Introduction

A Ricci flow on a smooth manifold is a family of Riemannian metrics g(t)g(t) satisfying ∂tg=−2Ric⁡g\partial_t g=-2\operatorname{Ric}_g. Here a closed manifold is compact and has no boundary, Rm⁡\operatorname{Rm} denotes its full curvature tensor, and R=tr⁡gRic⁡R=\operatorname{tr}_g\operatorname{Ric} denotes scalar curvature. A smooth Ricci flow on a closed manifold can fail to extend at a finite time only if its full curvature becomes unbounded [7]. The scalar-curvature extension conjecture asks whether scalar curvature alone must detect such a singularity; see [3], p. 756. A uniform bound for the Ricci tensor is sufficient for extension by Šešum’s Theorem [10], but the trace of that tensor contains substantially less information. The question concerns smooth extension on the original manifold; continuation through a singular space is a different conclusion.

Bounded scalar curvature imposes a necessary restriction on the rate of full-curvature blowup. Wang proved that, at a finite singular time TT, the product of T−tT-t, the square root of the maximum full curvature, and the square root of the maximum absolute scalar curvature has a strictly positive upper limit [13], Theorem 3. Consequently, a closed flow with bounded scalar curvature must satisfy

lim sup⁡t↑T(T−t)2max⁡M∣Rm⁡∣(⋅,t)>0.\limsup_{t \uparrow T}(T-t)^2\max_M|\operatorname{Rm}|(\cdot,t)>0.

This is a subsequential restriction; it does not assert a lower bound at every sufficiently late time. It explains why examples with curvature concentration faster than the parabolic rate are relevant to the extension question.

Symmetry has made it possible to construct and study singularities with several distinct geometric scales. Angenent and Knopf constructed rotationally symmetric neckpinches on spheres [2]. A finite-time singularity is of Type II when (T−t)max⁡M∣Rm⁡∣(T-t)\max_M|\operatorname{Rm}| is unbounded. Gu and Zhu constructed rotationally symmetric Type-II singularities on spheres [6]. Angenent, Isenberg, and Knopf later constructed degenerate neckpinches with prescribed rates, a Bryant-soliton tip model, and a shrinking-cylinder parabolic model [1]. The Type-II constructions establish that full curvature can concentrate faster than the parabolic scale, but do not supply the scalar bound in Theorem 1.1.

Stolarski constructed closed, doubly warped Ricci flows that develop conical singularities with arbitrarily fast curvature blow-up and approach a Ricci-flat cone at the parabolic scale [12]. Stolarski’s discussion identifies bounded scalar curvature as a possible feature of these examples. The construction does not supply the scalar-curvature bound proved below. We use its quantitative profile estimates and establish that bound for a choice of sufficiently large dimension and mode index. The geometric cap models considered in his formal discussion belong to the cohomogeneity-one Ricci-flat setting developed by Böhm [4, 12]. Our cap estimate uses only the quantitative construction inputs stated in Proposition 2.1; it does not require convergence to a prescribed complete cap metric.

Theorem 1.1. There are an integer q≥10q \ge10, a time T>0T > 0, and a smooth Ricci flow g(t)g(t), 0≤t<T0 \le t < T, on the closed connected manifold M=S2×Sq+1M = S^2 \times S^{q+1}, with smooth initial metric, such that

sup⁡M×[0,T)∣Rg(t)∣<∞,lim⁡t↑Tmax⁡M∣Rm⁡g(t)∣=∞.\sup_{M \times[0,T)} |R_{g(t)}| < \infty,\qquad\lim_{t \uparrow T}\max_M |\operatorname{Rm}_{g(t)}| = \infty.

In particular, TT is the finite maximal existence time of this flow.

Theorem 1.1 refutes this conjecture in its unrestricted all-dimensions formulation: the assertion that every finite-time singularity of a closed Ricci flow in dimension at least four has unbounded scalar curvature. The example is in sufficiently high dimension; no dimension-four conclusion is asserted.

The estimates also determine the full-curvature rate of the examples. Corollary (30) gives two-sided power-law bounds with an unbounded discrete set of exponents, while the dimension remains fixed. Thus the scalar bound is compatible with arbitrarily fast power-law Type-II singularities, and the upper rate is controlled as well as the lower rate.

The two scales and the proof

The examples have two sphere factors whose radii vary along an interval. Off the two pole orbits the metric is

ds2+ϕ(s,t)2gS2+r(s,t)2gSq.ds^2 + \phi(s,t)^2 g_{S^2} + r(s,t)^2 g_{S^q}.

where ss is arclength at the indicated time and the sphere metrics have sectional curvature one. At each endpoint the SqS^q factor collapses smoothly, leaving a positive-radius S2S^2 orbit. The singularity develops when that remaining orbit also shrinks.

Write δ=T−t\delta= T - t. The parabolic length scale is δ\sqrt{\delta}, where the rescaled metric closely approximates a Ricci-flat cone. The smaller cap scale is θ=δσ\theta= \delta^\sigma, with a fixed exponent σ>1/2\sigma> 1/2 supplied by the construction. These two scales have different roles: the cone approximation gives small Ricci curvature on fixed parabolic annuli, whereas smoothness at the pole must be controlled on the cap scale. A small Ricci tensor at the larger scale does not by itself control the smaller cap.

The additional estimates have two features. First, Stolarski’s strict one-sided comparison with the cone and monotonicity of a logarithmic slope, together with the ordinary scalar lower bound, control the size of the cap. We adapt the scalar-sign obstruction in his Proposition 5.3 [12] to obtain this quantitative estimate. Curvature point-picking then gives a full-curvature bound without assuming convergence to a cap model. Second, on radial cylinders moving with the dominant drift, one-dimensional parabolic estimates give a Ricci reaction bound with leading coefficient 2q2q. The corresponding diffusion coefficient leaves a positive margin in large dimension. This yields ∣Ric⁡∣≤Cr−e|\operatorname{Ric}| \le Cr^{-e} for an exponent 0<e<10 < e < 1, where rr is the radius of the SqS^q factor in the doubly warped metric. The square of this bound admits a bounded scalar-curvature supersolution. These are the new estimates beyond the imported singular-flow construction.

Section 2 states the precise construction input and translates its scales. Section 3 obtains the warping identities, the strict cone gap, and the parabolic-annulus estimates. Section 4 proves the cap and radius curvature bounds by two curvature-record arguments and Shi’s derivative estimates. Section 5 proves the dimension-explicit reaction bound; the analytic estimates take place in one space dimension, which is what keeps their constants independent of qq. Section 6 fixes the parameters in order and completes the Ricci and scalar comparisons, then records the resulting curvature rates.

Conventions. All tensor norms and geometric differential operators are taken with respect to g(t)g(t), and ∂tg=−2Ric⁡\partial_t g=-2\operatorname{Ric}. The unit sphere has sectional curvature one. A constant CC may change between occurrences. Unless explicitly stated otherwise, it may depend on all fixed parameters of the chosen flow, but never on t↑Tt \uparrow T. Constants used to choose the dimension will be identified as independent of both the dimension parameter qq and the mode index kk.

The construction used as input

We record precisely the part of Stolarski’s construction that is needed. The role of this input is to produce a single smooth singular flow with compatible inner signs and cone profiles. The curvature estimates proved in the later sections will be consequences of these data. Throughout, set p=2p=2 and write

m=p+q,A2=p−1m−1,B2=q−1m−1,d=m−1−(m−1)(m−9)2,ν=k−d/2,σ=k/d.(1)\begin{aligned} m &= p+q, \qquad A^2=\frac{p-1}{m-1}, \qquad B^2=\frac{q-1}{m-1},\\ d &= \frac{m-1-\sqrt{(m-1)(m-9)}}{2}, \qquad\nu=k-d/2, \qquad\sigma=k/d. \tag*{(1)} \end{aligned}

Here q≥10q \ge10, and kk is a sufficiently large even positive integer. In particular ν>0\nu>0. We take A,B>0A,B>0 and use the time-dependent scales

δ=T−t,τ=−log⁡δ,θ=δσ,γ=rδ.(2)\delta=T-t, \qquad\tau=-\log\delta, \qquad\theta=\delta^\sigma, \qquad\gamma=\frac{r}{\sqrt{\delta}}. \tag*{(2)}

The dimension of the manifold is m+1m+1. The identities ν/d=σ−1/2\nu/d=\sigma-1/2 and δ δν/d=θ\sqrt{\delta}\,\delta^{\nu/d}=\theta relate the two scales.

Proposition 2.1 (Construction input). For the parameters above, Stolarski’s construction supplies a smooth Ricci flow up to a finite time TT on Sp×Sq+1S^p \times S^{q+1} with the following properties, after translating its starting time to zero.

(i) Off the two pole orbits it has the form

g=ds2+ϕ2gSp+r2gSq.g=ds^2+\phi^2g_{S^p}+r^2g_{S^q}.

*Here ss is radial arclength at each time. The metric is invariant under reflection exchanging the poles. On each open hemisphere, oriented from its pole toward the equator, rs>0r_s>0. At a pole, r=0r=0, rs=1r_s=1, and ϕs=0\phi_s=0; the usual odd and even polar expansions hold for rr and ϕ\phi, respectively, and ϕ>0\phi>0 for every t<Tt<T. (ii) Write u=log⁡ϕu=\log\phi, z=rs2z=r_s^2, and

U~=log⁡ϕ(A/B)r,Z~=z−B2.\widetilde{U}=\log\frac{\phi}{(A/B)r},\qquad\widetilde{Z}=z-B^2.

