alphaFeedback

WorksPhysics and Astronomy

Thermofractal Dynamics in the Multisource Thermal Model: A Unified Approach to Multiparticle Production

AI contributions
Not recorded for this paper
View details

Abstract

The empirical success of non-extensive Tsallis statistics and multisource thermal models in describing transverse-momentum (pT ) spectra and rapidity distributions in high-energy relativistic collisions highlights a deep connection between expansion geometry, non-extensive thermodynamics, and QCD dynamics. In this work, we establish a theoretical framework showing that the thermofractal structure of QCD phase space provides a direct microscopic foundation for the multisource thermal model. By exploiting the Euler integral representation of non-extensive statistical factors, we demonstrate that a single thermofractal emission source generating q-exponential distributions is mathematically equivalent to a continuous superposition of local Boltzmann thermal sources whose temperature fluctuations follow an inverse-Gamma distribution. Furthermore, we prove that multi- component phenomenological fits with discrete source temperatures represent the exact, optimal Gauss-Laguerre quadrature discretisation of this underlying continuous thermofractal field. We show how this continuous field constrains the temperature parameter space in multisource formulations, matches pQCD hard-scattering power-law asymptotics, and provides a robust vacuum baseline for medium-induced jet quenching and nuclear modification factor (RAA ) calculations.

Introduction

Describing multiparticle production in high-energy proton-proton (pppp), proton-nucleus (pApA), and nucleus-nucleus (AAAA) collisions remains a central challenge in relativistic heavy-ion physics [1, 2, 3]. Over decades of experimental exploration at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) and the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), two distinct yet successful phenomenological paradigms have emerged to address different aspects of final-state hadron spectra. On one hand, the Multisource Thermal Models account for geometric, flow, and longitudinal expansion effects in relativistic heavy-ion and hadronic interactions. These models treat the emission volume as a spatio-temporal superposition of multiple thermal fireballs, participant partons, or expanding cylindrical sources [1, 4]. While visually intuitive and effective at capturing transverse expansion and longitudinal rapidity profiles, standard multisource formulations rely on tuning several independent source temperatures (T1,T2,T3,…T_1,T_2,T_3,\ldots) and relative normalisation weights to reproduce low-, intermediate-, and high-pTp_T regions [1].

On the other hand, the Thermofractals and Tsallis Statistics, grounded in the non-extensive entropy proposed by Tsallis [5], the thermofractal framework [3, 6, 7] provides a thermodynamic mechanism for qq-exponential energy distributions based on scale invariance. Systematic empirical analyses across RHIC and LHC energies [8, 9, 10, 11] have demonstrated that energy fluctuations in self-similar QCD phase space naturally generate qq-exponential distributions in pTp_T [3, 8]. Significantly, thermofractal theory predicts an entropic index q=8/7≈1.143q = 8/7 \approx1.143 derived from SU(3)SU(3) phase-space effective degrees of freedom [7]. The incorporation of qq-statistics and thermofractal concepts in expanding geometry is grounded in fundamental non-equilibrium dynamics [3, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16], and studies on local temperature fluctuations demonstrated that non-extensive statistics emerge naturally from superstatistical thermal ensembles [12, 13, 14], operating in close connection with Beck-Cohen superstatistics [16]. Modern kinetic theory shows that non-extensive statistics also arise from non-local correlations in quantum field theory and non-linear transport dynamics governed by the Plastino-Plastino equation [17], which has been formally derived from the Boltzmann transport equation endowed with qq-deformed algebraic correlations in self-similar thermofractal systems [19, 20, 21].

In this paper, we show that a thermofractal source governed by qq is mathematically equivalent to a continuous superposition of local Boltzmann sources with inverse-Gamma distributed temperatures, establishing a theoretical connection to the multisource thermal model.

Thermofractals and Multisource Models

Thermofractals and Tsallis Non-Extensive Statistics

Standard Boltzmann-Gibbs thermodynamics relies on additive entropy, S=−kB∑ipiln⁡piS=-k_B\sum_i p_i\ln p_i, suitable for short-range interactions and uncorrelated phase-space volumes. In high-energy hadronic collisions, long-range color force correlations, scale invariance, and self-similar parton branching violate statistical independence [3, 5]. Tsallis non-extensive statistics generalizes the entropy through a non-extensive entropic index qq:

Sq=kB1−∑ipiqq−1,(1)S_q=k_B\frac{1-\sum_i p_i^q}{q-1}, \tag*{(1)}

which recovers standard Boltzmann-Gibbs entropy in the limit q→1q\to1.

