alphaFeedback

WorksMathematics

Coisotropy-one homogeneous spacetimes I: (3,2)-Kinematical Lie algebras with d≥3d\geq 3

AI contributions
Not recorded for this paper
View details

Abstract

This is the first of several papers devoted to the classification of coisotropy-one homogeneous spacetimes. It is the first step in extending the classification of spatially isotropic homogeneous spacetimes of kinematical Lie groups to the much vaster context of homogeneous spacetimes that are not spatially isotropic; that is, where the rotations no longer act transitively on the space of directions in each tangent space. In this first paper we classify (up to isomorphisms preserving the rotational subalgebra) a class of the relevant transitive Lie algebras, the so-called (3,2)-kinematical Lie algebras, for the coisotropy-one case in spatial dimension at least 4. As a by-product of this classification, we classify two-dimensional real representations of Bianchi Lie algebras up to a suitable notion of equivalence.

Introduction

More than half a century ago, Bacry and Lévy-Leblond [1] started what could be termed the kinematical Erlanger programme, in effect adding “time” to Klein’s famous programme of studying geometries via their symmetry groups. In their original paper they classified kinematical Lie algebras for a class of four-dimensional spacetimes. The corresponding kinematical Lie groups act on the spacetimes as a composition of rotations, boosts and spatial and temporal translations. Their classification was subject to the assumptions of spatial isotropy and the existence of time-reversal and parity automorphisms. These latter “by no means compelling” [1] assumptions were lifted in work of Bacry and Nuyts [2], who still worked in four spacetime dimensions and still subject to spatial isotropy. More recently, this classification was extended to arbitrary dimension via deformation theory: [3] (recovering the classification of Bacry and Nuyts), [4] (in higher spacetime dimension) and [5] (in three spacetime dimensions), but always under the assumption of spatial isotropy. Based on these results, the simply-connected spatially isotropic homogeneous spacetimes (i.e., the kinematical Klein geometries) were classified in [6], resulting in a small class of geometries, including lorentzian, galilean and carrollian, which were further studied in [7].

A natural continuation of this programme is to lift the assumption of spatial isotropy and the natural first step is to consider the case of coisotropy-one: where the rotational subalgebra acts on the tangent sphere (i.e., the space of directions) with codimension-one orbits. This is a much richer class of spacetime geometries and their classification, which is substantially harder, is the goal of a series of papers commencing with this one.

We recall that a (d+2)(d+2)-dimensional spatially isotropic homogeneous spacetime admits a transitive action of a spatially isotropic kinematical Lie group KK. Its Lie algebra k\mathfrak{k} is a real Lie algebra of dimension (d+2)(d+3)/2(d+2)(d+3)/2 with a Lie subalgebra r≅so(d+1)\mathfrak{r} \cong\mathfrak{so}(d+1) under which the adjoint representation of k\mathfrak{k} decomposes into ad⁡⊕2U⊕R\operatorname{ad} \oplus2U \oplus R, where ad⁡\operatorname{ad}, U≅Rd+1U \cong\mathbb{R}^{d+1} and RR are the adjoint, vector and scalar representations of r\mathfrak{r}, respectively. Such Lie algebras were the subject of the classical papers already mentioned [1, 2] (for d=2d=2) as well as the more recent papers [3, 4, 5] which deal with general dd. The Klein pair corresponding to a spatially isotropic spacetime is (k,h)(\mathfrak{k},\mathfrak{h}), where h≅r⊕U\mathfrak{h} \cong\mathfrak{r} \oplus U as an r\mathfrak{r}-module. Among such Klein pairs, the simplest are those corresponding to Minkowski, Galilei and Carroll spacetimes. We collect them in Table 1. The notation in the table is such that k\mathfrak{k} is spanned by JabJ_{ab}, BaB_a, PaP_a, HH and h\mathfrak{h} is spanned by JabJ_{ab}, BaB_a, with JabJ_{ab} a basis for r\mathfrak{r}. Geometrically we may interpret JabJ_{ab} as generating rotations, BaB_a as generating boosts, PaP_a generating spatial translations and HH generating time translations. The table omits the indices and displays the Lie brackets of k\mathfrak{k} in an abbreviated – yet unambiguous – notation explained in [6 §2.2]. We omit the Lie brackets common to all kinematical Lie algebras; that is, those that involve the rotational subalgebra r\mathfrak{r}, which in this abbreviated notation are [J,J]=J[J,J]=J, [J,B]=B[J,B]=B, [J,P]=P[J,P]=P and [J,H]=0[J,H]=0.

