alphaFeedback

WorksMathematics

A family of finite dimensional Hopf algebras over C\mathbb{C} with varying algebra structure

AI contributions
  • OpenAI ChatGPT 6 Pro
View details

Abstract

We construct an algebraic one-parameter family of complex Hopf algebras of dimension 10241024, with fixed coalgebra, whose underlying associative algebras vary in a continuous family of isomorphism classes. Four multiplication lines in the second radical layer of a distinguished block recover the jj-invariant of the elliptic curve given by the equation y2=x(x−1)(x−t2).y^2=x(x-1)(x-t^2). This answers negatively the finiteness question of Etingof and Gelaki concerning algebra types of Hopf algebras of fixed dimension.

AI disclaimer

This text has been produced by ChatGPT at a request by Pavel Etingof. It was repeatedly checked by AI agents and revised in response to their comments. Pavel’s substantive prompts are reproduced in chronological order at the end. Feel free to use at your discretion. If you rewrite it or build on it, you may say that it was inspired by this note.

Introduction

Etingof and Gelaki ask in [1 p. 2 of the arXiv version] whether there are only finitely many associative algebra isomorphism classes underlying complex Hopf algebras of a given dimension. We construct a continuous family with infinitely many algebra types.

Theorem 1.1. There exists a Hopf algebra H\mathcal{H}, free of rank 1024 over C[t]\mathbb{C}[t], with constant underlying coalgebra, whose fibers HtH_t have the following property. For t,t′∈T:=C∖{0,1,−1}t,t' \in T := \mathbb{C} \setminus\{0,1,-1\},

Ht≅Ht′ as associative algebras⟹J(t)=J(t′),H_t \cong H_{t'}\ \text{as associative algebras}\quad\Longrightarrow\quad\mathcal{J}(t)=\mathcal{J}(t'),

where

J(t)=256(t4+t2+1)3t4(t2−1)2.(1)\mathcal{J}(t)=256\frac{(t^4+t^2+1)^3}{t^4(t^2-1)^2}. \tag*{(1)}

Each associative algebra isomorphism class occurs at most twelve times on TT. On some open complex disc U⊂TU \subset T, the fibers HtH_t are pairwise nonisomorphic as associative algebras.

The Hopf family

We use the convention [x,y]=xy−yx[x,y]=xy-yx. The algebra HtH_t has commuting generators g,r,sg,r,s satisfying g4=r2=s2=1g^4=r^2=s^2=1, and four further generators x1,y1,x2,y2x_1,y_1,x_2,y_2. Put

a=gr,b=gs,c=g2,d=ab=crs.a=gr,\qquad b=gs,\qquad c=g^2,\qquad d=ab=crs.

Thus cc is central, a2=b2=ca^2=b^2=c, and d2=1d^2=1. The group action is specified by the table below, where an entry ϵ\epsilon means hz=ϵzhhz=\epsilon zh:

x1x_1y1y_1x2x_2y2y_2
gg−1-111−1-111
rr111111−1-1
ss11−1-11111

Table 2.

The remaining relations are

x12=x22=1−c2,y12=y22=0,x_1^2=x_2^2=\frac{1-c}{2},\qquad y_1^2=y_2^2=0,
x1x2+x2x1=t(1−d),y1y2=y2y1,x_1x_2+x_2x_1=t(1-d),\qquad y_1y_2=y_2y_1,
x1y2+y2x1=0,x2y1+y1x2=0,x_1y_2+y_2x_1=0,\qquad x_2y_1+y_1x_2=0,
[x1,y1]2=0,[x2,y2]2=0.(2)[x_1,y_1]^2=0,\qquad[x_2,y_2]^2=0. \tag*{(2)}

