns conjugacy-class dimensions. For integral modular categories the two prime-power hypotheses agree, since the class dimensions are exactly the squares of the simple dimensions. Outside the modular case the dimensions may have different prime supports.
Coprime class dimensions and Tannakian subcategories
Cross-component vanishing and the regular-object identity
Write A = I C ( 1 ) \mathcal{A} = I_C(1) A = I C ( 1 ) , Z i ≺ A Z_i \prec\mathcal{A} Z i ≺ A , Y i = F ( Z i ) Y_i = F(Z_i) Y i = F ( Z i ) . All characters below are algebra characters of the complexified Grothendieck ring. The proposed vanishing statement is
μ i ( Y j ) = 0 if FPdim ( Z i ) , FPdim ( Z j ) > 1 belong to different components of Δ c l ( C ) . (58) \mu_i(Y_j) = 0 \quad\text{if } \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i), \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_j) > 1 \text{ belong to different components of } \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{C}). \tag*{(58)} μ i ( Y j ) = 0 if FPdim ( Z i ) , FPdim ( Z j ) > 1 belong to different components of Δ cl ( C ) . (58)
The prime divisors of each nontrivial class dimension lie in a unique component. Whether (58) holds for every weakly integral braided fusion category is Problem 9.1.
Proposition 5.1 (A sufficient vanishing criterion). Let C \mathcal{C} C be a weakly integral braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C . Let Z i ∈ Z ( C ) Z_i \in\mathcal{Z}(\mathcal{C}) Z i ∈ Z ( C ) be its class objects, Y i Y_i Y i their forgetful images, and μ i \mu_i μ i the corresponding algebra characters of K ( C ) K(\mathcal{C}) K ( C ) . Suppose that μ i ( Y j ) = 0 \mu_i(Y_j) = 0 μ i ( Y j ) = 0 whenever FPdim ( Z i ) , FPdim ( Z j ) > 1 \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i), \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_j) > 1 FPdim ( Z i ) , FPdim ( Z j ) > 1 have prime supports in distinct connected components of Δ c l ( C ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{C}) Δ cl ( C ) , as in (58) . Then Δ c l ( C ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{C}) Δ cl ( C ) has at most two connected components. More precisely, for every such pair,
[ Y i ] [ Y j ] = FPdim ( Z i ) FPdim ( Z j ) FPdim ( C a d ) R C a d , R C a d = ∑ X ∈ Irr ( C a d ) FPdim ( X ) [ X ] . (59) [Y_i][Y_j] = \frac{\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i)\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_j)}{\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}})}R_{\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}}}, \qquad R_{\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}}} = \sum_{X \in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}})} \operatorname{FPdim}(X)[X]. \tag*{(59)} [ Y i ] [ Y j ] = FPdim ( C ad ) FPdim ( Z i ) FPdim ( Z j ) R C ad , R C ad = X ∈ Irr ( C ad ) ∑ FPdim ( X ) [ X ] . (59) In particular FPdim ( C a d ) ∣ FPdim ( Z i ) FPdim ( Z j ) \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}}) \mid\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i)\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_j) FPdim ( C ad ) ∣ FPdim ( Z i ) FPdim ( Z j ) .
Proof. As shown in the proof of Theorem 3.1 , the class-size-one characters are exactly the characters whose restriction to K ( C a d ) K(\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}}) K ( C ad ) is FPdim \operatorname{FPdim} FPdim . Consequently
μ s ( R C a d ) = { FPdim ( C a d ) , FPdim ( Z s ) = 1 , 0 , FPdim ( Z s ) > 1. (60) \mu_s(R_{\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}}}) =
\begin{cases}
\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}}), & \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_s) = 1,\\
0, & \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_s) > 1.
\end{cases} \tag*{(60)} μ s ( R C ad ) = { FPdim ( C ad ) , 0 , FPdim ( Z s ) = 1 , FPdim ( Z s ) > 1. (60)
If FPdim ( Z s ) = 1 \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_s) = 1 FPdim ( Z s ) = 1 , then Y i , Y j ∈ C a d Y_i,Y_j \in\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}} Y i , Y j ∈ C ad give μ s ( Y i Y j ) = FPdim ( Z i ) FPdim ( Z j ) \mu_s(Y_iY_j) = \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i)\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_j) μ s ( Y i Y j ) = FPdim ( Z i ) FPdim ( Z j ) . If FPdim ( Z s ) > 1 \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_s) > 1 FPdim ( Z s ) > 1 , its component is different from at least one of the components of FPdim ( Z i ) , FPdim ( Z j ) \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i),\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_j) FPdim ( Z i ) , FPdim ( Z j ) , so the assumed vanishing gives μ s ( Y i Y j ) = 0 \mu_s(Y_iY_j) = 0 μ s ( Y i Y j ) = 0 . Thus both sides of (59) have the same value under every character. The complexified Grothendieck algebra is commutative semisimple, so its characters separate its elements. This proves the equality.
The coefficient of 1 1 1 on the right is FPdim ( Z i ) FPdim ( Z j ) / FPdim ( C a d ) \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i)\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_j)/\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}}) FPdim ( Z i ) FPdim ( Z j ) / FPdim ( C ad ) , whereas the corresponding coefficient on the left is an integer. Hence FPdim ( C a d ) ∣ FPdim ( Z i ) FPdim ( Z j ) \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}}) \mid\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i)\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_j) FPdim ( C ad ) ∣ FPdim ( Z i ) FPdim ( Z j ) . If three components existed, choose class objects Z a , Z b , Z c Z_a,Z_b,Z_c Z a , Z b , Z c whose nontrivial dimensions lie in the three components. These dimensions are pairwise coprime, and the preceding divisibility shows that FPdim ( C a d ) \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}}) FPdim ( C ad ) divides each of FPdim ( Z a ) FPdim ( Z b ) \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_a)\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_b) FPdim ( Z a ) FPdim ( Z b ) , FPdim ( Z a ) FPdim ( Z c ) \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_a)\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_c) FPdim ( Z a ) FPdim ( Z c ) , and FPdim ( Z b ) FPdim ( Z c ) \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_b)\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_c) FPdim ( Z b ) FPdim ( Z c ) . Hence FPdim ( C a d ) = 1 \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}}) = 1 FPdim ( C ad ) = 1 . This makes C \mathcal{C} C pointed, contradicting the existence of these nontrivial class dimensions. ∎
Lemma 5.2 (The coprime dichotomy). Let C C C be a weakly integral braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C . Let Z i , Z j Z_i, Z_j Z i , Z j be class objects in Z ( C ) Z(C) Z ( C ) , let μ i \mu_i μ i be the algebra character of K ( C ) K(C) K ( C ) corresponding to Z i Z_i Z i , and let Y j Y_j Y j be the forgetful image of Z j Z_j Z j . If gcd ( FPdim ( Z i ) , FPdim ( Z j ) ) = 1 \gcd(\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i),\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_j))=1 g cd( FPdim ( Z i ) , FPdim ( Z j )) = 1 , then
μ i ( Y j ) ∈ { 0 , FPdim ( Z j ) } . (61) \mu_i(Y_j) \in\{0,\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_j)\}. \tag*{(61)} μ i ( Y j ) ∈ { 0 , FPdim ( Z j )} . (61) The second alternative is equivalent to Z i Z_i Z i and Z j Z_j Z j centralizing each other in Z ( C ) Z(C) Z ( C ) .
Proof. Use the unnormalized S S S -matrix of Z ( C ) Z(C) Z ( C ) . The class-row identity (16) and positivity (15) from Proposition 2.3 give
S Z i , Z j = FPdim ( Z i ) μ i ( Y j ) ≥ 0. (62) S_{Z_i,Z_j}=\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i)\mu_i(Y_j)\ge0. \tag*{(62)} S Z i , Z j = FPdim ( Z i ) μ i ( Y j ) ≥ 0. (62)
Both S Z i , Z j / FPdim ( Z i ) S_{Z_i,Z_j}/\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i) S Z i , Z j / FPdim ( Z i ) and S Z i , Z j / FPdim ( Z j ) S_{Z_i,Z_j}/\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_j) S Z i , Z j / FPdim ( Z j ) are algebraic integers. Bezout’s identity therefore shows that α = S Z i , Z j / ( FPdim ( Z i ) FPdim ( Z j ) ) \alpha=S_{Z_i,Z_j}/(\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i)\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_j)) α = S Z i , Z j / ( FPdim ( Z i ) FPdim ( Z j )) is an algebraic integer. The objects Z i , Z j Z_i,Z_j Z i , Z j are integral, so every constituent of their tensor product is integral. Their twists are one, so the balancing formula (28) expresses α \alpha α as
α = 1 FPdim ( Z i ) FPdim ( Z j ) ∑ W N Z i , Z j W FPdim ( W ) θ W . (63) \alpha=\frac{1}{\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i)\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_j)}\sum_W N_{Z_i,Z_j}^{W}\operatorname{FPdim}(W)\theta_W. \tag*{(63)} α = FPdim ( Z i ) FPdim ( Z j ) 1 W ∑ N Z i , Z j W FPdim ( W ) θ W . (63)
The coefficients are nonnegative integers with total FPdim ( Z i ) FPdim ( Z j ) \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i)\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_j) FPdim ( Z i ) FPdim ( Z j ) . Since twists are roots of unity, every Galois conjugate of α \alpha α has absolute value at most one. Kronecker’s theorem implies that α \alpha α is zero or a root of unity. Its nonnegative real value leaves only zero or one. In the latter case equality in the pseudo-unitary S S S -matrix bound is precisely the centralization criterion.
The common Tannakian category and additional summands
For a centralizing pair of class objects of coprime dimensions, the common constituents of their adjoint products determine a Tannakian subcategory. The construction applies for every value of dim Hom ( Z i Z j , A ) \dim\operatorname{Hom}(Z_iZ_j,\mathcal{A}) dim Hom ( Z i Z j , A ) .
Proposition 5.3 (The common Tannakian category and its image). Let C C C be a weakly integral braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C . Let F : Z ( C ) → C F:Z(C)\to C F : Z ( C ) → C be the forgetful functor, and let Z i , Z j ∈ Z ( C ) Z_i,Z_j\in Z(C) Z i , Z j ∈ Z ( C ) be conjugacy-class objects that centralize each other in Z ( C ) Z(C) Z ( C ) and have coprime Frobenius–Perron dimensions. Put Y i = F ( Z i ) Y_i=F(Z_i) Y i = F ( Z i ) and Y j = F ( Z j ) Y_j=F(Z_j) Y j = F ( Z j ) . In Z ( C ) Z(C) Z ( C ) set
D i = ⟨ Z i Z i ∗ ⟩ , D j = ⟨ Z j Z j ∗ ⟩ , (64) \mathcal{D}_i=\langle Z_iZ_i^*\rangle,\qquad\mathcal{D}_j=\langle Z_jZ_j^*\rangle, \tag*{(64)} D i = ⟨ Z i Z i ∗ ⟩ , D j = ⟨ Z j Z j ∗ ⟩ , (64) and let E \mathcal{E} E be generated by all simple objects occurring in both Z i Z i ∗ Z_iZ_i^* Z i Z i ∗ and Z j Z j ∗ Z_jZ_j^* Z j Z j ∗ . Then E \mathcal{E} E is Tannakian. The full fusion subcategory K = F ( E ) \mathcal{K}=F(\mathcal{E}) K = F ( E ) generated by its forgetful image is Tannakian in C C C for the inherited braiding. The restriction F ∣ E F|_{\mathcal{E}} F ∣ E is braided, and E \mathcal{E} E centralizes the canonical lift K + \mathcal{K}^+ K + through the given braiding of C C C .
If Z i Z j Z_iZ_j Z i Z j is reducible, then E \mathcal{E} E is non-pointed. If, in addition, every Tannakian subcategory of C C C is pointed, then
⟨ Y i , Y j ⟩ ⊊ C . (65) \langle Y_i,Y_j\rangle\subsetneq C. \tag*{(65)} ⟨ Y i , Y j ⟩ ⊊ C . (65) In this case E \mathcal{E} E fails to centralize X + X^+ X + for some simple X ∉ ⟨ Y i , Y j ⟩ X\notin\langle Y_i,Y_j\rangle X ∈ / ⟨ Y i , Y j ⟩ .
Proof. The categories D i , D j \mathcal{D}_i,\mathcal{D}_j D i , D j centralize one another. A common simple constituent U U U belongs to D j \mathcal{D}_j D j , so it centralizes Z i Z_i Z i ; also Hom ( U Z i , Z i ) ≠ 0 \operatorname{Hom}(UZ_i,Z_i)\ne0 Hom ( U Z i , Z i ) = 0 . The balancing identity (28) then gives θ U = 1 \theta_U=1 θ U = 1 . The category generated by these objects is symmetric, being contained in D i ∩ D j \mathcal{D}_i\cap\mathcal{D}_j D i ∩ D j , and its generating objects have twist one. Thus it is Tannakian. Set L i = ⟨ Y i ⟩ \mathcal{L}_i=\langle Y_i\rangle L i = ⟨ Y i ⟩ and L j = ⟨ Y j ⟩ \mathcal{L}_j=\langle Y_j\rangle L j = ⟨ Y j ⟩ . The internal-end identity (13) of Proposition 2.2 , written as
[ Y i : X ] = dim Hom ( X + ⊗ Z i , Z i ) , (66) [Y_i:X]=\dim\operatorname{Hom}(X^+\otimes Z_i,Z_i), \tag*{(66)} [ Y i : X ] = dim Hom ( X + ⊗ Z i , Z i ) , (66)
implies L i + ⊆ D i \mathcal{L}_i^+\subseteq\mathcal{D}_i L i + ⊆ D i , and similarly for j j j . Therefore L i \mathcal{L}_i L i and L j \mathcal{L}_j L j centralize. Moreover K ⊆ L i ∩ L j \mathcal{K}\subseteq\mathcal{L}_i\cap\mathcal{L}_j K ⊆ L i ∩ L j , so K \mathcal{K} K is symmetric. Since E ⊆ D i \mathcal{E}\subseteq\mathcal{D}_i E ⊆ D i and K + ⊆ L j + ⊆ D j \mathcal{K}^+\subseteq\mathcal{L}_j^+\subseteq\mathcal{D}_j K + ⊆ L j + ⊆ D j , the category E \mathcal{E} E centralizes K + \mathcal{K}^+ K + . For U , V ∈ E U,V\in\mathcal{E} U , V ∈ E , this gives
F ( c U , V Z ( C ) ) = ( c F ( V ) , F ( U ) C ) − 1 = c F ( U ) , F ( V ) C , (67) F(c^{Z(\mathcal{C})}_{U,V})=(c^{\mathcal{C}}_{F(V),F(U)})^{-1}=c^{\mathcal{C}}_{F(U),F(V)}, \tag*{(67)} F ( c U , V Z ( C ) ) = ( c F ( V ) , F ( U ) C ) − 1 = c F ( U ) , F ( V ) C , (67)
the last equality using symmetry of K \mathcal{K} K . Consequently the dominant functor F ∣ E : E → K F|_{\mathcal{E}}:\mathcal{E}\to\mathcal{K} F ∣ E : E → K is braided, and K \mathcal{K} K is Tannakian.
Rigidity gives
dim End ( Z i Z j ) = dim Hom ( Z i Z i ∗ , Z j Z j ∗ ) . (68) \dim\operatorname{End}(Z_iZ_j)=\dim\operatorname{Hom}(Z_iZ_i^*,Z_jZ_j^*). \tag*{(68)} dim End ( Z i Z j ) = dim Hom ( Z i Z i ∗ , Z j Z j ∗ ) . (68)
If the product is reducible, these two internal-end objects have a common nontrivial constituent. A common invertible constituent stabilizes both Z i Z_i Z i and Z j Z_j Z j . Each stabilizer has order dividing the corresponding squared dimension by [36 Remark 9.4] . Since these squares are coprime, the stabilizers intersect trivially. This is the stabilizer argument used in the simplicity criterion of [36 Lemma 9.3] . Hence a noninvertible common constituent exists, and E \mathcal{E} E is non-pointed.
Under the additional hypothesis, K \mathcal{K} K is pointed. If ⟨ Y i , Y j ⟩ = C \langle Y_i,Y_j\rangle=\mathcal{C} ⟨ Y i , Y j ⟩ = C , then E \mathcal{E} E centralizes C + \mathcal{C}^+ C + and therefore lies in ( C + ) ′ = C − (\mathcal{C}^+)'=\mathcal{C}^- ( C + ) ′ = C − . The functor F F F is fully faithful on C − \mathcal{C}^- C − ; it would identify the non-pointed E \mathcal{E} E with the pointed K \mathcal{K} K , a contradiction. The same argument shows that some simple object outside ⟨ Y i , Y j ⟩ \langle Y_i,Y_j\rangle ⟨ Y i , Y j ⟩ detects E \mathcal{E} E by monodromy.
Proposition 5.4 (A sufficient condition for cross-component vanishing). Let C \mathcal{C} C be a weakly integral braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C . Suppose every Tannakian fusion subcategory of the Drinfeld center Z ( C ) Z(\mathcal{C}) Z ( C ) is pointed. Let Z i , Z j Z_i,Z_j Z i , Z j be conjugacy-class objects in Z ( C ) Z(\mathcal{C}) Z ( C ) with Frobenius–Perron dimensions greater than one whose prime supports lie in distinct components of Δ c l ( C ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{C}) Δ cl ( C ) . Then the algebra character μ i \mu_i μ i corresponding to Z i Z_i Z i vanishes on the forgetful image Y j Y_j Y j of Z j Z_j Z j , as in (58) . In particular Δ c l ( C ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{C}) Δ cl ( C ) has at most two components.
Proof. Take class dimensions in different components. They are coprime. If the evaluation were nonzero, the coprime dichotomy (61) of Lemma 5.2 would imply centralization. Proposition 5.3 then shows that the product must be simple, since a reducible product would generate a non-pointed Tannakian category in the center. But a simple product Z i Z j Z_iZ_j Z i Z j is itself a class object: its forgetful image contains 1 1 1 , and adjunction places it in A \mathcal{A} A . Its dimension FPdim ( Z i ) FPdim ( Z j ) \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i)\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_j) FPdim ( Z i ) FPdim ( Z j ) connects the two components, a contradiction. Now apply Proposition 5.1.
Lemma 5.5 (Common constituents of the class images). Let C \mathcal{C} C be a weakly integral braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C . Let F : Z ( C ) → C F:Z(\mathcal{C})\to\mathcal{C} F : Z ( C ) → C be the forgetful functor with right adjoint I I I . Let Z i , Z j Z_i,Z_j Z i , Z j be simple summands of A = I ( 1 ) \mathcal{A}=I(1) A = I ( 1 ) , and put Y i = F ( Z i ) Y_i=F(Z_i) Y i = F ( Z i ) and Y j = F ( Z j ) Y_j=F(Z_j) Y j = F ( Z j ) . If Z i , Z j Z_i,Z_j Z i , Z j centralize each other in Z ( C ) Z(\mathcal{C}) Z ( C ) and gcd ( FPdim ( Z i ) , FPdim ( Z j ) ) = 1 \gcd(\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i),\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_j))=1 g cd( FPdim ( Z i ) , FPdim ( Z j )) = 1 , then
[ Y i Y j : 1 ] > 1 ⟹ C contains a non-pointed Tannakian subcategory . (69) [Y_iY_j:1]>1\quad\Longrightarrow\quad\mathcal{C}\text{ contains a non-pointed Tannakian subcategory}. \tag*{(69)} [ Y i Y j : 1 ] > 1 ⟹ C contains a non-pointed Tannakian subcategory . (69) Consequently, if every Tannakian subcategory of C \mathcal{C} C is pointed, then dim Hom Z ( C ) ( Z i Z j , A ) = 1 \dim\operatorname{Hom}_{Z(\mathcal{C})}(Z_iZ_j,\mathcal{A})=1 dim Hom Z ( C ) ( Z i Z j , A ) = 1 .
Proof. The objects Y i , Y j Y_i,Y_j Y i , Y j are self-dual and contain the unit once by Proposition 2.3 . Their generated subcategories centralize by the proof of Proposition 5.3 . A common invertible constituent g g g would stabilize both Z i , Z j Z_i,Z_j Z i , Z j , so coprimeness forces g = 1 g=1 g = 1 . Thus [ Y i Y j : 1 ] > 1 [Y_iY_j:1]>1 [ Y i Y j : 1 ] > 1 gives a common noninvertible simple X X X . By the internal-end identity (13) of Proposition 2.2 , every common simple X X X satisfies X + ⊗ Z i Z i ∗ , Z j Z j ∗ X^+\otimes Z_iZ_i^*,Z_jZ_j^* X + ⊗ Z i Z i ∗ , Z j Z j ∗ . It centralizes Z i Z_i Z i , and Hom ( X + ⊗ Z i , Z i ) ≠ 0 \operatorname{Hom}(X^+\otimes Z_i,Z_i)\ne0 Hom ( X + ⊗ Z i , Z i ) = 0 , so θ X = 1 \theta_X=1 θ X = 1 by the balancing identity (28) . The common constituents therefore generate a Tannakian subcategory of the symmetric intersection ⟨ Y i ⟩ ∩ ⟨ Y j ⟩ \langle Y_i\rangle\cap\langle Y_j\rangle ⟨ Y i ⟩ ∩ ⟨ Y j ⟩ ; it is non-pointed. Finally, adjunction identifies Hom ( Z i Z j , A ) \operatorname{Hom}(Z_iZ_j,\mathcal{A}) Hom ( Z i Z j , A ) with Hom ( Y i Y j , 1 ) \operatorname{Hom}(Y_iY_j,1) Hom ( Y i Y j , 1 ) .
Lemma 5.6 (Constraints on the additional summands). Let C C C be a weakly integral braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C . For the forgetful functor F : Z ( C ) → C F: Z(C) \to C F : Z ( C ) → C and its right adjoint I I I , let A = I ( 1 ) = ⨁ a Z a \mathcal{A} = I(1) = \bigoplus_a Z_a A = I ( 1 ) = ⨁ a Z a and Y a = F ( Z a ) Y_a = F(Z_a) Y a = F ( Z a ) . Suppose two of these class objects Z i , Z j Z_i, Z_j Z i , Z j centralize each other in Z ( C ) Z(C) Z ( C ) , have coprime Frobenius–Perron dimensions, and satisfy dim Hom Z ( C ) ( Z i Z j , A ) = 1 \dim\operatorname{Hom}_{Z(C)}(Z_i Z_j,\mathcal{A}) = 1 dim Hom Z ( C ) ( Z i Z j , A ) = 1 . Then Z i Z j Z_i Z_j Z i Z j has a unique class constituent Z k Z_k Z k , of multiplicity one, and
Z i Z j = Z k ⊕ R , R = ⨁ W ⊀ A m W W . (70) Z_i Z_j = Z_k \oplus R,\qquad R = \bigoplus_{W \not\prec\mathcal{A}} m_W W. \tag*{(70)} Z i Z j = Z k ⊕ R , R = W ≺ A ⨁ m W W . (70) Here m W m_W m W is the multiplicity of the simple W ∈ Z ( C ) W \in Z(C) W ∈ Z ( C ) in Z i Z j Z_i Z_j Z i Z j . For the canonical ribbon twist on the center, every additional constituent satisfies
θ W = 1 , [ F ( W ) : 1 ] = 0. (71) \theta_W = 1,\qquad[F(W):1] = 0. \tag*{(71)} θ W = 1 , [ F ( W ) : 1 ] = 0. (71) Furthermore,
Y i Y j = Y k ⊕ ⨁ W m W F ( W ) , (72) Y_iY_j = Y_k \oplus\bigoplus_W m_W F(W), \tag*{(72)} Y i Y j = Y k ⊕ W ⨁ m W F ( W ) , (72) ∑ W m W FPdim ( W ) = FPdim ( Z i ) FPdim ( Z j ) − FPdim ( Z k ) , (73) \sum_W m_W \operatorname{FPdim}(W) = \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i)\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_j) - \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_k), \tag*{(73)} W ∑ m W FPdim ( W ) = FPdim ( Z i ) FPdim ( Z j ) − FPdim ( Z k ) , (73) 1 + ∑ W m W 2 = dim Hom ( Z i Z i ∗ , Z j Z j ∗ ) . (74) 1 + \sum_W m_W^2 = \dim\operatorname{Hom}(Z_i Z_i^*, Z_j Z_j^*). \tag*{(74)} 1 + W ∑ m W 2 = dim Hom ( Z i Z i ∗ , Z j Z j ∗ ) . (74) Proof. Multiplicity-freeness of A \mathcal{A} A and the stated Hom dimension give the unique class constituent. The balancing identity (28) gives trivial twist on the whole product, hence on each constituent. Adjunction gives [ F ( W ) : 1 ] = 0 [F(W):1] = 0 [ F ( W ) : 1 ] = 0 for nonclass constituents. Applying F F F , taking dimensions, and computing the dimension of the endomorphism algebra of the product give the remaining formulas.
Lemma 5.7 (A negative character contribution from the extra summands). Let C C C be a weakly integral braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C . For the forgetful functor F : Z ( C ) → C F: Z(C) \to C F : Z ( C ) → C with right adjoint I I I , write I ( 1 ) = ⨁ a Z a I(1) = \bigoplus_a Z_a I ( 1 ) = ⨁ a Z a , Y a = F ( Z a ) Y_a = F(Z_a) Y a = F ( Z a ) , and let μ a \mu_a μ a be the algebra character of K ( C ) K(C) K ( C ) corresponding to Z a Z_a Z a . Suppose that two of these class objects Z i , Z j Z_i, Z_j Z i , Z j centralize each other in Z ( C ) Z(C) Z ( C ) , have coprime Frobenius–Perron dimensions, and that dim Hom Z ( C ) ( Z i Z j , I ( 1 ) ) = 1 \dim\operatorname{Hom}_{Z(C)}(Z_i Z_j,I(1)) = 1 dim Hom Z ( C ) ( Z i Z j , I ( 1 )) = 1 . Decompose Z i Z j = Z k ⊕ R Z_i Z_j = Z_k \oplus R Z i Z j = Z k ⊕ R as in Lemma 5.6, with Z k Z_k Z k its unique class constituent. If R ≠ 0 R \ne0 R = 0 , then some μ s \mu_s μ s satisfies
μ s ( Y k ) > μ s ( Y i ) μ s ( Y j ) ≥ 0. (75) \mu_s(Y_k) > \mu_s(Y_i)\mu_s(Y_j) \ge0. \tag*{(75)} μ s ( Y k ) > μ s ( Y i ) μ s ( Y j ) ≥ 0. (75) If this witness satisfies gcd ( FPdim ( Z s ) , FPdim ( Z i ) FPdim ( Z j ) FPdim ( Z k ) ) = 1 \gcd(\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_s),\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i)\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_j)\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_k)) = 1 g cd( FPdim ( Z s ) , FPdim ( Z i ) FPdim ( Z j ) FPdim ( Z k )) = 1 , then
μ s ( F ( R ) ) = − FPdim ( Z k ) , 2 FPdim ( Z k ) ≤ FPdim ( Z i ) FPdim ( Z j ) . (76) \mu_s(F(R)) = -\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_k),\qquad2\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_k) \le\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i)\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_j). \tag*{(76)} μ s ( F ( R )) = − FPdim ( Z k ) , 2 FPdim ( Z k ) ≤ FPdim ( Z i ) FPdim ( Z j ) . (76) Proof. The actual object V = F ( R ) V = F(R) V = F ( R ) has zero unit multiplicity and positive dimension. It is self-dual, since [ V ] = [ Y i ] [ Y j ] − [ Y k ] [V] = [Y_i][Y_j] - [Y_k] [ V ] = [ Y i ] [ Y j ] − [ Y k ] and all class images are self-dual. The trace expansion (10) and the formal-codegree formula (8) give
0 = [ V : 1 ] = 1 FPdim ( C ) ∑ s FPdim ( Z s ) μ s ( V ) . (77) 0 = [V:1] = \frac{1}{\operatorname{FPdim}(C)}\sum_s \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_s)\mu_s(V). \tag*{(77)} 0 = [ V : 1 ] = FPdim ( C ) 1 s ∑ FPdim ( Z s ) μ s ( V ) . (77) All evaluations are real, all weights are positive, and the FPdim character contributes positively. Thus some evaluation is negative, proving the first assertion by the positivity of class images in Proposition 2.3. Under the additional coprimeness, the dichotomy (61) of Lemma 5.2 forces μ s ( Y k ) = FPdim ( Z k ) \mu_s(Y_k) = \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_k) μ s ( Y k ) = FPdim ( Z k ) and μ s ( Y i ) μ s ( Y j ) = 0 \mu_s(Y_i)\mu_s(Y_j) = 0 μ s ( Y i ) μ s ( Y j ) = 0 , because the only other possible product is FPdim ( Z i ) FPdim ( Z j ) > FPdim ( Z k ) \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i)\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_j) > \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_k) FPdim ( Z i ) FPdim ( Z j ) > FPdim ( Z k ) . Finally ∣ μ s ( V ) ∣ ≤ FPdim ( V ) = FPdim ( Z i ) FPdim ( Z j ) − FPdim ( Z k ) |\mu_s(V)| \le\operatorname{FPdim}(V) = \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i)\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_j) - \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_k) ∣ μ s ( V ) ∣ ≤ FPdim ( V ) = FPdim ( Z i ) FPdim ( Z j ) − FPdim ( Z k ) gives the inequality.
The additional summands in the group case
The pure-flux formula (78) is the single-double-coset case of [10 Theorem 4.1 and Example 4.3] for the untwisted double. Coprimality makes the diagonal conjugation action transitive and gives the following direct description of all multiplicities.
Lemma 5.8 (The centralizer-fiber formula). Let G G G be a finite group and let Rep ( G ) \operatorname{Rep}(G) Rep ( G ) be its category of finite-dimensional complex representations with its symmetric braiding. Use the canonical ribbon structure on Z ( Rep ( G ) ) ≃ Rep ( D ( G ) ) Z(\operatorname{Rep}(G)) \simeq\operatorname{Rep}(D(G)) Z ( Rep ( G )) ≃ Rep ( D ( G )) . Let a , b ∈ G a,b \in G a , b ∈ G have coprime conjugacy-class sizes. Write Z a , ρ Z_{a,\rho} Z a , ρ for the simple object indexed by the class of a a a and an irreducible representation ρ \rho ρ of C G ( a ) C_G(a) C G ( a ) . Put K = C G ( a ) ∩ C G ( b ) K=C_G(a)\cap C_G(b) K = C G ( a ) ∩ C G ( b ) and L = C G ( a b ) L=C_G(ab) L = C G ( ab ) . Then
Z a , 1 ⊗ Z b , 1 ≃ ⨁ ρ ∈ Irr ( L ) dim ( ρ K ) Z a b , ρ . (78) Z_{a,1}\otimes Z_{b,1}\simeq\bigoplus_{\rho\in\operatorname{Irr}(L)}\dim(\rho^{K})Z_{ab,\rho}. \tag*{(78)} Z a , 1 ⊗ Z b , 1 ≃ ρ ∈ Irr ( L ) ⨁ dim ( ρ K ) Z ab , ρ . (78) There is exactly one canonical class summand, Z a b , 1 Z_{ab,1} Z ab , 1 , of multiplicity one. The product is simple if and only if L = K L=K L = K . If a , b a,b a , b commute, the two class objects centralize and every summand in (78) has twist one.
Proof. The index [ G : K ] [G:K] [ G : K ] is divisible by both coprime indices [ G : C G ( a ) ] [G:C_G(a)] [ G : C G ( a )] , [ G : C G ( b ) ] [G:C_G(b)] [ G : C G ( b )] and is at most their product. It therefore equals that product. The diagonal G G G -action on a G × b G a^{G}\times b^{G} a G × b G is transitive. Its multiplication map has image ( a b ) G (ab)^{G} ( ab ) G and fiber L / K L/K L / K over a b ab ab . The pure-class tensor product is the corresponding equivariant vector bundle, with fiber representation Ind K L 1 \operatorname{Ind}_{K}^{L}1 Ind K L 1 . Frobenius reciprocity gives the decomposition (78) . The trivial representation occurs once, and the permutation representation is irreducible exactly when its dimension is one, namely when L = K L=K L = K .
If a , b a,b a , b commute, transitivity shows that every member of a G a^{G} a G commutes with every member of b G b^{G} b G . This is centralization for these pure-class objects. Moreover a b ∈ K ∩ Z ( L ) ab\in K\cap Z(L) ab ∈ K ∩ Z ( L ) . It acts trivially on L / K L/K L / K , hence on every occurring ρ \rho ρ , which is exactly the trivial-twist condition. □
Example 5.9 (Extra summands with a graph connection elsewhere). For an odd prime p p p , let
V = F p 2 , H = { ( t s 0 1 ) : t ∈ F p × , s ∈ F p } , G = V ⋊ H . (79) V=\mathbb{F}_{p}^{2},\qquad H=\left\{\begin{pmatrix}t&s\\0&1\end{pmatrix}:t\in\mathbb{F}_{p}^{\times},\ s\in\mathbb{F}_{p}\right\},\qquad G=V\rtimes H. \tag*{(79)} V = F p 2 , H = { ( t 0 s 1 ) : t ∈ F p × , s ∈ F p } , G = V ⋊ H . (79) This is the linear action of [18 Example 3.1] , written using column vectors. We compute the tensor product of the two associated class objects.
For a = ( 1 , 0 ) a=(1,0) a = ( 1 , 0 ) and b = ( 0 , 1 ) b=(0,1) b = ( 0 , 1 ) ,
a G = { ( u , 0 ) : u ≠ 0 } , b G = { ( v , 1 ) : v ∈ F p } . (80) a^{G}=\{(u,0):u\ne0\},\qquad b^{G}=\{(v,1):v\in\mathbb{F}_{p}\}. \tag*{(80)} a G = {( u , 0 ) : u = 0 } , b G = {( v , 1 ) : v ∈ F p } . (80) Their sizes are p − 1 p-1 p − 1 , p p p , and the two classes commute because they lie in the abelian normal subgroup V V V . Their product has support b G b^{G} b G . The fiber over b b b consists of
( ( u , 0 ) , ( − u , 1 ) ) , u ∈ F p × . (81) ((u,0),(-u,1)),\qquad u\in\mathbb{F}_{p}^{\times}. \tag*{(81)} (( u , 0 ) , ( − u , 1 )) , u ∈ F p × . (81) The quotient C G ( b ) / V ≃ F p × C_G(b)/V\simeq\mathbb{F}_{p}^{\times} C G ( b ) / V ≃ F p × acts regularly on it. The centralizer-fiber formula (78) of Lemma 5.8 therefore gives
Z a , 1 ⊗ Z b , 1 ≃ ⨁ χ ∈ F ^ p × Z b , χ . (82) Z_{a,1}\otimes Z_{b,1}\simeq\bigoplus_{\chi\in\widehat{\mathbb{F}}_{p}^{\times}}Z_{b,\chi}. \tag*{(82)} Z a , 1 ⊗ Z b , 1 ≃ χ ∈ F p × ⨁ Z b , χ . (82) where each χ \chi χ is inflated to C G ( b ) C_G(b) C G ( b ) . Every summand has dimension p p p and twist one. Exactly the trivial character yields a canonical class object; the other p − 2 p-2 p − 2 summands have no unit in their forgetful images.
For p = 3 p=3 p = 3 , this is the decomposition 2 ⋅ 3 = 3 + 3 2\cdot3=3+3 2 ⋅ 3 = 3 + 3 in the center of the representation category of a group of order 54. The element
u = ( 1 1 0 1 ) ∈ H ⊆ G (83) u=\begin{pmatrix}1&1\\0&1\end{pmatrix}\in H\subseteq G \tag*{(83)} u = ( 1 0 1 1 ) ∈ H ⊆ G (83)
has ∣ C H ( u ) ∣ = p \lvert C_H(u)\rvert=p ∣ C H ( u )∣ = p and ∣ C V ( u ) ∣ = p \lvert C_V(u)\rvert=p ∣ C V ( u )∣ = p , so its class size is p ( p − 1 ) p(p-1) p ( p − 1 ) . This supplies a graph connection outside the product under consideration. More generally, the multiplicities for all odd primes p p p are
class size 1 p − 1 p p ( p − 1 ) p 2 number of classes 1 1 p − 1 p p ( p − 2 ) (84) \begin{array}{c|ccccc}
\text{class size} & 1 & p-1 & p & p(p-1) & p^2\\
\text{number of classes} & 1 & 1 & p-1 & p & p(p-2) \tag*{(84)}
\end{array} class size number of classes 1 1 p − 1 1 p p − 1 p ( p − 1 ) p p 2 p ( p − 2 ) (84)
Indeed, an element ( u , v , r , h ) (u,v,r,h) ( u , v , r , h ) , r ≠ 0 r\ne0 r = 0 , commutes with ( x , y , t , s ) (x,y,t,s) ( x , y , t , s ) exactly when ( t − 1 ) u = ( r − 1 ) x + h y − s v (t-1)u=(r-1)x+hy-sv ( t − 1 ) u = ( r − 1 ) x + h y − s v and ( t − 1 ) h = ( r − 1 ) s (t-1)h=(r-1)s ( t − 1 ) h = ( r − 1 ) s . For t ≠ 1 t\ne1 t = 1 the free parameters are r , v r,v r , v , giving centralizer order p ( p − 1 ) p(p-1) p ( p − 1 ) . For t = 1 t=1 t = 1 , s ≠ 0 s\ne0 s = 0 one has r = 1 r=1 r = 1 and s v = h y sv=hy s v = h y , giving order p 2 p^2 p 2 . For t = 1 t=1 t = 1 , s = 0 s=0 s = 0 , the centralizer has order p 2 ( p − 1 ) p^2(p-1) p 2 ( p − 1 ) if y ≠ 0 y\ne0 y = 0 and order p 3 p^3 p 3 if y = 0 y=0 y = 0 , x ≠ 0 x\ne0 x = 0 . The remaining element is the identity. Dividing the number of elements in each case by the corresponding class size gives the table.
