AI USAGE

This manuscript was substantially generated and subsequently checked by AI systems. At the time of this version, the arguments and citations have not yet been independently verified in full by the human contributor. A digested and more streamlined version will replace this preliminary version on both Hexagon and arXiv in the coming months.

Only Heng Ma takes responsibility for this work.

Introduction

A favorite site of a random walk is a site at which the accumulated local time is maximal. Although the planar walk returns to the origin infinitely often, its favorite sites need not remain near the origin. The question considered here is how small a neighborhood of the origin can still contain a favorite at arbitrarily large times. Because several sites can tie for the maximum, there are two distinct observables: the distance of the nearest favorite and the distance of the farthest favorite.

Let (Sn)n≥0(S_n)_{n \ge0} be simple symmetric random walk on Z2\mathbb{Z}^2, started at the origin. Define

Ln(x)=∑j=0n1{Sj=x},Mn=max⁡x∈Z2Ln(x),Fn={x∈Z2:Ln(x)=Mn}.(1)L_n(x)=\sum_{j=0}^{n}\mathbf{1}_{\{S_j=x\}}, \qquad M_n=\max_{x\in\mathbb{Z}^2}L_n(x), \qquad\mathcal{F}_n=\{x\in\mathbb{Z}^2:L_n(x)=M_n\}. \tag*{(1)}

The set Fn\mathcal{F}_n is finite and nonempty. Put

Rn−=min⁡x∈Fn∥x∥2,Rn+=max⁡x∈Fn∥x∥2,aγ(n)=n(log⁡n)γ,n≥3.(2)R_n^-=\min_{x\in\mathcal{F}_n}\lVert x\rVert_2, \qquad R_n^+=\max_{x\in\mathcal{F}_n}\lVert x\rVert_2, \qquad a_\gamma(n)=\frac{\sqrt{n}}{(\log n)^\gamma}, \qquad n\ge3. \tag*{(2)}

For example, along the path (0,e1,0,e1)(0,e_1,0,e_1) the two sites tie, so R3−=0R_3^-=0 and R3+=1R_3^+=1. Thus localizing an arbitrarily chosen favorite does not by itself localize the whole favorite set.

Theorem 1.1 (Lower-class escape rate). Almost surely, simultaneously for every real γ\gamma,

lim inf⁡n→∞Rn−aγ(n)=∞,γ>12,(3)\liminf_{n\to\infty}\frac{R_n^-}{a_\gamma(n)}=\infty, \qquad\gamma>\frac{1}{2}, \tag*{(3)}
lim inf⁡n→∞Rn+aγ(n)=0,γ≤12.(4)\liminf_{n\to\infty}\frac{R_n^+}{a_\gamma(n)}=0, \qquad\gamma\le\frac{1}{2}. \tag*{(4)}

In particular, for each γ>1/2\gamma>1/2 and each fixed A>0A>0, eventually every favorite lies outside B(0,Aaγ(n))B(0,Aa_\gamma(n)). At the critical exponent, for every ε>0\varepsilon>0 there are infinitely many times at which all favorites lie in B(0,εn/log⁡n)B(0,\varepsilon\sqrt{n/\log n}). The conclusion identifies the boundary among logarithmic powers of the diffusive scale. It does not assert an integral test for arbitrary slowly varying perturbations of the critical gauge.

Dembo, Peres, Rosen and Zeitouni [7] proved that every planar favorite lies at distance n1/2+o(1)n^{1/2+o(1)}. This first-order exponent leaves the logarithmic scales in Theorem 1.1 undetermined. Erdős and Révész [8] asked whether planar favorite sites escape to infinity. Révész later asked for their rate of escape [12], as recorded by Dembo [5]. Dembo’s ICM survey [6] asks more broadly about the evolution of favorite sites in dimensions d≥2d\ge2. Hao, Li, Okada and Zheng [9] recently proved that almost surely three favorite sites occur simultaneously infinitely often and eventually there is no simultaneous occurrence of four favorite sites. In [9] they also highlight the planar escape-rate question. In one dimension the corresponding theorem has critical exponent 1; see Lifshits and Shi [11] for the simple random walk and Bass [2] for both Brownian motion and the walk. Our focus is the location of the full set of planar maximizers. The two assertions in Theorem 1.1 therefore retain the distinction between its nearest and farthest members throughout the proof.

Notation and the two local-time estimates

All logarithms are natural. We write PxP_x and ExE_x for the law and expectation of a walk started at xx, and omit the subscript when x=0x=0. Its transition operator is

Pf(x)=14∑y:∥y−x∥2=1f(y).Pf(x)=\frac{1}{4}\sum_{y:\lVert y-x\rVert_{2}=1}f(y).

By symmetry the same notation acts on lattice measures. For r>0r>0 let D(x,r)={y∈Z2:∥y−x∥2<r}D(x,r)=\{y\in\mathbb{Z}^{2}:\lVert y-x\rVert_{2}<r\} and τr=inf⁡{n≥0:Sn∉D(0,r)}\tau_{r}=\inf\{n\geq0:S_{n}\notin D(0,r)\}. Closed balls are denoted by B(x,r)B(x,r). We use the same geometric notation in the plane when the ambient space is specified. A local time at a stopping time includes that time; inside a killed domain it agrees with occupation strictly before exit.

The Green-function normalization and the local-time levels are

g=2π,uJ,c=2gJ2−cgJlog⁡J.(5)g=\frac{2}{\pi},\qquad u_{J,c}=2gJ^{2}-cgJ\log J. \tag*{(5)}

The logarithmic radius is JJ, so the corresponding time scale is e2Je^{2J}. The coefficient of Jlog⁡JJ\log J will matter: knowing only the leading 2gJ22gJ^{2} term cannot distinguish the powers in Theorem 1.1.

The escape argument uses the following two estimates, proved in Propositions 6.3 and 7.2. For fixed β>0\beta>0, c>2c>2 and A>0A>0,

P(max⁡∥x∥2≤eJJ−βLτeJ(x)≥uJ,c)≤J−2β+c−2+o(1)+O(J−A).(6)P\left(\max_{\lVert x\rVert_{2}\leq e^{J}J^{-\beta}}L_{\tau_{e^{J}}}(x)\geq u_{J,c}\right)\leq J^{-2\beta+c-2+o(1)}+O(J^{-A}). \tag*{(6)}

For every fixed η>0\eta>0, there is pη>0p_{\eta}>0 such that

P(MτeJ≥uJ,2+η)≥pηfor all sufficiently large J.(7)P(M_{\tau_{e^{J}}}\geq u_{J,2+\eta})\geq p_{\eta}\qquad\text{for all sufficiently large }J. \tag*{(7)}

Since aγ(e2J)=eJ/(2J)γa_{\gamma}(e^{2J})=e^{J}/(2J)^{\gamma}, the disk in (6) is at the scale relevant to the theorem. Taking β=γ\beta=\gamma and c=2+2δc=2+2\delta makes its main term J−2γ+2δ+o(1)J^{-2\gamma+2\delta+o(1)}, summable over integer JJ when γ>1/2\gamma>1/2 and δ>0\delta>0 is small enough. The lower estimate is amplified over independent segments to give an eventual almost-sure bound at deterministic exponential times. Comparing it with the upper estimate excludes a favorite near the origin throughout each time block. More precisely, if Nj=⌊e2j⌋N_{j}=\lfloor e^{2j}\rfloor and

max⁡x∈B(0,Cej+1j−γ)LNj+1(x)<MNj,\max_{x\in B(0,Ce^{j+1}j^{-\gamma})}L_{N_{j+1}}(x)<M_{N_{j}},

then monotonicity excludes every site in this ball from Fn\mathcal{F}_{n} for all Nj≤n≤Nj+1N_{j}\leq n\leq N_{j+1}. Section 8 makes this comparison with summable error probabilities. Recurrence at the critical exponent uses a separate geometric-time localization argument.

Constants denoted by c,Cc,C may change between occurrences. Dependence on a fixed parameter is indicated when relevant. Integer parts and fixed changes of radius are harmless in estimates with a Jlog⁡JJ\log J margin: replacing JJ by J+O(1)J+O(1) changes uJ,cu_{J,c} by O(J)O(J). Directed lattice crossings and conditional bridge laws are defined exactly when they are introduced.

Proof strategy

The two assertions of Theorem 1.1 have separate proofs. For critical recurrence we produce, at infinitely many times, a unique favorite in a small disk and then account for the local time inherited from earlier times. For escape we compare the local times in a small disk with the maximum over the whole walk. The recurrence argument is shorter and is completed in Section 4. The escape proof then has three parts: Section 5 controls traversal counts, Section 6 combines those counts with terminal occupation to prove the localized upper bound, and Section 7 proves and amplifies the global lower bound. Section 8 makes the final comparison over time blocks.

Critical recurrence: from one favorite to the whole set

Consider the walk at an independent geometric time KK with P(K=n)=(1−z)znP(K=n)=(1-z)z^{n} and time scale N=(1−z)−1N=(1-z)^{-1}. Choose one favorite using independent continuous priorities at the sites. Reversing the path through the last visit to this selected site separates it into completed excursions, a terminal arm, and a forward suffix. Once the excursions, suffix, and priorities are fixed, the selected-site condition imposes an upper capacity on the arm’s occupation at every other site. The admissible arm is therefore a walk stopped at its first return to the selected site or its first capacity violation. This exact reversal, including the priority rule, is proved in Lemma 4.2.

The endpoint law of the arm is a positive mixture of stopped occupation measures. Each measure μ\mu obeys a resolvent identity (I−zP)μ=αδ0−ν(I-zP)\mu=\alpha\delta_{0}-\nu, where ν≥0\nu\geq0 and α−ν(Z2)=(1−z)μ(Z2)\alpha-\nu(\mathbb{Z}^{2})=(1-z)\mu(\mathbb{Z}^{2}). Let wRw_{R} be the normalized autocorrelation of a square of radius RR, put Gz=∑m≥0zmPmG_{z}=\sum_{m\geq0}z^{m}P^{m}, and set ϕR=Gz∗wR\phi_{R}=G_{z}*w_{R}. Its nonnegative Fourier transform makes ϕR\phi_{R} maximal at the origin, so the unknown exit measure has the favorable sign:

μ(wR)=αϕR(0)−ν(ϕR)≥(1−z)μ(Z2)ϕR(0),ϕR(0)≳R2(1+log⁡NR2).\mu(w_{R})=\alpha\phi_{R}(0)-\nu(\phi_{R})\geq(1-z)\mu(\mathbb{Z}^{2})\phi_{R}(0),\qquad \phi_{R}(0)\gtrsim R^{2}\left(1+\log\frac{N}{R^{2}}\right).

Taking R≍N/fR\asymp\sqrt{N}/f gives

μ(B(0,CN/f))≥cμ(Z2)1+log⁡ff2,2≤f≤N1/8.(8)\mu\left(B\left(0,C\sqrt{N}/f\right)\right)\geq c\mu(\mathbb{Z}^{2})\frac{1+\log f}{f^{2}},\qquad2\leq f\leq N^{1/8}. \tag*{(8)}

If σ\sigma is the first visit to the selected favorite, restricting to K−σ≥N/8K-\sigma\geq N/8 retains a fixed positive mass. This condition depends only on the exposed pieces and implies K≥N/8K\geq N/8, changing the radius in this estimate from N/f\sqrt{N}/f to CK/fC\sqrt{K}/f.

Locating the selected favorite does not yet locate the entire favorite set: other sites may tie it. Insert the four-step loop (x,x+e1,x,x+e2,x)(x,x+e_{1},x,x+e_{2},x) after its last visit to xx. The new local time at xx rises by two and those at the two visited neighbors rise by one, so xx becomes the unique favorite. The loop can be recovered from the image path, and the injection costs only a fixed factor in probability. Nor does a fresh segment erase the preceding local times. If HH is the old profile and the fresh profile ℓ\ell has unique maximizer yy, then

arg⁡max⁡(H+ℓ)⊂supp⁡H∪{y}.\arg\max(H+\ell)\subset\operatorname{supp}H\cup\{y\}.

Thus we only need to keep the old range inside the target disk; no bound on the heights of HH is needed.

For the final block construction, take sk=⌊eJk⌋s_{k}=\lfloor e^{J_{k}}\rfloor with Jk+1−Jk=10log⁡JkJ_{k+1}-J_{k}=10\log J_{k} and fk≍Jk+1f_{k}\asymp\sqrt{J_{k+1}}. The fresh unique-favorite event has probability at least dk≍(log⁡Jk)/Jkd_{k}\asymp(\log J_{k})/J_{k}. Since Jk∼10klog⁡kJ_{k}\sim10k\log k, the sum ∑kdk\sum_{k}d_{k} diverges. Retaining clocks Kk≳dkeJk+1/Jk+12K_{k}\gtrsim d_{k}e^{J_{k+1}}/J_{k+1}^{2} and using the eventual old-range bound skJk\sqrt{s_{k}J_{k}} gives

skJkKk/Jk+1=O(1Jk2log⁡Jk)⟶0.\frac{\sqrt{s_{k}J_{k}}}{\sqrt{K_{k}/J_{k+1}}} =O\left(\frac{1}{J_{k}^{2}\sqrt{\log J_{k}}}\right)\longrightarrow0.

Conditional Borel–Cantelli then gives the critical assertion for Rn+R_{n}^{+}.

Escape: the missing power in a localized upper bound

Write uJ,c=2gJ2−cgJlog⁡Ju_{J,c}=2gJ^{2}-cgJ\log J and stop the walk on leaving a disk of radius eJe^{J}. The target disk has radius eJJ−βe^{J}J^{-\beta}. A geometric tail for one site’s local time, combined with the chance of hitting a site in the logarithmic shell at distance about eJ−ke^{J-k}, gives only

CJc−1∑k≥βlog⁡J+O(1)(k+1)e−2k≤J−2β+c−1+o(1).(9)CJ^{c-1}\sum_{k\geq\beta\log J+O(1)}(k+1)e^{-2k}\leq J^{-2\beta+c-1+o(1)}. \tag*{(9)}

As c↓2c\downarrow2, summing this over exponential time blocks would require β>1\beta>1. The theorem needs β>1/2\beta>1/2. The localized estimate (6) gains the missing factor J−1J^{-1} by keeping the traversal event and the terminal occupation in the same cell.

Cover the target disk by cells centered at yy, with terminal radius M=ehM=e^{h} and core Vy=D(y,M/2)V_{y}=D(y,M/2); write L=J−hL=J-h. Let TjT_{j} count the completed inward traversals around a cell at logarithmic level jj. The upper argument uses h=(Chlog⁡J)4h=(C_{h}\log J)^{4}, large enough that the first-crossing estimate applies through level LL. Fix a positive barrier intercept zz; from this point zz has this meaning in the traversal argument. The upper argument keeps the square-root traversal profile below Bj=ρJj+z+(j∧(J−j))1/4B_{j}=\rho_{J}j+z+(j\wedge(J-j))^{1/4}, where ρJ=2−(log⁡J)/J\rho_{J}=2-(\log J)/J. The slope records the Jlog⁡JJ\log J shift in an extreme traversal count; the curved buffer permits a summable bound on early barrier crossings.

Fix a cell in source shell βlog⁡J+O(1)≤k≤C0log⁡J\beta\log J+O(1)\leq k\leq C_{0}\log J. For a fixed unit endpoint band [q,q+1][q,q+1] in the central range ϵ0L≤q≤BL+1\epsilon_{0}L\leq q\leq B_{L}+1, let p=BL+1−q≥0p=B_{L}+1-q\geq0 be its deficit from the terminal barrier. Then the source-inclusive ballot estimate is

P ⁣(good prefix, q≤2TL<q+1)≤C(k+1)C(1+p)L−2e−q2/(2L).(10)P\!\left(\text{good prefix},\ q\leq\sqrt{2T_{L}}<q+1\right)\leq C(k+1)^{C}(1+p)L^{-2}e^{-q^{2}/(2L)}. \tag*{(10)}

It bounds a joint event, rather than the endpoint conditional on a good prefix. The factor L−2L^{-2} combines the source-height law and the ballot prefactor. The corresponding centered continuation and its lattice comparison are established in Sections 5 and 6.

The endpoint TLT_{L} counts completed pieces but does not determine their occupation of VyV_{y}. Expose the radial word ww and the entrance and directed-exit data, then erase the interiors of the pieces. Conditional on these data, the interiors are independent killed bridges. Conditioning on the complete word also constrains later endpoints, so the proof compares its full likelihood, including connectors and the final suffix, with a sequentially normalized endpoint law. For an admissible centered word with bb completed pieces, let Y=2bY=\sqrt{2b} and pw=BL+1−Yp_{w}=B_{L}+1-Y. If Xi(x)X_{i}(x) is the occupation of x∈Vyx\in V_{y} by piece ii, then, in the central range ϵ0L≤Y≤BL+1\epsilon_{0}L\leq Y\leq B_{L}+1, the terminal estimate has the form

P(max⁡x∈Vy∑i≤bXi(x)≥uJ,c ∣ w,b)≤Ce−2LJceb/L×exp⁡{−κmin⁡((pw−p∗)2h,J2h)}.\begin{aligned} P\left(\left.\max_{x\in V_{y}}\sum_{i\leq b}X_{i}(x)\geq u_{J,c}\ \right|\ w,b\right) &\leq Ce^{-2L}J^{c}e^{b/L} \\ &\quad\times\exp\left\{-\kappa\min\left(\frac{(p_{w}-p_{*})^{2}}{h},\frac{J^{2}}{h}\right)\right\}. \end{aligned}

Here p∗=O(log⁡J)p_{*}=O(\log J). For an endpoint in the unit band of (10), b=TL+O(1)=q2/2+O(L)b=T_{L}+O(1)=q^{2}/2+O(L), so Y=q+O(1)Y=q+O(1) and pw=p+O(1)p_{w}=p+O(1). Hence eb/Le^{b/L} cancels the factor e−q2/(2L)e^{-q^{2}/(2L)}. The decay around the preferred deficit p∗p_{*} controls the remaining endpoint sum:

∑0≤p≤BL+1(1+p)exp⁡{−κmin⁡((p−p∗)2h,J2h)}=Jo(1).\sum_{0\leq p\leq B_{L}+1}(1+p)\exp\left\{-\kappa\min\left(\frac{(p-p_{*})^{2}}{h},\frac{J^{2}}{h}\right)\right\}=J^{o(1)}.

The cancellation alone would not control that sum. One original cell therefore contributes at most (k+1)Ce−2LJc−2+o(1)(k+1)^{C}e^{-2L}J^{c-2+o(1)}. There are O(e2(L−k))O(e^{2(L-k)}) such cells in shell kk, so

∑k≥βlog⁡J+O(1)C0log⁡Je2(L−k)(k+1)Ce−2LJc−2+o(1)≤J−2β+c−2+o(1).\sum_{k\ge\beta\log J+O(1)}^{C_{0}\log J} e^{2(L-k)}(k+1)^{C}e^{-2L}J^{c-2+o(1)} \le J^{-2\beta+c-2+o(1)}.

The small-endpoint range and distant source shells are handled separately in Proposition 6.3.

Escape: restoring the terminal depth in the global maximum

For the global lower bound, the traversal construction reaches only L=J−hL=J-h and supplies a cell with

b=2L2−2Llog⁡L+O(L)(11)b=2L^{2}-2L\log L+O(L) \tag*{(11)}

completed pieces. Rosen’s one- and two-center estimates give a positive probability that at least one Brownian root exists. The pair estimate is used before a one-sided strong coupling transfers the existence event to the lattice; adding coupling errors separately over exponentially many roots would lose this positive probability.

For the lower bound take h=(log⁡J)ξh=(\log J)^{\xi} with 1<ξ<21<\xi<2. Conditional on regular endpoint moments, the centered bridge field has covariance close to a multiple of the killed Green function. A Gaussian approximation and the discrete Gaussian free field maximum yield, for the core VyV_{y},

max⁡x∈Vy∑i≤bXi(x)=gb+22 gbh+OP(Jh+Jlog⁡Jlog⁡log⁡J).(12)\max_{x\in V_{y}}\sum_{i\le b}X_{i}(x) =gb+2\sqrt{2}\,g\sqrt{bh} +O_{P}\left(J\sqrt{h}+\frac{J\log J}{\log\log J}\right). \tag*{(12)}

The second term is needed at the required precision. Indeed,

gb=2gJ2−4gJh−2gJlog⁡J+O(h2+hlog⁡J+J),gb=2gJ^{2}-4gJh-2gJ\log J+O(h^{2}+h\log J+J),
22 gbh=4gJh+O(h2+hlog⁡J).2\sqrt{2}\,g\sqrt{bh}=4gJh+O(h^{2}+h\log J).

The terminal maximum restores the 4gJh4gJh lost by truncating the traversal construction, leaving 2gJ2−2gJlog⁡J+oP(Jlog⁡J)2gJ^{2}-2gJ\log J+o_{P}(J\log J). Here ξ>1\xi>1 makes the terminal disk large enough for the lattice comparison, while ξ<2\xi<2 makes the moment screen and the error in (12) fit within the Jlog⁡JJ\log J margin. A conditional failure bound for each candidate cell, followed by a union bound, turns coarse-root existence into the positive probability estimate (7) without selecting a root using other bridge interiors.

Finally, independent walk segments amplify disk success to an almost-sure lower bound at deterministic exponential times. Comparing that lower bound at the left end of a time block with the localized upper bound at its right end gives a block error with main term j−2γ+2δ+o(1)j^{-2\gamma+2\delta+o(1)} and a summable exit error. For any γ>1/2\gamma>1/2, choose δ>0\delta>0 small enough to make the main term summable. This proves escape of Rn−R_{n}^{-} throughout the blocks and completes the other half of the theorem.

Elementary estimates

For a finite lattice domain DD, write

GD(x,y)=Ex∑j<τDc1{Sj=y},τDc=inf⁡{j≥0:Sj∉D}.G_{D}(x,y)=E_{x}\sum_{j<\tau_{D^{c}}}\mathbf{1}_{\{S_{j}=y\}}, \qquad \tau_{D^{c}}=\inf\{j\ge0:S_{j}\notin D\}.

The following estimates fix the normalization used throughout the paper.

Lemma 3.1 (Elementary walk estimates). There are constants c,C∈(0,∞)c,C \in(0,\infty) with the following properties.

(1) If τR=inf⁡{n:∥Sn∥2≥R}\tau_{R}=\inf\{n:\lVert S_{n}\rVert_{2}\ge R\}, then

sup⁡∥x∥<RExτR≤CR2,sup⁡∥x∥<RPx(τR>mCR2)≤2−m.\sup_{\lVert x\rVert<R} E_{x}\tau_{R}\le CR^{2},\qquad \sup_{\lVert x\rVert<R} P_{x}(\tau_{R}>mCR^{2})\le2^{-m}.

(2) For all N,R≥1N,R\ge1,

P(max⁡k≤N∥Sk∥2≥R)≤Cexp⁡{−cR2/N}.P\left(\max_{k\le N}\lVert S_{k}\rVert_{2}\ge R\right)\le C\exp\{-cR^{2}/N\}.

(3) Uniformly for 1≪r<∥x∥<R1\ll r<\lVert x\rVert<R,

Px(τ∂D(0,R)<τ∂D(0,r))=log⁡(∥x∥/r)+O(r−1)log⁡(R/r)P_{x}(\tau_{\partial D(0,R)}<\tau_{\partial D(0,r)}) = \frac{\log(\lVert x\rVert/r)+O(r^{-1})}{\log(R/r)}

and the complementary inner-hitting probability is obtained by replacing the numerator by log⁡(R/∥x∥)+O(r−1)\log(R/\lVert x\rVert)+O(r^{-1}).

(4) For each fixed κ∈(0,1)\kappa\in(0,1), uniformly for ∥x∥≤(1−κ)R\lVert x\rVert\le(1-\kappa)R in D(0,R)D(0,R),

GD(0,R)(x,x)=glog⁡R+Oκ(1).G_{D(0,R)}(x,x)=g\log R+O_{\kappa}(1).

Conditional on first hitting xx, the number of visits to xx before leaving the disk is geometric with this mean.

Proof. For (1), optional stopping of ∥Sn∧τR∥22−(n∧τR)\lVert S_{n\wedge\tau_{R}}\rVert_{2}^{2}-(n\wedge\tau_{R}), followed by the one-step overshoot bound, gives the expectation estimate. Markov’s inequality at time 2CR22CR^{2}, iterated with the strong Markov property, gives the geometric tail. Part (2) follows by applying the usual exponential martingale separately to both coordinates and to both signs.

For the annulus estimate, we use [9]: uniformly for r<∥x∥<Rr<\lVert x\rVert<R,

Px(H∂D(0,R)<H∂D(0,r))=log⁡(∥x∥/r)+O(r−1)log⁡(R/r).P_{x}(H_{\partial D(0,R)}<H_{\partial D(0,r)}) = \frac{\log(\lVert x\rVert/r)+O(r^{-1})}{\log(R/r)}.

Here HH is the positive-time hitting time and the boundaries are the digital outer vertex boundaries defined in that paper. The later directed-edge convention can differ from this vertex-boundary convention only within a one-unit radial collar. Applying the estimate with r,Rr,R shifted by at most two units, equivalently repeating its potential-kernel proof at the directed crossing time, changes the logarithmic terms by O(r−1)O(r^{-1}). Hence the same estimate holds for the directed-edge rows below. The potential-kernel proof of that result also gives (4). The geometric assertion in (4) is the strong Markov property at successive positive returns to xx. ■

Recurrence at the critical scale

We prove that the full favorite set lies in a disk of radius o(n/log⁡n)o(\sqrt{n}/\log n) at infinitely many times. The argument first localizes a selected favorite at a geometric time and then makes it unique by an injective four-step insertion. If a fresh segment has a unique favorite, every favorite after adding the past lies either at that site or in the old range. Thus a bound on the old range suffices even when its local-time heights are arbitrary.

A resolvent estimate and reversal at a favorite

Lemma 4.1 (A stopped resolvent bound). Let 0<z<10<z<1, N=(1−z)−1N=(1-z)^{-1}, and let μ\mu be a finite positive measure on Z2\mathbb{Z}^{2} of mass β\beta. Suppose that

(I−zP)μ=αδ0−ν,ν≥0,α−ν(Z2)=(1−z)β.(13)(I-zP)\mu=\alpha\delta_{0}-\nu,\qquad\nu\ge0,\qquad\alpha-\nu(\mathbb{Z}^{2})=(1-z)\beta. \tag*{(13)}

There are universal constants c,C>0c,C>0 such that, whenever 2≤f≤N1/82\le f\le N^{1/8},

μ(B(0,CNf))≥cβ1+log⁡ff2.(14)\mu\left(B\left(0,C\frac{\sqrt{N}}{f}\right)\right)\ge c\beta\frac{1+\log f}{f^{2}}. \tag*{(14)}

Proof. We test the resolvent identity against a function whose maximum is at the origin. This makes the unknown positive measure ν\nu contribute with the needed sign in (15).

Let QR=[−R,R]2∩Z2Q_{R}=[-R,R]^{2}\cap\mathbb{Z}^{2} and set

wR:=∣QR∣−11QR∗1−QR.w_{R}:=|Q_{R}|^{-1}\mathbf{1}_{Q_{R}}*\mathbf{1}_{-Q_{R}}.

Then 0≤wR≤10\le w_{R}\le1, wR(0)=1w_{R}(0)=1, and wRw_{R} is supported in B(0,3R)B(0,3R). Put

Gz:=∑n≥0znPn,ϕR:=Gz∗wR.G_{z}:=\sum_{n\ge0}z^{n}P^{n},\qquad\phi_{R}:=G_{z}*w_{R}.

Fourier inversion gives

ϕ^R(θ)=∣1QR^(θ)∣2/∣QR∣1−zP^(θ)≥0.\widehat{\phi}_{R}(\theta)=\frac{|\widehat{\mathbf{1}_{Q_{R}}}(\theta)|^{2}/|Q_{R}|}{1-z\widehat{P}(\theta)}\ge0.

Consequently ϕR(y)≤ϕR(0)\phi_{R}(y)\le\phi_{R}(0) for every yy. Pairing (13) with ϕR\phi_{R} and using (I−zP)ϕR=wR(I-zP)\phi_{R}=w_{R} yields

μ(wR)=αϕR(0)−ν(ϕR)≥(α−ν(Z2))ϕR(0)=(1−z)βϕR(0).(15)\begin{aligned} \mu(w_{R}) &= \alpha\phi_{R}(0)-\nu(\phi_{R}) \\ &\ge\left(\alpha-\nu(\mathbb{Z}^{2})\right)\phi_{R}(0)=(1-z)\beta\phi_{R}(0). \tag*{(15)} \end{aligned}

For ∥θ∥≤c/R\|\theta\|\le c/R, the numerator in the Fourier transform is at least cR2cR^{2}, while 1−zP^(θ)≍N−1+∥θ∥21-z\widehat{P}(\theta)\asymp N^{-1}+\|\theta\|^{2}. Hence, for R2≤N/4R^{2}\le N/4, polar integration gives

ϕR(0)≥cR2∫0c/Rt dtN−1+t2≥cR2(1+log⁡NR2).(16)\begin{aligned} \phi_{R}(0) &\ge cR^{2}\int_{0}^{c/R}\frac{t\,\mathrm{d}t}{N^{-1}+t^{2}} \\ &\ge cR^{2}\left(1+\log\frac{N}{R^{2}}\right). \tag*{(16)} \end{aligned}

Since μ(wR)≤μ(B(0,3R))\mu(w_{R})\le\mu(B(0,3R)), take R=⌊N/(4f)⌋R=\lfloor\sqrt{N}/(4f)\rfloor in (15)–(16). This proves (14), after changing the absolute radius constant. ■

Lemma 4.2 (Localization of a selected favorite). Let 0<z<10<z<1, N=(1−z)−1N=(1-z)^{-1}, and let KK be independent of the walk with

P(K=n)=(1−z)zn,n≥0.P(K=n)=(1-z)z^{n},\qquad n\ge0.

Attach independent uniform [0,1][0,1] priorities (Ux)x∈Z2(U_{x})_{x\in\mathbb{Z}^{2}} to the sites and let XK∗X_{K}^{*} be the least-priority member of FK\mathcal{F}_{K}. Then

P(∥XK∗∥2≤CKf)≥c1+log⁡ff2,2≤f≤N1/8.(17)P\left(\|X_{K}^{*}\|_{2}\le C\frac{\sqrt{K}}{f}\right)\ge c\frac{1+\log f}{f^{2}},\qquad2\le f\le N^{1/8}. \tag*{(17)}

More precisely, the proof gives a stopped-resolvent representation of the endpoint law of −XK∗-X_{K}^{*}. The representation remains a positive mixture satisfying (13) after restriction by any event measurable with respect to the base tuple defined there.

Proof. The purpose of reversal is to leave one path piece free: once the other pieces and priorities are fixed, its endpoints form a stopped occupation measure. We include the priority rule in the bijection so that ties impose fixed constraints on this free piece.

Step 1. Decompose and reconstruct the path.

Fix a clock atom K=nK=n, a path s=(s0,…,sn)s=(s_{0},\ldots,s_{n}), and first insert

1=∑x1{x=Xn∗}.1=\sum_{x}\mathbf{1}_{\{x=X_{n}^{*}\}}.

Thus we consider each selected site xx separately, with xx fixed when translating the priorities. Put r=Mn−1r=M_{n}-1, and let σ,ℓ\sigma,\ell be the first and last visits to xx. Reverse and center the prefix through ℓ\ell:

Ai=sℓ−i−x,0≤i≤ℓ.A_{i}=s_{\ell-i}-x,\qquad0\le i\le\ell.

It has exactly rr positive returns to zero by time ℓ−σ\ell-\sigma. Hence it decomposes uniquely as

A=E1⊕⋯⊕Er⊕C,(18)A=E_{1}\oplus\cdots\oplus E_{r}\oplus C, \tag*{(18)}

where each EiE_{i} is a nearest-neighbor excursion from zero to zero with no intermediate visit to zero. Here ⊕\oplus joins paths without counting their shared endpoints twice. Their total length is ρr=ℓ−σ\rho_{r}=\ell-\sigma. The remaining path CC starts at zero, has no positive return to zero, and ends at a=−xa=-x. The centered forward suffix

Bi=sℓ+i−x,0≤i≤n−ℓ,B_{i}=s_{\ell+i}-x,\qquad0\le i\le n-\ell,

also has no positive return to zero.

