alphaFeedback

WorksMathematics

The four-dimensional Hessian conjecture for quintic potentials with a ternary cone top

AI contributions
  • Anthropic Claude Opus
View details

Abstract

The Hessian conjecture HCn\mathrm{HC}_n asserts that if f∈C[x1,…,xn]f\in\mathbb{C}[x_1,\dots,x_n] has det⁡Hess⁡(f)∈C×\det\operatorname{Hess}(f)\in\mathbb{C}^\times, then ∇f\nabla f is a polynomial automorphism. It is known for n≤3n\le 3, false for n≥5n\ge 5, and open for n=4n=4, where it implies the plane Jacobian conjecture. Z. Ni proved HC4\mathrm{HC}_4 for potentials of degree at most four. We prove HC4\mathrm{HC}_4 for every potential of degree five whose top homogeneous form depends on exactly three linear forms. The proof combines a weighted analysis of the Hessian determinant with exact computer-algebra certificates (Groebner bases and Rabinowitsch tests over Q\mathbb{Q}); one branch reduces to plane Jacobian pairs of degrees (4,3)(4,3), which are excluded by Magnus' theorem. A self-contained verifier is supplied as an ancillary file. The binary and unary cone tops in degree five remain open.

Introduction

For f∈C[x]=C[x1,…,xn]f \in\mathbb{C}[x] = \mathbb{C}[x_1,\ldots,x_n] write Hess⁡(f)=(∂i∂jf)\operatorname{Hess}(f) = (\partial_i\partial_j f). The Hessian conjecture HCn\mathrm{HC}_n [9] states: if det⁡Hess⁡(f)∈C×\det\operatorname{Hess}(f) \in\mathbb{C}^{\times} then ∇f:Cn→Cn\nabla f:\mathbb{C}^n \to\mathbb{C}^n is a polynomial automorphism. It holds for n=2n=2 [4] and n=3n=3 [1]; it fails for every n≥5n \ge5 [10]; for n=4n=4 it is open and implies the plane Jacobian conjecture by the doubling construction Φ(x,y)=yTF(x)\Phi(x,y)=y^{\mathsf T}F(x), for which det⁡Hess⁡Φ=(det⁡JF)2\det\operatorname{Hess}\Phi=(\det JF)^2 [10, 11]. Ni [11] proved HC4\mathrm{HC}_4 for deg⁡f≤4\deg f \le4. In degree five the determinant has more homogeneous layers and the arguments of [11] do not transfer directly ([11 §8]); partial structural reductions for a degree-five branch are recorded in [5].

Let f∈C[x1,…,x4]f \in\mathbb{C}[x_1,\ldots,x_4] have degree 55 and det⁡Hess⁡(f)=c∈C×\det\operatorname{Hess}(f)=c \in\mathbb{C}^{\times}. Its top form f5f_5 has det⁡Hess⁡(f5)=0\det\operatorname{Hess}(f_5)=0, hence by Gordan–Noether [7, 2] depends on at most three linear forms. We say the top is a ternary cone if, after a linear change of coordinates, f5=φ(x1,x2,x3)f_5=\varphi(x_1,x_2,x_3) with det⁡Hess⁡3(φ)≢0\det\operatorname{Hess}_3(\varphi)\not\equiv0 (equivalently, f5f_5 depends on exactly three linear forms).

Theorem 1. Let f∈C[x1,x2,x3,x4]f \in\mathbb{C}[x_1,x_2,x_3,x_4] have degree five, det⁡Hess⁡(f)∈C×\det\operatorname{Hess}(f) \in\mathbb{C}^{\times}, and a ternary cone top. Then ∇f\nabla f is a polynomial automorphism of C4\mathbb{C}^4.

Remark 2. The class of Theorem 1 contains doubled potentials F(x1,x2)+x3a(x1,x2)+x4b(x1,x2)F(x_1,x_2)+x_3a(x_1,x_2)+x_4b(x_1,x_2), whose Hessian determinant is J(a,b)2J(a,b)^2 (§ 5.3). Hence no proof of the quintic case can avoid plane Jacobian pairs of low degree; here only pairs of degrees (4,3)(4,3) occur, and Magnus’ theorem excludes them.

