alphaFeedback

WorksPhysics and Astronomy

Unveiling the Shock-Excited Molecular Environment in the Orion Protostar HOPS 370

AI contributions
Not recorded for this paper
View details

Abstract

We present near-infrared K-band (1.941.94–2.52 μ2.52~μm) spectroscopy of the deeply embedded protostellar source HOPS,370, obtained with the TIFR–ARIES Near Infrared Spectrometer (TANSPEC) on the 3.6-m Devasthal Optical Telescope (DOT). The spectrum is dominated by prominent molecular hydrogen (H2\rm H_2) ro-vibrational emission, with multiple transitions detected from the 11–00 S, 22–11 S, and 11–00 Q branches. Using the intrinsically linked H2\rm H_2 11–00 Q(3) and 11–00 S(1) transitions, which arise from the same upper energy level, we derive a visual extinction of AV=23.24±1.25A_V = 23.24 \pm 1.25 mag, corresponding to AK=2.50±0.13A_K = 2.50 \pm 0.13 mag, consistent with the embedded Class~0/I nature of the source. The diagnostic line ratio F(2F(2–1 S(1))/F(11~{\rm S}(1))/F(1–0 S(1))=0.12±0.010~{\rm S}(1)) = 0.12 \pm 0.01 is consistent with thermal excitation and disfavors ultraviolet fluorescence as the dominant excitation mechanism. Assuming optically thin emission and local thermodynamic equilibrium, we derive an H2\rm H_2 excitation diagram that yields an excitation temperature of 2078±2152078 \pm 215 K and a molecular hydrogen column density of (1.93±0.93)×1020(1.93 \pm 0.93)\times10^{20} cm−2^{-2}. We further derive an ortho-to-para ratio of 2.45±0.212.45 \pm 0.21, indicating substantial shock-driven thermal processing while remaining below the high-temperature equilibrium value of 3. Taken together, these diagnostics indicate that the molecular hydrogen emission in HOPS,370 originates predominantly in warm, shock-heated gas most likely associated with its protostellar outflow. Our results demonstrate the diagnostic power of combined S- and Q-branch H2\rm H_2 spectroscopy for constraining the physical conditions and excitation history of deeply embedded protostellar systems.

Introduction

Stars form via the gravitational collapse of dense molecular cloud cores, passing through deeply embedded protostellar phases before emerging onto the pre-main-sequence track (e.g., [1, 31]). During these early evolutionary stages, dense natal circumstellar envelopes strongly obscure the central protostar at optical wavelengths (e.g., [1, 20]). Consequently, near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy serves as an indispensable tool to pierce this obscuration and probe the immediate protostellar environment, providing vital access to diagnostic ro-vibrational lines that trace accretion, outflows, and shock dynamics. In this study, we investigate the localized feedback and cloud-clearing processes associated with deeply embedded protostars by characterizing the spatial distribution and morphology of the shock-excited molecular gas and constraining its excitation temperature and column density.

Molecular hydrogen (H2H_2), the dominant constituent of cold molecular clouds, lacks a permanent dipole moment, making the cold molecular gas difficult to detect directly through H2H_2 rotational emission; instead, molecules such as CO are commonly used as tracers (e.g., [5, 28]). However, when collisional shocks or stellar radiation fields heat the gas to T∼1500T \sim1500–30003000 K, prominent ro-vibrational transitions are excited in the NIR KK band ([47, 22, 25]), tracing the interfaces where protostellar jets interact with the surrounding molecular cloud ([7, 9, 11, 19]). While the ubiquitous H2_2 1–0 S(1) line at 2.1218 μ\mum is the standard tool for charting these outflows, line ratios involving higher-level states like H2_2 2–1 S(1) provide crucial diagnostics to discriminate between thermal equilibrium shocks and non-thermal ultraviolet (UV) fluorescence ([6, 8]).

Simultaneously, the underutilized H2_2 1–0 Q-branch sequence (λ∼2.40\lambda\sim2.40–2.50 μ\mum) provides a robust diagnostic. Because selected Q-branch and S-branch transitions originate from identical upper quantum states (e.g., [13]), their intrinsic line-flux ratios are determined by the corresponding transition probabilities and wavelengths, and therefore any observed deviations can be served as a direct gauge of local, wavelength-dependent circumstellar extinction (AVA_V) (e.g., [3, 13, 55]). Despite this diagnostic utility, measurements of the Q-branch can be challenging because its lines lie near the red edge of the K band, where strong and variable telluric water-vapour absorption can introduce significant systematic uncertainties in the measured fluxes ([35, 21]).

In this work, we utilize the TIFR–ARIES Near Infrared Spectrometer (TANSPEC) on the 3.6-m Devasthal Optical Telescope (DOT) to analyze the deeply embedded young stellar object (YSO) HOPS 370 (also known as, 2MASS J05352762−0509337). HOPS 370 is a luminous (Lbol≈315L_{\mathrm{bol}} \approx315–361 L⊙L_{\odot}, K = 10.777 mag), intermediate-mass Class I protostar located within the Orion A molecular cloud ([20]). With a bolometric temperature of Tbol≈71.5T_{\mathrm{bol}} \approx71.5 K, it occupies the critical evolutionary transition boundary separating deeply embedded Class 0 objects from more evolved circumstellar disk systems ([50]). High-resolution interferometric observations reveal a massive, rotationally supported protostellar dust disk (Mdisk≈114.6 M⊕M_{\mathrm{disk}} \approx114.6\,M_{\oplus}) with a characteristic radius of Rdisk≈112.8R_{\mathrm{disk}} \approx112.8 au ([50]). Furthermore, it drives a powerful, highly collimated bipolar molecular outflow that carves distinct opacity cavities into its ambient envelope ([17, 51]), making HOPS 370 an excellent target for studying localized shock chemistry and stellar feedback.

The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we present the new K-band spectroscopic observations and the corresponding data reduction procedures. Section 3 describes the data analysis and the estimation of various physical parameters derived from the observed spectra, which are used to dynamically constrain the physical conditions of the inner envelope. In Section 4, we place our findings into a broader astrophysical

context through a detailed discussion. Finally, we summarize our main conclusions in Section 5.