The elements g,r,sg,r,s are group-like, and

Δ(x1)=x1⊗1+a⊗x1,Δ(y1)=y1⊗1+b⊗y1,\Delta(x_1)=x_1\otimes1+a\otimes x_1,\qquad\Delta(y_1)=y_1\otimes1+b\otimes y_1,
Δ(x2)=x2⊗1+b⊗x2,Δ(y2)=y2⊗1+a⊗y2.(3)\Delta(x_2)=x_2\otimes1+b\otimes x_2,\qquad\Delta(y_2)=y_2\otimes1+a\otimes y_2. \tag*{(3)}

The counit is zero on xi,yix_i,y_i. For a generator zz with Δ(z)=z⊗1+hz⊗z\Delta(z)=z\otimes1+h_z\otimes z, the antipode is S(z)=−hz−1zS(z)=-h_z^{-1}z.

Proposition 2.1. These formulas define Hopf algebras HtH_t of dimension 1024. Writing zi=[xi,yi]z_i=[x_i,y_i], a basis is

x1a1z1b1y1c1x2a2z2b2y2c2girjsk,aℓ,bℓ,cℓ,j,k∈{0,1},x_1^{a_1}z_1^{b_1}y_1^{c_1}x_2^{a_2}z_2^{b_2}y_2^{c_2}g^i r^j s^k, \qquad a_\ell,b_\ell,c_\ell,j,k\in\{0,1\},
0≤i<4.(4)0\leq i<4. \tag*{(4)}

They are the fibers of a free Hopf algebra of rank 1024 over C[t]\mathbb{C}[t], with constant coalgebra.

Proof. Let Γ=C4(h)×C2(v)×C2(w)\Gamma= C_4(h) \times C_2(v) \times C_2(w), and put u=h2u = h^2. Define an auxiliary Hopf algebra KK by adjoining X1,Y1,X2,Y2X_1,Y_1,X_2,Y_2 to CΓ\mathbb{C}\Gamma. The group action and the group degrees qZq_Z are

X1X_1Y1Y_1X2X_2Y2Y_2
hhi\mathrm{i}i\mathrm{i}i\mathrm{i}i\mathrm{i}
vv11−1-1−1-111
ww−1-11111−1-1
qZq_Zuuvvuuww

Table 1.

Δ(Z)=Z⊗1+qZ⊗Z.(5)\Delta(Z) = Z \otimes1 + q_Z \otimes Z. \tag*{(5)}

Its defining relations, besides those of the group and its action, are

Xi2=Yi2=(XiYi+YiXi)2=0(i=1,2),X_i^2 = Y_i^2 = (X_iY_i + Y_iX_i)^2 = 0 \qquad(i = 1,2),
X1X2+X2X1=X1Y2+Y2X1=X2Y1+Y1X2=0,Y1Y2=Y2Y1.X_1X_2 + X_2X_1 = X_1Y_2 + Y_2X_1 = X_2Y_1 + Y_1X_2 = 0,\qquad Y_1Y_2 = Y_2Y_1.

For either pair X,YX,Y, the algebra C⟨X,Y⟩/(X2,Y2,(XY+YX)2)\mathbb{C}\langle X,Y\rangle/(X^2,Y^2,(XY+YX)^2) has basis

1, X, Y, XY, YX, XYX, YXY, XYXY.(6)1,\ X,\ Y,\ XY,\ YX,\ XYX,\ YXY,\ XYXY. \tag*{(6)}

Indeed, only alternating words survive, YXYX=−XYXYYXYX = -XYXY, every word of length five vanishes, and there are no further relations in degrees at most four. The cross relations are scalar commutation relations between the two factors, so their product has dimension 64. Adjoining Γ\Gamma gives dim⁡K=1024\dim K = 1024.

The coproduct respects the relations. For the only quartic relation in the first pair, put Z1=X1Y1+Y1X1Z_1 = X_1Y_1 + Y_1X_1. Then

Δ(Z1)=Z1⊗1+uv⊗Z1+2vX1⊗Y1.\Delta(Z_1) = Z_1 \otimes1 + uv \otimes Z_1 + 2vX_1 \otimes Y_1.