Status. The statements labelled [C] below are certified by exact computation (identities of polynomials over Q\mathbb{Q} with symbolic coefficients, Gröbner bases, and the Rabinowitsch criterion $1 \in I + (1 - T g) \Leftrightarrow g \in \sqrt{I}$). Each such statement corresponds to a check of the ancillary verifier verify_hc4_ternary.py (§ 6); all 29 checks pass. The paper has not been refereed.

Tools

Throughout, x′=(x1,x2,x3)x' = (x_1,x_2,x_3), s=x4s = x_4, and A=Hess⁡3(φ)A = \operatorname{Hess}_3(\varphi). Linear changes of coordinates preserve both hypothesis and conclusion, since Hess⁡(f∘T)=TT(Hess⁡f)∘T\operatorname{Hess}(f \circ T) = T^{\mathsf{T}}(\operatorname{Hess} f) \circ T.

Imported results. (GN) A form in n≤4n \le4 variables with vanishing Hessian determinant depends on at most n−1n - 1 linear forms [7], [2, Thm. 3.1]. (HC2, HC3) [4, 1], together with transfer to arbitrary fields of characteristic zero and descent of polynomial inverses {citep}[11 Lemmas 2.6, 2.7]. (dBvdE) Over a field of characteristic zero, a bivariate polynomial without terms of degree ≤1\le1 and with vanishing Hessian determinant is a polynomial in one linear form [3, Thm. 3.1]. (Ni) [11 Prop. 6.1]: if $f = P(x') + sQ(x') + as^2$ with $\deg Q \le 2$ and $\det \operatorname{Hess} f \in \mathbb{C}^{\times}$, then $\nabla f$ is an automorphism. (Mag) {citep}[8]: a plane Jacobian pair whose degrees are coprime is an automorphism. (JvdK) For a plane automorphism $(F,G)$, $\deg F \mid \deg G$ or $\deg G \mid \deg F$ {citep}[6 Ch. 5]`.

Lemma 3 (Schur branch, any QQ). Let f=P(x′)+sQ(x′)+as2f = P(x') + sQ(x') + as^2 with a≠0a \ne0 and P,QP,Q arbitrary. If det⁡Hess⁡f∈C×\det\operatorname{Hess} f \in\mathbb{C}^{\times}, then ∇f\nabla f is a polynomial automorphism.

Proof. With z=s+Q/(2a)z = s + Q/(2a) and Sz=P−Q2/(4a)+zQS_z = P - Q^2/(4a) + zQ one has the polynomial identity det⁡Hess⁡f=2adet⁡Hess⁡x′(Sz)\det\operatorname{Hess} f = 2a \det\operatorname{Hess}_{x'}(S_z) at z=s+Q/(2a)z = s + Q/(2a) [C, S6a], and ∇x′f=∇x′Sz\nabla_{x'} f = \nabla_{x'} S_z, ∂sf=2az\partial_s f = 2az. Thus det⁡Hess⁡x′Sz\det\operatorname{Hess}_{x'} S_z is a nonzero constant; HC3 over C(z)\mathbb{C}(z) and descent to C[z]\mathbb{C}[z] give a polynomial inverse H(z,Y)H(z,Y) of ∇x′Sz\nabla_{x'}S_z, and z=Y4/(2a)z = Y_4/(2a), x′=H(z,Y1,Y2,Y3)x' = H(z,Y_1,Y_2,Y_3), s=z−Q(x′)/(2a)s = z - Q(x')/(2a) invert ∇f\nabla f. This is the argument of [11 Prop. 6.1, branch $a \ne 0$], which does not use deg⁡Q≤2\deg Q \le2.