Observations and Data Reduction

Observations

Near-infrared spectroscopic observations of HOPS 370 were carried out at continuum peak α=05h35m27.635s\alpha= 05^{\mathrm{h}}35^{\mathrm{m}}27.635^{\mathrm{s}}, δ=−05∘09′33.616′′\delta= -05^{\circ}09'33.616'' ([50]) (Figure 1) using the TIFR–ARIES Near Infrared Spectrometer (TANSPEC) mounted on the 3.6-m Devasthal Optical Telescope (DOT), operated by the Aryabhatta Research Institute of Observational Sciences (ARIES), Nainital, India. TANSPEC is a cross-dispersed spectrograph providing simultaneous wavelength coverage from approximately 0.55 to 2.5 μ\mum in a single exposure ([48]).

Three-color composite image of the target field HOPS 370

Figure 1. Three-color composite image of the target field HOPS 370 generated from UKIDSS data. Red, green, and blue channels correspond to the K, J, and Y bands, respectively. The target source position is highlighted at the center with white circle. The yellow bar denotes orientation of slit position for spectroscopic observations.

The target was observed on 17 February 2026 at 08:37:43 UT using the cross-dispersed mode with a slit width of 0.5 arcsec, yielding a spectral resolving power of R=λ/Δλ∼2500R = \lambda/\Delta\lambda\sim2500. The spatial profile across the cross-dispersion direction yielded a seeing of 2.3″ during the observations. Calibration frames, including flat-field exposures and wavelength calibration lamps, as well as standard-star observations, were obtained.

Data Reduction

The spectroscopic data were reduced using the standard pyTANSPEC (v1.0) pipeline designed for cross-dispersed spectra [45]. The reduction workflow involved standard procedures, including dark subtraction, flat-field correction, cosmic-ray rejection, and background sky subtraction. One-dimensional spectral extraction was performed, followed by wavelength calibration using an arc lamp assembly and subsequent telluric correction using observations of a standard star.

Although the full TANSPEC setup covers a wide wavelength range from approximately 0.550.55 to 2.5 μm2.5\,\mu\mathrm{m}, this study focuses exclusively on the KK-band region spanning 1.941.94–2.52 μm2.52\,\mu\mathrm{m}. The extracted KK-band spectrum was normalized to the local continuum to facilitate line identification and detailed analysis of the molecular hydrogen (H2\mathrm{H}_2) emission features.

Archival Data

Complementary near-infrared YY-, JJ-, and KK-band photometric observations of the target region were retrieved from the UKIRT Infrared Deep Sky Survey (UKIDSS; Lawrence et al. [32]). These data were acquired using the Wide Field Camera (WFCAM; Casali et al. [10]) mounted on the 3.8-m United Kingdom Infrared Telescope (UKIRT). The high-resolution archival images provide spatial and photometric context, enabling a detailed examination of the surrounding stellar distribution and the identification of potential stellar or substellar companions near the target. The RGB image constructed from the YY, JJ, and KK bands is shown in Figure 1. To contextualize the multiwavelength analysis, the precise pointing center of our TANSPEC spectroscopic observations and the relative orientation of the 0.5′′0.5^{\prime\prime} slit are overlaid on the color composite.

Analyses and Results

K-band Spectrum

The reduced KK-band spectrum of HOPS 370 is presented in Figure 2. The spectrum is dominated by numerous molecular hydrogen emission features superimposed on a relatively weak continuum. Several H2\mathrm{H}_2 ro-vibrational transitions are clearly detected, including lines from the 1–0 and 2–1 S-branch series, as well as a sequence of H2\mathrm{H}_2 Q-branch transitions between 2.42.4 and 2.5 μm2.5\,\mu\mathrm{m}.

Full K-band continuum-subtracted spectrum of HOPS 370

Figure 2. Full K-band continuum-subtracted spectrum of HOPS 370 obtained with TANSPEC. The principal H2_2 rovibrational transitions identified in the spectrum are marked. The spectrum is dominated by molecular hydrogen emission, including both S-branch and Q-branch transitions. The shaded regions indicate the wavelength ranges likely affected by telluric atmospheric absorption.

To verify the reality of the detected features, all candidate emission lines were visually inspected in the corresponding two-dimensional spectra and cross-checked against their expected wavelengths. Residual telluric features can affect near-infrared spectra and may complicate the identification and measurement of weak astronomical emission lines (e.g., Vacca et al. [52]). In our two-dimensional spectra, residual telluric features generally extend along the spatial direction of the slit, whereas genuine source emission is localized at the source position. Based on these criteria, the identified H2\mathrm{H}_2 lines are considered astrophysical in origin rather than artifacts of imperfect telluric correction. This verification is particularly important for the Q-branch transitions at the red end of the KK band, where atmospheric transmission is poor and variable beyond 2.4 μm2.4\,\mu\mathrm{m}, making reliable measurements of these lines more challenging [21].

Line profiles were measured by mapping the local adaptive spline continua, with the final relative and absolute line fluxes calculated by directly integrating the residual emission. All identified spectral features were visually inspected and cross-checked against published near-infrared line catalogs of young stellar objects and molecular outflows. The detected transitions are listed in Table 1.