There are positive tolerances ηjU,ηjZ\eta_j^U,\eta_j^Z, large fixed numbers 1<Y1≤Y21<Y_1\le Y_2, and constants M0>0M_0>0, 0<β<1/20<\beta<1/2, such that for j=0,1,2j=0,1,2,

∣∂γj(U~−δνUk)∣≤ηjUδν(γ−d−j+γ2k−d),∣∂γj(Z~−δνZk)∣≤ηjZδν(γ−d−j+γ2k−d).\begin{equation} \begin{aligned} \left|\partial_\gamma^j({\widetilde U}-\delta^\nu U_k)\right| &\le\eta_j^U\delta^\nu \bigl(\gamma^{-d-j}+\gamma^{2k-d}\bigr),\\ \left|\partial_\gamma^j({\widetilde Z}-\delta^\nu Z_k)\right| &\le\eta_j^Z\delta^\nu \bigl(\gamma^{-d-j}+\gamma^{2k-d}\bigr). \end{aligned} \end{equation}

The first estimate holds from γ1δν/d\gamma_1\delta^{\nu/d} to M0eβτM_0e^{\beta\tau}, and the second from γ2δν/d\gamma_2\delta^{\nu/d} to that upper endpoint, within the hemisphere. The profiles are smooth on γ>0\gamma>0. The function UkU_k is γ−d\gamma^{-d} times a polynomial of degree kk in γ2\gamma^2, with positive leading coefficients at zero and infinity:

Uk(γ)∼c1γ−d(γ↓0),Uk(γ)∼c2γ2k−d(γ→∞),c1,c2>0.U_k(\gamma)\sim c_1\gamma^{-d}\quad(\gamma\downarrow0),\qquad U_k(\gamma)\sim c_2\gamma^{2k-d}\quad(\gamma\to\infty),\qquad c_1,c_2>0.

Also Zk(γ)=Oq,k(γ−d)Z_k(\gamma)=O_{q,k}(\gamma^{-d}) as γ↓0\gamma\downarrow0.

(iii) For all sufficiently late times, putting f=rurf=ru_r, one has

ϕ/r≥A/B,0≤f≤1,fr≥0(0<r≤γ1θ),\phi/r\ge A/B,\qquad0\le f\le1,\qquad f_r\ge0\quad(0<r\le\gamma_1\theta),
B2≤z≤1(0<r≤γ2θ).(3)B^2\le z\le1\quad(0<r\le\gamma_2\theta). \tag*{(3)}

These inner intervals lie strictly below the equator.

(iv) At the initial time τ0=−log⁡T\tau_0=-\log T, the same weighted profile bounds hold up to an initial outer cutoff Ginit=M0eβinitτ0G_{\mathrm{init}}=M_0e^{\beta_{\mathrm{init}}\tau_0}, where 0<βinit<1/20<\beta_{\mathrm{init}}<1/2, and U~≥0\widetilde{U}\ge0 beyond that cutoff. The exponents are chosen in the ranges permitted by the construction; in particular, one may take

0<β<ν2ν+1≤βinit<12.0<\beta<\frac{\nu}{2\nu+1}\le\beta_{\mathrm{init}}<\frac12.

They are therefore distinct choices, not two arbitrary exponents. The tolerances can be chosen sufficiently small depending on q,kq,k. The inner cutoffs can then be increased in order, first γ1\gamma_1 and then γ2\gamma_2; the initial rescaled time can subsequently be increased. Each such increase is subject only to lower-size requirements from the construction.

Source and change of notation. The existence statement is the solution furnished by Lemma 3.12 and the proof of Theorem 1.1 in [12]. The weighted estimates are Definition 3.1. The initial family is Definition 3.5 and Lemma 3.6, with the outer conditions of Definition 3.2. The inner inequalities are the Inner Region Barriers I in Definition 3.3, as propagated by Lemmas 4.5–4.9 and explicitly invoked in the proof of Theorem 4.3 on page 25. In particular that proof gives the barrier conditions on the inner intervals; the shorter list in Definition 4.1 of its final class P\mathcal{P} is not the only information being used. The eigenprofile properties are Propositions A.12, A.13, and A.21; the parameter order is listed in Appendix B.

For completeness, the initial weighted bounds hold up to the initial expansion’s own upper endpoint, not just the smaller propagated endpoint. The lower UU-modes in Definition 3.5 are γ−d\gamma^{-d} times polynomials in γ2\gamma^2 of degree below kk. By Propositions A.10 and A.19, the homogeneous lower ZZ-modes are γ2\gamma^2 times polynomials, with growth exponents strictly below 2k−d2k-d. Each of these finitely many modes and its first two derivatives is therefore bounded by the corresponding weight in (2.3) on all γ>0\gamma> 0. Taking the lower-mode coefficient bound at the initial time to be ϵ0δν\epsilon_0\delta^\nu, with ϵ0\epsilon_0 sufficiently small, gives the required tolerances. This choice is compatible with the degree argument in Lemma 3.10: the projection errors in Lemmas 6.13–6.14 can subsequently be reduced by increasing the initial rescaled time. Definition 3.5 imposes the outer conditions starting at that same initial expansion endpoint. Thus the initial profile bounds and outer sign meet at GinitG_{\mathrm{init}}; no identification of βinit\beta_{\mathrm{init}} with β\beta is required. The relation between their permitted ranges is specified in the proof of Theorem 4.3, page 26, of [12].

In the source’s notation, B2λk=−νB^2\lambda_k=-\nu, αk=ν/d\alpha_k=\nu/d, and γ1=ΥU\gamma_1=\Upsilon_U, γ2=ΥZ\gamma_2=\Upsilon_Z. Thus δ γie−αkτ=γiθ\sqrt{\delta}\,\gamma_i e^{-\alpha_k\tau}=\gamma_i\theta.

Moreover

f=1+γU~γ,fr=γδ(U~γγ+U~γγ).f=1+\gamma\widetilde{U}_\gamma,\qquad f_r=\frac{\gamma}{\sqrt{\delta}}\left(\widetilde{U}_{\gamma\gamma}+\frac{\widetilde{U}_\gamma}{\gamma}\right).

which translates the source’s log-radius convexity into the last slope inequality in (3). The mode index kk here is the index in the construction, rather than the arbitrary curvature blow-up exponent in the statement of its Theorem 1.1.

Remark 2.2. Proposition 2.1 is the external existence input to this paper. We do not import a scalar-curvature upper bound, a full-curvature bound at the cap scale or convergence to a particular complete cap metric. The estimates establishing those curvature bounds are given below.

Geometric identities and profile consequences

We now extract three consequences needed in the curvature estimates: uniform bounds for the warping slopes, a strict inner separation from the cone, and small Ricci curvature on fixed parabolic annuli. We distinguish time differentiation at a fixed point of the manifold from differentiation at a fixed value of the evolving radius rr.

Warping equations

Let xx be a radial coordinate fixed on the manifold, so that ds=χ(x,t) dxds=\chi(x,t)\,dx. Subscripts ss denote arclength differentiation at the indicated time. On a regular orbit the sectional curvatures are

h=−ϕssϕ,hq=−rssr,j=1−ϕs2ϕ2,h=-\frac{\phi_{ss}}{\phi},\qquad h_q=-\frac{r_{ss}}{r},\qquad j=\frac{1-\phi_s^2}{\phi^2},
ℓ=1−rs2r2,μ=−ϕsrsϕr.(4)\ell=\frac{1-r_s^2}{r^2},\qquad\mu=-\frac{\phi_s r_s}{\phi r}. \tag*{(4)}

They correspond, respectively, to radial–SpS^p, radial–SqS^q, SpS^p-tangent, SqS^q-tangent, and mixed planes. These formulas also follow directly by computing the connection of the warped metric. The Ricci eigenvalues in the radial and the two fiber directions are

λ0=ph+qhq,λp=h+(p−1)j+qμ,λq=hq+(q−1)ℓ+pμ.\lambda_0=ph+qh_q,\qquad\lambda_p=h+(p-1)j+q\mu,\qquad\lambda_q=h_q+(q-1)\ell+p\mu.

Consequently

∂t∣xr=rss+(q−1)rs2−1r+pϕsrsϕ,\partial_t\big|_{x}r=r_{ss}+(q-1)\frac{r_s^2-1}{r}+p\frac{\phi_s r_s}{\phi},
∂t∣xϕ=ϕss+(p−1)ϕs2−1ϕ+qrsϕsr,\partial_t\big|_{x}\phi=\phi_{ss}+(p-1)\frac{\phi_s^2-1}{\phi}+q\frac{r_s\phi_s}{r},
[∂t∣x,∂s]=λ0∂s.(5)[\partial_t\big|_{x},\partial_s]=\lambda_0\partial_s. \tag*{(5)}

These are also the usual doubly warped Ricci-flow equations in [12, Section 2].

Lemma 3.1 (Global elementary bounds). For each flow in [2], there is a time-independent constant CC such that

r≤C,∣rs∣+∣ϕs∣≤C.r \le C,\qquad|r_s|+|\phi_s|\le C.

In particular, rr is uniformly Lipschitz in the metric g(t)g(t). Also R≥−CR\ge-C throughout the flow.

Proof. At a positive maximum of rr, its first derivative vanishes and (5) gives rt≤−(q−1)/rr_t\le-(q-1)/r. Differentiating the first equation with the stated commutator gives

∂t∣xrs=(rs)ss+(ϕsϕ+(q−2)rsr)(rs)s+[(q−1)(1−rs2)r2−pϕs2ϕ2]rs.(6)\partial_t|_x r_s=(r_s)_{ss}+\left(\frac{\phi_s}{\phi}+(q-2)\frac{r_s}{r}\right)(r_s)_s+\left[\frac{(q-1)(1-r_s^2)}{r^2}-p\frac{\phi_s^2}{\phi^2}\right]r_s. \tag*{(6)}

At a positive interior maximum with rs>1r_s>1, the reaction has negative sign; the corresponding sign is positive at a negative minimum below −1-1. Thus ∣rs∣|r_s| is bounded by the larger of one and its initial supremum. Interchanging (r,q)(r,q) and (ϕ,p)(\phi,p) proves the same bound for ∣ϕs∣|\phi_s|. On the complete interval between poles, the endpoint values are rs=1,−1r_s=1,-1 and ϕs=0\phi_s=0, so every offending extremum is interior. The argument is applied first on a compact time slab; the singular radial coefficients at the endpoints cause no extra boundary condition. Finally

(∂t−Δ)R=2∣Ric⁡∣2≥0(\partial_t-\Delta)R=2|\operatorname{Ric}|^2\ge0

and the compact maximum principle imply R(⋅,t)≥min⁡MR(⋅,0)R(\cdot,t)\ge\min_M R(\cdot,0).