Lemma 4 (constant direction). Let F∈C[x1,x2,x3]F \in\mathbb{C}[x_1,x_2,x_3] be homogeneous of degree dd, nonzero, without terms of degree ≤1\le1 in (x2,x3)(x_2,x_3), and with det⁡Hess⁡(x2,x3)F=0\det\operatorname{Hess}_{(x_2,x_3)} F = 0. Then there is a constant linear form l=λx2+μx3l = \lambda x_2 + \mu x_3 with F∈C[x1][l]F \in\mathbb{C}[x_1][l].

Proof. Over K=C(x1)K = \mathbb{C}(x_1), (dBvdE) gives F=G(l)F = G(l) with l=λx2+μx3l = \lambda x_2 + \mu x_3, λ,μ∈K\lambda,\mu\in K, G∈K[T]G \in K[T], deg⁡G≥2\deg G \ge2. Then Hess⁡(x2,x3)F=G′′(l)(λ,μ)T(λ,μ)\operatorname{Hess}_{(x_2,x_3)} F = G''(l)(\lambda,\mu)^{\mathsf{T}}(\lambda,\mu) has rank exactly one, so its kernel line is determined by FF. Since Hess⁡(x2,x3)F(tx)=td−2Hess⁡(x2,x3)F(x)\operatorname{Hess}_{(x_2,x_3)} F(tx) = t^{d-2}\operatorname{Hess}_{(x_2,x_3)} F(x), the kernel line at tx1tx_1 equals the one at x1x_1; thus the ratio λ/μ\lambda/\mu (or μ/λ\mu/\lambda), a rational function of x1x_1, is invariant under all dilations and hence constant. After rescaling λ,μ∈C\lambda,\mu\in\mathbb{C}, ll is a coordinate and the coefficients of FF as a polynomial in ll lie in C[x1]\mathbb{C}[x_1].

The weighted top

Proposition 5. Let ff be as in Theorem 1, f=f5+⋯+f0f = f_5 + \cdots+ f_0, f5=φ(x′)f_5 = \varphi(x'). Then:

  1. [det⁡Hess⁡f]11=det⁡A⋅∂s2f4[\det\operatorname{Hess} f]_{11} = \det A \cdot\partial_s^2 f_4 [C, S1b]; hence f4=g4(x′)+sh(x′)f_4 = g_4(x') + s h(x').

  1. With this, [det⁡Hess⁡f]10=det⁡A⋅∂s2f3−(∇h)Tadj⁡(A)∇h[\det\operatorname{Hess} f]_{10} = \det A \cdot\partial_s^2 f_3 - (\nabla h)^{\mathsf{T}}\operatorname{adj}(A)\nabla h [C, S1c]; writing f3=g3+sh2+s2m(x′)+es3f_3 = g_3 + s h_2 + s^2m(x') + es^3, it follows that e=0e = 0.

  1. For the weights (1,1,1,2)(1,1,1,2), ff has no monomial of weight >5> 5, its weight-5 part is ψ=φ+sh+s2m\psi= \varphi+ sh + s^2m, and the weight-10 part of det⁡Hess⁡f\det\operatorname{Hess} f equals det⁡Hess⁡ψ\det\operatorname{Hess}\psi [C, S2]. Hence det⁡Hess⁡ψ=0\det\operatorname{Hess}\psi= 0.

Proof. (1) and (2) are identities with fully symbolic f4f_4, f3f_3, f2f_2; as det⁡Hess⁡f\det\operatorname{Hess} f is constant and det⁡A≠0\det A \ne0, ∂s2f4=0\partial_{s}^{2}f_4=0, and in (2) the term 6esdet⁡A6es\det A is the only ss-dependent one, so e=0e=0. (3) After (1) and (2), ff contains no s2x′2s^2x'^2, s3x′s^3x', s4s^4 (degree 4) and no s3s^3 (degree 3); every other monomial outside φ\varphi has weight ≤4\le4, except sx′3sx'^3 (weight 5, in shsh) and s2x′s^2x' (weight 5, in s2ms^2m); the identity holds for arbitrary lower terms, and the constant has weight 0<100<10.