Write Hr(y)H_{r}(y) for the number of visits to y≠0y\ne0 in the completed excursions and NC(y),NB(y)N_{C}(y),N_{B}(y) for the corresponding positive-time counts in C,BC,B. Translate priorities by the fixed sector shift, Vy=Ux+yV_{y}=U_{x+y}. The statement that the root is the priority-selected favorite is exactly

Hr(y)+NC(y)+NB(y)≤r+1{Vy>V0},y≠0.(19)H_{r}(y)+N_{C}(y)+N_{B}(y)\le r+\mathbf{1}_{\{V_{y}>V_{0}\}},\qquad y\ne0. \tag*{(19)}

Indeed, a better-priority site must be strictly below the root’s value r+1r+1, while a worse-priority site may tie it.

We now fix all pieces except the terminal arm CC, together with the translated priorities:

B=(r,E1,…,Er,B,V).\mathcal{B}=(r,E_{1},\ldots,E_{r},B,V).

The local time still available to CC at y≠0y\ne0 is the capacity

cB(y)≔r+1{Vy>V0}−Hr(y)−NB(y),y≠0.(20)c_{\mathcal{B}}(y)\coloneqq r+\mathbf{1}_{\{V_{y}>V_{0}\}}-H_{r}(y)-N_{B}(y),\qquad y\ne0. \tag*{(20)}

Only tuples with cB(y)≥0c_{\mathcal{B}}(y)\ge0 for every y≠0y\ne0 can occur. For such a tuple, run a new walk CC from zero and let τc\tau_{c} be its first positive return to zero or its first time at which some occupation count NC(y)N_{C}(y) exceeds cB(y)c_{\mathcal{B}}(y). Condition (19) says exactly that the admissible terminal arms are the prefixes (C0,…,Cq)(C_{0},\ldots,C_{q}) with q<τcq<\tau_{c}.

Conversely, a feasible base tuple and one such prefix reconstruct the original path: concatenate (18), reverse it, translate by −a=x-a=x, and append the translated suffix BB. Inequality (19) makes xx a favorite and excludes every better-priority tie; avoidance of zero by BB makes ℓ\ell its last visit. The endpoint aa recovers the sector x=−ax=-a, so both the path and the priority translation are unique. The forward and inverse maps are therefore genuine bijections, including r=0r=0.

Step 2. Identify the stopped occupation measure.

Write q=∣C∣q=|C| and k=∣B∣k=|B| for the terminal-arm and suffix lengths, so that n=ρr+q+kn=\rho_{r}+q+k. Reversal and symmetry preserve the path weight, and

zρr4−ρrzq4−q(1−z)zk4−k=(1−z)zn4−n.(21)z^{\rho_{r}}4^{-\rho_{r}}z^{q}4^{-q}(1-z)z^{k}4^{-k}=(1-z)z^{n}4^{-n}. \tag*{(21)}

For each fixed tuple, the factors outside zq4−qz^{q}4^{-q} are fixed. Summing over its admissible terminal arms therefore gives their stopped occupation measure, with no multiplicity or extra normalization.

For a fixed capacity let

gc(u)=E0∑q<τczq1{Cq=u}.g_{c}(u)=E_{0}\sum_{q<\tau_{c}}z^{q}\mathbf{1}_{\{C_{q}=u\}}.

By the Markov property,

zPgc(u)=E0∑q<τczq+11{Cq+1=u}=gc(u)−1{u=0}+E0[zτc1{Cτc=u}].zPg_{c}(u)=E_{0}\sum_{q<\tau_{c}}z^{q+1}\mathbf{1}_{\{C_{q+1}=u\}}=g_{c}(u)-\mathbf{1}_{\{u=0\}}+E_{0}\left[z^{\tau_{c}}\mathbf{1}_{\{C_{\tau_{c}}=u\}}\right].

Thus the occupation terms cancel except at the initial and stopped endpoints:

(I−zP)gc=δ0−E0[zτcδCτc].(22)(I-zP)g_{c}=\delta_{0}-E_{0}\left[z^{\tau_{c}}\delta_{C_{\tau_{c}}}\right]. \tag*{(22)}

The arm endpoint is a=−xa=-x. Thus the bijection and (21) identify the law of −XK∗-X_{K}^{*} as a positive mixture of the gcg_{c}’s, integrating also over the translated i.i.d. priorities. Mixing (22) gives (13); its mass relation follows by summing over Z2\mathbb{Z}^{2}. Restricting the tuples by any event depending only on B\mathcal{B} merely removes positive mixture weights, so the same identity holds for the restricted endpoint measure.

Step 3. Compare the deterministic and random clock scales.

Lemma 4.1 gives a radius proportional to N/f\sqrt{N}/f. To obtain K/f\sqrt{K}/f, we restrict the mixture to an event of fixed positive probability on which K≥N/8K\geq N/8. This restriction must depend only on B\mathcal{B}, so that the resolvent identity still applies. Whole-path reversal, translation to the new starting point, and transport of the i.i.d. priorities preserve the joint law and send

(σ,ℓ)⟼(n−ℓ,n−σ).(\sigma,\ell)\longmapsto(n-\ell,n-\sigma).

Conditionally on K=nK=n, the pair has this symmetry. In particular, E[σ+ℓ∣K=n]=nE[\sigma+\ell\mid K=n]=n. Since σ≤ℓ\sigma\leq\ell and 0≤n−σ≤n0\leq n-\sigma\leq n, it follows that

E[n−σ∣K=n]=E[ℓ∣K=n]≥n/2,P(n−σ≥n/4∣K=n)≥1/3.(23)E[n-\sigma\mid K=n]=E[\ell\mid K=n]\geq n/2,\qquad P(n-\sigma\geq n/4\mid K=n)\geq1/3. \tag*{(23)}

Also P(K≥N/2)≥1/4P(K\geq N/2)\geq1/4 for all large NN. Hence the restriction

Γ={n−σ≥N/8}\Gamma=\{n-\sigma\geq N/8\}

has mixture mass β≥1/12\beta\geq1/12. In the tuple,

n−σ=(ℓ−σ)+(n−ℓ)=ρr+∣B∣,n-\sigma=(\ell-\sigma)+(n-\ell)=\rho_{r}+|B|,

so Γ\Gamma depends only on the fixed tuple. Apply Lemma 4.1 to this restricted endpoint measure, whose mass is β≥1/12\beta\geq1/12. It gives probability at least c(1+log⁡f)/f2c(1+\log f)/f^{2} in a disk of radius C1N/fC_{1}\sqrt{N}/f. On Γ\Gamma we have K≥N/8K\geq N/8, so this radius is at most 8C1K/f\sqrt{8}C_{1}\sqrt{K}/f. Since ∥−XK∗∥2=∥XK∗∥2\|-X_{K}^{*}\|_{2}=\|X_{K}^{*}\|_{2}, absorbing the fixed factor proves (17). ■

Removing ties and absorbing the past

Lemma 4.3 (Localization with a unique favorite). For the same geometric clock, uniformly for 2≤f≤N1/82 \le f \le N^{1/8},

P(∣FK∣=1, RK+≤CKf)≥c1+log⁡ff2.(24)P\left(\lvert\mathcal{F}_{K}\rvert=1,\ R_{K}^{+}\le C\frac{\sqrt{K}}{f}\right)\ge c\frac{1+\log f}{f^{2}}. \tag*{(24)}

The conclusion remains valid, up to a universal change of cc, after restricting the output clock to

aN≤K≤Nlog⁡N,a=c81+log⁡ff2.(25)aN\le K\le N\log N,\qquad a=\frac{c}{8}\frac{1+\log f}{f^{2}}. \tag*{(25)}

Proof. For every atom counted in (17), insert immediately after the last visit to its priority-selected favorite xx the fixed loop

x, x+e1, x, x+e2, x.(26)x,\ x+e_{1},\ x,\ x+e_{2},\ x. \tag*{(26)}

The local time at xx rises by two, those at the two neighbors rise by one, and all other local times are unchanged. Thus xx is the unique favorite of the new path. The old suffix avoids xx, so in the image the last visit to the unique favorite is the final vertex of (26). Removing the four preceding prescribed steps is therefore the unique inverse. On geometrically weighted path atoms the image-to-source weight ratio is z4/44z^{4}/4^{4}, bounded below for zz close to one. This proves (24).

Now P(K≤aN)≤2aP(K\le aN)\le2a, while P(K>Nlog⁡N)≤exp⁡{−(log⁡N)/2}P(K>N\log N)\le\exp\{-(\log N)/2\}. With the constant in (25) chosen after the constant in (24), these discarded masses total at most half the right-hand side of (24). Four added steps are absorbed by changing the universal constants. ■

Lemma 4.4 (Adding an inherited local-time profile). Let H≥0H\ge0 be any finitely supported integer profile and let ℓ≥0\ell\ge0 be a second integer profile with a unique maximizer yy. Every maximizer of H+ℓH+\ell lies in supp⁡H∪{y}\operatorname{supp}H\cup\{y\}.

Proof. For every x∉supp⁡H∪{y}x\notin\operatorname{supp}H\cup\{y\}, uniqueness of the maximum of ℓ\ell gives

(H+ℓ)(x)=ℓ(x)<ℓ(y)≤(H+ℓ)(y).(H+\ell)(x)=\ell(x)<\ell(y)\le(H+\ell)(y).

Such a site cannot maximize H+ℓH+\ell. ■

Infinitely many successful blocks

Proposition 4.5 (Recurrence at the critical scale). Almost surely,

lim inf⁡n→∞Rn+n/log⁡n=0.(27)\liminf_{n\to\infty}\frac{R_{n}^{+}}{\sqrt{n/\log n}}=0. \tag*{(27)}

Consequently, for every γ≤12\gamma\le\frac{1}{2},

lim inf⁡n→∞Rn+aγ(n)=0.(28)\liminf_{n\to\infty}\frac{R_{n}^{+}}{a_{\gamma}(n)}=0. \tag*{(28)}

Proof. Step 1. Choose independent fresh segments.

Fix ε>0\varepsilon>0. We need fresh segments long enough that the old range is small compared with Kk/log⁡Kk\sqrt{K_{k}/\log K_{k}}, while each segment still ends before the next deterministic block. Choose J1J_{1} sufficiently large and define

Jk+1=Jk+10log⁡Jk,sk=⌊eJk⌋,J_{k+1}=J_{k}+10\log J_{k},\qquad s_{k}=\lfloor e^{J_{k}}\rfloor,

Here JkJ_k is the logarithmic block time. For the fresh block beginning at sks_k, choose the geometric time scale and localization divisor as

Nk=eJk+1Jk+12,fk=Cε−1Jk+1.N_k=\frac{e^{J_{k+1}}}{J_{k+1}^{2}}, \qquad f_k=C\varepsilon^{-1}\sqrt{J_{k+1}}.

Choose CC large enough that localization gives the radius below; for all large kk, 2≤fk≤Nk1/82\le f_k\le N_k^{1/8}. Apply Lemma 4.3 to the fresh increment walk, with an independent geometric clock with parameter 1/Nk1/N_k. It gives a unique fresh favorite YkY_k satisfying

∥Yk∥≤ε8KkJk+1(29)\lVert Y_k\rVert\le\frac{\varepsilon}{8}\sqrt{\frac{K_k}{J_{k+1}}} \tag*{(29)}

with conditional probability at least

dk=cεlog⁡Jk+1Jk+1,(30)d_k=c_{\varepsilon}\frac{\log J_{k+1}}{J_{k+1}}, \tag*{(30)}

even after

dk8Nk≤Kk≤Jk+1Nk.(31)\frac{d_k}{8}N_k\le K_k\le J_{k+1}N_k. \tag*{(31)}

Since eJk+1=eJkJk10e^{J_{k+1}}=e^{J_k}J_k^{10} and Jk+1∼JkJ_{k+1}\sim J_k, (30)–(31) give, uniformly over the clock restriction,

cε′eJkJk7log⁡Jk≤Kk≤eJk+1Jk+1c_{\varepsilon}'e^{J_k}J_k^{7}\log J_k\le K_k\le\frac{e^{J_{k+1}}}{J_{k+1}}

for all sufficiently large kk. The lower bound makes the fresh segment dominate the past, while the upper bound keeps it within its deterministic block: Kk/sk→∞K_k/s_k\to\infty and sk+Kk<sk+1s_k+K_k<s_{k+1}. The singleton estimate already includes the four inserted steps.

Step 2. Include the inherited profile.

Let

Hk(x)=∑j=0sk−11{Sj=x},ℓk(z)=∑i=0Kk1{Ssk+i−Ssk=z}.H_k(x)=\sum_{j=0}^{s_k-1}\mathbf{1}_{\{S_j=x\}}, \qquad\ell_k(z)=\sum_{i=0}^{K_k}\mathbf{1}_{\{S_{s_k+i}-S_{s_k}=z\}}.

The old profile stops before sks_k, and the fresh profile includes its time-zero visit. Hence, for every x∈Z2x\in\mathbb{Z}^{2},

Hk(x)+ℓk(x−Ssk)=∑j=0sk−11{Sj=x}+∑i=0Kk1{Ssk+i=x}=Lsk+Kk(x).H_k(x)+\ell_k(x-S_{s_k})=\sum_{j=0}^{s_k-1}\mathbf{1}_{\{S_j=x\}}+\sum_{i=0}^{K_k}\mathbf{1}_{\{S_{s_k+i}=x\}}=L_{s_k+K_k}(x).

On a successful block, ℓk\ell_k has the unique maximizer YkY_k. Lemma 4.4, applied after translation by SskS_{s_k}, therefore gives, at tk=sk+Kkt_k=s_k+K_k,

Ftk⊂{Sj:0≤j<sk}∪{Ssk+Yk}.\mathcal{F}_{t_k}\subset\{S_j:0\le j<s_k\}\cup\{S_{s_k}+Y_k\}.

Part (2) of Lemma 3.1 and Borel–Cantelli give

max⁡j≤sk∥Sj∥≤skJk\max_{j\le s_k}\lVert S_j\rVert\le\sqrt{s_k}J_k

eventually. The clock bounds above give

skJk2Jk+1Kk=Oε(Jk−4log⁡Jk),log⁡(sk+Kk)=Jk+1+Oε(log⁡Jk+1)\frac{s_kJ_k^{2}J_{k+1}}{K_k}=O_{\varepsilon}\left(\frac{J_k^{-4}}{\log J_k}\right), \qquad\log(s_k+K_k)=J_{k+1}+O_{\varepsilon}(\log J_{k+1})

uniformly over (31). Consequently,

sk Jk=o(KkJk+1),log⁡(sk+Kk)∼Jk+1,sk=o(Kk).(32)\sqrt{s_k}\,J_k=o\left(\sqrt{\frac{K_k}{J_{k+1}}}\right), \qquad\log(s_k+K_k)\sim J_{k+1}, \qquad s_k=o(K_k). \tag*{(32)}

On every sufficiently late successful block, the favorite-set inclusion above now gives

Rtk+≤max⁡j≤sk∥Sj∥2+∥Yk∥2≤sk Jk+ε8KkJk+1≤ε2tklog⁡tk.\begin{aligned} R_{t_k}^{+} &\le\max_{j\le s_k}\lVert S_j\rVert_2+\lVert Y_k\rVert_2 \\ &\le\sqrt{s_k}\,J_k+\frac{\varepsilon}{8}\sqrt{\frac{K_k}{J_{k+1}}} \le\frac{\varepsilon}{2}\sqrt{\frac{t_k}{\log t_k}}. \end{aligned}

Here (32) makes the first term negligible and identifies the fresh and full time scales. Thus every full favorite at tkt_k lies in

B(0,ε2tklog⁡tk)(33)B\left(0,\frac{\varepsilon}{2}\sqrt{\frac{t_k}{\log t_k}}\right) \tag*{(33)}

for all sufficiently large successful kk.

Step 3. Obtain infinitely many witness times.

The recursion gives Jk∼10klog⁡kJ_k\sim10k\log k, so dk≍εk−1d_k\asymp_{\varepsilon}k^{-1}. In particular,

∑kdk=∞.(34)\sum_k d_k=\infty. \tag*{(34)}

The fresh increments occupy disjoint deterministic blocks. On the product space enlarged by the independent clocks and priorities, let EkE_k be the fresh singleton-success event (29), with clock restriction (31). The clock restriction ensures that EkE_k uses only increments within the kkth deterministic block. Its conditional probability, given the walk and auxiliary variables in earlier blocks, is at least dkd_k. Lévy’s conditional Borel–Cantelli lemma and (34) imply that EkE_k occurs infinitely often almost surely. The old-range bound and the deterministic comparisons (32) hold eventually almost surely; on their intersection, every sufficiently late EkE_k implies (33). Thus (33) occurs infinitely often. Fubini removes the auxiliary clocks and priorities: for almost every walk path, their probability of producing infinitely many witness times is one, so that path itself has infinitely many such integer witness times.

Intersecting over rational ε>0\varepsilon>0 proves (27). Finally,

a1/2(n)aγ(n)=(log⁡n)γ−1/2≤1\frac{a_{1/2}(n)}{a_{\gamma}(n)}=(\log n)^{\gamma-1/2}\le1

eventually for γ≤1/2\gamma\le1/2, which proves (28). ■\blacksquare

Continuum barriers and lattice traversal counts

Traversal counts separate the large-scale accumulation of excursions from occupation inside the last annulus. We first record the continuum barrier estimates in the form needed below. We then compare rare upper events by multiplying one-step lattice probabilities. For the lower event, a single strong coupling transfers the existence of a suitable Brownian center. The two comparisons have different purposes: the first preserves probabilities on their exponential scale, while the second preserves a positive probability of existence. Together they give the three lattice inputs used later: an upper bound on barrier crossings, a joint bound for a barrier-respecting traversal endpoint, and a positive probability of finding a lower root. The first two enter the localized upper bound; the third enters the lower bound for the disk maximum.

Spherical traversal estimates

We use Rosen’s spherical traversal construction [13]. Write dd for geodesic distance on the sphere. We denote the geodesic radii by ϑj\vartheta_{j} (Rosen’s hjh_{j}), reserving hh for the terminal logarithmic radius log⁡M\log M. The upper and lower arguments use separate fixed choices of the initial radius. We keep the customary notation r0r_{0} in each argument and state the change explicitly; the two choices are never used in the same pathwise comparison.

Let XX be spherical Brownian motion started at vv, stopped at its first hit τ\tau of ∂Bd(v,r∗)\partial B_{d}(v,r_{*}). When defining source stopping times we extend it by an independent Brownian continuation; the safety event below will imply that every portion actually used lies before τ\tau. Put

rj=r0e−j,ϑj=2arctan⁡(rj/2).(35)r_{j}=r_{0}e^{-j}, \qquad\vartheta_{j}=2\arctan(r_{j}/2). \tag*{(35)}

For the upper estimates, choose the fixed radii as in [13], Section 2, (9), in particular 2r∗≤ϑ02r_{*}\leq\vartheta_{0}. Let FjF_{j} be a maximal d0ϑjd_{0}\vartheta_{j}-separated set, augmented if necessary to a d0ϑjd_{0}\vartheta_{j}-cover; thus ∣Fj∣≍e2j|F_{j}|\asymp e^{2j}. For y∈FLy\in F_{L}, Ty,jT_{y,j} is the number, before τ\tau, of completed excursions from ∂Bd(y,ϑj−1)\partial B_{d}(y,\vartheta_{j-1}) to ∂Bd(y,ϑj)\partial B_{d}(y,\vartheta_{j}), with the initial and final incomplete pieces omitted. Its source shell is

ky=inf⁡{k:y∉Bd(v,ϑk)}.(36)k_{y}=\inf\{k:y\notin B_{d}(v,\vartheta_{k})\}. \tag*{(36)}

Pairs have separation shell kk when 2ϑk<d(y,y′)≤2ϑk−12\vartheta_{k}<d(y,y')\leq2\vartheta_{k-1}.

The barriers have an affine part and a buffer determined by the distance to the nearer endpoint. Set ρL=2−(log⁡L)/L\rho_{L}=2-(\log L)/L and define

αz,±(l)=ρLl+z±(l∧(L−l))1/4.(37)\alpha_{z,\pm}(l)=\rho_{L}l+z\pm(l\wedge(L-l))^{1/4}. \tag*{(37)}

Fix an admissible z≥z0z\geq z_{0} in Rosen’s upper argument. The upper first-crossing event U(y,l,z)U(y,l,z) means

2Ty,j≤αz,+(j)(ky<j<l),2Ty,l>αz,+(l).\sqrt{2T_{y,j}}\leq\alpha_{z,+}(j)\quad(k_{y}<j<l),\qquad\sqrt{2T_{y,l}}>\alpha_{z,+}(l).

Rosen’s representative construction is deterministic. With fixed tie-breaking, every fine center is sent to its closest point of the predetermined coarser net at scale ϑl+14(l∧(L−l))1/4\vartheta_{l+\frac{1}{4}(l\wedge(L-l))^{1/4}}; equations eq:2.26–eq:2.27–eq:2.28–eq:2.29–eq:2.30–eq:2.31–eq:2.32–eq:2.33 give the buffered ball inclusions and domination of its traversal count. Proposition 2.5, specifically equations eq:2.34–eq:2.35, then proves the complete estimates

#{representatives with source k}≤Cexp⁡{2(l−k)+12(l∧(L−l))1/4},(38)\#\{\text{representatives with source }k\}\leq C\exp\{2(l-k)+\tfrac{1}{2}(l\wedge(L-l))^{1/4}\}, \tag*{(38)}
P(U(y,l,z))≤Cexp⁡{−2l−(l∧(L−l))1/4}e−2z.(39)P(U(y,l,z))\leq C\exp\{-2l-(l\wedge(L-l))^{1/4}\}e^{-2z}. \tag*{(39)}

They hold pointwise for 1≤k≤l≤L−(4log⁡L)41\leq k\leq l\leq L-(4\log L)^{4}. Only the choice FL∩Bd(v,ϑlog⁡L)cF_{L}\cap B_{d}(v,\vartheta_{\log L})^{c}, and not the proof of (38)–(39), imposed k≤log⁡Lk\leq\log L. Hence, for any s≤C0log⁡Ls\leq C_{0}\log L, summing just the representatives whose source shell is at least ss gives the bound below. Indeed, the product of (38) and (39) is Ce−2ke−(l∧(L−l))1/4/2e−2zCe^{-2k}e^{-(l\wedge(L-l))^{1/4}/2}e^{-2z}, and

∑k≥se−2k∑l=kL−(4log⁡L)4e−(l∧(L−l))1/4/2≤Ce−2s.\sum_{k\geq s}e^{-2k}\sum_{l=k}^{L-(4\log L)^{4}}e^{-(l\wedge(L-l))^{1/4}/2}\leq Ce^{-2s}.

Here the inner sum is uniformly bounded by the two endpoint tails. Consequently,

P(∃y:ky≥s, ∃l≤L−(4log⁡L)4:U(y,l,z))≤Ce−2s+o(log⁡L)e−2z.(40)P\left(\exists y:k_{y}\geq s,\ \exists l\leq L-(4\log L)^{4}:U(y,l,z)\right)\leq Ce^{-2s+o(\log L)}e^{-2z}. \tag*{(40)}

The endpoint estimate for complete centered excursions.

The endpoint calculation must be applied to a complete centered excursion forest. To specify that law, start spherical Brownian motion at vv with ϑky≤d(v,y)<ϑky−1\vartheta_{k_y} \le d(v,y) < \vartheta_{k_y-1} and continue it until its first exit from Bd(y,ϑ0)B_d(y,\vartheta_0). Let Ty,jcT_{y,j}^{c} count its completed traversals at level jj, and let Gy,L,zc\mathcal{G}_{y,L,z}^{c} require the upper barrier in (37) from m=ky+1m=k_y+1 through L−1L-1. Put Yyc=2Ty,LcY_y^{c}=\sqrt{2T_{y,L}^{c}} and BL=ρLL+zB_L=\rho_L L+z. Uniformly for ky≤C0log⁡Lk_y\le C_0\log L, every fixed ϵ0>0\epsilon_0>0, ϵ0L≤q≤BL+1\epsilon_0L\le q\le B_L+1, and fixed zz, the source law in [13] and its Appendix Theorem 9.1(a) give

P(Gy,L,zc,Yyc∈[q,q+1])≤C(ky+1)C(2+BL−q)L−2e−q2/(2L).(41)P\left(\mathcal{G}_{y,L,z}^{c},Y_y^{c}\in[q,q+1]\right) \le C(k_y+1)^C(2+B_L-q)L^{-2}e^{-q^2/(2L)}. \tag*{(41)}

This assertion concerns the centered stopping rule just defined. We do not identify the descendants of a population stopped at the off-center boundary ∂Bd(v,r∗)\partial B_d(v,r_*) with an independent Galton–Watson forest. The later lattice endpoint estimate will be proved directly for its centered continuation.

The following version of [13] is sufficient: if TT is critical Galton–Watson with P(ξ=m)=2−m−1P(\xi=m)=2^{-m-1}, T0=x2/2T_0=x^2/2, and

δ>0,C≥0,η>1,ϵ∈(0,1/2),2≤x,y≤ηL,x2/2∈N,0≤x≤a,0≤y≤b,P(2Tj≤a+(b−a)j/L+C(j∧(L−j))1/2−ϵ, 1≤j<L;2TL∈[y,y+δ])≤C′(1+a−x)(1+b−y)LxyLe−(x−y)2/(2L).(42)\begin{aligned} &\delta>0,\qquad C\ge0,\qquad\eta>1,\qquad\epsilon\in(0,1/2),\\ &2\le x,y\le\eta L,\qquad x^2/2\in\mathbb{N},\\ &0\le x\le a,\qquad0\le y\le b,\\ &P\left(\sqrt{2T_j}\le a+(b-a)j/L+C(j\wedge(L-j))^{1/2-\epsilon},\ 1\le j<L;\right.\\ &\qquad\left.\sqrt{2T_L}\in[y,y+\delta]\right) \le C'\frac{(1+a-x)(1+b-y)}{L}\sqrt{\frac{x}{yL}}e^{-(x-y)^2/(2L)}. \tag*{(42)} \end{aligned}

Write m=ky+1m=k_y+1 and N=L−mN=L-m. Conditional on Ty,mc=tT_{y,m}^{c}=t, the tt complete source excursions give the critical geometric Galton–Watson chain in (42), started from tt. Indeed each excursion from level mm to level m−1m-1 is explored completely before the centered path can exit at level 0; its neighboring logarithmic side choices have probability 1/21/2 independently of the entrance angle. The logarithmic gambler–ruin calculation (2.8) gives

P(Ty,mc≥t)≤Cme−t/m,P(T_{y,m}^{c}\ge t)\le Cme^{-t/m},

and hence, after grouping the integer values of tt for which x=2tx=\sqrt{2t} lies in a unit band,

P(2Ty,mc∈[x,x+1])≤CmCe−x2/(2m).(43)P\left(\sqrt{2T_{y,m}^{c}}\in[x,x+1]\right)\le Cm^C e^{-x^2/(2m)}. \tag*{(43)}

On Gy,L,zc\mathcal{G}_{y,L,z}^{c}, x≤a≔αz,+(m)=O(m)x\le a\coloneqq\alpha_{z,+}(m)=O(m). Apply (42) over the remaining NN generations with this aa and with b=BL+1b=B_L+1. The needed deterministic barrier inclusion follows from

((m+j)∧(L−m−j))1/4≤(1−j/N)m1/4+C(j∧(N−j))1/4;(44)((m+j)\wedge(L-m-j))^{1/4} \le(1-j/N)m^{1/4}+C(j\wedge(N-j))^{1/4}; \tag*{(44)}

for j≤N/2j\le N/2 use (m+j)1/4≤m1/4+j1/4(m+j)^{1/4}\le m^{1/4}+j^{1/4} and m1/4j/N≤j1/4m^{1/4}j/N\le j^{1/4}, while for j>N/2j>N/2 use the right-end distance directly. Thus every parameter in (42) has been specified, including x≤ax\le a, q≤bq\le b, and x,q≤ηNx,q\le\eta N.

The sole positive start not covered by the hypothesis x≥2x\ge2 is t=1t=1. Couple a process from two ancestors as the sum of two independent one-ancestor processes. On the event, of probability 1/21/2, that the second ancestor has no child in the first generation, the total process agrees from generation 1 onward with the first process. The barrier in (42) is imposed precisely at generations 1,…,N−11,\ldots,N-1, so the t=1t=1 contribution is at most twice the same event for initial population two, to which (42) applies. The case t=0t=0 cannot have the positive endpoint q≥ϵ0Lq\ge\epsilon_0L.

The source-height cost and the descendant cost combine through the identity

x2m+(q−x)2N=q2L+L(x−mq/L)2mN.(45)\frac{x^{2}}{m}+\frac{(q-x)^{2}}{N}=\frac{q^{2}}{L}+\frac{L(x-mq/L)^{2}}{mN}. \tag*{(45)}

In particular, their product always contains e−q2/(2L)e^{-q^{2}/(2L)}; the remaining exponential factor is at most one. Since q≥ϵ0Lq\geq\epsilon_{0}L, N≍LN\asymp L, and x≤Cmx\leq Cm, the square-root factor in (42), together with its explicit N−1N^{-1}, is at most Cm1/2L−2Cm^{1/2}L^{-2}. Multiplying (43) by (42) and summing the O(m)O(m) possible unit source-height bands therefore gives

P(Gy,L,zc,Yyc∈[q,q+1])≤CmC(2+BL−q)L−2e−q2/(2L),P(\mathcal{G}^{c}_{y,L,z},Y^{c}_{y}\in[q,q+1])\leq Cm^{C}(2+B_{L}-q)L^{-2}e^{-q^{2}/(2L)},

which is (41). All source and band-counting factors are absorbed in mCm^{C}.

No estimate of the form (41) is asserted at q=0q=0: extinction there has order-one probability. In the lattice upper bound below, q<ϵ0Lq<\epsilon_{0}L is instead disposed of by the saturated terminal Chernoff factor. We shall also use the following truncated version. Set L=J−hL=J-h and N=L−mN=L-m, with m≤C0log⁡Jm\leq C_{0}\log J. For the barrier

Bl=ρJl+z+(l∧(J−l))1/4,B_{l}=\rho_{J}l+z+(l\wedge(J-l))^{1/4},

the estimate (41) holds using BlB_{l} in the no-crossing event and BLB_{L} on its right-hand side, for ϵ0L≤q≤BL+1\epsilon_{0}L\leq q\leq B_{L}+1. To verify the only new point, put ϕ(l)=(l∧(J−l))1/4\phi(l)=(l\wedge(J-l))^{1/4}. Its two Hölder bounds from mm and LL give

ϕ(m+j)≤(1−j/N)ϕ(m)+(j/N)ϕ(L)+C(j∧(N−j))1/4.(46)\phi(m+j)\leq(1-j/N)\phi(m)+(j/N)\phi(L)+C(j\wedge(N-j))^{1/4}. \tag*{(46)}

The affine part ρJl+z\rho_{J}l+z interpolates exactly, so (42) applies with the arbitrary endpoints a=Bma=B_{m}, b=BL+1b=B_{L}+1. In particular, no ρL\rho_{L}-barrier theorem is being assumed.

A fixed number of source excursions.

For the lower event, now choose r0r_{0} sufficiently small that 4ϑ−1<r∗4\vartheta_{-1}<r_{*}, as in [13], Section 3. The preceding upper estimates retain their separate choice of radii. Fix the source parameter x∗>0x_{*}>0 from that section so that

m0:=x∗2∈N.(47)m_{0}:=x_{*}^{2}\in\mathbb{N}. \tag*{(47)}

(This x∗x_{*} is not the variable called xx in Appendix Theorem 9.1; the latter equals 2m0\sqrt{2m_{0}} when that theorem is started with m0m_{0} particles.) Put

FL0=FL∩{ϑ1/40≤d(v,y)≤ϑ1/20}.F_{L}^{0}=F_{L}\cap\{\vartheta_{1}/40\leq d(v,y)\leq\vartheta_{1}/20\}.

This fixed annulus, instead of Rosen’s full ball, retains a fixed positive area fraction; the one- and two-point sums in Rosen’s proof are therefore unchanged up to constants, and every source index is O(1)O(1).