Remark 5.10 (Reducible products of coprime class objects). In Example 5.9 the two class objects centralize each other and have coprime dimensions. Their tensor product has a unique canonical class constituent and all its summands have twist one. Nevertheless the product is reducible, and every summand has dimension p p p . The ambient category Rep ( G ) \operatorname{Rep}(G) Rep ( G ) is itself a non-pointed Tannakian category.
Example 5.11 (The canonical constituents need not exhibit a local connection). Let C = Rep ( D ( A 5 ) ) \mathcal{C}=\operatorname{Rep}(D(A_5)) C = Rep ( D ( A 5 )) , and take the electric irreducibles X , Y X,Y X , Y of dimensions 3 , 4 3,4 3 , 4 . They centralize, and the ordinary A 5 A_5 A 5 fusion rule is
X ⊗ Y ≃ X ′ ⊕ Y ⊕ T , FPdim ( X ′ ) = 3 , FPdim ( T ) = 5. (85) X\otimes Y\simeq X'\oplus Y\oplus T,\qquad\operatorname{FPdim}(X')=3,\qquad\operatorname{FPdim}(T)=5. \tag*{(85)} X ⊗ Y ≃ X ′ ⊕ Y ⊕ T , FPdim ( X ′ ) = 3 , FPdim ( T ) = 5. (85)
Under Z ( C ) ≃ C ⊠ C r e v Z(\mathcal{C})\simeq\mathcal{C}\boxtimes\mathcal{C}^{\mathrm{rev}} Z ( C ) ≃ C ⊠ C rev , the corresponding class objects are X ⊠ X ∗ X\boxtimes X^* X ⊠ X ∗ and Y ⊠ Y ∗ Y\boxtimes Y^* Y ⊠ Y ∗ . Their dimensions are 9 , 16 9,16 9 , 16 , and the canonical constituents of their tensor product have dimensions 9 , 16 , 25 9,16,25 9 , 16 , 25 . None of these dimensions joins the prime 3 3 3 of the first class to the prime 2 2 2 of the second. Nevertheless C \mathcal{C} C has a simple pure-flux object of dimension 12 12 12 , coming from a five-cycle class in A 5 A_5 A 5 , and hence has a class dimension 12 2 = 144 12^2=144 1 2 2 = 144 . The primes 2 2 2 and 3 3 3 are therefore joined by this class.
Pointed forgetful images and the two-component theorem
When every Tannakian subcategory of C \mathcal{C} C is pointed, a failure of cross-component vanishing produces a solvable Tannakian subcategory of Z ( C ) Z(\mathcal{C}) Z ( C ) with pointed forgetful image. Its representation degrees occur among the class dimensions of C \mathcal{C} C and bound the number of components.
We retain F : Z ( C ) → C F:Z(\mathcal{C})\to\mathcal{C} F : Z ( C ) → C , its right adjoint I I I , the canonical algebra A = I ( 1 ) = ⨁ i Z i \mathcal{A}=I(1)=\bigoplus_i Z_i A = I ( 1 ) = ⨁ i Z i , and Y i = F ( Z i ) Y_i=F(Z_i) Y i = F ( Z i ) . For X ∈ C X\in\mathcal{C} X ∈ C , write X + = ι + ( X ) X^+=\iota_+(X) X + = ι + ( X ) for its lift determined by the given braiding.
Lemma 5.12 (Pointed images are translates of class objects). Let C \mathcal{C} C be a braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C , let F : Z ( C ) → C F:Z(\mathcal{C})\to\mathcal{C} F : Z ( C ) → C be the forgetful functor, and let I I I be its right adjoint. Suppose W ∈ Irr ( Z ( C ) ) W\in\operatorname{Irr}(Z(\mathcal{C})) W ∈ Irr ( Z ( C )) and F ( W ) F(W) F ( W ) is a direct sum of invertible objects. Write g + g^+ g + for the lift given by the braiding. For every invertible constituent g ≺ F ( W ) g\prec F(W) g ≺ F ( W ) , there exists, up to isomorphism, a unique simple summand Z ℓ Z_\ell Z ℓ of I ( 1 ) I(1) I ( 1 ) such that
W ≃ g + ⊗ Z ℓ . (86) W\simeq g^+\otimes Z_\ell. \tag*{(86)} W ≃ g + ⊗ Z ℓ . (86)
Consequently FPdim ( W ) = FPdim ( Z ℓ ) \operatorname{FPdim}(W) = \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_\ell) FPdim ( W ) = FPdim ( Z ℓ ) , and Y ℓ = F ( Z ℓ ) Y_\ell= F(Z_\ell) Y ℓ = F ( Z ℓ ) is pointed. In particular, let P ⊆ Z ( C ) \mathcal{P} \subseteq Z(\mathcal{C}) P ⊆ Z ( C ) be a full fusion subcategory tensor equivalent to Rep ( G ) \operatorname{Rep}(G) Rep ( G ) for a finite group G G G . If F ( P ) F(\mathcal{P}) F ( P ) is pointed, every ordinary irreducible degree of G G G is a class dimension of C \mathcal{C} C .
Proof. Adjunction and the projection formula (27) give
Hom C ( F ( W ) , g ) ≃ Hom Z ( C ) ( W , I ( g ) ) , I ( g ) ≃ g + ⊗ A . (87) \operatorname{Hom}_{\mathcal{C}}(F(W),g) \simeq\operatorname{Hom}_{Z(\mathcal{C})}(W,I(g)), \qquad I(g) \simeq g^{+} \otimes\mathcal{A}. \tag*{(87)} Hom C ( F ( W ) , g ) ≃ Hom Z ( C ) ( W , I ( g )) , I ( g ) ≃ g + ⊗ A . (87)
Thus ( g + ) ∗ ⊗ W (g^{+})^{*} \otimes W ( g + ) ∗ ⊗ W is a simple summand of I ( 1 ) I(1) I ( 1 ) . Its isomorphism class is uniquely determined by g g g and W W W . Applying F F F gives F ( W ) ≃ g ⊗ Y ℓ F(W) \simeq g \otimes Y_\ell F ( W ) ≃ g ⊗ Y ℓ . The last assertion follows by applying this argument to each simple object of P \mathcal{P} P .
For the stabilizer description, assume further that C \mathcal{C} C is pseudo-unitary and equip it with its canonical positive spherical structure. Put
G C [ Z ℓ ] = { a ∈ Irr ( C p t ) : a + ⊗ Z ℓ ≃ Z ℓ } . (88) G_{\mathcal{C}}[Z_\ell] = \{a \in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{pt}}) : a^{+} \otimes Z_\ell\simeq Z_\ell\}. \tag*{(88)} G C [ Z ℓ ] = { a ∈ Irr ( C pt ) : a + ⊗ Z ℓ ≃ Z ℓ } . (88)
For each invertible a a a , the internal-end identity (13) of Proposition 2.2 gives [ Y ℓ : a ] = dim Hom Z ( C ) ( a + ⊗ Z ℓ , Z ℓ ) [Y_\ell: a] = \dim\operatorname{Hom}_{Z(\mathcal{C})}(a^{+} \otimes Z_\ell, Z_\ell) [ Y ℓ : a ] = dim Hom Z ( C ) ( a + ⊗ Z ℓ , Z ℓ ) . By Schur’s lemma this is one for a ∈ G C [ Z ℓ ] a \in G_{\mathcal{C}}[Z_\ell] a ∈ G C [ Z ℓ ] and zero otherwise. Hence, if Y ℓ Y_\ell Y ℓ is pointed, then
Y ℓ = ⨁ a ∈ G C [ Z ℓ ] a , FPdim ( Z ℓ ) = ∣ G C [ Z ℓ ] ∣ . (89) Y_\ell= \bigoplus_{a \in G_{\mathcal{C}}[Z_\ell]} a, \qquad\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_\ell) = |G_{\mathcal{C}}[Z_\ell]|. \tag*{(89)} Y ℓ = a ∈ G C [ Z ℓ ] ⨁ a , FPdim ( Z ℓ ) = ∣ G C [ Z ℓ ] ∣. (89)
If F ( W ) F(W) F ( W ) lies in a pointed fusion subcategory K \mathcal{K} K and g ≺ F ( W ) g \prec F(W) g ≺ F ( W ) , then Y ℓ ∈ K Y_\ell\in\mathcal{K} Y ℓ ∈ K as well. In particular, FPdim ( W ) \operatorname{FPdim}(W) FPdim ( W ) divides FPdim ( K ) \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{K}) FPdim ( K ) . These conclusions concern pointed forgetful images; no analogous divisibility FPdim ( Z ℓ ) ∣ FPdim ( W ) \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_\ell) \mid\operatorname{FPdim}(W) FPdim ( Z ℓ ) ∣ FPdim ( W ) is asserted for an arbitrary central object in the same C + \mathcal{C}^{+} C + -module block.
Proposition 5.14 (A solvable Tannakian subcategory with pointed image). Let C \mathcal{C} C be a weakly integral braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C , and let F : Z ( C ) → C F : Z(\mathcal{C}) \to\mathcal{C} F : Z ( C ) → C be the forgetful functor. Suppose that Z ( C ) Z(\mathcal{C}) Z ( C ) contains a Tannakian subcategory
P ≃ Rep ( G ) (90) \mathcal{P} \simeq\operatorname{Rep}(G) \tag*{(90)} P ≃ Rep ( G ) (90) for a finite nonabelian solvable group G G G , and that F ( U ) ∈ C p t F(U) \in\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{pt}} F ( U ) ∈ C pt for every U ∈ P U \in\mathcal{P} U ∈ P . Then Δ c l ( C ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{C}) Δ cl ( C ) has at most two connected components.
Proof. We first establish the class-object version of the Gallagher argument. Let Q ≃ Rep ( L ) \mathcal{Q} \simeq\operatorname{Rep}(L) Q ≃ Rep ( L ) be a fusion subcategory of P \mathcal{P} P , and let Z i Z_i Z i be a class object such that gcd ( FPdim ( Z i ) , ∣ L ∣ ) = 1 \gcd(\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i), |L|) = 1 g cd( FPdim ( Z i ) , ∣ L ∣ ) = 1 . De-equivariantizing Z ( C ) Z(\mathcal{C}) Z ( C ) by Q \mathcal{Q} Q gives a fusion category M \mathcal{M} M with an L L L -action and Z ( C ) ≃ M L Z(\mathcal{C}) \simeq\mathcal{M}^L Z ( C ) ≃ M L . Taking dimensions in the forgetful-image formula (45) gives
FPdim ( Z i ) = [ L : L V ] dim ( π ) FPdim ( V ) , (91) \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i) = [L : L_V]\dim(\pi)\operatorname{FPdim}(V), \tag*{(91)} FPdim ( Z i ) = [ L : L V ] dim ( π ) FPdim ( V ) , (91)
where V ∈ Irr ( M ) V \in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{M}) V ∈ Irr ( M ) , L V L_V L V is its inertia subgroup, and π \pi π is an irreducible projective representation of L V L_V L V . Because FPdim ( Z i ) \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i) FPdim ( Z i ) is an integer, FPdim ( V ) \operatorname{FPdim}(V) FPdim ( V ) is a rational algebraic integer and is therefore an integer. Every prime dividing [ L : L V ] dim ( π ) [L : L_V]\dim(\pi) [ L : L V ] dim ( π ) divides ∣ L ∣ |L| ∣ L ∣ . Coprimeness now forces [ L : L V ] = dim ( π ) = 1 [L : L_V] = \dim(\pi) = 1 [ L : L V ] = dim ( π ) = 1 .
It follows that the de-equivariantization of Z i Z_i Z i is simple. Consequently U ⊗ Z i U \otimes Z_i U ⊗ Z i is simple for every U ∈ Irr ( Q ) U \in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{Q}) U ∈ Irr ( Q ) ; equivalently, the corresponding projective representation π \pi π is one-dimensional, and tensoring it with an ordinary irreducible representation preserves irreducibility. This is the argument of [36 Corollary 6.2 and Lemma 7.2] applied to the integral dimension FPdim ( V ) \operatorname{FPdim}(V) FPdim ( V ) . By Lemma 5.12, write U ≃ g + ⊗ Z ℓ U \simeq g^{+} \otimes Z_{\ell} U ≃ g + ⊗ Z ℓ . Then
Z ℓ ⊗ Z i ≃ ( g + ) − 1 ⊗ U ⊗ Z i (92) Z_{\ell} \otimes Z_{i} \simeq(g^{+})^{-1} \otimes U \otimes Z_{i} \tag*{(92)} Z ℓ ⊗ Z i ≃ ( g + ) − 1 ⊗ U ⊗ Z i (92)
is simple. Its forgetful image contains 1 1 1 , since both Y ℓ Y_{\ell} Y ℓ and Y i Y_{i} Y i contain 1 1 1 . Adjunction therefore shows that it is a constituent of A \mathcal{A} A , and hence is a class object. We have proved the implication
gcd ( FPdim ( Z i ) , ∣ L ∣ ) = 1 ⟹ dim ( U ) FPdim ( Z i ) is a class dimension of C . (93) \gcd(\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i), |L|) = 1
\quad\Longrightarrow\quad
\dim(U)\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i)\text{ is a class dimension of }\mathcal{C}. \tag*{(93)} g cd( FPdim ( Z i ) , ∣ L ∣ ) = 1 ⟹ dim ( U ) FPdim ( Z i ) is a class dimension of C . (93)
This holds for every U ∈ Irr ( L ) U \in\operatorname{Irr}(L) U ∈ Irr ( L ) .
Choose N ◃ G N \triangleleft G N ◃ G maximal among normal subgroups for which L = G / N L = G/N L = G / N is nonabelian. Then all proper quotients of L L L are abelian, and Rep ( L ) ⊆ P \operatorname{Rep}(L) \subseteq\mathcal{P} Rep ( L ) ⊆ P still has pointed forgetful image. The solvable-group classification used in [36 proof of Theorem 7.7] gives two possibilities: either L L L is a nonabelian p p p -group, or L L L is a Frobenius group with elementary abelian kernel of order r n r^n r n and abelian complement K K K . Its order is r n ∣ K ∣ r^n|K| r n ∣ K ∣ , and ∣ K ∣ |K| ∣ K ∣ is its unique nonlinear irreducible degree.
In the first case choose a nonlinear degree p a p^a p a . It is a class dimension by Lemma 5.12. Every class dimension divisible by p p p connects all its prime divisors to p p p . Every class dimension coprime to p p p does so through the class dimension p a FPdim ( Z i ) p^a\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i) p a FPdim ( Z i ) from (93) . Thus the graph is connected.
In the Frobenius case, ∣ K ∣ |K| ∣ K ∣ is a class dimension, so π ( ∣ K ∣ ) \pi(|K|) π ( ∣ K ∣ ) is a clique. If r ∣ FPdim ( Z i ) r \mid\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i) r ∣ FPdim ( Z i ) , all prime divisors of FPdim ( Z i ) \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i) FPdim ( Z i ) lie in the component containing r r r . If r ∤ FPdim ( Z i ) r \nmid\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i) r ∤ FPdim ( Z i ) but gcd ( FPdim ( Z i ) , ∣ K ∣ ) > 1 \gcd(\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i), |K|) > 1 g cd( FPdim ( Z i ) , ∣ K ∣ ) > 1 , they connect to π ( ∣ K ∣ ) \pi(|K|) π ( ∣ K ∣ ) . In the remaining case gcd ( FPdim ( Z i ) , ∣ L ∣ ) = 1 \gcd(\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i), |L|) = 1 g cd( FPdim ( Z i ) , ∣ L ∣ ) = 1 , and ∣ K ∣ FPdim ( Z i ) |K|\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i) ∣ K ∣ FPdim ( Z i ) supplies the same connection by (93) . There are at most two components; the component containing r r r need not exist or be distinct from the one containing π ( ∣ K ∣ ) \pi(|K|) π ( ∣ K ∣ ) .
Proposition 5.15 (Solvable enlargement of a pointed-image obstruction). Let C \mathcal{C} C be a braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C , let F : Z ( C ) → C F : Z(\mathcal{C}) \to\mathcal{C} F : Z ( C ) → C be the forgetful functor, and let E ⊆ Z ( C ) \mathcal{E} \subseteq Z(\mathcal{C}) E ⊆ Z ( C ) be a Tannakian fusion subcategory. Suppose its image fusion subcategory K = F ( E ) \mathcal{K} = F(\mathcal{E}) K = F ( E ) is pointed Tannakian for the braiding of C \mathcal{C} C . Write K + = ι + ( K ) \mathcal{K}^{+} = \iota_{+}(\mathcal{K}) K + = ι + ( K ) for its lift by that braiding, and suppose that E \mathcal{E} E centralizes K + \mathcal{K}^{+} K + in Z ( C ) Z(\mathcal{C}) Z ( C ) . Then
P = E ∨ K + ≃ Rep ( Γ ) (94) \mathcal{P} = \mathcal{E} \vee\mathcal{K}^{+} \simeq\operatorname{Rep}(\Gamma) \tag*{(94)} P = E ∨ K + ≃ Rep ( Γ ) (94) is Tannakian for a solvable finite group Γ \Gamma Γ . More precisely, writing K ≃ Rep ( H ) \mathcal{K} \simeq\operatorname{Rep}(H) K ≃ Rep ( H ) with H H H abelian, one has Γ ≃ N ⋊ H \Gamma\simeq N \rtimes H Γ ≃ N ⋊ H , where N N N is nilpotent of class at most two. If E \mathcal{E} E is non-pointed, then Γ \Gamma Γ is nonabelian.
Proof. The join of the two centralizing Tannakian subcategories E \mathcal{E} E and K + \mathcal{K}^{+} K + is Tannakian, and F ( P ) = K F(\mathcal{P}) = \mathcal{K} F ( P ) = K . The restriction F ∣ P F|_{\mathcal{P}} F ∣ P is braided. Indeed, for U ∈ E U \in\mathcal{E} U ∈ E and V ∈ K V \in\mathcal{K} V ∈ K , centralization with V + \mathcal{V}^{+} V + identifies the half-braiding of U U U on V V V with c V , F ( U ) − 1 = c F ( U ) , V c^{-1}_{V,F(U)} = c_{F(U),V} c V , F ( U ) − 1 = c F ( U ) , V , where the equality uses symmetry of K \mathcal{K} K . This proves compatibility on E \mathcal{E} E and on crossings with K + \mathcal{K}^{+} K + ; compatibility on K + \mathcal{K}^{+} K + itself holds by definition. It therefore holds on their join.
The dominant symmetric functor
F ∣ P : Rep ( Γ ) ⟶ Rep ( H ) (95) F|_{\mathcal{P}} : \operatorname{Rep}(\Gamma) \longrightarrow\operatorname{Rep}(H) \tag*{(95)} F ∣ P : Rep ( Γ ) ⟶ Rep ( H ) (95)
has the symmetric section K + ↪ P \mathcal{K}^{+} \hookrightarrow\mathcal{P} K + ↪ P . Tannaka duality gives homomorphisms
H → ι Γ → q H , q ι = id H , (96) H \xrightarrow{\iota} \Gamma\xrightarrow{q} H,
\qquad q\iota= \operatorname{id}_{H}, \tag*{(96)} H ι Γ q H , q ι = id H , (96)
where ι \iota ι is injective and q q q is surjective. Hence Γ = N ⋊ H \Gamma= N \rtimes H Γ = N ⋊ H , with N = ker q N = \ker q N = ker q . Let B = Fun ( H ) B=\operatorname{Fun}(H) B = Fun ( H ) be the regular algebra in K + \mathcal{K}^{+} K + and set D = C H \mathcal{D}=\mathcal{C}_{H} D = C H , using the compatible module convention for de-equivariantization. The equivalence of centers of module categories [39 ] , in the form of [17 ] , Theorem 3.20, gives
Z ( D ) ≃ Z ( C ) B 0 ≃ ( ( K + ) ′ ) H . (97) \mathcal{Z}(\mathcal{D})\simeq\mathcal{Z}(\mathcal{C})^{0}_{B}\simeq((\mathcal{K}^{+})')_{H}. \tag*{(97)} Z ( D ) ≃ Z ( C ) B 0 ≃ (( K + ) ′ ) H . (97)
Because P ⊆ ( K + ) ′ \mathcal{P}\subseteq(\mathcal{K}^{+})' P ⊆ ( K + ) ′ , this contains
P H ≃ Rep ( N ) . (98) \mathcal{P}_{H}\simeq\operatorname{Rep}(N). \tag*{(98)} P H ≃ Rep ( N ) . (98)
Under the forgetful functor Z ( D ) → D \mathcal{Z}(\mathcal{D})\to\mathcal{D} Z ( D ) → D , this entire subcategory has trivial underlying objects. Explicitly, its generating free modules have the form U ⊗ B U\otimes B U ⊗ B , U ∈ P U\in\mathcal{P} U ∈ P , and their underlying D \mathcal{D} D -objects are
F ( U ) ⊗ B ≃ 1 D ⊕ FPdim ( U ) , (99) F(U)\otimes B\simeq\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{D}}^{\oplus\operatorname{FPdim}(U)}, \tag*{(99)} F ( U ) ⊗ B ≃ 1 D ⊕ FPdim ( U ) , (99)
since F ( U ) ∈ Rep ( H ) F(U)\in\operatorname{Rep}(H) F ( U ) ∈ Rep ( H ) . Every object of P H \mathcal{P}_{H} P H is a direct summand of such a free module. This also verifies the needed compatibility of (97) with forgetting, rather than merely using an abstract equivalence of centers.
For any fusion category D \mathcal{D} D , the fusion subcategory of Z ( D ) \mathcal{Z}(\mathcal{D}) Z ( D ) consisting of objects with trivial underlying object is Rep ( U ( D ) ) \operatorname{Rep}(U(\mathcal{D})) Rep ( U ( D )) , where U ( D ) U(\mathcal{D}) U ( D ) is the universal grading group. One can see this directly: the half-braiding of V ⊗ 1 V\otimes\mathbf{1} V ⊗ 1 with a simple object X X X specifies an invertible linear map on V V V ; the hexagon identifies these maps according to the defining relations of U ( D ) U(\mathcal{D}) U ( D ) . Thus the inclusion Rep ( N ) ⊆ Rep ( U ( D ) ) \operatorname{Rep}(N)\subseteq\operatorname{Rep}(U(\mathcal{D})) Rep ( N ) ⊆ Rep ( U ( D )) makes N N N a quotient of U ( D ) U(\mathcal{D}) U ( D ) .
The category D \mathcal{D} D is braided H H H -crossed by [20 ] , Section 4.4. Its H H H -grading factors through a homomorphism
∂ : U ( D ) ⟶ H . (100) \partial:U(\mathcal{D})\longrightarrow H. \tag*{(100)} ∂ : U ( D ) ⟶ H . (100)
No surjectivity onto H H H is needed. If u ∈ ker ∂ u\in\ker\partial u ∈ ker ∂ , choose a simple X X X of universal degree u u u . Its H H H -degree is neutral, so the crossed braiding provides X ⊗ Y ≃ Y ⊗ X X\otimes Y\simeq Y\otimes X X ⊗ Y ≃ Y ⊗ X for every simple Y Y Y . Comparing universal degrees proves that u u u commutes with every element of U ( D ) U(\mathcal{D}) U ( D ) . Therefore
ker ∂ ⊆ Z ( U ( D ) ) , [ U ( D ) , U ( D ) ] ⊆ ker ∂ , (101) \ker\partial\subseteq Z(U(\mathcal{D})),\qquad[U(\mathcal{D}),U(\mathcal{D})]\subseteq\ker\partial, \tag*{(101)} ker ∂ ⊆ Z ( U ( D )) , [ U ( D ) , U ( D )] ⊆ ker ∂ , (101)
where the second inclusion uses that H H H is abelian. It follows that U ( D ) U(\mathcal{D}) U ( D ) , and hence N N N , is nilpotent of class at most two. The extension N ⋊ H N\rtimes H N ⋊ H is solvable. Finally, E \mathcal{E} E non-pointed implies that P \mathcal{P} P is non-pointed, so Γ \Gamma Γ is nonabelian.
Theorem 5.16 (The bound with pointed Tannakian subcategories). Let C \mathcal{C} C be a weakly integral braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C . If every Tannakian subcategory of C \mathcal{C} C is pointed, then
Δ c l ( C ) has at most two connected components. (102) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{C})\text{ has at most two connected components.} \tag*{(102)} Δ cl ( C ) has at most two connected components. (102)
Proof. Suppose, to the contrary, that the graph has at least three components. If all evaluations between classes in different components vanish, then Proposition 5.1 already gives a contradiction. Thus there exist class objects Z i , Z j Z_i,Z_j Z i , Z j whose nontrivial dimensions belong to different components and for which μ i ( Y j ) ≠ 0 \mu_i(Y_j)\ne0 μ i ( Y j ) = 0 . Their dimensions are coprime. By Lemma 5.2 , Z i Z_i Z i and Z j Z_j Z j centralize each other.
Their product is not simple: a simple product would have a unit in its forgetful image and hence would be a class object of dimension FPdim ( Z i ) FPdim ( Z j ) \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i)\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_j) FPdim ( Z i ) FPdim ( Z j ) , connecting the two components. Consequently
dim Hom ( Z i Z j ∗ , Z j Z i ∗ ) = dim End ( Z i Z j ) > 1. (103) \dim\operatorname{Hom}(Z_iZ_j^{*},Z_jZ_i^{*})=\dim\operatorname{End}(Z_iZ_j)>1. \tag*{(103)} dim Hom ( Z i Z j ∗ , Z j Z i ∗ ) = dim End ( Z i Z j ) > 1. (103)
The common-constituent construction in Proposition 5.3 therefore produces a non-pointed Tannakian category E ⊆ Z ( C ) \mathcal{E}\subseteq\mathcal{Z}(\mathcal{C}) E ⊆ Z ( C ) , with K = F ( E ) \mathcal{K}=F(\mathcal{E}) K = F ( E ) Tannakian in C \mathcal{C} C , such that E \mathcal{E} E centralizes K + \mathcal{K}^{+} K + . By hypothesis K \mathcal{K} K is pointed. Proposition 5.15 then yields a nonabelian solvable Tannakian subcategory P = E ∨ K + \mathcal{P} = \mathcal{E} \vee\mathcal{K}^{+} P = E ∨ K + with pointed forgetful image. Applying Proposition 5.14 gives at most two components, a contradiction.
Remark 5.17 (The role of the pointed-image hypothesis). The hypothesis concerns Tannakian subcategories of C \mathcal{C} C . The proof uses a possibly non-pointed Tannakian subcategory E ⊆ Z ( C ) \mathcal{E} \subseteq\mathcal{Z}(\mathcal{C}) E ⊆ Z ( C ) whose image F ( E ) F(\mathcal{E}) F ( E ) is pointed. When its image is non-pointed, the general component bound instead follows by equivariantization in Theorem 7.11 . Determining whether cross-component vanishing holds in this case remains a separate problem.
The modular and slightly degenerate cases
Modular categories and the group-theoretic core
The arguments in this section concern the prime graph of the integer squares of simple dimensions. For a modular category this is precisely the class graph, even when the category is not integral. For integral braided categories, the coprime-dimension monodromy criterion is [24 Lemma 7.1] . The following version uses coprime integer squares in a weakly integral modular category.
Lemma 6.1 (Coprime squares and monodromy). Let M \mathcal{M} M be a weakly integral modular fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C , and let S S S be its unnormalized S S S -matrix for the canonical positive spherical structure. Let X , Y ∈ Irr ( M ) X,Y \in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{M}) X , Y ∈ Irr ( M ) . If
gcd ( FPdim ( X ) 2 , FPdim ( Y ) 2 ) = 1 , (104) \gcd\left(\operatorname{FPdim}(X)^2,\operatorname{FPdim}(Y)^2\right)=1, \tag*{(104)} g cd( FPdim ( X ) 2 , FPdim ( Y ) 2 ) = 1 , (104) then either S X , Y = 0 S_{X,Y}=0 S X , Y = 0 or X X X and Y Y Y projectively centralize each other.
Proof. Write α = S X , Y / ( FPdim ( X ) FPdim ( Y ) ) \alpha= S_{X,Y}/(\operatorname{FPdim}(X)\operatorname{FPdim}(Y)) α = S X , Y / ( FPdim ( X ) FPdim ( Y )) , using the unnormalized S S S -matrix. The two numbers S X , Y / FPdim ( X ) S_{X,Y}/\operatorname{FPdim}(X) S X , Y / FPdim ( X ) and S X , Y / FPdim ( Y ) S_{X,Y}/\operatorname{FPdim}(Y) S X , Y / FPdim ( Y ) are algebraic integers, since they are values of Verlinde characters. Thus FPdim ( X ) 2 α 2 \operatorname{FPdim}(X)^2\alpha^2 FPdim ( X ) 2 α 2 and FPdim ( Y ) 2 α 2 \operatorname{FPdim}(Y)^2\alpha^2 FPdim ( Y ) 2 α 2 are algebraic integers. Bezout’s identity implies that α 2 \alpha^2 α 2 , and hence α \alpha α , is an algebraic integer.
The balancing formula (28) expresses α \alpha α as a weighted sum of roots of unity, with positive weights summing to one. The square of the dimension of every simple object is an integer. Consequently any Galois automorphism changes its dimension only by a sign. Applying a Galois automorphism to this expression therefore shows that every conjugate of α \alpha α has absolute value at most one. Kronecker’s theorem implies that α \alpha α is zero or a root of unity. In the second case, equality in the triangle inequality for this weighted sum forces all monodromy eigenvalues on X ⊗ Y X \otimes Y X ⊗ Y to be equal. This is projective centralization.
Lemma 6.2 (Squares realized as class dimensions). Let C \mathcal{C} C be a weakly integral braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C , equipped with its canonical positive spherical structure.
If C \mathcal{C} C is modular, its class dimensions are exactly FPdim ( X ) 2 \operatorname{FPdim}(X)^2 FPdim ( X ) 2 , for X ∈ Irr ( C ) X \in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{C}) X ∈ Irr ( C ) , with the corresponding class image X ⊗ X ∗ X \otimes X^{*} X ⊗ X ∗ .
If C \mathcal{C} C is slightly degenerate, then every number FPdim ( X ) 2 \operatorname{FPdim}(X)^2 FPdim ( X ) 2 , X ∈ Irr ( C ) X \in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{C}) X ∈ Irr ( C ) , occurs among the class dimensions of C \mathcal{C} C . The characters with μ ( [ f ] ) = 1 \mu([f])=1 μ ([ f ]) = 1 , where f f f is the transparent fermion, give one such class per fermion orbit. The other characters can yield different dimensions, as in Example 6.2.4.
Proof. In the modular case, Z ( C ) ≃ C ⊠ C r e v \mathcal{Z}(\mathcal{C}) \simeq\mathcal{C} \boxtimes\mathcal{C}^{\mathrm{rev}} Z ( C ) ≃ C ⊠ C rev and the canonical algebra is ⨁ X X ⊠ X ∗ \bigoplus_X X \boxtimes X^{*} ⨁ X X ⊠ X ∗ , which proves the assertion.
For the second assertion, choose a minimal modular extension M ⊇ C \mathcal{M} \supseteq\mathcal{C} M ⊇ C , whose existence follows from [30 Corollary 1.3] . Let f f f be the transparent fermion of C \mathcal{C} C . Then C = ⟨ f ⟩ M ′ \mathcal{C} = \langle f\rangle'_{\mathcal{M}} C = ⟨ f ⟩ M ′ and C M ′ = ⟨ f ⟩ \mathcal{C}'_{\mathcal{M}} = \langle f\rangle C M ′ = ⟨ f ⟩ . The modular quotient formula (21) of Theorem 2.5 for the character obtained from X ∈ Irr ( C ) X \in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{C}) X ∈ Irr ( C ) gives
FPdim ( Z μ X C ) = FPdim ( X ) 2 FPdim ( ( X ⊗ X ∗ ) ∩ ⟨ f ⟩ ) . (105) \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{Z}^{\mathcal{C}}_{\mu_X}) = \frac{\operatorname{FPdim}(X)^2}{\operatorname{FPdim}((X \otimes X^*) \cap\langle f\rangle)}. \tag*{(105)} FPdim ( Z μ X C ) = FPdim (( X ⊗ X ∗ ) ∩ ⟨ f ⟩) FPdim ( X ) 2 . (105)
The fermion acts freely on the simple objects of C \mathcal{C} C : if f X ≅ X fX \cong X f X ≅ X , the balancing identity (28) and the trivial monodromy of f f f with X X X would give θ X = − θ X \theta_X = -\theta_X θ X = − θ X . Hence the denominator is one. Proposition 6.22 below identifies exactly the characters with μ ( [ f ] ) = 1 \mu([f]) = 1 μ ([ f ]) = 1 by the reduced character table. □ \square □
Proposition 6.3 (The group-theoretic core in a modular category). Let M \mathcal{M} M be a weakly integral modular fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C . Suppose that M \mathcal{M} M contains a non-pointed Tannakian fusion subcategory braided equivalent to Rep ( G ) \operatorname{Rep}(G) Rep ( G ) for a finite group G G G . Then Δ c l ( M ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{M}) Δ cl ( M ) has at most two connected components. If G G G is nonsolvable, this graph is connected.
Proof. Remove the central Sylow subgroups of G G G . Their product is a central Hall subgroup, and G = P × H G = P \times H G = P × H , where P P P is abelian and H H H has no central Sylow subgroup. The subgroup H H H is nonabelian. The ordinary conjugacy-class graph of H H H has vertex set π ( H ) \pi(H) π ( H ) by the central Sylow criterion (1) . By Theorem 4.1, it has at most two components and is connected if H H H is nonsolvable. See also [36 Section 2] .
We regard Rep ( H ) \operatorname{Rep}(H) Rep ( H ) as a subcategory of M \mathcal{M} M and de-equivariantize. The resulting braided H H H -crossed category has faithful H H H -grading. If a simple object V V V has degree g g g , then its inertia subgroup H V H_V H V is contained in C H ( g ) C_H(g) C H ( g ) . By the equivariantization dimension formula (26) , a simple equivariant object W W W lying over V V V has dimension
FPdim ( W ) = [ H : H V ] dim ( ρ ) FPdim ( V ) . (106) \operatorname{FPdim}(W) = [H : H_V]\dim(\rho)\operatorname{FPdim}(V). \tag*{(106)} FPdim ( W ) = [ H : H V ] dim ( ρ ) FPdim ( V ) . (106)
The de-equivariantization is weakly integral, so FPdim ( V ) 2 \operatorname{FPdim}(V)^2 FPdim ( V ) 2 is an integer. It follows that ∣ g H ∣ 2 |g^H|^2 ∣ g H ∣ 2 divides FPdim ( W ) 2 \operatorname{FPdim}(W)^2 FPdim ( W ) 2 . Each graded component is nonzero, so the ordinary class graph of H H H embeds in the class graph of M \mathcal{M} M .
Let q q q be any vertex outside π ( H ) \pi(H) π ( H ) , and choose a simple X X X such that q ∣ FPdim ( X ) 2 q \mid\operatorname{FPdim}(X)^2 q ∣ FPdim ( X ) 2 . If FPdim ( X ) 2 \operatorname{FPdim}(X)^2 FPdim ( X ) 2 has a prime divisor in π ( H ) \pi(H) π ( H ) , then q q q is already connected to the embedded graph. Otherwise gcd ( FPdim ( X ) 2 , ∣ H ∣ ) = 1 \gcd(\operatorname{FPdim}(X)^2, |H|) = 1 g cd( FPdim ( X ) 2 , ∣ H ∣ ) = 1 . The equivariantization dimension formula (26) , after squaring, shows that the inertia index and the projective representation degree are both one. Thus the image of X X X under de-equivariantization is simple. Choose any nonlinear U ∈ Irr ( H ) U \in\operatorname{Irr}(H) U ∈ Irr ( H ) . The categorical Gallagher theorem [36 Corollary 6.2] implies that U ⊗ X U \otimes X U ⊗ X is simple. Its square dimension FPdim ( U ) 2 FPdim ( X ) 2 \operatorname{FPdim}(U)^2\operatorname{FPdim}(X)^2 FPdim ( U ) 2 FPdim ( X ) 2 connects q q q to a prime divisor of FPdim ( U ) \operatorname{FPdim}(U) FPdim ( U ) in π ( H ) \pi(H) π ( H ) . Every additional vertex therefore attaches to the embedded group graph, proving both claims. □ \square □
In the integral modular case, [36 Theorem 1.1 and Proposition 10.4] give the bound of three in general and the bound of two when the category is solvable or every Tannakian subcategory is pointed. The following theorem gives the bound of two for the graph of squared dimensions throughout the weakly integral modular case.
Theorem 6.4 (The modular two-component bound). Let M \mathcal{M} M be a weakly integral modular fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C . Then Δ c l ( M ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{M}) Δ cl ( M ) has at most two connected components.