The quadratic relations give [Z1,X1]=[Z1,Y1]=0[Z_1,X_1] = [Z_1,Y_1] = 0, while

Z1(uv)=−(uv)Z1,Z1(vX1)=−(vX1)Z1,(uv)(vX1)=−(vX1)(uv).Z_1(uv) = -(uv)Z_1,\qquad Z_1(vX_1) = -(vX_1)Z_1,\qquad(uv)(vX_1) = -(vX_1)(uv).

Together with (uv)2=1(uv)^2 = 1 and Y12=0Y_1^2 = 0, these identities give

Δ(Z12)=Z12⊗1+1⊗Z12,\Delta(Z_1^2) = Z_1^2 \otimes1 + 1 \otimes Z_1^2,

so the quartic relation is preserved. The second pair is identical with vv replaced by ww, and the quadratic relations are checked directly from (5). The usual antipode on the skew-primitive generators makes KK a Hopf algebra.

The elements u,X1,X2u,X_1,X_2 generate the Hopf subalgebra C⟨X1,X2⟩⋊C⟨u⟩\mathbb{C}\langle X_1,X_2\rangle\rtimes\mathbb{C}\langle u\rangle. Set

(bij)=−12(1tt1),Tt=∑i,j=12bijXiu⊗Xj,Ft=eTt=1+Tt+12Tt2.(7)(b_{ij}) = -\frac{1}{2}\begin{pmatrix} 1 & t \\ t & 1 \end{pmatrix},\qquad T_t = \sum_{i,j=1}^{2} b_{ij}X_i u \otimes X_j,\qquad F_t = e^{T_t} = 1 + T_t + \frac{1}{2}T_t^2. \tag*{(7)}

Here Tt3=0T_t^3 = 0. To check the twist equation, for L=∑bijXiu⊗XjL = \sum b_{ij}X_i u \otimes X_j consider

L12=L⊗1,L23=1⊗L,L13u=∑bijXiu⊗u⊗Xj.L_{12} = L \otimes1,\qquad L_{23} = 1 \otimes L,\qquad L_{13}^{u} = \sum b_{ij}X_i u \otimes u \otimes X_j.

Each summand of one tensor commutes with each summand of the other two: the signs from uXi=−XiuuX_i = -X_i u and XiXj=−XjXiX_iX_j = -X_jX_i cancel. Thus these tensors commute pairwise. Moreover,

(Δ⊗id⁡)L=L13u+L23,(id⁡⊗Δ)L=L12+L13u.(\Delta\otimes\operatorname{id})L = L_{13}^{u} + L_{23},\qquad (\operatorname{id} \otimes\Delta)L = L_{12} + L_{13}^{u}.

Exponentiation proves the twist equation; the counit normalization is immediate. Thus K⊗C[t]K \otimes\mathbb{C}[t], with coproduct Ft−1Δ(−)FtF_t^{-1}\Delta(-)F_t, is a Hopf algebra. Its C[t]\mathbb{C}[t]-linear dual HH is free of rank 1024, with coalgebra K∗⊗C[t]K^* \otimes\mathbb{C}[t]. Write H~t\widetilde{H}_t for its fibers.

We identify these fibers with the stated presentation. Take g,r,s∈Γ^g,r,s \in\widehat{\Gamma} to be the characters

hhvvww
ggii1111
rr1111−1-1
ss11−1-111

extended by zero in positive degree. Define degree-one functionals by

xi(Xjγ)=δij,yi(Yjγ)=δij(γ∈Γ).x_i(X_j\gamma)=\delta_{ij}, \qquad y_i(Y_j\gamma)=\delta_{ij} \qquad(\gamma\in\Gamma).