Where rs>0r_s>0, regard u=log⁡ϕu=\log\phi and v=rs=zv=r_s=\sqrt{z} as functions of (r,t)(r,t). From now on their time derivatives fix rr. Subtracting the advection (∂t∣xr)∂r(\partial_t|_x r)\partial_r in (5) gives

ut=zurr+q−1+zrur−(p−1)e−2u,u_t=zu_{rr}+\frac{q-1+z}{r}u_r-(p-1)e^{-2u},
vt=zvrr+q−1−zrvr+(q−1)v(1−v2)r2−pv3ur2.(7)v_t=zv_{rr}+\frac{q-1-z}{r}v_r+\frac{(q-1)v(1-v^2)}{r^2}-pv^3u_r^2. \tag*{(7)}

For later use, the geometric heat operator on a scalar composition with r>0r>0 is

DF:=(∂t−Δ)F(r,t)=Ft∣r−zFrr−q−1+zrFr.(8)DF:=(\partial_t-\Delta)F(r,t)=F_t|_r-zF_{rr}-\frac{q-1+z}{r}F_r. \tag*{(8)}

Indeed Δr=rss+qrs2/r+pϕsrs/ϕ\Delta r=r_{ss}+qr_s^2/r+p\phi_s r_s/\phi, so rt−Δr=−(q−1+z)/rr_t-\Delta r=-(q-1+z)/r. Equations (7) are written in a monotone radius coordinate. The composition identity (8) is geometric and remains valid across the equator. The same warping equations give the global identity, off the poles,

(∂t−Δ)log⁡(ϕ/r)=q−1r2−p−1ϕ2.(9)(\partial_t-\Delta)\log(\phi/r)=\frac{q-1}{r^2}-\frac{p-1}{\phi^2}. \tag*{(9)}

Consequences of the construction

The first estimate is Stolarski’s strict cone separation [12], Proposition 5.1(2), expressed in the present scales. We include its short proof to record the fixed positive gap as the cap shrinks. Its constant may be small and may depend on the chosen flow; it will be used only after the dimension and mode have been fixed.

Lemma 3.2 (A strict inner gap). After choosing the tolerances sufficiently small, there are constants ε1>0\varepsilon_1 > 0 and C<∞C < \infty such that, at all sufficiently late times,

ϕ/r≥A/B+ε1(0<r≤Y1θ),ϕ(Y1θ,t)≤Cθ.\phi/r \ge A/B + \varepsilon_1 \qquad(0 < r \le Y_1\theta), \qquad\phi(Y_1\theta,t) \le C\theta.

Proof. At γ1=Y1δν/d\gamma_1 = Y_1\delta^{\nu/d}, δνγ1−d=Y1−d\delta^\nu\gamma_1^{-d} = Y_1^{-d}, while the relative error in the leading small-γ\gamma asymptotic of UkU_k tends to zero. Choose η0U<c1/4\eta_0^U < c_1/4. Equation (2.3) then gives

0<12c1Y1−d≤U~(γ1,τ)≤Cq,k,Y10 < \frac{1}{2}c_1Y_1^{-d} \le\widetilde{U}(\gamma_1,\tau) \le C_{q,k,Y_1}

at late times. This proves both assertions at the interface. Since ∂log⁡rlog⁡(ϕ/r)=f−1≤0\partial_{\log r}\log(\phi/r) = f - 1 \le0, the lower bound propagates inward. For example, a fixed positive number below (A/B)(exp⁡(c1Y1−d/2)−1)(A/B)(\exp(c_1Y_1^{-d}/2)-1) is admissible as ε1\varepsilon_1.

Lemma 3.3 (Bounds used in the dimension estimate). The construction parameters can be chosen so that, for all sufficiently large qq and all sufficiently late times,

∣z−1∣≤C0/q,r∣ur∣≤2,(p−1)r2e−2u≤(q−1)(1+C0/q)|z-1| \le C_0/q, \qquad r|u_r| \le2, \qquad(p-1)r^2e^{-2u} \le(q-1)(1+C_0/q)

on 0<r≤δ0 < r \le\sqrt{\delta}, where C0C_0 is a numerical constant independent of qq and kk. This interval is below the equator.

Proof. For 0<γ≤10 < \gamma\le1, the fixed profiles and their errors satisfy

∣U~∣+γ∣U~γ∣≤Cq,kδνγ−d,∣Z~∣≤Cq,k′δνγ−d|\widetilde{U}|+\gamma|\widetilde{U}_\gamma| \le C_{q,k}\delta^\nu\gamma^{-d}, \qquad|\widetilde{Z}| \le C'_{q,k}\delta^\nu\gamma^{-d}

above their respective lower cutoffs. Enlarge Y1Y_1, then Y2Y_2, until the right sides at those cutoffs are at most 1/q1/q. They only decrease as γ\gamma increases. In the complementary inner ranges use (3). Since

1−B2=2q+1,rur=1+γU~γ,(p−1)r2e−2u=(q−1)e−2U~,1-B^2 = \frac{2}{q+1}, \qquad ru_r = 1+\gamma\widetilde{U}_\gamma, \qquad(p-1)r^2e^{-2u}=(q-1)e^{-2\widetilde{U}},

we obtain ∣z−1∣≤3/q|z-1| \le3/q, r∣ur∣≤1+1/qr|u_r| \le1+1/q, and the last bound with e2/q≤1+4/qe^{2/q} \le1+4/q for large qq. Thus C0=4C_0=4 suffices. All dimension- or mode-dependent profile constants have been absorbed by the cutoff choices; they do not enter C0C_0.

The lower cutoffs tend to zero and the upper cutoff exceeds one at late times. If the equator occurred before γ=1\gamma=1, the same estimate up to that endpoint would contradict its value z=0z=0, by continuity. Thus the stated interval is available in the rr coordinate.

Lemma 3.4 (Global ratio and parabolic annuli). For a flow chosen as above, ϕ/r≥c0>0\phi/r \ge c_0 > 0 globally off the poles. For every fixed 0<a1<a2<∞0 < a_1 < a_2 < \infty, at all sufficiently late times,

∣Ric⁡∣≤Ca1,a2δν−1(a1δ≤r≤a2δ).(10)|\operatorname{Ric}| \le C_{a_1,a_2}\delta^{\nu-1} \qquad(a_1\sqrt{\delta} \le r \le a_2\sqrt{\delta}). \tag*{(10)}

The constants and the required starting time may depend on the annulus.

Proof. The positive large-γ\gamma coefficient of UkU_k, with a tolerance small compared with that coefficient, gives U~≥0\widetilde{U} \ge0 for all γ≥Γ0\gamma\ge\Gamma_0 in the profile region, where Γ0\Gamma_0 is a fixed sufficiently large number. At the initial time use the initial profile bounds up to GinitG_{\mathrm{init}}, followed by the outer sign condition beyond that same endpoint. Increase the construction’s starting rescaled time so that Γ0\Gamma_0 belongs to the controlled region for every subsequent time. On the full exterior {r≥Γ0δ}\{r \ge\Gamma_0\sqrt{\delta}\}, compare log⁡(ϕ/r)\log(\phi/r) with log⁡(A/B)\log(A/B) in (9). The latter is an exact equilibrium value of its reaction. Initial and moving lateral data have the correct sign. On each compact time slab the reaction is locally Lipschitz there, so comparison applies. Both hemispheres are included, and the equator is not a boundary. Thus ϕ/r≥A/B\phi/r \ge A/B on the exterior. On 1≤γ≤Γ01 \le\gamma\le\Gamma_0, profile control bounds U~\widetilde{U} below; on γ≤1\gamma\le1 use Lemma 3.3. Earlier compact time intervals have a positive lower ratio by smoothness, positivity of ϕ\phi, and boundedness of rr.

For a fixed positive compact γ\gamma-interval, the pulled-back metric δ−1g\delta^{-1}g is

dγ2z+(A/B)2γ2e2U~gSp+γ2gSq.\frac{\mathrm{d}\gamma^2}{z} + (A/B)^2\gamma^2 e^{2\widetilde{U}}g_{\mathbb{S}^p} + \gamma^2g_{\mathbb{S}^q}.

It differs in C2C^2 by O(δν)O(\delta^\nu) from the metric with z=B2z = B^2, U~=0\widetilde{U}=0. The latter is the Ricci-flat cone with link A2gSp+B2gSqA^2g_{\mathbb{S}^p}+B^2g_{\mathbb{S}^q}. Curvature depends smoothly on a positive metric and its first two derivatives on this fixed annulus. Hence its Ricci norm is O(δν)O(\delta^\nu) in the rescaled metric. Scaling back gives (10). Any prescribed fixed annulus eventually lies inside the profile region; as above, positivity of zz there excludes the equatorial endpoint.

Curvature at the radius and cap scales

Proposition 4.1. For every flow with the choices made above, and qq sufficiently large, there is a constant CC, allowed to depend on that flow, such that

(r2+θ2)∣Rm⁡∣≤C(11)(r^2+\theta^2)|\operatorname{Rm}| \le C \tag*{(11)}

on M×[0,T)M \times[0,T).