Proof. If M \mathcal{M} M contains a non-pointed Tannakian subcategory, apply Proposition 6.3. Suppose that every Tannakian subcategory of M \mathcal{M} M is pointed. Let X , Y X,Y X , Y label classes in different components. Their squared dimensions are coprime. If S X , Y ≠ 0 S_{X,Y} \ne0 S X , Y = 0 , then Lemma 6.1 gives projective centralization. The stabilizers of X ∗ X^* X ∗ and Y Y Y have coprime orders, since those orders divide FPdim ( X ) 2 \operatorname{FPdim}(X)^2 FPdim ( X ) 2 and FPdim ( Y ) 2 \operatorname{FPdim}(Y)^2 FPdim ( Y ) 2 , respectively. It follows that X ⊗ Y X \otimes Y X ⊗ Y is simple [36 Lemma 9.3 and Remark 9.4] . Its squared dimension would join the two components. Thus S X , Y = 0 S_{X,Y}=0 S X , Y = 0 . For the Verlinde character μ X \mu_X μ X and the class image Y ⊗ Y ∗ Y \otimes Y^* Y ⊗ Y ∗ this gives
μ X ( Y ⊗ Y ∗ ) = ∣ S X , Y ∣ 2 FPdim ( X ) 2 = 0. (107) \mu_X(Y \otimes Y^*) = \frac{\lvert S_{X,Y}\rvert^2}{\operatorname{FPdim}(X)^2} = 0. \tag*{(107)} μ X ( Y ⊗ Y ∗ ) = FPdim ( X ) 2 ∣ S X , Y ∣ 2 = 0. (107)
Proposition 5.1 now bounds the number of components. For integral categories the simple-product or zero-entry alternative used here is [36 Corollary 9.5] .
Example 6.5. Take G = S 3 = C 3 ⋊ C 2 G=S_3=C_3 \rtimes C_2 G = S 3 = C 3 ⋊ C 2 in the Frobenius-group family of [36 Example 8.6] . In M = Rep ( D ( S 3 ) ) \mathcal{M}=\operatorname{Rep}(D(S_3)) M = Rep ( D ( S 3 )) , the centralizers of the three flux representatives are S 3 S_3 S 3 , C 2 C_2 C 2 , and C 3 C_3 C 3 . The corresponding simple dimensions, with multiplicity, are ( 1 , 1 , 2 ) (1,1,2) ( 1 , 1 , 2 ) , ( 3 , 3 ) (3,3) ( 3 , 3 ) , and ( 2 , 2 , 2 ) (2,2,2) ( 2 , 2 , 2 ) . By Lemma 6.2(1), the class dimensions have distinct values 1 1 1 , 4 4 4 , 9 9 9 , so the graph has two isolated vertices. On the other hand, Z ( M ) ≃ M ⊠ M r e v Z(\mathcal{M}) \simeq\mathcal{M} \boxtimes\mathcal{M}^{\mathrm{rev}} Z ( M ) ≃ M ⊠ M rev has class dimensions including 4 ⋅ 9 = 36 4 \cdot9=36 4 ⋅ 9 = 36 , so its class graph is connected. More generally, the graph of the center of an integral modular category is complete, as observed in [36 Example 10.1] .
Slightly degenerate categories and an Ising modification
Let C \mathcal{C} C be a weakly integral slightly degenerate braided fusion category. With its canonical positive spherical structure it admits a pseudo-unitary minimal modular extension M \mathcal{M} M by [30 Corollary 1.3] . We have
FPdim ( M ) = 2 FPdim ( C ) , C = ⟨ f ⟩ M ′ , (108) \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{M}) = 2\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}), \qquad\mathcal{C}=\langle f\rangle'_{\mathcal{M}}, \tag*{(108)} FPdim ( M ) = 2 FPdim ( C ) , C = ⟨ f ⟩ M ′ , (108)
where f f f is the fermion. Write M = M 0 ⊕ M 1 \mathcal{M}=\mathcal{M}_0 \oplus\mathcal{M}_1 M = M 0 ⊕ M 1 for the grading detected by monodromy with f f f , so that M 0 = C \mathcal{M}_0=\mathcal{C} M 0 = C . By Proposition 2.4, every character of C \mathcal{C} C is the restriction of a Verlinde character of M \mathcal{M} M , and the modular quotient formula (21) of Theorem 2.5 reads
FPdim ( Z μ W C ) = FPdim ( W ) 2 1 + δ f W , W . (109) \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_{\mu_W}^{\mathcal{C}}) = \frac{\operatorname{FPdim}(W)^2}{1+\delta_{fW,W}}. \tag*{(109)} FPdim ( Z μ W C ) = 1 + δ f W , W FPdim ( W ) 2 . (109)
For the restricted character μ W \mu_W μ W , the value μ W ( [ f ] ) \mu_W([f]) μ W ([ f ]) is the monodromy sign of W W W with f f f . Thus the odd sector supplies the negative fiber of Proposition 6.22; its class dimensions need not be simple squares in C \mathcal{C} C .
Lemma 6.6 (Parity in the odd sector). Let C \mathcal{C} C be a weakly integral slightly degenerate braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C , and let f f f be the fermion generating Z 2 ( C ) \mathbb{Z}_2(\mathcal{C}) Z 2 ( C ) . Let M \mathcal{M} M be a minimal modular extension of C \mathcal{C} C . It is weakly integral, with C = ⟨ f ⟩ M ′ \mathcal{C}=\langle f\rangle'_{\mathcal{M}} C = ⟨ f ⟩ M ′ and FPdim ( M ) = 2 FPdim ( C ) \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{M})=2\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}) FPdim ( M ) = 2 FPdim ( C ) . Write M = M 0 ⊕ M 1 \mathcal{M}=\mathcal{M}_0\oplus\mathcal{M}_1 M = M 0 ⊕ M 1 for the faithful C 2 \mathbb{C}_2 C 2 -grading defined by monodromy with f f f , with M 0 = C \mathcal{M}_0=\mathcal{C} M 0 = C . Suppose W ∈ Irr ( M 1 ) W\in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{M}_1) W ∈ Irr ( M 1 ) satisfies f ⊗ W ≃ W f\otimes W\simeq W f ⊗ W ≃ W and v 2 ( FPdim ( W ) 2 ) = 1 v_2(\operatorname{FPdim}(W)^2)=1 v 2 ( FPdim ( W ) 2 ) = 1 . Then FPdim ( V ) 2 \operatorname{FPdim}(V)^2 FPdim ( V ) 2 is even for every V ∈ Irr ( M 1 ) V\in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{M}_1) V ∈ Irr ( M 1 ) .
Proof. Assume that FPdim ( V ) 2 \operatorname{FPdim}(V)^2 FPdim ( V ) 2 is odd. The product W ⊗ V W\otimes V W ⊗ V belongs to C \mathcal{C} C and is fixed by tensoring with f f f . Since f f f acts freely on the simples of C \mathcal{C} C , its constituents occur in pairs X , f X X,fX X , f X of equal multiplicity and equal dimension.
All constituents of W ⊗ V W\otimes V W ⊗ V belong to one component of the canonical dimension grading of the weakly integral category M \mathcal{M} M . Thus their dimensions are integer multiples of the same square root s \sqrt{s} s , where s s s is squarefree. Write FPdim ( W ) FPdim ( V ) = b s \operatorname{FPdim}(W)\operatorname{FPdim}(V)=b\sqrt{s} FPdim ( W ) FPdim ( V ) = b s . The paired decomposition implies that b b b is even. Thus 4 ∣ b 2 s = FPdim ( W ) 2 FPdim ( V ) 2 4\mid b^2s=\operatorname{FPdim}(W)^2\operatorname{FPdim}(V)^2 4 ∣ b 2 s = FPdim ( W ) 2 FPdim ( V ) 2 , contradicting v 2 ( FPdim ( W ) 2 FPdim ( V ) 2 ) = 1 v_2(\operatorname{FPdim}(W)^2\operatorname{FPdim}(V)^2)=1 v 2 ( FPdim ( W ) 2 FPdim ( V ) 2 ) = 1 .
Proposition 6.7 (Modular realization of the class graph). Let C \mathcal{C} C be a weakly integral slightly degenerate braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C . There is a weakly integral modular fusion category N \mathcal{N} N containing C \mathcal{C} C as a full braided fusion subcategory such that
Δ c l ( N ) = Δ c l ( C ) . (110) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{N})=\Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{C}). \tag*{(110)} Δ cl ( N ) = Δ cl ( C ) . (110) Moreover N \mathcal{N} N can be chosen to have dimension 2 FPdim ( C ) 2\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}) 2 FPdim ( C ) .
Proof. Start with the minimal extension M \mathcal{M} M in (108) . For each f f f -fixed simple W W W , the fermion specialization (109) of the modular quotient formula (21) of Theorem 2.5 gives the integer class dimension FPdim ( W ) 2 / 2 \operatorname{FPdim}(W)^2/2 FPdim ( W ) 2 /2 . Thus FPdim ( W ) 2 \operatorname{FPdim}(W)^2 FPdim ( W ) 2 is even. If it is divisible by four for every fixed W W W , dividing these squares by two preserves all their prime divisors. The free orbits contribute the same squares in both categories, so N = M \mathcal{N}=\mathcal{M} N = M has the required graph.
Suppose now that v 2 ( FPdim ( W ) 2 ) = 1 v_2(\operatorname{FPdim}(W)^2)=1 v 2 ( FPdim ( W ) 2 ) = 1 for some fixed W W W . Choose a positive Ising modular category I \mathcal{I} I with fermion ψ \psi ψ and noninvertible simple σ \sigma σ . Write A = M ⊠ I \mathcal{A}=\mathcal{M}\boxtimes\mathcal{I} A = M ⊠ I and b = f ⊠ ψ b=f\boxtimes\psi b = f ⊠ ψ . The product of the two fermionic self-braidings is trivial, so ⟨ b ⟩ ≃ Rep ( C 2 ) \langle b\rangle\simeq\operatorname{Rep}(\mathbb{C}_2) ⟨ b ⟩ ≃ Rep ( C 2 ) is Tannakian. Take its connected étale regular algebra and the category of local modules
B = 1 ⊕ b , N = A B 0 . (111) B=\mathbf{1}\oplus b,\qquad\mathcal{N}=\mathcal{A}^{0}_{B}. \tag*{(111)} B = 1 ⊕ b , N = A B 0 . (111)
This is the Ising modification of [4 Theorem 3.13] in the unitary case. Here [17 Corollaries 3.30 and 3.32] apply to the nondegenerate category A \mathcal{A} A and give nondegeneracy of N \mathcal{N} N and
FPdim ( N ) = FPdim ( M ) FPdim ( I ) FPdim ( B ) 2 = 4 FPdim ( M ) 2 2 = 2 FPdim ( C ) . (112) \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{N})=
\frac{\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{M})\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{I})}{\operatorname{FPdim}(B)^2}
=
\frac{4\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{M})}{2^2}
=
2\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}). \tag*{(112)} FPdim ( N ) = FPdim ( B ) 2 FPdim ( M ) FPdim ( I ) = 2 2 4 FPdim ( M ) = 2 FPdim ( C ) . (112)
Hence N \mathcal{N} N is weakly integral and is modular for its canonical positive spherical structure.
Let F B : A → A B F_B\colon\mathcal{A}\to\mathcal{A}_B F B : A → A B , F B ( T ) = T ⊗ B F_B(T)=T\otimes B F B ( T ) = T ⊗ B , be the free right B B B -module functor [17 (15)] . By the locality criterion [17 Lemma 3.15] , F B ( T ) F_B(T) F B ( T ) is local precisely when T T T centralizes b b b , since B = 1 ⊕ b B=\mathbf{1}\oplus b B = 1 ⊕ b . Thus F B F_B F B restricts to a braided tensor functor ⟨ b ⟩ A ′ → N = A B 0 \langle b\rangle_{\mathcal{A}}'\to\mathcal{N}=\mathcal{A}^{0}_{B} ⟨ b ⟩ A ′ → N = A B 0 . Every simple local module is a summand of F B ( T ) F_B(T) F B ( T ) for some simple T T T in this centralizer [17 Example 3.14] . For X , Y ∈ C X,Y\in\mathcal{C} X , Y ∈ C , the objects X ⊠ 1 X\boxtimes\mathbf{1} X ⊠ 1 and Y ⊠ 1 Y\boxtimes\mathbf{1} Y ⊠ 1 centralize b b b . Adjunction gives
Hom N ( F B ( X ⊠ 1 ) , F B ( Y ⊠ 1 ) ) ≃ Hom A ( X ⊠ 1 , ( Y ⊠ 1 ) ⊗ B ) ≃ Hom C ( X , Y ) , (113) \operatorname{Hom}_{\mathcal{N}}(F_B(X\boxtimes\mathbf{1}),F_B(Y\boxtimes\mathbf{1}))
\simeq
\operatorname{Hom}_{\mathcal{A}}(X\boxtimes\mathbf{1},(Y\boxtimes\mathbf{1})\otimes B)
\simeq
\operatorname{Hom}_{\mathcal{C}}(X,Y), \tag*{(113)} Hom N ( F B ( X ⊠ 1 ) , F B ( Y ⊠ 1 )) ≃ Hom A ( X ⊠ 1 , ( Y ⊠ 1 ) ⊗ B ) ≃ Hom C ( X , Y ) , (113)
since Hom I ( 1 , ψ ) = 0 \operatorname{Hom}_{\mathcal{I}}(\mathbf{1},\psi)=0 Hom I ( 1 , ψ ) = 0 . By (113) , the functor X ↦ F B ( X ⊠ 1 ) X\mapsto F_B(X\boxtimes\mathbf{1}) X ↦ F B ( X ⊠ 1 ) embeds C \mathcal{C} C as a full braided fusion subcategory of N \mathcal{N} N .
Let U B : A B → A U_B\colon\mathcal{A}_B\to\mathcal{A} U B : A B → A be the forgetful functor. The underlying object U B ( F B ( T ) ) = T ⊗ B U_B(F_B(T))=T\otimes B U B ( F B ( T )) = T ⊗ B has dimension 2 FPdim A ( T ) 2\operatorname{FPdim}_{\mathcal{A}}(T) 2 FPdim A ( T ) , since FPdim A ( B ) = 2 \operatorname{FPdim}_{\mathcal{A}}(B)=2 FPdim A ( B ) = 2 . In A B \mathcal{A}_B A B one has FPdim A B ( F B ( T ) ) = FPdim A ( T ) \operatorname{FPdim}_{\mathcal{A}_B}(F_B(T))=\operatorname{FPdim}_{\mathcal{A}}(T) FPdim A B ( F B ( T )) = FPdim A ( T ) because the tensor functor F B F_B F B preserves Frobenius–Perron dimensions [22 Proposition 3.3.13(1)] . For T T T centralizing b b b , this is also FPdim N ( F B ( T ) ) \operatorname{FPdim}_{\mathcal{N}}(F_B(T)) FPdim N ( F B ( T )) , since N \mathcal{N} N is a fusion subcategory of A B \mathcal{A}_B A B .
The simples centralizing b b b are X ⊠ 1 X\boxtimes\mathbf{1} X ⊠ 1 , X ⊠ ψ X\boxtimes\psi X ⊠ ψ with X ∈ Irr ( C ) X\in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{C}) X ∈ Irr ( C ) , and V ⊠ σ V\boxtimes\sigma V ⊠ σ with V ∈ Irr ( M 1 ) V\in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{M}_1) V ∈ Irr ( M 1 ) , by the monodromy signs in the two factors. Since F B ( T ⊗ b ) ≃ F B ( T ) F_B(T\otimes b)\simeq F_B(T) F B ( T ⊗ b ) ≃ F B ( T ) , the first two families give the embedded simples of C \mathcal{C} C . For T = V ⊠ σ T=V\boxtimes\sigma T = V ⊠ σ the same adjunction gives End N ( F B ( T ) ) ≃ Hom A ( T , T ⊕ ( T ⊗ b ) ) \operatorname{End}_{\mathcal{N}}(F_B(T))\simeq\operatorname{Hom}_{\mathcal{A}}(T,T\oplus(T\otimes b)) End N ( F B ( T )) ≃ Hom A ( T , T ⊕ ( T ⊗ b )) as vector spaces. If f V ≄ V fV\not\simeq V f V ≃ V , this space has dimension one. Thus F B ( T ) F_B(T) F B ( T ) is simple in N \mathcal{N} N and FPdim N ( F B ( T ) ) = FPdim A ( T ) = 2 FPdim M ( V ) \operatorname{FPdim}_{\mathcal{N}}(F_B(T))=\operatorname{FPdim}_{\mathcal{A}}(T)=\sqrt{2}\operatorname{FPdim}_{\mathcal{M}}(V) FPdim N ( F B ( T )) = FPdim A ( T ) = 2 FPdim M ( V ) .
If f V ≃ V fV\simeq V f V ≃ V , choose an isomorphism T ⊗ b → T T\otimes b\to T T ⊗ b → T . By the cyclic cohomology formula (31) , H 2 ( C 2 , C × ) = 0 H^2(\mathbb{C}_2,\mathbb{C}^{\times})=0 H 2 ( C 2 , C × ) = 0 , so the isomorphism can be rescaled so that applying it twice agrees with multiplication b ⊗ b → 1 b\otimes b\to\mathbf{1} b ⊗ b → 1 . The two choices of sign then give inequivalent simple B B B -modules on T T T , each occurring once in F B ( T ) F_B(T) F B ( T ) by adjunction. They exhaust F B ( T ) F_B(T) F B ( T ) , whose endomorphism space has dimension two. Twisting both module actions by the algebra automorphism of B B B acting by − 1 -1 − 1 on b b b preserves the relative tensor product over B B B and the locality condition. It defines a tensor autoequivalence of N \mathcal{N} N interchanging these two summands, which therefore have equal Frobenius–Perron dimension in N \mathcal{N} N . Each summand has dimension FPdim N ( F B ( T ) ) / 2 = FPdim A ( T ) / 2 = FPdim M ( V ) / 2 \operatorname{FPdim}_{\mathcal{N}}(F_B(T))/2 = \operatorname{FPdim}_{\mathcal{A}}(T)/2 = \operatorname{FPdim}_{\mathcal{M}}(V)/\sqrt{2} FPdim N ( F B ( T )) /2 = FPdim A ( T ) /2 = FPdim M ( V ) / 2 .
Combining these calculations with (109) gives all the class dimensions in C \mathcal{C} C and all the simple squares in N \mathcal{N} N , up to repetition.
Table 6.11.
Lemma 6.6 gives 2 ∣ FPdim ( V ) 2 2 \mid\operatorname{FPdim}(V)^2 2 ∣ FPdim ( V ) 2 in the last row. Thus each entry in the middle column and the corresponding entry in the last column have precisely the same prime divisors. By Lemma 6.2[1 ] , the simple squares in the last column are the class dimensions of N \mathcal{N} N . The two columns therefore give the same vertices and edges.
Theorem 6.8 (The slightly degenerate two-component bound). Let C \mathcal{C} C be a weakly integral slightly degenerate braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C . Then Δ c l ( C ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{C}) Δ cl ( C ) has at most two connected components. If C \mathcal{C} C contains a Tannakian fusion subcategory braided equivalent to Rep ( G ) \operatorname{Rep}(G) Rep ( G ) for a finite nonsolvable group G G G , this graph is connected.
Proof. Use Proposition 6.7 and Theorem 6.4. A Tannakian subcategory of C \mathcal{C} C remains a Tannakian subcategory of the chosen N \mathcal{N} N , so the connectedness assertion follows from Proposition 6.3.
Centralizer orbit formulas and cyclic Tannakian center
Lemma 6.9 (Class dimensions in a Tannakian centralizer). Let M \mathcal{M} M be a weakly integral modular fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C , with its canonical positive spherical structure. Let Rep ( G ) ⊆ M \operatorname{Rep}(G) \subseteq\mathcal{M} Rep ( G ) ⊆ M be a Tannakian fusion subcategory for a finite group G G G , and put C = Rep ( G ) M ′ \mathcal{C} = \operatorname{Rep}(G)_{\mathcal{M}}^\prime C = Rep ( G ) M ′ , its Müger centralizer, equipped with the inherited braiding. This is a weakly integral fusion subcategory of M \mathcal{M} M . The de-equivariantization V = M G \mathcal{V} = \mathcal{M}_G V = M G by this copy of Rep ( G ) \operatorname{Rep}(G) Rep ( G ) is a weakly integral braided G G G -crossed fusion category. For W ∈ Irr ( M ) W \in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{M}) W ∈ Irr ( M ) denote by μ W \mu_W μ W the restriction to K ( C ) K(\mathcal{C}) K ( C ) of its Verlinde character [ X ] ↦ S X , W / FPdim ( W ) [X] \mapsto S_{X,W}/\operatorname{FPdim}(W) [ X ] ↦ S X , W / FPdim ( W ) . Under M ≃ V G \mathcal{M} \simeq\mathcal{V}^G M ≃ V G , choose a representative V ∈ Irr ( V ) V \in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{V}) V ∈ Irr ( V ) of the orbit underlying W W W and the corresponding irreducible projective representation ρ \rho ρ of its inertia group G V G_V G V . Set
H = G V , t = [ G : H ] . (114) H = G_V,\qquad t = [G:H]. \tag*{(114)} H = G V , t = [ G : H ] . (114) Then
FPdim ( W ) 2 = t 2 dim ( ρ ) 2 FPdim ( V ) 2 , (115) \operatorname{FPdim}(W)^2 = t^2\dim(\rho)^2\operatorname{FPdim}(V)^2, \tag*{(115)} FPdim ( W ) 2 = t 2 dim ( ρ ) 2 FPdim ( V ) 2 , (115) FPdim ( ( W ⊗ W ∗ ) ∩ Rep ( G ) ) = t dim ( ρ ) 2 , (116) \operatorname{FPdim}((W\otimes W^*)\cap\operatorname{Rep}(G)) = t\dim(\rho)^2, \tag*{(116)} FPdim (( W ⊗ W ∗ ) ∩ Rep ( G )) = t dim ( ρ ) 2 , (116) FPdim ( Z μ W C ) = t FPdim ( V ) 2 . (117) \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_{\mu_W}^{\mathcal{C}}) = t\operatorname{FPdim}(V)^2. \tag*{(117)} FPdim ( Z μ W C ) = t FPdim ( V ) 2 . (117) Every class dimension of C \mathcal{C} C is obtained in this way.
Proof. The first identity follows by squaring the equivariantization dimension formula (26) . For U ∈ Irr ( G ) U \in\operatorname{Irr}(G) U ∈ Irr ( G ) , the multiplicity of U U U in W ⊗ W ∗ W\otimes W^* W ⊗ W ∗ is
dim Hom H ( Res H G U ⊗ ρ , ρ ) . (118) \dim\operatorname{Hom}_{H}(\operatorname{Res}_{H}^{G}U\otimes\rho,\rho). \tag*{(118)} dim Hom H ( Res H G U ⊗ ρ , ρ ) . (118)
Since ρ ⊗ ρ ∗ \rho\otimes\rho^* ρ ⊗ ρ ∗ is an ordinary H H H -representation, summing with weights FPdim ( U ) \operatorname{FPdim}(U) FPdim ( U ) gives
∑ U FPdim ( U ) dim Hom H ( Res H G U , ρ ⊗ ρ ∗ ) = dim Ind H G ( ρ ⊗ ρ ∗ ) = t dim ( ρ ) 2 . (119) \sum_U \operatorname{FPdim}(U)\dim\operatorname{Hom}_{H}(\operatorname{Res}_{H}^{G}U,\rho\otimes\rho^*) = \dim\operatorname{Ind}_{H}^{G}(\rho\otimes\rho^*) = t\dim(\rho)^2. \tag*{(119)} U ∑ FPdim ( U ) dim Hom H ( Res H G U , ρ ⊗ ρ ∗ ) = dim Ind H G ( ρ ⊗ ρ ∗ ) = t dim ( ρ ) 2 . (119)
The modular quotient formula (21) of Theorem 2.5 and the double-centralizer identity (29) C M ′ = Rep ( G ) \mathcal{C}'_{\mathcal{M}}=\operatorname{Rep}(G) C M ′ = Rep ( G ) now yield FPdim ( Z μ W C ) = FPdim ( W ) 2 / ( t dim ( ρ ) 2 ) = t FPdim ( V ) 2 \operatorname{FPdim}(Z^\mathcal{C}_{\mu\mathcal{W}})=\operatorname{FPdim}(W)^2/(t\dim(\rho)^2)=t\operatorname{FPdim}(V)^2 FPdim ( Z μ W C ) = FPdim ( W ) 2 / ( t dim ( ρ ) 2 ) = t FPdim ( V ) 2 . Finally, by Proposition 2.4 , every character of the commutative semisimple algebra K ( C ) ⊗ C K(\mathcal{C})\otimes\mathbb{C} K ( C ) ⊗ C extends to a character of K ( M ) ⊗ C K(\mathcal{M})\otimes\mathbb{C} K ( M ) ⊗ C , and the latter are Verlinde characters.
Theorem 6.10 (Cyclic Tannakian Müger center). Let C \mathcal{C} C be a weakly integral braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C whose Müger center is Tannakian and braided equivalent to Rep ( C n ) \operatorname{Rep}(C_n) Rep ( C n ) , where C n C_n C n is cyclic of order n ≥ 1 n\ge1 n ≥ 1 . Then there is a weakly integral modular extension M \mathcal{M} M containing C \mathcal{C} C as a full braided fusion subcategory such that
Δ c l ( C ) = Δ c l ( M ) . (120) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{C})=\Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{M}). \tag*{(120)} Δ cl ( C ) = Δ cl ( M ) . (120) In particular, Δ c l ( C ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{C}) Δ cl ( C ) has at most two components.
Proof. If n = 1 n=1 n = 1 , take M = C \mathcal{M}=\mathcal{C} M = C . Suppose n > 1 n>1 n > 1 . For a Tannakian Müger center Rep ( G ) \operatorname{Rep}(G) Rep ( G ) , the obstruction to a minimal nondegenerate extension lies in H 4 ( G , C × ) H^4(G,\mathbb{C}^{\times}) H 4 ( G , C × ) ; see [26 Theorem 4.9] . The cyclic cohomology formula (31) with j = 2 j=2 j = 2 gives H 4 ( C n , C × ) = 0 H^4(C_n,\mathbb{C}^{\times})=0 H 4 ( C n , C × ) = 0 , so a minimal extension M \mathcal{M} M exists. Its dimension is n FPdim ( C ) n\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}) n FPdim ( C ) , so it is weakly integral, and C = Rep ( C n ) M ′ \mathcal{C}=\operatorname{Rep}(C_n)'_{\mathcal{M}} C = Rep ( C n ) M ′ .
Apply the orbit formulas (115) and (117) of Lemma 6.9 . Every inertia subgroup is cyclic, and its projective irreducible representations have dimension one by (31) with j = 1 j=1 j = 1 . Thus the corresponding dimensions are
FPdim ( W ) 2 = t 2 FPdim ( V ) 2 , FPdim ( Z μ W C ) = t FPdim ( V ) 2 . (121) \operatorname{FPdim}(W)^2=t^2\operatorname{FPdim}(V)^2,\qquad\operatorname{FPdim}(Z^\mathcal{C}_{\mu\mathcal{W}})=t\operatorname{FPdim}(V)^2. \tag*{(121)} FPdim ( W ) 2 = t 2 FPdim ( V ) 2 , FPdim ( Z μ W C ) = t FPdim ( V ) 2 . (121)
The number FPdim ( V ) 2 \operatorname{FPdim}(V)^2 FPdim ( V ) 2 is an integer because the de-equivariantization is weakly integral. These two numbers have identical prime supports. All class dimensions of C \mathcal{C} C occur, so the graphs agree. Apply Theorem 6.4 .
Remark 6.11 (A prime-support test for a chosen extension). For a noncyclic Tannakian center the fourth-cohomology obstruction may be nonzero. Suppose a minimal modular extension exists. By Lemma 6.9 , the dimensions in (117) and (115) , namely t FPdim ( V ) 2 t\operatorname{FPdim}(V)^2 t FPdim ( V ) 2 and t 2 dim ( ρ ) 2 FPdim ( V ) 2 t^2\dim(\rho)^2\operatorname{FPdim}(V)^2 t 2 dim ( ρ ) 2 FPdim ( V ) 2 , have the same prime support precisely when
π ( dim ( ρ ) ) ⊆ π ( t FPdim ( V ) 2 ) . (122) \pi(\dim(\rho))\subseteq\pi\left(t\operatorname{FPdim}(V)^2\right). \tag*{(122)} π ( dim ( ρ )) ⊆ π ( t FPdim ( V ) 2 ) . (122) Thus the square of the projective inertia degree dim ( ρ ) 2 \dim(\rho)^2 dim ( ρ ) 2 is the only factor that can introduce an additional prime in the ambient simple square. If (122) holds for every equivariant label ( V , ρ ) (V,\rho) ( V , ρ ) , the two graphs agree, since every downstairs class and every upstairs simple square occurs in these orbit formulas. The general bound in Theorem 7.11 uses central de-equivariantization and also covers super-Tannakian centers.
Class-image descent
Restricting class objects to a smaller braided category
Restriction to a braided subcategory containing Y i Y_i Y i detects when the class image becomes transparent.
Lemma 6.12 (Descent and collapse of a class). Let C \mathcal{C} C be a weakly integral braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C with its canonical positive spherical structure, and let L ⊆ C \mathcal{L}\subseteq\mathcal{C} L ⊆ C be a full fusion subcategory with the induced braiding. For a simple class summand Z i Z_i Z i of I C ( 1 ) I_{\mathcal{C}}(1) I C ( 1 ) in Z ( C ) \mathcal{Z}(\mathcal{C}) Z ( C ) , suppose its forgetful image Y i = F ( Z i ) Y_i=F(Z_i) Y i = F ( Z i ) belongs to L \mathcal{L} L . Write μ i \mu_i μ i for the corresponding character of K ( C ) K(\mathcal{C}) K ( C ) and put ν i = μ i ∣ K ( L ) \nu_i=\mu_i|_{K(\mathcal{L})} ν i = μ i ∣ K ( L ) . Restricting the half-braiding of Z i Z_i Z i to L \mathcal{L} L produces an object of Z ( L ) \mathcal{Z}(\mathcal{L}) Z ( L ) with
exactly one canonical class constituent, of multiplicity one, namely the class labeled by ν i \nu_i ν i . If FPdim ( Z ν i L ) = 1 \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_{\nu_i}^{\mathcal L})=1 FPdim ( Z ν i L ) = 1 , then
Y i ∈ Z 2 ( L ) . (123) Y_i \in\mathcal{Z}_2(\mathcal{L}). \tag*{(123)} Y i ∈ Z 2 ( L ) . (123)
If Z j Z_j Z j is another class summand with Y j = F ( Z j ) ∈ L Y_j=F(Z_j)\in\mathcal{L} Y j = F ( Z j ) ∈ L and Z i , Z j Z_i,Z_j Z i , Z j centralize each other in Z ( C ) \mathcal{Z}(\mathcal{C}) Z ( C ) , their descended canonical class constituents centralize as well.
Proof. Restrict half-braidings on the full subcategory of Z ( C ) \mathcal{Z}(\mathcal{C}) Z ( C ) whose underlying objects lie in L \mathcal{L} L . This gives a braided tensor functor R R R to Z ( L ) \mathcal{Z}(\mathcal{L}) Z ( L ) . Adjunction and [ Y i : 1 ] = 1 [Y_i:1]=1 [ Y i : 1 ] = 1 show that R ( Z i ) R(Z_i) R ( Z i ) contains exactly one canonical class constituent, once. For X ∈ Irr ( L ) X\in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{L}) X ∈ Irr ( L ) , preservation of the canonical positive spherical structure gives
S R ( Z i ) , X + FPdim ( Z i ) = ν i ( X ) . (124) \frac{S_{R(Z_i),X^+}}{\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i)}=\nu_i(X). \tag*{(124)} FPdim ( Z i ) S R ( Z i ) , X + = ν i ( X ) . (124)
Writing R ( Z i ) = ⨁ W n W W R(Z_i)=\bigoplus_W n_W W R ( Z i ) = ⨁ W n W W expresses this character as the positive weighted average of the restrictions of the Verlinde characters of the W W W , with weights n W FPdim ( W ) / FPdim ( Z i ) n_W\operatorname{FPdim}(W)/\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i) n W FPdim ( W ) / FPdim ( Z i ) . Distinct algebra characters are linearly independent, so every character in this average equals ν i \nu_i ν i . This identifies the canonical constituent. Braided functors preserve centralization, which also passes to constituents.
For the collapse assertion apply the modular quotient formula (21) of Theorem 2.5 to L + ⊆ Z ( C ) \mathcal{L}^+\subseteq\mathcal{Z}(\mathcal{C}) L + ⊆ Z ( C ) and the simple Z i Z_i Z i :
FPdim ( ( Z i Z i ∗ ) ∩ ( L + ) ′ ) = FPdim ( Z i ) 2 FPdim ( Z ν i L ) . (125) \operatorname{FPdim}\left((Z_iZ_i^*)\cap(\mathcal{L}^+)'\right)=\frac{\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i)^2}{\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_{\nu_i}^{\mathcal{L}})}. \tag*{(125)} FPdim ( ( Z i Z i ∗ ) ∩ ( L + ) ′ ) = FPdim ( Z ν i L ) FPdim ( Z i ) 2 . (125)
If FPdim ( Z ν i L ) = 1 \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_{\nu_i}^{\mathcal{L}})=1 FPdim ( Z ν i L ) = 1 , every constituent of Z i Z i ∗ Z_iZ_i^* Z i Z i ∗ centralizes L + \mathcal{L}^+ L + . For every X ≺ Y i X\prec Y_i X ≺ Y i , the internal-end identity (13) of Proposition 2.2 places X + X^+ X + in Z i Z i ∗ Z_iZ_i^* Z i Z i ∗ ; hence X X X centralizes L \mathcal{L} L . □
Remark 6.13 (The residual case in induction). Suppose that the stronger cross-component vanishing assertion holds in every proper fusion subcategory of C \mathcal{C} C . Let Z i , Z j Z_i,Z_j Z i , Z j be a counterexample, and let L \mathcal{L} L be a proper fusion subcategory containing Y i , Y j Y_i,Y_j Y i , Y j . Theorem 2.6, applied in the form (23) , gives FPdim ( Z ν i L ) ∣ FPdim ( Z i ) \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_{\nu_i}^{\mathcal{L}})\mid\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i) FPdim ( Z ν i L ) ∣ FPdim ( Z i ) and FPdim ( Z ν j L ) ∣ FPdim ( Z j ) \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_{\nu_j}^{\mathcal{L}})\mid\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_j) FPdim ( Z ν j L ) ∣ FPdim ( Z j ) . If both FPdim ( Z ν i L ) , FPdim ( Z ν j L ) > 1 \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_{\nu_i}^{\mathcal{L}}),\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_{\nu_j}^{\mathcal{L}})>1 FPdim ( Z ν i L ) , FPdim ( Z ν j L ) > 1 , their prime supports remain in different components, while Lemma 6.12 gives centralizing descended classes. This contradicts the inductive hypothesis. Thus one of FPdim ( Z ν i L ) , FPdim ( Z ν j L ) \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_{\nu_i}^{\mathcal{L}}),\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_{\nu_j}^{\mathcal{L}}) FPdim ( Z ν i L ) , FPdim ( Z ν j L ) is one, and the corresponding entire class image is transparent in L \mathcal{L} L .
Proposition 6.14 (Arithmetic of a symmetric class image). Let C \mathcal{C} C be a weakly integral braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C whose Tannakian fusion subcategories are all pointed. Let Z i Z_i Z i be a simple class summand of I C ( 1 ) I_{\mathcal{C}}(1) I C ( 1 ) in Z ( C ) \mathcal{Z}(\mathcal{C}) Z ( C ) with forgetful image Y i = F ( Z i ) Y_i=F(Z_i) Y i = F ( Z i ) . Assume that the fusion subcategory ⟨ Y i ⟩ ⊆ C \langle Y_i\rangle\subseteq\mathcal{C} ⟨ Y i ⟩ ⊆ C is symmetric for its induced braiding. For an invertible g ∈ C g\in\mathcal{C} g ∈ C write g + g^+ g + for its lift using that braiding. Let
G i = { g ∈ Irr ( C p t ) : g + Z i ≃ Z i } . (126) G_i=\{g\in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{pt}}):g^+Z_i\simeq Z_i\}. \tag*{(126)} G i = { g ∈ Irr ( C pt ) : g + Z i ≃ Z i } . (126)
Then precisely one of the following holds:
Y i Y_i Y i is pointed, Y i = ⨁ g ∈ G i g Y_i=\bigoplus_{g\in G_i}g Y i = ⨁ g ∈ G i g , and FPdim ( Z i ) = ∣ G i ∣ \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i)=|G_i| FPdim ( Z i ) = ∣ G i ∣ ;
Y i Y_i Y i is not pointed, FPdim ( Z i ) = 2 ∣ G i ∣ \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i)=2|G_i| FPdim ( Z i ) = 2∣ G i ∣ , and 4 ∣ FPdim ( Z i ) 4\mid\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i) 4 ∣ FPdim ( Z i ) .
In particular an odd-dimensional symmetric class image is pointed.
Proof. The internal-end identity (13) of Proposition 2.2 and Schur’s lemma give [ Y i : g ] = 1 [Y_i:g]=1 [ Y i : g ] = 1 for g ∈ G i g\in G_i g ∈ G i and zero for other invertible g g g . This proves the pointed case.