We spell out the superscript in Rosen (3.3), because it is important for the stopping-time comparison below. Write Γy,j=∂Bd(y,ϑj)\Gamma_{y,j}=\partial B_{d}(y,\vartheta_{j}) and set

Ay,1=HΓy,1,By,i=inf⁡{t>Ay,i:Xt∈Γy,0},Ay,i+1=inf⁡{t>By,i:Xt∈Γy,1},1≤i<m0.(48)\begin{aligned} A_{y,1}&=H_{\Gamma_{y,1}},\qquad B_{y,i}=\inf\{t>A_{y,i}:X_{t}\in\Gamma_{y,0}\},\\ A_{y,i+1}&=\inf\{t>B_{y,i}:X_{t}\in\Gamma_{y,1}\},\qquad1\leq i<m_{0}. \tag*{(48)} \end{aligned}

The intervals [Ay,i,By,i][A_{y,i},B_{y,i}], and only these intervals, are the first m0m_{0} source excursions; the intervening intervals [By,i,Ay,i+1][B_{y,i},A_{y,i+1}] are connectors and are not counted. Set Ty,11,m0=m0T_{y,1}^{1,m_{0}}=m_{0}. For l≥2l\geq2, define inside each source interval

Ci,l,1=inf⁡{t≥Ay,i:Xt∈Γy,l−1},C_{i,l,1}=\inf\{t\geq A_{y,i}:X_{t}\in\Gamma_{y,l-1}\},
Di,l,q=inf⁡{t>Ci,l,q:Xt∈Γy,l},Ci,l,q+1=inf⁡{t>Di,l,q:Xt∈Γy,l−1},D_{i,l,q}=\inf\{t>C_{i,l,q}:X_{t}\in\Gamma_{y,l}\},\qquad C_{i,l,q+1}=\inf\{t>D_{i,l,q}:X_{t}\in\Gamma_{y,l-1}\},

and put

Ty,l1,m0=∑i=1m0#{q:Di,l,q<By,i}.(49)T_{y,l}^{1,m_{0}}=\sum_{i=1}^{m_{0}}\#\{q:D_{i,l,q}<B_{y,i}\}. \tag*{(49)}

Thus Rosen’s abbreviation is exactly Ty,l1=Ty,l1,x22T_{y,l}^{1}=T_{y,l}^{1,x_{2}^{2}}, not a count in one source excursion. The strong Markov property and logarithmic gambler’s ruin make (Ty,1+j1,m0)j≥0(T_{y,1+j}^{1,m_{0}})_{j\geq0} a critical Galton–Watson chain with m0m_{0} ancestors and offspring law P(ξ=r)=2−r−1P(\xi=r)=2^{-r-1}, r≥0r\geq0.

Define I^y,z\widehat{I}_{y,z} by

2Ty,l1,m0≤αz,−(l),1≤l<L,2Ty,L1,m0≥ρLL+z.(50)\sqrt{2T_{y,l}^{1,m_{0}}}\leq\alpha_{z,-}(l),\quad1\leq l<L,\qquad\sqrt{2T_{y,L}^{1,m_{0}}}\geq\rho_{L}L+z. \tag*{(50)}

For the outward excursions at scale kk, let θk,i\theta_{k,i} be their angular increments and let νk\nu_{k} be the exit-angle law from radius rkr_{k} to rk−1r_{k-1}. If

Nk,a=⌊(ρLk+z−a+1)22⌋,N_{k,a}=\left\lfloor\frac{(\rho_{L}k+z-a+1)^{2}}{2}\right\rfloor,

set Nk=Nk,aN_{k}=N_{k,a} on 2Ty,k1,m0∈[ρLk+z−a,ρLk+z−a+1]\sqrt{2T_{y,k}^{1,m_{0}}}\in[\rho_{L}k+z-a,\rho_{L}k+z-a+1], and

Wy,k(Nk)={dW1(Nk−1∑i≤Nkδθk,i,νk)≤c0log⁡(L−k)2Nk}.(51)W_{y,k}(N_{k})=\left\{d_{W^{1}}\left(N_{k}^{-1}\sum_{i\leq N_{k}}\delta_{\theta_{k,i}},\nu_{k}\right)\leq\frac{c_{0}\log(L-k)}{2\sqrt{N_{k}}}\right\}. \tag*{(51)}

With L+=L−(500log⁡L)4L^{+}=L-(500\log L)^{4} and Rosen’s fixed d∗d_{*}, the event is

Iy,z=I^y,z∩⋂k=L+L−d∗Wy,k(Nk).(52)I_{y,z}=\widehat{I}_{y,z}\cap\bigcap_{k=L^{+}}^{L-d_{*}}W_{y,k}(N_{k}). \tag*{(52)}

Rosen Lemmas 3.3–3.4 state completely that, uniformly for 0≤z≤log⁡L0\leq z\leq\log L,

P(Iy,z)≍(1+z)e−2Le−2z,(53)P(I_{y,z})\asymp(1+z)e^{-2L}e^{-2z}, \tag*{(53)}

and, for a pair in separation class kk,

P(Iy,z∩Iy′,z)≤C(1+z)e−4L+2ke−2ze−c(k∧(L−k))1/4.(54)P(I_{y,z}\cap I_{y',z})\leq C(1+z)e^{-4L+2k}e^{-2z}e^{-c(k\wedge(L-k))^{1/4}}. \tag*{(54)}

The convention for L−d∗≤k<LL-d_{*}\leq k<L is the one-center bound from that lemma. Fix z0z_{0} in Rosen’s admissible range. After imposing the source-safety event below we will choose a fixed C∗C_{*} and use the truncated events

Iy∘:=Iy,z0∩{ρLL+z0≤2Ty,L1,m0≤ρLL+z0+C∗}.(55)I_{y}^{\circ}:=I_{y,z_{0}}\cap\left\{\rho_{L}L+z_{0}\leq\sqrt{2T_{y,L}^{1,m_{0}}}\leq\rho_{L}L+z_{0}+C_{*}\right\}. \tag*{(55)}

The notation in (55) is provisional until C∗C_{*} is chosen after safety has been proved. This order matters: because XX was extended after τ\tau, the inequality Ty,L1,m0≤Ty,LτT_{y,L}^{1,m_{0}}\leq T_{y,L}^{\tau} can fail before safety is imposed.

Keeping the source excursions before the stopping time

The lower event was defined using a Brownian continuation after τ\tau. We must therefore force the entire source forest to finish before τ\tau without losing its probability on the scale e−2Le^{-2L}. Let SyS_{y} require every connector [By,i,Ay,i+1][B_{y,i},A_{y,i+1}], i<m0i<m_{0}, to hit Γy,1\Gamma_{y,1} before the larger circle Γy,−1\Gamma_{y,-1}. In the centered logarithmic cylinder, the unrestricted connector endpoint subdensity and the safely killed one, relative to Haar measure, are respectively

q∞(u)=sinh⁡1cosh⁡1−cos⁡u,q_{\infty}(u)=\frac{\sinh1}{\cosh1-\cos u},
qsf(u)=12+2∑n≥1sinh⁡nsinh⁡(2n)cos⁡(nu)=π2∑k∈Zsech⁡(π2(u+2πk)).(56)q_{\mathrm{sf}}(u)=\frac{1}{2}+2\sum_{n\geq1}\frac{\sinh n}{\sinh(2n)}\cos(nu)=\frac{\pi}{2}\sum_{k\in\mathbb{Z}}\operatorname{sech}\left(\frac{\pi}{2}(u+2\pi k)\right). \tag*{(56)}

Both are continuous and strictly positive, so κ∗:=min⁡uqsf(u)/q∞(u)>0\kappa_{*}:=\min_{u}q_{\mathrm{sf}}(u)/q_{\infty}(u)>0. Thus the safe connector kernel dominates κ∗\kappa_{*} times the unrestricted kernel pointwise. Iterating the strong Markov factorization, with the whole later path functional left in the last factor, gives

P(Iy,z∩Sy)≥κ∗m0−1P(Iy,z).(57)P(I_{y,z}\cap S_{y})\geq\kappa_{*}^{m_{0}-1}P(I_{y,z}). \tag*{(57)}

The pointwise kernel bound can be integrated against every nonnegative function of the later path, so it preserves the barrier and angular conditions in Iy,zI_{y,z} together. Before endpoint truncation put

Z~Lsf:=∑y∈FL01Iy,z0∩Sy.\widetilde{Z}_{L}^{\mathrm{sf}}:=\sum_{y\in F_{L}^{0}}\mathbf{1}_{I_{y,z_{0}}\cap S_{y}}.

Equation (57) preserves its first moment, whereas Iy,z0∩Sy⊂Iy,z0I_{y,z_{0}}\cap S_{y}\subset I_{y,z_{0}} preserves the pair upper bound (5.20). Since ∣FL0∣≍e2L|F_{L}^{0}|\asymp e^{2L}, the one-center lower bound gives EZ~Lsf≥cE\widetilde{Z}_{L}^{\mathrm{sf}}\geq c. For the second moment, group distinct pairs by separation shell kk. There are at most Ce4L−2kCe^{4L-2k} pairs in shell kk, so (5.20) gives

E[(Z~Lsf)2]≤C+C∑k=0L−d∗e−c(k∧(L−k))1/4≤C.E[(\widetilde{Z}_{L}^{\mathrm{sf}})^{2}]\leq C+C\sum_{k=0}^{L-d_{*}}e^{-c(k\wedge(L-k))^{1/4}}\leq C.

The last d∗d_{*} shells contribute only O(1)O(1) by the one-center bound. Paley–Zygmund now gives

EZ~Lsf≤C,P(Z~Lsf>0)≥c1>0.(58)E\widetilde{Z}_{L}^{\mathrm{sf}}\leq C,\qquad P(\widetilde{Z}_{L}^{\mathrm{sf}}>0)\geq c_{1}>0. \tag*{(58)}

Rosen chooses r0r_{0} so that 4ϑ−1<r∗4\vartheta_{-1}<r_{*}. Since d(v,y)≤ϑ1/20d(v,y)\leq\vartheta_{1}/20, there is a fixed χ>0\chi>0 such that

Bd(y,ϑ−1)⊂Bd(v,r∗−χ).(59)B_{d}(y,\vartheta_{-1})\subset B_{d}(v,r_{*}-\chi). \tag*{(59)}

Every source block and every connector on SyS_{y} lies in the left side, hence ends before τ\tau. This is the exact stopped-source certificate used in the coupling below. In particular, on SyS_{y},

Ty,L1,m0≤Ty,Lτ.(60)T_{y,L}^{1,m_{0}}\leq T_{y,L}^{\tau}. \tag*{(60)}

Rosen’s Theorem 1.6 gives the following upper tail on FLF_{L}; extending its bound to bounded nonnegative zz only enlarges the constant:

P(sup⁡y∈FL2Ty,Lτ≥ρLL+z)≤C(1+z)e−2z,0≤z≤log⁡L.(61)P\left(\sup_{y\in F_{L}}\sqrt{2T_{y,L}^{\tau}}\geq\rho_{L}L+z\right)\leq C(1+z)e^{-2z},\qquad0\leq z\leq\log L. \tag*{(61)}

Choose C∗C_{*} so large that the right side at z=z0+C∗z=z_{0}+C_{*} is below c1/2c_{1}/2, and now define Iy∘I_{y}^{\circ} by (5.21). Equations (58)–(61) give, with

ZLsf:=∑y∈FL01Iy∘∩Sy,Z_{L}^{\mathrm{sf}}:=\sum_{y\in F_{L}^{0}}\mathbf{1}_{I_{y}^{\circ}\cap S_{y}},
EZLsf≤C,P(ZLsf>0)≥c1/2.(62)EZ_{L}^{\mathrm{sf}}\leq C,\qquad P(Z_{L}^{\mathrm{sf}}>0)\geq c_{1}/2. \tag*{(62)}

The constant C∗C_{*} and the safe count are now fixed.

Lemma 5.1 (Continuum barrier inputs). In the upper choice of radii, the first-crossing estimate (5.6) holds. For the complete centered traversal process, the endpoint estimate (5.7) holds, including the truncated barrier described in (5.12). In the lower choice of radii, on Iy∘∩SyI_y^\circ\cap S_y all first m0m_0 source excursions finish before τ\tau, and the number of centers with this event satisfies (62).

Proof of Lemma 5.1. The representative estimates are the packing and one-center bounds of [13], Proposition 2.5, (2.34)–(2.35), summed over the indicated source shells. The complete centered source calculation above proves (41), and (46) checks the change of barrier at a truncated horizon. The lower construction combines [13], Lemmas 3.3–3.4 with the connector-kernel domination (57) and the terminal truncation. All the first- and second-moment assertions (53)–(62) remain in Rosen’s original spherical geometry. In particular, we do not infer an event-level Euclidean two-center theorem from Rosen’s occupation-measure argument in Section 8. The next lemma instead maps the actual spherical interfaces into the plane, so the spherical event and its pair law are preserved exactly until the one-sided lattice coupling is made. ∎

Comparison of smooth interface kernels

The word comparison requires relative errors for the probabilities of successive radial decisions. We obtain them from a one-interface estimate: compare harmonic boundary payoffs, take the payoff equal to one, and then multiply the resulting row-mass bounds along a complete word.

Fix α∈(0,1)\alpha\in(0,1). Let (ΓR−,ΓR0,ΓR+)(\Gamma_R^-,\Gamma_R^0,\Gamma_R^+) range over triples of disjoint Jordan curves which, after translation, rotation, and scaling by R−1R^{-1}, together with their tubular-coordinate charts, belong to a bounded C4,αC^{4,\alpha} family. Assume consecutive curves are separated by distances comparable to RR, and that a specified conformal coordinate sends each triple to three concentric logarithmic levels. The interfaces used below are circles or uniformly Möbius-transformed circles, so this hypothesis entails no loss.

For a boundary function put

∥f∥4,R≔∑j=04Rj∥∂τjf∥∞+R4+α[∂τ4f]α.(63)\lVert f\rVert_{4,R} \coloneqq\sum_{j=0}^{4} R^j \lVert\partial_\tau^j f\rVert_\infty+ R^{4+\alpha}[\partial_\tau^4 f]_\alpha. \tag*{(63)}

A lattice starting state is a directed edge whose endpoints lie on opposite sides of ΓR0\Gamma_R^0; the lattice query starts from its post-crossing endpoint and the Brownian query from the normal projection of that endpoint onto ΓR0\Gamma_R^0. The side of a vertex is determined by membership in the bounded component of the complement (vertices lying on the curve are assigned to the exterior). Let QRBQ_R^B be the Brownian selected-side subprobability kernel, stopped at first contact with either competing curve, and let QRSQ_R^S be the lattice selected-side subprobability kernel, stopped at the first directed edge whose endpoint-side indicators differ for one of the two competing curves. A tangency, or any intersection of an interpolated edge whose two endpoints remain on the same side, is not a lattice crossing. Write π0,π+\pi_0,\pi_+ for normal projection of the digital source and selected target states. For a function ff on the selected target curve and a function gg on the middle curve, pull them back to the corresponding digital states by

U+f=f∘π+,U0g=g∘π0.U_+f=f\circ\pi_+,\qquad U_0g=g\circ\pi_0.

Lemma 5.2 (Comparison of interface kernels). As an estimate from functions on the selected target curve to functions on the digital source-edge space,

∥QRSU+f−U0(QRBf)∥∞≤CR−1∥f∥4,R.(64)\lVert Q_R^S U_+f-U_0(Q_R^Bf)\rVert_\infty\le CR^{-1}\lVert f\rVert_{4,R}. \tag*{(64)}

If the Brownian side probability pR=QRB1p_R=Q_R^{B_1} is constant on the middle curve and lies in [c,1−c][c,1-c], then, uniformly in the starting angle,

QRS1=pR(1+O(R−1))(65)Q_R^{S_1}=p_R\left(1+O\left(R^{-1}\right)\right) \tag*{(65)}

and the corresponding row-normalized angular kernels differ by O(R−1)O\left(R^{-1}\right) on C4C^4 tests.

Consequently, let a chronological radial word consist of NN ordinary decisions between neighboring concentric interfaces at scales Ri≥MR_i\ge M. The next queried triple may depend on the already exposed radial prefix, but not on an unexposed angular mark. For a fixed word, let EiE_i be the directed-edge state space after its first ii letters and let Ki,wi+1S(e,de′)K^S_{i,w_{i+1}}(e,\mathrm{d}e') be the subkernel realizing the next prescribed side. If pip_i is the corresponding Brownian side probability, then, for every current edge,

e−C/Ripi≤Ki,wi+1S1(e)≤eC/Ripi.(66)e^{-C/R_i}p_i\le K^S_{i,w_{i+1}}\mathbf{1}(e)\le e^{C/R_i}p_i. \tag*{(66)}

After summing all compatible directed-edge refinements,

e−C∑iRi−1PB(w)≤PS(w)≤eC∑iRi−1PB(w).(67)e^{-C\sum_i R_i^{-1}}P^B(w)\le P^S(w)\le e^{C\sum_i R_i^{-1}}P^B(w). \tag*{(67)}

The same inequality holds after integrating the initial edge against any entrance law and after summing a disjoint family of complete words. A radial-prefix stopping rule is padded by cemetery letters of row mass one. No assertion is made after conditioning on an edge list generated later by the word. Source-root and source-death letters are handled explicitly in Lemma 5.3.

Proof of Lemma 5.2. There are two errors to control: the discrete walk accumulates a small harmonicity defect before exit, and its crossing endpoints lie within one lattice unit of the smooth interfaces. The first error is O(R−2)O(R^{-2}); the second gives the stated O(R−1)O(R^{-1}) bound.

Let ΩR\Omega_R be the annulus between the two competing curves and let uu be the continuum Dirichlet solution with boundary data ff on the selected component and zero on the other. Uniform rescaled boundary regularity gives

∥Dju∥L∞(ΩR)≤CR−j∥f∥4,R,0≤j≤4.(68)\left\lVert D^j u\right\rVert_{L^\infty(\Omega_R)} \le CR^{-j}\lVert f\rVert_{4,R}, \qquad0\le j\le4. \tag*{(68)}

The compact rescaled family has a tubular radius ρR\rho R. In a signed normal chart Φ(s,t)\Phi(s,t), with t≥0t\ge0 on ΩR\Omega_R, choose fixed numbers c1,…,c5c_1,\ldots,c_5 satisfying

∑a=15ca(−a)q=1,q=0,1,2,3,4,\sum_{a=1}^{5}c_a(-a)^q=1,\qquad q=0,1,2,3,4,

and, for −ρR/5<t<0-\rho R/5<t<0, set

u~(Φ(s,t))=∑a=15cau(Φ(s,−at)).\widetilde{u}(\Phi(s,t)) = \sum_{a=1}^{5}c_a u(\Phi(s,-at)).

Do this in the two disjoint collars and retain u~=u\widetilde{u}=u on ΩR‾\overline{\Omega_R}. The five matching identities make u~\widetilde{u} a C4C^4 continuation through the boundary, with the same scaled derivative bounds as (68).

Let ΩR\Omega_R be understood with the same vertex-side convention and set

T=inf⁡{n≥1:Sn−1∈ΩR, Sn∉ΩR}.T=\inf\{n\ge1:S_{n-1}\in\Omega_R,\ S_n\notin\Omega_R\}.

Equivalently, TT is the first side-changing directed edge across one of the two competing components; same-side contacts of the interpolated edge are ignored. For n<Tn<T, SnS_n lies in the open annulus or on its inner boundary (with the exterior convention above); it cannot lie on the outer boundary. At an open-annulus point Δu~(Sn)=Δu(Sn)=0\Delta\widetilde{u}(S_n)=\Delta u(S_n)=0, while at an inner-boundary lattice vertex the C4C^4 matching and continuity from the annulus give

Δu~(Sn)=lim⁡ΩR∋x→SnΔu(x)=0.\Delta\widetilde{u}(S_n)=\lim_{\Omega_R\ni x\to S_n}\Delta u(x)=0.

Thus Taylor expansion is legitimate on the full four-neighbor stencil and its quadratic term vanishes in either case. The linear and cubic terms cancel by symmetry. Thus

∣(P−I)u~(Sn)∣≤CR−4∥f∥4,R,n<T.(69)\left|(P-I)\widetilde{u}(S_n)\right|\le CR^{-4}\lVert f\rVert_{4,R},\qquad n<T. \tag*{(69)}

For large RR, the two boundary components are more than two lattice spacings apart and each has tubular radius ρR\rho R. Hence the exit edge crosses exactly one component, its post-crossing endpoint is within one lattice spacing of that component and has a unique normal projection. Moreover TT is no larger than the exit time of a fixed CRCR-disk containing the annulus. Optional stopping of ∥Sn−z∗∥2−n\lVert S_n-z_*\rVert^2-n gives ET≤CR2ET\le CR^2, so the accumulated defect in (69) is O(R−2)∥f∥4,RO(R^{-2})\lVert f\rVert_{4,R}. The terminal endpoint is within one lattice unit of the uniquely crossed component; its value under u~\widetilde{u} differs from the projected boundary payoff by O(R−1)∥f∥4,RO(R^{-1})\lVert f\rVert_{4,R}. The post-crossing starting endpoint and its projection onto ΓR0\Gamma_R^0 have the same error. Optional stopping of u~(Sn∧T)\widetilde{u}(S_{n\wedge T}) minus its defect sum proves (64). Taking f=1f=1, using pR∈[c,1−c]p_R\in[c,1-c], and dividing by the row mass proves (65). Notice that the continuation is used only to make a boundary-crossing stencil legal; harmonicity, or its boundary-continuity consequence, is invoked only at a live vertex.

For concentric interfaces, (65) also follows from the logarithmic annulus estimate in part (3) of Lemma 3.1, taken from [9] (Lemma 2.1, (2.5)). At fixed logarithmic gaps both side probabilities are bounded away from zero, so the additive error becomes a relative error.

Finally fix a prescribed radial word and let νiS\nu_i^S be the finite measure on its current directed-edge states after the first ii letters, with every earlier edge integrated out. The radial prefix fixes the next interface and prescribed side before the current edge is integrated. Brownian conformal radial symmetry makes its row mass pip_i independent of the angular endpoint, while (66) gives

e−C/Ripi∥νiS∥≤∥νiSKi,wi+1S∥≤eC/Ripi∥νiS∥.(70)e^{-C/R_i}p_i\lVert\nu_i^S\rVert\le\left\lVert\nu_i^S K_{i,w_{i+1}}^S\right\rVert\le e^{C/R_i}p_i\lVert\nu_i^S\rVert. \tag*{(70)}

Forward induction proves (67). This remains valid for an adaptive exploration because the radial prefix determines its next query, and for a stopped exploration after adjoining the absorbing cemetery state. It is a forward marginal comparison, not a conditional law given future entrance points, and it never applies (64) to a rare future indicator. ■\blacksquare

Transfer of traversal events to the lattice

Fix A,C0<∞A,C_0<\infty and a positive barrier intercept zz in the admissible range above. The upper first-crossing estimate below is uniform for 0≤s≤C0log⁡J0\le s\le C_0\log J. Choose h=hJh=h_J so that

hlog⁡J⟶∞,h=o(J),M=eh,L=J−h+O(1).(71)\frac{h}{\log J}\longrightarrow\infty,\qquad h=o(J),\qquad M=e^h,\qquad L=J-h+O(1). \tag*{(71)}

For the lower comparison let vv and r∗r_* be Rosen’s starting point and outer stopping radius. Fix stereographic coordinates σ\sigma with σ(v)=0\sigma(v)=0, put R∗=2tan⁡(r∗/2)R_*=2\tan(r_*/2), and dilate by AJ=eJ/R∗A_J=e^J/R_*:

ΨJ=AJσ.\Psi_J=A_J\sigma.

Thus the spherical stopped path becomes, up to an increasing time change, planar Brownian motion started at zero and stopped on ∂B(0,eJ)\partial B(0,e^J). For a spherical center yy, let χy\chi_y be the rotated stereographic coordinate satisfying

χy(y)=0,∣χy(x)∣=2tan⁡(d(x,y)/2).\chi_y(y)=0,\qquad|\chi_y(x)|=2\tan(d(x,y)/2).

The lower-comparison physical interfaces are

Γy,j=ΨJ{x:∣χy(x)∣=r0e−j},−1≤j≤L.(72)\Gamma_{y,j}=\Psi_J\{x:|\chi_y(x)|=r_0e^{-j}\},\qquad-1\le j\le L. \tag*{(72)}

They are Euclidean circles, although their Euclidean centers need not be the same. In the conformal coordinate χy∘ΨJ−1\chi_y\circ\Psi_J^{-1}, they are exactly the concentric logarithmic levels used by Rosen. Their physical scale is comparable to eJ−je^{J-j}; the O(1)O(1) choice in L=J−h+O(1)L=J-h+O(1) makes the deepest scale comparable to MM.

The linearly interpolated lattice path identifies which smooth curve a lattice edge crosses, but every probabilistic cut is made at an integer edge-index stopping time. If Dy,jD_{y,j} is the bounded component inside Γy,j\Gamma_{y,j}, then, for adjacent levels and after an outer hit ηi\eta_i, set

σi=inf⁡{t>ηi:St−1∉Dy,j, St∈Dy,j},ηi+1=inf⁡{t>σi:St−1∈Dy,j−1, St∉Dy,j−1}.(73)\begin{aligned} \sigma_i&=\inf\{t>\eta_i:S_{t-1}\notin D_{y,j},\ S_t\in D_{y,j}\},\\ \eta_{i+1}&=\inf\{t>\sigma_i:S_{t-1}\in D_{y,j-1},\ S_t\notin D_{y,j-1}\}. \tag*{(73)} \end{aligned}

A state records the directed crossing edge; interpolation is used only to assign its projected χy\chi_y-angle. Only portions belonging to the first m0m_0 source intervals [Ay,i,By,i][A_{y,i},B_{y,i}] in (48) contribute traversal counts or terminal bridges. Inter-source connectors contribute only their guarded coarse boundary decisions, never their interior occupation. The whole segment from σi\sigma_i to ηi+1\eta_{i+1}, including further contacts with the inner interface, is one outward piece. Recursing inside each parent excursion gives the standard nested excursion tree. The lower radial word Wy=(Wy,1,…,Wy,m0)W_y=(W_{y,1},\ldots,W_{y,m_0}) is a fixed collection of m0m_0 centered words, one for each source interval, with all angles erased; the complete guard record additionally contains the finitely many connector boundary decisions. If ℓy,i∈{1,−1}\ell_{y,i}\in\{1,-1\} records whether the connector after By,iB_{y,i} first hits Γy,1\Gamma_{y,1} or Γy,−1\Gamma_{y,-1}, write

W‾y=(Wy,1,ℓy,1,Wy,2,…,ℓy,m0−1,Wy,m0)(74)\overline{W}_y=(W_{y,1},\ell_{y,1},W_{y,2},\ldots,\ell_{y,m_0-1},W_{y,m_0}) \tag*{(74)}

for the complete conditioned guard word. Its traversal coordinate Ty,jST_{y,j}^{S} is the sum over these words of completed crossings from Γy,j−1\Gamma_{y,j-1} to Γy,j\Gamma_{y,j}. At the last fixed number of levels, the interfaces are replaced through one unit-width digital collar by concentric circles about the nearest lattice point to ΨJ(y)\Psi_J(y), of radii My,eMyM_y,eM_y with My∈[cM,CM]M_y\in[cM,CM]. We relabel MyM_y as MM; every later estimate is uniform under this fixed-factor change and log⁡My=h+O(1)\log M_y=h+O(1). Define Ry\mathcal{R}_y by the chronological erasure map which replaces each completed terminal segment, from its inward directed crossing of radius MM through its next outward directed crossing of radius eMeM, by the two endpoint edges. It retains W‾y\overline{W}_y, all radial letters and all crossing edges and projected angles outside the erased segments, but it does not retain an erased segment’s duration, interior crossings, path, or occupation. Inward connector pieces outside these erased segments are exposed. This quotient sigma-field is the intrinsic coarse sigma-field.

The upper application is instead defined directly on the lattice and is entirely centered. Write N=eJN=e^J, τN=τD(0,N)\tau_N=\tau_{D(0,N)}, and, for each candidate cell center with ∥y∥<2N\|y\|<2N, set

σy=τD(y,3N).(75)\sigma_y=\tau_{D(y,3N)}. \tag*{(75)}

The pathwise inclusions

D(0,N)⊂D(y,3N),τN≤σy,LτN(x)≤Lσy(x)(76)D(0,N)\subset D(y,3N),\qquad\tau_N\le\sigma_y,\qquad L_{\tau_N}(x)\le L_{\sigma_y}(x) \tag*{(76)}

hold for every xx. For each one-cell probability we decompose the extended path up to σy\sigma_y using only circles centered at yy, and sum those probabilities only afterwards. In this upper application, Ty,jST_{y,j}^{S} counts all completed level-jj traversals before σy\sigma_y; in the lower application it counts traversals within the first m0m_0 source intervals defined above. Replacing NN by 3N3N changes every logarithmic index by O(1)O(1). Use Rosen’s formal horizon JJ, its barrier ρJj+z+(j∧(J−j))1/4\rho_Jj+z+(j\wedge(J-j))^{1/4}, and retain only interfaces through LL. Let UJ,s\mathcal{U}_{J,s} be the union of these centered lattice upper first-crossing events, with source shell at least ss, and let Gy,L,zS,J\mathcal{G}_{y,L,z}^{S,J} be the corresponding no-crossing event through L−1L-1, and put

BLJ=ρJL+z+(L∧(J−L))1/4.B_L^J=\rho_JL+z+(L\wedge(J-L))^{1/4}.

On the detailed range ∥y∥>M\lVert y\rVert>M, its exact source index is

uy=log⁡3eJ∥y∥,ky=⌈uy⌉,my=ky+1;(77)u_y=\log\frac{3e^J}{\lVert y\rVert},\qquad k_y=\lceil u_y\rceil,\qquad m_y=k_y+1; \tag*{(77)}

centers with ∥y∥≤M\lVert y\rVert\le M belong to the separately treated near-start range. Thus uy∈(ky−1,ky]u_y\in(k_y-1,k_y] and my−uy∈[1,2)m_y-u_y\in[1,2). For the lower application, use the horizon-LL slope ρL\rho_L and its endpoint buffer. Let IyS,oI_y^{S,o} be the radial lattice version of (55): it retains the traversal barrier and the bounded terminal band but drops every angular screen. Angular screens are used only in the spherical Brownian certificate that supplies the second moment.

Lemma 5.3 (Transfer of traversal events). With the definitions above,

P(UJ,s)≤J−2s/log⁡J+o(1)+O(J−A),(78)P(\mathcal{U}_{J,s})\le J^{-2s/\log J+o(1)}+O(J^{-A}), \tag*{(78)}
P(Gy,L,zS,J,2Ty,LS∈[a,a+1])≤C(ky+1)C(2+BLJ−a)L−2e−a2/(2L),(79)P\left(\mathcal{G}_{y,L,z}^{S,J},\sqrt{2T_{y,L}^{S}}\in[a,a+1]\right)\le C(k_y+1)^C(2+B_L^J-a)L^{-2}e^{-a^2/(2L)}, \tag*{(79)}

uniformly for ky≤C0log⁡Jk_y\le C_0\log J and every fixed central range ϵ0L≤a≤BLJ+1\epsilon_0L\le a\le B_L^J+1. No such assertion is made in the extinction range a<ϵ0La<\epsilon_0L. Most importantly, if

ZLS=∑y∈FL01IyS,o,Z_L^S=\sum_{y\in F_L^0}\mathbf{1}_{I_y^{S,o}},

then

EZLS≤C,P(ZLS>0)≥c.(80)EZ_L^S\le C,\qquad P(Z_L^S>0)\ge c. \tag*{(80)}

Only the Brownian proof of (80) uses the two-center estimate (54). No two-center lattice estimate is claimed or used.

Proof of Lemma 5.3. There are two logically separate comparisons. Rare upper and endpoint events are compared directly, word by word, using Lemma 5.2. The global strong coupling is used only in the safe direction “strict Brownian lower root implies loose lattice lower root.” At no point is a Brownian bad-subkernel estimate multiplied by an arbitrary future functional of the coupled lattice path. Throughout, LL is the last retained logarithmic level. The upper barrier has formal horizon JJ and carries a superscript JJ; the lower barrier has horizon LL.

Step 1. Geometry and one global coupling.

The conformal image retains the original spherical excursion structure. Stereographic projection is conformal and sends spherical Brownian motion to planar Brownian motion under a continuous increasing time change. Moreover, by the definition of χy\chi_y,

ΨJ(∂Bd(y,ϑj))=Γy,j.\Psi_J\left(\partial B_d(y,\vartheta_j)\right)=\Gamma_{y,j}.

Thus hitting orders, the complete nested excursion tree, all traversal counts, and all χy\chi_y-angular marks are literally Rosen’s spherical objects. In particular, (54) will be applied only before any lattice comparison.