We prove the two scale bounds separately. We use Shi’s curvature derivative estimates [11] in their global and local forms; precise statements and proofs are also given in [5], Theorems 1.4.1–1.4.2. A uniform curvature bound on a parabolic neighborhood gives a bound for ∣∇Rm⁡∣|\nabla\operatorname{Rm}| on a smaller neighborhood away from its initial time. The constants depend on the dimension, curvature bound, spatial margin, and elapsed time, and do not require an injectivity-radius lower bound. In each application below, the requisite parabolic neighborhood is established before the derivative estimate is used.

Stolarski proves a radius curvature bound in the inner region [12]. We first establish a global radius bound and then the cap-scale bound in Proposition 4.1. If the radius bound failed, both rescaled sphere radii would diverge while their arclength derivatives remained bounded. A persistent nonzero radial sectional curvature would then force a large change in one of those derivatives. For the cap bound, we first need a lower bound for the radius of the pole orbit and a quantitative estimate showing that rsr_s approaches one near the pole. The same radial integration argument can then be used at the cap scale.

Lemma 4.2. There is a time-independent constant CC such that r2∣Rm⁡∣≤Cr^2|\operatorname{Rm}| \le C.

Proof. Suppose otherwise. Choose record points (xi,ti)(x_i,t_i) with ti↑Tt_i \uparrow T, and put ri=r(xi,ti)>0r_i=r(x_i,t_i)>0, Qi=∣Rm⁡∣(xi,ti)Q_i=|\operatorname{Rm}|(x_i,t_i) so that

ri2Qi=max⁡M×[0,ti]r2∣Rm⁡∣⟶∞.(12)r_i^2Q_i=\max_{M\times[0,t_i]}r^2|\operatorname{Rm}| \longrightarrow\infty. \tag*{(12)}

Such points exist by compactness on each closed time slab. Boundedness of rr implies Qi→∞Q_i \to\infty. By the Sq\mathbb{S}^q component of the metric evolution,

∣∂t∣xr2∣=2∣λq∣r2≤Cmr2∣Rm⁡∣.|\partial_t|_x r^2|=2|\lambda_q|r^2 \le C_m r^2|\operatorname{Rm}|.

The identity extends to the poles since r2r^2 is smooth. For fixed sufficiently small b>0b > 0, Equation (12) gives

∣r(x,t)2−r(x,ti)2∣≤ri216for ti−bQi≤t≤ti,(13)\left|r(x,t)^2-r(x,t_i)^2\right| \le\frac{r_i^2}{16} \quad\text{for } t_i-\frac{b}{Q_i} \le t \le t_i, \tag*{(13)}

at every fixed manifold point xx. These time intervals lie in the flow for all large ii. Rescale by QiQ_i and translate tit_i to zero. On a fixed ball of radius RR about xix_i in the rescaled metric at time −b-b, the Lipschitz bound for rr, Equation (13), and riQi→∞r_i\sqrt{Q_i} \to\infty imply r≥ri/2r \ge r_i/2 throughout [−b,0][-b,0], for large ii. The record bound thus gives ∣Rm⁡∣/Qi≤4|\operatorname{Rm}|/Q_i \le4 on this fixed spatial domain throughout the interval. Integrating the metric evolution makes the metrics uniformly comparable there, with a length-comparison factor EE independent of RR and ii. Choose R>E+2R > E + 2. A final-time curve of length at most one cannot leave this initial ball: up to its first exit its initial length would be at least RR, and hence its final length at least R/E>1R/E > 1. The final unit ball therefore lies inside the initial ball, with a fixed positive margin measured in the initial metric. Take bb below the dimension-dependent time threshold in the local derivative estimate. That estimate gives a uniform bound for the final rescaled ∣∇Rm⁡∣|\nabla\operatorname{Rm}| on that ball.

In the final rescaled metric the warping functions are F1=QiϕF_1=\sqrt{Q_i}\phi and F2=QirF_2=\sqrt{Q_i}r. Both tend to infinity at the center by Lemma 3.4. Their derivatives with respect to rescaled arclength are the original ϕs,rs\phi_s,r_s, hence uniformly bounded. Therefore both functions tend uniformly to infinity on any fixed short radial interval about the center. Such intervals exist: the Lipschitz bound makes the rescaled distance to either pole tend to infinity. Crossing the equator presents no obstruction.

The rescaled tangential curvatures j,ℓ,μj,\ell,\mu tend to zero. Since the rescaled norm of curvature is one at the center, the identity

∣Rm⁡∣2=4(ph2+qhq2+p(p−1)2j2+q(q−1)2ℓ2+pqμ2)(14)|\operatorname{Rm}|^2=4\left(ph^2+qh_q^2+\frac{p(p-1)}{2}j^2+\frac{q(q-1)}{2}\ell^2+pq\mu^2\right) \tag*{(14)}

shows that a radial curvature −Fa′′/Fa-F_a''/F_a has absolute value bounded below by a positive dimension-dependent constant. Along a radial geodesic, the radial vector and a fixed sphere-tangent vector divided by its warping factor are parallel. The derivative estimate therefore keeps that same sectional curvature of one sign and bounded away from zero on a fixed shorter interval. On that interval Fa→∞F_a\to\infty uniformly. Integrating Fa′′F_a'' forces an unbounded change in Fa′F_a', contradicting the slope bound.

The next proof quantifies the scalar-sign obstruction in [12], Proposition 5.3. There, the strict cone gap and monotone logarithmic slope rule out an ancient limit with nonnegative scalar curvature. Here we use the lower bound R≥−CR \ge-C on the given flow and integrate over a finite annulus whose logarithmic width would diverge if the pole orbit were too small.

Lemma 4.3 (Size of the pole orbit). At all sufficiently late times,

cθ≤ϕ(0,t)≤Cθ.c\theta\le\phi(0,t) \le C\theta.

Moreover ϕ(r,t)≥cθ\phi(r,t) \ge c\theta for 0≤r≤Y1θ0 \le r \le Y_1\theta.

Proof. The upper bound follows from Lemma 3.2 and f=rur≥0f=ru_r \ge0. For the lower bound, the scalar curvature computed from (4) is

r2R=p(p−1)(rϕ)2+q(q−1)(1−z)−pz[(p+1)f2+(2q−2)f+2rfr]−(pf+q)rzr.(15)r^2R=p(p-1)\left(\frac{r}{\phi}\right)^2+q(q-1)(1-z) -pz\left[(p+1)f^2+(2q-2)f+2rf_r\right]-(pf+q)rz_r. \tag*{(15)}

For example, ϕss/ϕ=z(urr+ur2)+zrur/2\phi_{ss}/\phi= z(u_{rr} + u_r^2) + z_r u_r/2 and rss=zr/2r_{ss} = z_r/2; substituting ur=f/ru_r = f/r gives this formula directly.

If the lower bound failed, choose times tending to TT for which L0=ϕ(0,t)=o(θ)L_0 = \phi(0,t) = o(\theta). The inequalities rs≥Br_s \ge B and ∣ϕs∣≤C|\phi_s| \le C imply

ϕ(L0,t)/L0≤1+C/B.\phi(L_0,t)/L_0 \le1 + C/B.

Let r∗=(L0θ)1/2r_* = (L_0\theta)^{1/2}. Since ∂log⁡rlog⁡(ϕ/r)=f−1\partial_{\log r}\log(\phi/r) = f - 1, the lower ratio bound and the last upper bound give

0≤∫L0r∗(1−f)drr≤C.0 \le\int_{L_0}^{r_*}(1-f)\frac{dr}{r} \le C.

The integrand is nonnegative and nonincreasing, because 0≤f≤10 \le f \le1 and fr≥0f_r \ge0. Thus

0≤1−f(r∗,t)≤Clog⁡(r∗/L0)⟶0.0 \le1-f(r_*,t) \le\frac{C}{\log(r_*/L_0)} \longrightarrow0.

Consequently f=1+o(1)f = 1 + o(1) uniformly on [r∗,θ][r_*,\theta].

At f=1f=1, the nondifferentiated terms in the first two lines of (15), before the zrz_r term, reduce to

p(p−1)(ϕ/r)2+q(q−1)−m(m−1)z.\frac{p(p-1)}{(\phi/r)^2} + q(q-1) - m(m-1)z.

They vanish at ϕ/r=A/B\phi/r = A/B, z=B2z = B^2. By the fixed strict gap (3.8) and z≥B2z \ge B^2, they are at most −κ-\kappa for some fixed κ>0\kappa> 0. The term involving frf_r is nonpositive. The uniform error f−1=o(1)f-1=o(1) is harmless with the flow and dimension fixed. Using R≥−CR \ge-C from Lemma 3.1, we conclude, after reducing κ\kappa if necessary, that

(pf+q)rzr≤−κ+Cθ2≤−κ/2(r∗≤r≤θ).(pf+q)rz_r \le-\kappa+ C\theta^2 \le-\kappa/2 \qquad(r_* \le r \le\theta).

Since pf+q≤mpf+q \le m, this implies rzr≤−κ/(2m)rz_r \le-\kappa/(2m). Integration contradicts B2≤z≤1B^2 \le z \le1, because log⁡(θ/r∗)=12log⁡(θ/L0)→∞\log(\theta/r_*) = \frac{1}{2}\log(\theta/L_0) \to\infty. This proves the pole lower bound. Monotonicity of ϕ\phi extends it to the entire indicated inner interval.

Lemma 4.4 (Radial slope at the cap scale). For sufficiently large qq, at late times,

0≤1−v≤Cr/θ(0≤r≤θ).0 \le1-v \le Cr/\theta\qquad(0 \le r \le\theta).

Proof. Let w=1−vw = 1-v. Equation (7) gives

(∂t−z∂rr−q−1−zr∂r+(q−1)v(1+v)r2)w=pv3ur2≤Cθ−2.\left(\partial_t-z\partial_{rr}-\frac{q-1-z}{r}\partial_r+\frac{(q-1)v(1+v)}{r^2}\right)w = pv^3u_r^2 \le C\theta^{-2}.