Classification of the weighted top

Proposition 6. Let ψ=φ(x′)+sh(x′)+s2m(x′)\psi=\varphi(x')+sh(x')+s^2m(x') with φ\varphi a quintic, hh a cubic, mm linear, det⁡Hess⁡3φ≠0\det\operatorname{Hess}_3\varphi\ne0 and det⁡Hess⁡ψ=0\det\operatorname{Hess}\psi=0. After a linear change of coordinates preserving the shape of ψ\psi, one of the following holds:

(N) h=m=0(N)\ h=m=0;

(D) m=0(D)\ m=0 and ψ=Q(x1,x2)+x14x3+x13s\psi=Q(x_1,x_2)+x_1^4x_3+x_1^3s with ∂22Q≠0\partial_{2}^{2}Q\ne0;

(F) ψ=x1(s+x1x2)2+x14x3(F)\ \psi=x_1(s+x_1x_2)^2+x_1^4x_3.

Proof. Case m=0m=0. The coefficient of s2s^2 in det⁡Hess⁡(φ+sh)\det\operatorname{Hess}(\varphi+sh) is −32hdet⁡Hess⁡3h-\frac{3}{2}h\det\operatorname{Hess}_3h, and those of s3s^3, s4s^4 vanish [C, S3a, S3b]. So h=0h=0 (case (N)) or, by (GN), hh is a binary cubic in two linear forms; up to GL⁡3\operatorname{GL}_3, h∈{x13,x12x2,x13+x23}h\in\{x_1^3,x_1^2x_2,x_1^3+x_2^3\}. For h=x12x2h=x_1^2x_2 and h=x13+x23h=x_1^3+x_2^3, every coefficient of det⁡A\det A lies in the radical of the ideal of coefficients of det⁡Hess⁡ψ\det\operatorname{Hess}\psi [C, S3c]: excluded. For h=x13h=x_1^3, det⁡Hess⁡ψ=−9x14det⁡Hess⁡(x2,x3)φ\det\operatorname{Hess}\psi=-9x_1^4\det\operatorname{Hess}_{(x_2,x_3)}\varphi [C, S3d]. Apply Lemma 4 to the part of φ\varphi of degree ≥2\ge2 in (x2,x3)(x_2,x_3), which is nonzero (otherwise AA has a zero 2×22\times2 block and det⁡A=0\det A=0). After a rotation of (x2,x3)(x_2,x_3), φ=Q(x1,x2)+x14(β2x2+αx3)+β0x15\varphi=Q(x_1,x_2)+x_1^4(\beta_2x_2+\alpha x_3)+\beta_0x_1^5, and det⁡A=−16α2x16∂22Q\det A=-16\alpha^2x_1^6\partial_2^2Q [C, S8c], so α≠0≠∂22Q\alpha\ne0\ne\partial_2^2Q. Replacing x3x_3 by αx3+β2x2+β0x1\alpha x_3+\beta_2x_2+\beta_0x_1 gives (D).

Case m≠0m\ne0. Take m=x1m=x_1. The coefficient of s4s^4 is −4det⁡Hess⁡(x2,x3)h-4\det\operatorname{Hess}_{(x_2,x_3)}h [C, S4a]; Lemma 4 (applied to the part of hh of degree ≥2\ge2 in (x2,x3)(x_2,x_3), if nonzero) and a rotation of (x2,x3)(x_2,x_3) give h=ax32+bx1x22+x12(cx2+c′x3)+ex33h=ax_3^2+bx_1x_2^2+x_1^2(cx_2+c'x_3)+ex_3^3. If a≠0a\ne0, rescale to a=1a=1; if a=0≠ba=0\ne b, rescale to b=1b=1 and shift x2↦x2−c2x1x_2\mapsto x_2-\frac{c}{2}x_1 to get c=0c=0; in both cases det⁡A\det A vanishes on all solutions [C, S4 (I), (II)]. If a=b=0a=b=0 and (c,c′)≠0(c,c')\ne0, a rotation, rescaling and shift give h=x12x2h=x_1^2x_2; otherwise h=ex33h=ex_3^3, which is excluded [C, S4 (III.2)]. For h=x12x2h=x_1^2x_2 the solutions with det⁡A≢0\det A\not\equiv0 are exactly φ=14x32x22+p18x14x3+p19x14x2+p20x15\varphi=\frac{1}{4}x_3^2x_2^2+p_{18}x_1^4x_3+p_{19}x_1^4x_2+p_{20}x_1^5 [C, S4 (III.1), S8a], with det⁡A=−8p182x19\det A=-8p_{18}^2x_1^9 [C, S8b], so p18≠0p_{18}\ne0; the substitution x3←(x3−p19x2−p20x1)/p18x_3\leftarrow(x_3-p_{19}x_2-p_{20}x_1)/p_{18}, x2↦2x2x_2\mapsto2x_2 gives (F) [C, S8d]. All changes used fix x1x_1 and act on x′x' only, so they preserve m=x1m=x_1 and the shape of ψ\psi.