Thermofractals represent a physical realization of non-extensive thermodynamics within quantum chromodynamics [3, 6]. A thermofractal is defined as a thermodynamic system exhibiting self-similarity and scale invariance across its phase space [3]. When high energy is deposited into a collision volume, the system forms excited compound states (fireballs or partonic clusters) that recursively decay into smaller, self-similar sub-systems down through sequential generations [3, 7].

The total internal energy UU of a thermofractal system is partitioned between the kinetic energy KK of NsubN_{\mathrm{sub}} constituent sub-systems and internal energy εi\varepsilon_i stored within internal compound states [3]:

U=K+∑i=1Nsubεi,(2)U=K+\sum_{i=1}^{N_{\mathrm{sub}}}\varepsilon_i, \tag*{(2)}

where K=∑i=1NsubKiK=\sum_{i=1}^{N_{\mathrm{sub}}}K_i. The kinetic state density is given by ρ(K)=A0Kα−1\rho(K)=A_0K^{\alpha-1} with α=Nsub⋅d\alpha=N_{\mathrm{sub}}\cdot d, where dd denotes the spatial dimensionality of the kinetic phase space [3]. The scale-invariant phase-space density Ω(U)\Omega(U) obeys the recursive convolution integral [3, 6]:

Ω(U)=∫0UdK ρ(K)∫(∏i=1Nsubdεi Ω(εi))δ(U−K−∑i=1Nsubεi).(3)\Omega(U)=\int_0^U dK\,\rho(K)\int\left(\prod_{i=1}^{N_{\mathrm{sub}}}d\varepsilon_i\,\Omega(\varepsilon_i)\right)\delta\left(U-K-\sum_{i=1}^{N_{\mathrm{sub}}}\varepsilon_i\right). \tag*{(3)}

The internal density of states scales as a power law governed by an effective phase-space parameter DD: Ω(εi)∝εiD−1\Omega(\varepsilon_i)\propto\varepsilon_i^{D-1} [3, 7]. In the thermodynamic limit, this power-law phase-space density yields the non-extensive energy distribution P(E)P(E) [3]:

d2NdpTdy=Cq pTmTcosh⁡y[1+(q−1)mTcosh⁡y−μT0]−qq−1,(4)\frac{d^2N}{dp_Tdy}=C_q\,p_Tm_T\cosh y\left[1+(q-1)\frac{m_T\cosh y-\mu}{T_0}\right]^{-\frac{q}{q-1}}, \tag*{(4)}

where CqC_q is the global normalisation factor, T0T_0 is the scale temperature of the primary system, and qq is linked to DD by [3, 7]:

1q−1=D+1⟹q=1+1D+1.(5)\frac{1}{q-1}=D+1\Longrightarrow q=1+\frac{1}{D+1}. \tag*{(5)}

Non-extensive statistical mechanics in expanding hadronic systems can also be formulated via non-linear transport dynamics [17]. The distribution function P(E,t)P(E,t) evolves according to the generalized Plastino–Plastino Fokker–Planck equation [17]:

∂f(p,t)∂t=−∂∂pi[A(p)f(p,t)]+∂2∂pi∂pj[B(p)f2−q(p,t)],(6)\frac{\partial f(p,t)}{\partial t}=-\frac{\partial}{\partial p_i}\left[A(p)f(p,t)\right]+\frac{\partial^2}{\partial p_i\partial p_j}\left[B(p)f^{2-q}(p,t)\right], \tag*{(6)}

In momentum space, the distribution P(p,t)P(p,t) evolves according to the generalised Plastino–Plastino Fokker–Planck equation, with linear drift A(p)=−γpA(p)=-\gamma p and constant diffusion coefficient B(p)=BB(p)=B. The stationary solution depends on the drift and diffusion coefficients and on the boundary conditions. Its relationship to the thermofractal energy distribution in Eq. (4) must therefore be established separately. The stationary solution of Eq. (6) yields qq-exponential energy distributions [12, 17], and has the form given in Eq. (4).1 Nonextensive dynamics has also been used to study rapidity distributions in high-energy collisions [18].

The Multi-Source Thermal Model: Physical and Geometric Foundations

The multi-source thermal model provides a macroscopic hydrodynamic and geometric framework to describe multiparticle momentum and rapidity distributions in high-energy hadronic (pppp) and relativistic heavy-ion (AAAA) collisions [1, 2]. Rather than assuming that the entire interaction volume forms a single static fireball in global equilibrium, the multi-source model treats the emitting system as an inhomogeneous, spatio-temporal superposition of multiple localised emission sub-sources [1, 2].