The last inequality uses ur=ϕs/(ϕv)u_r = \phi_s/(\phi v), Lemma 4.3, and B≤v≤1B \le v \le1. Applying this operator to r/θr/\theta gives exactly

σrδθ+(q−1)[v(1+v)−1]+zrθ.\frac{\sigma r}{\delta\theta}+\frac{(q-1)[v(1+v)-1]+z}{r\theta}.

For large qq, B(1+B)>1B(1+B)>1. Thus this expression is bounded below by a fixed positive multiple of θ−2\theta^{-2} when r≤θr \le\theta. A sufficiently large multiple of r/θr/\theta dominates the source, the data at r=θr=\theta, and the data on a fixed late starting slice.

To justify comparison at the pole, fix a compact time slab. Smooth polar expansions give w=O(r2)w=O(r^2) uniformly on that slab. The proposed upper barrier therefore dominates on a sufficiently small inner boundary r=ηr=\eta. Compare on η≤r≤θ(t)\eta\le r \le\theta(t) and let η↓0\eta\downarrow0. The auxiliary radius may depend on the slab, but the barrier multiplier does not. This proves (4.7).

Proof of Proposition 4.1. It remains to bound θ2∣Rm⁡∣\theta^2 |\operatorname{Rm}|. If this were unbounded, choose record points with Qi=∣Rm⁡∣(xi,ti)Q_i = |\operatorname{Rm}|(x_i,t_i) such that

θi2Qi=max⁡M×[0,ti]θ(t)2∣Rm⁡∣(x,t)→∞,θi=θ(ti).\theta_i^2 Q_i = \max_{M \times[0,t_i]} \theta(t)^2 |\operatorname{Rm}|(x,t) \to\infty,\qquad\theta_i = \theta(t_i).

Since θ\theta decreases, for every t≤tit \le t_i we have

∣Rm⁡∣(x,t)≤θi2θ(t)2Qi≤Qi.|\operatorname{Rm}|(x,t) \le\frac{\theta_i^2}{\theta(t)^2} Q_i \le Q_i.

The global derivative estimate therefore bounds ∣∇Rm⁡∣|\nabla\operatorname{Rm}| at the final time after rescaling by QiQ_i, uniformly in ii. For all large ii, a fixed backward interval in rescaled time lies inside the flow. Lemma 4.2 gives riQi≤Cr_i\sqrt{Q_i} \le C, whereas θiQi→∞\theta_i\sqrt{Q_i} \to\infty. Any fixed short outward radial interval from the center consequently lies in r≤θir \le\theta_i. On such intervals the rescaled first warping function satisfies Qiϕ≥cQiθi→∞\sqrt{Q_i}\phi\ge c\sqrt{Q_i}\theta_i \to\infty. The rescaled second warping function is bounded above on each such interval, and its arclength derivative satisfies

v⟶1v \longrightarrow1

uniformly by Lemma 4.4. If the center is on a pole orbit, choose any outward radial ray. Move a fixed sufficiently small positive distance along the ray. The derivative estimate keeps the curvature norm at least 1/21/2, while the rescaled radius is now bounded below by a fixed positive number. At this new center the three tangential curvatures tend to zero. By (14), some radial curvature has nonzero magnitude and constant sign on a fixed subsequent interval. For F=QiϕF = \sqrt{Q_i}\phi, integration of F′′F'' contradicts bounded F′F' because F→∞F \to\infty. For F=QirF = \sqrt{Q_i}r, it contradicts the uniform convergence F′=v→1F' = v \to1, because FF stays bounded below by a positive constant on that interval. Both alternatives are impossible. Together with Lemma 4.2, this proves (11). □

A dimension-explicit Ricci reaction bound

The constant in Proposition 4.1 may grow arbitrarily with the dimension. We next obtain a different estimate whose leading dimension dependence is controlled. Only the latter estimate will be used to choose the dimension. The cap estimate will enter afterward, with its flow-dependent constant, through an independently chosen small parameter.

A one-dimensional interior estimate

For R>0R > 0, let PR=(−R,R)×[−R2,0]P_R = (-R,R) \times[-R^2,0], with space coordinate yy and time coordinate ρ\rho.

Lemma 5.1. There is ϵ0>0\epsilon_0 > 0 with the following property. If a smooth function HH on P2P_2 satisfies

Hρ=aHyy+bHy+F,∣a−1∣≤ϵ0,∣H∣+∣b∣+∣F∣≤K,H_\rho= aH_{yy} + bH_y + F,\qquad|a-1| \le\epsilon_0,\qquad|H| + |b| + |F| \le K,

then ∣Hy∣≤C(K)|H_y| \le C(K) on P1P_1, including the terminal time by continuity from below. No bounds on derivatives of the coefficients are required. The same conclusion holds after any fixed rescaling of the cylinders.

Proof. Fix an exponent s>3s > 3. The constant-coefficient heat estimate is

∥Vyy∥Ls+∥Vρ∥Ls≤Cs∥Vρ−Vyy∥Ls\|V_{yy}\|_{L^s} + \|V_\rho\|_{L^s} \le C_s \|V_\rho- V_{yy}\|_{L^s}

for smooth Sobolev functions compactly supported in space and vanishing in the distant past, with norms over times up to zero. This is the classical parabolic Calderón–Zygmund estimate for the heat operator; its constants here are one-dimensional; see [8], with time reversed. It follows equivalently from the LsL^s boundedness of the second spatial derivative of the causal heat potential. The half-infinite time version follows by extending its forcing to future times by zero. The function itself need not vanish at time zero.

For 1≤R1<R2<21 \le R_1 < R_2 < 2, put dR=R2−R1d_R = R_2 - R_1 and choose a cutoff ζ\zeta equal to one on PR1P_{R_1}, supported spatially and in the past inside PR2P_{R_2}, with

∣ζy∣≤CdR−1,∣ζyy∣+∣ζρ∣≤CdR−2.|\zeta_y| \le C d_R^{-1}, \qquad|\zeta_{yy}| + |\zeta_\rho| \le C d_R^{-2}.

Writing V=ζHV = \zeta H, direct expansion gives

(∂ρ−∂yy)V=(a−1)Vyy+bVy+ζF+(ζρ−aζyy−bζy)H−2aζyHy.(16)(\partial_\rho- \partial_{yy})V = (a-1)V_{yy} + bV_y + \zeta F + (\zeta_\rho- a\zeta_{yy} - b\zeta_y)H - 2a\zeta_yH_y. \tag*{(16)}

Choose ϵ0\epsilon_0 so that Csϵ0<1/2C_s\epsilon_0 < 1/2 and absorb the first term using (5.1). If E(R)=∥Hyy∥Ls(PR)+∥Hρ∥Ls(PR)E(R) = \lVert H_{yy}\rVert_{L^s(P_R)} + \lVert H_\rho\rVert_{L^s(P_R)}, the remaining terms yield

E(R1)≤C(K)dR−1∥Hy∥Ls(PR2)+C(K)dR−2.E(R_1) \le C(K)d_R^{-1}\lVert H_y\rVert_{L^s(P_{R_2})} + C(K)d_R^{-2}.

Spatial interpolation on intervals of radius between one and two gives

∥Hy∥Ls(PR)≤h∥Hyy∥Ls(PR)+Ch−1∥H∥Ls(PR)\lVert H_y\rVert_{L^s(P_R)} \le h\lVert H_{yy}\rVert_{L^s(P_R)} + Ch^{-1}\lVert H\rVert_{L^s(P_R)}

for sufficiently small h>0h > 0, without boundary conditions on HH. Taking hh to be a sufficiently small multiple of dRd_R gives

E(R1)≤116E(R2)+C(K)dR−2.(17)E(R_1) \le\frac{1}{16}E(R_2) + C(K)d_R^{-2}. \tag*{(17)}

Iterate with Rj=7/4−2−j/4R_j = 7/4 - 2^{-j}/4. The error terms are summable since their factors grow as 4j4^j whereas the iteration contributes 16−j16^{-j}. The remainder tends to zero because E(Rj)≤E(7/4)<∞E(R_j) \le E(7/4) < \infty for each individual smooth function. This finiteness is not a presumed uniform bound. Hence E(3/2)≤C(K)E(3/2) \le C(K). Interpolation also controls the first derivative norm. Parabolic Sobolev embedding [9], with s>1+2s > 1 + 2, bounds the spatial first derivative on P1P_1. This proves the claim.

Cylinders moving with the radial drift

Lemma 5.2. For all sufficiently large qq, and sufficiently late times,

∣rzr∣≤Cq−1/2,r2∣urr∣≤Cq1/2(0<r<18δ).(18)|r z_r| \le Cq^{-1/2}, \qquad r^2|u_{rr}| \le Cq^{1/2} \qquad\left(0 < r < \frac{1}{8}\sqrt{\delta}\right). \tag*{(18)}

where CC is independent of both qq and kk.

Proof. Fix (rc,tc)(r_c,t_c) in the indicated region and set

hc=rcq,t=tc+hc2ρ,r=Rc(t)+hcy,Rc(t)=rc2+2(q−1)(tc−t).(19)h_c = \frac{r_c}{\sqrt{q}}, \qquad t = t_c + h_c^2\rho, \qquad r = R_c(t) + h_cy, \qquad R_c(t) = \sqrt{r_c^2 + 2(q-1)(t_c-t)}. \tag*{(19)}

On P2P_2, 1≤Rc/rc≤31 \le R_c/r_c \le3. For q≥16q \ge16,

12rc≤r≤72rc,r2≤49256δc<δ(t),δc=T−tc.(20)\frac{1}{2}r_c \le r \le\frac{7}{2}r_c, \qquad r^2 \le\frac{49}{256}\delta_c < \delta(t), \qquad\delta_c = T-t_c. \tag*{(20)}

Moreover its earliest time is at least tc−δc/(16q)t_c-\delta_c/(16q). Thus a single sufficiently late threshold for tct_c, for the chosen flow, puts every such cylinder inside the region of Lemma 3.3.