In the non-pointed case write the symmetric category generated by Y i Y_i Y i as Rep ( G , z ) \operatorname{Rep}(G,z) Rep ( G , z ) , where z z z is a central involution giving the parity. Its even Tannakian subcategory is pointed, so G / ⟨ z ⟩ G/\langle z\rangle G / ⟨ z ⟩ is abelian. Non-pointedness implies [ G , G ] = ⟨ z ⟩ [G,G]=\langle z\rangle [ G , G ] = ⟨ z ⟩ . All linear representations are even, and every odd irreducible has even degree: its determinant is trivial on the commutator z z z , whereas z z z acts on it as − 1 -1 − 1 .
As a connected separable algebra in the underlying category Rep ( G ) \operatorname{Rep}(G) Rep ( G ) , Y i Y_i Y i is Ind H G End ( V ) \operatorname{Ind}_{H}^{G}\operatorname{End}(V) Ind H G End ( V ) for a subgroup H H H and an irreducible projective H H H -representation V V V ; see [37 Section 3.4] . The trace of z z z on this algebra is either zero or its full dimension. Indeed, if z ∉ H z\notin H z ∈ / H it permutes the matrix blocks without fixed blocks. If z ∈ H z\in H z ∈ H , projective commutation gives a character a : H → C × a:H\to\mathbb{C}^{\times} a : H → C × with ρ ( t ) ρ ( z ) ρ ( t ) − 1 = a ( t ) ρ ( z ) \rho(t)\rho(z)\rho(t)^{-1}=a(t)\rho(z) ρ ( t ) ρ ( z ) ρ ( t ) − 1 = a ( t ) ρ ( z ) . If a a a is nontrivial then Tr ρ ( z ) = 0 \operatorname{Tr}\rho(z)=0 Tr ρ ( z ) = 0 ; otherwise Schur’s lemma makes ρ ( z ) \rho(z) ρ ( z ) scalar. Conjugation on End ( V ) \operatorname{End}(V) End ( V ) therefore has trace zero or full dimension, and the same holds on the induced algebra. The full-dimension alternative would make every constituent even and thus invertible, contrary to the assumption. Hence the even and odd parts each have dimension FPdim ( Z i ) / 2 \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i)/2 FPdim ( Z i ) /2 . The even part consists exactly of the invertible constituents, each once, giving FPdim ( Z i ) / 2 = ∣ G i ∣ \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i)/2=|G_i| FPdim ( Z i ) /2 = ∣ G i ∣ . Its odd part is a sum of even-dimensional simples, so ∣ G i ∣ |G_i| ∣ G i ∣ is even.
Corollary 6.15 (Odd pointed class images). Let C \mathcal{C} C be a weakly integral braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C with its canonical positive spherical structure. Let Z i Z_i Z i be a simple class summand of I C ( 1 ) I_{\mathcal{C}}(1) I C ( 1 ) in Z ( C ) Z(\mathcal{C}) Z ( C ) whose forgetful image Y i = F ( Z i ) Y_i=F(Z_i) Y i = F ( Z i ) is a direct sum of invertibles in C \mathcal{C} C . If FPdim ( Z i ) \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i) FPdim ( Z i ) is odd, then Z i Z_i Z i centralizes itself in Z ( C ) Z(\mathcal{C}) Z ( C ) . Consequently ⟨ Z i ⟩ ⊆ Z ( C ) \langle Z_i\rangle\subseteq Z(\mathcal{C}) ⟨ Z i ⟩ ⊆ Z ( C ) is Tannakian and has pointed forgetful image.
Proof. By Proposition 6.14, Y i = ⨁ g ∈ G i g Y_i=\bigoplus_{g\in G_i}g Y i = ⨁ g ∈ G i g . The balancing identity (28) for g + Z i ≃ Z i g+Z_i\simeq Z_i g + Z i ≃ Z i gives μ i ( g ) = θ g − 1 \mu_i(g)=\theta_g^{-1} μ i ( g ) = θ g − 1 . Since μ i \mu_i μ i is multiplicative, the twist restricts to a character on G i G_i G i , so the corresponding pointed subcategory is symmetric. A symmetric pointed category of odd order has trivial twist. Thus μ i ( Y i ) = FPdim ( Z i ) \mu_i(Y_i)=\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i) μ i ( Y i ) = FPdim ( Z i ) , proving self-centralization. The category generated by the twist-one self-centralizing simple Z i Z_i Z i is Tannakian. Its image is generated by the pointed object Y i Y_i Y i .
Disconnected graphs, Tannakian subcategories, and modular solvability
A disconnected class graph forces a nontrivial Tannakian subcategory. In the modular case this gives a reduction by a cyclic group of prime order. Throughout this section a disconnected graph has at least two nonempty connected components.
Proposition 6.16 (Disconnectedness forces a Tannakian subcategory). Let C \mathcal{C} C be a weakly integral braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C . If C \mathcal{C} C has no nontrivial Tannakian subcategory, then Δ c l ( C ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{C}) Δ cl ( C ) is empty or connected. Equivalently, if Δ c l ( C ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{C}) Δ cl ( C ) has at least two nonempty connected components, then C \mathcal{C} C contains a nontrivial Tannakian fusion subcategory.
Proof. We first treat the case in which C \mathcal{C} C is modular, and suppose for a contradiction that its class graph is disconnected.
If noninvertible simples X , Y X,Y X , Y have square dimensions belonging to different components, then S X , Y = 0 S_{X,Y}=0 S X , Y = 0 . Indeed, their square dimensions are coprime. Lemma 6.1 says that a nonzero S X , Y S_{X,Y} S X , Y would make them projectively centralize one another. The orders of their invertible stabilizers divide FPdim ( X ) 2 \operatorname{FPdim}(X)^2 FPdim ( X ) 2 and FPdim ( Y ) 2 \operatorname{FPdim}(Y)^2 FPdim ( Y ) 2 , respectively, by [36 Remark 9.4] , so the stabilizers have trivial intersection. By [36 Lemma 9.3] , X ⊗ Y X\otimes Y X ⊗ Y would be simple. Its square dimension FPdim ( X ) 2 FPdim ( Y ) 2 \operatorname{FPdim}(X)^2\operatorname{FPdim}(Y)^2 FPdim ( X ) 2 FPdim ( Y ) 2 would join the two components, a contradiction. We next remove a nondegenerate pointed factor. The symmetric center of C p t \mathcal{C}_{pt} C pt is either Vec \operatorname{Vec} Vec or sVec \operatorname{sVec} sVec : any larger symmetric category has a nontrivial even Tannakian subcategory. If C p t \mathcal{C}_{pt} C pt is nondegenerate, split it off. Otherwise the decomposition of a slightly degenerate pointed category in [20 Corollary A.19] writes it as a nondegenerate pointed category times sVec, and we split off the first factor. By Proposition 4.3, the pointed factor does not change the class graph. Thus we may assume
C p t = V e c or C p t = s V e c , FPdim ( C p t ) ∈ { 1 , 2 } . (127) \mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{pt}} = \mathrm{Vec} \quad\text{or} \quad\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{pt}} = \mathrm{sVec}, \qquad\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{pt}}) \in\{1,2\}. \tag*{(127)} C pt = Vec or C pt = sVec , FPdim ( C pt ) ∈ { 1 , 2 } . (127)
The remaining modular factor still has no nontrivial Tannakian subcategory.
If C a d \mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}} C ad is pointed, then C \mathcal{C} C is braided nilpotent and its graph is complete by Proposition 4.4 . Hence assume that C a d \mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}} C ad is non-pointed. Choose any noninvertible Y ∈ Irr ( C a d ) Y \in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}}) Y ∈ Irr ( C ad ) and choose a simple X X X whose square dimension lies in another component. The category C a d \mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}} C ad is integral in the weakly integral setting, so FPdim ( Y ) \operatorname{FPdim}(Y) FPdim ( Y ) is an integer at least two. We use the Verlinde computation of [36 Remark 10.3] . For integral modular categories with trivial pointed part, it yields the connectedness criterion of [36 Proposition 10.5] . Here X X X may have nonintegral dimension, and the pointed part may be sVec. The Verlinde formula gives
N X , X ∗ Y = 1 FPdim ( C ) ∑ T ∈ Irr ( C ) S X , T S X ∗ , T S Y ∗ , T FPdim ( T ) . (128) N^{Y}_{X,X^*} = \frac{1}{\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C})} \sum_{T \in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{C})} \frac{S_{X,T}S_{X^*,T}S_{Y^*,T}}{\operatorname{FPdim}(T)}. \tag*{(128)} N X , X ∗ Y = FPdim ( C ) 1 T ∈ Irr ( C ) ∑ FPdim ( T ) S X , T S X ∗ , T S Y ∗ , T . (128)
Every summand with T T T noninvertible vanishes: either its component differs from that of X X X , or it differs from that of Y Y Y . For invertible T T T , S X , T S X ∗ , T = FPdim ( X ) 2 S_{X,T}S_{X^*,T} = \operatorname{FPdim}(X)^2 S X , T S X ∗ , T = FPdim ( X ) 2 , while S Y ∗ , T = FPdim ( Y ) S_{Y^*,T} = \operatorname{FPdim}(Y) S Y ∗ , T = FPdim ( Y ) , because C a d = ( C p t ) ′ \mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}} = (\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{pt}})' C ad = ( C pt ) ′ . Therefore
N X , X ∗ Y = FPdim ( C p t ) FPdim ( X ) 2 FPdim ( Y ) FPdim ( C ) . (129) N^{Y}_{X,X^*} = \frac{\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{pt}})\operatorname{FPdim}(X)^2\operatorname{FPdim}(Y)}{\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C})}. \tag*{(129)} N X , X ∗ Y = FPdim ( C ) FPdim ( C pt ) FPdim ( X ) 2 FPdim ( Y ) . (129)
Both FPdim ( X ) 2 \operatorname{FPdim}(X)^2 FPdim ( X ) 2 and FPdim ( Y ) 2 \operatorname{FPdim}(Y)^2 FPdim ( Y ) 2 are class dimensions and divide FPdim ( C ) \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}) FPdim ( C ) . Since they are coprime, FPdim ( C ) = t FPdim ( X ) 2 FPdim ( Y ) 2 \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}) = t\operatorname{FPdim}(X)^2\operatorname{FPdim}(Y)^2 FPdim ( C ) = t FPdim ( X ) 2 FPdim ( Y ) 2 for a positive integer t t t . Consequently
N X , X ∗ Y = FPdim ( C p t ) t FPdim ( Y ) . (130) N^{Y}_{X,X^*} = \frac{\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{pt}})}{t\operatorname{FPdim}(Y)}. \tag*{(130)} N X , X ∗ Y = t FPdim ( Y ) FPdim ( C pt ) . (130)
For FPdim ( C p t ) = 1 \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{pt}}) = 1 FPdim ( C pt ) = 1 this is impossible. For FPdim ( C p t ) = 2 \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{pt}}) = 2 FPdim ( C pt ) = 2 , integrality forces FPdim ( Y ) = 2 \operatorname{FPdim}(Y) = 2 FPdim ( Y ) = 2 . Since Y Y Y was arbitrary, every noninvertible simple of C a d \mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}} C ad has dimension two.
Let f f f be the fermion when FPdim ( C p t ) = 2 \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{pt}}) = 2 FPdim ( C pt ) = 2 . It belongs to C a d \mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}} C ad and is transparent there. It acts freely on its simples: f Y ≅ Y fY \cong Y f Y ≅ Y would contradict the balancing identity (28) , because θ f = − 1 \theta_f = -1 θ f = − 1 . Thus Y ⊗ Y ∗ Y \otimes Y^* Y ⊗ Y ∗ contains the unit once and does not contain f f f . Its remaining dimension is 4 − 1 = 3 4 - 1 = 3 4 − 1 = 3 , whereas every remaining constituent has dimension two. This contradiction finishes the modular case.
Now let C \mathcal{C} C be arbitrary with no nontrivial Tannakian subcategory. Its Müger center is Vec or sVec. Only the second case remains. Choose the graph-preserving minimal modular extension N \mathcal{N} N supplied by Proposition 6.7 , and write C = ⟨ f ⟩ N \mathcal{C} = \langle f \rangle_{\mathcal{N}} C = ⟨ f ⟩ N . If N \mathcal{N} N has no nontrivial Tannakian subcategory, the modular case applies. Otherwise choose one, say T \mathcal{T} T . The faithful C 2 \mathbb{C}_2 C 2 -grading of N \mathcal{N} N with neutral component C \mathcal{C} C restricts to a grading of T \mathcal{T} T with neutral component T ∩ C = V e c \mathcal{T} \cap\mathcal{C} = \mathrm{Vec} T ∩ C = Vec . Hence T = ⟨ g ⟩ ≅ Rep ( C 2 ) \mathcal{T} = \langle g \rangle\cong\operatorname{Rep}(\mathbb{C}_2) T = ⟨ g ⟩ ≅ Rep ( C 2 ) , where g g g lies outside C \mathcal{C} C . Its monodromy with f f f is − 1 -1 − 1 .
The pointed category P = ⟨ f , g ⟩ \mathcal{P} = \langle f,g \rangle P = ⟨ f , g ⟩ has dimension four and is nondegenerate: its generators have orders two, twists − 1 , 1 -1,1 − 1 , 1 , and mutual monodromy − 1 -1 − 1 . Thus
N = P ⊠ B , C = ⟨ f ⟩ ⊠ B ≃ s V e c ⊠ B . (131) \mathcal{N} = \mathcal{P} \boxtimes\mathcal{B}, \qquad\mathcal{C} = \langle f \rangle\boxtimes\mathcal{B} \simeq\mathrm{sVec} \boxtimes\mathcal{B}. \tag*{(131)} N = P ⊠ B , C = ⟨ f ⟩ ⊠ B ≃ sVec ⊠ B . (131)
Here B \mathcal{B} B is modular and has no nontrivial Tannakian subcategory, since it is a subcategory of C \mathcal{C} C . The modular case applies to B \mathcal{B} B , and Proposition 4.3 identifies its graph with that of C \mathcal{C} C . ∩ევნ
Lemma 6.17 (Free invertible actions and class divisibility). Let A \mathcal{A} A be a weakly integral braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C . For each algebra character μ \mu μ of K ( A ) \mathcal{K}(\mathcal{A}) K ( A ) , consider the corresponding class object Z μ A Z^\mathcal{A}_\mu Z μ A in Z ( A ) Z(\mathcal{A}) Z ( A ) . If a subgroup H ⊆ Inv ( A ) H \subseteq\operatorname{Inv}(\mathcal{A}) H ⊆ Inv ( A ) acts freely on Irr ( A ) \operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{A}) Irr ( A ) by tensor product, then
FPdim ( Z μ A ) ∣ FPdim ( A ) ∣ H ∣ \operatorname{FPdim}(Z^\mathcal{A}_\mu)\mid\frac{\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{A})}{\lvert H\rvert} FPdim ( Z μ A ) ∣ ∣ H ∣ FPdim ( A ) for every character μ \mu μ .
In particular, let a cyclic group C p C_p C p of prime order act by braided tensor autoequivalences on a weakly integral braided fusion category B \mathcal{B} B over C \mathbb{C} C . If this categorical action fixes every simple isomorphism class of B \mathcal{B} B , then every character μ \mu μ of the complexified Grothendieck algebra K ( B C p ) \mathcal{K}(\mathcal{B}^{C_p}) K ( B C p ) satisfies
FPdim ( Z μ B C p ) ∣ FPdim ( B ) . \operatorname{FPdim}(Z^{\mathcal{B}^{C_p}}_\mu)\mid\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{B}). FPdim ( Z μ B C p ) ∣ FPdim ( B ) .
Proof. For an invertible a a a , the number μ ( a ) \mu(a) μ ( a ) is a root of unity. Hence μ ( a X ) μ ( ( a X ) ∗ ) = μ ( X ) μ ( X ∗ ) \mu(aX)\mu((aX)^*)=\mu(X)\mu(X^*) μ ( a X ) μ (( a X ) ∗ ) = μ ( X ) μ ( X ∗ ) . Choose one representative in each free H H H -orbit. The formal codegree formula (10) becomes
f μ = ∣ H ∣ ∑ X ∈ Irr ( A ) / H μ ( X ) μ ( X ∗ ) . f_\mu=\lvert H\rvert\sum_{X\in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{A})/H}\mu(X)\mu(X^*). f μ = ∣ H ∣ X ∈ Irr ( A ) / H ∑ μ ( X ) μ ( X ∗ ) .
Thus f μ / ∣ H ∣ f_\mu/\lvert H\rvert f μ / ∣ H ∣ is an algebraic integer. By (11) , it is the rational number FPdim ( A ) / ( ∣ H ∣ FPdim ( Z μ A ) ) \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{A})/(\lvert H\rvert\operatorname{FPdim}(Z^\mathcal{A}_\mu)) FPdim ( A ) / (∣ H ∣ FPdim ( Z μ A )) , so it is an integer.
For the final assertion, each simple of B \mathcal{B} B has inertia group C p C_p C p . Its projective equivariant representations are all one-dimensional, since H 2 ( C p , C × ) = 0 H^2(C_p,\mathbb{C}^{\times})=0 H 2 ( C p , C × ) = 0 by (31) . Tensoring with the canonical charges permutes its p p p equivariant lifts freely. Apply the first assertion to these charges.
Lemma 6.18 (Fixing the noninvertibles in a modular category). Let D \mathcal{D} D be a non-pointed weakly integral modular fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C . If a braided tensor autoequivalence of D \mathcal{D} D fixes the isomorphism class of every noninvertible simple object, then it fixes the isomorphism class of every invertible simple object.
Proof. Let T T T be the autoequivalence, let a a a be invertible, and let X X X be noninvertible. The canonical positive spherical structure, and therefore the S S S -matrix, is preserved by T T T . Consequently
S T ( a ) , X = S a , T − 1 ( X ) = S a , X . S_{T(a),X}=S_{a,T^{-1}(X)}=S_{a,X}. S T ( a ) , X = S a , T − 1 ( X ) = S a , X .
The invertible object T ( a ) a − 1 T(a)a^{-1} T ( a ) a − 1 thus centralizes every noninvertible simple. These simples generate D \mathcal{D} D : fix one noninvertible X X X ; for every invertible b b b , both b X bX b X and X ∗ X^* X ∗ are noninvertible, and their product contains b b b . Modularity forces T ( a ) a − 1 = 1 T(a)a^{-1}=1 T ( a ) a − 1 = 1 .
Proposition 6.19 (Components survive prime gauging). Let M \mathcal{M} M be a weakly integral modular fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C and let E ≃ Rep ( C p ) \mathcal{E}\simeq\operatorname{Rep}(C_p) E ≃ Rep ( C p ) be a Tannakian fusion subcategory of M \mathcal{M} M , with p p p prime. De-equivariantize M \mathcal{M} M by E \mathcal{E} E , and let D = ( M C p ) e \mathcal{D}=(\mathcal{M}_{C_p})_e D = ( M C p ) e be the weakly integral modular neutral component of the faithful C p C_p C p -grading on the resulting braided C p C_p C p -crossed fusion category. If D \mathcal{D} D is non-pointed, then every component of Δ c l ( M ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{M}) Δ cl ( M ) contains a vertex of Δ c l ( D ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{D}) Δ cl ( D ) . In particular,
# π 0 Δ c l ( M ) ≤ # π 0 Δ c l ( D ) . \#\pi_0\Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{M})\leq\#\pi_0\Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{D}). # π 0 Δ cl ( M ) ≤ # π 0 Δ cl ( D ) . Proof. Set Π = Vert Δ c l ( D ) \Pi=\operatorname{Vert}\Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{D}) Π = Vert Δ cl ( D ) . The iterated class Itô–Michler decomposition (39) of Corollary 3.3 gives
D = P ⊠ B , P pointed , π ( FPdim B ) = Π , gcd ( FPdim P , FPdim B ) = 1. \mathcal{D}=\mathcal{P}\boxtimes\mathcal{B},\qquad\mathcal{P}\ \text{pointed},\qquad\pi(\operatorname{FPdim}\mathcal{B})=\Pi,\qquad\gcd(\operatorname{FPdim}\mathcal{P},\operatorname{FPdim}\mathcal{B})=1. D = P ⊠ B , P pointed , π ( FPdim B ) = Π , g cd( FPdim P , FPdim B ) = 1.
The factor B \mathcal{B} B is non-pointed. These factors are preserved by the C p C_p C p -action. Indeed, P \mathcal{P} P is the product of the full pointed Sylow factors for the absent primes, hence is canonical; since D \mathcal{D} D is modular, its complementary factor is its centralizer. Inside E M \mathcal{E}^{\mathcal{M}} E M put
A = B C p , Q = D C p . (132) \mathcal{A}=\mathcal{B}^{C_p},\qquad\mathcal{Q}=\mathcal{D}^{C_p}. \tag*{(132)} A = B C p , Q = D C p . (132)
They centralize one another. Their dimensions multiply to p 2 FPdim ( D ) = FPdim ( M ) p^2\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{D})=\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{M}) p 2 FPdim ( D ) = FPdim ( M ) , so modularity gives
A M = Q , A ∩ Q = E . (133) \mathcal{A}_{\mathcal{M}}=\mathcal{Q},\qquad\mathcal{A}\cap\mathcal{Q}=\mathcal{E}. \tag*{(133)} A M = Q , A ∩ Q = E . (133)
The intersection assertion follows by forgetting equivariance: an object belonging to both factors has underlying object in P ∩ B = Vec \mathcal{P}\cap\mathcal{B}=\operatorname{Vec} P ∩ B = Vec .
Let Σ \Sigma Σ be the union of the components of Δ c l ( M ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{M}) Δ cl ( M ) which meet Π \Pi Π . Every downstairs edge persists upstairs. More explicitly, the squares of neutral equivariant simples have the form t 2 FPdim ( X ) 2 t^2\operatorname{FPdim}(X)^2 t 2 FPdim ( X ) 2 , where X ∈ Irr ( D ) X\in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{D}) X ∈ Irr ( D ) and t ∈ { 1 , p } t\in\{1,p\} t ∈ { 1 , p } ; projective representations of cyclic inertia subgroups have degree one.
We claim that all neutral simple squares and all class dimensions of A \mathcal{A} A have prime support in Σ \Sigma Σ . If p ∈ Σ p\in\Sigma p ∈ Σ , this follows from the equivariantization dimension formula (26) and FPdim ( Z μ A ) ∣ p FPdim ( B ) \operatorname{FPdim}(Z^{\mathcal{A}}_\mu)\mid p\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{B}) FPdim ( Z μ A ) ∣ p FPdim ( B ) . Suppose instead that p ∉ Σ p\notin\Sigma p ∈ / Σ . A noninvertible D \mathcal{D} D -simple cannot have an orbit of length p p p , since its equivariant square would connect p p p to Π \Pi Π . Lemma 6.18 then shows that the action fixes every simple of D \mathcal{D} D . Neutral simple dimensions are unchanged, and the free-action divisibility (6.31) of Lemma 6.17 gives FPdim ( Z μ A ) ∣ FPdim ( B ) \operatorname{FPdim}(Z^{\mathcal{A}}_\mu)\mid\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{B}) FPdim ( Z μ A ) ∣ FPdim ( B ) . This proves the claim.
Suppose a component of Δ c l ( M ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{M}) Δ cl ( M ) misses Π \Pi Π , and choose a simple W W W whose nontrivial square dimension belongs to that component. The claim makes W W W nonneutral. By the braided class divisibility (23) of Theorem 2.6,
FPdim ( Z μ W ∣ A A ) ∣ FPdim ( W ) 2 . (134) \operatorname{FPdim}(Z^{\mathcal{A}}_{\mu_W\mid\mathcal{A}})\mid\operatorname{FPdim}(W)^2. \tag*{(134)} FPdim ( Z μ W ∣ A A ) ∣ FPdim ( W ) 2 . (134)
The two sides have disjoint prime support unless the left side is one. The modular quotient formula (21) of Theorem 2.5 therefore yields
FPdim ( ( W ⊗ W ∗ ) ∩ A ′ ) = FPdim ( W ) 2 , W ⊗ W ∗ ∈ Q . (135) \operatorname{FPdim}((W\otimes W^*)\cap\mathcal{A}')=\operatorname{FPdim}(W)^2,\qquad W\otimes W^*\in\mathcal{Q}. \tag*{(135)} FPdim (( W ⊗ W ∗ ) ∩ A ′ ) = FPdim ( W ) 2 , W ⊗ W ∗ ∈ Q . (135)
Choose a simple Z ∈ A Z\in\mathcal{A} Z ∈ A over a noninvertible simple of B \mathcal{B} B . Its square dimension is nontrivial and supported in Σ \Sigma Σ . Every common simple constituent of W ∗ W W^*W W ∗ W and Z Z ∗ ZZ^* Z Z ∗ lies in Q ∩ A = E \mathcal{Q}\cap\mathcal{A}=\mathcal{E} Q ∩ A = E . No nontrivial charge a a a can stabilize W W W : if a W ≃ W aW\simeq W aW ≃ W , the balancing identity (28) and θ a = 1 \theta_a=1 θ a = 1 would make W W W centralize a a a , hence all of the prime-order category E \mathcal{E} E . That would make W W W neutral. Thus the unit is the only common constituent, with multiplicity one. Rigidity gives
dim End ( W ⊗ Z ) = dim Hom ( W ∗ W , Z Z ∗ ) = 1. (136) \dim\operatorname{End}(W\otimes Z)=\dim\operatorname{Hom}(W^*W,ZZ^*)=1. \tag*{(136)} dim End ( W ⊗ Z ) = dim Hom ( W ∗ W , Z Z ∗ ) = 1. (136)
The simple W ⊗ Z W\otimes Z W ⊗ Z has square dimension FPdim ( W ) 2 FPdim ( Z ) 2 \operatorname{FPdim}(W)^2\operatorname{FPdim}(Z)^2 FPdim ( W ) 2 FPdim ( Z ) 2 , joining the allegedly distinct components. This contradiction proves the first assertion. Because downstairs edges persist, the induced map from downstairs components to upstairs components is surjective, proving the component inequality.
Theorem 6.20 (Disconnected modular class graphs imply solvability). Let M \mathcal{M} M be a weakly *integral modular fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C . If Δ c l ( M ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{M}) Δ cl ( M ) has at least two nonempty connected components, then M \mathcal{M} M is solvable.
Proof. We argue by induction on the integer FPdim ( M ) \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{M}) FPdim ( M ) . Proposition 6.16 supplies a nontrivial Tannakian subcategory Rep ( G ) \operatorname{Rep}(G) Rep ( G ) . Proposition 6.3 excludes a nonsolvable G G G . A nontrivial solvable group has a quotient C p C_p C p , so we obtain E = Rep ( C p ) ⊆ M \mathcal{E}=\operatorname{Rep}(C_p)\subseteq\mathcal{M} E = Rep ( C p ) ⊆ M . De-equivariantize and put D = ( M C p ) e \mathcal{D}=(\mathcal{M}_{C_p})_e D = ( M C p ) e . This is modular, weakly integral, and has dimension FPdim ( M ) / p 2 \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{M})/p^2 FPdim ( M ) / p 2 . If it is pointed, it is solvable. If it is non-pointed, Proposition 6.19 shows that its graph is disconnected, since the upstairs graph is disconnected. The induction hypothesis then makes D \mathcal{D} D solvable. In both cases, M C p \mathcal{M}_{C_p} M C p is a C p C_p C p -extension of a solvable category, and M = ( M C p ) C p \mathcal{M}=(\mathcal{M}_{C_p})^{C_p} M = ( M C p ) C p is solvable. We use closure under extensions and equivariantizations by solvable groups [24 Proposition 4.5] .
Corollary 6.21 (Slightly degenerate and cyclic-center cases). Let C \mathcal{C} C be a weakly integral braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C . Suppose that either C \mathcal{C} C is slightly degenerate or its Müger center is braided equivalent to the Tannakian category Rep ( C n ) \operatorname{Rep}(C_n) Rep ( C n ) for a cyclic group of order n ≥ 1 n\geq1 n ≥ 1 . If Δ c l ( C ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{C}) Δ cl ( C ) has at least two nonempty connected components, then C \mathcal{C} C is solvable.
Proof. Proposition 6.7 and Theorem 6.10 , respectively, provide a weakly integral modular extension with the same class graph. Theorem 6.20 makes that extension solvable. Its fusion subcategory C \mathcal{C} C is therefore solvable, by [24 Proposition 4.5] .
In particular, Corollary 6.21 applies to weakly group-theoretical braided categories with any of the stated Müger centers, since they are weakly integral.
Class dimensions from the reduced ring and the signed quotient
Let C \mathcal{C} C be weakly integral and slightly degenerate, with transparent fermion f f f . Choose a set Π 0 \Pi_0 Π 0 of representatives for the pairs { X , f X } \{X,fX\} { X , f X } in Irr ( C ) \operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{C}) Irr ( C ) , with 1 ∈ Π 0 1\in\Pi_0 1 ∈ Π 0 . For ϵ = ± 1 \epsilon=\pm1 ϵ = ± 1 write
R ϵ = K 0 ( C ) / ( [ f ] − ϵ [ 1 ] ) , x X ϵ = [ X ] mod ( [ f ] − ϵ [ 1 ] ) . (137) R_\epsilon=K_0(\mathcal{C})/([f]-\epsilon[1]),\qquad x^\epsilon_X=[X]\mathbin{\operatorname{mod}}([f]-\epsilon[1]). \tag*{(137)} R ϵ = K 0 ( C ) / ([ f ] − ϵ [ 1 ]) , x X ϵ = [ X ] mod ([ f ] − ϵ [ 1 ]) . (137)
The quotient R + R_+ R + is the reduced fusion ring used in [9 Proposition 2.4] . With the positive spherical structure, its character table is given by the reduced S S S -matrix [41 Proposition 3.3] . The classes detected by these characters are also described by the coset dimension formula [7 Corollary 4.19 and Proposition 4.21] . The quotient R − R_- R − retains the characters taking value − 1 -1 − 1 at f f f . Its structure constants in the orbit basis can be negative.
Proposition 6.22 (Class dimensions for the two fermion characters). Let C \mathcal{C} C , f f f , Π 0 \Pi_0 Π 0 and R ϵ R_\epsilon R ϵ be as in (137) . An algebra character λ \lambda λ of R ϵ ⊗ Z C R_\epsilon\otimes_{\mathbb{Z}}\mathbb{C} R ϵ ⊗ Z C lifts to a unique character μ \mu μ of K ( C ) K(\mathcal{C}) K ( C ) with μ ( [ f ] ) = ϵ \mu([f])=\epsilon μ ([ f ]) = ϵ . As ϵ \epsilon ϵ and λ \lambda λ vary, every conjugacy class occurs exactly once, with dimension
FPdim ( Z μ C ) = FPdim ( C ) 2 ∑ X ∈ Π 0 ∣ λ ( x X ϵ ) ∣ 2 . (138) \operatorname{FPdim}(Z^\mathcal{C}_\mu)=\frac{\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C})}{2\sum_{X\in\Pi_0}|\lambda(x^\epsilon_X)|^2}. \tag*{(138)} FPdim ( Z μ C ) = 2 ∑ X ∈ Π 0 ∣ λ ( x X ϵ ) ∣ 2 FPdim ( C ) . (138)
For ϵ = + 1 \epsilon=+1 ϵ = + 1 these dimensions are FPdim ( X ) 2 \operatorname{FPdim}(X)^2 FPdim ( X ) 2 , one for each X ∈ Π 0 X\in\Pi_0 X ∈ Π 0 . Each sign accounts for ∣ Π 0 ∣ |\Pi_0| ∣ Π 0 ∣ classes and for half the total class dimension.
Proof. The balancing identity (28) gives θ f X = − θ X \theta_{fX}=-\theta_X θ f X = − θ X for every simple X X X , so the fermion acts freely. The quotient R ϵ R_\epsilon R ϵ is free over Z \mathbb{Z} Z on { x X ϵ : X ∈ Π 0 } \{x^\epsilon_X:X\in\Pi_0\} { x X ϵ : X ∈ Π 0 } , with multiplication
x X ϵ x Y ϵ = ∑ Z ∈ Π 0 ( N X , Y Z + ϵ N X , Y f Z ) x Z ϵ . (139) x^\epsilon_Xx^\epsilon_Y=\sum_{Z\in\Pi_0}\left(N^Z_{X,Y}+\epsilon N^{fZ}_{X,Y}\right)x^\epsilon_Z. \tag*{(139)} x X ϵ x Y ϵ = Z ∈ Π 0 ∑ ( N X , Y Z + ϵ N X , Y f Z ) x Z ϵ . (139)
Indeed, multiplication by [ f ] [f] [ f ] exchanges the two basis vectors in each pair. Since [ f ] 2 = [ 1 ] [f]^2=[1] [ f ] 2 = [ 1 ] , each algebra character factors through exactly one quotient. Both complexified quotients are commutative semisimple of dimension ∣ Π 0 ∣ |\Pi_0| ∣ Π 0 ∣ . On a pair X , f X X,fX X , f X the two character values differ by the factor ϵ \epsilon ϵ . Thus the full formal codegree in (10) is twice the orbit sum of squared absolute values. The class-dimension formula (11) gives (138) .
For Y ∈ Π 0 Y \in\Pi_0 Y ∈ Π 0 , the normalized reduced column sends x X + x_X^+ x X + to S X , Y / FPdim ( Y ) S_{X,Y}/\operatorname{FPdim}(Y) S X , Y / FPdim ( Y ) . Reduced character orthogonality [41 Proposition 3.3] gives
∑ X ∈ Π 0 ∣ S X , Y FPdim ( Y ) ∣ 2 = FPdim ( C ) 2 FPdim ( Y ) 2 . (140) \sum_{X \in\Pi_0} \left|\frac{S_{X,Y}}{\operatorname{FPdim}(Y)}\right|^2 = \frac{\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C})}{2\operatorname{FPdim}(Y)^2}. \tag*{(140)} X ∈ Π 0 ∑ FPdim ( Y ) S X , Y 2 = 2 FPdim ( Y ) 2 FPdim ( C ) . (140)
These columns exhaust the characters of R + ⊗ Z C R_+ \otimes_{\mathbb{Z}} \mathbb{C} R + ⊗ Z C , which proves the assertion for ϵ = + 1 \epsilon=+1 ϵ = + 1 . Finally, apply the fiber-extent formula (18) of Proposition 2.4 to ⟨ f ⟩ ⊆ C \langle f\rangle\subseteq\mathcal{C} ⟨ f ⟩ ⊆ C . Each of the two characters of ⟨ f ⟩ \langle f\rangle ⟨ f ⟩ has class dimension one, so each fiber has total class dimension FPdim ( C ) / 2 \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C})/2 FPdim ( C ) /2 .
Corollary 6.23 (When the two class-dimension multisets agree). In Proposition 6.22, the two multisets of class dimensions, counted with multiplicity, coincide if and only if f ∉ C a d f \notin\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}} f ∈ / C ad . In this case the full multiset is { FPdim ( X ) 2 : X ∈ Irr ( C ) } \{\operatorname{FPdim}(X)^2 : X \in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{C})\} { FPdim ( X ) 2 : X ∈ Irr ( C )} , with one entry per simple object. In particular, under this condition the reduced ring R + R_+ R + gives the full class prime graph.
Proof. If f ∉ C a d f \notin\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}} f ∈ / C ad , its universal degree has order two in the finite abelian group U ( C ) U(\mathcal{C}) U ( C ) . Choose a character γ \gamma γ of U ( C ) U(\mathcal{C}) U ( C ) taking value − 1 -1 − 1 there. Twisting μ ( [ X ] ) \mu([X]) μ ([ X ]) by γ ( deg X ) \gamma(\deg X) γ ( deg X ) gives a bijection from the positive fiber to the negative fiber. It preserves formal codegrees by (10) . Conversely, the positive fiber contains a class of dimension one, so equality of multisets gives such a class in the negative fiber. By the characterization (146) in the proof of Lemma 7.2 , its character is FPdim \operatorname{FPdim} FPdim twisted by a character of U ( C ) U(\mathcal{C}) U ( C ) . Its value − 1 -1 − 1 at f f f forces deg f ≠ e \deg f \ne e deg f = e .
Example 6.24 (A class of dimension two in an integral fermion centralizer). Let I \mathcal{I} I be a positive Ising modular category, with fermion ψ \psi ψ and noninvertible simple σ \sigma σ , and set
M = I ⊠ 3 , f = ψ ⊠ ψ ⊠ ψ , C = ⟨ f ⟩ M ′ . (141) \mathcal{M}=\mathcal{I}^{\boxtimes3}, \qquad f=\psi\boxtimes\psi\boxtimes\psi, \qquad\mathcal{C}=\langle f\rangle'_{\mathcal{M}}. \tag*{(141)} M = I ⊠ 3 , f = ψ ⊠ ψ ⊠ ψ , C = ⟨ f ⟩ M ′ . (141) The double-centralizer identity (29) gives Z 2 ( C ) = ⟨ f ⟩ ≃ s V e c Z_2(\mathcal{C})=\langle f\rangle\simeq\mathrm{sVec} Z 2 ( C ) = ⟨ f ⟩ ≃ sVec . Monodromy with f f f acts on a simple triple by ( − 1 ) k (-1)^k ( − 1 ) k , where k k k counts its σ \sigma σ factors. Hence C \mathcal{C} C has eight invertibles and six simples of dimension two, so FPdim ( C ) = 32 \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C})=32 FPdim ( C ) = 32 and the only simple squares are 1 , 4 1,4 1 , 4 . On fermion orbits these contribute four classes of dimension one and three of dimension four by Proposition 6.22.