Transitionλrest\lambda_{\mathrm{rest}} (μm\mu\mathrm{m})AulA_{ul} (×10−7 s\times10^{-7}\ \mathrm{s})gug_uEu/kE_u/k (K)Absolute Flux (erg s−1 cm−2\mathrm{erg\ s^{-1}\ cm^{-2}})State / Note
Atomic
Brγ\gamma2.1661––––Absorption
He I 2.04122.0422––––P-Cygni
He I 2.05812.0581––––P-Cygni
Molecular
H2_2 1-0 S(0)2.22352.5356471(5.99±0.18)×10−14(5.99 \pm0.18) \times10^{-14}para
H2_2 1-0 S(1)2.12183.47216956(1.86±0.02)×10−13(1.86 \pm0.02) \times10^{-13}ortho
H2_2 1-0 S(2)2.03383.9897584(2.28±0.19)×10−14(2.28 \pm0.19) \times10^{-14}para
H2_2 1-0 S(3)1.95864.21338365(8.13±0.34)×10−14(8.13 \pm0.34) \times10^{-14}ortho
H2_2 2-1 S(1)2.24774.982112550(2.23±0.18)×10−14(2.23 \pm0.18) \times10^{-14}ortho
H2_2 2-1 S(2)2.15425.60913150(6.54±1.84)×10−15(6.54 \pm1.84) \times10^{-15}para
H2_2 2-1 S(3)2.07355.773313890(7.42±1.89)×10−15(7.42 \pm1.89) \times10^{-15}ortho
H2_2 1-0 Q(0)+Q(1)2.4066–––(7.62±0.19)×10−14(7.62 \pm0.19) \times10^{-14}blended
H2_2 1-0 Q(2)2.41343.0356471(7.15±0.19)×10−14(7.15 \pm0.19) \times10^{-14}para
H2_2 1-0 Q(3)2.42372.78216956(8.16±0.19)×10−14(8.16 \pm0.19) \times10^{-14}ortho
H2_2 1-0 Q(4)2.43752.6597566(4.56±0.19)×10−14(4.56 \pm0.19) \times10^{-14}para
H2_2 1-0 Q(5)2.45482.55338365(1.02±0.02)×10−13(1.02 \pm0.02) \times10^{-13}ortho
H2_2 1-0 Q(6)2.47562.45139286(4.64±0.19)×10−14(4.64 \pm0.19) \times10^{-14}para
H2_2 1-0 Q(7) + 3-2 S(0)2.5001–––(1.76±0.02)×10−13(1.76 \pm0.02) \times10^{-13}blended

Table 1. Line Measurement Parameters, Transition Configurations, and Derived Absolute Fluxes

The extracted spectrum was flux calibrated using the KK-band magnitude of HOPS 370 from the Visible and Infrared Survey Telescope for Astronomy (VISTA; Großschedl et al. [23]) survey, converting the relative spectral fluxes to absolute units through the standard KK-band zero-point calibration. No explicit slit-loss correction was applied; therefore, the absolute line fluxes may be subject to additional systematic uncertainties associated with slit throughput and source variability. Extinction corrections were not applied during the calibration process and were instead incorporated later through the H2\mathrm{H}_2 line-ratio analysis.

The spectrum is characterized by strong molecular emission accompanied by comparatively weak hydrogen recombination lines and He I emission. Notably, the He I λ2.0412\lambda2.0412 and λ2.0581\lambda2.0581 transitions show tentative asymmetric profiles that may be consistent with P-Cygni-type structure. The Brγ\gamma line at 2.1661 μm2.1661\,\mu\mathrm{m} appears weak and may be present in absorption; however, given the moderate spectral resolution and signal-to-noise ratio of the data, we do not attempt a detailed interpretation of this feature. The overall KK-band spectral morphology suggests that the emission is dominated by warm molecular gas rather than active magnetospheric accretion. The detection of numerous H2\mathrm{H}_2 transitions provides a valuable opportunity to investigate the excitation conditions and physical origin of the molecular emission.

The line identifications, Einstein A coefficients, and energy levels are adopted from the NIST Standard Atomic Spectra Database1 (Kramida et al., [30]) and the Gemini Important H2_2 Line List2.

Detected H2_2 Emission Lines

As summarized in Table 1, the observed transitions encompass an extensive suite of both S-branch and Q-branch lines originating from vibrationally excited molecular states. The simultaneous detection of these transitions allows for a detailed investigation into the excitation temperature, visual extinction (AVA_V), and underlying excitation mechanisms of the emitting gas.

The dominant feature in the spectrum is the H2_2 1–0 S(1) transition at 2.1218 μ\mum, a classic tracer commonly associated with shocked molecular gas in protostellar outflows (e.g., Reipurth & Bally, [44]). Beyond this primary feature, several other fundamental rovibrational transitions are detected, including lower S-branch lines from the 1–0 vibrational state, higher-excitation 2–1 S-branch lines, and an array of 1–0 Q-branch lines longward of 2.40 μ\mum. This broad collection of transitions spans a wide range of upper-state energies (Eu/kE_u/k), providing the empirical basis needed to construct an H2_2 excitation diagram and distinguish between thermal shock excitation and non-thermal ultraviolet fluorescence.

Extinction from H2_2 Q- and S-Branch Transitions

A powerful advantage of detecting both Q-branch and S-branch transitions is that several of these lines originate from the same upper rovibrational level. Under optically thin conditions, which are generally appropriate for the weak electric-quadrupole H2_2 rovibrational transitions at the column densities characteristic of shock-excited gas (e.g., Navarro et al., [39]; Le Gouellec et al., [33]), their intrinsic line ratios are determined solely by the transition probabilities and wavelengths, making them largely insensitive to uncertainties in excitation conditions or localized gas temperatures. In particular, the H2_2 1–0 Q(3) and 1–0 S(1) transitions share the upper level (vv, JJ) = (1, 3). Their intrinsic flux ratio is given by:

(FQ(3)FS(1))int=AQ(3)λS(1)AS(1)λQ(3),(1)\left(\frac{F_{Q(3)}}{F_{S(1)}}\right)_{\mathrm{int}} = \frac{A_{Q(3)}\lambda_{S(1)}}{A_{S(1)}\lambda_{Q(3)}}, \tag*{(1)}

where AulA_{ul} denotes the Einstein transition probability from the upper level (uu) to the lower level (ll) and λ\lambda is the rest wavelength of the transition. Consequently, any deviation between the observed line ratio and this intrinsic quantum mechanical value can be attributed primarily to wavelength-dependent differential extinction.

We derived the visual extinction from the H2_2 1–0 Q(3)/S(1) line ratio using a near-infrared power-law extinction curve (Indebetouw et al., [27]). The extinction coefficient (k(λ)k(\lambda)), defined as the ratio of the extinction at wavelength (λ\lambda) to the visual extinction (AVA_V), is given by

k(λ)=AλAV=0.112(λ2.148 μm)−1.61,k(\lambda) = \frac{A_\lambda}{A_V} = 0.112\left(\frac{\lambda}{2.148\,\mu\mathrm{m}}\right)^{-1.61},

corresponding to an extinction-law normalization of AK/AV=0.112A_K/A_V = 0.112 and a power-law index α=1.61\alpha= 1.61.