and zero on the other homogeneous basis elements. Their coproducts and group action are (3) and (2). Together with g,r,sg,r,s, they generate the graded algebra K∗K^*: on either factor, pairing the words x,yx,y; xy,yxxy,yx; xyx,yxyxyx,yxy; xyxyxyxy with the corresponding words in X,YX,Y gives the invertible matrices

I2,(11−11),2I2,(2).I_2,\qquad \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 1\\ -1 & 1 \end{pmatrix}, \qquad2I_2,\qquad(2).

and the assertion follows for K∗K^* by the scalar cross relations and Fourier duality on Γ\Gamma. The twisted dual multiplication is filtered, with this graded multiplication as its leading term: the positive-degree terms of FtF_t contribute only lower-degree terms. Hence the same elements generate H~t\widetilde{H}_t.

Quadratic products acquire only degree-zero corrections, since Ft−1F_t-1 starts in total degree two. For γ∈Γ\gamma\in\Gamma,

Ft−1(γ⊗γ)Ft=γ⊗γ+(γ⊗γ)Tt−Tt(γ⊗γ)+terms of total degree at least four.F_t^{-1}(\gamma\otimes\gamma)F_t = \gamma\otimes\gamma+ (\gamma\otimes\gamma)T_t - T_t(\gamma\otimes\gamma) + \text{terms of total degree at least four}.

Applying xi⊗xjx_i \otimes x_j, and writing χ1=a\chi_1=a, χ2=b\chi_2=b for the characters of X1,X2X_1,X_2, gives

(xixj)(γ)=bij(χi(γ)χj(γ)−1).(x_i x_j)(\gamma)=b_{ij}\bigl(\chi_i(\gamma)\chi_j(\gamma)-1\bigr).

Together with the unchanged degree-two terms, this gives the square and linking relations in (2). The other quadratic relations acquire no correction, since the twist involves only X1,X2X_1,X_2.

For the quartic relations, put z1=[x1,y1]z_1=[x_1,y_1]. Centrality of x12x_1^2 and the relation y12=0y_1^2=0 give z1x1=−x1z1z_1x_1=-x_1z_1 and z1y1=−y1z1z_1y_1=-y_1z_1. Moreover,

Δ(z1)=z1⊗1+d⊗z1−2bx1⊗y1.\Delta(z_1)=z_1\otimes1+d\otimes z_1-2b x_1\otimes y_1.

Using d2=1d^2=1 and (2), its square is z12⊗1+1⊗z12z_1^2\otimes1+1\otimes z_1^2. A finite-dimensional Hopf algebra in characteristic zero has no nonzero primitive elements, as follows by applying the coproduct to a minimal polynomial. Thus z12=0z_1^2=0; the same argument gives z22=0z_2^2=0.

There is therefore a surjection from the presented algebra onto H~t\widetilde{H}_t. To obtain a spanning set, move group elements to the right and move the second pair past the first using the cross relations. The linking correction lowers the number of non-group generators. Within each pair, the square relations and

yixiyixi=−xiyixiyiy_i x_i y_i x_i=-x_i y_i x_i y_i

reduce every word to the span of eight monomials, equivalently xiaizibiyicix_i^{a_i}z_i^{b_i}y_i^{c_i} with exponents in {0,1}\{0,1\}. Thus (4) spans. It has 1024 elements, so the surjection is an isomorphism and (4) is a basis. ∎

A distinguished block and its radical layers

Fix t∈Tt \in T. The central involution cc gives

Ht=Ht+⊕Ht−,Ht±=1±c2Ht,dim⁡Ht±=512.H_t = H_t^+ \oplus H_t^-, \qquad H_t^\pm= \frac{1 \pm c}{2}H_t, \qquad\dim H_t^\pm= 512.

Regard At=Ht−A_t = H_t^- as a unital algebra with identity (1−c)/2(1-c)/2. In this algebra,

g2=−1,x12=x22=1,x1x2+x2x1=t(1+rs).g^2=-1,\qquad x_1^2=x_2^2=1,\qquad x_1x_2+x_2x_1=t(1+rs).