SpacetimeNonzero Lie brackets
Minkowski[H,B]=−P[H,B]=-P   [B,B]=J[B,B]=J   [B,P]=H[B,P]=H
Galilei[H,B]=−P[H,B]=-P
Carroll[B,P]=H[B,P]=H

Table 1. Minkowski, Galilei and Carroll spacetimes.

The minimal breaking of spatial isotropy (where the rotational algebra so(d+1)\mathfrak{so}(d+1) breaks to so(d)\mathfrak{so}(d)) in these spacetimes will result in a coisotropy-one homogeneous spacetime whose transitive Lie algebra belongs to one of two classes of Lie algebras we now describe. To this end it is convenient to recall a definition due to Morand [8].

Definition 1.1. An (s,ν)(s,\nu)-kinematical Lie algebra (KLA) with nn-dimensional spatial isotropy is a real Lie algebra g\mathfrak{g} with a Lie subalgebra r≅so(n)\mathfrak{r} \cong\mathfrak{so}(n) and relative to which g\mathfrak{g} decomposes as an r\mathfrak{r}-module as g=r⊕Rn⊕R\mathfrak{g}=\mathfrak{r}\oplus\mathbb{R}^{n}\oplus\mathbb{R}, where Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} and R\mathbb{R} denote, respectively, the standard (vector) and scalar irreducible representations of so(n)\mathfrak{so}(n).

This definition encompasses many classes of Lie algebras relevant to the description of spacetimes. For example, (1,1)(1,1)-KLAs are aristotelian Lie algebras, whereas (1,2)(1,2)-KLAs are the original spatially-isotropic kinematical Lie algebras. The (2,1)(2,1)-KLAs are the Lifshitz Lie algebras, classified in [9], whereas (2,2)(2,2)-KLAs are the boost-extended Lifshitz Lie algebras, which are the subject of ongoing work which will be presented in [10]. The following structural result will be shown in that paper.

Theorem [10]. Every (2,2)(2,2)-KLA g\mathfrak{g} is isomorphic to an extension-by-derivation of a (1,2)(1,2)-KLA k\mathfrak{k}; that is, it fits in a (split) exact sequence of the form

0⟶k⟶g⟶RD⟶0.(1)0 \longrightarrow\mathfrak{k} \longrightarrow\mathfrak{g} \longrightarrow\mathbb{R}D \longrightarrow0. \tag*{(1)}

The (2,2)(2,2)-KLAs obtained by extending k\mathfrak{k} by DD and by D′=θ∘(λD−μad⁡H)∘θ−1D'=\theta\circ(\lambda D-\mu\operatorname{ad}_{H})\circ\theta^{-1}, where θ∈Aut⁡(k)\theta\in\operatorname{Aut}(\mathfrak{k}) is an automorphism and λ,μ∈R\lambda,\mu\in\mathbb{R} with λ≠0\lambda\ne0, are isomorphic.

This theorem is analogous to a theorem proved in [9], which shows that every (2,1)(2,1)-KLA is an extension-by-grading-element of a (1,1)(1,1)-KLA.

Let us now break spatial isotropy in any of the spacetimes in Table 1. We assume that there is a distinguished nonzero spatial vector u∈k/h\mathbf{u}\in\mathfrak{k}/\mathfrak{h}, which breaks the rotational symmetry from r\mathfrak{r} to the stabiliser of u\mathbf{u}, which is a subalgebra s=so(u⊥)\mathfrak{s}=\mathfrak{so}(\mathbf{u}^{\perp}) isomorphic to so(d)\mathfrak{so}(d). Under s\mathfrak{s}, the vector representation decomposes as U=u⊥⊕RuU=\mathbf{u}^{\perp}\oplus\mathbb{R}\mathbf{u}, where u⊥≅Rd\mathbf{u}^{\perp}\cong\mathbb{R}^{d} is the vector representation of s\mathfrak{s}. We define g\mathfrak{g} to be the normaliser of u⋅P\mathbf{u}\cdot P in k\mathfrak{k} and consider the Klein pair (g,g∩h)(\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{g}\cap\mathfrak{h}) as a model of a coisotropy-one homogeneous spacetime. For Minkowski and Carroll spacetimes, g∩h\mathfrak{g}\cap\mathfrak{h} does not contain the boost u⋅B\mathbf{u}\cdot B along u\mathbf{u}, since [u⋅B,u⋅P]=∣u∣2H[\mathbf{u}\cdot B,\mathbf{u}\cdot P]=|\mathbf{u}|^{2}H; whereas for Galilei spacetime g∩h\mathfrak{g}\cap\mathfrak{h} does include u⋅B\mathbf{u}\cdot B. This gives rise to two classes of Lie algebras g\mathfrak{g}.