Closing the three cases

Case (N)

Here ff has no monomials sx′3sx'^3, s2x′s^2x', s3s^3, so f=P(x′)+sQ(x′)+as2f=P(x')+sQ(x')+as^2 with deg⁡Q≤2\deg Q\le2, and (Ni) applies.

Case (F)

Proposition 7. No quintic ff with weight-5 part x1(s+x1x2)2+x14x3x_1(s+x_1x_2)^2+x_1^4x_3 has det⁡Hess⁡f∈C×\det\operatorname{Hess}f\in\mathbb{C}^{\times}.

Proof. Write f=ψF+∑μcμμf=\psi_F+\sum_{\mu}c_\mu\mu over all monomials μ\mu of weight ≤4\le4 and degree ≥2\ge2 (41 unknowns). The constant term of det⁡Hess⁡f\det\operatorname{Hess}f lies in the radical of the ideal generated by the coefficients of all non-constant monomials [C, S5].

Case (D)

Proposition 8. Let ff be quintic with weight-5 part Q(x1,x2)+x14x3+x13sQ(x_1,x_2)+x_1^4x_3+x_1^3s, ∂22Q≠0\partial_2^2Q\ne0, and det⁡Hess⁡f=c∈C×\det\operatorname{Hess} f=c\in\mathbb{C}^{\times}. Then ∇f\nabla f is an automorphism.

Proof. By Proposition 5 and m=0m=0, f=P(x′)+sR(x′)+as2f=P(x')+sR(x')+as^2 with R=x1′3+(terms of degree ≤2)R=x_1^{\prime3}+(\text{terms of degree }\le2). If a≠0a\ne0, Lemma 3 applies. Let a=0a=0; then c=−(∇R)Tadj⁡(Hess⁡P+sHess⁡R)∇Rc=-(\nabla R)^{T}\operatorname{adj}(\operatorname{Hess}P+s\operatorname{Hess}R)\nabla R.

(i) The coefficient of s2s^2 forces (∂2R,∂3R)(\partial_2R,\partial_3R) to be proportional [C, S6b], so R=R~(x1,w)R=\widetilde{R}(x_1,w) for a linear form ww in (x2,x3)(x_2,x_3). Complete to linear coordinates (x1,w,v)(x_1,w,v) with ∂vx1=∂vw=0\partial_vx_1=\partial_vw=0; thus v=(0,v2,v3)v=(0,v_2,v_3).

(ii) The coefficient of ss equals −Pvv⋅Br⁡(R~)-P_{vv}\cdot\operatorname{Br}(\widetilde{R}), Br⁡(R)=R12Rww−2R1RwR1w+Rw2R11\operatorname{Br}(R)=R_1^2R_{ww}-2R_1R_wR_{1w}+R_w^2R_{11} [C, S6c]. As C[x]\mathbb{C}[x] is a domain, Br⁡=0\operatorname{Br}=0 or Pvv=0P_{vv}=0.

(iii) If Br⁡=0\operatorname{Br}=0, then R~=g(x1)\widetilde{R}=g(x_1) [C, S6d] and c=−g′(x1)2det⁡Hess⁡(w,v)Pc=-g'(x_1)^2\det\operatorname{Hess}_{(w,v)}P [C, S6e], impossible since deg⁡g′=2\deg g'=2.

