WorksMathematics
The four-dimensional Hessian conjecture for quintic potentials with a ternary cone top
Abstract
The Hessian conjecture asserts that if has , then is a polynomial automorphism. It is known for , false for , and open for , where it implies the plane Jacobian conjecture. Z. Ni proved for potentials of degree at most four. We prove for every potential of degree five whose top homogeneous form depends on exactly three linear forms. The proof combines a weighted analysis of the Hessian determinant with exact computer-algebra certificates (Groebner bases and Rabinowitsch tests over ); one branch reduces to plane Jacobian pairs of degrees , which are excluded by Magnus' theorem. A self-contained verifier is supplied as an ancillary file. The binary and unary cone tops in degree five remain open.
Introduction
For write . The Hessian conjecture [9] states: if then is a polynomial automorphism. It holds for [4] and [1]; it fails for every [10]; for it is open and implies the plane Jacobian conjecture by the doubling construction , for which [10, 11]. Ni [11] proved for . In degree five the determinant has more homogeneous layers and the arguments of [11] do not transfer directly ([11 §8]); partial structural reductions for a degree-five branch are recorded in [5].
Let have degree and . Its top form has , hence by Gordan–Noether [7, 2] depends on at most three linear forms. We say the top is a ternary cone if, after a linear change of coordinates, with (equivalently, depends on exactly three linear forms).
Theorem 1. Let have degree five, , and a ternary cone top. Then is a polynomial automorphism of .
Remark 2. The class of Theorem 1 contains doubled potentials , whose Hessian determinant is (§ 5.3). Hence no proof of the quintic case can avoid plane Jacobian pairs of low degree; here only pairs of degrees occur, and Magnus’ theorem excludes them.
Status. The statements labelled [C] below are certified by exact computation (identities of polynomials over with symbolic coefficients, Gröbner bases, and the Rabinowitsch criterion $1 \in I + (1 - T g) \Leftrightarrow g \in \sqrt{I}$). Each such statement corresponds to a check of the ancillary verifier verify_hc4_ternary.py (§ 6); all 29 checks pass. The paper has not been refereed.
Tools
Throughout, , , and . Linear changes of coordinates preserve both hypothesis and conclusion, since .
Imported results. (GN) A form in variables with vanishing Hessian determinant depends on at most linear forms [7], [2, Thm. 3.1]. (HC2, HC3) [4, 1], together with transfer to arbitrary fields of characteristic zero and descent of polynomial inverses {citep}[11 Lemmas 2.6, 2.7]. (dBvdE) Over a field of characteristic zero, a bivariate polynomial without terms of degree and with vanishing Hessian determinant is a polynomial in one linear form [3, Thm. 3.1]. (Ni) [11 Prop. 6.1]: if $f = P(x') + sQ(x') + as^2$ with $\deg Q \le 2$ and $\det \operatorname{Hess} f \in \mathbb{C}^{\times}$, then $\nabla f$ is an automorphism. (Mag) {citep}[8]: a plane Jacobian pair whose degrees are coprime is an automorphism. (JvdK) For a plane automorphism $(F,G)$, $\deg F \mid \deg G$ or $\deg G \mid \deg F$ {citep}[6 Ch. 5]`.
Lemma 3 (Schur branch, any ). Let with and arbitrary. If , then is a polynomial automorphism.
Proof. With and one has the polynomial identity at [C, S6a], and , . Thus is a nonzero constant; HC3 over and descent to give a polynomial inverse of , and , , invert . This is the argument of [11 Prop. 6.1, branch $a \ne 0$], which does not use .
Lemma 4 (constant direction). Let be homogeneous of degree , nonzero, without terms of degree in , and with . Then there is a constant linear form with .
Proof. Over , (dBvdE) gives with , , , . Then has rank exactly one, so its kernel line is determined by . Since , the kernel line at equals the one at ; thus the ratio (or ), a rational function of , is invariant under all dilations and hence constant. After rescaling , is a coordinate and the coefficients of as a polynomial in lie in .
The weighted top
Proposition 5. Let be as in Theorem 1, , . Then:
[C, S1b]; hence .
With this, [C, S1c]; writing , it follows that .
For the weights , has no monomial of weight , its weight-5 part is , and the weight-10 part of equals [C, S2]. Hence .
Proof. (1) and (2) are identities with fully symbolic , , ; as is constant and , , and in (2) the term is the only -dependent one, so . (3) After (1) and (2), contains no , , (degree 4) and no (degree 3); every other monomial outside has weight , except (weight 5, in ) and (weight 5, in ); the identity holds for arbitrary lower terms, and the constant has weight .