The visual extinction AVA_V toward the embedded protostar can be estimated as:

AV=2.5k(λS1)−k(λQ3)log⁡10[(FQ(3)/FS(1))int(FQ(3)/FS(1))obs].(2)A_V = \frac{2.5}{k(\lambda_{S1}) - k(\lambda_{Q3})}\log_{10}\left[\frac{(F_{Q(3)}/F_{S(1)})_{\mathrm{int}}}{(F_{Q(3)}/F_{S(1)})_{\mathrm{obs}}}\right]. \tag*{(2)}

where (FQ(3)/FS(1))obs(F_{Q(3)}/F_{S(1)})_{\mathrm{obs}} is the observed absolute flux ratio.

From this relation, we derived a visual extinction of AV=23.24±1.25A_V = 23.24 \pm1.25 mag, corresponding to a KK-band extinction of AK=2.50±0.13A_K = 2.50 \pm0.13 mag. This high level of extinction is characteristic of deeply embedded Class 0/I protostars and is consistent with the range (AV∼10A_V \sim10–30 mag) measured in dense star-forming environments observed with JWST (e.g., Li et al., 2026), as well as in individual protostars studied by the JWST Observations of Young protoStars (JOYS) program (e.g., van Dishoeck et al., 2025). Comparable extinction values have also been reported for low-mass protostars such as IRAS 16253–2429 (Narang et al., [38]) and HOPS 315 (Dutta, [16]), both of which drive highly collimated jets and molecular outflows while remaining embedded within their natal envelopes. The derived extinction toward HOPS 370 supports its classification as an actively accreting protostellar system still deeply embedded in its parent molecular cloud.

The extinction estimate derived from the H2_2 1–0 Q(3)/S(1) line ratio should be interpreted with some caution, as the Q-branch transitions lie in a wavelength region affected by strong telluric absorption. Residual telluric-correction uncertainties at the 10–20% level could introduce systematic uncertainties of several magnitudes in the derived extinction. For the present dataset, a 20% uncertainty in the Q(3) flux would result in AVA_V values ranging from approximately 14 to 35 mag.

Shock versus Fluorescent Excitation

The excitation mechanism of the molecular hydrogen emission was investigated using the ratio of the vibrationally excited H2_2 lines (Black & van Dishoeck, [4]; Reunanen et al., [46]). A commonly used diagnostic is the H2_2 2–1 S(1) to 1–0 S(1) line ratio (RR), defined as

R=F(2–1 S(1))F(1–0 S(1)),(3)R = \frac{F(2\text{--}1\,\mathrm{S}(1))}{F(1\text{--}0\,\mathrm{S}(1))}, \tag*{(3)}

which helps examine the excitation mechanism. Because shock excitation and UV fluorescence popu-

late the rovibrational levels through different physical processes and therefore produce distinct relative line strengths. Specifically, because the v=2v=2 level requires more energy than the v=1v=1 level, its relative thermal population is low, yielding a small value of RR (≲0.2\lesssim0.2) characteristic of thermal shock excitation. Conversely, UV fluorescence pumps molecules into excited electronic states, with subsequent radiative cascades heavily overpopulating higher vibrational levels (v=2v=2, 3, etc.) relative to a thermal distribution. This results in a significantly higher value of RR (often approaching ∼0.5\sim0.5–0.6), making this ratio a powerful tool for distinguishing between thermal and non-thermal excitation regimes. Using the measured line fluxes listed in Table 1, we obtain R=0.12±0.01R=0.12\pm0.01. This value is significantly lower than the typical ratios expected for ultraviolet fluorescent excitation (R∼0.5R\sim0.5–0.6) and is consistent with thermal excitation in shocked molecular gas (R≲0.2R\lesssim0.2) [e.g. 46, 24].

The vibrational excitation temperature was estimated directly from the column densities of the v=1v=1, J=3J=3 and v=2v=2, J=3J=3 levels, corresponding to the H2_2 1–0 S(1) and 2–1 S(1) transitions, respectively. Assuming a Boltzmann distribution of level populations, the vibrational temperature is given by

N(v=2,J=3)N(v=1,J=3)=exp⁡[−E2,3−E1,3Tvib],(4)\frac{N(v=2,J=3)}{N(v=1,J=3)}=\exp\left[-\frac{E_{2,3}-E_{1,3}}{T_{\mathrm{vib}}}\right], \tag*{(4)}

where N(v,J)N(v,J) denotes the upper-level column density, E2,3/k=12550E_{2,3}/k=12550 K and E1,3/k=6956E_{1,3}/k=6956 K. Rearranging yields

Tvib=E2,3−E1,3ln⁡[N(v=1,J=3)/N(v=2,J=3)].(5)T_{\mathrm{vib}}=\frac{E_{2,3}-E_{1,3}}{\ln\left[N(v=1,J=3)/N(v=2,J=3)\right]}. \tag*{(5)}

Using the measured line fluxes listed in Table 1, we derive the column densities of the upper rovibrational levels, N(v,J)N(v,J), assuming optically thin emission, following [e.g. 54, 33, 16]:

N(v,J)=4πFulλAulhc,(6)N(v,J)=\frac{4\pi F_{ul}\lambda}{A_{ul}hc}, \tag*{(6)}

where uu and ll denote the upper and lower rovibrational energy levels of the transition, respectively, FulF_{ul} is the measured line flux, λ\lambda is the rest wavelength, and AulA_{ul} is the Einstein AA-coefficient. We derive a vibrational temperature of Tvib=2305±79T_{\mathrm{vib}}=2305\pm79 K. The low value of the diagnostic line ratio (R=0.12R=0.12), together with the derived vibrational temperature, indicates that the H2_2 emission is predominantly thermally excited. Such temperatures are characteristic of warm molecular gas heated by shocks most likely associated with protostellar jets and outflows. The dominance of strong H2_2 emission lines and the relative weakness of Brγ\gamma further support a shock-driven origin for the observed near-infrared spectrum. The measured line ratio favors thermal excitation within a dense, shock-heated environment, where the molecular gas is expected to approach Local Thermodynamic Equilibrium (LTE). Under these conditions, the rotational and vibrational level populations become thermalized, leading to a common excitation temperature. Motivated by this result, we construct a unified H2_2 rovibrational excitation diagram using all detected extinction-corrected 1–0 S, 2–1 S, and 1–0 Q transitions.