In the multi-source model, the total single-particle differential yield across transverse momentum pTp_T and rapidity yy is given by a weighted linear combination of NsrcN_{\mathrm{src}} discrete thermal sources:

(d2NdpTdy)MS=∑i=1NsrckiSi(pT,y;Ti,βT,μ),(7)\left(\frac{d^2N}{dp_Tdy}\right)_{\mathrm{MS}}=\sum_{i=1}^{N_{\mathrm{src}}} k_i S_i(p_T,y;T_i,\beta_T,\mu), \tag*{(7)}

where kik_i is the relative yield contribution of the ii-th source (∑i=1Nsrcki=1\sum_{i=1}^{N_{\mathrm{src}}} k_i=1) [1].

For a single thermal source at local temperature TiT_i and chemical potential μ\mu, particle emission follows relativistic phase-space kinetics. The local invariant thermal spectrum SiS_i takes the form[2]:

Si(pT,y;Ti,μ)=C(Ti) pTmTcosh⁡(y−yb,i)exp⁡(−mTcosh⁡(y−yb,i)−μTi),(8)S_i(p_T,y;T_i,\mu)=C(T_i)\,p_Tm_T\cosh(y-y_{b,i})\exp\left(-\frac{m_T\cosh(y-y_{b,i})-\mu}{T_i}\right), \tag*{(8)}

where C(Ti)C(T_i) is the temperature-dependent normalization factor. When superimposing thermal sources, distinction must be made between combining unnormalized Boltzmann exponential factors—which directly maps onto the Euler integral representation—and combining fully normalized thermal yields SiS_i, where C(Ti)C(T_i) introduces additional temperature weighting into the superposition kernel.

When collective transverse radial expansion with velocity βT\beta_T (γT=1/1−βT2\gamma_T=1/\sqrt{1-\beta_T^2}) is present, the effective single-particle energy in the rest frame of the expanding fluid cell is Lorentz-boosted:

Es,i=γT[mTcosh⁡(y−yb,i)−pTβT]−μ.(9)E_{s,i}=\gamma_T\left[m_T\cosh(y-y_{b,i})-p_T\beta_T\right]-\mu. \tag*{(9)}

The longitudinal extension of source rapidities yby_b is parameterized by a Gaussian profile centered at mid-rapidity y0y_0 with width σy\sigma_y:

fy(yb)=12πσyexp⁡(−(yb−y0)22σy2).(10)f_y(y_b)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}\sigma_y}\exp\left(-\frac{(y_b-y_0)^2}{2\sigma_y^2}\right). \tag*{(10)}

Although multi-temperature parameterizations (Nsrc=2N_{\mathrm{src}}=2 or 33, with T1≈100T_1\approx100–120120 MeV, T2≈180T_2\approx180–220220 MeV, and T3≥300T_3\ge300 MeV) fit transverse momentum spectra across soft and hard regimes, the conventional multi-source model treats TiT_i and kik_i as independent free parameters, lacking a microscopic thermodynamic principle that governs their discrete values [1].

Decomposition of Thermofractals into Thermal Superpositions

Using Euler’s integral identity for the Gamma function,

x−a=1Γ(a)∫0∞ta−1e−xt dt(x>0, a>0),(11)x^{-a}=\frac{1}{\Gamma(a)}\int_0^\infty t^{a-1}e^{-xt}\,dt\quad(x>0,\ a>0), \tag*{(11)}

we set x=1+(q−1)ET0x=1+(q-1)\frac{E}{T_0} and a=qq−1a=\frac{q}{q-1}, where E=mTcosh⁡y−μE=m_T\cosh y-\mu. Substituting these definitions into the equation above yields:

[1+(q−1)ET0]−qq−1=1Γ(qq−1)∫0∞tqq−1−1exp⁡(−t[1+(q−1)ET0]) dt.(12)\left[1+(q-1)\frac{E}{T_0}\right]^{-\frac{q}{q-1}}=\frac{1}{\Gamma\left(\frac{q}{q-1}\right)}\int_0^\infty t^{\frac{q}{q-1}-1}\exp\left(-t\left[1+(q-1)\frac{E}{T_0}\right]\right)\,dt. \tag*{(12)}