To see a further class directly in the fusion ring, let η \eta η be the Ising character with η ( [ ψ ] ) = − 1 \eta([\psi])=-1 η ([ ψ ]) = − 1 and η ( [ σ ] ) = 0 \eta([\sigma])=0 η ([ σ ]) = 0 . Restrict η ⊠ FPdim ⊠ FPdim \eta\boxtimes\operatorname{FPdim}\boxtimes\operatorname{FPdim} η ⊠ FPdim ⊠ FPdim to K ( C ) K(\mathcal{C}) K ( C ) . Its value at [ f ] [f] [ f ] is − 1 -1 − 1 . On the eight invertibles its absolute value is one. Of the six remaining simples, only those with σ \sigma σ in the last two positions contribute, with values 2 , − 2 2,-2 2 , − 2 . Thus its full formal codegree is 8 + 2 ⋅ 2 2 = 16 8+2\cdot2^2=16 8 + 2 ⋅ 2 2 = 16 , and the class-dimension formula (11) gives 32 / 16 = 2 32/16=2 32/16 = 2 .
For completeness the negative fiber has six classes of dimension two and one of dimension four. Indeed, put η \eta η successively in each of the three positions and choose either sign of 2 \sqrt{2} 2 for the value at σ \sigma σ of one of the other two Ising characters with value 1 1 1 at ψ \psi ψ . This gives six distinct restrictions of codegree 16 16 16 . The restriction of η ⊠ 3 \eta^{\boxtimes3} η ⊠ 3 has codegree 8 8 8 , since it vanishes on the six noninvertibles. These seven characters exhaust the fiber by Proposition 6.22. In this example the additional dimension 2 2 2 has the same prime support as 4 4 4 , so both fibers give the single vertex 2 2 2 .
Equivariantization and the component bound
Coprime actions and components under equivariantization
For a non-pointed base, we show that equivariantization induces a surjection on the sets of connected components of the class graphs. All group actions in this section are categorical actions by braided tensor autoequivalences. We call an action trivial if it is equivalent to the action with identity functors and identity coherence maps.
Rank-one components and the size-one spectral subspace
Lemma 7.1 (A rank-one universal component forces solvability). Let B \mathcal{B} B be a weakly integral braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C . If a homogeneous component of its universal grading has exactly one isomorphism class of simple objects, then B \mathcal{B} B is solvable.
Proof. Let A = B a d \mathcal{A}=\mathcal{B}_{\mathrm{ad}} A = B ad and suppose Irr ( B u ) = { X } \operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{B}_u)=\{X\} Irr ( B u ) = { X } . For every Y ∈ Irr ( A ) Y\in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{A}) Y ∈ Irr ( A ) the object Y ⊗ X Y\otimes X Y ⊗ X belongs to B u \mathcal{B}_u B u , so comparison of dimensions gives
Y ⊗ X ≃ FPdim ( Y ) X , X ⊗ X ∗ = ⨁ Y ∈ Irr ( A ) FPdim ( Y ) Y , FPdim ( X ) 2 = FPdim ( A ) , (142) Y\otimes X\simeq\operatorname{FPdim}(Y)X,\qquad X\otimes X^{*}=\bigoplus_{Y\in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{A})}\operatorname{FPdim}(Y)Y,\qquad\operatorname{FPdim}(X)^2=\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{A}), \tag*{(142)} Y ⊗ X ≃ FPdim ( Y ) X , X ⊗ X ∗ = Y ∈ Irr ( A ) ⨁ FPdim ( Y ) Y , FPdim ( X ) 2 = FPdim ( A ) , (142) where FPdim ( Y ) \operatorname{FPdim}(Y) FPdim ( Y ) is consequently an integer. The second equality follows from the first by rigidity.
Equip B \mathcal{B} B with its canonical positive ribbon structure. The balancing identity (28) shows that the monodromy of Y Y Y and X X X is the scalar θ Y − 1 \theta_Y^{-1} θ Y − 1 , because Y ⊗ X Y\otimes X Y ⊗ X is a multiple of X X X . Thus X X X and Y Y Y projectively centralize each other. By [20 Proposition 3.22] , X ⊗ X ∗ X\otimes X^{*} X ⊗ X ∗ centralizes Y Y Y . Its support is all of A \mathcal{A} A , so A \mathcal{A} A is symmetric.
Write A ≃ Rep ( L , z ) \mathcal{A}\simeq\operatorname{Rep}(L,z) A ≃ Rep ( L , z ) , where z z z is the central involution determining its symmetric braiding, and allow z = 1 z=1 z = 1 . Its even Tannakian subcategory is
E = Rep ( H ) , H = L / ⟨ z ⟩ . (143) \mathcal{E}=\operatorname{Rep}(H),\qquad H=L/\langle z\rangle. \tag*{(143)} E = Rep ( H ) , H = L / ⟨ z ⟩ . (143) Let T = ⟨ X ⟩ \mathcal{T}=\langle X\rangle T = ⟨ X ⟩ . Since X X ∗ XX^{*} X X ∗ contains every simple of A \mathcal{A} A , one has T a d = A \mathcal{T}_{\mathrm{ad}}=\mathcal{A} T ad = A . The universal grading of T \mathcal{T} T is cyclic, generated by the degree of X X X . Every object of E \mathcal{E} E has twist one, so the same balancing identity (28) gives actual centralization of X X X . Hence E ⊆ Z 2 ( T ) \mathcal{E}\subseteq\mathcal{Z}_2(\mathcal{T}) E ⊆ Z 2 ( T ) .
De-equivariantize T \mathcal{T} T by E \mathcal{E} E . The cyclic grading descends because the algebra of functions on H H H lies in the neutral component. Its neutral component becomes Vec \operatorname{Vec} Vec if z = 1 z=1 z = 1 , and sVec \operatorname{sVec} sVec otherwise. Each homogeneous component therefore has dimension 1 or 2, and contains at most two simple objects.
Consider the component corresponding to X X X . Its equivariantization has just one simple. The parametrization of equivariant simple objects [10 Corollary 2.13] implies that its simples downstairs form one H H H -orbit, and that the inertia subgroup K K K of one of them has exactly one irreducible projective representation for the relevant cocycle α \alpha α . Thus
[ H : K ] ≤ 2 , C α [ K ] is a matrix algebra . (144) [H:K]\leq2,\qquad\mathbb{C}^{\alpha}[K]\text{ is a matrix algebra}. \tag*{(144)} [ H : K ] ≤ 2 , C α [ K ] is a matrix algebra . (144) The theorem on groups of central type implies that K K K is solvable [28 Theorem 7.3] . Since [ H : K ] ≤ 2 [H:K]\leq2 [ H : K ] ≤ 2 , the group H H H is solvable, and so is its central extension L L L . Hence A \mathcal{A} A is solvable. Finally, the universal grading group of the braided category B \mathcal{B} B is abelian; B \mathcal{B} B is an extension of A \mathcal{A} A by this group, and is solvable by [24 Proposition 4.5] .
Lemma 7.2 (Rigidity on the nontrivial class characters). Let B \mathcal{B} B be a weakly integral braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C , and let T T T be a based-ring automorphism of K 0 ( B ) K_0(\mathcal{B}) K 0 ( B ) . Suppose the induced action on the algebra characters of K ( B ) K(\mathcal{B}) K ( B ) fixes every μ \mu μ such that FPdim ( Z μ B ) > 1 \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_\mu^{\mathcal{B}})>1 FPdim ( Z μ B ) > 1 . Then every simple moved by T T T lies in a rank-one component of the universal grading. Moreover, T T T cannot move a simple within its own component. In particular, if B \mathcal{B} B is nonsolvable, then T T T fixes every simple and every character.
Proof. Put U = U ( B ) U=U(\mathcal{B}) U = U ( B ) and
R u = ∑ X ∈ Irr ( B u ) FPdim ( X ) [ X ] . (145) R_u=\sum_{X\in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{B}_u)}\operatorname{FPdim}(X)[X]. \tag*{(145)} R u = X ∈ Irr ( B u ) ∑ FPdim ( X ) [ X ] . (145) The class-dimension-one characters are exactly
μ χ ( [ X ] ) = χ ( u ) FPdim ( X ) , X ∈ B u , χ ∈ U ^ . (146) \mu_\chi([X])=\chi(u)\operatorname{FPdim}(X),\qquad X\in\mathcal{B}_u,\quad\chi\in\widehat{U}. \tag*{(146)} μ χ ([ X ]) = χ ( u ) FPdim ( X ) , X ∈ B u , χ ∈ U . (146)
By (11) and the formal codegree formula (10) , FPdim ( Z μ B ) = 1 \operatorname{FPdim}(Z^{\mathcal{B}}_{\mu})=1 FPdim ( Z μ B ) = 1 means ∑ X ∣ μ ( [ X ] ) ∣ 2 = FPdim ( B ) \sum_X\lvert\mu([X])\rvert^2=\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{B}) ∑ X ∣ μ ([ X ]) ∣ 2 = FPdim ( B ) . Since ∣ μ ( [ X ] ) ∣ ≤ FPdim ( X ) \lvert\mu([X])\rvert\leq\operatorname{FPdim}(X) ∣ μ ([ X ])∣ ≤ FPdim ( X ) , equality holds termwise. Multiplicativity and equality in the triangle inequality show that the phases μ ( [ X ] ) / FPdim ( X ) \mu([X])/\operatorname{FPdim}(X) μ ([ X ]) / FPdim ( X ) multiply across every nonzero fusion coefficient. They therefore define a character of the universal grading group. The converse is immediate.
The primitive-idempotent formula (10) gives
e χ = 1 FPdim ( B ) ∑ u ∈ U χ ( u ) − 1 R u . (147) e_{\chi}=\frac{1}{\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{B})}\sum_{u\in U}\chi(u)^{-1}R_u. \tag*{(147)} e χ = FPdim ( B ) 1 u ∈ U ∑ χ ( u ) − 1 R u . (147)
Fourier inversion identifies their linear span with span C { R u : u ∈ U } \operatorname{span}_{\mathbb{C}}\{R_u:u\in U\} span C { R u : u ∈ U } . For every simple X X X , the element [ T ( X ) ] − [ X ] [T(X)]-[X] [ T ( X )] − [ X ] is annihilated by all characters μ \mu μ with FPdim ( Z μ B ) > 1 \operatorname{FPdim}(Z^{\mathcal{B}}_{\mu})>1 FPdim ( Z μ B ) > 1 , and therefore belongs to this span.
Each R u R_u R u has strictly positive coefficients on precisely the simples of B u \mathcal{B}_u B u . A nonzero difference of two basis elements in the same component cannot be a multiple of R u R_u R u . If the two elements belong to distinct components, restricting their difference to either component forces that component to have rank one. This proves the first two assertions. The final assertion follows from Lemma 7.1 .
Two coprime-action lemmas
Lemma 7.3 (Coprime actions fixing all simples). Let B \mathcal{B} B be a weakly integral braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C , and let a finite group H H H act categorically on B \mathcal{B} B by braided tensor autoequivalences. Suppose
gcd ( ∣ H ∣ , FPdim ( B ) ) = 1 (148) \gcd(\lvert H\rvert,\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{B}))=1 \tag*{(148)} g cd(∣ H ∣ , FPdim ( B )) = 1 (148) and every simple isomorphism class of B \mathcal{B} B is H H H -fixed. Then the categorical action is equivalent to the trivial action.
Proof. First restrict to a cyclic subgroup L ≤ H L\leq H L ≤ H . Since every simple is L L L -fixed and H 2 ( L , C × ) = 0 H^2(L,\mathbb{C}^{\times})=0 H 2 ( L , C × ) = 0 by (31) , each simple of B \mathcal{B} B has ∣ L ∣ \lvert L\rvert ∣ L ∣ inequivalent equivariant lifts, permuted freely by the canonical charges L ^ \widehat{L} L . The free-orbit codegree formula (6.32) from the proof of Lemma 6.17 gives, for every character μ \mu μ of K ( B L ) K(\mathcal{B}^L) K ( B L ) ,
f μ = ∣ L ∣ ∑ X ∈ Irr ( B L ) / L ^ μ ( [ X ] ) μ ( [ X ∗ ] ) . (149) f_\mu=\lvert L\rvert\sum_{X\in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{B}^L)/\widehat{L}}\mu([X])\mu([X^*]). \tag*{(149)} f μ = ∣ L ∣ X ∈ Irr ( B L ) / L ∑ μ ([ X ]) μ ([ X ∗ ]) . (149) Thus f μ / ∣ L ∣ f_\mu/\lvert L\rvert f μ / ∣ L ∣ is an algebraic integer. Since
f μ ∣ L ∣ = FPdim ( B ) FPdim ( Z μ B L ) ∈ Q , (150) \frac{f_\mu}{\lvert L\rvert}=\frac{\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{B})}{\operatorname{FPdim}(Z^{\mathcal{B}^L}_{\mu})}\in\mathbb{Q}, \tag*{(150)} ∣ L ∣ f μ = FPdim ( Z μ B L ) FPdim ( B ) ∈ Q , (150) it is an integer. Every prime dividing ∣ L ∣ \lvert L\rvert ∣ L ∣ is therefore absent from Δ c l ( B L ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{B}^L) Δ cl ( B L ) . The iterated class Itô–Michler decomposition (39) of Corollary 3.3 splits off the full pointed factors for these primes:
B L ≃ P ⊠ N , FPdim ( P ) = ∣ L ∣ , FPdim ( N ) = FPdim ( B ) . (151) \mathcal{B}^L\simeq\mathcal{P}\boxtimes\mathcal{N},\qquad\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{P})=\lvert L\rvert,\qquad\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{N})=\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{B}). \tag*{(151)} B L ≃ P ⊠ N , FPdim ( P ) = ∣ L ∣ , FPdim ( N ) = FPdim ( B ) . (151) All canonical charges have orders dividing ∣ L ∣ \lvert L\rvert ∣ L ∣ . Their components in N \mathcal{N} N must be trivial, by coprimality. Hence the specified subcategory Rep ( L ) \operatorname{Rep}(L) Rep ( L ) lies in P \mathcal{P} P , and equality of dimensions gives P = Rep ( L ) \mathcal{P}=\operatorname{Rep}(L) P = Rep ( L ) . This splitting is over the canonical Rep ( L ) \operatorname{Rep}(L) Rep ( L ) . De-equivariantization shows that the restricted categorical L L L -action is equivalent to the trivial action.
In particular, each functor belonging to an element of H H H is monoidally isomorphic to the identity. After choosing such isomorphisms, the coherence of the action is represented by a class in
H 2 ( H , Aut ⊗ ( Id B ) ) . (152) H^2\left(H,\operatorname{Aut}_{\otimes}(\operatorname{Id}_{\mathcal B})\right). \tag*{(152)} H 2 ( H , Aut ⊗ ( Id B ) ) . (152)
Here Aut ⊗ ( Id B ) ≃ U ( B ) ^ \operatorname{Aut}_{\otimes}(\operatorname{Id}_{\mathcal B}) \simeq\widehat{U(\mathcal B)} Aut ⊗ ( Id B ) ≃ U ( B ) . Its order divides FPdim ( B ) \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal B) FPdim ( B ) because the universal grading is faithful and its neutral component has integral Frobenius–Perron dimension. For a finite group H H H and a finite abelian H H H -module A A A of order coprime to ∣ H ∣ |H| ∣ H ∣ , one has H n ( H , A ) = 0 H^n(H,A)=0 H n ( H , A ) = 0 for every n > 0 n>0 n > 0 [13 Chap. XII, §2, Cor. 2.7, p. 237] . Here gcd ( ∣ H ∣ , FPdim ( B ) ) = 1 \gcd(|H|,\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal B))=1 g cd( ∣ H ∣ , FPdim ( B )) = 1 , so the result applies to A = Aut ⊗ ( Id B ) A=\operatorname{Aut}_{\otimes}(\operatorname{Id}_{\mathcal B}) A = Aut ⊗ ( Id B ) . Taking n = 2 n=2 n = 2 makes the coherence obstruction vanish.
Lemma 7.4 (Coprime actions fixing the nontrivial classes). Let B \mathcal B B be a non-pointed weakly integral braided fusion category over C \mathbb C C , and let a finite group H H H act categorically on B \mathcal B B by braided tensor autoequivalences. If
gcd ( ∣ H ∣ , FPdim ( B ) ) = 1 (153) \gcd(|H|,\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal B))=1 \tag*{(153)} g cd( ∣ H ∣ , FPdim ( B )) = 1 (153) and H H H fixes every character μ \mu μ of K ( B ) K(\mathcal B) K ( B ) with FPdim ( Z μ B ) > 1 \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal Z_\mu^{\mathcal B})>1 FPdim ( Z μ B ) > 1 , then the categorical action is equivalent to the trivial action.
Proof. Set A = B a d \mathcal A=\mathcal B_{\mathrm{ad}} A = B ad and U = U ( B ) U=U(\mathcal B) U = U ( B ) . Since B \mathcal B B is non-pointed, A ≠ Vec \mathcal A\ne\operatorname{Vec} A = Vec . Lemma 7.2 shows that every simple in a universal component of rank greater than one is fixed. In particular, all simples of A \mathcal A A are fixed. Lemma 7.3 trivializes the restricted action on A \mathcal A A .
The universal grading determines a homomorphism
ϕ : U ⟶ BrPic ( A ) , u ⟼ [ B u ] . (154) \phi: U\longrightarrow\operatorname{BrPic}(\mathcal A),\qquad u\longmapsto[\mathcal B_u]. \tag*{(154)} ϕ : U ⟶ BrPic ( A ) , u ⟼ [ B u ] . (154)
Indeed, the components are invertible A \mathcal A A -bimodule categories and multiplication induces equivalences B u ⊠ A B v ≃ B u v \mathcal B_u\boxtimes_{\mathcal A}\mathcal B_v\simeq\mathcal B_{uv} B u ⊠ A B v ≃ B uv ; see [23 Theorem 6.1 and Corollary 6.2] . Let K = ker ϕ K=\ker\phi K = ker ϕ .
Since each acting functor is monoidally isomorphic to the identity on A \mathcal A A , its restriction B u → B h ( u ) \mathcal B_u\to\mathcal B_{h(u)} B u → B h ( u ) is an equivalence of A \mathcal A A -bimodule categories. Hence ϕ ( h ( u ) ) = ϕ ( u ) \phi(h(u))=\phi(u) ϕ ( h ( u )) = ϕ ( u ) , and H H H acts trivially on U / K U/K U / K . For k ∈ K k\in K k ∈ K , the component B k \mathcal B_k B k is equivalent to the regular A \mathcal A A -bimodule category, so has rank rank ( A ) > 1 \operatorname{rank}(\mathcal A)>1 rank ( A ) > 1 . The rigidity assertion in Lemma 7.2 shows that H H H fixes its simples, hence fixes K K K pointwise.
The group U U U is abelian. Its automorphisms inducing the identity on both K K K and U / K U/K U / K identify with
Hom ( U / K , K ) , f ⟼ id U + ι f π , (155) \operatorname{Hom}(U/K,K),\qquad f\longmapsto\operatorname{id}_U+\iota f\pi, \tag*{(155)} Hom ( U / K , K ) , f ⟼ id U + ι f π , (155)
using additive notation, where ι : K → U \iota:K\to U ι : K → U and π : U → U / K \pi:U\to U/K π : U → U / K are the canonical maps. Its order has only primes dividing ∣ U ( B ) ∣ |U(\mathcal B)| ∣ U ( B ) ∣ . Since ∣ U ( B ) ∣ ∣ FPdim ( B ) |U(\mathcal B)|\mid\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal B) ∣ U ( B ) ∣ ∣ FPdim ( B ) , coprimality forces the H H H -action on U U U to be trivial. Every rank-one component is therefore preserved and its unique simple is fixed. The other simples were already fixed. A final application of Lemma 7.3 trivializes the action on B \mathcal B B .
Components under equivariantization
Proposition 7.5 (Components under prime cyclic equivariantization). Let p p p be a prime, and let B \mathcal B B be a non-pointed weakly integral braided fusion category over C \mathbb C C . Suppose C p C_p C p acts categorically on B \mathcal B B by braided tensor autoequivalences. The inclusion Δ c l ( B ) ⊆ Δ c l ( B C p ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal B)\subseteq\Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal B^{C_p}) Δ cl ( B ) ⊆ Δ cl ( B C p ) induces a surjection on connected components. In particular,
# π 0 Δ c l ( B C p ) ≤ # π 0 Δ c l ( B ) . (156) \#\pi_0\Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal B^{C_p})\leq\#\pi_0\Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal B). \tag*{(156)} # π 0 Δ cl ( B C p ) ≤ # π 0 Δ cl ( B ) . (156)
Proof. Write A = B C p \mathcal{A}=\mathcal{B}^{C_p} A = B C p , and let a a a generate the group of canonical invertible charges. Characters of Rep ( C p ) \operatorname{Rep}(C_p) Rep ( C p ) are evaluations at group elements. We call the evaluation at the identity the identity fiber.
We first record the arithmetic of the other fibers. If μ ( a ) ≠ 1 \mu(a)\ne1 μ ( a ) = 1 and a X ≃ X aX\simeq X a X ≃ X , then μ ( [ X ] ) = μ ( a ) μ ( [ X ] ) \mu([X])=\mu(a)\mu([X]) μ ([ X ]) = μ ( a ) μ ([ X ]) , so μ ( [ X ] ) = 0 \mu([X])=0 μ ([ X ]) = 0 . Every other charge orbit has length p p p . Since μ ( a ) μ ( a ∗ ) = 1 \mu(a)\mu(a^*)=1 μ ( a ) μ ( a ∗ ) = 1 , the summand μ ( [ X ] ) μ ( [ X ∗ ] ) \mu([X])\mu([X^*]) μ ([ X ]) μ ([ X ∗ ]) in the formal codegree formula (10) is constant on a charge orbit. It follows that f μ / p f_\mu/p f μ / p is an algebraic integer. Therefore
FPdim ( Z μ A ) ∣ FPdim ( B ) if μ ∣ Rep ( C p ) ≠ FPdim . (157) \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_\mu^\mathcal{A})\mid\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{B}) \qquad\text{if }\mu|_{\operatorname{Rep}(C_p)}\ne\operatorname{FPdim}. \tag*{(157)} FPdim ( Z μ A ) ∣ FPdim ( B ) if μ ∣ Rep ( C p ) = FPdim . (157)
For the identity fiber, the orbit formula (44) of Lemma 4.5 gives
FPdim ( Z ν A ) = [ C p : ( C p ) ν ] FPdim ( Z ν B ) , [ C p : ( C p ) ν ] ∈ { 1 , p } . (158) \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_\nu^\mathcal{A})=[C_p:(C_p)_\nu]\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_\nu^\mathcal{B}),\qquad[C_p:(C_p)_\nu]\in\{1,p\}. \tag*{(158)} FPdim ( Z ν A ) = [ C p : ( C p ) ν ] FPdim ( Z ν B ) , [ C p : ( C p ) ν ] ∈ { 1 , p } . (158)
Thus the inclusion of graphs preserves every vertex and edge. We must show that each component of Δ c l ( A ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{A}) Δ cl ( A ) contains a vertex of Δ c l ( B ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{B}) Δ cl ( B ) . The class Itô–Michler theorem (Theorem 1.1), in the iterated form (39) of Corollary 3.3, gives
B = P ⊠ D , gcd ( FPdim ( P ) , FPdim ( D ) ) = 1 , π ( FPdim ( D ) ) = Π , (159) \mathcal{B}=\mathcal{P}\boxtimes\mathcal{D},\qquad\gcd(\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{P}),\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{D}))=1,\qquad\pi(\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{D}))=\Pi, \tag*{(159)} B = P ⊠ D , g cd( FPdim ( P ) , FPdim ( D )) = 1 , π ( FPdim ( D )) = Π , (159)
where P \mathcal{P} P is pointed and Π = Vert Δ c l ( B ) = Vert Δ c l ( D ) \Pi=\operatorname{Vert}\Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{B})=\operatorname{Vert}\Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{D}) Π = Vert Δ cl ( B ) = Vert Δ cl ( D ) . Since B \mathcal{B} B is non-pointed, so is D \mathcal{D} D , and Π \Pi Π is nonempty. Both factors are preserved by the action. For P \mathcal{P} P , this follows because its invertibles form the full Hall subgroup of invertibles for the primes absent from Π \Pi Π . To check D \mathcal{D} D , project the P \mathcal{P} P -coordinate of each simple image T ( X ) T(X) T ( X ) , X ∈ Irr ( D ) X\in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{D}) X ∈ Irr ( D ) . Tensor compatibility makes these coordinates a grading of D \mathcal{D} D by a subgroup of Inv ( P ) \operatorname{Inv}(\mathcal{P}) Inv ( P ) . Its order divides both ∣ U ( D ) ∣ |U(\mathcal{D})| ∣ U ( D ) ∣ and FPdim ( P ) \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{P}) FPdim ( P ) , so it is trivial. Thus T ( D ) = D T(\mathcal{D})=\mathcal{D} T ( D ) = D . The multiplication equivalence P ⊠ D → B \mathcal{P}\boxtimes\mathcal{D}\to\mathcal{B} P ⊠ D → B is equivariant through the tensorators of the braided action. Put
A P = P C p , A D = D C p . (160) \mathcal{A}_{\mathcal{P}}=\mathcal{P}^{C_p},\qquad\mathcal{A}_{\mathcal{D}}=\mathcal{D}^{C_p}. \tag*{(160)} A P = P C p , A D = D C p . (160)
By (158) , the only possible new prime in the identity fiber is p p p . Assume p ∉ Π p\notin\Pi p ∈ / Π . If a character of P \mathcal{P} P moves, pair it with any character of D \mathcal{D} D of class dimension greater than one. The resulting character of B \mathcal{B} B has orbit size p p p , so its class dimension upstairs is divisible by p p p and by a prime in Π \Pi Π . If instead a character of D \mathcal{D} D of class dimension greater than one moves, pairing it with the Frobenius–Perron character of P \mathcal{P} P has the same effect. In the remaining case all P \mathcal{P} P -characters and all D \mathcal{D} D -characters of class dimension greater than one are fixed. Since p ∤ FPdim ( D ) p\nmid\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{D}) p ∤ FPdim ( D ) , Lemma 7.4 trivializes the action on D \mathcal{D} D . Thus every pair of characters is fixed and the identity fiber introduces no new prime.
It remains to treat a nonidentity charge value ζ \zeta ζ . Write K ( A ) ζ = e ζ K ( A ) K(\mathcal{A})_\zeta=e_\zeta K(\mathcal{A}) K ( A ) ζ = e ζ K ( A ) , where
e ζ = 1 p ∑ j = 0 p − 1 ζ − j [ a j ] . (161) e_\zeta=\frac{1}{p}\sum_{j=0}^{p-1}\zeta^{-j}[a^j]. \tag*{(161)} e ζ = p 1 j = 0 ∑ p − 1 ζ − j [ a j ] . (161)
A simple lying over a free underlying C p C_p C p -orbit is fixed by all charges, so its image under e ζ e_\zeta e ζ vanishes. A fixed underlying simple has p p p equivariant lifts by the cyclic cohomology formula (31) . Their images span one line. These lines, one for each fixed underlying simple, give a basis of the fiber algebra. A pair of underlying simples of P \mathcal{P} P and D \mathcal{D} D is fixed if and only if both are fixed. The product of chosen equivariant lifts from the two factors gives a lift of the corresponding pair. Multiplication therefore takes the tensor products of these basis vectors to a basis and induces an algebra isomorphism
K ( A P ) ζ ⊗ C K ( A D ) ζ → ∼ K ( A ) ζ . (162) K(\mathcal{A}_{\mathcal{P}})_\zeta\otimes_{\mathbb{C}}K(\mathcal{A}_{\mathcal{D}})_\zeta\xrightarrow{\sim} K(\mathcal{A})_\zeta. \tag*{(162)} K ( A P ) ζ ⊗ C K ( A D ) ζ ∼ K ( A ) ζ . (162)
The units are the corresponding charge idempotents.
Let μ \mu μ correspond to ( μ P , μ D ) (\mu_P,\mu_D) ( μ P , μ D ) . Choose one equivariant lift of each fixed underlying simple. The charge-orbit computation gives
f μ = p ( ∑ X ∈ Irr ( P ) C P ∣ μ P ( X ~ ) ∣ 2 ) ( ∑ Y ∈ Irr ( D ) C P ∣ μ D ( Y ~ ) ∣ 2 ) = f μ P f μ D p . (163) f_\mu=p\left(\sum_{X\in\operatorname{Irr}(P)_{\mathcal C_P}}|\mu_P(\widetilde{X})|^2\right)\left(\sum_{Y\in\operatorname{Irr}(D)_{\mathcal C_P}}|\mu_D(\widetilde{Y})|^2\right)=\frac{f_{\mu_P}f_{\mu_D}}{p}. \tag*{(163)} f μ = p X ∈ Irr ( P ) C P ∑ ∣ μ P ( X ) ∣ 2 Y ∈ Irr ( D ) C P ∑ ∣ μ D ( Y ) ∣ 2 = p f μ P f μ D . (163)
Comparison with the three global dimensions yields the exact formula
FPdim ( Z μ A ) = FPdim ( Z μ P A P ) FPdim ( Z μ D A D ) . (164) \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_\mu^{\mathcal A})=\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_{\mu_P}^{\mathcal A_P})\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_{\mu_D}^{\mathcal A_D}). \tag*{(164)} FPdim ( Z μ A ) = FPdim ( Z μ P A P ) FPdim ( Z μ D A D ) . (164)
Every such fiber of A D \mathcal A_D A D contains a class of dimension greater than one. Indeed, its total class mass is FPdim ( D ) \operatorname{FPdim}(D) FPdim ( D ) by the extent formula (18) of Proposition 2.4, while its number of characters equals the number of fixed simple objects of D D D , which is at most rank D < FPdim ( D ) \operatorname{rank} D<\operatorname{FPdim}(D) rank D < FPdim ( D ) . Moreover, (157) puts all its class primes in Π \Pi Π . Pair any μ P \mu_P μ P with such a μ D \mu_D μ D in (164) . Each prime of FPdim ( Z μ P A P ) \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_{\mu_P}^{\mathcal A_P}) FPdim ( Z μ P A P ) thus lies in a component meeting Π \Pi Π , while every prime from A D \mathcal A_D A D already belongs to Π \Pi Π . This proves the assertion in every fiber.
Theorem 7.6 (Components under arbitrary equivariantization). Let B \mathcal B B be a non-pointed weakly integral braided fusion category over C \mathbb C C , and let a finite group G G G act categorically on B \mathcal B B by braided tensor autoequivalences. The inclusion Δ c l ( B ) ⊆ Δ c l ( B G ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal B)\subseteq\Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal B^G) Δ cl ( B ) ⊆ Δ cl ( B G ) induces a surjection on connected components. Consequently,
# π 0 Δ c l ( B G ) ≤ # π 0 Δ c l ( B ) . (165) \#\pi_0\Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal B^G)\leq\#\pi_0\Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal B). \tag*{(165)} # π 0 Δ cl ( B G ) ≤ # π 0 Δ cl ( B ) . (165) In particular, if Δ c l ( B ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal B) Δ cl ( B ) is connected, then so is Δ c l ( B G ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal B^G) Δ cl ( B G ) .
Proof. The identity-fiber formula (44) of Lemma 4.5 gives the inclusion of graphs. For a normal subgroup N ◃ G N\triangleleft G N ◃ G , equivariantization in stages gives the induced G / N G/N G / N -action on B N \mathcal B^N B N and a braided equivalence ( B N ) G / N ≃ B G (\mathcal B^N)^{G/N}\simeq\mathcal B^G ( B N ) G / N ≃ B G , as in [25 §3] . Each intermediate equivariantization is non-pointed because its dominant forgetful functor has non-pointed image. For solvable G G G , iteration of Proposition 7.5 along a composition series proves the assertion.
Suppose now that G G G is centerless and nonsolvable. Its ordinary class graph is connected, and every prime dividing ∣ G ∣ |G| ∣ G ∣ is a vertex: a prime absent from this graph would have central Sylow subgroup [36 Remark 2.4 and Theorem 2.5] . By the individual braided divisibility (23) of Theorem 2.6, the ordinary class graph lies in a single component Σ \Sigma Σ of Δ c l ( B G ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal B^G) Δ cl ( B G ) . Consider any class of dimension greater than one lying outside Σ \Sigma Σ . Its restriction to Rep ( G ) \operatorname{Rep}(G) Rep ( G ) has class dimension one by the same divisibility. It is evaluation at a central element, which must be the identity. Therefore, by the identity-fiber formula (44) , there is a character ν \nu ν of K ( B ) K(\mathcal B) K ( B ) such that
FPdim ( Z μ B G ) = [ G : G ν ] FPdim ( Z ν B ) . (166) \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_\mu^{\mathcal B^G})=[G:G_\nu]\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_\nu^{\mathcal B}). \tag*{(166)} FPdim ( Z μ B G ) = [ G : G ν ] FPdim ( Z ν B ) . (166)
The left side is coprime to ∣ G ∣ |G| ∣ G ∣ , so the orbit index is one. Every vertex outside Σ \Sigma Σ therefore belongs to Δ c l ( B ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal B) Δ cl ( B ) .
It remains to show that Σ \Sigma Σ meets Π = Vert Δ c l ( B ) \Pi=\operatorname{Vert}\Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal B) Π = Vert Δ cl ( B ) . Otherwise Π \Pi Π is disjoint from π ( G ) \pi(G) π ( G ) , and all characters of B \mathcal B B of class dimension greater than one are G G G -fixed. Indeed, a nontrivial orbit index in (166) would join a prime of ∣ G ∣ |G| ∣ G ∣ to a prime in Π \Pi Π . As in (159) , apply Corollary 3.3 to split off the pointed factor for the absent primes to obtain
B = P ⊠ D , π ( FPdim ( D ) ) = Π . (167) \mathcal B=\mathcal P\boxtimes\mathcal D,\qquad\pi(\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal D))=\Pi. \tag*{(167)} B = P ⊠ D , π ( FPdim ( D )) = Π. (167)
The factors are G G G -stable by the argument following (159) . The category D \mathcal D D is non-pointed and gcd ( ∣ G ∣ , FPdim ( D ) ) = 1 \gcd(|G|,\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal D))=1 g cd( ∣ G ∣ , FPdim ( D )) = 1 . Pairing a character of D \mathcal D D of class dimension greater than one with the dimension character of P \mathcal{P} P shows that the former is fixed. Lemma 7.4 trivializes the action on D \mathcal{D} D . The equivariance of the product decomposition now gives
B G ≃ D ⊠ P G . (168) \mathcal{B}^{G} \simeq\mathcal{D} \boxtimes\mathcal{P}^{G}. \tag*{(168)} B G ≃ D ⊠ P G . (168)
Both factors are non-pointed since P G \mathcal{P}^{G} P G contains Rep ( G ) \operatorname{Rep}(G) Rep ( G ) . Proposition 4.3 makes the product graph connected. Its unique component contains the nonempty set Π \Pi Π , contrary to the assumption on Σ \Sigma Σ .
For arbitrary nonsolvable G G G , the hypercenter N = Z ∞ ( G ) N = Z_{\infty}(G) N = Z ∞ ( G ) is nilpotent and G / N G/N G / N is centerless and nonsolvable. Apply the solvable case to B N \mathcal{B}^{N} B N over B \mathcal{B} B , then the centerless case to ( B N ) G / N (\mathcal{B}^{N})^{G/N} ( B N ) G / N over B N \mathcal{B}^{N} B N . The two surjections on components compose to give the assertion.
All equivariant character fibers and pointed bases
For the fiber over the conjugacy class of g g g , the relevant action is the action of C G ( g ) C_G(g) C G ( g ) on the cyclic fiber algebra. It incorporates the coherence maps of the categorical action.
Proposition 7.7 (The all-fiber equivariantization formula). Let D \mathcal{D} D be a weakly integral braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C , and let a finite group G G G act categorically on D \mathcal{D} D by braided tensor autoequivalences. Put C = D G \mathcal{C} = \mathcal{D}^{G} C = D G . Fix g ∈ G g \in G g ∈ G , set L = ⟨ g ⟩ L = \langle g \rangle L = ⟨ g ⟩ and Q = C G ( g ) Q = C_G(g) Q = C G ( g ) . There is a canonical Q Q Q -action on the g g g -fiber algebra of K ( D L ) K(\mathcal{D}^{L}) K ( D L ) . Characters in the conjugacy-[ g ] [g] [ g ] fiber of K ( C ) K(\mathcal{C}) K ( C ) correspond to Q Q Q -orbits of characters ν \nu ν in that algebra. For the corresponding character μ \mu μ ,
FPdim ( Z μ C ) = ∣ g G ∣ [ Q : Q ν ] FPdim ( Z ν D L ) . (169) \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_{\mu}^{\mathcal{C}})=|g^{G}|[Q:Q_{\nu}]\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_{\nu}^{\mathcal{D}^{L}}). \tag*{(169)} FPdim ( Z μ C ) = ∣ g G ∣ [ Q : Q ν ] FPdim ( Z ν D L ) . (169) Here the g g g -fiber means restriction to evaluation at g g g on K ( Rep ( L ) ) K(\operatorname{Rep}(L)) K ( Rep ( L )) , and the [ g ] [g] [ g ] -fiber means restriction to evaluation on the conjugacy class of g g g on K ( Rep ( G ) ) K(\operatorname{Rep}(G)) K ( Rep ( G )) .