Give y1,y2y_1,y_2 degree one and g,r,s,x1,x2g,r,s,x_1,x_2 degree zero. The basis (4) gives

Hilb⁡(At;q)=32(1+q)4.\operatorname{Hilb}(A_t;q)=32(1+q)^4.

The semisimple quotient

Let Dt=(At)0D_t=(A_t)_0. Its simple modules are indexed by eight triples

v=(rv,sv,αv),rv,sv∈{1,−1},αv+αv−1=t(1+rvsv),(8)v=(r_v,s_v,\alpha_v),\qquad r_v,s_v\in\{1,-1\},\qquad\alpha_v+\alpha_v^{-1}=t(1+r_vs_v), \tag*{(8)}

and are given by

g=(i00−i),x1=(0110),x2=(0αvαv−10),r=rvI2,s=svI2.(9)g=\begin{pmatrix} \mathrm{i} & 0 \\ 0 & -\mathrm{i} \end{pmatrix},\qquad x_1=\begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 \end{pmatrix},\qquad x_2=\begin{pmatrix} 0 & \alpha_v \\ \alpha_v^{-1} & 0 \end{pmatrix},\qquad r=r_vI_2,\qquad s=s_vI_2. \tag*{(9)}

For rvsv=−1r_vs_v=-1, the roots are ±i\pm\mathrm{i}; for rvsv=1r_vs_v=1, they are t±t2−1t\pm\sqrt{t^2-1}. The eight representations are simple and inequivalent. Since dim⁡Dt=32\dim D_t=32, it follows that Dt≅Mat⁡2(C)⊕8D_t\cong\operatorname{Mat}_2(\mathbb{C})^{\oplus8}. The positive-degree ideal is nilpotent with semisimple quotient, so it is rad⁡At\operatorname{rad} A_t.

The elements g,x1g,x_1 generate a copy of Mat⁡2(C)\operatorname{Mat}_2(\mathbb{C}) in degree zero. The corner

Bt=pAtp,p=1−ig2,B_t=pA_tp,\qquad p=\frac{1-\mathrm{i}g}{2},

is basic, and

At≅Mat⁡2(Bt),Hilb⁡(Bt;q)=8(1+q)4.(10)A_t\cong\operatorname{Mat}_2(B_t),\qquad\operatorname{Hilb}(B_t;q)=8(1+q)^4. \tag*{(10)}

Inserting the degree-zero matrix units between factors shows that BtB_t, like AtA_t, is generated in degrees zero and one. Consequently, for J=rad⁡BtJ=\operatorname{rad} B_t,

Jk=⨁j≥k(Bt)j,gr⁡JBt≅Bt.(11)J^k=\bigoplus_{j\geq k}(B_t)_j,\qquad\operatorname{gr}_J B_t\cong B_t. \tag*{(11)}

In particular, (Bt)0=C8(B_t)_0=\mathbb{C}^8, dim⁡(Bt)1=32\dim(B_t)_1=32, and dim⁡(Bt)2=48\dim(B_t)_2=48.

Arrows

Let eve_v be the primitive idempotents of (Bt)0(B_t)_0, indexed by (8). Under (10) the component of yiy_i from vv to ww is a 2×22\times2 matrix with entries in ew(Bt)1eve_w(B_t)_1e_v. The group relations force y1y_1 to change (rv,sv)(r_v,s_v) to (rv,−sv)(r_v,-s_v), and y2y_2 to change it to (−rv,sv)(-r_v,s_v). The relations with g,x2g,x_2, respectively g,x1g,x_1, force each component to be a single element of ew(Bt)1eve_w(B_t)_1e_v times, respectively, the matrix

Ywv=(100−αv/αw),Qwv=(100−1).(12)Y_{wv}=\begin{pmatrix}1&0\\0&-\alpha_v/\alpha_w\end{pmatrix},\qquad Q_{wv}=\begin{pmatrix}1&0\\0&-1\end{pmatrix}. \tag*{(12)}