(iv) If Pvv=0P_{vv}=0: the degree-5 part of PvvP_{vv} is ∂v2(Q+x14x3)=v22∂22Q\partial_v^2(Q+x_1^4x_3)=v_2^2\partial_2^2Q [C, S8e], so v2=0v_2=0, v=e3v=e_3, R=R(x1,x2)R=R(x_1,x_2) and P=P0(x1,x2)+x3P1(x1,x2)P=P_0(x_1,x_2)+x_3P_1(x_1,x_2) with P1=x14+(deg⁡≤3)P_1=x_1^4+(\deg\le3). Then c=J(P1,R)2c=J(P_1,R)^2 [C, S6f], so (P1,R)(P_1,R) is a plane Jacobian pair of degrees (4,3)(4,3). By (Mag) it is an automorphism, contradicting (JvdK).

Proof of Theorem 1. Propositions 5 and 6 leave the cases (N), (D), (F), settled in this section.

Certificates

The ancillary file verify_hc4_ternary.py (Python with python-flint, sympy, and Singular through Sage/passagemath) performs 29 checks, labelled S1a–S8e as cited above, and prints ALL CHECKS PASSED; it runs in a few minutes. Identities are verified with fully symbolic coefficients (or with undetermined functions where stated). Exclusions use the Rabinowitsch criterion over Q\mathbb{Q}; since a Gröbner basis equal to {1}\{1\} over Q\mathbb{Q} is also {1}\{1\} over C\mathbb{C}, the conclusions hold over C\mathbb{C}. The classification of S4 (III.1) is certified twice, by minimal associated primes and by Rabinowitsch tests (S8a).

Scope. Theorem 1 does not treat quintic potentials whose top form depends on two linear forms or on one; these cases, and hence HC4_4 in degree five, remain open.

References

  1. [1]M. de Bondt, Polynomials with constant Hessian determinants in dimension three, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 219 (2015), no. 9, 3743–3754.DOI
  2. [2]M. de Bondt, Quasi-translations and singular Hessians, Colloq. Math. 152 (2018), no. 2, 175–198.arxiv.org/abs/1501.05168
  3. [4]F. Dillen, Polynomials with constant Hessian determinant, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 71 (1991), no. 1, 13–18.DOI
  4. [5]Anonymous, Structural reductions toward the quartic Hessian conjecture in dimension four, v0.1.0-candidate, Zenodo, doi:10.5281/zenodo.22216400 (2026).DOI
  5. [6]A. van den Essen, Polynomial Automorphisms and the Jacobian Conjecture, Progr. Math. 190, Birkhäuser, 2000.
  6. [7]P. Gordan and M. Nöther, Über die algebraischen Formen, deren Hesse’sche Determinante identisch verschwindet, Math. Ann. 10 (1876), 547–568.DOI
  7. [8]A. Magnus, On polynomial solutions of a differential equation, Math. Scan. 3 (1955), 255–260.DOI
  8. [9]G. Meng, Legendre transform, Hessian conjecture and tree formula, Appl. Math. Lett. 19 (2006), no. 6, 503–510.DOI
  9. [10]G. Meng and L. Yang, A five-variable counterexample to the Hessian conjecture, and the low-dimensional status of the Jacobian and Hessian conjectures, arXiv:2607.22198 (2026).arxiv.org/abs/2607.22198
  10. [11]Z. Ni, The quartic Hessian conjecture in dimension four, arXiv:2608.14217 (2026).arxiv.org/abs/2608.14217

Paper details

vlnc:W_yvfytuss
v1 · latestHistory (1)

published · Fresh — added to the Hub within the last 30 days

added ·

Usage

views · 9

downloads · 0

A view counts once per browser per day, a download each time the PDF is requested.

CC BY 4.0

Original source

  • Mathematics

Anthropic Claude Opus · View statement →

Looking for related papers…
Contents