Proof. Regard the braided action as a crossed braided category with trivial grading. The extended Verlinde algebra of [32 ] has the decomposition
K ~ ( D ) = ⨁ x ∈ G T x ( D ) , T x ( D ) = ⨁ X ∈ Irr ( D ) x X ≃ X Hom ( X , x X ) . (170) \widetilde{K}(\mathcal{D})=\bigoplus_{x\in G}T_x(\mathcal{D}),\qquad T_x(\mathcal{D})=\bigoplus_{\substack{X\in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{D})\\xX\simeq X}}\operatorname{Hom}(X,xX). \tag*{(170)} K ( D ) = x ∈ G ⨁ T x ( D ) , T x ( D ) = X ∈ Irr ( D ) x X ≃ X ⨁ Hom ( X , x X ) . (170)
The morphism spaces are understood in the usual twisted-trace description, so the construction is independent of the chosen simple representatives. Tensor multiplication is zero between distinct x x x -summands. Each T x T_x T x is commutative here, because the original crossed grading is trivial. The group action transports T x T_x T x to T h x h − 1 T_{hxh^{-1}} T h x h − 1 .
By [32 Corollary 8.18] ,
K ( D G ) ≃ K ~ ( D ) G . (171) K(\mathcal{D}^{G})\simeq\widetilde{K}(\mathcal{D})^{G}. \tag*{(171)} K ( D G ) ≃ K ( D ) G . (171)
Put x = g − 1 x=g^{-1} x = g − 1 . In the map of [32 (8.14)] the equivariant structure map g X → X gX\to X g X → X contributes to T x ( D ) T_x(\mathcal{D}) T x ( D ) . Thus a charge representation acts on T x T_x T x by its character evaluated at g g g . Under (171) the block over evaluation at [ g ] [g] [ g ] identifies with T x ( D ) Q T_x(\mathcal{D})^{Q} T x ( D ) Q , by taking the x x x -component of an invariant element supported on the conjugacy class of x x x .
The cyclic group L = ⟨ x ⟩ L=\langle x\rangle L = ⟨ x ⟩ acts trivially on T x T_x T x . Indeed, the twisted-trace relation, with the structural identifications of the action understood, is
[ x ( f ) φ f − 1 ] = [ φ ] for f : X → ∼ Y , φ : X ⟶ x X . (172) [x(f)\varphi f^{-1}]=[\varphi]\quad\text{for }f:X\xrightarrow{\sim}Y,\quad\varphi:X\longrightarrow xX. \tag*{(172)} [ x ( f ) φ f − 1 ] = [ φ ] for f : X ∼ Y , φ : X ⟶ x X . (172)
On a fixed simple X X X , any nonzero φ \varphi φ is an isomorphism. Taking f = φ f=\varphi f = φ gives [ x ( φ ) ] = [ φ ] [x(\varphi)]=[\varphi] [ x ( φ )] = [ φ ] , and these morphisms span T x T_x T x . Thus the cyclic version of the same identification is
T g − 1 ( D ) ≃ K ( D L ) g . (173) T_{g^{-1}}(\mathcal{D})\simeq K(\mathcal{D}^{L})_{g}. \tag*{(173)} T g − 1 ( D ) ≃ K ( D L ) g . (173)
In particular T x T_x T x is a finite-dimensional commutative semisimple algebra. The primitive idempotents of T x Q T_x^Q T x Q are the sums over Q Q Q -orbits of primitive idempotents of T x T_x T x .
Let σ x \sigma_x σ x be the coefficient of the canonical unit morphism 1 → x 1 1 \to x1 1 → x 1 in T x T_x T x . For a fusion category A \mathcal{A} A , let τ A \tau_{\mathcal{A}} τ A be the coefficient of the unit in K ( A ) K(\mathcal{A}) K ( A ) . The trace identity and inverse map of [32 Theorem 8.17(2)–(3) and Corollary 8.18] give
τ C ∣ [ g ] = 1 ∣ Q ∣ σ x , τ D L ∣ g = 1 ∣ L ∣ σ x . (174) \tau_{\mathcal{C}|[g]} = \frac{1}{|Q|}\sigma_x,\qquad\tau_{\mathcal{D}^L|g} = \frac{1}{|L|}\sigma_x. \tag*{(174)} τ C ∣ [ g ] = ∣ Q ∣ 1 σ x , τ D L ∣ g = ∣ L ∣ 1 σ x . (174)
For the first equality the invariant element has ∣ g G ∣ |g^G| ∣ g G ∣ conjugate components with equal unit coefficients, and the inverse map divides their total coefficient by ∣ G ∣ |G| ∣ G ∣ . For the second the conjugacy class in L L L has one element.
For a primitive idempotent e ν e_\nu e ν of T x T_x T x this yields
σ x ( e ν ) = ∣ L ∣ f ν = FPdim ( Z ν D L ) FPdim ( D ) . (175) \sigma_x(e_\nu) = \frac{|L|}{f_\nu} = \frac{\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_\nu^{\mathcal{D}^L})}{\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{D})}. \tag*{(175)} σ x ( e ν ) = f ν ∣ L ∣ = FPdim ( D ) FPdim ( Z ν D L ) . (175)
The functional σ x \sigma_x σ x is Q Q Q -invariant. If the orbit of ν \nu ν has length t = [ Q : Q ν ] t = [Q : Q_\nu] t = [ Q : Q ν ] , the sum of its primitive idempotents has C C C -trace
t ∣ Q ∣ FPdim ( Z ν D L ) FPdim ( D ) . (176) \frac{t}{|Q|}\frac{\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_\nu^{\mathcal{D}^L})}{\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{D})}. \tag*{(176)} ∣ Q ∣ t FPdim ( D ) FPdim ( Z ν D L ) . (176)
Multiplying by FPdim ( C ) = ∣ G ∣ FPdim ( D ) \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}) = |G|\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{D}) FPdim ( C ) = ∣ G ∣ FPdim ( D ) converts the trace to the upstairs class dimension, giving the all-fiber formula (169) . For g = 1 g = 1 g = 1 , it reduces to the identity-fiber formula (44) of Lemma 4.5.
Proposition 7.8 (Pointed bases and perfect acting groups). Let D \mathcal{D} D be a pointed braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C , and let a finite group G G G act categorically on D \mathcal{D} D by braided tensor autoequivalences. Fix g ∈ G g \in G g ∈ G . Write A = Inv ( D ) A = \operatorname{Inv}(\mathcal{D}) A = Inv ( D ) and A g = { a ∈ A : g ( a ) = a } A^g = \{a \in A : g(a) = a\} A g = { a ∈ A : g ( a ) = a } . Let μ \mu μ correspond to the C G ( g ) C_G(g) C G ( g ) -orbit of a character ν \nu ν in the g g g -fiber of K ( D ⟨ g ⟩ ) K(\mathcal{D}\langle g\rangle) K ( D ⟨ g ⟩) as in Proposition 7.7 . Then
FPdim ( Z μ D G ) = ∣ g G ∣ [ C G ( g ) : C G ( g ) ν ] ∣ A : A g ∣ . (177) \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_\mu^{\mathcal{D}^G}) = |g^G|[C_G(g) : C_G(g)_\nu]|A : A^g|. \tag*{(177)} FPdim ( Z μ D G ) = ∣ g G ∣ [ C G ( g ) : C G ( g ) ν ] ∣ A : A g ∣. (177) If G G G is nontrivial and perfect, then Δ c l ( D G ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{D}^G) Δ cl ( D G ) is connected. More generally, the same conclusion holds whenever the ordinary class graph of G G G is nonempty, connected, and has vertex set π ( ∣ G ∣ ) \pi(|G|) π ( ∣ G ∣ ) .
Proof. Put L = ⟨ g ⟩ L = \langle g\rangle L = ⟨ g ⟩ , and take a character ν \nu ν in the generator-g g g fiber of K ( D L ) K(\mathcal{D}^L) K ( D L ) . A simple lying over an underlying element a ∈ A a \in A a ∈ A not fixed by g g g has proper inertia group L a < L L_a < L L a < L . Choose a character χ \chi χ of L L L trivial on L a L_a L a and with χ ( g ) ≠ 1 \chi(g) \ne1 χ ( g ) = 1 . Tensoring by its canonical charge fixes that simple, so its value under ν \nu ν is zero.
Each a ∈ A g a \in A^g a ∈ A g has exactly ∣ L ∣ |L| ∣ L ∣ equivariant lifts since H 2 ( L , C × ) = 0 H^2(L,\mathbb{C}^{\times}) = 0 H 2 ( L , C × ) = 0 by (31) . These lifts are invertible; their character values therefore have absolute value one. The formal-codegree sum (10) and the class-dimension formula (8) give
f ν = ∣ L ∣ ∣ A g ∣ , FPdim ( Z ν D L ) = ∣ L ∣ ∣ A ∣ ∣ L ∣ ∣ A g ∣ = ∣ A : A g ∣ . (178) f_\nu= |L||A^g|,\qquad\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_\nu^{\mathcal{D}^L}) = \frac{|L||A|}{|L||A^g|} = |A : A^g|. \tag*{(178)} f ν = ∣ L ∣∣ A g ∣ , FPdim ( Z ν D L ) = ∣ L ∣∣ A g ∣ ∣ L ∣∣ A ∣ = ∣ A : A g ∣. (178)
Substitution in the all-fiber formula (169) proves the first assertion.
Suppose the group class graph is nonempty and connected with vertex set π ( G ) \pi(G) π ( G ) . Braided divisibility (23) of Theorem 2.6 places this graph in one upstairs component Σ \Sigma Σ . Let q q q be a prime in another component. Then q ∤ ∣ G ∣ q \nmid|G| q ∤ ∣ G ∣ , and the pointed-base formula (177) shows that q q q could occur only in the factor ∣ A : A g ∣ |A : A^g| ∣ A : A g ∣ . For every noncentral g g g , the factor ∣ g G ∣ > 1 \lvert g^{G}\rvert> 1 ∣ g G ∣ > 1 has a prime divisor in π ( G ) \pi(G) π ( G ) . Each corresponding fiber is nonzero, so (177) would join q q q to Σ \Sigma Σ if q ∣ ∣ A : A g ∣ q \mid\lvert A : A^{g}\rvert q ∣ ∣ A : A g ∣ . Thus every noncentral g g g fixes the full q q q -Sylow subgroup A q A_q A q pointwise. Noncentral elements generate a nonabelian group: for z ∈ Z ( G ) z \in Z(G) z ∈ Z ( G ) and x ∉ Z ( G ) x \notin Z(G) x ∈ / Z ( G ) , both x x x and x z xz x z are noncentral and z = x − 1 ( x z ) z = x^{-1}(xz) z = x − 1 ( x z ) . Consequently all of G G G fixes A q A_q A q . Then q q q divides none of the indices ∣ A : A g ∣ \lvert A : A^{g}\rvert ∣ A : A g ∣ , and it divides neither of the group-theoretic factors. It is absent from every class dimension, contrary to its choice.
A nontrivial perfect group is nonsolvable, so its ordinary class graph is connected by Theorem 4.1 . If a prime divisor of ∣ G ∣ \lvert G\rvert ∣ G ∣ were absent from that graph, its Sylow subgroup would be central. A central Sylow subgroup splits off as an abelian direct factor, contradicting perfectness. Thus the full-support hypothesis holds for nontrivial perfect G G G .
Remark 7.9. Proposition 7.8 applies to an arbitrary braided action on the pointed category, with its given associator. The orbit factor in (169) is computed from the centralizer action on the fiber algebra. For example, the central extension of G = C 2 × C 2 G = C_2 \times C_2 G = C 2 × C 2 by C 2 C_2 C 2 with total group Q 8 Q_8 Q 8 realizes Rep ( Q 8 ) \operatorname{Rep}(Q_8) Rep ( Q 8 ) as an equivariantization of Rep ( C 2 ) \operatorname{Rep}(C_2) Rep ( C 2 ) . Conjugation fixes both simples of Rep ( C 2 ) \operatorname{Rep}(C_2) Rep ( C 2 ) . For g ≠ 1 g \ne1 g = 1 the preimage of ⟨ g ⟩ \langle g\rangle ⟨ g ⟩ is C 4 C_4 C 4 . Its two lifts of g g g give singleton classes in C 4 C_4 C 4 and are interchanged by conjugation in Q 8 Q_8 Q 8 . Thus ∣ g G ∣ = 1 \lvert g^{G}\rvert= 1 ∣ g G ∣ = 1 , [ C G ( g ) : C G ( g ) ν ] = 2 [C_G(g) : C_G(g)_\nu] = 2 [ C G ( g ) : C G ( g ) ν ] = 2 , and each nonidentity fiber contains a single class of size two. The identity fiber contributes the two classes of size one. For the strict trivial action all eight classes have size one.
A prime q ≠ p q \ne p q = p occurring downstairs can disappear from every nonidentity fiber of a C p C_p C p -equivariantization, as in Example 9.2.
Corollary 7.10. (The component bound for equivariantizations of pointed categories). Let D \mathcal{D} D be a pointed braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C with group of invertible objects A = Inv ( D ) A = \operatorname{Inv}(\mathcal{D}) A = Inv ( D ) , and let a finite group G G G act categorically on D \mathcal{D} D by braided tensor autoequivalences. Then Δ c l ( D G ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{D}^{G}) Δ cl ( D G ) has at most two components. If G = C p G = C_p G = C p has prime order and acts nontrivially on A A A , the graph is the union of the single vertex p p p and the complete graph on π ( ∣ A : A C p ∣ ) \pi(\lvert A : A^{C_p}\rvert) π (∣ A : A C p ∣) . In particular it has two components exactly when p ∤ ∣ A : A C p ∣ p \nmid\lvert A : A^{C_p}\rvert p ∤ ∣ A : A C p ∣ . If G = C p G = C_p G = C p acts trivially on A A A , the graph is empty.
Proof. For G = C p G = C_p G = C p , the identity-fiber dimensions are the orbit sizes of the characters of C [ A ] \mathbb{C}[A] C [ A ] by the identity-fiber formula (44) of Lemma 4.5 . All have size one if the action on A A A is trivial. Otherwise a character moves, since characters separate the elements of A A A , and its orbit has size p p p . Every g ≠ 1 g \ne1 g = 1 generates C p C_p C p . By (178) , every class in its nonempty fiber has dimension ∣ A : A C p ∣ \lvert A : A^{C_p}\rvert ∣ A : A C p ∣ . These are all the fibers, which gives the asserted graph and the criterion for two components.
For solvable G G G , take a composition series. A prime cyclic step with pointed base produces at most two components by the preceding paragraph. At any step with non-pointed base Proposition 7.5 bounds the number of components by that of the preceding graph. This proves the bound by induction. For nonsolvable G G G , first equivariantize by its nilpotent hypercenter N N N . The intermediate graph has at most two components. If D N \mathcal{D}^{N} D N is non-pointed, apply Theorem 7.6 to the induced G / N G/N G / N -action. If D N \mathcal{D}^{N} D N is pointed, the centerless nonsolvable group G / N G/N G / N has a connected class graph with vertex set π ( ∣ G / N ∣ ) \pi(\lvert G/N\rvert) π (∣ G / N ∣) , and Proposition 7.8 gives connectedness. □
The two-component bound
Theorem 7.11. (The general two-component bound). For every weakly integral braided fusion category C \mathcal{C} C over C \mathbb{C} C ,
# π 0 ( Δ c l ( C ) ) ≤ 2. (179) \#\pi_0\bigl(\Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{C})\bigr) \le2. \tag*{(179)} # π 0 ( Δ cl ( C ) ) ≤ 2. (179) Equality is attained by Rep ( D ( S 3 ) ) \operatorname{Rep}(D(S_3)) Rep ( D ( S 3 )) .
Proof. Write Z 2 ( C ) ≃ Rep ( G , z ) \mathcal{Z}_2(\mathcal{C}) \simeq\operatorname{Rep}(G,z) Z 2 ( C ) ≃ Rep ( G , z ) , allowing z = 1 z = 1 z = 1 , and let H = G / ⟨ z ⟩ H = G/\langle z\rangle H = G / ⟨ z ⟩ . The Tannakian subcategory Rep ( H ) \operatorname{Rep}(H) Rep ( H ) is the even part of Z 2 ( C ) \mathcal{Z}_2(\mathcal{C}) Z 2 ( C ) . Its central de-equivariantization B = C H \mathcal{B} = \mathcal{C}_H B = C H is weakly integral and braided, and C ≃ B H \mathcal{C} \simeq\mathcal{B}^{H} C ≃ B H . Under the centralizer correspondence for this de-equivariantization, Z 2 ( B ) Z_{2}(\mathcal{B}) Z 2 ( B ) is the de-equivariantization of Rep ( G , z ) \operatorname{Rep}(G,z) Rep ( G , z ) by Rep ( H ) \operatorname{Rep}(H) Rep ( H ) , hence is Vec \operatorname{Vec} Vec if z = 1 z=1 z = 1 and sVec \operatorname{sVec} sVec otherwise [20 Corollary 4.27 and Proposition 4.30(iii)] . Theorems 6.4 and 6.8 therefore bound # π 0 ( Δ c l ( B ) ) \#\pi_{0}(\Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{B})) # π 0 ( Δ cl ( B )) by two.
If B \mathcal{B} B is non-pointed, apply Theorem 7.6 to its braided H H H -action. If B \mathcal{B} B is pointed, Corollary 7.10 gives the bound for B H \mathcal{B}^{H} B H directly. Finally, the nontrivial class dimensions of Rep ( D ( S 3 ) ) \operatorname{Rep}(D(S_{3})) Rep ( D ( S 3 )) are 4 and 9, giving the two isolated vertices 2 and 3.
Centralizer descent and solvability
Symmetric class images and prime Tannakian centralizers
For a noncentral Rep ( C p ) ⊆ C \operatorname{Rep}(C_{p}) \subseteq\mathcal{C} Rep ( C p ) ⊆ C , the centralizer controls the components of Δ c l ( C ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{C}) Δ cl ( C ) . The proof uses the structure of connected separable algebras in symmetric fusion categories.
Lemma 8.1 (Prime-free connected algebras in a symmetric category). Let S \mathcal{S} S be a symmetric fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C (hence integral), and let A A A be a connected separable algebra object in S \mathcal{S} S . Suppose that every prime dividing FPdim ( A ) \operatorname{FPdim}(A) FPdim ( A ) is absent from Δ c l ( S ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{S}) Δ cl ( S ) . Then the object A A A is pointed. In particular, if A A A generates S \mathcal{S} S as a fusion category, then S \mathcal{S} S is pointed.
Proof. Write S = Rep ( H , z ) \mathcal{S}=\operatorname{Rep}(H,z) S = Rep ( H , z ) , with its possibly super braiding. The underlying tensor category is Rep ( H ) \operatorname{Rep}(H) Rep ( H ) , so a connected separable algebra has the form
A = Ind L H End ( V ) , n : = FPdim ( A ) = [ H : L ] ( dim V ) 2 , (180) A=\operatorname{Ind}_{L}^{H}\operatorname{End}(V),\qquad n:=\operatorname{FPdim}(A)=[H:L](\dim V)^{2}, \tag*{(180)} A = Ind L H End ( V ) , n := FPdim ( A ) = [ H : L ] ( dim V ) 2 , (180)
where L ≤ H L\leq H L ≤ H and V V V is an irreducible projective representation of L L L ; see [37 Section 3.4] . The prime divisors of a projective irreducible degree belong to the prime divisors of the group order. This follows, for example, by realizing the projective representation on a finite central covering group whose order has the same prime divisors as the original group.
For every prime dividing n n n , the corresponding Sylow subgroup of H H H is central, since that prime divides no conjugacy-class size of H H H . Their product P P P is therefore an abelian central Hall subgroup. A complement to P P P gives
H = P × H 0 , gcd ( n , ∣ H 0 ∣ ) = 1. (181) H=P\times H_{0},\qquad\gcd(n,|H_{0}|)=1. \tag*{(181)} H = P × H 0 , g cd( n , ∣ H 0 ∣ ) = 1. (181)
The index [ H : L ] [H:L] [ H : L ] divides n n n . Its coprimality with ∣ H 0 ∣ |H_{0}| ∣ H 0 ∣ implies that the projection of L L L onto H 0 H_{0} H 0 is onto. Goursat’s lemma and the coprimality of ∣ P ∣ |P| ∣ P ∣ and ∣ H 0 ∣ |H_{0}| ∣ H 0 ∣ then give
L = P 1 × H 0 ( P 1 ≤ P ) . (182) L=P_{1}\times H_{0}\qquad(P_{1}\leq P). \tag*{(182)} L = P 1 × H 0 ( P 1 ≤ P ) . (182)
Projective cocycles on this coprime direct product split into cocycles on its factors: the mixed term, a pairing between their abelianizations, is trivial. Consequently
V ≃ V 1 ⊗ V 0 , (183) V\simeq V_{1}\otimes V_{0}, \tag*{(183)} V ≃ V 1 ⊗ V 0 , (183)
with irreducible projective representations of P 1 P_{1} P 1 and H 0 H_{0} H 0 , respectively. Since ( dim V 0 ) 2 (\dim V_{0})^{2} ( dim V 0 ) 2 divides n n n , while the prime divisors of dim V 0 \dim V_{0} dim V 0 divide ∣ H 0 ∣ |H_{0}| ∣ H 0 ∣ , we have dim V 0 = 1 \dim V_{0}=1 dim V 0 = 1 .
Thus H 0 H_{0} H 0 acts trivially on H / L H/L H / L and by scalars on V 0 V_{0} V 0 . It acts trivially on the induced algebra A A A . The underlying representation A A A therefore factors through the abelian group P P P , and all its simple constituents are invertible. If these constituents generate S \mathcal{S} S , the latter category is pointed as well. ∎
Proposition 8.2 (The component exception for a prime centralizer). Let C \mathcal{C} C be a weakly integral braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C . Let p p p be a prime, and let E ≃ Rep ( C p ) \mathcal{E}\simeq\operatorname{Rep}(\mathbb{C}_p) E ≃ Rep ( C p ) be a Tannakian fusion subcategory of C \mathcal{C} C not contained in Z 2 ( C ) \mathcal{Z}_2(\mathcal{C}) Z 2 ( C ) . Let B = E ′ \mathcal{B}=\mathcal{E}' B = E ′ be its Müger centralizer in C \mathcal{C} C . Then C \mathcal{C} C has a faithful C p \mathbb{C}_p C p -grading with neutral component B \mathcal{B} B . For each algebra character μ \mu μ of K ( C ) K(\mathcal{C}) K ( C ) ,
FPdim ( Z μ C ) = s μ FPdim ( Z μ ∣ B B ) , s μ ∈ { 1 , p } . (184) \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{Z}_{\mu}^{\mathcal{C}})=s_\mu\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{Z}_{\mu|_{\mathcal{B}}}^{\mathcal{B}}),\qquad s_\mu\in\{1,p\}. \tag*{(184)} FPdim ( Z μ C ) = s μ FPdim ( Z μ ∣ B B ) , s μ ∈ { 1 , p } . (184) Every vertex and edge of Δ c l ( B ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{B}) Δ cl ( B ) survives in Δ c l ( C ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{C}) Δ cl ( C ) . The only possible increase in the number of connected components is a new isolated vertex p p p , absent from Δ c l ( B ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{B}) Δ cl ( B ) .
If this exceptional configuration occurs, every class dimension divisible by p p p equals p p p . Its class image has the form
FPdim ( Z i ) = p , Y i = ⨁ g ∈ K i g , K i ≤ Inv ( Z 2 ( B ) ) , ∣ K i ∣ = p . (185) \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{Z}_i)=p,\qquad Y_i=\bigoplus_{g\in K_i}g,\qquad K_i\leq\operatorname{Inv}(\mathcal{Z}_2(\mathcal{B})),\qquad|K_i|=p. \tag*{(185)} FPdim ( Z i ) = p , Y i = g ∈ K i ⨁ g , K i ≤ Inv ( Z 2 ( B )) , ∣ K i ∣ = p . (185) For odd p p p , the pointed subcategory with simple objects K i K_i K i is Tannakian; for p = 2 p=2 p = 2 it may instead be sVec.
Proof. Monodromy with the invertible objects of E \mathcal{E} E defines a grading by Inv ( E ) ≃ C p \operatorname{Inv}(\mathcal{E})\simeq\mathbb{C}_p Inv ( E ) ≃ C p . Noncentrality makes this grading nontrivial, hence faithful because p p p is prime; its neutral component is exactly E ′ \mathcal{E}' E ′ . The grading formula (50) of Lemma 4.6 gives (184) .
Every character downstairs extends by Proposition 2.4 . For any such extension, (184) gives the divisibility of class dimensions. Moreover, (184) introduces no new prime other than p p p . It can only add edges incident with p p p ; such edges cannot increase the number of components. An increase can therefore occur only when p p p is new and isolated.
In this case, a p p p -divisible class dimension has prime support { p } \{p\} { p } . Its restricted class dimension is p p p -free, so (184) forces FPdim ( Z i ) = p \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{Z}_i)=p FPdim ( Z i ) = p and FPdim ( Z μ i ∣ B B ) = 1 \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{Z}_{\mu_i|_{\mathcal{B}}}^{\mathcal{B}})=1 FPdim ( Z μ i ∣ B B ) = 1 . Since Y i ∈ C a d ⊆ B Y_i\in\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}}\subseteq\mathcal{B} Y i ∈ C ad ⊆ B , Lemma 6.12 gives Y i ∈ Z 2 ( B ) Y_i\in\mathcal{Z}_2(\mathcal{B}) Y i ∈ Z 2 ( B ) . Apply Lemma 8.1 to its connected separable algebra structure: the only prime in FPdim ( Y i ) \operatorname{FPdim}(Y_i) FPdim ( Y i ) is absent from the class graph of ⟨ Y i ⟩ ⊆ B \langle Y_i\rangle\subseteq\mathcal{B} ⟨ Y i ⟩ ⊆ B . Thus Y i Y_i Y i is pointed. The internal-end identity (13) of Proposition 2.2 and Schur’s lemma identify its constituents with the subgroup
K i = { g ∈ Inv ( C ) : g ⊗ Z i ≃ Z i } . (186) K_i=\{g\in\operatorname{Inv}(\mathcal{C}):g\otimes\mathcal{Z}_i\simeq\mathcal{Z}_i\}. \tag*{(186)} K i = { g ∈ Inv ( C ) : g ⊗ Z i ≃ Z i } . (186)
each with multiplicity one. Its order is consequently p p p . The last assertion follows from the classification of symmetric pointed categories. Notice that K i K_i K i need not be the original copy of C p \mathbb{C}_p C p defining E \mathcal{E} E . ∎
Lemma 8.3 (Relative autoequivalences of a prime extension). Let p p p be a prime, and let
R = ⨁ g ∈ C p R g (187) \mathcal{R}=\bigoplus_{g\in\mathbb{C}_p}\mathcal{R}_g \tag*{(187)} R = g ∈ C p ⨁ R g (187) be a faithfully C p \mathbb{C}_p C p -graded fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C . Suppose its neutral component A = R e \mathcal{A}=\mathcal{R}_e A = R e has p p p -power Frobenius–Perron dimension. In particular R \mathcal{R} R is weakly integral, since FPdim ( R ) = p FPdim ( A ) \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{R})=p\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{A}) FPdim ( R ) = p FPdim ( A ) . The group of isomorphism classes of pairs ( T , η ) (T,\eta) ( T , η ) , where T T T is a tensor autoequivalence of R \mathcal{R} R preserving each R g \mathcal{R}_g R g , and η : T ∣ A → ∼ Id A \eta:T|_{\mathcal{A}}\xrightarrow{\sim}\operatorname{Id}_{\mathcal{A}} η : T ∣ A ∼ Id A is a monoidal natural isomorphism, is a finite p p p -group. Isomorphisms of pairs are required to respect the specified neutral trivializations.
Consequently, let H H H be a finite group of order prime to p p p acting categorically on R \mathcal{R} R by tensor autoequivalences preserving each R g \mathcal{R}_g R g . Every coherent trivialization of its restricted action on A \mathcal{A} A extends to a coherent trivialization on R \mathcal{R} R .
Proof. Every R g \mathcal{R}_g R g is an invertible A \mathcal{A} A -bimodule category, and multiplication induces bimodule equivalences
M g , h : R g ⊠ A R h → ∼ R g h ; (188) M_{g,h}:\mathcal{R}_g\boxtimes_{\mathcal{A}}\mathcal{R}_h\xrightarrow{\sim}\mathcal{R}_{gh}; \tag*{(188)} M g , h : R g ⊠ A R h ∼ R g h ; (188)
see [23 Theorem 6.1] . The neutral trivialization η \eta η turns each T ∣ R g T|_{\mathcal R_g} T ∣ R g into an A \mathcal A A -bimodule autoequivalence. Restriction therefore defines a group homomorphism
Aut ⊗ C p ( R ; A ) ⟶ ∏ g ∈ C p Aut A − A ( R g ) . (189) \operatorname{Aut}_{\otimes}^{C_p}(\mathcal R;\mathcal A)\longrightarrow\prod_{g\in C_p}\operatorname{Aut}_{\mathcal A-\mathcal A}(\mathcal R_g). \tag*{(189)} Aut ⊗ C p ( R ; A ) ⟶ g ∈ C p ∏ Aut A − A ( R g ) . (189)
Here and below the automorphism groups consist of isomorphism classes. The endomorphism category of each invertible bimodule is equivalent to Z ( A ) Z(\mathcal A) Z ( A ) , so every group on the right is isomorphic to Inv Z ( A ) \operatorname{Inv} Z(\mathcal A) Inv Z ( A ) [23 Corollary 6.2 and Section 8.2] . This is a finite p p p -group, since FPdim Z ( A ) = ( FPdim A ) 2 \operatorname{FPdim} Z(\mathcal A)=(\operatorname{FPdim}\mathcal A)^2 FPdim Z ( A ) = ( FPdim A ) 2 is a power of p p p .
We check injectivity. For a pair in the kernel, choose bimodule natural isomorphisms α g : T ∣ R g ⟶ ∼ Id R g \alpha_g:T|_{\mathcal R_g}\overset{\sim}{\longrightarrow}\operatorname{Id}_{\mathcal R_g} α g : T ∣ R g ⟶ ∼ Id R g , with α e = η \alpha_e=\eta α e = η . Transporting the tensor structure of T T T along these isomorphisms leaves bimodule natural automorphisms of the equivalences M g , h M_{g,h} M g , h . Such automorphisms are scalars: the endomorphism space of an invertible bimodule functor is the endomorphism space of the unit in its fusion category of bimodule endofunctors, hence is one-dimensional. Write these scalars as λ ( g , h ) ∈ C × \lambda(g,h)\in\mathbb C^\times λ ( g , h ) ∈ C × . The unit constraints make them normalized, and the pentagon is exactly
λ ( g , h ) λ ( g h , k ) = λ ( h , k ) λ ( g , h k ) . (190) \lambda(g,h)\lambda(gh,k)=\lambda(h,k)\lambda(g,hk). \tag*{(190)} λ ( g , h ) λ ( g h , k ) = λ ( h , k ) λ ( g , hk ) . (190)
Thus λ \lambda λ is a normalized group 2-cocycle. Since H 2 ( C p , C × ) = 0 H^2(C_p,\mathbb C^\times)=0 H 2 ( C p , C × ) = 0 by (31) , rescaling the α g \alpha_g α g makes all λ ( g , h ) \lambda(g,h) λ ( g , h ) equal to one. The pair is then isomorphic to the identity pair. This proves the claimed injection and the first assertion.
For the second assertion, choose a coherent trivialization of the H H H -action on A \mathcal A A . It makes the action a homomorphism from H H H to the preceding group of relative isomorphism classes. The homomorphism is trivial by coprimality. Choose relative monoidal isomorphisms between all acting functors and the identity. Their failure to respect multiplication in H H H is a 2-cocycle with values in
{ γ ∈ Aut ⊗ ( Id R ) : γ ∣ A = 1 } ≃ C ^ p . (191) \{\gamma\in\operatorname{Aut}_{\otimes}(\operatorname{Id}_{\mathcal R}):\gamma|_{\mathcal A}=1\}\simeq\widehat C_p. \tag*{(191)} { γ ∈ Aut ⊗ ( Id R ) : γ ∣ A = 1 } ≃ C p . (191)
For this identification, a natural monoidal automorphism trivial on A \mathcal A A is scalar on each indecomposable homogeneous A \mathcal A A -module category; its scalars multiply according to the grading. Since ∣ C ^ p ∣ = p |\widehat C_p|=p ∣ C p ∣ = p is coprime to ∣ H ∣ |H| ∣ H ∣ , we have H 2 ( H , C ^ p ) = 0 H^2(H,\widehat C_p)=0 H 2 ( H , C p ) = 0 by [13 Chap. XII, §2, Cor. 2.7, p. 237] . Altering the chosen isomorphisms by a 1-cochain makes the trivialization coherent, without changing it on A \mathcal A A .
Lemma 8.4 (Coprime splitting across a prime Tannakian centralizer). Let C \mathcal C C be a weakly integral braided fusion category over C \mathbb C C . Let p p p be a prime, and let E ≃ Rep ( C p ) \mathcal E\simeq\operatorname{Rep}(C_p) E ≃ Rep ( C p ) be a Tannakian fusion subcategory of C \mathcal C C not contained in Z 2 ( C ) Z_2(\mathcal C) Z 2 ( C ) . Suppose P , B ⊆ E ′ \mathcal P,\mathcal B\subseteq\mathcal E' P , B ⊆ E ′ are full fusion subcategories and their tensor product induces the braided decomposition
E C ′ = P ⊠ B , P pointed , FPdim P = p a , p ∤ FPdim B . (192) \mathcal E'_{\mathcal C}=\mathcal P\boxtimes\mathcal B,\qquad\mathcal P\ \text{pointed},\qquad\operatorname{FPdim}\mathcal P=p^a,\qquad p\nmid\operatorname{FPdim}\mathcal B. \tag*{(192)} E C ′ = P ⊠ B , P pointed , FPdim P = p a , p ∤ FPdim B . (192) Then there is a braided p p p -category R p ⊆ C \mathcal R_p\subseteq\mathcal C R p ⊆ C such that
C ≃ R p ⊠ B , FPdim R p = p a + 1 . (193) \mathcal C\simeq\mathcal R_p\boxtimes\mathcal B,\qquad\operatorname{FPdim}\mathcal R_p=p^{a+1}. \tag*{(193)} C ≃ R p ⊠ B , FPdim R p = p a + 1 . (193) The equivalence extends the specified inclusion of B \mathcal B B .