For the strong approximation we use Zaitsev, Estimates for the Strong Approximation in Multidimensional Central Limit Theorem, [14], Theorem 2 and Corollary 1. The form needed here is: for fixed dimension dd, centered independent vectors with identity covariance whose laws lie in the analytic finite-exponential-moment class Ad(τ)\mathcal{A}_{d}(\tau) for a fixed τ≥1\tau\ge1, one can couple them with independent standard Gaussian vectors so that, for ΔN=max⁡k≤N∥∑i≤k(Xi−Yi)∥\Delta_{N}=\max_{k\le N}\left\lVert\sum_{i\le k}(X_{i}-Y_{i})\right\rVert,

Eexp⁡{cΔN/(τd7/2log⁡∗d)}≤exp⁡{Cd9/4+αlog⁡∗(N/τ2)},E\exp\left\{c\Delta_{N}/(\tau d^{7/2}\log^{*}d)\right\}\le\exp\left\{Cd^{9/4+\alpha}\log^{*}(N/\tau^{2})\right\},

and hence

P(ΔN>Clog⁡N+x)≤Ce−cx,x≥0,(81)P(\Delta_{N}>C\log N+x)\le Ce^{-cx},\qquad x\ge0, \tag*{(81)}

for a fixed i.i.d. law. The planar walk increment multiplied by 2\sqrt{2} has identity covariance and bounded support, so the hypotheses apply.

Take the deterministic time cap

TJ=e2JJ20.T_{J}=e^{2J}J^{20}.

Lemma 3.1 and its Brownian analogue show that the walk or Brownian motion remains inside the outer disk beyond TJT_{J} with probability e−cJ10e^{-cJ^{10}}. By (81), after changing Brownian time by the covariance factor 1/21/2, there is a coupling for which

sup⁡t≤TJ∥S2tlin−Bt∥≤bJ:=CJ8(82)\sup_{t\le T_{J}}\left\lVert S_{2t}^{\mathrm{lin}}-B_{t}\right\rVert\le b_{J}:=CJ^{8} \tag*{(82)}

except on an event of probability e−cJ8e^{-cJ^{8}}. Brownian interpolation between integer times has a smaller Gaussian error.

The crossing convention is an intrinsic deterministic function of the finite lattice path. For a curve with bounded component DD, a lattice crossing is recorded exactly when 1{St−1∈D}≠1{St∈D}\mathbf{1}_{\{S_{t-1}\in D\}}\ne\mathbf{1}_{\{S_{t}\in D\}}; a curve vertex is assigned to the exterior, and same-side tangencies or chord contacts are ignored. The crossing angle is the normal projection of the post-crossing endpoint. At all used scales the endpoint lies in the uniform tubular collar, so this projection is unique. On the compact family of centers under consideration, the maps χy∘ΨJ−1\chi_{y}\circ\Psi_{J}^{-1} and their inverses have uniformly bounded scaled first two derivatives. Consequently, if two physical paths are within bb, then every crossing of a nominal interface by one path is sandwiched between the crossings by the other path of the two interfaces obtained by changing its log⁡∣χy∣\log|\chi_{y}|-level by Cb/RCb/R, where RR is the physical scale. This is just the deterministic inclusion of the two bb-neighborhoods of a smooth separating curve; applying it successively preserves chronological order. The crossed directed edge retains the digital-boundary overshoot, which costs at most two extra lattice units. Thus the only difference between the nominal Brownian word and the lattice word comes from collars of relative logarithmic width

δJ=CbJ+1M=O(J8M).(83)\delta_{J}=C\frac{b_{J}+1}{M}=O\left(\frac{J^{8}}{M}\right). \tag*{(83)}

Step 2. Preserving the lower radial word.

The target is the pathwise inclusion (95). It suffices to exclude a set Dy\mathcal{D}_{y} of collar failures whose conditional probability is small for each complete capped radial word. Outside Dy\mathcal{D}_{y}, collar closeness must give the same ordered traversal forest, and hence the same counts Ty,j1,m0T_{y,j}^{1,m_{0}}, for the two paths. The three guards below prevent a wrong neighboring hit, a retreat before the intended hit, and a reversal just after it, respectively.

Uniform path closeness alone does not preserve an excursion tree: a path may enter a narrow collar, retreat, and thereby insert or delete a traversal. We exclude precisely these retreats and wrong-side approaches. Their total conditional probability will be small for every prescribed radial word. Work in the centered cylinder coordinate

Ut=−log⁡(∣χy(Xt)∣/r0),U_t=-\log\left(\lvert\chi_y(X_t)\rvert/r_0\right),

after its conformal time change, so that UU is one-dimensional Brownian motion and Γy,j={U=j}\Gamma_{y,j}=\{U=j\}. For a stopping time ss, write Ha[s]=inf⁡{t≥s:Ut=a}H_a[s]=\inf\{t\ge s:U_t=a\}, with inf⁡∅=∞\inf\varnothing=\infty. Put

ηJ=8δJ,N0=J4,(84)\eta_J=8\delta_J,\qquad N_0=J^4, \tag*{(84)}

and take JJ large enough that 0<δJ<ηJ/40<\delta_J<\eta_J/4 and ηJ≤1/4\eta_J\le1/4.

The truncated word. Here is the finite depth-LL word belonging to (48). From Si,0=Ay,iS_{i,0}=A_{y,i}, Ki,0=1K_{i,0}=1, recursively set, when Ki,r<LK_{i,r}<L,

Si,r+1=inf⁡{t>Si,r:Ut∈{Ki,r−1,Ki,r+1}},Ki,r+1=USi,r+1.S_{i,r+1}=\inf\{t>S_{i,r}:U_t\in\{K_{i,r}-1,K_{i,r}+1\}\},\qquad K_{i,r+1}=U_{S_{i,r+1}}.

When Ki,r=LK_{i,r}=L, instead set

Si,r+1=HL−1[Si,r],Ki,r+1=L−1;(85)S_{i,r+1}=H_{L-1}[S_{i,r}],\qquad K_{i,r+1}=L-1; \tag*{(85)}

this is a forced terminal return, and the motion below Γy,L\Gamma_{y,L} is deliberately not resolved. Stop at Ni=inf⁡{r≥1:Ki,r=0}N_i=\inf\{r\ge1:K_{i,r}=0\}, so By,i=Si,NiB_{y,i}=S_{i,N_i}. For i<m0i<m_0 put

Ci=inf⁡{t>By,i:Ut∈{−1,1}}.C_i=\inf\{t>B_{y,i}:U_t\in\{-1,1\}\}.

On SyS_y, UCi=1U_{C_i}=1, Ci=Ay,i+1C_i=A_{y,i+1}, and the connector is the single prescribed sign 0→10\to1. Concatenating the m0m_0 block words and these m0−1m_0-1 connector signs gives exactly W‾y\overline{W}_y in (74). A block letter j−1→jj-1\to j pushes the next Ulam–Harris child, a letter j→j−1j\to j-1 pops it, and (85) closes a terminal leaf. Hence

Ty,11,m0=m0,Ty,j1,m0=#{j−1→j block letters},2≤j≤L.(86)T_{y,1}^{1,m_0}=m_0,\qquad T_{y,j}^{1,m_0}=\#\{j-1\to j\text{ block letters}\},\qquad2\le j\le L. \tag*{(86)}

All these times are recursively defined hitting times of closed sets; the completed m0m_0-block word and the cap ∣W‾y∣≤N0\lvert\overline{W}_y\rvert\le N_0 are therefore stopping-line measurable.

The collar conditions. Consider first a competitive letter beginning at a stopping time ss, at level k<Lk<L, whose prescribed sign is ϵ∈{−1,1}\epsilon\in\{-1,1\}. Its end is

t=inf⁡{u>s:Uu∈{k−1,k+1}},Ut=k+ϵ.t=\inf\{u>s:U_u\in\{k-1,k+1\}\},\qquad U_t=k+\epsilon.

Define

p=Hk+ϵ(1−ηJ)[s],w=Hk−ϵ(1−ηJ)[s],r=Hk+ϵηJ[p],e=Hk+ϵ(1+ηJ)[t],o=Hk+ϵηJ[t].\begin{aligned} p&=H_{k+\epsilon(1-\eta_J)}[s],\qquad w=H_{k-\epsilon(1-\eta_J)}[s],\qquad r=H_{k+\epsilon\eta_J}[p],\\ e&=H_{k+\epsilon(1+\eta_J)}[t],\qquad o=H_{k+\epsilon\eta_J}[t]. \end{aligned}

The bad events for this letter are

Dwrong={w<t},Dret={r<t},Dpost={o<e}.(87)D^{\mathrm{wrong}}=\{w<t\},\qquad D^{\mathrm{ret}}=\{r<t\},\qquad D^{\mathrm{post}}=\{o<e\}. \tag*{(87)}

The last comparison is with the old-side collar k+ϵηJk+\epsilon\eta_J, not merely with the old nominal line kk. For a forced terminal return L→L−1L\to L-1 beginning at ss, set

t=HL−1[s],p=HL−1+ηJ[s],r=HL−ηJ[p],e=HL−1−ηJ[t],o=HL−ηJ[t],t=H_{L-1}[s],\qquad p=H_{L-1+\eta_J}[s],\qquad r=H_{L-\eta_J}[p],\qquad e=H_{L-1-\eta_J}[t],\qquad o=H_{L-\eta_J}[t],

and use Dret={r<t}D^{\mathrm{ret}}=\{r<t\} and Dpost={o<e}D^{\mathrm{post}}=\{o<e\}. There is no wrong-side guard because the path below level LL is not resolved.

The first source opening needs its own two guards. The fixed annulus defining FL0F_{L}^{0} gives a uniform initial margin. Indeed, d(v,y)≤ϑ1/20d(v,y)\le\vartheta_{1}/20, convexity of tan⁡\tan on the relevant fixed small interval, and r1=r0e−1r_{1}=r_{0}e^{-1} imply

∣χy(v)∣=2tan⁡(d(v,y)2)≤2tan⁡(ϑ140)≤r120,U0≥1+log⁡20.|\chi_{y}(v)|=2\tan\left(\frac{d(v,y)}{2}\right)\le2\tan\left(\frac{\vartheta_{1}}{40}\right)\le\frac{r_{1}}{20},\qquad U_{0}\ge1+\log20.

(The lower annulus bound keeps U0U_{0} finite.) Thus, with csrc:=log⁡20c_{\mathrm{src}}:=\log20, one has U0≥1+csrcU_{0}\ge1+c_{\mathrm{src}}, and for ηJ<csrc\eta_{J}<c_{\mathrm{src}} the stopping time c1=H1+ηJ[0]c_{1}=H_{1+\eta_{J}}[0] satisfies c1<Ay,1c_{1}<A_{y,1}. Since the first opening approaches level 11 from the inner side, define

DA1,pre={H2−ηJ[c1]<Ay,1},DA1,post={H2−ηJ[Ay,1]<H1−ηJ[Ay,1]}.(88)D_{A1,\mathrm{pre}}=\{H_{2-\eta_{J}}[c_{1}]<A_{y,1}\},\qquad D_{A1,\mathrm{post}}=\{H_{2-\eta_{J}}[A_{y,1}]<H_{1-\eta_{J}}[A_{y,1}]\}. \tag*{(88)}

For i≥2i\ge2, the pre-opening guard at Ay,iA_{y,i} is exactly DretD^{\mathrm{ret}} for connector i−1i-1, and its post-opening guard is exactly DpostD^{\mathrm{post}} for that connector; they are named both ways but counted once. At every By,iB_{y,i}, the last block symbol is the competitive closing letter 1→01\to0; its wrong, retreat, and post events in (87) are respectively the pre-closing and closing-recognition guards. For i<m0i<m_{0} the following symbol is the connector 0→10\to1. At the last close By,m0B_{y,m_{0}}, retain its post-guard and expose it without any following letter. Let DyD_{y} be the union of these events through the last post-closing collar hit. Every member of this union has the form {Ha[S]<Hb[S]}\{H_{a}[S]<H_{b}[S]\} for a named stopping time SS, so DyD_{y} is measurable at that finite stopping line.

The conditional failure bound. Each guard is decided at a named stopping line. Strong Markov cancels the likelihood of all later prescribed letters in the numerator and denominator of its conditional ratio; for a post-guard the next prescribed sign is kept in the calculation. We record these ratios for an admissible complete word ww. Translation, reflection, gambler’s ruin, and strong Markov at the integer-line hits give, for every competitive letter,

P(Dwrong,W‾y=w)P(W‾y=w)=ηJ2−ηJ,P(Dret,W‾y=w)P(W‾y=w)=ηJ(1+ηJ)(1−ηJ)(2−ηJ).(89)\frac{P(D^{\mathrm{wrong}},\overline{W}_{y}=w)}{P(\overline{W}_{y}=w)} =\frac{\eta_{J}}{2-\eta_{J}},\qquad \frac{P(D^{\mathrm{ret}},\overline{W}_{y}=w)}{P(\overline{W}_{y}=w)} =\frac{\eta_{J}(1+\eta_{J})}{(1-\eta_{J})(2-\eta_{J})}. \tag*{(89)}

If the next symbol is competitive, then

P(Dpost,W‾y=w)P(W‾y=w)={ηJ2,if the next sign continues the present direction,2ηJ−ηJ2,if it reverses it.(90)\frac{P(D^{\mathrm{post}},\overline{W}_{y}=w)}{P(\overline{W}_{y}=w)} = \begin{cases} \eta_{J}^{2}, & \text{if the next sign continues the present direction},\\ 2\eta_{J}-\eta_{J}^{2}, & \text{if it reverses it}. \end{cases} \tag*{(90)}

Indeed, after translating the new level to 11, P1(HηJ<H1+ηJ)=ηJP_{1}(H_{\eta_{J}}<H_{1+\eta_{J}})=\eta_{J}; from ηJ\eta_{J}, the probabilities of the next exits at 22 and 00 are respectively ηJ/2\eta_{J}/2 and 1−ηJ/21-\eta_{J}/2, while either prescribed next sign has probability 1/21/2. If the successor is the forced return in (85), or there is no successor, the post ratio is simply ηJ\eta_{J}. For a forced return L→L−1L\to L-1,

P(Dret,W‾y=w)P(W‾y=w)=ηJ1−ηJ.(91)\frac{P(D^{\mathrm{ret}},\overline{W}_{y}=w)}{P(\overline{W}_{y}=w)} =\frac{\eta_{J}}{1-\eta_{J}}. \tag*{(91)}

The first-opening pre ratio in (88) is also ηJ/(1−ηJ)\eta_{J}/(1-\eta_{J}). If d1=−1d_{1}=-1 is its crossing direction and ϵ1\epsilon_{1} is the first block sign, its post ratio is ηJ2\eta_{J}^{2} when ϵ1=d1\epsilon_{1}=d_{1}, and 2ηJ−ηJ22\eta_{J}-\eta_{J}^{2} otherwise. The same table applies at every later opening through its incoming connector. In particular, at By,iB_{y,i}, i<m0i<m_{0}, the close has direction −1-1 and the next connector has sign +1+1, so its post ratio is 2ηJ−ηJ22\eta_{J}-\eta_{J}^{2}. At the final close By,m0B_{y,m_{0}} it is exactly ηJ\eta_{J}, with no fictitious next sign. No angular or future functional is inserted into these ratios. A union bound, without any independence assertion among guards, gives

P(Dy∣W‾y=w)≤8(∣w∣+2m0+1)ηJ≤εJ,εJ:=CJ4δJ=o(J−A)(92)P(\mathcal{D}_{y}\mid\overline{W}_{y}=w)\le8(|w|+2m_{0}+1)\eta_{J}\le\varepsilon_{J},\qquad\varepsilon_{J}:=CJ^{4}\delta_{J}=o(J^{-A}) \tag*{(92)}

for every ∣w∣≤N0|w|\le N_{0} and every fixed AA. The estimate remains valid after conditioning on barriers, traversal counts, or any other function of ww, but is not claimed after conditioning on Rosen’s angular screens.

Preserving the traversal counts. We now check the deterministic implication used below. Let AJ\mathcal{A}_{J} be the finite set of all nominal integer levels and all guard-collar levels occurring in (87)–(88), including the forced-return collars. Let VV be the corresponding log-radius of the linearly interpolated lattice path, in the coupling time parametrization. Its nominal source blocks and truncated word are defined at integer edge indices by the endpoint-side-change convention above: a letter is recorded only when an edge’s endpoints change sides, and interpolation along such an edge is used only to locate its crossing and evaluate collar separation. Same-side tangencies and chord contacts record no letter. Assume the following symmetric collar condition: whenever either UtU_{t} or VtV_{t} is within 2δJ2\delta_{J} of AJ\mathcal{A}_{J}, both log-radii are finite and ∣Ut−Vt∣≤δJ|U_{t}-V_{t}|\le\delta_{J}. No comparison is required while both paths lie strictly on the unresolved inner side of the deepest collars. Suppose Sy\mathcal{S}_{y}, ∣W‾y∣≤N0|\overline{W}_{y}|\le N_{0}, and Dyc\mathcal{D}_{y}^{c} occur. Before the target collar of a competitive Brownian letter, VV cannot make a side-changing crossing of the target nominal line, while Dwrong,cD^{\mathrm{wrong},c} prevents it from hitting the other neighbor. From the first target-collar hit until the nominal target, Dret,cD^{\mathrm{ret},c} keeps UU beyond the old-side collar; hence an early side-changing target crossing by VV cannot be followed by a reversal. From the nominal hit to the far collar, Dpost,cD^{\mathrm{post},c} gives the same separation, and at the far collar

ϵ(V−(k+ϵ))≥ηJ−δJ>0.\epsilon\bigl(V-(k+\epsilon)\bigr)\ge\eta_{J}-\delta_{J}>0.

Thus VV’s next nominal neighboring line is exactly k+ϵk+\epsilon, and it has made no intervening push or pop. The forced return (85) uses the retreat and post guards only; deeper visits are ignored by both truncated words.

At Ay,1A_{y,1}, (88) first prevents a premature completed neighboring letter and then forces VV across the source line. The preceding letter argument initializes every later Ay,iA_{y,i} through its connector. Induction in chronological order on the active Ulam–Harris stack now gives the same push/pop operation at every symbol. At By,iB_{y,i} the same stack empties; for i<m0i<m_{0} the guarded connector has sign 0→10\to1 and starts the next stack, while the unconditional final post-guard forces VV across level 00 at By,m0B_{y,m_{0}}. Hence the two stopped ordered forests are canonically isomorphic and

Ty,j1,m0(V)=Ty,j1,m0(U),1≤j≤L.(93)T_{y,j}^{1,m_{0}}(V)=T_{y,j}^{1,m_{0}}(U),\qquad1\le j\le L. \tag*{(93)}

Moreover the exact word length is

∣W‾y∣=2∑j=2LTy,j1,m0+2m0−1≤CL3<N0,(94)|\overline{W}_{y}|=2\sum_{j=2}^{L}T_{y,j}^{1,m_{0}}+2m_{0}-1\le CL^{3}<N_{0}, \tag*{(94)}

on the lower barrier and terminal band. On the single global coupling event (82), the symmetric collar condition holds. Indeed, every 2δJ2\delta_{J}-neighborhood of a nominal or guard collar used by the truncated word has physical radius at least cMcM. If either path is in such a neighborhood, physical bJb_{J}-closeness, the radial Lipschitz inequality, chart distortion, and the O(1)O(1) terminal-interface rounding give

∣Ut−Vt∣≤C(bJ+1)/M≤δJ|U_{t}-V_{t}|\le C(b_{J}+1)/M\le\delta_{J}

after fixing the constant in (83). No log-radius comparison is asserted or used while both paths are deeper than the terminal collars. Source safety keeps every collar test before global killing. This condition suffices: any premature target, wrong-neighbor, or reversal crossing occurs at a member of AJ\mathcal{A}_{J}, where collar closeness and δJ<ηJ/4\delta_{J}<\eta_{J}/4 contradict the corresponding safe guard. This also covers a premature L−1L-1 hit during a forced L→L−1L\to L-1 return. Consequently

I_{y}^{o}\cap S_{y}\cap D_{y}^{c}\cap\{\text{global coupling [](#eq:5.48)}\}\subseteq I_{y}^{S,o}. \tag*{(95)}

Only the radial consequence is transferred: Rosen’s original angular screens remain solely on the Brownian certificate.

Step 3. The upper first-crossing probability.

We now prove the rare upper estimates by direct lattice comparison. Fix a target cell and use the centered continuation (75)–(76). Put

Rj=R0e−j,R0=3eJ,R_{j}=R_{0}e^{-j},\qquad R_{0}=3e^{J},

rounding every radius by at most two lattice units. On the detailed-source range ∥y∥>M\lVert y\rVert>M, define from the actual starting radius

uy=log⁡R0∥y∥,ky=⌈uy⌉,m=ky+1.(96)u_{y}=\log\frac{R_{0}}{\lVert y\rVert},\qquad k_{y}=\lceil u_{y}\rceil,\qquad m=k_{y}+1. \tag*{(96)}

Then uy∈(ky−1,ky]u_{y}\in(k_{y}-1,k_{y}], m−uy∈[1,2)m-u_{y}\in[1,2), and the deterministic start lies outside D(y,Rm−1)D(y,R_{m-1}). This index differs by only O(1)O(1) from ⌊log⁡(eJ/∥y∥)⌋\lfloor\log(e^{J}/\lVert y\rVert)\rfloor, so it changes no shell exponent. Write

Ejin={(a,b):a∉D(y,Rj), b∈D(y,Rj), a∼b},Ejout={(a,b):a∈D(y,Rj), b∉D(y,Rj), a∼b}.(97)\begin{aligned} E_{j}^{\mathrm{in}}&=\{(a,b):a\notin D(y,R_{j}),\ b\in D(y,R_{j}),\ a\sim b\},\\ E_{j}^{\mathrm{out}}&=\{(a,b):a\in D(y,R_{j}),\ b\notin D(y,R_{j}),\ a\sim b\}. \tag*{(97)} \end{aligned}

Every radial query retains its phase, level, Ulam–Harris stack and child counters, population vector, and current directed crossing edge.

Potential-kernel optional stopping, uniformly in that edge, gives for k<lk<l

qk,lS≤Ck+1l,plS(e)=l−1+O(Rl−1)l+O(Rl−1),dlS(e)=1+O(Rl−1)l+O(Rl−1).(98)q_{k,l}^{S}\le C\frac{k+1}{l},\qquad p_{l}^{S}(e)=\frac{l-1+O(R_{l}^{-1})}{l+O(R_{l}^{-1})},\qquad d_{l}^{S}(e)=\frac{1+O(R_{l}^{-1})}{l+O(R_{l}^{-1})}. \tag*{(98)}

Here qk,lSq_{k,l}^{S} includes the first completion at level ll, while plSp_{l}^{S} and dlS=1−plSd_{l}^{S}=1-p_{l}^{S} are the continuation and death rows after return to level l−1l-1. Indeed, the two complete formulas from [9], Lemma 2.1, (2.5), recalled in part (3) of Lemma 3.1, have respective logarithmic gaps l−1+O(Rl−1)l-1+O(R_{l}^{-1}), 1+O(Rl−1)1+O(R_{l}^{-1}), and l+O(Rl−1)l+O(R_{l}^{-1}). Thus both the continuation and the order-1/l1/l death probability are relative estimates. Strong Markov at every successive directed hit yields, for N≥1N\ge1,

P ⁣(Ty,lS,k→0≥N∣initial directed edge)≤Ck+1lexp⁡{−Nl+CNlM}.(99)P\!\left(T_{y,l}^{S,k\to0}\ge N\mid\text{initial directed edge}\right) \le C\frac{k+1}{l}\exp\left\{-\frac{N}{l}+\frac{CN}{lM}\right\}. \tag*{(99)}

In particular, for X=2Ty,mX=\sqrt{2T_{y,m}} and x≤Cmx\le Cm,

P(X∈[x,x+1])≤CmCe−x2/(2m).(100)P(X\in[x,x+1])\le Cm^{C}e^{-x^{2}/(2m)}. \tag*{(100)}

No independence of directed entrance edges is used in these scalar bounds.

A union bound over all fine centers would count many copies of the same crossing. We replace each center by a deterministic nearby representative and enlarge its target disk so that the crossing count can only increase. Put

ϕ(l)=exp⁡{14(l∧(J−l))1/4}.\phi(l)=\exp\left\{\frac{1}{4}\bigl(l\wedge(J-l)\bigr)^{1/4}\right\}.

Fix constants

0<csep≤cmesh<Cδ<e−1e+1.0 < c_{\mathrm{sep}} \le c_{\mathrm{mesh}} < C_{\delta} < \frac{e-1}{e+1}.

For each ll, choose a deterministic maximal csepRl/ϕ(l)c_{\mathrm{sep}}R_l/\phi(l)-separated subset of Z2\mathbb{Z}^{2}, with csepc_{\mathrm{sep}} chosen so that its covering radius (for lattice points) is at most cmeshRl/ϕ(l)c_{\mathrm{mesh}}R_l/\phi(l). Given a candidate lattice center yy in source shell kk, choose a mesh point y^=y^(y,l)∈Z2\widehat{y}=\widehat{y}(y,l)\in\mathbb{Z}^{2} with

∣y−y^∣≤cmeshRl/ϕ(l),δl=Cδ/ϕ(l),Rj±=(1±δl)Rj.|y-\widehat{y}| \le c_{\mathrm{mesh}}R_l/\phi(l), \qquad\delta_l=C_{\delta}/\phi(l), \qquad R_j^{\pm}=(1\pm\delta_l)R_j.

For all sufficiently large JJ, the gap (Cδ−cmesh)Rl/ϕ(l)(C_{\delta}-c_{\mathrm{mesh}})R_l/\phi(l) absorbs the at-most-two-unit rounding of every radius on the used range. Moreover δl<(e−1)/(e+1)\delta_l<(e-1)/(e+1), and hence Rl−1−>Rl+R_{l-1}^{-}>R_l^{+}, so every buffered annulus below is nonempty. Starting with the first entrance into D(y^,Rk+)D(\widehat{y},R_k^{+}), and stopping on exiting D(y^,R0+)D(\widehat{y},R_0^{+}), let T~y^,lS,k→0\widetilde{T}_{\widehat{y},l}^{S,k\to0} count completed crossings from ∂D(y^,Rl−1−)\partial D(\widehat{y},R_{l-1}^{-}) to ∂D(y^,Rl+)\partial D(\widehat{y},R_l^{+}). The inclusions

D(y,Rk)⊂D(y^,Rk+),D(y,Rl)⊂D(y^,Rl+),D(y^,Rl−1−)⊂D(y,Rl−1),D(y,R0)⊂D(y^,R0+)(101)\begin{aligned} D(y,R_k) &\subset D(\widehat{y},R_k^{+}), \\ D(y,R_l) &\subset D(\widehat{y},R_l^{+}), \\ D(\widehat{y},R_{l-1}^{-}) &\subset D(y,R_{l-1}), \\ D(y,R_0) &\subset D(\widehat{y},R_0^{+}) \tag*{(101)} \end{aligned}

show pathwise that

Ty,lS,k→0≤T~y^,lS,k→0.(102)T_{y,l}^{S,k\to0} \le\widetilde{T}_{\widehat{y},l}^{S,k\to0}. \tag*{(102)}

Indeed every yy-crossing begins outside the representative’s buffered outer circle, ends inside its buffered inner circle, and occurs after the representative start and before its stop. The same inclusions cover k=l−1k=l-1. Area comparison for the mesh in a shell of diameter O(Rk)O(R_k) gives, for every k≤l−1k\le l-1,

#{representatives at (k,l)}≤Ce2(l−k)ϕ(l)2.(103)\#\{\text{representatives at }(k,l)\}\le Ce^{2(l-k)}\phi(l)^{2}. \tag*{(103)}

The buffered inclusions in Rosen eq:2.26–eq:2.27–eq:2.28–eq:2.29–eq:2.30–eq:2.31–eq:2.32–eq:2.33 do not impose k≤log⁡Jk\le\log J. For the four modified radii (Rk+,Rl−1−,Rl+,R0+)(R_k^{+},R_{l-1}^{-},R_l^{+},R_0^{+}), the same potential-kernel calculation gives, uniformly in all directed entrance edges,

q~k,lS≤Ck+1l,p~lS≤1−1−C/ϕ(l)−C/Ml.(104)\widetilde{q}_{k,l}^{S}\le C\frac{k+1}{l}, \qquad\widetilde{p}_l^{S}\le1-\frac{1-C/\phi(l)-C/M}{l}. \tag*{(104)}

Consequently (99) holds with TT replaced by T~y^,lS,k→0\widetilde{T}_{\widehat{y},l}^{S,k\to0}, the additional exponent being CN/(lϕ(l))+CN/(lM)CN/(l\phi(l))+CN/(lM). Taking the upper horizon-JJ barrier level

N=12(ρJl+z+(l∧(J−l))1/4)2N=\frac{1}{2}\left(\rho_Jl+z+(l\wedge(J-l))^{1/4}\right)^{2}

there gives

P(T~y^,lS,k→0≥N)≤Ce−2l−(l∧(J−l))1/4e−2z.(105)P\left(\widetilde{T}_{\widehat{y},l}^{S,k\to0}\ge N\right)\le Ce^{-2l-(l\wedge(J-l))^{1/4}}e^{-2z}. \tag*{(105)}

On the used range l≤J−(4log⁡J)4l\le J-(4\log J)^{4}, the elementary exponent calculation gives l/ϕ(l)=O(1)l/\phi(l)=O(1) (the bounded early values are absorbed into CC), and N/(lM)=o(1)N/(lM)=o(1). Multiplying (103) and (105) and summing first in ll, then in k≥sk\ge s, proves (78), including the range log⁡J<k≤C0log⁡J\log J<k\le C_0\log J.

Step 4. The centered endpoint probability.

The source population and its descendants must be compared together. Conditioning on a later list of entrance edges would change the law of the current radial decision. We therefore compare the entire chronological word, integrating each edge when it is first produced, and only then condition under the ideal Galton–Watson law. In addition to the directed-edge/stack states in (97), introduce a special deterministic initial atom ⋆y\star_y, representing S0=0S_0=0. The first query is ROOT (hit DmD_m before leaving D0D_0), whose kernel maps ⋆y\star_y to EminE_m^{\mathrm{in}}, or FAILURE, whose kernel maps ⋆y\star_y to the cemetery state. After every root, its descendants are explored depth first: at an active node of level j<Lj<L, BIRTH is the first hit of Dj+1D_{j+1} and pushes the next child, while CLOSE is the first exit from Dj−1D_{j-1} and pops the node. A level-LL leaf has a forced return to level L−1L-1, of row mass one. After a root closes, the current state lies in Em−1outE_{m-1}^{\mathrm{out}}; the next source query is another ROOT, mapping to EminE_m^{\mathrm{in}}, or the final DEATH, mapping through E0outE_0^{\mathrm{out}} to the cemetery state. Thus a word with t≥1t\geq1 roots has the physical order

ROOT,DFS(1),ROOT,DFS(2),…,ROOT,DFS(t),DEATH.(106)\mathrm{ROOT},\mathrm{DFS}(1),\mathrm{ROOT},\mathrm{DFS}(2),\ldots,\mathrm{ROOT},\mathrm{DFS}(t),\mathrm{DEATH}. \tag*{(106)}

The word stops at the first barrier violation, endpoint decision, death, or a fixed deterministic cap Q∗=C∗J3Q_* = C_*J^3, chosen above 3+2∑j=mL(Ty,j+1)3+2\sum_{j=m}^{L}(T_{y,j}+1) on the coefficient-two barrier, and is then padded by cemetery letters. It contains every terminating close and the final source death, so there is no residual future condition.

Let P∗P_* be the angle-free ideal law. Its first root and failure probabilities are uy/mu_y/m and (m−uy)/m(m-u_y)/m; subsequent root and death probabilities are (m−1)/m(m-1)/m and 1/m1/m; every descendant birth/close decision has probability 1/21/2. Potential-kernel optional stopping, with every output edge summed but every current directed edge retained, gives the four lattice source rows

r0,yS=uy+O(Rm−1)m+O(Rm−1),f0,yS=m−uy+O(Rm−1)m+O(Rm−1),rmS(e)=m−1+O(Rm−1)m+O(Rm−1),dmS(e)=1+O(Rm−1)m+O(Rm−1).(107)\begin{aligned} r_{0,y}^{S} &= \frac{u_y+O(R_m^{-1})}{m+O(R_m^{-1})}, & f_{0,y}^{S} &= \frac{m-u_y+O(R_m^{-1})}{m+O(R_m^{-1})}, \\ r_m^{S}(e) &= \frac{m-1+O(R_m^{-1})}{m+O(R_m^{-1})}, & d_m^{S}(e) &= \frac{1+O(R_m^{-1})}{m+O(R_m^{-1})}. \tag*{(107)} \end{aligned}

Here the first pair starts from ⋆y\star_y, while the second pair is uniform in e∈Em−1oute\in E_{m-1}^{\mathrm{out}}. Since every candidate satisfies ∥y∥<2eJ\lVert y\rVert<2e^J,

uy≥log⁡(3/2),m−uy∈[1,2),m−1≥1.u_y\geq\log(3/2),\qquad m-u_y\in[1,2),\qquad m-1\geq1.