The moving center in (19) follows the radial drift. Figure 1 depicts the resulting cylinder. A cylinder centered at a fixed radius would leave an uncontrolled coefficient of size q\sqrt{q}; the movement cancels this coefficient before the one-dimensional estimate is applied.

Schematic image of the fixed cylinder $P_2$ under (5.5)

Figure 1. Schematic image of the fixed cylinder P2P_2 under (5.5). Its radial width is 4hc4h_c and its time length is 4hc24h_c^2. Moving with Rc′(t)=−(q−1)/Rc(t)R_c'(t)=-(q-1)/R_c(t) leaves a bounded drift after rescaling. The drawing is not to scale.

Since Rc′=−(q−1)/RcR_c'=-(q-1)/R_c, the function H=q(v−1)H=q(v-1), pulled back to this cylinder, satisfies Lemma 5.1 with

a=z,b=hc[(q−1)(1r−1Rc)−zr],F=qhc2[(q−1)v(1−z)r2−pv3ur2].(21)\begin{aligned} a&=z,\\ b&=h_c\left[(q-1)\left(\frac{1}{r}-\frac{1}{R_c}\right)-\frac{z}{r}\right],\\ F&=qh_c^2\left[\frac{(q-1)v(1-z)}{r^2}-pv^3u_r^2\right]. \tag*{(21)} \end{aligned}

Indeed ∣H∣≤C0|H|\le C_0, since q∣v−1∣=q∣z−1∣/(v+1)q|v-1|=q|z-1|/(v+1), and ∣a−1∣≤C0/q|a-1|\le C_0/q. The apparently large drift is bounded by

∣hc(q−1)(1r−1Rc)∣=(q−1)hc2∣y∣rRc≤C.\left|h_c(q-1)\left(\frac{1}{r}-\frac{1}{R_c}\right)\right|=\frac{(q-1)h_c^2|y|}{rR_c}\le C.

For the source use qhc2=rc2qh_c^2=r_c^2, (q−1)∣1−z∣≤C0(q-1)|1-z|\le C_0, and r∣ur∣≤2r|u_r|\le2. All these coefficients and amplitudes are therefore bounded by one numerical constant. Increasing qq meets its smallness hypothesis. It follows that ∣Hy∣≤C|H_y|\le C on P1P_1, and hence

∣zr∣=2vqhc∣Hy∣≤Crcqon P1.(22)|z_r|=\frac{2v}{qh_c}|H_y|\le\frac{C}{r_c\sqrt{q}}\quad\text{on }P_1. \tag*{(22)}

Differentiate the first equation of (7). With w=urw=u_r,

wt=zwrr+[zr+q−1+zr]wr+[zrr−q−1+zr2+2(p−1)e−2u]w.w_t=zw_{rr}+\left[z_r+\frac{q-1+z}{r}\right]w_r+\left[\frac{z_r}{r}-\frac{q-1+z}{r^2}+2(p-1)e^{-2u}\right]w.

On the smaller cylinder P1P_1, set W=rcwW=r_cw. Its transformed drift is

bW=hc(q−1)(1/r−1/Rc)+hc(zr+z/r),b_W=h_c(q-1)(1/r-1/R_c)+h_c(z_r+z/r),

and its zeroth-order coefficient is

cW=hc2[zrr−q−1+zr2+2(p−1)e−2u].c_W = h_c^2\left[\frac{z_r}{r}-\frac{q-1+z}{r^2}+2(p-1)e^{-2u}\right].

Equations (3.9), (20), and (22) bound ∣W∣|W|, ∣bW∣|b_W|, and ∣cW∣|c_W| numerically. In particular hc2(p−1)e−2u≤Ch_c^2(p-1)e^{-2u}\le C. Treat cWWc_WW as a bounded source and apply a fixed rescaled version of Lemma 5.1 on P1P_1. Evaluating at its center gives

∣Wy(0,0)∣=rchc∣urr(rc,tc)∣≤C.|W_y(0,0)|=r_ch_c|u_{rr}(r_c,t_c)|\le C.

This proves the second estimate. The first follows from (22) at the center. Only the numerical C0C_0 and the one-dimensional estimates entered the constants, so neither qq nor kk occurs in CC.

The Ricci norm and its reaction matrix

The derivative estimates now control the radial sectional curvatures. The remaining task is algebraic: write the curvature action on invariant diagonal tensors in coordinates that include their multiplicities in the norm. This isolates the leading term in qq.

The tensor evolution and the evolving metric give

(∂t−Δ)∣Ric⁡∣2=−2∣∇Ric⁡∣2+4⟨Rm⁡(Ric⁡),Ric⁡⟩.(\partial_t-\Delta)|\operatorname{Ric}|^2=-2|\nabla\operatorname{Ric}|^2+4\langle\operatorname{Rm}(\operatorname{Ric}),\operatorname{Ric}\rangle.

The inverse-metric derivatives in the squared norm cancel the cubic Ricci term from the covariant tensor evolution. Kato’s inequality then gives, wherever ∣Ric⁡∣>0|\operatorname{Ric}|>0,

(∂t−Δ)∣Ric⁡∣≤2∣Ric⁡∣⟨Rm⁡(Ric⁡),Ric⁡⟩(23)(\partial_t-\Delta)|\operatorname{Ric}|\le\frac{2}{|\operatorname{Ric}|}\langle\operatorname{Rm}(\operatorname{Ric}),\operatorname{Ric}\rangle \tag*{(23)}

For diagonal tensors, our curvature convention is ⟨Rm⁡(D),D⟩=∑i,jRijijDiDj\langle\operatorname{Rm}(D),D\rangle=\sum_{i,j}R_{ijij}D_iD_j, with RijijR_{ijij} the sectional curvature for i≠ji\ne j.

Proposition 5.3. At late times on 0<r≤18δ0<r\le\frac{1}{8}\sqrt{\delta}, the reaction quotient

c(x,t)=2⟨Rm⁡(Ric⁡),Ric⁡⟩∣Ric⁡∣2where ∣Ric⁡∣>0c(x,t)=\frac{2\langle\operatorname{Rm}(\operatorname{Ric}),\operatorname{Ric}\rangle}{|\operatorname{Ric}|^2}\qquad\text{where }|\operatorname{Ric}|>0

satisfies both bounds

c≤2(q−1)+Cqr2,c≤C∗θ2(24)c\le\frac{2(q-1)+C\sqrt{q}}{r^2},\qquad c\le\frac{C_*}{\theta^2} \tag*{(24)}

Here CC is independent of q,kq,k; C∗C_* may depend on the entire chosen flow. The second bound holds at the pole orbits as well. Globally at positive rr, one also has c≤D1/r2c\le D_1/r^2 for some flow-dependent D1>0D_1>0.

Proof. The Ricci tensor is diagonal and scalar on each sphere factor. For a tensor with entries (α,β×p,χ×q)(\alpha,\beta^{\times p},\chi^{\times q}), use the Euclidean coordinates (α,pβ,qχ)(\alpha,\sqrt{p}\beta,\sqrt{q}\chi), so its norm is the ordinary Euclidean norm. The curvature form has matrix

(0p hq hqp h(p−1)jpq μq hqpq μ(q−1)ℓ)(25)\begin{pmatrix} 0 & \sqrt{p}\,h & \sqrt{q}\,h_q\\ \sqrt{p}\,h & (p-1)j & \sqrt{pq}\,\mu\\ \sqrt{q}\,h_q & \sqrt{pq}\,\mu& (q-1)\ell \tag*{(25)} \end{pmatrix}

Indeed its mixed terms are 2phαβ2ph\alpha\beta, 2qhqαχ2qh_q\alpha\chi, and 2pqμβχ2pq\mu\beta\chi; this accounts for the ordered pairs and all multiplicities. Using rr as the spatial coordinate,

h=−z(urr+ur2)−12zrur,hq=−zr2r,μ=−zurr,j=e−2u−zur2,ℓ=1−zr2.(26)\begin{aligned} h &= -z(u_{rr}+u_r^2)-\frac{1}{2}z_r u_r, & h_q &= -\frac{z_r}{2r}, & \mu&= -\frac{z u_r}{r},\\ j &= e^{-2u}-z u_r^2, & \ell&= \frac{1-z}{r^2}. \tag*{(26)} \end{aligned}

By Lemmas 3.3 and 5.2, after multiplication by r2r^2 the diagonal entries of (5.12) are bounded above by 0,q−1+C0,C00,q-1+C_0,C_0, respectively. Its off-diagonal entries have sizes O(q),O(1),O(q)O(\sqrt{q}),O(1),O(\sqrt{q}), respectively, with numerical constants. The largest eigenvalue is therefore at most q−1+Cqq-1+C\sqrt{q}. Equation (5.10) proves the first bound. The curvature contraction is bounded in absolute value by a dimension-dependent constant times ∣Rm⁡∣∣Ric⁡∣2\lvert\operatorname{Rm}\rvert\lvert\operatorname{Ric}\rvert^2. Proposition 4.1 gives the other two bounds, including the bound at a pole by continuity of the geometric curvature tensor.

Comparison and the scalar-curvature bound

We combine the two reaction bounds with small Ricci curvature on parabolic annuli. The inner comparison gives a spatial Ricci exponent strictly below one; integrating its square through a scalar supersolution then gives the required bounded scalar curvature.

For the inner Ricci comparison we will use a positive function of the form

H=δL(r2+b0θ2)−a/2,a,L,b0>0.H=\delta^L(r^2+b_0\theta^2)^{-a/2},\qquad a,L,b_0>0.