Proof. Put S = Z 2 ( B ) \mathcal S=Z_2(\mathcal B) S = Z 2 ( B ) . We first show that S \mathcal S S is transparent in C \mathcal C C . It centralizes both factors of E ′ \mathcal E' E ′ , so the double-centralizer identity (29) gives
S ⊆ ( E ′ ) ′ = E ∨ Z 2 ( C ) . (194) \mathcal S\subseteq(\mathcal E')'=\mathcal E\vee Z_2(\mathcal C). \tag*{(194)} S ⊆ ( E ′ ) ′ = E ∨ Z 2 ( C ) . (194)
Noncentrality and primality give E ∩ Z 2 ( C ) = Vec \mathcal E\cap Z_2(\mathcal C)=\operatorname{Vec} E ∩ Z 2 ( C ) = Vec . As these two subcategories centralize each other, their join is the braided product
E ∨ Z 2 ( C ) ≃ E ⊠ Z 2 ( C ) . (195) \mathcal E\vee Z_2(\mathcal C)\simeq\mathcal E\boxtimes Z_2(\mathcal C). \tag*{(195)} E ∨ Z 2 ( C ) ≃ E ⊠ Z 2 ( C ) . (195)
The first factor grades this product by C p C_p C p . If its restriction to S S S were nontrivial, it would be a faithful C p C_p C p -grading, forcing p ∣ FPdim S p \mid\operatorname{FPdim} S p ∣ FPdim S . This is impossible because FPdim S ∣ FPdim B \operatorname{FPdim} S \mid\operatorname{FPdim} \mathcal{B} FPdim S ∣ FPdim B . Hence
S ⊆ Z 2 ( C ) , B ∩ Z 2 ( C ) = S . (196) \mathcal{S} \subseteq Z_2(\mathcal{C}), \qquad\mathcal{B} \cap Z_2(\mathcal{C}) = \mathcal{S}. \tag*{(196)} S ⊆ Z 2 ( C ) , B ∩ Z 2 ( C ) = S . (196)
Let Q = B C ′ \mathcal{Q} = \mathcal{B}^{\prime}_{\mathcal{C}} Q = B C ′ . The centralizer dimension formula (29) and the faithful monodromy grading give
FPdim Q = p a + 1 FPdim S , Q ∩ B = S , Q ∩ E ′ = P ⊠ S . (197) \operatorname{FPdim} \mathcal{Q} = p^{a+1}\operatorname{FPdim} \mathcal{S}, \qquad\mathcal{Q} \cap\mathcal{B} = \mathcal{S}, \qquad\mathcal{Q} \cap\mathcal{E}^{\prime} = \mathcal{P} \boxtimes\mathcal{S}. \tag*{(197)} FPdim Q = p a + 1 FPdim S , Q ∩ B = S , Q ∩ E ′ = P ⊠ S . (197)
In particular, the grading of C \mathcal{C} C restricts to a faithful C p C_p C p -grading of Q \mathcal{Q} Q with neutral component P ⊠ S \mathcal{P} \boxtimes\mathcal{S} P ⊠ S . The join dimension formula (30) also gives
B ∨ Q = C . (198) \mathcal{B} \vee\mathcal{Q} = \mathcal{C}. \tag*{(198)} B ∨ Q = C . (198)
Suppose first that S = Rep ( H ) \mathcal{S} = \operatorname{Rep}(H) S = Rep ( H ) is Tannakian. Its central de-equivariantization
R = Q H (199) \mathcal{R} = \mathcal{Q}_H \tag*{(199)} R = Q H (199)
is braided and faithfully C p C_p C p -graded, with neutral component P \mathcal{P} P and dimension p a + 1 p^{a+1} p a + 1 . The canonical H H H -action preserves the grading and is coherently trivial on P \mathcal{P} P : on the neutral component it is the de-equivariantization of the specified product P ⊠ Rep ( H ) \mathcal{P} \boxtimes\operatorname{Rep}(H) P ⊠ Rep ( H ) over Rep ( H ) \operatorname{Rep}(H) Rep ( H ) . Since p ∤ ∣ H ∣ p \nmid|H| p ∤ ∣ H ∣ , Lemma 8.3 trivializes the entire action relative to P \mathcal{P} P . Therefore, as a braided category over the specified symmetric factor,
Q ≃ R ⊠ S . (200) \mathcal{Q} \simeq\mathcal{R} \boxtimes\mathcal{S}. \tag*{(200)} Q ≃ R ⊠ S . (200)
Suppose next that S \mathcal{S} S is super-Tannakian but not Tannakian. Then p p p is odd. Write S = Rep ( H , z ) \mathcal{S} = \operatorname{Rep}(H,z) S = Rep ( H , z ) with z ≠ 1 z \ne1 z = 1 , and let S 0 = Rep ( L ) \mathcal{S}_0 = \operatorname{Rep}(L) S 0 = Rep ( L ) be its even part, where L = H / ⟨ z ⟩ L = H/\langle z\rangle L = H / ⟨ z ⟩ . De-equivariantize by this central even part:
R = Q L , R e ≃ P ⊠ s V e c , FPdim R = 2 p a + 1 . (201) \mathcal{R} = \mathcal{Q}_L, \qquad\mathcal{R}_e \simeq\mathcal{P} \boxtimes\mathrm{sVec}, \qquad\operatorname{FPdim} \mathcal{R} = 2p^{a+1}. \tag*{(201)} R = Q L , R e ≃ P ⊠ sVec , FPdim R = 2 p a + 1 . (201)
The neutral component is pointed, so Rad ⊆ R e \operatorname{Rad} \subseteq\mathcal{R}_e Rad ⊆ R e is pointed and R \mathcal{R} R is nilpotent. Its braided Sylow decomposition gives
R ≃ R p ⊠ s V e c ; (202) \mathcal{R} \simeq\mathcal{R}_p \boxtimes\mathrm{sVec}; \tag*{(202)} R ≃ R p ⊠ sVec ; (202)
the second factor is the specified central fermionic subcategory, which already has the full 2-dimension. We use the uniqueness of the Sylow factors in [19 Theorem 1.1] . The L L L -action preserves these factors. Its restriction to R p \mathcal{R}_p R p preserves the C p C_p C p -grading, whose neutral component is P \mathcal{P} P , and is coherently trivial on P \mathcal{P} P . Lemma 8.3 therefore trivializes this restricted action. The action on the sVec factor, including its coherence, is precisely the action whose equivariantization reconstructs S \mathcal{S} S from S 0 \mathcal{S}_0 S 0 . The braided product functor is equivariant because the action preserves both factors. It follows that
Q ≃ R L ≃ R p ⊠ ( s V e c ) L ≃ R p ⊠ S . (203) \mathcal{Q} \simeq\mathcal{R}^{L} \simeq\mathcal{R}_p \boxtimes(\mathrm{sVec})^{L} \simeq\mathcal{R}_p \boxtimes\mathcal{S}. \tag*{(203)} Q ≃ R L ≃ R p ⊠ ( sVec ) L ≃ R p ⊠ S . (203)
In both cases we have obtained a p p p -category R p \mathcal{R}_p R p inside Q \mathcal{Q} Q . It centralizes B \mathcal{B} B , and its intersection with B \mathcal{B} B is trivial by coprimality. Since S ⊆ B \mathcal{S} \subseteq\mathcal{B} S ⊆ B and B ∨ Q = C \mathcal{B} \vee\mathcal{Q} = \mathcal{C} B ∨ Q = C , these two categories generate C \mathcal{C} C . Their braided product is therefore the asserted equivalence. □ \square □
Corollary 8.5 (Connectedness across a prime Tannakian centralizer). Let C \mathcal{C} C be a weakly integral braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C . Let p p p be a prime, let E ≃ Rep ( C p ) \mathcal{E} \simeq\operatorname{Rep}(C_p) E ≃ Rep ( C p ) be a Tannakian fusion subcategory of C \mathcal{C} C not contained in Z 2 ( C ) Z_2(\mathcal{C}) Z 2 ( C ) , and let B = E C ′ \mathcal{B} = \mathcal{E}^{\prime}_{\mathcal{C}} B = E C ′ be its Müger centralizer. If B \mathcal{B} B is non-pointed, then
# π 0 Δ cl ( C ) ≤ # π 0 Δ cl ( B ) . (204) \#\pi_0\Delta_{\operatorname{cl}}(\mathcal{C}) \leq\#\pi_0\Delta_{\operatorname{cl}}(\mathcal{B}). \tag*{(204)} # π 0 Δ cl ( C ) ≤ # π 0 Δ cl ( B ) . (204) In particular, a nonempty connected centralizer graph gives a connected graph upstairs. If B \mathcal{B} B is pointed, then C \mathcal{C} C is nilpotent and its class graph is empty or complete.
Proof. By Proposition 8.2 , an increase could only be a new isolated p p p . In that case p p p is absent from the graph of B \mathcal{B} B , so Theorem 1.1 gives
B = P p ⊠ B 0 , p ∤ FPdim B 0 , (205) \mathcal{B}=\mathcal{P}_p\boxtimes\mathcal{B}_0,\qquad p\nmid\operatorname{FPdim}\mathcal{B}_0, \tag*{(205)} B = P p ⊠ B 0 , p ∤ FPdim B 0 , (205)
with P p \mathcal{P}_p P p pointed. The coprime splitting of Lemma 8.4 gives C = R p ⊠ B 0 \mathcal{C}=\mathcal{R}_p\boxtimes\mathcal{B}_0 C = R p ⊠ B 0 . Since B 0 \mathcal{B}_0 B 0 is non-pointed, Proposition 4.3 shows that a non-pointed R p \mathcal{R}_p R p would make the product graph connected, while a pointed R p \mathcal{R}_p R p would make p p p absent upstairs. Neither possibility gives a new isolated p p p . If B \mathcal{B} B is pointed, the monodromy grading gives C a d ⊆ B \mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}}\subseteq\mathcal{B} C ad ⊆ B , so C \mathcal{C} C is nilpotent. Apply Proposition 4.4 .
Disconnected class graphs force solvability
In this section a minimal counterexample means a nonsolvable weakly integral braided fusion category of least Frobenius–Perron dimension among those with disconnected class graph.
Theorem 8.6 (Solvable Müger center). Let C \mathcal{C} C be a weakly integral braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C . Suppose that Z 2 ( C ) \mathcal{Z}_2(\mathcal{C}) Z 2 ( C ) is equivalent as a symmetric fusion category to Rep ( G , z ) \operatorname{Rep}(G,z) Rep ( G , z ) , where G G G is a finite solvable group and z ∈ Z ( G ) z\in Z(G) z ∈ Z ( G ) satisfies z 2 = 1 z^2=1 z 2 = 1 . If Δ c l ( C ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{C}) Δ cl ( C ) is disconnected, then C \mathcal{C} C is solvable.
Proof. Let Rep ( H ) \operatorname{Rep}(H) Rep ( H ) be the maximal even Tannakian subcategory of Rep ( G , z ) \operatorname{Rep}(G,z) Rep ( G , z ) ; thus H = G H=G H = G when z = 1 z=1 z = 1 , and H = G / ⟨ z ⟩ H=G/\langle z\rangle H = G / ⟨ z ⟩ otherwise. It is central in C \mathcal{C} C , so
D = C H is braided , C ≃ D H . (206) \mathcal{D}=\mathcal{C}_H\text{ is braided},\qquad\mathcal{C}\simeq\mathcal{D}^H. \tag*{(206)} D = C H is braided , C ≃ D H . (206)
Central de-equivariantization gives
Z 2 ( D ) ≃ { Vec , z = 1 , sVec , z ≠ 1. (207) \mathcal{Z}_2(\mathcal{D})\simeq
\begin{cases}
\operatorname{Vec}, & z=1,\\
\operatorname{sVec}, & z\ne1.
\end{cases} \tag*{(207)} Z 2 ( D ) ≃ { Vec , sVec , z = 1 , z = 1. (207)
If C \mathcal{C} C were nonsolvable, then D \mathcal{D} D would be nonsolvable, because H H H is solvable and solvability is preserved by such equivariantizations [24 Proposition 4.5] . The modular and slightly degenerate solvability results (Theorem 6.20 and Corollary 6.21) then imply that Δ c l ( D ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{D}) Δ cl ( D ) is connected and nonempty. Theorem 7.6 makes Δ c l ( C ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{C}) Δ cl ( C ) connected as well, a contradiction.
Proposition 8.7 (A minimal counterexample is weakly group-theoretical). Let C \mathcal{C} C be a nonsolvable weakly integral braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C whose class graph has at least two nonempty connected components. Suppose FPdim ( C ) \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}) FPdim ( C ) is minimal among categories with these properties. Then C \mathcal{C} C is weakly group-theoretical. More precisely, Z 2 ( C ) \mathcal{Z}_2(\mathcal{C}) Z 2 ( C ) contains a Tannakian subcategory equivalent to Rep ( H ) \operatorname{Rep}(H) Rep ( H ) for a finite centerless nonsolvable group H H H . De-equivariantizing C \mathcal{C} C by this subcategory gives a weakly integral braided fusion category D = C H \mathcal{D}=\mathcal{C}_H D = C H over C \mathbb{C} C with a categorical H H H -action by braided tensor autoequivalences, and
C ≃ D H , D = C H is solvable . (208) \mathcal{C}\simeq\mathcal{D}^H,\qquad\mathcal{D}=\mathcal{C}_H\text{ is solvable}. \tag*{(208)} C ≃ D H , D = C H is solvable . (208)
Proof. Theorem 8.6 makes the underlying group of Z 2 ( C ) \mathcal{Z}_2(\mathcal{C}) Z 2 ( C ) nonsolvable. The group of its even Tannakian part is also nonsolvable, since the omitted subgroup has order at most two. Quotient this group by its hypercenter. The resulting group H H H is centerless and nonsolvable, and its representation category embeds centrally in C \mathcal{C} C . The hypercenter is nilpotent, so quotienting by it cannot make a nonsolvable group solvable.
Let D = C H \mathcal{D}=\mathcal{C}_H D = C H . It is weakly integral and braided, has strictly smaller dimension, and C ≃ D H \mathcal{C}\simeq\mathcal{D}^H C ≃ D H . If D \mathcal{D} D were nonsolvable, minimality would make its class graph connected. The graph is nonempty because an empty class graph forces pointedness by Corollary 3.3. Theorem 7.6 would then make the class graph of C \mathcal{C} C connected, a contradiction. Thus D \mathcal{D} D is solvable. Since weakly group-theoretical categories are closed under equivariantizations by arbitrary finite groups [24 Proposition 4.1] , C \mathcal{C} C is weakly group-theoretical.
Lemma 8.8 (Tannakian subcategories of a minimal counterexample). Let C \mathcal{C} C be a nonsolvable weakly integral braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C whose class graph has at least two nonempty connected components. Suppose FPdim ( C ) \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}) FPdim ( C ) is minimal among categories with these properties. Then C \mathcal{C} C contains no Tannakian subcategory equivalent to Rep ( C p ) \operatorname{Rep}(\mathbb{C}_p) Rep ( C p ) for any prime p p p . Every Tannakian subcategory of C \mathcal{C} C is contained in Z 2 ( C ) \mathcal{Z}_2(\mathcal{C}) Z 2 ( C ) . In particular the group of every nontrivial Tannakian subcategory is perfect and nonsolvable.
Proof. Suppose first that E = Rep ( C p ) \mathcal{E} = \operatorname{Rep}(\mathbb{C}_p) E = Rep ( C p ) is central. The braided category D = C C p \mathcal{D} = \mathcal{C}_{\mathbb{C}_p} D = C C p is smaller and must be nonsolvable: otherwise its C p \mathbb{C}_p C p -equivariantization C \mathcal{C} C would be solvable. Minimality gives a nonempty connected class graph for D \mathcal{D} D . Theorem 7.6 then contradicts disconnectedness of Δ c l ( C ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{C}) Δ cl ( C ) .
Suppose instead that E = Rep ( C p ) \mathcal{E} = \operatorname{Rep}(\mathbb{C}_p) E = Rep ( C p ) is noncentral. Its centralizer B = E ′ \mathcal{B} = \mathcal{E}' B = E ′ is proper and nonsolvable. Indeed, if B \mathcal{B} B were solvable, its de-equivariantization by Rep ( C p ) \operatorname{Rep}(\mathbb{C}_p) Rep ( C p ) would be solvable, and C C p \mathcal{C}_{\mathbb{C}_p} C C p is an extension of this neutral category by a subgroup of C p \mathbb{C}_p C p . Re-equivariantizing would make C \mathcal{C} C solvable. This is also a special case of [21 Proposition 5.2] . Minimality makes Δ c l ( B ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{B}) Δ cl ( B ) connected and nonempty. Corollary 8.5 again makes Δ c l ( C ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{C}) Δ cl ( C ) connected. We have excluded all Rep ( C p ) \operatorname{Rep}(\mathbb{C}_p) Rep ( C p ) .
Every nontrivial Tannakian subcategory E = Rep ( G ) \mathcal{E} = \operatorname{Rep}(G) E = Rep ( G ) therefore has G G G perfect: a nontrivial abelianization has a quotient C p \mathbb{C}_p C p , producing a forbidden subcategory Rep ( C p ) \operatorname{Rep}(\mathbb{C}_p) Rep ( C p ) . A nontrivial finite perfect group is nonsolvable. Suppose that such an E \mathcal{E} E is noncentral. Its centralizer L = E ′ \mathcal{L} = \mathcal{E}' L = E ′ is proper and nonsolvable, because it contains the nonsolvable category Rep ( G ) \operatorname{Rep}(G) Rep ( G ) . Thus Δ c l ( L ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{L}) Δ cl ( L ) is nonempty and connected, and lies in a single component K K K of Δ c l ( C ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{C}) Δ cl ( C ) .
The ordinary class graph of G G G has 2 2 2 as a vertex. Indeed, a nontrivial perfect group has even order by the odd-order theorem, and it cannot have a central Sylow subgroup: such a subgroup would split off as a nontrivial abelian direct factor. Since E ⊆ L \mathcal{E} \subseteq\mathcal{L} E ⊆ L , class divisibility (23) of Theorem 2.6 gives 2 ∈ K 2 \in K 2 ∈ K .
Choose a class object Z i Z_i Z i whose dimension FPdim ( Z i ) > 1 \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i)>1 FPdim ( Z i ) > 1 belongs to a component outside K K K . Individual class divisibility (23) gives
FPdim ( Z i E ) = 1 , FPdim ( Z i L ) = 1. (209) \operatorname{FPdim}\left(Z_i^{\mathcal{E}}\right)=1,\qquad\operatorname{FPdim}\left(Z_i^{\mathcal{L}}\right)=1. \tag*{(209)} FPdim ( Z i E ) = 1 , FPdim ( Z i L ) = 1. (209) Apply the modular quotient formula (21) of Theorem 2.5 in Z ( C ) \mathcal{Z}(\mathcal{C}) Z ( C ) to E + \mathcal{E}^{+} E + and the simple object Z i Z_i Z i . The first equality forces all of Z i Z i ∗ Z_iZ_i^{*} Z i Z i ∗ to centralize E + \mathcal{E}^{+} E + . For every X ≺ Y i X \prec Y_i X ≺ Y i , the internal-end identity (13) places X + X^{+} X + in Z i Z i ∗ Z_iZ_i^{*} Z i Z i ∗ . Hence Y i Y_i Y i centralizes E \mathcal{E} E , that is, Y i ∈ L Y_i \in\mathcal{L} Y i ∈ L . Now Lemma 6.12 , using the second equality, gives
Y i ∈ Z 2 ( C ) . (210) Y_i \in\mathcal{Z}_2(\mathcal{C}). \tag*{(210)} Y i ∈ Z 2 ( C ) . (210) Let S = ⟨ Y i ⟩ \mathcal{S}=\langle Y_i\rangle S = ⟨ Y i ⟩ . It is symmetric, and its class graph is a subgraph of Δ c l ( L ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{L}) Δ cl ( L ) , whereas every prime dividing FPdim ( Z i ) \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i) FPdim ( Z i ) lies outside K K K . By Proposition 2.2 , the internal end identified in (13) carries a connected separable algebra structure. Lemma 8.1 therefore makes Y i Y_i Y i pointed. Its invertible constituents form the stabilizer subgroup
T i = { a ∈ Inv ( C ) : a + Z i ≃ Z i } , (211) T_i=\{a\in\operatorname{Inv}(\mathcal{C}):a+Z_i\simeq Z_i\}, \tag*{(211)} T i = { a ∈ Inv ( C ) : a + Z i ≃ Z i } , (211) each with multiplicity one. Consequently FPdim S = ∣ T i ∣ = FPdim ( Z i ) > 1 \operatorname{FPdim}\mathcal{S}=|T_i|=\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i)>1 FPdim S = ∣ T i ∣ = FPdim ( Z i ) > 1 . Since 2 ∈ K 2\in K 2 ∈ K , this order is odd. A symmetric pointed category of odd dimension is Tannakian and contains a subcategory Rep ( C p ) \operatorname{Rep}(\mathbb{C}_p) Rep ( C p ) for a prime divisor p p p of its dimension. This contradicts the first part of the proof. Every Tannakian subcategory is therefore central. □ \square □
Theorem 8.9 (Disconnected conjugacy-class prime graph implies solvability). Let C \mathcal{C} C be a weakly integral braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C . If Δ c l ( C ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{C}) Δ cl ( C ) has at least two nonempty connected components, then C \mathcal{C} C is solvable. Equivalently, the class prime graph of every nonsolvable weakly integral braided fusion category is nonempty and connected.
Proof. Suppose that the assertion fails, and choose a counterexample C \mathcal{C} C of least Frobenius–Perron dimension. By Proposition 8.7, C \mathcal{C} C is weakly group-theoretical. By Lemma 8.8 , it contains no Rep ( C p ) \operatorname{Rep}(C_p) Rep ( C p ) , and every Tannakian subcategory is central.
Choose a maximal Tannakian subcategory E = Rep ( G ) \mathcal{E}=\operatorname{Rep}(G) E = Rep ( G ) . It is nontrivial by Proposition 8.7. The group G G G is perfect and nonsolvable. Since E \mathcal{E} E is central, the whole de-equivariantization
D = C G (212) \mathcal{D}=\mathcal{C}_G \tag*{(212)} D = C G (212)
is braided and coincides with the core of C \mathcal{C} C relative to E \mathcal{E} E . The core theorem for weakly group-theoretical braided categories [35 Theorem 1.1] gives
D ≃ P or D ≃ I ⊠ P , (213) \mathcal{D}\simeq\mathcal{P}\quad\text{or}\quad\mathcal{D}\simeq\mathcal{I}\boxtimes\mathcal{P}, \tag*{(213)} D ≃ P or D ≃ I ⊠ P , (213)
where P \mathcal{P} P is pointed and weakly anisotropic, and I \mathcal{I} I is an Ising braided category. In the second case the class graph of D \mathcal{D} D is the single vertex { 2 } \{2\} { 2 } : the Ising class dimensions are 1 , 1 , 2 1,1,2 1 , 1 , 2 , and a pointed factor preserves the graph by Proposition 4.3. Theorem 7.6 then makes the graph of C ≃ D G \mathcal{C}\simeq\mathcal{D}^G C ≃ D G connected. In the first case, Proposition 7.8 gives the same conclusion because G G G is nontrivial and perfect. Both cases contradict the defining property of C \mathcal{C} C .
Finally, Corollary 3.3 makes a category with empty class graph pointed, hence solvable. This proves the equivalent formulation as well. □ \square □
Remark 8.10. The group of a maximal Tannakian subcategory in the proof is perfect. Proposition 7.8 therefore applies in the pointed-core case even when this group has a nontrivial center.
Vanishing across the two components
Theorems 7.11 and 8.9 show that a disconnected class graph has exactly two nonempty components and its category is solvable. In particular, if the class graph of C i n t \mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{int}} C int has two components supported on odd primes, Corollary 4.8 and (179) force any new vertex 2 2 2 to be adjacent to an odd prime.
Problem 9.1 (Cross-component vanishing). Let C \mathcal{C} C be a weakly integral braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C . If FPdim ( Z i ) , FPdim ( Z j ) > 1 \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i),\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_j)>1 FPdim ( Z i ) , FPdim ( Z j ) > 1 belong to different components of Δ c l ( C ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{C}) Δ cl ( C ) , must μ i ( Y j ) = 0 \mu_i(Y_j)=0 μ i ( Y j ) = 0 ?
This is open for general weakly integral braided fusion categories. By Lemma 5.2 , it amounts to excluding centralization of the two corresponding class objects in Z ( C ) Z(\mathcal{C}) Z ( C ) . For a category satisfying this vanishing for all such pairs, the cross-component regular-product formula (59) of Proposition 5.1 gives
[ Y i ] [ Y j ] = FPdim ( Z i ) FPdim ( Z j ) FPdim ( C a d ) R C a d . (214) [Y_i][Y_j]=\frac{\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i)\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_j)}{\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}})}R_{\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}}}. \tag*{(214)} [ Y i ] [ Y j ] = FPdim ( C ad ) FPdim ( Z i ) FPdim ( Z j ) R C ad . (214)
This imposes a numerical condition on every class in either component Π \Pi Π . For a positive integer n n n , write n Π = ∏ p ∈ Π p v p ( n ) n_{\Pi}=\prod_{p\in\Pi}p^{v_p(n)} n Π = ∏ p ∈ Π p v p ( n ) . Fix a class Z i Z_i Z i in Π \Pi Π and take Z j Z_j Z j in the other component. The unit coefficient in (214) gives FPdim ( C a d ) ∣ FPdim ( Z i ) FPdim ( Z j ) \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}})\mid\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i)\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_j) FPdim ( C ad ) ∣ FPdim ( Z i ) FPdim ( Z j ) , while no prime in Π \Pi Π divides FPdim ( Z j ) \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_j) FPdim ( Z j ) . The formal codegree FPdim ( C ) / FPdim ( Z i ) \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C})/\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i) FPdim ( C ) / FPdim ( Z i ) is an integer. Taking the Π \Pi Π -parts therefore gives
( FPdim ( C a d ) ) Π ∣ FPdim ( Z i ) Π ∣ ( FPdim ( C a d ) ) Π ∣ U ( C ) ∣ Π . (215) \bigl(\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}})\bigr)_{\Pi}\mid\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i)_{\Pi}\mid\bigl(\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}})\bigr)_{\Pi}\lvert U(\mathcal{C})\rvert_{\Pi}. \tag*{(215)} ( FPdim ( C ad ) ) Π ∣ FPdim ( Z i ) Π ∣ ( FPdim ( C ad ) ) Π ∣ U ( C ) ∣ Π . (215)
By Theorem 1.1, every prime of Π \Pi Π divides FPdim ( C a d ) \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}_{\mathrm{ad}}) FPdim ( C ad ) . Thus vanishing across components forces every nontrivial class in Π \Pi Π to contain all primes of Π \Pi Π and forces each component to be complete. A class whose dimension fails the first divisibility in (215) would give a negative answer to Problem 9.1 .
Survival of components under equivariantization
Suppose Δ c l ( B ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{B}) Δ cl ( B ) has two components. Under a braided action of a finite group G G G , Theorem 7.6 shows that each old vertex and edge survives equivariantization and each upstairs component contains an old vertex. Thus the graph of B G \mathcal{B}^{G} B G is disconnected exactly when the two old components remain separate. To detect possible paths between them, one can use the all-fiber equivariantization formula (169) of Proposition 7.7 . For g ∈ G g \in G g ∈ G , L = ⟨ g ⟩ L=\langle g\rangle L = ⟨ g ⟩ , Q = C G ( g ) Q=C_G(g) Q = C G ( g ) , and a character ν \nu ν in the g g g -fiber of K ( B L ) K(\mathcal{B}^{L}) K ( B L ) , the character μ \mu μ indexed by its Q Q Q -orbit has class dimension
FPdim ( Z μ B G ) = ∣ g G ∣ [ Q : Q ν ] FPdim ( Z ν B L ) . (216) \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_{\mu}^{\mathcal{B}^{G}})=|g^{G}|[Q:Q_{\nu}]\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_{\nu}^{\mathcal{B}^{L}}). \tag*{(216)} FPdim ( Z μ B G ) = ∣ g G ∣ [ Q : Q ν ] FPdim ( Z ν B L ) . (216)
The following example distinguishes persistence in the whole graph from persistence in a specified fiber.
Example 9.2 (A prime need not persist in a nonidentity fiber). Let K = C 7 ⋊ C 6 K=C_{7}\rtimes C_{6} K = C 7 ⋊ C 6 be the faithful affine group, and let N = C 7 ⋊ C 3 N=C_{7}\rtimes C_{3} N = C 7 ⋊ C 3 be its normal subgroup of index two. The split extension gives
Rep ( K ) ≃ Rep ( N ) C 2 . (217) \operatorname{Rep}(K)\simeq\operatorname{Rep}(N)^{C_{2}}. \tag*{(217)} Rep ( K ) ≃ Rep ( N ) C 2 . (217) The nonidentity elements of the kernel C 7 C_{7} C 7 form two N N N -classes of size 3. The outer involution interchanges them, and they become one K K K -class of size 6. Every element of K ∖ N K\setminus N K ∖ N has nontrivial image in C 6 C_{6} C 6 and lies in a class of size 7: the complement acts fixed-point freely on the nonzero elements of C 7 C_{7} C 7 , and the centralizer of such an element has order 6.
Thus 3 occurs in the downstairs class graph, but every class in the nonidentity Rep ( C 2 ) \operatorname{Rep}(C_{2}) Rep ( C 2 ) -fiber upstairs has dimension 7. In particular, the implication
q ≠ p , q ∈ Vert Δ c l ( B ) ⟹ q occurs in a nonidentity fiber of B C p (218) q\ne p,\quad q\in\operatorname{Vert}\Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{B})\quad\Longrightarrow\quad q\text{ occurs in a nonidentity fiber of }\mathcal{B}^{C_{p}} \tag*{(218)} q = p , q ∈ Vert Δ cl ( B ) ⟹ q occurs in a nonidentity fiber of B C p (218) is false without further hypotheses. Here p = 2 p=2 p = 2 and q = 3 q=3 q = 3 . The orbit factor in the identity fiber supplies the actual connection, through the class dimension 6.
Finite groups, untwisted doubles and the two components
Proposition 9.3 (Vanishing for finite-group representation categories). Let C \mathcal{C} C be a fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C tensor equivalent to Rep ( G ) \operatorname{Rep}(G) Rep ( G ) for a finite group G G G , so C \mathcal{C} C is integral. The graph and class images are formed using the underlying tensor category. Suppose the conjugacy-class dimensions FPdim ( Z i ) , FPdim ( Z j ) > 1 \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i),\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_j)>1 FPdim ( Z i ) , FPdim ( Z j ) > 1 belong to different components of Δ c l ( C ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{C}) Δ cl ( C ) . Then μ i ( Y j ) = 0 \mu_i(Y_j)=0 μ i ( Y j ) = 0 , where Y j = F ( Z j ) Y_j=F(Z_j) Y j = F ( Z j ) . In particular, cross-component vanishing holds for every symmetric fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C .
Proof. Realize Z ( Rep ( G ) ) Z(\operatorname{Rep}(G)) Z ( Rep ( G )) as the category of conjugation-equivariant vector bundles on G G G . In this model I ( 1 ) I(1) I ( 1 ) has a trivial line over each group element. Its simple summands are the bundles of trivial lines over the conjugacy classes. Thus a class supported on y G y^{G} y G has image C [ y G ] \mathbb{C}[y^{G}] C [ y G ] with its permutation action. Every character of K ( Rep ( G ) ) K(\operatorname{Rep}(G)) K ( Rep ( G )) is evaluation at a conjugacy class x G x^{G} x G , and its formal codegree is ∣ C G ( x ) ∣ |C_G(x)| ∣ C G ( x ) ∣ by column orthogonality (10) for Rep ( G ) \operatorname{Rep}(G) Rep ( G ) . If μ i \mu_i μ i is this evaluation, its class dimension is ∣ x G ∣ |x^{G}| ∣ x G ∣ and
μ i ( C [ y G ] ) = ∣ y G ∩ C G ( x ) ∣ . (219) \mu_i(\mathbb{C}[y^{G}])=|y^{G}\cap C_G(x)|. \tag*{(219)} μ i ( C [ y G ]) = ∣ y G ∩ C G ( x ) ∣. (219)
These identifications use the underlying tensor category.
Put Z = Z ( G ) Z=Z(G) Z = Z ( G ) . By [36 ] , Theorem 2.5(ii), G / Z G/Z G / Z is a Frobenius group whose kernel N / Z N/Z N / Z and complement H / Z H/Z H / Z have abelian inverse images N N N and H H H in G G G . For x ∈ N ∖ Z x\in N\setminus Z x ∈ N ∖ Z , the Frobenius action gives C G / Z ( x Z ) = N / Z C_{G/Z}(xZ)=N/Z C G / Z ( x Z ) = N / Z . Since N N N is abelian, C G ( x ) = N C_G(x)=N C G ( x ) = N . Every x ∉ N x\notin N x ∈ / N lies in a conjugate H u H^u H u of H H H . The centralizer of x Z xZ x Z in G / Z G/Z G / Z is contained in H u / Z H^u/Z H u / Z by the Frobenius property, and H u H^{u} H u is abelian, so C G ( x ) = H u C_G(x)=H^{u} C G ( x ) = H u . The two nontrivial class sizes are consequently ∣ H / Z ∣ |H/Z| ∣ H / Z ∣ on N ∖ Z N\setminus Z N ∖ Z and ∣ N / Z ∣ |N/Z| ∣ N / Z ∣ on its complement in G ∖ Z G\setminus Z G ∖ Z . They are coprime. Conjugates of elements giving opposite sizes cannot commute since N ∩ H u = Z N\cap H^{u}=Z N ∩ H u = Z . Equation (219) now gives the required vanishing. Finally a symmetric fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C is super-Tannakian, and Rep ( G , z ) \operatorname{Rep}(G,z) Rep ( G , z ) has underlying tensor category Rep ( G ) \operatorname{Rep}(G) Rep ( G ) .
Proposition 9.4 (Pointed equivariantizations with odd-order monodromy). Let B \mathcal{B} B be a pointed braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C , and let a finite group G G G act categorically on B \mathcal{B} B by braided tensor autoequivalences. Suppose the monodromy bicharacter on Inv ( B ) \operatorname{Inv}(\mathcal{B}) Inv ( B ) determined by its braiding has odd order. Then B G \mathcal{B}^{G} B G admits a symmetric braiding on its underlying fusion category. In particular, its class graph is the conjugacy-class-size graph of a finite group. If the graph is disconnected, the category satisfies cross-component vanishing.
Proof. Let b b b be the monodromy bicharacter on the group of simple objects, and let n n n be its odd order. Choose an integer r r r with 2 r ≡ 1 ( m o d n ) 2r\equiv1\pmod{n} 2 r ≡ 1 ( mod n ) . For homogeneous objects replace c X , Y c_{X,Y} c X , Y by b ( X , Y ) − r c X , Y b(X,Y)^{-r}c_{X,Y} b ( X , Y ) − r c X , Y . Multiplying a braiding by a bicharacter preserves the hexagon identities. The new monodromy is b 1 − 2 r = 1 b^{1-2r}=1 b 1 − 2 r = 1 , so the new braiding is symmetric. Every braided autoequivalence in the given action preserves b b b , and therefore preserves this new braiding, with the same tensor and action coherence maps. The equivariantization is thus symmetric. By the super-Tannakian description, its underlying fusion category is tensor equivalent to Rep ( K ) \operatorname{Rep}(K) Rep ( K ) for a finite group K K K , with a possible super braiding. By (8) , class dimensions are determined by the Frobenius–Perron dimension and the formal codegrees of the Grothendieck ring, so they equal the conjugacy-class sizes of K K K . Proposition 9.3 gives the vanishing assertion.
Proposition 9.5 (Vanishing for untwisted Drinfeld doubles). Let G G G be a finite group and C = Rep ( D ( G ) ) \mathcal{C}=\operatorname{Rep}(D(G)) C = Rep ( D ( G )) . If X , Y ∈ Irr ( C ) X,Y\in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{C}) X , Y ∈ Irr ( C ) label nontrivial classes in different components of Δ c l ( C ) \Delta_{\mathrm{cl}}(\mathcal{C}) Δ cl ( C ) , then S X , Y = 0 S_{X,Y}=0 S X , Y = 0 and μ X ( Y ⊗ Y ∗ ) = 0 \mu_X(Y\otimes Y^{*})=0 μ X ( Y ⊗ Y ∗ ) = 0 .
Proof. The graph on class dimensions of C \mathcal{C} C is the graph on its simple dimensions, since the former are the squares of the latter by Lemma 6.2 (1). By [36 Theorem 8.5(iii)] , this disconnected graph is the class-size prime graph of G G G . With Z = Z ( G ) Z=Z(G) Z = Z ( G ) , the quotient G / Z G/Z G / Z is Frobenius, and the inverse images N , H N,H N , H of its kernel and a complement are abelian. Put m = ∣ N / Z ∣ m=|N/Z| m = ∣ N / Z ∣ and n = ∣ H / Z ∣ n=|H/Z| n = ∣ H / Z ∣ . The centralizer computation in Proposition 9.3 gives class sizes n n n on N ∖ Z N\setminus Z N ∖ Z and m m m on G ∖ N G\setminus N G ∖ N . In both cases the centralizer is abelian, so every simple with that flux has the indicated class size as its simple dimension. A simple with central flux has dimension χ ( 1 ) \chi(1) χ ( 1 ) for some χ ∈ Irr ( G ) \chi\in\operatorname{Irr}(G) χ ∈ Irr ( G ) , which divides [ G : N ] = n [G:N]=n [ G : N ] = n by Itô’s abelian-normal-subgroup theorem [29 ] . Thus once member of an opposite-component pair has outer flux y ≠ N y\ne N y = N , and the other has either noncentral kernel flux or central flux with a nonlinear character.
In the first case the two flux classes have no commuting representatives. Their S S S -entry vanishes by the commuting-pair formula [16 (2.12)–(2.13)] . In the second case the same formula reduces vanishing to χ ( y ) = 0 \chi(y)=0 χ ( y ) = 0 . Conjugate H H H so that y ∈ H y\in H y ∈ H . The endomorphism a ↦ y a y − 1 a − 1 a\mapsto yay^{-1}a^{-1} a ↦ y a y − 1 a − 1 of the abelian group N N N has kernel Z Z Z and induces an automorphism of N / Z N/Z N / Z by the Frobenius property. Its image K K K therefore has order m m m and N = K Z N=KZ N = K Z . The subgroup K K K is normalized by N N N and by H H H , since H H H is abelian and centralizes y y y . Now G = K H G=KH G = K H and H H H is abelian, so [ G , G ] ⊆ K [G,G]\subseteq K [ G , G ] ⊆ K . The reverse inclusion follows from the definition of K K K . It follows that ∣ G / [ G , G ] ∣ = ∣ H ∣ = ∣ C G ( y ) ∣ |G/[G,G]|=|H|=|C_G(y)| ∣ G / [ G , G ] ∣ = ∣ H ∣ = ∣ C G ( y ) ∣ . In the column orthogonality relation (10) at y y y , the linear characters are constant on the conjugate class ∣ C G ( y ) ∣ |C_G(y)| ∣ C G ( y ) ∣ , hence every nonlinear χ \chi χ vanishes there. Finally, the character evaluation in (107) gives μ X ( Y ⊗ Y ∗ ) = ∣ S X , Y ∣ 2 / FPdim ( X ) 2 = 0 \mu_X(Y\otimes Y^{*})=|S_{X,Y}|^{2}/\operatorname{FPdim}(X)^{2}=0 μ X ( Y ⊗ Y ∗ ) = ∣ S X , Y ∣ 2 / FPdim ( X ) 2 = 0 .
For twisted doubles the simple objects can carry projective centralizer representations. It remains to determine which twists admit the same vanishing argument.