Also Rm=euy−m∥y∥≥e−2∥y∥≥e−2MR_m=e^{u_y-m}\lVert y\rVert\geq e^{-2}\lVert y\rVert\geq e^{-2}M on the detailed range. Consequently each of the four displayed rows, including the two order-1/m1/m FAILURE and DEATH rows, equals its ideal row times 1+O(M−1)1+O(M^{-1}). Ordinary birth/close rows are (1/2)(1+O(Rj+1−1))(1/2)(1+O(R_{j+1}^{-1})).

Fix a complete radial word ww, but no directed-edge refinement. If νr\nu_r is the edge-valued finite measure after its first rr letters, the next ideal row prp_r is determined by the radial prefix, and the uniform row estimates give

e−C/Mpr∥νr∥≤∥νr+1∥≤eC/Mpr∥νr∥.e^{-C/M}p_r\lVert\nu_r\rVert\leq\lVert\nu_{r+1}\rVert\leq e^{C/M}p_r\lVert\nu_r\rVert.

Forward induction, with all compatible entrance and exit edges integrated, therefore gives

e−C∣w∣/MP∗(w)≤PS(w)≤eC∣w∣/MP∗(w).(108)e^{-C|w|/M}P_*(w)\leq P_S(w)\leq e^{C|w|/M}P_*(w). \tag*{(108)}

This is not a conditional comparison given a future edge list.

Under P∗P_*, the source population has the exact law

πm,uy(0)=1−uym,πm,uy(t)=uym(m−1m)t−11m,t≥1,(109)\pi_{m,u_y}(0)=1-\frac{u_y}{m},\qquad \pi_{m,u_y}(t)=\frac{u_y}{m}\left(\frac{m-1}{m}\right)^{t-1}\frac{1}{m},\quad t\geq1, \tag*{(109)}

and, conditional on tt, the tt descendant trees are independent critical Galton–Watson trees with P(ξ=r)=2−r−1P(\xi=r)=2^{-r-1}. Hence, for the disjoint union U(q)\mathcal{U}(q) of complete barrier-respecting words ending in 2TL∈[q,q+1]\sqrt{2T_L}\in[q,q+1],

PS(U(q))≤eCJ3/M∑t≥1πm,uy(t)PtGW(AtGW(q)).(110)P_S(\mathcal{U}(q)) \le e^{CJ^3/M}\sum_{t\ge1}\pi_{m,u_y}(t)P_t^{\mathrm{GW}}(\mathcal{A}_t^{\mathrm{GW}}(q)). \tag*{(110)}

Only the ideal law on the right has been disintegrated. Moreover, for x≤Cmx\le Cm,

∑2t∈[x,x+1]πm,uy(t)≤C(1+x)m−1e−x2/(2m)+O(1)≤Ce−x2/(2m).(111)\sum_{\sqrt{2t}\in[x,x+1]}\pi_{m,u_y}(t)\le C(1+x)m^{-1}e^{-x^2/(2m)+O(1)}\le Ce^{-x^2/(2m)}. \tag*{(111)}

Apply Rosen Appendix Theorem 9.1(a), quoted in (42), to the ideal Galton–Watson factor in (110), group 2t\sqrt{2t} into unit bands, and use (45)–(46). This proves (79). The t=1t=1 term is covered by the extra-ancestor argument following (42), while t=0t=0 cannot reach a positive central endpoint. Since J3/M=o(J−A)J^3/M=o(J^{-A}), the comparison is relative even for the rare endpoint event.

Step 5. The lower count and the terminal interfaces.

We apply the Brownian second moment before transferring any event to the lattice. We retain Rosen’s original event Iy∘I_y^\circ and its original angular screens exactly as written in (51)–(55), and intersect it with the source-safety event SyS_y. No tightened or halved screen is used. Put Iysf=Iy∘∩SyI_y^{\mathrm{sf}}=I_y^\circ\cap S_y. By (62),

P(∑y1Iysf>0)≥c∗.(112)P\left(\sum_y 1_{I_y^{\mathrm{sf}}}>0\right)\ge c_*. \tag*{(112)}

The screens occur only in this Brownian second-moment certificate; the lattice target discards all angular screens.

Let I^yB\widehat{I}_y^B be the Brownian event obtained from Iy∘I_y^\circ by deleting every angular screen and retaining only the radial barrier, the bounded endpoint band, and the fixed m0m_0-source definition. Rosen Appendix Theorem 9.1(a), followed by the same source and barrier calculation as (41), gives

P(I^yB)≤Ce−2L,∑yP(I^yB)≤C.(113)P(\widehat{I}_y^B)\le Ce^{-2L},\qquad\sum_y P(\widehat{I}_y^B)\le C. \tag*{(113)}

Since Iysf∩Dy⊆I^yB∩Sy∩DyI_y^{\mathrm{sf}}\cap D_y\subseteq\widehat{I}_y^B\cap S_y\cap D_y, estimate (92) may be summed over complete safe radial words before any angular screen is imposed. Hence

∑yP(Iysf∩Dy)≤εJ∑yP(I^yB∩Sy)≤εJ∑yP(I^yB)=o(1).(114)\sum_y P(I_y^{\mathrm{sf}}\cap D_y)\le\varepsilon_J\sum_y P(\widehat{I}_y^B\cap S_y)\le\varepsilon_J\sum_y P(\widehat{I}_y^B)=o(1). \tag*{(114)}

Let KJK_J be the single global coupling/time-cap event (82). The pathwise implication (95) gives

{ZLsf>0}∩KJ\⋃y(Iysf∩Dy)⊆{ZLS>0}.\{Z_L^{\mathrm{sf}}>0\}\cap K_J\mathbin{\backslash}\bigcup_y(I_y^{\mathrm{sf}}\cap D_y)\subseteq\{Z_L^S>0\}.

Consequently, paying the coupling failure only once,

P(ZLS>0)≥P(ZLsf>0)−∑yP(Iysf∩Dy)−P(KJc)≥c∗−o(1).(115)P(Z_L^S>0)\ge P(Z_L^{\mathrm{sf}}>0)-\sum_y P(I_y^{\mathrm{sf}}\cap D_y)-P(K_J^c)\ge c_*-o(1). \tag*{(115)}

Source safety and (59) keep every block, connector, and final exposed post-closing collar a fixed positive distance inside the stopping boundary, so the close lattice path is not killed before the transferred blocks finish. No Brownian angular screen is transferred. This is the only use of the two-center estimate (54), and it occurs entirely on the spherical Brownian side.

For the lattice first moment, extend the path if necessary and decompose its first m0m_{0} source blocks, treating every connector as an integrated subkernel of row mass at most one. For a fixed collection of block words, apply the edge-marginal induction (70) to all competitive letters, uniformly over the entrance law supplied by each preceding connector. Forced terminal returns have row mass one. Thus, if qq is the number of competitive decisions,

PS(these block words)≤eCJ3/M2−q.P_{S}(\text{these block words}) \le e^{C J^{3}/M}2^{-q}.

Summing the disjoint words obeying the lower barrier and terminal band gives the critical geometric Galton–Watson probability with exactly m0m_{0} ancestors. Rosen Appendix Theorem 9.1(a), followed by the fixed-source calculation already used in (113), gives

P(IyS,o)≤Ce−2L,EZLS≤C.(116)P(I_{y}^{S,o}) \le Ce^{-2L}, \qquad E Z_{L}^{S} \le C. \tag*{(116)}

This proves (80); in particular, the lower first moment does not use the upper source-population estimate (100).

Finally we justify the terminal switch used in the definition of RyR_{y}. On the compact center family, with Fy=σ∘χy−1F_{y}=\sigma\circ\chi_{y}^{-1},

Fy(w)=Fy(0)+ayw+byw2+O(∣w∣3),0<c≤∣ay∣≤C.F_{y}(w)=F_{y}(0)+a_{y}w+b_{y}w^{2}+O(|w|^{3}), \qquad0<c\le|a_{y}|\le C.

At rL≍e−J+hr_{L}\asymp e^{-J+h}, dilation by AJ≍eJA_{J}\asymp e^{J} shows that the actual deepest image circle is at Hausdorff distance

O(AJrL2)=O(e−J+2h)=o(1)(117)O(A_{J}r_{L}^{2})=O(e^{-J+2h})=o(1) \tag*{(117)}

from its affine concentric circle. Rounding the center and the digital boundary costs O(1)O(1), or relative width O(M−1)O(M^{-1}), and is one additional collar in the lower guard construction (84)–(93). The induced angular conjugacy, after removing the fixed rotation ay/∣ay∣a_{y}/|a_{y}|, is C4C^{4}-close to the identity by O(e−J+h)O(e^{-J+h}); its Haar-density defect is therefore absorbed by M−7/24log⁡M+M−1M^{-7/24}\log M+M^{-1}. Thus the outer χy\chi_{y}-rotation kernels and the terminal Euclidean rotation kernels use the same common center up to the stated error. All lattice events were defined before introducing the auxiliary coupling and are measurable in RyR_{y}. We may therefore discard the Brownian path after (115); every later conditional law is the original simple-random-walk law given RyR_{y}. ■\blacksquare

Terminal occupation and the localized upper bound

The traversal estimates control how often the walk reaches a terminal disk. We now control the occupation accumulated during those visits. The first subsection compares the endpoint laws needed for the first two bridge moments. The second turns this comparison into an exponential occupation moment, including the likelihood of the prescribed radial word. The last subsection combines the traversal and occupation costs: their Gaussian factors cancel, leaving the ballot prefactor that gives the localized upper bound.

Endpoint products in one centered block

For a killed walk with prescribed entrance and exit, the observables mxm_{x} and qx,x′q_{x,x'} below are its first and second occupation moments. Their dependence on the lattice exit edge can be rough, but averaging that edge gives Green functions whose poles stay away from the entrance circle. The next lemma compares products only for these averaged observables; it does not require comparison of arbitrary endpoint functions.

Lemma 6.1. Let D=D(y,eM)D=D(y,eM), let AA be the inner vertex boundary of D(y,M)D(y,M), and let EE be the directed edges leaving DD. Put

HS(a,e)=Pa((SτD−1,SτD)=e),(HSf)(a)=∑eHS(a,e)f(a,e).H^{S}(a,e)=P_{a}\bigl((S_{\tau_{D}-1},S_{\tau_{D}})=e\bigr),\qquad (\mathcal{H}^{S}f)(a)=\sum_{e}H^{S}(a,e)f(a,e).

Let GS=GDG^{S}=G_{D}. For x,x′∈V≔D(y,M/2)x,x'\in V\coloneqq D(y,M/2), define on A×EA\times E

mx(a,e)=GS(a,x)HS(x,e)HS(a,e),m_{x}(a,e)=\frac{G^{S}(a,x)H^{S}(x,e)}{H^{S}(a,e)},
qx,x′(a,e)=1HS(a,e)(GS(a,x)GS(x,x′)HS(x′,e)+GS(a,x′)GS(x′,x)HS(x,e)−1{x=x′}GS(a,x)HS(x,e)),\begin{aligned} q_{x,x'}(a,e) ={}&\frac{1}{H^{S}(a,e)} \bigl(G^{S}(a,x)G^{S}(x,x')H^{S}(x',e)\\ &\qquad{}+G^{S}(a,x')G^{S}(x',x)H^{S}(x,e)\\ &\qquad{}-\mathbf{1}_{\{x=x'\}}G^{S}(a,x)H^{S}(x,e)\bigr), \end{aligned}

and let

FM={mx/C:x∈V}∪{qx,x′/[C(1+GS(x,x′))]:x,x′∈V},(118)\mathcal{F}_{M} = \{m_{x}/C:x\in V\} \cup \{q_{x,x'}/[C(1+G^{S}(x,x'))]:x,x'\in V\}, \tag*{(118)}

where the fixed CC is large enough that all functions have sup norm at most one. Let RiS(e,da′)R_{i}^{S}(e,\mathrm{d}a') be a fixed radial-only centered return word from a previous exit edge to the next inward entrance, let σi=RiS1\sigma_{i}=R_{i}^{S}1, JiS=RiS/σiJ_{i}^{S}=R_{i}^{S}/\sigma_{i}, and set

PiS((a,e),d(a′,e′))=JiS(e,da′)HS(a′,de′).(119)P_{i}^{S}\bigl((a,e),\mathrm{d}(a',e')\bigr) = J_{i}^{S}(e,\mathrm{d}a')H^{S}(a',\mathrm{d}e'). \tag*{(119)}

The word may be selected adaptively from its radial prefix, but not from an angular endpoint. If it contains qiq_{i} elementary letters, all at scales at least MM, and λAS\lambda_{A}^{S} is the center-to-AA first-hit law, put ΛS=λASHS\Lambda^{S}=\lambda_{A}^{S}H^{S}. For f∈FMf\in\mathcal{F}_{M} and every consecutive portion r≤sr\le s of one centered block,

∣ΛSPrS⋯PsSf−ΛSf∣≤C{M−7/24log⁡M+1M∑i=rs(qi+1)}.(120)\left|\Lambda^{S}P_{r}^{S}\cdots P_{s}^{S}f-\Lambda^{S}f\right| \le C\left\{ M^{-7/24}\log M+\frac{1}{M}\sum_{i=r}^{s}(q_{i}+1) \right\}. \tag*{(120)}

The bound is uniform over the fixed realized radial word and applies only within one centered block. An arbitrary inter-block reset ends this comparison; the effect of the next block’s initial law will be controlled by contraction in Lemma 6.2.

Proof of Lemma 6.1. The comparison is applied after averaging the exit edge, which removes the roughness of the digital boundary. We then normalize each complete return word and compare the resulting product with rotation-invariant Brownian kernels.

Step 1. Smooth the endpoint observables. A discrete pair is (a,e)∈A×E(a,e)\in A\times E. Every exterior kernel starts at the head out⁡(e)\operatorname{out}(e) of the preceding exit edge. With PiS=JiSHSP_{i}^{S}=J_{i}^{S}H^{S}, exact operator composition is

ΛSPrS⋯PsSf=λASHSJrSHS⋯JsS(HSf).(121)\Lambda^{S}P_{r}^{S}\cdots P_{s}^{S}f = \lambda_{A}^{S}H^{S}J_{r}^{S}H^{S}\cdots J_{s}^{S}(\mathcal{H}^{S}f). \tag*{(121)}

Thus the first operation on the terminal observable is the exact exit-edge average HS\mathcal{H}^{S}. This is the operation that makes the smooth angular comparison applicable.

The continuum entrance and exit state spaces are separate copies of T\mathbb{T}, in the common angular coordinate of the centered block. Let Hˉ\bar{H} be Brownian exit from radii MM to eMeM, and let Jˉi\bar{J}_{i} be the normalized Brownian return word. Their densities are rotation convolutions. Explicitly,

dHˉ(α,⋅)dθ/(2π)(β)=e2−1e2+1−2ecos⁡(β−α),(122)\frac{\mathrm{d}\bar{H}(\alpha,\cdot)}{\mathrm{d}\theta/(2\pi)}(\beta) = \frac{e^{2}-1}{e^{2}+1-2e\cos(\beta-\alpha)}, \tag*{(122)}

and an elementary side kernel from logarithmic level xx to bb before aa has unnormalized density

12π{x−ab−a+2∑n≥1sinh⁡(n(x−a))sinh⁡(n(b−a))cos⁡n(β−α)}.(123)\frac{1}{2\pi}\left\{\frac{x-a}{b-a}+2\sum_{n\geq1}\frac{\sinh(n(x-a))}{\sinh(n(b-a))}\cos n(\beta-\alpha)\right\}. \tag*{(123)}

Consequently Haar measure m(dα)=dα/(2π)m(\mathrm{d}\alpha)=\mathrm{d}\alpha/(2\pi) is preserved by Hˉ\bar{H} and every Jˉi\bar{J}_{i}. The continuum pair transition JˉiHˉ\bar{J}_{i}\bar{H} therefore preserves Λˉ(dα,dβ)=m(dα)Hˉ(α,dβ)\bar{\Lambda}(\mathrm{d}\alpha,\mathrm{d}\beta)=m(\mathrm{d}\alpha)\bar{H}(\alpha,\mathrm{d}\beta).

We next construct the continuum test functions. Write GS=GDG^{S}=G_{D}. For x,x′∈D(y,M/2)x,x'\in D(y,M/2), the exact bridge identities are

HSmx(a)=GS(a,x),(124)\mathcal{H}^{S}m_{x}(a)=G^{S}(a,x), \tag*{(124)}
HSqx,x′(a)=GS(a,x)GS(x,x′)+GS(a,x′)GS(x′,x)−1{x=x′}GS(a,x).(125)\begin{aligned} \mathcal{H}^{S}q_{x,x'}(a) &=G^{S}(a,x)G^{S}(x,x')+G^{S}(a,x')G^{S}(x',x) \\ &\quad-\mathbf{1}_{\{x=x'\}}G^{S}(a,x). \tag*{(125)} \end{aligned}

Let aα=y+Meiαa_{\alpha}=y+Me^{i\alpha} and

GB(aα,x)=2πgB(y,eM)B(aα,x).\mathcal{G}^{B}(a_{\alpha},x)=\frac{2}{\pi}g^{B}_{B(y,eM)}(a_{\alpha},x).

For f=mx/Cf=m_{x}/C, define φf(α)=GB(aα,x)/C\varphi_{f}(\alpha)=\mathcal{G}^{B}(a_{\alpha},x)/C. For f=qx,x′/[C(1+GS(x,x′))]f=q_{x,x'}/[C(1+G^{S}(x,x'))], define φf\varphi_{f} by the right side of (125), divided by C(1+GS(x,x′))C(1+G^{S}(x,x')), and replace only the boundary-variable factors GS(a,x),GS(a,x′)G^{S}(a,x),G^{S}(a,x') by GB(aα,x)\mathcal{G}^{B}(a_{\alpha},x) and GB(aα,x′)\mathcal{G}^{B}(a_{\alpha},x'). Only the dependence on the entrance angle is compared with Brownian motion. The short-distance lattice coefficients GS(x,x′)G^{S}(x,x') are retained, including on the diagonal, so the comparison does not have to approximate a lattice singularity.

After scaling by MM,

gB(0,e)B(z,ξ)=log⁡∣e2−zξˉe(z−ξ)∣,∣z∣=1,∣ξ∣≤12,(126)g^{B}_{B(0,e)}(z,\xi)=\log\left|\frac{e^{2}-z\bar{\xi}}{e(z-\xi)}\right|,\qquad|z|=1,\quad|\xi|\leq\frac{1}{2}, \tag*{(126)}

where the logarithmic Green function is normalized as in the preceding display. The denominators stay uniformly away from zero, and symmetry of GSG^{S} bounds all retained normalized coefficients. Hence

sup⁡f∥φf∥C4(T)≤C.(127)\sup_{f}\|\varphi_{f}\|_{C^{4}(\mathbb{T})}\leq C. \tag*{(127)}

We use the Green-function comparison of Kozdron–Lawler [10], Corollary 3.5, equation (30). For a simply connected lattice domain AA of inradius in [n,2n][n,2n], let A~\widetilde{A} be its union-of-squares domain. If u∈An∗:={z:gA~(0,z)≥n−1/16}u\in A_{n}^{*}:=\{z:g_{\widetilde{A}}(0,z)\geq n^{-1/16}\}, the comparison, away from the diagonal, is

GA(u,z)=2πgA~(u,z)+kz−u+O(n−7/24log⁡n),(128)G_{A}(u,z)=\frac{2}{\pi}g_{\widetilde{A}}(u,z)+k_{z-u}+O(n^{-7/24}\log n), \tag*{(128)}

where aa is the lattice potential kernel and kw=k0+(2/π)log⁡∣w∣−a(w)k_{w}=k_{0}+(2/\pi)\log|w|-a(w) for w≠0w\neq0. Apply this with the core pole in D(y,M/2)D(y,M/2). This pole is a fixed fraction of the radius from the boundary and belongs to An∗A_{n}^{*}. The boundary-variable point is at distance at least M/2−O(1)M/2-O(1) from the pole, so ka−x=O(M−2)k_{a-x}=O(M^{-2}). Sandwiching the union-of-squares disk between disks whose radii differ by O(1)O(1), and projecting radially to the continuum circle, each costs O(M−1)O(M^{-1}). Equations (124)–(128) therefore give, with UAF(a)=F(arg⁡(a−y))U_{A}F(a)=F(\arg(a-y)),

∥HSf−UAφf∥∞≤CM−7/24log⁡M.(129)\|\mathcal{H}^{S}f-U_{A}\varphi_{f}\|_{\infty}\leq CM^{-7/24}\log M. \tag*{(129)}

For an exit edge put UEF(e)=F(arg⁡(out⁡(e)−y))U_EF(e)=F(\arg(\operatorname{out}(e)-y)). Lemma 5.2, with the same tubular continuation for a disk having only its exit boundary, gives for every smooth angular test FF

∥HSUEF−UAHˉF∥∞+∣λASUAF−mF∣≤CM∥F∥C4.(130)\left\|H^S U_EF-U_A\bar{H}F\right\|_{\infty} +\left|\lambda_A^S U_AF-mF\right| \le\frac{C}{M}\left\|F\right\|_{C^4}. \tag*{(130)}

For the second term, solve the disk Dirichlet problem with boundary data FF, start at its center, and apply the tubular continuation argument of (68)–(69). For the first term, solve the exit-disk problem and start on the inner circle. This proves the comparison for the digital circles directly.

Step 2. Normalize each complete return word. A prescribed return word may have very small probability. An absolute error in its probability would therefore be insufficient after conditioning. We first multiply the relative estimates for its elementary letters, then normalize the complete word. Write its elementary kernels as

Ti,lS(z,dz′)=pi,lS(z)Ki,lS(z,dz′),Tˉi,l=pˉi,lKˉi,l,1≤l≤qi,T_{i,l}^S(z,\mathrm{d}z')=p_{i,l}^S(z)K_{i,l}^S(z,\mathrm{d}z'), \qquad \bar{T}_{i,l}=\bar{p}_{i,l}\bar{K}_{i,l}, \qquad 1\le l\le q_i,

and let QiS=Ki,1S⋯Ki,qiSQ_i^S=K_{i,1}^S\cdots K_{i,q_i}^S. Under this normalized digital chain put

Wi=∏l=1qipi,lS(Zl−1)pˉi,l.W_i=\prod_{l=1}^{q_i}\frac{p_{i,l}^S(Z_{l-1})}{\bar{p}_{i,l}}.

By (65), if ηi=C∑lRi,l−1≤Cqi/M\eta_i=C\sum_l R_{i,l}^{-1}\le Cq_i/M, then e−ηi≤Wi≤eηie^{-\eta_i}\le W_i\le e^{\eta_i}. With sˉi=∏lpˉi,l\bar{s}_i=\prod_l\bar{p}_{i,l}, the identities

RiS1(e)sˉi=EQi,eSWi,JiSF(e)=EQi,eS[WiF(Zqi)]EQi,eSWi(131)\frac{R_i^S1(e)}{\bar{s}_i}=E_{Q_{i,e}^S}W_i, \qquad J_i^SF(e)=\frac{E_{Q_{i,e}^S}\left[W_iF(Z_{q_i})\right]}{E_{Q_{i,e}^S}W_i} \tag*{(131)}

are exact. Hence

∥JiSF−QiSF∥∞≤Cηi∥F∥∞.(132)\left\|J_i^SF-Q_i^SF\right\|_{\infty}\le C\eta_i\left\|F\right\|_{\infty}. \tag*{(132)}

Apply the normalized smooth-test estimate following (65) to the Ki,lSK_{i,l}^S and telescope from the right. If Φl,F=Kˉi,l+1⋯Kˉi,qiF\Phi_{l,F}=\bar{K}_{i,l+1}\cdots\bar{K}_{i,q_i}F, convolution gives ∥Φl,F∥C4≤∥F∥C4\left\|\Phi_{l,F}\right\|_{C^4}\le\left\|F\right\|_{C^4}. Let Ui,lU_{i,l} pull an angular test back to the state after letter ll, so that Ui,0=UEU_{i,0}=U_E and Ui,qi=UAU_{i,q_i}=U_A. The indexed telescoping identity is

QiSUAF−UEJˉiF=∑l=1qiKi,1S⋯Ki,l−1S(Ki,lSUi,lΦl,F−Ui,l−1Kˉi,lΦl,F).Q_i^SU_AF-U_E\bar{J}_iF = \sum_{l=1}^{q_i} K_{i,1}^S\cdots K_{i,l-1}^S \left(K_{i,l}^SU_{i,l}\Phi_{l,F}-U_{i,l-1}\bar{K}_{i,l}\Phi_{l,F}\right).

Each Markov prefix contracts the sup norm, and the normalized smooth-test estimate bounds the llth bracket by CRi,l−1∥F∥C4CR_{i,l}^{-1}\left\|F\right\|_{C^4}. Hence

∥QiSUAF−UEJˉiF∥∞≤Cηi∥F∥C4.\left\|Q_i^SU_AF-U_E\bar{J}_iF\right\|_{\infty} \le C\eta_i\left\|F\right\|_{C^4}.

Together with (132),

∥JiSUAF−UEJˉiF∥∞≤Cηi∥F∥C4.(133)\left\|J_i^SU_AF-U_E\bar{J}_iF\right\|_{\infty} \le C\eta_i\left\|F\right\|_{C^4}. \tag*{(133)}

The weight in (131) contains the row masses of every letter of the fixed word, including letters after the state currently being compared.

Step 3. Compare the complete product.

Write (121) as alternating operators HS,JrS,HS,…,JsSH^S,J_r^S,H^S,\ldots,J_s^S, with terminal test gfS=HSfg_f^S=\mathcal{H}^Sf. Let LjS,LˉjL_j^S,\bar{L}_j be the corresponding discrete and Brownian operators. Write UjU_j for the angular pullback on the state space after the jj-th operator, and put Φj,f=Lˉj+1⋯LˉNφf\Phi_{j,f}=\bar L_{j+1}\cdots\bar L_N\varphi_f. The operator identity, with every pullback on its corresponding state space, is

L1S⋯LNSgfS−U0Lˉ1⋯LˉNφf=L1S⋯LNS(gfS−UNφf)+∑j=1NL1S⋯Lj−1S[LjSUjΦj,f−Uj−1LˉjΦj,f].(134)\begin{aligned} L_1^S\cdots L_N^S g_f^S-U_0\bar L_1\cdots\bar L_N\varphi_f &=L_1^S\cdots L_N^S(g_f^S-U_N\varphi_f)\\ &\quad+\sum_{j=1}^{N}L_1^S\cdots L_{j-1}^S\left[L_j^S U_j\Phi_{j,f}-U_{j-1}\bar L_j\Phi_{j,f}\right]. \tag*{(134)} \end{aligned}

All Φj,f\Phi_{j,f} have uniformly bounded C4C^4-norm by (127) and convolution contraction. The terminal mismatch in the first line of (134) costs CM−7/24log⁡MCM^{-7/24}\log M by (129). Each exit operator costs C/MC/M by (130), and each return word costs Cqi/MCq_i/M by (133). Sup-norm contraction of the discrete prefixes therefore bounds the whole product by the right side of (120). In the continuum the alternating product preserves Haar measure, so it has integral mφfm\varphi_f. A separate zero-length use of (129)–(130) gives ∣ΛSf−mφf∣≤C(M−7/24log⁡M+M−1)|\Lambda^S f-m\varphi_f|\le C(M^{-7/24}\log M+M^{-1}). Subtracting these two comparisons proves (120).

For a lower conformal block the same proof uses its one common χy\chi_y-angle. Each occurrence of HSH^S has angular conjugacy error O(M−1+e−J+h)O(M^{-1}+e^{-J+h}). Since 2h≤J2h\le J, e−J+h≤M−1e^{-J+h}\le M^{-1}, and paying this error once per occurrence is already contained in M−1∑i(qi+1)M^{-1}\sum_i(q_i+1). A decision depending on an angular endpoint can change Haar measure. Such decisions are therefore included in the reset density constructed below, at the boundary between centered blocks. ■

Occupation of completed terminal excursions

We now apply the endpoint comparison to completed terminal excursions. Fix a center yy, and omit the superscript SS from the lattice kernels in this subsection. Let

Dy={z∈Z2:∥z−y∥<eM},Ay=∂in{z:∥z−y∥<M},Vy={z:∥z−y∥<M/2},\begin{aligned} D_y&=\{z\in\mathbb{Z}^2:\lVert z-y\rVert<eM\},\\ A_y&=\partial_{\mathrm{in}}\{z:\lVert z-y\rVert<M\},\\ V_y&=\{z:\lVert z-y\rVert<M/2\}, \end{aligned}

where ∂inD={a∈D:∃a′∉D, a′∼a}\partial_{\mathrm{in}}D=\{a\in D:\exists a'\notin D,\ a'\sim a\}, and let Ey={(u,v):u∈Dy,v∉Dy,u∼v}E_y=\{(u,v):u\in D_y,v\notin D_y,u\sim v\} be the directed exit edges. A completed terminal piece begins at the first lattice vertex aa after an inward crossing of radius MM, and is killed on the directed edge e∈Eye\in E_y that first crosses radius eMeM. Erasing the interiors of all such outward pieces gives exactly the intrinsic sigma-field RyR_y of Lemma 5.3. Conditional on their endpoint pairs ωi=(ai,ei)\omega_i=(a_i,e_i), their occupation vectors Xi=(Xi(x):x∈Vy)X_i=(X_i(x):x\in V_y) are independent killed lattice bridges. Write G=GDyG=G_{D_y}. Thus the endpoint observables in (141)–(142) below satisfy mx(a,e)=Ea,eX(x)m_x(a,e)=E^{a,e}X(x) and qx,x′(a,e)=Ea,e[X(x)X(x′)]q_{x,x'}(a,e)=E^{a,e}[X(x)X(x')].

An admissible centered block word ww is a positive-probability radial-only cylinder. It has b=O(J2)b=O(J^2) completed pieces, at most Q≤J3Q\le J^3 adjacent-shell decisions, and a fixed number G0G_0 of blocks. Within each block every decision is between circles centered at yy, or, in the lower spherical transfer, between successive level sets of the single conformal coordinate χy\chi_y. In either case the normalized Brownian kernels are rotation convolutions in one common angular coordinate; this is what “centered block” means here.

Between two lower blocks the safe connector contributes no core occupation and its normalized angular kernel is treated only as an arbitrary reset. Its scalar prescribed-side row mass is retained in the exact word factorization. We use no invariant law for this connector.

Before factorization, retain only source intervals containing at least one completed terminal piece as blocks. Fold any initial empty intervals and connectors into the first chronological law, every intervening string of empty intervals and connectors into the preceding reset, and every terminal such string into the final reset. Hence bg≥1b_g \ge1, and in the lower application G0≤m0G_0 \le m_0; the inter-source connectors and empty intervals contribute no core occupation. In the upper application G0=1G_0=1 when b>0b>0, after the centered extension (75). The case b=0b=0 is trivial and is henceforth excluded. The reset construction below assigns every initial/final suffix and connector exactly once, so there is no unrecorded future weight.

We separate a subkernel into its row mass and its normalized transition. The row masses will retain the probability of the complete word; the normalized transitions will provide contraction of endpoint observables. Put

H(a,e)=Pa((SτDyc−1,SτDyc)=e).H(a,e)=P_a\left(\left(S_{\tau_{D_y^c}-1},S_{\tau_{D_y^c}}\right)=e\right).