Its radial diffusion has leading coefficient a(q−1)a(q-1), so we require a>2a>2 to dominate the leading reaction coefficient 2(q−1)2(q-1). At the cap scale, the identity δL=θL/σ\delta^L=\theta^{L/\sigma} makes its size proportional to θ−(a−L/σ)\theta^{-(a-L/\sigma)}. We will arrange that this exponent lies between zero and one, allowing a bounded scalar barrier to dominate the resulting Ricci-square source. The choices below also make the parabolic-annulus estimate supply the lateral data for HH.

Order of the choices

We now choose one flow to prove Theorem 1.1. Set a=5/2a=5/2. Since d→2d\to2 as q→∞q\to\infty, choose qq large enough that 2<d<a2<d<a, all universal thresholds above hold, and

m:=(a−2)(q−1)−Cq−2a2−1>0.(27)m:=(a-2)(q-1)-C\sqrt{q}-2a^2-1>0. \tag*{(27)}

where CC is the universal constant in Proposition 5.3. Next choose a sufficiently large even kk so that, with

L=k−1,e=a−Lσ=a−d+dk,(28)L=k-1,\qquad e=a-\frac{L}{\sigma}=a-d+\frac{d}{k}, \tag*{(28)}

we have 0<e<10<e<1, ν>1\nu>1, and σ>1/2\sigma>1/2. These requirements are compatible because d>2d>2. Define

ξ=min⁡{18,12L}.\xi=\min\left\{\frac{1}{8},\frac{1}{2\sqrt{L}}\right\}.

Choose the tolerances and cutoffs as in Section 3, and fix the resulting flow. In particular C∗C_* and D1D_1 in Proposition 5.3 are now fixed finite numbers. Only after this step choose b0>0b_0>0 so that

b0C∗<m.(29)b_0C_*<m. \tag*{(29)}

The remaining constants below are chosen for this same flow. Whenever a later starting time is needed, we restrict to a later slice of the flow already chosen; we do not repeat the construction or change its parameters.

In Figure 2, Γ>ξ\Gamma>\xi denotes a fixed outer comparison radius whose size will be chosen in (6.13). The annular estimate is available for every such fixed radius after moving the starting time later.

Schematic radius axis showing the cap, inner comparison, annulus and exterior regions

Figure 2. The comparison regions at a late time, shown on a schematic radius axis. The cap scale θ\theta is much smaller than the parabolic scale δ\sqrt{\delta}. The inner Ricci estimate bridges these scales. Fixed parabolic-annulus control supplies lateral data for both the inner and exterior comparisons; Γ\Gamma is chosen later in (37).

The inner Ricci estimate

Proposition 6.1. There is a constant CC such that, at all sufficiently late times,

∣Ric⁡∣≤CδL(r2+b0θ2)−a/2(0≤r≤ξδ).(30)|\operatorname{Ric}| \le C\delta^{L}(r^2+b_0\theta^2)^{-a/2}\qquad(0\le r\le\xi\sqrt{\delta}). \tag*{(30)}

In particular,

∣Ric⁡∣≤Cr−e(0<r≤ξδ).(31)|\operatorname{Ric}| \le Cr^{-e}\qquad(0<r\le\xi\sqrt{\delta}). \tag*{(31)}

Proof. Put D0=r2+b0θ2D_0=r^2+b_0\theta^2 and H=δLD0−a/2H=\delta^L D_0^{-a/2}. This is a positive smooth geometric function on both closed caps, including their pole orbits, because r2r^2 is smooth there. Using θt=−σθ/δ\theta_t=-\sigma\theta/\delta and Equation (8), direct differentiation gives

DHH=−Lδ+aσb0θ2δD0+a(q−1)+2azD0−a(a+2)zr2D02≥−Lδ+a(q−1)−a2zD0.(32)\begin{aligned} \frac{DH}{H} &=-\frac{L}{\delta}+\frac{a\sigma b_0\theta^2}{\delta D_0}+\frac{a(q-1)+2az}{D_0}-\frac{a(a+2)zr^2}{D_0^2}\\ &\ge-\frac{L}{\delta}+\frac{a(q-1)-a^2z}{D_0}. \tag*{(32)} \end{aligned}

The first line has a nonnegative extra time term, and r2≤D0r^2\le D_0 gives the second. The identities extend to a pole by continuity; in particular the apparent r−1Hrr^{-1}H_r term has a finite limit.

In the indicated region z≤2z\le2 for large qq, and

LD0/δ≤Lξ2+Lb0δ2σ−1≤1LD_0/\delta\le L\xi^2+Lb_0\delta^{2\sigma-1}\le1

at sufficiently late times. Where ∣Ric⁡∣>0|\operatorname{Ric}|>0 and r>0r>0, the two bounds in (24) imply

cD0=cr2+b0cθ2≤2(q−1)+Cq+b0C∗.cD_0=cr^2+b_0c\theta^2\le2(q-1)+C\sqrt{q}+b_0C_*.

Both inequalities may be added even if cc is negative. At a pole, the second reaction bound alone implies the same upper bound for cD0cD_0. Therefore

DHH−c≥−1+a(q−1)−2a2−2(q−1)−Cq−b0C∗D0>0(33)\frac{DH}{H}-c\ge\frac{-1+a(q-1)-2a^2-2(q-1)-C\sqrt{q}-b_0C_*}{D_0}>0 \tag*{(33)}

by (27) and (29).

On the moving lateral boundary r=ξδr=\xi\sqrt{\delta},

H=δL−a/2(ξ2+b0δ2σ−1)−a/2≍δL−a/2.H=\delta^{L-a/2}(\xi^2+b_0\delta^{2\sigma-1})^{-a/2}\asymp\delta^{L-a/2}.

Lemma 3.4 and ν=k−d/2\nu= k - d/2 give

∣Ric⁡∣H≤Cδν−1−(L−a/2)=Cδ(a−d)/2.(34)\frac{\lvert\operatorname{Ric}\rvert}{H} \le C\delta^{\nu-1-(L-a/2)} = C\delta^{(a-d)/2}. \tag*{(34)}

This ratio is uniformly bounded at late times. Choose a sufficiently late fixed starting time t0t_0. On that compact starting slice, HH has a positive minimum on the caps, so a single multiple of HH strictly dominates both initial and lateral data for every subsequent compact time slab.

At a first contact of ∣Ric⁡∣\lvert\operatorname{Ric}\rvert with this positive barrier, the Ricci norm is nonzero and hence smooth nearby. Equation (23) and the strict inequality (33) rule out the contact by the maximum principle. This argument also applies at a pole, which is interior to the smooth manifold. It proves (30) with one multiplier for all times t0≤t<Tt_0 \le t < T.

Finally δL=θL/σ=θa−e\delta^L = \theta^{L/\sigma} = \theta^{a-e}, with a−e>0a-e > 0. For r≥θr \ge\theta,

H≤θa−er−a≤r−e.H \le\theta^{a-e}r^{-a} \le r^{-e}.

For 0<r≤θ0 < r \le\theta,

H≤b0−a/2θ−e≤b0−a/2r−e.H \le b_0^{-a/2}\theta^{-e} \le b_0^{-a/2}r^{-e}.

These prove (31).

A scalar barrier at the pole

Proposition 6.2. The scalar curvature is uniformly bounded above on 0≤r≤ξδ0 \le r \le\xi\sqrt{\delta} at late times.

Proof. For a real exponent α\alpha, Equation (8) gives

D(rα)=−α(q−1+αz)rα−2(r>0).(35)\mathcal{D}(r^\alpha) = -\alpha(q-1+\alpha z)r^{\alpha-2}\qquad(r>0). \tag*{(35)}

Put ℓ0=2−2e∈(0,2)\ell_0 = 2-2e \in(0,2). In particular,

D(−rℓ0)=ℓ0(q−1+ℓ0z)r−2e,D(r−1)=(q−1−z)r−3.(36)\mathcal{D}(-r^{\ell_0}) = \ell_0(q-1+\ell_0 z)r^{-2e},\qquad\mathcal{D}(r^{-1}) = (q-1-z)r^{-3}. \tag*{(36)}

Write ∣Ric⁡∣≤KRr−e\lvert\operatorname{Ric}\rvert\le K_Rr^{-e} as in Proposition 6.1. Choose

C2≥2KR2ℓ0(q−1).C_2 \ge\frac{2K_R^2}{\ell_0(q-1)}.

Since 0≤z≤2<q−10 \le z \le2 < q-1, every function

Sε=C1−C2rℓ0+εr−1,ε>0,S_\varepsilon= C_1-C_2r^{\ell_0}+\varepsilon r^{-1},\qquad\varepsilon>0,

satisfies DSε≥2∣Ric⁡∣2\mathcal{D}S_\varepsilon\ge2\lvert\operatorname{Ric}\rvert^2 at positive radii in the inner region.

Choose one late starting time t0t_0 and let ρ0=ξT−t0\rho_0=\xi\sqrt{T-t_0}. Smoothness bounds scalar curvature on the starting slice by a constant K0K_0. On the moving lateral boundary, Lemma 3.4, ν>1\nu>1, and ∣R∣≤m+1∣Ric⁡∣\lvert R\rvert\le\sqrt{m+1}\lvert\operatorname{Ric}\rvert give a uniform upper bound K∂K_\partial. The choice

C1>max⁡{K0,K∂}+C2ρ0ℓ0C_1 > \max\{K_0,K_\partial\}+C_2\rho_0^{\ell_0}

therefore dominates the initial and lateral scalar data for every $\varepsilon>0. Fix ε>0\varepsilon> 0 and t1<Tt_1 < T. Scalar curvature is bounded on the compact slab [t0,t1][t_0,t_1]. For sufficiently small η>0\eta> 0, the level r=ηr = \eta lies in the regular inner region throughout that slab and ε/η\varepsilon/\eta makes SεS_\varepsilon dominate its scalar data. Apply comparison to R−SεR - S_\varepsilon on

{(x,t):t0≤t≤t1, η≤r(x,t)≤ξT−t}.\{(x,t): t_0 \le t \le t_1,\ \eta\le r(x,t) \le\xi\sqrt{T-t}\}.