Excitation Diagram

The excitation conditions of the molecular gas were investigated using the observed H2_2 line intensities. The column density NuN_u (or N(v,J)N(v,J)) is estimated using Equation (6). Under local thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE), the population distribution follows the Boltzmann relation

ln⁡(Nugu)=−1Tex(Euk)+C,(7)\ln\left(\frac{N_u}{g_u}\right)=-\frac{1}{T_{\mathrm{ex}}}\left(\frac{E_u}{k}\right)+C, \tag*{(7)}

where gug_u is the statistical weight of the upper level, Eu/kE_u/k is the upper-level energy expressed in units of temperature, kk is the Boltzmann constant, and TexT_{\mathrm{ex}} is the excitation temperature. The intercept constant CC is explicitly defined as

C=ln⁡(NtotZ(Tex)),(8)C=\ln\left(\frac{N_{\mathrm{tot}}}{Z(T_{\mathrm{ex}})}\right), \tag*{(8)}

where NtotN_{\mathrm{tot}} is the total column density of molecular hydrogen summed over all rovibrational states, and Z(Tex)Z(T_{\mathrm{ex}}) is the total internal partition function of H2_2 evaluated at the derived excitation temperature. Thus, the total column density NtotN_{\mathrm{tot}} (or NH2N_{\mathrm{H}_2}) is determined from the intercept CC through Ntot=exp⁡(C)×Z(Tex)N_{\mathrm{tot}}=\exp(C)\times Z(T_{\mathrm{ex}}).

An excitation diagram was constructed by plotting ln⁡(Nugu)\ln\left(\frac{N_u}{g_u}\right) against Eu/kE_u/k, as shown in Figure 3. For thermalized gas, the data points lie along a straight line whose slope yields slope =−1/Tex=-1/T_{\mathrm{ex}}, directly providing the excitation temperature. Furthermore, the total column density NH2N_{\mathrm{H}_2} is determined from the intercept CC of the best-fit line, which accounts for the molecular population distributed across all unobserved states.

Molecular hydrogen rovibrational excitation diagram

Figure 3. Molecular hydrogen (H2_2) rovibrational excitation diagram derived from KK-band line measurements. The natural logarithm of the upper-state column density normalized by its statistical weight, ln⁡(Nu/gu)\ln(N_u/g_u), is shown as a function of the upper-state energy Eu/kE_u/k in Kelvin. Gray markers represent the baseline observed data points, while colored markers denote data corrected for interstellar extinction. Data points are grouped by transitions: 1-0 S branch (blue circles), 2-1 S branch (green squares), and 1-0 Q branch (purple triangles). The dashed crimson line illustrates an unweighted ordinary least-squares linear fit applied to the dereddened population distribution, yielding an excitation temperature of Tex=2078±215T_{\rm ex} = 2078 \pm215 K and column density NH2=(1.927±0.93)×1020 cm−2N_{\mathrm{H}_2} = (1.927 \pm0.93) \times10^{20}\,\mathrm{cm}^{-2}. Vertical error bars reflect the combined quadrature sum of relative flux measurement uncertainties and propagated errors from the extinction correction. The fit has an RMS residual scatter of σscatter≈0.41\sigma_{\rm scatter} \approx0.41, with a reduced chi-squared of χν2≈12.4\chi_\nu^2 \approx12.4.

We present a unified H2_2 rovibrational diagram (Boltzmann plot) across all detected transitions. The observed fluxes were corrected for extinction. By plotting the column densities over a wide baseline of upper-state energies (Eu/kB∼6400E_{\mathrm{u}}/k_{\mathrm{B}} \sim6400–14000 K), the global linear regression filters out local line variations, yielding an excitation temperature of Tex=2078±215T_{\mathrm{ex}} = 2078 \pm215 K and column density NH2=(1.927±0.93)×1020 cm−2N_{\mathrm{H}_{2}} = (1.927 \pm0.93) \times10^{20}\,\mathrm{cm}^{-2} from the extinction corrected data. To evaluate the validity of the single-temperature LTE assumption, we examine the residual scatter of the data points around the linear fit. Following the methodology of Maragkoudakis et al. [36]; Porel et al. [42], the global fit exhibits an RMS residual scatter of σscatter≈0.41\sigma_{\mathrm{scatter}} \approx0.41 (with a reduced chi-squared of χν2≈12.4\chi_{\nu}^{2} \approx12.4). While smaller scatter is broadly consistent with a dominant single-temperature LTE component, larger dispersions can reflect temperature gradients, multiple excitation components, or unresolved substructure (e.g., Maragkoudakis et al. [36]).

Individual transition branch fittings of 1–0 S, 1–0 Q and 2–1 S were rejected in favor of a unified global rovibrational diagram for three primary reasons. First, isolating single branches (such as the 1–0 S transitions) restricts the data to a narrow upper-state energy baseline (ΔEu/kB∼2000−3000\Delta E_{\mathrm{u}}/k_{\mathrm{B}} \sim2000 - 3000 K), leaving the linear regression highly vulnerable to minor observational flux scatter. Combining all detected transitions expands this baseline to a robust range of ΔEu/kB∼7500\Delta E_{\mathrm{u}}/k_{\mathrm{B}} \sim7500 K, which stabilizes the fit against local noise. Second, individual fits fail to expose systematic, wavelength-dependent anomalies, such as telluric degradation or differential extinction affecting the 1–0 Q branch at λ>2.4 μm\lambda> 2.4\,\mu\mathrm{m}. Finally, fitting individual branches with sparse line counts (e.g., the 2–1 S branch) suffers from severely limited degrees of freedom.

Ortho-to-Para Ratio

The ortho-to-para ratio (OPR) of molecular hydrogen is a valuable diagnostic of the thermal and chemical history of shocked molecular gas. Under local thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE) at temperatures above ∼2000\sim2000 K, the OPR approaches the statistical value of 3, whereas lower values can indicate incomplete thermalization, recent H2_2 formation on dust grains, or gas that has not yet fully equilibrated following a shock event. Measuring the OPR therefore provides an independent probe of the excitation conditions and thermal history of protostellar outflows.