Since (At)1=Dty1Dt+Dty2Dt(A_t)_1 = D_t y_1 D_t + D_t y_2 D_t, each of the 8⋅4=328 \cdot4 = 32 possible arrow spaces has dimension at most one. As dim⁡(Bt)1=32\dim(B_t)_1 = 32, every one has dimension one. We take the nonzero upper-left entries as arrow generators. The resulting quiver has underlying graph K4,4K_{4,4}, with parts distinguished by rvsvr_v s_v.

The graph is connected, so AtA_t is a block. It is the unique block of HtH_t of dimension 512512 all of whose simple modules have dimension two. Indeed, the complementary summand Ht+H_t^+ also has dimension 512512 and contains the one-dimensional counit module. Any other block with the stated dimension would exhaust that summand.

Products of two arrows

For vertices v,wv,w, put

Wwv=ew(J2/J3)ev=ew(Bt)2ev.W_{wv}=e_w(J^2/J^3)e_v=e_w(B_t)_2e_v.

There are four length-two paths from vv to each ww in the same bipartite part, and none to the opposite part.

First suppose (rw,sw)=(rv,sv)(r_w,s_w)=(r_v,s_v). There are two paths of type y1y1y_1y_1 and two of type y2y2y_2y_2, with intermediate scalars β,β−1\beta,\beta^{-1}. For either type ii, write their products as Pβ,Pβ−1P_\beta,P_{\beta^{-1}}. The relations yi2=zi2=0y_i^2=z_i^2=0, using (9) and (12), give

Pβ+Pβ−1=0,fi(β)Pβ+fi(β−1)Pβ−1=0.P_\beta+P_{\beta^{-1}}=0,\qquad f_i(\beta)P_\beta+f_i(\beta^{-1})P_{\beta^{-1}}=0.

where

f1(β)=(1+β/αw)(1+αv/β),f2(β)=β+αv+αw+αvαwβ.(13)f_1(\beta)=(1+\beta/\alpha_w)(1+\alpha_v/\beta),\qquad f_2(\beta)=\beta+\alpha_v+\alpha_w+\frac{\alpha_v\alpha_w}{\beta}. \tag*{(13)}

For the second weight, the coefficient matrix of z2=[x2,y2]z_2=[x_2,y_2] on a y2y_2-arrow with source scalar γ\gamma and target scalar δ\delta is

R(δ,γ)=(0−(δ+γ)δ−1+γ−10).R(\delta,\gamma)= \begin{pmatrix} 0 & -(\delta+\gamma)\\ \delta^{-1}+\gamma^{-1} & 0 \end{pmatrix}.

The upper-left entry of the two-step product through β\beta is

(R(αw,β)R(β,αv))11=−(αw+β)(β−1+αv−1)=−f2(β)αv.\bigl(R(\alpha_w,\beta)R(\beta,\alpha_v)\bigr)_{11} =-(\alpha_w+\beta)(\beta^{-1}+\alpha_v^{-1}) =-\frac{f_2(\beta)}{\alpha_v}.

which gives the stated relation.

If w=vw=v, the differences of the second coefficients are

(β−β−1)(αv−1−αv),(β−β−1)(1−αv2),(\beta-\beta^{-1})(\alpha_v^{-1}-\alpha_v),\qquad (\beta-\beta^{-1})(1-\alpha_v^2),

respectively. Both are nonzero, so all return-path products vanish. If αw=αv−1\alpha_w=\alpha_v^{-1}, the coefficients agree; each type then spans at most one line. Thus Wvv=0W_{vv}=0, and the other target with the same r,sr,s has dimension at most two.