For group-theoretical modular categories, the identification with the prime graph of a twisted double in the proof of [36 Theorem 1.2(ii)] gives two complete components whenever the graph is disconnected [36 Theorem 8.5(iii)] . In the connected case its diameter is at most three [36 Theorem 1.2(ii)] . For arbitrary weakly integral braided categories, must each component of a disconnected class graph be complete? Can one characterize its two prime sets categorically, as the kernel and complement of the Frobenius quotient do for finite groups? Does a uniform diameter bound hold for connected class graphs?
A related comparison concerns the Tannakian category in Proposition 5.3 . For group elements x , y x, y x , y with coprime class sizes, the intersection of their normal closures is abelian [12 Theorem B] . For the pure-class objects attached to x x x and y y y , it would be of interest to describe how this intersection is reflected in their common adjoint constituents.
Relative vanishing and the fibers of the forgetful functor
For a fusion category A \mathcal{A} A with commutative Grothendieck ring, write K ^ ( A ) \widehat{K}(\mathcal{A}) K ( A ) for the set of algebra characters of K ( A ) K(\mathcal{A}) K ( A ) . The following estimate locates a zero on a prescribed set of characters and bounds the total weight of such zeros. Its proof uses the first-moment argument for zeros of S S S -characters [40 Theorem 4.3] and the Galois-orbit argument of [11 Theorem 4.17] .
A relative Burnside theorem
Theorem A.1 (Relative vanishing). Let A \mathcal{A} A be a fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C with commutative Grothendieck ring. Let B ∈ A B \in\mathcal{A} B ∈ A have a simple summand Z Z Z , and let K ^ ( A ) \widehat{K}(\mathcal{A}) K ( A ) be the set of algebra characters of its complexified Grothendieck ring. For each ρ ∈ K ^ ( A ) \rho\in\widehat{K}(\mathcal{A}) ρ ∈ K ( A ) , let n ρ n_\rho n ρ be its formal codegree. Suppose that k ρ = ρ ( B ) ∈ Z ≥ 0 k_\rho=\rho(B)\in\mathbb{Z}_{\geq0} k ρ = ρ ( B ) ∈ Z ≥ 0 for every ρ \rho ρ and that ρ ( Z ) ∈ R ≥ 0 \rho(Z)\in\mathbb{R}_{\geq0} ρ ( Z ) ∈ R ≥ 0 whenever k ρ > 0 k_\rho>0 k ρ > 0 . The subcategory H = ⟨ B ⟩ \mathcal{H}=\langle B\rangle H = ⟨ B ⟩ is integral. Moreover,
∑ ρ ( Z ) = 0 k ρ > 0 k ρ n ρ ≥ [ B : 1 ] − [ B : Z ] + FPdim ( B ) FPdim ( H ) ( FPdim ( Z ) − 1 ) . (220) \sum_{\substack{\rho(Z)=0\\ k_\rho>0}}\frac{k_\rho}{n_\rho}\geq[B:1]-[B:Z]+\frac{\operatorname{FPdim}(B)}{\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{H})}\bigl(\operatorname{FPdim}(Z)-1\bigr). \tag*{(220)} ρ ( Z ) = 0 k ρ > 0 ∑ n ρ k ρ ≥ [ B : 1 ] − [ B : Z ] + FPdim ( H ) FPdim ( B ) ( FPdim ( Z ) − 1 ) . (220) Equality in (A.1) holds if and only if every character ψ ≠ FPdim \psi\ne\operatorname{FPdim} ψ = FPdim of K ( H ) ∗ w i t h ∗ K(\mathcal{H}) *with* K ( H ) ∗ w i t h ∗ \psi(B)>0$ satisfies ψ ( Z ) ∈ { 0 , 1 } \psi(Z)\in\{0,1\} ψ ( Z ) ∈ { 0 , 1 } . In particular, if [ B : 1 ] = [ B : Z ] = 1 [B:1]=[B:Z]=1 [ B : 1 ] = [ B : Z ] = 1 , then
∑ ρ ( Z ) = 0 k ρ > 0 k ρ n ρ ≥ FPdim ( B ) FPdim ( H ) ( FPdim ( Z ) − 1 ) . (221) \sum_{\substack{\rho(Z)=0\\ k_\rho>0}}\frac{k_\rho}{n_\rho}\geq\frac{\operatorname{FPdim}(B)}{\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{H})}\bigl(\operatorname{FPdim}(Z)-1\bigr). \tag*{(221)} ρ ( Z ) = 0 k ρ > 0 ∑ n ρ k ρ ≥ FPdim ( H ) FPdim ( B ) ( FPdim ( Z ) − 1 ) . (221) A character with ρ ( B ) > 0 \rho(B)>0 ρ ( B ) > 0 and ρ ( Z ) = 0 \rho(Z)=0 ρ ( Z ) = 0 therefore exists whenever FPdim ( Z ) > 1 \operatorname{FPdim}(Z)>1 FPdim ( Z ) > 1 and [ B : 1 ] ≥ [ B : Z ] [B:1]\geq[B:Z] [ B : 1 ] ≥ [ B : Z ] .
Proof. Since ρ ( B ∗ ) = ρ ( B ) ‾ = ρ ( B ) \rho(B^*)=\overline{\rho(B)}=\rho(B) ρ ( B ∗ ) = ρ ( B ) = ρ ( B ) for every character, B ≃ B ∗ B\simeq B^* B ≃ B ∗ . In particular [ B : Z ∗ ] = [ B : Z ] [B:Z^*]=[B:Z] [ B : Z ∗ ] = [ B : Z ] , and every simple X ∈ H X\in\mathcal{H} X ∈ H occurs in some B ⊗ m B^{\otimes m} B ⊗ m . The dimension character gives FPdim ( B ) ∈ Z \operatorname{FPdim}(B)\in\mathbb{Z} FPdim ( B ) ∈ Z . For any Galois automorphism γ \gamma γ of a splitting field of the fusion matrices, ∣ γ ( FPdim ( X ) ) ∣ ≤ FPdim ( X ) |\gamma(\operatorname{FPdim}(X))|\leq\operatorname{FPdim}(X) ∣ γ ( FPdim ( X )) ∣ ≤ FPdim ( X ) by the spectral-radius bound. Applying γ \gamma γ to the simple decomposition of FPdim ( B ) m \operatorname{FPdim}(B)^m FPdim ( B ) m and taking real parts shows that each constituent attains equality in ℜ γ ( FPdim ( X ) ) ≤ FPdim ( X ) \Re\gamma(\operatorname{FPdim}(X))\leq\operatorname{FPdim}(X) ℜ γ ( FPdim ( X )) ≤ FPdim ( X ) . Each FPdim ( X ) \operatorname{FPdim}(X) FPdim ( X ) is consequently a rational algebraic integer.
Every character ψ \psi ψ of K ( H ) K(\mathcal{H}) K ( H ) extends to K ( A ) K(\mathcal{A}) K ( A ) since the inclusion is unital and both algebras are commutative semisimple. Thus the two hypotheses on character values hold also in H \mathcal{H} H . Write f ψ f_\psi f ψ for its formal codegree. The corresponding class object of H \mathcal{H} H has dimension FPdim ( H ) / f ψ \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{H})/f_\psi FPdim ( H ) / f ψ by [38 Theorem 2.13] , which applies to the canonical spherical structure of the integral category H \mathcal{H} H . This dimension is an integer since its forgetful image belongs to H \mathcal{H} H . In particular f ψ f_\psi f ψ is rational. Set w ψ = FPdim ( H ) ψ ( B ) / f ψ w_\psi=\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{H})\psi(B)/f_\psi w ψ = FPdim ( H ) ψ ( B ) / f ψ . The unit-coefficient trace (10) gives
∑ ψ w ψ = FPdim ( H ) [ B : 1 ] , ∑ ψ w ψ ψ ( Z ) = FPdim ( H ) [ B : Z ] . (222) \sum_\psi w_\psi=\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{H})[B:1],\qquad\sum_\psi w_\psi\psi(Z)=\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{H})[B:Z]. \tag*{(222)} ψ ∑ w ψ = FPdim ( H ) [ B : 1 ] , ψ ∑ w ψ ψ ( Z ) = FPdim ( H ) [ B : Z ] . (222)
The nonnegative integer weights w ψ w_\psi w ψ are Galois-invariant since ψ ( B ) \psi(B) ψ ( B ) is integral and f γ ψ = γ ( f ψ ) f_{\gamma\psi}=\gamma(f_\psi) f γ ψ = γ ( f ψ ) . The dimension character ψ 0 \psi_0 ψ 0 is fixed by Galois, with w ψ 0 = FPdim ( B ) w_{\psi_0}=\operatorname{FPdim}(B) w ψ 0 = FPdim ( B ) . On every other Galois orbit where w ψ > 0 w_\psi>0 w ψ > 0 and ψ ( Z ) ≠ 0 \psi(Z)\ne0 ψ ( Z ) = 0 , the values ψ ( Z ) \psi(Z) ψ ( Z ) are positive algebraic integers. Their product is a positive rational algebraic integer, so their arithmetic mean is at least one. In the difference of the two moments in (A.3), these orbits thus contribute a nonnegative amount to ∑ ψ w ψ ( ψ ( Z ) − 1 ) \sum_\psi w_\psi(\psi(Z)-1) ∑ ψ w ψ ( ψ ( Z ) − 1 ) . The dimension character contributes FPdim ( B ) ( FPdim ( Z ) − 1 ) \operatorname{FPdim}(B)(\operatorname{FPdim}(Z)-1) FPdim ( B ) ( FPdim ( Z ) − 1 ) , and a zero contributes − w ψ -w_\psi − w ψ . Rearranging and dividing by FPdim ( H ) \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{H}) FPdim ( H ) gives the bound in H \mathcal{H} H . Equality requires each positive-weight orbit outside the dimension character on which ψ ( Z ) ≠ 0 \psi(Z)\ne0 ψ ( Z ) = 0 to have arithmetic mean one. Its geometric mean is at least one, so equality in the arithmetic–geometric mean inequality forces every value on the orbit to be one. Conversely, this condition makes every such orbit contribute zero to the difference.
For transfer to A \mathcal{A} A , the primitive idempotent of ψ \psi ψ is the sum of the idempotents of its extensions. Taking the unit-coefficient trace (10) gives
∑ ρ ∣ K ( H ) = ψ 1 n ρ = 1 f ψ . (223) \sum_{\rho|_{\mathcal{K}(\mathcal{H})}=\psi}\frac{1}{n_\rho}=\frac{1}{f_\psi}. \tag*{(223)} ρ ∣ K ( H ) = ψ ∑ n ρ 1 = f ψ 1 . (223)
Both B B B and Z Z Z belong to H \mathcal{H} H , so their values are constant on these fibers. Summation preserves both the bound and its equality condition.
Example A.2 (Equality and the multiplicity hypothesis). Let Z Z Z be the two-dimensional irreducible of S 3 S_3 S 3 . On the identity, a transposition and a three-cycle its values are 2, 0, − 1 -1 − 1 . For B = 1 ⊕ Z B=1\oplus Z B = 1 ⊕ Z the corresponding values are 3, 1, 0. The only supported zero is the transposition class, whose formal codegree is two. Its contribution 1 / 2 1/2 1/2 attains (A.2). For the regular representation B B B , the values are 6, 0, 0 and [ B : Z ] = 2 [B:Z]=2 [ B : Z ] = 2 . The supported zero set is empty and both sides of (A.1) are zero.
The canonical algebra and three character fibers
Return to a weakly integral braided category C \mathcal{C} C . For its i i i -th class object, define
E i = ⟨ Z i ⟩ ⊆ Z ( C ) , D i = ⟨ Y i ⟩ ⊆ C , B i = I ( 1 ) ∩ E i = ⨁ Z j ∈ E i Z j . (224) \mathcal{E}_i=\langle Z_i\rangle\subseteq\mathcal{Z}(\mathcal{C}),\qquad\mathcal{D}_i=\langle Y_i\rangle\subseteq\mathcal{C},\qquad B_i=I(1)\cap\mathcal{E}_i=\bigoplus_{Z_j\in\mathcal{E}_i}Z_j. \tag*{(224)} E i = ⟨ Z i ⟩ ⊆ Z ( C ) , D i = ⟨ Y i ⟩ ⊆ C , B i = I ( 1 ) ∩ E i = Z j ∈ E i ⨁ Z j . (224)
The restriction F i : E i → D i F_i:\mathcal{E}_i\to\mathcal{D}_i F i : E i → D i of forgetting is a dominant central functor. Indeed, all simples of D i \mathcal{D}_i D i occur in tensor words in Y i Y_i Y i and Y i ∗ Y_i^* Y i ∗ , and the half-braidings of E i \mathcal{E}_i E i restrict to D i \mathcal{D}_i D i . By adjunction B i B_i B i is the value at 1 1 1 of its right adjoint. It is a connected étale algebra, and [17 Lemmas 3.5 and 3.11] give
FPdim ( D i ) = FPdim ( E i ) FPdim ( B i ) . (225) \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{D}_i)=\frac{\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{E}_i)}{\operatorname{FPdim}(B_i)}. \tag*{(225)} FPdim ( D i ) = FPdim ( B i ) FPdim ( E i ) . (225)
The canonical algebra is self-dual because the multiplicities of X X X and X ∗ X^* X ∗ in I ( 1 ) I(1) I ( 1 ) both equal [ F ( X ) : 1 ] [F(X):1] [ F ( X ) : 1 ] by adjunction and duality. Thus B i B_i B i is self-dual, and multiplicity-freeness gives [ B i : 1 ] = [ B i : Z i ] = 1 [B_i:1]=[B_i:Z_i]=1 [ B i : 1 ] = [ B i : Z i ] = 1 . Since Z i Z_i Z i is a summand of B i B_i B i , ⟨ B i ⟩ = E i \langle B_i\rangle=\mathcal{E}_i ⟨ B i ⟩ = E i .
For ρ ∈ K ( E i ) ^ \rho\in\widehat{\mathcal{K}(\mathcal{E}_i)} ρ ∈ K ( E i ) and σ ∈ K ( D i ) ^ \sigma\in\widehat{\mathcal{K}(\mathcal{D}_i)} σ ∈ K ( D i ) write n ρ n_\rho n ρ and m σ m_\sigma m σ for their respective formal codegrees, and put k ρ = ρ ( B i ) k_\rho=\rho(B_i) k ρ = ρ ( B i ) . Let χ W \chi_W χ W be the Verlinde character of W ∈ Irr ( Z ( C ) ) W\in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{Z}(\mathcal{C})) W ∈ Irr ( Z ( C )) . Define the fibers and their weights by
Ω ρ = { W ∈ Irr ( Z ( C ) ) : χ W ∣ K ( E i ) = ρ } , r ρ = ∑ j : Z j ∈ Ω ρ FPdim ( Z j ) . (226) \Omega_\rho=\{W\in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{Z}(\mathcal{C})):\chi_W|_{\mathcal{K}(\mathcal{E}_i)}=\rho\},\qquad
r_\rho=\sum_{j:Z_j\in\Omega_\rho}\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_j). \tag*{(226)} Ω ρ = { W ∈ Irr ( Z ( C )) : χ W ∣ K ( E i ) = ρ } , r ρ = j : Z j ∈ Ω ρ ∑ FPdim ( Z j ) . (226)
Π ρ = { σ ∈ K ( D i ) ^ : σ ∘ F i ∗ = ρ } , s ρ = ∑ σ ∈ Π ρ FPdim ( Z σ D i ) . (227) \Pi_\rho=\{\sigma\in\widehat{\mathcal{K}(\mathcal{D}_i)}:\sigma\circ F_{i*}=\rho\},\qquad
s_\rho=\sum_{\sigma\in\Pi_\rho}\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_\sigma^{\mathcal{D}_i}). \tag*{(227)} Π ρ = { σ ∈ K ( D i ) : σ ∘ F i ∗ = ρ } , s ρ = σ ∈ Π ρ ∑ FPdim ( Z σ D i ) . (227)
Here F i ∗ F_{i*} F i ∗ denotes the induced algebra map.
Lemma A.3 (Full and canonical-algebra fibers). Let C \mathcal{C} C be a weakly integral braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C . For the forgetful functor F : Z ( C ) → C F:\mathcal{Z}(\mathcal{C}) \to\mathcal{C} F : Z ( C ) → C with right adjoint I I I , write I ( 1 ) = ⨁ j Z j I(1)=\bigoplus_j Z_j I ( 1 ) = ⨁ j Z j and Y j = F ( Z j ) Y_j=F(Z_j) Y j = F ( Z j ) . Fix i i i and set E i = ⟨ Z i ⟩ ⊆ Z ( C ) \mathcal{E}_i=\langle Z_i\rangle\subseteq\mathcal{Z}(\mathcal{C}) E i = ⟨ Z i ⟩ ⊆ Z ( C ) , D i = ⟨ Y i ⟩ ⊆ C \mathcal{D}_i=\langle Y_i\rangle\subseteq\mathcal{C} D i = ⟨ Y i ⟩ ⊆ C , and B i = I ( 1 ) ∩ E i B_i=I(1)\cap\mathcal{E}_i B i = I ( 1 ) ∩ E i . Write F i : E i → D i F_i:\mathcal{E}_i\to\mathcal{D}_i F i : E i → D i for the restriction of F F F . For an algebra character ρ \rho ρ of K ( E i ) K(\mathcal{E}_i) K ( E i ) let n ρ n_\rho n ρ be its formal codegree and set k ρ = ρ ( B i ) k_\rho=\rho(B_i) k ρ = ρ ( B i ) . Let Ω ρ \Omega_\rho Ω ρ consist of those W ∈ Irr ( Z ( C ) ) W\in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{Z}(\mathcal{C})) W ∈ Irr ( Z ( C )) whose Verlinde character for the canonical modular structure restricts to ρ \rho ρ on K ( E i ) K(\mathcal{E}_i) K ( E i ) . Put r ρ = ∑ j : Z j ∈ Ω ρ FPdim ( Z j ) r_\rho=\sum_{j:Z_j\in\Omega_\rho}\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_j) r ρ = ∑ j : Z j ∈ Ω ρ FPdim ( Z j ) . Then
∑ W ∈ Ω ρ FPdim ( W ) 2 = FPdim ( C ) 2 n ρ , (228) \sum_{W\in\Omega_\rho}\operatorname{FPdim}(W)^2=\frac{\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C})^2}{n_\rho}, \tag*{(228)} W ∈ Ω ρ ∑ FPdim ( W ) 2 = n ρ FPdim ( C ) 2 , (228) r ρ = FPdim ( C ) k ρ n ρ , k ρ ∈ Z ≥ 0 . (229) r_\rho=\frac{\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C})k_\rho}{n_\rho},\qquad k_\rho\in\mathbb{Z}_{\geq0}. \tag*{(229)} r ρ = n ρ FPdim ( C ) k ρ , k ρ ∈ Z ≥ 0 . (229) Let μ j \mu_j μ j be the algebra character of K ( C ) K(\mathcal{C}) K ( C ) corresponding to Z j Z_j Z j . The supported characters are characterized by
k ρ > 0 ⟺ ρ = ( μ j ∣ K ( D i ) ) ∘ F i ∗ for some j . (230) k_\rho>0\quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad\rho=(\mu_j|_{K(\mathcal{D}_i)})\circ F_i^*\quad\text{for some }j. \tag*{(230)} k ρ > 0 ⟺ ρ = ( μ j ∣ K ( D i ) ) ∘ F i ∗ for some j . (230) For such j j j , ρ ( Z i ) = μ j ( Y i ) ≥ 0 \rho(Z_i)=\mu_j(Y_i)\geq0 ρ ( Z i ) = μ j ( Y i ) ≥ 0 .
Proof. The primitive idempotent e ρ e_\rho e ρ of K ( E i ) K(\mathcal{E}_i) K ( E i ) maps in K ( Z ( C ) ) K(\mathcal{Z}(\mathcal{C})) K ( Z ( C )) to the sum of the idempotents corresponding to W ∈ Ω ρ W\in\Omega_\rho W ∈ Ω ρ . Their unit traces are FPdim ( W ) 2 / FPdim ( C ) 2 \operatorname{FPdim}(W)^2/\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C})^2 FPdim ( W ) 2 / FPdim ( C ) 2 , which gives (A.9). On the other hand, for v ∈ K ( E i ) v\in K(\mathcal{E}_i) v ∈ K ( E i ) adjunction and self-duality of B i B_i B i give
τ C ( F i ∗ ( v ) ) = τ D i ( F i ∗ ( v ) ) = τ E i ( v [ B i ] ) . (231) \tau_{\mathcal{C}}(F_i^*(v))=\tau_{\mathcal{D}_i}(F_i^*(v))=\tau_{\mathcal{E}_i}(v[B_i]). \tag*{(231)} τ C ( F i ∗ ( v )) = τ D i ( F i ∗ ( v )) = τ E i ( v [ B i ]) . (231) Indeed on a simple X X X both sides equal [ F ( X ) : 1 ] = [ B i : X ] [F(X):1]=[B_i:X] [ F ( X ) : 1 ] = [ B i : X ] . By (11) , μ j ∘ F ∗ = χ Z j \mu_j\circ F^*=\chi_{Z_j} μ j ∘ F ∗ = χ Z j . Hence in K ( C ) K(\mathcal{C}) K ( C ) the image of e ρ e_\rho e ρ is the sum of the idempotents corresponding to those j j j for which Z j ∈ Ω ρ Z_j\in\Omega_\rho Z j ∈ Ω ρ . Its trace is r ρ / FPdim ( C ) r_\rho/\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C}) r ρ / FPdim ( C ) , while the right side of (A.12) gives k ρ / n ρ k_\rho/n_\rho k ρ / n ρ . Since n ρ n_\rho n ρ is rational and k ρ k_\rho k ρ is an algebraic integer, (A.10) gives k ρ ∈ Z ≥ 0 k_\rho\in\mathbb{Z}_{\geq0} k ρ ∈ Z ≥ 0 . The last assertion follows from Proposition 2.3 .
Proposition A.4 (Three compatible fiber identities). Let C \mathcal{C} C be a weakly integral braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C . For the forgetful functor F : Z ( C ) → C F:\mathcal{Z}(\mathcal{C})\to\mathcal{C} F : Z ( C ) → C with right adjoint I I I , write I ( 1 ) = ⨁ j Z j I(1)=\bigoplus_j Z_j I ( 1 ) = ⨁ j Z j and Y j = F ( Z j ) Y_j=F(Z_j) Y j = F ( Z j ) . Fix i i i and set E i = ⟨ Z i ⟩ ⊆ Z ( C ) \mathcal{E}_i=\langle Z_i\rangle\subseteq\mathcal{Z}(\mathcal{C}) E i = ⟨ Z i ⟩ ⊆ Z ( C ) , D i = ⟨ Y i ⟩ ⊆ C \mathcal{D}_i=\langle Y_i\rangle\subseteq\mathcal{C} D i = ⟨ Y i ⟩ ⊆ C , and B i = I ( 1 ) ∩ E i B_i=I(1)\cap\mathcal{E}_i B i = I ( 1 ) ∩ E i . Write F i : E i → D i F_i:\mathcal{E}_i\to\mathcal{D}_i F i : E i → D i for the restriction of F F F . For an algebra character ρ \rho ρ of K ( E i ) K(\mathcal{E}_i) K ( E i ) let n ρ n_\rho n ρ be its formal codegree and set k ρ = ρ ( B i ) k_\rho=\rho(B_i) k ρ = ρ ( B i ) . Let Π ρ \Pi_\rho Π ρ consist of the algebra characters σ \sigma σ of K ( D i ) K(\mathcal{D}_i) K ( D i ) whose pullback along F i ∗ F_i^* F i ∗ equals ρ \rho ρ . For these σ \sigma σ , let m σ m_\sigma m σ denote the formal codegree in D i \mathcal{D}_i D i and put s ρ = ∑ σ ∈ Π ρ FPdim ( Z ρ E i ) s_\rho=\sum_{\sigma\in\Pi_\rho}\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_\rho^{\mathcal{E}_i}) s ρ = ∑ σ ∈ Π ρ FPdim ( Z ρ E i ) . Write r ρ = ∑ j FPdim ( Z j ) r_\rho=\sum_j\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_j) r ρ = ∑ j FPdim ( Z j ) , summing over precisely those j j j for which the central Verlinde character χ Z j \chi_{Z_j} χ Z j restricts to ρ \rho ρ on K ( E i ) K(\mathcal{E}_i) K ( E i ) . Then
∑ σ ∈ Π ρ 1 m σ = k ρ n ρ , (232) \sum_{\sigma\in\Pi_\rho}\frac{1}{m_\sigma}=\frac{k_\rho}{n_\rho}, \tag*{(232)} σ ∈ Π ρ ∑ m σ 1 = n ρ k ρ , (232) FPdim ( B i ) s ρ = FPdim ( Z ρ E i ) k ρ , (233) \operatorname{FPdim}(B_i)s_\rho=\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_\rho^{\mathcal{E}_i})k_\rho, \tag*{(233)} FPdim ( B i ) s ρ = FPdim ( Z ρ E i ) k ρ , (233) r ρ = FPdim ( C ) FPdim ( D i ) s ρ . (234) r_\rho=\frac{\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C})}{\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{D}_i)}s_\rho. \tag*{(234)} r ρ = FPdim ( D i ) FPdim ( C ) s ρ . (234) In particular Π ρ ≠ ∅ \Pi_\rho\ne\varnothing Π ρ = ∅ precisely when k ρ > 0 k_\rho>0 k ρ > 0 , and
FPdim ( B i ) ∣ FPdim ( Z ρ E i ) k ρ , n ρ ∣ FPdim ( D i ) k ρ , FPdim ( C ) FPdim ( D i ) ∣ r ρ . (235) \operatorname{FPdim}(B_i)\mid\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_\rho^{\mathcal{E}_i})k_\rho,\qquad n_\rho\mid\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{D}_i)k_\rho,\qquad\frac{\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C})}{\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{D}_i)}\mid r_\rho. \tag*{(235)} FPdim ( B i ) ∣ FPdim ( Z ρ E i ) k ρ , n ρ ∣ FPdim ( D i ) k ρ , FPdim ( D i ) FPdim ( C ) ∣ r ρ . (235) Proof. Evaluation on the characters of K ( D i ) K(\mathcal{D}_i) K ( D i ) identifies F i ∗ ( e ρ ) F_i^*(e_\rho) F i ∗ ( e ρ ) with the sum of the primitive idempotents of σ ∈ Π ρ \sigma\in\Pi_\rho σ ∈ Π ρ . Taking its trace in (A.12) proves (A.13). Multiplying by FPdim ( D i ) \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{D}_i) FPdim ( D i )
gives s ρ = FPdim ( D i ) k ρ / n ρ s_\rho= \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{D}_i)k_\rho/n_\rho s ρ = FPdim ( D i ) k ρ / n ρ . Now use (A.6) and FPdim ( Z ρ E i ) = FPdim ( E i ) / n ρ \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_\rho^{\mathcal{E}_i}) = \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{E}_i)/n_\rho FPdim ( Z ρ E i ) = FPdim ( E i ) / n ρ to obtain (A.14). Finally, the fibers of restriction from K ( C ) K(\mathcal{C}) K ( C ) to K ( D i ) K(\mathcal{D}_i) K ( D i ) over the members of Π ρ \Pi_\rho Π ρ partition { μ j : Z j ∈ Ω ρ } \{\mu_j : Z_j \in\Omega_\rho\} { μ j : Z j ∈ Ω ρ } by (11) . Applying the extent formula (18) of Proposition 2.4 to each of them gives (A.15). Both s ρ s_\rho s ρ and the index FPdim ( C ) / FPdim ( D i ) \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C})/\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{D}_i) FPdim ( C ) / FPdim ( D i ) are integers, which yields the divisibilities.
Corollary A.5 (Divisibility in the two categories). Let C \mathcal{C} C be a weakly integral braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C . For the forgetful functor F : Z ( C ) → C F:\mathcal{Z}(\mathcal{C}) \to\mathcal{C} F : Z ( C ) → C with right adjoint I I I , write I ( 1 ) = ⨁ j Z j I(1)=\bigoplus_j Z_j I ( 1 ) = ⨁ j Z j and Y j = F ( Z j ) Y_j=F(Z_j) Y j = F ( Z j ) . Fix i i i and set E i = ⟨ Z i ⟩ ⊆ Z ( C ) \mathcal{E}_i=\langle Z_i\rangle\subseteq\mathcal{Z}(\mathcal{C}) E i = ⟨ Z i ⟩ ⊆ Z ( C ) , D i = ⟨ Y i ⟩ ⊆ C \mathcal{D}_i=\langle Y_i\rangle\subseteq\mathcal{C} D i = ⟨ Y i ⟩ ⊆ C , and B i = I ( 1 ) ∩ E i B_i=I(1)\cap\mathcal{E}_i B i = I ( 1 ) ∩ E i . Write F i : E i → D i F_i:\mathcal{E}_i\to\mathcal{D}_i F i : E i → D i for the restriction of F F F . For an algebra character ρ \rho ρ of K ( E i ) K(\mathcal{E}_i) K ( E i ) let n ρ n_\rho n ρ be its formal codegree and set k ρ = ρ ( B i ) k_\rho=\rho(B_i) k ρ = ρ ( B i ) . Let Ω ρ \Omega_\rho Ω ρ consist of those W ∈ Irr ( Z ( C ) ) W\in\operatorname{Irr}(\mathcal{Z}(\mathcal{C})) W ∈ Irr ( Z ( C )) whose Verlinde character for the canonical modular structure restricts to ρ \rho ρ on K ( E i ) K(\mathcal{E}_i) K ( E i ) . Let Π ρ \Pi_\rho Π ρ consist of the algebra characters σ \sigma σ of K ( D i ) K(\mathcal{D}_i) K ( D i ) whose pullback along F i ∗ F_i^* F i ∗ equals ρ \rho ρ . For W ∈ Ω ρ W\in\Omega_\rho W ∈ Ω ρ one has
FPdim ( W ) 2 FPdim ( Z ρ E i ) = FPdim ( ( W W ∗ ) ∩ E i ) Z ( C ) ∈ Z > 0 . (236) \frac{\operatorname{FPdim}(W)^2}{\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_\rho^{\mathcal{E}_i})}
=
\operatorname{FPdim}\bigl((WW^*)\cap\mathcal{E}_i\bigr)_{\mathcal{Z}(\mathcal{C})}
\in\mathbb{Z}_{>0}. \tag*{(236)} FPdim ( Z ρ E i ) FPdim ( W ) 2 = FPdim ( ( W W ∗ ) ∩ E i ) Z ( C ) ∈ Z > 0 . (236) Let μ j \mu_j μ j denote the algebra character of K ( C ) K(\mathcal{C}) K ( C ) corresponding to Z j Z_j Z j . If μ j ∣ K ( D i ) = σ ∈ Π ρ \mu_j|_{K(\mathcal{D}_i)}=\sigma\in\Pi_\rho μ j ∣ K ( D i ) = σ ∈ Π ρ , then
FPdim ( Z ρ E i ) ∣ FPdim ( Z j ) 2 , FPdim ( Z σ D i ) ∣ FPdim ( Z j ) . (237) \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_\rho^{\mathcal{E}_i})\mid\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_j)^2,\qquad
\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_\sigma^{\mathcal{D}_i})\mid\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_j). \tag*{(237)} FPdim ( Z ρ E i ) ∣ FPdim ( Z j ) 2 , FPdim ( Z σ D i ) ∣ FPdim ( Z j ) . (237) Thus a prime absent from all class dimensions in C \mathcal{C} C is absent from all class dimensions in D i \mathcal{D}_i D i , and also from the dimensions FPdim ( Z ρ E i ) \operatorname{FPdim}(Z_\rho^{\mathcal{E}_i}) FPdim ( Z ρ E i ) for k ρ > 0 k_\rho>0 k ρ > 0 .
Proof. Apply the modular quotient formula (21) of Theorem 2.5 to E i ⊆ Z ( C ) \mathcal{E}_i\subseteq\mathcal{Z}(\mathcal{C}) E i ⊆ Z ( C ) . Under the stated restriction, Z j ∈ Ω ρ Z_j\in\Omega_\rho Z j ∈ Ω ρ , so (A.17) applies with W = Z j W=Z_j W = Z j . Apply the individual braided divisibility (23) of Theorem 2.6 to D i ⊆ C \mathcal{D}_i\subseteq\mathcal{C} D i ⊆ C for the second divisibility. Every σ \sigma σ extends to K ( C ) K(\mathcal{C}) K ( C ) by Proposition 2.4, and every supported ρ \rho ρ has such a lift by Lemma A.3.
Quantitative vanishing for a class image
Corollary A.6 (Zero bounds in the center and its forgetful image). Let C \mathcal{C} C be a weakly integral braided fusion category over C \mathbb{C} C . For the forgetful functor F : Z ( C ) → C F:\mathcal{Z}(\mathcal{C})\to\mathcal{C} F : Z ( C ) → C with right adjoint I I I , write I ( 1 ) = ⨁ j Z j I(1)=\bigoplus_j Z_j I ( 1 ) = ⨁ j Z j and Y j = F ( Z j ) Y_j=F(Z_j) Y j = F ( Z j ) . Fix i i i and set E i = ⟨ Z i ⟩ ⊆ Z ( C ) \mathcal{E}_i=\langle Z_i\rangle\subseteq\mathcal{Z}(\mathcal{C}) E i = ⟨ Z i ⟩ ⊆ Z ( C ) , D i = ⟨ Y i ⟩ ⊆ C \mathcal{D}_i=\langle Y_i\rangle\subseteq\mathcal{C} D i = ⟨ Y i ⟩ ⊆ C , and B i = I ( 1 ) ∩ E i B_i=I(1)\cap\mathcal{E}_i B i = I ( 1 ) ∩ E i . For an algebra character ρ \rho ρ of K ( E i ) K(\mathcal{E}_i) K ( E i ) let n ρ n_\rho n ρ be its formal codegree and set k ρ = ρ ( B i ) k_\rho=\rho(B_i) k ρ = ρ ( B i ) . Let σ \sigma σ range over the algebra characters of K ( D i ) K(\mathcal{D}_i) K ( D i ) , and let μ j \mu_j μ j be the algebra character of K ( C ) K(\mathcal{C}) K ( C ) corresponding to Z j Z_j Z j . Then
∑ ρ ( Z i ) = 0 k ρ > 0 k ρ n ρ ≥ FPdim ( Z i ) − 1 FPdim ( D i ) . (238) \sum_{\substack{\rho(Z_i)=0\\ k_\rho>0}}\frac{k_\rho}{n_\rho}
\ge
\frac{\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i)-1}{\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{D}_i)}. \tag*{(238)} ρ ( Z i ) = 0 k ρ > 0 ∑ n ρ k ρ ≥ FPdim ( D i ) FPdim ( Z i ) − 1 . (238) ∑ σ ( Y i ) = 0 FPdim ( Z σ D i ) ≥ FPdim ( Z i ) − 1. (239) \sum_{\sigma(Y_i)=0}\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_\sigma^{\mathcal{D}_i})
\ge\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i)-1. \tag*{(239)} σ ( Y i ) = 0 ∑ FPdim ( Z σ D i ) ≥ FPdim ( Z i ) − 1. (239) ∑ μ j ( Y i ) = 0 FPdim ( Z j ) = FPdim ( C ) FPdim ( D i ) ∑ σ ( Y i ) = 0 FPdim ( Z σ D i ) ≥ FPdim ( C ) FPdim ( D i ) ( FPdim ( Z i ) − 1 ) . (240) \sum_{\mu_j(Y_i)=0}\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_j)
=
\frac{\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C})}{\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{D}_i)}
\sum_{\sigma(Y_i)=0}\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_\sigma^{\mathcal{D}_i})
\ge
\frac{\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{C})}{\operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{D}_i)}
\bigl(\operatorname{FPdim}(Z_i)-1\bigr). \tag*{(240)} μ j ( Y i ) = 0 ∑ FPdim ( Z j ) = FPdim ( D i ) FPdim ( C ) σ ( Y i ) = 0 ∑ FPdim ( Z σ D i ) ≥ FPdim ( D i ) FPdim ( C ) ( FPdim ( Z i ) − 1 ) . (240) In particular every Z i Z_i Z i of dimension greater than one admits a character μ j \mu_j μ j of K ( C ) K(\mathcal{C}) K ( C ) with μ j ( Y i ) = 0 \mu_j(Y_i)=0 μ j ( Y i ) = 0 .
Proof. Apply Theorem A.1 in E i \mathcal{E}_i E i with B = B i B=B_i B = B i and Z = Z i Z=Z_i Z = Z i . The multiplicities are both one and ⟨ B i ⟩ = E i \langle B_i\rangle=\mathcal{E}_i ⟨ B i ⟩ = E i . Lemma A.3 supplies the nonnegative integral weights and positivity on their support. Equation (A.6) therefore gives (A.19). For σ ∈ Π ρ \sigma\in\Pi_\rho σ ∈ Π ρ , one has σ ( Y i ) = ρ ( Z i ) \sigma(Y_i)=\rho(Z_i) σ ( Y i ) = ρ ( Z i ) . Summing (A.13) of Proposition A.4 over the zero fibers and multiplying by FPdim ( D i ) \operatorname{FPdim}(\mathcal{D}_i) FPdim ( D i ) gives (A.20). Summing (A.15) over the same fibers gives (A.21).
Acknowledgments
The author used the assistance of ChatGPT Pro (OpenAI) in developing proof strategies, examining examples, and drafting and revising portions of this paper. The author takes full responsibility for the statements, proofs, references, and final text.