To determine the OPR toward HOPS 370, we constructed a rovibrational H2_2 excitation diagram, shown in Figure 4. The observed line fluxes were first corrected for interstellar extinction (AV=23.24±1.25A_{\mathrm{V}} = 23.24 \pm1.25 mag). The dereddened fluxes were then converted into upper-level column densities (NuN_{\mathrm{u}}) and normalized by their statistical weights, gu=gs(2Ju+1)g_{\mathrm{u}} = g_{\mathrm{s}}(2J_{\mathrm{u}} + 1), where gs=1g_{\mathrm{s}} = 1 and 3 correspond to para- and ortho-H2_2, respectively.

Rovibrational diagram and single-temperature LTE model fit for H$_2$ emission lines toward HOPS 370

Figure 4. Rovibrational diagram and single-temperature LTE model fit for H2_2 emission lines toward HOPS 370. The column densities normalized by statistical weights, ln⁡(Nu/gu)\ln(N_u/g_u), are plotted against the upper-state energies (Eu/kBE_u/k_B). Observed para-H2_2 (gs=1g_s = 1) and ortho-H2_2 (gs=3g_s = 3) lines are represented by blue circles and red triangles, respectively. Solid lines illustrate the simultaneous best-fit linear models for the para (blue) and ortho (red) populations. The fit yields a rovibrational temperature of Topr=1758±103T_{\mathrm{opr}} = 1758 \pm103 K and an ortho-to-para ratio of OPR =2.45±0.21= 2.45 \pm0.21. The fit exhibits an RMS residual scatter of σscatter≈0.39\sigma_{\mathrm{scatter}} \approx0.39 and a reduced chi-squared of χν2≈13.64\chi_\nu^2 \approx13.64. Individual H2_2 transitions are labeled textually above their respective data points.

Rather than assuming the high-temperature equilibrium value of OPR = 3, we treated the OPR as a free parameter during the fitting procedure. In the excitation diagram, a non-equilibrium OPR produces a systematic vertical offset of ln⁡(OPR/3)\ln(\mathrm{OPR}/3) between the ortho- and para-H2_2 transitions in ln⁡(Nu/gu)\ln(N_{\mathrm{u}}/g_{\mathrm{u}}) space. We therefore fitted the ortho and para populations simultaneously using a single-temperature Boltzmann model. In this approach, both spin isomers share a common slope, corresponding to a single rovibrational temperature, while the relative vertical displacement between the two sequences is determined by the OPR. The model parameters (ToprT_{\mathrm{opr}} and OPR) were obtained through a non-linear least-squares fit to all detected transitions, using the uncertainties in ln⁡(Nu/gu)\ln(N_{\mathrm{u}}/g_{\mathrm{u}}) as statistical weights.

The best-fitting model yields a rovibrational temperature of Topr=1758±103T_{\mathrm{opr}} = 1758 \pm103 K and an ortho-to-para ratio of OPR = 2.45±0.212.45 \pm0.21. Although slightly below the LTE value of 3, the derived OPR indicates that the molecular gas is close to thermal equilibrium, consistent with excitation in warm, shock-heated gas associated with the protostellar outflow.

For comparison, the excitation temperature (TexT_{\mathrm{ex}}) derived in Section 3.5 was obtained from a global Boltzmann fit that assumes the equilibrium value OPR = 3. That temperature is adopted for determining the total H2_2 column density and partition function, whereas rovibrational temperature (ToprT_{\mathrm{opr}}) from the present analysis allows the OPR to vary freely in order to independently constrain the spin-state population distribution. The difference between the two fitted temperatures therefore reflects the distinct assumptions regarding the ortho and para level populations rather than evidence for multiple thermal components.

Discussion

Nature of the H2_2 Emission and Relation to Protostellar Outflows

The near-infrared K-band spectrum of HOPS 370 is dominated by molecular hydrogen emission, including numerous S-branch and Q-branch transitions, indicating the presence of warm (∼1500\sim1500–3000 K) molecular gas. The strongest detected feature is the H2_2 1–0 S(1) line at 2.1218 μ\mum, while the detection of multiple Q-branch lines implies a substantial column density of excited H2_2 within the circumstellar environment. Such spectra are commonly observed toward embedded Class 0/I protostars associated with molecular outflows and shock-excited gas (Davis et al., [11]; Caratti o Garatti et al., [7]; Davis et al., [12]). Molecular hydrogen has emerged as one of the most powerful tracers of protostellar feedback. Recent JWST observations of embedded protostars have demonstrated that H2_2 emission can trace both highly collimated jets and wider-angle molecular winds, carrying a significant fraction of the mass and momentum injected into the surrounding cloud [43, 9, 54, 16]. The observed properties of HOPS 370 are broadly consistent with this interpretation. In contrast to many actively accreting Class I protostars, the source exhibits weak Brγ\gamma absorption and likely weak He I P-cygni profiles. Since these atomic lines are generally associated with magnetospheric accretion [37], its weakness suggests that the K-band spectrum is not dominated by accretion-related processes. Instead, the observed emission appears to arise primarily from shock-excited molecular gas associated with ongoing outflow activity and the emitting gas is produced mainly in non-dissociative molecular shocks, likely magnetically mediated C-type shocks in which H2_2 survives the shock passage and remains the principal coolant [14, 15, 29, 18]. This interpretation is further supported by the location of HOPS 370 in the OMC-2 region of the Orion Molecular Cloud, a well-known site of active star formation and molecular outflows. HOPS 370 is known to drive a powerful bipolar jet and molecular outflow.

Using JWST/MIRI spectroscopy, Neufeld et al. [41] detected highly excited OH emission from shocked knots along the outflow and attributed it to ultraviolet radiation generated in fast shocks (∼80\sim80 km s−1^{-1}) within the jet. More recently, Tyagi et al. [51] showed that the H2_2- and OH-emitting knots coincide with cavities and regions of reduced ice-column density, providing direct evidence that the outflow is influencing the surrounding envelope. Together, these observations support the conclusion that the rich H2_2 spectrum of HOPS 370 originates most likely in shock-heated molecular gas associated with its protostellar jet and outflow, rather than in the immediate accretion environment of the central source.