If g\mathfrak{g} does not include the boost u⋅B\mathbf{u}\cdot B, then as a representation of s=so(u⊥)\mathfrak{s}=\mathfrak{so}(\mathbf{u}^{\perp}), g\mathfrak{g} decomposes as g=s⊕2u⊥⊕2R\mathfrak{g}=\mathfrak{s}\oplus2\mathbf{u}^{\perp}\oplus2\mathbb{R}, where the two scalars are the translation generators along time and along u\mathbf{u}. Therefore g\mathfrak{g} is a (2,2)(2,2)-KLA.

If g\mathfrak{g} does include the boost u⋅B\mathbf{u}\cdot B, then it has an additional so(u⊥)\mathfrak{so}(\mathbf{u}^{\perp}) scalar, namely u⋅B\mathbf{u}\cdot B itself. In that case, g=s⊕2u⊥⊕3R\mathfrak{g}=\mathfrak{s}\oplus2\mathbf{u}^{\perp}\oplus3\mathbb{R} as a representation of s\mathfrak{s} and hence it is a (3,2)(3,2)-KLA, a class of Lie algebras whose classification is the main result of this paper (for d≥3d\ge3) and a following paper (for d=2d=2). A further paper will contain the classification of the corresponding simply-connected coisotropy-one homogeneous spacetimes; that is, the corresponding spacetime Klein geometries.

Let us now summarise the paper and explain its organisation. In § 2 we prove several structure theorems for (3,2)(3,2)-KLAs. We consider d≥3d\ge3. For d=1d=1 there is no distinction between the scalar and vector representations, so every finite-dimensional real Lie algebra is a (3,2)(3,2)-KLA. Such Lie algebras were classified up to isomorphism in [11] and we shall have nothing more to say about them. For d=2d=2 there is no distinction between the scalar and adjoint representations and this, together with the fact that the vector representation admits a larger endomorphism ring than when d≥3d\ge3, makes the classification problem substantially more complicated. In order to keep the papers to a reasonable size, we will present the d=2d=2 classification in a separate paper.

In this first paper, our treatment breaks naturally into two cases and this will be reflected throughout: the generic case (d>3d>3) and the special case d=3d=3. The main results in § 2 are contained in Theorems A (for d>3d>3) and B (for d=3d=3).

Theorem A. Let g=so(V)⊕(V⊗W)⊕b\mathfrak{g}=\mathfrak{so}(V)\oplus(V\otimes W)\oplus\mathfrak{b} be a (3,2)(3,2)-KLA with dim⁡V=d>3\dim V=d>3. Then the Lie bracket of g\mathfrak{g} is determined by the following algebraic data:

  1. a (bianchi) Lie algebra structure on b\mathfrak{b},

  2. a two-dimensional Lie algebra representation ρ:b→gl(W)\rho:\mathfrak{b}\to\mathfrak{gl}(W),

  3. and a b\mathfrak{b}-equivariant b\mathfrak{b}-valued 2-form φ:Λ2W→b\varphi:\Lambda^{2}W\to\mathfrak{b}.

For all X∈so(V)X \in\mathfrak{so}(V), v,vi∈Vv,v_i \in V, w,wi∈Ww,w_i \in W and B∈bB \in\mathfrak{b}, the Lie algebra structure is given by the brackets

[X,v⊗w]=Xv⊗w,[X,B]=0,[B,v⊗w]=v⊗ρ(B)w,[v1⊗w1,v2⊗w2]=α(w1,w2)v1∧v2+⟨v1,v2⟩φ(w1∧w2).(2)\begin{aligned} [X,v \otimes w] &= Xv \otimes w,\\ [X,B] &= 0,\\ [B,v \otimes w] &= v \otimes\rho(B)w,\\ [v_1 \otimes w_1,v_2 \otimes w_2] &= \alpha(w_1,w_2)v_1 \wedge v_2+\langle v_1,v_2\rangle\varphi(w_1\wedge w_2). \tag*{(2)} \end{aligned}

where α:W×W→R\alpha: W \times W \to\mathbb{R} is the unique b\mathfrak{b}-invariant symmetric bilinear form given by

ρ(φ(w1∧w2))w3=α(w2,w3)w1−α(w1,w3)w2,wi∈W.(3)\rho(\varphi(w_1 \wedge w_2))w_3=\alpha(w_2,w_3)w_1-\alpha(w_1,w_3)w_2,\qquad w_i \in W. \tag*{(3)}