Defining the fluctuating local temperature variable Ts=T0(q−1)tT_s=\frac{T_0}{(q-1)t}, we transform the integration variable from tt to TsT_s:

d2NdpTdy=Cq pTmT∫0∞f(Ts;T0,q)exp⁡(−mTcosh⁡y−μTs) dTs,(13)\frac{d^2N}{dp_Tdy}=C_q\,p_Tm_T\int_0^\infty f(T_s;T_0,q)\exp\left(-\frac{m_T\cosh y-\mu}{T_s}\right)\,dT_s, \tag*{(13)}

where f(Ts;T0,q)f(T_s;T_0,q) is the normalized inverse-Gamma probability density function [12, 16]:

f(Ts;T0,q)=1Γ(qq−1)(T0q−1)qq−11Tsqq−1+1exp⁡(−T0(q−1)Ts).(14)f(T_s;T_0,q)=\frac{1}{\Gamma\left(\frac{q}{q-1}\right)}\left(\frac{T_0}{q-1}\right)^{\frac{q}{q-1}}\frac{1}{T_s^{\frac{q}{q-1}+1}}\exp\left(-\frac{T_0}{(q-1)T_s}\right). \tag*{(14)}

Eq. (13) demonstrates that a qq-exponential thermofractal factor maps into a continuous superposition of local Boltzmann exponentials weighted by an inverse-Gamma distribution f(Ts;T0,q)f(T_s;T_0,q) [12, 14, 16]. Note that if local Boltzmann sources are normalised individually prior to superposition, the temperature-dependent normalisation factor C(Ts)C(T_s) is absorbed into an effective weight function f~(Ts)∝C(Ts)f(Ts;T0,q)\tilde{f}(T_s) \propto C(T_s)f(T_s;T_0,q), shifting the effective quadrature nodes accordingly.

Defining the inverse temperature variable β≡1/Ts\beta\equiv1/T_s, the distribution f(Ts;T0,q)dTsf(T_s;T_0,q)dT_s converts into a Gamma distribution g(β)dβg(\beta)d\beta:

g(β)dβ=1Γ(n)(nβ0)nβn−1e−nββ0dβ,where n=qq−1 and β0=qT0.(15)g(\beta)d\beta=\frac{1}{\Gamma(n)}\left(\frac{n}{\beta_0}\right)^n\beta^{n-1}e^{-\frac{n\beta}{\beta_0}}d\beta,\quad\text{where }n=\frac{q}{q-1}\text{ and }\beta_0=\frac{q}{T_0}. \tag*{(15)}

The expectation value of β\beta is ⟨β⟩=β0=q/T0\langle\beta\rangle=\beta_0=q/T_0. Within Beck-Cohen Superstatistics [12, 16], the relative variance of inverse-temperature fluctuations across local sources is given by:

⟨β2⟩−⟨β⟩2⟨β⟩2=1n=q−1q.(16)\frac{\langle\beta^2\rangle-\langle\beta\rangle^2}{\langle\beta\rangle^2}=\frac{1}{n}=\frac{q-1}{q}. \tag*{(16)}

For q=8/7q=8/7, the relative fluctuation variance is fixed to (q−1)/q=1/8=12.5%(q-1)/q=1/8=12.5\%.

To evaluate or discretise the exact continuous temperature field given by Eq. (14) for practical applications in multisource model fits, one can apply a discrete quadrature approximation. This method provides an exact transition from the continuous thermofractal temperature field f(Ts;T0,q)f(T_s;T_0,q) to discrete NsrcN_{\mathrm{src}}-component multisource models.

Substituting x=T0(q−1)Tsx=\frac{T_0}{(q-1)T_s} into Eq. (13) maps the thermal superposition integral directly onto the standard Gauss-Laguerre weight function:

d2NdpTdy=CqpTmTΓ(α+1)∫0∞xαe−xexp⁡(−x(q−1)ET0)dx,(17)\frac{d^2N}{dp_Tdy}=C_q\frac{p_Tm_T}{\Gamma(\alpha+1)}\int_0^\infty x^\alpha e^{-x}\exp\left(-x\frac{(q-1)E}{T_0}\right)dx, \tag*{(17)}

where the shape exponent is uniquely fixed by the entropic index:

α=qq−1−1=1q−1.(18)\alpha=\frac{q}{q-1}-1=\frac{1}{q-1}. \tag*{(18)}

For q=8/7q=8/7, the exponent evaluates to α=7\alpha=7. The integral in Eq. (17) can be evaluated numerically with high precision using an NsrcN_{\mathrm{src}}-point Gauss-Laguerre quadrature:

