alphaFeedback

WorksPhysics and Astronomy

Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering Simulation Using GENIE Event Generator

AI contributions
Not recorded for this paper
View details

Abstract

The Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE) relies on the precise reconstruction of incident neutrino energy to extract oscillation parameters. The use of Liquid Argon introduces significant theoretical complexities due to nuclear effects. This work evaluates neutrino-nucleus scattering models using the GENIE Monte Carlo event generator. We demonstrate the limitations of the Relativistic Fermi Gas (RFG) model in the Charged Current Quasi-Elastic (CCQE) channel and its reliance on an inflated Axial Mass to match experimental data from MicroBooNE. We show that transitioning to advanced many-body frameworks, specifically the Local Fermi Gas (LFG) supplemented with Random Phase Approximation (RPA), is needed. Additionally, we evaluate the impact of the 2021 Bodek-Yang parameter updates on Deep Inelastic Scattering (DIS), concluding that modernized constraints are a prerequisite for mitigating systematic biases in DUNE.

The 43rd International Conference on High Energy Physics (ICHEP 2026)

© Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). All rights for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies for commercial purposes, are reserved.

ISSN 1824-8039. Published by SISSA Medialab. https://pos.sissa.it/

Introduction

The Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE) is a next-generation project designed to measure neutrino oscillation parameters with unprecedented precision [1]. Because the neutrino energy is unknown, it must be reconstructed from the measured kinematics of the outgoing particles [2]. This energy reconstruction is distorted by the nuclear environment of the 40Ar{}^{40}\mathrm{Ar} target [2]. To accurately test the models’ predictions, DUNE relies on Monte Carlo event generators, prominently the GENIE framework [2]. This work, which is an upcoming master’s dissertation [3], investigates the phenomenologies of neutrino-nucleus scattering in GENIE, quantifying the limitations of the GENIE models and the necessity of advanced nuclear frameworks for DUNE, utilizing the SDumont supercomputer (LNCC).

The Axial Mass and MicroBooNE Data

In the Charged Current Quasi-Elastic (CCQE) channel, the dipole approach of the axial form factor FA(Q2)F_{A}(Q^{2}) depends on the axial mass (MAM_{A}) which is an observable [2]. While free nucleon data established MA≈1.03M_{A} \approx1.03 GeV [4], modern experiments utilizing heavy nuclear targets found a severe underprediction of the total cross-section when applying the standard Relativistic Fermi Gas (RFG) model [5]. To reconcile theoretical predictions with experimental data, the axial mass was inflated to an effective value of MA=1.20±0.09M_{A} = 1.20 \pm0.09 GeV [6]. To contextualize this parameter within Liquid Argon targets, we simulated the RFG predictions in GENIE and compared them against the inclusive νμ\nu_{\mu} cross-section data measured by MicroBooNE in 2022 [5]. As shown in Figure 1, the experimental data align closely with the MA=1.20M_{A} = 1.20 GeV. However, inflating the axial mass to recover the event rate masks incomplete nuclear modeling [2]. It is necessary to implement models that better describe nuclear dynamics. The Local Fermi Gas (LFG) model improves upon the RFG by accounting for the radial density of the nucleus via a Woods-Saxon distribution, providing a more physically realistic initial momentum distribution [2].

GENIE simulation of the $\nu_\mu$ inclusive cross-section on Argon compared to MicroBooNE data

Figure 1. Figure 1: GENIE simulation of the νμ\nu_\mu inclusive cross-section on Argon compared to MicroBooNE (2022) data [5] (black points). The curves represent the GENIE value evaluated at MA=0.99M_A = 0.99 GeV (blue dashed), 1.03 GeV (green solid) from ref. [4], and 1.20 GeV (red solid) from ref. [6].

Deep Inelastic Scattering Updates

Deep Inelastic Scattering (DIS) constitutes the largest fraction of the DUNE flux [1]. The GENIE framework utilizes the Bodek-Yang model. We evaluated the implementation of the modernized 2021 Bodek-Yang parameters [7] against the GENIE tune. As shown in Figure 2, the updated coefficients induce a suppression of the DIS cross-section, corresponding to an approximately 7% reduction at the DUNE energy peak (2.5 GeV) [1].

DIS cross-section comparison between GENIE and 2021 Bodek-Yang parameter updates

Figure 2. Figure 2: DIS cross-section comparison between GENIE and 2021 Bodek-Yang parameter updates from ref. [7]. The bottom panel is the ratio, representing the percentual difference between the models - 1.

Conclusion

[3]The systematic evaluation using the GENIE event generator demonstrates that the standard Relativistic Fermi Gas model is insufficient for high-precision oscillation physics. Relying on parameter adjustments to reconcile theoretical predictions with Liquid Argon data can severely bias DUNE’s energy reconstruction. Instead, we need more robust models accounting for more precise nuclear dynamics. The update of the modernized constraints for DIS is fundamental for mitigating systematic backgrounds and ensuring the success of DUNE’s measurements.

References

  1. [1]Babak Abi et al. Deep underground neutrino experiment (dune), far detector technical design report, volume ii: Dune physics. Journal of Instrumentation (JINST), 15(08):T08010, 2020.
  2. [2]Luis Alvarez-Ruso et al. Nustec white paper: Status and challenges of neutrino–nucleus scattering. Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, 100:1–68, 2018.
  3. [3]L. Rodrigues. Systematic study of neutrino-nucleus interactions for the dune experiment. Master’s thesis, Federal University of Alfenas, Poços de Caldas, Brazil, 2026. Forthcoming. To be submitted to arXiv.arxiv.org/abs/2610.32669
  4. [4]Ko Abe, N Akhlaq, Ryosuke Akutsu, A Ali, S Alonso Monsalve, C Alt, C Andreopoulos, M Antonova, S Aoki, T Arihara, et al. Updated t2k measurements of muon neutrino and antineutrino disappearance using 3.6×10²¹ protons on target. Physical Review D, 108(7):072011, 2023.
  5. [5]P Abratenko et al. First measurement of energy-dependent inclusive muon neutrino charged-current cross sections on argon with the microboone detector. Physical Review Letters, 128:151801, 2022.DOI
  6. [6]R Gran, EJ Jeon, E Aliu, S Andringa, S Aoki, J Argyriades, K Asakura, R Ashie, F Berghaus, H Berns, et al. Measurement of the quasielastic axial vector mass in neutrino interactions on oxygen. Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology, 74(5):052002, 2006.
  7. [7]A Bodek, UK Yang, and Y Xu. Inelastic axial and vector structure functions for lepton-nucleon scattering 2021 update. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.09240, 2021.arxiv.org/abs/2108.09240

Paper details

vlnc:W_utsy6q5g
v1 · latestHistory (1)

published · Fresh — added to the Hub within the last 30 days

added ·

Usage

views · 0

downloads · 0

A view counts once per browser per day, a download each time the PDF is requested.

CC BY 4.0

Original source

  • Physics and Astronomy

Not recorded for this paper · View statement →

Looking for related papers…
Contents