Write bgb_g for the number of completed pieces in block gg, so ∑gbg=b\sum_g b_g=b. For i<bgi<b_g, let Rg,iw(e,da′)R_{g,i}^w(e,\mathrm{d}a') be the sub-Markov kernel of the prescribed exterior return word, started at out⁡(eg,i)\operatorname{out}(e_{g,i}), from eg,i=ee_{g,i}=e to the next entrance ag,i+1=a′a_{g,i+1}=a'. The pair subkernel factors exactly as

Qg,iw((a,e),d(a′,e′))=Rg,iw(e,da′)H(a′,de′).(135)Q_{g,i}^w\left((a,e),\mathrm{d}(a',e')\right)=R_{g,i}^w(e,\mathrm{d}a')H(a',\mathrm{d}e'). \tag*{(135)}

Write

σg,i(e)=Rg,iw1(e),Jg,iw=Rg,iwσg,i,K~g,iw=Jg,iwH.(136)\sigma_{g,i}(e)=R_{g,i}^w1(e),\qquad J_{g,i}^w=\frac{R_{g,i}^w}{\sigma_{g,i}},\qquad\widetilde{K}_{g,i}^w=J_{g,i}^wH. \tag*{(136)}

For g<G0g<G_0, let

Cgw(e,dζ,dω′)(137)C_g^w(e,\mathrm{d}\zeta,\mathrm{d}\omega') \tag*{(137)}

be the genuine sub-Markov reset kernel which, after the last endpoint of block gg, contains the prescribed final no-more-piece suffix, the safe connector and its data ζ\zeta, and the prefix of block g+1g+1 through its first endpoint pair ω′\omega'. For g=G0g=G_0, the same notation denotes the final suffix to a cemetery state. Put

σg,bg(e)=Cgw1(e),Jg,bgw=Cgw/σg,bg.(138)\sigma_{g,b_g}(e)=C_g^w1(e),\qquad J_{g,b_g}^w=C_g^w/\sigma_{g,b_g}. \tag*{(138)}

In a centered suffix every adjacent-shell letter is included in QQ. A lower inter-source connector is not declared centered; its normalized kernel Jg,bgwJ_{g,b_g}^w is used as an arbitrary reset.

Let μ1,w\mu_{1,w} be the law of the first endpoint pair conditioned only on the word prefix through that piece; this prefix has positive probability by admissibility. Define P~w\widetilde{P}_w to be the joint law of all endpoint and reset variables that starts with μ1,w\mu_{1,w}, uses K~g,iw\widetilde{K}_{g,i}^w internally, and uses the normalized reset kernels Jg,bgwJ_{g,b_g}^w between blocks and at the final cemetery transition. Thus the first law of every later block is generated chronologically by the preceding reset, not conditioned on its future output. Write PwP_w for the true endpoint-and-reset law conditioned on the complete word ww. It is obtained from P~w\widetilde{P}_w by weighting endpoint sequences by the product of their subsequent row masses. Formula (149) will express this weighting exactly. All estimates are uniform over the arbitrary normalized reset kernels, which are marginalized at the end.

Let λA\lambda_A be the law of the first hit of AyA_y by a walk started at yy, and set

ΛM(da,de)=λA(da)H(a,de).(139)\Lambda_M(\mathrm{d}a,\mathrm{d}e)=\lambda_A(\mathrm{d}a)H(a,\mathrm{d}e). \tag*{(139)}

For a pair observable ff, write

(Hf)(a)=∑eH(a,e)f(a,e).(140)(\mathcal{H}f)(a)=\sum_{e}H(a,e)f(a,e). \tag*{(140)}

For x,x′∈Vyx,x' \in V_y, define

mx(a,e)=G(a,x)H(x,e)H(a,e),(141)m_x(a,e)=\frac{G(a,x)H(x,e)}{H(a,e)}, \tag*{(141)}
qx,x′(a,e)=1H(a,e)(G(a,x)G(x,x′)H(x′,e)+G(a,x′)G(x′,x)H(x,e)−1{x=x′}G(a,x)H(x,e)).(142)\begin{aligned} q_{x,x'}(a,e) ={}&\frac{1}{H(a,e)}\bigl(G(a,x)G(x,x')H(x',e) \\ &\quad+G(a,x')G(x',x)H(x,e) \\ &\quad-\mathbf{1}_{\{x=x'\}}G(a,x)H(x,e)\bigr). \tag*{(142)} \end{aligned}

Uniformly,

0≤mx≤C,0≤qx,x′≤C(1+G(x,x′)),(143)0\leq m_x\leq C,\qquad0\leq q_{x,x'}\leq C(1+G(x,x')), \tag*{(143)}

and the exit-edge averages are exactly

Hmx(a)=G(a,x),Hqx,x′(a)=G(a,x)G(x,x′)+G(a,x′)G(x′,x)−1{x=x′}G(a,x).(144)\begin{aligned} \mathcal{H}m_x(a)&=G(a,x),\\ \mathcal{H}q_{x,x'}(a)&=G(a,x)G(x,x')+G(a,x')G(x',x)-\mathbf{1}_{\{x=x'\}}G(a,x). \tag*{(144)} \end{aligned}

The finite normalized observable family is

FM={mx/C:x∈Vy}∪{qx,x′C(1+G(x,x′)):x,x′∈Vy};(145)\mathcal{F}_M=\{m_x/C:x\in V_y\}\cup\left\{\frac{q_{x,x'}}{C(1+G(x,x'))}:x,x'\in V_y\right\}; \tag*{(145)}

it has at most CM4CM^4 members. Put

εM=CM−7/24log⁡M,ηw∗:=CQ/M+CGnc,(146)\varepsilon_M=CM^{-7/24}\log M,\qquad\eta_w^*:=CQ/M+CG_{\mathrm{nc}}, \tag*{(146)}

where Gnc≤G0≤m0G_{\mathrm{nc}}\leq G_0\leq m_0 counts noncentered whole resets; each is factored once through the separator (166) below. Thus Gnc=0G_{\mathrm{nc}}=0 in the upper application and is fixed in the lower one. The reference expectation of an observable is cf=ΛMfc_f=\Lambda_Mf. We use the same notation for the unnormalized observables mxm_x and qx,x′q_{x,x'}; their reference expectations satisfy

cmx=g+O(εM),(147)c_{m_x}=g+O(\varepsilon_M), \tag*{(147)}
cqx,x′=gG(x,x′)+gG(x′,x)−1{x=x′}g+O(εM(1+G(x,x′))).(148)c_{q_{x,x'}}=gG(x,x')+gG(x',x)-\mathbf{1}_{\{x=x'\}}g+O\bigl(\varepsilon_M(1+G(x,x'))\bigr). \tag*{(148)}

Lemma 6.2. Let ww be an admissible word with b>0b>0 completed pieces as above. The following estimates compare its endpoint law, concentrate its first two bridge moments, and control its occupation.

The exact density of the complete word is

dPwdP~w=∏g=1G0∏i=1bgσg,i(eg,i)EP~w∏g=1G0∏i=1bgσg,i(eg,i),e−2ηw∗≤dP~wdPw≤e2ηw∗.(149)\frac{\mathrm{d}P_w}{\mathrm{d}\widetilde{P}_w} = \frac{\prod_{g=1}^{G_0}\prod_{i=1}^{b_g}\sigma_{g,i}(e_{g,i})} { E_{\widetilde{P}_w}\prod_{g=1}^{G_0}\prod_{i=1}^{b_g}\sigma_{g,i}(e_{g,i})}, \qquad e^{-2\eta_w^*}\leq\frac{\mathrm{d}\widetilde{P}_w}{\mathrm{d}P_w}\leq e^{2\eta_w^*}. \tag*{(149)}

The product includes the final no-more-piece suffix and every connector likelihood. The endpoint averages concentrate about their reference expectations: for every t>0t>0,

Pw(max⁡f∈FM∣b−1∑i≤bf(ωi)−cf∣>t+C{G0/b+εM+Q/M})≤2∣FM∣exp⁡{2ηw∗−cbt2}.(150)P_{w}\left(\max_{f\in\mathcal{F}_{M}}\left|b^{-1}\sum_{i\le b}f(\omega_{i})-c_{f}\right|>t+C\{G_{0}/b+\varepsilon_{M}+Q/M\}\right)\le2|\mathcal{F}_{M}|\exp\{2\eta_{w}^{*}-cbt^{2}\}. \tag*{(150)}

For x∈Vyx\in V_{y}, G=GDyG=G_{D_{y}}, and

rθ(x):=eθ−11−(G(x,x)−1)(eθ−1),(151)r_{\theta}(x):=\frac{e^{\theta}-1}{1-(G(x,x)-1)(e^{\theta}-1)}, \tag*{(151)}

the logarithmic occupation moment satisfies, uniformly for 0≤rθ≤c/h0\le r_{\theta}\le c/h, h=log⁡Mh=\log M,

log⁡E[exp⁡{θ∑i=1bXi(x)}∣w]=bg rθ+O(brθ2+rθ{G0+bεM+bQ/M}+ηw∗).(152)\log E\left[\left.\exp\left\{\theta\sum_{i=1}^{b}X_{i}(x)\right\}\right|w\right] =bg\,r_{\theta}+O\left(br_{\theta}^{2}+r_{\theta}\{G_{0}+b\varepsilon_{M}+bQ/M\}+\eta_{w}^{*}\right). \tag*{(152)}

The leading term is the number of pieces times the reference mean gg, expressed in the tilt parameter rθr_{\theta}. The errors record the quadratic expansion, the initial laws of the G0G_{0} blocks, the Green and return-word comparisons, and the full-word likelihood. The estimate is uniform in x,w,bx,w,b and concerns completed pieces. In both applications below every visit to VyV_{y} lies in a completed piece, as verified at the end of the proof.

For the upper-bound choice from Lemma 5.3,

h=(Chlog⁡J)4,L=J−h+O(1),U=uJ,c,c>2,h=(C_{h}\log J)^{4},\qquad L=J-h+O(1),\qquad U=u_{J,c},\qquad c>2,

put Y=2bY=\sqrt{2b}. On a radial word satisfying the coefficient-two coarse barrier below, the upper occupation tail satisfies

P(max⁡x∈Vy∑iXi(x)≥U∣w,b)≤Ce−2LJceb/L×exp⁡{−κmin⁡((p−p∗)2h,J2h)},(153)P\left(\left.\max_{x\in V_{y}}\sum_{i}X_{i}(x)\ge U\right|w,b\right) \le Ce^{-2L}J^{c}e^{b/L} \times\exp\left\{-\kappa\min\left(\frac{(p-p_{*})^{2}}{h},\frac{J^{2}}{h}\right)\right\}, \tag*{(153)}

in the central endpoint range ϵL≤Y≤BL+1\epsilon L\le Y\le B_{L}+1, for one fixed small ϵ>0\epsilon>0. Here

p=BL+1−Y,BL=ρJL+z0+h1/4,p∗=O(log⁡J).p=B_{L}+1-Y,\qquad B_{L}=\rho_{J}L+z_{0}+h^{1/4},\qquad p_{*}=O(\log J).

The gap pp measures the distance of the endpoint below the barrier, and p∗p_{*} is the gap at the preferred endpoint of the terminal tilt. The coefficient-two barrier is

2Ty,jS≤Bj:=ρJj+z0+(j∧(J−j))1/4(ky<j≤L),(154)\sqrt{2T_{y,j}^{S}}\le B_{j}:=\rho_{J}j+z_{0}+(j\wedge(J-j))^{1/4}\qquad(k_{y}<j\le L), \tag*{(154)}

after the fixed O(1)O(1) relaxation of Lemma 5.3. For Y<ϵLY<\epsilon L, (153) holds with its last factor replaced by exp⁡(−κJ2/h)\exp(-\kappa J^{2}/h).

Proof of Lemma 6.2. The bridge formula reduces the occupation moment to ∏i(1+rθmx(ωi))\prod_{i}(1+r_{\theta}m_{x}(\omega_{i})). We first identify the reference expectations and contract the centered endpoint transitions. This gives concentration and the logarithmic moment under P~w\widetilde{P}_{w}. We then compare this law with PwP_{w}, retaining the last suffix and every reset in the likelihood. Finally we optimize the tilt to obtain the tail bound (153).

Step 1. Compute bridge moments and their centers. Let

H(a,e)=Pa((Sτ−1,Sτ)=e),τ=τDyc.H(a,e)=P_a\bigl((S_{\tau-1},S_\tau)=e\bigr), \qquad\tau=\tau_{D_y^c}.

For the bridge from aa to ee, write X(x)X(x) for its occupation of xx. Splitting at the first visit to xx, and then summing the geometric number of returns to xx, gives the exact rank-one identity

Hθ(a,e)≔Ea[eθX(x);(Sτ−1,Sτ)=e]=H(a,e)+rθG(a,x)H(x,e).(155)\begin{aligned} H_\theta(a,e)&\coloneqq E_a\bigl[e^{\theta X(x)};(S_{\tau-1},S_\tau)=e\bigr] \\ &=H(a,e)+r_\theta G(a,x)H(x,e). \tag*{(155)} \end{aligned}

Thus

Hθ(a,e)H(a,e)=1+rθmx(a,e),mx(a,e)≔G(a,x)H(x,e)H(a,e).(156)\frac{H_\theta(a,e)}{H(a,e)}=1+r_\theta m_x(a,e), \qquad m_x(a,e)\coloneqq\frac{G(a,x)H(x,e)}{H(a,e)}. \tag*{(156)}

A Harnack chain inside the fixed-ratio disk gives 0≤mx≤C0\le m_x\le C, uniformly in x∈Vyx\in V_y. Although mx(a,e)m_x(a,e) is indexed by the rough digital exit edges, the transition (135) first averages over that edge. From (156),

(Hmx)(a)=∑eH(a,e)mx(a,e)=G(a,x).(157)(\mathcal{H}m_x)(a)=\sum_e H(a,e)m_x(a,e)=G(a,x). \tag*{(157)}

More generally, if qx,x′(a,e)=Ea,e[X(x)X(x′)]q_{x,x'}(a,e)=E^{a,e}[X(x)X(x')], the two ordered visit-time decompositions give

(Hqx,x′)(a)=G(a,x)G(x,x′)+G(a,x′)G(x′,x)−1{x=x′}G(a,x).(158)\begin{aligned} (\mathcal{H}q_{x,x'})(a) &=G(a,x)G(x,x')+G(a,x')G(x',x) \\ &\quad-\mathbf{1}_{\{x=x'\}}G(a,x). \tag*{(158)} \end{aligned}

Thus the only functions subsequently fed into a return-word kernel are Green functions with their singularities a distance at least M/2M/2 from AyA_y.

We next identify the common center and the only observables that require comparison. With λA\lambda_A defined as the first-hit law of the inner vertex boundary, the strong Markov property gives

dx≔∑aλA(a)GDy(a,x)=GD(y,eM)(y,x)−GD(y,M)(y,x)+O(M−1log⁡M).(159)d_x\coloneqq\sum_a\lambda_A(a)G_{D_y}(a,x)=G_{D(y,eM)}(y,x)-G_{D(y,M)}(y,x)+O(M^{-1}\log M). \tag*{(159)}

Indeed the one-edge collar can return from AyA_y to D(y,M/2)D(y,M/2) before exiting D(y,M)D(y,M) with probability O(M−1)O(M^{-1}), while the Green function is at most Clog⁡MC\log M. This remainder is o(εM)o(\varepsilon_M).

Apply the Green comparison (128) to both disks in (159). For distinct arguments, their inradii are comparable to MM, so it reads

GA(u,z)=2πgA(u,z)+kz−u+O(M−7/24log⁡M),(160)G_A(u,z)=\frac{2}{\pi}g_A(u,z)+k_{z-u}+O(M^{-7/24}\log M), \tag*{(160)}

with kw=k0+(2/π)log⁡∣w∣−a(w)k_w=k_0+(2/\pi)\log|w|-a(w) for w≠0w\ne0. The lattice correction is identical in the two domains and cancels. When x=yx=y, use instead the diagonal formula in [10], Theorem 1.2; its additive potential-kernel constant also cancels. The core points lie a fixed fraction of the radius from both boundaries, and the union-of-squares domains are between disks whose radii differ by O(1)O(1). The Brownian Green-function difference for the concentric disks is exactly log⁡e=1\log e=1. Consequently, uniformly in x∈Vyx\in V_y,

dx=g+O(εM),εM=CM−7/24log⁡M.(161)d_x=g+O(\varepsilon_M), \qquad\varepsilon_M=CM^{-7/24}\log M. \tag*{(161)}

The identities (157)–(158) now give the centers (147)–(148).

Step 2. Compare and contract centered transitions. The state of Rg,iwR_{g,i}^{w} is the preceding directed exit edge, and the walk restarts at its head; its target is the next inward directed edge. A word is called admissible only when its cylinder has positive probability, so every row normalization below is defined. Brownian row masses of its elementary letters are scalar, while Lemma 5.2 gives their relative lattice comparison. The exact whole-word weighting formula (131) therefore yields, for a scalar sg,i>0s_{g,i}>0,

sup⁡e∣σg,i(e)sg,i−1∣≤CqiM.(162)\sup_{e}\left|\frac{\sigma_{g,i}(e)}{s_{g,i}}-1\right|\leq\frac{Cq_i}{M}. \tag*{(162)}

This estimate holds for the complete word, since (131) retains the row masses of all its letters.

In the common logarithmic conformal coordinate, every normalized Brownian letter is the rotation convolution (123), and the terminal disk exit is (122). Apply Lemma 6.1 to the exact exit-edge averages (157)–(158). For consecutive internal transitions r≤sr\leq s in one block and every f∈FMf\in\mathscr{F}_{M}, it gives

∣ΛMK~g,rwK~g,r+1w⋯K~g,swf−cf∣≤C{εM+1M∑i=rs(qi+1)}.(163)\left|\Lambda_M\widetilde{K}_{g,r}^{w}\widetilde{K}_{g,r+1}^{w}\cdots\widetilde{K}_{g,s}^{w}f-c_f\right| \leq C\left\{\varepsilon_M+\frac{1}{M}\sum_{i=r}^{s}(q_i+1)\right\}. \tag*{(163)}

The two terms are compared separately with the same Haar integral of the disk-Green traces (124)–(127). The estimate therefore controls complete prefixes even though ΛM\Lambda_M need not be invariant for a single discrete transition. In a lower source interval the common coordinate is χy\chi_y; its terminal chart error is included in the displayed sum. An inter-source connector ends this comparison.

To remove dependence on the initial law of each block, we also need a uniform contraction in total variation. The elliptic Harnack inequality [1], Theorem 1.1 states that for every d≥1d\geq1 there is CdC_d such that a nonnegative function harmonic in B(x0,R)B(x_0,R) satisfies

max⁡B(x0,R/2)u≤Cdmin⁡B(x0,R/2)u.(164)\max_{B(x_0,R/2)}u\leq C_d\min_{B(x_0,R/2)}u. \tag*{(164)}

Starting one step inside the outer boundary is too close to use (164) directly. Insert instead the deterministic intermediate circle

CM=∂D(y,e1/2M),C_M=\partial D(y,e^{1/2}M),

which every successful outer-to-inner crossing must hit. For a target atom a∈Aya\in A_y, put

ha(z)=Pz(SHAy=a, HAy<τD(y,eM)),s(z)=∑a∈Ayha(z),z∈CM.h_a(z)=P_z(S_{H_{A_y}}=a,\ H_{A_y}<\tau_{D(y,eM)}),\qquad s(z)=\sum_{a\in A_y}h_a(z),\qquad z\in C_M.

A bounded chain of lattice balls of radius cMcM, all a fixed positive fraction from both boundary components, applies (164) to hah_a and ss. Uniformly in a,z,z0∈CMa,z,z_0\in C_M,

cha(z0)≤ha(z)≤Cha(z0),cs(z0)≤s(z)≤Cs(z0).ch_a(z_0)\leq h_a(z)\leq Ch_a(z_0),\qquad cs(z_0)\leq s(z)\leq Cs(z_0).

After division by the total successful-leg probability this gives

Jin(z,⋅)≥αJin(z0,⋅)(165)J_{\mathrm{in}}(z,\cdot)\geq\alpha J_{\mathrm{in}}(z_0,\cdot) \tag*{(165)}

where Jin(z,⋅)=h⋅(z)/s(z)J_{\mathrm{in}}(z,\cdot)=h_{\cdot}(z)/s(z) is the entrance law conditional on reaching the inner boundary, and α>0\alpha>0 is uniform in M,z,z0M,z,z_0. Precomposition by all earlier within-block word factors and postcomposition by HH preserve this row-independent minorization. Writing osc⁡(f)=sup⁡f−inf⁡f\operatorname{osc}(f)=\sup f-\inf f, we obtain osc⁡(K~g,i,jwf)≤(1−α)osc⁡(f)\operatorname{osc}(\widetilde{K}_{g,i,j}^{w}f)\leq(1-\alpha)\operatorname{osc}(f) for every bounded ff at every within-block transition. Write ρ=1−α<1\rho=1-\alpha<1. A reset transition is used exactly and has Dobrushin coefficient at most one; there are only G0−1G_{0}-1 of them.

Step 3. Retain the full likelihood at resets. A connector can have an arbitrary normalized angular kernel. What is needed is a bound on the oscillation of its row mass, uniform even when the prescribed future event is rare. To obtain it, factor each reset through a deterministic separator. Fix

λ∗=e3/2∈(e,e2),Σy=∂D(y,λ∗M).(166)\lambda_{*}=e^{3/2}\in(e,e^{2}),\qquad\Sigma_{y}=\partial D(y,\lambda_{*}M). \tag*{(166)}

The next active outer interface after the terminal eMeM-circle has scale e2Me^{2}M. The fixed-gap geometry and (135) put Σy\Sigma_{y} strictly between them and keep D(y,λ∗M)D(y,\lambda_{*}M) inside the applicable source interval and global killing domain.

Let e=(u,v)∈Eye=(u,v)\in E_{y} be the last exit edge of a nonempty block, so the exterior kernel starts at v=out⁡(e)v=\operatorname{out}(e) and ∣v−y∣=eM+O(1)|v-y|=eM+O(1). Put

θ−=HD(y,M),θ+=τD(y,λ∗M),\theta_{-}=H_{D(y,M)},\qquad\theta_{+}=\tau_{D(y,\lambda_{*}M)},

and on {θ+<θ−}\{\theta_{+}<\theta_{-}\} let F+F_{+} be the directed outward edge at θ+\theta_{+}. For g<G0g<G_{0}, let Bgw(f,dζ,dω′)B_{g}^{w}(f,\mathrm{d}\zeta,\mathrm{d}\omega') be the genuine post-separator subkernel which realizes the rest of the no-more-piece suffix, all folded empty source intervals and safe connector signs, and the next nonempty block prefix through its first endpoint pair. For g=G0g=G_{0} it instead contains the remaining suffix and final cemetery transition. Durations, parities, angles, and already visible edge data are outputs of this kernel, never extra scalar conditions. Set rgw(f)=Bgw(f,all outputs)r_{g}^{w}(f)=B_{g}^{w}(f,\text{all outputs}). The strong Markov property gives the exact factorization

Cgw(e,dγ)=∑fPv(θ+<θ−,F+=f)Bgw(f,dγ).(167)C_{g}^{w}(e,\mathrm{d}\gamma)=\sum_{f}P_{v}(\theta_{+}<\theta_{-},F_{+}=f)B_{g}^{w}(f,\mathrm{d}\gamma). \tag*{(167)}

Indeed, a return to D(y,M)D(y,M) before Σy\Sigma_{y} after the alleged last completed piece would, on the subsequent trip to the block’s outer endpoint, force another exit of DyD_{y}, hence another completed terminal piece. Conversely, no reset restriction other than avoiding the inner circle is tested before Σy\Sigma_{y}; all remaining restrictions occur in BgwB_{g}^{w}.

Define on the digital annulus

Ωy=D(y,λ∗M)∖D(y,M)hgw(z)=Ez[rgw(F+);θ+<θ−].(168)\begin{aligned} \Omega_{y} &= D(y,\lambda_{*}M)\setminus D(y,M) \\ h_{g}^{w}(z) &= E_{z}[r_{g}^{w}(F_{+});\theta_{+}<\theta_{-}]. \tag*{(168)} \end{aligned}

This is a nonnegative discrete harmonic function at every interior vertex, with exact Dirichlet value zero on the inner boundary and the possibly rough edge data rgwr_{g}^{w} on the outer boundary. Global killing and the entire later connector/prefix occur only in that outer boundary datum. Moreover,

σg,bg(e)=Cgw1(e)=hgw(v).(169)\sigma_{g,b_{g}}(e)=C_{g}^{w}1(e)=h_{g}^{w}(v). \tag*{(169)}

All such vv’s lie in the band ∣∥v−y∥−eM∣≤2\bigl|\lVert v-y\rVert-eM\bigr|\leq2, a distance comparable to MM from both components of ∂Ωy\partial\Omega_{y}. A fixed number of overlapping lattice balls of radius cMcM, whose doubled balls remain in Ωy\Omega_{y}, connects any two points of this band. Applying (164) along this chain gives

sup⁡eσg,bg(e)≤CHinf⁡eσg,bg(e).(170)\sup_{e}\sigma_{g,b_{g}}(e)\leq C_{H}\inf_{e}\sigma_{g,b_{g}}(e). \tag*{(170)}

If hgwh_{g}^{w} vanishes at one interior start, the mean-value property and connectedness make it identically zero, and the complete word cylinder has zero mass and is discarded. Otherwise every row is positive and the normalization Jg,bgw=Cgw/σg,bgJ_{g,b_g}^{w}=C_g^{w}/\sigma_{g,b_g} is defined. This proves (170) independently of how rare or rough the later event is.

Start the first block with its actual chronological law through the first endpoint. Use every normalized internal kernel and every normalized reset in chronological order, including the final cemetery output, to define P~w\widetilde{P}_w. Direct disintegration of the unnormalized cylinder measure gives

dPwdP~w=∏g=1G0∏i=1bgσg,i(eg,i)EP~w∏g=1G0∏i=1bgσg,i(eg,i).(171)\frac{\mathrm{d}P_w}{\mathrm{d}\widetilde{P}_w} = \frac{\prod_{g=1}^{G_0}\prod_{i=1}^{b_g}\sigma_{g,i}(e_{g,i})} { E_{\widetilde{P}_w}\prod_{g=1}^{G_0}\prod_{i=1}^{b_g}\sigma_{g,i}(e_{g,i})}. \tag*{(171)}

The initial prefix is absorbed into μ1,w\mu_{1,w}, and the product includes the final suffix. Equation (162), applied also to a centered final suffix, bounds the logarithmic row oscillation of centered factors by Cqi/MCq_i/M; (170) costs log⁡CH\log C_H once per genuinely noncentered reset. Thus in the upper centered extension Gnc=0G_{\mathrm{nc}}=0, while in the lower construction Gnc≤G0≤m0G_{\mathrm{nc}}\le G_0\le m_0. Scalar constants cancel between numerator and denominator, so, after absorbing log⁡CH\log C_H into CC,

∣log⁡dPwdP~w∣≤2{CQ/M+CGnc}=2ηw∗.(172)\left|\log\frac{\mathrm{d}P_w}{\mathrm{d}\widetilde{P}_w}\right| \le2\{CQ/M+CG_{\mathrm{nc}}\}=2\eta_w^{*}. \tag*{(172)}

Step 4. Concentrate the endpoint averages. Fix ww and a normalized f∈FMf\in\mathscr{F}_M, expose the sequential joint chain under P~w\widetilde{P}_w, and use the Doob martingale of the whole sum ∑i≤bf(ωi)\sum_{i\le b}f(\omega_i). Changing ωi\omega_i changes the conditional expectation of the future sum by at most

2G0∑j≥0ρj≤2G01−ρ;2G_0\sum_{j\ge0}\rho^j\le\frac{2G_0}{1-\rho};

the factor G0G_0 accounts for the possibility that a reset preserves all the remaining variation. Azuma–Hoeffding consequently gives

P~w(∣∑i≤bf(ωi)−EP~w∑i≤bf(ωi)∣>bt)≤2e−cbt2.(173)\widetilde{P}_w\left(\left|\sum_{i\le b}f(\omega_i)-E_{\widetilde{P}_w}\sum_{i\le b}f(\omega_i)\right|>bt\right) \le2e^{-cbt^2}. \tag*{(173)}

To center this concentration bound at bcfbc_f, let μ\mu be the law of the first endpoint of a block, and consider its kk-th endpoint. Comparing the same transition product started from μ\mu and from ΛM\Lambda_M costs 2ρk−12\rho^{k-1} by contraction. The reference product is controlled by (163), so

∣μK~g,1w⋯K~g,k−1wf−cf∣≤2ρk−1+C{εM+1M∑j<k(qj+1)}.(174)\begin{aligned} \left|\mu\widetilde{K}_{g,1}^{w}\cdots\widetilde{K}_{g,k-1}^{w}f-c_f\right| &\le2\rho^{k-1}\\ &\quad+C\left\{\varepsilon_M+\frac{1}{M}\sum_{j<k}(q_j+1)\right\}. \tag*{(174)} \end{aligned}

For k=1k=1 this just uses ∥f∥∞≤1\lVert f\rVert_\infty\le1. Summing (174) over all endpoints and blocks, and using ∑j(qj+1)≤CQ\sum_j(q_j+1)\le CQ, gives

∣EP~w∑i≤bf(ωi)−bcf∣≤C{G0+bεM+bQ/M}.(175)\left|E_{\widetilde{P}_w}\sum_{i\le b}f(\omega_i)-bc_f\right| \le C\{G_0+b\varepsilon_M+bQ/M\}. \tag*{(175)}

A union bound under P~w\widetilde{P}_w, followed by (149), proves (150).

Step 5. Bound the exponential occupation moment. Conditional on the endpoints, (155)–(156) makes the exponential moment ∏i(1+rmx(ωi))\prod_i(1+rm_x(\omega_i)). Under P~w\widetilde P_w, put

ψi=log⁡(1+rmx(ωi)).(176)\psi_i=\log(1+rm_x(\omega_i)). \tag*{(176)}

Since 0≤mx≤C0\le m_x\le C, ψi=rmx(ωi)+O(r2)\psi_i=rm_x(\omega_i)+O(r^2) and osc⁡(ψi)≤Cr\operatorname{osc}(\psi_i)\le Cr. The same influence calculation as for (173) shows that every Doob martingale difference for ∑iψi\sum_i\psi_i is at most CG0r/(1−ρ)CG_0r/(1-\rho). Conditional Hoeffding and Jensen therefore give

0≤log⁡EP~we∑iψi−EP~w∑iψi≤Cbr2.(177)0\le\log E_{\widetilde P_w}e^{\sum_i\psi_i}-E_{\widetilde P_w}\sum_i\psi_i\le Cbr^2. \tag*{(177)}

The exact exit-edge average and its Taylor remainder are

∑eH(a,e)log⁡(1+rmx(a,e))=rG(a,x)+O(r2),(178)\sum_e H(a,e)\log(1+rm_x(a,e))=rG(a,x)+O(r^2), \tag*{(178)}

because mx≤Cm_x\le C and ∑eH(a,e)mx(a,e)=G(a,x)≤C\sum_eH(a,e)m_x(a,e)=G(a,x)\le C. The endpoint mean estimate (175), applied to mx/Cm_x/C, and the reference mean (161) give

∑i≤bEP~wmx(ωi)=bg+O{G0+bεM+bQ/M}.(179)\sum_{i\le b}E_{\widetilde P_w}m_x(\omega_i)=bg+O\{G_0+b\varepsilon_M+bQ/M\}. \tag*{(179)}

Combining (176)–(179) proves the completed-piece version of (152) under P~w\widetilde P_w. Finally, (149) puts the exact full-word density (171) between e−2ηw∗e^{-2\eta_w^*} and e2ηw∗e^{2\eta_w^*}. Multiplying the nonnegative exponential by this global density and taking logarithms changes the answer by at most 2ηw∗2\eta_w^*, exactly the last error in (152). This proves (152) under PwP_w.

Step 6. Optimize the terminal upper tail. The first choice of tilt will cancel the endpoint Gaussian cost. A further adjustment supplies decay in the distance from the preferred endpoint, which is needed when summing all endpoint bands. The inverse of (151) is

θ(r)=log⁡1+G(x,x)r1+(G(x,x)−1)r.(180)\theta(r)=\log\frac{1+G(x,x)r}{1+(G(x,x)-1)r}. \tag*{(180)}

Take r0=(gL)−1r_0=(gL)^{-1}. Since G(x,x)=gh+O(1)G(x,x)=gh+O(1) and h2/J=o(1)h^2/J=o(1),

θ(r0)=1gJ+O(J−2+h2J−3),θ(r0)U=2J−clog⁡J+O(1),bgr0=b/L.(181)\theta(r_0)=\frac{1}{gJ}+O(J^{-2}+h^2J^{-3}),\qquad \theta(r_0)U=2J-c\log J+O(1),\qquad bgr_0=b/L. \tag*{(181)}

Since G0=1G_0=1, b=O(J2)b=O(J^2), Q≤J3Q\le J^3, and M=e(Chlog⁡J)4M=e^{(C_h\log J)^4}, every error term in (152) is O(1)O(1) at r0r_0, uniformly in the word. Write θx(r0)\theta_x(r_0) for (180) at site xx. Since r0=O(J−1)≤c/hr_0=O(J^{-1})\le c/h, (152) applies; also ∣Vy∣≤Ce2h|V_y|\le Ce^{2h} and (181) is uniform over x∈Vyx\in V_y. Thus Chernoff’s inequality gives

P(max⁡x∈Vy∑i=1bXi(x)≥U ∣ w)≤∑x∈Vye−θx(r0)UE[eθx(r0)∑i=1bXi(x) ∣ w]≤Ce2he−2J+clog⁡J+b/L=Ce−2LJceb/L.\begin{aligned} P\left(\left.\max_{x\in V_y}\sum_{i=1}^{b}X_i(x)\ge U\ \right|\ w\right) &\le\sum_{x\in V_y}e^{-\theta_x(r_0)U} E\left[\left.e^{\theta_x(r_0)\sum_{i=1}^{b}X_i(x)}\ \right|\ w\right] \\ &\le Ce^{2h}e^{-2J+c\log J+b/L} =Ce^{-2L}J^ce^{b/L}. \end{aligned}

This is the first line of (153).