∫0∞xαe−xH(x)dx≈∑i=1NsrcwiH(xi),(19)\int_0^\infty x^\alpha e^{-x}H(x)dx\approx\sum_{i=1}^{N_{\mathrm{src}}}w_iH(x_i), \tag*{(19)}

where xix_i are the roots of the generalized Laguerre polynomial LNsrc(α)(x)L_{N_{\mathrm{src}}}^{(\alpha)}(x), and wiw_i are the corresponding quadrature weights. The discrete source temperatures TiT_i extracted in phenomenological multisource fits thus directly correspond to the optimal quadrature nodes:

Ti=T0(q−1)xi,with relative weights ki=wiΓ(α+1).(20)T_i=\frac{T_0}{(q-1)x_i},\quad\text{with relative weights }k_i=\frac{w_i}{\Gamma(\alpha+1)}. \tag*{(20)}

This mapping highlights the relationship between continuous thermofractal dynamics and discrete multisource models. While the representation of the qq-exponential Tsallis factor as a continuous superposition of Boltzmann exponentials over a Gamma inverse-temperature distribution in Eq. (15) is exact, the discrete NsrcN_{\mathrm{src}}-component formulation obtained via Gauss-Laguerre quadrature in Eq. (19) is a finite-degree numerical approximation. For small numbers of sources (Nsrc=2N_{\mathrm{src}}=2 or 33), this quadrature provides an optimal discrete approximation to the continuous thermofractal field, rather than an exact algebraic identity.

Up to this point, the thermofractal superposition integral has been formulated in the rest frame of a single, static emission source. In relativistic hadronic and heavy-ion collisions, however, the continuous thermofractal temperature field f(Ts;T0,q)f(T_{\mathrm{s}};T_0,q) is embedded within a hydrodynamically expanding medium characterised by transverse radial flow and longitudinal expansion along the beam axis.

To account for collective radial expansion with transverse velocity βT\beta_{\mathrm{T}} (Lorentz factor γT=1/1−βT2\gamma_{\mathrm{T}} = 1/\sqrt{1-\beta_{\mathrm{T}}^2}), assuming flow aligned with pTp_{\mathrm{T}}, the effective energy of an emitted particle in the rest frame of a local fluid cell is modified to Es=γT[mTcosh⁡(y−yb)−pTβT]−μE_{\mathrm{s}} = \gamma_{\mathrm{T}}[m_{\mathrm{T}}\cosh(y-y_b)-p_{\mathrm{T}}\beta_{\mathrm{T}}]-\mu, where yby_b denotes the longitudinal shift rapidity of the emitting cell. Convolving the single-cell emission yield over both the longitudinal source rapidity distribution fy(yb)f_y(y_b) and the continuous thermofractal temperature distribution f(Ts;T0,q)f(T_{\mathrm{s}};T_0,q) yields the master differential spectrum:

d2NdpTdy=∫−∞∞dyb∫0∞dTs fy(yb) f(Ts;T0,q) Cq pTmTexp⁡(−γT[mTcosh⁡(y−yb)−pTβT]−μTs).(21)\frac{\mathrm{d}^2N}{\mathrm{d}p_{\mathrm{T}}\mathrm{d}y}=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\mathrm{d}y_b\int_{0}^{\infty}\mathrm{d}T_{\mathrm{s}}\,f_y(y_b)\,f(T_{\mathrm{s}};T_0,q)\,C_q\,p_{\mathrm{T}}m_{\mathrm{T}}\exp\left(-\frac{\gamma_{\mathrm{T}}\left[m_{\mathrm{T}}\cosh(y-y_b)-p_{\mathrm{T}}\beta_{\mathrm{T}}\right]-\mu}{T_{\mathrm{s}}}\right). \tag*{(21)}

For a longitudinally expanding system described by NcylN_{\mathrm{cyl}} cylindrical sources centered at rapidities yb,jy_{b,j} with spatial widths σy,j\sigma_{y,j} [1, 4]:

fy(yb)=∑j=1Ncylkj2πσy,jexp⁡(−(yb−yb,j)22σy,j2).(22)f_y(y_b)=\sum_{j=1}^{N_{\mathrm{cyl}}}\frac{k_j}{\sqrt{2\pi}\sigma_{y,j}}\exp\left(-\frac{(y_b-y_{b,j})^2}{2\sigma_{y,j}^2}\right). \tag*{(22)}

In the limit of vanishing radial flow (βT→0\beta_{\mathrm{T}}\to0, γT→1\gamma_{\mathrm{T}}\to1) and localized rest-frame rapidity emission fy(yb)→δ(yb)f_y(y_b)\to\delta(y_b), Eq. (21) reduces smoothly to the single-source Lorentz-invariant spectrum.