Now let (rw,sw)=(−rv,−sv)(r_w,s_w)=(-r_v,-s_v). Write UβU_\beta for the product through (−rv,sv,β)(-r_v,s_v,\beta), and VβV_\beta for the product through (rv,−sv,β)(r_v,-s_v,\beta). The two matrix entries of y1y2=y2y1y_1y_2=y_2y_1 give

Uβ+Uβ−1=Vβ+Vβ−1,U_\beta+U_{\beta^{-1}}=V_\beta+V_{\beta^{-1}},
βUβ+β−1Uβ−1=αvαw(β−1Vβ+βVβ−1).(14)\beta U_\beta+\beta^{-1}U_{\beta^{-1}} =\alpha_v\alpha_w(\beta^{-1}V_\beta+\beta V_{\beta^{-1}}). \tag*{(14)}

These relations are independent because β≠β−1\beta\ne\beta^{-1}, so each of the two mixed targets has dimension at most two. Since BtB_t is generated in degrees zero and one, (Bt)2(B_t)_2 is spanned by length-two paths.

Thus only the four targets considered above occur for each source, and the exhaustive upper bounds sum to

8(0+2+2+2)=48=dim⁡(Bt)2.8(0+2+2+2)=48=\dim(B_t)_2.

Every bound is therefore attained. For each mixed target, the map from the four-dimensional path space onto WwvW_{wv} has a two-dimensional kernel. The two independent relations (14) form a basis of this kernel.

The elliptic invariant

Proof of Theorem 1.1. Proposition 2.1 constructs the required algebraic family. We recover J(t)\mathcal{J}(t) from the associative algebra.

The radical multiplication maps

ew(J/J2)ek⊗ek(J/J2)ev⟶Wwve_w(J/J^2)e_k\otimes e_k(J/J^2)e_v\longrightarrow W_{wv}

attach a product line to each intermediate vertex kk, whenever the product is nonzero. Here the eve_v may be viewed in Bt/JB_t/J: each radical layer Jm/Jm+1J^m/J^{m+1} is canonically a Bt/JB_t/J-bimodule. Indeed, changing a lift by an element of JJ changes its action only in Jm+1J^{m+1}. The construction is therefore independent of the chosen idempotent lifts. If WwvW_{wv} is two-dimensional and the four product lines are distinct, their unordered configuration in P(Wwv)\mathbb{P}(W_{wv}) is intrinsic. Indeed, an algebra isomorphism preserves the radical filtration and permutes the vertices and arrow spaces of its associated graded algebra. Passing to a basic algebra does not affect the construction, since basic algebras in a given Morita class are isomorphic.

We determine all configurations of four distinct lines. The return target has zero product space. For the other target with the same r,sr,s, the relation yi2=0y_i^2=0 makes the two paths of each type span the same line, so there are at most two distinct lines. For the mixed target with αw=αv−1\alpha_w=\alpha_v^{-1}, equation (14) gives

Vβ=Uβ−1,Vβ−1=Uβ,V_\beta=U_{\beta-1},\qquad V_{\beta-1}=U_\beta,

again leaving only two lines.

It remains to take w=(−rv,−sv,αv)w=(-r v,-s v,\alpha_v). Put α=αv=αw\alpha=\alpha_v=\alpha_w. Equation (14) expresses the two VV’s in terms of the two UU’s, and conversely; each pair is therefore a basis of the two-dimensional space WwvW_{wv}. Solving these equations gives the cross-ratio of their four spans, up to ordering:

λ=−(α2β−β−1)(β−α2β−1)(α2−1)2=(α+α−1)2−(β+β−1)2(α−α−1)2.(15)\begin{aligned} \lambda=-\frac{(\alpha^2\beta-\beta^{-1})(\beta-\alpha^2\beta^{-1})}{(\alpha^2-1)^2} \\ &=\frac{(\alpha+\alpha^{-1})^2-(\beta+\beta^{-1})^2}{(\alpha-\alpha^{-1})^2}. \tag*{(15)} \end{aligned}

By (8), the two sums in the numerator are (0,2t)(0,2t) or (2t,0)(2t,0). Hence

λ=t2orλ=t2t2−1.\lambda=t^2\qquad\text{or}\qquad\lambda=\frac{t^2}{t^2-1}.