The first tilt’s factor eb/Le^{b/L} will cancel the traversal endpoint cost. We need additional decay in the endpoint gap to sum the ballot factor 1+p1+p over all endpoint bands. Choose C0C_0 to dominate the quadratic error O(br2)O(br^2) in (152), and set

Fb(r)=θ(r)U−bgr−C0br2.F_b(r)=\theta(r)U-bgr-C_0br^2.

The remaining moment errors are O(1)O(1) uniformly on each fixed interval 0≤r≤a/h0 \le r \le a/h allowed by (152). Hence Chernoff’s inequality and the union over sites give a bound of Cexp⁡{2h−Fb(r)}C\exp\{2h-F_b(r)\}. An increase in FbF_b beyond Fb(r0)F_b(r_0) therefore improves the preceding tail estimate by the corresponding exponential factor. We now quantify that increase. Uniformly on every fixed interval 0≤r≤a/h0 \le r \le a/h,

θ′(r)=1(1+G(x,x)r)(1+(G(x,x)−1)r),−θ′′(r)=θ′(r){G(x,x)1+G(x,x)r+G(x,x)−11+(G(x,x)−1)r}.\begin{aligned} \theta'(r) &= \frac{1}{(1+G(x,x)r)(1+(G(x,x)-1)r)}, \\ -\theta''(r) &= \theta'(r)\left\{\frac{G(x,x)}{1+G(x,x)r}+\frac{G(x,x)-1}{1+(G(x,x)-1)r}\right\}. \end{aligned}

Thus ca≤θ′(r)≤Cac_a \le\theta'(r) \le C_a, cah≤−θ′′(r)≤Cahc_a h \le-\theta''(r) \le C_a h, and ∣θ′′′(r)∣≤Cah2|\theta'''(r)| \le C_a h^2. Since b=O(J2)b=O(J^2), after increasing JJ,

−C1J2h≤Fb′′(r)≤−c1J2h.(182)-C_1J^2h \le F_b''(r) \le-c_1J^2h. \tag*{(182)}

Also

θ′(r0)=1−2hL+O(L−1+h2L−2).(183)\theta'(r_0)=1-\frac{2h}{L}+O(L^{-1}+h^2L^{-2}). \tag*{(183)}

Define b∗b_* by Fb∗′(r0)=0F_{b_*}'(r_0)=0. Since

b∗=Uθ′(r0)g+2C0r0,b_*=\frac{U\theta'(r_0)}{g+2C_0r_0},

the relations J=L+h+O(1)J=L+h+O(1) and h2=o(J)h^2=o(J) give

b∗=2L2−cLlog⁡J+O(L+h2+hlog⁡J)=2L2−cLlog⁡J+O(L).b_*=2L^2-cL\log J+O(L+h^2+h\log J)=2L^2-cL\log J+O(L).

Consequently

Y∗=2b∗=2L−c2log⁡J+O(1),(184)Y_*=\sqrt{2b_*}=2L-\frac{c}{2}\log J+O(1), \tag*{(184)}

The preferred gap is therefore BL+1−Y∗=O(log⁡J)B_L+1-Y_*=O(\log J). More exactly,

Fb′(r0)=(g+2C0r0)(b∗−b)=(g+o(1))(Y∗−Y)(Y∗+Y)2.(185)F_b'(r_0)=(g+2C_0r_0)(b_*-b)=(g+o(1))\frac{(Y_*-Y)(Y_*+Y)}{2}. \tag*{(185)}

Fix a sufficiently small constant δ>0\delta>0. If ϵL≤Y≤BL+1\epsilon L \le Y \le B_L+1 and ∣Y−Y∗∣≤δJ|Y-Y_*| \le\delta J, Taylor’s formula, (182), and the displacement

s=Fb′(r0)C1J2hs=\frac{F_b'(r_0)}{C_1J^2h}

(with C1C_1 enlarged once) give

sup⁡rFb(r)−Fb(r0)≥κ(Y−Y∗)2h.(186)\sup_r F_b(r)-F_b(r_0)\ge\kappa\frac{(Y-Y_*)^2}{h}. \tag*{(186)}

This displacement is feasible. If it is negative, the barrier and h1/4=O(log⁡J)h^{1/4}=O(\log J) imply Y−Y∗=O(log⁡J)Y-Y_*=O(\log J), whence ∣s∣=O(log⁡J/(Jh))=o(r0)|s|=O(\log J/(Jh))=o(r_0). If it is positive, choosing δ\delta small ensures s<a/(2h)s<a/(2h). When ϵL≤Y≤Y∗−δJ\epsilon L \le Y \le Y_*-\delta J, choose instead a fixed s=a0/h>0s=a_0/h>0, with a0a_0 small compared with δ/C1\delta/C_1. Equations (182)–(185) then give

Fb(r0+s)−Fb(r0)≥κJ2/h.(187)F_b(r_0+s)-F_b(r_0)\ge\kappa J^2/h. \tag*{(187)}

There is no range Y≥Y∗+δJY \ge Y_*+\delta J because the upper barrier permits only an O(log⁡J)O(\log J) overshoot above Y∗Y_*.

Finally, if Y<ϵLY<\epsilon L, take r=a0/hr=a_0/h directly. The integral formula θ(r)=∫0rθ′(t) dt\theta(r)=\int_0^r\theta'(t)\,\mathrm{d}t gives θ(a0/h)≥caa0/h\theta(a_0/h)\ge c_a a_0/h. First choosing ϵ\epsilon and then a0a_0 small yields

Fb(a0/h)≥κ0J2/h,Fb(r0)=O(J)=o(J2/h).(188)F_b(a_0/h)\ge\kappa_0J^2/h,\qquad F_b(r_0)=O(J)=o(J^2/h). \tag*{(188)}

Equations (186)–(188) supply the gain beyond the first tilt. Since p−(BL+1−Y∗)=Y∗−Yp-(B_L+1-Y_*)=Y_*-Y, this is the decay claimed in (153). The expansion (184) is uniform in xx, so a common choice

p∗=BL+1−2L+c2log⁡Jp_* = B_L + 1 - 2L + \frac{c}{2}\log J

differs from each site’s preferred gap by O(1)O(1). The inequality (u−v)2≥u2/2−v2(u-v)^2 \ge u^2/2-v^2 absorbs this bounded shift by changing C,κC,\kappa. Thus the union over sites retains the same decay factor, proving both endpoint alternatives in (153).

Step 7. Account for the initial and final portions. In the applications, all core occupation belongs to completed pieces. A lower source block begins and ends on interfaces outside DyD_y. An upper block with k≤C0log⁡Jk\le C_0\log J starts at the origin, which is outside DyD_y, and ends at σy\sigma_y, also outside DyD_y. Before the first inward crossing of radius MM the path cannot visit VyV_y. After any visit to VyV_y, reaching the block’s outer endpoint forces a later crossing of radius eMeM, so that inward crossing and all intervening core occupation form a completed piece. Thus the initial and final incomplete portions contribute exactly zero to every X(x)X(x) used here. Upper cells with k>C0log⁡Jk>C_0\log J, including the cells near the walk’s starting point, are treated separately by the one-site Green estimate in (198). ■\blacksquare

A local upper bound for the maximum.

Proposition 6.3. For every fixed β>0\beta>0, c>2c>2 and A<∞A<\infty,

P(max⁡∥x∥≤eJJ−βLτeJ(x)≥uJ,c)≤J−2β+c−2+o(1)+O(J−A).(189)P\left(\max_{\lVert x\rVert\le e^J J^{-\beta}}L_{\tau_{e^J}}(x)\ge u_{J,c}\right)\le J^{-2\beta+c-2+o(1)}+O(J^{-A}). \tag*{(189)}

The o(1)o(1) is uniform when β,c\beta,c range over compact subsets of (0,∞)(0,\infty) and (2,∞)(2,\infty), respectively.

Proof of Proposition 6.3. We work with one terminal cell at a time and extend the walk to a disk centered at that cell. This puts the source law, traversal barrier, and terminal word in the same centered geometry. The traversal estimate and the terminal exponential moment then have opposite Gaussian factors; after their cancellation, the ballot prefactor supplies the required power J−2J^{-2}.

Step 1. Choose cells and exclude barrier crossings. Use the upper buffer

h=(Chlog⁡J)4,M=eh,L=J−h,h=(C_h\log J)^4,\qquad M=e^h,\qquad L=J-h,

with ChC_h fixed large. Cover the target disk by original MM-cells obtained from the dilated image of Rosen’s predetermined net FL′F'_L, rounding each image center to its nearest lattice point. The chart has uniformly bounded distortion on the relevant compact patch, so these centers are cMcM-separated and form a CMCM-cover. After altering the fixed core and terminal radius factors, every lattice point lies in a core, the overlap multiplicity is bounded, and Lemmas 5.3 and 6.2 apply to the same cells. We continue to denote their radii by M/2M/2 and eMeM. For a cell center with ∥y∥>M\lVert y\rVert>M, use the exact index from (96),

uy=log⁡3eJ∥y∥,k=k(y)=⌈uy⌉,m=k+1.(190)u_y=\log\frac{3e^J}{\lVert y\rVert},\qquad k=k(y)=\lceil u_y\rceil,\qquad m=k+1. \tag*{(190)}

Cells with ∥y∥≤M\lVert y\rVert\le M are assigned to the final sitewise range k>C0log⁡Jk>C_0\log J. Uniform distortion of the fixed chart makes (190) equal to the spherical source index (36) up to a bounded additive error, which is absorbed by the barrier slack. Every target cell has

k≥s:=βlog⁡J+O(1).(191)k\ge s:=\beta\log J+O(1). \tag*{(191)}

For this fixed cell continue the walk from τeJ\tau_{eJ} to σy=τD(y,3eJ)\sigma_y=\tau_{D(y,3e^J)}. By (76), a high local time in the cell before τeJ\tau_{eJ} is also high before σy\sigma_y. All counts, words, terminal bridges, and the source index below refer to this single yy-centered extended path. This domination is applied separately to each cell before the final union bound.

First exclude a crossing of the fixed positive-intercept coefficient-two barrier (154) at or before level LL. Since h>(4log⁡J)4h>(4\log J)^4 after choosing ChC_h large, all these levels lie in the range of (103)–(105). Restricting the source shells to k≥sk\ge s and using (78) gives

P(some bad prefix in the target)≤C∑k≥s∑l=k+1Le2(l−k)+12(l∧(J−l))1/4e−2l−(l∧(J−l))1/4≤J−2β+o(1).(192)\begin{aligned} P(\text{some bad prefix in the target}) &\le C\sum_{k\ge s}\sum_{l=k+1}^{L} e^{2(l-k)+\frac{1}{2}(l\wedge(J-l))^{1/4}} e^{-2l-(l\wedge(J-l))^{1/4}} \\ &\le J^{-2\beta+o(1)}. \tag*{(192)} \end{aligned}

The direct lattice estimates (98)–(105), for both the representative count and the probability of a crossing at one center, apply through the source-shell range k≤C0log⁡Jk\le C_0\log J.

Step 2. Use the source-inclusive endpoint estimate. Fix an original cell with s≤k≤C0log⁡Js\le k\le C_0\log J, where its source index is k=k(y)k=k(y) in (190). The extension to σy\sigma_y makes all its radial interfaces centered at yy, as required by Lemma 5.3; our choice of hh satisfies h/log⁡J→∞h/\log J\to\infty and h=o(J)h=o(J). On the complement of the crossing event in Step 1, its prefix satisfies the barrier (154) and hence the no-crossing event in (79). Put Y=2Ty,LSY=\sqrt{2T_{y,L}^{S}}, and use the same small cutoff ϵ0=ϵ\epsilon_0=\epsilon as in Lemma 6.2. Take ϵ0L≤q≤BL+1\epsilon_0L\le q\le B_L+1. With p=BL+1−qp=B_L+1-q, the bound (79) gives

P(prefix good, Y∈Iq)≤C(k+1)C(1+p)L−2exp⁡{−q2/(2L)}.(193)P(\text{prefix good},\,Y\in I_q)\le C(k+1)^C(1+p)L^{-2}\exp\{-q^2/(2L)\}. \tag*{(193)}

Here Iq=[q,q+1]I_q=[q,q+1], and BL=BLJB_L=B_L^J in that lemma because L=J−hL=J-h. The estimate already includes the source population and its last death decision; no conditioning on a source height is needed.

Step 3. Combine the traversal and terminal costs. The complementary endpoint range is controlled directly by the terminal tilt. If Y<ϵ0LY<\epsilon_0L, then b≤ϵ02L2/2+O(L)b\le\epsilon_0^2L^2/2+O(L), and the saturated line of (153), uniformly in the radial word, gives

P(terminal mark∣w)≤Ce−2LJcexp⁡{ϵ02L/2−κJ2/h+O(1)}.(194)P(\text{terminal mark}\mid w)\le Ce^{-2LJ^c}\exp\{\epsilon_0^2L/2-\kappa J^2/h+O(1)\}. \tag*{(194)}

After summing this over at most Ce2LCe^{2L} original cells, the result is o(J−A)o(J^{-A}) for every fixed AA, because h=o(J)h=o(J), after fixing ϵ0\epsilon_0 sufficiently small. This is why neither (41) nor (79) was claimed in the extinction range.

For the number b=TL+O(1)b=T_L+O(1) of completed outward pieces in the band IqI_q,

b=q2/2+O(L).b=q^2/2+O(L).

Since q≥ϵ0Lq\ge\epsilon_0L, uniformly in this band the actual terminal gap satisfies BL+1−2b=p+O(1)B_L+1-\sqrt{2b}=p+O(1). The bounded shift is absorbed by the same quadratic inequality used to choose a common p∗p_* above. Conditional on the radial word, Lemma 6.2 applies; the start/end observation at the end of that lemma shows that all visits to VyV_y belong to its completed pieces. Multiply (193) by (153). Since b=q2/2+O(L)b=q^2/2+O(L), the combined endpoint cost is

exp⁡{−q22L+bL}=eO(1).\exp\left\{-\frac{q^2}{2L}+\frac{b}{L}\right\}=e^{O(1)}.

Thus the cancellation is uniform throughout the central range. The remaining ballot factor 1+p1+p is summable because of the additional terminal decay:

∑0≤p≤BL+1(1+p)exp⁡{−κmin⁡((p−p∗)2h,J2h)}=Jo(1).(195)\sum_{0 \le p \le B_{L}+1}(1+p)\exp\left\{-\kappa\min\left(\frac{(p-p_{*})^{2}}{h},\frac{J^{2}}{h}\right)\right\}=J^{o(1)}. \tag*{(195)}

Indeed the nonsaturated Gaussian sum is

O((1+∣p∗∣)h+h)=Jo(1),O\left((1+|p_{*}|)\sqrt{h}+h\right)=J^{o(1)},

while its saturated complement contributes O(J2)e−κJ2/h=o(1)O(J^{2})e^{-\kappa J^{2}/h}=o(1). The small-YY part has the saturated factor in (153). Thus, uniformly over all endpoint bands and all radial words,

P(this original cell is good and marked)≤(k+1)Ce−2LJc−2+o(1).(196)P(\text{this original cell is good and marked})\le(k+1)^{C}e^{-2L}J^{c-2+o(1)}. \tag*{(196)}

The terminal maximum has already included all sites of the original cell, so the remaining union bound is over the original cells.

There are O(e2(L−k))O(e^{2(L-k)}) original cells in shell kk. Summing (196) and using (191) yields

∑k=sC0log⁡Je2(L−k)(k+1)Ce−2LJc−2+o(1)≤J−2β+c−2+o(1).(197)\sum_{k=s}^{C_{0}\log J}e^{2(L-k)}(k+1)^{C}e^{-2L}J^{c-2+o(1)} \le J^{-2\beta+c-2+o(1)}. \tag*{(197)}

Step 4. Treat cells near the starting point. It remains to treat k>C0log⁡Jk>C_{0}\log J. For a lattice site in shell kk, Green-function identities and Lemma 3.1 give

P0(Hx<σy)≤C(k+1)/JP_{0}(H_{x}<\sigma_{y})\le C(k+1)/J

and, conditionally on the hit,

Px(Lσy(x)≥uJ,c)≤Ce−2JJc.P_{x}(L_{\sigma_{y}}(x)\ge u_{J,c})\le Ce^{-2J}J^{c}.

There are O(e2J−2k)O(e^{2J-2k}) sites in that shell. Their total contribution is

Jc−1−2C0+o(1).(198)J^{c-1-2C_{0}+o(1)}. \tag*{(198)}

Choose C0C_{0} after A,cA,c to make (198) O(J−A)O(J^{-A}). The barrier-crossing bound (192) is absorbed by (197) because c>2c>2. These two estimates and the sitewise remainder therefore give (189). The word-cap and digital row errors are superpolynomial by Lemma 5.3 and are included in O(J−A)O(J^{-A}). ■\blacksquare

The terminal maximum and the lower bound

The coarse construction stops at depth L=J−hL=J-h and produces a cell with b=2L2−2Llog⁡L+O(L)b=2L^{2}-2L\log L+O(L) completed terminal pieces. Their mean occupation, about gbgb, misses a contribution of order JhJh from the last hh logarithmic scales. Maximizing over the terminal disk recovers this contribution: after conditioning on the entrance and exit pairs, the pieces are independent, and their normalized centered occupation field has covariance close to 2g2g times the killed Green function. A Gaussian approximation and the discrete Gaussian free field maximum then give a gain of 22gbh2\sqrt{2}g\sqrt{bh}, which restores the missing depth.

We prove this estimate for one fixed cell before combining it with coarse-root existence. Uniform conditional failure bounds allow us to sum over the candidates and obtain a disk maximum with positive probability. Independent walk segments then yield the almost-sure lower bound at deterministic times.

Conditional occupation in one terminal disk

Recall that Dy=D(y,eM)D_y=D(y,eM) is the killing disk, Vy=D(y,M/2)V_y=D(y,M/2) is its core, and Xi(x)X_i(x) is the occupation of xx by the iith completed bridge. Write G=GDyG=G_{D_y} and retain the conditional moments from Section 6:

mx(ω)=EωX(x),qx,x′(ω)=Eω[X(x)X(x′)],ω=(a,e).m_x(\omega)=E^\omega X(x), \qquad q_{x,x'}(\omega)=E^\omega[X(x)X(x')], \qquad\omega=(a,e).

Here aa is the entrance vertex, ee is the directed exit edge, and ΛM(a,e)=λA(a)H(a,e)\Lambda_M(a,e)=\lambda_A(a)H(a,e) is the reference endpoint law. As before, ΛMf=∑a,eΛM(a,e)f(a,e)\Lambda_M f=\sum_{a,e}\Lambda_M(a,e)f(a,e) denotes its average. We need the empirical means and second moments to be close to these reference averages for every site and pair of sites. The terminal scale below is chosen so that this simultaneous control and the final error both fit within the Jlog⁡JJ\log J margin.

Lemma 7.1 (The terminal maximum). Fix 1<ξ<21<\xi<2 and put

h=(log⁡J)ξ,M=eh,L=J−h.h=(\log J)^\xi,\qquad M=e^h,\qquad L=J-h.

Suppose an admissible centered block word has G0≤m0G_0\le m_0 blocks and bb completed terminal pieces, where

b=2L2−2Llog⁡L+O(L)(199)b=2L^2-2L\log L+O(L) \tag*{(199)}

with a uniform remainder constant. Put tJ=log⁡J/(Jlog⁡log⁡J)t_J=\log J/(J\log\log J). Call the endpoint realization moment regular if, for every x,x′∈Vyx,x'\in V_y,

∣1b∑i≤bmx(ωi)−ΛMmx∣≤2tJ,∣1b∑i≤bqx,x′(ωi)−ΛMqx,x′∣≤2tJ(1+G(x,x′)).(200)\begin{aligned} \left|\frac{1}{b}\sum_{i\le b}m_x(\omega_i)-\Lambda_Mm_x\right|&\le2t_J,\\ \left|\frac{1}{b}\sum_{i\le b}q_{x,x'}(\omega_i)-\Lambda_Mq_{x,x'}\right|&\le2t_J\left(1+G(x,x')\right). \tag*{(200)} \end{aligned}

Uniformly over these words,

P(moment regularity fails∣w)≤CM4e−cbtJ2=o(J−A)(201)P(\text{moment regularity fails}\mid w)\le CM^4e^{-cbt_J^2}=o(J^{-A}) \tag*{(201)}

for every fixed A>0A>0.

Condition on the intrinsic sigma-field Ry\mathcal{R}_y defined in Section 5. It records the exterior pieces, the word, and every entrance and directed-exit pair, while erasing the completed bridges and their durations. For every moment-regular realization, under the conditional law given Ry\mathcal{R}_y,

max⁡x∈Vy∑i≤bXi(x)=gb+22 gb h+OP(Jh+Jlog⁡Jlog⁡log⁡J).(202)\max_{x\in V_y}\sum_{i\le b}X_i(x)=gb+2\sqrt{2}\,g\sqrt{b}\,h+O_P\left(J\sqrt{h}+\frac{J\log J}{\log\log J}\right). \tag*{(202)}

The remainder is uniform over such realizations. In particular, for every fixed η>0\eta>0, the conditional probability that this maximum is at least uJ,2+ηu_{J,2+\eta} tends to one uniformly.

Proof. All probabilities, moments, and covariances of bridge interiors in this proof are conditional on Ry\mathcal{R}_y. We will show that the normalized centered field has maximum 22 gh+OP(h)2\sqrt{2}\,gh+O_P(\sqrt{h}). Multiplication by b\sqrt{b} and restoration of the means then give (202); the final calculation checks that its deterministic part reaches the required level.

Step 1. Conditional moments and their common center. Fix the entrance and directed-exit pairs (ai,ei)i≤b(a_i,e_i)_{i\le b}. The erased occupation vectors are independent killed bridges under the conditional law. With H(a,e)H(a,e) denoting the exit-edge probability from aa, the one-visit and two-visit decompositions give

Ea,eX(x)=G(a,x)H(x,e)H(a,e)(203)E^{a,e}X(x)=\frac{G(a,x)H(x,e)}{H(a,e)} \tag*{(203)}

and

Ea[X(x)X(x′);E=e]=G(a,x)G(x,x′)H(x′,e)+G(a,x′)G(x′,x)H(x,e)−1{x=x′}G(a,x)H(x,e).(204)\begin{aligned} E_a[X(x)X(x');E=e] ={}& G(a,x)G(x,x')H(x',e) \\ &+G(a,x')G(x',x)H(x,e)-\mathbf{1}_{\{x=x'\}}G(a,x)H(x,e). \tag*{(204)} \end{aligned}

The subtraction accounts for the visit counted in both orders when x=x′x=x'. Dividing (204) by H(a,e)H(a,e) gives qx,x′(a,e)q_{x,x'}(a,e).

To apply the endpoint concentration estimate, first normalize the two moment functions. The fixed-ratio Harnack estimates yield

∥mx/C∥∞≤1,∥qx,x′C(1+G(x,x′))∥∞≤1(205)\lVert m_x/C\rVert_{\infty}\le1,\qquad \left\lVert\frac{q_{x,x'}}{C(1+G(x,x'))}\right\rVert_{\infty}\le1 \tag*{(205)}

uniformly in x,x′∈Vyx,x'\in V_y. These are exactly the functions in the finite Green class (145), whose exit-edge averages are (157)–(158). Thus the word concentration estimate (150) applies to at most CM4CM^4 functions. Its deterministic bias and likelihood correction are small enough: admissibility gives G0≤m0G_0\le m_0 and Q≤J3Q\le J^3, while the choice h=(log⁡J)ξh=(\log J)^\xi with ξ>1\xi>1 makes M=ehM=e^h grow faster than every power of JJ. Hence

G0/b+εM+Q/M=o(tJ),ηw∗=O(1).(206)G_0/b+\varepsilon_M+Q/M=o(t_J),\qquad\eta_w^*=O(1). \tag*{(206)}

Apply (150) with t=tJ/C1t=t_J/C_1, where C1C_1 is a sufficiently large fixed multiple of the normalization constant in (145). After restoring the normalizations in (205), the tolerances are those in (200). Thus

\begin{aligned} P\bigl(\text{[](#eq:7.2) fails}\mid w\bigr) &\le CM^4\exp\left\{-c\frac{\log^2 J}{(\log\log J)^2}\right\} \\ &=o(J^{-A}) \tag*{(207)} \end{aligned}

for every fixed A>0A>0. Indeed, log⁡M4=4h\log M^4=4h, whereas btJ2≍log⁡2J/(log⁡log⁡J)2bt_J^2\asymp\log^2J/(\log\log J)^2; the latter dominates both hh and log⁡J\log J because ξ<2\xi<2. The estimate is uniform over the normalized reset kernels, which are integrated out in the conditional endpoint law. This proves (201). The smaller terminal scale is needed here because all pairs of sites are screened simultaneously; the upper bound used the one-point exponential estimate (152) before its spatial union bound.

We next identify the reference averages, which determine the mean and covariance of the occupation field. Multiplying each conditional moment by ΛM(a,e)=λA(a)H(a,e)\Lambda_M(a,e)=\lambda_A(a)H(a,e) cancels its denominator H(a,e)H(a,e). Summing over ee uses ∑eH(x,e)=1\sum_e H(x,e)=1; averaging the remaining entrance factor gives dx=∑aλA(a)G(a,x)d_x=\sum_a\lambda_A(a)G(a,x) from (159). The Green comparison (160)–(161) therefore yields

ΛMmx=dx,ΛMqx,x′=dxG(x,x′)+dx′G(x′,x)−1{x=x′}dx,sup⁡x∈Vy∣dx−g∣≤CεM.(208)\begin{aligned} \Lambda_Mm_x &= d_x,\\ \Lambda_Mq_{x,x'} &= d_xG(x,x')+d_{x'}G(x',x)-\mathbf{1}_{\{x=x'\}}d_x,\\ \sup_{x\in V_y}|d_x-g| &\le C\varepsilon_M. \tag*{(208)} \end{aligned}

In particular, a moment-regular realization satisfies

max⁡x∈Vy∣1b∑i≤bEωiXi(x)−g∣≤CtJ+O(εM).(209)\max_{x\in V_y}\left|\frac{1}{b}\sum_{i\le b}E^{\omega_i}X_i(x)-g\right| \le Ct_J+O(\varepsilon_M). \tag*{(209)}

Center each bridge and normalize the sum:

X~i(x)=Xi(x)−mx(ωi),Ux=b−1/2∑i≤bX~i(x).\widetilde{X}_i(x)=X_i(x)-m_x(\omega_i),\qquad U_x=b^{-1/2}\sum_{i\le b}\widetilde{X}_i(x).

Conditional independence gives the covariance explicitly as

Cov⁡(Ux,Ux′)=1b∑i≤b(qx,x′(ωi)−mx(ωi)mx′(ωi)).\operatorname{Cov}(U_x,U_{x'})=\frac{1}{b}\sum_{i\le b}\left(q_{x,x'}(\omega_i)-m_x(\omega_i)m_{x'}(\omega_i)\right).

The moment screen replaces the average of qx,x′q_{x,x'} by its reference value with error O(tJ(1+h))=o(1)O(t_J(1+h))=o(1), since sup⁡x,x′G(x,x′)≤Ch\sup_{x,x'}G(x,x')\le Ch. In (208), replacing dx,dx′d_x,d_{x'} by gg costs O(εMh)=o(1)O(\varepsilon_Mh)=o(1), and symmetry gives gG(x,x′)+gG(x′,x)=2gG(x,x′)gG(x,x')+gG(x',x)=2gG(x,x'). The diagonal correction and the average of mx(ωi)mx′(ωi)m_x(\omega_i)m_{x'}(\omega_i) are bounded by (205). Consequently

max⁡x,x′∈Vy∣Cov⁡(Ux,Ux′)−2gGDy(x,x′)∣≤C.(210)\max_{x,x'\in V_y}\left|\operatorname{Cov}(U_x,U_{x'})-2gG_{D_y}(x,x')\right|\le C. \tag*{(210)}

Thus the reference averages give a nearly constant mean gg and a covariance equal to 2gG2gG up to a bounded error. These are the two inputs needed for the Gaussian approximation and comparison.

Step 2. Approximation of the maximum by a Gaussian maximum. The number of coordinates is P=∣Vy∣=e2h+O(1)P=|V_y|=e^{2h+O(1)}, whereas there are only b≍J2b\asymp J^2 independent vectors. We therefore need an approximation whose dimension dependence is logarithmic.

Let Yi=(Yi(x):x∈Vy)Y_i=(Y_i(x):x\in V_y) be independent centered Gaussian vectors with the respective conditional covariances of X~i\widetilde{X}_i, and set

Γx=b−1/2∑i≤bYi(x).\Gamma_x=b^{-1/2}\sum_{i\le b}Y_i(x).

Then Γ\Gamma has the conditional covariance of UU. Chernozhukov–Chetverikov–Kato [4], Theorem 3.1, applied under the conditional bridge law, gives, for every Borel set A⊂RA\subset\mathbb{R} and δ>0\delta>0,

P(max⁡x∈VyUx∈A)≤P(max⁡x∈VyΓx∈AC7δ)+C8log⁡2Pδ3b{Lb+Mb,X(δ)+Mb,Y(δ)}.(211)\begin{aligned} P\left(\max_{x\in V_y}U_x\in A\right) &\le P\left(\max_{x\in V_y}\Gamma_x\in A^{C_7\delta}\right)\\ &\quad+\frac{C_8\log^2P}{\delta^3\sqrt{b}} \left\{L_b+M_{b,X}(\delta)+M_{b,Y}(\delta)\right\}. \tag*{(211)} \end{aligned}

Here Ar={s:dist⁡(s,A)≤r}A^r=\{s:\operatorname{dist}(s,A)\le r\}, the constants are universal, and the error depends on the following third moments:

Lb=max⁡x∈Vy1b∑i≤bEωi∣X~i(x)∣3,L_b=\max_{x\in V_y}\frac{1}{b}\sum_{i\le b}E^{\omega_i}|\widetilde{X}_i(x)|^3,
Mb,X(δ)=1b∑i≤bEωi[max⁡x∈Vy∣X~i(x)∣3;max⁡x∈Vy∣X~i(x)∣>δblog⁡P].M_{b,X}(\delta)=\frac{1}{b}\sum_{i\le b}E^{\omega_i}\left[\max_{x\in V_y}|\widetilde{X}_i(x)|^3;\max_{x\in V_y}|\widetilde{X}_i(x)|>\frac{\delta\sqrt{b}}{\log P}\right].

The definition of Mb,YM_{b,Y} is the same with YiY_i in place of X~i\widetilde{X}_i and expectation under its Gaussian law. We will use δ=1\delta=1, so it remains to bound these moments and the maximum of Γ\Gamma.

A bridge reaches a fixed core site with probability of order at most h−1h^{-1}; conditional on reaching it, its number of visits has an exponential tail on scale hh. Retaining both factors makes the third-moment error small enough. The rank-one identity (155) gives this tail estimate directly. Indeed, at θ=c0/h\theta=c_0/h, with c0>0c_0>0 fixed and sufficiently small, (151) gives rθ≤C/hr_\theta\le C/h, and hence

Eω(eθX(x)−1)=rθmx(ω)≤C/h.E^\omega\left(e^{\theta X(x)}-1\right)=r_\theta m_x(\omega)\le C/h.