To assess the accuracy and range of validity of the discrete multisource representation, we compare, in Figure 1, the exact continuous thermofractal yield [Eq. (13)] with NsrcN_{\mathrm{src}}-component Gauss–Laguerre quadrature approximations [Eq. (19)] for q=8/7q=8/7 (α=7\alpha=7). We emphasise that the exact curve representing the nonextensive distribution provides a good description of the experimental data over 14 orders of magnitude of the measured cross-section, covering the pTp_{\mathrm{T}} range 0<pT<10000<p_{\mathrm{T}}<1000 GeV [26]. The multi-source, as well, model has been tested in several works (see [27, 28] and references therein).

Comparison of the exact continuous nonextensive yield with Gauss–Laguerre quadrature approximations

Figure 1. Comparison of the exact continuous nonextensive yield (Ref. [26]) with Nsrc=2N_{\mathrm{src}}=2, 3, and 4 Gauss-Laguerre quadrature approximations for q=8/7q=8/7. The lower panel shows the relative deviations as a function of pTp_{\mathrm{T}}.

For Nsrc=2N_{\mathrm{src}}=2, the roots of L2(7)(x)L_2^{(7)}(x) yield discrete temperatures T1=1.1667T0T_1=1.1667T_0 and T2=0.5833T0T_2=0.5833T_0 with relative normalization weights k1=2/3k_1=2/3 and k2=1/3k_2=1/3. In Figure 1, we show the invariant differential yield d2N/(dpTdy)\mathrm{d}^2N/(\mathrm{d}p_{\mathrm{T}}\mathrm{d}y) as a function of pTp_{\mathrm{T}} for Nsrc=2N_{\mathrm{src}}=2, 3, and 4 compared against the exact continuous thermofractal result, alongside the corresponding relative deviations (Yquad−Yexact)/Yexact(Y_{\mathrm{quad}}-Y_{\mathrm{exact}})/Y_{\mathrm{exact}}.

The comparison demonstrates that while a two-source formulation captures the low- and intermediate-pTp_{\mathrm{T}} spectrum within 5% accuracy up to pT/T0≈10p_{\mathrm{T}}/T_0\approx10, increasing to Nsrc=3N_{\mathrm{src}}=3 or 4 extends the agreement to higher pTp_{\mathrm{T}} scales. At ultra-high pTp_{\mathrm{T}}, any finite quadrature eventually underestimates the exact power-law tail, reflecting the physical necessity of the full continuous temperature field f(Ts;T0,q)f(T_{\mathrm{s}};T_0,q) for high-pTp_{\mathrm{T}} hard scattering.

Discussion and Conclusions

We have established a formal equivalence connecting thermofractal dynamics, Superstatistics, and the multisource thermal model. By demonstrating that qq-exponential distributions map into a continuous superposition of Boltzmann sources through an inverse-Gamma temperature density f(Ts;T0,q)f(T_s;T_0,q), we link microscopic phase-space self-similarity [3, 7] with macroscopic multi-source expansion geometries [1, 4].

Key insights obtained from this synthesis include:

  1. Parameter Constraint: Fixing q=8/7≈1.143q = 8/7 \approx1.143 from SU(3)SU(3) thermofractal theory constrains the temperature distribution shape f(Ts)f(T_s), replacing unconstrained multi-temperature parameters (T1,T2,T3,…)(T_1,T_2,T_3,\ldots) with a single primary scale parameter T0T_0.

  1. Fluctuation Variance: The relative variance of inverse-temperature fluctuations across local sources is fixed to (q−1)/q=1/8=12.5%(q-1)/q = 1/8 = 12.5\%.

  1. High-pTp_T Asymptotics and pQCD Connection: In the ultrarelativistic regime (pT≫m0)(p_T \gg m_0), the single-particle differential yield scales asymptotically as:

d2NdpTdy∝pT mT⋅pT−qq−1=pT2⋅pT−8=pT−6.(23)\frac{d^2N}{dp_Tdy} \propto p_T\,m_T\cdot p_T^{-\frac{q}{q-1}} = p_T^2\cdot p_T^{-8} = p_T^{-6}. \tag*{(23)}

For q=8/7q = 8/7, this power-law falloff (pT−6)(p_T^{-6}) is in direct agreement with the dimensional counting rules and perturbative QCD (pQCD) parton 2→22 \to2 hard-scattering expectations observed across RHIC and LHC pppp spectra. This demonstrates that thermofractal dynamics smoothly bridges soft thermal particle production at low pTp_T and hard partonic scattering tails at high pTp_T without requiring ad hoc model switches. Furthermore, while finite Gauss-Laguerre quadratures (Nsrc=2,3)(N_{\mathrm{src}} = 2, 3) serve as effective discrete approximations capturing the low- and intermediate-pTp_T regions, they truncate the spectrum at high momentum. Resolving the exact, continuous power-law asymptotics (pT→∞)(p_T \to\infty) highlights the physical necessity of the full, continuous inverse-Gamma distribution f(Ts;T0,q)f(T_s;T_0,q).