Quantitative Excitation Diagnostics

The H2_2 line ratios provide a direct probe of the excitation mechanism operating in HOPS 370. The measured 2–1 S(1)/1–0 S(1) ratio of R=0.12R = 0.12 is characteristic of thermal excitation and substantially lower than the values expected for pure ultraviolet fluorescence. Such low ratios are commonly observed in shock-excited molecular gas, where collisions efficiently thermalize the H2_2 level populations.

The excitation temperature of 2078 ± 215 K and H2_2 column density of (1.93 ± 0.93) × 1020^{20} cm−2^{-2}, derived from the rovibrational transitions further supports this interpretation. Temperatures of a few thousand Kelvin are consistent with theoretical models of molecular shocks in dense protostellar environments, where H2_2 acts as the dominant coolant of the post-shock gas [25, 15, 29].

Comparing our derived line ratio (RR = 0.12 ± 0.01) and kinetic excitation temperature (TexT_{\mathrm{ex}} = 2078 ± 215 K) with theoretical shock models (e.g., Kaufman & Neufeld, [29]; Flower & Pineau Des Forêts, [18]) provides a clear physical picture of the outflow dynamics. Non-dissociative CC-type (continuous) shocks propagating at velocities vsv_s ∼ 15–30 km s−1^{-1} into dense envelope gas (nH2n_{\mathrm{H}_2} ∼ 104^{4}–106^{6} cm−3^{-3}) maintain an extended ambipolar diffusion zone that produces warm, thermally excited molecular hydrogen without causing complete dissociation. In contrast, planar JJ-type shocks capable of reaching TexT_{\mathrm{ex}} ≈ 2100 K operate near the H2_2 dissociation limit (vsv_s ≳ 20 km s−1^{-1}), typically driving higher values of RR or causing complete molecular breakup. The combination of a low vibrational ratio (RR = 0.12) and TexT_{\mathrm{ex}} ≈ 2080 K therefore points to CC-type shocks as the dominant excitation mechanism along the outflow cavity walls of HOPS 370.

The high rovibrational temperature captures the hot, localized shock fronts where the protostellar molecular jets interacts with the surrounding ambient medium. The derived OPR of 2.45 ± 0.21, is below the high-temperature statistical equilibrium value of 3, indicating that the molecular hydrogen has not yet reached complete ortho–para equilibrium. Such non-equilibrium OPR values are commonly observed in shocked molecular gas and suggest that the spin-state populations retain a partial memory of an earlier, colder phase of the cloud. A progressive increase in the OPR toward the high-temperature equilibrium limit of 3 reflects the evolution of molecular gas from cold, quiescent reservoirs, where ortho-to-para conversion is suppressed by freeze-out at low temperatures, to shock-processed environments in which high-velocity shocks and reactive collisions efficiently re-equilibrate the molecular spin populations (e.g., Timmermann, [49]; Neufeld et al., [40]; Navarro et al., [39]). The measured value therefore implies that the molecular gas in HOPS 370 has undergone substantial thermal processing by shocks but may not yet have fully erased the imprint of its colder pre-shock history.

Taken together, the measured 2–1 S(1)/1–0 S(1) ratio, excitation temperature, and OPR demonstrate that the molecular hydrogen emission in HOPS 370 is thermally excited and is most likely associated with shocked gas in the protostellar outflow. The elevated, but sub-equilibrium, OPR indicates that the molecular gas has experienced substantial thermal processing and substantial ortho–para conversion, while still retaining a partial imprint of its colder pre-shock history. This is consistent with ongoing shock activity in which the molecular spin populations are evolving toward, but have not yet fully reached, the high-temperature equilibrium value.

Summary and Conclusions

Using TANSPEC on the 3.6-m Devasthal Optical Telescope, we performed K-band (1.94–2.52 μ\mum) spectroscopy of the Orion Class I protostar HOPS 370. Our key findings are:

  1. The spectrum is heavily dominated by H2_2 rovibrational transitions (1–0 S, 2–1 S, and 1–0 Q branches) with negligible atomic features, suggesting that near-infrared emission is most likely driven by protostellar outflow shocks.

  1. From the intrinsically linked 1–0 Q(3) and 1–0 S(1) lines, we derive a visual extinction of AVA_V = 23.24 ± 1.25 mag (AKA_K = 2.50 ± 0.13 mag), quantifying substantial circumstellar obscuration.

  1. The flux ratio FF(2–1 S(1))/FF(1–0 S(1)) = 0.12 ± 0.01 and vibrational temperature TvibT_{\mathrm{vib}} = 2305 ± 79 K rule out UV fluorescence, suggesting most likely thermal shock excitation.

  1. A unified Boltzmann diagram across all dereddened lines yields a kinetic temperature of TexT_{\mathrm{ex}} = 2078±215 K and an H2_2 column density of (1.93±0.93) × 1020^{20} cm−2^{-2}.

  1. We derive an ortho-to-para ratio of 2.45 ± 0.21, indicating active thermal processing in warm shock fronts that has not yet reached full high-temperature equilibrium.

Acknowledgements

We thank the staff at the 1.3m DFOT and 3.6m DOT, Devasthal (ARIES), for their cooperation during observations. It is a pleasure to thank the members of 3.6m DOT team and IR astronomy group at TIFR for their support during TANSPEC observations. TIFR–ARIES Near Infrared Spectrometer (TANSPEC) was built in collaboration with TIFR, ARIES, and MKIR, Hawaii, for the DOT. K.S., D.K.O., J.P.N. and J.D. acknowledge the support of the Department of Atomic Energy, Government of India, under Project Identification No. RTI 4012. We are also thankful to Mr. Varghese Reji for his helpful guidance on the usage of the pyTANSPEC pipeline.