The moving outer boundary is regular in the monotone inner region. Both initial and lateral boundaries have been controlled, so the usual interior first-maximum argument applies. Let η↓0\eta\downarrow0. This proves R≤SεR \le S_\varepsilon at every positive radius on the slab.

Only the auxiliary excision radius depends on ε,t1\varepsilon,t_1; the constants in (6.12) do not. Letting the slab range up to TT and then sending ε↓0\varepsilon\downarrow0 pointwise gives

R≤C1−C2rℓ0≤C1(r>0).R \le C_1-C_2r^{\ell_0} \le C_1 \qquad(r>0).

At every fixed time t<Tt<T, continuity gives the same bound at the pole orbits. No smoothness of rℓ0r^{\ell_0} at the pole or uniform regularity at t=Tt=T was used.

The exterior and the maximal time

Proposition 6.3. There is a constant CC such that ∣Ric⁡∣≤C|\operatorname{Ric}| \le C on r≥ξδr \ge\xi\sqrt{\delta} at late times.

Proof. Choose b1>2D1+1b_1 > 2D_1+1, where D1D_1 is the global reaction constant in Proposition (17), and choose

Γ>ξ~,Γ2≥max⁡{2b1,4(q−1)}.(37)\Gamma> \widetilde{\xi},\qquad\Gamma^2 \ge\max\{2b_1,4(q-1)\}. \tag*{(37)}

On the entire geometric exterior r≥Γδr \ge\Gamma\sqrt{\delta}, put Ho=1−b1δ/r2H_o = 1-b_1\delta/r^2. This is smooth across the equator and satisfies 1/2≤Ho≤11/2 \le H_o \le1. Equation (8) gives

DHo=b1r2[1−(2(q−1)−4z)δr2]≥b12r2>D1Hor2.(38)\mathcal{D}H_o=\frac{b_1}{r^2}\left[1-(2(q-1)-4z)\frac{\delta}{r^2}\right]\ge\frac{b_1}{2r^2}>\frac{D_1H_o}{r^2}. \tag*{(38)}

Here only z≥0z \ge0 was needed; no global smallness of z−1z-1 is required.

The fixed parabolic radius Γ\Gamma eventually lies in the region of Lemma 3.4. The annular estimate and ν>1\nu>1 bound ∣Ric⁡∣|\operatorname{Ric}| on the moving lateral boundary uniformly. On a sufficiently late starting slice, compactness and Ho≥1/2H_o \ge1/2 allow one multiplier to dominate the initial data. The same first-contact argument as in Proposition 6.1 proves ∣Ric⁡∣≤CHo≤C|\operatorname{Ric}| \le CH_o \le C throughout the exterior. The equator is interior, since both hemispheres are included. On the remaining fixed annulus ξ~≤r/δ≤Γ\widetilde{\xi} \le r/\sqrt{\delta} \le\Gamma, use Lemma 3.4 directly.

Proof of Theorem 1.1. Take the single flow selected at the start of Section 6. Propositions 6.2 and 6.3 give a uniform scalar upper bound on all of MM for sufficiently late times. There are only finitely many required starting-time restrictions, and every parameter and constant has already been fixed, so a common such time exists. Earlier times form a compact smooth interval and contribute a finite bound. Lemma 3.1 supplies the scalar lower bound. Thus sup⁡M×[0,T)∣R∣<∞\sup_{M\times[0,T)}|R|<\infty.

By Lemma 4.3, ϕ(0,t)≤Cθ(t)→0\phi(0,t) \le C\theta(t) \to0. At a pole orbit, smoothness gives ϕs=0\phi_s=0. Since p=2p=2, a two-plane tangent to the SpS^p orbit has sectional curvature

j(0,t)=ϕ(0,t)−2⟶∞.j(0,t)=\phi(0,t)^{-2}\longrightarrow\infty.

Consequently max⁡M∣Rm⁡∣→∞\max_M|\operatorname{Rm}| \to\infty. A smooth extension on the same compact manifold would bound curvature on a compact time neighborhood of TT, which is impossible. The constructed flow exists smoothly for every t<Tt < T; closed-manifold uniqueness therefore identifies TT with the maximal existence time for its smooth initial metric. The product S2×Sq+1\mathbb{S}^{2} \times\mathbb{S}^{q+1} is closed, connected, and has dimension q+3≥4q + 3 \ge4, as required.

Corollary 6.4 (Curvature rates in a fixed dimension). For every sufficiently large integer qq, set

dq=q+1−(q+1)(q−7)2.d_q = \frac{q + 1 - \sqrt{(q + 1)(q - 7)}}{2}.

For every sufficiently large even integer kk, with the threshold allowed to depend on qq, there is a smooth Ricci flow on S2×Sq+1\mathbb{S}^{2} \times\mathbb{S}^{q+1} with finite maximal time TT, uniformly bounded scalar curvature, and constants 0<c≤C<∞0 < c \le C < \infty such that

c(T−t)−2k/dq≤max⁡M∣Rm⁡∣(⋅,t)≤C(T−t)−2k/dq.c(T-t)^{-2k/d_q} \le\max_{M} \lvert\operatorname{Rm} \rvert(\cdot,t) \le C(T-t)^{-2k/d_q}.

for all sufficiently late times. In particular, one fixed dimension admits such flows with an unbounded discrete set of power-law Type-II curvature exponents. The flow, TT, and the constants may depend on qq and kk.

Proof. Every threshold used to choose qq at the beginning of this section is independent of kk. Once such a qq is fixed, all sufficiently large even kk satisfy the requirements in (28); Proposition 2.1 then permits the remaining choices. The preceding comparisons apply to each resulting flow, with constants that may depend on it.

Here d=dqd = d_q and θ=(T−t)k/dq\theta= (T-t)^{k/d_q}. Proposition 4.1 gives max⁡M∣Rm⁡∣≤Cθ−2\max_{M} \lvert\operatorname{Rm} \rvert\le C\theta^{-2}. At either pole orbit, Lemma 4.3 gives ϕ(0,t)≤Cθ\phi(0,t) \le C\theta, and the tangential sectional curvature is j(0,t)=ϕ(0,t)−2j(0,t) = \phi(0,t)^{-2}. Hence max⁡M∣Rm⁡∣≥cθ−2\max_{M} \lvert\operatorname{Rm} \rvert\ge c\theta^{-2}. These are the claimed two-sided bounds. Since 2k/dq>12k/d_q > 1 and tends to infinity with kk, the flows are Type II and their exponents are unbounded with qq fixed.

References

  1. [1]S. Angenent, J. Isenberg, and D. Knopf, Degenerate neckpinches in Ricci flow, J. Reine Angew. Math. 709 (2015), 81–117. arXiv:1208.4312v1.DOI
  2. [2]S. Angenent and D. Knopf, An example of neckpinching for Ricci flow on Sⁿ⁺¹, Math. Res. Lett. 11 (2004), no. 4, 493–518. Author’s text; corrigendum.DOI
  3. [3]R. H. Bamler, Convergence of Ricci flows with bounded scalar curvature, Ann. of Math. (2) 188 (2018), no. 3, 753–831. doi:10.4007/annals.2018.188.3.2.DOI
  4. [4]C. Böhm, Non-compact cohomogeneity one Einstein manifolds, Bull. Soc. Math. France 127 (1999), no. 1, 135–177. doi:10.24033/bsmf.2345.DOI
  5. [5]H.-D. Cao and X.-P. Zhu, A complete proof of the Poincaré and geometrization conjectures—application of the Hamilton–Perelman theory of the Ricci flow, Asian J. Math. 10 (2006), no. 2, 165–492. Full text.DOI
  6. [6]H.-L. Gu and X.-P. Zhu, The existence of Type II singularities for the Ricci flow on Sⁿ⁺¹, Comm. Anal. Geom. 16 (2008), no. 3, 467–494. arXiv:0707.0033v1.arxiv.org/abs/0707.0033
  7. [7]R. S. Hamilton, The formation of singularities in the Ricci flow, Surveys in Differential Geometry, Vol. II (Cambridge, MA, 1993), International Press, Cambridge, MA, 1995, 7–136. Full text.
  8. [8]N. V. Krylov, Parabolic equations with VMO coefficients in spaces with mixed norms, arXiv:math/0610955v1, 2006. Theorem numbering refers to this version. Published as Parabolic equations with VMO coefficients in Sobolev spaces with mixed norms, J. Funct. Anal. 250 (2007), no. 2, 521–558. doi:10.1016/j.jfa.2007.04.003.DOI
  9. [9]O. A. Ladyzhenskaya, V. A. Solonnikov, and N. N. Ural’tseva, Linear and Quasi-linear Equations of Parabolic Type, Translations of Mathematical Monographs, vol. 23, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1968; corrected reprint, 1988. doi:10.1090/mmono/023.
  10. [10]N. Šešum, Curvature tensor under the Ricci flow, Amer. J. Math. 127 (2005), no. 6, 1315–1324. doi:10.1353/ajm.2005.0042.DOI
  11. [11]W.-X. Shi, Deforming the metric on complete Riemannian manifolds, J. Differential Geom. 30 (1989), no. 1, 223–301. doi:10.4310/jdg/1214443292.DOI
  12. [12]M. Stolarski, Curvature Blow-up in Doubly-warped Product Metrics Evolving by Ricci Flow, arXiv:1905.00087v1, 2019. All numbered source references in this paper use this version. Published in Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 295 (2024), no. 1470. doi:10.1090/memo/1470.DOI
  13. [13]B. Wang, On the conditions to extend Ricci flow (II), Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2012, no. 14, 3192–3223. doi:10.1093/imrn/rnr141. arXiv:1107.5107v1; theorem numbering refers to this preprint version.DOI

Paper details

Contents