  1. Medium Effects and Nuclear Modification Factor (RAAR_{AA}): In heavy-ion collisions (AAAA), a dense partonic medium modifies particle production relative to vacuum pppp interactions. Within the thermofractal paradigm, medium effects do not simply wash out non-extensive statistics towards BG equilibrium; instead, partonic energy loss, medium-induced jet quenching, and non-local correlations alter the energy structure across subsystem generations. Recent transport analyses based on the Plastino–Plastino Fokker–Planck equation have demonstrated that the nuclear modification factor RAA(pT)R_{AA}(p_T) and energy-loss transport parameters (such as the jet quenching coefficient) can be rigorously calculated by modelling the anomalous diffusion of partons traversing the non-additive QGP [24, 25]. The continuous inverse-Gamma distribution f(Ts;T0,q)f(T_s;T_0,q) established in this work serves as the exact baseline vacuum field, upon which medium-drag interaction channels modulate the effective energy scale T0→T0med(pT)T_0 \to T_0^{\mathrm{med}}(p_T), providing a unified physical connection between pppp vacuum spectra, transport dynamics in expanding fireballs, and RAAR_{AA} suppression patterns observed across RHIC and LHC energies.

In summary, the unified thermofractal-multisource framework provides a consistent mathematical bridge connecting scale-invariant QCD phase-space dynamics, temperature-fluctuating Superstatistics, and multi-source hadronic expansion models.

Acknowledgments

A. D. thanks the warm hospitality found at the Jan Kochanowski University. This work was partially supported by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) and by the project RID/SP/00015/2024/01.