These values are related by an anharmonic transformation, and neither is 0,1,∞0,1,\infty. Thus the four lines are distinct, and every such configuration is projectively equivalent to {0,1,∞,t2}\{0,1,\infty,t^2\}.

For an unordered quadruple, the expression

j(λ)=256(1−λ+λ2)3λ2(1−λ)2j(\lambda)=256\frac{(1-\lambda+\lambda^2)^3}{\lambda^2(1-\lambda)^2}

is independent of ordering: it is unchanged by λ↦1−λ\lambda\mapsto1-\lambda and λ↦1/λ\lambda\mapsto1/\lambda, which generate the six changes of cross-ratio. Every configuration just found has the same value j(t2)=J(t)j(t^2)=\mathcal{J}(t). Thus J(t)\mathcal{J}(t) is intrinsic to BtB_t, hence to AtA_t, and hence to HtH_t, because AtA_t is the unique block identified in § 4. This proves the asserted implication.

For fixed j0j_0, the equation J(t)=j0\mathcal{J}(t)=j_0 is a polynomial equation of degree twelve after clearing the denominator. It therefore has at most twelve solutions in TT. Since J\mathcal{J} is nonconstant, choose t0∈Tt_0\in T with J(t0)≠0\mathcal{J}(t_0)\ne0. The inverse function theorem gives a small complex disc about t0t_0 on which J\mathcal{J} is injective. The corresponding fibers are pairwise nonisomorphic as associative algebras.

Remark 4.1. The invariant J\mathcal{J} is the classical elliptic jj-invariant. The smooth projective double cover of the projective line branched over the recovered quadruple has affine equation

Et:y2=x(x−1)(x−t2).E_t:\quad y^2=x(x-1)(x-t^2).

Choosing a ramification point as origin gives an elliptic curve, with isomorphism class independent of this choice. Its invariants are

c4=16(1−t2+t4),Δ=16t4(1−t2)2,j(Et)=c43/Δ=J(t).c_4=16(1-t^2+t^4),\qquad\Delta=16t^4(1-t^2)^2,\qquad j(E_t)=c_4^3/\Delta=\mathcal{J}(t).

Thus [Ht]↦[Et][H_t]\mapsto[E_t] defines a map from the associative algebra isomorphism classes occurring in this family to the moduli of complex elliptic curves.

Acknowledgements

This paper was written in response to the following substantive prompts by Pavel Etingof, reproduced in chronological order:

  1. In the paper https://arxiv.org/pdf/math/0110043 (top of p. 2) it is asked if there are finitely many algebra structures for Hopf algebras over C\mathbb{C} of a given dimension nn. Can you find a counterexample? Work hard!

  1. It’s a sequence, but is there a continuous family?

  1. We don’t need the sequence, the continuous family is good. So the moduli of these Hopf algebras are moduli of elliptic curves, and J\mathcal{J} is the JJ-invariant? If so, you may make a remark to that extent. Write a high-quality paper with abstract and introduction. State the main result in the introduction. In the body of the paper give a proof. Be concise, absolutely nothing not needed for the proof. Make the presentation clear and easily human-readable!

References

  1. [1]P. Etingof and S. Gelaki, On families of triangular Hopf algebras, International Mathematics Research Notices 2002, no. 14, 757–768. arXiv:math/0110043.DOI

Paper details

vlnc:W_wnc4v2x5
v1 · latestHistory (1)

published · Fresh — published within the last 30 days

Usage

views · 0

downloads · 0

A view counts once per browser per day, a download each time the PDF is requested.

CC BY 4.0

Original source

  • Mathematics

OpenAI ChatGPT 6 Pro · View statement →

Looking for related papers…
Contents