For s≥hs\ge h, exponential Markov’s inequality gives Pω(X(x)>s)≤Ch−1e−cs/hP^\omega(X(x)>s)\le Ch^{-1}e^{-cs/h}. To see the same scale for smaller ss, the generating function in (155) identifies X(x)X(x) as zero with probability 1−mx(ω)/G(x,x)1-m_x(\omega)/G(x,x) and, otherwise, as a geometric random variable of mean G(x,x)G(x,x). Since G(x,x)≍hG(x,x)\asymp h on VyV_y, we obtain, uniformly in the endpoint pair,

Pω(X(x)>s)≤Ch−1e−cs/h,Eω∣X(x)−EωX(x)∣3≤Ch2.(212)P^\omega(X(x)>s)\le Ch^{-1}e^{-cs/h},\qquad E^\omega\lvert X(x)-E^\omega X(x)\rvert^3\le Ch^2. \tag*{(212)}

Here and below s≥0s\ge0. Integrating the tail proves the moment bound, and therefore Lb=O(h2)L_b=O(h^2).

For δ=1\delta=1, the truncation threshold is

T=blog⁡P≍Jh.T=\frac{\sqrt b}{\log P}\asymp\frac{J}{h}.

A union bound over PP coordinates, followed by integration of (212), gives the truncated third moment. To make the truncation explicit, put Vi=max⁡x∈Vy∣X~i(x)∣V_i=\max_{x\in V_y}\lvert\widetilde X_i(x)\rvert. Since P≤Ce2hP\le Ce^{2h} and T≍J/h→∞T\asymp J/h\to\infty, (212) implies P(Vi>t)≤CPh−1e−ct/hP(V_i>t)\le CPh^{-1}e^{-ct/h} for t≥Tt\ge T. Therefore

E[Vi3;Vi>T]=T3P(Vi>T)+3∫T∞t2P(Vi>t) dt≤CPh−1(T3+hT2+h2T+h3)e−cT/h.\begin{aligned} E[V_i^3;V_i>T] &=T^3P(V_i>T)+3\int_T^\infty t^2P(V_i>t)\,\mathrm{d}t \\ &\le CPh^{-1}(T^3+hT^2+h^2T+h^3)e^{-cT/h}. \end{aligned}

Here T/h≍J/h2T/h\asymp J/h^2 and log⁡P=O(h)\log P=O(h), which gives

1b∑i≤bEωi[max⁡x∈Vy∣X~i(x)∣3;max⁡x∈Vy∣X~i(x)∣>T]≤exp⁡{−cJ/h2+Ch}.(213)\frac{1}{b}\sum_{i\le b}E^{\omega_i}\left[\max_{x\in V_y}\lvert\widetilde X_i(x)\rvert^3;\max_{x\in V_y}\lvert\widetilde X_i(x)\rvert>T\right]\le\exp\{-cJ/h^2+Ch\}. \tag*{(213)}

The polynomial factors are absorbed by the negative exponent, since J/h2J/h^2 dominates hh and log⁡J\log J. The matching Gaussian vectors have coordinate variances at most ChCh, by the second derivative of (6.38). Their truncated third-moment contribution is bounded by exp⁡{−cJ2/h3+Ch}\exp\{-cJ^2/h^3+Ch\} after the same union bound. Finally, log⁡2P/b=O(h2/J)\log^2P/\sqrt b=O(h^2/J) and Lb=O(h2)L_b=O(h^2), so the error in (7.13) is at most

O(h4/J)+exp⁡{−cJ/h2+Ch}=o(1).(214)O(h^4/J)+\exp\{-cJ/h^2+Ch\}=o(1). \tag*{(214)}

All estimates depend on the endpoint data only through the uniform bounds already established.

Step 3. The Gaussian maximum. We now compare the Gaussian field Γ\Gamma from Step 2 with 2g ϕ\sqrt{2g}\,\phi, where ϕ\phi is the zero-boundary discrete Gaussian free field in DyD_y:

E[ϕxϕx′]=GDy(x,x′).E[\phi_x\phi_{x'}]=G_{D_y}(x,x').

The extremal-process result of Biskup–Louidor [3], (1.2), (1.6), and Theorem 2.1, together with its stated consequence for maxima on open subsets following (1.8), gives tightness of the maximum on a fixed inner subdisk after centering by

mM=2glog⁡M−34glog⁡log⁡M.m_M=2\sqrt g\log M-\frac{3}{4}\sqrt g\log\log M.

The digital disks here approximate a disk, and VyV_y is a fixed nonempty subdisk strictly inside it. In particular,

max⁡x∈Vyϕx=2g h+OP(log⁡h).(215)\max_{x\in V_y}\phi_x=2\sqrt g\,h+O_P(\log h). \tag*{(215)}

Only this localization, rather than the full limiting point process, is used below.

To pass to expectations, convergence in distribution alone is insufficient. The tightness just stated places every median of the maximum at mM+O(1)m_M+O(1). Its maximal coordinate variance is O(h)O(h), so Gaussian concentration places the mean within O(h)O(\sqrt{h}) of a median. Therefore

Emax⁡x∈Vyϕx=2g h+O(h).(216)E\max_{x\in V_y}\phi_x=2\sqrt{g}\,h+O(\sqrt{h}). \tag*{(216)}

The covariance error in (210) has no sign, so we compare expected maxima by Gaussian interpolation. The following smooth approximation to the maximum makes a uniform entrywise covariance error sufficient. For λ>0\lambda>0, define

Fλ(z)=λ−1log⁡∑x∈Vyeλzx.F_\lambda(z)=\lambda^{-1}\log\sum_{x\in V_y}e^{\lambda z_x}.

If px=eλzx/∑x′eλzx′p_x=e^{\lambda z_x}/\sum_{x'}e^{\lambda z_{x'}}, then

∂xx′Fλ=λ(px1{x=x′}−pxpx′),∑x,x′∣∂xx′Fλ∣≤2λ.\partial_{xx'}F_\lambda=\lambda\left(p_x\mathbf{1}_{\{x=x'\}}-p_xp_{x'}\right), \qquad \sum_{x,x'}\left|\partial_{xx'}F_\lambda\right|\le2\lambda.

Gaussian interpolation between Γ\Gamma and 2g ϕ\sqrt{2g}\,\phi therefore gives

∣EFλ(Γ)−EFλ(2g ϕ)∣≤12max⁡x,x′∣Cov⁡(Γx,Γx′)−2gG(x,x′)∣sup⁡z∑x,x′∣∂xx′Fλ(z)∣≤Cλ.\begin{aligned} \left|EF_\lambda(\Gamma)-EF_\lambda(\sqrt{2g}\,\phi)\right| &\le\frac{1}{2}\max_{x,x'}\left|\operatorname{Cov}(\Gamma_x,\Gamma_{x'})-2gG(x,x')\right| \sup_z\sum_{x,x'}\left|\partial_{xx'}F_\lambda(z)\right| \\ &\le C\lambda. \end{aligned}

Since

0≤Fλ(z)−max⁡xzx≤log⁡Pλ,0\le F_\lambda(z)-\max_x z_x\le\frac{\log P}{\lambda},

the difference of the two expected maxima is bounded by Cλ+2log⁡P/λC\lambda+2\log P/\lambda. Balancing these errors with λ≍log⁡P\lambda\asymp\sqrt{\log P} yields

∣Emax⁡xΓx−Emax⁡x2g ϕx∣≤Clog⁡P.(217)\left|E\max_x\Gamma_x-E\max_x\sqrt{2g}\,\phi_x\right|\le C\sqrt{\log P}. \tag*{(217)}

Both fields have maximal coordinate variance O(h)O(h). Combining Gaussian concentration with (216)–(217) gives

max⁡xΓx=22 gh+OP(h+log⁡h)=22 gh+OP(h).(218)\max_x\Gamma_x=2\sqrt{2}\,gh+O_P(\sqrt{h}+\log h)=2\sqrt{2}\,gh+O_P(\sqrt{h}). \tag*{(218)}

Apply (211) to each of the two half-lines. For any K>0K>0, the probability that max⁡xUx\max_xU_x is below 22 gh−Kh2\sqrt{2}\,gh-K\sqrt{h} is bounded by the corresponding Gaussian lower-tail probability with its threshold increased by C7C_7, plus the error in (214). The upper tail is bounded by the Gaussian upper tail with its threshold decreased by C7C_7, plus the same error. Equation (218) thus transfers to max⁡xUx\max_xU_x, uniformly in the regular endpoint data. This argument compares distributions; it requires no pathwise coupling of the maxima.

Step 4. Restoring the means and the terminal depth. The conditional means are not exactly constant in xx, but (209) gives

sup⁡x∈Vy∣∑i≤bmx(ωi)−gb∣≤Cb(tJ+εM)=O(Jlog⁡Jlog⁡log⁡J).\sup_{x\in V_y}\left|\sum_{i\le b}m_x(\omega_i)-gb\right| \le Cb(t_J+\varepsilon_M) =O\left(\frac{J\log J}{\log\log J}\right).

Using ∑iXi(x)=∑imx(ωi)+b Ux\sum_iX_i(x)=\sum_i m_x(\omega_i)+\sqrt{b}\,U_x, we have

∣max⁡x∈Vy∑i≤bXi(x)−gb−bmax⁡x∈VyUx∣≤sup⁡x∈Vy∣∑i≤bmx(ωi)−gb∣.\left|\max_{x\in V_y}\sum_{i\le b}X_i(x)-gb-\sqrt{b}\max_{x\in V_y}U_x\right| \le \sup_{x\in V_y}\left|\sum_{i\le b}m_x(\omega_i)-gb\right|.

The centered maximum estimate from Step 3 and b=O(J)\sqrt{b}=O(J) now prove (202).

Finally, (199) gives

gb+22gbh=2gJ2−2gJlog⁡J+O(h2+hlog⁡J+J).(219)gb+2\sqrt{2}g\sqrt{b}h=2gJ^{2}-2gJ\log J+O(h^{2}+h\log J+J). \tag*{(219)}

Indeed, (199) implies b=2L−(log⁡L)/2+O(1+(log⁡L)2/L)\sqrt{b}=\sqrt{2}L-(\log L)/\sqrt{2}+O(1+(\log L)^{2}/L). Thus the terminal gain is 4gLh+O(hlog⁡L+h)4gLh+O(h\log L+h), while gb=2gL2−2gLlog⁡L+O(L)gb=2gL^{2}-2gL\log L+O(L). Substituting L=J−hL=J-h uses

2gL2+4gLh=2gJ2−2gh2,Llog⁡L=Jlog⁡J+O(hlog⁡J),2gL^{2}+4gLh=2gJ^{2}-2gh^{2},\qquad L\log L=J\log J+O(h\log J),

which gives (219). This is how the terminal maximum restores the contribution lost by stopping the coarse construction at LL. Since ξ<2\xi<2,

Jh+Jlog⁡Jlog⁡log⁡J+h2+hlog⁡J+J=o(Jlog⁡J).J\sqrt{h}+\frac{J\log J}{\log\log J}+h^{2}+h\log J+J=o(J\log J).

The level in (219) exceeds uJ,2+ηu_{J,2+\eta} by ηgJlog⁡J+o(Jlog⁡J)\eta gJ\log J+o(J\log J), which proves the final assertion.

■\blacksquare

A positive probability of a large disk maximum

The terminal estimate applies to one fixed cell under its own coarse conditioning. We cannot simply select a coarse root and then apply it: the selection may reveal bridge interiors of other cells. Instead, we sum the failure probabilities over all candidate roots. The bounded expected number of roots makes this sum tend to zero, even though their terminal disks may overlap.

Proposition 7.2 (The disk maximum). For every fixed η>0\eta>0, there is pη>0p_{\eta}>0 such that, for all sufficiently large JJ,

P(MτeJ≥uJ,2+η)≥pη.(220)P\left(M_{\tau_{e^{J}}}\geq u_{J,2+\eta}\right)\geq p_{\eta}. \tag*{(220)}

Proof. Take h=(log⁡J)ξh=(\log J)^{\xi}, 1<ξ<21<\xi<2, and L=J−hL=J-h. Apply the lower-root construction (50)–(62) at depth LL, with terminal physical radius M=ehM=e^{h}. Restrict the centers to a fixed compact subdisk so that their enlarged terminal domains are contained in D(0,eJ)D(0,e^{J}). This keeps a fixed positive fraction of the available area, and the estimates are uniform on the restricted set. The endpoint band in (55), with ρL=2−(log⁡L)/L\rho_{L}=2-(\log L)/L, is

2TL∈[2L−log⁡L+z0, 2L−log⁡L+z0+C∗].\sqrt{2T_{L}}\in[2L-\log L+z_{0},\,2L-\log L+z_{0}+C_{*}].

Squaring gives the completed-piece count b=2L2−2Llog⁡L+O(L)b=2L^{2}-2L\log L+O(L) in (199).

Lemma 5.3 transfers the probability of existence of a coarse root directly from Brownian motion; the pair estimate is used on the Brownian side. At each root, the terminal pieces are ordered separately within the m0m_{0} source intervals. The inter-source connectors are exposed and omitted from the occupation sums. Their occupation is nonnegative, so omitting it preserves a lower bound for the full-walk maximum. For the lattice coarse-root count ZLSZ_{L}^{S}, the count assertion of that lemma gives

P(ZLS>0)≥p0,EZLS≤C.(221)P(Z_{L}^{S}>0)\geq p_{0},\qquad EZ_{L}^{S}\leq C. \tag*{(221)}

We first check that imposing moment regularity loses only o(1)o(1) in the probability of root existence. Recall that the lattice event IyS,∘I_{y}^{S,\circ} retains only the radial barrier and terminal band; the Brownian angular screens were dropped in its definition. Thus it is determined by the complete radial words. The scalar radial-word comparison (67) and Rosen’s Appendix Theorem 9.1(a), as used in (116), give

P(IyS,o)≤Ce−2L,∑yP(IyS,o)=EZLS≤C,(222)P(I_y^{S,o}) \le Ce^{-2L}, \qquad\sum_y P(I_y^{S,o}) = E Z_L^S \le C, \tag*{(222)}

where the sum is over the deterministic net of O(e2L)O(e^{2L}) centers. For every complete radial word realizing IyS,oI_y^{S,o}, (201) bounds failure of moment regularity by the same ϵJ=o(J−A)\epsilon_J=o(J^{-A}). Consequently,

E∑y1IyS,o1{moment regularity fails at y}=∑y∑w: w realizes IyS,oP(w)P(failure at y∣w)≤ϵJ∑yP(IyS,o)=ϵJEZLS=o(1).(223)\begin{aligned} E\sum_y \mathbf{1}_{I_y^{S,o}}\mathbf{1}_{\{\text{moment regularity fails at }y\}} &= \sum_y \sum_{w:\,w\ \text{realizes }I_y^{S,o}} P(w)P(\text{failure at }y\mid w) \\ &\le\epsilon_J\sum_y P(I_y^{S,o})=\epsilon_J E Z_L^S=o(1). \tag*{(223)} \end{aligned}

The radial nature of IyS,oI_y^{S,o} is needed for this averaging: the endpoint failure estimate is conditional on ww, so its bound must be weighted by P(w)P(w). Equations (221) and (223) therefore show that a moment-regular lattice root exists with probability at least p0−o(1)p_0-o(1).

For a fixed root yy, use its intrinsic erasure sigma-field Ry\mathcal{R}_y. The event Gy\mathcal{G}_y that yy is a moment-regular coarse root is Ry\mathcal{R}_y-measurable. Given this sigma-field, the erased pieces have the independent killed bridge laws used in Lemma 7.1. Let

Ay={max⁡x∈Vy∑i≤bXi(x)≥uJ,2+η}.\mathcal{A}_y=\left\{\max_{x\in V_y}\sum_{i\le b}X_i(x)\ge u_{J,2+\eta}\right\}.

The uniform conclusion of that lemma gives a deterministic ϵ~J↓0\widetilde{\epsilon}_J\downarrow0 such that

P(Gy∩Ayc)=E[1GyP(Ayc∣Ry)]≤ϵ~JP(Gy).(224)P(\mathcal{G}_y\cap\mathcal{A}_y^c) =E[\mathbf{1}_{\mathcal{G}_y}P(\mathcal{A}_y^c\mid\mathcal{R}_y)] \le\widetilde{\epsilon}_J P(\mathcal{G}_y). \tag*{(224)}

Consequently

P(∃y:Gy∩Ay)≥P(∃y:Gy)−∑yP(Gy∩Ayc)≥p0−o(1)−ϵ~JEZLS≥p0/2(225)\begin{aligned} P(\exists y:\mathcal{G}_y\cap\mathcal{A}_y) &\ge P(\exists y:\mathcal{G}_y)-\sum_y P(\mathcal{G}_y\cap\mathcal{A}_y^c) \\ &\ge p_0-o(1)-\widetilde{\epsilon}_J E Z_L^S\ge p_0/2 \tag*{(225)} \end{aligned}

for all sufficiently large JJ. Each summand uses the intrinsic bridge disintegration for its own cell; the union bound does not require disjoint terminal disks. On the event in (225), the full local-time maximum is at least the terminal maximum of a successful cell. This proves (220). ■\blacksquare

An almost-sure lower bound at deterministic times

The disk estimate gives one attempt with probability bounded away from zero. We make (log⁡N)a(\log N)^a independent attempts within the first NN increments. Each attempt has a smaller time budget, so its logarithmic radius decreases by about (a/2)log⁡log⁡N(a/2)\log\log N. Choosing aa small keeps the resulting loss below the available Jlog⁡JJ\log J margin, while the probability that all attempts fail is summable.

Proposition 7.3 (The deterministic-time maximum). Let Nj=⌊e2j⌋N_j=\lfloor e^{2j}\rfloor. For every η>0\eta>0, almost surely,

MNj≥uj,2+ηM_{N_j}\ge u_{j,2+\eta}

for all sufficiently large jj.

Proof. Reserve part of the target margin for shortening the independent blocks: first fix 0<δ<η0<\delta<\eta, and then choose a>0a>0 with δ+2a<η\delta+2a<\eta. Proposition 7.2 gives a disk-success probability pδ>0p_{\delta}>0. By Lemma 3.1, choose a fixed CC large enough that

sup⁡RP0(τR>CR2)≤pδ/2.\sup_{R} P_{0}(\tau_{R}>CR^{2})\le p_{\delta}/2.

For the walk started at the center of a radius-RR disk,

P(MτR≥ulog⁡R,2+δ, τR≤CR2)≥pδ−P(τR>CR2)≥pδ/2.P\left(M_{\tau_{R}}\ge u_{\log R,2+\delta},\ \tau_{R}\le CR^{2}\right)\ge p_{\delta}-P(\tau_{R}>CR^{2})\ge p_{\delta}/2.

Translation invariance therefore gives the same success probability p=pδ/2p=p_{\delta}/2 for a segment of length CR2CR^{2} from any starting site, uniformly for sufficiently large RR.

Partition the first NjN_{j} increments into

qj=⌊(log⁡Nj)a⌋q_{j}=\left\lfloor(\log N_{j})^{a}\right\rfloor

disjoint blocks of length mj=⌊Nj/qj⌋m_{j}=\lfloor N_{j}/q_{j}\rfloor, ignoring the remainder. Use the sites immediately after the increments in each block to define its within-block local times. The translated block paths depend on disjoint increment sets and are independent. Their local times count disjoint sets of observation times, so each block maximum is bounded by MNjM_{N_{j}}. Changing the endpoint convention changes a local time by at most a bounded amount, which the strict margin δ+2a<η\delta+2a<\eta absorbs. Choose RjR_{j} by

log⁡Rj=12log⁡(mj/C)=j−a2log⁡j+O(1).\log R_{j}=\frac{1}{2}\log(m_{j}/C)=j-\frac{a}{2}\log j+O(1).

The loss in logarithmic radius is therefore (a/2)log⁡j+O(1)(a/2)\log j+O(1). Substituting this into the quadratic leading term gives

2g(log⁡Rj)2=2gj2−2agjlog⁡j+O(j+(log⁡j)2),2g(\log R_{j})^{2}=2gj^{2}-2agj\log j+O\left(j+(\log j)^{2}\right),

while g(log⁡Rj)log⁡log⁡Rj=gjlog⁡j+O(j+(log⁡j)2)g(\log R_{j})\log\log R_{j}=gj\log j+O\left(j+(\log j)^{2}\right). Hence

ulog⁡Rj,2+δ=uj,2+δ+2a+o(1)≥uj,2+η(226)u_{\log R_{j},2+\delta}=u_{j,2+\delta+2a+o(1)}\ge u_{j,2+\eta} \tag*{(226)}

for all sufficiently large jj. The coefficient 2a2a is the cost of splitting the time budget into qjq_{j} blocks. Each block therefore succeeds at the target level with probability at least pp, and independence implies

P(MNj<uj,2+η)≤(1−p)qj≤e−cja.(227)P(M_{N_{j}}<u_{j,2+\eta})\le(1-p)^{q_{j}}\le e^{-cj^{a}}. \tag*{(227)}

The right-hand side is summable, so Borel–Cantelli proves the assertion. ■\blacksquare

Escape below the critical scale

The localized disk estimate must exclude a favorite at every time in a block, not just at its endpoints. Monotonicity of local times makes this possible: use the global maximum at the left endpoint and the local time in the target disk at the right endpoint.

Proposition 8.1 (Escape below the critical scale). For every γ>12\gamma>\frac{1}{2}, almost surely,

lim inf⁡n→∞Rn−n/(log⁡n)γ=∞.(228)\liminf_{n\to\infty}\frac{R_{n}^{-}}{\sqrt{n}/(\log n)^{\gamma}}=\infty. \tag*{(228)}

Proof. Fix γ>1/2\gamma>1/2 and a positive integer spatial multiplier A0A_{0}. Choose

0<δ<2γ−14.0<\delta<\frac{2\gamma-1}{4}.

Set Nj=⌊e2j⌋N_j=\lfloor e^{2j}\rfloor. Proposition 7.3 gives, for all sufficiently large jj,

MNj≥uj,2+δ.(229)M_{N_j}\ge u_{j,2+\delta}. \tag*{(229)}

Consider any n∈[Nj,Nj+1]∩Nn\in[N_j,N_{j+1}]\cap\mathbb{N}. If x∈Fnx\in\mathcal{F}_n lies in

B(0,A0n(log⁡n)γ),B\left(0,A_0\frac{\sqrt{n}}{(\log n)^\gamma}\right),

then monotonicity of local times and (229) give

LNj+1(x)≥Ln(x)=Mn≥MNj≥uj,2+δ.L_{N_{j+1}}(x)\ge L_n(x)=M_n\ge M_{N_j}\ge u_{j,2+\delta}.

Since n≤Nj+1n\le N_{j+1} and log⁡n≥log⁡Nj\log n\ge\log N_j, the same site lies in

B(0,CA0ej+1j−γ)(230)B\left(0,C_{A_0}e^{j+1}j^{-\gamma}\right) \tag*{(230)}

throughout the block.

Take

Kj=C∗ej+1log⁡j,Jj′=log⁡Kj.K_j=C_*e^{j+1}\sqrt{\log j},\qquad J'_j=\log K_j.

By the maximal inequality in Lemma 3.1, C∗C_* can be chosen so that

∑jP(τKj≤Nj+1)<∞.(231)\sum_j P(\tau_{K_j}\le N_{j+1})<\infty. \tag*{(231)}

For large jj, the ball (230) is contained in

B(0,Kj(Jj′)−γ).B(0,K_j(J'_j)^{-\gamma}).

Moreover Jj′=j+O(log⁡log⁡j)J'_j=j+O(\log\log j), and the fixed extra coefficient δ\delta gives

uj,2+δ≥uJj′,2+2δ(232)u_{j,2+\delta}\ge u_{J'_j,2+2\delta} \tag*{(232)}

for all large jj, because

uj,2+δ−uJj′,2+2δ=δgjlog⁡j+O(jlog⁡log⁡j)>0.u_{j,2+\delta}-u_{J'_j,2+2\delta} =\delta g_j\log j+O(j\log\log j)>0.

Thus the extra coefficient δ\delta absorbs the enlargement of the stopping disk.

Choose independently an upper-error exponent Aerr>2A_{\mathrm{err}}>2. If (229) holds and the early exit in (231) does not occur, any such favorite forces

max⁡x∈B(0,Kj(Jj′)−γ)LτKj(x)≥uJj′,2+2δ.\max_{x\in B(0,K_j(J'_j)^{-\gamma})}L_{\tau_{K_j}}(x)\ge u_{J'_j,2+2\delta}.

Proposition 6.3, with β=γ\beta=\gamma and c=2+2δc=2+2\delta, bounds the probability of this last event by

(Jj′)−2γ+2δ+o(1)+O(j−Aerr).(233)(J'_j)^{-2\gamma+2\delta+o(1)}+O(j^{-A_{\mathrm{err}}}). \tag*{(233)}

Our choice of δ\delta makes the power in (233) strictly smaller than −1-1. Hence (233) is summable. The lower bound (229) holds eventually almost surely, and Borel–Cantelli excludes both upper events and early exits eventually. The block implication therefore proves that eventually no favorite in the jj-th block lies in the ball with multiplier A0A_0. Intersecting over A0∈NA_0\in\mathbb{N} proves (8.1). ■\blacksquare

Proof of Theorem 1.1. Propositions 4.5 and 8.1 give the two assertions for each fixed exponent. Intersect the probability-one events for rational γ>1/2\gamma>1/2 and for the single critical exponent 1/21/2. If γ>1/2\gamma>1/2 is real, choose a rational q∈(1/2,γ)q\in(1/2,\gamma); then

Rn−aγ(n)=Rn−aq(n)(log⁡n)γ−q⟶∞.\frac{R_n^-}{a_\gamma(n)} = \frac{R_n^-}{a_q(n)}(\log n)^{\gamma-q} \longrightarrow\infty.

For γ≤1/2\gamma\le1/2, the inequality Rn+/aγ(n)≤Rn+/a1/2(n)R_n^{+}/a_{\gamma}(n) \le R_n^{+}/a_{1/2}(n) gives the other assertion on the same event. This proves the simultaneous formulation. ∎

Appendix A. Notation guide

We use nn for physical time and L=J−hL = J - h for the retained traversal depth; JJ and hh are the outer and terminal logarithmic radii. The table collects notation used across subsections.

SymbolMeaningWhere used
Ln(x),MnL_n(x), M_nSite local time and its spatial maximum.Section 1
Fn,Rn−,Rn+\mathcal{F}_n, R_n^{-}, R_n^{+}Favorite set and its nearest and farthest distances from the origin.Section 1
aγ(n)a_\gamma(n)n/(log⁡n)γ\sqrt{n}/(\log n)^\gamma.Theorem 1.1
g,uJ,cg, u_{J,c}g=2/πg = 2/\pi and uJ,c=2gJ2−cgJlog⁡Ju_{J,c} = 2gJ^2 - cgJ \log J.Both disk estimates
D(x,r),τrD(x,r), \tau_rLattice disk and exit time from D(0,r)D(0,r).Section 3
GDG_DGreen function for the walk killed on leaving DD.Sections 3 and 6
z,N,Kz, N, KGeometric weight, N=(1−z)−1N = (1-z)^{-1} and clock with P(K=n)=(1−z)znP(K=n) = (1-z)z^n.Section 4
XK∗,UxX_K^{*}, U_xPriority-selected favorite and independent site priorities.Lemma 4.2
σ,ℓ\sigma, \ellFirst and last visits to the selected favorite.Lemma 4.2
B,τc\mathcal{B}, \tau_cExposed excursion/suffix tuple and terminal-arm killing time.Lemma 4.2
J,h,M,LJ, h, M, LOuter logarithmic radius, terminal logarithmic radius, M=ehM=e^h, and retained traversal depth L=J−hL=J-h.Sections 5–7
rj,ϑjr_j, \vartheta_jConformal radius r0e−jr_0e^{-j} and geodesic radius 2arctan⁡(rj/2)2\arctan(r_j/2).Section 5
ρL,αz,±\rho_L, \alpha_{z,\pm}Barrier slope 2−(log⁡L)/L2-(\log L)/L and its upper/lower curved barriers.Section 5
FL,kyF_L, k_yDeterministic net of centers and a center’s source shell.Section 5
Ty,j1,m0T_{y,j}^{1,m_0}Traversal count within the first m0m_0 complete source excursions.Section 5
Iy∘,SyI_y^{\circ}, S_yTruncated Brownian root event and connector safety event.Section 5
χy,ΨJ\chi_y, \Psi_JCentered conformal coordinate and dilated stereographic chart.Section 5
w,Q,G0w, Q, G_0Complete radial word, number of shell decisions, and number of nonempty source blocks.Section 6
Dy,Ay,Vy,EyD_y, A_y, V_y, E_yTerminal killing disk, entrance interface, core, and directed exit edges.Section 6
ωi,Xi(x)\omega_i, X_i(x)Entrance/exit pair and occupation at xx of its killed bridge.Section 6
mx,qx,x′m_x, q_{x,x'}First and second occupation moments under the bridge with prescribed endpoints.Sections 6–7
Pw,P~wP_w, \widetilde{P}_wTrue complete-word endpoint law and its sequentially normalized comparison law.Section 6
ΛM\Lambda_MReference entrance/exit measure obtained from harmonic measure at the center.Section 6
Ry\mathcal{R}_yIntrinsic information exposing exterior paths and bridge endpoints while erasing bridge interiors.Sections 5 and 7
ZLSZ_L^SNumber of lattice centers satisfying the radial lower barrier and terminal endpoint band.Sections 5 and 7

Table 1.

References

References

  1. [1]S. Athreya, N. Gadhiwala and R. R. Radhakrishnan, Elliptic Harnack inequality for Z^d, Involve 15 (2022), 687–708. doi:10.2140/involve.2022.15.687. arXiv version. 41DOI
  2. [2]R. F. Bass, The rate of escape of the most visited site of Brownian motion, Electron. J. Probab. 28 (2023), 1–12. doi:10.1214/23-EJP916. See also arXiv:1303.2040v5, Theorem 2.2. 2DOI
  3. [3]M. Biskup and O. Louidor, Full extremal process, cluster law and freezing for the two-dimensional discrete Gaussian free field, Adv. Math. 330 (2018), 589–687. doi:10.1016/j.aim.2018.02.018. arXiv:1606.00510. 52DOI
  4. [4]V. Chernozhukov, D. Chetverikov and K. Kato, Empirical and multiplier bootstraps for suprema of empirical processes of increasing complexity, and related Gaussian couplings, Stochastic Process. Appl. 126 (2016), 3632–3651. doi:10.1016/j.spa.2016.04.009. arXiv:1502.00352. 51DOI
  5. [5]A. Dembo, Favorite points, cover times and fractals, in Lectures on Probability Theory and Statistics, Lecture Notes in Math. 1869, Springer (2005), 1–101. doi:10.1007/11429579_1. 2DOI
  6. [6]A. Dembo, Simple random covering, disconnection, late and favorite points, in Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, Madrid 2006, Vol. III, EMS (2007), 535–558. doi:10.4171/022-3/28. 2DOI
  7. [7]A. Dembo, Y. Peres, J. Rosen and O. Zeitouni, Thick points for planar Brownian motion and the Erdős–Taylor conjecture on random walk, Acta Math. 186 (2001), 239–270. doi:10.1007/BF02401841. 2DOI
  8. [8]P. Erdős and P. Révész, Problems and results on random walks, in Mathematical Statistics and Probability Theory, Vol. B, D. Reidel (1987), 59–65. Full text. 2DOI
  9. [9]C. Hao, X. Li, I. Okada and Y. Zheng, Favorite sites for simple random walk in two and more dimensions, Probab. Theory Related Fields 195 (2026), 1765–1822. doi:10.1007/s00440-025-01441-1. arXiv:2409.00995. The planar escape-rate question is discussed in Remark 1.4(1); the elementary walk estimates cited here are in Lemma 2.1, (2.5). 2, 7, 21, 28DOI
  10. [10]M. J. Kozdron and G. F. Lawler, Estimates of random walk exit probabilities and application to loop-erased random walk, Electron. J. Probab. 10 (2005), 1442–1467. arXiv version. 34, 40arxiv.org/abs/math/0501189
  11. [11]M. A. Lifshits and Z. Shi, The escape rate of favorite sites of simple random walk and Brownian motion, Ann. Probab. 32 (2004), 129–152. doi:10.1214/aop/1078415831. 2DOI
  12. [12]P. Révész, Random Walk in Random and Non-Random Environments, World Scientific, Singapore, 1990. doi:10.1142/1107. 2DOI
  13. [13]J. Rosen, Tightness for thick points in two dimensions, arXiv:2203.14394 (2022). arXiv version. 14, 15, 16, 19arxiv.org/abs/2203.14394
  14. [14]A. Yu. Zaitsev, Estimates for the strong approximation in multidimensional central limit theorem, arXiv:math/0304373 (2003). arXiv version. 24DOI

Paper details

Contents