References

  1. [1]F.-H. Liu, Y.-H. Chen, and B.-C. Li, “Transverse momentum distribution of particles in high energy collisions and relativistic temperature transformation,” Indian Journal of Physics 87, 1149–1151 (2013). doi:10.1007/s12648-013-0349-6.DOI
  2. [2]F.-H. Liu, Y.-Q. Gao, T. Tian, and B. C. Li, “Unified description of transverse momentum distributions of final state particles produced in high energy collisions,” Advances in High Energy Physics 2012, 287521 (2012). doi:10.1155/2012/287521.
  3. [3]A. Deppman, “Thermodynamics with fractal structure, Tsallis statistics, and hadrons,” Physical Review D 93, 054001 (2016). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.054001.DOI
  4. [4]F.-H. Liu, Y.-Q. Gao, and H.-R. Wei, “On Descriptions of Particle Transverse Momentum Spectra in High Energy Collisions,” Advances in High Energy Physics 2014, 293873 (2014). doi:10.1155/2014/293873.
  5. [5]C. Tsallis, “Possible generalization of Boltzmann-Gibbs statistics,” Journal of Statistical Physics 52, 479–487 (1988). doi:10.1007/BF01016429.DOI
  6. [6]A. Deppman, T. Frederico, E. Megías, and D. P. Menezes, “Fractal Structure and Non-Extensive Statistics,” Entropy 20, 633 (2018). doi:10.3390/e20090633.DOI
  7. [7]A. Deppman, E. Megías, and D. P. Menezes, “Fractals, nonextensive statistics, and QCD,” Physical Review D 101, 034019 (2020). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.034019.DOI
  8. [8]M. D. Azmi and J. Cleymans, “Transverse momentum distributions in proton–proton collisions at LHC energies and Tsallis thermodynamics,” Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics 41, 065001 (2014). doi:10.1088/0954-3899/41/6/065001.DOI
  9. [9]L. Marques, E. Andrade-II, and A. Deppman, “Nonextensivity of hadronic systems,” Physical Review D 87, 114022 (2013). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.114022.
  10. [10]G. Biró, G. G. Barnaföldi, T. S. Biró, K. Ürmössy, and Á. Takács, “Systematic Analysis of the Non-Extensive Statistical Approach in High Energy Particle Collisions—Experiment vs. Theory,” Entropy 19, 88 (2017). doi:10.3390/e19030088.DOI
  11. [11]L. Q. Rocha, E. Megías, L. A. Trevisan, K. K. Olimov, F. Liu, and A. Deppman, “Nonextensive Statistics in High Energy Collisions,” Physics 4, 659–671 (2022). doi:10.3390/physics4020044.DOI
  12. [12]G. Wilk and Z. Włodarczyk, “Interpretation of the Nonextensivity Parameter q in Some Applications of Tsallis Statistics and Lévy Distributions,” Physical Review Letters 84, 2770–2773 (2000). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2770.DOI
  13. [13]G. Wilk and Z. Włodarczyk, “Multiplicity fluctuations due to the temperature fluctuations in high-energy nuclear collisions,” Physical Review C 79, 054903 (2009). doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.79.054903.DOI
  14. [14]M. Rybczyński and Z. Włodarczyk, “Similarities in Multiparticle Production Processes in pp Collisions as Imprints of Nonextensive Statistics,” Symmetry 12, 1339 (2020). doi:10.3390/sym12081339.DOI
  15. [15]M. Rybczynski, G. Wilk, and Z. Włodarczyk, “Quasi-Power Law Ensembles: Nonextensive Statistics or Superstatistics,” Entropy 28, 171 (2026). doi:10.3390/e28020171.DOI
  16. [16]C. Beck and E. G. D. Cohen, “Superstatistics,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 322, 267–275 (2003). doi:10.1016/S0378-4371(03)00019-0.DOI
  17. [17]A. R. Plastino and A. Plastino, “Non-extensive statistical mechanics and generalized Fokker-Planck equation,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 222, 347–354 (1995). doi:10.1016/0378-4371(95)00211-1.DOI
  18. [18]T. Bhattacharyya, M. Rybczyński, and Z. Włodarczyk, “Rapidity spectra in high-energy collisions and longitudinal nuclear suppression from nonadditive statistics,” Physics Letters B 872, 140076 (2026). doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025.140076.DOI
  19. [19]A. Deppman, A. Khalili Golmankhaneh, E. Megías, and R. Pasechnik, “From the Boltzmann equation with non-local correlations to a standard non-linear Fokker-Planck equation,” Physics Letters B 839, 137752 (2023). doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.137752.DOI
  20. [20]T. Bhattacharyya, “Nonextensive Boltzmann transport equation: The relaxation time approximation and beyond,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 624, 128910 (2023). doi:10.1016/j.physa.2023.128910.DOI
  21. [21]E. Megías, A. Khalili Golmankhaneh, and A. Deppman, “Dynamics in fractal spaces,” Physics Letters B 848, 138370 (2024). doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138370.DOI
  22. [24]T. Bhattacharyya, E. Megías, and A. Deppman, “Jet quenching of the heavy quarks in the quark-gluon plasma and the nonadditive statistics,” Physics Letters B 856, 138907 (2024). doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138907.DOI
  23. [25]R. Baptista, L. Q. Rocha, J. M. C. Pareja, T. Bhattacharyya, A. Deppman, E. Megías, M. Rybczyński, G. Wilk, and Z. Włodarczyk, “Nuclear modification factor within a dynamical approach to the complex entropic index,” The European Physical Journal A 61, 271 (2025). doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-025-01749-5.
  24. [26]C.-Y. Wong, G. Wilk, L. J. L. Cirto, and C. Tsallis, “From QCD-based hard-scattering to nonextensive statistical mechanical descriptions of transverse momentum spectra in high-energy pp and pp̄ collisions,” Physical Review D 91, 114027 (2015). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.114027.DOI
  25. [27]K. K. Olimov, F.-H. Liu, A. I. Fedosimova, I. A. Lebedev, A. Deppman, K. A. Musaeва, M. Z. Shodmonov, and B. J. Tukhtaev, “Analysis of Midrapidity pT Distributions of Identified Charged Particles in Pb + Pb Collisions at √sNN = 5.02 TeV Using Tsallis Distribution with Embedded Transverse Flow,” Universe 8, 401 (2022).DOI
  26. [28]J.-Y. Chen, M.-Y. Duan, F.-H. Liu, and K. K. Olimov, “Multi-source thermal model describing multi-region structure of transverse momentum spectra of identified particles and parameter dynamics of system evolution in relativistic collisions,” Indian Journal of Physics 98, 2493–2505 (2023). doi:10.1007/s12648-023-03003-4.DOI

Paper details

vlnc:W_vj2vekr7
v1 · latestHistory (1)

published · Fresh — added to the Hub within the last 30 days

added ·

Usage

views · 0

downloads · 0

A view counts once per browser per day, a download each time the PDF is requested.

CC BY 4.0

Original source

  • Physics and Astronomy

Not recorded for this paper · View statement →

Looking for related papers…
Contents