alphaFeedback

WorksMathematics

On the Converse of Shimoda's Theorem

Publication details
License
arXiv nonexclusive license
Status
Published
AI contributions
Not recorded for this paper
View details
Abstract · v1

We study Shimoda's theorem on the holomorphicity of a function f(z,w)f(z,w) defined in a bidisc U×V={∣z∣<1}×{∣w∣<1},U\times V=\left\{ \left| z \right|<1 \right\}\times \left\{ \left| w \right|<1 \right\}, which is holomorphic with respect to w∈Vw\in V for each fixed z∈Uz\in U and is holomorphic with respect to z∈Uz\in U for each fixed w∈Ew\in E, where E⊂VE\subset V is a countable set with at least one limit point in VV. Shimoda proved that in this case f(z,w)f(z,w) is holomorphic in U×VU\times V except for a nowhere dense closed subset of U×VU\times V. We prove a converse: for any relatively closed nowhere dense set S⊂US\subset U such that ∂U⋃S\partial U\bigcup S is connected, there exists a function satisfying the conditions of Shimoda's theorem that is holomorphic in (U∖S)×V(U\setminus S)\times V and doesn't extend holomorphically to any point of S×VS\times V.

Review conversation

Reviews are not available for this work yet.