References

  1. [1]H. Bacry and J.-M. Lévy-Leblond, “Possible kinematics,” J. Math. Phys. 9 (1968) 1605–1614. [Page 2.]DOI
  2. [2]H. Bacry and J. Nuys, “Classification of Ten-dimensional Kinematical Groups With Space Isotropy,” J. Math. Phys. 27 (1968) 2455. [Page 2.]
  3. [3]J. M. Figueroa-O’Farrill, “Kinematical Lie algebras via deformation theory,” J. Math. Phys. 59 no. 6, (2018) 061701, arXiv:1711.06111 [hep-th]. [Page 2.]
  4. [4]J. M. Figueroa-O’Farrill, “Higher-dimensional kinematical Lie algebras via deformation theory,” J. Math. Phys. 59 no. 6, (2018) 061702, arXiv:1711.07363 [hep-th]. [Page 2.]
  5. [5]T. Andrzejewski and J. M. Figueroa-O’Farrill, “Kinematical Lie algebras in 2 + 1 dimensions,” J. Math. Phys. 59 no. 6, (2018) 061703, arXiv:1802.04048 [hep-th]. [Page 2.]DOI
  6. [6]J. Figueroa-O’Farrill and S. Prohazka, “Spatially isotropic homogeneous spacetimes,” JHEP 01 (2019) 229, arXiv:1809.01224 [hep-th]. [Page 2.]
  7. [7]J. Figueroa-O’Farrill, R. Grassie, and S. Prohazka, “Geometry and BMS Lie algebras of spatially isotropic homogeneous spacetimes,” JHEP 08 (2019) 119, arXiv:1905.00034 [hep-th]. [Page 2.]
  8. [8]K. Morand, “Possible ambient kinematics,” J. Math. Phys. 64 no. 11, (2023) 112502, arXiv:2305.14371 [hep-th]. [Page 2.]DOI
  9. [9]J. Figueroa-O’Farrill, R. Grassie, and S. Prohazka, “Lifshitz symmetry: Lie algebras, spacetimes and particles,” SciPost Phys. 14 no. 3, (2023) 035, arXiv:2206.11806 [hep-th]. [Page 3.]
  10. [10]J. Figueroa-O’Farrill, J. Fluxman, R. Grassie, and S. Prohazka, “Homogeneous Lifshitz spacetimes with boosts.” In preparation, 2026. [Page 3.]
  11. [11]G. M. Mubarakzyanov, “Classification of real structures of Lie algebras of fifth order,” Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved. Matematika 1963 no. 3(34), (1963) 99–106. [Page 3.]
  12. [12]L. Bianchi, “Sugli spazi a tre dimensioni che ammettono un gruppo continuo di movimenti,” Memorie di Matematica e di Fisica della Societa Italiana delle Scienze, Serie Terza Tomo XI (1898) 267–352. [Pages 7 and 54.]
  13. [13]L. Bianchi, “On the three-dimensional spaces which admit a continuous group of motions,” Gen. Relativity Gravitation 33 no. 12, (2001) 2171–2253. Translated from the Italian by R. Jantzen. [Pages 7 and 54.]DOI
  14. [14]J. Patera and P. Winternitz, “Subalgebras of real three- and four-dimensional Lie algebras,” J. Mathematical Phys. 18 no. 7, (1977) 1449–1455. [Page 18.]DOI
  15. [15]R. O. O. Opanovych, V. M. Boyko, M. O. Nesterenko, and M. W. Lutfullin, “Realizations of real low-dimensional Lie algebras,” J. Phys. A 36 no. 26, (2003) 7337–7360. [Page 18.]
  16. [16]Y. Y. Chapovskyi, S. D. Koval, and O. Zhur, “Subalgebras of Lie algebras. Example of sl(3, R) revisited,” Journal of Algebra and Its Applications (2024) , arXiv:2403.02554 [math-ph]. (to appear). [Page 18.]
  17. [17]E. Goursat, “Sur les substitutions orthogonales et les divisions régulières de l’espace,” Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. (3) 6 (1889) 9–102. [Page 18.]DOI
  18. [18]J. Figueiroa-O’Farrill and M. Ungureanu, “Homogeneous M2 duals,” JHEP 01 (2016) 150, arXiv:1511.03637 [hep-th]. [Page 19.]
  19. [19]G. D. Mostow, “On maximal subgroups of real Lie groups,” Ann. of Math. (2) 74 (1961) 503–517. https://doi.org/10.2307/1970295. [Page 19.]
  20. [20]P. J. Oliver, Classical invariant theory, vol. 44 of London Mathematical Society Student Texts. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999. [Page 57.]

Paper details

vlnc:W_w6xaracn
v1 · latestHistory (1)

published · Fresh — added to the Hub within the last 30 days

added ·

Usage

views · 0

downloads · 0

A view counts once per browser per day, a download each time the PDF is requested.

CC BY 4.0

Original source

  • Mathematics

Not recorded for this paper · View statement →

Looking for related papers…
Contents