Facilities: ARIES:DOT (TANSPEC), UKIDSS

Software: pyTANSPEC (v1.0) [45], Astropy [2], Matplotlib [26]

References

  1. [1]Andre, P., Ward-Thompson, D., & Barsony, M. 2000, in Protostars and Planets IV, ed. V. Mannings, A. P. Boss, & S. S. Russell, 59
  2. [2]Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33
  3. [3]Beckwith, S., Persson, S. E., Neugebauer, G., & Becklin, E. E. 1978, ApJ, 223, 464
  4. [4]Black, J. H., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 1987, ApJ, 322, 412
  5. [5]Bolatto, A. D., Wolfire, M., & Leroy, A. K. 2013, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 51, 207
  6. [6]Burton, M. G., Geballe, T. R., Brand, P. W. J. L., & Moorhouse, A. 1990, ApJ, 352, 625
  7. [7]Caratti o Garatti, A., Giannini, T., Nisini, B., & Lorenzetti, D. 2006, A&A, 449, 1077
  8. [8]Caratti o Garatti, A., Stecklum, B., Linz, H., Garcia Lopez, R., & Sanna, A. 2015, A&A, 573, A82
  9. [9]Caratti o Garatti, A., Ray, T. P., Kavanagh, P. J., et al. 2024, A&A, 691, A134
  10. [10]Casali, M., Adamson, A., Alves de Oliveira, C., et al. 2007, A&A, 467, 777
  11. [11]Davis, C. J., Ray, T. P., Desroches, L., & Aspin, C. 2001, MNRAS, 326, 524
  12. [12]Davis, C. J., Froebrich, D., Stanke, T., et al. 2009, A&A, 496, 153
  13. [13]Davis, C. J., Cervantes, B., Nisini, B., et al. 2011, A&A, 528, A3
  14. [14]Draine, B. T. 1980, ApJ, 241, 1021
  15. [15]Draine, B. T., Roberge, W. G., & Dalgarno, A. 1983, ApJ, 264, 485
  16. [16]Dutta, S. 2025, ApJ, 991, 45
  17. [17]Federman, S. A., Megeath, S. T., Rubinstein, A. E., et al. 2024, ApJ, 966, 41
  18. [18]Flower, D. R., & Pineau Des Forêts, G. 2010, MNRAS, 406, 1745
  19. [19]Francis, L., Tychoniec, Ł., van Dishoeck, E. F., et al. 2026, A&A, 711, A258
  20. [20]Furlan, E., Fischer, W. J., Ali, B., et al. 2016, ApJS, 224, 5
  21. [21]Gledhill, T. M., Forde, K. P., Lowe, K. T. E., & Smith, M. D. 2011, MNRAS, 411, 1453
  22. [22]Godard, B., Pineau des Forêts, G., Lesaffre, P., et al. 2019, A&A, 622, A100
  23. [23]Großschedl, J. E., Alves, J., Teixeira, P. S., et al. 2019, A&A, 622, A149
  24. [24]Guo, Z., Lucas, P. W., Contreras Peña, C., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 492, 294
  25. [25]Hollenbach, D., & McKee, C. F. 1989, ApJ, 342, 306
  26. [26]Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science and Engineering, 9, 90
  27. [27]Indebetouw, R., Mathis, J. S., Babler, B. L., et al. 2005, ApJ, 619, 931
  28. [28]Jørgensen, J. K., Belloche, A., & Garrod, R. T. 2020, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 58, 727
  29. [29]Kaufman, M. J., & Neufeld, D. A. 1996, ApJ, 456, 611
  30. [30]Kramida, A., Ralchenko, Y., Reader, J., & NIST ASD Team. 2023, NIST Atomic Spectra Database (ver. 5.10), [Online], https://physics.nist.gov/asd, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, doi:10.18434/T4W30F
  31. [31]Lada, C. J., & Lada, E. A. 2003, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 41, 57
  32. [32]Lawrence, A., Warren, S. J., Almaini, O., et al. 2007, MNRAS, 379, 1599
  33. [33]Le Gouellec, V. J. M., Lew, B. W. P., Greene, T. P., et al. 2025, ApJ, 985, 225
  34. [35]Luhman, K. L., Engelbracht, C. W., & Luhman, M. L. 1998, ApJ, 499, 799
  35. [36]Maragkoudakis, A., Ivkovich, N., Peeters, E., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 481, 5370
  36. [37]Muzerolle, J., Hartmann, L., & Calvet, N. 1998, AJ, 116, 2965
  37. [38]Narang, M., Manoj, P., Tyagi, H., et al. 2024, ApJL, 962, L16
  38. [39]Navarro, M. G., Nisini, B., Giannini, T., et al. 2025, ApJ, 995, 199
  39. [40]Neufeld, D. A., Melnick, G. J., Sonnentrucker, P., et al. 2006, ApJ, 649, 816
  40. [41]Neufeld, D. A., Manoj, P., Tyagi, H., et al. 2024, ApJL, 966, L22
  41. [42]Porel, P., Soam, A., & Pravash, S. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2609.22846arxiv.org/abs/2609.22846
  42. [43]Ray, T. P., McCaughrean, M. J., Caratti o Garatti, A., et al. 2023, Nature, 622, 48
  43. [44]Reipurth, B., & Bally, J. 2001, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 39, 403
  44. [45]Reji, V., Ninan, J. P., Ghosh, S., Ojha, D. K., & Sharma, S. 2026, Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy, 47, 40
  45. [46]Reunanen, J., Kotilainen, J. K., & Prieto, M. A. 2002, MNRAS, 331, 154
  46. [47]Roueff, E., Abgrall, H., Czachorowski, P., et al. 2019, A&A, 630, A58
  47. [48]Sharma, S., Ojha, D. K., Ghosh, A., et al. 2022, PASP, 134, 085002
  48. [49]Timmermann, R. 1998, ApJ, 498, 246
  49. [50]Tobin, J. J., Sheehan, P. D., Megeath, S. T., et al. 2020, ApJ, 890, 130
  50. [51]Tyagi, H., Manoj, P., Narang, M., et al. 2025, ApJ, 983, 110
  51. [52]Vacca, W. D., Cushing, M. C., & Rayner, J. T. 2003, PASP, 115, 389
  52. [54]Vleugels, C., McClure, M., Sturm, A., & Vlasblom, M. 2025, A&A, 695, A145
  53. [55]Youngblood, A., Ginsburg, A., & Bally, J. 2016, AJ, 151, 173

Paper details

vlnc:W_xwh6fdck
v1 · latestHistory (1)

published · Fresh — added to the Hub within the last 30 days

added ·

Usage

views · 0

downloads · 0

A view counts once per browser per day, a download each time the PDF is requested.

CC BY 4.0

Original source

  • Physics and Astronomy

Not recorded for this paper · View statement →

Looking for related papers…
Contents