Classification of the weighted top
Proposition 6. Let with a quintic, a cubic, linear, and . After a linear change of coordinates preserving the shape of , one of the following holds:
;
and with ;
.
Proof. Case . The coefficient of in is , and those of , vanish [C, S3a, S3b]. So (case (N)) or, by (GN), is a binary cubic in two linear forms; up to , . For and , every coefficient of lies in the radical of the ideal of coefficients of [C, S3c]: excluded. For , [C, S3d]. Apply Lemma 4 to the part of of degree in , which is nonzero (otherwise has a zero block and ). After a rotation of , , and [C, S8c], so . Replacing by gives (D).
Case . Take . The coefficient of is [C, S4a]; Lemma 4 (applied to the part of of degree in , if nonzero) and a rotation of give . If , rescale to ; if , rescale to and shift to get ; in both cases vanishes on all solutions [C, S4 (I), (II)]. If and , a rotation, rescaling and shift give ; otherwise , which is excluded [C, S4 (III.2)]. For the solutions with are exactly [C, S4 (III.1), S8a], with [C, S8b], so ; the substitution , gives (F) [C, S8d]. All changes used fix and act on only, so they preserve and the shape of .
Closing the three cases
Case (N)
Here has no monomials , , , so with , and (Ni) applies.
Case (F)
Proposition 7. No quintic with weight-5 part has .
Proof. Write over all monomials of weight and degree (41 unknowns). The constant term of lies in the radical of the ideal generated by the coefficients of all non-constant monomials [C, S5].
Case (D)
Proposition 8. Let be quintic with weight-5 part , , and . Then is an automorphism.
Proof. By Proposition 5 and , with . If , Lemma 3 applies. Let ; then .
(i) The coefficient of forces to be proportional [C, S6b], so for a linear form in . Complete to linear coordinates with ; thus .
(ii) The coefficient of equals , [C, S6c]. As is a domain, or .
(iii) If , then [C, S6d] and [C, S6e], impossible since .
(iv) If : the degree-5 part of is [C, S8e], so , , and with . Then [C, S6f], so is a plane Jacobian pair of degrees . By (Mag) it is an automorphism, contradicting (JvdK).
Proof of Theorem 1. Propositions 5 and 6 leave the cases (N), (D), (F), settled in this section.
Certificates
The ancillary file verify_hc4_ternary.py (Python with python-flint, sympy, and Singular through Sage/passagemath) performs 29 checks, labelled S1a–S8e as cited above, and prints ALL CHECKS PASSED; it runs in a few minutes. Identities are verified with fully symbolic coefficients (or with undetermined functions where stated). Exclusions use the Rabinowitsch criterion over ; since a Gröbner basis equal to over is also over , the conclusions hold over . The classification of S4 (III.1) is certified twice, by minimal associated primes and by Rabinowitsch tests (S8a).
Scope. Theorem 1 does not treat quintic potentials whose top form depends on two linear forms or on one; these cases, and hence HC in degree five, remain open.
References
- [1]M. de Bondt, Polynomials with constant Hessian determinants in dimension three, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 219 (2015), no. 9, 3743–3754.DOI
- [2]M. de Bondt, Quasi-translations and singular Hessians, Colloq. Math. 152 (2018), no. 2, 175–198.arxiv.org/abs/1501.05168
- [4]F. Dillen, Polynomials with constant Hessian determinant, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 71 (1991), no. 1, 13–18.DOI
- [5]Anonymous, Structural reductions toward the quartic Hessian conjecture in dimension four, v0.1.0-candidate, Zenodo, doi:10.5281/zenodo.22216400 (2026).DOI
- [6]A. van den Essen, Polynomial Automorphisms and the Jacobian Conjecture, Progr. Math. 190, Birkhäuser, 2000.
- [7]P. Gordan and M. Nöther, Über die algebraischen Formen, deren Hesse’sche Determinante identisch verschwindet, Math. Ann. 10 (1876), 547–568.DOI
- [8]A. Magnus, On polynomial solutions of a differential equation, Math. Scan. 3 (1955), 255–260.DOI
- [9]G. Meng, Legendre transform, Hessian conjecture and tree formula, Appl. Math. Lett. 19 (2006), no. 6, 503–510.DOI
- [10]G. Meng and L. Yang, A five-variable counterexample to the Hessian conjecture, and the low-dimensional status of the Jacobian and Hessian conjectures, arXiv:2607.22198 (2026).arxiv.org/abs/2607.22198
- [11]Z. Ni, The quartic Hessian conjecture in dimension four, arXiv:2608.14217 (2026).arxiv.org/abs/2608.14217